Open Access

The phylogeography of trypanosomes from South American alligatorids and African crocodilids is consistent with the geological history of South American river basins and the transoceanic dispersal of Crocodylus at the Miocene

  • Bruno R Fermino1,
  • Laerte B Viola1,
  • Fernando Paiva2,
  • Herakles A Garcia3,
  • Catia D de Paula4,
  • Robinson Botero-Arias5,
  • Carmen S A Takata1,
  • Marta Campaner1,
  • Patrick B Hamilton6,
  • Erney P Camargo1 and
  • Marta MG Teixeira1Email author
Contributed equally
Parasites & Vectors20136:313

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-6-313

Received: 31 August 2013

Accepted: 11 October 2013

Published: 29 October 2013

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the diversity, phylogenetic relationships, and biogeography of trypanosomes infecting non-mammalian hosts. In this study, we investigated the influence of host species and biogeography on shaping the genetic diversity, phylogenetic relationship, and distribution of trypanosomes from South American alligatorids and African crocodilids.

Methods

Small Subunit rRNA (SSU rRNA) and glycosomal Glyceraldehyde Phosphate Dehydrogenase (gGAPDH) genes were employed for phylogenetic inferences. Trypanosomes from crocodilians were obtained by haemoculturing. Growth behaviour, morphology, and ultrastructural features complement the molecular description of two new species strongly supported by phylogenetic analyses.

Results

The inferred phylogenies disclosed a strongly supported crocodilian-restricted clade comprising three subclades. The subclade T. grayi comprised the African Trypanosoma grayi from Crocodylus niloticus and tsetse flies. The subclade T. ralphi comprised alligatorid trypanosomes represented by Trypanosoma ralphi n. sp. from Melanosuchus niger, Caiman crocodilus and Caiman yacare from Brazilian river basins. T. grayi and T. ralphi were sister subclades. The basal subclade T. terena comprised alligatorid trypanosomes represented by Trypanosoma terena n. sp. from Ca. yacare sharing hosts and basins with the distantly genetic related T. ralphi. This subclade also included the trypanosome from Ca. crocodilus from the Orinoco basin in Venezuela and, unexpectedly, a trypanosome from the African crocodilian Osteolaemus tetraspis.

Conclusion

The close relationship between South American and African trypanosomes is consistent with paleontological evidence of recent transoceanic dispersal of Crocodylus at the Miocene/Pliocene boundaries (4–5 mya), and host-switching of trypanosomes throughout the geological configuration of South American hydrographical basins shaping the evolutionary histories of the crocodilians and their trypanosomes.

Keywords

CrocodilianTrypanosoma evolutionHistorical biogeographyHost-switchingPhylogeographyTransoceanic dispersionDisjunct distributionSouth American river basins

Background

There is increasing evidence that the evolutionary histories of hosts and parasites are associated, and consequently, that parasites can serve as proxies to understand host evolutionary history and vice versa. Comparative phylogeography and biogeography of hosts and obligate parasites can reveal the impressions left on contemporary species by evolutionary processes such as co-evolution, dispersion and colonisation [17].

The genus Trypanosoma (Kinetoplastea, Trypanosomatidae) comprises worldwide parasites of all vertebrate classes transmitted by hematophagous vectors, such as insects, ticks and leeches [8, 9]. Trypanosomes have been described in many lizards, snakes and crocodilians [10]. The evolutionary histories of trypanosomes from mammals of distinct orders and from other vertebrate classes only recently began to be addressed [1119]. Trypanosomes parasitizing alligatorids have been reported in Ca. crocodilus and Ca. yacare from Brazilian Amazonia and Pantanal, respectively [20, 21]. In Africa, trypanosomes of Crocodylus niloticus, Mecistops cataphractus and Osteolaemus tetraspis were all named T. grayi[22, 23], a species that has been commonly described in its vector tsetse flies [2427]. The transmission of T. grayi to crocodiles occurs by oral contamination with tsetse faeces or the ingestion of crushed flies [23]. The South American vectors of crocodilian trypanosomes are unknown. The first trypanosomes from alligatorids established as continuous cultures were from the Brazilian Ca. yacare. Nine isolates were molecularly characterised and assigned to two genotypes, Cay01 and Cay02, distinct from T. grayi from the African C. niloticus. However, previous phylogenetic analysis restricted to a few crocodilian trypanosomes hampered any attempt to evaluate species richness, and to infer biogeographical scenarios underlining the evolutionary history of crocodilian trypanosomes [8, 9, 12, 21].

In an evolutionary story that spans more than 200 million years, from the late Triassic to present, a very large diversity of crocodilians occupied worldwide habitats, but only a limited number of species survived the long and intricate Crocodylia evolutionary history [2833]. The Crocodylia comprises species of Crocodylidae, inhabiting all continents, and of Alligatoridae, which are exclusive to the Western hemisphere (except for the Chinese alligator). The Alligatoridae and Crocodylidae diverged in the late Cretaceous (~90 mya) [28, 32]. M. niger occurs in the Amazon basin; Ca. crocodilus is the most widespread species in the Latin America; and Ca. yacare occurs mainly in the Paraguay/Paraná basin [34]. The current limited distribution and small number of Crocodylus species in South America (C. intermedius in the Orinoco basin and C. acutus from northwest Colombia/Venezuela) contrast with great diversity and wide distribution of fossils at the Miocene (9–5 mya) [35, 36]. C. niloticus is the most widespread crocodilian species in Africa, and more closely related to South American than to Asian species of Crocodylus, whereas the African Osteolaemus tetraspis together with Mecistops cataphractus constitute the sister clade of Crocodylus[2932].

In this study, we characterized trypanosomes from the South American Ca. crocodilus, M. niger and Ca. yacare and the African C. niloticus and O. tetraspis aiming: a) to evaluate the relative forces of host species and geography in shaping the genetic diversity, emergence of new species, phylogenetic relationships and distribution of crocodilian trypanosomes; b) to hypothesise paleontological and biogeographical scenarios consistent with both trypanosome and crocodilian evolutionary histories.

Methods

Collection sites, handling of the crocodilians, and culture of trypanosomes

From 2002 to 2012 we captured crocodilians in the Paraguay-Paraná (PP), Amazonian (AM), Araguaia-Tocantins (AT) and Orinoco (OR) basins. Caiman yacare (19 animals) was captured in the Miranda River in the PP basin (S20o14´ W55o28´). Ca. crocodilus (4 animals) was captured in Brazil in the Purus River (S7o15´W64o47´) of the AM basin, and in the Araguaia River (S7o32´ W49o22´) of the AT basin (2 animals). Two Ca. crocodilus were captured in the Capanaparo River (Santos Luzardo National Park, Apure, Venezuela) (N6o83´ W67o69´) of the OR basin. M. niger was captured in Brazil, at the Purus River (two animals), and the Solimões River at the Mamirauá Reserve (5 animals) (S3o35´W64o72´), both in the AM basins. One specimen of O. tetraspis was captured in the National Park of Lagoas de Cufada in Guinea Bissau (S11o60´ W15o04´) (Figure 1, Table 1).
Figure 1

Geographical distribution of Trypanosoma ralphi, Trypanosoma terena and allied trypanosomes (a), and the alligatorid host species (b) throughout the South American river basins (a,b).

Table 1

Trypanosome isolates from South American and African crocodilians, host and geographic origin, and identification using sequences from SSU rRNA and gGAPDH genes

Trypanosoma Isolate

Host species

Geographic origin Locality/State/country

River Basin

Date

Sequence: GenBank acession numbers

SSU rRNA

gGAPDH

T. terena subclade

      

TCCa 610

Caiman yacare

Miranda/MS/Brazil

PP

2002

EU5962522

EU596256

TCC 1611

Caiman yacare

Miranda/MS/ Brazil

PP

2005

KF546517

KF546503

BSCb 28

Caiman crocodilus

Achaguas/Apure/Venezuela

OR

2005

KF546518

KF546504

BSC 50

Melanosuchus niger

Mamirauá/AM/ Brazil

AM

2010

KF546519

 

BSC 53

Melanosuchus niger

Mamirauá/AM/ Brazil

AM

2010

KF546520

 

BSC 27

Osteolaemus tetraspis

Quinara/Guinea Bissau

 

2012

 

KF546505

T. ralphi subclade

      

TCC 624

Caiman yacare

Miranda/MS/Brazil

PP

2002

EU596253

EU596257

TCC 625

Caiman yacare

Miranda/MS/Brazil

PP

2002

EU596259

KF546506

TCC 1092

Caiman yacare

Miranda/MS/Brazil

PP

2005

EU596254

EU596258

TCC 1100

Caiman yacare

Miranda/MS/Brazil

PP

2005

EU596260

 

TCC 1101

Caiman yacare

Miranda/MS/Brazil

PP

2005

EU596261

KF546507

TCC 1102

Caiman yacare

Miranda/MS/Brazil

PP

2005

EU596262

KF546508

TCC 1119

Caiman yacare

Miranda/MS/Brazil

PP

2005

EU596263

KF546509

TCC 1120

Caiman yacare

Miranda/MS/Brazil

PP

2005

EU596255

KF546510

TCC 1829

Caiman crocodilus

Lábrea/AM/Brazil

AM

2009

KF546521

KF546511

TCC1838

Melanosuchus niger

Lábrea/AM/Brazil

AM

2009

KF546527

KF546512

TCC 1974

Caiman yacare

Miranda/MS/Brazil

PP

2009

KF546522

KF546513

TCC 2218

Caiman crocodilus

Araguaína/TO/Brazil

AT

2011

KF546523

KF546514

BSC 29

Caiman yacare

Miranda/MS/Brazil

PP

2011

 

KF546515

BSC 51

Melanosuchus niger

Mamirauá/AM/Brazil

AM

2010

KF546524

 

BSC 56

Melanosuchus niger

Mamirauá/AM/Brazil

AM

2010

KF546525

 

BSC 64

Caiman crocodilus

Araguaína/TO/Brazil

AT

2011

 

KF546516

T. grayi subclade

      

BAN 1c

Glossina palpalis tsetse fly

The Gambia

 

-

AJ620258

AJ620258

ANR 4 c

Glossina palpalis tsetse fly

The Gambia

 

-

AJ620257

AJ62025

CroCamp1c

Crocodylus niloticus

Cameroon

 

-

KF546526

FM164795

a, TCC, Codes of cultures cryopreserved at the Trypanosomatid Culture Collection of the University of São Paulo; b, BSC, Blood Sample Collection; c, DNA samples. Samples analyses for the first time in this study are those obtained from 2005 to 2011; the Genbank accession numbers of DNA sequences determined in this study are KF546503-27.

Brazilian States: MS, Mato Grosso do Sul; AM, Amazonas; TO, Tocantins. River Basins: PP, Paraguay/Paraná; OR, Orinoco; AM, Amazon; AT, Araguaya/Tocantins.

All procedures were performed according to the recommendations of IBAMA (the Brazilian Institute for the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources; Permit Number: 10080–2). The work in Venezuela and Guinea Bissau was carried out with the permission of local institutions. Animal handling was performed in strict accordance with good animal practice, as determined by the protocols (108/2003 and 021/2012) approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experimentation of the University of São Paulo, Institute of Biomedical Sciences.

After immobilisation, the animals were bled by tail puncture using sodium citrate as an anticoagulant. The distribution of the crocodilian species and locals within each South American hydrographic basin where the animals were captured are shown in the Figure 1a, Table 1. We examined crocodilian blood for trypanosomes under light microscopy in Giemsa-stained smears on glass slides. Blood samples (~ 1.0 ml) were immediately inoculated into tubes containing BAB-LIT medium, and the positive haemocultures were transferred to monolayers of Hi-5 feeder cells cultivated in TC100 medium as previously described [14, 19, 21]. All cultures were deposited in the Trypanosomatid Culture Collection of the University of São Paulo (TCC-USP) (Table 1).

DNA amplification, sequencing and data analyses

DNA preparations from cultured trypanosomes were obtained using the classical phenol-chloroform method. The DNA preparations from blood samples were obtained from samples preserved in ethanol (v/v) stored in our Blood Sample Collections (BSC). DNA of T. grayi (CroCamp1) of C. niloticus from Cameroon, included in a previous study [12], was kindly provided by S. Helder, University of Yaoundé, Cameroon. PCR-amplification and sequencing of the V7V8 region of SSU rRNA (small subunit of rRNA) and glycosomal glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (gGAPDH) genes were performed as described previously [37, 38]. The sequences obtained were employed for the following phylogenetic analyses: a) V7V8 SSU rRNA sequences (880 ~bp) from the crocodilian trypanosomes; b) gGAPDH sequences (864 bp) from the crocodilian trypanosomes and species representing all major clades within Trypanosoma using non-trypanosome trypanosomatids as an outgroup; and c) concatenated V7V8 SSU rRNA and gGAPDH sequences (~3.3 kb) from the crocodilian trypanosomes and their closest related trypanosomes. The species included in the phylogenetic trees and their respective GenBank accession numbers are shown in in the phylogenetic trees and Table 1. The alignments were employed for Parsimony (V7V8 SSU rRNA), maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses as previously described [15, 19, 21, 37, 38].

Light, Scanning (SEM) and Transmission (TEM) Electron Microscopy

For light microscopy, cultured trypanosomes were fixed with methanol and stained with Giemsa. For Scanning (SEM) and Transmission (TEM) Electron Microscopy, trypanosomes from Hi-5 cultures were prepared and observed as previously described [14, 19, 37, 38].

Results

Isolation in culture and growth behaviour

We collected blood from crocodilians captured in four South American river basins: PP, AM, AT and OR (Figure 1; Table 1) and characterized 5 new cultures: two from Ca. yacare (TCC1611, 1974), two from Ca. Crocodilus (TCC 1829, 2218) and one from M. niger (TCC 1838). We observed accentuated growth differences by culture comparison. The absence of Hi-5 cells markedly reduced the multiplication of the TCC 610 and 1611 isolates, whereas the remaining isolates easily adapted to grow on TC100 or LIT media without the feeder layer cells.

One primary culture (BSC28) was obtained from Ca. crocodilus from Venezuela (Table 1). This isolate and other Brazilian isolates failed to propagate beyond the first passage in culture. Some blood samples that tested positive for trypanosomes by microscopic investigation of fresh blood could not be cultured at all. To overcome this limiting factor, DNA isolated directly from crocodilian blood samples was used for PCR amplification and sequencing of the V7V8 SSU rRNA and/or gGAPDH sequences.

Barcoding, species diversity and the phylogenetic relationships of crocodilian trypanosomes

In previous studies, we demonstrated that barcoding using V7V8 SSU rRNA sequences is valuable for rapid species identification, and for revealing intra-specific diversity of trypanosomes in mammals [1619] anurans [15], and snakes [13, 14]. We previously employed this marker to characterise the genotypes Cay01 and Cay02 in Ca. yacare[21]. Here, we barcoded two new cultures from Ca. yacare, two from Ca. crocodilus, and one from M. niger. Barcoding the trypanosomes directly from crocodilian blood samples disclosed sequences that were identical to Cay01 or Cay02 genotypes (Table 1; Figure 2).
Figure 2

Barcoding of crocodilian trypanosomes. Dendrogram inferred using V7V8 SSU rRNA sequences (DNA barcodes) of 22 isolates from 5 species of crocodilians revealing three subclades of trypanosomes: T. terena, T. ralphi and T. grayi. The node numbers are bootstrap values derived from 100 replicates.

The SSU rRNA sequences obtained from the 5 new established cultures, the primary culture derived from the Venezuelan Ca. crocodilus, and 8 sequences obtained directly from the DNA from blood samples of M. niger, Ca. yacare and Ca. crocodilus and O. tetraspis were aligned with those previously determined [8, 9, 12, 21] for 9 isolates from Ca. yacare and three isolates of T. grayi, including the trypanosome from C. niloticus from Cameroon barcoded in this study (Table 1). The inferred dendrogram corroborated the previous separation [21] of the alligatorid trypanosomes into the main genotypes Cay01 and Cay02, both distinct from T. grayi (Figure 2). The barcode analysis showed that Cay01 and Cay02 diverged ~2.5%, Cay02 and T. grayi also diverged ~2.5%, whereas a smaller divergence (1.3%) separated Cay01 from T. grayi.

The gGAPDH gene (single copy gene) sequence can be more valuable than SSU rRNA genes (multiple copies) for the phylogenetic positioning of trypanosomatids [9, 14, 15, 17, 18, 37, 38]. Here, we showed that among the crocodilian trypanosomes, gGAPDH diverged more than SSU rRNA. The gGAPDH+V7V8 SSU rRNA (Figure 3) or gGAPDH (Figure 4) derived phylogenetic trees supported the monophyly of crocodilian trypanosomes resulting in a well-supported assemblage named the Crocodilian clade. This clade comprises three well-supported subclades and confirms the branching pattern inferred by the V7V8 SSU rRNA (Figure 1). The Crocodilian clade was positioned closer to the major assemblage of trypanosomes from mammals and from Archosaurian hosts, such as birds, lizards and snakes, than to the trypanosomes from fishes and anurans nested into the Aquatic clade (Figures 3, 4).
Figure 3

Phylogenetic positioning of the crocodilian trypanosomes from South America and Africa. Phylogenetic tree inferred by maximum likelihood (ML) of concatenated gGAPDH and V7V8 SSU rRNA sequences from 17 trypanosome isolates from crocodilians evidencing the Crocodilian clade and its three subclades T. terena, T. ralphi and T. grayi. The analyses include species representative of all major clades within the genus Trypanosoma, and trypanosomatids of other genera as outgroups (1.778 characters, – Ln = -17937.481223). Numbers at nodes are bootstrap support (P/ML) >50% or Bayesian posterior probability > 0.25, derived from 500 replicates. Codes within parenthesis are GenBank accession numbers.

Figure 4

Phylogeographical analysis of South American alligatorid and African crocodilid trypanosomes: Phylogenetic relationships and geographical origin of trypanosomes from South American alligatorids, African crocodilids, and tsetse flies. ML phylogeny based on gGAPDH sequences (810 characters, –Ln = -10359.469307) from the trypanosomes nested into the Crocodilian clade (GenBank accession numbers are on Table 1), and trypanosomes from other hosts (GenBank accession numbers are within parenthesis on the tree). Numbers at nodes are bootstrap support >50% (P/ML) or Bayesian posterior probability > 0.25, derived from 500 replicates.

The results strongly support a crocodilian clade that consists exclusively of and comprises all trypanosomes from crocodilians, including isolates obtained from tsetse flies (Figures 3, 4). The positioning in the phylogenetic trees and gGAPDH sequence divergences, permitted classification of the Brazilian isolates into two new species, Trypanosoma terena n. sp. and Trypanosoma ralphi n. sp. The gGAPDH divergence between T. ralphi (the isolate TCC1838 from M. niger captured in the AM basin represents the type species) and T. terena (the isolate TCC610 from C. yacare captured in PP basin represents the type species) was 7.6%. The divergence separating T. ralphi and T. grayi was 7.0%, whereas the largest distances (9.5%) separated T. terena from T. grayi.

The phylogenetic analyses supported three subclades within the clade Crocodilian. The basal subclade comprised T. terena and four isolates from South America, one from Ca. yacare, one from Ca. crocodilus and two from M. niger, and also included the trypanosome from the African O. tetrapsis. The second subclade clustered together with T. ralphi from 16 Brazilian isolates, 10 from Ca. yacare, three from Ca. crocodilus, and three from M. niger. The third subclade was formed exclusively by African isolates, which grouped T. grayi of C. niloticus from Cameroon, and two tsetse isolates from The Gambia. T. ralphi and T. grayi are sister clades (Figures 3, 4). The most homogeneous subclade (< 0.5% gGAPDH divergences) was represented by T. ralphi, and South American isolates. The only exception within this clade was the TCC 1102 isolate, which diverged by ~1.0% from all isolates. Within the subclade T. terena, the isolate TCC 610 diverged by higher distances: 1.8% for the isolate from O. tetrapsis, 1.3% for the Ca. crocodilus isolate from OR, and 1.4% for the C. yacare isolate TCC1611 from PP. Considering that the divergences within the subclades are too small to justify the creation of new species, the isolates were designed as genotypes of the leading species of their respective subclades.

The African isolates from C. niloticus and O. tetrapsis were positioned into the two distant subclades T. grayi and T. terena (Figures 3, 4), and were separated by the largest gGAPDH divergences (9.6%). The divergences separating the African trypanosomes were larger than those separating T. grayi from the South American trypanosomes nested into the subclade T. ralphi (6.3%). Divergences separating the isolates of T. grayi from C. niloticus (Cameroon) and tsetse flies (The Gambia) were 1.2% (isolate BAN1) and 1.7% (isolate ANR4), whereas the two tsetse isolates diverged by 1.9%. These findings underline the heterogeneity of the African crocodilian trypanosomes, all assigned to T. grayi, which probably comprise more than one species.

Light microscopy and the development and differentiation of the new species of alligatorid trypanosomes

An examination of the Giemsa-stained blood smears revealed a small number of C-shaped and roll-shaped (rounded forms with overlapping extremities) trypomastigotes in Ca. yacare blood samples as previously observed [21]. Blood flagellates were not observed in other crocodilian species. Hemocultures in TC100 using Hi-5 as feeder cells exhibited flagellates resembling blood trypomastigotes (Figure 5a,e). After ~7 days, the flagellates gradually differentiated to epimastigotes, and a few small trypomastigotes appeared in T. terena cultures (Figure 5b,f).
Figure 5

Microphotographs (light microscopy) of Giemsa-staining culture forms of Trypanosoma ralphi (a-d) and Trypanosoma terena (e-i). Cultures (~5 days) showing C- and roll-shaped large trypomastigotes with small kinetoplast and exuberant “undulant membrane” (a,e), transient forms between trypo- and epimastigotes (b,f), and small trypomastigotes (asterisk) (~7 days). Log-phase forms (c,g) showing rounded and long dividing forms (stars). The T. ralphi epimastigotes are pointed, exhibit a dilated anterior end (c), and the kinetoplast is thin and adjacent to the nucleus (c,d). The epimastigotes of T. terena are slender and the kinetoplast is rounded, and either very close or far from the nucleus (g,h); wider forms predominated in stationary cultures (h,i). Arrows indicate segments of the flagellar membrane detached from the cell body membrane. Nucleus (n), kinetoplast (k), flagellum (f).

The flagellates from log-cultures ranged from small rounded forms to large epimastigotes. In T. ralphi (TCC 1838), epimastigotes varied in length and were generally wide forms with bodies measuring 17.5 to 32.5 μm long (average 23.26±4.48 μm) and 1.7 to 3.5 μm wide (average of 2.76±0.50 μm) showing a pointed posterior extremity, and dilated anterior end particularly in the stationary phase (Figure 5b,d). T. terena (TCC 610) epimastigotes were also pleomorphic in shape and size. Their bodies in log-phase ranged from 15 to 27.5 μm long (average of 22.2±3.7 μm), and 1.35 to 3.0 μm width (average of 2.06±0.44 μm) showing a rounded or pointed posterior extremity (Figure 5g). Long and slender epimastigotes ranging from ~30 to 40 μm long (average of 35.5±6.8 μm), and slim and twisted forms (Figure 5h,i) were common in the stationary cultures. Consistently, the epimastigotes of both species exhibited segments of the flagellar membrane that were detached from the cell body membrane before the emergence of free flagellum (Figure 5c,d,i). T. ralphi exhibited a thin kinetoplast adjacent to the central nucleus (Figure 5c,d), whereas the kinetoplasts in T. terena were rounded, compacted, and positioned either close or far from the nucleus (Figure 5g,h).

Scanning (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of cultured trypanosomes

SEM microphotographs of T. ralphi (Figure 6a,c,e,f,h,i) and T. terena (Figure 6d,g,j,k) show flagellates varying from small and rounded forms to long epimastigotes. The epimastigotes typically divide by binary fission (Figure 6j) while rounded flagellates divided by multiple fission as squash-like forms (Figure 6c,g). Epimastigotes of T. terena displayed a surface protuberance correspondent to the subjacent kinetoplast (Figure 6k). Both trypanosome species exhibited a cytostome opening, represented by a small orifice in the cell membrane close to the flagellar pocket (Figure 6f). In addition to areas of detachment of the flagellum and the cell body membranes (Figure 6d,h,j,k), the two species exhibited highly developed flagellar lamellae (Figure 6i,j).
Figure 6

Scanning electron microscopy of epimastigote forms of Trypanosoma ralphi (a,b,c,e,f,h,i) and Trypanosoma terena (d, g,j,k). Log-phase epimastigotes of T. ralphi showing slender and pointed forms (a,e), and of T. terena (d,k) exhibiting rounded posterior extremity and a membrane protuberance corresponding to the kinetoplast (k). Both species exhibited squash-like forms dividing by multiple fissions (b,c,g), and long epimastigotes dividing by binary fission (j). Higher magnification of the cytostome opening (f), flagellar membrane detached from the cell body membrane (d,h,j,k), and flagellar lamellae indicated by stars (i,j). Cy, cytostome; K, kinetoplast. Bars = 1 μm.

The ultrastructural organisation of T. terena and T. ralphi were not particularly distinct from one another or from other trypanosomatids [14, 19, 3739]. However, some features shared by both species were noticeable: a) large amount of organelles resembling reservosomes [19, 39], which are compartments that accumulate endocytotic macromolecules (Figure 7e); b) an apparent short invagination of the cytostome inside the cytoplasm (Figure 7g,h); c) very well developed spongiomes [37], which are a network of tubules converging to the contractile vacuole attached to the membrane of the flagellar pocket constituting the osmoregulatory apparatus (Figure 7c,d), and d) a conspicuous paraflagelar rod (PR), a network of filaments that runs alongside the flagellar microtubules (Figure 7l). The thickness and the arrangement of the kDNA fibrils differed between the two species. In T. ralphi (Figure 7i), the kinetoplast exhibits a disk-shaped structure with two bands of fibrils and thickness varying from 170 to 190 nm (176.7± 6.5 nm). In T. terena (Figure 7j), the kinetoplast is highly compacted with no visible particular organization, and the thickness varied from 162 to 241 nm (198 ± 22 nm).
Figure 7

Transmission electron microscopy showing the ultrastructural organisation of Trypanosoma ralphi (a,b,c,e,h,i) and Trypanosoma terena (d,f,g,j,k,l) . Longitudinal sections of log-phase flagellates showing elongated epimastigotes (a-c). Network of microtubules near to flagellar pocket forming the espongiome in longitudinal (c) and transversal (d) sections. Both species exhibited cytostome (g,h), multiple acidocalcisomes (f,g,h), organelles resembling reservosomes (e), multivesicular bodies (k) and a well-developed paraflagelar rod (l). The arrangement of the kDNA fibrils in T. ralphi produced a two-band pattern (i) differing from the more compacted kDNA of T. terena (j). Arrowheads (b) indicate regions where the flagellar membrane detached from the cytoplasmatic membrane. N, nucleus; M, mitochondrion; K, kinetoplast, F, flagellum; Fp, flagellar pocket; Cy, cytostome; Sp, spongiome; Pr, paraflagellar rod; Ac, acidocalcisomes; R, reservosome; Mvb, multivesicular body. Bars = 0.5 μm.

Taxonomical summary

New species description

Phylum Euglenozoa Cavalier-Smith 1981; Class Kinetoplastea Honigberg 1963; Order Trypanosomatida (Kent 1880) Hollande 1982; Family Trypanosomatidae Doflein 1951; Genus Trypanosoma Gruby 1843; Trypanosoma ralphi Teixeira and Camargo n. sp. and Trypanosoma terena Teixeira and Camargo n. sp.

Trypanosoma ralphi Teixeira and Camargo n. sp.

Type material

Hapantotype, culture of the isolate TCC 1838; paratypes: TCC624, 625, 1092, 1100, 1101, 1119, 1120, 1829, 1974 and 2218. The hosts and collection locations of paratypes are in Table 1. Type host: Melanosuchus niger (Crocodylia, Alligatoridae). Additional hosts: Caiman crocodilus and Ca. yacare. Habitat: Blood. Locality: Purus river, Western Amazonas, Brazil (S7o15’ W64o47’). Additional collection localities: indicated in the Figure 1 and Table 1. Morphology: Log-phase epimastigotes averaging 23.26±4.48 μm long and 2.76±0.50 μm wide (Figure 5c). Diagnosis: The diagnosis was based on DNA sequences from the isolate TCC 1838 deposited in Genbank: SSU rRNA (KF546527) and gGAPDH (KF546512). Etymology: the name T. ralphi honours Dr. Ralph Lainson, a respected British protozoologist particularly known for his work on the leishmaniae, who lives in the Brazilian Amazônia enthusiastically studying haemosporidians of reptiles.

Trypanosoma terena Teixeira and Camargo n. sp.

Type material

Hapantotype, culture TCC 610. Type host: Caiman yacare (Alligatoridae, Crocodylia). Habitat: blood. Locality: Miranda River, State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil (S20o14’ W56o22’). Because of the relevant genetic divergences, the isolates from Ca. yacare, M. niger, Ca. crocodilus and O. tetrapsis clustering with the isolate TCC 610 in the subclade T. terena were not designated paratypes of this species but merely subclade genotypes; their host species and collection sites are indicated in the Figure 1 and Table 1. Morphology: Log-phase epimastigotes averaged of 22.20±3.72 μm long and 2.06±0.44 μm wide (Figure 5g). Diagnosis: based on DNA sequences of the isolate TCC 610 deposited in GenBank: SSU rRNA (EU5962522) and gGAPDH (EU596256). Etymology: “terena”, name in apposition, refers to the indigenous Terena ethnic group inhabiting the region of the Pantanal where the first isolates of this species were obtained.

The cryopreserved cultures, Giemsa-stained smears and DNA samples from cultures and crocodilian blood samples were all deposited in the TCC-USP. To comply with the regulations of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN), details of the two species have been submitted to ZooBank with the following Life Science Identifier (LSID): urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CF0B3CA9-C42A-4F76-B60F-DCD1771B79CA

Taxonomical comments

Lainson [20] described Trypanosoma cecili based on flagellates observed in tissue imprints of Ca. crocodilus captured at Eastern AM basin; cultures have never been obtained and no molecular data are available. The forms of T. cecili resemble those we previously described in lung imprints from Ca. yacare[21], but we cannot attest whether these forms correspond to one or more trypanosome species. We demonstrated that Ca. crocodilus captured in the AM, AT and OR basins can harbour at least three genetically different trypanosomes. Because the holotype of T. cecili is lost, no trypanosome could be elected as a neotype for T. cecili. Therefore, the trypanosomes herein analysed must be described as new species.

Discussion

In this study, we assessed the genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of trypanosomes from South American alligatorids and African crocodilids, and compared phylo- and biogeographical patterns of these parasites with those of their host species to uncover possible events that could help to hypothesize evolutionary scenarios. The phylogenetic analyses enabled the description of T. ralphi n. sp and T. terena n. sp from Brazilian alligatorids. Data on culture behaviour, morphology and ultrastructural features complemented the species description.

The crocodilian trypanosomes from Africa and South America clustered together forming the strongly supported Crocodilian clade, which comprised three subclades led respectively by T. terena, T. grayi and T. ralphi. Unexpectedly, a trypanosome from the African O. tetraspis clustered tightly within the South American T. terena subclade instead of the T. grayi subclade exclusive of African trypanosomes. Also unpredictably, the T. ralphi subclade, which comprises exclusively South American isolates, was more closely related to the African T. grayi subclade than to the South American T. terena subclade.

The close genetic relationships between South American and African crocodilian trypanosomes is incompatible with the Cretaceous (~90 mya) split of Crocodylidae and Alligatoridae [28, 30, 32]. The results are more consistent with the paleontological and phylogenetic evidence of Crocodylus marine circumtropical dispersal at the Miocene/Pliocene boundary (~4-5 mya) [3133]. Therefore, we hypothesised that marine dispersion played an important role in determining the close relationships between South American and African crocodilian trypanosomes. This scenario favours oceanic dispersion as the determinant of the disjunct distribution of crocodilian trypanosomes, that is, the discontinuous distribution of closely related trypanosomes of hosts separated by large geographical distances [40]. Disjunct distribution can also be demonstrated for other trypanosomes such as the homogeneous T. lewisi and T. theileri, which are distributed throughout the word, probably by the anthropogenic dispersal of their respective domestic rat and cattle hosts [11, 16, 18, 39, 41, 42].

Our findings are in accordance with paleontological and phylogenetic evidence that Crocodylus species colonized the Neotropics and Afrotropics in the late Miocene (~5 mya) through transoceanic circumtropical dispersion. The dispersal of Crocodylus from Australasia proceeded to the Neotropics and then to Africa or inversely to Africa and then to the Neotropics [3133]. Whatever the route, there was a profusion of alligatorids at the South American hydrographic basins when the ancestors of Crocodylus reached the Neotropics [33, 35, 36, 43]. At that time, Amazonia was part of a much larger wetland extending from the OR to the PP basins without barriers separating the large and diverse crocodilian populations. The South American basins reached its present configuration at the Pliocene (~3 mya), following successive disconnections and reconnections due to marine and river drainage changes accompanying the Andean uplift. The present day basins are still interconnected although at a much smaller scale [4346]. Resident alligatorids and the new arriving crocodilids shared wetlands and lakes where successive episodes of trypanosome host switches, apparently restricted to phylogenetically related hosts, may have occurred [14, 1618, 47, 48]. Host switching mediated by ecological fitting appear to be commonly used for trypanosome jumping among hosts that share ecological niches and can, therefore, serve as blood source for the same hematophagous vectors [1216, 19, 4750]. However, this part of the biogeographical history of crocodilian trypanosomes requires data about their transmission in South America. Tsetse flies, which cyclically transmit T. grayi, are widespread in Sub-Saharan Africa, and also occur in a few spots of the Arabian Peninsula. However, there is fossil evidence indicating tsetse dispersal into the Nearctic at the Miocene [51]. The virtual absence of tsetse flies in the location at Guinea Bissau where the trypanosome from O. tetrapsis was obtained suggests the existence of alternative vectors for crocodilian trypanosomes in Africa. In South America, different haematophagous vectors could transmit the crocodilian trypanosomes either cyclically or mechanically. We are currently searching for possible vectors among leeches and insects aiming to provide new insights into the evolutionary history of crocodilian trypanosomes.

Comparative phylogeography using parasites as biological tags has been valuable to track vertebrate hosts and vectors in time and space [15, 18, 39, 5254]. The finding that all crocodilian trypanosomes, whatever their vectors, clustered together forming a clade exclusively of crocodilian trypanosomes, regardless of host species and geographic origin, indicated that the evolution of these trypanosomes was strongly linked to that of their vertebrate hosts. Our phylogeographical analysis can contribute to the understanding of the worldwide dispersal of crocodilians, similarly to studies on bat trypanosomes that indicated recent movements of bats that could not be inferred from available paleontological and phylogenetic data [11, 39, 41]. Furthers studies including more comprehensive sampling of trypanosomes from crocodilians, in Africa, Asia and the Americas, and their vectors are required for an improved hypothesis about the origin, dispersal route and evolutionary relationships of crocodilian trypanosomes.

Conclusions

Phylogenetic and paleontological data on crocodilians and phylogenetic and biogeographical data on their trypanosomes are consistent with past and present biogeographical scenarios playing important roles in the genetic diversity, and phylogenetic relationships of crocodilian trypanosomes. In the most likely scenario, the evolutionary history of crocodilian trypanosomes was shaped in response to the ancient geographical isolation between alligatorids and crocodilids, followed by the transcontinental voyage of Crocodylus at the Miocene allowing the contact between South American alligatorids and crocodilids. This contact probably enabled successive host switches of trypanosomes between resident alligatorids and migrating crocodiles throughout the configuration of the present day South American hydrographic basins.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to many people who kindly helped us in crocodilian capture and sample collection in Brazil, Venezuela, and Guinea Bissau. We would like to thank Dr. Miguel U. Trefault Rodrigues for the animal identifications. We acknowledge the Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI) for support through the Mamirauá Institute for Sustainable Development (IDSM). We thank Cristina Schwartz for the coordination of the work in Guinea Bissau. We also thank Marcio C. Valentin from the Laboratory of Electron Microscopy, Institute of Biosciences, USP, and Carlos E. Jared and Marta M. Antoniazzi from the Institute Butantan, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, for their kindly permission to use their electron microscopic facilities. This work was supported by CNPq (PROAFRICA and PROSUL) and CAPES (Programa Nacional de Incentivo à Pesquisa em Parasitologia Básica). LBV was postdoctoral fellow sponsored by CNPq-MCTI (PROTAX – National Program of Taxonomy) and CAPES (PNPD). BRF is recipient of a scholarship from CNPq (PROTAX).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade de São Paulo
(2)
Departamento de Parasitologia Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul
(3)
Departamento de Patología Veterinaria, Faculdad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Central de Venezuela
(4)
Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Brasília
(5)
Caiman Research in Conservation and Management Program, Mamirauá Institute for Sustainable Development
(6)
Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter

References

  1. Brooks DR, O’Grady RT: Crocodilians and their helminth parasites: macroevolutionary considerations. Am Zool. 1989, 29: 873-883.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Brooks DR: McLennan DA: The nature of diversity: an evolutionary voyage of discovery. 2002, Chicago, Illinois, USA: University of Chicago PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Nieberding CS, Morand R: Libois, JR Michaux: A parasite reveals cryptic phylogeographic history of its host. Proc Royal Soc B Biolog Sci. 2004, 271: 2559-2568. 10.1098/rspb.2004.2930.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Nieberding CM, Durette-Desset MC, Vanderpoorten A, Casanova JC, Ribas A, Deffontaine V, Feliu C, Morand S, Libois R, Michaux JR: Geography and host biogeography matter for understanding the phylogeography of a parasite. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008, 47: 538-554. 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.01.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Nieberding C, Olivieri I: Parasites: proxies for host genealogy and ecology?. Trends in Ecol Evol. 2007, 22: 156-165. 10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Poulin R: Evolutionary ecology of parasites. 2008, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Poulin R, Krasnov BR, Muillot D, Thieltges DW: The comparative ecology and biogeography of parasites. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2011, 366: 2379-2390. 10.1098/rstb.2011.0048.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamilton PB, Gibson WC, Stevens JR: Patterns of co-evolution between trypanosomes and their hosts deduced from ribosomal RNA and protein-coding gene phylogenies. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007, 44: 15-25. 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.03.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamilton PB, Stevens JR, Gaunt MW, Gidley J, Gibson WC: Trypanosomes are monophyletic: evidence from genes for glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase and small subunit ribosomal RNA. Int J Parasitol. 2004, 12: 1393-1404.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Telford RS: The kinetoplastid hemoflagellates of reptiles. 1995, New York: AcademicView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamilton PB, Teixeira MMG, Stevens JR: The evolution of Trypanosoma cruzi: the 'bat seeding' hypothesis. Trends Parasitol. 2012, 28: 136-141. 10.1016/j.pt.2012.01.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamilton PB, Adams ER, Njiokou F, Gibson WC, Cuny G, Herder S: Phylogenetic analysis reveals the presence of the Trypanosoma cruzi clade in African terrestrial mammals. Infect Genet Evol. 2009, 9: 81-86. 10.1016/j.meegid.2008.10.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Viola LB, Campaner M, Takata CS, Ferreira RC, Rodrigues AC, Freitas RA, Duarte MR, Grego KF, Barrett TV, Camargo EP, Teixeira MMG: Phylogeny of snake trypanosomes inferred by SSU rDNA sequences, their possible transmission by phlebotomines, and taxonomic appraisal by molecular, cross-infection and morphological analysis. Parasitology. 2008, 135: 595-605.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Viola LB, Attias M, Takata CS, Campaner M, De Souza W, Camargo EP, Teixeira MMG: Phylogenetic analyses based on small subunit rRNA and glycosomal glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase genes and ultrastructural characterization of two snake Trypanosomes: Trypanosoma serpentis n. sp. from Pseudoboa nigra and Trypanosoma cascavelli from Crotalus durissus terrificus. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2009, 56: 594-602. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2009.00444.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferreira RC, De Souza AA, Freitas R, Campaner M, Takata CSA, Barrett TV, Shaw JJ, Teixeira MMG: A Phylogenetic Lineage of Closely Related Trypanosomes (Trypanosomatidae, Kinetoplastida) of Anurans and Sand Flies (Psychodidae, Diptera) Sharing the Same Ecotopes in Brazilian Amazonia. J Euk Microbiol. 2008, 55: 427-435. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2008.00342.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Maia Da Silva F, Marcili A, Ortiz PA, Epiphanio S, Campaner M, Catão-Dias JL, Shaw JJ, Camargo EP, Teixeira MMG: Phylogenetic, morphological and behavioural analyses support host switching of Trypanosoma (Herpetosoma) lewisi from domestic rats to primates. Infect Genet Evol. 2010, 10: 522-529. 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.02.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cavazzana M, Marcili A, Lima L, da Silva FM, Junqueira AC, Veludo HH, Viola LB, Campaner M, Nunes VL, Paiva F, Coura JR, Camargo EP, Teixeira MMG: Phylogeographical, ecological and biological patterns shown by nuclear (ssrRNA and gGAPDH) and mitochondrial (Cyt b) genes of trypanosomes of the subgenus Schizotrypanum parasitic in Brazilian bats. Int J Parasitol. 2010, 40: 345-355. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.08.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Garcia HA, Rodrigues AC, Martinkovic F, Minervino AH, Campaner M, Nunes VL, Paiva F, Hamilton PB, Teixeira MMG: Multilocus phylogeographical analysis of Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) genotypes from sympatric cattle and water buffalo populations supports evolutionary host constraint and close phylogenetic relationships with genotypes found in other ruminants. Int J Parasitol. 2011, 41: 1385-1396. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.09.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lima L, Espinosa-Álvarez O, Hamilton PB, Neves L, Takata CS, Campaner M, Attias M, de Souza W, Camargo EP, Teixeira MMG: Trypanosoma livingstonei: a new species from African bats supports the bat seeding hypothesis for the Trypanosoma cruzi clade. Parasit Vectors. 2013, 1: 221-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lainson R: Trypanosoma cecili n. sp. a parasite of the South American cayman, Caiman crocodilus crocodilus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Crocodilia: alligatoridae). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1977, 3: 87-93.Google Scholar
  21. Viola LB, Almeida R, Ferreira RC, Campaner M, Takata CSA, Rodrigues AC, Paiva F, Camargo EP, Teixeira MMG: Evolutionary history of trypanosomes from South American caiman (Caiman jacare) and African crocodiles inferred by phylogenetic analyses using SSU rDNA and GAPDH genes. Parasitology. 2008, 136: 55-75.20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoare CA: Studies on Trypanosoma grayi II. Experimental transmission to the crocodile. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1929, 23: 39-56. 10.1016/S0035-9203(29)90831-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoare CA: Studies on Trypanosoma grayi III, Life cycle in the tsetse fly and in the crocodile. Parasitology. 1931, 23: 449-484. 10.1017/S0031182000013858.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. McNamara JJ, Snow WF: Improved identification of Nannomonas infections in tsetse flies from The Gambia. Acta Trop. 1990, 48: 127-136. 10.1016/0001-706X(90)90052-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dirie MF, Wallbanks KR, Molyneux DH, McNamara J: Comparison of Trypanosoma grayi-like isolates from west and east Africa. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1991, 85: 49-52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Minter-Goedbloed E, Pudney M, Kilgour V, Evans DA: First record of a reptile trypanosome isolated from Glossina pallidipes in Kenya. Z Parasitenkd. 1983, 69: 17-26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Orston JPG, Gibson WC: Detection of infections of Trypanosoma grayi in Glossina fuscipes fuscipes in the Central African Republic. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1996, 90: 555-557.Google Scholar
  28. Brochu CA: Phylogenetic approaches toward crocodylian history. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci. 2003, 31: 357-397. 10.1146/annurev.earth.31.100901.141308.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Janke A, Gullberg A, Hughes S, Aggarwal RK, Arnason U: Mitogenomic analyses place the gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) on the crocodile tree and provide pre-K/T divergence times for most crocodilians. J Mol Evol. 2005, 61: 620-626. 10.1007/s00239-004-0336-9. 35View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Roos J, Aggarwal RK, Janke A: Extended mitogenomic phylogenetic analyses yield new insight into crocodylian evolution and their survival of the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. Mol Phylogen Evol. 2007, 45: 663-673. 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.06.018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Meredith RW, Hekkala ER, Amato G, Gatesy J: A phylogenetic hypothesis for Crocodylus (Crocodylia) based on mitochondrial DNA: evidence for a trans-Atlantic voyage from Africa to the New World. Mol Phylogen Evol. 2011, 60: 183-191. 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.03.026.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Oaks JR: A time-calibrated species tree of Crocodylia reveals a recent radiation of the true crocodiles. Evolution. 2011, 65: 3285-3297. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01373.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hekkala E, Shirley MH, Amato G, Austin JD, Charter S, Thorbjarnarson J, Vliet KA, Houck ML, Desalle R, Blum MJ: An ancient icon reveals new mysteries: mummy DNA resurrects a cryptic species within the Nile crocodile. Mol Ecol. 2011, 20: 4199-4215.34. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05245.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Brazaitis P, Rebelo GH, Yamashita C: The status of Caiman crocodilus crocodilus and Melanosuchus niger populations in the Amazonian regions of Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia. 1996, 17: 377-385. 10.1163/156853896X00090.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Hastings , Alexander K, Bloch JI, Carlos J, Rincon AF, MacFadden BJ: Systematics and biogeography of crocodylians from the Miocene of Panama. J Vert Paleontol. 2013, 33: 1-125. 10.1080/02724634.2012.719176.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Scheyer TM, Aguilera OA, Delfino M, Fortier DC, Carlini AA, Sánchez R, Carrillo-Briceño JD, Quiroz L, Sánchez-Villagra MR: Crocodylian diversity peak and extinction in the late Cenozoic of the northern Neotropics. Nat Commun. 1907, 2013: 4-Google Scholar
  37. Borghesan TC, Ferreira RC, Takata CS, Campaner M, Borda CC, Paiva F, Milder RV, Teixeira MMG, Camargo EP: Molecular phylogenetic redefinition of Herpetomonas (Kinetoplastea, Trypanosomatidae), a genus of insect parasites associated with flies. Protist. 2013, 164: 129-152. 10.1016/j.protis.2012.06.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Teixeira MMG, Borghesan TC, Ferreira RC, Santos MA, Takata CS, Campaner M, Nunes VL, Milder RV, de Souza W, Camargo EP: Phylogenetic validation of the genera Angomonas and Strigomonas of trypanosomatids harboring bacterial endosymbionts with the description of new species of trypanosomatids and of Proteobacterial symbionts. Protist. 2011, 162: 503-524. 10.1016/j.protis.2011.01.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lima L, Silva FM, Neves L, Attias M, Takata CS, Campaner M, de Souza W, Hamilton PB, Teixeira MMG: Evolutionary insights from bat trypanosomes: morphological, developmental and phylogenetic evidence of a new species, Trypanosoma (Schizotrypanum) erneyi sp. nov., in African bats closely related to Trypanosoma (Schizotrypanum) cruzi and allied species. Protist. 2012, 163: 856-872. 10.1016/j.protis.2011.12.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. De Queiroz A: The resurrection of oceanic dispersal in historical biogeography. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005, 20: 68-73. 10.1016/j.tree.2004.11.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Hamilton P, Cruickshank C, Stevens JR, Teixeira MMG, Mathews F: Parasites reveal movement of bats between the new and old worlds. Mol Phylog Evol. 2012, 63: 521-526. 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.01.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Cortez AP, Rodrigues AC, Garcia HA, Neves L, Batista JS, Bengaly Z, Paiva F, Teixeira MMG: Cathepsin L-like genes of Trypanosoma vivax from Africa and South America–characterization, relationships and diagnostic implications. Mol Cell Probes. 2009, 23: 44-51. 10.1016/j.mcp.2008.11.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hoorn C, Wesselingh FP, ter Steege H, Bermudez MA, Mora A, Sevink J, Sanmartín I, Sanchez-Meseguer A, Anderson CL, Figueiredo JP, Jaramillo CD, Negri FR, Hooghiemstra H, Lundberg J, Stadler T, Särkinen T, Antonelli A: Amazonia through Time: Andean Uplift, Climate Change, Landscape Evolution, and Biodiversity. Science. 2010, 330: 927-931. 10.1126/science.1194585.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lunderberg JG, Marshall LG, Guerrero BH, Malabarba MCSL, Wesselingh F: The stage for neotropical fish diversification: a history of tropical south American rivers. Phylogeny and classification of neotropical fishes Part 1 – Fossils and Geological evidence. Edited by: Malabarta LR, RE Reis RP, Vari ZM Lucena CAS, Lucena CAS. 1998, Porto Alegre: Edipucrs, 603-Google Scholar
  45. Hrbek T, Vasconcelos WR, Rebelo G, Farias IP: Phylogenetic relationships of South American Alligatorids and the Caiman of Madeira River. J Exp Zool. 2008, 309: 588-599.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Latrubesse EM, Cozzuol M, Silva-Caminha SAF, Rigsby CA, Absy ML, Jaramillo C: The Late Miocene paleogeography of the Amazon Basin and the evolution of the Amazon River system. Earth-Science Rev. 2010, 99: 99-124. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.02.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Zídková L, Cepicka I, Szabová J, Svobodová M: Biodiversity of avian trypanosomes. Infect Genet Evol. 2012, 12: 102-112. 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.10.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Jakes KA, O'Donoghue PJ, Adlard RD: Phylogenetic relationships of Trypanosoma chelodina and Trypanosoma binneyi from Australian tortoises and platypuses inferred from small subunit rRNA analyses. Parasitology. 2001, 123: 483-487.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Austen JM, Jefferies R, Friend JA, Ryan U, Adams P, Reid SA: Morphological and molecular characterization of Trypanosoma copemani n. sp. (Trypanosomatidae) isolated from Gilbert's potoroo (Potorous gilbertii) and quokka (Setonix brachyurus). Parasitology. 2009, 136: 783-792. 10.1017/S0031182009005927.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Thompson CK, Botero A, Wayne AF, Godfrey SS, Lymbery AJ, Thompson RA: Morphological polymorphism of Trypanosoma copemani and description of the genetically diverse T. vegrandis sp. nov. from the critically endangered Australian potoroid, the brush-tailed bettong (Bettongia penicillata) (Gray,1837). Parasit Vectors. 2013, 6: 121-10.1186/1756-3305-6-121.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Cockerell TDA: The Third Fossil Tsetse-Fly. Nature. 1916, 98: 70-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Maia Da Silva F, Junqueira AC, Campaner M, Rodrigues AC, Crisante G, Ramirez LE, Caballero ZC, Monteiro FA, Coura JR, Añez N, Teixeira MMG: Comparative phylogeography of Trypanosoma rangeli and Rhodnius (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) supports a long coexistence of parasite lineages and their sympatric vectors. Mol Ecol. 2007, 16: 3361-3373. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03371.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Brooks DR, León-Règagnon V, McLennan DA, Zelmer D: Ecological fitting as determinant of the community structure of platyhelminth parasites of anurans. Ecology. 2006, 87: 76-85. 10.1890/05-0023.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Hoberg EP, Brooks DR: A macroevolutionary mosaic: episodic host-switching, geographical colonization and diversification in complex host-parasite systems. J Biogeog. 2008, 35: 1533-1550. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01951.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Fermino et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement