Open Access

Thermal limits of two biting midges, Culicoides imicola Kieffer and C. bolitinos Meiswinkel (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae)

  • F Arné Verhoef1Email author,
  • Gert J Venter2 and
  • Christopher W Weldon1
Parasites & Vectors20147:384

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-384

Received: 24 June 2014

Accepted: 8 August 2014

Published: 20 August 2014

Abstract

Background

Culicoides imicola Kieffer and Culicoides bolitinos Meiswinkel (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) are both of veterinary importance, being vectors of Schmallenberg, bluetongue and African horse sickness (AHS) viruses. Within South Africa, these Culicoides species show a marked difference in their abundances according to altitude, with C. imicola highly abundant in lower altitudes, but being replaced as the dominant species by C. bolitinos in cooler, high-altitude regions.

Methods

The thermal physiology of field collected adults of each species was determined to evaluate whether it could account for differences in their distribution and abundance. Critical thermal maxima (CTmax) and minima (CTmin), as well as upper and lower lethal temperatures (ULT and LLT) were assessed after acclimation temperatures of 19ˌC, 24ˌC and 29ˌC. Critical thermal limits were determined using an ecologically relevant rate of temperature change of 0.06ˌC.min−1.

Results

Significant differences in CTmin and CTmax were found between acclimation temperatures for C. imicola and C. bolitinos. In C. bolitinos, the LLT of individuals acclimated at 24ˌC was significantly improved (LLT50 = −6.01ˌC) compared with those acclimated at the other temperatures (LLT50 = −4ˌC). Acclimation had a weak (difference in LLT50 of only 1ˌC) but significant effect on the LLT of C. imicola. When CTmin, CTmax, LLT and ULT were superimposed on daily maximum and minimum temperature records from locations where each tested Culicoides species is dominant, it was found that temperatures frequently declined below the CTmin and LLT of C. imicola at the location where C. bolitinos was dominant.

Conclusions

The distribution and abundance of C. imicola is likely directly constrained by their relatively poor tolerance of lower temperatures. Results for C. bolitinos suggest that the adult phase is hardy, and it is hypothesised that the thermal biology of other life stages could determine their range.

Keywords

Bluetongue African horse sickness Orbiviruses Phenotypic plasticity Thermal biology Tolerance limits

Background

Biting midges in the genus Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) are incredibly abundant, small flies (ranging from 1–4 mm). Female biting midges feed on vertebrate blood, and in so doing, act as vectors of up to 66 viruses that affect animals including humans [1, 2]. At least three of these viruses, namely bluetongue (BTV), epizootic haemorrhagic disease, and African horse sickness (AHSV) viruses, all belonging within the genus Orbivirus (Reoviridae), cause diseases of such international significance in livestock that they have been classified as notifiable to the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). The rapid spread of BTV in Europe, outbreaks of AHSV in Spain since 1987 [3], and recent outbreaks of a novel orthobunyavirus, Schmallenberg virus [4, 5], has demonstrated the devastating effect of these viruses on naïve livestock populations. Due to the emergence and over-wintering potential of these viruses in Europe, whereby novel European Culicoides species have been incriminated as the vector [6], there is an increased interest in the vector competence and ecology of Culicoides species [7]. Similarly, in sub-Saharan Africa where AHS is endemic and widespread, long term economic losses have resulted from export embargoes on horses as well as direct loss of livestock [8]. The population dynamics of Culicoides species are markedly influenced by environmental conditions [9]. On account of these factors, there is a need to understand the biotic and abiotic drivers of Culicoides distribution and abundance.

Two Culicoides species have been implicated in the transmission of BTV and AHSV in southern Africa, namely C. imicola and C. bolitinos. Culicoides (Avaritia) imicola Kieffer is one of the most widely distributed members of Culicoides in the world, extending over the African continent into southern Europe and eastwards to south China [10, 11]. Based on its wide geographical distribution and host preference for larger mammals, as indicated by the high numbers collected near livestock, C. imicola is considered the principal vector of AHSV, equine encephalosis virus and BTV in South Africa [12, 13] and BTV in southern Europe [14, 15]. Often found in great densities, with single trap captures able to reach 106 individuals [16], they may make up 99% of all Culicoides species collected near livestock in areas where they are abundant [10, 17]. The larvae develop in moist soils rich in organic matter, often in full sun. In years with above-average rainfall, a 200-fold increase in abundance may be observed [16] due to increased availability of breeding sites. In contrast, C. bolitinos Meiswinkel occurs in low numbers across sub-Saharan Africa, but can become the dominant species in cooler, high altitude regions [16, 18] such as the Free State province of South Africa, and Lesotho. In South Africa, Culicoides bolitinos was also shown to be abundant in the winter rainfall region of the Western Cape province [19, 20], and the dominant Culicoides species, in the absence of C. imicola, in the sandy dunefields adjoining Port Elizabeth in the Eastern Cape Province [21]. The absence of C. imicola at Port Elizabeth in light trap collections made at Struisbaai and Alexander Bay on the southern and western coastline was attributed to the sandiness of the soil [22]. Described in 1989 [11], C. bolitinos was identified as a potential vector of AHSV as recently as 1998 [16]. The larval cycle is completed in bovid dung (buffalo, domestic cattle and blue wildebeest) [11]. The abundance of C. bolitinos is thus affected by the availability of suitable dung, with the decomposition of dung potentially acting to incubate C. bolitinos larvae.

Despite the role of Culicoides species as potential vectors and their increased relevance to epidemiological research [23] little is known about their basic physiology. This is most likely due to their small size, nocturnal behaviour as well as ease of injury during handling, which has discouraged or hampered experimental manipulation [10]. As noted above, C. imicola and C. bolitinos show marked differences in abundance, seemingly according to regional climate. It is likely, therefore, that thermal physiology may be a determining factor in their distribution and abundance. Most of the physiological processes of insects are temperature-dependent [24] and thermal limits are significant for fitness because they determine the ability of an organism to remain active and survive during extreme conditions [25]. Extending from this tenet, thermal limits form a fundamental part of mechanistic niche modelling [26] that aid in the generation of distribution maps and risk management strategies. These distribution models are increasingly important with a changing climate, in order to assist in predicting future outbreaks or range expansions or to assess local changes in dominance of species [27]. Some work has been done on the role of temperature on the geographical distribution of Culicoides species [28], including C. imicola[2932], mainly through the use of climate envelope models. The effect of temperature on BTV replication within both C. imicola and C. bolitinos has also been investigated [33, 34]. However, the tolerance of these species to temperature extremes has never been established, and spatial models are coarse [23]. Knowledge of the thermal biology of these species may aid in understanding their population dynamics, particularly their distribution and abundance, and may even provide insight into the epidemiology of the arboviruses they transmit.

This study determined the thermal limits of adult C. imicola and C. bolitinos. Phenotypic plasticity in measured thermal tolerance traits was also determined. Results were related to the temperature conditions of locations within the known geographical distribution of these two livestock associated species.

Methods

Collections and study animals

Rearing Culicoides in the laboratory is extremely difficult [10], and due to unsuccessful rearing attempts during pilot studies, only the thermal limits of adult, field collected individuals were investigated in this study. All midges were collected using Onderstepoort light traps during March, April and October, 2013. Trap catches of both species are highly female biased, so all individuals tested using the methods outlined below were female. All C. imicola were trapped at ARC-Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Gauteng, South Africa (ARC-OVI; 25ˌ 39’ 2.58” S 28ˌ11’ 8.58” E; 1219 m a.s.l.). The Onderstepoort area is relatively frost-free with only a few days where the minimum temperature will fall below 0ˌC. Culicoides bolitinos were trapped on Koeberg farm near the Clarens Valley, Free State, South Africa (28ˌ 0’ 0” S, 28ˌ 31’ 0.12” E, 1631 m a.s.l.). Clarens regularly experiences minimum daily temperatures below freezing, with occasional snow in winter. Both species were transported in cool boxes to the Hatfield Campus of the University of Pretoria where they were housed as described by Venter et al. [35] and fed a 10% sucrose solution (in distilled water) from saturated cotton wool. Adult C. imicola and C. bolitinos were kept at acclimation temperatures of 19ˌC, 24ˌC and 29ˌC with a 12 L:12D photoperiod for three days before being subjected to thermal tolerance assays. In most cases, insects held at constant temperatures for a period of three days will exhibit phenotypic changes in thermal tolerance traits [36].

Temperature data from meteorological stations close to ARC-OVI (Pretoria-Arcadia, 30164, −25ˌ 44′ 18.8514″ S 28ˌ 12′ 26.3874″ E, 1400 m a.s.l) and Clarens (Golden Gate-Clarens, 30647, −28ˌ 30′ 13.716″ S 28ˌ 35′ 1.68″ E, 1849 m a.s.l) were obtained for the period 1st January 2011 until 31st October 2013 from the ARC-Institute for Soil, Climate and Water (Arcadia, South Africa). These data were used to determine the relevance of the thermal limits of both species.

Critical thermal limits

A dynamic, ramping temperature protocol was used to determine the critical thermal minimum (CTmin) and maximum (CTmax) for each species after having been exposed to the three acclimation temperatures. It has been reported that critical thermal limits vary with methodological context [37], so an ecologically relevant rate of change was determined and used. Little of the micro-habitat preference of adult C. imicola is known, except their heliophilic and exophilic nature [31]. Consequently, a known larval habitat and adult catch site was chosen. The appropriate rate of temperature change was determined using iButtons with a 0.5ˌC resolution housed in waterproof silicone enclosures (SL50-ACC06, Maxim, Dallas, TX, USA). The iButtons were buried just beneath the soil surface in two waterlogged areas, in full sun, at ARC-OVI. Emergence traps indicated this area to be a habitat for C. imicola. The mean daily temperature change of this microhabitat was found to be 0.06ˌCmin−1.

To determine critical thermal limits, individual midges were placed in an aluminium 8-chamber stage, made for use under a dissecting microscope (Additional file 1) and connected to a programmable circulating refrigerated waterbath (CC-K25, Huber Kältemaschinenbau, Offenburg, Germany). A 1:1 blend of propylene glycol and water was pumped through silicone tubing from the waterbath to the stage, through which a number of channels had been drilled to permit flow of liquid and the exchange of heat. Biting midges were placed in individual 0.2 mL plastic microcentrifuge tubes (430–11, WhiteSci, Bellville, South Africa) and subjected to a heating or cooling rate of 0.06ˌC.min−1 after a ten minute equilibration period at the start temperature of 24ˌC. Sample size for each treatment was n = 14 (two trials, each with n = 7). CTmin was defined as the point where muscle contraction ceased (i.e. cold stupor). CTmax was initially defined as the onset of muscle spasms [36]. However, no discernible difference between erratic movements due to discomfort or muscle spasms could be seen, and thus CTmax was redefined as the heat stupor point, when muscle contractions ceased. In both cases, midges were gently prodded with a horse hair attached to a wooden toothpick to ascertain an inability to move. A type-T thermocouple connected to an eight-channel temperature data logger (TC-08, Pico Technology, St. Neots, UK) was inserted into an empty tube to record temperature in the remaining chamber of the stage.

For each species, data were checked for equality of variances (Levene’s test) and inspected for normality. In all cases, the data met these assumptions. The effect of acclimation on both CTmin and CTmax were assessed by subjecting data to a one way analysis of variance. Post-hoc multiple comparisons were performed using Fisher’s LSD tests. Analyses were implemented using Statistica v. 7 (Statsoft, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA).

Upper and lower lethal temperatures

A static temperature, plunging protocol was adopted to determine lethal temperatures. Ten to 20 individuals from each species and acclimation temperature were placed in 2 ml centrifuge tubes, with 5 replicates per test temperature. The centrifuge tubes were sealed before being placed in a resealable plastic bag that was immersed in a programmable circulating refrigerated waterbath. The fluid (1:1 blend of propylene glycol and water) in the waterbath was held at a set test temperature. The midges were exposed to the test temperature for 2 hours, after which they were placed in a 70 mm Petri dish lined with a moistened 2 cm2 filter paper, and given 6 hours to recover. Survival was noted after the recovery period. Temperatures tested were: −6ˌC, −3ˌC and 0ˌC for lower lethal temperatures (LLT), and 36ˌC, 39ˌC and 42ˌC for upper lethal temperatures (ULT). Pilot studies indicated no temperature-related mortality above (for LLT) or below (for ULT) these temperatures and they were omitted. Complete mortality for C. bolitinos acclimated at 19 and 29ˌC was recorded at a test temperature of −6ˌC, and so tests at lower temperatures were performed on these flies. Culicoides bolitinos acclimated at 24ˌC survived below −6ˌC (100% mortality was recorded at −8ˌC) but this data was not included in analysis of LLT.

Generalised linear models with binomial distribution and logit link function were used to test the effect of test temperature, acclimation and the interaction between test temperature and acclimation on survival. Probit regression analyses were used to determine upper and lower median lethal temperatures (ULT50 and LLT50). All lethal temperature data analyses were performed in SPSS Statistics 21 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, USA).

Results

Critical thermal limits

Critical thermal limits for C. imicola responded significantly to acclimation (CTmin: F2,39 = 23.553; p < 0.0001; CTmax: F2,39 = 22.2; p < 0.0001) with an increase of 2.10ˌC in CTmin and 1.63ˌC for CTmax between acclimation temperatures of 19 and 29ˌC (Figure 1). Post hoc comparisons indicated that the CTmin of C. imicola from each acclimation temperature was significantly different from all other acclimation temperatures. For CTmax, C. imicola acclimated at 19ˌC and 24ˌC did not differ significantly from each other but both differed significantly from the individuals acclimated at 29ˌC.
Figure 1

Effect of acclimation on critical thermal maximum for (A) C. imicola and (B) C. bolitinos , and critical thermal minimum of (C) C. imicola and (D) C. bolitinos . In each case, the mean ± 1 S.E. is shown (n = 14). Means labelled with the same lowercase letter are not significantly different from each other at the 0.05 level (Fisher’s LSD).

For C. bolitinos, variation in critical thermal limits in response to acclimation was less pronounced than in C. imicola (Figure 1; CTmin: 1.37ˌC; CTmax: 1.30ˌC), but these differences were statistically significant (CTmin: F2,38 = 4.64907; p = 0.0156; CTmax: F2,39 = 11.3; p = 0.0001). Fisher’s LSD tests revealed that the CTmin between 19ˌC- and 24ˌC-acclimated individuals did not differ significantly, but both differed significantly from C. bolitinos acclimated at 29ˌC. For CTmax, the 24ˌC treatment was lowest and differed significantly from the 19ˌC- and 29ˌC-acclimated individuals, which did not differ significantly from each other.

Lethal temperatures

The interaction of LLT test temperatures and acclimation temperature had a significant effect on survival of both species (Table 1, Figure 2 A and B). Culicoides bolitinos acclimated to 24ˌC had the lowest LLT50 (−6.01ˌC), whereas those acclimated at 29ˌC had the highest LLT50 (−3.98ˌC). Parameter estimates relative to an acclimation temperature of 29ˌC were inspected and indicated that survival of C. bolitinos was significantly higher (p < 0.001) when acclimated at 24ˌC. LLT of those acclimated at 19ˌC and 29ˌC were not significantly different from each other. There was no significant effect of acclimation on the LLT of C. imicola. The LLT50 between acclimation treatments varied by 1ˌC, with the lowest estimated for 19ˌC (−4.39ˌC).
Table 1

Effects of temperature and acclimation on the thermal limits of Culicoides bolitinos and C. imicola

Species

Trait

Effect

Waldχ2

d.f.

p

C. bolitinos

ULT

Intercept

276.072

1

<0.0001

Acclimation

341.425

2

<0.0001

Temperature

5.826

1

0.016

Acclimation × Temperature

521.357

5

<0.0001

LLT

Intercept

59.813

1

<0.0001

Acclimation

37.235

2

<0.0001

Temperature

128.514

2

<0.0001

Acclimation × Temperature

107.761

4

<0.0001

C. imicola

ULT

Intercept

4.1

1

0.043

Acclimation

29.793

2

<0.0001

Temperature

63.892

2

<0.0001

Acclimation × Temperature

67.629

4

<0.0001

LLT

Intercept

167.244

1

<0.0001

Acclimation

6.978

2

0.031

Temperature

0.993

1

0.319

  

Acclimation × Temperature

425.118

4

<0.0001

Figure 2

Effect of test and acclimation temperature on survival of cohorts of C. imicola and C. bolitinos . Survival was assessed 6 hours after each cohort was exposed to the test temperature for 2 hours. (A) Survival at high temperatures by C. imicola; (B) survival at high temperatures by C. bolitinos; (C) survival at low temperatures by C. imicola; (D) survival at low temperatures by C. bolitinos. In each case, the mean ± 1 S.E. are shown (n = 5) for each test and acclimation temperature combination.

Interactions between acclimation and temperature were significant for the ULT of both species (Table 1) Upper lethal temperatures were generally similar for both species, (mean ULT50: C. imicola = 40.05ˌC; C. bolitinos = 40.39ˌC). No significant difference relative to 29ˌC was noted for 19ˌC-acclimated C. bolitinos, though individuals acclimated to 24ˌC did differ significantly from 29ˌC, with 24ˌC-acclimated C. bolitinos having the highest ULT50 (41.59ˌC). For C. imicola, parameter estimates relative to 29ˌC indicated a significant difference between the 19ˌC and 29ˌC acclimated flies but none between 24ˌC and 29ˌC. Culicoides imicola showed near-total mortality when exposed to 42ˌC, with only 5.3% of the 29ˌC treatment surviving, and 0% of the other treatments. Culicoides bolitinos showed similar mortality at 42ˌC, with 0% survival of 19ˌC and 29ˌC. The 24ˌC-acclimated C. bolitinos, however, had a survivorship of 26.13%, with complete mortality documented only when subjected to 44ˌC (Figure 2).

Discussion

Temperature is a determining factor in insect life history, and thermal tolerance plays a key role in determining insect distribution [24, 38, 39]. Critical thermal limits are valuable for determining the relative temperature tolerances of insects acclimated to different temperatures, or originating from different latitudinal and altitudinal ranges [40]. Typically critical thermal minima are more variable in response to acclimation than critical thermal maxima, both inter- and intra-specifically [41, 42]. Interspecific differences in our study agree with this notion, with the CTmax of C. imicola and C. bolitinos being similar (41.87ˌC SE ± 0.976, and 41.56ˌC SE ± 0.828 respectively), whilst the CTmin of C. imicola (1.61ˌC SE ± 1.175) is nearly a degree higher than that of C. bolitinos (0.65ˌC SE ± 1.117). For the Culicoides species tested in this study, expected intra-specific variation was found only for C. imicola, with acclimation at temperatures from 19 to 29ˌC leading to a change in CTmin of 2.10ˌC, but only 1.63ˌC for CTmax. In the case of C. bolitinos, while acclimation had a statistically significant effect on both CTmin and CTmax, the change in CTmin (1.37ˌC) was similar to that of CTmax (1.30ˌC). For C. imicola, CTmin changed in a stepwise manner, with approximately 1ˌC difference between acclimation temperatures. Culicoides bolitinos showed little variation between the two lower acclimation temperatures (<0.5ˌC), but the 29ˌC-acclimated midges showed a significant increase in CTmin, possibly because 24ˌC still falls within the optimal performance breadth for C. bolitinos, whereas 29ˌC might be considered an ‘extreme’ temperature that reduces performance (see Deere & Chown [43]).

Little difference in the upper lethal temperatures was found between C. imicola and C. bolitinos, highlighting limited variability in ULT. Similar to critical temperatures, it has previously been found that variability in lethal limits is greater at a family or generic level, with limited variability between species [44]. Upper thermal limits are also less pliable than lower limits, among species, populations, and over time (i.e. plasticity responses) [26, 42] Our study corroborates this, with little difference in survival of C. imicola and C. bolitinos at high temperatures.. However, our study also points to a dissimilar response of different species to experimental conditions, and possibly environmental variation, as suggested by Chown et al. [37]. Culicoides imicola had a clear response to acclimation, with prior exposure to high temperatures improving heat tolerance in a stepwise manner. This was not the case with C. bolitinos however, as individuals acclimated to 24ˌC outperformed both those acclimated at 19ˌC and 29ˌC. The relatively poor performance of C. bolitinos when exposed to high temperatures after acclimation at 29ˌC contrasts to the idea of the beneficial acclimation hypothesis, and may indicate a deleterious acclimation response. The deleterious acclimation hypothesis predicts substantial negative performance implications for individuals held at extreme temperatures, both relative to those at median temperatures and those that typically do not experience such extremes in the field [43]. Indeed, although not formally tested, C. bolitinos acclimated at 29ˌC exhibited higher mortality in holding cages, with no individuals surviving past a week in the laboratory, whereas conspecifics acclimated at 19ˌC and 24ˌC were capable of surviving in the laboratory for at least two weeks. Determining the degree to which stress proteins and other thermal protectants are up-regulated would provide clarification as to whether a temperature of 29ˌC is indeed detrimental [40], as would longevity and other performance assays.

Acclimation had no significant effect on the LLT of C. imicola, with LLT50 values similar for all acclimation temperatures (c. -4ˌC), and total mortality at −6ˌC. In contrast, acclimation had a significant effect on C. bolitinos, with the LLT50 for the 24ˌC-acclimated individuals reaching −6.01ˌC, but no significant difference between 19ˌC and 29ˌC was found. The deleterious acclimation hypothesis might once again explain the observed pattern, as would a mismatch between optimum temperatures and realised habitat. Another possibility may be the uncontrolled age and physiological state of the field-collected insects. To obtain sufficient numbers for all experiments it was necessary to collect additional individuals from the field by trapping on several occasions. Senescence has been suggested to reduce stress tolerance in insects [41]. This is supported by Luckinbill [44], who found longevity selection improved low temperature tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster[41]. Adult C. bolitinos, however, have an average life expectancy of approximately 20 days, but may survive up to 90 days [15]. Similarly, C. imicola adults can survive for more than 15 days and C. pycnostictus for 54 days at temperatures of −1.5ˌC [17]. Given that our collection methods were consistent and that the period of time that elapsed before testing was an equivalent proportion of the life expectancy of both species, we believe that our data are a true representation of the ability of C. imicola and C. bolitinos to withstand temperature extremes.

This study indicates that lower temperature limits may play a role in constraining the distribution of C. imicola. Modelling attempts often rely on a mean temperature threshold of 12.5ˌC to predict presence or absence of C. imicola[29, 45] as established by Purse et al. [46]. Peters et al. [45] on the other hand, found absence indicated by a mean temperature of 14.4ˌC and presence by a mean of 15.7ˌC. For the two years of weather data we analysed, Clarens had a mean annual temperature of 14.51ˌC, two degrees above the suggested thermal intercept suggested by Purse, but very close to that of Peters and colleagues. Furthermore, the suggested mean minimum temperature thresholds of Peters et al. (Absence: 9.4ˌC; Presence: 10.0ˌC) coincide strongly with the mean minimum temperatures of our study sites (Clarens: 8.67ˌC; Onderstepoort: 10.74ˌC). However, we propose that mean temperatures are only an indication of potential distribution, and it is extreme minimum temperatures reached that determine population persistence of C. imicola. The lowest temperature recorded for Clarens in 2012 was −8ˌC (Figure 3), with temperatures regularly below 0ˌC and often dropping below the LLT of adult C. imicola in winter. In tandem with a relatively high CTmin, it seems likely that the thermal environment in the areas surrounding Clarens may prevent adult C. imicola from surviving or establishing in any great abundance, concurring with the negative correlation found between C. imicola abundance and low winter temperatures [47]. In addition, it is highly likely that the low winter temperatures of Clarens and similar areas affect larval development and survival because the lower developmental threshold of larvae is ~11.75ˌC (calculated from [10]). Indeed, Baylis et al. [30] suggested that minimum temperatures determine the ability of the C. imicola to successfully overwinter as larvae (for one or two months [47]), as the larvae inhabit the O horizon and are easily affected by ambient temperature in the open habitats they prefer [31]. Furthermore, Legg et al. [48] suggested that median lower developmental thresholds are useful for determining phenology (and thus also distribution potential).
Figure 3

Daily temperature range for Onderstepoort and Clarens from the end of winter 2011, to end of winter 2013 (1 August 2011 – 31 July 2013). Horizontal lines represent thermal limits of C. imicola and C. bolitinos: ULT50 and CTmax of C. bolitinos and ULT50 of C. imicola (red); ULT50 of C. imicola (orange); CTmin of C. imicola (purple); LLT50 of C. imicola (magenta); CTmin of C. bolitinos (blue); LLT50 of C. bolitinos (light blue).

In the case of C. bolitinos it appears that the thermal limits of adults are not related to their distribution because their upper temperature tolerance is similar to that of C. imicola and they are tolerant of lower temperatures. It may be that the thermal limits of other life stages, especially the larvae, play an important role in limiting the abundance and distribution of C. bolitinos. In warmer environments where they are less abundant, the exothermic decomposition of dung could lead to dung temperatures too high for larvae to survive. Evidence for this scenario is currently not available, as when we placed iButtons in fresh dung, mean dung temperatures were isothermic with moderate ambient temperature (c. 14ˌC), making inference difficult. Non-lethal thermal stress effects could also explain their limited numbers in warmer regions. Scatophaga stercoraria, another dipteran with coprophagous larvae, displays temperature-mediated variation in egg size as a maternal physiological response [49]. In this study, Blanckenhorn [49] found reduced egg-size and reduced survivorship of offspring even at intermediate temperatures of 24ˌC. Similar stress effects could suppress populations of C. bolitinos in hotter environments. Modelling done on an allopatric, identical sister species C. brevitarsis in Australia found that mean maximum temperatures could predict BTV infection (and thus C. brevitarsis distribution) with an accuracy of ~75% [50]. Considering the notable similarity of C. bolitinos and C. brevitarsis in morphology, habitat and habit, it is possible that it could be similarly employed.

Conclusion

It appears that although factors such as precipitation and availability of breeding sites may affect C. imicola distribution and abundance, thermal limits play an important role in determining abundance and distribution of this species. Temperatures lower than the CTmin of C. imicola may prohibit its dominance in high-altitude areas or its expansion into more temperate climes. The presence of C. imicola in Clarens, even though at low abundance (<1% of all Culicoides spp. captured) [16], indicates that some individuals of this species may utilise protected microclimates to escape severe cold, similar to some European species that overwinter in stables [51]. Another possibility may be that C. imicola reinvades these areas annually, as Culicoides species have been known to travel long distances by wind-mediated dispersal [52]. The results for C. bolitinos are more complex, as adults of this species show a relative wide thermal performance breadth in comparison to C. imicola. Further research on the thermal biology of juvenile life stages is required to explain the more temperate distribution of C. bolitinos. Due to difficulty in rearing Culicoides in the laboratory, this resolution may prove to be logistically challenging. This study shows that thermal limits and tolerance varies between closely related species and that this may play a regulatory role in the presence and abundance of species. A better understanding of thermal phenomena may contribute to the creation of more realistic risk maps and the elucidation of the influence of climate change on the presence and expansion of viral diseases.

Abbreviations

AHSV: 

African horse sickness virus

BTV: 

Blue tongue virus

CTmin

Critical thermal minimum

CTmax

Critical thermal maximum

LLT: 

Lower lethal temperature

ULT: 

Upper lethal temperature.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The water-jacketed eight-chamber stage was kindly designed and built by Wietsche Penny and Schalk Els, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Pretoria. Weather data were kindly supplied by the ARC-Institute for Soil, Climate and Water. Light traps and other collection and rearing materials were made available to us by the ARC-Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute. We are grateful to the owners and staff of Koeberg Farm for providing access to and use of their facilities. Solomon Boikanyo and Steven Jones provided invaluable field assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Flies of Economic Significance Research Group, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria
(2)
ARC-Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute

References

  1. Borkent A: The Biting Midges, the Ceratopogonidae (Diptera). Biology of Disease Vectors. Edited by: Marquardt WC. 2005, San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press, 2Google Scholar
  2. Meiswinkel R, Venter G, Nevill E, Coetzer J, Tustin R: Infectious Diseases of Livestock, Volume One. Vectors: Culicoides spp. 2004, Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 93-136. 2Google Scholar
  3. Rodriguez M, Hooghuis H, Castano M: African horse sickness in Spain. Vet Microbiol. 1992, 33 (1): 129-142.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hoffmann B, Scheuch M, Höper D, Jungblut R, Holsteg M, Schirrmeier H, Eschbaumer M, Goller KV, Wernike K, Fischer M: Novel orthobunyavirus in Cattle, Europe, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012, 18 (3): 469-472. 10.3201/eid1803.111905.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Van den Brom R, Luttikholt S, Lievaart-Peterson K, Peperkamp N, Mars M, van der Poel W, Vellema P: Epizoötie uitbraak van congenital afwijkingen bij Schmallenbergvirus. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 2012, 137: 106-111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. de Vos C, Hoek C, Nodelijk G: Risk of introducing African horse sickness virus into the Netherlands by international equine movements. Prev Vet Med. 2012, 106 (2): 108-122. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.01.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Purse BV, Mellor PS, Rogers DJ, Samuel AR, Mertens PP, Baylis M: Climate change and the recent emergence of bluetongue in Europe. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005, 3 (2): 171-181. 10.1038/nrmicro1090.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sinclair M, Buhrmann G, Gummow B: An epidemiological investigation of the African horse sickness outbreak in the Western Cape Province of South Africa in 2004 and its relevance to the current equine export protocol. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2006, 77 (4): 191-196.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tilibaşa E, Dărăbuş G: Preliminary studies on dynamics of Culicoides spp. in western Romania in conjunction with some environmental factors. Parasite Vector. 2014, 7 (Suppl 1): O7-10.1186/1756-3305-7-S1-O7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Veronesi E, Venter G, Labuschagne K, Mellor P, Carpenter S: Life-history parameters of culicoides (avaritia) imicola kieffer in the laboratory at different rearing temperatures. Vet Parasitol. 2009, 163 (4): 370-373. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.04.031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Meiswinkel R: Afrotropical Culicoides: a redescription of C.(avaritia) imicola kieffer, 1913 (diptera: ceratopogonidae) with description of the closely allied C.(A.) bolitinos sp. nov. reared from the dung of the African buffalo, blue wildebeest and cattle in South Africa. Onderstepoort J Vet. 1989, 56 (1): 23-39.Google Scholar
  12. Nevill E, Venter G, Edwardes M: Potential Culicoides vectors of livestock orbiviruses in South Africa. Bluetongue, African horse sickness, and related orbiviruses: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium: 1992. 1992, CRC Press, Inc, 306-314.Google Scholar
  13. Paweska J, Venter G: Vector competence of Culicoides species and the seroprevalence of homologous neutralizing antibody in horses for six serotypes of equine encephalosis virus (EEV) in South Africa. Med Vet Entomol. 2004, 18 (4): 398-407. 10.1111/j.0269-283X.2004.00524.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mellor P, Walton T, Osburn B: Culicoides as Potential Orbivirus Vectors in Europe. Bluetongue, African horse sickness, and related orbiviruses: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium: 1992. 1992, CRC Press, Inc, 278-283.Google Scholar
  15. Mellor P, Boorman J, Baylis M: Culicoides biting midges: their role as arbovirus vectors. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000, 45 (1): 307-340. 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Meiswinkel R, Paweska J: Evidence for a new field Culicoides vector of African horse sickness in South Africa. Prev Vet Med. 2003, 60 (3): 243-253. 10.1016/S0167-5877(02)00231-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nevill E: Cattle and Culicoides biting midges as possible overwintering hosts of bluetongue virus. Onderstepoort J Vet. 1971, 38 (2): 65-Google Scholar
  18. Venter G, Meiswinkel R: The Virtual Absence of Culicoides Imicola (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in a Light-Trap Survey of the Colder, High-Lying Area of the Eastern Orange Free State, South Africa, and Implications for the Transmission of Arboviruses. Onderstepoort J Vet. 1994, 61 (4): 327-340.Google Scholar
  19. Nevill E, Venter G, Edwardes M, Pajor I, Meiswinkel R, Van Gas J: Culicoides species associated with livestock in the Stellenbosch area of the Western Cape Province, Republic of South Africa (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Onderstepoort J Vet. 1988, 55 (2): 101-106.Google Scholar
  20. Venter G, Nevill E, Van der Linde T: Geographical distribution and relative abundance of stock-associated culicoides species (diptera: ceratopogonidae) in southern Africa in relation to their potential as viral vectors. Onderstepoort J Vet. 1996, 63 (1): 25-Google Scholar
  21. Meiswinkel R: Discovery of a culicoides imicola-free zone in South Africa: preliminary notes and potential significance. Onderstepoort J Vet. 1997, 64: 43-Google Scholar
  22. Meiswinkel R, Labuschagne K, Baylis M, Mellor P: Multiple vectors and their differing ecologies: observations on two bluetongue and African horse sickness vector culicoides species in South Africa. Veter Ital. 2004, 40 (3): 297-Google Scholar
  23. Kirkeby C, Bødker R, Stockmarr A, Lind P: Spatial abundance and clustering of culicoides (diptera: ceratopogonidae) on a local scale. Parasite Vector. 2013, 6 (43): 1-14.Google Scholar
  24. Chown SL, Nicolson S: Insect Physiological Ecology: Mechanisms and Patterns. 2004, Oxford: Oxford University PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Terblanche JS, Marais E, Chown SL: Stage-related variation in rapid cold hardening as a test of the environmental predictability hypothesis. J Insect Physiol. 2007, 53 (5): 455-462. 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.01.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyons CL, Coetzee M, Terblanche JS, Chown SL: Thermal limits of wild and laboratory strains of two African malaria vector species, anopheles arabiensis and anopheles funestus. Malar J. 2012, 11 (226): 10.1186-Google Scholar
  27. Kearney M, Porter W: Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species’ ranges. Ecol Lett. 2009, 12 (4): 334-350. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01277.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Racloz V, Venter G, Griot C, Stärk K: Estimating the temporal and spatial risk of bluetongue related to the incursion of infected vectors into Switzerland. BMC Vet Res. 2008, 4 (1): 42-10.1186/1746-6148-4-42.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wittmann E, Mellor P, Baylis M: Using climate data to map the potential distribution of culicoides imicola (diptera: ceratopogonidae) in Europe. Rev Sci Tech OIE. 2001, 20 (3): 731-736.Google Scholar
  30. Baylis M, Meiswinkel R, Venter G: A preliminary attempt to use climate data and satellite imagery to model the abundance and distribution of culicoides imicola (diptera: ceratopogonidae) in southern Africa. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 1999, 70 (2): 80-89. (2), pp. 80--89View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Conte A, Goffredo M, Ippoliti C, Meiswinkel R: Influence of biotic and abiotic factors on the distribution and abundance of culicoides imicola and the obsoletus complex in Italy. Vet Parasitol. 2007, 150 (4): 333-344. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.09.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Brugger K, Rubel F: Characterizing the species composition of European culicoides vectors by means of the köppen-geiger climate classification. Parasite Vector. 2013, 6: 333-10.1186/1756-3305-6-333.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Paweska J, Venter G, Mellor P: Vector competence of South African culicoides species for bluetongue virus serotype 1 (BTV‐1) with special reference to the effect of temperature on the rate of virus replication in C. Imicola and C. Bolitinos. Med Vet Entomol. 2002, 16 (1): 10-21. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2002.00334.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Carpenter S, Wilson A, Barber J, Veronesi E, Mellor P, Venter G, Gubbins S: Temperature dependence of the extrinsic incubation period of orbiviruses in culicoides biting midges. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (11): e27987-10.1371/journal.pone.0027987.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Venter G, Paweska J, Van Dijk A, Mellor P, Tabachnick W: Vector competence of culicoides bolitinos and C. Imicola for South African bluetongue virus serotypes 1, 3 and 4. Med Vet Entomol. 1998, 12 (4): 378-385. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.1998.00116.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Terblanche JS, Clusella-Trullas S, Deere JA, Chown SL: Thermal tolerance in a south-east African population of the tsetse fly glossina pallidipes (diptera, glossinidae): implications for forecasting climate change impacts. J Insect Physiol. 2008, 54: 114-127. 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.08.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Chown SL, Jumbam KR, Sørensen JG, Terblanche JS: Phenotypic variance, plasticity and heritability estimates of critical thermal limits depend on methodological context. Funct Ecol. 2009, 23 (1): 133-140. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01481.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Addo-Bediako A, Chown S, Gaston K: Thermal tolerance, climatic variability and latitude. P R Soc London. 2000, 267 (1445): 739-745. 10.1098/rspb.2000.1065.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Mitchell KA, Hoffmann AA: Thermal ramping rate influences evolutionary potential and species differences for upper thermal limits in Drosophila. Funct Ecol. 2010, 24 (3): 694-700. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01666.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Bowler K, Terblanche JS: Insect thermal tolerance: what is the role of ontogeny, ageing and senescence?. Biol Rev. 2008, 83 (3): 339-355. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00046.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Goto S: Expression of drosophila homologue of senescence marker protein-30 during cold acclimation. J Insect Physiol. 2000, 46 (7): 1111-1120. 10.1016/S0022-1910(99)00221-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Weldon C, Terblanche J, Chown S: Time-course for attainment and reversal of acclimation to constant temperature in two ceratitis species. J Therm Biol. 2011, 36: 479-485. 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2011.08.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Deere JA, Chown SL: Testing the beneficial acclimation hypothesis and its alternatives for locomotor performance. Am Nat. 2006, 168 (5): 630-644. 10.1086/508026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Luckinbill L: Selection for longevity confers resistance to low-temperature stress in drosophila melanogaster. J Gernotol A-Biol. 1998, 53 (2): B147-B153.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Peters J, De Baets B, Calvete C, Lucientes J, De Clercq E, Ducheyne E, Verhoest N: Absence reduction in entomological surveillance data to improve niche-based distribution models for Culicoides imicola. Prev Vet Med. 2011, 100 (1): 15-28. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.03.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Purse BV, McCormick BJ, Mellor PS, Baylis M, Boorman J, Borras D, Burgu I, Capela R, Caracappa S, Collantes F: Incriminating bluetongue virus vectors with climate envelope models. J App Ecol. 2007, 44 (6): 1231-1242. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01342.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. De Liberato C, Purse BV, Goffredo M, Scholl F, Scaramozzino P: Geographical and seasonal distribution of the bluetongue virus vector, Culicoides imicola, in central Italy. Med Vet Entomol. 2003, 17 (4): 388-394. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2003.00456.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Legg D, Van Vleet S, Lloyd J: Simulated predictions of insect phenological events made by using mean and median functional lower developmental thresholds. J Econ Entomol. 2000, 93 (3): 658-661. 10.1603/0022-0493-93.3.658.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Blanckenhorn WU: Temperature effects on egg size and their fitness consequences in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria. Evol Ecol. 2000, 14 (7): 627-643. 10.1023/A:1010911017700.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Ward M: The use of discriminant analysis in predicting the distribution of bluetongue virus in Queensland, Australia. Vet Res Comm. 1994, 18 (1): 63-72. 10.1007/BF01839261.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Mehlhorn H, Walldorf V, Klimpel S, Schmahl G, Al-Quraishy S, Walldorf U, Mehlhorn B, Bätza H-J: Entomological survey on vectors of Bluetongue virus in Northrhine-Westfalia (Germany) during 2007 and 2008. Parasitol Res. 2009, 105 (2): 321-329. 10.1007/s00436-009-1413-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Bishop A, Barchia I, Spohr L: Models for the dispersal in Australia of the arbovirus vector, Culicoides brevitarsis Kieffer (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Prev Vet Med. 2000, 47 (4): 243-254. 10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00175-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Verhoef et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement