Skip to main content

First evidence of gonadal hybrid dysgenesis in Chagas disease vectors (Hemiptera, Triatominae): gonad atrophy prevents events of interspecific gene flow and introgression

Abstract

Background

Hybridization events between Triatoma spp. have been observed under both natural and laboratory conditions. The ability to produce hybrids can influence different aspects of the parent species, and may even result in events of introgression, speciation and extinction. Hybrid sterility is caused by unviable gametes (due to errors in chromosomal pairing [meiosis]) or by gonadal dysgenesis (GD). All of the triatomine hybrids analyzed so far have not presented GD. We describe here for the first time GD events in triatomine hybrids and highlight these taxonomic and evolutionary implications of these events.

Methods

Reciprocal experimental crosses were performed between Triatoma longipennis and Triatoma mopan. Intercrosses were also performed between the hybrids, and backcrosses were performed between the hybrids and the parent species. In addition, morphological and cytological analyzes were performed on the atrophied gonads of the hybrids.

Results

Hybrids were obtained only for the crosses T. mopan♀ × T. longipennis♂. Intercrosses and backcrosses did not result in offspring. Morphological analyses of the male gonads of the hybrids confirmed that the phenomenon that resulted in sterility of the hybrid was bilateral GD (the gonads of the hybrids were completely atrophied). Cytological analyses of the testes of the hybrids also confirmed GD, with no germ cells observed (only somatic cells, which make up the peritoneal sheath).

Conclusions

The observations made during this study allowed us to characterize, for the first time, GD in triatomines and demonstrated that gametogenesis does not occur in atrophied gonads. The characterization of GD in male hybrids resulting from the crossing of T. mopan♀ × T. longipennis♂ highlights the importance of evaluating both the morphology and the cytology of the gonads to confirm which event resulted in the sterility of the hybrid: GD (which results in no gamete production) or meiotic errors (which results in non-viable gametes).

Graphical Abstract

Background

Chagas disease (CD) is a neglected disease caused by the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas, 1909) (Kinetoplastida, Trypanosomatidae) which affects about 6–7 million people worldwide [1]. Although T. cruzi can be transmitted in various ways, such as by blood transfusion, organ transplantation and orally [1]), the WHO considers vector transmission through the direct consumption of/contact with feces and/or urine of triatomines contaminated with T. cruzi to be the main transmission mode [1]. As such, vector control is considered t be the main measure to mitigate new cases of CD [1].

There are currently 160 species described in the subfamily Triatominae (157 extant species and 3 fossil species), grouped into 18 genera and five tribes (Alberproseniini, Bolboderini, Cavernicolini, Rhodniini and Triatomini) [2,3,4,5,6]. The Triatomini tribe is composed of nine genera (Dipetalogaster Usinger, 1939; Eratyrus Stål, 1859; Hermanlentia Jurberg & Galvão, 1997; Linshcosteus Distant, 1904; Mepraia Mazza, Gajardo & Jörg, 1940; Nesotriatoma Usinger, 1944; Panstrongylus Berg, 1879; Paratriatoma Barber, 1938; Triatoma Laporte, 1832) [2], with Triatoma being the most diversified of these and the genus with the largest number of species [2].

The genus Triatoma is paraphyletic [7, 8], which has led to several complexes and subcomplexes being proposed [9,10,11]. The Phyllosoma complex is a monophyletic grouping composed of the Phyllosoma and Dimidiata subcomplexes [9, 12]. Among the species of the Phyllosoma subcomplex, Triatoma longipennis (Usinger, 1939) is the main vector of T. cruzi in northern, western and central Mexico [13], with infection rates of between 20% and 33% [14]. To date, this species has been recorded in 11 Mexican states: Aguascalientes, Chihuahua, Colima, Durango, Guanajuato, Hidalgo, Jalisco, Michoacan, Nayarit, Sinaloa and Zacatecas [15, 16]. In contrast, among the species of the Dimidiata subcomplex, the distribution of Triatoma mopan Dorn et al., 2018, a species related to Triatoma dimidiata (Latreille, 1811) [17], is more limited than that of T. longipennis, with distribution restricted to the Rio Frio cave, Cayo District, Belize [17]. The authors of this latter study point out that specimens of T. mopan collected in the Rio Frio cave were found to be infected with T. cruzi [17].

Hybridization events between species of the genus Triatoma have been observed under natural [18,19,20] and laboratory conditions [21,22,23,24,25,26]. The ability to produce hybrids can influence different aspects of the parent species, and may even result in events of introgression, speciation and extinction [27]. In this context, several studies have evaluated the hybridization capacity and, above all, the reproductive barriers that prevent the formation of hybrids or result in hybrids being unviable (causing mortality, infertility or lower fitness for these organisms) [21,22,23,24,25,26, 28,29,30].

By studying species for the presence of interspecific barriers under laboratory conditions, it has been possible to assess the specific status of species, based on the biological concept of species [21, 25, 28,29,30]. Furthermore, by evaluating the ability of species to produce hybrids, the systematic and evolutionary relationship between different species can be confirmed, as hybrids, in general, are produced only among phylogenetically related species [25, 26, 28,29,30].

Reproductive barriers already characterized in Triatominae include the habitat [30, 31] and mechanical isolation [31, 32] as prezygotic barriers, and infeasibility [33], sterility [29, 32] and collapse [34, 35] of the hybrid as postzygotic barriers. Hybrid sterility result from unviable gametes (due chromosomal pairing [meiosis] errors) [29, 32] or the phenomenon of gonadal dysgenesis (GD) [36].

Triatomine gonads consist of two testes (in males) and two ovaries (in females) [37, 38]. The testis is an ellipsoid-shaped organ located in the abdominal region, fixed by tracheas between the second and fifth segments (almost on the side edges), located below the diaphragm (more specifically within the perivisceral sinus) [38]. It is lined with a transparent peritoneal sheath [39], which covers seven testicular follicles (sites where gametogenesis occurs) [38, 40], as well as the vessels (1 vas deferens and 7 vas efferens) and the seminal vesicle [38]. These follicles are important from a taxonomic point of view, as they vary in size between different genera [41,42,43,44,45].

Gonadal dysgenesis is associated with factors related to gonad atrophy in hybrids and can be unilateral or bilateral [36]. All of the triatomine hybrids analyzed so far have not presented GD [26, 29] and consequently, all recorded cases of hybrid sterility have been associated only with errors during meiosis [29, 32, 46,47,48]. We describe here for the first time a GD event in triatomine hybrids and highlight its taxonomic and evolutionary implications.

Methods

Experimental crosses

Reciprocal experimental crosses were performed between T. longipennis (origin: Mexico, Jalisco, El Grullo; colony started in March 2008) and T. mopan (origin: Central America, Belize, Cayo, Belmopan; colony started in August 2013) (Fig. 1a; Table 1). In addition, intercrosses were performed between the hybrids (Fig. 1b; Table 1) and backcrosses were performed between the hybrids and the parent species (Fig. 1C, Table 1). The insects used in the experiment came from colonies kept in the Triatominae insectary of the School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil. The experimental crosses were conducted in the Triatominae insectary according to the experimental protocols of Mendonça et al. [34]. In brief, the insects were sexed as fifth instar nymphs (N5), and males and females were kept separately until they reached the adult stage to guarantee the virginity of the insects used in the crosses. For the experimental crosses, five pairs from each set were placed in plastic jars (5 cm [diameter] × 10 cm [height]) and kept at room temperature. The eggs were collected on a weekly basis and counted to evaluate the hatching rate. The eggs from the cross between T. longipennis♀ × T. mopan♂ were infertile (Table 1), and those from the cross between T. longipennis♂ × T. mopan♀ were fertile (Table 1). The N5 hybrids resulting from the cross between T. mopan♀ × T. longipennis♂ (Fig. 1a) were sexed, separated and, after the imaginal molt, five intercrosses (Fig. 1b) were performed to assess hybrid fertility (Table 1). In addition, 10 backcrosses with T. longipennis (5 for each direction) and 10 with T. mopan (5 for each direction) were also performed to assess hybrid fertility (Table 1); the eggs were collected and counted and the hatching rate evaluated in the same way as reported for the N5 cross.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Examples of experimental crosses between Triatoma mopan♀ × Triatoma longipennis♂ (a), intercrossing between hybrid♀ × hybrid♂ (b) and backcrossing between hybrid♀ × T. mopan♂ (c). Bar: 1 cm

Table 1 Experimental crosses performed between T. mopan, T. longipennis and hybrids

Morphology of the gonads

Ten adult male hybrids resulting from the cross between T. mopan♀ × T. longipennis♂ were dissected at intervals of 5, 15 and 30 days after the imaginal molt. The morphology of the male gonads was analyzed under a stereomicroscope microscope (SM) (model MZ APO; Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) fitted with the Motic Advanced 3.2 Plus Image Analysis System (Motic, Hong Kong) to evaluate the presence of GD (which may be uni- or bilateral) [36]. In addition, the gonads of 10 adult males of the parental species (T. longipennis and T. mopan) were also dissected and analyzed under the SM (control group).

Cytological analysis

Ten male hybrids were dissected, and the testes were removed and stored in methanol:acetic acid solution (3: 1). Slides were prepared by the cell crushing technique (as described by Alevi et al. [49]), and the cytological analyses were performed with the aim to evaluate whether spermatogenesis was normal in gonads with GD, using the lacto-acetic orcein technique [49, 50]. As a control group, the gonads of 10 adult males of T. mopan and T. longipennis were also dissected and analyzed cytologically. The slides were examined by light microscopy under a Jena model Jenaval light microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Jena, Germany) coupled to a digital camera; the Axio Vision LE 4.8 image analyzer system (Carl Zeiss AG) with a 400-fold increase was used to analyze the images.

Results and discussion

Hybrids were obtained only for the T. mopan♀ × T. longipennis♂ crosses (Fig. 1a) (crosses between T. mopan♂ × T. longipennis♀ showed a prezygotic barrier) (Table 1). Intercrosses (Fig. 1b) were performed to evaluate the fertility of the first-generation hybrid (F1) and demonstrated that the hybrids are sterile (Table 1). To evaluate whether hybrids of both sexes were sterile, backcrosses were performed with T. mopan and T. longipennis (Table 1; Fig. 1c). None of the backcrossing directions resulted in offspring, confirming the postzygotic barrier of hybrid sterility (Table 1).

Morphological analyses of the male gonads of the hybrids (Fig. 2c) and of the parents (Fig. 2a, b) confirmed that the phenomenon which resulted in the sterility of the hybrid was bilateral GD. The gonads of the hybrids were completely atrophied (Fig. 2c), with the morphology of the testis being different morphology from that of the parents (Fig. 2a, b). The testis of the triatomine parents had seven testicular follicles (where all phases of spermatogenesis occur [51]) [38, 41,42,43,44,45] and a transparent peritoneal sheath [40]; in contrast, the testis of the hybrids showed only the peritoneal sheath (without seminiferous tubules) (Fig. 2c).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Male gonads of Triatoma mopan (a), Triatoma longipennis (b) and the hybrid (c). Note that the hybrid’s testes are atrophied (c). Bar: 10 mm

Cytological analyses of the testis of the hybrids confirmed GD based on the absence of germ cells and only somatic cells (with the latter forming the peritoneal sheath) (Fig. 3). In comparison, cytological analysis of the gonads of T. mopan and T. longipennis revealed the presence of spermatocytes, spermatids and spermatozoa (as has been well characterized in several studies in the subfamily Triatominae [52,53,54,55]).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Somatic cells from the testicular peritoneal sheath of hybrids. Note the absence of germ cells. Bar: 10 μm

In their studies on Triatoma spp., Perlowagora-Szumlewics and Correia [56] and Perlowagora-Szumlewics et al. [57] observed, for example, that male hybrids resulting from crossing T. pseudomaculata Corrêa & Espínola, 1964 × T. sordida (Stål, 1859), T. pseudomaculata × T. infestans (Klug, 1834), T. pseudomaculata × T. brasiliensis Neiva, 1911 and Rhodnius prolixus Stål, 1859 × Rhodnius neglectus Lent, 1954 are sterile, while females are fertile. Several interspecific crosses between Triatoma spp. [32], Panstrongylus spp. [47], Rhodnius spp. [46] and Psammolestes spp. [29] resulted in sterile hybrids. Most of these studies have cytologically analyzed the gonads of male hybrids and observed chromosomal pairing errors during meiosis, suggesting an association between the meiotic errors and hybrid sterility [29, 32, 46, 47].

Study of the interspecific reproductive barriers of insect vectors of CD has taxonomic, systematic, genetic and evolutionary value [20, 23,24,25, 28,29,30, 32,33,34,35, 46,47,48, 58, 59]. From a taxonomic point of view, characterization of pre- and/or postzygotic barriers confirms the specific status of the parental species [20, 23, 25, 29, 30, 32,33,34,35, 46,47,48, 58], based on the biological species concept [60, 61]. From a systematic point of view, in general, evolutionarily more distant species have prezygotic barriers that prevent the formation of hybrids while evolutionarily closer species can produce hybrids that will be later declined (hybrid breakdown) by postzygotic barriers [26, 30, 59]. From a genetic and evolutionary point of view, the characterization of reproductive barriers directly implies the genetic integrity of the parent species because it prevents events of interspecific gene flow and also, mainly, introgression [23, 28, 32].

The aim of crossing species belonging to two subcomplexes grouped in the Phyllosoma complex (Phyllosoma and Dimidiata subcomplexes) was to assess whether these phylogenetically related subcomplexes [7, 8, 12] are reproductively isolated or not. Thus, the production of hybrids in one direction and, subsequently, the breakdown of these hybrids by post-zygotic barriers (GD) confirm that these subcomplexes are closer in terms of a systematic perspective (as initially suggested by molecular studies [7, 8, 12]); if they had ever been distant subcomplexes, pre-zygotic barriers would be present, making hybrid formation unviable.

Conclusions

We characterized, for the first time, GD in Triatominae and demonstrated that gametogenesis does not occur in atrophied gonads. The characterization of GD in hybrids resulting from the T. mopan♀ × T. longipennis♂ cross highlights the importance of evaluating both the morphology and the cytology of the gonads to confirm which event resulted in the sterility of the hybrid: GD (which results in no gamete production) or meiotic errors (which results in non-viable gametes).

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

References

  1. WHO. Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis). 2022. http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chagas-disease-(american-trypanosomiasis). Accessed 17 Feb 2023.

  2. Alevi KCC, de Oliveira J, Rocha DS, Galvão C. Trends in taxonomy of Chagas disease vectors (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae): from Linnaean to integrative taxonomy. Pathogens. 2021;10:1627.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Oliveira-Correia JPS, Gil-Santana HR, Dale C, Galvão C. Triatoma guazu Lent and Wygodzinsky is a junior synonym of Triatoma williami Galvão, Souza and Lima. Insects. 2022;13:591.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gil-Santana HR, Chavez T, Pita S, Panzera F, Galvão C. Panstrongylus noireaui, a remarkable new species of Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) from Bolivia. ZooKeys. 2022;1104:203–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Téllez-Rendón J, Esteban L, Rengifo-Correa L, Díaz-Albiter H, Huerta H, Dale C. Triatoma yelapensis sp. nov. (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) from Mexico, with a Key of Triatoma Species Recorded in Mexico. Insects. 2023;14:331.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao Y, Fan M, Li H, Cai W. Review of kissing bugs (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae) from China with descriptions of two new species. Insects. 2023;14:450.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Justi SA, Russo CAM, Mallet JRDS, Obara MT, Galvão C. Molecular phylogeny of Triatomini (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:149.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Justi SA, Galvão C, Schrago CG. Geological changes of the Americas and their influence on the diversification of the Neotropical kissing bugs (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004527.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Schofield CJ, Galvão C. Classification, evolution, and species groups within the Triatominae. Acta Trop. 2009;110:88–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pita S, Lorite P, Nattero J, Galvão C, Alevi KCC, Teves SC, et al. New arrangements on several species subcomplexes of Triatoma genus based on the chromosomal position of ribosomal genes (Hemiptera—Triatominae). Infect Genet Evol. 2016;43:225–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alevi KCC, Oliveira J, Azeredo-Oliveira MTV, Rosa JA. Triatoma vitticeps subcomplex (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae): a new grouping of Chagas disease vectors from South America. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:180.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Renfigo-Correa L, Abad-Franch F, Martinez-Hernandez F, Salazar-Schettino PM, Tellez-Rendon JL, Villalobos G. A biogeographic–ecological approach to disentangle reticulate evolution in the Triatoma phyllosoma species group (Heteroptera: Triatominae), vectors of Chagas disease. J Zool Syst Evol Res. 2021;59:94–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brenière SF, Waleckx E, Magallón-Gastélum E, Bosseno MF, Hardy X, Ndo C, et al. Population genetic structure of Meccus longipennis (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae), vector of Chagas disease in West Mexico. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12:254–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Espinoza-Gómez F, Maldonado-Rodríguez A, Coll-Cárdenas R, Hernández-Suárez CM, Fernández-Salas I. Presence of triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) and risk of transmission of Chagas disease in Colima, México. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2002;97:25–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Martínez-Hernandez F, Villalobos G, Martínez-Ibarra JA. Population structure and genetic diversity of Triatoma longipennis (Usinger, 1939) (Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae) in Mexico. Infect Genet Evol. 2021;89:104718.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rivas N, Antonio-Campos A, Noguez-García J, Alejandre-Aguilar R. First record of Triatoma longipennis Usinger, 1939 (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae) in Tecozautla, Hidalgo. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2023;56:e00782023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dorn PL, Justi AS, Dale C, Stevens L, Galvão C, Cordon RL, et al. Description of Triatoma mopan sp. n. (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae) from a cave in Belize. Zookeys. 2018;775:69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Martínez-Fernandez F, Martínez-Ibarra JA, Catalá S, Villalobos G, de La Torre P, Laclette JP, et al. Natural crossbreeding between sympatric species of the Phyllosoma complex (Insecta: Hemiptera: Reduviidae) indicate the existence of only one species with morphologic and genetic variations. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;82:74–82.

  19. Noireau F, Gutierrez T, Zegarra M, Flores R, Brenière F, Cardozo L, et al. Cryptic speciation in Triatoma sordida (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) from the Bolivian Chaco. Trop Med Int Health. 1998;3:364–72.

  20. Abalos JW. Sobre híbridos naturales y experimentales de Triatoma. An Inst Reg. 1948;2:209–23.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alevi KCC, Oliveira J, Garcia ACC, Cristal DC, Delgado LMG, Bittinelli IF, et al. Triatoma rosai sp. nov. (Hemiptera, Triatominae): a new species of Argentinian Chagas disease vector described based on integrative taxonomy. Insects. 2020;11:830.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Vicente RD, Madeira FF, Borsatto KC, Garcia ACC, Cristal DC, Delgado LMG, et al. Morphological, Cytological and molecular studies and feeding and defecation pattern of hybrids from experimental crosses between Triatoma sordida and T. rosai (Hemiptera, Triatominae). Pathogens. 2022;11:1302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Cesaretto NR, Reis YV, Oliveira J, Galvão C, Alevi KCC. Revisiting the genetic, taxonomic and evolutionary aspects of chagas disease vectors of the Triatoma phyllosoma Subcomplex (Hemiptera, Triatominae). Diversity. 2022;14:978.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pinotti H, Alevi KCC, Oliveira J, Ravazi A, Madeira FF, Reis YV, et al. Segregation of phenotypic characteristics in hybrids of Triatoma brasiliensis species complex (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae). Infect Genet Evol. 2021;91:104798.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cesaretto NR, Oliveira J, Ravazi A, Madeira FF, Reis YV, Oliveira ABB de, et al. Trends in taxonomy of Triatomini (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae): reproductive compatibility reinforces the synonymization of Meccus Stål, 1859 with Triatoma Laporte, 1832. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14:340.

  26. Pinotti H, Alevi KCC, Oliveira J, Ravazi A, Madeira FF, Reis YV, et al. Revisiting the hybridization processes in the Triatoma brasiliensis complex (Hemiptera, Triatominae): interspecific genomic compatibility point to a possible recent diversification of the species grouped in this monophyletic complex. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0257992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Chunco AJ. Hybridization in a warmer world. Ecol Evol. 2014;4:2019–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Reis YV, Oliveira J, Madeira FF, Ravazi A, Oliveira ABB, Mello DV de, et al. Trends in evolution of the Triatomini tribe (Hemiptera, Triatominae): reproductive incompatibility between four species of geniculatus clade. Parasit Vectors. 2022;15:403.

  29. Ravazi A, Oliveira J, Campos FF, Madeira FF, Reis YV, Oliveiraet ABB de, et al. Trends in evolution of the Rhodniini tribe (Hemiptera, Triatominae): experimental crosses between Psammolestes tertius Lent & Jurberg, 1965 and P. coreodes Bergroth, 1911 and analysis of the reproductive isolating mechanisms. Parasit Vectosr. 2021;14:350.

  30. Delgado LMG, Oliveira J, Ravazi A, Madeira FF, Reis YV, Pinottiet H, et al. Revisiting the hybridization processes in the Triatoma brasiliensis Complex (Hemiptera, Triatominae): Reproductive Isolation between Triatoma petrocchiae and T. b. brasiliensis and T. lenti. Insects. 2021;12:1015.

  31. Usinger RL, Wygodzinsky P, Ryckman RE. The biosystematics of Triatominae. Annu Rev Entomol. 1966;11:309–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pérez R, Hérnandez M, Quintero O, Scvortzoff E, Canale D, Méndez L, et al. Cytogenetic analysis of experimental hybrids in species of Triatominae (Hemiptera-Reduviidae). Genetica. 2005;125:261–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Martínez-Ibarra JA, Grant-Guillén Y, Delgadillo-Aceves IN, Zumaya-Estrada FA, Rocha-Chávez G, Salazar-Schettino PM, et al. Biological and genetic aspects of crosses between phylogenetically close species of Mexican Triatomines (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). J Med Entomol. 2011;48:705–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mendonça VJ, Alevi KCC, Medeiros LMO, Nascimento JD, Azeredo-Oliveira MTV, Rosa JA. Cytogenetic and morphologic approaches of hybrids from experimental crosses between Triatoma lenti Sherlock & Serafim, 1967 and T. sherlocki Papa et al., 2002 (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Infect Genet Evol. 2014;26:123–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Alevi KCC, Pinotti H, Araújo RF, Azeredo-Oliveira MTV, Rosa JA, Mendonça VJ. Hybrid colapse confirm the specific status of Triatoma bahiensis Sherlock and Serafim, 1967 (Hemiptera, Triatominae). Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98:475–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Almeida LM, Carareto CMA. Gonadal hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila sturtevanti (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Ilheringia. 2002;92:71–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Barth R. Estudo anatômico e histológico sobre a subfamília Triatominae (Heteroptera, Reduviidae). Parte XXIII: O ovário de Triatoma infestans. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1973;71:123–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Barth R. Estudos anatômicos e histológicos sobre a subfamília Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae). V: Anatomia do testículo e espermiocitogênese do Triatoma infestans. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1956;54:135–229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Alevi KCC, Castro NFC, Oliveira J, Rosa JA, Azeredo-Oliveira MTV. Cystic spermatogenesis in three species of the prolixus complex (Hemiptera: Triatominae). Ital J Zool. 2015;82:172–8.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Alevi KCC, Oliveira J, Rosa JA, Azeredo-Oliveira MTV. Coloration of the testicular peritoneal sheath as a synapomorphy of triatomines (Hemiptera, Reduviidae). Biota Neotrop. 2014;14:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Alevi KCC. Morphology of testicular follicles as taxonomic tool in the subfamily Triatominae. Entomol Ornithol Herpetol. 2015;4:e110.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schreiber G, Penalva F, Carvalho HC. Morfologia comparada dos folículos testiculares e sistemática dos Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae). Cien Cult. 1968;20:640–1.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Silva FP, Schreiber G. Morfologia comparada nos canalículos testiculares da subfamília Triatominae como caráter taxonômico. Arq Museu Nac. 1971;58:275–6.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gonçalves TCM, Lent H, Almeida JR. Estudo anatômico e morfométrico dos folículos testiculares de algumas espécies de Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1987;82:543–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lent H, Jurberg J, Galvão C. Revalidação do gênero Mepraia Mazza, Gajardo & Jorg, 1940 (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1994;89:347–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Díaz S, Panzera F, Jaramillo-O N, Pérez R, Fernández R, Vallejo G, et al. Genetic, cytogenetic and morphological trends in the evolution of the Rhodnius (Triatominae: Rhodniini) Trans-Andean Group. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:87493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Villacís AG, Dujardin JP, Panzera F, Yumiseva CA, Pita S, Santillán-Guayasamín S, et al. Chagas vectors Panstrongylus chinai (Del Ponte, 1929) and Panstrongylus howardi (Neiva, 1911): chromatic forms or true species? Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:226.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Campos-Soto R, Panzera F, Pita S, Lages C, Solari A, Botto-Mahan C. Experimental crosses between Mepraia gajardoi and M. spinolai and hybrid chromosome analyses reveal the occurrence of several isolation mechanisms. Infect Genet Evol. 2016;45:205–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Alevi KCC, Mendonça PP, Pereira NP, Rosa JA, Azeredo-Oliveira MTV. Karyotype of Triatoma melanocephala Neiva & Pinto (1923). Does this species fit in the Brasiliensis subcomplex? Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12:1652–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. De Vaio ES, Grucci B, Castagnino AM, Franca ME, Martinez ME. Meiotic differences between three triatomine species (Hemiptera:Reduviidae). Genetica. 1985;67:185–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Davey KG. La reprodución em los insectos. Madrid: Editorial Alhambra; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Alevi KCC, Rosa JA, Azeredo-Oliveira MTV. Spermatogenesis in Triatoma melanica Neiva and Lent, 1941 (Hemiptera, Triatominae). J Vector Ecol. 2014;39:231–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Alevi KCC, Mendonça PP, Pereira NP, Rosa JA, Azeredo-Oliveira MTV. Spermatogenesis in Triatoma melanocephala (Hemiptera: Triatominae). Gen Mol Res. 2013;12:4944–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Alevi KCC, Mendonça PP, Pereira NP, Rosa JA, Azeredo-Oliveira MTV. Heteropyknotic filament in spermatids of Triatoma melanocephala and T. vitticeps (Hemiptera, Triatominae). Invert Reprod Dev. 2013;58:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Alevi KCC, Mendonça PP, Pereira NP, Fernandes ALVZ, Rosa JA, Azeredo-Oliveira MTV. Analysis of spermiogenesis like a tool in the study of the triatomines of the Brasiliensis subcomplex. Comp Rend Biol. 2013;336:46–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Perlowagora-Szumlewics A, Correia MV. Induction of male sterility manipulation of genetic mechanisms present in vector species of Chagas disease (remarks on integrating sterile-male release with insecticidal control measures against vectors of Chagas disease). Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 1972;14:360–71.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Perlowagora-Szumlewicz A, Correia MV, Trinchet AMR. Induction of male sterility through manipulation of genetic mechanisms present in vector species of triatominae. II. Partial restoration of male fertility. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1976;10:367–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Martinez-Ibarra JA, Noqueda-Torres B, Licón-Trillo A, Alejandre-Aguilar R, Salazar-Schettino PM, Vences-Blanco MO. Biological aspects of crosses between Triatoma recurva (Stål), 1868 (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae) and other members of the Phyllosoma complex. J Vector Ecol. 2015;40:117–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Neves JMS, Sousa PS, Oliveira J, Ravazi A, Madeira FF, Reis YV, et al. Prezygotic isolation confirms the exclusion of Triatoma melanocephala, T. vitticeps and T. tibiamaculata of the T. brasiliensis subcomplex (Hemiptera, Triatominae). Infect Genet Evol. 2020;79:104149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Mayr E. Populações Espécies e Evolução. 1st ed. São Paulo: Editora Nacional; 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Mayr E. Populations, species, and evolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully thank the following institutions for financial support: Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP, Brazil); Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Brazil)—Finance Code 001; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brazil); and Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ, Brazil).

Funding

The study was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP, Brazil), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Brazil)—Finance Code 001, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brazil) and Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ, Brazil).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LMSA: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing—original draft preparation and writing—review & editing, NRC: Methodology, investigation and data curation. JO: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation and writing—review & editing. AR: Methodology, investigation and data curation. YVR: Methodology, investigation and data curation. SCAFD: Methodology, investigation and data curation. ISM: Methodology, investigation and data curation. KCB: Methodology, investigation and data curation. CG: Conceptualization, writing—review, editing and funding acquisition, JAR: Conceptualization, resources and writing—review & editing. MTVAO: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing—original draft preparation and writing—review & editing, supervision, project administration and funding acquisition. KCCA: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing—original draft preparation and writing—review & editing, supervision, project administration and funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cleber Galvão.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azevedo, L.M.S., Cesaretto, N.R., de Oliveira, J. et al. First evidence of gonadal hybrid dysgenesis in Chagas disease vectors (Hemiptera, Triatominae): gonad atrophy prevents events of interspecific gene flow and introgression. Parasites Vectors 16, 390 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-06006-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-06006-6

Keywords