Skip to main content

Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola in the northeast Pacific Ocean is rare in farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar despite widespread occurrence and pathology in wild Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp.



Infection with the myxozoan parasite Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola causes disease in wild and farmed salmonids in Norway. In the northeast Pacific Ocean, the parasite has been reported in Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp. without evidence of disease. The objectives of the present study were to confirm the identity of P. pseudobranchicola in the Pacific, document its host and geographic ranges, and describe associated pathological changes.


Ocean-entry year wild pink salmon Oncorhynchus gorbuscha, chum salmon O. keta, Chinook salmon O. tshawytscha, coho salmon O. kisutch and sockeye salmon O. nerka were collected in summer and autumn surveys near Vancouver Island (VI) and from a winter survey in the Gulf of Alaska. Samples were also obtained from farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar and Chinook salmon near VI. Samples were analysed by qPCR and histology using conventional staining or in situ hybridisation. Parasite sequence was obtained from small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU rDNA).


Identical 1525 base-pair SSU rDNA sequences from infected pink salmon, chum salmon and Chinook salmon shared 99.93% identity with a P. pseudobranchicola sequence from Norwegian Atlantic salmon. In autumn surveys, the prevalence was greatest in chum salmon (91.8%) and pink salmon (85.9%) and less so in Chinook salmon (68.8%) and sockeye salmon (8.3%). In farmed salmon, the prevalence was zero in Atlantic salmon (n = 967) and 41% in Chinook salmon (n = 118). Infections were preferentially sited in pseudobranch and visualised by in situ hybridisation. Heavy parasite burdens in all species of Pacific salmon were inconsistently associated with focal granulomatous pseudobranchitis.


In the northeast Pacific, widespread occurrence of P. pseudobranchicola in Pacific salmon together with its absence or sporadic occurrence in farmed Atlantic salmon differs from its epidemiology in Norway, despite similar pathological development in the pseudobranch. Consequences of the infections to the health of wild Pacific salmon, identity of the invertebrate host and the distribution and abundance of infective actinospores are unknown and remain high priorities for research.

Graphical Abstract


Members of the genus Parvicapsula (Cnidaria, Myxosporea) are parasites of the urinary bladder, gall bladder, intestinal epithelium and pseudobranch in marine or anadromous teleosts in which they have occasionally been shown to cause disease [1, 2]. Of the 16 known Parvicapsula spp., three have been reported from salmonid hosts. In western North America, Parvicapsula kabatai [3, 4] and P. minibicornis [5,6,7,8,9,10,11] are parasites of anadromous Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp. Parvicapsula kabatai was detected by using molecular methods in farmed coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch in Washington State (USA) [3], previously found to be infected with Parvicapsula sp. [12]. With the exception of P. minibicornis whose invertebrate host is the freshwater polychaete Manayunkia occidentalis [13], the life cycles of Parvicapsula spp. are unknown.

Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola was originally described in northern Norway from marine farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar [14] in which it causes inflammation and necrosis of the pseudobranch as well as the non-specific clinical signs of lethargy, anorexia and dark pigmentation (Table 1) [14,15,16]. The parasite has also been reported from wild Atlantic salmon, farmed rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss and wild sea trout Salmo trutta in southern and northern Norwegian coastal waters [17,18,19,20]. In the northeastern Pacific waters of British Columbia (BC), Canada, P. pseudobranchicola has been detected in adult sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka, coho salmon and Chinook salmon O. tshawytscha [21,22,23,24] and in juvenile Chinook salmon and coho salmon [25]. In BC, the parasite was detected in farmed Atlantic and Chinook salmon [26]. The parasite was also detected in coho salmon, sockeye salmon, chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta and pink salmon O. gorbuscha overwintering in international waters of the Gulf of Alaska [27]. The Pacific detections of P. pseudobranchicola are based on molecular evidence with neither microscopic observations of the parasite nor evidence of disease caused by the infection.

Table 1 Host, site of infection and location of Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola

The objectives of the present study were to use PCR and sequence data together with site preference and morphology to confirm the identity of the parasite presently described as P. pseudobranchicola in BC, to document its host range and geographic distribution and to describe pathological changes associated with the infection.


Fish collections and tissue samples

Chum salmon, pink salmon, coho salmon, sockeye salmon and Chinook salmon were caught by trawl and purse seine gear in summer and/or autumn surveys in BC waters in 2008, 2010–2015 and 2019–2021 (Additional file 1: Table S1). The fish were collected from areas adjacent to Vancouver Island including Discovery Islands, Bute Inlet, Desolation Sound, Strait of Georgia, Gulf Islands, Howe Sound and the Strait of Juan de Fuca (Fig. 1). Chum salmon, pink salmon and coho salmon were also collected in a winter survey from international waters in the Gulf of Alaska in 2020 (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map showing Pacific waters adjacent to Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada, with areas from which wild Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) were collected. DIS, Discovery Islands; BUT, Bute Inlet; DES, Desolation Sound; SOG, Strait of Georgia; HOW, Howe Sound; GIS, Gulf Islands; JDF, Strait of Juan de Fuca. Star in inset approximates the Gulf of Alaska

The 306 fish caught in 2008 and 2010–2015 and the 133 caught in the Gulf of Alaska were frozen immediately after capture and later thawed in the laboratory, weighed and processed. The 1249 salmon collected in 2019–2021 were identified, weighed and tissue samples preserved within 2 h of capture. Pseudobranch samples from all fish and individually matched mid-kidney and/or gill samples from subsets of fish were aseptically dissected and preserved in 95% ethanol. Of the 1249 salmon collected in 2019 to 2021, replicate tissue samples from 1218 were preserved in 10% neutral-buffered formalin (NBF). Pseudobranch samples from farmed Atlantic and Chinook salmon collected in 2019 and 2020 and preserved in RNAlater were provided by the Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s Fish Health Audit and Intelligence Program (DFO-FHAIP). The Atlantic salmon were collected during scheduled audits from aquaculture facilities within the fish health zones (FHZ) 2.3 (Clayoquot Sound), 2.4 (Nootka Sound and Quatsino Sound), 3.1 (Sechelt), 3.2 (Discovery Islands), 3.3 (Broughton Archipelago), 3.4 (Port Hardy) and 3.5 (Central Coast) (Aquaculture maps Pacific Region ( The Chinook salmon were collected from FHZ 2.3 and 3.2.

DNA extraction and qPCR

DNA was extracted from the ethanol- and RNAlater-preserved tissues and from previously frozen tissues by using the DNeasy® Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen). The DNA concentration was quantified by absorbance at 260 nm and samples then stored at − 20 °C until analysis. The qPCR assay was performed using primer and probe sequences targeting a 187-bp fragment of the P. pseudobranchicola 18S rRNA gene [18]. An individual reaction consisted of 1X TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 400 nM of the primers Parvi2fwd and Parvi1rev, 200 nM of the Parviprobe (Table 2), 5 μl DNA template and nuclease-free water for a final reaction volume of 25 μl. Each sample was screened in triplicate on the CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad) or StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR detection system (Applied Biosystems). Extractions and amplifications followed manufacturers’ protocols.

Table 2 Nucleotide primers and probes used for qPCR (a), PCR and sequencing (s) and in situ hybridisation (i) assessments of Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola small sub-unit DNA

For each qPCR run, the number of copies of target sequence per reaction (c/rxn) was determined from standard dilutions of a P. pseudobranchicola target sequence (gBlock, IDT Technologies) [33] and normalised to c/ng DNA. The limit of detection (LOD) was determined from a series of tenfold dilutions of the gBlock from 1000 to 15.625 copies per µl spiked into a pink salmon gill homogenate and extracted (Qiagen DNeasy® Blood and Tissue kit) assuming 80% DNA recovery. The LOD was estimated as the lowest DNA concentration from which a Ct value was obtained in ≥ 50% of six replicates [34]. Only reactions ≥ LOD (10 c/rxn) were reported as positive.


Parasite DNA samples from the most heavily infected pink salmon, Chinook salmon and chum salmon were amplified by PCR (Table 2) and reaction products were purified with ExoSAP-IT (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The sequences obtained using Sanger technology (Génome Québec) were edited and assembled using Sequencher 5.1, archived in Genbank and analysed by BLAST (


NBF-fixed pseudobranch tissues were stored in 95% isopropanol, then dehydrated in an alcohol gradient, clarified in xylene, infiltrated with paraffin wax and sectioned for routine histological examination. Histological sections of pseudobranch from pink salmon (n = 5), chum salmon (n = 5) and Chinook salmon (n = 3) with no molecular evidence of infection and from those with the highest c/rxn (n = 9, 8 and 11, respectively) were stained with haematoxylin and eosin, Giemsa or Gram-Twort stains and were processed for in situ hybridisation (ISH) and examined by light microscopy. An earlier ISH protocol [35] was followed using 1 μM of the Parvi LNA digoxigenin-labelled probe [32] (Table 2), without acetylation and with 0.5% Light Green SF Yellowish counterstaining. Semi-quantitative histopathology and ISH scores were adopted based on extent of damage and number of stained parasites, respectively (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Statistical analysis

Weight and parasite burden (c/ng DNA) data were not normally distributed, and non-parametric tests were used. Differences in median fish weights and median parasite burdens between summer and autumn collections were tested using the Mann-Whitney (MW) test. Comparisons of median burdens among species were tested using the Kruskal-Wallis (KW) test, with pairwise multiple comparisons tested using Dunn’s method (Sigma Plot 13.0). The significance of differences in prevalence was tested using the Chi-square test. Results of all tests were considered statistically significant if P ≤ 0.05.


Fish data

Wild salmon

All salmon examined were in their first year at sea. In BC and with the exception of one coho salmon (56.0 g), the median weights of chum salmon, pink salmon, Chinook salmon and sockeye salmon collected during summer surveys were ≤ 26.5 g (Additional file 1: Table S1). The median weights of chum salmon, pink salmon and sockeye salmon collected in autumn surveys were significantly larger than those collected in summer surveys the same year (Additional file 1: Table S1). The chum salmon, pink salmon and coho salmon collected from the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) were first sea-winter fish and correspondingly heavier than the fish collected in summer (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Farmed salmon

A total of 967 Atlantic salmon were sampled during 148 audits. The mean number of days following transfer to sea (dps) of the audited salmon was 329.8 (range 22–740). Of these, 199 salmon were audited between 22 and 150 dps. A total of 118 Chinook salmon were sampled during 16 audits, with a mean of 336.1 (1–812) dps. Of these, 27 Chinook salmon were audited between one and 150 dps.

Parasite prevalence

Wild salmon

In BC waters, P. pseudobranchicola was detected in four of the five species of Pacific salmon examined. In 2019 and 2021, the prevalence in pink salmon and chum salmon was significantly higher in autumn compared with summer surveys (Table 3), and this pattern was observed in multiple regions (Additional file 1: Table S3). In autumn surveys from all years, prevalence of the parasite was greatest in chum salmon (91.8%) and pink salmon (85.9%) and less so in Chinook salmon (68.8%) and sockeye salmon (8.3%). None of 114 fish collected between 2008 and 2011 was infected, and nine of 189 (4.8%) collected between 2012 and 2015 were infected. However, between 2019 and 2021, 808 of 1382 fish (58.4%) tested positive for the infection, reflecting the inclusion of more fish from autumn surveys in the latter years (Table 3). The parasite was undetected in 32 coho salmon, 31 of which were from the GOA. Overall, two chum salmon out of all 133 salmon examined from the GOA were found to be infected (Table 3).

Table 3 Prevalence and burden of Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola in pseudobranch of wild Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) from coastal waters of British Columbia (BC) and from international waters of the Gulf of Alaska

Farmed salmon

Of the 1085 salmon examined in 2019 and 2020, the parasite was detected in 48 of 118 (40.7%) Chinook salmon from two FHS zones. The mean days at sea for infected Chinook salmon was 415.7 (1–812). The overall prevalence in Chinook salmon farmed in zone 3.2 (73.9%) was greater than in zone 2.3 (32.6%) (Table 4) (Χ2 = 13.08, df = 1, P < 0.001). The parasite was not detected in any of 967 Atlantic salmon from seven zones (Table 4).

Table 4 Quantitative PCR prevalence of Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola in pseudobranch of farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tchawytscha) by fish health zones in British Columbia

Parasite burden

Wild salmon

In the 2019 and 2021 autumn surveys, parasite burden (median c/ng DNA) in pseudobranch of chum salmon were significantly higher than in summer surveys, whereas in pink salmon these seasonal differences were not statistically significant (Table 3). In the 2021 autumn survey, median c/ng DNA in chum salmon was higher than in Chinook salmon and pink salmon, whereas the difference between Chinook salmon and pink salmon was not statistically significant (H-statistic = 55.99, df = 2, P < 0.001). In the 2019 and 2020 autumn surveys, median c/ng DNA in chum salmon was higher than in pink salmon (U-statistic = 6976.0. P < 0.001).

Farmed salmon

In 2019 but not in 2020, median c/ng DNA was significantly higher in Chinook salmon from FHS zone 3.2 compared with zone 2.3 (Table 4).

Site of infection

Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola was detected in individually matched pseudobranch, gill and kidney samples from chum salmon, pink salmon and Chinook salmon collected in the 2021 autumn survey. Among the three species, the infection was consistently detected in a higher proportion of pseudobranch samples, followed by gill and kidney (Additional file 1: Table S4). Similarly in all three species, the median parasite burden in pseudobranch was significantly higher than in gill or kidney (Additional file 1: Table S4). Burdens in gill and kidney differed significantly in chum salmon but not in Chinook salmon or pink salmon (Additional file 1: Table S4).


Parasite SSU rDNA sequences obtained from infected pink salmon (GenBank accession no. OP133363), Chinook salmon (OP133361) and chum salmon (OP133362) were 1525 base pairs (bp), 1549 bp and 1565 bp in length, respectively, and were identical to one another. The Pacific sequence differed from the available P. pseudobranchicola sequence (AY308481), obtained from an infection in Atlantic salmon in northern Norway in 2003, with a single G—A substitution (position 1420, 99.93% identity).


Histopathological changes were not observed in 13 pseudobranch samples which had tested negative for the infection. A range of histopathological lesion scores and ISH scores was observed among 28 samples from all three species with burdens ranging from 11.46 to 3410.98 c/ng DNA (Additional file 1: Table S1). Similar microscopic lesions were observed in infected Chinook salmon, chum salmon and pink salmon, the most mild of which included a diffuse interlamellar proliferation of fibrocyte-like cells between the basal or distal lamellae. An increase in the extent of organ involvement was associated with filament and lamellar degeneration and necrosis. Infiltration of the lesion with polymorphonuclear cells and lymphocytes was occasionally observed, as was the formation of focal granulomas. The typical lesion was a focal, granulomatous pseudobranchitis, the most extensive of which was observed in Chinook salmon. In Chinook salmon, pathology ranged from normal to extensive, and the three fish with the highest pathology scores occurred among the four highest ranked for burdens (Additional file 1: Table S1). Similarly, four of five Chinook salmon with the highest ISH scores occurred among the five highest ranked for burdens. In chum salmon, despite having the highest overall burdens, pathology scores were normal to moderate, and there was no obvious association with ISH score rankings. In pink salmon, three of the four highest ISH scores aligned with the highest burdens and there was no obvious correspondence between pathology and burden.

Conventional histological staining permitted visualisation of the parasite in the two Chinook salmon with the highest burden (Fig. 2), which were the only fish with visible myxospores (Fig. 3). Myxospores were membrane-bound, and earlier developmental stages occurred as multi-cell clusters. Mean dimensions of myxospores (n = 5) were 5.8 × 4.8 μm. Polar capsules were subspherical and 1.7 μm in diameter. Fresh material was not available. In these and the remaining fish for which histological analysis was conducted, P. pseudobranchicola was unambiguously observed by ISH. In most infections detected by ISH, relatively few morphologically indistinct stages were observed with an apparent tendency to be distally located within pseudobranch filaments. The ISH probe did not bind to P. minibicornis or P. kabatai.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola within and between pseudobranch lamellae in histological preparations from juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). A, B: H&E staining. C, D: In situ hybridisation. Scale bars all 10 μm

Fig. 3
figure 3

Histological preparations from Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) in British Columbia, Canada, showing myxospores of Parvicapsula spp. AC Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola in pseudobranch of juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from the Strait of Georgia. D P. kabatai in renal tubule of adult pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) from the Quinsam River. E Parvicapsula minibicornis in renal tubule of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) from the Fraser River. Gram-Twort stain. Scale bar is 5 μm


Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola was identified in Pacific salmon from Canadian and international waters of the northeast Pacific Ocean by demonstrating virtual identity between a SSU rDNA sequence from infections in chum salmon, pink salmon and Chinook salmon with that from an infected Atlantic salmon from northern Norway. The similarity between the Canadian and Norwegian sequences agrees with several earlier studies in which high intraspecific identities of SSU rDNA sequences were demonstrated among geographical isolates of other widespread myxozoan parasites [36,37,38], reflecting in part the relatively conserved region of the SSU rDNA targeted for amplification [39]. Large subunit (LSU) and internal transcribed spacer (ITS-1) rDNA sequences previously shown to be informative in resolving the phylogeography of Kudoa thyrsites, another cosmopolitan marine myxozoan parasite [37], may also be useful in characterising genetic heterogeneity among geographic isolates of P. pseudobranchicola. The present information, however, permitted unambiguous identification of the parasite in Pacific salmon. Although the myxospores observed here were superficially similar to their appearance in Norwegian cases, their relatively small mean length (5.8 μm versus 12.4 or 14.4 μm) [14, 15] may be related to immaturity, as indicated by their inclusion within the pseudoplasmodium membrane, in addition to artifactual changes associated with histological processing. In agreement with earlier indications of a broad host range in the northeast Pacific [21,22,23,24], P. pseudobranchicola was detected in nearly half of all juveniles examined belonging to four species of Pacific salmon. However, the parasite was most frequently detected in chum salmon and pink salmon. This broad host range is consistent with findings from Norway where the parasite has been reported in Atlantic salmon, sea trout, Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) and rainbow trout [17,18,19].

In Norway, screening of Atlantic salmon pseudobranch throughout a farm production cycle initiated by transfer of smolts to sea in autumn revealed 100% prevalence of P. pseudobranchicola by 21 dps, followed by an increase in histologically evident parasites between 35 and 49 dps and the presence of myxospores by 89 and 147 dps [20]. At the site under study, the parasite burden declined sharply after 147 dps and there was no increase during the second autumn at sea [20]. Other studies from Norway report similarly high prevalence in farmed Atlantic salmon and found that among salmon transferred to sea in spring, infections were detected in July and spores were visible by autumn [17,18,19]. The elevated infections observed in the summer and autumn in Norway were suggested to be caused by an elevated abundance of actinospores [20]. Therefore, an unexpected characteristic of P. pseudobranchicola infections in BC waters was the absence of infection in farmed Atlantic salmon despite the relatively high prevalence in wild Pacific salmon throughout the study area. Approximately 21% (n = 199) of the Atlantic salmon in the present study were sampled between 22 and 150 dps. Of these, the 84 salmon that were put to sea between May and October were most likely to have been at immediate risk of infection according to the Norwegian data. The absence of detectable infections in these 84 fish was therefore unlikely to have been because they were sampled prior to exposure or following resolution of the infection. In BC, farmed Atlantic salmon are sentinels for the presence of K. thyrsites actinospores in waters adjacent to Vancouver Island [40], suggesting they would also be reliable as sentinels for P. pseudobranchicola actinospores, which is supported by the earlier report of 8% prevalence in this species [26]. Farmed Chinook salmon also serve as actinospore sentinels, as reported here and earlier [26]. The absence of clinical parvicapsulosis in BC farmed salmon (Dr. L. Sitter, DFO-FHAIP, Personal Communication), similar to that reported in Norway [15] and in Washington State [12], is further evidence that the epidemiology of P. pseudobranchicola in Pacific waters is dissimilar to that in Norway. Specifically, our findings suggest that the epidemiological differences may in part be explained by patterns of actinospore distribution and abundance at or near salmon farms.

A hypothetical framework of parasite transmission may assist in understanding the patterns of P. pseudobranchicola infections in farmed and wild salmon in BC. This framework is informed by the distinct spatial and temporal patterns of two relatively well-described myxozoan parasites in the northeast Pacific: K. thyrsites and P. minibicornis in farmed Atlantic salmon and wild Pacific salmon, respectively. Furthermore, patterns of infection in fish hosts provide insights into the distributions of the invertebrate hosts and the infective actinospores [40]. Knowledge of the variation in the severity of K. thyrsites infections among production regions in the vicinity of Vancouver Island is well enough established that farms in these regions have predictably high or low impacts from the infection [41]. In addition, controlled exposure and seawater filtration studies indicate that infection prevalence and the concentration of water-borne K. thyrsites DNA is greatest in the summer and autumn [42, 43]. These patterns suggest a transmission scenario (TS-1) in which the actinospores occur in seawater adjacent to Vancouver Island with an abundance that varies seasonally and geographically. Alternatively, infections with P. minibicornis are acquired by juvenile and adult Pacific salmon and increase in prevalence and/or severity following salmon migration to the ocean or into the river to spawn [7, 8, 44]. These patterns are consistent with a transmission scenario (TS-2) in which actinospores are restricted to the estuary and/or lower reaches of some salmon natal rivers [13]. Pink salmon and chum salmon juveniles migrate to the ocean between late February and late April and may be exposed to P. pseudobranchicola under either TS-1 or TS-2 scenarios. However, our inability to detect the infection in a high proportion of wild salmon caught between May and July tends not to support a TS-2 scenario. Instead, a TS-1 scenario is favoured by the rare to sporadic occurrence of P. pseudobranchicola among farmed salmon, combined with the apparent acquisition of infections at sea among wild salmon. The wide geographic distribution of the infection among wild and farmed salmon in Norwegian waters [18,19,20] also supports a TS-1 scenario. We suggest that the limited impact of P. pseudobranchicola on farmed salmon in Pacific waters is due in part to differences in the identity, abundance or local distributions of the invertebrate host relative to Norwegian waters. Framing future research in the context of the TS-1 and TS-2 hypotheses will inform an improved understanding of the spatial and seasonal distributions and abundances of P. pseudobranchicola actinospores in coastal BC waters.

Infection with P. pseudobranchicola was inconsistently associated with histopathological lesions in the pseudobranch. The association was greatest in Chinook salmon, whereas in chum salmon with higher parasite burdens, the association was weak. In qPCR-uninfected Pacific salmon and in most specimens examined from infected salmon, normal pseudobranch histological morphology was observed, as described previously [12], suggesting that an infection threshold must be exceeded before visible tissue damage occurs. The data further suggest the threshold for parasite-inducted pathology is lower in Chinook salmon relative to chum salmon. While not ruling out a role of other pathogenic stimuli, the pseudobranchitis associated with P. pseudobranchicola infections in juvenile wild Pacific salmon was similar to earlier descriptions from farmed Atlantic salmon [15, 20] and from farmed coho salmon infected with Parvicapsula sp. [12]. Compartmentalisation of the pseudobranch into damaged and healthy zones in which filaments adjacent to affected areas remained visibly normal as previously reported [20] may indicate a non-uniform initial establishment of the infection, possibly by direct exposure to actinospores from seawater or from the blood-borne stages visualised earlier [20]. The preference of pseudobranch over kidney and gill as the site of infection in Pacific salmon was similar to that reported in Atlantic salmon [15, 20]; however, observations of gross pseudobranch or ocular lesions or of clinical manifestations of the infection were not collected in this study and it is premature to speculate about health consequences of the infections to Pacific salmon. Notable also was the rarity of intense infections which permitted the development of myxospores in the Pacific salmon, suggesting the infections were pre-patent at the time of the autumn surveys because of insufficient development time or thermal history [20]. Alternatively, the rarity of myxospores may indicate host incompatibility among Pacific salmon as suggested from a Norwegian study in which infections without myxospores were detected among rainbow trout farmed in netpens neighboring those with Atlantic salmon presenting with myxospores [19]. A host effect may also explain the involvement of pseudobranch during P. kabatai infections in farmed coho salmon [12] but not in pink salmon [3], although the possibility of mixed infections with P. kabatai and P. pseudobranchicola in the coho salmon cannot be ruled out.


In waters of the northeast Pacific Ocean, wild Pacific salmon became infected with P. pseudobranchicola in their first year at sea, and the prevalence in pink salmon and chum salmon was significantly greater in autumn compared with summer surveys. Myxospores were detected in two Chinook salmon with high parasite burdens. Pseudobranch was the preferred site of infection relative to gills or kidney and in the Pacific salmon, pathological changes in the pseudobranch were similar to those reported in farmed Atlantic salmon in Norway. Although inconsistently associated with the infection, a focal granulomatous pseudobranchitis was observed. Health consequences to Pacific salmon were not assessed. The parasite was detected in farmed Chinook salmon but not in farmed Atlantic salmon. To better understand this epidemiological discrepancy and the seasonal patterns of infection, two transmission scenarios were hypothesised to assist in the characterisation of actinospore distribution in BC waters. Further research should be undertaken to identify the invertebrate host and to describe the life cycle, including myxospore development and resolution of infection among species of Pacific salmon.

Availability of data and materials

Sequence data reported herein have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers OP133361, OP133362 and OP133363. Additional datasets will be made available upon reasonable request.


  1. Lom J, Dyková I. Myxozoan genera: definition and notes on taxonomy, life-cycle terminology and pathogenic species. Folia Parasitol. 2006;53:1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Køie M. Parvicapsula spinachiae n. sp. (Myxozoa, Parvicapsulidae) in Spinachia spinachia (L.) (Teleostei, Gasterosteidae) from Denmark. Parasitol Res. 2003;90:445–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones S, Prosperi-Porta G, Dawe S. A new parvicapsulid (Myxosporea) species in adult pink salmon, Oncorhynchus gorbuscha, from the quinsam river, British Columbia. Canada J Parasitol. 2006;92:1313–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saksida SM, Marty GD, Jones SRM, Manchester HA, Diamond CL, Bidulka J, et al. Parasites and hepatic lesions among pink salmon, Oncorhynchus gorbuscha (Walbaum), during early seawater residence. J Fish Dis. 2012;35:137–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kent ML, Whitaker DJ, Dawe SC. Parvicapsula minibicornis n. sp. (Myxozoa, Myxosporea) from the kidney of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) from British Columbia Canada. J Parasitol. 1997;83:1153–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Raverty S, Kieser D, Bagshaw J, St-Hilaire S. Renal infestation with Parvicapsula minibicornis in wild sockeye salmon from the Harrison and adams rivers in British Columbia. Can Vet J. 2000;41:317–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. St-Hilaire S, Boichuk M, BarnesD Higgins M, Devlin R, Withler R, Khattra J, et al. Epizootiology of Parvicapsula minibicornis in fraser river sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka (Walbaum). J Fish Dis. 2002;25:107–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones SRM, Prosperi-Porta G, Dawe SM, Barnes D. The distribution, prevalence and severity of Parvicapsula minibicornis infections among anadromous salmonids in the fraser river, British Columbia. Canada Dis Aquat Org. 2003;54:49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Foott J, Harmon R, Stone R. Effect of water temperature on non-specific immune function and ceratomyxosis in juvenile chinook salmon and steelhead from the klamath river. Calif Fish Game. 2004;90:71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones S, Prosperi-Porta G, Dawe S, Taylor K, Goh B. Parvicapsula minibicornis in anadromous sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) and Coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch) salmon from tributaries of the columbia river. J Parasitol. 2004;90:882–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Atkinson SD, Jones SR, Adlard RD, Bartholomew JL. Geographical and host distribution patterns of Parvicapsula minibicornis (Myxozoa) small subunit ribosomal RNA genetic types. Parasitology. 2011;138:969–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yasutake WT, Elliot DG. Epizootiology and histopathology of Parvicapsula sp. in coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch. Dis Aquat Org. 2003;56:215–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Atkinson SD, Bartholomew JL, Rouse GW. The invertebrate host of salmonid fish parasites Ceratonova shasta and Parvicapsula minibicornis (Cnidaria: Myxozoa), is a novel fabriciid annelid, Manayunkia occidentalis sp. nov. (Sabellida: Fabriciidae). Zootaxa. 2020;4751:310–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Karlsbakk E, Sæther PA, Høstlund C, Fjellsøy KR, Nylund A. Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola n. sp. (Myxozoa), a myxosporidian infecting the pseudobranch of cultured Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Norway. Bull Eur Assoc Fish Pathol. 2002;22:381–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sterud E, Simolin P, Kvellestad A. Infection by Parvicapsula sp. (Myxozoa) is associated with mortality in sea-caged Atlantic salmon Salmo salar in northern Norway. Dis Aquat Org. 2003;54:259–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones SRM, Smith PA. Sporadic Emerging Disease and Disorders. In: Woo PTK, Bruno DW, editors. Diseases and Disorders of Finfish in Cage Culture. 2nd ed. UK: CABI; 2014. p. 287–312.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Hansen H, Poppe TT, Markussen T, Karlsbakk E. Seatrout (Salmo trutta) is a natural host for Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola (Myxozoa, Myxosporea), an important pathogen of farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:218.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Jørgensen A, Nylund A, Nikolaisen V, Alexandersen S, Karlsbakk E. Real-time PCR detection of Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola (Myxozoa: Myxosporea) in wild salmonids in Norway. J Fish Dis. 2011;34:365–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nylund A, Karlsbakk E, Sæther PA, Koren C, Larsen T, Nielsen BD, et al. Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola (Myxosporea) in farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar: tissue distribution, diagnosis and phylogeny. Dis Aquat Org. 2005;63:197–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nylund A, Hansen H, Brevik ØJ, Hustoft H, Markussen T, Plarre H, et al. Infection dynamics and tissue tropism of Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola (Myxozoa: Myxosporea) in farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller KM, Teffer A, Tucker S, Li S, Schulze AD, Trudel M, et al. Infectious disease, shifting climates, and opportunistic predators: cumulative factors potentially impacting wild salmon declines. Evol Appl. 2014;7:812–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bass AL, Hinch SG, Teffer AK, Patterson DA, Miller KM. A survey of microparasites present in adult migrating Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in south-western British Columbia determined by high-throughput quantitative polymerase chain reaction. J Fish Dis. 2017;40:453–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thakur KK, Vanderstichel R, Kaukinen K, Nekouei O, Laurin E, Miller KM. Infectious agent detections in archived Sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) samples from British Columbia, Canada (1985–94). J Fish Dis. 2019;42:533–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nekouei O, Vanderstichel R, Kaukinen KH, Thakur K, Ming T, Patterson DA, et al. Comparison of infectious agents detected from hatchery and wild juvenile Coho salmon in British Columbia, 2008–2018. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0221956.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bass AL, Bateman AW, Connors BM, Staton BA, Rondeau EB, Mordecai GJ, et al. Identification of infectious agents in early marine Chinook and coho salmon associated with cohort survival. FACETS. 2022;7:742–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Laurin E, Jaramillo D, Vanderstichel R, Ferguson H, Kaukinen KH, Schulze AD, et al. Histopathological and novel high-throughput molecular monitoring data from farmed salmon (Salmo salar and Oncorhynchus spp.) in British Columbia, Canada, from 2011–2013. Aquaculture. 2019;499:220–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Deeg CM, Kanzeparova AN, Somov AA, Esenkulova S, Di Cicco E, Kaukinen KH, et al. Way out there: pathogens, health, and condition of overwintering salmon in the gulf of alaska. FACETS. 2022;7:247–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kent ML, Khattra J, Hedrick RP, Devlin RH. Tetracapsula renicola n. sp. (Myxozoa: Saccosporidae); the PKX myxozoan—the cause of proliferative kidney disease of salmonid fishes. J Parasitol. 2000;86:103–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Andree KB, MacConnell E, Hedrick RP. A nested polymerase chain reaction for the detection of genomic DNA of Myxobolus cerebralis in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Dis Aquat Org. 1998;34:145–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lin D, Hanson L, Pote LM. Small subunit ribosomal RNA sequence of Henneguya exilis (Class Myxosporea) identifies the actinosporean stage from an oligochaete host. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1999;46:66–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hallett SL, Diamant A. Ultrastructure and small-subunit ribosomal DNA sequence of Henneguya lesteri n sp (Myxosporea), a parasite of sand whiting Sillago analis (Sillaginidae) from the coast of queensland. Dis Aquat Org. 2001;46:197–212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Markussen T, Agusti C, Karlsbakk E, Nylund A, Brevik Ø, Hansen H. Detection of the myxosporean parasite Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) using in situ hybridization (ISH). Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Snow M, McKay P, Matejusova I. Development of a widely applicable positive control strategy to support detection of infectious salmon anaemia virus (ISAV) using taqman real-time PCR. J Fish Dis. 2009;32:151–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jones SRM, Long A, MacWilliams C, Polinski M, Garver K. Factors associated with severity of naturally occurring piscirickettsiosis in netpen- and tank-reared juvenile Atlantic salmon at a research aquarium in western Canada. J Fish Dis. 2020;43:49–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Meyer GR, Bower SM, Carnegie RB. Sensitivity of a digoxigenin-labelled DNA probe in detecting Mikrocytos mackini, causative agent of Denman Island disease (mikrocytosis), in oysters. J Invert Pathol. 2005;88:89–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Fiala I. The phylogeny of Myxosporea (Myxozoa) based on small subunit ribosomal RNA gene analysis. Int J Parasitol. 2006;36:1521–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Whipps CM, Kent ML. Phylogeography of the cosmopolitan marine parasite Kudoa thyrsites (Myxozoa: Myxosporea). J Euk Microbiol. 2006;53:364–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Urawa S, Freeman MA, Johnson SC, Jones SRM, Yokoyama H. Geographical variation in spore morphology, gene sequence and host susceptibility of Myxobolus arcticus (Myxozoa) infecting salmonid nerve tissues. Dis Aquatic Org. 2011;96:229–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Andree KB, El-Matbouli M, Hoffman RW, Hedrick RP. Comparison of 18S and ITS-1 rDNA sequences of selected geographic isolates of Myxobolus cerebralis. Int J Parasitol. 1999;29:771–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Giulietti L, Karlsbakk E, Cipriani P, Bao M, Storesund JE, Marathe NP, et al. Long-term investigation of the “soft flesh” condition in northeast Atlantic mackerel induced by the myxosporean parasite Kudoa thyrsites (Cnidaria, Myxozoa): temporal trends and new molecular epidemiological observations. Fish Res. 2022;248:106221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Marshall WL, Sitja-Bobadilla A, Brown HM, MacWilliam T, Richmond Z, Lamson H, et al. Long-term epidemiological survey of Kudoa thyrsites (Myxozoa) in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) from commercial aquaculture farms. J Fish Dis. 2016;39:929–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Moran JDW, Kent ML. Kudoa thyrsites (Myxozoa: Myxosporea) infections in pen-reared Atlantic salmon in the northeast Pacific Ocean with a survey of potential nonsalmonid reservoir hosts. J Aquat Anim Health. 1999;11:101–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Jones SRM, Cho S, Nguyen J, Mahony A. Acquired resistance to Kudoa thyrsites in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar following recovery from a primary infection with the parasite. Aquaculture. 2016;451:457–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mahony AM, Johnson SC, Neville CM, Thiess ME, Jones SRM. Myxobolus arcticus and Parvicapsula minibicornis infections in sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) following migration to the ocean in British Columbia. Canada Dis Aquat Org. 2017;126:89–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to Chrys Neville, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) for providing access to the samples collected from 2008 to 2015 and for the samples collected in the Gulf of Alaska. Thanks to Dr. L. Sitter for providing access to samples from DFO’s FHAI Program. We acknowledge the assistance of the crews of the fishing vessels Georgia Girl, Viking Storm, Ocean Venture, Nordic Pearl, Sea Crest, Pacific Legacy, CCGS Neocaligus, CCGS W. E. Ricker and CCGS Sir John Franklin. Drs. Amy Long and Derek Price, DFO, provided valuable comments on an earlier draft.


This research was funded through Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s Program for Aquaculture Regulatory Research (grant FHTT-2019-P-03).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



SJ conceived and designed the study, interpreted the histology and wrote the manuscript. JL collected and processed the samples, conducted the in situ hybridisation assays, assembled data into an Excel spreadsheet and edited the manuscript. AG conducted the PCR and qPCR analyses, facilitated the sequencing and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon R. M. Jones.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

This study did not involve ethical approval or patient informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Weight of wild Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.). Table S2. Histopathological scores and in situ hybridisation by ranked qPCR parasite burdens. Table S3. Seasonal prevalence of Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola in wild salmon by regions. Table S4. Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola in matched tissues.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jones, S.R.M., Low, J.C. & Goodall, A. Parvicapsula pseudobranchicola in the northeast Pacific Ocean is rare in farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar despite widespread occurrence and pathology in wild Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp.. Parasites Vectors 16, 138 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: