Morphometric analyses of canine blood microfilariae isolated by the Knott’s test enables Dirofilaria immitis and D. repens species-specific and Acanthocheilonema (syn. Dipetalonema) genus-specific diagnosis
© Magnis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 21 January 2013
Accepted: 19 February 2013
Published: 25 February 2013
Considering the increasing importance of small animals travel medicine and the spread of filariae with zoonotic potential to non-endemic European areas, routine filarial diagnosis in dogs is becoming important. Dirofilaria immitis, D. repens, Acanthocheilonema dracunculoides and A. reconditum are the most common canine filarial nematodes presenting blood circulating microfilariae (mf) which can be differentiated to species level by the acid phosphatase activity patterns or by PCR. Available data on the size of the mf vary considerably in the literature. The aim of this study was to validate morphometric criteria for filarial identification in blood samples of dogs after concentration of mf with the modified Knott’s technique.
Morphometric analysis of 10 mf from samples identified to species level by acid phosphatase activity and partially confirmed by PCR were performed with specimens from 377 dogs.
The mean length and width of D. immitis mf from 60 dogs were 301.77±6.29 μm and 6.30±0.26 μm, of D. repens mf from 171 dogs 369.44±10.76 μm 8.87±0.58 μm, of A. dracunculoides mf from 133 dogs 259.43±6.69 μm and 5.09±0.47 μm and of A. reconditum mf from 13 dogs 264.83±5.47 μm and 4.63±0.52 μm.
For a subset of 30 samples, morphometric analysis was repeated with identical results in two laboratories. Furthermore, the size of mf concentrated and fixed by the Knott’s technique was shown to be stable over 105 days.
The Knott’s test enables to clearly distinguish between D. immitis, D. repens and Acanthocheilonema spp. However, due to the overlapping size ranges of A. dracunculoides and A. reconditum, biochemical or molecular methods are required to distinguish these two species.
In Europe the most common canine filarial species presenting blood circulating microfilariae (mf) are Dirofilaria immitis, D. repens, Acanthocheilonema (syn. Dipetalonema) dracunculoides and A. (syn. Dip.) reconditum. They are transmitted by haematophagous arthropods: Dirofilaria spp. by mosquitoes, A. reconditum by fleas and lice and A. dracunculoides by ticks. D. immitis, the aetiological agent of canine heartworm disease, is the most pathogenic species for dogs: adults live in the right side of the heart and in the pulmonary artery, causing pulmonary hypertension and congestive heart failure. Adults of D. repens live in the subcutaneous tissue, occasionally causing dermatological problems. A. reconditum and A. dracunculoides live in the peritoneal cavity and adipose tissue and are less pathogenic. However, D. immitis and D. repens are considered emerging agents of parasitic zoonoses in Europe with expanding ranges, and A. reconditum has occasionally been reported as a zoonotic agent.
All these species release mf in the blood of their final hosts, and diagnosis of canine filariosis is mainly based on the detection of circulating mf. Specific identification of these stages is essential for an accurate diagnosis and for choosing the appropriate treatment[5, 6]. Data on length and width of mf reported in the literature vary considerably. The objective of this study was to validate morphometric criteria for species or genus identification of mf concentrated by the modified Knott’s technique, a classical, inexpensive and widely used method.
Canine EDTA blood samples containing mf (n=379) were collected between 2006 and 2011 by different parasitological laboratories in Europe and sent to Parasitus Ex e.V. in Niederkassel (lab 1). The samples were taken from dogs from Spain (73), Portugal (102), Greece (6), Italy (30), Romania (3), Hungary (141), Bulgaria (1), Turkey (2) and France (1); for 19 samples the dog origin was unknown. Dogs of both sexes and various age groups were sampled; exact age determination was impossible for most dogs due to their unknown history. The modified Knott’s technique was applied to concentrate and to detect mf. One ml of EDTA blood was mixed with 9 ml of 2% formalin in a 15 ml tube and centrifuged for 5 minutes at 500 × g. The supernatant was poured off, and 2 × 10 μl of the sediment was transferred to a slide and covered with a coverslip.
Morphometric analyses of the mf were conducted with standard diagnostic microscopes equipped with calibrated measuring eyepieces at a final magnification of 200–400 x. Body length and diameter, and the form of the front end and the tail of ten randomly selected mf were determined. To demonstrate the reliability of the measurements, a subset of 30 samples was repeatedly tested at the Institute of Parasitology, University of Zürich, Switzerland (lab. 2, D. immitis, D. repens and A. dracunculoides) and at the Department of Veterinary Science, University of Pisa, Italy (lab. 3, A. reconditum).
To estimate size variations in relation to time, microfilariae in two samples concentrated by the modified Knott’s technique were measured repeatedly after intervals of 30 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, 24 hours, 7 days, 18 days, 31 days, 45 days, and 105 days (storage of concentrated material at 4°C) by two independent operators in labs 1 and 2.
All samples had been identified to species level by demonstrating the characteristic acid phosphatase activity patterns. The Leucognost SP® kit was used according to the manufacturer’s recommendations to demonstrate acid phophatase activity patterns in the mf. The fourteen A. reconditum positive samples were additionally stained histochemically, as no experience with Leucognost SP® exists for this species as yet.
Heartworm antigen detection tests were carried out on all blood samples (FASTest® Hw Ag.; MegaCor or DiroCHEK®, Synbiotics). To confirm species identification by acid phosphatase activity, 6 samples with D. immitis, 4 with D. repens, 7 with A. dracunculoides and 14 with A. reconditum were investigated by PCR, and sequencing confirmed the species identification in all cases.
Results and discussion
Measures (μm) of microfilariae determined after fixation with the modified Knott’s technique
Microfilariae species identified by histochemical staining and partially confirmed by PCRa
Total number and origin of dogs
Mean length ± standard deviation (μm)
Mean width ± standard deviation (μm)
60 (GR 1; IT 6; PT 33; ES 16; TR 2; UO 2)
301.77 ± 6.29
6.30 ± 0.26
171 (BG 1; FR 1; GR 5; IT 10; RO 3; ES 2; HU 141; UO 8)
369.44 ± 10.76
8.87 ± 0.58
133 (PT 69; ES 55; UO 9)
259.43 ± 6.69
5.09 ± 0.47
13 (IT 13)
264.83 ± 5.47
4.63 ± 0.52
Microfilariae of D. repens were 369 μm in length and 9 μm in width, with a conical front end and curved caudal end. For A. dracunculoides, the mf length was 259 μm and the width 5 μm. The front was round, the end of the tail was straight. Mf of A. reconditum had a mean length of 265 μm and a mean width of 5 μm. The front end was blunt, the rear end showed a small hook. In one blood sample, a mixed infection with D. immitis and A. dracunculoides was detected. In this case, circulating D. immitis-antigens could be demonstrated and, after staining with the Leucognost SP® kit, most of the mf were identified as A. dracunculoides and a lower number as D. immitis. However, only A. dracunculoides-DNA was detected by PCR in this sample. Another dog was positive for D. repens and A. reconditum; in this case histochemical staining and PCR identified both species. These two samples were excluded from the morphometric analyses (Table 1).
In accordance with the expected acidic phosphatase activity patterns[5, 8, 9], D. immitis mf displayed two spots (excretory and anal pores), D. repens one spot (anal pore) and A. dracunculoides three areas of enzymatic activity (anal pore, internal body, excretory pore) when stained with the Leucognost SP® kit. Using this kit, acid phosphatase activity could not be demonstrated in any of the A. reconditum mf. A technical failure of the kit could be excluded since D. immitis specimens were included in the staining runs and always gave results as expected. When stained histochemically, A. reconditum mf showed a diffuse light red pattern. The reason why A. reconditum mf were not stained by Leucognost SP® is not clear, and more experience with this kit applied to A. reconditum is needed. Circulating D. immitis antigens could be demonstrated in all samples containing mf of this species. All other samples, except for one case where A. dracunculoides mf were detected, were negative with this test. PCR and sequencing confirmed the species identification in all cases.
The measures found in our study agree well with the results of comparable studies[5, 10, 11]. In a survey of 351 dogs, mf of D. immitis were reported to be 311.3 ± 9.5 μm long and 5.96 ± 0.15 μm wide, D. repens 366.2 ± 12.1 × 6.40 ± 0.3 and A. reconditum 265.2 ± 10.1 × 5.01 ± 0.49. The latter species has recently been reported with a mean length of 273.1±9.4 and a mean width of 5.4 ± 0.2. In another study, the length of D. repens mf isolated by the modified Knott’s technique from blood samples of 8 Romanian dogs had been reported to vary between 300.3 ± 38.0 and 342.8 ± 18.1. The obvious difference to our measurements cannot be fully explained. However, the authors solely used morphological criteria for species identification without confirmation by additional histochemical or molecular methods. Regarding A. dracunculoides, our results correspond to a study in which the mean size of 150 microfilariae from 14 positive dogs was 256.5 ± 9.2 × 5.5 ± 0.5. The microfilariae of A. dracuculoides are slightly shorter than A. reconditum, as reported in dogs in this study (Table 1) and in as well as in foxes[14, 15].
In recent publications[16, 17] or guidelines, broader size ranges are reported. This could partly be due to the influence of examination methods. Air-drying and methanol fixation as used for Giemsa staining will affect size in a different way than the formalin treatment of the Knott’s technique. In a recent study, the mean length of Giemsa-stained D. immitis and D. repens mf in thin blood films was shown to be significantly shorter than after applying the Knott’s test.
Other species of canine filariae, such as Cercopithifilaria spp., present microfilariae in the dermis, thus they do not represent a real issue in the differential diagnosis of mf circulating in blood. Furthermore, the length of Cercopithifilaria spp. mf significantly differs from the length of Dirofilaria and Acanthocheilonema spp. mf.
The Knott’s technique has several advantages. It is easy to perform, rapid and inexpensive, it conserves mf morphology and size, and it enhances the sensitivity of mf detection in blood samples. Courtney and Zeng showed that only in 80.9% of the samples in which D. immitis mf had been detected by the Knott’s test, the parasites could also be found in direct smears and that the sensitivity of the direct smear was especially low in samples with less than 10 mf per ml. This is of particular relevance for A. dracunculoides and A. reconditum mf, since the average number of mf/ml is usually low in these species[10, 11, 13].
Considering the recent spread of canine filarial infections, particularly of D. repens, from southern to more northern and eastern European areas[21, 22], the increased importance of canine travel medicine due to tourism with pets and the import of dogs from eastern and southern endemic European countries to central Europe, the diagnosis of filarial infections in dogs is becoming more and more important.
The morphometric analysis proved to be a very useful, quick and inexpensive diagnostic tool and it represents the first step in the diagnosis of filarial infections. However, the discrimination between different species can be challenging in cases of mixed infections[17, 24] or in cases with low parasitaemia. In these cases, as well as in cases where discrimination between Acanthocheilonema spp. is required, molecular methods (e. g. PCR[7, 25]) or histochemical staining[5, 6] are required.
- Genchi C, Kramer LH, Rivasi F: Dirofilarial infections in Europe. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011, 10: 1307-1317.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bredal WP, Gjerde B, Eberhard ML, Aleksandersen M, Wilhelmsen DK, Mansfield LS: Adult Dirofilaria repens in a subcutaneous granuloma on the chest of a dog. J Small Anim Pract. 1998, 39: 595-597. 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1998.tb03715.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lindemann BA, Evans TL, McCall JW: Clinical responses of dogs to experimentally induced Dipetalonema reconditum infection. Am J Vet Res. 1983, 44: 2170-2172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huynh T, Thean J, Maini R: Dipetalonema reconditum in the human eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001, 85: 1391-1392.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chalifoux L, Hunt RD: Histochemical differentiation of Dirofilaria immitis and Dipetalonema reconditum. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1971, 5: 601-605.Google Scholar
- Peribanez MA, Lucientes J, Arce S, Morales M, Castillo JA, Gracia MJ: Histochemical differentiation of Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilaria repens and Acanthocheilonema dracunculoides microfilariae by staining with a commercial kit, Leucognost-SP®. Vet Parasitol. 2001, 102: 173-175. 10.1016/S0304-4017(01)00516-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rishniw M, Barr SC, Simpson KW, Frongillo MF, Franz M, Dominguez Alpizar JL: Discrimination between six species of canine microfilariae by a single polymerase chain reaction. Vet Parasitol. 2006, 135: 303-314. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.10.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Balbo T, Abate O: Histochemical differentiation of microfilariae of Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilaria repens and Dipetalonema sp. Parassitologia. 1972, 14: 240-244.Google Scholar
- Ortega-Mora LM, Gomez-Bautista M, Rojo-Vazquez FA: The acid phosphatase activity and the morphological characteristic of Dipetalonema dracunculoides (Cobbold, 1870) microfilariae. Vet Parasitol. 1989, 33: 187-190. 10.1016/0304-4017(89)90066-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cringoli G, Rinaldi L, Veneziano V, Capelli G: A prevalence survey and risk analysis of filariasis in dogs from the Mt. Vesuvius area of southern Italy. Vet Parasitol. 2001, 102: 243-252. 10.1016/S0304-4017(01)00529-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brianti E, Gaglio G, Napoli E, Giannetto S, Dantas-Torres F, Bain O, Otranto D: New insights into the ecology and biology of Acanthocheilonema reconditum (Grassi, 1889) causing canine subcutaneous filariosis. Parasitology. 2012, 139: 530-536. 10.1017/S0031182011002198.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ciocan R, Dărăbuş G, Igna V: Morphometric study of microfilariae of Dirofilaria spp. on dogs. Bull UASVM Vet Med. 2010, 67: 45-49.Google Scholar
- Giannetto S, Poglayen G, Gaglio G, Brianti E, Ferlazzo M, Giudice E: Dipetalonema dracunculoides (Nematoda: Onchocercidae): first report for Italian dogs. Parasite. 2003, 10: 188-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marconcini A, Magi M, Macchioni G, Sassetti M: Filariosis in foxes in Italy. Vet Res Commun. 1996, 20: 316-319. 10.1007/BF00366537.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Magi M, Macchioni F, Dell’Omodarme M, Prati MC, Calderini P, Gabrielli S, Iori A, Cancrini G: Endoparasites of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in central Italy. J Wild Dis. 2009, 45: 881-885.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Otranto D, Brianti E, Dantas-Torres F, Weigl S, Latrofa MS, Gaglio G, Cauquil L, Giannetto S, Bain O: Morphological and molecular data on the dermal microfilariae of a species of Cercopithifilaria from a dog in Sicily. Vet Parasitol. 2011, 182: 221-229. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Traversa D, Di Cesare A, Conboy G: Canine and feline cardiopulmonary parasitic nematodes in Europe: emerging and underestimated. Parasit Vectors. 2010, 3: 62-10.1186/1756-3305-3-62.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- ESCCAP Guideline 5: Control of Vector-Borne Diseases in Dogs and Cats. 2012,http://www.esccap.org/uploads/file/ESCCAP%20Guidelines%20GL5%2001Oct2012.pdf, Second,Google Scholar
- Liotta JL, Sandhu GK, Rishniw M, Bowman DD: Differentiation of the microfilariae of Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in stained blood films. J Parasitol. in pressGoogle Scholar
- Courtney CH, Zeng QY: Relationship between microfilaria count and sensitivity of the direct smear for diagnosis of canine dirofilariosis. Vet Parasitol. 2001, 94: 199-204. 10.1016/S0304-4017(00)00377-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Genchi C, Rinaldi L, Mortarino M, Genchi M, Cringoli G: Climate and Dirofilaria infection in Europe. Vet Parasitol. 2009, 163: 286-292. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.03.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kramer L, Kartashev VV, Grandi G, Morchón R, Nagornii SA, Karanis P, Simón F: Human subcutaneous dirofilariasis in Russia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007, 13: 150-152.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deplazes P, Staebler S, Gottstein B: Travel medicine of parasitic diseases in the dog. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2006, 148: 447-461. 10.1024/0036-72220.127.116.117.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Magi M, Guardone L, Prati MC, Tozzini G, Torracca B, Monni G, Macchioni F: Canine filarial infections in Tuscany, central Italy. J Helminthol. 2012, 86: 113-116. 10.1017/S0022149X11000113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Latrofa MS, Weigl S, Dantas-Torres F, Annoscia G, Traversa D, Brianti E, Otranto D: A multiplex PCR for the simultaneous detection of species of filarioids infesting dogs. Acta Trop. 2012, 122: 150-154. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.01.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.