Skip to main content

Evaluating the effects of short-term low temperature on the growth and development of Trichopria drosophilae based on the age–stage two-sex life table

Abstract

Background

The effects of low temperatures on parasitic wasps are crucial for maintaining farmland biodiversity and enhancing biological control, especially given the implications of global warming and frequent extreme cold events.

Methods

We studied the effects of different low temperatures (−8 ± 1 °C, −4 ± 1 °C, 0 ± 1 °C, 4 ± 1 °C, and 8 ± 1 °C) on the mating frequency and duration of male adults of Trichopria drosophilae and the number of pupae beaten by female adults, and constructed the age–stage two-sex life table of T. drosophilae.

Results

This study found that male T. drosophilae adults exposed to low temperatures for 12 h significantly altered their mating behavior, peaking between 15:00 and 17:00. As the temperature dropped during the exposure, both the mating frequency of T. drosophilae and the duration of pupal beating were affected. The survival rate of female adults dropped from 39.55% at 8 °C to just 21.17% at −8 °C. Low-temperature treatment shortened the development period and lifespan for T. drosophilae adults. They developed 4.71 days faster and had a total lifespan that was 10.66 days shorter than those in the control group after being exposed to −8 °C. Furthermore, the average number of eggs laid by females at −8 °C was 4.46 less than that at 8 °C and 6.16 less than that in the control group, which laid an average of 21.55 eggs. The net reproductive rate (R0) of T. drosophilae decreased with lower temperatures, reaching a low of 23.64 at −8 °C. Conversely, the intrinsic growth rate (rm) actually increased as temperatures dropped, with the lowest value being 0.21 at −8 °C.

Conclusions

The findings indicate that short-term exposure to low temperatures hampers the growth and population increase of T. drosophilae, thereby reducing their effectiveness as biological control agents.

Graphical Abstract

Highlights

  1. 1.

    We studied how short-term exposure to low temperatures affects the mating behavior of the parasite Trichopria drosophilae and found that it disrupts their mating process.

  2. 2.

    Using data on age and developmental stage, we developed a two-sex life table for T. drosophilae under short-term low temperatures.

  3. 3.

    Our findings indicate that short-term low temperatures reduce the population growth of T. drosophilae.

Background

The global fruit industry faces a serious threat from Drosophila suzukii (spotted wing drosophila, SWD). This pest is causing significant losses, particularly as China expands its soft fruit cultivation. In Yunnan Province’s Shiping County [1, 2], a survey found that Morella rubra fresh fruit had a 100% damage rate during a peak outbreak of D. suzukii [3]. In 2016, this pest caused economic losses of 8.92 billion yuan to China’s Prunus pseudocerasus [4]. In the United States, D. suzukii was first reported in California in 2008, resulting in a 30% loss for the local P. pseudocerasus industry [5]. In Europe, the European Union has listed D. suzukii as an A2 quarantine pest due to its significant spread and impact [6].

The parasitic wasp Trichopria drosophilae (Hymenoptera: Diapriinae) can find and parasitize D. suzukii pupae, even when hidden inside fruit or buried in the soil [7]. After immobilizing the host, the wasp lays its eggs inside the pupa. Trichopria drosophilae is one of the most important natural enemies of D. suzukii and is found in many countries, including China, South Korea, Israel, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Morocco, Mexico, and the United States [8, 9]. Recent studies have shown that T. drosophilae can effectively control D. suzukii populations. For instance, after releasing large numbers of T. drosophilae in P. pseudocerasus orchards in southern Italy, the rate of fruit pest damage decreased by 34% [10]. Research by Wang revealed that T. drosophilae is more efficient than another wasp, Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae, in locating and parasitizing host pupae [11]. The parasitic efficiency of T. drosophilae increases with temperatures between 15 °C and 30 °C, which shortens both its pre-parasitic period and lifespan. However, at 35 °C, the survival rate of T. drosophilae drops to 0%, indicating that this temperature exceeds its tolerance limits. The optimal temperature for the growth and reproduction of T. drosophilae is around 23 °C [12].

Parasitic wasps are sensitive to temperature, making it difficult for them to maintain a stable body temperature. Short-term exposure to low temperatures in their natural habitat can disrupt their reproductive behavior [13]. When the temperature drops, adult insects become less active, and their sexual organs and gonads do not fully develop. This can prevent male and female adults from mating, or if they do mate, the rates of hatching and egg-laying are reduced [14]. Hao found that when Drosophila melanogaster were exposed to 5 °C for 24 h, they became inactive and could not communicate with one another [15]. This lack of activity led to reduced mating behavior between male and female D. melanogaster for up to 72 h after the temperature drop.

The life table, introduced by Pearl and Parker in 1921, is an important tool for studying the growth and reproduction of insect populations [16]. However, traditional life tables often overlook factors like developmental rates and male populations, which can lead to significant errors in calculations. The age–stage two-sex life table offers a more accurate method by considering age differences and sex ratios in population growth, as well as generation overlap [17]. Recently, many researchers have used this method to analyze the growth, development, and reproductive capacity of various insects, including Frankliniella intonsa [18], Riptortus pedestris [19], Aedes aegypti [20], and Trichogramma achaeae [21]. In the case of T. drosophilae, Fang is the only researcher to have investigated its life table under constant laboratory temperatures, ignoring how short-term low temperatures affect the species’ population dynamics and parameters of the age–stage two-sex life table [12]. Since short-term low temperatures can significantly impact reproduction, further research is needed to understand their effects on the growth and development of T. drosophilae. This research will provide a scientific foundation for mass breeding, low-temperature storage, and efficient use, and will help avoid unsuitable short-term low-temperature conditions during field releases.

Methods

Insect cultures

In the summer of 2016, adult colonies of D. suzukii were collected from Morella rubra fruit in Dianwei village, Kunming, Yunnan province, Southwest China (coordinates: 102° 9′ E, 24° 8′ N). The adult T. drosophilae colony was also obtained from infested fruit collected at the same location. The D. suzukii specimens were maintained in incubators set at a temperature of 23 ± 1 °C, with relative humidity (RH) of 70 ± 5%, and a light cycle of 16 h of light followed by 8 h of darkness (L:D). The colonies were raised on a maize flour-based artificial diet and housed in 50-ml plastic centrifuge tubes (12 cm height, 3 cm diameter). This diet included 1000 ml of water, 15 g of yeast per liter, 21 g of agar per liter, 90 g of sucrose per liter, 180 g of semolina flour per liter, and 15 g of raisins per liter. Flies were introduced into these tubes twice a week; the tubes were sealed with fine mesh and left for 2–3 days to encourage egg-laying. Trichopria drosophilae colonies were reared using D. suzukii as their host, feeding on a diet infested with D. suzukii larvae and pupae. Adult parasitoids were removed 2 weeks prior to the emergence of the new generation. Adult T. drosophilae received a solution of 10% honey on a cotton ball for nourishment [22]. The temperature and RH inside all climate cabinets were monitored every 30 min using a COS-03 temperature/RH system (Shandong Renke Control Technology Co., Ltd., China).

Effects of short-term low temperature on the mating frequency and duration of male adults of T. drosophilae

Fang’s study [12] examined the effects of various low-temperature environments on the mating behavior of T. drosophilae. The temperatures tested were −8 ± 1 °C, −4 ± 1 °C, 0 ± 1 °C, 4 ± 1 °C, and 8 ± 1 °C. Male adult T. drosophilae were first exposed to these temperatures for 12 h in an artificial climate incubator. After this exposure, the males were paired with females in a 10:1 ratio and placed in an insect rearing tank. The researchers recorded the mating frequency of the male adults during three time periods: morning (9:00–11:00), afternoon (15:00–17:00), and evening (20:00–22:00). To aid in observations, a cold light source was used, and the visual field was adjusted to 2.5 × 20 times under a stereoscopic microscope. A fixed camera was used to track and capture mating behavior. Each observation session included 10 pairs of insects, and this was carried out three times. Additionally, the number and duration of mating at 23 °C served as the control for comparison [23].

Effects of short-term low temperature on the duration of beating pupae of T. drosophilae female adults

Female T. drosophilae were exposed to various low-temperature environments for 12 h. Male and female T. drosophilae were raised separately. During the peak mating period, from 15:00 to 17:00 PM, equal numbers of male and female T. drosophilae were paired and placed in a rearing tank with D. suzukii pupae. After mating, the parasitic behavior of the female T. drosophilae was observed using an anatomical microscope, and a fixed camera recorded the duration of the pupal stage. Each treatment consisted of 10 pairs and was replicated three times. The duration of pupal development at 23 °C served as a control [24].

Effect of short-term low temperature on age–stage two-sex life table of T. drosophilae

The experiment was conducted in a controlled environment with humidity levels of 60% ± 5%, 16 h of light and 8 h of darkness each day, and a light intensity of 18,000 lx. The temperature was maintained at 23 °C. A total of 100 pupae of D. suzukii, infested with T. drosophilae, were collected at 23 °C and placed in 750 ml glass bottles. These bottles were then positioned in incubators set to various low temperatures (−8 ± 1 °C, −4 ± 1 °C, 0 ± 1 °C, 4 ± 1 °C, and 8 ± 1 °C). Adult emergence was observed daily at 8:00 and 20:00. The emerging male and female adults were paired in a 1:1 ratio and placed in a rearing cage. New D. suzukii pupae were added daily to allow newly emerged T. drosophilae to infest them, and the parasitoids were provided with a 10% honey-water solution for nutrition. When the D. suzukii pupae turned black, it indicated that the parasitoid had entered the pupal stage. The duration from larval pupation to eclosion was measured as the pupal stage. Data on parasitism and survival were collected until all adults had died [25].

Life table analysis

The TWOSEX-MSChart program was used to create an age–stage two-sex life table [26], following the methods outlined by Chi and Liu [27] and Chi [28]. This life table includes several important population parameters: age–stage-specific survival rate (sxj, x = age and j = stage), age-specific survival rate (lx), age–stage-specific fecundity (fxj), age-specific fecundity (mx), age–stage life expectancy (exj), and reproductive value (vxj). Additionally, the life table parameters include net reproductive rate (R0), intrinsic rate of increase (r), finite rate of increase (λ), and mean generation time (T).

To calculate the values for mx and lx in the age–stage two-sex life table [27], the following calculations were performed:

$${m}_{x}=\frac{ {\sum }_{j= 1}^{k}{s}_{xj} {f}_{xj}}{{\sum }_{j= 1}^{k}{s}_{xj} } {l}_{x}={\sum }_{j= 1}^{k}{s}_{xj},$$

where the variable k represents the number of stages, sxj denotes the probability of survival and growth from birth to age x and stage j, and fxj represents the average number of offspring produced by a female at age x. Subsequently, the net reproductive rate (R0) was computed using the following equation:

$${R}_{0}={\sum }_{x= 0}^{\infty }{l}_{x}{m}_{x}.$$

The intrinsic rate of increase (r) was estimated by applying the Euler–Lotka equation, where the age is indexed from 0 [29]:

$${\sum }_{x= 0}^{\infty }{e}^{-r(x+1)}{l}_{x}{m}_{x}= 1.$$

The finite rate of increase (λ) was computed using the equation λ = er. The mean generation time (T) was defined as the duration required for a population to increase its size by R0 times (erT = R0 or λT = R0) while maintaining a stable age–stage distribution. The formula utilized to calculate the value of T was as follows:

$$T=\frac{\text{ ln}{R}_{0} }{r},$$

where exj denotes the duration for which an individual of age x and stage j is expected to live. The value of exj was determined using the formula described by Chi and Su [30]:

$${e}_{xj}={\sum }_{i=x}^{\infty }{\sum }_{y=j}^{k}{ s{\prime}}_{iy},$$

where siy is the probability that an individual of age x and stage j will survive to age i and stage y, assuming that sxj = 1 [30]. The reproductive value (vxj) is defined as the contribution of individuals at age x and stage j to the future population, and its calculation formula, as provided by Tuan [31], is presented below:

$${v}_{xj}=\frac{{e}^{r(x+1)}}{{s}_{xj}}{\sum }_{i=x}^{\infty }{e}^{-r(i+1)}{\sum }_{y=j}^{k}{{s{\prime}}_{iy}f}_{iy}.$$

Data analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0 software to calculate the mean and standard error (SE) of all data points. We used analysis of variance to examine the frequency of mating, mating duration, and pupal duration of T. drosophilae at different temperatures. The least significant difference (LSD) method was employed to determine the significance of any differences observed. For analyzing the age–stage two-sex life table data, as well as the developmental duration, total longevity of eggs, larvae, pupae, and adults, net reproductive rate, mean generation time, intrinsic growth rate, and finite growth rate, we utilized TWOSEX-Mschart software. To assess significance, we conducted a bootstrap paired test with 100,000 iterations (P < 0.05) using a bootstrap program. Finally, Origin 2018 software was used for creating graphs and visual representations of the data [32, 33].

Results

Effects of short-term low-temperature treatment on the mating frequency and duration of male adults of T. drosophilae

Short-term low temperatures exposure significantly affected the mating frequency of adult male T. drosophilae (Fig. 1). The mating frequency decreased as temperatures fell from 8 °C to −8 °C. The peak mating activity occurred between 15:00 and 17:00, with the highest mating frequency of 6.00 observed at 8 °C during this time. Mating frequencies at 8 °C and 4 °C together accounted for over 50% of the total mating activity. At 0 °C, −4 °C, and −8 °C, mating frequency between 20:00 and 22:00 was significantly lower than during the other two time periods (0 °C: F(2,6) = 21.15, P = 0.0021; −4 °C: F(2,6) = 20.55, P = 0.0019; −8: F(2,6) = 57.30, P = 0.0001). Furthermore, from 9:00 to 11:00, the mating frequency at 0 °C was significantly higher than at other temperatures and control groups (F(2,4) = 6.00, P = 0.0256). During the period from 15:00 to 17:00, the mating frequency of insects at 8 °C and 4 °C and the control group was significantly greater than that of insects kept at other temperatures (F(4,10) = 131.50, P = 0.0001), showing 5.67-fold greater frequency. In contrast, between 20:00 and 22:00, the mating frequency of insects at −8 °C was significantly lower than at other temperatures (F(4,10) = 8.67, P = 0.0027), with frequency that was 0.33 times lower.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effects of short-term low temperature on mating frequency of male adults of T. drosophilae. The data in the figure are mean + SE bars. In the figure, different uppercase letters indicate significant differences in the mating frequency of T. drosophilae treated with different short-term low temperatures during the same period using the LSD method (P < 0.05). On the other hand, lowercase letters denote significant differences in the mating frequency of T. drosophilae at the same temperature and different periods, also after applying the LSD method (P < 0.05)

Brief low-temperature exposure affected the mating duration of T. drosophilae. As illustrated in Table 1, the time spent mating increased as temperatures fell between 4 °C and −8 °C. At 8 °C, there were no significant differences in mating duration during the time intervals of 9:00–11:00, 15:00–17:00, and 20:00–22:00 (F(2,6) = 0.52, P = 0.6191). Similarly, at 4 °C, the duration of mating remained consistent across the same time intervals (F(2,6) = 3.06, P = 0.1212). However, at 0 °C, the mating duration from 9:00 to 11:00 was significantly shorter than from 20:00 to 22:00 (F(2,6) = 11.63, P = 0.0086). At −4 °C and −8 °C, there were no significant differences in mating duration among the time intervals (F(2,6) = 3.25, P = 0.1106 and F(2,6) = 3.00, P = 0.1250, respectively). The longest mating duration was recorded at −8 °C, with the durations during the intervals 15:00–17:00 and 20:00–22:00 being significantly longer than the control (15:00–17:00: F(5,12) = 12.13, P = 0.0002; 20:00–22:00: F(5,12) = 8.32, P = 0.0013). Furthermore, the mating duration from 9:00 to 11:00 was significantly longer than that at 4 °C (9:00–11:00: F(5,12) = 8.10, P = 0.0015).

Table 1 Effects of short-term low temperature on the duration of mating behavior of T. drosophilae

Effects of short-term low-temperature treatment on the duration of beating pupae of T. drosophilae

Short-term low-temperature treatment affected the flapping time of T. drosophilae beating pupae (Fig. 2). The study found that as the temperature dropped from 8 °C to −8 °C, the flapping time of the pupae increased. At −8 °C, the longest recorded flapping time was 5.33 min. In contrast, at 23 °C and 8 °C, the shortest flapping times were 3.67 min and 4.00 min, respectively. Additionally, the study showed that the flapping time of T. drosophilae treated at −8 °C was significantly longer than that of the control group (F(5,12) = 1.79, P < 0.05).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of short-term low temperature on the duration of beating pupae of T. drosophilae. The data in the figure are mean + SE. The uppercase letters in the picture indicate significant differences in the duration of pupation of T. drosophilae under various short-term low-temperature stress during the same peak mating period of 15:00–17:00. This was determined after using the LSD method (P < 0.05)

Effects of short-term low-temperature treatment on developmental duration and longevity of T. drosophilae F1

Short-term low-temperature treatment was found to affect the developmental stages of T. drosophilae. At 23 °C, the average development duration for the egg and larval stages was 5.16 ± 0.17 days, the pupal stage lasted 9.69 ± 0.52 days, and the adult stage was 28.62 ± 0.49 days. After treatment at 8 °C, the egg-larval development period increased to 5.67 ± 0.16 days, the pupal stage extended to 10.56 ± 0.52 days, and the adult stage averaged 28.23 ± 0.59 days. Following treatment at 4 °C, the egg-larval period increased to 5.70 ± 0.19 days, the pupal stage lasted 10.36 ± 0.54 days, and the adult stage duration was 27.79 ± 0.66 days. At 0 °C, the egg-larval development took 5.84 ± 0.22 days, the pupal duration was 11.13 ± 0.68 days, and the adult stage lasted 27.23 ± 0.89 days. Treatment at −4 °C led to an egg-larval development time of 6.27 ± 0.25 days, a pupal duration of 11.58 ± 0.69 days, and an adult stage duration of 24.38 ± 0.78 days. After exposure to −8 °C, the egg-larval development period increased to 6.73 ± 0.31 days, the pupal stage lasted 13.09 ± 0.92 days, while the adult stage time was 23.91 ± 0.93 days. At this temperature, the egg-larval development was 1.57 days longer than the control group, the pupal duration was 3.40 days longer, and the adult stage was 4.71 days shorter. Additionally, low-temperature treatment influenced the overall lifespan of T. drosophilae; at 23 °C, the average lifespan was 40.15 days, significantly longer than that at lower temperatures (P < 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2 Developmental duration of F1 generation of T. drosophilae under short-term low-temperature stress at each developmental stage

The growth curves of T. drosophilae under different temperature conditions show significant overlaps, highlighting the complex and variable relationships between individual growth patterns. Except for the egg-larval stage, the specific age–stage survival rate (Sxj) for developmental stages generally increases before decreasing with the progression of development time. As temperatures range from 8 °C to −8 °C, the survival rate of T. drosophilae decreases as the temperature decreases. For female adults, the survival rate declines from 39.55% at 8 °C to 21.17% at −8 °C (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effects of short-term low temperature on the survival rate (Sxj) of T. drosophilae

After brief exposure to low temperatures, the specific age–stage fecundity (fx) and specific age fecundity (mx) of T. drosophilae females first increase and then decrease. The peak age-specific fecundity (fx) for females at 8 °C occurs at 15 days, reaching 19.85 eggs. At −8 °C, the maximum mx for females is observed at 14 days, with 15.39 eggs. The age-specific fecundity (fx) of females at −8 °C is 4.46 eggs less than that of females treated at 8 °C, and 6.16 eggs less than the peak of females at 8 °C (21.55 eggs) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effects of short-term low temperature on the age-specific survival rate (lx), age-specific fecundity (fx), and age-specific fecundity (mx) of F1 generation of T. drosophilae

The specific age–stage life expectancy (exj) of T. drosophilae under short-term low and high temperatures indicates a gradual decline in life expectancy during the egg-larval and pupal stages, followed by an increase in the middle stages. Male adults exhibit a significantly higher life expectancy than female adults, and life expectancy for both sexes decreases over time during each temperature treatment along the growth time axis (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effects of short-term low-temperature treatment on the specific age–stage life expectancy (exj) of T. drosophilae

Effects of short-term low-temperature treatment on life table parameters of T. drosophilae population

Short-term exposure to low temperatures had a significant impact on the life table parameters of T. drosophilae (Table 3). The net R0 value decreased as the temperature dropped, with the highest recorded value of 46.37 ± 7.11 at 8 °C and the lowest of 23.64 ± 5.40 at −8 °C, both of which were lower than the control value of 64.75 ± 7.83. Similarly, the average generation period (T) also decreased with lower temperatures; the average period was longest at 15.11 ± 0.40 at 8 °C and shortest at 13.62 ± 0.54 at −8 °C. However, these comparisons to the control value of 14.60 ± 0.34 were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In contrast, the intrinsic rate of increase (rm) rose with lower temperatures, with a value of 0.21 ± 0.02 at −8 °C, which was significantly lower than the control rate of 0.28 ± 0.011 (P < 0.05). Additionally, the finite growth rate (λ) decreased at lower temperatures, reaching minimum values of 1.26 ± 0.02 at −4 °C and 1.24 ± 0.02 at −8 °C, both significantly below the control value of 1.33 ± 0.01 (P < 0.05). In summary, short-term exposure to low temperatures suppressed the population growth of T. drosophilae.

Table 3 Effects of short-term low temperature on life table parameters of T. drosophilae population

Discussion

Short-term low temperatures affect the mating behavior of T. drosophilae at different life stages. The main mating activity occurs between 15:00 and 18:00, similar to other parasitic wasps such as Tetrastichus hagenowii [34] and Coccophagus japonicus [35]. This peak may be linked to the production of female sex hormones. Different insect species exhibit varied mating behaviors in response to environmental temperatures. For instance, Callosobruchus chinensis [36] has a shorter mating duration at lower temperatures, which aligns with our observations of T. drosophilae. Similarly, Bactrocera tryoni [37] shows a decrease in mating frequency at lower temperatures, and we noted a similar decline in T. drosophilae mating frequency when temperatures ranged from 8 °C to −8 °C. This reduction may result from the inhibitory effects of short-term low temperatures on the release of female hormones in T. drosophilae and a decrease in male vitality.

Once T. drosophilae identifies a potential host, it assesses the host's health, developmental stage, and size to determine whether it is suitable for parasitism. The wasp first taps the host pupae, an important behavior that helps prevent unsuitable parasitism and ensures the proper development of its offspring [38]. It uses its antennae, keen eyesight, and ovipositor receptors to evaluate the host's suitability before deciding whether to lay eggs. If the host is found to be unsuitable, the wasp quickly abandons it in search of a more appropriate host. Recent studies indicate that brief exposure to low temperatures can extend the duration of T. drosophilae’s pupae-tapping behavior and reduce its parasitic effectiveness. Research by Shen et al. [39] showed that stress can significantly lower the host selection rate of Trichogramma chilonis adults and prolong the time it takes for them to find and court potential mates. These effects are likely due to reduced energy expenditure and the need to maintain physiological balance.

Studying insect life tables is crucial for understanding how insects develop, survive, and reproduce in different environments. This research is also important for examining the relationships between different species and the dynamics of insect populations [40]. In this study, we focused on T. drosophilae after exposure to various short-term low-temperature treatments. We created life tables that displayed the age–stage survival rate (Sxj) and age-specific survival rate (lx) to show the complete life cycle of T. drosophilae, from egg to adult, under different temperatures. Our investigation highlights how short-term low temperatures affect the growth, development, and survival of T. drosophilae. Although T. drosophilae can complete its life cycle and reproduce, low temperatures significantly impact factors like development time, survival rate, and reproductive output. Changes in temperature stress result in differences in the growth and reproductive capabilities of the species. Specifically, exposure to low temperatures extends the egg-larval and pupal stages but reduces the adult stage and overall lifespan of T. drosophilae. Other parasitoids, such as Fopius vandenboschi [41], also show reduced adult longevity under low temperatures. This decline may occur because T. drosophilae must use significant lipid reserves and energy to survive brief periods of cold, which adults cannot replenish since they do not produce lipids internally. This leads to a trade-off in resource allocation between survival and reproduction, ultimately shortening their lifespan [42]. Generally, a longer lifespan in adult parasitic wasps improves their effectiveness in controlling target pest populations. Their ability to manage host populations relies heavily on their feeding, parasitism, and predatory abilities during the adult stage [43]. Moreover, a longer adult lifespan supports successful establishment of insect populations in outdoor settings. Therefore, short-term low temperatures reduce the adult lifespan of T. drosophilae, which diminishes its effectiveness as a biological control agent.

The survival rate is a common metric used to evaluate how resilient natural enemy insects like T. drosophilae are to temperature changes. It reflects their sensitivity to temperature fluctuations and is vital for understanding their survival prospects [44, 45]. When temperatures rise above a certain critical level, the survival of these insects is at risk, which is essential for the growth of their populations. This study found that short-term exposure to low temperatures can decrease the survival rate of T. drosophilae, aligning with previous research by Sun [40]. This indicates that lower temperatures could limit their survival and, consequently, their effectiveness in controlling host populations. Fertility is a crucial factor for the growth and sustainability of insect populations and serves as an important indicator of how well natural enemy insects can control pest populations. Insects generally have a narrower temperature range for reproduction, making their fecundity particularly sensitive to temperature changes [46]. The same study found that short periods of low temperature can impair the reproductive capacity of T. drosophilae. Key indicators for predicting insect population dynamics include the net reproductive rate (R0), intrinsic rate of increase (rm), finite rate of increase (λ), and mean generation period (T). These metrics illustrate the potential for population growth under different environmental conditions [47], with the intrinsic rate of increase (rm) directly correlating with population trends [48, 49].

After a 12-h exposure to low temperatures, male T. drosophilae showed increased mating activity between 15:00 and 17:00. However, as the treatment temperature decreased, mating frequency dropped, and the duration of pupal beating increased. Additionally, the low-temperature treatment led to a shorter development time and reduced lifespan for adult T. drosophilae, as well as lower age-specific fecundity. On the other hand, both high and low temperatures during brief treatment periods negatively impacted the growth, development, and overall population increase of T. drosophilae, ultimately reducing their potential for biocontrol.

Conclusions

Short-term cold temperatures impaired the reproductive ability of T. drosophilae, hindering their growth and reducing their effectiveness as biocontrol agents.

Availability of data and materials

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. Cini A, Anfora G, Escudero-Colomar LA, Grassi A, Santosuosso U, Seljak G, et al. Tracking the invasion of the alien fruit pest Drosophila suzukii in Europe. J Pest Sci. 2014;87:559–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Asplen MK, Anfora G, Biondi A, Choi DS, Chu D, Daane KM, et al. Invasion biology of spotted wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii): a global perspective and future priorities. J Pest Sci. 2015;88:469–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao C, Li P, Xie DS, Hu CH, Xiong Y, He LY, et al. The seasonal abundance of Drosophila suzukii in orchards and seasonal variation in fruit damage caused by this pest. Chin J Appl Entomol. 2017;54:724–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang C. Prediction of the potential suitable growth areas of Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) and assessment of economic losses in China. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tait G, Mermer S, Stockton D, Lee J, Avosani S, Abrieux A, et al. Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae): a decade of research towards a sustainable integrated pest management program. J Econ Entomol. 2021;114:1950–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Elsensohn JE, Schal C, Burrack HJ. Plasticity in oviposition site selection behavior in Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in relation to adult density and host distribution and quality. J Econ Entomol. 2021;114:1517–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JC, Wang X, Daane KM, Hoelmer KA, Isaacs R, Sial AA, et al. Biological control of spotted-wing drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae)—current and pending tactics. J Integr Pest Manag. 2019;10:13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen JN, Zhou SC, Wang Y, Shi M, Chen X, Huang J. Biocontrol characteristics of the fruit fly pupal parasitoid Trichopria drosophilae (Hymenoptera: Diapriidae) emerging from different hosts. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Giorgio DR, Grassi A, Pantezzi T. Recent trends in the economic impact of Drosophila suzukii. In: Garcia FRM, editor. Drosophila suzukii management. Cham: Springer Nature; 2020. p. 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rossi SMV, Grassi A, Ioriatti C, Anfora G. Augmentative releases of Trichopria drosophilae for the suppression of early season Drosophila suzukii populations. Bio Control. 2019;64:9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang XG, Serrato MA, Son Y, Walton VM, Hogg BN, Daane KM. Thermal performance of two indigenous pupal parasitoids attacking the invasive Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Environ Entomol. 2018;47:764–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fang Y. Study on the population dynamics of Drosophila suzukii and the species of its natural enemies and the biological characteristics of the Trichopria drosophilae, Kunming: Yunnan Agricultural University, Master’s thesis. 2018.

  13. Hellmann JJ, Pineda-Krch M. Constraints and reinforcement on adaptation under climate change: selection of genetically correlated traits. Biol Conserv. 2007;137:599–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abram PK, Boivin G, Moiroux J, Brodeur J. Behavioural effects of temperature on ectothermic animals: unifying thermal physiology and behavioural plasticity. Biol Rev. 2017;92:1859–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hao DC, Yao MJ, Liu Y. Study on low temperature delaying mating behavior of Drosophila melanogaster. Bull Biol. 2006;02:53–4.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Qi X, Fu JW, You MS. Age-stage, two-sex life table and its application in population ecology and integrated pest management. Acta Entomol Sin. 2019;62:255–62.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chi H, Kavousi A, Gharekhani G, Atlihan R, Özgökçe MS, Güncan A, et al. Advances in theory, data analysis, and application of the age-stage, two-sex life table for demographic research, biological control, and pest management. Entomol Gener. 2023;43:705–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tang LD, Guo LH, Shen Z, Chen YM, Zang LS. Comparison of the biology of Frankliniella intonsa and Megalurothrips usitatus on cowpea pods under natural regimes through an age-stage, two-sex life table approach. Bull Entomol Res. 2023;113(4). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485323000238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tian XY, Gao Y, Ali MY, Li XH, Hu YL, Li WB, et al. Impact of temperature on age-stage, two-sex life table analysis of a Chinese population of bean bug, Riptortus pedestris (Hemiptera: Alydidae). Agriculture. 2022;12:1505–1505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alexandre L, Filipe M, Roberto M, Pons X. Effects of temperature on the fitness of the alfalfa weevil (Hypera postica). Pest Manag Sci. 2022;78:4223–4223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pino DM, Gallego RJ, Suárez HE, Cabello T. Effect of temperature on life history and parasitization behavior of Trichogramma achaeae Nagaraja and Nagarkatti (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae). Insects. 2020;11:482.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen Q, Tian Y, Zhang JL, Li J, Ren H, Chen GH, et al. Resilience mechanisms of Trichopria drosophilae (Hymenoptera: Diapriinae) under global extreme cooling: insights into parasitic response and physiological adaptation. J Econ Entomol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toae134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen Q, Zhang J, Tian Y, Chen G, Zhang X. Effect of short-term high-temperature stimuli on the functional response of Trichopria drosophilae (Matsumura). Insects. 2023;14:748.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang Y, Gu X, Peng X, Tao M, Chen G, Zhang X. Effect of short-term high-temperatures on the growth, development and reproduction in the fruit fly, Bactrocera tau (Diptera: Tephritidae). Sci Rep. 2020;10:6418.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Leopold RA. Cold storage of insects for integrated pest management. In: Hallman GJ, Denlinger DL, editors. Temperature sensitivity in insects and application in integrated pest management. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2019. p. 235–67.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Ebrahimi M, Sahragard A, Talaei-Hassanloui R, Kavousi A, Chi H. The life table and parasitism rate of Diadegma insulare (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) reared on larvae of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), with special reference to the variable sex ratio of the offspring and comparison of jackknife and bootstrap techniques. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2013;106:279–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chi H. TWOSEX-MSChart: a computer program for the age stage, two-sex life table analysis. Taichung: National Chung Hsing University; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chi H, Liu H. Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bull Inst Math Acad Sin. 1985;24:225–40.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chi H. Life-table analysis incorporating both sexes and variable development rates among individuals. Environ Entomol. 1988;17:26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Goodman D. Optimal life histories, optimal notation, and the value of reproductive value. Am Nat. 1982;119:803–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chi H, Su HY. Age-stage, two-sex life tables of Aphidius gifuensis (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and its host Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae) with mathematical proof of the relationship between female fecundity and the net reproductive rate. Environ Entomol. 2006;35:10–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tuan SJ, Lee CC, Chi H. Population and damage projection of Spodoptera litura (F.) on peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) under different conditions using the age-stage, two-sex life table. Pest Manag Sci. 2014;70:805–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wei MF, Chi H, Guo YF, Li XW, Zhao LL, Ma RY. Demography of Cacopsylla chinensis (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) reared on four cultivars of Pyrus bretschneideri (Rosales: Rosaceae) and P. communis pears with estimations of confidence intervals of specific life table statistics. J Econ Entomol. 2020;113:2343–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Xu L, Wu ZQ. Oviposition preference of Tetrastichus hagenowii (Hymenoptera: Eubphidae). J Fujin Agric For Univ. 2009;38:577–80.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shen SZ, Niu LM, Fu YG, Chen JY, Zhu JH, Zhang FP. Studies on the mating behavior and reproductive system of female Coccophagus japonicus Compere. J Envirl Entomol. 2020;42:985–90.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Katsuki M, Miyatake T. Effects of temperature on mating duration, sperm transfer and remating frequency in Callosobruchus chinensis. J Insect Physiol. 2009;55:113–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Meats A, Fay FAC. Distribution of mating frequency among males of the Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt), in relation to temperature, acclimation and chance. Gener Appl Entomol. 2020;29:27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sivinski J, Vulinec K, Aluja M. Ovipositor length in a guild of parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) attacking Anastrepha spp. fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in southern Mexico. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2001;94:886–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Weissteiner S, Huetteroth W, Kollmann M, Weißbecker B, Romani R, Schachtner J, et al. Cockchafer larvae smell host root scents in soil. PLoS ONE. 2017;7:e45827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Shen JZ, Zhang WZ, Zhang CQ, Liu YH. Investigation of the lethal and behavioral effects of chlorantraniliprole on the parasitoid wasp Trichogramma chilonis. Chin J Biol Contr. 2024; 1–11.

  41. Sun W, Cui M, Xia L, Yu Q, Cao Y, Wu Y. Age-stage, two-sex life tables of the predatory mite Cheyletus malaccensis Oudemans at different temperatures. Insects. 2020;11:181.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Lin J, Yang DQ, Hao XX, Jia PF, Cai PM, Liu CM, et al. Effect of cold storage on the biological characteristics of Fopius vandenboschi (Fullaway). Chin J Biol Contr. 2022;38:292–9.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Visser B, Ellers J. Lack of lipogenesis in parasitoids: a review of physiological mechanisms and evolutionary implications. J Insect Physiol. 2008;54:1315–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Malek R, Kaser JM, Anfora G, Ciolli M, Khrimian A, Weber DC, et al. Trissolcus japonicus foraging behavior: implications for host preference and classical biological control. Biolog Contr. 2021;161:104700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ryan S, Lill JT. Higher temperatures reduce the efficacy of a key biocontrol parasitoid. Bio Control. 2022;176:105079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Abbes K, Biondi A, Kurtulus A, Ricupero M, Russo A, Siscaro G, et al. Combined non-target effects of insecticide and high temperature on the parasitoid Bracon nigricans. PLoS ONE. 2017;10:e0138411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ma CS, Ma G, Pincebourde S. Survive a warming climate: insect responses to extreme high temperatures. Annu Rev Entomol. 2021;66:163–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Farhadi R, Allahyari H, Chi H. Life table and predation capacity of Hippodamia variegata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) feeding on Aphis fabae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Biol Control. 2011;59:83–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Melero Y, Stefanescu C, Pino J. General declines in Mediterranean butterflies over the last two decades are modulated by species traits. Biolog Conserv. 2016;201:336–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms. Liling Mei and Xiaoyan Liao (Yunnan Agricultural University) for helping us collect the Drosophila suzukii and T. drosophilae populations in the field. We thank Ms. Guizhen Qian and Yijuan Meng (Yunnan Agricultural University) for helping to feed the experimental population.

Funding

The present research work was supported by the Key Agricultural Joint Project of Basic Research in Yunnan Province (202101BD070001-015), the Reserve Talents of Young and Middle-aged Academic and Technological Leaders in Yunnan Province (202105AC160071), and the Young Talents of “Xingdian Talent Support Program” (YNWRQNBJ2020291).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jinlong Zhang: conceptualization, methodology, software. Ye Tian: validation, formal analysis. Juan Li: investigation, resources. Weizhi Ning: data curation. Qiang Chen: writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. Guohua Chen: visualization, supervision. Xiaoming Zhang: project administration, funding acquisition. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoming Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval our research complies with established ethical standards. The study did not involve humans or protected animals. In this study, samples of D. suzukii and T. drosophilae populations could be collected without ethical approval or permission.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Q., Zhang, J., Tian, Y. et al. Evaluating the effects of short-term low temperature on the growth and development of Trichopria drosophilae based on the age–stage two-sex life table. Parasites Vectors 17, 418 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06480-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06480-6

Keywords