Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Differential effect of human ivermectin treatment on blood feeding Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus

Parasites & Vectors20158:130

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0735-3

  • Received: 5 December 2014
  • Accepted: 13 February 2015
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Widespread and large scale use of ivermectin in humans and domestic animals can have unexpected effects on non-target organisms. As a search for a possible explanation for an observed longitudinal decline in density of anopheline vector mosquitoes, but not in Culex quinquefasciatus, in an area of north-eastern Tanzania which has been exposed to ivermectin mass drug administration, this study assessed and compared the effect of human ivermectin treatment on blood feeding Anopheles gambiae and Cx. quinquefasciatus.

Methods

Consenting adult volunteers were randomized into two groups to receive either ivermectin or placebo. Twenty four hours after treatment, one volunteer from each group was concurrently exposed to 50 laboratory reared An. gambiae on one arm and 50 laboratory reared Cx. quinquefasciatus on the other arm for 15–30 minutes. Engorged mosquitoes were maintained on 10% glucose solution for 12 days and observed for survival and fecundity. The experiment was repeated 15 times.

Results

Two days after the blood meals, nearly half (average 47.7% for the 15 experiments) of the blood fed An. gambiae in the ivermectin group had died while almost all in the placebo group were alive (97.2%), and the difference in survival between these two groups continued to widen on the following days. There was no clear effect of ivermectin on Cx. quinquefasciatus, which had high survival in both ivermectin and placebo group on day 2 (95.7% and 98.4%, respectively) as well as on the following days. Ivermectin completely inhibited egg laying in An. gambiae, while egg laying and subsequent development of immature stages appeared normal in the other three groups.

Conclusion

Blood meals taken on ivermectin treated volunteers significantly reduced survival and halted fecundity of An. gambiae but had only limited or no effect on Cx. quinquefasciatus. The result suggests that widespread use of ivermectin may have contributed to the observed decline in density of An. gambiae, without similar decrease in Cx. quinquefasciatus, in north-eastern Tanzania.

Keywords

  • Ivermectin
  • Anopheles gambiae
  • Culex quinquefasciatus
  • Tanzania

Background

Ivermectin, a macrocyclic lactone derived as a fermentation product from the soil bacteria Streptomyces avermilitis [1], is widely used globally in human and veterinary medicine as a drug for treatment and control of nematode and ecto-parasitic infections. It is currently also used in large scale programs to eliminate human onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis in many countries in sub-Saharan Africa, through yearly application of community-wide ivermectin mass drug administration (MDA) [2]. In concordance with the extensive scale-up and use of ivermectin in recent years, its potential effect on non-target organisms, including many species of free-living arthropods, has been increasingly documented [3]. This includes its effect on dung beetles being exposed to ivermectin when feeding on faecal matter from treated cattle, as well as on freshwater stages of insects exposed to ivermectin excreted into their environment.

Of recent, it has moreover been documented that female Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes have a much higher mortality if they feed on humans shortly after treatment with ivermectin than if they feed on untreated humans [4]. Laboratory studies using membrane feeding of adult mosquitoes have confirmed this effect of ivermectin, when used in concentrations equaling those found in treated humans, in female An. gambiae whereas no effect was seen in female Aedes aegypti [5,6]. In line with this, field studies have indicated that human MDA with ivermectin may have resulted in a temporary significant reduction in malaria transmission, most likely due to its effect on the anopheline vectors [7-10]. This has led to the suggestion that human MDA with ivermectin could be used as a supplement measure for malaria transmission control [9-12].

In Tanzania, An. gambiae and An. funestus are the major vectors of human malaria, and these two mosquito species together with Cx. quinquefasciatus are also the vectors of lymphatic filariasis. A longitudinal study conducted in north-eastern Tanzania has documented a dramatic decline in anopheline mosquito densities during the past decade, whereas no decline has been seen in densities of Cx. quinquefasciatus [13,14]. The cause of these changes, which have important implications for the transmission and control of malaria and lymphatic filariasis in the area, remains somewhat unclear, and could not immediately be related to change in rainfall pattern or major application of mosquito control interventions [14]. In fact, insecticide treated bed-nets (ITNs) were only distributed on a large scale after the major decline in anopheline population densities occurred. As MDA with ivermectin has been widely applied in the area for control of onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis [13,15], the present study assessed and compared the survival and fecundity of An. gambiae and Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes after taking a blood meal on humans treated with ivermectin.

Methods

Mosquitoes

An. gambiae sensu stricto (a colony originating from Kisumu, Kenya) and Cx. quinquefasciatus (a colony originating from Arusha, Tanzania) mosquitoes which had been maintained for several generations at the insectary of the National Institute for Medical Research, Amani Research Centre, in Tanga Region of Tanzania, were used in the feeding experiments. They were raised using recommended standard mosquito rearing techniques [16]. Adult mosquitoes for feeding experiments were kept in cages and supplied with cotton pads soaked in 10% glucose solution until they reached an age of 3 days. They were then starved for 6–8 hours before being fed on the human volunteers.

Experimental drugs

Ivermectin tablets (Mectzan®, Laboratoires Merck Sharp & Dohme-Chibret, Paris, France) were generously supplied by the Regional Neglected Tropical Diseases Control Programme in Tanga. This programme also provided height guides for estimation of dosage according to procedures used during MDAs (150–200 μg/kg body weight). Multivitamin tablets (Laboratory & Allied Ltd, Nairobi, Kenya) were used as placebo at a dose of 2 tablets per person.

Selection and treatment of volunteers

Amani Research Centre staff and community members living near the Amani Research Centre premises were invited to participate in the study. A total of 30 adult volunteers, who gave written informed consent, were recruited for the feeding experiments. Volunteers were randomly assigned to either an ivermectin (n = 15) or a placebo (n = 15) treatment group. This assignment was blinded to the volunteers, to those who provided them the drugs as well as to those who handled the mosquito feeding and subsequently observed mosquito survival. The volunteers were thereafter arranged in 15 pairs, each with an ivermectin and a placebo group member, to participate in 15 mosquito feeding experiments on 15 different days. Each experiment started by requesting the pair of volunteers to swallow their respective assigned drug in the evening at 18:00 hours. They were then requested to return 24 hours later for mosquito feeding.

Mosquito feeding and mortality scoring

At the time of mosquito feeding, 50 An. gambiae and 50 Cx. quinquefasciatus maintained in cages were concurrently allowed to feed on exposed arms of each volunteer for 15 to 30 minutes (until no more mosquitoes showed interest in feeding on the bait). Each volunteer was instructed to insert the right arm in the cage containing 50 An. gambiae and the left arm in the cage containing 50 Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. The mosquito cages were labeled with codes identifying the feeder, the treatment given and the species of mosquito. Thus, feeding experiments were carried out with two volunteers at a time (ivermectin and placebo group) and repeated 15 times using new volunteers and new batches of mosquitoes. Following the feeding, unfed mosquitoes were removed from the cage using an aspirator. Fully engorged mosquitoes were maintained on 10% glucose solution (soaked onto cotton wool) and observed for mortality every 24 hours for 12 days. On each day, dead mosquitoes were counted and removed from the cages.

The test mosquitoes were provided with egg laying substrate to monitor their egg laying ability three days (72 hours) after the blood meal. An. gambiae mosquitoes were provided with a wet filter paper fitted in a Petri-dish and placed inside the maintenance cage with surviving An. gambiae mosquitoes. For Cx. quinquefasciatus, a plastic larvae-rearing pan containing water was placed in the cage with survivors of this species. These devices were left in place for three days and then transferred to a larvae-rearing room for incubation and egg hatching. Eggs were not counted. Upon hatching, the offspring were reared to adult mosquitoes following routine procedures.

Data analysis

Data were entered in Excel and subsequently analyzed by SPSS. Proportions were compared by Pearson’s Chi-square test and continuous variables by Student’s t-test. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Ethics

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Medical Research Coordinating Committee of the National Institute for Medical Research, Tanzania (Ref: NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol. IX/1554). Written informed consent was obtained from all volunteers before they participated in the study. Mosquito feeding experiments were conducted using insectary reared mosquitoes free from any infection. The study coincided with the timing of ivermectin based MDA in the area, and volunteers who took ivermectin were informed not to take the ivermectin distributed in the communities in 2013. Volunteers who took multivitamin were encouraged to participate in the 2013 MDA. The volunteers were also told that they would experience minor discomfort and itching during mosquito feeding, resembling their usual experience with mosquito bites in north-eastern Tanzania.

Results

A total of 30 adult volunteers (25 males, 5 females; mean age 32.4 years; age range 19–50 years) were assigned to either the ivermectin (n = 15) or the placebo (n = 15) treatment group. Fifteen consecutive mosquito feeding experiments were conducted. In each experiment, one volunteer from each treatment group fed An. gambiae and Cx. quinquefasciatus simultaneously (each volunteer arm with different species). Of the 1500 An. gambiae and 1500 Cx. quinquefasciatus exposed to the feeding baits, 1461 (97.4%) and 947 (63.1%), respectively, fed (Table 1). Mosquitoes were moreover attracted differently by individual volunteers such that for An. gambiae a mean of 48.7 mosquitoes fed (range 36–50) while for Cx. quinquefasciatus a mean of 31.6 mosquitoes fed (range 8–50) in the 30 feeding sessions (2 sessions in each of the 15 experiments). However, there was no significant difference in overall percentage of mosquitoes that fed in the ivermectin or the placebo group, neither for An. gambiae (97.6% vs. 97.1%, respectively; p = 0.75) nor for Cx. quinquefasciatus (63.7% vs. 62.5%, respectively; p = 0.67).
Table 1

Overview of mosquitoes exposed and mosquitoes that fed in the two treatment groups

Treatment group

Mosquito species

No. exposed

No. fed (%)

Ivermectin

An. gambiae

750

732 (97.6)

Cx. quinquefasciatus

750

478 (63.7)

All

1500

1210 (80.7)

Placebo

An. gambiae

750

729 (97.1)

Cx. quinquefasciatus

750

469 (62.5)

All

1500

1198 (79.9)

The mean number (and range) of live blood fed mosquitoes that survived in each of the four experimental groups during the 12 days are shown in Table 2. For An. gambiae, blood fed mosquitoes died considerably faster in the ivermectin than the placebo group. Already on day 2, nearly half of the blood fed An. gambiae in the ivermectin group had died while those in the placebo group appeared largely unaffected. The gap between the two groups in mean number of surviving mosquitoes widened from day to day, and on day 6 the mean number was only 10% of starting value for the ivermectin group while it was 91% for the placebo group. Statistical analysis showed that from day 2 onwards the mean number of live mosquitoes was significantly lower in the ivermectin group than in the placebo group (p < 0.001 for all days). In the later period of the experiments (especially after day 8) some mortality also became evident in the placebo group, possibly mainly due to increasing mosquito age.
Table 2

Mean number (range) of live blood fed mosquitoes for the 15 experiments as recorded on each day in the four experimental groups

Day

Mean no. (range) of An. gambiae

Mean no. (range) of Cx. quinquefasciatus

Ivermectin group

Placebo group

p-value*

Ivermectin group

Placebo group

p-value*

0

48.8 (36–50)

48.6 (40–50)

NS

31.9 (13–50)

31.3 (8–50)

NS

1

45.5 (28–50)

48.3 (40–50)

NS

31.1 (11–50)

31.2 (8–50)

NS

2

25.4 (9–45)

47.2 (40–50)

<0.001

30.7 (11–50)

30.9 (7–50)

NS

3

16.7 (0–37)

46.4 (40–50)

<0.001

30.1 (11–49)

30.7 (7–50)

NS

4

10.4 (0–18)

45.7 (40–50)

<0.001

29.9 (11–49)

30.7 (7–50)

NS

5

6.5 (0–14)

44.9 (39–49)

<0.001

29.5 (11–49)

30.3 (7–50)

NS

6

5.0 (0–14)

44.3 (39–49)

<0.001

29.1 (10–49)

29.6 (7–50)

NS

7

2.9 (0–10)

42.3 (38–49)

<0.001

28.9 (10–49)

29.3 (7–50)

NS

8

2.4 (0–10)

33.3 (20–49)

<0.001

27.9 (10–48)

27.9 (6–50)

NS

9

1.7 (0–5)

27.8 (5–43)

<0.001

27.5 (9–48)

27.5 (6–50)

NS

10

1.5 (0–4)

23.3 (1–39)

<0.001

26.5 (9–48)

27.1 (5–50)

NS

11

1.3 (0–4)

21.3 (0–36)

< 0.001

25.0 (9–48)

26.1 (5–48)

NS

12

0.8 (0–2)

16.0 (0–36)

< 0.001

20.5 (0–48)

21.1 (0–48)

NS

*Student’s t-test; NS = not significant.

By contrast, no clear effect of ivermectin was observed on the mean number of blood fed Cx. quinquefasciatus (Table 2), and on none of the experimental days was there a statistically significant difference between the mean number in the ivermectin and the placebo group (p > 0.05 for all days). There was also a gradual but slight decrease in mean number of mosquitoes in both treatment groups (most noticeable after day 8), which possibly was mainly due to increasing mosquito age.

As the number of mosquitoes feeding varied between experiments, the percent survival should rightly be calculated separately for each experiment and group, and the mean survival in groups then calculated on the basis of survival in the individual experiments. This has been done in Table 3, where moreover data have been excluded from both ivermectin and placebo groups when the mortality in the placebo group exceeded 20%. This gives an even more striking impression of the difference in An. gambiae survival between the ivermectin and the placebo group, and of the lack of difference between these groups in Cx. quinquefasciatus. The mean survival in the four experimental groups until day 8 (when mortality in the placebo groups was minimal in most experiments) is moreover shown in Figure 1.
Table 3

Mosquito survival on each day of the experiment in the four groups

Day

An. gambiae

Cx. quinquefasciatus

No. experiments included

Mean % survival in ivermectin group*

Mean % survival in placebo group*

No. experiments included

Mean % survival in ivermectin group*

Mean % survival in placebo group*

0

15

100.0

100.0

15

100.0

100.0

1

15

93.4

99.5

15

97.1

99.9

2

15

52.3

97.2

15

95.7

98.4

3

15

33.8

95.6

15

93.5

97.8

4

15

21.2

94.2

15

92.8

97.8

5

15

13.3

92.6

15

91.7

96.7

6

15

10.3

91.3

13

89.6

95.3

7

13

7.0

87.6

13

88.9

94.9

8

6

6.0

86.8

13

85.5

89.8

9

2

5.0

88.0

13

83.6

88.0

10

1

0.0

80.0

13

80.4

86.4

11

1

0.0

80.0

12

75.1

85.7

12

1

0.0

80.0

9

80.3

86.4

Calculated as mean of % survival in the individual experiments. For each of the two species, results from experiments were excluded when mortality in the placebo group exceeded 20%.

*Mean for included experiments.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Survival of Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus after taking a blood meal on human volunteers who had ingested ivermectin (150–200 μg/kg) or placebo. Graphs show mean of % survival in the individual experiments for the four groups during the first 8 days. 15 experiments were carried out, but data were excluded from both ivermectin and placebo group of the same mosquito species when the mortality in the placebo group exceeded 20%. Thus, for the two An. gambiae groups, data on days 7 and 8 are based on 13 and 6 experiments, while for the two Cx. quinquefasciatus groups, data on days 6, 7 and 8 are all based on 13 experiments (see also Table 3).

Three days after the feeding, a total of 247 and 697 surviving An. gambiae and 447 and 459 surviving Cx. quinquefasciatus in the ivermectin and placebo groups, respectively, were provided with egg laying substrates. None of the An. gambiae in the ivermectin group laid eggs, although the majority spent long periods on the laying substrate, and eventually some were recovered dead on the substrate. Surviving An. gambiae in the placebo group as well as Cx. quinquefasciatus in both groups laid eggs. The eggs hatched and larvae were subsequently reared to adult mosquitoes.

Discussion

Ivermectin has a broad spectrum of activity against helminth and ecto-parasite infections and its widespread use in human and veterinary medicine has been linked with potential effects on non-target organisms [3]. Ivermectin based MDA to humans for control and elimination of onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis has been reported to reduce survival of An. gambiae mosquitoes and thereby also to affect malaria transmission [7,8,10]. As a result, ivermectin has recently been considered a drug with potential in integrated malaria control operations [8,10-12]. MDA with ivermectin is also well known to have a beneficial effect on human infections with ectoparasites, such as scabies and lice [2]. In north-eastern Tanzania, where ivermectin based MDA has been in place for more than a decade, a significant decline in overall malaria vector density has been recorded. During the same period, no decline (rather an increase) in density of Cx. quinquefasciatus was noted [13,14]. The observed changes could not explicitly be explained by change in rainfall pattern or mosquito control interventions. Thus, this study was a sequel of an effort to indirectly assess whether ivermectin based MDAs could have contributed to causing the observed changes in mosquito population densities in the study area.

Using insectary reared An. gambiae and Cx. quinquefasciatus, 15 mosquito feeding experiments were conducted to compare the survival and fecundity of these vectors when fed on human hosts recently treated with ivermectin or a placebo. The two species of mosquitoes had different feeding efficiency, with 97.4% and 63.1%, respectively, taking a blood meal. The lower efficiency of Cx. quinquefasciatus was probably due to its preference for bird feeding [17] whereas An. gambiae is known to be strongly anthropophilic [18]. For both species, the number of fed mosquitoes moreover varied between the volunteers. Such differential human attractiveness to mosquitoes is a common phenomenon [19]. In some of the experiments, an increase was seen in mortality in the control group in the later period of the study, probably due to older age of mosquitoes and/or adverse environmental factors. For this reason, experimental days where control group mortality exceeded 20% were excluded when comparing mosquito survival in the ivermectin and control group for the same species.

The study confirmed findings from previous studies, in that, at a dosage similar to that used in MDAs, ivermectin considerably reduced the survival of blood feeding An. gambiae [4,7-12,20]. Thus, after 2 days nearly half (47.7%) of the blood fed An. gambiae in the ivermectin group had died while almost all in the placebo group were alive, and the difference in survival between these two groups continued to widen as the experiment progressed. On the other hand, ivermectin had only minimal or no effect on the survival of Cx. quinquefasciatus. Chandre and Hougard [21] similarly recorded no effect on survival of Cx. quinquefasciatus exposed to a blood meal from humans treated with a therapeutic dose of ivermectin. In future studies it will be interesting also to feed mosquitoes on volunteers at different time intervals after ivermectin treatment, to assess the time-course of the drug effect on the mosquitoes.

In addition to considerably reduce their survival, ivermectin in the blood meal caused complete inhibition of fecundity in the exposed An. gambiae. Thus, among the An. gambiae that managed to survive for 3 days post blood meal, none were capable of laying eggs. By contrast, the An. gambiae in the placebo group, and the Cx. quinquefasciatus in both groups laid eggs. The eggs were incubated, hatched and larvae were successfully reared to adult mosquitoes. The eggs were not counted, though, to compare if there was any difference in numbers laid by Cx. quinquefasciatus in the ivermectin and placebo group, or in their subsequent development. This would be worthwhile to investigate further, as in Ae. aegypti mosquitoes it has been shown that although an ivermectin containing blood meal did not affect survival, it caused a significant decline in fecundity [22].

The fact that Cx. quinquefasciatus has a slightly lower feeding capacity on humans, combined with their apparent inherent tolerance to ivermectin in blood meals, put them at a much reduced risk of being affected by ivermectin based MDA when compared to An. gambiae. These factors, combined with evidence of increasing proliferation and colonization of more rural areas by Cx. quinquefasciatus [23,24] and their high level of insecticide tolerance [17,25], might explain the stable density of this species in the areas with declining anopheline density in north-eastern Tanzania [14]. The increasing significance of Cx. quinquefasciatus as a vector of lymphatic filariasis in north-eastern Tanzania, as compared to the previously most important anopheline vectors [13,26], calls for more research on how to control this vector.

Conclusions

The study showed that mosquito blood meals taken from humans recently treated with ivermectin at a dosage similar to that used in MDA for control of filarial infections have a markedly different effect on survival and fecundity of An. gambiae and Cx. quinquefasciatus. Thus, while ivermectin treatment considerably reduced survival and fecundity in the former, no obvious effect was noted in the latter species. The findings suggest that the recently observed decline in density of An. gambiae, but not Cx. quinquefasciatus, in north-eastern Tanzania might at least partly be attributed to the widespread use of ivermectin for control of parasitic infections in humans and domestic animals in the area.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the 30 volunteers who participated in the mosquito feeding experiments. Our gratitude also goes to Dr. Rehema Maggid for providing ivermectin tablets and Dr. Geofrey Makenga for giving advice on the choice of placebo and supervising its administration. The invaluable skilled assistance provided by laboratory staff at the Amani Research Centre (Demitrius Max, Bernard Batengana, John Samwel, Josephine Nyongole, Stephen Mkongewa, Isaya Kibwana and Kisesa Kassim) is also highly appreciated. The study received financial support from the Danida Research Council, Denmark (FFU grant #09-096LIFE).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Institute for Medical Research, Amani Research Centre, P.O. Box 81, Muheza, Tanga, Tanzania
(2)
Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlægevej 100, 1870 Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark

References

  1. Õmura S. Ivermectin: 25 years and still going strong. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008;31:91–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ottesen EA, Hooper PJ, Bradley M, Biswas G. The global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis: health impact after 8 years. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2:e317.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lumaret J, Errouissi F, Floate K, Römbke J, Wardhaugh K. A Review on the toxicity and non-target effects of macrocyclic lactones in terrestrial and aquatic environments. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012;13:1004–60.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chaccour C, Lines J, Whitty CJM. Effect of ivermectin on Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes fed on humans: the potential of oral insecticides in malaria control. J Infect Dis. 2010;202:113–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kobylinski KC, Deus KM, Butters MP, Hongyu T, Gray M, da Silva IM, et al. The effect of oral anthelmintics on the survivorship and re-feeding frequency of anthropophilic mosquito disease vectors. Acta Trop. 2010;116:119–26.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Butters MP, Kobylinski KC, Deus KM, da Silva IM, Gray M, Sylla M, et al. Comparative evaluation of systemic drugs for their effects against Anopheles gambiae. Acta Trop. 2012;121:34–43.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sylla M, Kobylinski KC, Gray M, Chapman PL, Sarr MD, Rasgon JL, et al. Mass drug administration of ivermectin in south-eastern Senegal reduces the survivorship of wild-caught, blood fed malaria vectors. Malar J. 2010;9:365.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kobylinski KC, Sylla M, Chapman PL, Sarr MD, Foy BD. Ivermectin mass drug administration to humans disrupts malaria parasite transmission in Senegalese villages. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;85:3–5.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Foy BD, Kobylinski KC, da Silva IM, Rasgon JL, Sylla M. Endectocides for malaria control. Trends Parasitol. 2011;27:423–8.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Alout H, Krajacich BJ, Meyers JI, Grubaugh ND, Brackney DE, Kobylinski KC, et al. Evaluation of ivermectin mass drug administration for malaria transmission control across different West African environments. Malar J. 2014;13:417.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chaccour CJ, Kobylinski KC, Bassat Q, Bousema T, Drakeley C, Alonso P, et al. Ivermectin to reduce malaria transmission: a research agenda for a promising new tool for elimination. Malar J. 2013;12:153.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kobylinski KC, Alout H, Foy BD, Clements A, Adisakwattana P, Swierczewski BE, et al. Rationale for the co-administration of albendazole and ivermectin to humans for malaria parasite transmission control. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;91:655–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Simonsen PE, Pedersen EM, Rwegoshora RT, Malecela MN, Derua YA, Magesa SM. Lymphatic filariasis control in Tanzania: effect of repeated mass drug administration with ivermectin and albendazole on infection and transmission. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e696.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Meyrowitsch DW, Pedersen EM, Alifrangis M, Scheike TH, Malecela MN, Magesa SM, et al. Is the current decline in malaria burden in sub-Saharan Africa due to a decrease in vector population? Malar J. 2011;10:188.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Simonsen PE, Derua YA, Magesa SM, Pedersen EM, Stensgaard A-S, Malecela MN, et al. Lymphatic filariasis control in Tanga region Tanzania: status after eight rounds of mass drug administration. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:507.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Benedict MQ. Methods in Anopheles Research. 4th ed. Atlanta: CDC; 2014.Google Scholar
  17. Bøgh C, Pedersen EM, Mukoko DA, Ouma JH. Permethrin-impregnated bednet effects on resting and feeding behaviour of lymphatic filariasis vector mosquitoes in Kenya. Med Vet Entomol. 1998;12:52–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gillies MT, Coetzee M. A Supplement to the Anophelinae of Africa South of the Sahara (Afrotropical Region). Johannesburg: South Africa Institute for Medical Research; 1987.Google Scholar
  19. Knols BGJ, de Jong R, Takken W. Differential attractiveness of isolated humans to mosquitoes in Tanzania. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1995;89:604–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fritz ML, Siegert PY, Walker ED, Bayoh MN, Vulule JR, Miller JR. Toxicity of bloodmeals from ivermectin-treated cattle to Anopheles gambiae s.l. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2009;103:539–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chandre F, Hougard JM. Systemic action of ivermectin on Culex quinquefasciatus and Simulium squamosum. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1999;92:71–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Focks DA, McLaughlin RE, Linda SB. Effects of ivermectin (MK-933) on the reproductive rate of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 1991;28:501–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dossou-yovo J, Doannio J, Riviere F, Chauvancy G. Urbanization and establishment of Culex quinquefasciatus in a West African rural area. Acta Trop. 1995;59:251–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Chavasse DC, Lines JD, Ichimori K, Marijani J. Mosquito-control in Dar-es-Salaam.1. Assessment of Culex quinquefasciatus breeding sites prior to intervention. Med Vet Entomol. 1995;9:141–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Magesa SM, Wilkes TJ, Mnzava AEP, Njunwa KJ, Myamba J, Kivuyo MDP, et al. Trial of pyrethroid impreganted bednets in an area of Tanzania holoendemic for malaria Part 2. Effects on the malaria vector population. Acta Trop. 1991;49:97–108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Simonsen PE, Derua YA, Kisinza WN, Magesa SM, Malecela MN, Pedersen EM. Lymphatic filariasis control in Tanzania: effect of six rounds of mass drug administration with ivermectin and albendazole on infection and transmission. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:335.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Derua et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement