Open Access

Evaluating preservation methods for identifying Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis complex mosquitoes species using near infra-red spectroscopy

  • Valeriana Simon Mayagaya1Email author,
  • Alex John Ntamatungiro1, 2,
  • Sarah Jane Moore1, 3, 4,
  • Robert Andrew Wirtz5,
  • Floyd Ercell Dowell6 and
  • Marta Ferreira Maia1, 3, 4
Parasites & Vectors20158:60

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0661-4

Received: 23 April 2014

Accepted: 14 January 2015

Published: 27 January 2015

Abstract

Background

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has been successfully used on fresh and RNAlater®-preserved members of the Anopheles gambiae complex to identify sibling species and age. No preservation methods other than using RNAlater® have been tested to preserve mosquitoes for species identification using NIRS. However, RNAlater® is not the most practical preservative for field settings because it is expensive, requires basic laboratory conditions for storage and is not widely available in sub-Saharan Africa. The aim of this study was to test several cheaper and more field-friendly preservation methods for identifying sibling species of the An. gambiae complex using NIRS.

Methods

In this study we describe the use of NIRS to identify sibling species of preserved An. gambiae s. s. and An. arabiensis. Mosquitoes of each species were placed in sample tubes and preserved using one of the following preservation methods: (i) refrigeration at 4°C, (ii) freezing at −20°C, (iii) drying over a silica-gel desiccant, (iv) submersion in RNAlater® at room temperature, (v) submersion in RNAlater® at 4°C, and (vi) submersion in RNAlater® at −20°C. Mosquitoes were preserved for 1, 4, 10, 32 or 50 weeks before they were scanned.

Results

Storage at 4°C was the only preservation method that, up to 32 weeks, did not result in significantly lower predicted values than those obtained from fresh insects. After 50 weeks, however, refrigerated samples did not give meaningful results. When storing for 50 weeks, desiccating samples over silica gel was the best preservation method, with a partial least squares regression cross-validation of >80%. Predictive data values were analyzed using a generalized linear model.

Conclusion

NIRS can be used to identify species of desiccated Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis for up to 50 weeks of storage with more than 80% accuracy.

Keywords

Near-infrared spectroscopy Anopheles gambiae s.s Anopheles arabiensis Species identification Preservation methods Malaria

Background

In sub-Saharan Africa, mosquitoes of the Anopheles gambiae complex are the main vectors of malaria. Of the seven morphologically indistinguishable siblings of this complex, An. gambiae sensu stricto and An. arabiensis are the most effective malaria vectors and are widely spread throughout the continent, co-existing in many regions [1]. These two sibling species differ in their ecological and biological behaviors [2,3], and therefore their response to control measures is also different [4-7]. For this reason, species identification of this complex is critical for characterizing malaria transmission and for developing control strategies suitable to each ecological and social setting.

Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a tool that has the ability to differentiate siblings of the An. gambiae complex based on the composition of their biochemical components such as water, proteins, lipids and carbohydrates. NIRS is faster and cheaper than using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the current gold standard [8], and it has been successfully used to identify the age and species of fresh and RNAlater®-preserved An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis [9-11]. Given the relative expense of RNAlater® and that the use of NIRS on fresh mosquitoes is limiting in large-scale studies, other preservatives such as ethanol, desiccants (drierite and silica gel), refrigeration and Carnoy have been studied for preservation of mosquitoes for the purpose of age grading. Among these, desiccants (drierite and silica gel) and refrigeration appeared to be very promising in terms of accuracy and price [12]. Other than RNAlater®, preservation methods have not been evaluated for identifying mosquito species using NIRS. It is important to identify a more affordable preservation method that allows for species differentiation from preserved specimens. This is critical for NIRS to become a feasible, low-cost option for researchers working on large-scale projects. The present study aims to test cheaper, more field-friendly preservation methods that can be used in conjunction with NIRS to identify the sibling species of An. gambiae complex, specifically An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis.

Methods

Mosquitoes

An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis were obtained from the Ifakara Health Institute (IHI) insectaries. An. gambiae s.s. were reared at 27°C and 80% relative humidity. An. arabiensis were reared inside a non-acclimatized insectary that was situated inside a semi-field system (screen house) and therefore subject to natural weather conditions [13]. Temperature and relative humidity were not monitored in the An. arabiensis colony. Larvae of both species were fed Tetramin fish food, and adults were provided with fresh 10% glucose solution daily. Mosquitoes were 4 days old and had not been previously blood fed.

Preservation methods

An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis were collected from the IHI insectaries. Approximately 45 mosquitoes were stored in 1.5 ml tubes for preservation by refrigeration at 4°C, refrigeration at −20°C and inclusion in RNAlater®. To ensure better moisture absorption during silica gel desiccation, only approximately 20 – 25 mosquitoes were put in each 1.5 ml tube. A thin cotton layer separated the silica gel and the samples. The number of samples scanned for each species and preservation method are illustrated in Table 1.
Table 1

The number of mosquitoes scanned for each species per preservation method

Preservation method

An. arabiensis

An. gambiae s.s.

Fresh

134

134

Refrigeration at 4°C

533

543

Refrigeration at −20°C

666

673

Dried with silica gel and stored at room temperature

686

688

Stored in RNAlater® at room temperature

672

673

Stored in RNAlater® at 4°C

625

620

Stored in RNAlater® at −20°C

668

663

accuracies across each storage duration and preservation method (Figure 1).

For each preservation method, mosquitoes were stored for 1, 4, 10, 32 or 50 weeks. For each storage time period and preservation method, three replicates were stored, with approximately 45 mosquitoes per replicate. For example, preservation by refrigeration for 1 week had 3 replicates, each containing approximately 45 mosquitoes.

Mosquito scanning

Prior to scanning, fresh mosquitoes were anesthetized using chloroform vapors. Samples stored at 4°C and −20°C were allowed to reach room temperature before scanning. Those stored in RNAlater® were first put on a paper towel to remove excess fluid. Using a LabSpec 5000 (ASD Inc., Boulder, CO) spectrometer as detailed previously [9], approximately 20 mosquitoes were placed on a 9 cm spectralon disc and immediately scanned, capturing only head-thorax. All spectra were collected using ASD RS3 software.

Data analysis

ASD ViewSpecPro was used to convert spectra from ASD to GRAMS format (Thermo Galactic, Salem, NH). The GRAMS software PLSPlus/IQ was used to perform partial least squares (PLS) regressions and cross-validations on the spectra. For species identification, a cross-validation was calculated for a given preservation method using all three replicates for each storage-period. For analysis, An. arabiensis was assigned a value of 1, and An. gambiae s.s. was assigned a value of 2. All samples with a predicted value of less than 1.5 were classified as An. arabiensis, and above 1.5 as An. gambiae s.s. Six to 10 factors were used in cross-validation analysis. To avoid over-fitting the data, the number of factors used in regression coefficient plots were added up to the point where the plots of the regression coefficients were still interpretable (i.e., the positive and negative peaks are well identified along the plot). Data analysis was conducted as described previously [9]. To analyze the relationship between the prediction values for each preservation method versus fresh insects, a generalized linear model was fitted to a normal distribution, with preservation as the fixed effect and indicator variable. The dependent variable was the prediction value. A separate analysis was conducted for each storage-period of a particular preservation method compared to mosquitoes that had been scanned fresh and thus not subjected to a preservation method.

Results

PLS cross-validation prediction accuracies (%) of the mosquito species An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis for both fresh and preserved samples are reported in Table 2. Fresh samples had an average PLS cross-validation of 91.4% prediction accuracy (Table 2). In general, preservation by refrigeration at 4°C gave the best results for up to 32 weeks of storage (Figure 1). Desiccation over silica gel gave very good results for up to 50 weeks duration of storage, with a PLS cross-validation of consistently > 80% prediction accuracy. These predictions were significantly different from the predictions for fresh mosquitoes but still delivered over 80% accuracy. Preservation in RNAlater® gave good results at 1 and 4 weeks of storage with a PLS cross-validation prediction accuracy of > 82%. However, results for samples preserved in RNAlater® for 10, 32 and 50 weeks were poor when compared to the fresh predictions. Both An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis showed similar prediction.
Table 2

PLS cross-validation, % accuracy of species predictions using NIRS on preserved and fresh An. gambiae s.s. and An. Arabiensis samples

Storage duration (weeks)

Fresh

4°C

−20°C

Desiccated in silica gel

RNA later ® room temp.

RNA later ® at 4°C

RNA later ® at −20°C

An. arabiensis

       

0

91.8

.

.

.

.

.

.

1

 

96.3

94.8

94.8

82.8

87.4

87.8

4

 

83.3

91.1

88.9

78.5

85.1

83.1

10

 

90.8

69.6

80.7

68.7

70.6

72.9

32

 

83.7

83.7

80.7

72.2

80.0

71.1

50

 

**

92.6

90.4

84.4

88.9

93.3

An. gambiae

       

0

91.0

.

.

.

.

.

.

1

 

97.3

98.5

85.2

90.2

94.0

94.6

4

 

91.9

91.8

88.4

78.8

83.7

82.6

10

 

94.1

74.2

81.5

69.6

69.1

69.5

32

 

87.8

79.3

89.7

80.0

75.9

70.4

50

 

**

92.6

89.6

63.7

75.6

77.0

Average

91.4

90.7

86.8

87.0

76.9

81.0

80.2

Caption: **Samples refrigerated at 4°C for 50 weeks were not suitable for scanning.

Figure 1

This model estimated the means and standard errors obtained from a generalized linear model analyzing species prediction values obtained by near-infrared spectroscopy of preserved Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes and Anopheles gambiae s.s. Species are predicted to be Anopheles arabiensis if the prediction value is lower than 1.5 and predicted as Anopheles gambiae s.s. if the prediction value is higher than 1.5. Legend: * p-value <0.05; ** p-value < 0.001.

Discussion

This study demonstrated that with varying degrees of accuracy depending on the preservation condition, NIRS can successfully be used to distinguish between laboratory-reared An. gambiae s.s. and An. Arabiensis that are preserved for up to 50 weeks. NIRS was capable of differentiating between laboratory-reared An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis that had been preserved by refrigeration; dried over silica gel; and stored in RNAlater®. Although the prediction values for mosquitoes dried over silica gel desiccant were significantly different from the prediction values for fresh samples, their PLS cross-validation predictions were always > 80% accurate up to 50 weeks storage duration. Thus, drying with silica gel desiccant was the best preservation method for long-term storage. The ability to distinguish between malaria vectors with an accuracy of 80% is ecologically relevant because it can be used to effectively plan and monitor vector control programs and to estimate the transmission risk that the known vectors can generate or sustain in the human population [14]. The results of refrigeration and desiccation over silica gel are in accordance with the findings obtained in a previous study where preserved An. arabiensis were successfully scanned for age prediction [12]. In that study, desiccation over silica gel (84.1% accurate) and refrigeration (81.3% accurate) gave the best results after 2 months of storage. This is an advantage because both species and age data can be obtained from the same mosquitoes preserved in silica gel desiccant or at 4°C.

In a study conducted by Dowell et al., refrigeration and desiccation over silica gel were among the cheapest preservation methods, where the cost of preserving samples in a 1.5 ml tube was $0.01 as compared to $1.00 for RNAlater® [12]. These methods allow for the preservation of many samples at a reasonably low cost relative to the cost of frequently transporting fresh samples from field sites to the location where the machine is stationed, or moving the machine to each study site. Although refrigeration and desiccation over silica gel are both comparably low in cost, the latter is more field-friendly. This is because silica gel desiccant is easy to handle and use in the field, and the only major requirement is to keep containers tightly closed to avoid moisture. Therefore, the preservation of mosquitoes with silica gel desiccant addresses the challenges posed by changes in tropical weather conditions and the instability of electricity, a common situation in much of sub-Saharan Africa.

The benefits of NIRS as a rapid [15] and non-destructive [9] method of identification of mosquito species is further cemented by the advantages of using mosquitoes preserved over silica gel desiccant (long lasting, cheap and field friendly), making the technique ideal for large-scale and long-term field studies. This method makes it possible to rapidly process many samples for both species identification and age grading at a low cost. Any method that allows for the collection, preservation and processing of more samples in a shorter time period than the conventional techniques of species identification and age grading, will allow for a larger sample size, which is essential for attaining more representative and meaningful study outputs.

Sample storage in RNAlater® at 4°C and −20°C gave good PLS cross-validation results (>82%) for up to 4 weeks of storage, which confirms the results from previous NIRS studies on preserved mosquitoes [10,12]. The inconsistent RNAlater® PLS cross-validation results at greater than 4 weeks and for all room temperature samples after 1 week and the sizable deviation from the prediction values for fresh samples, could mean that this preservation method is only suitable for species delineation for up to 4 weeks of storage when the samples are refrigerated or frozen. Additionally, RNAlater® seems to be more appropriate for age grading studies than for species identification. Manufacturer specifications recommend that samples in RNAlater® be stored for no longer than 1 week at 25°C, 1 month at 4°C, or indefinitely at −20°C [16]. Thus our RNAlater® room temperature and 4°C results agree with the manufacturer recommendations. However, it is not clear why the RNAlater® -20°C results beyond 4 weeks of storage were poor. Sometimes during storage mosquitoes do not stay immersed in RNAlater® or become trapped in air bubbles. This could result in poor spectra and poor prediction results.

The findings of this study confirm the conclusions of the two previous studies [10,12] on the potential of using NIRS for species identification and age grading of preserved An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis. With the ultimate goal of eliminating malaria, NIRS is a potential tool both for monitoring the disease and for evaluating interventions that involve age grading and species identification of An. gambiae s.s and An. arabiensis.

Conclusions

Desiccation over silica gel appeared to be the most consistent and long-lasting preservation method. Previous studies have indicated that this method is cheap, long-lasting and field-friendly; therefore, we recommend using NIRS, a rapid and non-destructive technique, as the best method for species identification and age prediction. More focus should be put on this method for future field studies. Now that we know it is possible to use NIRS on preserved laboratory-reared mosquito samples, there is a need to validate NIRS to identify the age of field-collected mosquitoes. However, if NIRS is proven to accurately predict the age and species of wild Anopheles gambiae s.l., there will be a need to produce standard guidelines and operational procedures so this technology can be made widely accessible to scientists working in the field. Additionally, there is still a gap in knowledge regarding the individual characteristics of the mosquitoes that influence the NIRS absorption spectra and allow us to predict species and age. Pinpointing these particular characteristics could lead to the development of new methods, guaranteeing even higher prediction accuracies.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

Our gratitude goes to Ally Daraja, Paulina Kasanga, Neema Nombo and Zuhura Kondo for rearing the mosquitoes we used in this study. This study was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Ifakara Health Institute
(2)
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
(3)
Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
(4)
University of Basel
(5)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(6)
Engineering and Wind Erosion Research Unit, USDA ARS Centre for Grain and Animal Health Research

References

  1. Kiszewski A, Mellinger A, Spielman A, Malaney P, Sachs SE, Sachs J. A global index presenting the stability of malaria. Trop Med Hyg. 2004;70:484–98.Google Scholar
  2. Githeko AK, Adongo NI, Karanja DM, Hawley W, Vulule JM, Seroney IK, et al. Some observations on biting behaviour of Anopheles gambiae, An. arabiensis and An. funestus and their implications for malaria control. Exp Parasitology. 1996;82:306–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Hay SI, Rogers DJ, Toomer JF, Snow RW. Annual Plasmodium falciparum entomological inoculation rates (EIR) Across Africa: literature survey, internet access and review. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000;94:113–27.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Killeen GF, Smith TA. Exploring the contributions of bed nets, cattle, insecticides and excitorepellancy to malaria control: a deterministic model of mosquito host-seeking behaviour and mortality. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101:867–80.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Saul A. Zooprophylaxis or zoopotentiation: the outcome of introducing animals on vector transmission is highly dependent on the mosquito mortality while searching. Malar J. 2003;2:32.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. White GB. Anopheles gambiae complex and disease transmission in Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1974;68:278–98.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Mathenge EM, Gimnig JE, Kolczak M, Ombok M, Irungu LW, Hawley WA. Effect of permethrin-impregnated nets on exiting behaviour, blood feeding success, and time of feeding of malaria mosquitoes (Diptera: Cilicidae) in Western Kenya. J Med Entomol. 2001;38:531–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins FH, Finnerty V, Petraraca V. Ribosomal DNA-probes differentiate five criptic species in the Anopheles gambiae complex. Parassitologia. 1988;30:231–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mayagaya VS, Michel K, Benedict MQ, Killeen GF, Wirtz RA, Ferguson HM, et al. Non-destructive determination of Age and species of anopheles gambiae s.l. Using near-infrared spectroscopy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;81:622–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Sikulu M, Dowell KM, Hugo LE, Wirtz RA, Michel K, Peiris KHS, et al. Evaluating RNAlater® as a preservative for using near-infrared spectroscopy to predict Anopheles gambiae age and species. Malar J. 2011;10:186.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Sikulu M, Killeen G, Hugo L, Ryan P, Dowell K, Wirtz R, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy as a complementary age grading and species identification tool for African malaria vectors. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:49.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Dowell FE, Noutcha AEM, Michel K. Short report: the effect of preservation methods on predicting mosquito age by near infrared spectroscopy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;85:1093–6.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferguson HM, Ng'habi KR, Walder T, Kadungula D, Moore SJ, Lyimo I, et al. Establishment of a large semi-field system for experimental study of African malaria vector ecology and control in Tanzania. Malar J. 2008;7:158.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Beier JC, Killeen GF, Githure J. Short report: entomologic inoculation rates and plasmodium falciparum malaria prevalence in Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;61:109–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sikulu MT, Majambere S, Khatib BO, Ali AS, Hugo LE, Dowell FE. Using a near-infrared spectrometer to estimate the age of anopheles mosquitoes exposed to pyrethroids. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e90657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090657. eCollection 2014.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. RNAlater® solutions for RNA Stabilization and storage [http://www.lifetechnologies.com/us/en/home/brands/product-brand/rnalater.html]

Copyright

© Mayagaya et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement