Skip to main content


We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research
  • Open Access

DNA sequence characterisation and phylogeography of Lymnaea cousini and related species, vectors of fascioliasis in northern Andean countries, with description of L. meridensis n. sp. (Gastropoda: Lymnaeidae)

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
Parasites & Vectors20114:132

  • Received: 23 June 2011
  • Accepted: 12 July 2011
  • Published:



Livestock fascioliasis is a problem throughout Ecuador, Colombia and Venezuela, mainly in Andean areas where the disease also appears to affect humans. Transmission patterns and epidemiological scenarios of liver fluke infection have shown to differ according to the lymnaeid vector snail species involved. These Andean countries present the vectors Lymnaea cousini, L. bogotensis and L. ubaquensis, unknown in the rest of Latin America. An exhaustive combined haplotype study of these species is performed by means of DNA sequencing of the nuclear ribosomal 18S RNA gene, ITS-2 and ITS-1, and mitochondrial DNA cox 1 gene.


The conserved 5.8S rDNA sequence corroborated that no pseudogenes are involved in the numerous non-microsatellite/minisatellite-related indels appearing between the ITS-2 and ITS-1 sequences when comparing different L. cousini - L. bogotensis populations. Sequence analyses and phylogenetic reconstruction methods including other lymnaeid vector species show that (i) L. bogotensis is a synonym of L. cousini, (ii) L. ubaquensis is a synonym of Pseudosuccinea columella, and (iii) populations of L. cousini hitherto known from Venezuelan highlands indeed belong to a new species for which the name L. meridensis n. sp. is proposed. This new species is described and a complete phenotypic differentiation provided.


ITS-2, ITS-1 and cox 1 prove to be good markers for specimen classification and haplotype characterisation of these morphologically similar lymnaeids in endemic areas. Analysis of the 18S gene and phylogenetic reconstructions indicate that L. cousini and L. meridensis n. sp. cluster in an evolutionary line different from the one of P. columella, despite their external resemblance. This suggests an evolutionary phenotypic convergence related to similar environments and which has given rise to frequent specimen misclassification. Body size and phylogenetic relationships of L. meridensis n. sp. with well-known vectors as Lymnaea cousini and P. columella, as well as with Galba/Fossaria species, suggest that the new species may participate in disease transmission to both animals and humans in altitude areas during the yearly window in which temperatures are higher than the F. hepatica minimum development threshold. The involvement of L. cousini and P. columella in the transmission and geographical/altitudinal distribution of fascioliasis in these Andean countries is analysed.


  • High Altitude Area
  • Fascioliasis
  • Hepatica Infection
  • Nidamental Gland
  • Combine Haplotype


The two liver fluke species Fasciola hepatica and F. gigantica (Trematoda: Fasciolidae) cause fascioliasis, a highly pathogenic disease which appears to emerge in many countries of Latin America, Europe, Africa and Asia at present [1]. This parasitic disease has been recognised as a very important veterinary problem in livestock since long ago [2]. Its public health impact at the human level has, however, only been ascertained from the 1990s [35].

In the two host life cycle of fasciolids, livestock species play an important reservoir role. Transmission studies have shown that different species, such as sheep, cattle, pig and donkey, represent similar infection sources when considering the infectivity of the metacercarial infective stage from their respective origins [6, 7]. On the contrary, the specificity of fasciolid species regarding freshwater snail species of the family Lymnaeidae (Gastropoda) [8], represents a crucial factor in establishing not only the geographical distribution of the disease in both animals and humans, but also prevalences and intensities due to more or less appropriate ecological characteristics (population dynamics, anthropophilic characteristics, type of water bodies, etc.) of the different lymnaeid intermediate host or vector species. That is why different lymnaeid species appear linked to the different transmission patterns and epidemiological scenarios of this very heterogeneous disease in humans [1, 4]. Additionally, both lymnaeid snails and the larval stages of fasciolids have been shown to be highly dependent on climatic and environmental characteristics [911]. This explains the relationships of fascioliasis with climate change effects recently observed in different areas [12, 13].

In the Americas, fascioliasis is only caused by F. hepatica, due to the absence of lymnaeids of the genus Radix which act as transmitters of F. gigantica[8]. In South America, human fascioliasis endemic areas appear mainly related to high altitude areas of Andean countries, where the transmission of F. hepatica has been shown to be increased [14]. Two different patterns are included [4]: (i) the Altiplano pattern with transmission throughout the year due to lymnaeid vectors linked to permanent water bodies [15] as in the human hyperendemic areas of Bolivia [15, 16] and Peru [17], and (ii) the valley pattern with seasonal transmission due to lymnaeid vectors more linked to temporary water bodies, including situations as those in Chile [18] and Peru [1921].

Human and animal fascioliasis is also known to be a great problem in northern Andean countries such as Ecuador [2224], Colombia [2532] and Venezuela [33, 34]. In all these areas, epidemiological and transmission characteristics should a priori fit the valley pattern. Among the lymnaeid species acting as vectors of fascioliasis in these countries, Lymnaea cousini Jousseaume, 1887 is one of the species mainly involved in the transmission in high altitude areas in Ecuador [24, 35], Colombia [25, 36] and Venezuela [37, 38]. Shell morphology, ecological characteristics and seasonal population dynamics of this species [25, 3941] explain why it may be confused, when dealing with young specimens, with other lymnaeids, mainly vector species of the so-called Galba/Fossaria group [42]. These facts are also related to the different lymnaeid species having been proposed to be synonyms of L. cousini: L. raphaelis Jousseaume, 1887 described from Azuay, South of Cuenca, Ecuador; L. selli Preston, 1907 and L. bogotensis Pilsbry, 1935, both originally described from Bogota, Colombia; and L. ubaquensis Piaget, 1914 only known from Laguna Ubaque, Cundinamarca, Colombia [37, 39, 43, 44].

The problems in specimen classification and species distinction in the aforementioned vector groups is a good example of the wide confusion in which the family Lymnaeidae is immersed, due to the large intraspecific variability and the insufficiency of efficient classification characteristics in shell and morphoanatomy on which to rely [8]. Fortunately, in recent years, genetic studies by means of DNA marker sequences have proved to be very useful in assessing not only the classification of lymneid snail specimens, but also the validity of the species and its phylogenetic relationships with other taxa of the family in the way for a natural systematic and taxonomic classification of the family. Additionally, these molecular tools have shown to be appropriate tools to analyse the fasciolid species/lymnaeid species specificity, by providing deep distinction capacity of populations and geographic strains by combined haplotyping when using different markers of the nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) together [45]. Therefore, a worldwide initiative to clarify vector species within Lymnaeidae by molecular tools was launched in parallel to multidisciplinary studies to assess human fascioliasis in the different continents [1]. Markers used so far and having shown their usefulness at different levels are: (i) within the rDNA operon, the 18S gene [42, 46, 47], ITS-2 [8, 14, 42, 4850] and ITS-1 [14, 48, 51]; (ii) within the mtDNA genome, the 16S [50, 52, 53], and cox 1 [42, 54].

The purpose of the present study is to characterise the vector species L. cousini, L. bogotensis and L. ubaquensis from Ecuador, Colombia and Venezuela by means of DNA sequences of 18S, ITS-2, ITS-1 and cox 1, compare their different populations, reconstruct their phylogenetic relationships with other close vector species of the family Lymnaeidae in the Americas, and analyse its geographical distribution and transmission role regarding human and animal fascioliasis. The results of the molecular analyses, made by using specimens of the type localities of each Latin American lymnaeid species in order to be systematically conclusive, indicate that a new species is present in Venezuela. For this species the name Lymnaea meridensis n. sp. is proposed and a diagnostic description is provided.


Lymnaeid snail materials

The snail specimens studied were from the following lymnaeid species and geographical origins (Figure 1):
Figure 1
Figure 1

Geographical distribution of lymnaeid sampling localities. Map of northern Andean countries showing localities where lymnaeids were collected: 1 = Lymnaea cousini from Chanchu-Yacu, Chillogallo, Quito, Ecuador; 2 = L. bogotensis from Zipaquira, savannah of Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia; 3 = L. ubaquensis from Laguna de Ubaque, Cundinamarca, Colombia; 4 = L. meridensis n. sp. from Laguna Mucubaji, Merida State, Venezuela.

  1. 1.-

    Lymnaea cousini Jousseaume, 1887 from the type locality of Chanchu-Yacu, Chillogallo, Quito, Ecuador [55] (0°18'54.9'' S, 78°34'2.3'' W - 3,036 m a.s.l.) and from Laguna Mucubaji, Merida State, Venezuela (8°47'51.8'' N, 70°49'32.4'' W - 3,550 m a.s.l.).

  2. 2.-

    L. bogotensis Pilsbry, 1935 from the type locality of the savannah of Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia [56] (snails collected in the locality of Zipaquira; 4°59'46.4'' N, 74°0'6.6'' W - 2,567 m a.s.l.); L. selli Preston, 1907 indeed corresponds to the same species and identical type locality [39].

  3. 3.-

    L. ubaquensis Piaget, 1914 from the type locality of Laguna de Ubaque, Cundinamarca, Colombia [57] (4°29'11.3'' N, 73°56'11.0'' W - 1,884 m a.s.l.).

  4. 4.-

    Pseudosuccinea columella (Say, 1817) from Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico (18°23'45.5'' N, 66°3'24.5'' W - 9 m a.s.l.), used for comparison purposes; a Caribbean origin was selected due to the core distribution of this species in that area [58].


DNA was extracted from more than one specimen of a given population when this was deemed necessary for sequence verification. Only snails that appeared free of helminth infection were used in the molecular analyses. To reduce further the risk of contamination of DNA from helminths (which are more likely to be localized in other tissues), DNA was only isolated from the foot of each snail.

Molecular techniques

DNA extraction

Snail feet fixed in 70% ethanol were used for DNA extraction procedures. After dissection under a microscope, half of the foot was suspended in 400 μl of lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate SDS) containing 500 μg/ml Proteinase K (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and digested for 2 hr at 55°C with alternate shaking each 15 min. The procedure steps were performed according to methods outlined previously [8, 42, 46]. Total DNA was isolated according to the phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation method [59]. The pellet was dried and resuspended in 30 μl sterile TE buffer (pH 8.0). This suspension was stored at -20°C until use.

DNA sequence amplification

DNA sequences were amplified by PCR using 4-6 μl of genomic DNA for each 50 μl PCR reaction, according to methods outlined previously [8, 14, 42, 46]. Each one of the five DNA markers were PCR amplified independently for each lymnaeid specimen and each PCR product was sequenced for a bona-fide haplotype characterisation. A set of 8 conserved oligonucleotide primers was used for the amplification of five superimposed fragments of the 18S ribosomal RNA gene using specific primers and a standard protocol [42, 47] to amplify specific 18S rDNA regions. The rDNA spacers ITS-2 and ITS-1 were amplified using primers designed in conserved positions of 5.8S and 28S rRNA genes and 18S and 5.8S rRNA genes of several eukaryote Metazoa species, respectively [8, 42, 51]. A mitochondrial DNA cox 1 gene fragment was amplified using universal primers [60]. Amplifications were generated in a Mastercycle epgradient (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), by 30 cycles of 30 sec at 94°C, 30 sec at 50°C and 1 min at 72°C, preceded by 30 sec at 94°C and followed by 7 min at 72°C for ITS-2 and ITS-1, and by 40 cycles of 30 sec at 90°C, 1 min at 48°C and 1 min at 72°C, preceded by 2.5 min at 94°C and followed by 10 min at 72°C for cox 1. Ten μl of each PCR product was checked by staining with ethidium bromide on 1% Nusieve® GTG agarose (FMC) gel electrophoresis, using the Molecular Weight Marker VI (Boehringer Mannheim) at 0.1 μg DNA/μl as control.

Purification and quantification of PCR products

Primers and nucleotides were removed from PCR products by purification on Wizard™ PCR Preps DNA Purification System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol and resuspended in 50 μl of 10 mM TE buffer (pH 7.6). The final DNA concentration was determined by measuring the absorbance at 260 and 280 nm.

DNA sequencing

The sequencing of the entire 18S rRNA gene, the complete rDNA ITS-2 and ITS-1 and, and the fragment of the mtDNA cox 1 gene was performed on both strands by the dideoxy chain-termination method [61]. It was carried out with the Taq dye-terminator chemistry kit for ABI 373A and ABI 3700 capillary system (Perkin Elmer, Foster City, CA, USA), using PCR primers.

Pseudogene absence verification

To assure that no pseudogenes were involved in the sequences of the intergenic region of the different lymnaeid populations analysed, the 5.8S rRNA gene was amplified independently using primers designed in conserved regions of the 18S and ITS-2 rDNA of several lymnaeid species [8, 42, 51, 62]. To further assure accurateness of the sequences obtained in the way to discriminate between lymnaeid populations, additional amplifications were carried out using population-specific primers designed in the sequences of the ITS-2 region previously obtained. Amplifications were generated in a Mastercycle epgradient (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), by 35 cycles of 30 sec at 94°C, 40 sec at 55°C and 2 min at 72°C, preceded by 3 min at 94°C and followed by 3 min at 72°C for the 5.8S rDNA region.

DNA haplotype nomenclature

The codes for the sequences obtained follow the standard nomenclature proposed for lymnaeid snails previously [1, 45, 51]. It shall be noted that haplotype codes are only definitive in the case of complete sequences. When dealing with fragments or incomplete sequences, haplotype codes are provisional.

Software programs

Sequence alignments

Sequences were aligned using CLUSTAL-W version 1.8 [63] and MEGA 4.0 [64], and assembly was made with the Staden Package [65]. Subsequently, minor corrections were manually introduced for a better fit of nucleotide correspondences in microsatellite sequence regions. Homologies were performed using the BLASTN programme from the National Center for Biotechnology information web site Genetic distances were measured using parameters provided by PAUP v.4.0b10 [66].

Sequence comparisons

The following sequences from GenBank-EMBL have been used for comparison analyses:
  • 18S rRNA gene: complete sequences of Lymnaea (Lymnaea) stagnalis [EMBL: Z73984], Lymnaea (Stagnicola) palustris [EMBL: Z73983], Omphiscola glabra [EMBL: Z73982], Galba truncatula [EMBL: Z73985] [46]; L. cubensis [EMBL: Z83831] [42, 47]; L. viatrix and L. neotropica both species with the same sequence [EMBL: AM412222] [42]; Pseudosuccinea columella [GenBank: EU241866] [67]; Radix auricularia [EMBL: Z73980] and R. balthica [EMBL: Z73981] [46]. Other incomplete sequences available in the GenBank have not been used to avoid problems in comparative sequence analyses.

  • rDNA ITS-2: L. (S.) palustris palustris [EMBL: AJ319620], L. (S.) palustris turricula [EMBL: AJ319618], L. (S.) fuscus [EMBL: AJ319621] and Catascopia occulta [EMBL: AJ319642] [8, 49] (C. occulta has been recently proposed to be a younger synonym of C. terebra [68] although molecular confirmation is still pending); L. cubensis H1 from Cuba [EMBL: AM412223] and H2 from USA [EMBL: FN182200], L. viatrix [EMBL: AM412224] and L. neotropica [EMBL: AM412225], including respective type localities for each one [42]; G. truncatula H1 [EMBL: AJ296271], H2 [EMBL: AJ243017] and H3 (= L. viatrix sensu Ueno et al., 1975; = L. cubensis sensu Ueno et al., 1975) [EMBL: AJ272051] [8, 14, 42]; P. columella from Cuba [GenBank: AY186751] [69].

  • rDNA ITS-1: L. (S.) palustris palustris [EMBL: AJ626849], L. (S.) palustris turricula [EMBL: AJ626853], L. (S.) fuscus [EMBL: AJ626856] and C. occulta [EMBL: AJ626858] [51]; L. cubensis HA from Cuba [EMBL: AM412226] and HB from USA [EMBL: FN182202], L. viatrix [EMBL: AM412227], and L. neotropica [EMBL: AM412228], including respective type localities for each one [42]; G. truncatula HA [EMBL: AJ243018], HB [EMBL: AJ296270] and HC (= L. viatrix sensu Ueno et al., 1975; = L. cubensis sensu Ueno et al., 1975) [EMBL: AJ272052] [8, 42, 51]; P. columella from Cuba [GenBank: AY186751] [69].

  • mtDNA cox 1 gene: L. cubensis cox 1-a [EMBL: AM494009], L. viatrix cox 1-a [EMBL: AM494010], L. neotropica cox 1-a [EMBL: AM494008], all three from respective type localities [42]; L. neotropica cox 1-b from Argentina [EMBL: FN356741] [62]; G. truncatula cox 1-a from Spain [EMBL: AM494011] [42]; G. truncatula from Germany [GenBank: EU818799] [70]; and P. columella from Australia [GenBenk: AY227366] [54].

Representation of the 18S rRNA secondary structure

The previously published secondary structure prediction for Limicolaria kambeul 18S rRNA [71] based on the general eukaryote 18S rRNA secondary structure [72] was used and extended to encompass lymnaeid sequences.

Phylogenetic inference

Phylogenies were inferred from DNA sequences using maximum-likelihood (ML) estimates with PAUP. ML parameters such as model, base frequencies, transition/transversion ratio (ts/tv), the shape parameter for the gamma distribution, and the proportion of invariant sites, were optimised using the hierarchical likelihood ratio test (hLRT) and the Akaike information criterion (AIC) [73, 74], implemented in Modeltest 3.7 [75]. Starting branch lengths were obtained using the least-squares method with ML distances.

To provide an assessment of the reliability of the nodes in the ML tree, three methods were used. First, a bootstrap analysis using 1000 replicates was made with fast-heuristic search in PAUP. Second, a distance-based phylogeny using the neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithm [76] with the ML pairwise distances was obtained and statistical support for the nodes was evaluated with 1000 bootstrap replicates, with and without removal of gapped positions. Third, a Bayesian phylogeny reconstruction procedure was applied to obtain posterior probabilities (BPP) for the nodes in the ML tree, by using the same evolutionary model as above, implemented in MrBayes 3.1 [77] with four chains during 1,000,000 generations and trees were sampled every 100 generations. The first 1000 trees sampled were discarded ("burn-in") and clade posterior probabilities (PP) were computed from the remaining trees. Alternative methods of phylogenetic reconstruction allowing an evaluation of the support for each node were also applied. A distance-based phylogeny using the NJ algorithm with LogDet distances was obtained. Statistical support for the nodes was evaluated with 1000 bootstrap replicates.

Due to the several limitations recently shown by mtDNA coding genes for interspecific sequence analyses in invertebrates [7880], phylogenetic reconstruction was only made from combined sequences of ITS-2 and ITS-1 as the markers considered to be best for the analysis of relationships between species belonging to different genera, as has already been verified in Lymnaeidae [45].

Phylogenetic analyses were performed after adding reference sequences of ITS-2 and ITS-1 of lymnaeid rDNA stored in the GenBank database (see species and Acc. Nos. used in list noted above in chapter of sequence comparisons). The intergenic region sequence (Genbank: AY030361) [81] including both ITSs of a planorbid species, Biomphalaria pfeifferi, was used as outgroup.

Phenotypic study

Shells of lymnaeids were measured, according to traditional malacological methods [82, 83], using a computerized image-analysis system [84]. This system was based on a DXC-930P colour video camera (Sony, Tokyo) fitted to a stereomicroscope, and connected to a computer running image analysis software (ImageProH Plus 4.5; Media Cybernetics Inc., Silver Spring, MD).

For anatomical studies, adult lymnaeids were collected in the field and allowed to relax overnight in water containing menthol. They were then immersed for 40 s in hot water (70°C) before transfer to water at room temperature. The soft parts were drawn from the shells with forceps applied to the cephalopedal mass, and fixed in slightly modified Railliet-Henry's fluid (930 ml distilled water, 6 g NaCl, 50 ml 40% formalin, and 20 ml glacial acetic acid). The fixed snails were then dissected under a stereomicroscope, so that drawings of the reproductive system could be made using a camera lucida [85].


18S rRNA Gene

The 18S rDNA sequence of L. cousini from Chanchu-Yacu (Ecuador) and Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela) and the one from L. bogotensis from Bogota savannah (Colombia) are identical base to base, with a length of 1848 bp, GC content of 51.70%, and base frequencies of: A = 0.239, G = 0.282, C = 0.235, and T = 0.244. This 18S sequence has been deposited in GenBank under the Accession No. FN598151. The 18S rDNA sequence of L. ubaquensis from Laguna Ubaque (Colombia) showed a sequence different to the aforementioned one, but identical to that of P. columella from Puerto Rico, with a 1850 bp length and a 51.70% GC content (0.238 A, 0.282 G, 0.235 C, 0.245 T), and which has been deposited under Acc. No. FN598152. When comparing both 18S sequences, a total of 16 nucleotide differences appear, including 11 mutations and 5 insertions/deletions (indels) (see Figure 2).
Figure 2
Figure 2

Nucleotide differences in a total of 62 variable positions found in the complete 18S rDNA sequence of the lymnaeid species compared and their location in the secondary structure. Helix, Position and Difference number = numbers to be read in vertical. Position = numbers refer to positions obtained in the alignment made with MEGA 4.0. Identical = .; Indel = -. Bold text corresponds to helix E10-1 of the variable area V2 where differences in the 18S rRNA gene of Lymnaeidae are concentrated [46]. Accession Nos. = [EMBL: Z73980-Z73985] [46]; [EMBL: Z83831] [47]; [EMBL: AM4122222] [42]; L. cousini and P. columella from present study. Sequence correspondences: * L. cubensis, L. viatrix and L. cousini without definitive genus ascription; ** 18S identical in L. viatrix and L. neotropica [42]; *** 18S identical in P. columella and L. ubaquensis (present paper); **** 18S identical in L. cousini from Ecuador, L. bogotensis and L. meridensis n. sp. (= L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji, Venezuela) (present study)

When comparing the 18S sequence shared by L. ubaquensis and P. columella with the only P. columella 18S from Argentina [EU241866] previously available in GenBank, a total of 22 nucleotide differences unexpectedly appeared (6 ts, 4 tv and 12 indels in a 1856 bp-long pairwise alingment), most differences representing singleton polymorphic sites in conserved areas of the secondary structure of this gene.

The multiple sequence alignment, including the ten different 18S sequences of (a) L. cousini and L. bogotensis, (b) P. columella from Puerto Rico and L. ubaquensis, the stagnicoline species (c) L. (L.) stagnalis, (d) L. (S.) palustris and (e) O. glabra, the fossarine species (f) G. truncatula, (g) L. cubensis and (h) L. viatrix (identical sequence as in L. neotropica), and the radicine species (i) R. auricularia and (j) R. balthica, was 1867 bp long, showing a total of 62 variable nucleotide positions (3.32% divergence) (Figure 2). A total of 31 of these 62 polymorphic sites appears grouped between positions 233 and 266, which corresponds to the helix E10-1 of the variable area V2 of the secondary structure. The other modified positions appear isolated in variable areas V1, V2, V4, V5 and V9 and scattered throughout the rest of the 18S sequence (Figure 2).


The populations of L. cousini from Chanchu-Yacu (Ecuador) and L. bogotensis from Bogota savannah (Colombia) show an identical ITS-2 sequence, which is different from the one showed by L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela). These sequences have been deposited in GenBank with the Acc. Nos. FN598153 and FN598154, respectively. Their length and slightly GC biased average nucleotide composition were 506 bp and 57.70% in Ecuador and Colombia, and 457 bp and 58.85% in Venezuela.

The pairwise comparison of these two ITS-2 sequences shows 64 polymorphic sites, including 12 ts, 3 tv and 49 indels and representing a 12.65% divergence (Table 1). Worth mentioning is that the high number of indels is not due to the presence or absence of microsatellites and differences in corresponding repeats. Only 17 indels appear related to microsatellite repeats, all of them located in the 3' sequence end: GGTC (2 times in Ecuador and Colombia, 1 time in Venezuela), GCAG (2 and 1 times respectively), GT (7 and 3), and CGT) (2 and 1).
Table 1

Sequence differences detected in pairwise comparisons of ITS-2 and ITS-1 between Lymnaea cousini and the most proximal species L. bogotensis and L. meridensis n. sp. (= L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji, Venezuela)


Alignment length

Nucleotide differences


Insertions + deletions





Compared species

No. of bp











L. cousini H11 vs. L. meridensis H12












L. cousini HA vs. L. cousini HB3










L. cousini HA vs. L. meridensis HA2










L. cousini HB3 vs. L. meridensis HA2










Sequence correspondences: 1 ITS-2 identical in L. cousini and L. bogotensis; 2 L. meridensis n. sp. = L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela); 3 L. cousini HB = L. bogotensis

The ITS-2 sequence of L. ubaquensis from Ubaque (Colombia) differs pronouncedly from that of L. cousini from Chanchu-Yacu (Ecuador) and L. bogotensis from Bogota savannah (Colombia) and also from the one of L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela). On the contrary, when compared to P. columella from Puerto Rico, L. ubaquensis only shows one mutation, with C or T in the position 6 of the ITS-2 alignment, respectively. These two sequences have been deposited in the GenBank with the Acc. Nos. FN598155 for the population of Puerto Rico and FN598156 for that of Ubaque. When compared to the ITS-2 of P. columella from Cuba available in the GenBank (AY186751), a total of 2 mutations and 9 indels appear.

For an analysis of species relationships, a comparison between these four ITS-2 sequences (L. cousini = L. bogotensis, L. cousini from Venezuela, P. columella from Puerto Rico, and L. ubaquensis = P. columella from Colombia) and those of stagnicolines and fossarines of GenBank was made with a pairwise ITS-2 distance matrix (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Figure 3

Pairwise distances between rDNA ITS-2 sequences of the lymnaeid species analysed according to PAUP. Below diagonal = total character differences; above diagonal = mean character differences (adjusted for missing data). Sequence correspondences: * L. cousini H1 = L. bogotensis; ** L. meridensis n. sp. = L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela); *** P. columella H1 corresponds to the population of Puerto Rico; **** P. columella H2 = L. ubaquensis; ***** P. columella [GenBank: AY186751] from Cuba [69]


Each one of the lymnaeid populations studied presented a different ITS-1 sequence. Their length and slightly GC biased average nucleotide composition were: 592 bp and 57.06% in L. cousini from Chanchu-Yacu (Ecuador); 587 bp and 56.82% in L. bogotensis from Bogota savannah (Colombia); 530 bp long and 58.67%GC in L. ubaquensis from Laguna Ubaque (Colombia); and 570 bp and 58.41% in L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela). The four sequences have been deposited under the Acc. Nos. FN598157, FN598158, FN598160 and FN598159, respectively.

The most similar sequences were those of L. cousini from Chanchu-Yacu (Ecuador) and L. bogotensis from Bogota savannah (Colombia), with only 24 polymorphic sites (11 ts, 5 tv and 8 indels) representing a 4.05% divergence. When the aforementioned two sequences are pairwise compared with L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela), the number of nucleotide differences increases notably (Table 1). None of the numerous indels corresponds to microsatellite repeat differences.

As in the case of ITS-2, the ITS-1 sequence of L. ubaquensis is very different from the three aforementioned sequences, but identical to the one of P. columella from Puerto Rico. In a pairwise alignment comparison with P. columella ITS-1 from Cuba available in the GenBank (AY186751: 527 bp long and 58.44% GC), three indels appear in positions 262, 270 and 276. Worth noting is the presence of A in position 510, in which whether A or G were found in Cuba depending to the susceptibility or resistance characteristics of the population, respectively.

For an analysis of species relationships, a comparison between these four ITS-1 sequences (L. cousini, L. bogotensis, L. cousini from Venezuela, and L. ubaquensis = P. columella from Puerto Rico) and those of stagnicolines and fossarines of GenBank was made with a pairwise ITS-1 distance matrix (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Figure 4

Pairwise distances between rDNA ITS-1 sequences of the lymnaeid species analysed according to PAUP. Below diagonal = total character differences; above diagonal = mean character differences (adjusted for missing data). Sequence correspondences: * L. cousini HA corresponds to the population of Chanchu-Yacu (Ecuador); ** L. cousini HB = L. bogotensis; *** L. meridensis n. sp. = L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela); **** P. columella HA from Puerto Rico = L. ubaquensis; ***** P. columella [GenBank: AY186751] from Cuba [69]

Putative Intergenic Region Pseudogene Analysis

Only functional 5.8S rDNA sequences were obtained in all individuals and populations analysed of L. cousini from Chanchu-Yacu (Ecuador), L. bogotensis from Bogota savannah (Colombia), L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela), L. ubaquensis from Ubaque (Colombia) and P. columella from Puerto Rico. These sequences were all identical in length and nucleotide composition and have been deposited in GenBank with the Acc. Nos. HM560968, HM560969 and HM560970. Their length and slightly GC biased average composition were 154 bp and 55.84%. No methylation-related substitutions (C-T, G-A) were detected. Thus, no degree of polymorphism was observed for the 5.8S rDNA.

mtDNA cox 1

Five different cox 1 sequences were obtained, all of 672 bp and highly AT-biased. Respective AT contents and GenBank Accession Nos. are: L. cousini from Chanchu-Yacu (Ecuador): 69.5% (FN598161); L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela): 69.2% (FN598164); L. bogotensis from Bogota savannah (Colombia): two different sequences with 69.6% (FN598162) and 69.8% (FN598163); L. ubaquensis from Laguna Ubaque (Colombia) and P. columella from Puerto Rico: both share the same sequence, with 69.1% (FN598165).

In a multiple 672-bp-long sequence alignment including the five aforementioned sequences, a total of 565 positions were conserved, 107 variable, 18 parsimony informative and 89 singleton sites. The sequence of L. cousini from Chanchu-Yacu (Ecuador) and the two of L. bogotensis from Bogota savannah (Colombia) differ in only 3 mutations. The number of nucleotide differences increases considerably to 37 (5.5% divergence) when these three sequences are compared to that of L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela) and to very numerous when with the one shared by L. ubaquensis and P. columella (Figure 5).
Figure 5
Figure 5

Nucleotide differences found in the mtDNA cox 1 sequence of the lymnaeid species studied. Position = numbers (to be read in vertical) refer to variable positions obtained in the alignment made with MEGA 4.0. Identical = .; Indel = -. Haplotype codes only provisional due to incomplete sequences of the gene. Sequence correspondences: * L. cousini cox 1b and cox 1c correspond to two different haplotypes found in L. bogotensis; ** L. meridensis n. sp. = L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela); *** P. columella cox1a from Puerto Rico = L. ubaquensis cox 1a

Species relationships were analysed by comparing these five cox 1 sequences with other proximal lymnaeid species available in GenBank, whose cox 1 fragment sequences were similar in lenght to those obtained in the present paper, in a pairwise cox 1 distance matrix (Figure 6).
Figure 6
Figure 6

Pairwise distances between mtDNA cox 1 nucleotide sequences according to PAUP. Including the lymnaeid species studied, together with Latinoamerican species of the Galba / Fossaria group and other proximal lymnaeid species available in GenBank (only cox 1 sequence fragments of a length similar to that of sequences obtained in present study). Below diagonal = total character differences; above diagonal = mean character differences (adjusted for missing data). Haplotype codes only provisional due to incomplete sequences of the gene. Sequence correspondences: * L. cousini cox 1b and cox 1c correspond to two different haplotypes found in L. bogotensis; ** L. meridensis n. sp. = L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela); *** L. neotropica cox1a and cox1b from Peru and Argentina, respectively; **** G. truncatula from Germany, without provisional code ascription due to undetermined nucleotides in the sequence [GenBank: EU818799] [70]; ***** P. columella cox 1a = L. ubaquensis; ****** P. columella from Australia, without provisional code ascription due to the shorter sequence fragment [GenBank: AY227366] [54]

For each of the lymnaeid taxa studied, the amino-acid sequence of the COX1 gene fragment obtained was 224 aa long. A pairwise comparison of the COX1 amino-acid sequences showed a 100% identity between the two L. bogotensis from Bogota savannah (Colombia), and only one amino-acid difference (asparagine/isoleucine, respectively) in position 215 between them and L. cousini from Chanchu-Yacu (Ecuador). When comparing L. cousini from Chanchu-Yacu (Ecuador) and L. bogotensis from Bogota savannah (Colombia) with L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela), two differences appear: valine/isoleucine respectively in position 8, and isoleucine in lymnaeids from both Ecuador and Venezuela and asparagine in those from Colombia in position 215. The COX1 amino-acid sequence of P. columella is characterised by the presence of a methionine and threonine in positions 32 and 204, whereas all others show threonine and serine, respectively. Worth mentioning is that L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela) shows a COX1 amino-acid sequence identical to that of L. viatrix from Argentina (AM494010) (Figure 7).
Figure 7
Figure 7

COX1 amino acid sequence differences detected in the alignment of the haplotypes of the lymnaeid species studied, together with Latinoamerican species of the Galba / Fossaria group and other proximal lymnaeid species available in GenBank (only cox 1 sequence fragments of a lenght similar to that of sequences obtained in present study). Variable positions = Numbers (to be read in vertical) refer to positions obtained in the alignment made with MEGA 4.0. - = position not sequenced. Haplotype codes only provisional due to incomplete sequences of the gene. Sequence correspondences: * L. cousini cox 1b and cox 1c correspond to two different haplotypes found in L. bogotensis; ** L. meridensis n. sp. = L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela); *** P. columella cox 1a = L. ubaquensis; **** P. columella sequence fragment shorter [GenBank: AY227366] [54]

Phylogenetic Analysis

The combination of the two internal transcribed spacers in a single data-set generated a robust tree, indicating phylogenetic accordance between the two spacers. The ML model best fitting this data-set was HKY85+G, using a ts/tv ratio of 1.062 (kappa = 2.08626), base frequencies for A, C, G and T of 0.2094, 0.2696, 0.2405 and 0.2806, respectively, a proportion of invariable sites = 0, and a gamma-distribution shape parameter of 0.53. To assess the reliability of the nodes in the ML tree (Figure 8), a bootstrap analysis using 1000 replicates was made using fast step-wise addition and the neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithm with the ML pairwise distances in PAUP. Finally, a Bayesian phylogeny reconstruction procedure was applied to obtain posterior probabilities (BPP) for the nodes in the ML tree with MrBayes.
Figure 8
Figure 8

Phylogenetic maximum-likelihood analysis of lymnaeid species from northern Andean countries. Phylogenetic tree of lymnaeid species studied, obtained using the planorbid B. pfeifferi as outgroup, based on maximum-likelihood (ML) estimates. Scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per sequence position. Support for nodes a/b/c: a: bootstrap with NJ reconstruction using PAUP with ML distance and 1000 replicates; b: bootstrap with ML reconstruction using PAUP with 1000 fast-heuristic replicates; c: Bayesian posterior probability with ML model using MrBayes.

In the ML tree obtained (Figure 8), L. cousini from Chanchu-Yacu (Ecuador) and L. bogotensis from Bogota savannah (Colombia) cluster together with L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela), within a well supported clade (87/98/100 in NJ/ML/BBP). This clade appears basal to the Galba/Fossaria species and the European stagnicoline species groups. However, this basal position does not seem to be clearly resolved, given the relatively low supports. Lymnaea ubaquensis from Ubaque (Colombia) clusters in the same branch with P. columella from Puerto Rico with the highest support, but the relationship of this branch with the main node including all other lymnaeid species is not well resolved. A similar, low-supported link appears between the European Lymnaea (Stagnicola) species and the basally appearing Palaearctic C. occulta, contrary to the relationships between the different Galba/Fossaria species which are well supported.

The topology obtained with the NJ algorithm using LogDet distances (Figure 9) is somewhat different to that shown by the ML tree (Figure 8). Here again, L. cousini from Ecuador, L. bogotensis from Colombia and L. cousini from Venezuela cluster together with a 100% bootstrap support, but this branch now appears as a sister group of the Galba/Fossaria species clade, a 97% of bootstrap value supporting this relationship. As in the ML phylogeny, L. ubaquensis from Ubaque (Colombia) clusters with P. columella from Puerto Rico in a 100% supported branch which appears basal to the rest of lymnaeids. The position of the Palaearctic C. occulta in this topology becomes interestingly different, changing to appear separated from the rest of European stagnicolines and becoming basal to the node including the Galba/Fossaria species group plus the lymnaeids studied in the present work.
Figure 9
Figure 9

Phylogenetic neighbor-joining analysis of lymnaeid species from northern Andean countries. Phylogenetic tree of the lymnaeid species studied, obtained using the planorbid B. pfeifferi as outgroup, based on minimum evolution (ME) tree based on Log-Det corrected distances using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method. Scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per sequence position. Numbers indicate the frequency of a particular branch cluster in 1000 bootstrap replicates.

Diagnostic Description of Lymnaea meridensis n. sp

Type locality

A permanent pond in Mucubaji, Merida State, located at an altitude of 3,550 m (8°47'51.8'' N, 70°49'32.4'' W).

Other locality

A small ditch in the Paso del Condor area, Merida State, at an altitude of 4,040 m (8°50'38.2.'' N, 70°49'33.9'' W).

Type specimens
Voucher specimens are deposited in the parasite and vector collection of the Department of Parasitology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain, including a haplotype (Figure 10; 8.5 mm long by 5.4 mm wide; DPUV No. and four paratypes (DPUV No. - 5.MV). In accordance with section 8.6 of the ICZN's International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, copies of this article are deposited at the following five publicly accessible libraries: Natural History Museum, London, UK; American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA; Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France; Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Figure 10
Figure 10

Shells of Lymnaea meridensis n. sp. Shells of Lymnaea meridensis n. sp. from Laguna Mucubaji, Merida State, Venezuela, in ventral (A) and dorsal (B) views.

The shell is light brown, thin-walled, with relatively short spire, obtuse apex and fine growth lines, and has only 3 whorls. The body whorl dominates the shell, is inflated and separated by a deep, well-marked suture. The aperture is large, oblique, oval and wide at the base. The form of the shell is illustrated in Figure 10. Measurements and calculated ratios are noted in Table 2. The shell tends to be one and a half times as long as it is wide, and its aperture tends to be two thirds as long as the shell or more than twice as long as the spire.
Table 2

Lymnaeid shell measurement comparison between Lymnaea cousini, L. bogotensis (= L. cousini), L. ubaquensis (= Pseudosuccinea columella) and L. meridensis n. sp. (= L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji, Venezuela), from their respective type localities in northern Andean countries


L. cousini

Chanchu-Yacu, Chillogallo


L. bogotensis

Savannah of Bogota


L. ubaquensis

Laguna de Ubaque


L. meridensis n. sp.

Mucubaji, Mérida State


Shell parameters

Jousseaume (1887) 1

n = n.s.

Paraense (1995) 2

n = 24

Velasquez (2006) 3

n = 30

present study

n = 30

present study

n = 30

present study

n = 16

Shell length (SL)




(6.85 ± 2.3)


(6.03 ± 0.65)


(9.47 ± 0.97)


(8.05 ± 0.78)

Shell width (SW)





(3.64 ± 0.38)


(5.49 ± 0.52)


(5.24 ± 0.58)

Last spire length (LSL)





(5.26 ± 0.56)


(8.62 ± 0.89)


(7.57 ± 0.13)

Spire length (SpL)





(1.99 ± 0.26)


(2.37 ± 0.30)


(2.24 ± 0.31)

Aperture length (AL)





(3.79 ± 0.42)


(6.65 ± 0.72)


(5.70 ± 0.15)

Aperture width (AW)





(2.53 ± 0.28)


(4.06 ± 0.39)


(3.39 ± 0.13)

Whorl number





(3.20 ± 0.41)


(3.13 ± 0.35)


(3.00 ± 0.00)

SW/SL ratio



(0.59 ± 0.03)


(0.62 ± 0.05)


(0.60 ± 0.02)


(0.58 ± 0.03)


(0.62 ± 0.04)

AL/SL ratio



(0.65 ± 0.02)


(0.64 ± 0.05)


(0.63 ± 0.02)


(0.70 ± 0.02)


(0.69 ± 0.04)

AL/SpL ratio



(1.88 ± 0.18)


(1.84 ± 0.41)


(1.91 ± 0.15)


(2.82 ± 0.30)


(2.58 ± 0.43)

SpL/SL ratio



(0.35 ± 0.02)


(0.36 ± 0.05)


(0.33 ± 0.02)


(0.25 ± 0.02)


(0.27 ± 0.03)

Range include minimum and maximum extremes, with mean and standard deviation SD in parentheses. Measurements in mm. n.s. = not specified. 1 = [55]; 2 = [40]; 3 = [43]

The morphoanatomical features are shown in Figure 11. The renal tube extends straightly from the pericardial region toward the mantle collar, diagonally across the roof of the pallial cavity. In its distal part, behind the osphradium, it shows two distinct flexures, coming back upon itself and, after a short course, bending sharply cephalad and rightward forming a ureter which tapers to a subterminal meatus behind the pneumostome (Figure 11A).
Figure 11
Figure 11

Anatomy of Lymnaea meridensis n. sp. Aspects of soft part anatomy of Lymnaea meridensis n. sp. from Laguna Mucubaji, Venezuela: A) renal tube and ureter in renal region extending between pericardium and mantle collar; B) reproductive system; C) detail of spermiduct and prostate in dorsal view; D) preputium and penis sheath. Scale bars: A = 1 mm; B,D = 1.5 mm; C = 0.75 mm.

The ovotestis appears composed by pressed acini around a collecting canal which continues into an ovispermiduct presenting a very short smooth-walled proximal segment followed by a bosselated swelling seminal vesicle and finally a relatively short distal segment which ends in the carrefour. The albumen gland covers the carrefour and the origin of a bosselated, transverse tubular oviduct which follows a somewhat convolute course continuing into a striated nidamental gland. The nidamental gland narrows into a smooth-walled uterus, which bends and continues into a short bulbous vagina showing a sphincter-like thickening. The spherical spermatheca gives rise to an uniformly thin spermathecal duct which extends diagonally between the nidamental gland and the prostate until joining the vagina (Figure 11B).

The distal portion of the spermiduct and the proximal portion of the prostate run on the ventral surface of the nidamental gland. The spermiduct, of granular outer surface, emerges from the carrefour, runs distalward and finally narrows to merge into a similarly granular prostate (Figure 11B). The prostate increases in width to its distal end, shows ventrally a lengthwise fissure, formed by the folding of its left margin, and finally two rounded protuberances, from whose convergence the vas deferens arises (Figure 11C). The vas deferens appears as a long, more or less uniformly thin duct which merges into a penis which is included within the penial sheath (Figure 11D).

The penis sheath is regularly cylindrical, with a somewhat thicker proximal part. The penis sheath is a little longer than the prepuce (ratio range of 0.93-1.38; mean 1.18 ± 0.18). The prepuce is thicker, around twice as wide as the penis sheath at the point of insertion of the penial sheath and gradually narrowing to terminate in the male genital pore (Figure 11D).

DNA sequence markers

Specific classification can be based on the sequences of rDNA ITS-2 (GenBank Accession No. FN598154; haplotype H1), rDNA ITS-1 (FN598159; haplotype HA) and mtDNA cox 1 (FN598164; provisional haplotype code Ha). For supraspecific classification, the nucleotide sequence of the 18S rRNA gene (FN598151) can be employed. The amino-acid sequence corresponding to the mtDNA COX1 protein (FN598164; provisional haplotype code HI) does not appear to be helpful for species discrimination.


Genetic characterisation

The sequences of such a conserved gene as the 18S rRNA [45, 46] indicate that L. cousini from Chanchu-Yacu (Ecuador), L. bogotensis from Bogota savannah (Colombia) and L. meridensis n. sp. from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela) belong to the same evolutionary lineage and which is different of the one of L. ubaquensis from Laguna Ubaque (Colombia) and P. columella from Puerto Rico. The surprisingly high number of nucleotide differences in conserved positions of the 18S between our P. columella from Puerto Rico and the same species in Argentina [67] indicate that possibly another unknown lymnaeid species was involved in that study carried out in Argentina or, most probably, the Argentinean sequence was not sufficiently "clean". In one or another case, results showing a real-time, 18S-based PCR strategy to be useful for rapid discrimination among main lymnaeid species from Argentina [67] should be reassessed, even if the target used was the sequence fragment corresponding to the helix E10-1 of the variable area V2 highlighted by Bargues and Mas-Coma [46] and not the entire gene. Moreover, this gene has recently proved to be useless for the discrimination of other lymnaeid species present in this country, as L. viatrix and L. neotropica which present identical 18S sequence [62].

The analyses of both ITS-2 and ITS-1 offer conclusive results. The identical ITS-2 sequence and scarcely different ITS-1 sequences indicate that the lymnaeid populations from Chanchu-Yacu (Ecuador) and Bogota savannah (Colombia) are indeed different combined haplotypes belonging to the same species. Consequently, the systematic name L. cousini shall be retained and L. bogotensis is molecularly confirmed to be its synonym. This conclusion agrees with the same synonymy based on shell morphology and soft part anatomy already proposed by Hubendick [39] and later accepted by several authors [37, 43, 44], but different from the proposal of Malek [86] who included L. bogotensis as a synonym of P. columella. Thus, the population of the type locality Chanchu-Yacu (Ecuador) corresponds to the combined haplotype L. cousini ITS-2 H1 and ITS-1 HA, and that of Bogota savannah (Colombia) to L. cousini ITS-2 H1 and ITS-1 HB. The total of 16 nucleotide substitutions in ITS-1 (Table 1), despite the lack of differences in ITS-2, suggests that these two populations begin to follow divergent evolutionary lineages, owing to the evolutionary rate of ITS-1 faster than the one of ITS-2 in lymnaeids [45].

However, ITS-2 and ITS-1 sequences do not support the synonymy of L. ubaquensis with L. cousini proposed by Hubendick [39] and Malek [86]. In fact, the insufficient description of L. ubaquensis by both Piaget [57] and Hubendick [39] does not allow to draw clear conclusions on the true identity of this species, and its quotation by Hubendick [39] in such a southern locality as Valdivia, in Chile, has posed acceptance problems [37]. The sequences of the two spacers demonstrate that the population of Laguna Ubaque (Colombia) is only a haplotype of P. columella. Therefore, L. ubaquensis becomes a synonym of P. columella with the following haplotype correspondences: the population of Puerto Rico corresponds to the combined haplotype P. columella ITS-2 H1 and ITS-1 HA, and that of Laguna Ubaque (Colombia) to P. columella ITS-2 H2 and ITS-1 HA. The sequence of the intergenic ITS-1, 5.8S, ITS-2 region of P. columella from Cuba ((AY186751)) [69] should be verified with regard to the 12 indels (9 in ITS-2 and 3 in ITS-1) appearing in the comparison, previously to a definitive haplotype code ascription. Interestingly, these authors were able to find a correlation between two mutations, one in each one of the spacers, and the susceptibility or resistance of P. columella populations to F. hepatica miracidial infection. With regard to this aspect, P. columella from Puerto Rico presents C (susceptible) and that of Laguna Ubaque shows T (resistant) in position 6 of the ITS-2, and both present A (susceptible, instead of G in the resistant populations) in position 510 of the ITS-1.

Additionally, ITS-2 and ITS-1 sequences from Venezuelan lymnaeids are sufficiently different from those of L. cousini (= L. bogotensis) and P. columella (= L. ubaquensis) as to indicate that the population of Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela) merits species status. Although close to L. cousini, the 12.65% divergence at ITS-2 level and 11.29-11.73% divergence at ITS-1 level fit within ITS divergences known between different species and are higher than those known between different populations of the same species in Lymnaeidae [8, 14, 42, 4851]. Thus, these results agree with the phenotypic differences shown by the shell and soft part anatomy (see below) and support the erection of L. meridensis n. sp.

The mtDNA cox 1 sequence fully supports the results obtained with rDNA ITSs (haplotype codes only provisional due to incomplete sequences of the gene - see Figures 5, 6 and 7). The very few nucleotide differences between L. cousini from Chanchu-Yacu (Ecuador) and the two of L. bogotensis from Bogota savannah (Colombia) indicate their belonging to the same species. The higher differences of the aforementioned with that from L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela) support species status for the latter. The identical cox 1 sequence of L. ubaquensis from Laguna Ubaque (Colombia) and P. columella from Puerto Rico also indicates that these lymnaeids belong in fact to the same species. Finally, the great cox 1 differences between the lymnaeids from Ecuador, Colombia and Venezuela, on one side, and those of Laguna Ubaque and Puerto Rico, on the other side, indicate that two well separated groups are involved.

Differences in the COX1 amino-acid sequence do not appear to be helpful (haplotype codes only provisional due to incomplete sequences of the gene - see Figure 7). The two amino-acid positions discriminating L. ubaquensis from Laguna Ubaque (Colombia) and P. columella from Puerto Rico from the rest of lymnaeid species seem to be the only exception. Amino-acids in these two positions agree with the incomplete sequence of P. columella from Australia [54] (Figure 7). The lack of amino-acid differences between two species as distant one another as L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela) and L. viatrix from Argentina [42] suggests that nucleotide saturation in codon positions occurs in the evolution of the mtDNA cox 1 coding gene.

Intergenic region pseudogene exclusion

The numerous, non-microsatellite/minisatellite-related indels found in both ITS-2 and ITS-1 sequences when comparing the populations of L. cousini from Chanchu-Yacu (Ecuador) and L. bogotensis from Bogota savannah (Colombia), on one side, with those of L. cousini from Laguna Mucubaji (Venezuela), on the other side, offered a situation never detected in lymnaeids before. This posed a question mark on the accuracy of the ITS-2 and ITS-1 sequences obtained, even more when considering that these sequences came from different populations of the a priori same species.

Although the so-called intergenic region, including the short-length 5.8S rRNA gene separating the two internal transcribed spacers ITS-1 and ITS-2, has been assumed to evolve in concert, the number of investigations revealing high degrees of intra-individual polymorphism has risen in recent years. Such an intra-individual polymorphism is the consequence of an incomplete concerted or non-concerted evolution caused by i.e. hybridization, disadventageous loci or polyploidy [87, 88]. In the studies on eukaryotes in which polymorphic intergenic regions have been identified, polymorphic ITS copies have often shown to contain potential pseudogenes in addition to functional copies [89]. Pseudogenes are DNA sequences that (i) were derived from functional genes but have been rendered nonfunctional by mutations that prevent their proper expression and (ii) evolve at a high rate because they are subject to no functional constraints. The influence of pseudogenes is one of the most important issues recently arisen in the debates on phylogenetic hypotheses [80].

When dealing with the intergenic region of the nuclear rDNA, one way to rule out the possibility of pseudogenes being related to a priori unexpected sequences of the ITSs is through the 5.8S rDNA sequence. Putative pseudogenes can be identified by the detection of mutations at highly conserved sites such as within the 5.8S [90]. Hence, this gene has become the most valuable indicator of the functionality of ITS copies [91]. The 5.8S is assumed to be highly conserved because its secondary structure is required for proper function of the ribosomal complex [92]. Thus, 5.8S rDNA copies which have lost the ability to build up this conserved secondary structure represent pseudogenes. They are expected to mutate freely, even in conserved positions. Therefore, pseudogenes are characterised by accelerated substitution rates, length variation, methylation-related substitutions causing reduced GC content, and reduced stability of the secondary structure [9396].

In the present study, sequencing results obtained from the 5.8S rRNA gene of the three aforementioned lymnaeid populations yielded three 154-bp-long sequences which proved to be identical one another. The 5.8S rDNA proved to be a conserved sequence, with no difference in length, total absence of mutations and no low GC content. All these features corroborate that no pseudogenes are involved in the numerous indels appearing between the ITS-2 and ITS-1 sequences. Hence, there is no reason against the presence of that high non-microsatellite/minisatellite-related indel polymorphism in functional ITS sequences of the three lymnaeid populations in question.

Phenotypic differentiation

Lymnaea cousini (= L. bogotensis; = L. selli), L. meridensis n. sp. (= L. cousini sensu Pointier et al., 2004, 2009) and P. columella (= L. ubaquensis) present a similar general type of shell, with an aperture of about 2/3 of the total shell height, which explains the repeated confusion in specimen classifications. However, a detailed morphometric comparison allows the differentiation of L. cousini and L. meridensis n. sp. by three shell characteristics (Table 2; Figure 10): (i) the shell in L. cousini is of greater size, of up to 14/10 mm, 13.7/8.6 mm and 11.7/7.0 mm length/width according to different studies [43, 55, 56], than in L. meridensis n. sp. (up to 9.3/6.0 mm length/width), (ii) it has 4 whorls in L. cousini at a shell length in which there are only 3 whorls in L. meridensis n. sp., and (iii) the spire is relatively shorter in L. meridensis n. sp. than in L. cousini (which is shown by a greater AL/SpL ratio in the new species). In its turn, both L. cousini and L. meridensis n. sp. differ from P. columella by the characteristic raised spiral threads of the periostracum, which are absent in the former two lymnaeid species but present in P. columella[86]. Additionally, the shell of L. cousini and L. meridensis n. sp. is more broadly conic, its aperture wider and the body whorl more convex than in P. columella.

With regard to the inner anatomy, four characteristics may help in distinguishing L. meridensis n. sp. from L. cousini: a) the distal segment of the ovispermiduct or hermaphroditic duct appears to be shorter in L. meridensis n. sp. than in L. cousini[40, 43]; b) the spermiduct is only somewhat thinner than the prostate in L. meridensis n. sp. whereas clearly slender in L. cousini[40, 43]; c) the external forms at the beginning of the penis sheath, described as a circlet of minute knobs by Paraense [40] and as a ring of papillae by Velasquez [43], were not observed in L. meridensis n. sp.; d) the penis sheath length/prepuce length ratio in L. meridensis n. sp. (range of 0.93-1.38; mean 1.18 ± 0.18) is smaller than in L. cousini (penis sheath is 1.5 times as long as the prepuce according to Paraense [40]; range of 1.30-1.96; mean 1.5 ± 0.24 according to Velasquez [43]).

Moreover, L. cousini shares several crucial anatomic features with L. meriden sis n. sp. but which allow them to be distinguished from P. columella and other important authochthonous lymnaeid vector species in South America [40,42,97-100): A) Kidney: it distally presents two distinct flexures in the ureter, similarly as in P. columella but differently than in L. viatrix, L. neotropica and L. diaphana in which this distal part is straight; B) Vagina: with a bulbous swelling, which is absent in P. columella, L. viatrix, L. neotropica and L. diaphana; C) Spermiduct: thinner than the prostate, as in L. viatrix, L. neotropica and L. diaphana, whereas of about the same width in P. columella; D) Prostate: with distal oblique or lengthwise fissure, as in L. viatrix, L. neotropica and L. diaphana, whereas such a fissure is absent in P. columella; E) Penis sheath: from as long to longer than the prepuce, while much shorter in P. columella, shorter in L. viatrix and L. neotropica, and from as long to shorter in L. diaphana.

Species relationships

DNA sequences, phenotypic characteristics and the phylogenetic reconstruction show the close relationships between Lymnaea cousini (= L. bogotensis; = L. selli) and L. meridensis n. sp., as well as their distance regarding P. columella (= L. ubaquensis). This means that the assignment of both L. cousini and L. meridensis n. sp. to the genus Pseudosuccinea does not appear to be the correct option, despite their pronounced external resemblance which suggests an evolutionary phenotypic convergence probably related to the inhabitance of similar environments and which has given rise to frequent specimen misclassification as shown in the present study.

Moreover, the phylogenetic relationships between the different great lineages, including the groups of the stagnicolines, the Galba/Fossaria and Pseudosuccinea, and the L. cousini-L. meridensis group do not appear to be well resolved (see Figures 8 and 9). Consequently, prudence suggests to better keep L. cousini and L. meridensis n. sp. within the genus Lymnaea sensu lato for the time being, awaiting a general review of Lymnaeidae from Latin America which will include the appropriate systematic-taxonomic analysis of the taxa which have been recognised as valid after accurate DNA sequence study. At any rate, according to the value of the information furnished by 18S rDNA sequences [45, 46], the results here obtained suggest that the L. cousini-L. meridensis group is following a lineage different from those of the other lymnaeids hightherto analysed. The ML and NJ-LogDet phylogenetic reconstructions obtained indicate in the same sense.

The present results show that ITS-2, ITS-1 and cox 1 are good markers not only for identifying L. cousini, L. meridensis n. sp. and P. columella in fascioliasis endemic areas in northern Andean countries, but also for the classification of samples of these species to haplotype level. This usefulness becomes crucial when considering that these three species may be easily confused and specimen classification be a hard task. Numerous exhaustive studies on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) have already proved the value of these three markers for the distinction and identification of lymnaeids. Moreover, they can be helpful in assessing the fascioliasis vector role of different populations, according to recent studies having shown different susceptibility to F. hepatica infection, as proved in P. columella[69].

Distributional outline

Although L. cousini appears to be widespread where present [25], it has been the objective of studies published in the literature only sporadically. The southern-most report of this species, under the name of L. ubaquensis, in Valdivia, Chile [39] poses a problem already highlighted [37, 40]. The brief description of the shell and the male copulatory organ made by Hubendick [39] is insufficient to draw clear conclusions on the correct classification of the Chilean specimen. Although the climate of the lowland of Valdivia is of temperate type and thus not so different from the environmental characteristics of the high altitude in the Andean areas of Ecuador and Colombia, such a southern isolated location becomes surprising and should be verified. The confusion of L. ubaquensis with P. columella demonstrated in our molecular study suggests that another species may be involved.

Thus, the aforementioned report excluded, the following southernmost report of L. cousini concerns Ecuador, namely quoted as L. raphaelis Jousseaume, 1887, in the area of Azuay, South of Cuenca (2550 m a.s.l.) [55] and which has also been synonymized with L. cousini[39]. Although this finding still needs appropriate confirmation, the distance from and Andean plateau characteristics similar to the more northern Machachi, Pichincha province, Ecuador (78°30'W, 00°30'S, 3100 m a.s.l.) [24] suggests, together with the type locality about 10 km southwest of Quito (2650 m a.s.l.) [40, 41, 55], that L. cousini may be widespread from the south to the north throughout the Andean flatlands in that country. This species has been noted to be also found in Lake San Pablo (0°13' N, 78°14' W, 2660 m a.s.l.), close to Otavalo [41], where it coexists with P. columella[101] with which it may be easily confused when only basing on shell characteristics.

In Colombia, Laguna de Ubaque [57] excluded due to the proved confusion of L. ubaquensis with P. columella, L. cousini has been reported, under the name L. bogotensis, from the neighbourhood of Bogota city (4°35'56'' N, 74°04'51'' W; 2650 m a.s.l.) [25, 27, 39, 44, 56, 86] up to the 90 km north from the capital, in the surroundings of Utabe, and also 180 km more northward in Quebrada and Vereda la Toibita in Paipa, Boyaca (5°47'04'' N, 73°06'47'' W; 2525 m a.s.l.) [36, 43].

Thus, the distribution of L. cousini appears restricted to Andean highland areas of an altitude between 2,500 and 3,100 m (Figure 1). This lymnaeid species appears to prefer wet flatlands, where it is typically found among watercress and other aquatic and semiaquatic vegetation in slowly flowing waters of swamped areas from subsoil effluences, as in Chanchu-Yacu [40] (Figure 12A, B), on mud around small watercourses, on the very small water bodies originated in cattle footprints, and on natural and man-made, little deep drainage canals in culture fields and livestock pasturelands in both the savannah of Bogota and Utabe surroundings ([25] and personal observations) (Figure 12C), and more rarely at the water's edges of lakes, lagoons or ponds, as in Lake San Pablo [41].
Figure 12
Figure 12

Lymnaeid biotopes. Environments of localities where lymnaeids were collected: A, B) habitat of Lymnaea cousini in Chanchu-Yacu, Chillogallo, Quito, Ecuador; C) habitat of L. cousini (= L. bogotensis) in Bogota savannah, Cundinamarca, Colombia; D, E) habitats of Pseudosuccinea columella (= L. ubaquensis) in Laguna de Ubaque, Cundinamarca, Colombia; F, G) habitat of L. meridensis n. sp. in Laguna Mucubaji, Merida State, Venezuela.

Lymnaea meridensis n. sp. appears, on the contrary, to be a geographically more restricted species according to present knowledge which suggests this species to have evolved isolatedly in permanent ponds and small ditches in more northern, very high altitude areas (3,550-4,040 m) of the Andean mountains, as those of Merida State, in Venezuela [38, 41] (Figure 12F, G).

Involvement in fascioliasis transmission

Lymnaea cousini is known to be a vector of F. hepatica since early last century, when it was proved to be the lymnaeid responsible for the usual livestock infection in the Cundinamarca-Boyaca plateau, where it follows an apparent seasonal population dynamics which still need an accurate follow-up analysis. In that area, natural liver fluke infection rates in the snails seem to be low, of 0.07-1.64% [2527]. This lymnaeid was noted to be a mollusc of low parasitic efficacy for F. hepatica, due to its very low fasciolid infection percentages and its additional role of intermediate host for other trematode species [25]. The very low experimental infection rate of 0.6% obtained in L. cousini by Muñoz Rivas [27] supported that assumption. However, in an area of the same Bogota savannah presenting a serious animal infection problem, a higher 12% natural infection rate in lymnaeids was found [102]. Although these snails were not classified at specific level, they all presumably belonged to L. cousini given their geographical origin. Specimens of the same lymnaeid species were also found infected in Paipa [43].

A surprisingly high natural infection rate of 31.43% was found in L. cousini from Machachi, in Ecuador [24], the classification of the fluke larval stages being confirmed by experimental infection of mice with metacercariae [103]. The environmental conditions favouring the development of snail populations and the transmission of the parasite in that Andean area were highlighted to explain such a high transmission rate. The relatively high infection rates of 34.0% and of 39-60% recently obtained in the laboratory with a Colombian isolate of the same lymnaeid species from Vereda la Toibita in Paipa, Boyaca [36], indicate that L. cousini may develop an important transmission role in concrete areas.

A recent comparison of experimental infection in L. cousini and P. columella has furnished interesting results [36]: A) Infectivity: the infection rate in L. cousini (34.0%) is pronuncedly lower than that obtained in P. columella (82.8% in that study; even higher rates have been obtained in other places [104]). B) Survival: in L. cousini, a statistically significant, pronounced decline from 13 weeks post-exposure onwards was detected, whereas numbers of the controls fell drastically only after 25 weeks post-exposure. The mean lifespan of L. cousini is long (mean 20-23 weeks) and allows the parasite to remain and produce a great number of rediae. On the contrary, the infection did not affect the survival of P. columella, whose lifespan is shorter (mean 9-11 weeks) with regard to the occurrence of cercarial shedding (7 weeks post-exposure). C) Fecundity: parasitisation showed a greater effect on L. cousini than on P. columella. In L. cousini, egg number and mainly egg clusters per snail decreased, egg cluster production ceasing almost completely in infected snails. Influences were also seen in P. columella, including a significant reduction in the number of eggs per cluster, mainly egg clusters per snail, and also eggs per snail, many clusters lacking eggs, a phenomenon not observed in L. cousini. D) Growth: whereas no effect was observed in L. cousini, a reduced growth rate was shown by P. columella throughout snail's life. E) Life table: differences appeared smaller in L. cousini than in P. columella, with a net reproductive rate (R o) in the control group of almost double in the first species and nearly four times greater in the second. Thus, the main conclusion is that, although both L. cousini and P. columella are affected by F. hepatica infection, in L. cousini the prevalences are low but cercarial shedding is more prolonged since its lifespan is greater, while in P. columella infection rates are high but cercarial shedding time is brief due to its short lifespan [36].

The aforementioned compensatory development strategy followed by the liver fluke in L. cousini may explain how it is able to maintain high livestock prevalences by its own, as is the case of the 90% prevalence in cattle of Machachi, Ecuador [103] and the high prevalences known in cattle in the Cundinamarca-Boyaca plateau, Colombia [25]. However, this lymnaeid species does not appear to be a vector facilitating human infection, contrary to the case of the species of the Galba/Fossaria group [4, 42]. Indeed, human infection cases reported in areas inhabited by L. cousini in both Ecuador [22, 23] and Colombia [26, 28, 29, 31] only seem to concern sporadic patients.

With regard to L. meridensis n. sp., its phylogenetic relationships and body size suggest that it may most probably be susceptible for F. hepatica infection. Its isolated populations on very high altitude areas of Andean Venezuela (3,550-4,040 m) may be involved in disease transmission in such altitude areas during the yearly window in which temperatures are higher than the F. hepatica development threshold of 10°C [11]. This is the case of the human hyperendemic area of the Northern Bolivian Altiplano, at 3800-4100 m a.s.l., where disease transmission is increased due to the very high altitude conditions [14] and the highest human prevalences and intensities are known [15, 105]. An experimental F. hepatica infection assay in the laboratory is needed, and field studies should be carried out to assess its possibly wider distributional outline and potential role to participate in fascioliasis transmission to both animals and humans.


DNA sequences confirm the originality of the lymnaeid fauna in the northern Andean countries of Ecuador, Colombia and Venezuela. However, results obtained change the species spectrum previously known. Lymnaea cousini proved to be a valid species, but L. bogotensis and L. ubaquensis showed to in fact only be synonyms of L. cousini and P. columella, respectively. Additionally, a new species apparently endemic to very high altitudes, L. meridensis n. sp., should be included in this northern fauna.

The importance of the two original faunistic members lies on their capacity to participate in fascioliasis transmission. Lymnaea cousini is involved as vector in highlands of Ecuador and Colombia, where it appears mainly related to animal fascioliasis and only sporadically with isolated human infection cases. Phylogenetic results indicating a close relationship between L. cousini and L. meridensis n. sp. and their relationship with the Galba/Fossaria vector group clade, suggest the new species to also be a disease transmitter.



Studies supported by Projects No. SAF2006-09278 and SAF No. 2010-20805 of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology, Madrid, Spain, and the Red de Investigación de Centros de Enfermedades Tropicales - RICET (Grants No. C03/04, No. PI030545 and No. RD06/0021/0017 of the Program of Redes Temáticas de Investigación Cooperativa RETICS/FEDER), Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS), Spanish Ministry of Health, Madrid, Spain. The help by Prof. Dr. G. A. Trueba and Prof. Dr. M. Fornasini (Quito), Prof. F. Guhl (Bogota), Prof. Dr. G. Schaub (Bochum, Germany) and Dr. L. C. González (Mérida, Venezuela) in the field work carried out in Ecuador, Colombia and Venezuela is greatly acknowledged. Thanks are given to Dr. R. Toledo (Valencia, Spain) for the collection of P. columella in Puerto Rico and to Dr. J. P. Pointier (Perpignan, France) for providing L. cousini material from Venezuela, for comparison purposes. The aim of this study is included within the worldwide initiative of WHO (Headquarters Geneva, Switzerland) against human fascioliasis. Technical support provided by the Servicio Central de Secuenciación para la Investigación Experimental (SCSIE) of the Universidad de Valencia (Dr. A. Martínez).

Authors’ Affiliations

Departamento de Parasitología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Valencia, Av. Vicente Andrés Estellés s/n, 46100 Burjassot - Valencia, Spain


  1. Mas-Coma S, Valero MA, Bargues MD: Fasciola, lymnaeids and human fascioliasis, with a global overview on disease transmission, epidemiology, evolutionary genetics, molecular epidemiology and control. Adv Parasitol. 2009, 69: 41-146.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Torgerson P, Claxton J: Epidemiology and control. Fasciolosis. Edited by: Dalton JP. 1999, Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CAB International Publishing, 113-149.Google Scholar
  3. World Health Organization: Control of foodborne trematode infections. WHO Techn Rep Ser. 1995, 849: 1-157.Google Scholar
  4. Mas-Coma S: Epidemiology of fascioliasis in human endemic areas. J Helminthol. 2005, 79: 207-216. 10.1079/JOH2005296.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Mas-Coma S, Bargues MD, Valero MA: Fascioliasis and other plant-borne trematode zoonoses. Int J Parasitol. 2005, 35: 1255-1278. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.07.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Valero MA, Mas-Coma S: Comparative infectivity of Fasciola hepatica metacercariae from isolates of the main and secondary reservoir animal host species in the Bolivian Altiplano high human endemic region. Folia Parasitol. 2000, 47: 17-22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Valero MA, Darce NA, Panova M, Mas-Coma S: Relationships between host species and morphometric patterns in Fasciola hepatica adults and eggs from the Northern Bolivian Altiplano hyperendemic region. Vet Parasitol. 2001, 102: 85-100. 10.1016/S0304-4017(01)00499-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Bargues MD, Vigo M, Horak P, Dvorak J, Patzner RA, Pointier JP, Jackiewicz M, Meier-Brook C, Mas-Coma S: European Lymnaeidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda), intermediate hosts of trematodiases, based on nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS-2 sequences. Inf Genet Evol. 2001, 1: 85-107. 10.1016/S1567-1348(01)00019-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Ollerenshaw CB, Smith LP: Meteorological factors and forecasts of helminthic disease. Adv Parasitol. 1969, 7: 283-232.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Ollerenshaw CB: Forecasting liver-fluke disease. The Effects of Meteorological Factors upon Parasites. Edited by: Taylor AR, Muller R. 1974, Oxford: Symposium of the British Society for Parasitology, Blackwell Scientific Publications, 12: 33-52.Google Scholar
  11. Fuentes MV, Valero MA, Bargues MD, Esteban JG, Angles R, Mas-Coma S: Analysis of climatic data and forecast indices for human fascioliasis at very high altitude. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1999, 93: 835-850. 10.1080/00034989957844.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Mas-Coma S, Valero MA, Bargues MD: Effects of climate change on animal and zoonotic helminthiases. Rev Sci Techn Off Int Epiz. 2008, 27: 443-457.Google Scholar
  13. Mas-Coma S, Valero MA, Bargues MD: Climate change effects on trematodiases, with emphasis on zoonotic fascioliasis and schistosomiasis. Vet Parasitol. 2009, 163: 264-280. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.03.024.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Mas-Coma S, Funatsu IR, Bargues MD: Fasciola hepatica and lymnaeid snails occurring at very high altitude in South America. Parasitology. 2001, 123: S115-S127.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Mas-Coma S, Angles R, Esteban JG, Buchon P, Franken M, Strauss W: The Northern Bolivian Altiplano: a region highly endemic for human fascioliasis. Trop Med Int Health. 1999, 4: 454-467. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1999.00418.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Esteban JG, Flores A, Angles R, Strauss W, Aguirre C, Mas-Coma S: A population-based coprological study of human fascioliasis in a hyperendemic area of the Bolivian Altiplano. Trop Med Int Health. 1997, 2: 695-699. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1997.d01-356.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Esteban JG, Gonzalez C, Bargues MD, Angles R, Sanchez C, Naquira C, Mas-Coma S: High fascioliasis infection in children linked to a man-made irrigation zone in Peru. Trop Med Int Health. 2002, 7: 339-348. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2002.00870.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Apt W, Aguilera X, Vega F, Alcaino H, Zulantay I, Apt P, Gonzalez V, Retamal C, Rodriguez J, Sandoval J: Prevalencia de Fascioliasis en humanos, caballos, cerdos y conejos silvestres en tres provincias de Chile. Bol Of Sanit Panam. 1993, 115: 405-414.Google Scholar
  19. Claxton JR, Zambrano H, Ortiz P, Amoros C, Delgado E, Escurra E, Clarkson MJ: The epidemiology of fasciolosis in the inter-Andean valley of Cajamarca, Peru. Parasitol Int. 1997, 46: 281-288. 10.1016/S1383-5769(97)00039-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ortiz P, Cabrera M, Jave J, Claxton J, Williams D: Human fascioliasis: prevalence and treatment in a rural area of Peru. Infect Dis Rev. 2000, 2: 42-46.Google Scholar
  21. Espinoza JR, Maco V, Marcos L, Saez S, Neyra V, Terashima A, Samalvides F, Gotuzzo E, Chavarry E, Huaman C, Bargues MD, Valero MA, Mas-Coma S: Evaluation of Fas2-ELISA for the serological detection of Fasciola hepatica infection in humans. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 76: 977-982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Trueba G, Guerrero T, Fornasini M, Casariego I, Zapata S, Ontaneda S, Vasco L: Detection of Fasciola hepatica infection in a community located in the Ecuadorian Andes. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000, 62: 518-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gozalbo M, Trueba G, Fornasini M, Fuentes MV, Bargues MD, Esteban JG, Mas-Coma S: Coproparasitological survey in schoolchildren from the community of Planchaloma (Province of Cotopaxi, Ecuador). Multidisciplinarity for Parasites, Vectors and Parasitic Diseases, EMOP 9. Edited by: Mas-Coma S, et al. 2004, Valencia: J Aguilar SL, 874: 447-Google Scholar
  24. Villavicencio A, Carvalho de Vasconcellos M: First report of Lymnaea cousini Jousseaume, 1887 naturally infected with Fasciola hepatica (Linnaeus, 1758) (Trematoda: Digenea) in Machachi, Ecuador. Mem Inst Osw Cruz. 2005, 100: 735-737. 10.1590/S0074-02762005000700010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Brumpt E, Velasquez J, Ucroz H, Brumpt LCh: Mission E. Brumpt et L.-Ch. Brumpt en Colombie et au Venezuela. 1.- Découverte de l'hôte intermédiaire, Limnaea bogotensis Pilsbry, de la grande douve, Fasciola hepatica, en Colombie. Ann Parasitol Hum Comp. 1939, 17: 563-579.Google Scholar
  26. Muñoz-Rivas G: Coccidiosis y distomatosis humanas en Colombia. Rev Fac Med Bogotá. 1952, 21: 47-58.Google Scholar
  27. Muñoz-Rivas G: Fasciolosis experimental. Rev Acad Colomb Cienc Ex Fís Nat. 1953, 9: 156-158.Google Scholar
  28. Campo Posada A, De Castro Gomez F: Distomatosis humana. Un nuevo caso en Colombia. Rev Hosp San Juan de Dios. 1955, 61: 61-63.Google Scholar
  29. Escobar JA, Amezquita-Meneses M: Primer caso de Fasciola hepatica en el Valle de Cauca. Acta Médica del Valle. 1973, 4: 57-58.Google Scholar
  30. Griffiths IB, Parra DG, Vizcaino OG, Gallego MI: Prevalence of parasite eggs and cysts in faeces from dairy cows in Colombia. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1986, 18: 155-157. 10.1007/BF02359526.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Corredor A, Ronderos M: Fascioliasis humana en la vereda de Sabaneta, municipio de La Vega, Cundinamarca. II Congreso Latinoamericano y V Congreso Colombiano de Medicina Tropical,, Resúmenes. Biomédica. 1987, 69-Supl. 1Google Scholar
  32. Gomez T: Ciclo de vida de Fasciola hepatica (Linnaeus, 1758) e identificación de su huésped intermediario en algunas zonas ganaderas del depatamento del Tolima. Rev Univ Tolima, Cienc Tecnol. 1990, 5: 45-75.Google Scholar
  33. Morales G, Pino LA: Infection de Lymnaea cubensis par Fasciola hepatica dans une région d'altitude, au Venezuela. Ann Parasitol Hum Comp. 1983, 58: 27-30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Alarcon de Noya B, Rojas E, Colmenares C, Morales C, Contreras R, Valero SK, Hernandez D, Briceño S, Scorza JV, Noya O: Brote familiar de fascioliasis en Venezuela. Bol Malariol Salud Anim. 2007, 47: 47-54.Google Scholar
  35. Puls-Van der Kamp GM, Jansen HB: Observations on fascioliasis and its intermediate host, Lymnaea cousini, in the Andes mountains of Ecuador. Tijdschr Diergeneeskunde. 1974, 99: 410-420.Google Scholar
  36. Salazar L, Estrada VE, Velasquez L: Effect of the exposure to Fasciola hepatica (Trematoda: Digenea) on life history traits of Lymnaea cousini and Lymnaea columella (Gastropoda: Lymnaeidae). Exp Parasitol. 2006, 114: 77-83. 10.1016/j.exppara.2006.02.013.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Pointier JP, Noya O, Amarista M, Theron A: Lymnaea cousini Jousseaume, 1887 (Gastropoda: Lymnaeidae): first record for Venezuela. Mem Inst Osw Cruz. 2004, 99: 567-569.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Pointier JP, Noya O, Alarcon de Noya B, Theron A: Distribution of Lymnaeidae (Mollusca: Pulmonata), intermediate snail hosts of Fasciola hepatica in Venezuela. Mem Inst Osw Cruz. 2009, 104: 790-796. 10.1590/S0074-02762009000500022.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Hubendick B: Recent Lymnaeidae. Their variation, morphology, taxonomy, nomenclature, and distribution. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar, Fjärde Serien. 1951, 3: 1-223. + 5 plGoogle Scholar
  40. Paraense WL: Lymnaea cousini Jousseaume, 1887 from Ecuador (Gastropoda: Lymnaeidae). Mem Inst Osw Cruz. 1995, 90: 605-609. 10.1590/S0074-02761995000500011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Paraense WL: Planorbidae, Lymnaeidae and Physidae of Ecuador (Mollusca: Basommatophora). Mem Inst Osw Cruz. 2004, 99: 357-362.Google Scholar
  42. Bargues MD, Artigas P, Mera y Sierra RL, Pointier JP, Mas-Coma S: Characterisation of Lymnaea cubensis, L. viatrix and L. neotropica n. sp., the main vectors of Fasciola hepatica in Latin America, by analysis of their ribosomal and mitochondrial DNA. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2007, 101: 621-641.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Velasquez LE: Synonymy between Lymnaea bogotensis Pilsbry, 1935 and Lymnaea cousini Jousseaume, 1887 (Gastropoda: Lymnaeidae). Mem Inst Osw Cruz. 2006, 101: 795-799.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Mas-Coma S: Lymnaea cousini (Gastropoda: Lymnaeidae) as transmitter of fascioliasis. Mem Inst Osw Cruz. 2007, 102: 241-242. 10.1590/S0074-02762007005000023.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Bargues MD, Mas-Coma S: Reviewing lymnaeid vectors of fascioliasis by ribosomal DNA sequence analyses. J Helminthol. 2005, 79: 257-267. 10.1079/JOH2005297.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Bargues MD, Mas-Coma S: Phylogenetic analysis of lymnaeid snails based on 18S rDNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 1997, 14: 569-577.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Bargues MD, Mangold AJ, Muñoz-Antoli C, Pointier JP, Mas-Coma S: SSU rDNA characterization of lymnaeid snails transmitting human fascioliasis in South and Central America. J Parasitol. 1997, 83: 1086-1092. 10.2307/3284367.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Remigio EA, Blair D: Relationships among problematic North American stagnicoline snails (Pulmonata: Lymnaeidae) reinvestigated using nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Can J Zool. 1997, 75: 1540-1545. 10.1139/z97-779.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Bargues MD, Horak P, Patzner RA, Pointier JP, Jackiewicz M, Meier-Brook C, Mas-Coma S: Insights into the relationships of Palaearctic and Nearctic lymnaeids (Mollusca: Gastropoda) by rDNA ITS-2 sequencing and phylogeny of stagnicoline intermediate host species of Fasciola hepatica. Parasite. 2003, 10: 243-255.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Puslednik L, Ponder WF, Dowton M, Davis AR: Examining the phylogeny of the Australasian Lymnaeidae (Heterobranchia: pulmonata: Gastropoda) using mitochondrial, nuclear and morphological markers. Mol Phyl Evol. 2009, 52: 643-659. 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.03.033.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Bargues MD, Artigas P, Jackiewicz M, Pointier JP, Mas-Coma S: Ribosomal DNA ITS-1 sequence analysis of European stagnicoline Lymnaeidae (Gastropoda). Heldia, München. 2006, 6: 29-40.Google Scholar
  52. Remigio EA, Blair D: Molecular systematics of the freshwater snail family Lymnaeidae (Pulmonata: Basommatophora) utilising mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. J Moll Stud. 1997, 63: 173-185. 10.1093/mollus/63.2.173.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Remigio EA: Molecular phylogenetic relationships in the aquatic snail genus Lymnaea, the intermediate host of the causative agent of fascioliasis: insights from broader taxon sampling. Parasitol Res. 2002, 88: 687-696. 10.1007/s00436-002-0658-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Remigio EA, Hebert PD: Testing the utility of partial COI sequences for phylogenetic estimates of gastropod relationships. Mol Phyl Evol. 2003, 29: 641-647. 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00140-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Jousseaume F: Mollusques nouveaux de la République de l'Equateur. Bull Soc Zool France. 1887, 12: 165-186.Google Scholar
  56. Pilsbry HA: South American land and freshwater mollusks, IX Colombian species. Proc Acad Nat Sci Philadelphia. 1935, 87: 83-88.Google Scholar
  57. Piaget J: Quelques mollusques de Colombie. Mém Soc Neuchâtel Sci Nat. 1914, 5: 265-269.Google Scholar
  58. Harry HW, Hubendick B: The freshwater pulmonate Mollusca of Puerto Rico. Göteborgs Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar. 1964, 3: 1-93.Google Scholar
  59. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. 1989, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, I, II & III: 1-1647. 2Google Scholar
  60. Folmer O, Black M, Hoch W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R: DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994, 3: 294-299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR: DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1977, 74: 5463-5467. 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Mera y Sierra R, Artigas P, Cuervo P, Deis E, Sidoti L, Mas-Coma S, Bargues MD: Fascioliasis transmission by Lymnaea neotropica confirmed by nuclear rDNA and mtDNA sequencing in Argentina. Vet Parasitol. 2009, 166: 73-79. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.08.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity and progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl Acids Res. 1994, 22: 4673-4680. 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei MB, Kumar S: MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis (MEGA) sofware version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24: 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Staden R, Judge DP, Bonfield JK: Sequence assembly and finishing methods. Meth Biochem Anal. 2001, 43: 302-322.Google Scholar
  66. Swofford DL: PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other Methods). Version 4. 2002, Computer program distributed by the Smithsonian Institution. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc. PublishersGoogle Scholar
  67. Duffy T, Kleiman F, Pietrokovsky S, Issia L, Schijman AG, Wisnivesky-Colli C: Real-time PCR strategy for rapid discrimination among main lymnaeid species from Argentina. Acta Trop. 2009, 109: 1-4. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.08.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Vinarski VM, Glöer P: Taxonomic notes on Euro-Siberian freshwater molluscs. 3. Galba occulta Jackiewicz, 1959 is a junior synonym of Limnaea palustris var. terebra Westerlund, 1885. Mollusca. 2008, 26: 175-185.Google Scholar
  69. Gutierrez A, Pointier JP, Fraga J, Jobet E, Modat S, Perez RT, Yong M, Sanchez J, Loker ES, Theron A: Fasciola hepatica: identification of molecular markers for resistant and susceptible Pseudosuccinea columella snail hosts. Exp Parasitol. 2003, 105: 211-218. 10.1016/j.exppara.2003.12.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Albrecht C, Wolf C, Gloer P, Wilke T: Concurrent evolution of ancient sister lakes and sister species: the freshwater gastropod genus Radix in lakes Ohrid and Prespa. Hydrobiologia. 2008, 615: 157-167. 10.1007/s10750-008-9555-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Winnepenickx B, Backeljau T, Van De Peer Y, De Wachter R: Structure of the small ribosomal subunit RNA of the pulmonate snail, Limicolaria kambeul, and phylogenetic analysis of the Metazoa. FEBS Letters. 1992, 309: 123-126. 10.1016/0014-5793(92)81078-Z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. De Rijk P, Neefs JM, Van de Peer Y, De Wachter R: Compilation of small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences. Nucl Acids Res. 1992, 20: 2075-2089.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Akaike H: A new look at the statistical model identification. Ieee Transactions on Automatic Control. 1974, 19: 716-723. 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Posada D, Buckley TR: Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of the AIC and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst Biol. 2004, 53: 793-808. 10.1080/10635150490522304.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Posada D, Crandall KA: Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 1998, 14: 817-818. 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Saitou N, Nei M: The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987, 4: 406-425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP: MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19: 1572-1574. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Lin CP, Danforth BN: How do insect nuclear and mitochondrial gene substitution patterns differ? Insights from Bayesian analyses of combined datasets. Mol Phyl Evol. 2004, 30: 686-702. 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00241-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Ballard JWO, Rand DM: The population biology of mitochondrial DNA and its phylogenetic implications. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2005, 36: 621-642. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.091704.175513.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Mas-Coma S, Bargues MD: Populations, hybrids and the systematic concepts of species and subspecies in Chagas disease triatomine vectors inferred from nuclear ribosomal and mitochondrial DNA. Acta Trop. 2009, 110: 112-136. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.10.013.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. DeJong RJ, Morgan JAT, Paraense WL, Pointier JP, Amarista M, Ayeh-Kumi PFK, Babiker A, Barbosa CS, Bremond Ph, Canese AP, Pereira de Suoza C, Dominguez C, File S, Gutierrez A, Incani RN, Kawano T, Kazibwe F, Kpikpi J, Lwambo NJS, Mimpfoundi R, Njiokou F, Poda JN, Sene M, Velasquez LE, Yong M, Adema CM, Hofkin BV, Mkoji GM, Loker ES: Evolutionary relationships and biogeography of Biomphalaria (Gastropoda: Planorbidae) with implications regarding its role as host of the human bloodfluke, Schistosoma mansoni. Mol Biol Evol. 2001, 18: 2225-2239.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Oviedo JA, Bargues MD, Mas-Coma S: Lymnaeid snails in the human fascioliasis high endemic zone of the Northern Bolivian Altiplano. Res Rev Parasitol. 1995, 55: 35-43.Google Scholar
  83. Samadi S, Roumegoux A, Bargues MD, Mas-Coma S, Yong M, Pointier JP: Morphological studies of lymnaeid snails from the human fascioliasis endemic zone of Bolivia. J Moll Stud. 2000, 66: 31-44. 10.1093/mollus/66.1.31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Valero MA, Panova M, Mas-Coma S: Phenotypic analysis of adults and eggs of Fasciola hepatica by computer image analysis system. J Helminthol. 2005, 79: 217-225. 10.1079/JOH2005301.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Pointier JP, Cazzaniga NJ, Gonzalez-Salas C, Gutierrez A, Arenas JA, Bargues MD, Mas-Coma S: Anatomical studies of sibling species within Neotropical lymnaeids snail intermediate hosts of fascioliasis. Mem Inst Osw Cruz. 2006, 101: 431-435. 10.1590/S0074-02762006000400015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Maleck EA: Snail Hosts of Schistosomiasis and Other Snail-Transmitted Diseases in Tropical America: A Manual. 1985, Washington DC: PAHO, Scientific Publication, 478: 1-325.Google Scholar
  87. Hughes CE, Bailey CD, Harris SA: Divergent and reticulate species relationships in Leucanea (Fabaceae) inferred from multiple data sources: insights into polyploid origins and nrDNA polymorphism. Am J Botany. 2002, 89: 1057-1073. 10.3732/ajb.89.7.1057.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Wissemann V: Hybridization and the evolution of the nrITS spacer region. Plant Genome Biodiversity and Evolution, Part A: Phanerogams. Edited by: Sharma AK, Sharma A. 2003, Enfield: Scientific Publications Inc, I: 57-71.Google Scholar
  89. Harpke D, Peterson A: Extensive 5.8S nrDNA polymorphism in Mammillaria (Cactaceae) with special reference to the identification of pseudogenic internal transcribed spacer regions. J Plant Res. 2008, 121: 261-270. 10.1007/s10265-008-0156-x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Jobes DV, Thien LB: A conserved motif in the 5.8S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene is a useful diagnostic marker for plant internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. Plant Mol Biol Reprod. 1997, 15: 326-334. 10.1023/A:1007462330699.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Hershkovitz MA, Zimmer EA, Hahn WJ: Ribosomal DNA sequences and angiosperm systematics. Molecular Systematics and Plant Evolution. Edited by: Hollingsworth PM, Bateman RM, Cornall RJ. 1999, London: Taylor & Francis, 268-326.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Suh YB, Thien LB, Zimmer EA: Nucleotide sequences of the internal transcribed spacers and 5.8S rRNA gene in Canella winterana (Magnoliales; Canellaceae). Nucl Acids Res. 1992, 20: 6101-6102. 10.1093/nar/20.22.6101.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Li W: Molecular Evolution. 1997, Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, 1-487.Google Scholar
  94. Buckler IV ES, Ippolito A, Holtsford TP: The evolution of ribosomal DNA: divergent paralogues and phylogenetic implications. Genetics. 1997, 145: 821-832.PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  95. Kita Y, Ito M: Nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences and phylogeny in East Asian Aconitum subgenus Aconitum (Ranunculaceae), with special reference to extensive polymorphism in individual plants. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 2000, 225: 1-13. 10.1007/BF00985455.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Bailey CD, Carr TG, Harris SA, Hughes CE: Characterization of angiosperm nrDNA polymorphism, paralogy, and pseudogenes. Mol Phyl Evol. 2003, 29: 435-455. 10.1016/j.ympev.2003.08.021.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Paraense WL: Lymnaea viatrix: a study of topotypic specimens (Mollusca: Lymnaeidae). Rev Brasil Biol. 1976, 36: 419-428.Google Scholar
  98. Paraense WL: Lymnaea columella in northern Brazil. Mem Inst Osw Cruz. 1983, 78: 477-482. 10.1590/S0074-02761983000400011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Paraense WL: Lymnaea diaphana: a study of topotypic specimens (Pulmonata: Lymnaeidae). Mem Inst Osw Cruz. 1984, 79: 75-81. 10.1590/S0074-02761984000100009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Paraense WL: Lymnaea columella: two new Brazilian localities in the states of Amazonas and Bahia. Mem Inst Osw Cruz. 1986, 81: 121-123. 10.1590/S0074-02761986000100016.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Paraense WL: Lymnaea viatrix and Lymnaea columella in the Neotropical region: a distributional outline. Mem Inst Osw Cruz. 1982, 77: 181-188.Google Scholar
  102. Parra Florez AD, Mateus Valles JG: El huésped intermediario de Fasciola hepatica y su control con N-tritylmorholine. VII Congreso Panamericano de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia (Bogota, 23-28 July 1973), Resúmenes. 1973, Bogota: Asociación Panamericana de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia, 42-43.Google Scholar
  103. Carvalho de Vasconcellos M, Villavicencio A: Reply. Mem Inst Osw Cruz. 2007, 102: 242-243.Google Scholar
  104. Gutierrez A, Yong M, Perera G, Sanchez J, Theron A: Fasciola hepatica (Trematoda: Digenea): its effect on the life history traits of Pseudosuccinea columella (Gastropoda: Lymnaeidae) an uncommon interaction. Parasitol Res. 2002, 88: 535-539. 10.1007/s00436-002-0625-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Esteban JG, Flores A, Angles R, Mas-Coma S: High endemicity of human fascioliasis between Lake Titicaca and La Paz valley, Bolivia. Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999, 93: 151-156. 10.1016/S0035-9203(99)90289-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Bargues et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.