- Open Access
The effects of oviposition-site deprivation on longevity and bloodfeeding rate in Anopheles gambiae
© Artis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
- Received: 24 November 2013
- Accepted: 15 March 2014
- Published: 3 April 2014
The African malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae, needs surface water in order to lay their eggs. In many parts of Africa, there are dry periods varying from days to months in length when suitable larval sites are not available and female mosquitoes experience oviposition-site deprivation (OSD). Previous studies have shown that egg-laying and egg-hatching rates were reduced due to OSD. Here, we assessed its effect on longevity and bloodfeeding rate of Anopheles gambiae. We predicted that OSD will increase mosquito longevity and the aptitude of mosquitoes to take additional blood meals; importantly, these changes will increase its vectorial capacity.
To measure the effect of OSD, four treatments were utilized: two oviposition-deprived groups, one of which was bloodfed once (OBOD) and one that was bloodfed weekly (MBOD); a non-oviposition-deprived, weekly bloodfed control group (MBC); and a blood-deprived age-control group (BD). Mortality was assessed daily and bloodfeeding rate was measured at weekly intervals.
Under OSD, survival of female A. gambiae was reduced by 10-20%, reflecting reduction of the MBOD and OBOD groups from the MBC group, respectively. Likewise, bloodfeeding response during three weeks of OSD was reduced but the reduction varied as a function of time from the last blood meal.
These results indicate that OSD is expected to reduce A. gambiae vectorial capacity and that OSD alone does not act as cue used by female mosquitoes to switch into a dormant state of extended survivorship with reproductive quiescence.
- African malaria mosquito
- Dry season
- Vectorial capacity
The African malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae, needs surface water in order to lay eggs. In many areas, larval sites are unavailable during short and long dry spells when mosquitoes endure oviposition-site deprivation (OSD). The effects of OSD on the mosquito and her capacity to transmit disease are poorly understood. In areas such as the Sahel, when no larval sites are available during the dry season for two to seven months, mosquitoes must ensure their survival until the resumption of rains [1–4]. Possibly, OSD may play a role in extending longevity by shifting mosquito physiology into a reproductively depressed state [5, 6]. The longer a female mosquito survives, the higher the risk she poses in terms of malaria transmission [7–10]. Infection of the vector requires at least one bloodmeal followed by oviposition (gonotrophic cycle), and disease transmission further requires survival of the female for enough time to become infectious before she can inoculate the pathogen into a new host [10, 11].
The effects of OSD on mosquito reproduction was previously assessed in Aedes aegypti[12, 13], Aedes sollicitans, Culex fatigans, Culex quinquefasciatus, Anopheles phareoensis, and Anopheles maculatus. These studies reported that A. aegypti[13, 15] and C. fatigans were less affected by OSD than were A. maculatus and A. pharoensis, yet they all exhibited depressed reproductive output. Similar to the other anophelines studied, A. gambiae was found to be sensitive to short-term OSD, since even one or two weeks of OSD dramatically reduced its egg-batch size and egg-hatching rate . The longer the female was subjected to OSD, the greater these effects were . The authors also found that supplemental bloodmeals diminished the effect of OSD by partially restoring both oviposition rate and embryonic development, resulting in a partially rescued hatch rate.
Despite its possible relevance for modulating vectorial capacity, to the best of our knowledge, the effect of OSD on female bloodfeeding rate and longevity has not been assessed in A. gambiae or in other mosquito species. We hypothesized that oviposition-deprived females, especially those with access to bloodmeals, would live longer than non-oviposition-deprived controls, because they could potentially allocate more nutrients into “maintenance” and avoid the direct and indirect costs of reproduction . Additionally, OSD may act as a signal to shift mosquito physiology into short- or long-term dormancy geared to extend survival [1, 2, 6, 19]. We also predicted that the oviposition-deprived females would take more frequent blood meals to lessen the impact of OSD, as suggested by Dieter and colleagues , and that multiply bloodfed OSD females would survive longer than both the non-deprived females (control) and once-bloodfed oviposition-deprived females. Here, we test these hypotheses in a laboratory colony of A. gambiae, extending our previous study .
Four treatments were used to assess the effects of OSD separate from the effects of age and bloodmeals (see Figure 1). In the once-bloodfed oviposition-deprived (OBOD) treatment, mosquitoes were bloodfed during the first feeding cycle and then sugar-fed for the rest of the experiment without receiving water for oviposition. The other OSD group received weekly bloodfeedings without receiving water for oviposition (multiple-bloodfed oviposition-deprived, hereafter MBOD). To simulate the normal mosquito life-cycle, we had a multiple-bloodfed non-oviposition-deprived control group (MBC) that received weekly bloodfeedings and water for oviposition. Finally, we had a blood-deprived (BD) age control treatment that did not receive bloodmeals or water for oviposition. After the initial bloodfeeding at 5 days of age, the MBOD and MBC groups were bloodfed every 7 days (see Figure 1). However, unfed mosquitoes were not removed subsequent to the first blood meal (above). Estimates of feeding rate by counting 30 mosquitoes in one sector of the cage were over 85%. In our insectary, the gonotrophic cycle of the G3 colony is four days long and it is routinely maintained by feeding on a weekly basis. To maximize oviposition and bloodfeeding receptivity, we provided egg dishes on days four and five post-feeding while blood-feeding was offered on a weekly basis.
To assess bloodfeeding rate, a weekly bloodfeeding assay was performed with 7 mosquitoes from each cage (excluding the BD) prior to each of the first four bloodfeedings. These mosquitoes were put into pint-size paper cups for 4 hours to adjust before they were given an opportunity to bloodfeed on a chicken for 5 minutes. The mosquitoes were killed by freezing and then smeared on white paper to check for the presence of blood; the number that bloodfed was recorded for each group. To measure mosquito longevity, dead mosquitoes were removed daily and preserved in tubes filled with 80% ethanol.
Wing length as a proxy of body size was measured after removing one wing from each specimen and mounting the wing in glycerol. Pictures of the wings were taken at 25× magnification using a Leica DM 4500B microscope and wing length was measured as previously described . The wing-length measurements were obtained for one-quarter of the mosquitoes from each cage (approximately 32 per cage, totaling 354 mosquitoes). To eliminate selection bias by age, mosquitoes were sorted by longevity and every fourth specimen was selected for measurement.
Differences in body size (measured as wing length) among groups was evaluated using univariate ANOVA implemented by Proc GLM in SAS . To assess the effect of body size on longevity and the heterogeneity of slopes reflecting treatment-specific size effects, we used an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) by including group, body size, and their interaction, implemented by the same procedure. Differences in survival (longevity) were visualized and tested using a Wilcoxon test in Proc Lifetest . Mosquitoes that were lost or removed from the longevity experiment and those subjected to the bloodfeeding assay (above) were treated as censored individuals. Calculation of the expected longevity incorporated censored mosquitoes. A statistically significant global test including all four treatments was followed by all unique pairwise tests (total of 6 tests). The sequential Bonferroni test  was then used to accommodate the number of tests in the decision regarding the significance of each individual test. Differences between treatments in bloodfeeding response were assessed after pooling the seven mosquitoes from different cages (within treatment) to increase the sample size to 21/treatment/assay. Here, we assume that variation between cages of the same treatment is negligible compared with that between treatments. A total of 4 assays were conducted at ages 5, 12, 19, and 26 d, reflecting pre-OSD and 1, 2, and 3 weeks of OSD, respectively. Each assay was subjected to a global test to determine if bloodfeeding rates were different across the three treatments using an exact test implemented by permutation of χ2 tests in Proc Freq (SAS). Only if the global test was significant (P < 0.05), three additional pairwise tests were performed to determine which treatments differed from each other using the same (exact) test. The sequential Bonferroni test  was then used to accommodate the number of tests in the decision regarding the significance of each individual test.
This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All animal procedures were approved by the National Institutes of Health Animal Care and Use Committee (ACUC, Protocol ID: LMVR102).
Body-size variation within and between treatments and measures of the effect of body size on longevity
Once-bloodfed oviposition-deprived (OBOD)
Multiple-bloodfed oviposition-deprived (MBOD)
Multiple-bloodfed non-oviposition-deprived control (MBC)
Blood-deprived age control (BD)
These results also suggest that OSD by itself does not serve as a cue used by mosquitoes to switch their physiology from reproduction to long-term survival. It is consistent with the aestivation (dry-season diapause) hypothesis, which unlike quiescence, requires token environmental stimuli such as changing photoperiod to anticipate the coming hardship rather than responding to the hardship as it unfolds [25–28]. Accordingly, the presumably aestivating A. coluzzii ( previously known as the M-form of A. gambiae) has been observed to nearly disappear from villages approximately one month before the larval sites disappear [1, 2, 6, 19]. These results provide evidence that OSD does not act as the cue for dormancy or that quiescence is involved. However, it is possible that OSD may be important in maintaining the state of dormancy of females already dormant.
Oviposition-site deprivation was shown to reduce egg-batch size and hatch rate in A. aegypti, A. albopictus, C. quinquefasciatus, A. maculatus, A. pharoensis, and A. gambiae[5, 12, 14–17]. The effects of OSD were manifested as early as 2 days (A. pharoensis) and 7 days (A. gambiae) to as high as 70 days (A. albopictus and C. quinquefasciatus). Thus, anopheline species appear more sensitive to shorter-term OSD as measured by their egg-batch size and hatch rate. The lack of oviposition sites can cause mosquitoes to retain and reabsorb their eggs . Partly degraded eggs were observed in our previous study , although additional bloodmeals diminished the reduction in egg-batch size and hatch rate, leading to the hypothesis that bloodfeeding rate is elevated in females subjected to OSD. Contrary to this hypothesis, the present results suggest that bloodfeeding rate was reduced.
Degradation of eggs appears to be a very costly process in A. gambiae, using nearly all of the resources that were invested in egg development or reducing survivorship irrespective of the available resources (e.g., elevated oxidative stress), because supplemental blood meals had limited improvements on survivorship (present study) or reproduction success . Whether species and populations inhabiting areas subjected to frequent or rare dry spells vary in their response is of much interest and cannot be inferred from a study on a laboratory colony.
Because the range of A. gambiae s.l. includes dry regions where short and long dry spells are common, its high sensitivity to short-term OSD is surprising. Here, we extend previous studies showing that 7–14 days OSD dramatically reduce A. gambiae’s reproductive output and show that its sensitivity to OSD includes reduced longevity and reduced bloodfeeding rates. It is therefore concluded that vectorial capacity of A. gambiae is diminished by OSD. Further, OSD alone probably does not act as a cue to switch its physiology from maximizing reproductive output to maximizing survival. However, our experiments were conducted with a laboratory-adapted colony of tropical origin (G3) and may not reflect the responses of natural mosquitoes from populations that experience extended OSD on a regular basis, such as many Sahelian populations of A. coluzzii and Sudanese Anopheles arabiensis. Thus, additional work is required to assess variation in the response to OSD in populations that frequently experience short-term OSD as well as in those that experience extended OSD regularly.
The authors thank A. Laughinghouse and K. Lee for insectary support and B. St. Laurent and K. Dieter, and 2 anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on prior versions of this manuscript. This study was supported by the Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health. M. Artis was supported in part by the NIAID INRO Fellowship Program.
- Adamou A, Dao A, Timbine S, Kassogue Y, Yaro AS, Diallo M, Traore SF, Huestis DL, Lehmann T: The contribution of aestivating mosquitoes to the persistence of Anopheles gambiae in the Sahel. Malar J. 2011, 10: 151-10.1186/1475-2875-10-151.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lehmann T, Dao A, Yaro AS, Adamou A, Kassogue Y, Diallo M, Sekou T, Coscaron-Arias C: Aestivation of the African malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae, in the Sahel. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010, 83: 601-606. 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0779.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Omer SM, Cloudsley-Thompson JL: Dry season biology of Anopheles gambiae Giles in the Sudan. Nature. 1968, 217: 879-880. 10.1038/217879a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Omer SM, Cloudsley-Thompson JL: Survival of female Anopheles gambiae Giles through a 9-month dry season in Sudan. Bull WHO. 1970, 42: 319-330.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dieter KL, Huestis DL, Lehmann T: The effects of oviposition-site deprivation on Anopheles gambiae reproduction. Parasites Vectors. 2012, 5: 235-10.1186/1756-3305-5-235.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yaro AS, Traore AI, Huestis DL, Adamou A, Timbine S, Kassogue Y, Diallo M, Dao A, Traore SF, Lehmann T: Dry-season reproductive depression of Anopheles gambiae in the Sahel. J Insect Physiol. 2012, 58: 1050-1059. 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.04.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kittayapong P, Edman JD, Harrison BA, Delorme DR, Mahidol University BT: Female body size, parity, and malaria infection of Anopheles maculatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in peninsular Malaysia. J Med Entomol. 1992, 29: 379-383.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lyimo EO, Koella JC: Relationship between body size of adult Anopheles gambiae s.l. and infection with the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Parasitology. 1992, 104: 233-237. 10.1017/S0031182000061667.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clements AN: The Biology of Mosquitoes, Volume 1. 1992, London: Chapman & HallGoogle Scholar
- Garrett-Jones C, Shidrawi GR: Malaria vectorial capacity of a population of Anopheles gambiae: an exercise in epidemiological entomology. Bull WHO. 1969, 40: 531-545.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bentley MD, Day JF: Chemical ecology and behavioral-aspects of mosquito oviposition. Ann Rev Entomol. 1989, 34: 401-421. 10.1146/annurev.en.34.010189.002153.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Woke PA: Deferred oviposition in Aedes aegypti (Linn.). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1955, 48: 39-46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chadee DD: Effects of forced egg-retention on the oviposition patterns of female Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Bull Entomol Res. 1997, 87: 649-651. 10.1017/S000748530003875X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wearne HM, Shisler JK: Stressed versus unstressed oviposition patterns in the saltmarsh mosquito, Aedes sollicitans (Walker) (Diptera: Culicidae). Proc Annu Meet NJ Mosq Control Assoc. 1989, 76: 115-119.Google Scholar
- McDonald JL, Lu LC: Viability of mosquito eggs produced by female mosquitoes denied ovipositing sites. Mosq News. 1972, 32: 463-466.Google Scholar
- Yang P: Effect of oviposition-site deprivation on oviposition performance and egg hatch rate of naturally blood–fed gravid Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). Proc Hawaii Entomol Soc. 2008, 40: 51-54.Google Scholar
- El-Akad AS, Humphreys JG: Factors affecting oviposition and egg production in laboratory-reared Anopheles pharoensis Theobald. Bull Soc Vector Ecol. 1988, 13: 243-247.Google Scholar
- Dao A, Kassogue Y, Adamou A, Diallo M, Yaro AS, Traore SF, Lehmann T: Reproduction-longevity trade-off in Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 2010, 47: 769-777. 10.1603/ME10052.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huestis DL, Yaro AS, Traore AI, Dieter KL, Nwagbara JI, Bowie AC, Adamou A, Kassogue Y, Diallo M, Timbine S, Dao A, Lehmann T, Dao A, Lehmann T: Seasonal variation in metabolic rate, flight activity and body size of Anopheles gambiae in the Sahel. J Exp Biol. 2012, 215: 2013-2021. 10.1242/jeb.069468.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huestis DL, Yaro AS, Traore AI, Adamou A, Kassogue Y, Diallo M, Timbine S, Dao A, Lehmann T: Variation in metabolic rate of Anopheles gambiae and A. arabiensis in a Sahelian village. J Exp Biol. 2011, 214: 2345-2353. 10.1242/jeb.054668.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- SAS Inc: SAS for Windows Version 9.2. 2010, Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1Google Scholar
- Holm S: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979, 6: 65-70.Google Scholar
- Ameneshewa B, Service MW, National Organization for Control of Malaria and Other V-B, Diseases AAE: The relationship between female body size and survival rate of the malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis in Ethiopia. Med Vet Entomol. 1996, 10: 170-172. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1996.tb00724.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gary RE, Foster WA: Effects of available sugar on the reproductive fitness and vectorial capacity of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 2001, 38: 22-28. 10.1603/0022-2585-38.1.22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Denlinger DL: Dormancy in tropical insects. Ann Rev Entomol. 1986, 31: 239-264. 10.1146/annurev.en.31.010186.001323.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tauber MJ, Tauber CA: Insect seasonality: diapause maintenance, termination, and postdiapause development. Ann Rev Entomol. 1976, 21: 81-107. 10.1146/annurev.en.21.010176.000501.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tauber MJ, Tauber CA, Masaki S: Seasonal Adaptations of Insects. 1986, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Masaki S: Summer diapause. Ann Rev Entomol. 1980, 25: 1-25. 10.1146/annurev.en.25.010180.000245.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smartt CT, Richards SL, Anderson SL, Vitek CJ: Effects of forced egg retention on the temporal progression of West Nile Virus infection in Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). Environ Entomol. 2010, 39: 190-194. 10.1603/EN09172.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.