Skip to main content
Download PDF

Seasonal variations of intensity of avian malaria infection in the Thousand Island Lake System, China

Parasites & Vectors volume 16, Article number: 218 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Migratory birds play an important part in the spread of parasites, with more or less impact on resident birds. Previous studies focus on the prevalence of parasites, but changes in infection intensity over time have rarely been studied. As infection intensity can be quantified by qPCR, we measured infection intensity during different seasons, which is important for our understanding of parasite transmission mechanisms.

Methods

Wild birds were captured at the Thousand Island Lake with mist nets and tested for avian hemosporidiosis infections using nested PCR. Parasites were identified using the MalAvi database. Then, we used qPCR to quantify the infection intensity. We analyzed the monthly trends of intensity for all species and for different migratory status, parasite genera and sexes.

Results

Of 1101 individuals, 407 were infected (37.0%) of which 95 were newly identified and mainly from the genus Leucocytozoon. The total intensity trend shows peaks at the start of summer, during the breeding season of hosts and during the over-winter season. Different parasite genera show different monthly trends. Plasmodium causes high prevalence and infection intensity of winter visitors. Female hosts show significant seasonal trends of infection intensity.

Conclusions

The seasonal changes of infection intensity is consistent with the prevalence. Peaks occur early and during the breeding season and then there is a downward trend. Spring relapses and avian immunity are possible reasons that could explain this phenomenon. In our study, winter visitors have a higher prevalence and infection intensity, but they rarely share parasites with resident birds. This shows that they were infected with Plasmodium during their departure or migration and rarely transmit the disease to resident birds. The different infection patterns of different parasite species may be due to vectors or other ecological properties.

Graphical abstract

Background

Emerging infectious diseases are a serious challenge for human health [1], with infectious diseases killing millions of people every year [2] and threatening the survival of wild animals [3]. Avian hemosporidiosis is a global infectious disease widely prevalent among wild birds and caused by blood parasites [4] of the genera Plasmodium, Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon [5]. Recently, increasing research has been done on avian hemosporidians. Hemosporidians multiply as haploid clones in the cells of the fixed tissues of avian hosts and undergo the sexual process in vectors [6]. Some Plasmodium lineages, like SGS1, can infect at least hundreds of birds species [7], and the same bird species can also be infected by different parasites [8]. The interaction between hosts and parasites is a complex system, which includes individuals [9], species [10], communities [11], potential vectors and other different organizational scales [12, 13]. Due to the complexity of the avian hemosporidian host-parasite system together with the relatively ease by which it can be studied in the wild, avian hemosporidiosis has become a model for studies on disease dynamics in the wild [14].

Previous studies have found seasonal variations in infectious diseases [15, 16]. The mechanism leading to this change is worth exploring. Vectors [6], host migration [17], flocking behavior and habitat [18] are all factors that lead to changes in prevalence. Due to host body mass and conditions, host migration or insect vectors [19,20,21], the prevalence of avian hemosporidians shows seasonal and annual variations [22, 23]. A model from Beaudoin et al. found a hypothetical model predicting that a peak in malaria prevalence is supposed to occur in late summer and autumn [24]. Prevalence also increases when the host's immune system is weakened [25], so birds are usually infected when they are fledglings [26]. This leads to an increased prevalence during the breeding season. On the other hand, there are different host preferences and infection specificities within the genera Plasmodium, Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon [27], which could further lead to different seasonal trends among different genera.

It is a well-known fact that migratory animals play an important part in the spread of parasites and diseases [28, 29] as they can travel great distances while spreading parasites [30,31,32], especially during wintering and breeding seasons [33]. For example, 4 to 39 million exotic neotropical ticks are spread to the USA annually by migratory songbirds [34], and different parasite transmission strategies or coevolution between the host and avian malaria parasite lineages cause the different prevalences found in Garden warblers (Sylvia borin) [35]. In Barn swallows (Hirundo rustica), the prevalence of Africa-transmitted Plasmodium lineages was significantly higher in individuals overwintering in the moist habitats of Western Central Africa [36]. Moreover, the Thousand Island Lake (TIL), located in the south of the Asian continent, has both summer and winter avian visitors [37], and also some passing birds, so it has a different migration pattern from the previous main research in Europe and North America. Thus, it gives us a chance to learn how the different migratory birds might affect the parasite communities in local resident birds.

However, most studies focused on the effect of residency types on prevalence, but infection intensity has rarely been considered. The intensity of blood parasites might not only have a link with how they affect the hosts (although the effects might vary between different host-parasite combinations) but also with the dynamics of transmission. Some research shows that specialist parasites are well adapted to their host species but not to other potential hosts [38]. Instead, there also records showing that generalist parasites have higher prevalence than specialists in particular host species [27]. According to previous studies, the intensity of infection is correlated with the immune system of the host in different life stages [26] and competition between different parasites in mixed infections [39]. Therefore, the study of seasonal variations in infection intensity is important for us to understand the parasites’ infection mechanism.

In this study we investigate the overall patterns of parasite diversity, prevalence and infection intensity in TIL system with the aim to understand and describe (i) the seasonal trends in infection intensity, (ii) how intensity is affected by the residence types of its hosts and (iii) different seasonal infection patterns between migratory and resident bird species in TIL.

Methods

Field sampling and data collection

The research site is located at the Thousand Island Lake (TIL). TIL is situated in an area with limited knowledge about avian malaria diversity and was formed because of construction of a hydroelectric dam in 1959.

Wild birds were captured by mist nets in 2019, 2020 and 2021, starting before their breeding season (April to June) and until their overwinter season (November to January). They were captured at 24 islands and six mainland sampling points (Fig. 1) in Zhejiang Province, China (29°22’–29°50′N and 118°34’–119°15′E).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Island distribution in TIL and our sampling locations (islands 1–24, mainland points M1–M6)

Full size image

Parasite identification, phylogenetic reconstruction and diversity

Blood samples (10 μl–50 μl) were collected from the brachial vein immediately after capture and stored in anhydrous ethanol until DNA extraction. DNA was extracted using a TIAN amp Genomic DNA kit (Tiangen Biotech Ltd., Beijing) following the manufacturer’s protocol and dissolved in 80 μl of TE buffer. Infections were identified using the nested PCR protocol [40], which amplifies a 479‐bp fragment of the cyt b gene located in the mitochondrial genome of avian hemosporidians. Positive samples were then sequenced, and the BLAST module in the MalAvi database [41] was used to match the infections to lineages. Each sample was sequenced at least twice to ensure the accuracy of the results. Novel parasite lineages were determined based on any unique one-nucleotide substitution, as recent research shows that just a small difference can cause various ecological characteristics [42]. All the new lineages have been added to the MalAvi database and GeneBank [43].

Positive samples were diluted to 1 ng/μl for further analysis of the infection intensity. However, 59 samples were co-infected and could not be clearly separated, so we removed this part of the data in the analysis of the infection intensity of different parasites.

Sex determination

The sex of > 50% of bird species cannot be judged directly by external morphology [44]. The individual sex in birds is determined by genes on the two sex chromosomes; males are homogametic (ZZ) and females are heterogametic (ZW). With the development of molecular experiments, the Chromo Helicase DNA-binding gene (CHD gene) on the W chromosome [45] and a very closely related copy of CHD gene on the Z chromosome [46] have been discovered. Since then, several studies have invented primers for sex determination. We used the primers: P2 (5′-TCTGCATCGCTAAATCCTTT-3′) and P8 (5′-CTCCCAAGGATGAGRAAYTG-3′) [44] and 2550F (5′-GTTACTGATTCGTCTACGAGA-3′) and 2718R (5′-ATTGAAATGATCCAGTGCTTG-3′) [47] for the sex identification.

For P2–P8, we started with an incubation step at 94 °C for 1 min, followed by 34 thermal cycles (94 °C for 45 s, 48 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 45 s) and a final extension step at 72 °C for 5 min. For 2550F-2718R, we started with an incubation step at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 thermal cycles (94 °C for 30 s, 48 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 45 s) and a final extension step at 72 °C for 7 min.

PCR products were separated in 3% agarose gels, run together with DNA Marker (25–500 bp) in standard TBE buffer and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. We used UV light to observe Z-bands and W-bands. We also checked the results of some of the gender observation results we had recorded when we captured some sex-determining birds. For unclear bands, we performed repeated measurements.

Intensity quantification

Due to the low intensity often occurring in natural infections, infection intensity is difficult to quantify accurately with blood smears. However, a new method, real‐time quantitative PCR (qPCR), is used to estimate the infection intensities in each individual bird. This protocol has been confirmed to accurately estimate infection intensities compared to microscopic analyses of blood smears [48]. To quantify the total amount of parasite DNA, a general qPCR protocol, which amplifies a fragment of the mitochondrial rRNA from all hemosporidians, was first used [49]. Two pairs of primers were used to amplify the host and parasite DNA fragments, respectively, SFSR/3Fb (5-ACTAGCCCTTTCAGCGTCATGT-3) and SFSR/3Rb (5-CATGCTCGGGAACCAAAGG-3) as host primers, 343F (5-GCTCACGCATCGCTTCT-3), 496R (5-GACCGGTCATTTTCTTTG-3) as parasite primer [50].

All PCRs were performed in an Eppendorf AG 22331 Hamburg qPCR instrument (Germany) using a SYBR‐green reaction kit (Hard-Shell PCR Plates, HSP9655, USA). The thermal profile started with an incubation step at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 thermal cycles (95 °C for 20 s, 60 °C for 20 s and 70 °C for 20 s) and immediately followed by a melting analysis between 47 and 95 °C. Each reaction included 4 ng of DNA template, 0.5 μM of each primer and 5 μl SYBR‐green mix to reach a final volume of 10 μl.

We replicated each sample three times and used the mean value, and we only considered it qualified when the standard deviation of the three values for the same sample was < 0.4; otherwise, the experiment was repeated. At the end of the runs, the amplification curves were checked to obtain threshold cycles (Ct) for each sample with default settings, and results were only accepted if the NTCs did not exhibit fluorescence curves that crossed the threshold line. Melting curves were also inspected to determine false positives (i.e. samples with melting peaks corresponding to non‐specific amplifications).

We used the positive sample 1–1 as the standard to correct differences between each QPCR plate and used it as the golden sample and set the parasite gene concentration and the host gene concentration as 1; we then used it to calculate the concentration of other samples.

$${Q}_{x}={2}^{({Ct}_{gs}-{Ct}_{x})}*{Q}_{gs}$$

Differences in CT values between each PCR plate were calculated and corrected. (When △Ct is > 1, re-experiment)

$${Q}_{n}={2}^{{\Delta Ct}_{parasite}-\Delta {Ct}_{host}}*{Q}_{gs}$$

In our analysis, the logarithm of the infection intensity was taken.

Phylogenetic reconstruction

We used jModelTest v2.1.1 software [51] to compare the best nucleotide substitution model according to the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and chose the maximum likelihood (GTR + G + I) model. The maximum credibility tree was selected by TreeAnotator v1.7.5 and visualized in Figtree v1.3.1 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/). We used the ggtree in R 3.4.3 to groom the phylogenetic tree [52].

Data analysis

Due to the nonlinear correlation between parasite and time, we used the generalized additive model (GAM) to analyze the trend of infection intensity by month. GAM is a generalized linear model offering a middle ground that can be fit to complex, nonlinear relationships and make good predictions in these cases [53]; it has been used to examine nonlinear relationships between infection status and seasonal changes in studies [19, 35, 54, 55]. By generalized cross-validation, smoothing parameters were automatically selected by penalized likelihood maximization, retaining more parsimonious linear function and penalising more complex nonlinear functions. Therefore, we established the generalized additive model in R package mgcv, with date as the independent variable and infection intensity as the response variable. We used binomial errors and a logit link to incorporate the smoothed function of sampling date as a model predictor. Generalized cross validation (GCV) was used to choose the number of iterations for smoothing parameter selection. To exclude hazardous results from our analysis, we tried to remove parasites that only appeared once and then compared the experimental results with the results of all parasites. We found that this did not affect the trend (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Since there was many new lineages of Leucocytozoon, removing this part of the data would only have been partial, so we finally decided to keep it. We also analyzed the monthly trends of infection intensity of resident birds, summer visitors and winter visitors, and separated trends into females and males, also in the different genera, Plasmodium, Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon.

Results

We surveyed parasite infections of blood samples from a total of 1101 individuals from 86 avian host species on 24 islands and 6 mainland areas. We detected 95 lineages of Leucocytozoon in 206 individuals, 21 lineages of Plasmodium in 108 individuals and 40 lineages of Haemoproteus in 150 individuals. The total prevalence was 37.0% (407 individuals) (Additional file 1: Table S1), which included 59 samples co-infected. Due to the survey of avian blood parasites in Asia at the initial stage, we found 95 new lineages, accounting for 60.9% of the total lineages; most new lineages occurred in Leucocytozoon genus (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Phylogenetic trees for all the species/lineages found in TIL. Green points represent new lineages

Full size image

Seasonal trend of infection intensity

GAM examining seasonal variation in the infection intensity. The curves represent the estimated model effect as predicted by date and the fitted infection intensity for overall infections. We found significant variation in infection intensity with date (ANOVA, F(8.33) = 3.10, P = 0.003; Fig. 3). The average infection intensity during the breeding seasons (April to June) and overwinter seasons (October to January) has a growing trend and declines from June to October. The result is consistent with seasonal variations of infection rates in our other unpublished study (Wu et al. Unpublished Data). Moreover, the trend of resident birds has the same shape as our total data, but the relative changes tend to be flat (ANOVA, F(5.26) = 3.78, P = 0.002; Fig. 4a). For the summer visitors, the infection intensity decreases gradually (ANOVA, F(2.61) = 2.76, P = 0.084; Fig. 4b), while the infection intensity for winter visitors is continuously high with only a slow, non-statistically significant decline in the overwinter season (ANOVA, F(1) = 0.23, P = 0.634; Fig. 4c).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Monthly trends of infection intensity for all parasite-infected passerine bird samples

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Monthly trends of infection intensity for a resident, b summer visitors, c winter visitors

Full size image

Different trends of infection intensity in females and males

In the individuals we collected, 39.3% of females (175 out of 445) were infected, which is higher than the 35.4% in males (232 out of 656), but prevalence between females and males did not show any significant difference (Chi-square testχ2 = 1.78, df = 1, P = 0.250). Instead, the infection intensity in females is higher than in males (t-test, t(354.6) = 2.00, P = 0.047). By comparing the monthly trends of infection intensity, we can observe a sharp trend in females (ANOVA, F(8.72) = 1.94, P = 0.034; Fig. 5). Instead, the trend in males does not show significant variation (ANOVA, F(5.40) = 1.50, P = 0.195; Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Monthly trends of infection intensity in females and males

Full size image

Different trends of infection intensity in various genera of parasites

The three different parasite genera have various trends and high points in different seasons (Fig. 6). As described in Methods, we removed the 59 co-infection samples for analysis to ensure the accuracy of infection intensity in each genus. For the genus Leucocytozoon, the trend of infection intensity reached its highest point in June (ANOVA, F(8.59) = 3.98, P < 0.001; Fig. 2). It is also likely due to the fact that the main hosts of Leucocytozoon might be resident birds (Table 1). The infection of the genus Plasmodium, concentrated in winter, is at a high level of intensity, which is also consistent with our results that Plasmodium infection is highly prevalent in winter visitors (ANOVA, F(4.43) = 4.68, P = 0.001; Table 1; Fig. 6). In addition, the trend of infection intensity of the genus Haemoproteus does not show a significant variation (ANOVA, F(3.34) = 1.17, P = 0.324; Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Monthly trends of infection intensity in Plasmodium, Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon

Full size image
Table 1 Prevalence of infection in Plasmodium, Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon in different types of residential birds
Full size table

Discussion

How parasite intensities differ based on season or migratory behavior of its host is important in order to understand the mechanisms of transmission of parasites and diseases. By studying the bird community in TIL, we have shown that there are peaks of infection intensity during the summer. Correspondingly, Huang et al.'s recent research of a wild bird community in southern Sweden also found peaks of infection intensity and prevalence in summer, which can be explained by spring relapse [56]; Šujanová et al. found the infection intensity of a local avian community in Slovakia peaked during summer around mid-July [57]. From the perspective of prevalence, Schrader et al. found that Red-bellied woodpeckers (Melanerpes carolinus) have a peak of prevalence during summer [21]. The seasonal trend between intensity and prevalence in TIL coincides with an earlier study [58], which shows a positive correlation between prevalence and infection intensity. Our other unpublished research (Wu et al. Unpublished Data), which focuses on the trend of prevalence, also shows a similar seasonal trend. All these studies consistently show that infection intensity peaks during summer; our study supports these findings.

Some avian hemosporidian parasites might become dormant during the winter, followed by a relapsing of parasites during spring, a so-called spring relapse [24]. One reason that we observe that the intensity has a peak during summer can be explained by possible spring relapses, which cause higher infection intensity and prevalence [55, 56, 59]. An alternative or additional explanation of the high intensity during the spring and breeding period of the birds might be related to the immunity of birds [56, 60]. In the present study, we observed that the intensity in females is indeed higher than in males (P = 0.024), which may also be caused by the difference in immune investments between females and males [61]. According to the findings of Šujanová et al., infection intensity tended to be higher in older birds [57]. Considering supressed immunity activity in reproductively active birds [56], we guess the supressed immunity may also differ between sexes. The seasonality trends of avian immunity between different sexes would also be an interesting area to study in the future and could better explain variations in infection intensity during the breeding season.

Impact of migration on local species could help us to better understand transmission of parasites and diseases [28]. Notably, in our study, summer visitors have a high infection intensity during the initial stage of arrival at TIL but show a downward trend afterwards (Fig. 4). The avian migration study in Beijing shows that parasites can be transmitted during migration. Migratory birds can be infected at the breeding ground [62]. Migratory birds are often exposed to different parasite fauna during their migratory cycle, so they have more chances of being infected with different lineages than residents, which causes the interspecific differences in investment in immune defense [63]. There are also studies testing metabolic rates and exercise endurance in great reed warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus), showing that phenotypic changes associated with preparation for migration are similarly unaffected by parasitemia [64]. Another study also shows that the physiology of migratory birds after migration reduces parasite survival [65], which could be a reason for the reduction of infection intensity during the summer. In our study, both summer visitors and resident birds show a reduction in parasite intensity after the breeding season.

Parasites play an important part in bird migration [66]. The recent study of the hemosporidian infections of wild birds belonging to the order Columbiformes in the Northern Hemisphere also found a higher parasite prevalence in long-distance migratory birds [67]. However, contrary to overwintering migratory birds, which are rarely infected with hemosporidian parasites as reported in previous studies in Hispaniola [65], in our research, winter visitors have a significantly higher prevalence (Chi-square test, χ2 = 477.4, df = 1, P < 0.001) and infection intensity (t-test, t(202.1) = 3.75, P < 0.001) than residents. The reason for this difference could be the extremely high rate of Plasmodium infection (Table 1) in migratory compared to resident birds. Moreover, we found that the most prevalent Plasmodium SYAT05 (46 out of 108 individuals infected by Plasmodium) only exists in winter visitors and some passing birds but never infect residents in TIL. Therefore, we believe that the winter visitors are infected with Plasmodium in the northern living area or along the way before arriving in TIL and rarely spread it to local resident birds. Furthermore, we found that, in the winter visitors, the intensity during the winter continues at a high infection intensity and does not show significant changes (Fig. 4c), which is different from our results in summer visitors. The infection patterns of summer and winter visitors may be different and should be studied separately in follow-up studies.

The monthly intensity trends in different parasite genera also show different patterns (Fig. 6). Plasmodium infection has a high prevalence and maintains a high infection intensity during the winter; Haemoproteus mainly infects birds in July and November, and the intensity does not obviously change over the years; the seasonal trend of Leucocytozoon is consistent with the overall trend. Moreover, since the infection intensity of Leucocytozoon is lower than for Plasmodium (t-test, t(171.8) = 3.75, P < 0.001) and Haemoproteus (t-test, t(207.8) = 3.45, P < 0.001), we can infer the following reasons. First, the dynamics of the infections are totally different so it is difficult to compare between genera. Different species of parasites infect different blood cells. Since Plasmodium have asexual reproduction in the blood [68], they will have more copy numbers of parasites in qPCR. Then, due to the extremely high variation and diversity of Leucocytozoon in nature [69], there are 82.1% new species that are not found in MalAvi yet [41], so the adaptability to the host might be low.

Moreover, the infection by parasites can damage organs [70] and cause some wild birds to have limited mobility or die, which can lead us to underestimate the infection intensity and prevalence. These problems have also appeared in previous studies [58, 71]. The solution to this problem needs to be tackled by follow-up infection experiments and investigation of mosquitoes and blackflies [72]. In addition, different species of parasites have different vectors and host preferences [73]. Seasonal trends are also found in the vectors which are affected by precipitation [74]. These factors also account for seasonal variations in different species. The collection of mosquitoes will help us understand the transmission mechanism of different parasites, which will also be part of our future studies.

Our research shows the total infection intensity variations among different resident birds and different seasons in TIL. However, habitat fragmentation also has an impact on parasite infection [75, 76]. Anthropogenic habitat change, like deforestation, can affect host-parasite systems and reduce the rate by which parasitic infection are accumulated in the populations [77]. The prevalence of Plasmodium infections showed significantly higher levels in undisturbed forests [78]. Island systems may act as the effective natural laboratories for biodiversity, playing an important role in the ecology and disease ecology studies [79, 80]. TIL, as an ideal fragmentation experimental base, has clear geographic boundaries and the same formation history and isolation medium (water). Due to their short formation time, they were not affected by historical evolutionary processes and geological events, which make it easier to reveal complex ecological mechanisms. The prevalence and intensity between different islands, which could help us better analyze the impact of habitat fragmentation on blood parasites, will also be examined in our future studies. By collecting data over a long time period, we may find changes in infection due to vectors’ change, and perhaps Plasmodium will also infect residents in future studies, after better adaptation to the hosts and environment. Therefore, long-term investigation is very important to elucidate this ecological mechanism.

Finally, there are still some limitations of our study. First, morphological species could not be identified without blood smears, so we can only explain that there were new lineages instead of new species. This limitation may also make us underestimate some co-infections between Plasmodium and Haemoproteus. Hence, using different sets of primers in the future to study multiple infections [81] may solve this problem. Second, for the measurement of infection intensity, because of the lack of participation of standard infection intensity obtained from blood cells count, all our intensity values became a relative value. Meanwhile, the cells infected by Plasmodium and Haemoproteus were different from those infected by Leucocytozoon, so we could not completely compare the intensities between different parasite genera.

Conclusions

Our study shows the distribution and seasonal variation intensity trend of blood parasites in TIL. Most of the new species are of the Leucocytozoon genus. The seasonal variation has peaks at the beginning of summer and winter. A similar trend is also shown in the Leucocytozoon genus. The differences between migratory birds and residents have also been discussed. The infection intensity of summer visitors gradually decreases after they arrive at TIL. However, winter visitors have a constant high intensity during the winter. They are almost always infected by Plasmodium spp. and rarely share parasites with resident birds. We observe a significant seasonal trend of infection intensity in females but not in males. Different parasite genera shows different monthly trends of infection intensity. Our subsequent investigation will focus on vectors and fragmentation to study the transmission mechanism of parasites and diseases after reaching TIL by longer-term sampling of mosquitos and bird blood samples.

Availability of data and materials

All the linages have been uploaded to GeneBank (number OQ745964-OQ746058).

Abbreviations

qPCR:

Quantitative PCR

TIL:

Thousand Island Lake

cytb:

Cytochrome b

GAM:

Generalized additive model

CHD gene:

Chromo helicase DNA-binding gene

References

  1. Altizer S, Harvell D, Friedle E. Rapid evolutionary dynamics and disease threats to biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003;18:589–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Atkinson CT, Thomas NJ, Hunter DB. Parasitic diseases of wild birds. Oxford: Wiley; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jones KE, Patel NG, Levy MA, Storeygard A, Balk D, Gittleman JL, et al. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature. 2008;451:990–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Atkinson C. Pathogenicity and epizootiology of avian haematozoa: plasmodium, haemoproteus, and leucocytozoon. London: Oxford University Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Valkiunas G. Avian malaria parasites and other haemosporidia. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Rivero A, Gandon S. Evolutionary ecology of avian Malaria: past to present. Trends Parasitol. 2018;34:712–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Galen SC, Speer KA, Perkins SL. Evolutionary lability of host associations promotes phylogenetic overdispersion of co-infecting blood parasites. J Anim Ecol. 2019;88:1936–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ezenwa VO, Archie EA, Craft ME, Hawley DM, Martin LB, Moore J, et al. Host behaviour-parasite feedback: an essential link between animal behaviour and disease ecology. Proc Biol Sci. 2016;283:20153078.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheldon BC, Verhulst S. Ecological immunology: costly parasite defences and trade-offs in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11:317–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Decaestecker E, Gaba S, Raeymaekers JAM, Stoks R, Van Kerckhoven L, Ebert D, et al. Host–parasite ‘Red Queen’ dynamics archived in pond sediment. Nature. 2007;450:870–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lafferty KD, Allesina S, Arim M, Briggs CJ, De Leo G, Dobson AP, et al. Parasites in food webs: the ultimate missing links. Ecol lett. 2008;11:533–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Dunne JA, Lafferty KD, Dobson AP, Hechinger RF, Kuris AM, Martinez ND, et al. Parasites affect food web structure primarily through increased diversity and complexity. PLoS Biol. 2013;11:e1001579.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ishtiaq F. Ecology and evolution of avian malaria: Implications of land use changes and climate change on disease dynamics. J Indian Inst Sci. 2021;101:213–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dowell SF. Seasonal variation in host susceptibility and cycles of certain infectious diseases. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:369.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Altizer S, Dobson A, Hosseini P, Hudson P, Pascual M, Rohani P. Seasonality and the dynamics of infectious diseases. Ecol Lett. 2006;9:467–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jenkins T, Owens IP. Biogeography of avian blood parasites (Leucocytozoon spp.) in two resident hosts across Europe: phylogeographic structuring or the abundance–occupancy relationship? Mol Ecol. 2011;20:3910–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lutz HL, Hochachka WM, Engel JI, Bell JA, Tkach VV, Bates JM, et al. Parasite prevalence corresponds to host life history in a diverse assemblage of Afrotropical birds and haemosporidian parasites. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0121254.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Pulgarín-R PC, Gómez C, Bayly NJ, Bensch S, FitzGerald AM, Starkloff N, et al. Migratory birds as vehicles for parasite dispersal? Infection by avian haemosporidians over the year and throughout the range of a long-distance migrant. J Biogeogr. 2019;46:83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Svensson-Coelho M, Loiselle BA, Blake JG, Ricklefs RE. Resource predictability and specialization in avian malaria parasites. Mol Ecol. 2016;25:4377–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schrader MS, Walters EL, James FC, Greiner EC. Seasonal prevalence of a haematozoan parasite of red-bellied woodpeckers (Melanerpes carolinus) and its association with host condition and overwinter survival. Auk. 2003;120:130–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bensch S, Waldenström J, Jonzán N, Westerdahl H, Hansson B, Sejberg D, et al. Temporal dynamics and diversity of avian malaria parasites in a single host species. J Anim Ecol. 2007;76:112–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang X, Dong L, Zhang C, Zhang Y. Genetic diversity, temporal dynamics, and host specificity in blood parasites of passerines in North China. Parasitol Res. 2015;114:4513–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Beaudoin RL, Applegate JE, Davis DE, Mclean RG. A model for the ecology of avian malaria. J Wildl Dis. 1971;7:5–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Norris K, Evans MR. Ecological immunology: life history trade-offs and immune defense in birds. Behav Ecol. 2000;11:19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sol D, Jovani R, Torres J. Parasite mediated mortality and host immune response explain age-related differences in blood parasitism in birds. Oecologia. 2003;135:542–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hellgren O, Pérez-Tris J, Bensch S. A jack-of-all-trades and still a master of some: prevalence and host range in avian malaria and related blood parasites. Ecology. 2009;90:2840–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Altizer S, Bartel R, Han BA. Animal migration and infectious disease risk. Science. 2011;331:296–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Garamszegi LZ, Møller AP. Prevalence of avian influenza and host ecology. Proc Biol Sci. 2007;274:2003–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Fourment M, Darling AE, Holmes EC. The impact of migratory flyways on the spread of avian influenza virus in North America. BMC Evol Biol. 2017;17:118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Rappole JH, Derrickson SR, Hubálek Z. Migratory birds and spread of West Nile virus in the Western Hemisphere. Emerg Infect Dis. 2000;6:319–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Waldenstrom J, Bensch S, Kiboi S, Hasselquist D, Ottosson U. Cross-species infection of blood parasites between resident and migratory songbirds in Africa. Mol Ecol. 2002;11:1545–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Klaassen M, Hoye BJ, Nolet BA, Buttemer WA. Ecophysiology of avian migration in the face of current global hazards. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012;367:1719–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Cohen EB, Auckland LD, Marra PP, Hamer SA. Avian migrants facilitate invasions of neotropical ticks and tick-borne pathogens into the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:8366–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Hellgren O, Wood MJ, Waldenström J, Hasselquist D, Ottosson U, Stervander M, et al. Circannual variation in blood parasitism in a sub-Saharan migrant passerine bird, the garden warbler. J Evol Biol. 2013;26:1047–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Von Rönn JAC, Harrod C, Bensch S, Wolf JBW. Transcontinental migratory connectivity predicts parasite prevalence in breeding populations of the European barn swallow. J Evol Biol. 2015;28:535–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jingcheng Z, Yanping W, Pingping J, Peng L, Mingjian Y, Ping D. Nested analysis of passeriform bird assemblages in the Thousand Island Lake region. Biodivers Sci. 2008;16:321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Antonovics J, Boots M, Ebert D, Koskella B, Poss M, Sadd BM. The origin of specificity by means of natural selection: evolved and nonhost resistance in host–pathogen interactions. Evolution. 2013;67:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. De Roode JC, Pansini R, Cheesman SJ, Helinski ME, Huijben S, Wargo AR, et al. Virulence and competitive ability in genetically diverse malaria infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005;102:7624–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Hellgren O, Waldenström J, Bensch S. A new PCR assay for simultaneous studies of Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium, and Haemoproteus from avian blood. J Parasitol. 2004;90:797–802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bensch S, Hellgren O, PÉRez-Tris J. MalAvi: a public database of malaria parasites and related haemosporidians in avian hosts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009;9:1353–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pérez-Tris J, Bensch S. Diagnosing genetically diverse avian malarial infections using mixed-sequence analysis and TA-cloning. Parasitology. 2005;131:15–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. In our unpublished study (Wu et al. Unpublished Data)

  44. Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson RJ. A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol. 1998;7:1071–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Griffiths R, Tiwari B. Sex of the last wild Spix’s macaw. Nature. 1995;375:454.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Griffiths R, Korn RM. A CHD1 gene is Z chromosome linked in the chicken Gallus domesticus. Gene. 1997;197:225–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Fridolfsson A-K, Ellegren H. A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J Avian Biol. 1999;30:116–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ishtiaq F, Rao M, Huang X, Bensch S. Estimating prevalence of avian haemosporidians in natural populations: a comparative study on screening protocols. Parasites Vectors. 2017;10:127.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Fallon SM, Ricklefs RE, Swanson BL, Bermingham E. Detecting avian malaria: an improved polymerase chain reaction diagnostic. J Parasitol. 2003;89:1044–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Westerdahl H, Asghar M, Hasselquist D, Bensch S. Quantitative disease resistance: to better understand parasite-mediated selection on major histocompatibility complex. Proc Biol Sci. 2012;279:577–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012;9:772.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Yu G, Smith DK, Zhu H, Guan Y, Lam TTY. ggtree: an R package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods Ecol Evol. 2016;8:28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wood SN. Stable and efficient multiple smoothing parameter estimation for generalized additive models. J Am Stat Assoc. 2004;99:673–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wood MJ, Cosgrove CL, Wilkin TA, Knowles SC, Day KP, Sheldon BC. Within-population variation in prevalence and lineage distribution of avian malaria in blue tits, Cyanistes caeruleus. Mol Ecol. 2007;16:3263–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Cosgrove CL, Wood MJ, Day KP, Sheldon BC. Seasonal variation in Plasmodium prevalence in a population of blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus. J Anim Ecol. 2008;77:540–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Huang X, Jönsson J, Bensch S. Persistence of avian haemosporidians in the wild: a case study to illustrate seasonal infection patterns in relation to host life stages. Int J Parasitol. 2020;50:611–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Šujanová A, Špitalská E, Václav R. Seasonal dynamics and diversity of haemosporidians in a natural woodland bird community in Slovakia. Diversity. 2021;13:439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Huang X, Ellis VA, Jönsson J, Bensch S. Generalist haemosporidian parasites are better adapted to a subset of host species in a multiple host community. Mol Ecol. 2018;27:4336–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Applegate JE. Spring relapse of plasmodium relictum infections in an experimental field population of english sparrows (Passer domesticus). J Wildl Dis. 1971;7:37–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Deviche P, Greiner EC, Manteca X. Interspecific variability of prevalence in blood parasites of adult passerine birds during the breeding season in Alaska. J Wildl Dis. 2001;37:28–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. McKean KA, Nunney L. Bateman’s principle and immunity: phenotypically plastic reproductive strategies predict changes in immunological sex differences. Evolution. 2005;59:1510–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Huang X, Chen Z, Yang G, Xia C, Luo Q, Gao X, et al. Assemblages of plasmodium and related parasites in birds with different migration statuses. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:10277.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Møller AP, Erritzøe J. Host immune defence and migration in birds. Evol Ecol. 1998;12:945–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Hahn S, Bauer S, Dimitrov D, Emmenegger T, Ivanova K, Zehtindjiev P, et al. Low intensity blood parasite infections do not reduce the aerobic performance of migratory birds. Proc Biol Sci. 2018;285:20172307.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Soares L, Latta SC, Ricklefs RE. Neotropical migratory and resident birds occurring in sympatry during winter have distinct haemosporidian parasite assemblages. J Biogeogr. 2019;47:748–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Møller AP, Szép T. The role of parasites in ecology and evolution of migration and migratory connectivity. J Ornithol. 2010;152:141–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Schumm YR, Bakaloudis D, Barboutis C, Cecere JG, Eraud C, Fischer D, et al. Prevalence and genetic diversity of avian haemosporidian parasites in wild bird species of the order Columbiformes. Parasitol Res. 2021;120:1405–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Taliaferro WH, Taliaferro LG. The effect of immunity on the asexual reproduction of plasmodium brasilianum. J Infect Dis. 1944;75:1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Honjo Y, Fukumoto S, Sakamoto H, Hikosaka K. New PCR primers targeting the cytochrome b gene reveal diversity of Leucocytozoon lineages in an individual host. Parasitol Res. 2022;121:3313–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Ilgūnas M, Bukauskaitė D, Palinauskas V, Iezhova TA, Dinhopl N, Nedorost N, et al. Mortality and pathology in birds due to Plasmodium (Giovannolaia) homocircumflexum infection, with emphasis on the exoerythrocytic development of avian malaria parasites. Malar J. 2016;15:256.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Bensch S, Waldenström J, Jonzén N, Westerdahl H, Hansson B, Sejberg D, et al. Temporal dynamics and diversity of avian malaria parasites in a single host species. J Anim Ecol. 2007;76:112–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Palinauskas V, Žiegytė R, Iezhova TA, Ilgūnas M, Bernotienė R, Valkiūnas G. Description, molecular characterisation, diagnostics and life cycle of Plasmodium elongatum (lineage pERIRUB01), the virulent avian malaria parasite. Int J Parasitol. 2016;46:697–707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Gutiérrez-López R, Puente JM-DL, Gangoso L, Soriguer R, Figuerola J. Effects of host sex, body mass and infection by avian Plasmodium on the biting rate of two mosquito species with different feeding preferences. Parasites Vectors. 2019;12:87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Ferreira FC, Rodrigues RA, Sato Y, Borges MA, Braga ÉM. Searching for putative avian malaria vectors in a seasonally dry tropical forest in Brazil. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Laurance SGW, Jones D, Westcott D, McKeown A, Harrington G, Hilbert DW. Habitat fragmentation and ecological traits influence the prevalence of avian blood parasites in a tropical rainforest landscape. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e76227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Fallon SM, Bermingham E, Ricklefs RE. Island and taxon effects in parasitism revisited: avian malaria in the Lesser Antilles. Evolution. 2003;57:606–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Chasar A, Loiseau C, ValkiŪNas G, Iezhova T, Smith TB, Sehgal RNM. Prevalence and diversity patterns of avian blood parasites in degraded African rainforest habitats. Mol Ecol. 2009;18:4121–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Bonneaud C, Sepil I, Milá B, Buermann W, Pollinger J, Sehgal RNM, et al. The prevalence of avian Plasmodium is higher in undisturbed tropical forests of Cameroon. J Trop Ecol. 2009;25:439–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Whittaker RJ, Fernández-Palacios JM, Matthews TJ, Borregaard MK, Triantis KA. Island biogeography: taking the long view of nature’s laboratories. Science. 2017;357:eaam8326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Warren BH, Simberloff D, Ricklefs RE, Aguilée R, Condamine FL, Gravel D, et al. Islands as model systems in ecology and evolution: prospects fifty years after MacArthur-Wilson. Ecol Lett. 2015;18:200–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Bernotienė R, Palinauskas V, Iezhova T, Murauskaitė D, Valkiūnas G. Avian haemosporidian parasites (Haemosporida): a comparative analysis of different polymerase chain reaction assays in detection of mixed infections. Exp Parasitol. 2016;163:31–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the Thousand Island Lake National Forest Park and the Chun'an Forestry Bureau for permitting us to conduct this research. We thank Xi Huang and Lu Dong’s lab in Beijing Normal University for equipment direction. We thank Qi Si and Chang Cai from Zhejiang University for their help in bird capturing. This study was funded by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (#32030066) and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (#LD21C030002). Qiang Wu was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (#32001124) and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (#LY22C030002).

Funding

National Nature Science Foundation of China, grant/award numbers 32030066 and 32001124; Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, grant/award numbers LD21C030002 and LY22C030002.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MOE Key Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis & Protection, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China

    Yuxiao Han, Qiang Wu, Juan Liu, Tinghao Jin & Ping Ding

  2. Molecular Ecology and Evolution Lab, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

    Olof Hellgren & Staffan Bensch

Authors
  1. Yuxiao Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Olof Hellgren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qiang Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Juan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tinghao Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Staffan Bensch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ping Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YH and PD conceived the ideas and guided the sampling methods; OH and SB guided the data processing and analysis methods; QW provided assistance with analytical methods; JL and TJ helped with collection of bird blood samples and checking of manuscript details; YH drafted the first version of the manuscript with contributions from OH; all authors revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping Ding.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All field operations were conducted under the ethical approval of Zhejiang University and National Bird Banding Center of China (permit number: ZJU20220127).

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

The list of birds we collected at TIL and their residence types and prevalence of different parasite species. Figure S1. The monthly trends of infection intensity for parasite-infected passerine bird samples except where the parasite species only appeared once.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, Y., Hellgren, O., Wu, Q. et al. Seasonal variations of intensity of avian malaria infection in the Thousand Island Lake System, China. Parasites Vectors 16, 218 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-05848-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-05848-4

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us