Skip to main content

Treatment and management of coenurosis by Taenia multiceps: field data from outbreaks in endemic regions and literature review

Abstract

Background

Taenia multiceps coenurosis is endemic in sheep from various regions worldwide. Dogs, the key hosts, shed T. multiceps eggs in their feces contaminating the pasture, and lambs are mostly infected during their first turnout into pastures. The disease is manifested in two forms: acute (due to the migrating oncospheres in the CNS) or chronic (due to the developing coenuri in the brain or spinal cord). Both forms are frequently accompanied by neurological symptoms.

Methods

Field trials conducted in an endemic region (Sardinia, Italy) to treat replacement lambs in six sheep flocks infected with acute coenurosis are summarized in this article. The article also reviews earlier reports on various approaches developed to treat and immunize sheep against coenurosis.

Results

Accurate detection of the time in which lambs become infected is crucial in deciding which treatment approach should be used. Acute disease can be successfully treated via chemotherapy. Results of field trials conducted in Sardinia revealed the efficacy of three (1-week apart) oxfendazole doses (14.15 mg/kg) in protecting apparently healthy lambs in the infected flocks from developing neurological symptoms. A single praziquantel dose (18.75 mg/kg) worked well for the same purpose and was also found significant in treating 5 of 16 clinically ill lambs in one flock. Earlier reports documented high rates of recovery (up to 100%) in clinically diseased lambs that received much higher doses (50–100 mg/kg) of praziquantel. However, chemotherapy is not preferred in chronic coenurosis since it can lead to rupture of the coenuri, giving rise to serious inflammation in the CNS. Surgical intervention is highly recommended in this case, and the pooled success rates for surgery in chronic-infected cases was estimated at 82.1% (95% CI 73.1–91.0%). However, various trials have been conducted to immunize sheep against T. multiceps coenurosis, and the 18k (Tm18) family of oncosphere antigens was found promising as a vaccine candidate.

Conclusions

In acute coenurosis, selection of the proper anthelmintic should be done after consulting the owner for several reasons: (1) costs of the used anthelmintic: treating a small flock of 100 sheep costs around 1170 and 660 € for praziquantel and oxfendazole, respectively; (2) withdrawal time of the used anthelmintic: No time is required before consuming meat and milk from praziquantel-treated sheep, whereas meat and milk from oxfendazole-treated sheep should not be consumed for 44 and 9 days, respectively, causing additional costs for the farmers. Since no commercial vaccines have yet been developed against T. multiceps coenurosis in sheep, preventive measures remain the cornerstone of controlling this serious disease.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Coenurosis by Taenia multiceps is one of the most important parasitic diseases in small ruminants, leading to significant economic losses in their economy [1]. A few surveys conducted in Ethiopia revealed annual loss of US$ 124,821 based on occurrence of the disease in brains of apparently healthy sheep and goats, reviewed in Varcasia et al. [1]. The parasite can also cause fatal consequences in various wildlife species including deer and yak [2]. Humans can also be infected, and a few human cases of T. multiceps coenurosis have been reported worldwide [3]. Domestic and wild canids can serve as definitive hosts for T. multiceps. Although foxes, wolves and jackals have been recorded as proper hosts, shepherd dogs remain the most important host for the parasite transmission [4, 5]. The intermediate hosts include a wide variety of domestic and wild ungulates, primarily sheep and goats [6]. Infected dogs shed the gravid proglottids and/or eggs of T. multiceps in their feces, and eggs contaminate the environment [4]. Eggs are then ingested, in contaminated food and water, by the intermediate hosts and hatch in the intestine, giving rise to the oncospheres, which then migrate to the central nervous system (CNS) [1]. The migrating oncospheres develop to large (~ 5 cm diameter) fluid-filled coenuri within 6–8 months, leading to neurological symptoms. In sheep, cerebral coenurosis (also termed gid or sturdy) is a significant contributor to neurological disease [6]. Coenuri can also develop in other locations outside the CNS (e.g., subcutaneous tissues), particularly in goats [7].

Control of T. multiceps coenurosis is challenging since the parasite can circulate in various pastoral (mostly dog-sheep) and sylvatic life cycles, and its eggs can survive for long periods in the environment [8]. The permeant association between dogs and sheep herds as well as farm slaughter, unsanitary disposal of sheep offal and lack of management of coenurus-infected animals in pastures (very common in extensive breeding) contribute to the widespread occurrence of coenurosis in the endemic regions [1, 5, 9]. Sardinia is an obvious example for these regions, where the disease is known by the farmers, and the parasite is typically responsible for several neurologically diseased cases in sheep farms [10, 11]. In addition, atypical outbreak of acute coenurosis has been documented in lambs < 30 days old in a flock from Sardinia [12]. This emphasizes the potential occurrence of T. multiceps coenurosis in replacement lambs, giving rise to extensive mortality episodes due to acute disease. Herein, we provide field experience to treat replacement lambs in six Sardinian sheep flocks with several cases of acute coenurosis.

Although several articles and reviews have been published so far on coenurosis, a few of these articles have focused on treatment and management of this parasitic disease, which highlights the importance of summarizing, in a single contribution, all the most important effective treatment therapies and control strategies against this serious disease. The present article, therefore, reviews the literature on various treatment approaches and vaccines developed to control T. multiceps coenurosis.

Methods

Field work data

From March 2020 to April 2024, six different outbreaks of coenurosis by Taenia multiceps occurred in six Sarda breed sheep farms in Sardinia, Italy. These farms were located in six different municipalities belonging to two provinces: Nuoro (farm #1 in Bitti and farm #2 in Oniferi) and Sassari (farm #3 in Tula, farm #4 in Pattada, farm #5 in Thiesi and farm#6 in Benetutti). Table 1 summarizes information on the six flocks, and data mentioned in this section are based on field experience of one of the authors (Madau G), who works as a local veterinary practitioner in Sardinia. The included farms contained 250–500 sheep reared for dairy purposes. Each farm contained 50–120 replacement lambs. Most of the coenurosis cases occurred in replacement lambs aged 4–6 months; however, acute infections were also observed in sheep aged 1–3 years in the Oniferi flock (farm #2). Around 18—24% of the replacement lambs displayed neurological symptoms, including separation from the flock, ataxia, lateral recumbency and head tilt. Some episodes of sudden deaths had also occurred. The disease was confirmed after necropsy of all clinically ill lambs in four flocks and a few clinically ill lambs in the remaining two flocks (#4 and 5). The infected animals had typical lesions of acute coenurosis. Hyperemia of the vessels on the brain surface and several necrotic tracks of T. multiceps oncospheres migrating in the CNS were observed [1]. After diagnosis, off-label therapies of commercial preparations containing either praziquantel (Neomansonil®, 25 mg/ml) or oxfendazole (Oxfenil®, 2.265 g/100 ml) were administered. Informed consents from the owners were taken orally by Madau G. The owners were informed about the disease and consequences of treating or not treating their animals. The anthelmintic preparations were given orally in different regimens; see Fig. 1. For example, animals in three flocks (#1, 2 and 5) received a single 30 ml dose of the praziquantel preparation (i.e. 562.5 mg) equivalent to 18.75 mg/kg. Animals in the remaining 3 flocks (#3, 4 and 6) received three 25 ml doses (i.e. 566.25 mg) of the oxfendazole preparation equivalent to 14.15 mg/kg 7 days apart. All apparently healthy lambs in the six flocks were treated, but in flock #3, only 50% of the apparently healthy lambs were treated, whereas the remaining 50% did not receive any treatments. Besides, clinically ill lambs in two flocks (#4 and 5) were treated. The six flocks were then carefully monitored for a long period.

Table 1 Field off-label treatment used in coenurosis-infected sheep reared in six different flocks in Sardinia, Italy
Fig. 1
figure 1

Various regimens used in the present study to treat acute coenurosis in six sheep flocks from Sardinia, Italy

Literature review

Various databases (e.g. Scopus, PubMed, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar) were searched to collect all published data on treatment and control of T. multiceps infections. Various keywords were used in various combinations, including T. multiceps, coenurosis, sheep, goat, dogs, treatment, vaccination, immunity and control. These keywords were combined using the Boolean operators “AND” and “OR.” Full texts of the published papers were collected. Abstracts of the previously published papers that were not available in full texts were collected from the CABI database (https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/product/ca/fulltext). Important findings of the collected studies are summarized in the tables and throughout the text. The software Open Meta (Analyst) was used to estimate the pooled success rate of the surgical treatment of coenurosis based on a 95% confidence interval [13].

Results and discussion

Results of chemotherapeutic management of six coenurosis-infected sheep flocks in Sardinia are summarized in Table 1. The replacement lambs in these flocks received off-label doses of two anthelmintics, either praziquantel or oxfendazole. After long surveillance, no apparently healthy lambs that received the three oxfendazole doses developed any neurological symptoms. Additionally, in the case-control experiment conducted in flock #3, lambs that were given oxfendazole did not develop any neurological symptoms, whereas the majority (90%) of untreated lambs did and even died of coenurosis. On the other hand, variable results were revealed when treating lambs in three flocks with the praziquantel. A few praziquantel-treated lambs in flocks #1 (5/50) and #2 (3/48) developed neurological symptoms. This was not the case in flock #5; no neurological symptoms were observed in any apparently healthy lambs that received a single praziquantel dose. In addition, 5 of the 16 clinically ill lambs that also received a praziquantel dose were successfully treated.

These field work data illustrated the efficacy of large doses of either praziquantel or oxfendazole in protecting the replacement lambs against acute coenurosis. In addition, large praziquantel doses can treat a significant portion of the already infected lambs showing neurological symptoms. However, this field work does not provide data on the efficacy of both anthelmintics in treating chronically infected cases. In the following sections, we discuss our field work data along with results of the earlier published experiments to give a comprehensive overview on various approaches used to treat and immunize sheep against coenurosis.

Treatment of T. multiceps coenurosis

Treatments of T. multiceps coenurosis can be performed at various stages of the disease, and the most important thing to achieve success is to determine the approximatel time when animals were infected. For example, if we had recently infected animals, such as replacement lambs with acute infection by T. multiceps oncospheres in early stages of migration, then it would be better to use chemotherapy (i.e. anthelmintic treatment). The timing in this case is very important because using anthelmintic treatments in animals with already vesicolized oncospheres could result in rupture of the coenuri, giving rise to serious inflammatory consequences in the CNS. However, if we are managing animals with symptoms of chronic coenurosis (with vesicolization of oncospheres and coenuri in different stages of maturation), then we can determine the exact localization of the coenuri with the help of imaging diagnostics and decide to perform a surgical intervention.

Chemotherapy

Earlier reports have used several anthelmintics in different regimens to treat coenurosis in naturally and experimentally infected sheep and goats (Table 2). However, it is thought that chemotherapy can only be used during the migration stages of the parasite since the fully grown coenurus can rupture after treatment, which threatens the life of the infected animal [1]. The efficacy of the used anthelmintic was evaluated based on clearance of the neurological symptoms, degenerative changes occurring in the recovered coenuri from treated animals and the ability of these coenuri to develop into adult worms when experimentally fed to dogs.

Table 2 Chemotherapeutic trials to treat cerebral and non-cerebral coenurosis in sheep and goats

Various benzimidazoles were trialed, including albendazole, fenbendazole, oxfendazole and mebendazole. The latter was found ineffective in treating coenurosis [14]. Mebendazole also has a lower efficacy in treating cystic echinococcosis in humans since it has lower systemic absorption and penetration into hydatid cysts compared to the albendazole [15]. The superior efficacy of albendazole might also be related to its activity against protoscoleces [16]. In coenurosis, albendazole at a dose of 25 mg/kg for 6 consecutive days (i.e. a total dose of 150 mg/kg) was successfully used to treat neurologically diseased lambs after experimental infection [17]. Albendazole penetrates well into the CSF, which increases its efficacy [18], and this can explain the higher efficacy of albendazole than praziquantel in treating human neurocysticercosis caused by Taenia solium [19]. However, when the experimentally infected sheep received a lower albendazole dose of 10 mg/kg for 14 consecutive days, 50% of the coenuri displayed degenerative changes, whereas the other coenuri remained alive [20]. The efficacy of benzimidazoles, in general, correlates with sustained plasma level of the drug derived from administering effective concentrations over a prolonged time. This allows prolonged interaction between the drug and the parasite, giving rise to higher efficacy [21]. However, prolonged use of albendazole has been associated with bone marrow toxicity in sheep [22]. Notably, albendazole is frequently used to control gastrointestinal nematodes, lung worms and liver flukes that commonly infect sheep and goats in doses ranging from 5 to 10 mg/kg [23].

In our field work, oxfendazole, one of the most commonly used anthelmintics to control various parasitic infections in livestock, has been shown very effective in protecting apparently healthy lambs from developing coenurosis, when given at a cumulative dose > 1.5 g (1.698.75 g) divided over three doses. However, earlier studies scarcely reported use of this anthelmintic to treat coenurosis, and a single 30-mg/kg oxfendazole dose was not found effective in treating two neurologically diseased sheep with cerebral coenurosis (Table 2) [24]. Unfortunately, the efficacy of oxfendazole in treating lambs with clinical coenurosis was not tested in our field work.

However, praziquantel, an isoquinoline derivative, has been tested in several studies and displayed great efficacy in treating coenurosis as well as preventing early disease; see Table 2. Praziquantel has great cestocidal activity and is very safe when given orally or parenterally [25]. This anthelmintic is also widely used to treat cystic echinococcosis in humans since it can inhibit the vesicular evolution of protoscoleces and has a role in loss of viability of small cysts [26]. Praziquantel is commonly used to treat coenurosis at a dose of 50–100 mg/kg, and this dose has been described based on results of earlier experiments (Table 2). Historically, Bankov (1977) was the first to use praziquantel to treat sheep coenurosis and found that two doses of 50 mg/kg praziquantel were successful in treating acute coenurosis, reviewed in Eslami and Bazargani [27]. However, a five times higher dose (100 mg/kg for 5 days) failed to treat acute infection in a lamb that was experimentally fed 50,000 T. multiceps eggs [28]. This suggests that the efficacy of praziquantel at a given dose correlates with the intensity of the parasite. However, it is important to note that the dose of 50,000 eggs is huge and probably 8–10 times bigger than that of common field infections (Varcasia, personal observation).

Verster and Tustin [28, 29] did the most comprehensive trials to detect the appropriate praziquantel dose for treating sheep coenurosis. The authors used various praziquantel treatment regimens in naturally and experimentally infected sheep. Results of their experiments are detailed in Table 2. In conclusion, a single dose of 100 mg/kg was found effective. This was also evidenced when a dead coenurus (based on transmission to dogs) was revealed from a brain of sheep killed 2 days after receiving a single 100 mg/kg dose of praziquantel. Unsatisfactory results were revealed when using the single 50 mg/kg dose. No or temporary clinical improvement occurred in two of the four sheep that received this dose. Nevertheless, according to our field work, a much lower praziquantel dose (18.75 mg/kg) can protect apparently healthy lambs and can also treat some neurologically ill lambs (Table 1). On the other hand, the combination praziquantel-fenbendazole was occasionally tested in earlier reports, and the results were satisfactory, but full doses of both anthelmintics were required [17]. A combined therapy of two anthelmintics (e.g. praziquantel-albendazole) is commonly used pre- and post-surgical intervention in cystic echinococcosis. This combination can reduce the risk of disease recurrence and intraperitoneal seeding of infection, which develops from cyst rupture and spillage of the hydatid fluid [26]. In humans, praziquantel-albendazole combination has also been used as a postoperative therapy after surgical removal of T. multiceps coenuri from the brain of a 4-year-old girl [30]. Notably, praziquantel is the only drug used to successfully control T. multiceps infections in dogs [31].

Compared to cerebral coenurosis, reports on treating the non-cerebral form of the disease are few, probably because of its non-life-threatening nature. Albendazole at a dose of 10 mg/kg for 3 consecutive days significantly reduced the viability of the early 2-month developed coenuri in experimentally infected goats. However, the viability was similar to that of the controls when treating goats that had 5-month-old coenuri [32]. Fenbendazole at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg was also found effective [33] (Table 2).

Overall, some practical considerations should be considered when selecting an anthelmintic to treat coenurosis under field conditions. First, the treatment protocols should be sustainable, meaning applicable by farmers. Protocols with too many interventions are usually abandoned by farmers because they cannot follow them up. Therefore, any useful treatment with a single administration should be welcomed. Second, while the local practitioner can select any protocol to treat ruminants bred as pets, it is crucial for farmers to consider the cost-effect ratio since all replacement lambs should usually be treated, including both symptomatic and asymptomatic animals; otherwise, the untreated asymptomatic animals may develop chronic coenurosis a few months later. Cost of the therapy is also important because 3–5 times higher anthelmintic doses are occasionally used during the off-label treatments. According to Table 2, for example, treating a single animal with a single dose of 18.75 mg/kg praziquantel or three doses of 14.15 mg/kg oxfendazole results in an economic investment of 11.7 and 6.6 €, respectively. The costs of treatment in a small flock of 100 sheep are therefore 1170 and 660 €, respectively, for the two drugs. This difference is huge. However, even with the use of praziquantel, the costs of treating all replacement lambs are less than the economic loss incurred by the untreated lamb's deaths. For example, flock #3 lost 54 (90%) of the 60 untreated lambs, and each replacement lamb costs around 90 €. This results in 4860 € loss, which is much less than the 720 € loss due to praziquantel treatment of those 60 lambs.

Lastly, the other practical aspect to consider is the withdrawal time for consuming products derived from the treated animals. In praziquantel-treated animals, no time is required to consume meat and milk according to different pharmacological formulations. Praziquantel is characterized by rapid absorption, reaching the peak plasma concentration within 2 h of dosing, and around 90% of the total dose administered is excreted within 24 h [34]. Contrarily, oxfendazole can be detected in the plasma up to 144 h after oral dosing. Therefore, a long time is required before meat (44 days) and milk (9 days equivalent to 18 milking) from oxfendazole-treated animals can be consumed [35]. Therefore, in case of treatment failure, farmers can finally decide to slaughter praziquantel-treated lambs to minimize the economic loss. This is not the case in oxfendazole-treated lambs since farmers will have to destroy the carcasses, incurring additional costs (90–120 € per lamb plus the destruction costs). However, the 9 days off milking for a single oxfendazole-treated lactating ewe will result in 25 € loss since a primiparous sarda ewe can produce around 15 l in 9 days, and each liter costs around 1.70 €. A practitioner guide suggesting that veterinarians manage coenurosis-infected flocks is given in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

A guide suggested for veterinary practitioners to manage sheep and goat flocks with cases of cerebral coenurosis

Surgical treatment

The surgical removal of the coenuri from brains of chronically infected sheep is frequently successful [36]. A very important step in this process is to detect the exact number of coenuri present in the brain or spinal cord and their exact localization, and this can be successfully performed using magnetic resonance irradiation (MRI). Although it has commonly been believed that coenurus infections are usually caused normally by a single cyst, Varcasia et al. [1] reported that 30% of infected animals had multiple cysts, and the number of coenuri in a single brain can be up to 12.

The surgical procedures include grasping the coenurus through a hole (~ 0.5 cm in diameter) in the skull, aspiration of the fluid inside and removal of the collapsed coenurus through gentle traction of its wall [37, 38]. Surgical procedures to aspirate the fluid without removing the collapsed coenurus were also effective [39], reporting neurological symptoms associated with increased intracranial pressure due to development of coenuri. Table 3 summarizes important findings of the earlier reports on surgical removal of coenuri from brains of infected sheep and goats. Data from these reports were combined, and recovery occurred in 898 of 1128 sheep subjected to surgery, with an estimated pooled success rate of 82.1% (95% CI 73.1–91.0%). The recovery usually occurs 1–4 weeks post-surgery. However, surgery is not commonly practiced under field conditions; it is usually restricted to economically valuable animals and requires a professional practitioner. In Italy, surgical procedures to remove brain coenurus cost the owners around 300–500 €, considering that they should also include a CT scan or MRI prior to surgery to assess the exact positions of coneuri in the SNC. In addition, this approach is not successful in cases with deeply located coenuri (e.g. in the cerebellum and brain stem) or in cases with multiple coenuri. Deaths can also occasionally occur during the surgery (see Table 3). In addition, horns of male sheep and goats constitute a significant obstacle to this treatment strategy [38].

Table 3 Reports on surgical treatment of cerebral coenurosis in sheep and goats

Immunity against T. multiceps

Several factors may contribute to the development of immunity against T. multiceps infections in the intermediate hosts. Age-related resistance can be suggested since most cases with clinical coenurosis occurred in young animals. Sheep aged 1–3 years had three times more infections compared to sheep > 3 years old [6]. In addition, the younger the animal was, the more likely the infection would become patent [8]. Feeding on colostrum may also play a role in development of at least partial immunity against coenurosis since infections can frequently occur in the first few weeks of life [8, 12]. Herbert et al. [8] found that experimentally infected lambs that had not received colostrum during their first few days of life had more infections than those fed on colostrum.

Earlier experiments also suggested occurrence of some degree of resistance to T. multiceps eggs/protoscoleces in the definitive/intermediate hosts. For example, Herbert et al. [8] experimentally fed 1000–5000 viable T. multiceps eggs to each of 107 3–27-week-old lambs. Brain invasions were evidenced only in 49 lambs, including 37 that developed mature coenuri. The coenuri failed to develop in 12 cases. This indicates that only a small proportion of ingested T. multiceps eggs can develop into mature coenuri, even when the oncospheres reach the CNS. On the other hand, Willis and Herbert [9] fed five dogs 50–80 T. multiceps protoscoleces harvested from freshly collected coenuri. Dogs were then purged at varying times. Not all the ingested protoscoleces developed into mature worms. The reasons for this partial resistance to eggs/protoscoleces are not clear. In the intermediate hosts, many of the oncospheres migrate outside the CNS to the liver, heart, kidney, diaphragm and skeletal muscles, where they display limited development before being attacked mostly by neutrophils. These unsuccessful infections may have a role in developing some degree of protection [8].

No trials have been conducted to immunize dogs against T. multiceps. However, dogs can turn refractory after repeated infections 2–3 times in a short period [40]. On the other hand, various experiments have been conducted to immunize sheep and goats against T. multiceps coenurosis, and various types of antigens have been used, including the oncosphere antigen and recombinant protein antigens. These experiments are summarized in Table 4. Results of the experimental studies conducted by Verster and Tustin [41, 42] documented the appropriateness of oncosphere secretory antigen (OSA) as a vaccine candidate to induce protective immunity against the larval stages of T. multiceps, particularly when given in two doses; see Table 4. In addition, Verster and Tustin [42] found that vaccinated lambs (1–4 months old) from either OSA-vaccinated or unvaccinated mothers displayed similar levels of protection against T. multiceps larvae, and this protection was significantly higher than that from unvaccinated lambs of both groups. This suggests that the passive immunity transferred from vaccinated mothers to their offspring lasts for short periods, and all newborn lambs should be vaccinated in the first few days after birth. Under field conditions, OSA vaccination was applied in a sheep flock with endemic coenurosis, and no further cases were observed in the vaccinated animals. However, T. multiceps was detected in the dogs associated with this flock when they were sampled 2–3 times during the experiment [42].

Table 4 Immunization trials against Taenia multiceps coenurosis

However, Escherichia coli-expressed recombinant antigens have been successfully used as vaccine candidates against various parasitic diseases [43]. For example, the EG95 recombinant protein vaccine can produce 98% protective immunity against cystic echinococcosis in sheep [44]. This type of vaccine is advantageous since it can be produced on a large scale and can develop a stronger and more specific immune response. Experimental trials to use recombinant antigen vaccines to control coenurosis were first established by Gauci et al. [45]. The authors used homologs of 16k and 18k (Tm16 and Tm18, respectively) families of oncosphere antigens. Although no deaths occurred in the vaccinated group, around 40% of animals of this group had coenuri in their brains after necropsy. Contrarily, all unvaccinated controls displayed cerebral coenuri following the experimental challenge, and > 50% of them had died. This points to a significant level of protection against larvae of T. multiceps when using the recombinant Tm16-Tm18 oncosphere antigens; however, this level of protection is lower than that detected when these recombinant antigens were used in other taeniid cestode vaccines, and the authors attributed this to the relatively lower level of antibody response produced against the Tm18 antigen. Contrarily, when Guo et al. [46] used both Tm16 and Tm-GST recombinant antigens, no cerebral coenuri were detected in the vaccinated goats, which suggests development of complete resistance; see Table 4.

Varcasia et al. [47], on the other hand, conducted a successful field trial to control coenurosis in a hyperendemic region (Sardinia, Italy). Six farms were selected with 11.3% mean coenurosis-related mortality (CRM). From these farms, 632 10–12-week-old lambs were selected for the trial. Of them, 208 lambs received a few subcutaneous doses of a vaccine containing Tm18 recombinant protein with 1-month intervals. The remaining 424 lambs served as controls. Over the next 40 months, the mean CRM declined to 5.2%, and no cases of acute coenurosis were observed. Chronic coenurosis was confirmed in a single vaccinated animal, whereas disease was detected in 32 of the controls. In addition, 98% of the vaccinated animals that were serologically tested (n = 60) produced specific serum antibodies against the vaccine. Gauci et al. [45], in their experiment, detected a lower antibody response in vaccinated sheep with the Tm18 antigen. A possible explanation for this variation is the difference in strain used. Differences in the nature of the Tm18 protein from various T. multiceps strains probably contribute to variabilities in the antigenic characters between these strains. However, nothing is known on variabilities in the Tm18 nature among various T. multiceps strains.

Conclusions

Given that no commercial vaccines are currently available against T. multiceps coenurosis, the preventive measures remain the keystone in controlling this disease. These measures include routine anthelmintic dosing of farm dogs with an effective taeniacide, e.g. praziquantel at 5 mg/kg body weight, and controlling the population of stray dogs. Besides, proper disposal of carcasses of the intermediate hosts breaks the transmission cycle of T. multiceps by preventing herding and stray dogs as well as wild canids (e.g. foxes) from accessing the coenuri. In addition, increasing knowledge and skills of farmers regarding the cause, clinical signs and prevention of coenurosis is an important strategy to control this economically important disease.

Availability of data and materials

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Varcasia A, Tamponi C, Ahmed F, Cappai MG, Porcu F, Mehmood N, et al. Taenia multiceps coenurosis: a review. Parasit Vectors. 2022;15:84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05210-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang ZZ, Shi BX, You H, Zhao L, Tuerhong Y, Wang JC, et al. Immune protection of recombinant membrane protein against Taenia multiceps larvae in sheep. Chin J Parasitol Parasitic Dis. 2009;27:336–9 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deplazes P, Eichenberger RM, Grimm F. Wildlife-transmitted Taenia and Versteria cysticercosis and coenurosis in humans and other primates. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2019;11:342–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.03.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Scala A, Varcasia A. Updates on morphobiology, epidemiology and molecular characterization of coenurosis in sheep. Parassitologia. 2006;48:61–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Varcasia A, Tamponi C, Tosciri G, Pipia AP, Dore F, Schuster RK, et al. Is the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) a competent definitive host for Taenia multiceps? Parasit Vectors. 2015;25:491. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1096-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abbas I, El-Alfy ES, Saleh S, Tamponi C, Varcasia A. Global epidemiology and molecular biology of Taenia multiceps: a comparative meta-analysis and in silico analysis study. Parasitology. 2022;149:1607–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182022001123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Oryan A, Akbari M, Moazeni M, Amrabadi OR. Cerebral and non-cerebral coenurosis in small ruminants. Trop Biomed. 2014;31:1–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Herbert IV, Edwards GT, Willis JM. Some host factors which influence the epidemiology of Taenia multiceps infections in sheep. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1984;78:243–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00034983.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Willis JM, Herbert IV. Some factors affecting the eggs of Taenia multiceps: their transmission onto pasture and their viability. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1984;78:236–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00034983.1984.11811808.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ligios C, Viglietti A, Carta P, Dexter G, Agrimi U, Simmons MM. Clinicopathological findings in sheep from Sardinia showing neurological signs of disease. Vet Rec. 2004;154:365–70. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.154.12.365.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scala A, Cancedda GM, Varcasia A, Ligios C, Garippa G, Genchi C. A survey of Taenia multiceps coenurosis in Sardinian sheep. Vet Parasitol. 2007;143:294–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.08.020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pintus D, Varcasia A, Dessì G, Tamponi C, Manunta ML, Carboni GA, et al. Atypical outbreak of acute coenurosis by Taenia multiceps in a sheep flock. Parasitol Res. 2018;117:1985–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-018-5873-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wallace BC, Dahabreh IJ, Trikalinos TA, Lau J, Trow P, Schmid CH. Closing the gap between methodologists and end-users: R as a computational back-end. J Stat Softw. 2012;49:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Verster A, Tustin RC, Reinecke RK. An attempt to treat the larval stage of Taenia multiceps and a résumé of its neural and extraneural distribution in sheep. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1978;45:257–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shams-Ul-Bari; Arif SH, Malik AA, Khaja AR, Dass TA, Naikoo ZA. Role of albendazole in the management of hydatid cyst liver. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:343–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-3767.84493.

  16. Khuroo MS, Dar MY, Yattoo GN, Zargar SA, Javaid G, Khan BA, et al. Percutaneous drainage versus albendazole therapy in hepatic hydatidosis: a prospective, randomized study. Gastroenterology. 1993;104:1452–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(93)90355-g.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghazaei C. Evaluation of therapeutic effects of antihelminthic agents albendazole, fenbendazole and praziquantel against coenurosis in sheep. Small Rumin Res. 2007;71:48–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SMALLRUMRES.2006.04.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Adams HR. Veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics. Iowa: Iowa State University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Matthaiou DK, Panos G, Adamidi ES, Falagas ME. Albendazole versus praziquantel in the treatment of neurocysticercosis: a meta-analysis of comparative trials. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2:e194. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Biyikoğlu G, Doğanay A. Effects of praziquantel and albendazole on coenurus cerebralis in experimentally infected lambs. Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 1998;22:43–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Delatour P, Benoit E, Lechenet J, Besse S. Pharmacokinetics in sheep and cattle of albendazole administered by an intraruminal slow release capsule. Res Vet Sci. 1990;48:271–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Morris DL, Clarkson MJ, Stallbaumer MF, Pritchard J, Jones RS, Chinnery JB. Albendazole treatment of pulmonary hydatid cysts in naturally infected sheep: a study with relevance to the treatment of hydatid cysts in man. Thorax. 1985;40:453–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.40.6.453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. The European Agency for Evaluation of Medicinal Products. Albendazole summary report, committee of veterinary medicinal products. EMEA/MRL/247/97-FINAL, December 1997, London, UK.

  24. Schweizer G, Grünenfelder F, Titus S, Rademacher N, Ueli B, Deplazes P. Imported coenurosis in sheep. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2006;148:490–9 (In German).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rickard MD, Arundel JH. Chemotherapy of tapeworm infections in Animals. In: Bossche HV, Thienpont D, Janssens PG. Chemotherapy of gastrointestinal helminths. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, vol 77. Berlin: Springer; 1985. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69527-8_13.

  26. Bygott JM, Chiodini PL. Praziquantel: neglected drug? Ineffective treatment? Or therapeutic choice in cystic hydatid disease? Acta Trop. 2009;111:95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.04.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Eslami A, Bazargani TT. Efficacy of praziquantel against Coenurus cerebralis in naturally infected sheep. Vet Med Rev. 1986;21:97–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Verster A, Tustin RC. Treatment of cerebral coenuriosis in sheep with praziquantel. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 1990;61:24–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Verster A, Tustin RC. Treatment of the larval stage of Taenia multiceps with praziquantel. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 1982;53:107–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. El-On J, Shelef I, Cagnano E, Benifla M. Taenia multiceps: a rare human cestode infection in Israel. Vet Ital. 2008;44:621–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Guo Z, Li W, Peng M, Duo H, Shen X, Fu Y, et al. Epidemiological study and control trial of taeniid cestode infection in farm dogs in Qinghai Province. China J Vet Med Sci. 2014;76:395–400. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.13-0504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Afonso SM, Neves L, Pondja A, Macuamule C, Mukaratirwa S, Arboix M, et al. Efficacy of albendazole against Taenia multiceps larvae in experimentally infected goats. Vet Parasitol. 2014;206:304–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.09.020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Venkatesan M, Saravanan M, Selvaraj P, Yogeshpriya S, Jayalakshmi K, Veeraselvam M. Non-cerebral coenurosis in goats-a case study. J Anim Health Prod. 2018;6:47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  34. The European Agency for Evaluation of Medicinal Products. Praziquantel summary report, committee of veterinary medicinal products. EMEA/MRL/141/96-FINAL, September 1996, London, UK.

  35. Lanusse CE, Gascon LH, Prichard RK. Comparative plasma disposition kinetics of albendazole, fenbendazole, oxfendazole and their metabolites in adult sheep. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 1995;18:196–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.1995.tb00578.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Manunta ML, Evangelisti MA, Burrai GP, Columbano N, Ligios C, Varcasia A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and skull of sheep with cerebral coenurosis. Am J Vet Res. 2012;73:1913–8. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.73.12.1913.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nooruddin M, Dey A, Ali MA. Coenurosis in Bengal goats of Bangladesh. Small Rumin Res. 1996;19:77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4488(95)00734-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Komnenou A, Argyroudis S, Giadinis N, Dessiris A. Surgical treatment of coenurosis (gid) in sheep. Vet Rec. 2000;147:242–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.147.9.242.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kelly DF, Payne-Johnson CE. Cerebral healing after craniotomy to evacuate a Coenurus cerebralis cyst. J Comp Pathol. 1993;108:399–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9975(08)80212-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Edwards GT, Herbert IV. Preliminary investigations into the immunization of lambs against infection with Taenia multiceps metacestodes. Vet Parasitol. 1982;9:193–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Verster A, Tustin RC. Preliminary report on the stimulation of immunity to the larval stage of Taenia multiceps. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 1982;53:175–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Verster A, Tustin RC. Immunization of sheep against the larval stage of Taenia multiceps. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1987;54:103–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Noon JB, Aroian RV. Recombinant subunit vaccines for soil-transmitted helminths. Parasitology. 2017;144:1845–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003118201700138X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gauci CG, Jenkins DJ, Lightowlers MW. Protection against cystic echinococcosis in sheep using an Escherichia coli-expressed recombinant antigen (EG95) as a bacterin. Parasitology. 2022;150:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182022001457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gauci C, Vural G, Oncel T, Varcasia A, Damian V, Kyngdon CT, et al. Vaccination with recombinant oncosphere antigens reduces the susceptibility of sheep to infection with Taenia multiceps. Int J Parasitol. 2008;38:1041–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.11.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Cheng G, Jie W, Ying-dong Y, Jian-guo W, Liu Yu-chen Gu, Xiao-bin XY, et al. Immune protective effect analysis of recombinant protein rTm16 and rTm-gst from Coenurus cerebralis. Acta Vet Zootech Sin. 2018;49:2707–14.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Varcasia A, Tosciri G, Coccone GN, Pipia AP, Garippa G, Scala A, et al. Preliminary field trial of a vaccine against coenurosis caused by Taenia multiceps. Vet Parasitol. 2009;162:285–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.03.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Dabbir BKR, Bezavada SR. Therapeutic efficacy of fenbendazole and praziquantel for management of gid—a clinical study of 24 sheep. Intas Polivet. 2018;19:116–7.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ozmen O, Sahinduran S, Haligur M, Sezer K. Clinicopathologic observations on Coenurus cerebralis in naturally infected sheep. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2005;147:129–34. https://doi.org/10.1024/0036-7281.147.3.129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Li JY, Wang FY, Huo XC, Chen YJ. Treatment of coenurus cerebralis infestation in sheep with praziquantel. Chin J Vet Med. 1983;9:16–7.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Abdollahi M, Lotfollahzadeh S, Shokrpoor S, Daneshi M, Abolhasani DM. Acute coenurosis in lambs. Vet Med Sci. 2023;9:2786–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.1278.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Aminzhanov M, Musinov M, Baratov VA. Chemoprophylaxis of coenurus cerebralis infestation in sheep, using fenbendazole and praziquantel. Vet Moscow. 1988;10:46–7.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yakovlev CA. Surgical method of control of coenurosis in sheep. Veterinariya. 1950;27:47–8.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Skerritt GC, Stallbaumer MF. Diagnosis and treatment of coenuriasis (gid) in sheep. Vet Rec. 1984;115:399–403. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.115.16.399.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tirgari M, Howard BR, Boargob A. Clinical and radiographical diagnosis of coenurosis cerebralis in sheep and its surgical treatment. Vet Rec. 1987;120:173–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.120.8a.173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Nassef M, Youssef M, Taha M, Ahmed LS, Bayoumi A. Studies on coenurosis cerebralis in sheep. Assiut Vet Med J. 1989;1:211–9. https://doi.org/10.21608/avmj.1990.187634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Hereș S, Breban S, Haag Z. Results of surgical treatment of coenurosis in sheep. Rev Româna Med Vet. 1994;4:385–7.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Mărcuţan ID, Magdaș C, Cozma V, Muste A, Beteg F. Coenurosis in sheep: basic and therapeutic aspects. Sci Parasitol. 2016;17:113–7.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Tas A, Sen I, Hatipoglu F, Ari HH, Risvanli A, Salykov R, et al. Surgical removal of Coenurus cerebralis cysts located in the brain of sheep. J Appl Anim Res. 2024;52:2292362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2023.2292362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Biswas D. Ultrasound diagnosis and surgical treatment of coenurosis (GID) in Bengal goat (Capra hircus) at Chittagong metropolitan area, Chittagong, Bangladesh. Sci J Vet Adv. 2013;2:68–75.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Amin MN, Hashim MA, Hossain MA, Al-Sultan IIA. Coenurus cerebralis infection (Gid disease) in Black Bengal goats; effects on certain blood values after surgical treatment. J Adv Biomed Pathobiol. 2013;3:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Kalim KO, Dewangan R, Tiwari SK. Surgical management of coenurus cerebralis (gid) in a doe. Intas Polivet. 2016;17:449–50.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Singh D, Gharu S, Khosa JS, Kumawat S, Gahlot TK. Clinical diagnosis and surgical management of gid (Coenurus cerebralis) in goats (Capra hircus). Indian Vet J. 2016;93:69–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Sarma BK, Das J. Surgical management of cerebral coenurosis of goats in Lakhimpur district of Assam (India). J Entomol Zool Stud. 2019;7:1268–70.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Merbl Y, Shilo-Benjamini Y, Chai O, Chamisha Y, Anglister N, King R, et al. Taenia multiceps brain cyst removal in two wild Nubian ibex (Capra nubianas). J Zoo Wildl Med. 2014;45:193–6. https://doi.org/10.1638/2013-0175R.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Alkhuzaie SS. Protoscolex metabolites of Coenurus cerebralis as antigenic-produced humoral immune response in sheep. IJVS. 2022;36:297–301. https://doi.org/10.33899/ijvs.2021.130043.1727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Laĭpanov BK. Attempts to control coenurosis by vaccination of lambs. Veterinariya (Moskva). 1993;1:41–2.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Zhang XY, Jian YN, Duo H, Shen XY, Ma YJ, Fu Y, et al. Coenurosis of Yak, Bos grunniens, caused by Taenia multiceps: a case report with molecular identification in Qinghai Tibetan plateau area. China Korean J Parasitol. 2019;57:423–7. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2019.57.4.423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article was partially funded by the project CAREFREE WITH OUR PETS_- PRIN_PNRR—Codice progetto P2022EHFA9—CUP UNISS—J53D23014130001 and Bando Fondazione Sardegna 2018-2021 FDS1821VARCASIA.

Funding

This article was partially funded by the project CAREFREE WITH OUR PETS_- PRIN_PNRR–Codice progetto P2022EHFA9–CUP UNISS–J53D23014130001 and Bando Fondazione Sardegna 2018–2021 FDS1821VARCASIA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AV: funding acquisition; AV, AS: conceptualization; IA, AV, CT: literature search; GM: field work data: IA, AV: writing—original draft; IA, CT, LC, GM, AV, AS: critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Varcasia.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The group in charge of the Animal Welfare and Experimentation of the University of Sassari, Italy (Organismo Preposto al Benessere e alla Sperimentazione Animale; OPBSA), expresses a favorable ethical opinion on retrospective study on field treatments carried out on sheep affected by clinical forms (acute gid) of coenurosis (Prot. n. 0001070 del 08/04/2024– [UOR: SI000198 Classif.III/13], University of Sassari, Italy). Oral consent was taken from owners of the included flocks, and they were informed about consequences on not treating their animals.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbas, I., Tamponi, C., Madau, G. et al. Treatment and management of coenurosis by Taenia multiceps: field data from outbreaks in endemic regions and literature review. Parasites Vectors 17, 335 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06430-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06430-2

Keywords