Open Access

New insights into the evolution of the Trypanosoma cruzi clade provided by a new trypanosome species tightly linked to Neotropical Pteronotus bats and related to an Australian lineage of trypanosomes

  • Luciana Lima1,
  • Oneida Espinosa-Álvarez1,
  • C. Miguel Pinto2, 3,
  • Manzelio Cavazzana Jr.4,
  • Ana Carolina Pavan5,
  • Julio C. Carranza6,
  • Burton K. Lim7,
  • Marta Campaner1,
  • Carmen S. A. Takata1,
  • Erney P. Camargo1,
  • Patrick B. Hamilton8 and
  • Marta M. G. Teixeira1Email author
Parasites & Vectors20158:657

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1255-x

Received: 19 September 2015

Accepted: 10 December 2015

Published: 23 December 2015

Abstract

Background

Bat trypanosomes are implicated in the evolution of the T. cruzi clade, which harbours most African, European and American trypanosomes from bats and other trypanosomes from African, Australian and American terrestrial mammals, including T. cruzi and T. rangeli, the agents of the American human trypanosomiasis. The diversity of bat trypanosomes globally is still poorly understood, and the common ancestor, geographical origin, and evolution of species within the T. cruzi clade remain largely unresolved.

Methods

Trypanosome sequences were obtained from cultured parasites and from museum archived liver/blood samples of bats captured from Guatemala (Central America) to the Brazilian Atlantic Coast. Phylogenies were inferred using Small Subunit (SSU) rRNA, glycosomal glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (gGAPDH), and Spliced Leader (SL) RNA genes.

Results

Here, we described Trypanosoma wauwau n. sp. from Pteronotus bats (Mormoopidae) placed in the T. cruzi clade, then supporting the bat-seeding hypothesis whereby the common ancestor of this clade likely was a bat trypanosome. T. wauwau was sister to the clade T. spp-Neobats from phyllostomid bats forming an assemblage of trypanosome species exclusively of Noctilionoidea Neotropical bats, which was sister to an Australian clade of trypanosomes from indigenous marsupials and rodents, which possibly evolved from a bat trypanosome. T. wauwau was found in 26.5 % of the Pteronotus bats examined, and phylogeographical analysis evidenced the wide geographical range of this species. To date, this species was not detected in other bats, including those that were sympatric or shared shelters with Pteronotus. T. wauwau did not develop within mammalian cells, and was not infective to Balb/c mice or to triatomine vectors of T. cruzi and T. rangeli.

Conclusions

Trypanosoma wauwau n. sp. was linked to Pteronotus bats. The positioning of the clade T. wauwau/T.spp-Neobats as the most basal Neotropical bat trypanosomes and closely related to an Australian lineage of trypanosomes provides additional evidence that the T. cruzi clade trypanosomes likely evolved from bats, and were dispersed in bats within and between continents from ancient to unexpectedly recent times.

Keywords

Chiroptera Bat trypanosomes Museum archives Phylogeny Evolution Phylogeography Australia Neotropics Host-parasite association

Background

The number of studies on bat trypanosomes from the New and Old Worlds that proposed that T. cruzi and T. rangeli evolved from within the broader monophyletic assemblage of the T. cruzi clade is increasing. This clade was formed mainly by trypanosomes of bats, and some other mammalian hosts in the Americas, Africa and Australia. Accordingly, it was proposed the bat-seeding hypothesis, in which a common ancestor bat trypanosome gave origin (speciation) to several trypanosomes that evolved linked to bats or have switched, by several independent events at different times, into a range of terrestrial mammals in the New and Old Worlds, then originating several lineages (monophyletic assemblages) of bat trypanosomes [15].

Regardless of their traditional taxonomic classification, morphology and development in cultures, or ranges of host species and geographical distributions, trypanosomes nested into the T. cruzi clade are distributed in two main sister phylogenetic lineages. One lineage represents the subgenus Schizotrypanum that harbours T. cruzi, which is a species found in bats and mammals of virtually all terrestrial orders from the southern United States to southern South America. The other species within the subgenus Schizotrypanum are all restricted to bats: T. dionisii found in bats from the New and Old Worlds, T. cruzi marinkellei of Central and South America, and T. erneyi of African bats [3, 59]. The second lineage (T. rangeli/T. conorhini) comprises two sister clades. One clade is exclusive of T. rangeli from humans, monkeys, rodents, xenarthrans, bats and other mammals. The other clade includes T. conorhini (tropicopolitan of rats), T. vespertilionis (European bats), and African trypanosomes from bats, monkeys and civets. The lineage of Australian trypanosomes from marsupials and rodents were basal to these lineages [1, 3, 4, 10].

T. livingstonei from African bats was placed at the edge of the T. cruzi clade [4]. Recently, PCR surveys revealed new trypanosome species in phyllostomid bats from Panamá positioned at the base of the clade T. cruzi. However, the relationships of the new trypanosomes with T. livingstonei and the Australian trypanosomes were unresolved [11]. In a likely evolutionary scenario, all trypanosome species within the T. cruzi clade evolved from an Old World bat trypanosome, possibly in Africa where the most basal species was found so far, and from where bats irradiated in the Eocene [14, 10]. Therefore, further surveys of the trypanosomes in bats of the New and Old Worlds are required to shed more light on the evolution of these intriguing parasites, and on the emergence of the human infective bat trypanosomes T. cruzi and T. rangeli.

The discovery of bat trypanosomes in Europe and Africa that were highly closely related to bat trypanosomes in South America suggests natural movements of bats carrying trypanosomes across continents more recently than those suggested by the fossil records [1, 2]. Apparently, the constant movements of hosts (vertebrates and invertebrates) shaped the diversity, phylogenetic relationships, ranges of vertebrate and vector species, and present day distributions of trypanosomatids in general. Phylogeographical analyses have revealed unexpected distributions of trypanosome and leishmania species across the world [1, 2, 1214].

Surveys and molecular characterization of bat trypanosomes conducted by our and other research groups in Brazil, Panama, Colombia, Bolivia and Ecuador [25, 9, 11, 1520] discovered a large repertoire of bat trypanosomes, revealing a range of genotypes of T. cruzi, T. rangeli, T. dionisii and T. c marinkellei, and the existence of an increasing number of trypanosomes diverging by relevant genetic distance from any known trypanosome species, including one different trypanosome species found exclusively in bats of Pteronotus [9].

The genera Pteronotus and Mormoops constitute the Mormoopidae family of strictly insectivorous Neotropical bats. The species of Pteronotus live in warm regions near water sources and form large colonies in caves and under bridges often together with phyllostomid bats [21]. This genus is currently Neotropical and, in Brazil, Pteronotus spp. are quite common in Amazonia and Cerrado biomes, and were recently found in the Atlantic Forest of northeastern Brazil [22]. The Mormoopidae is sister to Phyllostomidae and closely allied with Noctilionidae, Furipteridae and Natalidae, which together form the Noctilionoidea superfamily widespread in the Neotropics and comprising one extant species of Myzopodidae in Australia, and a single species of Mystacinidae in New Zealand [2327].

In the present study, we carried out a comprehensive survey of the trypanosomes infecting Pteronotus bats from Central and South America. The molecular characterization of the trypanosomes revealed a link between bats of Pteronotus and a new species of trypanosome, which will be described in this study using a combination of phylogenetic, morphological, biological, and eco-biogeographical data.

Methods

Capture and identification of bats, and isolation of trypanosomes in culture

Bats of the genus Pteronotus were captured using mist nets in two localities in the State of Rondonia, Amazonia biome, Brazil (Fig. 1) in 2001, 2002, 2005 and 2009. The bats were anaesthetised and manipulated for blood sampling as previously described [4, 9].
Fig. 1

Geographical origin of Trypanosoma wauwau isolates obtained from hemocultures and archive blood/tissue samples from Pteronotus bats captured in Central and South America

Ethical approval

All procedures in Brazil were in accord with the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experimentation of the Institutes of Biomedical Sciences and Biosciences, University of São Paulo (Approved protocols:no17/page 3/book2 and no109/03), and with the recommendations of the Brazilian Institute of the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA- Permit Number 10080-2). The bats from other countries were manipulated according to procedures approved by the Royal Ontario Museum (Toronto, Canada) for previous studies [24]. Bat blood samples (100–200 ul) were submitted to haemoculture (HE) as we described previously [4]. The bats captured in Brazil were identified with morphological keys and representative specimens of each species (deposited in the Zoological Museum of the University of São Paulo) were confirmed using DNA from liver/blood samples preserved in ethanol for PCR amplification and sequencing of the Cytochrome b (Cytb) and the Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) genes [28]. The barcode sequences were analysed by BLAST search in GenBank, and the bats were identified as P. parnellii, P. personatus and P. gymnonotus. A study is currently being developed using these sequences aiming the taxonomic revision of the genus Pteronotus (Pavan et al., manuscript in preparation).

Archived blood samples from bats of the genus Pteronotus

We tested 101 DNA samples from archived tissue (liver) samples from Pteronotus spp. captured in four biomes: Amazonia (States of Pará and Mato Grosso); transitional areas between Amazonia and Cerrado (Maranhão); Cerrado (Goias, Mato Grosso, Piauí and Tocantins), and the Atlantic Forest (Sergipe). In addition, we tested 80 liver samples of Pteronotus spp. from Central America (Panama, Guatemala and El Salvador) and South America (Guyana, Suriname and Venezuela) from the archives of Royal Ontario Museum in Canada (Table 1 and Additional file 1). Blood and tissue samples (BSC/TSC) positive for trypanosomes, and DNA from these samples were preserved in the TCC-USP.
Table 1

Trypanosoma wauwau and closely related trypanosomes from Neotropical phyllostomid bats and Australian marsupials and rodents included in the phylogenetic tree based on V7V8 SSU rRNA and gGAPDH genes (Fig. 4)

Trypanosoma

Host batc

Year

Geographic Origin

Isolate

Family species

Locality country

T. wauwau cultures (TCCa)

    

352

ROMO 86

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

2001

Monte Negro/Rondônia

BR

409-413

ROMO 166/156/159/167/163

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

2002

Monte Negro/Rondônia

BR

599/600

HMO 150/152

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

2002

Porto Velho/Rondônia

BR

980-989/1007/

ROMO 01-04/06/08/20/22-24/ 50/56/41/51/48

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

2005

Porto Velho/Rondônia

BR

1008/1019-1023

43/44

1871/1878

Ptero 6/8

Mor

Pteronotus gymnonotus

2009

Porto Velho/Rondônia

BR

1872/1873

Ptero 11/17

Mor

Pteronotus personatus

2009

Porto Velho/Rondônia

BR

Archived blood/tissue of Pteronotus bats (BSC/TSCb)

     

PR

100/105

Mor

Pteronotus gymnonotus

2006

Itabaiana/Sergipe

BR

VCT

6227/ 6236/ 6238/ 6239/ 6254/ 6379/ 6409

Mor

Pteronotus gymnonotus

2009

Parauapebas/Pará

BR

VCT

1103

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

2007

Parauapebas/Pará

BR

VCT

3880

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

2008

Xinguara/Pará

BR

VCT

4330

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

2008

Canaã dos Carajás/Pará

BR

MOL

174

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

2004

Rio Sono/Tocantins

BR

RB

06

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

2010

Ribeirãozinho/Mato Grosso

BR

MN7

07

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

2010

São Vicente/Mato Grosso

BR

ROM

97963/97965

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

1990

Annai/Upper Takutu Upper Essequibo

GY

ROM

102929/102973/102990/103126

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

1994

Surama/Upper Takutu Upper Essequibo

GY

ROM

103420

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

1994

Tropenbos/Upper Demerara-Berbice

GY

ROM

106659

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

1996

Upper Takutu Upper Essequibo

GY

ROM

107348/109024/109292

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

1997

Iwokrama Reserve/Potaro-Siparuni

GY

ROM

111534/111664/111814

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

1999

Iwokrama Forest

GY

Potaro-Siparuni

ROM

113739/113823

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

2001

Demerara/Mahaica

GY

ROM

115482/115561

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

2002

Essequibo-West Demerara/Shanklands

GY

ROM

116524/116636/116651

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

2005

Kaieteur National Park Potaro-Siparuni

GY

ROM

99235

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

1991

Petén

GT

ROM

104227

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

1995

Nacional Park Soberania

PA

Canal Zone

ROM

104355/104369

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

1995

Parque Nacional Darién

PA

ROM

114151

Mor

Pteronotus parnellii

2002

Brownsberg Nature Park/Brokopondo

SR

Trypanosomes of phyllostomid bats: T. spp-Neobats

     

T. sp Neot 1

093AJBohio/134AJCacao/278AJLeon 216AJGuava/300,302AJBCI

Phy

Artibeus jamaicensis

2005

-

PA

 

RNMO56/63

Phy

Trachops cirrhosus

2012

Angicos/Rio Grande do Norte

BR

T. sp Neot 2

082AJBohio2/092AJBohio/275AJLeon 173AJGigante/196AJPenaBlanca

Phy

Artibeus jamaicensis

2005

-

PA

T. sp Neot 3

070AJGuanabano/109AJBohio/240,268,269,282AJLeon/121AJCacao

Phy

Artibeus jamaicensis

2005

-

PA

 

BACO44/ 46

Phy

Artibeus lituratus

2014

Boyacá

CO

Australian trypanosomes

 

Marsupial and rodent hosts

   

T. sp

H25

 

Macropus giganteus - kangaroo

1997

-

AU

T. sp

G8

 

Bettongia penicillata - woylie

2013

-

AU

T. sp

BDA1

 

Bettongia lesueur - woylie

2009

-

AU

T. sp

D15/D17/D64

 

Trichosurus vulpecula - possum

2009

-

AU

T. sp

BRA2

 

Rattus fuscipes - rodent

2007

-

AU

a TCC, codes of cultures deposited in the Trypanosomatid Culture Collection of the Department of Parasitology, University of São Paulo, Brazil (TCC-USP)

b BSC/TSC, codes of blood and tissue samples deposited in the TCC-USP

c Mor, Mormoopidae, Phy, Phyllostomidae. BR, Brazil; GY, Guyana; GT, Guatemala; PA, Panamá; SR, Suriname; CO, Colombia; AU, Australia

Barcoding (V7V8 SSU rRNA) of bat trypanosomes in culture and blood samples

The DNA extracted from the cultures of bat trypanosomes using the phenol-chloroform method was used for PCR amplification of the variable V7V8 region of SSU rRNA (~800 bp). To detect the presence of trypanosomes in archived bat samples, we used a nested-PCR that target partial sequence (~561 bp) of the V7V8 SSU rRNA [29]. For the amplification of entire V7V8 SSU rRNA genes, other nested-PCR was developed using the primers 285 F/202R in the first round and the primers 609 F/706R in the second round as reported previously [30].

Phylogenetic analyses of whole SSU rRNA and gGAPDH genes

The sequences of SSU rRNA and gGAPDH genes were obtained as described previously [30], and alignments were obtained using Clustal X [31] and manually refined. We created the following alignments: a) entire SSU rRNA sequences (~1728 bp) of the novel samples aligned with those from available trypanosomes from bats and other hosts using non-trypanosome trypanosomatids as outgroups [32]; b) concatenated sequences of entire V7V8 SSU rRNA and gGAPDH genes from all trypanosomes of the T. cruzi clade using T. lewisi as outgroup (Table 1). All the species included in the phylogenetic analyses, and their respective hosts, geographical origins and GenBank accession numbers are provided as Additional files (Table 1 and Additional file 2).

The phylogenies were inferred using the parsimony (P), maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inferences (BI) analyses. The parsimony and bootstrap analyses were carried out using PAUP version 4.0b10 [33] with 500 replicates of random addition sequences followed by branch swapping (RAS-TBR). The ML analyses were performed using RAxML-VI-HPC v.2.2.3 [34] with tree searches performed with GTR model with gamma-distributed rate variation across sites and proportion of invariable sites (GTRGAMMA model) and 500 maximum parsimony-starting trees; the model parameters were estimated in RAxML for the duration of the tree search [32]. Nodal supports were estimated with 500 bootstrap replicates (alignments 1 and 2) in RAxML using GTRGAMMA and maximum parsimony starting trees. The BI analyses were performed in MrBayes v3.1.2 [35] with GTRGAMMA and the first 25 % of the trees from 1 million generations were discarded as burn-in as previously detailed [32].

Spliced leader (SL) RNA sequences: amplification, sequencing and data analysis

The amplification of the whole SL RNA gene repeats and sequencing of both strands of at least five clones from each isolate, obtained from two independent PCR reactions, were performed as described previously [36]. The alignment of resulting sequences was manually refined. Network genealogy was inferred by SplitsTree v4.11.3 using the neighbour-net method [37]. The analysis of secondary structures was performed as before [4].

Morphology, growth behaviour and development in mammalian cell cultures, triatomine bugs and mice

We examined blood smears from naturally infected bats and logarithmic and stationary phase cultures obtained with or without the monolayers of Hi-5 insect cells of two selected isolates, one from each genotype (TCC411 and TCC1873). The flagellates smeared in glass-slides were Giemsa-stained. To verify whether the trypanosome differentiated in the supernatant and invaded and developed within mammalian cells, stationary cultures that contained a reasonable number of trypomastigotes were transferred to monolayers of monkey LLC-MK2 cells cultivated at 37 °C, as described previously [4]. The isolates TCC411, TCC413 and TCC599 were assessed for their ability to infect triatomine bugs and Balb/c mice, as described previously [9, 15].

Transmission (TEM) and scanning (SEM) electron microscopy

For TEM analyses, cultures at mid-log phase from trypanosomes (TCC411 and TCC1873) were fixed with glutaraldehyde, post-fixed in osmium tetroxide, embedded in Spurr’s resin, and examined with a JEOL 100CX electron microscope. For SEM analysis, flagellates fixed with glutaraldehyde were adhered to poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips and processed for observation on a ZEISS DSM 940 microscope as reported before [30].

Results

Surveys by haemoculture and isolation in culture of trypanosomes from Pteronotus spp

During the surveys of trypanosomes carried out from 2001 to 2009 in the state of Rondonia, 83 Pteronotus bats were captured, and the haemoculture (HE) analysis yielded a general prevalence of ~35 %, resulting in 29 cultures of trypanosomes obtained from P. parnellii (25), P. personatus (2) and P. gymnonotus (2) (Table 1). Most of the bats captured in Rondonia were from two shelters, a cave and a river bridge, separated by ~300 km and shared with phyllostomid bats (Fig. 1; Table 1). Cultures of trypanosomes were obtained by HE from bats from different families captured in the two shelters (Additional file 2). Pteronotus bats from other Brazilian states and other countries were not examined by haemoculturing.

The prevalence of trypanosomes in blood/tissues of Pteronotus spp. from a wide geographical range

In Brazil, blood/tissue samples of 101 Pteronotus bats examined by nested-PCR included samples from P. parnellii (56), P. personatus (26) and P. gymnonotus (19) from the states of Para, Mato Grosso, Maranhão, Goiás, Piauí, Tocantins and Sergipe. We identified only 15 bats positive for trypanosomes (~15 %) probably due to the small size of archived liver samples used for DNA preparation. However, the analysis of 80 archived tissue samples of P. parnellii from other countries showed a prevalence of ~32.5 % (26 positive bats). Altogether, we found trypanosomes by nested-PCR in 41of 181 blood/tissues samples: 32 of 136 samples examined from P. parnellii and 9 of 19 from P. gymnonotus. The details of the host species, geographical origins and trypanosome species, and genotypes detected in the Pteronotus bats examined in the present study are shown in Table 1 and in the Additional file 1.

V7V8 SSU rRNA barcoding revealed a novel trypanosome species in Pteronotus bats

In the phylogenetic analysis, the V7V8 SSU rRNA sequences from 70 trypanosome samples obtained by HE or from blood/tissue samples of Pteronotus spp. formed a strongly supported clade. Despite sharing high similarity (0.4 % of sequence divergence), the sequences were separated into three clusters designated as Pt1-Pt3. The trypanosomes from Brazilian bats clustered in Pt1 and Pt2, whereas Pt3 comprised exclusively the four samples from Guyana (Fig. 2). The small fragment of SSU rRNA (~561 bp) sequenced from the isolates from Guatemala, Suriname, Guyana and Panama lacked the beginning of gene sequences, which contained the sites that distinguished between Pt1 and Pt2, so we were unable to identify the genotypes of these trypanosomes.
Fig. 2

Barcoding and phylogeographical analysis of new trypanosomes from Neotropical bats. Phylogenetic analysis of V7V8 SSU rRNA sequences of trypanosomes from cultures and bat blood/tissue samples from Pteronotus and Phyllostomidae bats from Central and South America. The numbers on the nodes are bootstrap values (P/ML) derived from 500 replicates

The divergences in the barcode sequences separating the trypanosomes of Pteronotus bats from the other trypanosomes were as follows: 1) ~5.5 % from the barcode sequences of trypanosomes from Panamanian [11], Colombian and Brazilian phyllostomids (the clade T. spp. Neobats), which correspond to several new trypanosome species; 2) ~7.6 % from sequences of the Australian trypanosomes from kangaroo (T. sp. H25), possums (T. sp. D15, D17 and D64), woylie (T. sp. G8 and T. sp. BDA1) and bush rats (T. sp. BRA2); and 3) ~10 % from T. livingstonei of African bats. Therefore, the large genetic distances separating the trypanosomes indicated that the Pteronotus isolates are representatives of a new trypanosome species, which was herein named Trypanosoma wauwau n. sp.

Phylogenetic relationships within the clade T. cruzi based on whole SSU rRNA and gGAPDH genes

We selected seven isolates from Pteronotus spp. representatives of the genotypes Pt1 and Pt2 for the positioning of T.wauwau in the Trypanosoma phylogenetic tree using the whole SSU rRNA and gGAPDH sequences. Two isolates from the clade T. spp. Neobats were also included in the analyses. The phylogenetic trees inferred using these genes exhibited highly congruent topologies, as showed using SSU rRNA sequences alone (Fig. 3), which are the only sequences available in GenBank for all trypanosomes included in the analyses, especially those obtained from blood and tissue samples, whereas most gGAPDH sequences are from cultured trypanosomes.
Fig. 3

Positioning of T. wauwau in the phylogenetic tree of Trypanosoma. Phylogenetic tree (ML) inferred using whole SSU rRNA sequences from the trypanosomes of Noctilionoidea Neotropical bats: T. wauwau, to date found exclusively in Pteronotus bats clustered with the trypanosomes of the clade T. spp. Neobats (Panamanian, Colombian and Brazilian Phyllostomidae bats) close to the clade of Australian bats. The analyses included species of all major clades of Trypanosoma and trypanosomatids of other genera as outgroups (1.728 characters, –Ln = -8870.359849). The numbers at the nodes correspond respectively to P, ML (500 replicates) and BI support values. Codes within parenthesis are GenBank accession numbers

In the better-resolved phylogenetic trees inferred using concatenated SSU rRNA and gGAPDH sequences, the clade of trypanosomes from Pteronotus bats was sister to the clade T. spp. Neobats, and both formed a clade sister to the Australian clade (Fig. 4). Although the support values for the positioning of these trypanosomes varied depending on the taxa included in the analyses and the methods employed for the inferences, the positioning of T. wauwau was consistent in most phylogenetic analyses. In addition, the relationships among other trypanosomes within and outside the T. cruzi clade were consistent with our previous phylogenies [3, 4].
Fig. 4

Phylogenetic relationships between T. wauwau and the other T. cruzi clade trypanosomes. ML phylogenetic analysis based on the concatenated sequences of V7V8 SSU rRNA and gGAPDH genes (1.691 characters, –Ln = 8457.739334) from seven isolates (genotypes Pt1 and Pt2) of T. wauwau, two isolates of T. spp. Neobats, other 24 bat trypanosomes, and 13 trypanosomes from other mammals. Species of the clade T. lewisi were used as outgroup. The numbers at the nodes correspond respectively to P, ML (500 replicates) and BI support values

The degree of gGAPDH divergences separating between the genotypes Pt1 and Pt2 of the Pteronotus trypanosomes were 0.6 %; we are describing a single species with two genotypes to be consistent with other species of the clade such as T. cruzi, T. c. marinkellei, T. dionisii and T. rangeli that comprises an increasing number of divergent genotypes/lineages [2, 3, 5, 15]. The gGAPDH divergences separating T. wauwau from related trypanosomes were ~ 9.0 % from the nearest Neotropical trypanosomes of the clade T.spp. Neobats, 10 % from the Australian clade, 14.3 and 14.6 % from T. livingstonei and T. sp.bat, an unnamed and unique species from African megabats, respectively, and 15.5 % from T. vespertilionis of European bats. Therefore, the positioning into the phylogenetic trees, and the highly relevant degree of sequence divergence from other trypanosomes strongly supported the description of Trypanosoma wauwau n. sp.

Trypanosoma wauwau n. sp. was tightly linked to Pteronotus bats

The analysis of 264 bats of the genus Pteronotus, including 83 cultures and 181 blood/tissue samples, revealed a high prevalence of infection with T. wauwau (average of ~26,5 %). This trypanosome species was not detected in a large sampling of bats from other genera and families investigated so far by our and other research groups in this and in previous studies [9, 11, 1519]. Phyllostomid bats captured in shelters shared with Pteronotus in Rondônia, western Amazonia, were identified as T. c. marinkellei and T. dionisii [9]. Previous studies suggested some degree of specificity of trypanosome species to certain bat taxa. For instance, T. c. marinkellei appear to be composed of divergent trypanosomes and genotypes related to different genera of the Phyllostomidae family [9]. Also suggesting some host-specificity, T. livingstonei was identified in African bats of the closely related genera Rhinolophus and Hipposideros, whereas sympatric bats of Molossidae harboured T. erneyi [3, 4]. However, host-specificity of bat trypanosomes were still limited to data from a few surveys in general focused in the more abundant and easier to capture bat species, then precluding any strong associations of trypanosome species with bat hosts and geography.

Notably, other than T. wauwau, Pteronotus bats are apparently infected by very few other trypanosome species, despite the presence of T. cruzi in species of Pteronotus in Brazil [5, 38] and Mexico [39]. In contrast, species of diverse genera of Phyllostomidae that shared areas and shelters with Pteronotus were infected with a wide range of trypanosomes, including T. dionisii, T. c. marinkellei and unnamed species of the clade T. spp. Neobats, as shown in this (Additional file 2) and previous studies [9, 11].

High conservation of transcripts and structures of SL RNAgene repeat of T. wauwau and trypanosomes from Australia and Africa

The SL RNA genes have been used as taxonomic markers for trypanosomatids because the repeats of SL RNA vary in both length and sequence, and the different species exhibited highly conserved exons, moderately conserved introns and highly variable intergenic sequences. Shared by all SL RNA structures, the Y-shaped topology is formed by three stem-loops and a bifurcation point variable according to the species/genotypes [4, 15, 36, 40].

We determined the primary sequences of cloned full-length SLRNA repeats of four isolates of T. wauwau. The SL RNA repeats varied in length, ~722 bp and ~702 bp for the T. wauwau genotypes Pt1 and Pt2, respectively, in addition to SNPs, microsatellites and insertions/deletions in the intergenic regions that distinguished the two genotypes. The intergenic regions of T. wauwau could not be aligned with confidence with those from any other trypanosome species (data not shown). Notable, T. wauwau shared highly conserved transcript sequences, and almost identical secondary structures when compared with those from its closest relatives T. sp H25 (SL RNA characterized in the present study) and T. livingstonei (Fig. 5a, b) [4].
Fig. 5

The SL RNA primary and secondary structures of T. wauwau and its closest trypanosomes. a, Aligned sequences of the SL RNA transcripts from T. wauwau (Pt1 and Pt2 genotypes), and other T. cruzi clade trypanosomes. b, Network of SL RNA transcript sequences and almost identical secondary structures shared by Neotropical T. wauwau and Australian T. sp H25 (differences are indicated by arrows in the T. wauwau SL structure), and highly similar to that of T. livingstonei from African bats. Numbers in nodes correspond to bootstrap values estimated by 500 replicates using the same parameters optimized for network inferences

Behaviour of T. wauwau inoculated in mice and triatomine bugs

Similar to the behaviour shown previously for T. sp. H25 [29] and T. livingstonei [4], T. wauwau did not develop within mammalian (human and monkey) cells in vitro, and was unable to infect mice as determined by negative HE and PCR tests of mice blood samples done from 2 to 30 days after the inoculation of cultured trypomastigotes of T. wauwau.

T. wauwau was not infective to triatomines (Rhodnius robustus, Rhodnius neglectus and Triatoma infestans), which destroyed the parasites in their gut and haemolymph. Similar results were obtained for T. dionisii, T. erneyi and T. livingstonei [3, 4, 9]. The high prevalence of bats infected with T. wauwau suggested that this species should be transmitted by common vectors and routes. The Pteronotus bats captured were in general heavily infested with ectoparasites such as hippoboscid flies and ticks, but cimicids were not found in these bats. Cave-dwelling sand flies can be the vectors of bat trypanosomes as previously indicated for T. leonidasdeanei in Central America [41], and suggested by prevalent trypanosome infection in sand flies usually associated with bats [42]. Studies of ectoparasites and sand flies associated with bats are required, as done to demonstrate that cimicids cyclically transmit T. dionisii and T. vespertilionis in Africa and Europe [43]. However, mechanical transmission through the bites of ectoparasites, and oral infection through the ingestion of ectoparasites, are very probable among bats that live in colonies, and share grooming and feeding on the ectoparasites.

Morphology of blood and culture developmental forms and growth behaviour of T. wauwau

The parasitemia was very low in all bats examined, even in blood samples of bats that generated positive haemocultures. The blood smears stained with Giemsa of Pteronotus bats showed scarce large trypomastigote forms with a wide and striated body, pointed posterior end, a noticeable undulating membrane, and a short free flagellum. The small kinetoplast occupied a lateral position adjacent to the rounded and nearly to the central nucleus (Fig. 6a). The trypomastigotes in the Pteronotus blood smears resembled those of T. leonidasdeanei and T. pessoai in Central and South American bats [41, 44], and the trypomastigotes found in blood smears of African bats infected with T. heybergi and T. livingstonei [4, 45]. Interestingly, blood trypomastigotes of T. wauwau were also quite similar to those of T. sp. from the Australian marsupial Trichosurus vulpecula, which clustered together with T. sp. H25 in the clade T. cruzi; so far the blood forms of T. sp. H25 remain undescribed [29, 46].
Fig. 6

Pteronotus parnellii and developmental forms of T. wauwau: Light microscopy of Giemsa-stained forms: A, trypomastigotes in bat blood smear. B, flagellates co-cultivated with Hi-5 insect cells: Supernatants of early cultures showing small and rounded division forms (a, b, c), multiple fission forms united by the posterior extremity exhibiting various nuclei, kinetoplasts and flagella (a, c), rosettes of epimastigotes attached by the flagella (b), epimastigotes largely varying in shape and size (b, d-f), log-phase regular epimastigote that multiply by binary fission (d), small trypomastigotes with terminal kinetoplast of stationary cultures (g). C, Epimastigotes (a, b) and trypomastigotes (b) with noticeable undulant membrane, and small trypomastigotes (a) in the supernatant of LLC-MK2 mammalian cells at 37 °C. Trypomastigotes are indicated by black stars. Nucleus (N); Kinetoplast (K); Flagellum (F), Undulant Membrane (UM). Scale bars: 10 μm

The developmental and morphological analyses of T. wauwau co-cultivated with Hi-5 cells showed initially spheromastigotes that multiply by binary or multiple and irregular fissions (Fig. 6Ba) generating rosettes of epimastigotes attached by their flagella (Fig. 6Bb), and large forms exhibiting various flagella (Fig. 6Bc). The free epimastigotes varied largely in shape and size (Fig. 6Bb, d–f), and the more common log-phase forms (Fig. 6Bd) ranged in length from 11.0 to 35.7 μm (average of 23.8 μm) and in width from 1.0 to 5.2 μm (average of 2.3 μm). These forms exhibited a punctual kinetoplast, in general, not adjacent to the central nucleus, and a long flagellum (average 13.0 μm), but undulant membrane was unnoticeable (Fig. 6Bd,e). The stationary cultures exhibited small trypomastigotes with a rounded posterior extremity and terminal kinetoplast (Fig. 6Bg).

The co-cultivation of T. wauwau with a monolayer of LLC-MK2 at 37 °C displayed, in the supernatants of the cultures, epimastigotes (Fig. 6Ca) that differentiate to trypomastigotes (Fig. 6Ca,b) of the two main morphotypes: 1) long and wide multiplicative forms with pointed posterior end, noticeable undulant membrane, and punctual kinetoplast, and 2) small trypomastigotes with a large terminal kinetoplast (Fig. 6Ca,b). Although some rounded flagellates resembling amastigote forms were detected in the beginning of the cultures inside of a few cells, they were not able to multiply.

Morphological and ultrastructural features of T. wauwau assessed by electron microscopy

The analyses of T. wauwau by SEM showed small rounded forms that divided by multiple irregular fissions (Fig. 7a,b) forming rosettes of epimastigotes united by the flagella (Fig. 7c) or large forms likely resulting from multiple and incomplete fissions (Fig. 7b,d). The cultures also exhibited free epimastigotes (Fig. 7e–h), which multiplies by binary fission and differentiate to epimastigotes pointed at posterior end, lacking visible undulant membrane, and exhibiting a long flagella (Fig. 7g). Few small trypomastigotes were also observed (Fig. 7i). The TEM ultrastructural analysis revealed a set of morphological features unique of T. wauwau: unusual large, rounded and condensed nucleolus in dividing epimastigotes often showing more than two nuclei that divided before the kinetoplast (Fig. 8a), the flagellum exhibiting a conspicuous paraxial structure (Fig. 8b,c), flagellar pockets showing many vesicles (Fig. 8b), large numbers of acidocalcisomes (Fig. 8a), enlarged mitochondria with many cristae (Fig. 8c), kDNA fibrils arranged in a highly compacted disk-shaped kinetoplast (Fig. 8b,c), and an electron-dense structure that resembled a short cytostome-cytopharynx complex (Fig. 8d). The ultrastructural features displayed by T. wauwau were more similar to those exhibited by T. livingstonei [4] than to the general features shared by all bat trypanosomes of the subgenus Schizotrypanum as revealed in previous studies for T. cruzi, T. dionisii and T. erneyi [3, 4].
Fig. 7

Morphology of T. wauwau developmental forms in culture assessed by SEM. Small dividing forms and rounded flagellates common in early cultures (a, b),rosettes of epimastigotes attached by the flagella (c), large multiple fission form showing the anterior ends and the flagella of many parasites that remained united by the posterior extremity (d), epimastigotes of variable size and shape likely originated from multiple and irregular division forms (e, f, h), log-phase regular epimastigotes and binary division (g), small flagellate resembling the trypomastigotes of stationary-phase cultures (i)

Fig. 8

Ultrastructural features of T. wauwau revealed by TEM microscopy. Cultured epimastigotes: transversal section showing three nuclei with large and condensed nucleolus and a single kinetoplast (a); acidocalcisomes (b), flagellum with a conspicuous paraxial structure (b’, c), highly compacted disk-shaped kinetoplast (b, c), enlarged mitochondria filled with many cristae (c), structure resembling a short cytostome-cytopharynx complex (d). Nucleus (N), Kinetoplast (K), Flagellum (F), Acidocalcisomes (Ac), Mitochondria (M), Cytostome (Cy), Paraxial structure (PR)

Taxonomic summary

Phylum Euglenozoa Cavalier-Smith, 1981; Class Kinetoplastea Honigberg, 1963; Order Trypanosomatida Hollande, 1952; Family Trypanosomatidae Doflein, 1951; Genus Trypanosoma Gruby, 1843.

New species description

Trypanosoma wauwau n. sp.

Type material

Hapantotype: the culture of the isolate TCC411 cryo preserved at TCC-USP. Paratypes: the cultures of the isolates TCC599, 988, 1007, 1022, 1871-1873 and 1878, all identified as genotype Pt1 of T. wauwau. The cultures of the isolates TCC352, 409-413, 600, 980-987, 989, 1008, 1019-1021 and 1023 are considered the genotype Pt2 of T. wauwau.

Type host

Chiroptera, Mormoopidae, Pteronotus parnellii.

Additional host

Chiroptera, Mormoopidae, Pteronotus gymnonotus and Pteronotus personatus.

Locality

Brazil, state of Rondonia, Amazonia.

Additional localities in Brazil

States of Pará, Mato Grosso, Tocantins and Sergipe.

Additional countries

Guyana, Suriname, Panama and Guatemala.

Morphology

The blood trypomastigotes are large and wide with body striations, small kinetoplast and frilled undulating membrane. The epimastigotes predominating in log-phase cultures are long and pointed at posterior ends (averaging 23.8 μm in length and 2.3 in width), in general, the kinetoplast is laterally positioned and not adjacent to the nucleus, and the flagellum is long (average 13.0 μm). All forms are shown in the Figs. 6 and 7.

Species diagnosis

DNA sequences (isolate TCC411) unique to T. wauwau deposited in GenBank (accession numbers): SSU rRNA (KT030810), gGAPDH (KT030800) and SL gene (KT368810).

Etymology

The name Trypanosoma wauwau n. sp. was adopted because this species was firstly discovered in bats captured in the Brazilian state of Rondonia, Western Amazonia, near the land-dwelling of the endangered Brazilian indigenous people Uru-Eu-Wau-Wau.

Species depository

The cultures of T. wauwau are all cryopreserved at the Trypanosomatid Culture Collection of the University of São Paulo, TCC-USP. Giemsa-stained smears of cultures and blood samples of bats infected with T. wauwau, and DNA from cultures and T. wauwau-infected bat blood/tissue samples are also conserved at TCC-USP. Trypanosoma wauwau n. sp. was registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN, under the code: to urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub: 67EBC3EB-35B4-4645-B45A-F12CA818DC09.

Discussion

In this study, we described the prevalent Trypanosoma wauwau n. sp. that infected Neotropical bats of the genus Pteronotus (Mormoopidae) and nested into the T. cruzi clade, then supporting the bat-seeding hypothesis proposed for the origin of this clade [1, 3, 4]. Comprehensive surveys of bat trypanosomes strongly linked T. wauwau to Pteronotus bats. The phylogeographical analysis of the T. wauwau isolates from wide geographical range revealed two main genotypes infecting three species of Pteronotus, P. parnellii, P. personatus and P. gymnonotus, across Central and South America. Bats of Mormoops, the other genus of the Mormoopidae, were not examined to determine whether T. wauwau can parasitize bats of the entire family.

In the SSU rRNA and gGAPDH phylogenies, T. wauwau was sister to the clade composed of trypanosomes from Panama [11], Brazil and Colombia, all from Neotropical Phyllostomidae bats and clustered in the clade T. spp. Neobats. The positioning of T. wauwau and T. spp. Neobats as the most basal trypanosomes of Neotropical bats, and closer to Australian than to other Neotropical trypanosomes is very relevant to the evolutionary history of the T. cruzi clade. Corroborating previous studies, T. livingstonei from African bats remained at the edge of this clade [4]. However, the eventual positioning of New World trypanosomes in more basal positions can change the hypothesis of Old World origin for the T. cruzi clade.

Previously to the bat-seeding hypothesis, a southern super-continent hypothesis was suggested by the relationships and host distribution of the T. cruzi clade trypanosomes, especially by the positioning of the Australian T. sp. H25 (kangaroo) at the edge of the clade. According to this scenario, T. cruzi and related parasites could be primarily evolved in marsupials of South America, Antarctica and Australia [47]. Contradicting the southern super-continent hypothesis, African trypanosomes of civets (carnivorous) and monkeys nested into the T. cruzi clade, showing that the species of this clade were also present in African terrestrial mammals, in addition to bats [10].

Currently proposed scenarios suggested multiple movements of marsupials between Australia and South America, which remained connected by Antarctica until ~35 mya. There is also evidence that bats and a few rodents were the only placental mammals that successfully colonized Australia after its complete isolation, and before the animals brought by humans [48, 49]. The Australian trypanosomes within the T. cruzi clade were from kangaroo, woylie and possum, marsupials of the order Diprodontia of the superorder Australidelphia [1, 2, 29, 5053]. The order Microbiotheria, which contains a single extant species, is the only Neotropical representative of Australidelphia. New World marsupials (Ameridelphia) are common hosts of T. cruzi, T. rangeli and other trypanosome species [45]. Noteworthy, intra erythrocytic parasites of Sarcocystidae molecularly identified from the South American and Australian marsupials shared a common ancestor [54]. However, phylogenetic studies revealed that trypanosomes from Australian marsupials are unrelated to one another, some species showed to be more related to trypanosomes of other hosts outside Australia, and so far no species could be linked to South American marsupials [50, 52, 53].

Despite old reports of trypanosomes infecting Australian bats, including T. pteropi showing blood trypomastigotes resembling those of the Schizotrypanum species [45, 53, 55], only recently trypanosomes from Australian bats began to be molecularly characterized, and T. vegrandis, a species previously reported in a range of non-volante mammals (woylie, kangaroo, bandicoot and wallaby) was identified in bats (Pteropus scapulatus, Nyctophilus geoffroyi and Chalinolobus gouldii). T. vegrandis, however, is apparently restricted to Australia, and was not nested into the T. cruzi clade [53, 56].

T. wauwau and the clade T. spp. Neobats, an assemblage of several unnamed trypanosome species, were found, respectively, in the Neotropical Mormoopidae and Phyllostomidae families of Noctilionoidea, a superfamiliy with basal groups limited to two extant species of each non-Neotropical Myzopodidae and Mystacinidae families that once flourished in Australia and Africa, respectively [2327]. Likely, Noctilionoidea may have had their origin in eastern Gondwana, and then dispersed from Africa into Australia from where they could have migrated across Antarctica to South America to give origin to Neotropical noctilionoids [27]. It is tempting to speculate that the ancestors of Noctilionoidea bats carrying trypanosomes of the T. cruzi clade once inhabited Australia, and may have been introduced into South America.

Conclusions

Here, we described Trypanosoma wauwau n. sp. of Neotropical Pteronotus bats and nested into the T. cruzi clade supporting the bat-seeding hypothesis. The findings from the present study suggest a link of Australian trypanosomes with newly discovered Neotropical bat trypanosomes support an evolutionary scenario whereby a lineage of the T. cruzi clade may have expanded into Australian mammals. Accordingly, trypanosomes from indigenous Australian mammals within the clade T. cruzi likely evolved from a bat trypanosome. Strongly supporting this hypothesis, a new trypanosome species found in an Australian bat (Pteropus scapulatus) showed to be related to T. rangeli [56, 57]. Therefore, besides the ancient great radiation of bats throughout the Word and more recent movements of bats across the land bridge of the Bering Strait and quite large oceanic barriers [1, 2, 4], a route in the southern supercontinent may also have played an important role in the dispersion of bats carrying T. cruzi clade trypanosomes. Our findings contribute to the discussion on the two competing biogeographical hypotheses: whether the ancestor trypanosomes of the clade T. cruzi originated in the New World or Old Word bats. The results gathered to date are more consistent with an Old World origin of the bat trypanosome ancestor of the T. cruzi clade. The present study provides relevant insights into the origin, dispersion, host-colonization and speciation of trypanosomes that shaped the T. cruzi clade. However, improved knowledge about Australian, African, and Neotropical trypanosome bats, as well as comprehensive molecular studies of bat trypanosomes from the Nearctic and Palearctic can be valuable to understand the origin and global distribution of T. cruzi clade trypanosomes, and to shed more light on the evolution of these intriguing parasites and the emergence of human pathogens.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Brazilian agencies CNPq (PROSUL, PRAFRICA and PROTAX), CAPES (PNIPB and PNPD) and FAPESP. The analysis of bats from Central America, Suriname and Guyana was supported by grant ‘Investissements d’Avenir’ from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Canada (ANR-10-LABX-25-01). Archived samples from Brazilian Pteronotus were donated to ACP by VC Tavares, A Césari, PA Rocha, FM Martins, MOG Lopes, CS Bernabé, TG Oliveira, E Gonçalves and M Marcos. We are grateful to many student from USP and researches of other universities for the inestimable help in the fieldworks. We also thanks JA Rosa for the generous contribution with triatomines from the insectary of UNESP-Araraquara, and CE Jared and MM Antoniazzi for the access to electron microscopic facilities of the Institute Butantan, Brazil. Luciana Lima is postdoctoral fellow sponsored by FAPESP, and Oneida Espinosa-Álvarez is recipient of a PhD fellowship from CNPq (PROTAX).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade de São Paulo
(2)
Division of Mammals, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution
(3)
Centro de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas y Crónicas, Escuela de Biología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador
(4)
Faculdades Integradas Padre Albino (FIPA) e Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde de Barretos (FACISB)
(5)
Departamento de Biologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo
(6)
Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Parasitología Tropical, Universidad del Tolima
(7)
Department of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum
(8)
Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter

References

  1. Hamilton PB, Teixeira MMG, Stevens JR. The evolution of Trypanosoma cruzi: the ‘bat seeding’ hypothesis. Trends Parasitol. 2012;28:136–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Hamilton PB, Cruickshank C, Stevens JR, Teixeira MMG, Mathews F. Parasites reveal movement of bats between the New and Old Worlds. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012;63:521–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Lima L, Maia da Silva F, Neves L, Attias M, Takata CS, Campaner M, et al. Evolutionary insights from bat trypanosomes: morphological, developmental and phylogenetic evidence of a new species, Trypanosoma (Schizotrypanum) erneyi sp. nov. in African bats closely related to Trypanosoma(Schizotrypanum) cruzi and allied species. Protist. 2012;163:856–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Lima L, Espinosa-Álvarez O, Hamilton PB, Neves L, Takata CSA, Campaner M, et al. Trypanosoma livingstonei: a new species from African bats supports the bat seeding hypothesis for the Trypanosoma cruzi clade. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6(1):221.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Lima L, Espinosa-Álvarez O, Ortiz P, Trejo-Varon JA, Carranza JC, Pinto CM, et al. Genetic diversity of Trypanosoma cruzi in bats, and multilocus phylogenetic and phylogeographical analyses supporting Tcbat as an independent DTU (discrete typing unit). Acta Trop. 2015;151:166–77.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Marinkelle CJ. The biology of the trypanosomes of bats. In: Lumsden WHR, Evans DA, editors. Biology of the Kinetoplastida. New York: Academic; 1976. p. 175–216.Google Scholar
  7. Molyneux DH. Trypanosomes of bats. In: Kreier JP, Baker JR, editors. Parasitic Protozoa. New York: Academic; 1991. p. 195–223.Google Scholar
  8. Barnabé C, Brisse S, Tibayrenc M. Phylogenetic diversity of bat trypanosomes of subgenus Schizotrypanum based on multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, random amplified polymorphic DNA, and cytochrome b nucleotide sequence analyses. Inf Gen Evol. 2003;2:201–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavazzana Jr M, Marcili A, Lima L, da Silva FM, Junqueira AC, Veludo HH, et al. Phylogeographical, ecological and biological patterns shown by nuclear (ssrRNA and gGAPDH) and mitochondrial (Cyt b) genes of trypanosomes of the subgenus Schizotrypanum parasitic in Brazilian bats. Int J Parasitol. 2010;40:345–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamilton PB, Adams ER, Njiokou F, Gibson WC, Cuny G, Herder S. Phylogenetic analysis reveals the presence of the Trypanosoma cruzi clade in African terrestrial mammals. Infect Genet Evol. 2009;9:81–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Cottontail VM, Kalko EKV, Cottontail I, Wellinghausen N, Tschapka M, Perkins SL, et al. High local diversity of Trypanosoma in a common bat species, and implications for the biogeography and taxonomy of the T. cruzi clade. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e108603.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Fermino BR, Viola LB, Paiva F, Garcia HA, de Paula CD, Botero-Arias R, et al. The phylogeography of trypanosomes from South American alligatorids and African crocodilids is consistent with the geological history of South American river basins and the transoceanic dispersal of Crocodylus at the Miocene. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6(1):313.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Pothirat T, Tantiworawit A, Chaiwarith R, Jariyapan N, Wannasan A, Siriyasatien P, et al. First isolation of Leishmania from Northern Thailand: case report, identification as Leishmania martiniquensis and phylogenetic position within the Leishmania enriettii complex. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(12):e3339.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kwakye-Nuako G, Mosore MT, Duplessis C, Bates MD, Puplampu N, Mensah-Attipoe I, et al. First isolation of a new species of Leishmania responsible for human cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ghana and classification in the Leishmania enriettii complex. Int J Parasitol. 2015;45:679–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Maia da Silva F, Marcili A, Lima L, Cavazzana Jr M, Ortiz PA, Campaner M, et al. Trypanosoma rangeli isolates of bats from Central Brazil: genotyping and phylogenetic analysis enable description of a new lineage using spliced-leader gene sequences. Acta Trop. 2009;109:199–207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Pinto CM, Kalko EK, Cottontail I, Wellinghausen N, Cottontail VM. TcBat a bat-exclusive lineage of Trypanosoma cruzi in the Panama Canal Zone, with comments on its classification and the use of the 18S rRNA gene for lineage identification. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12:1328–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Pinto CM, Ocaña-Mayorga S, Tapia EE, Lobos SE, Zurita AP, Aguirre-Villacís F, et al. Trypanosomes, and Triatomines in Ecuador: New Insights into the Diversity, Transmission, and Origins of Trypanosoma cruzi and Chagas Disease. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0139999.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. García L, Ortiz S, Osorio G, Torrico MC, Torrico F, Solari A. Phylogenetic analysis of Bolivian bat trypanosomes of the subgenus Schizotrypanum based on cytochrome B sequence and minicircle analyses. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36578.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ramírez JD, Tapia G, Muñoz G, Poveda C, Rendón LM, Hincapié E, et al. Trypanosome species in Neotropical bats: biological, evolutionary and epidemiological implications. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;22:250–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lima VS, Jansen AM, Messenger LA, Miles MA, Llewellyn MS. Wild Trypanosoma cruzi I genetic diversity in Brazil suggests admixture and disturbance in parasite populations from the Atlantic Forest region. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:263.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Simmons NB. Order Chiroptera. In: Wilson DE, Reeder DM, editors. Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  22. da Rocha PA, Feijó JA, Mikalauskas JS, Ferrari SF. First records of mormoopid bats (Chiroptera, Mormoopidae) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Mammalia. 2011;75:295–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Simmons NB, Conway TM. Phylogenetic relationships of mormoopid bats (Chiroptera: Mormoopidae) based on morphological data. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 2001;258:1–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lim BK. Review of the origins and biogeography of bats in South America. Chiroptera Neotrop. 2009;15:391–410.Google Scholar
  25. Teeling EC, Madsen O, Murphy WJ, Springer MS, O’Brien J. Nuclear gene sequences confirm an ancient link between New Zealand’s short-tailed bat and South American noctilionoid bats. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003;28:308–19.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Teeling EC, Springer MS, Madsen O, Bates P, O’brien SJ, Murphy WJ. A Molecular Phylogeny for Bats Illuminates Biogeography and the Fossil Record. Science. 2005;307:580–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Gunnell GF, Simmons NB, Seiffert ER. New Myzopodidae (Chiroptera) from the Late Paleogene of Egypt: Emended Family Diagnosis and Biogeographic Origins of Noctilionoidea. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e86712.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Cui J, Han N, Streicker D, Li G, Tang X, Shi Z, et al. Evolutionary relationships between bat coronaviruses and their hosts. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1526–32.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Noyes HA, Stevens JR, Teixeira MMGT, Phelan J, Holz P. A nested PCR for the ssrRNA gene detects Trypanosoma binneyi in platypus and Trypanosoma sp. in wombats and kangaroos in Australia. Int J Parasitol. 1999;29:331–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Borghesan TC, Ferreira RC, Takata CS, Campaner M, Borda CC, Paiva F, et al. Molecular phylogenetic redefinition of Herpetomonas (Kinetoplastea, Trypanosomatidae), a genus of insect parasites associated with flies. Protist. 2013;164:129–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4876–82.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hamilton PB, Gibson WC, Stevens JR. Patterns of co-evolution between trypanosomes and their hosts deduced from ribosomal RNA and protein-coding gene phylogenies. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007;44:15–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Swofford DL. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2002.Google Scholar
  34. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:2688–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 2001;17:754–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Rodrigues AC, Garcia HA, Batista JS, Minervino AH, Góes-Cavalcante G, Maia da Silva F. Characterization of spliced leader genes of Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) theileri: phylogeographical analysis of Brazilian isolates from cattle supports spatial clustering of genotypes and parity with ribosomal markers. Parasitology. 2010;137:111–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Huson DH, Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23:254–67.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Pinto AS, Bento DN. Trypanosoma cruzi-like bloodstream trypomastigotes in bats from the State of Piauí, Northeastern Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1986;19(1):31–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Villegas-García JC, Santillán-Alarcón S. Role of Meccus pallidipennis Stal, 1872 in the transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi to man in the state of Morelos, Central Mexico. Entomol Vect. 2004;11:349–62.Google Scholar
  40. Gibson W, Bingle L, Blendeman W, Brown J, Wood J, Stevens J. Structure and sequence variation of the trypanosome spliced leader transcript. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2000;107:269–77.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Zeledon R, Rosabal R. Trypanosoma leonidasdeanei sp. nov. in insectivorous bats of Costa Rica. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1969;63:221–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. McConnell E, Correa M. Trypanosomes and other microorganisms from Panamanian Phlebotomus sandflies. J Parasitol. 1964;50:523–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Gardner RA, Molyneux DH. Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) incertum from Pipistrellus pipistrellus: development and transmission by cimicid bugs. Parasitology. 1988;96:433–47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Deane LM, Sugay W. Trypanosoma pessoai n. sp. in vampire bats Desmodus rotundus rotundus from the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1963;5:165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Hoare CA. The trypanosomes of mammals: a zoological monograph. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publishing; 1972.Google Scholar
  46. Paparini A, Irwin PJ, Warren K, McInnes LM, de Torres P, Ryan UM. Identification of novel trypanosome genotypes in native Australian marsupials. Vet Parasitol. 2011;183:21–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Stevens JR, Noyes HA, Schofield CJ, Gibson WC. The molecular evolution of Trypanosomatidae. Adv Parasit. 2001;48:1–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Beck RMD. An ‘ameridelphian’ marsupial from the early Eocene of Australia supports a complex model of Southern Hemisphere marsupial biogeography. Naturwissenschaften. 2012;99:715–29.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Nilsson MA, Churakov G, Sommer M, Tran NV, Zemann A, Brosius J, et al. Tracking Marsupial Evolution Using Archaic Genomic Retroposon Insertions. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(7):e1000436.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Austen JM, Jefferies R, Friend JA, Ryan U, Adams P, Reid SA. Morphological and molecular characterization of Trypanosoma copemani n. sp. (Trypanosomatidae) isolated from Gilbert’s potoroo (Potorous gilbertii) and quokka (Setonix brachyurus). Parasitology. 2009;136:783–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. McInnes LM, Gillett A, Ryan UM, Austen J, Campbell RS, Hanger J, et al. Trypanosoma irwini n. sp (Sarcomastigophora: Trypanosomatidae) from the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). Parasitology. 2009;136:875–85.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. McInnes LM, Hanger J, Simmons G, Reid SA, Ryan UM. Novel trypanosome Trypanosoma gilletti sp. (Euglenozoa: Trypanosomatidae) and the extension of the host range of Trypanosoma copemani to include the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). Parasitology. 2011;138:59–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Thompson CK, Godfrey SS, Thompson RCA. Trypanosomes of Australian mammals: a review. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2014;3:57–66.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Merino S, Martínez J, Vásquez RA, Slapeta J. Monophyly of marsupial intraerythrocytic apicomplexan parasites from South America and Australia. Parasitology. 2010;137:37–43.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Mackerras MJ. The haematozoa of Australian mammals. Aust J Zool. 1959;7:105–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Austen JM, O’Dea M, Jackson B, Ryan U. High prevalence of Trypanosoma vegrandis in bats Western Australia. Vet Parasitology. 2015;214:342-47. Google Scholar
  57. Mackie JT, Stenner R, Gillett A, Barbosa A, Ryan U, Irwin P. Trypanosomiasis in an Australian little red flying-fox (Pteropus scapulatus). Vet. Pathol. 2015 (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright

© Lima et al. 2015

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement