Skip to main content

A bloody interaction: plasma proteomics reveals gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) impairment caused by Sparicotyle chrysophrii

Abstract

Background

Sparicotylosis is an enzootic parasitic disease that is well established across the Mediterranean Sea. It is caused by the polyopisthocotylean monogenean Sparicotyle chrysophrii and affects the gills of gilthead sea bream (GSB; Sparus aurata). Current disease management, mitigation and treatment strategies are limited against sparicotylosis. To successfully develop more efficient therapeutic strategies against this disease, understanding which molecular mechanisms and metabolic pathways are altered in the host is critical. This study aims to elucidate how S. chrysophrii infection modulates the plasma proteome of GSB and to identify the main altered biological processes involved.

Methods

Experimental infections were conducted in a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) in which naïve recipient GSB ([R]; 70 g; n = 50) were exposed to effluent water from S. chrysophrii-infected GSB (98 g; n = 50). An additional tank containing unexposed naïve fish (control [C]; 70 g; n = 50) was maintained in parallel, but with the open water flow disconnected from the RAS. Haematological and infection parameters from sampled C and R fish were recorded for 10 weeks. Plasma samples from R fish were categorised into three different groups according to their infection intensity, which was based on the number of worms fish−1: low (L: 1–50), medium (51–100) and high (H: > 100). Five plasma samples from each category and five C samples were selected and subjected to a SWATH-MS proteome analysis. Additional assays on haemoglobin, cholesterol and the lytic activity of the alternative complement pathway were performed to validate the proteome analysis findings.

Results

The discriminant analysis of plasma protein abundance revealed a clear separation into three groups (H, M/L and C). A pathway analysis was performed with the differentially quantified proteins, indicating that the parasitic infection mainly affected pathways related to haemostasis, the immune system and lipid metabolism and transport. Twenty-two proteins were significantly correlated with infection intensity, highlighting the importance of apolipoproteins, globins and complement component 3. Validation assays of blood and plasma (haemoglobin, cholesterol and lytic activity of alternative complement pathway) confirmed these correlations.

Conclusions

Sparicotylosis profoundly alters the haemostasis, the innate immune system and the lipid metabolism and transport in GSB. This study gives a crucial global overview of the pathogenesis of sparicotylosis and highlights new targets for further research.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Sparicotylosis is a gill infection caused by the polyopisthocotylean monogenean parasite Sparicotyle chrysophrii (formerly Microcotyle chrysophrii; Microcotylidae). This parasite has a direct life-cycle in which gravid adult specimens shed embryonated eggs into the water column from which motile ciliated larvae hatch after 5–10 days. If any hosts are nearby, the larvae will attach to their gill filaments, giving rise first to post-larvae and subsequently to juveniles and adults [1, 2]. This disease is enzootic in the Mediterranean Sea, affecting several fish species of the Sparidae family [3,4,5,6,7], amongst which gilthead sea bream (GSB; Sparus aurata) stands out as the type host and its commercial relevance in the Mediterranean aquaculture industry [8].

Sparicotylosis is associated with lethargy due to hypoxia, severe anaemia and emaciation. Gill histopathological findings, such as lamellar synechiae, clubbing and shortening, epithelial hyperplasia resulting in secondary lamellae fusion and proliferation of chloride cells, have been described [9, 10].

Disease management in on-growing offshore net pens is a complex process. The high stocking densities, the proximity of the cages, the marine currents and the seeding of fingerlings without year-class separation or fallowing strategies create a perfect niche for amplification and dissemination of any pathogen. Current methods to control sparicotylosis rely on disinfectant bath treatments, net changing or cleaning [11] and nutraceutical formulation feedings [12].

For more than two decades, efforts have been made to widen the chemotherapeutic alternatives against S. chrysophrii [9, 12, 13], but only hydrogen peroxide and formalin baths, which present a narrow therapeutic index and several concerns [12, 14,15,16,17], remain as treatment options against sparicotylosis. The successful development of more efficient therapeutic strategies to control sparicotylosis critically relies on knowledge of both the host’s and parasite’s molecular mechanisms and metabolic pathways, which are relevant in the host-parasite relationship. Thus far, few studies dealing with S. chrysophrii—GSB interactions have been published. Henry et al. [18] described the inhibition of the humoral response and activation of cellular components in GSB—S. chrysophrii long-term infections. A subsequent tissue-level transcriptomic analysis of mild S. chrysophrii infections revealed that apoptosis, inflammation and cell proliferation played leading roles in the gills, whereas a hypometabolic response was detected in the spleen [19].

In recent years, proteomic analyses have transformed how host-parasite interactions are studied and understood. These interactions can be studied either by determining the expression of the parasite proteome throughout the infection process (i.e. tegumental and secreted proteins and extracellular vesicles), by detecting parasite proteins in its host, or by defining the infection effects on the host’s proteome. Thus far, significant progress has been achieved in understanding critical high-impact zoonotic and animal parasitic diseases through this technology [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29].

The aim of the study reported here is to elucidate how S. chrysophrii infection modulates the plasma proteome of GSB and to identify the main altered biological processes involved.

Methods

Animals, experimental infections and sampling

Healthy GSB juveniles were purchased from a Mediterranean-based hatchery (Piscimar, Burriana, Spain) and maintained at the indoor experimental facilities of the Institute of Aquaculture Torre de La Sal–Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IATS–CSIC; 40°5′N, 0°10′E) under natural photoperiod and temperature conditions. Water parameters were monitored; oxygen saturation was kept > 85% and unionised ammonia was kept < 0.02 mg l−1 in all tanks. All animals used in this experiment were fed twice daily, 5 days per week, until visual satiety, with a commercial dry pellet diet of the adequate size.

The experimental infection was conducted in a recirculation aquaculture system (RAS) from April to June, with water temperatures ranging from 15.23 °C to 23.85 °C. The experimental design consisted of a recipient (R) tank (200 l) holding naïve GSB (70 g; n = 50) receiving water from a donor (D) tank (200 l) with Sparicotyle chrysophrii-infected GSB (98 g; n = 50). The infective status of D fish was confirmed by observation of S. chrysophrii eggs on egg collectors placed in the D tank. In parallel, an additional tank with control (C); n = 50) unexposed naïve fish from the same stock was maintained with the open water flow disconnected from RAS but the same temperature and oxygen conditions maintained.

After the beginning of the exposure to S. chrysophrii, one sampling was performed every 2 weeks for 10 weeks. Three casualties were registered in the R group, one at day 44 and two at day 49 post exposure. In each sampling, 20 fish (10 R, 10 C) were euthanised by tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222) overdose (0.1 g l−1), and blood was collected from the caudal vein using heparinised syringes, taking special care to avoid haemolysis; the collected blood samples were constantly maintained on ice. Details on fish numbers, sampling times and the downstream use of individual samples are indicated in Table 1 and Additional file 1: Figure S1. Following blood collection, haemoglobin (Hb) values were immediately recorded (HemoCue® 201+ Hb System; HemoCue AB, Ängelholm, Sweden). The remaining blood was centrifuged at 3000 g for 30 min, and plasma was stored at − 80 °C until processing. The right-side gill arches of each R specimen were dissected and S. chrysophrii counts of adult and juvenile specimens were carried out in situ under a stereomicroscope to determine the infection intensity. Infection intensities were extrapolated for the eight gill arches of each fish after Riera-Ferrer et al. [30].

Table 1 Experimental setup and sampling details

Ethics statement

All experiments were carried out according to current Spanish (Royal Decree RD53/2013) and EU (2010/63/EU) legislation on the handling of experimental fish. All procedures were approved by the Ethics and Animal Welfare Committee of the Institute of Aquaculture Torre de la Sal (IATS—CSIC, Castellón, Spain), CSIC and “Generalitat Valenciana” (permit number 2018/VSC/PEA/0240).

Plasma proteome analysis

Candidate selection

A total of 20 different plasma samples were processed for proteomic analysis by the Central Service for Experimental Research (SCSIE) proteomics facility at the University of Valencia, Spain, which is a member of the Spanish network of proteomic research facilities (ProteoRed). All R fish were categorised into three groups according to their infection intensity recorded as worms fish−1: low, medium and high (L: 1–50; M: 51–100; H: > 100 worms fish−1,respectively). Five plasma samples of each category and five C samples were selected for testing of infection intensity. The remaining plasma samples were stored until used in the validation assays (alternative complement pathway activity, cholesterol and biotin concentration).

Sample preparation

For the albumin depletion assay, 12 µl of each individual sample was precipitated with cold ethanol at a final concentration of 40% (v/v). The precipitation was incubated overnight at 5 °C and then centrifuged at 15,000 g for 1 h. The albumin-containing supernatant was then removed, and the pellets air-dried. The pellets were then dissolved in 50 μl of 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate. The proteins were quantified with a protein quantification assay kit (Macherey−Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Due to the presence of lipids in the samples, 7 µg of protein was loaded in a one-dimensional (1D) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) system without resolving and in-gel digested. The gel slices of each sample were cut into small cubes and sequentially dehydrated with 50% acetonitrile in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate and 100% acetonitrile. Cysteine residues were reduced by 10 mM dithiothreitol in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer at 60 °C for 20 min, and sulfhydryl groups were alkylated with 5.5 mM iodoacetamide in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, in the dark, at room temperature, for 30 min. Gel cubes were incubated overnight at 37 °C in 100 μl of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate solution with 400 ng of trypsin. The digestions were quenched with trifluoroacetic acid (final concentration: 1%). The supernatants were then removed, and the gel plugs were dehydrated with neat acetonitrile. The acetonitrile peptide solutions were recombined with the previous supernatants. The digestion mixture was dried in a vacuum centrifuge and resuspended in 20 μl of 2% acetonitrile, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid.

Sequential window acquisition of all theoretical mass spectra analysis

For every mixture of digested peptide, 2 µl of peptide mixture sample was loaded in a NanoLC 425 HPLC system (Eksigent Technologies, Redwood, CA, US) onto a trap column (C18-CL 3 μm, 300 Å; internal diameter [id]: 350 μm × 0.5 mm) and desalted with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid at a flow rate of 5 µl min−1 for 5 min. The peptides were then loaded onto an analytical column (C18-CL 3 μm, 120 Ᾰ; id: 75 μm × 150 mm; Eksigent Technologies) equilibrated in 5% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid. Peptide elution was carried out with a linear gradient of 7–40% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 300 nl min−1. Peptides were analysed in a nanoESI qQTOF mass spectrometer (TripleTOF 6600+ System; AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA). The samples were ionised in a Source Type: Optiflow < 1 µl Nano applying 3.0 kV to the spray emitter at 200 °C. The TripleTOF mass spectrometer was operated in swath mode, in which a 0.050-s time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOF–MS) scan from 350 to 1250 m/z was performed. Thereafter, 0.080-s product ion scans were acquired in 100 variable windows from 400 to 1250 m/z. The total cycle time was 2.79 s. The individual sequential window acquisition of all theoretical mass spectra (SWATH-MS) injections were randomised to avoid bias in the analysis. Prior to running the individual samples, a pooled sample was injected to determine the best gradient and sample amount.

Spectral library building

Plasma aliquots of all samples were pooled to build the spectral library by in-gel digestion and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) with data-dependent acquisition (DDA) in order to separate and identify the proteins present in the samples. After resolving the 1D SDS-PAGE, the gel lane corresponding to the library was cut into pieces, and each piece was digested with trypsin, extracted with acetonitrile, dried and resuspended as described above. Exactly as described before, each library sample was first loaded into a trap column and then into an analytical column, before loading the eluted peptides in the nanoESI qTOF mass spectrometer for analysis in DDA mode. Survey MS1 scans were acquired from 350 to 1400 m/z for 250 ms. The quadrupole resolution was set to ‘low’ for MS2 experiments, which were acquired at 100–1500 m/z for 25 ms in ‘high sensitivity’ mode. The following switch criteria were used: charge: 2+ to 4+ ; minimum intensity; 100 counts per second (cps). Up to 100 ions were selected for fragmentation after each survey scan. Dynamic exclusion was set to 15 s.

The obtained DDA data files were processed using the ProteinPilot v5.0 (AB Sciex) search engine, and a single list of peaks was generated using the default parameters and combining the acquired information of all gel fragments. The Paragon algorithm (ProteinPilot software; AB Sciex) was used to search against 279,921 sequences available in GSB protein databases (NCBI, UniProt and transcriptome from the genome assembly [31]). A false discovery rate (FDR) correction was applied for the validation of the data. The identified proteins were grouped based on MS/MS spectra by the ProteinPilot Pro Group algorithm to avoid using the same spectral evidence for more than one protein. The protein within each group that could explain more spectral data with a 95% confidence threshold was depicted as the primary protein of the group. To increase the spectral data with data-independent acquisition (DIA) information, the data from the pooled samples were analysed by DIA Umpire as previously published [32].

Protein quantification

The SCIEX.wiff data-files obtained from SWATH runs of the 20 individual plasma samples were loaded into PeakView v2.1 (AB Sciex) with the generated spectral library consisting of a combination of data-dependent and -independent acquisition information, obtained from the pooled sample interrogated in the available protein databases at a peptide confidence threshold of 95% and an FDR < 1. The extracted ion chromatograms were integrated, and peak areas were used to calculate the total protein quantity of each individual sample.

Validation assays

In order to corroborate some of the findings of the proteomic analysis, three assays were performed in plasma samples from all sampled fish, including the ones used in the proteomics study.

Plasma complement assay

The lytic activity of the alternative complement pathway (ACP) was determined using sheep red blood cells (RBCs; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) as targets, and the dilution corresponding to 50% haemolysis ml−1 was expressed as alternative complement activity (ACH50). This assay was performed following the procedure described in [33], in sample duplicates using 2.85 × 108 sheep RBCs ml−1.

Plasma cholesterol assay

Plasma cholesterol was measured using the Infinity Cholesterol Liquid Stable Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), following the manufacturer’s instructions. A calibration curve was performed using serial dilutions of Cholesterol (0–780 mg dl−1; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The amount of plasma per reaction was 4 µl. Reactions were performed in duplicate.

Plasma biotin detection

Plasma biotin was measured using the Biotin Quantitation Kit (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) following the manufacturer’s instructions, using 30 µl of plasma, in duplicate. Biotinylated bovine serum albumin was used as a positive control. A standard curve was prepared using biotin concentrations ranging between 20 and 1000 µM.

Data and statistical analysis

The protein areas obtained with PeakView® v2.1 software (AB Sciex) were normalised by the total sum of the areas of all the quantified proteins. Normalised data were used to build a partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) model using the Bioconductor R package ‘ropls’ [34]. The quality of th ePLS-DA model was evaluated with the fit [R2Y(cum)] and prediction [Q2 (cum)] indicators. A validation test consisting of 500 random permutations was performed to discard overfitting of the PLS-DA model. The contribution of the different proteins to the group separation was determined by variable importance in projection (VIP) values. A VIP value > 1 was considered to be the threshold to determine discriminant proteins in the PLS-DA model [35,36,37]. Hierarchical clustering, heatmap representation and K-means analyses were performed with the normalised area values of all discriminant proteins (VIP > 1) using iDEP.95 web application [38].

To perform a pathway analysis, the discriminant protein identifiers were converted to their human equivalents, when possible, and analysed with the Bioconductor ‘ReactomePA’ R package [39].

The R package corrplot was used to calculate correlations between the different proteins and the infection intensity applying the cor.test function to compute significant correlation coefficients with a confidence level of 0.95.

All data were checked for normality prior to any statistical analysis. Statistical differences between C and R (L, M, H) Hb, ACP, cholesterol and biotin values were calculated using a one-way analysis of variance and a post hoc multiple comparisons Holm-Šídák test. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05, and a power analysis was performed in every test. All statistical analyses were performed using SigmaPlot v.14.0 (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA USA).

Results

Plasma proteome analysis

A total of 291 GSB proteins were identified and quantified in the whole set of plasma samples. The normalised abundance values of each individual sample were used to construct a PLS-DA model to determine differences amongst groups. The PLS-DA model was based on five components (Additional file 2: Figure S2) which explained 98.8% (R2Y) and predicted 70% (Q2Y) of the total variance (Fig. 1a). The model was validated using a permutation test (Additional file 2: Figure S2), and no outliers were detected during this analysis (Additional file 2: Figure S2). The PLS-DA model clearly separated the C group from fish in the R group. The dispersion of the C samples in the plot showed great individual variability in this group (Fig. 1a). Highly infected fish (H) formed a separate group, whereas fish with medium and low levels of infection (M/L) were not significantly separated by the model and constituted a single set. Recipient fish (H and M/L groups) showed lower variability in their proteomic profiles than the C group. A PLS-DA model using the sampling point as variable, instead of infection intensity, was constructed to determine whether differences could be due to the sampling time. As this model failed, we proceeded with the results showing differences by infection intensity.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Two-dimensional PLS-DA score plot representing the distribution of the samples between the first two components of the model (t1 & t2). Uninfected fish [Control (C); n = 5] are represented in red; Sparicotyle chrysophrii-infected fish are represented in different colours according to level of infection (worms fish—1), with green indicating a high level of infection (H; n = 5), violet indicating a medium level of infection (M; n = 5) and blue indicating a low level of infection (L; n = 5). Ellipses represent the Mahalanobis distance. R2X and R2Y represent the fraction of the variance of the X and Y matrix, respectively (explained variance). Q2Y represents the predictive accuracy of the model. Values that approximate 1 indicate an effective model. RMSEE represents the square root of the mean error between the actual and the predicted responses. The model was constructed using five components (pre = 5). b Heatmap representing the abundance distribution (Z-score) of the 129 proteins identified to be driving the separation among groups in a). Dendrograms represent hierarchical clustering of proteins (rows) and samples (columns). Samples are colour coded following the same criteria as in a. PLS-DA, Partial least squares-discriminant analysis

The PLS-DA model yielded 129 proteins with VIP values > 1 which are responsible for the separation of the proteomic profiles among the three groups (Additional file 3: Table S1). These differentially abundant proteins driving the separation of the different groups were further explored in a heatmap. Hierarchical clustering once again showed a clear separation into three groups: C, M/L and H, validating the results obtained from the PLS-DA (Fig. 1b). K-means analysis, conducted to visualise patterns among the differentially abundant proteins, revealed four clear clusters (Fig. 2). Cluster A consisted of 20 proteins that were more abundant in the C samples than in R samples, among which immunoglobulin proteins prevailed. Cluster B grouped 46 proteins that were more abundant in the highly infected samples (H) than in the other two groups. Cluster C contained 41 proteins with a high abundance in the M/L group, a low abundance in the H group and intermediate values in the C group. Cluster D comprised 22 proteins with a low presence in C samples and increased presence in R fish.

Fig. 2
figure 2

K-means analysis separating the 129 discriminant proteins into four clusters based on expression level in the different groups (Z-score). Different colours indicate different clusters, with blue indicating cluster A (n = 20), yellow indicating cluster B (n = 46), violet indicating cluster C (n = 41) and green indicating cluster D (n = 22). Group means are represented for clarity. C, control (uninfected) fish; H, fish with high degree of infection; M/L, fish with medium/low degree of infection

Pathway analysis

In an attempt to clarify the biological significance of the changes observed in the plasma proteome of the different groups, pathway analysis was performed with the differentially abundant proteins classified in the four K-means clusters. Enriched pathways (Padj. < 0.05) in R GSB were coherent with functions expected to be found in plasma, highlighting an enrichment in pathways related to haemostasis, immune system, metabolism of vitamins and proteins, and transport of lipoproteins or O2/CO2 (Fig. 3). Among the pathways associated with the immune system, the complement system was highly represented. Overall, the most represented function was related to lipid (cholesterol) transport. Only 15 of the 129 proteins (11.63%) could not be converted into human equivalents and were not considered for the pathway analysis.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Dot plot pathway enrichment map showing significantly overrepresented pathways (left) (Padj. < 0.05) in the lists of proteins obtained for the different clusters in the K-means analysis (right) represented in Fig. 2. The colour of the dots represents the Padj. value, and the size of the dots represents the proportion of proteins relative to the total amount of proteins for each pathway

Proteins correlated with infection intensity

Correlation analysis revealed that 22 proteins were significantly correlated with the infection degree (Table 2). Fourteen proteins, including three apolipoproteins, two globins, complement component 3 (C3), ceruloplasmin and biotinidase, were negatively correlated with the infection intensity. Conversely, eight proteins exhibited a positive correlation with the disease.

Table 2 Plasma proteins whose abundance was significantly correlated with Sparicotyle chrysophrii infection degree

Validation assays

Haemoglobin values (Fig. 4), plasma cholesterol concentrations (Fig. 5) and ACP (Fig. 6) showed a gradual and significant decrease with increasing infection intensity. These results validated the detected gradual decline in plasma alpha-2 and beta globins, apolipoproteins B-100, H and A-II and C3 at the protein level. On the other hand, no significant differences were detected in plasma biotin levels, and the measured values were very close to the lower detection threshold of the technique (Additional file 4: Figure S3). It is to be noted that biotinidase levels were also in the low range, preventing us from drawing firm conclusions about the detected differences.

Fig. 4
figure 4

a Haemoglobin values measured in control fish (C, n = 50) and in S. chrysophrii-infected fish with a medium/low (M/L, n = 31) and high (H, n = 16) infection degree. b, c Normalised protein abundance values of alpha-2 globin (b) and beta-globin (c) measured by proteomics in plasma samples of C fish (n = 5) and in M/L (n = 10) and H (n = 5) infection groups. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean). Statistical differences among groups at P < 0.05 are noted with different letters (Kruskall-Wallis test)

Fig. 5
figure 5

a Plasma cholesterol values measured in control fish (n = 50) and in S. chrysophrii-infected fish with a medium/low (M/L, n = 31) and high (H, n = 16) infection degree. bd Normalised protein abundance values of apolipoprotein B-100 (b), apolipoprotein H (c) and apolipoprotein A-II (d) measured by proteomics in plasma samples of C fish (n = 5) and in the M/L (n = 10) and H (n = 5) infection groups. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM. Statistical differences among groups at P < 0.05 are noted with different letters [one-way analysis of variance (a, c, d) or Kruskall-Wallis test (b)]

Fig. 6
figure 6

a Activity of plasma alternative complement pathway (ACP) measured in control fish (n = 50) and in S. chrysophrii-infected fish with a medium/low (M/L, n = 31) and high (H, n = 16) infection degree. b Normalised protein abundance values of complement component 3 (C3) protein measured by proteomics in plasma samples of C fish (n = 5) and in the M/L (n = 10) and H (n = 5) infection groups. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM. Statistical differences among groups at P < 0.05 are noted with different letters (one-way analysis of variance)

Discussion

Despite the impact of S. chrysophrii on infection on animal welfare and the economic repercussions, little is known about the effect of S. chrysophrii in GSB. The results of the present study on plasma proteomics of S. chrysophrii-infected GSB provide information that will enable a better understanding of the pathogenesis of sparicotylosis, providing evidence on the metabolic pathways affected by the disease under different infection intensities. Furthermore, these results may shed some light upon which host resources are required by this monogenean species to ensure its survival as a first approach to elucidate the unknown pathogenicity mechanisms of the parasite and ultimately suggest immune-evasion strategies.

The discriminant analysis of the abundance of all detected proteins formed three different groups (C, M/L and H). The dispersal of these proteins among the healthy GSB (C) group was clearly greater than that among diseased fish (M/L and H groups) (Fig. 1a). However, differentially abundant proteins in the M/L group showed a greater disparity than those in the H group, which in turn seemed closer to the C group phenotype in both the PLS-DA model and heatmap (Fig. 1). Large variability is always an expected feature in control samples; in our study, the fish were obtained from a commercial farm and were not clonal lines or even from a single family. Although they came from the same production batch, they probably had very different genetic backgrounds, which would provide variable results. The observed decrease in variability during infection is interesting, as it points towards a homogeneous response elicited by/against the parasite, with all fish responding with the same trend. These observations suggest that the hosts suffer a profound imbalance with mild (M/L) S. chrysophrii-infection intensities, as observed by Piazzon et al. [19]. In GSB that survived to high parasitic burdens (H), the plasma proteomic profile closely resembled that of C fish, possibly reflecting the onset of compensation mechanisms to restore homeostasis, such as haemostatic events. During the progress of sparicotylosis under experimental conditions, this apparent recovery of the plasma’s proteomic profile might be the result of the monogeneans’ intimate coevolution with their hosts. Monogenean evolution is associated with strict host specificity and coevolution between worm and host [40, 41], which, in light of the results of the present study, might include attenuation of the worm’s pathogenicity in order to assure the host’s survival and parasite’s persistence. Under farming conditions, however, which include high stocking densities, exposure to environmental stressors and multiple pathogen offenders, high infection pressures and recurrent sparicotylosis infections once the disease is established, high mortality is reported, even after the fish has received treatment. Apparently, under these harsh farming conditions, fish would be unable to recover homeostasis, resulting in the combined pathogenic effect of the parasite with the biotic and abiotic stressors, including secondary opportunistic infections, being more devastating. Hence, future proteomic plasma studies of moribund GSB from sea cages suffering sparicotylosis would shed some light on this issue. However, the current results were obtained under experimental conditions, in a time-limited exposure (10 weeks) to a single purified pathogen offender, in contrast to an enzootic farm. The potential therapeutic importance of such a natural attempt of homeostatic restitution in highly infected fish under experimental conditions is paramount, since a strategy based on an earlier stimulation of these mechanisms by dietary or health interventions would open the path to mitigation of the effects of the disease. Sparicotyle chrysophrii-modulated proteins are involved in several biological processes in GSB. Among these, the levels of various proteins increased while those of others decreased in a complex network of interactions. The main pathways severely modulated by S. chrysophrii were those related to haemostasis, lipid metabolism and transport and the immune system (Fig. 3).

Haemostasis

Polyopisthocotylean monogeneans have been described as haematophagous parasites [42, 43], but it has not been until recently that the haematophagous nature of S. chrysophrii has been experimentally demonstrated [44]. From the current study, we can discern a clear negative impact on haemostasis in GSB. Blood Hb levels significantly dropped as the parasite burden increased (Fig. 4). These low Hb values mirrored the plasma proteomic results, which showed that the main Hb constituents, alpha-2 and beta globins, negatively and significantly correlated with the infection intensity (Table 2; Fig. 4). In addition, alpha-1-microglobulin, a radical scavenger associated with haem toxicity and erythroprotective anti-haemolytic effects in humans [45], presented a positive and significant correlation (Table 2). This suggests that S. chrysophrii-infected GSB suffer from haemolytic anaemia, as an increase in alpha-1-microglobulin occurs in hosts facing a haemolytic insult, which leads to the release of Hb and free haem groups from erythrocytes, increasing the oxidative stress [45]. Overall, these results would imply anaemia and oxygen transport impairment, explaining the hypoxia and lethargy signs observed in parasitised fish. Furthermore, the specific mechanisms this parasite uses for blood-feeding are still unknown, but our preliminary results on the matter suggest that S. chrysophrii is able to feed on blood meals resulting from GSB RBC lysate. The exact mechanism remains to be elucidated.

The coagulation cascade also seems to be triggered by sparicotylosis. In mammalian [46, 47] and fish [48] blood, the extrinsic pathway is initiated following tissue damage and subsequent exposure of subendothelial tissue factor (TF) to coagulation factor VII, whereas the intrinsic pathway is triggered by the exposure of a foreign negatively charged surface to coagulation factor XII. Both pathways converge in coagulation factor X, after which the common pathway of the coagulation cascade follows, resulting in the production of thrombin and leading to clot formation and final restoration of haemostasis [46, 47]. In the current study, most proteins involved in the coagulation cascade were represented in cluster B of the K-means analysis (Fig. 2). In GSB suffering sparicotylosis, both intrinsic (coagulation factor IX) and extrinsic (factor VII) pathways of the coagulation cascade as well as the common pathway of the coagulation cascade (factors X and V) were modulated (Additional file 3: Table S1). It is noteworthy that all coagulation factors in cluster B were upregulated in the H group, but not in the M/L group (Fig. 2), which is in agreement with the significantly positive correlation of factor X with the infection intensity (Table 2). Thus, the coagulation capacity of GSB apparently increased when high parasitic burdens were reached. Similarly, in several tick species, different proteins with anticoagulant properties affecting the intrinsic, extrinsic and common coagulation pathways [49,50,51] have been described and characterised, suggesting that these haematophagous parasites can modulate their host’s haemostasis at different levels.

Since S. chrysophrii is an ectoparasite and not an intravascular parasite, we suspect that the intrinsic pathway could be, in part, triggered by remnants of RBCs [52] resulting from haemolysis. In contrast, the activation of the extrinsic pathway may be due to tissue disruption induced by the parasite’s haptor and feeding mechanisms.

Lipid metabolism and transport

Different parasitic species, ranging from Protozoa to Metazoa, have been described as being able to alter the lipidic profile of their host species, both in fish [53] as well as in higher vertebrates [54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63]. In particular, Platyhelminthes are unable to synthesise fatty acids de novo [64], thus relying on the host’s lipid reservoir to ensure their survival. Several fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) have been identified in trematode species, such as Schistosoma spp., Fasciola spp and, most recently, in the diplozoid monogenean Eudiplozoon nipponicum [65, 66]. Although FABPs have been described to play a role in fatty acid uptake by Fasciola hepatica from host blood and in immunomodulation, their function in monogeneans remains unknown [65]. Our results show that apolipoprotein B-100 (ApoB-100) and apolipoprotein A-II (ApoA-II) levels were negatively and significantly correlated with the infection intensity (Table 2; Fig. 5). In agreement with this observation, the expression of apolipoproteins was found downregulated in the liver and spleen of GSB with a mild S. chrysophrii infection [19]. In addition, cholesterolaemia values in plasma samples of S. chrysophrii—infected GSB were significantly lower than those in the C group, supporting our proteomic results (Fig. 5). The reduction in plasma cholesterol levels in GSB was also triggered by environmental stressors [67, 68]) and dietary intervention involving the replacement of fish meal and oil by vegetable ingredients [33, 69]. The latter provoked a simultaneous drop in plasma cholesterol and blood Hb, which was reversed by a butyrate additive in the diet. This finding could open a path for the use of butyrate as a mitigation strategy for the effects of sparicotylosis.

ApoB-100 is a crucial structural component in very-low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) and low-density lipoproteins (LDL), which are predominantly composed of triglycerides and cholesteryl esters, respectively. ApoA-II, on the other hand, is associated with high-density lipoproteins (HDL2 and HDL3) that are predominantly composed of cholesteryl esters [70, 71]. Our results suggest a dependency of S. chrysophrii on its host’s lipid reservoir, but the function of these lipids is intriguing. In the case of the previously mentioned trematode species Schistosoma spp. and Fasciola spp. and the diplozoid monogenean E. nipponicum, it has been suggested that the host’s incorporated lipids may play important roles in maintaining different cellular structures after their distribution and storage in the parasite’s body or they may also be found in excretion/secretion products, which are involved in the modulation of the host’s immune system [66, 67]. The human trematode Schistosoma mansoni has been described to bind part of the host’s LDL to their surface, which might be an immune evasion strategy, in addition to ingesting LDL, breaking it down and distributing lipids throughout the worm [72]. Sparicotyle chrysophrii might be using similar strategies since it seems to preferentially rely on the easier digestible and transportable smaller sized VLDLs and LDLs of the host, but there is still no evidence for the worm feeding or displacing GSB’s lipoproteins.

Plasma lipoproteins (LDLs and HDLs) play an essential role in host defence as a component of the immune system [73,74,75] and against bacterial, viral and parasitological infections [73] in mammals. Hence, in our fish-parasite model, an alteration in lipoprotein levels could render the host more susceptible to secondary infections. Moreover, other roles in haemostasis have been granted to LDLs and HDLs, thus somewhat contributing to the control of haematological parameters, such as RBC membrane stability [76].

Immune system

Differences in the host’s immune response have been observed between monopistholocotylean and polyopisthocotylean monogenean parasites [77]. These differences have been suggested to lie in the different feeding strategies [77] since polyopisthocotylean monogeneans are generally considered to be haematophagous and, therefore, need to evade the host’s immune response to ensure their feeding and survival. Our study shows how S. chrysophrii infection changes the abundance of several complement proteins (factor H, factor B, factor I, C1q, C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8; Additional file 3: Table S1), inducing an inhibition of the alternative pathway as the infection intensity increases (Fig. 6). Along the same line, other studies with the same host and parasite species have revealed that this parasite downregulated c3 splenic expression, upregulated complement factor H (complement inhibitor) in spleen and gills [19] and lowered complement levels in serum [18]. A local downregulation of c3 expression has also been described in other monogenean infections [78, 79]. We observed that the depletion of complement effectors in GSB plasma worsened during the infection, compromising the fish immunocompetence. It is also noteworthy that the presence of immunoglobulin chains, mostly variable regions of the light chains, among the proteins were significantly less abundant in R fish, regardless of their infection intensity (cluster A). This result indicates that B cells are being modulated upon parasite infection, with a probable shift of the immunoglobulin (Ig) repertoire. Modulation of immunoglobulin transcripts, including light chains and variable genes, have also found at a transcriptomic level in gills (local) and spleen (systemic) in mild S. chrysophrii infections [19]. Further studies elucidating Ig titres and the Ig repertoire at systemic and local levels are needed to determine if this is due to an inhibition of antibody production or a shift towards a focused and specific response. Our results point to a complex network regulating the innate immune response, including SERPINs and ceruloplasmin, which may indirectly modulate the complement system, resulting in neutrophil activation and inflammation.

Proteins linking haemostasis and the immune system

Serine-protease inhibitors

Serine proteases are enzymes that have been highly conserved during evolution which play crucial roles in several physiological processes, including blood coagulation, fibrinolysis, inflammation and immune response. Serine-protease inhibitors (SERPINs) obtain their name from serine protease inhibitors. They are a superfamily of proteins that primarily regulate the proteolytic pathways of serine and cysteine proteases [80,81,82,83]. It has been described that protease inhibitors may have a leading role in host-parasite interactions and, more specifically, in evasion mechanisms and survival on the parasite’s behalf [84,85,86].

In the current study, three SERPINs were differentially expressed following infection; SERPINA1 (α1–antitrypsin), SERPIND1 (heparin coagulation factor II) and SERPING1 (C1-inhibitor; C1INH) (Additional file 3: Table S1). SERPINA1 was grouped in cluster C (more abundant in the M/L group), whereas both SERPIND1 and SERPING1 were grouped in cluster B (more abundant in the H group) (Fig. 2).

SERPINA1 inhibits neutrophil elastase, a serine protease with microbiocidal effects that is involved in the acute phase of the inflammation process and tissue remodelling [87]. We relate this observation to an early impairment of an inflammatory response elicited by neutrophils. This event could be driven by either a GSB response towards a traumatic event involving tissue disruption or by deliberate modulation of SERPINA1 by S. chrysophrii as an evasion mechanism, with the ultimate aim to enable attachment to gill filaments. It has recently been suggested that some digenean trematode parasites could have the ability to modulate the host’s SERPINs [25], but no published data are are available on SERPINA family members being modulated by fish parasites.

Both SERPIND1 and SERPING1 play key roles in coagulation; however, SERPING1 also affects the immune system. SERPIND1 is known to, directly and indirectly, inhibit thrombin in the common pathway of the coagulation cascade [80, 81, 88], thus preventing fibrinogen and platelet activation and ultimately preventing clot formation and haemostasis restoration. At the haemostatic level, SERPING1 inhibits several components within the intrinsic coagulation pathway [plasma kallikrein, activated factors XII (FXIIa) and XI (FXIa)] as well as fibrinolytic proteases (plasmin, tPA and uPA). Further SERPING1 inhibitory abilities extend to both C1s and C1r, modular proteases responsible for the activation and proteolytic activity of the C1 complex of the classic complement pathway [46, 47, 80, 81, 83, 89,90,91].

Thus, the significantly higher abundance of SERNPIND1 and SERPING1 in GSB with high parasitic burdens could imply an anticoagulant and innate immunosuppressor effect in these hosts (Fig. 2). However, within cluster B, SERPING1 shows a significant negative correlation with the infection intensity (Table 2). SERPINs operate within a complex physiological modulation network, and further SERPIN-targeted studies are needed to unravel this paradox, as well as the opposing coagulant and anticoagulant actions of serpins and the coagulation cascade. Counter-regulation evidenced by our results might be the effect of the host response aiming for homeostatic balance or a host versus parasite modulation.

Ceruloplasmin

Ceruloplasmin is an acute-phase protein that has been associated with inflammation, severe infection and tissue damage in mammals and fish. Ceruloplasmin has also been described as a copper-carrying protein, ultimately playing a role in hypoxic vasodilation and ischaemia–reperfusion cytoprotection [92,93,94] and having the ability to oxidise toxic plasma ferrous iron into its ferric form to be transported by transferrin [93]. Moreover, under hyperammonaemia conditions, the intrinsic pathway of the coagulation cascade is triggered, and the functional activity of platelets decreases. However, ceruloplasmin can prevent haemostatic disorders by restoring platelet functionality and preventing hypercoagulation [95].

Henry et al. [18] previously described no significant differences in ceruloplasmin activity in GSB after a 10 week-long S. chrysophrii infection. Our results suggest an initial increase in plasma ceruloplasmin levels in M/L fish followed by a later decrease during the course of infection in the H group. Thus, we hypothesise that fish with lower infection intensities were in an acute phase of the disease, while H GSB restored their ceruloplasmin to control levels later during the progress of infection. However, comparison of our results with previously published findings [18] is however complicated since experimental designs and the infection outcome were very different.

Conclusions

Understanding how GSB responds to S. chrysophrii is critical for developing new treatments and health management strategies in the aquaculture industry. The present plasma proteomic study of S. chrysophrii-infected GSB provides a crucial global overview of the pathogenesis of sparicotylosis, representing a valuable contribution to the understanding of the disease and highlighting new targets for further research. However, our results are based on the disease progression of a pure S. chrysophrii experimental infection, which does not totally depict farming conditions. Sparicotylosis profoundly alters the haemostasis, the innate immune system and the lipid metabolism and transport in GSB. However, in high-intensity experimental infections, GSB seems to attempt to restore some of the alterations suffered during the acute phase of the disease. This could be either due to the close evolutionary ties between S. chrysophrii and GSB, or to a host protection mechanism against the damage caused by the activation of acute mechanisms.

Availability of data and materials

The proteomics data has been deposited in the PRIDE repository, with the dataset identifier PXD034541. The rest of the data generated by this study is included in the manuscript and in the additional files.

Abbreviations

ACP:

Alternative complement pathway

C:

Control

GSB:

Gilthead sea bream

H:

High level of infection

L:

Low level of infection

M:

Medium level of infection

R:

Recipient

SWATH-MS:

Sequential window acquisition of all theoretical mass spectra

References

  1. Repullés-Albelda A, Raga JA, Montero FE. Post-larval development of the microcotylid monogenean Sparicotyle chrysophrii (Van Beneden and Hesse, 1863): Comparison with species of Microcotylidae and Heteraxinidae. Parasitol Int. 2011;60:512–20.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Repullés-Albelda A, Holzer AS, Raga JA, Montero FE. Oncomiracidial development, survival and swimming behaviour of the monogenean Sparicotyle chrysophrii (Van Beneden and Hesse, 1863). Aquaculture. 2012;338–341:47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mladineo I. Parasite communities of adriatic cage-reared fish. Dis Aquat Organ. 2005;64:77–83.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sánchez-García N, Raga JA, Montero FE. Risk assessment for parasites in cultures of Diplodus puntazzo (Sparidae) in the Western Mediterranean: prospects of cross infection with Sparus aurata. Vet Parasitol. 2014;204:120–33.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mladineo I, Maršić-Lučić J. Host switch of Lamellodiscus elegans (Monogenea: Monopisthocotylea) and Sparicotyle chrysophrii (Monogenea: Polyopisthocotylea) between cage-reared Sparids. Vet Res Commun. 2007;31:153–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mladineo I, Šegvić T, Grubišić L. Molecular evidence for the lack of transmission of the monogenean Sparicotyle chrysophrii (Monogenea, Polyopisthocotylea) and isopod Ceratothoa oestroides (Crustacea, Cymothoidae) between wild bogue (Boops boops) and cage-reared seabream (Sparus aurata) and sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Aquaculture. 2009;295:160–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Katharios P, Papandroulakis N, Divanach P. Treatment of Microcotyle sp. (Monogenea) on the gills of cage-cultured red porgy, Pagrus pagrus following baths with formalin and mebendazole. Aquac Eng. 2006;251:167–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Federation of European Aquaculture Producers (FEAP). European aquaculture production report. FEAP Production Report—2020. 2020. https://feap.info/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/20201007_feap-production-report-2020.pdf. Accessed 7 Mar 2022.

  9. Sitjà-Bobadilla A, de Felipe MC, Álvarez-Pellitero P. In vivo and in vitro treatments against Sparicotyle chrysophrii (Monogenea: Microcotylidae) parasitizing the gills of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.). Aquaculture. 2006;261:856–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sitjà-Bobadilla A, Álvarez-Pellitero P. Experimental transmission of Sparicotyle chrysophrii (Monogenea: Polyopisthocotylea) to gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) and histopathology of the infection. Folia Parasitol. 2009;56:143–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fioravanti ML, Mladineo I, Palenzuela O, Beraldo P, Massimo M, Gustinelli A, et al. Fish farmer’s guide to combating parasitic infections in European sea bass and gilthead sea bream aquaculture. ParaFishControl. 2020. https://www.parafishcontrol.eu/parafishcontrol-results/parafishcontrol-deliverables. Accessed 3 Mar 2022.

  12. Mladineo I, Trumbić Ž, Ormad-García A, Palenzuela O, Sitjà-Bobadilla A, Manuguerra S, et al. In vitro testing of alternative synthetic and natural antiparasitic compounds against the monogenean Sparicotyle chrysophrii. Pathogens. 2021;10:980.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Merella P, Montero FE, Burreddu C, Garippa G. In-feed trials of fenbendazole and other chemical/natural compounds against Sparicotyle chrysophrii (Monogenea) infections in Sparus aurata (Osteichthyes). Aquac Res. 2021;52:5908–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bögner D, Bögner M, Schmachtl F, Bill N, Halfer J, Slater MJ. Hydrogen peroxide oxygenation and disinfection capacity in recirculating aquaculture systems. Aquac Eng. 2021;92:102140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). Formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers—strategy for future work. 2018. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/17233/formaldehyde_review_report_en.pdf/551df4a2-28c4-2fa9-98ec-c8d53e2bf0fc?t=1516170136797. Accessed 15 Mar 2022.

  16. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). Substance evaluation conclusion as require by REACH article 48 and evaluation report for formaldehyde. 2019. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/cc0acabf-6e82-f2ed-5dbe-8058f48ce6c4. Accessed 15 Mar 2022.

  17. Leal JF, Neves MGPMS, Santos EBH, Esteves VI. Use of formalin in intensive aquaculture: properties, application and effects on fish and water quality. Rev Aquac. 2018;10:281–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Henry MA, Nikoloudaki C, Tsigenopoulos C, Rigos G. Strong effect of long-term Sparicotyle chrysophrii infection on the cellular and innate immune responses of gilthead sea bream, Sparus aurata. Dev Comp Immunol. 2015;51:185–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Piazzon MC, Mladineo I, Naya-Català F, Dirks RP, Jong-Raadsen S, Vrbatović A, et al. Acting locally - Affecting globally: RNA sequencing of gilthead sea bream with a mild Sparicotyle chrysophrii infection reveals effects on apoptosis, immune and hypoxia related genes. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu RD, Cui J, Liu XL, Jiang P, Sun GG, Zhang X, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of surface proteins of Trichinella spiralis muscle larvae and intestinal infective larvae. Acta Trop. 2015;150:79–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Suttiprapa S, Sotillo J, Smout M, Suyapoh W, Chaiyadet S, Tripathi T. Opisthorchis viverrini proteome and host—parasite interactions. Adv Parasitol. 2018;102:45–72.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cui S, Xu L, Zhang T, Xu M, Yao J, Fang C, et al. Proteomic characterization of larval and adult developmental stages in Echinococcus granulosus reveals novel insight into host—parasite interactions. J Proteomics. 2013;84:158–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tu V, Mayoral J, Sugi T, Tomita T, Han B, Weiss LM. Enrichment and proteomic characterization of the cyst wall from in vitro Toxoplasma gondii cysts. MBio. 2019;10:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Marzano V, Pane S, Foglietta G, Mortera SL, Vernocchi P, Muda AO, et al. Mass spectrometry based-proteomic analysis of Anisakis spp.: a preliminary study towards a new diagnostic tool. Genes. 2020;11:1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang FK, Hu RS, Elsheikha HM, Sheng ZA, Zhang WY, Zhengbin W, et al. Global serum proteomic changes in water buffaloes infected with Fasciola gigantica. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:281.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou C, Xie S, Li M, Huang C, Zhou H, Cong H. Analysis of the serum peptidome associated with Toxoplasma gondii infection. J Proteomics. 2020;222:1–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gillis-Germitsch N, Kockmann T, Kapel CMO, Thamsborg SM, Webster P, Tritten L, et al. Fox serum proteomics analysis suggests host-specific responses to Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in canids. Pathogens. 2021;10:1–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Raza A, Schulz BL, Nouwens A, Jackson LA, Piper EK, James P, et al. Serum proteomes of Santa Gertrudis cattle before and after infestation with Rhipicephalus australis ticks. Parasite Immunol. 2021;43:1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuleš J, Lovrić L, Gelemanović A, Ljubić BB, Rubić I, Bujanić M, et al. Complementary liver and serum protein profile in wild boars infected by the giant liver fluke Fascioloides magna using tandem mass tags quantitative approach. J Proteomics. 2021;247:104332.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Riera-Ferrer E, Estensoro I, Del Pozo R, Piazzon MC, Moreno-Estruch P, Sitjà-Bobadilla A, et al. A non-lethal approach upon Sparicotyle chrysophrii burden prediction in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). In: Aquaculture Europe 2021, Madeira. Book of abstracts 2021. p. 1093.

  31. Pérez-Sánchez J, Naya-Català F, Soriano B, Piazzon MC, Hafez A, Gabaldón T, et al. Genome sequencing and transcriptome analysis reveal recent species-specific gene duplications in the plastic gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). Front Mar Sci. 2019;6:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tsou CC, Avtonomov D, Larsen B, Tucholska M, Choi H, Gingras AC, et al. DIA-Umpire: comprehensive computational framework for data-independent acquisition proteomics. Nat Methods. 2015;12:258–64.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sitjà-Bobadilla A, Peña-Llopis S, Gómez-Requeni P, Médale F, Kaushik S, Pérez-Sánchez J. Effect of fish meal replacement by plant protein sources on non-specific defence mechanisms and oxidative stress in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). Aquaculture. 2005;249:387–400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Thévenot EA, Roux A, Xu Y, Ezan E, Junot C. Analysis of the human adult urinary metabolome variations with age, body mass index, and gender by implementing a comprehensive workflow for univariate and OPLS statistical analyses. J Proteome Res. 2015;14:3322–35.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wold S, Sjöström M, Eriksson L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 2001;58:109–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kieffer DA, Piccolo BD, Vaziri ND, Liu S, Lau WL, Khazaeli M, et al. Resistant starch alters gut microbiome and metabolomic profiles concurrent with amelioration of chronic kidney disease in rats. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol. 2016;310:F857–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Li H, Ma ML, Luo S, Zhang RM, Han P, Hu W. Metabolic responses to ethanol in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry-based metabolomics approach. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2012;44:1087–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ge SX, Son EW, Yao R. iDEP: An integrated web application for differential expression and pathway analysis of RNA-Seq data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018;19:1–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yu G, He QY. ReactomePA: an R/Bioconductor package for reactome pathway analysis and visualization. Mol Biosyst. 2016;12:477–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kearn GC. Evolutionary expansion of the Monogenea. Int J Parasitol. 1994;24:1227–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Poulin R. The evolution of monogenean diversity. Int J Parasitol. 2002;32:245–54.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Llewellyn J. Observations on the food and the gut pigment of the polyopisthocotylea (Trematoda: Monogenea). Parasitology. 1954;44:428–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Halton DW, Jennings JB. Observations on the nutrition of monogenetic trematodes. Biol Bull. 1965;129:257–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Riera-Ferrer E, Estensoro I, Piazzon MC, del Pozo R, Palenzuela O, Sitjà-Bobadilla A. Unveiling the blood-feeding behaviour of the gill parasite Sparicotyle chrysophrii. In: 20th International Conference on diseases of fish and shellfish, virtual conference 20–23 Sept 2021. Book of abstracts 2021. p. 35.

  45. Kristiansson A, Gram M, Flygare J, Hansson SR, Åkerström B, Storry JR. The role of α1-microglobulin (A1M) in erythropoiesis and erythrocyte homeostasis—therapeutic opportunities in hemolytic conditions. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Smith SA, Travers RJ, Morrissey JH. How it all starts: initiation of the clotting cascade. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2015;50:326–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. He S, Cao H, Thålin C, Svensson J, Blombäck M, Wallén H. The clotting trigger is an important determinant for the coagulation pathway in vivo or in vitro-inference from data review. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2021;47:63–73.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tavares-Dias M, Oliveira SR. A review of the blood coagulation system of fish. Braz J Biosci. 2009;7:205–24.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Parizi LF, Ali A, Tirloni L, Oldiges DP, Sabadin GA, Coutinho ML, et al. Peptidase inhibitors in tick physiology. Med Vet Entomol. 2018;32:129–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kotál J, Polderdijk SGI, Langhansová H, Ederová M, Martins LA, Beránková Z, et al. Ixodes ricinus salivary serpin iripin-8 inhibits the intrinsic pathway of coagulation and complement. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:9480.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ehebauer MT, Mans BJ, Gaspar ARM, Neitz AWH. Identification of extrinsic blood coagulation pathway inhibitors from the tick Ornithodoros savignyi (Acari: Argasidae). Exp Parasitol. 2002;101:138–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Cappellini MD. Coagulation in the pathophysiology of hemolytic anemias. Am Soc Hematol. 2007;2007:74–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Yuskiv LL, Yuskiv ID. The lipid metabolism in carp during invasion by the tapeworn Bothriocephalus acheilognathi. Regul Mech Biosyst. 2020;11:214–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Luján HD, Mowatr MR, Byrd LG, Nash TE. Cholesterol starvation induces differentiation of the intestinal parasite Giardia lamblia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:7628–33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Coppens I, Sinai AP, Joiner KA. Toxoplasma gondii exploits host low-density lipoprotein receptor- mediated endocytosis for cholesterol acquisition. J Cell Biol. 2000;149:167–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sonda S, Ting LM, Novak S, Kim K, Maher JJ, Farese RV, et al. Cholesterol esterification by host and parasite is essential for optimal proliferation of Toxoplasma gondii. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:34434–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Pucadyil TJ, Tewary P, Madhubala R, Chattopadhyay A. Cholesterol is required for Leishmania donovani infection: implications in leishmaniasis. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2004;133:145–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Bansal D, Bhatti HS, Sehgal R. Role of cholesterol in parasitic infections. Lipids Health Dis. 2005;4:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Stanley RG, Jackson CL, Griffiths K, Doenhoff MJ. Effects of Schistosoma mansoni worms and eggs on circulating cholesterol and liver lipids in mice. Atherosclerosis. 2009;207:131–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Rivero MR, Miras SL, Quiroga R, Rópolo AS, Touz MC. Giardia lamblia low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein is involved in selective lipoprotein endocytosis and parasite replication. Mol Microbiol. 2011;79:1204–19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Magen E, Bychkov V, Ginovker A, Kashuba E. Chronic Opisthorchis felineus infection attenuates atherosclerosis—an autopsy study. Int J Parasitol. 2013;43:819–24.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Oneal AJ, Butler LR, Rolandelli A, Gilk SD, Pedra JHF. Lipid hijacking: a unifying theme in vector-borne diseases. eLife. 2020;9:1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Tokumasu F, Hayakawa EH, Fukumoto J, Tokuoka SM, Miyazaki S. Creative interior design by Plasmodium falciparum: lipid metabolism and the parasite’s secret chamber. Parasitol Int. 2021;83:102369.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Barrett J. Nutrition and biosynthesis. In: Barrett J, editor. Biochemistry of parasitic helminths. 1st ed. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1981. p. 149–244.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  65. Vorel J, Cwiklinski K, Roudnický P, Ilgová J, Jedličková L, Dalton JP, et al. Eudiplozoon nipponicum (Monogenea, Diplozoidae) and its adaptation to haematophagy as revealed by transcriptome and secretome profiling. BMC Genomics. 2021;22:1–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Lombardo JF, Pórfido JL, Sisti MS, Giorello AN, Rodríguez S, Córsico B, et al. Function of lipid binding proteins of parasitic helminths: still a long road. Parasitol Res. 2022;121:1117–29.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Schrama D, Richard N, Silva TS, Figueiredo FA, Conceição LEC, Burchmore R, et al. Enhanced dietary formulation to mitigate winter thermal stress in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata): a 2D-DIGE plasma proteome study. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2017;43:603–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Diógenes AF, Teixeira C, Almeida E, Skrzynska A, Costas B, Oliva-Teles A, et al. Effects of dietary tryptophan and chronic stress in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) juveniles fed corn distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) based diets. Aquaculture. 2019;498:396–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Benedito-Palos L, Ballester-Lozano GF, Simó P, Karalazos V, Ortiz Á, Calduch-Giner J, et al. Lasting effects of butyrate and low FM/FO diets on growth performance, blood haematology/biochemistry and molecular growth-related markers in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). Aquaculture. 2016;454:8–18.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Bayly GR. Lipids and disorders of lipoprotein metabolism. In: Marshall WJ, Lapsley M, Day AP, Ayling RM, editors. Clinical biochemistry: Metabolic and clinical aspects. 3rd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2014. p. 702–36.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  71. Nelson DL, Cox MM. Lipid biosynthesis. In: Lehninger principles of biochemistry. 7th ed. New York: Macmillan Learning; 2017.

  72. Bennett MW, Caulfield JP. Specific binding of human low-density lipoprotein to the surface of schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni and ingestion by the parasite. Am J Pathol. 1991;138:1173–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Han R. Plasma lipoproteins are important components of the immune system. Microbiol Immunol. 2010;54:246–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Norata GD, Pirillo A, Ammirati E, Catapano AL. Emerging role of high density lipoproteins as a player in the immune system. Atherosclerosis. 2012;220:11–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Grao-Cruces E, Lopez-Enriquez S, Martin ME, de la Paz Montserrat S. High-density lipoproteins and immune response: a review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;195:117–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Van der Stoep M, Korporaal SJA, van Eck M. High-density lipoprotein as a modulator of platelet and coagulation responses. Cardiovasc Res. 2014;103:362–71.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Buchmann K. Antiparasitic immune responses. In: Buchmann K, Secombes CJ, editors. Principles of fish immunology: from cells and molecules to host protection. 1st ed. Gewerbestrasse: Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2022. p. 535–63.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  78. Zhou S, Li WX, Zou H, Zhang J, Wu SG, Li M, et al. Expression analysis of immune genes in goldfish (Carassius auratus) infected with the monogenean parasite Gyrodactylus kobayashii. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018;77:40–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Zhang C, Li DL, Chi C, Ling F, Wang GX. Dactylogyrus intermedius parasitism enhances Flavobacterium columnare invasion and alters immune-related gene expression in Carassius auratus. Dis Aquat Organ. 2015;116:11–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Gettins PGW. Serpin structure, mechanism, and function. Chem Rev. 2002;102:4751–803.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Law RHP, Zhang Q, McGowan S, Buckle AM, Silverman GA, Wong W, et al. An overview of the serpin superfamily. Genome Biol. 2006;7:1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Huntington JA. Serpin structure, function and dysfunction. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9:26–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Sanrattana W, Maas C, de Maat S. SERPINs-From trap to treatment. Front Med. 2019;6:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Knox DP. Proteinase inhibitors and helminth parasite infection. Parasite Immunol. 2007;29:57–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Molehin AJ, Gobert GN, McManus DP. Serine protease inhibitors of parasitic helminths. Parasitology. 2012;139:681–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Bao J, Pan G, Poncz M, Wei J, Ran M, Zhou Z. Serpin functions in host-pathogen interactions PeerJ. 2018;2018:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Pham CTN. Neutrophil serine proteases: specific regulators of inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:541–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Rau JC, Mitchell JW, Fortenberry YM, Church FC. Heparin cofactor II: discovery, properties, and role in controlling vascular homeostasis. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2011;37:339–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Beinrohr L, Murray-Rust TA, Dyksterhuis L, Závodszky P, Gál P, Pike RN, et al. Serpins and the complement system. Methods Enzymol. 2011;499:55–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Rossi V, Bally I, Lacroix M, Arlaud GJ, Thielens NM. Classical complement pathway components C1r and C1s: purification from human serum and in recombinant form and functional characterization. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1100:43–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Mutch NJ. Regulation of fibrinolysis by platelets. In: Michelson AD, Cattaneo M, Frelinger AL, Newman PJ, editors. Platelets. 4th ed. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2019. p. 417–31.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  92. Yamamoto K, Yoshida K, Miyagoe Y, Ishikawa A, Hanaoka K, Nomoto S, et al. Quantitative evaluation of expression of iron-metabolism genes in ceruloplasmin-deficient mice. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1588:195–202.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Das S, Sahoo PK. Ceruloplasmin, a moonlighting protein in fish. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018;82:460–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Orzheshkovskyi VV, Trishchynska MA. Ceruloplasmin: its role in the physiological and pathological processes. Neurophysiology. 2019;51:141–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Osikov MV, Makarov EV, Krivokhizhina LV. Ceruloplasmin prevents hemostatic disorders during experimental hyperammonemia. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2006;142:416–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Prof. J. Pérez-Sánchez from the Nutrigenomics and Fish Growth Endocrinology group (IATS, CSIC) for providing access to genomic database of GSB, M. Luz Valero from SCSIE proteomics facility (University of Valencia, Spain) for the proteomics analyses and support and I. Vicente for technical assistance with fish husbandry and samplings at IATS.

Funding

This work has been financed by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and Universities project (SpariControl, RTI2018-098664-B-I00, AEI/FEDER, UE). ERF was supported by an FPI contract PRE2019-087409 (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033). MCP was funded by a Ramón y Cajal Postdoctoral Research Fellowship (RYC2018-024049-I & ACOND/2022 Generalitat Valenciana). RDP was contracted under the PTA Programme from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (PTA2018-015315-I). ERF, MCP and RDP contracts were co-funded by the European Social Fund (ESF). We acknowledge support of the publication fee by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ERF: Methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing of original draft. MCP: Investigation, formal analysis, data curation, visualisation. RDP: Investigation, writing of original draft; OP: Supervision, funding acquisition. IE: Methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, visualisation, supervision, writing original draft. ASB: Methodology, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Itziar Estensoro.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

An ethics statement on the use of experimental animals is included in the Methods section.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1. 

Schematic representation of samples taken in each sampling and their downstream use.

Additional file 2: Figure S2. 

Partial least-squares discriminant analysis model overview depicting the optimal number of components used to build the model (p1-p5). The Y-axis represents the cumulative fit (R2Y) and prediction (Q2Y) coefficients for each of the components (A). Validation of the model (permutation test, 500 permutations) to estimate R2Y and Q2Y significance. pR2Y and pQ2 are considered significant at P < 0.05 (B). Observation diagnostics was performed to detect outliers by plotting the score and orthogonal distances of each sample (red = control fish; blue = fish with low/medium infection degree; green = fish with high infection degree). No outliers were detected in this model (C).

Additional file 3: Table S1. 

List of proteins with VIP value > 1 responsible for the separation of groups in the PLS-DA model presented in Fig. 1. ordered by the corresponding cluster from the K-means analysis (Fig. 2). The group mean normalised abundance values are shown on the right.

Additional file 4: Figure S4. 

Plasma biotin values measured in control (C, n = 50) and Sparicotyle chrysophrii-infected fish with a medium/low (M/L, n = 31) and high (H, n = 16) infection degree (A). Normalised protein abundance values of biotinidase (B) measured by proteomics in plasma samples of control (C, n = 5), medium/low (M/L, n = 10), and high (H, n = 5) infection groups. Values are represented as mean ± SEM and statistical differences among groups are noted with different letters (Kruskall-Wallis test, P < 0.05).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riera-Ferrer, E., Piazzon, M.C., Del Pozo, R. et al. A bloody interaction: plasma proteomics reveals gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) impairment caused by Sparicotyle chrysophrii. Parasites Vectors 15, 322 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05441-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05441-1

Keywords

  • Monogenea
  • SWATH-MS
  • Haemoglobin
  • Haemostasis
  • Immune system
  • Host-parasite interactions
  • Cholesterol