Skip to main content
Download PDF

Experimental feeding of Sergentomyia minuta on reptiles and mammals: comparison with Phlebotomus papatasi

Parasites & Vectors volume 16, Article number: 126 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Sergentomyia minuta (Diptera: Phlebotominae) is an abundant sand fly species in the Mediterranean basin and a proven vector of reptile parasite Leishmania (Sauroleishmania) tarentolae. Although it feeds preferentially on reptiles, blood meal analyses and detection of Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum DNA in wild-caught S. minuta suggest that occasional feeding may occur on mammals, including humans. Therefore, it is currently suspected as a potential vector of human pathogens.

Methods

A recently established S. minuta colony was allowed to feed on three reptile species (i.e. lizard Podarcis siculus and geckos Tarentola mauritanica and Hemidactylus turcicus) and three mammal species (i.e. mouse, rabbit and human). Sand fly mortality and fecundity were studied in blood-fed females, and the results were compared with Phlebotomus papatasi, vector of Leishmania (L.) major. Blood meal volumes were measured by haemoglobinometry.

Results

Sergentomyia minuta fed readily on three reptile species tested, neglected the mouse and the rabbit but took a blood meal on human. However, the percentage of females engorged on human volunteer was low in cage (3%) and feeding on human blood resulted in extended defecation times, higher post-feeding mortality and lower fecundity. The average volumes of blood ingested by females fed on human and gecko were 0.97 µl and 1.02 µl, respectively. Phlebotomus papatasi females readily fed on mouse, rabbit and human volunteer; a lower percentage of females (23%) took blood meal on the T. mauritanica gecko; reptilian blood increased mortality post-feeding but did not affect P. papatasi fecundity.

Conclusions

Anthropophilic behaviour of S. minuta was experimentally demonstrated; although sand fly females prefer reptiles as hosts, they were attracted to the human volunteer and took a relatively high volume of blood. Their feeding times were longer than in sand fly species regularly feeding on mammals and their physiological parameters suggest that S. minuta is not adapted well for digestion of mammalian blood. Nevertheless, the ability to bite humans highlights the necessity of further studies on S. minuta vector competence to elucidate its potential role in circulation of Leishmania and phleboviruses pathogenic to humans.

Graphical abstract

Background

Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) are hematophagous insects of major medical and veterinary importance. Among more than 900 described sand fly species, approximately 100 are proven or suspected vectors of Leishmania protozoa, bacteria (Bartonella spp.) and sand fly-borne viruses [1]. In the Old World, Phlebotomus species act as major vectors of human diseases, while Sergentomyia species are mainly herpetophilic and have long been associated only with the reptilian parasites of subgenus Sauroleishmania [2]. Although some Sergentomyia species are currently suspected vectors of Leishmania pathogenic to humans [3], their capability to transmit human pathogens is yet to be revealed, as solid field and laboratory evidence is still lacking.

Sergentomyia minuta is one of the most abundant sand fly species in Mediterranean basin and the main vector of Leishmania (Sauroleishmania) tarentolae, a non-pathogenic parasite of geckos [4, 5]. Although S. minuta feeds preferentially on reptiles, blood meal analyses indicate it may occasionally feed on mammals, including humans [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Moreover, DNA of two mammalian parasites, Leishmania (Leishmania) major and L. (L.) infantum has been detected in S. minuta repeatedly [9, 12,13,14,15,16,17]. RNA of Toscana phlebovirus (TOSV), a causative agent of sporadic outbreaks of acute human encephalitis and meningoencephalitis in Mediterranean countries, was detected in wild-caught females of S. minuta in France [18]. Although molecular detection alone is not sufficient evidence to incriminate a sand fly as vector, all these findings raised questions about the spectrum of S. minuta hosts and its role in the transmission cycle of phleboviruses and Leishmania infecting humans and other mammals.

The aim of this study was to investigate the feeding behaviour of S. minuta in different reptilian and mammalian hosts. The effect of various blood sources on S. minuta mortality and fecundity was also studied. The results were compared with Phlebotomus papatasi, a species widespread in Europe, Africa and Asia and well known as human-biting pest [19].

Methods

Sand flies

The colonies of Sergentomyia minuta (originating from Portugal) and Phlebotomus papatasi (originating from Turkey) were established at the Department of Parasitology, Charles University, in 2019 and 2005, respectively. Sergentomyia minuta colony was maintained feeding on leopard geckos (Eublepharis macularius), while P. papatasi was routinely maintained on BALB/c mice. During the experiments, sand flies were kept in the insectaries of the Department of Parasitology, Charles University, and the Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari. Colonies were maintained at 24–26 °C, 55–70% humidity, with 14 h light/10 h dark photoperiod, and offered 50% sucrose ad libitum, as described previously [20].

Mammals and reptiles

Three species of mammals were tested, including a human volunteer (co-author Volfova), mice and rabbits. BALB/c mice originating from AnLab s.r.o. (Harlan Laboratories, USA) were maintained in T3 breeding containers (Velaz) equipped with bedding (German Horse Span, Pferde a.s.) and breeding material (Woodwool) and provided with a standard feed mixture (ST-1, Velaz) and water ad libitum, with a 12 h light/12 h dark photoperiod, at 22–25 °C and 40–60% humidity. NZW rabbits (originating from AnLab s.r.o.) were kept in breeding boxes (Velaz) equipped according to guidelines and legislation, provided with a standard feeding mixture for rabbits (Biopharm), hay (Krmne smesi Kvidera) and water ad libitum.

Three reptile species were offered as hosts to test sand fly feeding, with two species of geckos (Moorish gecko Tarentola mauritanica; Mediterranean house gecko Hemidactylus turcicus) and a lacertid lizard (Italian wall lizard Podarcis siculus) being compared. Animals were captured and maintained at the Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, as part of a study on Leishmania spp. in Mediterranean reptiles [21].

Sergentomyia minuta feeding on a gecko and a human: assessment of blood meal volumes and sand fly fecundity

During the establishment of the S. minuta colony, several potential hosts for its blood-feeding were tested. Preliminary experiments revealed that, in addition to the geckos, S. minuta females also feed on human; therefore, its anthropophilic behaviour was further investigated. Routine maintenance of the S. minuta colony was done on leopard gecko (E. macularius), which is used in our faculty as a laboratory animal. However, its natural area of distribution differs from that of S. minuta; therefore, in feeding preferences experiments, we replaced it with three Mediterranean reptiles.

To compare blood meal volumes and fecundity on reptile versus mammalian blood, S. minuta females (5 days old) were fed either on a male leopard gecko (E. macularius) or on a forearm of the human volunteer. In human, a feeding chamber was used to increase numbers of S. minuta fully fed by human blood. The type of feeding chamber was described and depicted previously [22]. Briefly, 20 females were transferred into a plastic tube (diameter 3 cm) covered with fine gauze and placed onto an elbow area of a human arm for 2 h. The same relatively long exposure time (2 h) was used in gecko to allow the females to feed to repletion. Two independent trials were performed.

Haemoglobinometry was used to measure the blood meal volumes taken by individual S. minuta females. During blood-feeding, sand flies concentrate ingested proteins because of prediuresis; thus, gravimetry might lead to underestimated results. Haemoglobinometry is independent of diuresis and provides more precise estimation of the ingested blood meal volume [23, 24]. For haemoglobin assay, individual guts without Malpighian tubules were dissected 1 h post-blood meal (PBM) and transferred into microtubes with 500 μl of distilled water in batches of ten guts per sample. The samples were stored at − 70 °C until use. After thawing the samples were thoroughly homogenized and then analysed using Haemoglobin Assay Kit (MAK115, Sigma-Aldrich) following the manufacturer’s instruction. Afterwards, 50 μl of homogenate was loaded per well in triplications. The resulting haemoglobin content per gut was compared to the haemoglobin concentration measured in the host blood (same gecko and human individuals as used for experimental feeding).

The second group of females, fully fed on either gecko or human, was maintained in cages under standard conditions until defecation and dissected in buffered saline, and mature oocytes were counted under a Leica M205 FA stereomicroscope. The experiment was repeated twice.

Sergentomyia minuta and Phlebotomus papatasi feeding on reptiles and mammals: comparison of mortality and fecundity

In experiments with reptiles, sand fly females (i.e. n = 50, 5–7 days old) were separated into nylon cloth cages and left there for acclimatisation for 20 min. A small number of sand fly males (< 10) was used in each group. Reptiles were placed individually into cages, and sand flies were allowed to feed in darkness, at 23–26 °C, for 2 h. In mammalian experiments the methodology was modified in the following way: BALB/c mouse anaesthetized with ketamine/xylazine (62.5 mg/kg and 25 mg/kg, respectively), mechanically immobilized NZW rabbit and forearm of the human volunteer were positioned in the cages, and sand flies were allowed to feed on the hosts for 1 h (because of the use of anaesthesia in mice).

Approximately 2 h after the hosts were removed from the cages, the blood-fed females were separated into new cages, kept under standard conditions as described above, and their post-blood meal mortality was monitored until defecation of blood meal remains (day 4 PBM in P. papatasi and day 6 PBM in S. minuta). The surviving sand fly females were then anaesthetized on ice and dissected in saline solution. The number of mature oocytes from 10 sand fly females per group was counted under the stereomicroscope, and the experiment was repeated twice.

Statistical analysis

Differences in fecundity (oocytes numbers) of sand flies engorged on different hosts were tested by one-way ANOVA and multiple comparison of means using LSD post hoc test. Mortality and feeding were compared using Fisher’s exact or Pearson’s Chi-square test. All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 23.

Results

Life cycle parameters of Sergentomyia minuta colony

The whole development cycle of S. minuta in colony maintained on leopard geckos (E. macularius) at 26 °C was relatively fast; females laid first eggs 4–8 days post-blood meal (PBM) and first-instar larvae hatched 10–14 days PBM (Table 1). Development of four larval instars took about 2 weeks; first pupae were observed on days 23–28 PBM. Pupal period lasts for about 6 days and first adults emerged 4–5 weeks PBM. These life cycle parameters did not change during the maintenance of the colony, as they were almost the same in generations 1–4 and 23–25 (Table 1).

Table 1 Life cycle parameters of Sergentomyia minuta colony
Full size table

The blood meal volumes of Sergentomyia minuta feeding on a gecko and a human

The prolonged time of exposure (2 h), together with the application of the feeding chamber, resulted in a relatively high feeding rate (60%) on human (24 out of 40 females), which allowed the study of blood meal volumes and fecundity of females. The feeding rate on leopard gecko in nylon cloth cage was > 70%, similar to the routine feeding on this gecko species during regular colony maintenance (Volfova, personal communication).

No visible skin reaction was observed in geckos, even after repeated exposure to S. minuta bites. The blood meal volumes were measured in two samples of 10 fully engorged S. minuta females fed on gecko and two samples of 10 fully engorged females fed on human. Volumes ingested by S. minuta fed on human arm and gecko were similar and ranged around 1 µl (0.97 ± 0.03 µl/female and 1.02 ± 0.05 µl/female, respectively). As the result of such relatively big blood meals, the fully fed females were scarcely able to fly and usually only crawled out of the host.

Considerable differences were, however, found in the feeding process; on the gecko, females started to feed within 5 min and the mean feeding time to repletion was 45 min. On the other hand, feeding on human was delayed; S. minuta females started to feed in an interval from 5 to > 60 min after beginning of exposure. Unlike feeding on the gecko, the females fed on the human often interrupted feeding and needed several attempts to full engorgement.

All females fed on the gecko defecated by day 4 PBM. In contrast, defecation of females fed on the human was delayed for 2 days (i.e. by day 6 PBM). Post-feeding mortality was also higher in the females fed on the human host than in those fed on the reptile (25% versus 15%).

Following defecation, ovaria were dissected, and mature oocytes were counted. All examined females (fed on either the reptile or the human host) developed mature oocytes (Fig. 1). Nevertheless, the oocyte numbers differed substantially between the experimental groups; females fed on reptile developed significantly higher numbers (average 73, range 45–108, median 76) than those fed on human (average 26, range 17–40, median 22). Interestingly, ascogregarine infection contaminating the colony was found markedly elevated in the sand fly females fed on human blood (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Dissected ovaria of Sergentomyia minuta females fed on gecko (A) and human (B). The number of developing oocytes was high in females fed on reptile; gregarine gamonts (g) were frequently found in the females fed on human

Full size image

Mortality and fecundity of Sergentomyia minuta and Phlebotomus papatasi feeding on mammals

Sergentomyia minuta females were attracted to the hand and forearm of the human volunteer placed in a nylon cloth cage several minutes after exposure. Although numerous sand fly attempts of bite were recorded (Fig. 2A), only a negligible number of females (3%) engorged on the human volunteer under these conditions (Table 2, Fig. 3). Females were feeding mostly on parts with softer skin, typically on the back of the hand, on the elbow or between the fingers. Contrarily, no S. minuta females fed on mouse or rabbit, and these hosts were completely ignored by this sand fly species (Table 2, Fig. 3). Sergentomyia minuta bites did not cause any visible effects on naive individual (human); however, repeated exposure resulted in pronounced skin hypersensitivity with maximum reaction 24–72 h post-feeding (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Skin hypersensitivity reaction to Sergentomyia minuta bites in human volunteer repeatedly exposed to this sand fly species (reaction 24 h post-exposure) (A) S. minuta females feeding on Tarentola mauritanica gecko (B)

Full size image
Table 2 Feeding of Sergentomyia minuta and Phlebotomus papatasi on mammals and reptiles: feeding rate and the effect on sand fly mortality and fecundity
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Feeding rate of Sergentomyia minuta and Phlebotomus papatasi on different mammals and reptiles. MIN Sergentomyia minuta, PAP Phlebotomus papatasi, MOU BALB/c mouse, RAB NZW rabbit, HUM human volunteer, TAR Tarentola mauritanica, HEM Hemidactylus turcicus, POD Podarcis siculus

Full size image

The experiment confirmed that human blood had a negative effect on the digestion, mortality and fecundity of S. minuta. Females displayed a prolonged defecation period (i.e. 5–6 days post-blood feeding), their mortality post-feeding was increased to 30%, and number of developed oocytes (15,5 in average) was significantly lower compared to blood-feeding on reptilian hosts (P < 0.001, F = 11.309; Table 2; Additional file 1).

Phlebotomus papatasi females readily fed on mouse, rabbit and human volunteer with relatively high feeding rates (68, 72 and 89%, respectively; Fig. 3). The feeding process was considerably faster compared to S. minuta females. The blood meal source did not affect the mean number of P. papatasi mature oocytes (P = 0.914, F = 0.012); 56 and 55 oocytes were produced on average after feeding on mammals (mean of all three species tested) and T. mauritanica gecko, respectively (Table 2).

Mortality and fecundity of Sergentomyia minuta and Phlebotomus papatasi feeding on reptiles

Sergentomyia minuta readily fed on all three reptile species tested, with a slight preference of geckos over the lizard (Table 2, Fig. 2B; P < 0.001, Chi-square = 14.646, df = 2). This may be due to differences in host activity: both gecko species were relatively calm throughout the experiment, whereas the lizard was more active, and thus sand flies were more disturbed while feeding. Usually, reptiles did not show any defensive behaviour and only sporadic scratching was observed when many sand fly females were feeding at the same time. Sand fly females were attracted to reptilian hosts almost immediately after the exposure, but their feeding behaviour varied: some started to feed within a few minutes while the others after dozens of minutes or even more than 1 h. Post-blood meal mortality of S. minuta was low (6–14%) and fecundity was relatively high (42–64 oocytes in average) (Table 2).

Phlebotomus papatasi females were regularly attracted to all reptilian hosts but only a small number initiated blood-feeding, as they were more easily distracted by host activity compared to S. minuta females. Of three reptile species tested, P. papatasi females took blood only on T. mauritanica gecko (feeding rate 23%), which was the calmest reptile tested.

Although reptilian blood increased P. papatasi mortality (P = 0.033), it did not have a significant effect on sand fly fecundity (P = 0.914, F = 0.012); females fed on T. mauritanica gecko were able to develop oocytes in relatively high numbers (average 55.4). These numbers are fully comparable to S. minuta oocyte numbers after feeding on the same host (average 64.3) or to P. papatasi oocyte numbers after feeding on mammalian hosts (average 50.4–59.7) (Table 2).

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated experimentally that S. minuta had an anthropophilic behaviour, being attracted to the human volunteer. Indeed, it is generally accepted that sand flies of the genus Phlebotomus are mostly mammalophilic and transmit Leishmania pathogenic to humans, while species of the genus Sergentomyia are referred as herpetophilic, being proven vectors of reptilian leishmaniasis [2]. However, some members of both genera have a broader host spectrum and thus availability of the hosts is an important factor to consider. For example, an extensive study in Paloich Area in the Sudan demonstrated that several Sergentomyia and Phlebotomus sand flies feed on both mammals and/or reptiles [25]. From laboratory experiments it is known that Sergentomyia schwetzi readily feeds on geckos but can feed and thrive also on mammals for many generations [26, 27]. Such an opportunistic behaviour may have important consequences, potentially opening new epidemiological scenarios for the transmission of vectored pathogens.

Feeding behaviour of S. minuta differed from that of P. papatasi and all other sand fly species tested so far. On both types of hosts (leopard gecko and human) the relatively small-sized S. minuta females were able to ingest the biggest volume of blood meal compared to other sand flies studied to date [24, 28]. In addition, the feeding was markedly prolonged when observed in other sand fly species, including S. schwetzi [23, 29, 30], which readily feeds on various mammals [26, 27]. This behaviour may reflect the adaptation of S. minuta to feeding on reptiles. In mosquitoes, similar long feeding time up to 40 min has been observed in Culex territans mosquitoes, which also primarily feed on cold-blooded vertebrates [31]. Due to the prolonged feeding time, S. minuta females might regulate and concentrate the imbibed large volume of a blood meal in a gut via prediuresis and thus supposedly compensate significantly lower haemoglobin content in reptilian erythrocytes.

Phlebotomus papatasi is well known for its aggressive behaviour in biting humans [19] and is a proven vector of L. (L.) major and viruses pathogenic to humans [1]. It is considered an opportunistic species, feeding on a variety of hosts, including mammals, birds and reptiles [25, 32,33,34]. Recently, P. papatasi was shown to be susceptible to L. (S.) tarentolae under laboratory conditions [35] and the demonstration of its ability to feed on T. mauritanica geckos, further supports the hypothesis of its involvement in Sauroleishmania transmission as a secondary vector [35, 36].

The colony of S. minuta thrives on leopard geckos (E. macularius); at standard temperature 26 °C the development of all life cycle stages was relatively fast. Comparison to other colonies maintained at the Department of Parasitology, Charles University, showed that S. minuta has the shortest generation time (i.e. 7–8 weeks). Accordingly, the larval period took approximately 2 weeks, which is about 1 week shorter than in other sand flies maintained in the same conditions [20]. In contrast to humans, no skin reactions were observed in geckos after repeated S. minuta bites.

Herpetophillic behaviour of S. minuta demonstrated in the experiments overlaps results of previous reports from the field [10, 11, 17]. Among three reptile species tested, S. minuta readily fed on geckos but was also able to feed on P. siculus lizards, from which L. (S.) tarentolae DNA was recently isolated [16]. This Sauroleishmania species has so far been described in three species of geckos, namely Tarentola mauritanica, T. annularis and Mediodactylus kotschyi [5]. The ability of S. minuta to feed on P. siculus highlights the possibility that this common lizard is involved in circulation of L. (S.) tarentolae in Italy.

Even more interesting is, however, the experimental confirmation that S. minuta occasionally bites mammals, particularly humans. Although S. minuta prefers reptiles as a blood meal source, females were attracted to the forearm of the human volunteer placed in the nylon cloth cage and took a blood meal. These findings correspond to the results of field surveys showing this sand fly species occasionally feeds on human blood [6,7,8,9,10,11]. In S. minuta, humans were the most frequently detected hosts apart from reptiles in different catching sites [6, 8,9,10,11]. However, it was also reported that this species feeds to a lesser extent on a relatively wide range of mammalian hosts, including large ungulates, dogs and rabbits [9]. Our experiments showed that S. minuta took a blood meal on human volunteer but completely refused to feed on a rabbit or a mouse.

If allowed to feed ad libitum, S. minuta females were able to acquire almost the same volume of blood meal on the human as on the reptile host (approximately 1 µl). Nevertheless, the digestion of human blood was prolonged, post-feeding mortality was increased, while fecundity was decreased. Similar changes of physiological parameters were observed during an unsuccessful attempt to keep a S. minuta colony by feeding on humans: females had high mortality, low fecundity and the colony died out after two generations (Volfova and Volf, unpublished). All these results suggest that S. minuta is not adapted to feeding on mammals and cannot digest human blood properly. Consequently, feeding on humans is more likely an opportunistic behaviour of this sand fly species, which is in striking contrast to S. schwetzi where a lineage feeding exclusively on mice was successfully established [27], and females readily feed on humans (Volfova and Volf, unpublished).

Potential involvement of Sergentomyia as vectors of human pathogenic Leishmania spp. was mentioned repeatedly [3] but reliable evidence is still lacking and all Leishmania parasites isolated from S. minuta so far were typed as L. (S.) tarentolae [5]. Interestingly, this reptilian parasite was recently also detected in humans [11, 37] and dogs [16], and thus its pathogenic potential for mammals is currently unclear [5]. Demonstration of S. minuta feeding on humans may therefore explain how L. (S.) tarentolae was transmitted from geckos to humans and dogs.

Laboratory experiments are crucial for vector identification. Even though promastigotes were found and L. (L.) infantum DNA was detected in S. schwetzi [38], it was proved experimentally that this sand fly is refractory to mammal-infecting Leishmania spp. [39]. Early phase of Leishmania infection in sand flies is a non-specific process accompanied by rapid multiplication of promastigotes in the ingested blood meal; then, defecation of blood meal remnants represents the crucial barrier in unnatural parasite-vector pairs [40]. Leishmania (L.) infantum promastigotes were able to develop early-stage infections even in biting midges Culicoides nubeculosus, but they were, similarly to S. schwetzi, lost during defecation, although Leishmania DNA was detectable up to 7 days post-infection [41].

Unfortunately, the experiments with S. minuta are limited by the fact that females refused to feed through membranes. All attempts to perform experimental infections with this species failed, although various feeding conditions were tested repeatedly; these include the use of different blood sources (i.e. sheep, rabbit and chicken blood), membranes (i.e. chick skin, gecko skin, a membrane from pig intestine) and changes of temperature and humidity in the experimental box. Therefore, the field work accompanied by direct observation on natural promastigote infection (together with parasite isolation and its typing) remains the best way to prove the involvement of S. minuta in circulation of L. (L.) infantum and other species pathogenic to mammals.

Conclusions

Experimental data on the feeding behaviour of S. minuta were herein assessed for the first time. We demonstrated that S. minuta females readily took a blood meal on geckos and lizards and that the feeding times of S. minuta were significantly longer than those typical for sand fly species regularly feeding on mammals. Interestingly, despite the relatively small size of this sand fly species, the volume of ingested blood was higher than in other sand fly species tested so far. Sergentomyia minuta females refused to feed on mice and rabbits but were able to bite a human volunteer, causing pronounced skin hypersensitivity reaction in the volunteer repeatedly exposed. Digestion of human blood was prolonged, post-feeding mortality was high, and fecundity was reduced. All these findings suggest that S. minuta is not well adapted to feeding on humans and digesting human blood. However, the ability of S. minuta to bite humans raises questions about its potential role in circulation of various Leishmania parasites and phleboviruses.

Availability of data and materials

All the data are included within the article and its additional files.

Abbreviations

PBM:

Post-blood meal

TOSV:

Toscana phlebovirus

References

  1. Maroli M, Feliciangeli MD, Bichaud L, Charrel RN, Gradoni L. Phlebotomine sandflies and the spreading of leishmaniases and other diseases of public health concern. Med Vet Entomol. 2013;27:123–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Killick-Kendrick R, Lainson R, Rioux JA, Saf’janova VM. The taxonomy of Leishmania-like parasites of reptiles. In: Rioux JA, editor. Leishmania: Taxonomie et phylogenèse. Application Éco-epidemiologiques (Colloque International du CNRS/INSERM, 1984), MEE, Montpellier; 1986. p. 143–8.

  3. Maia C, Depaquit J. Can Sergentomyia (Diptera, Psychodidae) play a role in the transmission of mammal-infecting Leishmania?. Parasit Vectors. 2016;23:55. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2016062.

  4. Klatt S, Simpson L, Maslov DA, Konthur Z. Leishmania tarentolae: Taxonomic classification and its application as a promising biotechnological expression host. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007424.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mendoza-Roldan JA, Votypka J, Bandi C, Epis S, Modry D, Ticha L, et al. Leishmania tarentolae: a new frontier in the epidemiology and control of the leishmaniases. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022;69:e1326-1337.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Maia C, Parreira R, Cristóvão JM, Freitas FB, Afonso MO, Campino L. Molecular detection of Leishmania DNA and identification of blood meals in wild caught phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) from southern Portugal. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bravo-Barriga D, Parreira R, Maia C, Afonso MO, Frontera E, Campino L, et al. First molecular detection of Leishmania tarentolae-like DNA in Sergentomyia minuta in Spain. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:1339–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bennai K, Tahir D, Lafri I, Bendjaballah-Laliam A, Bitam I, Parola P. Molecular detection of Leishmania infantum DNA and host blood meal identification in Phlebotomus in a hypoendemic focus of human leishmaniasis in northern Algeria. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12:e0006513.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Abbate JM, Maia C, Pereira A, Arfuso F, Gaglio G, Rizzo M, et al. Identification of trypanosomatids and blood feeding preferences of phlebotomine sand fly species common in Sicily, Southern Italy. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0229536.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. González E, Molina R, Aldea I, Iriso A, Tello A, Jiménez M. Leishmania sp. detection and blood-feeding behaviour of Sergentomyia minuta collected in the human leishmaniasis focus of southwestern Madrid, Spain (2012–2017). Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020;67:1393–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pombi M, Giacomi A, Barlozzari G, Mendoza-Roldan JA, Macrì G, Otranto D, et al. Molecular detection of Leishmania (Sauroleishmania) tarentolae in human blood and Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum in Sergentomyia minuta: unexpected host-parasite contacts. Med Vet Entomol. 2020;34:470–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Campino L, Cortes S, Dionísio L, Neto L, Afonso MO, Maia C. The first detection of Leishmania major in naturally infected Sergentomyia minuta in Portugal. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2013;108:516–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jaouadi K, Ghawar W, Salem S, Gharbi M, Bettaieb J, Yazidi R, et al. First report of naturally infected Sergentomyia minuta with Leishmania major in Tunisia. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pereira S, Pita-Pereira D, Araujo-Pereira T, Britto C, Costa-Rego T, Ferrolho J, et al. First molecular detection of Leishmania infantum in Sergentomyia minuta (Diptera, Psychodidae) in Alentejo, southern Portugal. Acta Trop. 2017;174:45–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Latrofa MS, Iatta R, Dantas-Torres F, Annoscia G, Gabrielli S, Pombi M, et al. Detection of Leishmania infantum DNA in phlebotomine sand flies from an area where canine leishmaniosis is endemic in southern Italy. Vet Parasitol. 2018;253:39–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mendoza-Roldan JA, Latrofa MS, Iatta R, Manoj RRS, Panarese R, Annoscia G, et al. Detection of Leishmania tarentolae in lizards, sand flies and dogs in southern Italy, where Leishmania infantum is endemic: hindrances and opportunities. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mendoza-Roldan JA, Zatelli A, Latrofa MS, Iatta R, Bezerra-Santos MA, Annoscia G, et al. Leishmania (Sauroleishmania) tarentolae isolation and sympatric occurrence with Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum in geckoes, dogs and sand flies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16:e0010650.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Charrel RN, Izri A, Temmam S, De Lamballerie X, Parola P. Toscana virus RNA in Sergentomyia minuta flies. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewis DJ, Ward RD. Transmission and vectors. In: Peters W, Killick-Kendrick R, editors. The leishmaniases in biology and medicine. London: Academic Press; 1987. p. 235–62.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Volf P, Volfova V. Establishment and maintenance of sand fly colonies. J Vector Ecol. 2011;36:S1-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mendoza-Roldan JA, Latrofa MS, Tarallo VD, Manoj RRS, Bezerra-Santos MA, Annoscia G, et al. Leishmania spp. in Squamata reptiles from the Mediterranean basin. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022;69:2856–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sadlova J, Vojtkova B, Hrncirova K, Lestinova T, Spitzova T, Becvar T, et al. Host competence of African rodents Arvicanthis neumanni, A. niloticus and Mastomys natalensis for Leishmania major. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2019;8:118–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sadlova J, Reishig J, Volf P. Prediuresis in female Phlebotomus sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae). Eur J Entomol. 1998;95:643–7.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pruzinova K, Sadlova J, Seblova V, Homola M, Votypka J, Volf P. Comparison of bloodmeal digestion and the peritrophic matrix in four sand fly species differing in susceptibility to Leishmania donovani. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0128203.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Quate LW. Phlebotomus sandflies of the Paloich area in the Sudan (Diptera, Psychodidae). J Med Entomol. 1964;1:213–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lawyer PG, Ngumbi PM, Anjili CO, Odongo SO, Mebrathu YM, Githure JI, et al. Development of Leishmania major in Phlebotomus duboscqi and Sergentomyia schwetzi (Diptera: Psychodidae). Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1990;43:31–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Polanska N, Ishemgulova A, Volfova V, Flegontov P, Votypka J, Yurchenko V, et al. Sergentomyia schwetzi: Salivary gland transcriptome, proteome and enzymatic activities in two lineages adapted to different blood sources. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0230537.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Daba S, Daba A, Shehata MG, El Sawaf BM. A simple micro-assay method for estimating blood meal size of the sand fly, Phlebotomus Langeroni (Diptera: Psychodidae). J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2004;34:173–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sant’anna MR, Nascimento A, Alexander B, Dilger E, Cavalcante RR, Diaz-Albiter HM, et al. Chicken blood provides a suitable meal for the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis and does not inhibit Leishmania development in the gut. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Roby NH, Hussein MA, Doha SA, Ghani SA. Effect of different blood sources on the feeding time of sand fly, Phlebotomus papatasi. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2015;45:555–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Reinhold JM, Shaw R, Lahondère C. Beat the heat: Culex quinquefasciatus regulates its body temperature during blood-feeding. J Therm Biol. 2021;96:102826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2020.102826.

  32. Adler S, Theodor O. Observations on Leishmania ceramodactyli N.SP. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1929;22:343–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Svobodova M, Sadlova J, Chang KP, Volf P. Distribution and feeding preference of the sand flies Phlebotomus sergenti and P. papatasi in a cutaneous leishmaniasis focus in Sanliurfa, Turkey. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;68:6–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Palit A, Bhattacharya SK, Kundu SN. Host preference of Phlebotomus argentipes and Phlebotomus papatasi in different biotopes of West Bengal, India. Int J Environ Health Res. 2005;15:449–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ticha L, Kykalova B, Sadlova J, Gramiccia M, Gradoni L, Volf P. Development of various Leishmania (Sauroleishmania) tarentolae strains in three Phlebotomus species. Microorganisms. 2021;9:2256.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ticha L, Sadlova J, Bates P, Volf P. Experimental infections of sand flies and geckos with Leishmania (Sauroleishmania) adleri and Leishmania (S.) hoogstraali. Parasit Vectors. 2022;15:289.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Iatta R, Mendoza-Roldan JA, Latrofa MS, Cascio A, Brianti E, Pombi M, et al. Leishmania tarentolae and Leishmania infantum in humans, dogs and cats in the Pelagie archipelago, southern Italy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15:e0009817.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Senghor MW, Niang AA, Depaquit J, Ferté H, Faye MN, Elguero E, et al. Transmission of Leishmania infantum in the canine leishmaniasis focus of Mont-Rolland, Senegal: ecological, parasitological and molecular evidence for a possible role of Sergentomyia sand flies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004940.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Sadlova J, Dvorak V, Seblova V, Warburg A, Votypka J, Volf P. Sergentomyia schwetzi is not a competent vector for Leishmania donovani and other Leishmania species pathogenic to humans. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dostalova A, Volf P. Leishmania development in sand flies: parasite–vector interactions overview. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Seblova V, Sadlova J, Carpenter S, Volf P. Development of Leishmania parasites in Culicoides nubeculosus (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) and implications for screening vector competence. J Med Entomol. 2014;49:967–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Lenka Krejcirikova, Lenka Hlubinkova and Kristyna Srstkova for their administrative and technical support.

Funding

This study was funded by the Grant Agency of Charles University (GAUK 180220), the project National Institute of virology and bacteriology (Programme EXCELES, ID Project No. LX22NPO5103)—funded by the European Union—Next Generation EU; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. (GHTM-UID/Multi/04413/2013; IF/01302/2015) and it was conducted under the frame of the NextGenerationEU-MUR PNRR Extended Partnership initiative on Emerging Infectious Diseases (Project no. PE00000007, INF-ACT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

    Lucie Ticha, Vera Volfova, Jovana Sadlova & Petr Volf

  2. Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Valenzano, Italy

    Jairo Alfonso Mendoza-Roldan, Marcos Antonio Bezerra-Santos, Domenico Otranto & Petr Volf

  3. Global Health and Tropical Medicine, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

    Carla Maia

  4. Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

    Domenico Otranto

Authors
  1. Lucie Ticha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vera Volfova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jairo Alfonso Mendoza-Roldan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marcos Antonio Bezerra-Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Carla Maia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jovana Sadlova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Domenico Otranto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Petr Volf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LT and VV carried out the experimental part of the project. PV, VV and CM helped with the establishment of Sergentomyia minuta colony. Reptiles were provided by JAMR, MABS and DO. PV designed and supervised the study. Article was drafted by LT, VV and PV. JS performed the statistical analysis. JAMR, MABS, CM, and DO contributed to the revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucie Ticha.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Mice, rabbits and leopard geckos were maintained and handled in the animal facility of Charles University in Prague in accordance with institutional guidelines and Czech legislation (Act No. 246/1992 and 359/2012 coll. on Protection of Animals against Cruelty in present statutes at large), which complies with all relevant European Union and international guidelines for experimental animals. All experiments were approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Laboratory Experiments of the Charles University, Prague, and were performed under permissions of no. MSMT-8604/2019-6 and MSMT-11459/2019-4 of the Czech Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic. Investigators are certified for experimentation with animals by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. Protocols for reptile collection were authorized by the Ministry for Environment, Land and Sea Protection of Italy (approval number 0073267/2019), the Societas Herpetologica Italica and the Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (approval number 71216). Reptile handling and maintenance were authorized by the ethical committee of the Department of Veterinary Medicine of the University of Bari, Italy (Prot. Uniba 14/2022).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1

. Number of developed oocytes of Sergentomyia minuta females feeding on different hosts. TAR, Tarentola mauritanica; HEM, Hemidactylus turcicus; POD, Podarcis siculus; HUM, human volunteer. Table S2. Comparison of Sergentomyia minuta fecundity after feeding on different hosts. TAR, Tarentola mauritanica; HEM, Hemidactylus turcicus; POD, Podarcis siculus; HUM, human volunteer.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ticha, L., Volfova, V., Mendoza-Roldan, J.A. et al. Experimental feeding of Sergentomyia minuta on reptiles and mammals: comparison with Phlebotomus papatasi. Parasites Vectors 16, 126 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-05758-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-05758-5

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us