Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Direct detection of falciparum and non-falciparum malaria DNA from a drop of blood with high sensitivity by the dried-LAMP system

  • 1,
  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 4 and
  • 1, 5
Parasites & Vectors201710:26

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1949-8

  • Received: 22 September 2016
  • Accepted: 21 December 2016
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Because of the low sensitivity of conventional rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria infections, the actual prevalence of the diseases, especially those caused by non-Plasmodium falciparum (non-Pf) species, in asymptomatic populations remain less defined in countries lacking in well-equipped facilities for accurate diagnoses. Our direct blood dry LAMP system (CZC-LAMP) was applied to the diagnosis of malaria as simple, rapid and highly sensitive method as an alternative for conventional RDTs in malaria endemic areas where laboratory resources are limited.

Results

LAMP primer sets for mitochondria DNAs of Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) and human-infective species other than Pf (non-Pf; P. vivax, P. ovale, P. malariae) were designed and tested by using human blood DNA samples from 74 residents from a malaria endemic area in eastern Zambia. These malaria dry-LAMPs were optimized for field or point-of-care operations, and evaluated in the field at a malaria endemic area in Zambia with 96 human blood samples. To determine the sensitivities and specificities, results obtained by the on-site LAMP diagnosis were compared with those by the nested PCR and nucleotide sequencing of its product. The dry LAMPs showed the sensitivities of 89.7% for Pf and 85.7% for non-Pf, and the specificities of 97.2% for Pf and 100% for non-Pf, with purified blood DNA samples. The direct blood LAMP diagnostic methods, in which 1 μl of anticoagulated blood were used as the template, showed the sensitivities of 98.1% for Pf, 92.1% for non-Pf, and the specificities of 98.1% for Pf, 100% for non-Pf. The prevalences of P. falciparum, P. malariae and P. ovale in the surveyed area were 52.4, 25.3 and 10.6%, respectively, indicating high prevalence of asymptomatic carriers in endemic areas in Zambia.

Conclusions

We have developed new field-applicable malaria diagnostic tests. The malaria CZC-LAMPs showed high sensitivity and specificity to both P. falciparum and non-P. falciparum. These malaria CZC-LAMPs provide new means for rapid, sensitive and reliable point-of-care diagnosis for low-density malaria infections, and are expected to help update current knowledge of malaria epidemiology, and can contribute to the elimination of malaria from endemic areas.

Keywords

  • Malaria
  • Malaria Infection
  • Rapid Diagnostic Test
  • Nest Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Malaria Endemic Area

Background

Malaria is one of the commonest and most important infectious diseases in tropical and sub-tropical countries. In sub-Saharan Africa, Plasmodium falciparum is thought to be the most prevalent among Plasmodium species. Although P. falciparum has been well investigated epidemiologically, non-P. falciparum malaria infections have been rather neglected because of their less severe clinical symptoms and difficulties of diagnosis. Therefore, the endemicity of P. vivax has only been reported recently [1], and actual distributions of P. malariae and P. ovale are still unknown [2].

Recently it turned out to be clear that the duration of infections with both P. falciparum and P. malariae is quite longer than previously estimated, despite the fact that these two species do not turn into hypnozoite, the dormant liver stage usually observed in P. vivax and P. ovale infections [3]. During chronic infection phase of malaria, parasitemia always are kept at low density. In high endemic area of malaria, asymptomatic P. falciparum-infected individuals with low-density parasitemia that is undetectable by the conventional rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) including light microscopy test or immunochromatographic test (ICT), are very common. In view of the fact that even the density of parasitemia is very low, it is possible to transmit malaria gametocytes into Anopheles mosquitos, part of which become infective to human. Consequently, asymptomatic P. falciparum or P. malariae carrier could be the reservoir for malaria infection. Therefore, highly sensitive diagnostic tools which are able to detect low-density parasitemia are essential for elimination of malaria.

Molecular diagnostic tests are highly sensitive methods to detect malaria infection even at very low parasitemia levels. For instance, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification is one of the most sensitive and reliable methods to detect malaria parasite DNA. Compared to RDTs, PCR requires an expensive equipment such as a thermal-cycler, and well-equipped and clean laboratory conditions. Nucleic acid extraction tools from blood samples are sometime required for PCR. Therefore, PCR is not suitable for the use in resource-poor settings where malaria is endemic. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is an alternative molecular method which requires neither expensive machines nor clean laboratory [4]. Although LAMP is more user-friendly, it still needs burdensome blood sample preparation.

Previously, we have developed a direct blood dry LAMP diagnostic system, named CZC-LAMP, for detection of human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) [5]. As is the case with conventional RDT, a drop of blood obtained by pricking a finger or an earlobe is sufficient and able to be used directly for the CZC-LAMP. In this study, we applied this system to develop a new easy-to-use RDT that is able to differentiate P. falciparum and non-P. falciparum even in cases with low density infections.

Methods

LAMP primers

LAMP primer sets were used to detect a part of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of human-infective Plasmodium species. The LAMP primer sets consisting of F3 (forward outer primer), B3 (backward outer primer), FIP (forward inner primer), BIP (backward inner primer), LF (loop forward primer), and LB (loop backward primer) were designed as previously described by Notomi et al. [4] and are listed in Table 1. The LAMP primer set targeting mtDNA for non-P. falciparum species (P. malariae, P. ovale curtisi, P. ovale wallikeri and P. vivax) were designed in this study using online PCR primer design tool Primer3 [6, 7]. The sequences of the same target region are also conserved in P. knowlesi and P. cynomolgi (Fig. 1). We also modified P. falciparum mtDNA detection primer sets reported in a previous literature [8]. After the primer sets were evaluated by real-time LAMP using the Rotor-Gene 3000 thermocycler (Corbett Research, Sydney, Australia) to select the best candidate primer sets by monitoring the reaction speed, cross-reactivity, primer multimer formation and optimal amplification time, the optimal temperature of LAMP reaction for the primer sets was determined.
Table 1

LAMP and nested PCR primer sequences for Pf and non-Pf used in this study

Primer set

Primer

Target species

Sequence (5'-3')

Non-Pf CZC-LAMP primer set (7 primers)

Non-Pf.Mt-FIP

Pv, Poc, Pow, Pm

AGGCTGCGATGAGACGACGCCGGGGATAACAGGTTATAGT

 

Non-Pf.Mt-BIP

Pv, Poc, Pow, Pm

AGCGTGTATTGTTGCCTTGTACTTAACGCCTGGAGTTCTTTATCTT

 

Non-Pf.Mt-LF

Pv, Poc, Pow, Pm

TGGAGGTGCCAATAGTATATAAAGAT

 

Non-Pf.Mt-LB

Pv, Poc, Pow, Pm

TGTACACACCGCTCGTCAC

 

Pov.Mt-F3

Pv, Poc, Pow

GGTGATTTTGTGTGCCGTT

 

Pm.Mt-F3

Pm

ACGGTTATTTTGTGTACCGTT

 

Non-Pf.Mt-B3

Pv, Poc, Pow, Pm

CGGCTGTTTCCATCTCAACT

Pf CZC-LAMP primer set (6 primers)

Pf.newMt-FIP

Pf

CAGTATATTGATATTGCGTGACGACCTTGCAATAAATAATATCTAGCGTGT

 

P.f.Mt-BIPa

Pf

AACTCCAGGCGTTAACCTGTAATGATCTTTACGTTAAGGGC

 

Pf.newMt-LF

Pf

GTGTACAAGGCAACAATACACG

 

P.f.Mt-LBa

Pf

GTTGAGATGGAAACAGCCGG

 

Pf.newMt-F3

Pf

TATTGGCACCTCCATGTCG

 

P.f.Mt-B3a

Pf

AACATTTTTTAGTCCCATGCTAA

Non-Pf nested PCR primers

PnfMt-Fout

Pv, Poc, Pow, Pm

TGCTGTCATACATGATGCACTT

 

PnfMt-Rout

Pv, Poc, Pow, Pm

ATGTAGTTTCCTCACAGCTTTATTCA

 

PnfMt-Fin

Pv, Poc, Pow, Pm

TGCTGTCATACATGATGCACTT

 

PnfMt-Rin

Pv, Poc, Pow, Pm

ATAACATTTTTTAGTCCCATGCTAGTA

aThe published LAMP primer sequence (PfMt869) [8] was used

Abbreviations: Pv P. vivax, Pow P. ovale wallikeri, Poc P. ovale curtisi, Pm P. malariae, Pf P. falciparum

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

LAMP primers designed for Pf and non-Pf malaria detection. Primer sets for Pf and non-Pf malaria are indicated in P. falciparum (Pf), P. vivax (Pv), P. ovale curtisi (Poc), P. ovale wallikeri (Pow), P. malariae (Pm), P. knowlesi and P. cynomolgi

LAMP reaction

The preparation of dry LAMP (CZC-LAMP) reagent was previously described [5]. Briefly, 3.0 μmol of trehalose, 35 nmol each of dNTPs mix and 8 U of Bst2.0 WS DNA polymerase were mixed and dried on the lid of a 0.2 ml microtube. Colori-Fluorometric Indicator (CFI; 3 nmol hydroxyl-naphtol blue with 3.5 nl GelGreen™ (10,000× Sol), 3.2 pmol of FIP and BIP, 0.4 pmol of F3 and B3, and 1.6 pmol of LF and LB primers were mixed and dried to prepare a dry LAMP tube.

When genomic DNA purified from the blood from malaria infected patients were used as a reaction template, 1 μl of extracted DNA solution plus 24 μl of 1× LAMP reaction buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.8], 10 mM KCl, and 7 mM MgSO4 and 0.1% TritonX-100 in DDW) were added to make a 25 μl reaction mix, which was added to the LAMP reaction tube. The tubes were turned upside down several times, so that the dried reagents were completely reconstituted. For the direct blood LAMP method, 1 μl of anticoagulated patient blood was mixed with 24 μl of 1× LAMP buffer, which had been placed in a dry LAMP tube. After the reaction tubes were incubated at 60 °C for 40 min for P. falciparum and 60 min for non-P. falciparum detection, amplified DNA products were visualized using GelGreen™ contained in the CFI using battery-driven hand-made LED illuminator that was designed for suitable field use [5]. Positive samples exhibited a bright fluorescent green colour under a transilluminator, and two independent observers recorded the result.

Plasmodium nested PCR

Nested PCR for P. falciparum and non-P. falciparum SSUrRNA was performed according to the published methods [9]. Nested PCR detection of non-P. falciparum infection was double-checked by mtDNA nested PCR primers newly designed in this study by using Primer 3 online program (Table 1). After 25 cycles of 1st PCR (denaturing at 98 °C for 10 s, annealing at 64 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 50 s), 0.5 μl of 1st PCR product was used for 2nd PCR template which was subjected to 25 cycles of the same program as 1st PCR. All PCR reactions were carried out with ExTaq Hot Start Version (Takara-Bio, Shiga, Japan) in a volume of 20 μl. Amplicons of the SSUrRNA and mtDNA nested PCR were sequenced by ABI 3130 capillary sequencer to identify the species of non-P. falciparum. In case of detection of mixed wave patterns in the DNA sequencing, the amplicon was cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, USA), and then several clones were sequenced. Before the final confirmation of results, all negative samples of first screening were re-examined by nested PCR.

Immunochromatographic test (ICT) for malaria

As a malaria conventional RDT that immunologically detects and differentiate P. falciparum and non-P. falciparum species, Hexagon Malaria Combi™ test (Human Gesellschaft für Biochemica und Diagnostica, Wiesbaden, Germany) was used in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions. The results were read at 15 min after the first diluent drop had been applied into the sample window. Even a faint color band was read as positive. Two independent observers confirm and record the result.

Field studies

Malaria diagnoses, ICT and malaria CZC-LAMP were performed for 35 voluntary participated residents at Chinshimbwe in the eastern Zambia, (14°3'2.12"S, 30°58'48.15"E) on August 15th and 61 residents at Shikabeta (14°57'12.41"S, 29°49'54.54"E) in the east central Zambia, on August 20th 2013 (Additional file 1: Figure S1). After a brief interview and signing an informed consent form, 2 ml of venous blood were collected in a heparin-containing BD Vacutainer tubes (Becton, Dickinson and Company, USA). Hexagon malaria combi test, and CZC-LAMP tests were performed within 10 min after blood collection as described above. Blood samples were kept at 4 °C for 3 to 4 days during transportation to Lusaka, and frozen at -80 °C in the laboratory at the University of Zambia, Lusaka. About 200 μl of each blood sample was used for DNA extraction by using QuickGene DNA whole blood kit (FujiFilm, JAPAN). These DNA samples were used for the nested PCR analysis.

Human blood samples collected at Mwanya in the eastern Zambia (12°72'82.93"S, 32°24'88.54"E) on October 24th, 2012 were also used to establish our LAMP system.

Data management and statistical analysis

LAMP, ICT and PCR data were entered in Microsoft Office Excel 2011. Nested-PCR results were used as reference tests. Sensitivity was estimated as the number of both LAMP and nested-PCR positives divided by the number of nested-PCR positives. Specificity was estimated as the number of both LAMP and nested-PCR positives divided by the total number of LAMP positives. Binomial exact 95% CIs were calculated for sensitivities and specificities.

Results

Malaria nested PCR diagnosis for extracted blood DNA

Prior to develop malaria CZC-LAMP, extracted DNAs from human blood samples collected from Mwanya in eastern Zambia were analyzed by malaria nested PCR (Table 2). Based on this result on 74 asymptomatic Mwanya individuals, 42 were parasite DNA-positive while 32 were negative. Among the positive samples, 21 were P. falciparum (Pf)-single infection, 3 were non-P. falciparum (non-Pf) single infection and 18 were mixed infection with Pf /non-Pf. The details of non-Pf infections were single infection with P. malariae (Pm; 13 cases), P. ovale curtisi (Poc; 4), P. ovale wallikeri (Pow; 2), and other two cases were Pm/Poc mixed infections. When the nested PCR results were used as reference, the sensitivities of ICT were 48.7% (95% CI: 32.5–64.9) for Pf and 14.3% (95% CI: 0–30.2) for non-Pf, the specificities were 95.0% (95% CI: 84.8–100) for Pf and 60.0% (95% CI: 0–100) for non-Pf. The integrated sensitivity and specificity of malaria ICT for Pf and non-Pf were 47.6 and 95.2%, respectively.
Table 2

Results of malaria diagnostic tests for archived extracted DNA of blood samples collected from Mwanya, eastern Zambia

ID

ICT

Non-Pf CZC-LAMP

Non-Pf Nested PCR

PfMt869 LAMP [8]

Pf CZC-LAMP

Pf Nested PCR

1

+

+

+

7

+

+

+

9

F

Pow

+

+

+

10

+

11

+

Pow

13

+

+

+

14

F

+

+

+

15

F

+

+

+

17

F

+

Pm

+

+

+

18

Pm + Poc

+

+

+

19

+

+

+

20

+

+

+

23

+

+

+

27

F, NF

+

Poc

+

+

+

29

F

+

+

+

30

F

+

Poc

+

+

+

32

+

Pm

+

+

+

34

Pm + Poc

+

+

+

40

F, NF

+

+

+

41

+

42

+

Pm

+

43

+

+

+

44

+

Poc

45

F

+

+

+

50

NF

+

Pm

52

F

+

Pm

+

+

+

54

+

55

F

+

Pm

+

+

+

58

F

+

Pm

+

+

+

61

F, NF

+

Pm

+

+

+

63

F

+

Poc

+

+

+

64

F

+

Pm

+

+

+

65

F

+

+

+

66

+

Pm

+

+

+

71

+

+

73

F, NF

75

+

+

+

80

+

+

85

+

Pm

+

+

87

F

+

Pm

+

+

+

89

+

+

+

91

F

+

+

+

95

+

Pm

+

+

+

103

F

+

+

+

Abbreviations: F P. falciparum positive in ICT, NF non-P. falciparum positive in ICT, Pow P. ovale wallikeri, Poc P. ovale curtisi, Pm P. malariae

Development and evaluation of Pf and non-Pf detecting LAMP primers using extracted blood DNA samples

To differentiate Pf from non-Pf, we designed several LAMP primer sets so that mtDNAs of non-Pf species can be detected universally without cross-reaction with Pf. The extracted DNA samples of non-Pf single infection (ID #11 and 50 in Table 2) were used as template for screening and selection. At the same time, those of Pf single infection (ID #1 and 7 in Table 2) were used as negative control to exclude Pf cross-reactive primers. After the real time LAMP and melting curve analyses of those DNA samples, the best primer set was selected (Fig. 1). In the same way, Pf-specific LAMP primer set was also selected. Because there is a published LAMP primer set which detects Pf mtDNA specifically [8], we also tested these six primers as candidates, while half of them were replaced by newly designed primers to improve sensitivity and specificity (Table 1).

The performances of non-Pf and Pf primer sets were evaluated by using extracted DNA samples described above (Table 2). Of the 74 samples, non-Pf LAMP specifically detected 18 non-Pf PCR positive samples without cross-reaction to Pf or nonspecific reaction to malaria-free DNA samples. Although non-Pf LAMP detected Pm and Po equally, these two species could not be detected in three of non-Pf PCR-positive samples (ID #9, 18 and 34). On the other hand, Pf LAMP reacted to 35 Pf PCR-positive samples and to one (ID #80) malaria PCR-negative one, but missed four Pf PCR-positive samples (ID #10, 41, 42 and 54). The existing LAMP primer set (PfMt869) [8] was also used for comparison. LAMP with PfMt869 primer sets detected 33 Pf PCR positive samples and also detected the same malaria PCR-negative sample that was positive by CZC-Pf LAMP (ID #80 in Table 2). If the nested PCR results were used as a standard, sensitivities were 85.7% for non-Pf LAMP and 89.7% for Pf LAMP; specificities were 100% for non-Pf LAMP and 97.2% for Pf LAMP. Nested PCR-positive and ICT-negative samples were supposed to be infections with very low parasitemia. The sensitivities of three LAMP primer sets for those of low density samples were 83.3% (non-Pf), 80.0% (Pf) and 70.0% (PfMt869) (Table 3). All nested PCR-positive and ICT-positive which were supposed to be high parasitemic samples were detected by non-Pf, Pf and PfMt869 LAMP primer sets with 100% of sensitivity.
Table 3

Diagnostic accuracy of malaria LAMPs for archived extracted DNA of blood samples collected from Mwanya, eastern Zambia

  

Pf CZC-LAMP

PfMt869-LAMPa

non-Pf CZC-LAMP

% (95% CI)

% (95% CI)

% (95% CI)

Total

Sensitivity

89.7 (79.9–99.5)

84.6 (72.9–96.3)

85.7 (69.9–100)

Specificity

97.2 (91.7–100)

97.1 (91.2–100)

100

ICT positive

Sensitivity

100

100

100

Specificity

100

100

100

ICT negative

Sensitivity

80.0 (61.3–98.7)

70.0 (48.6–91.4)

83.3 (64.8–100)

Specificity

94.1 (82.0–100)

93.3 (79.5–100)

100

aThe published LAMP primer sequence (PfMt869) [8] was used

Evaluation of malaria CZC-LAMP in field surveillance at the malaria endemic areas in Zambia

Next, we evaluated the performance of Pf and non-Pf malaria CZC-LAMP in the malaria endemic areas where we used 1 μl of anticoagulated unprocessed blood for each kit instead of using purified DNA or other processed blood materials. For the diagnosis, ICT was also performed at the same time. Representative visual appearance of test tubes after Pf CZC-LAMP reaction is shown in Fig. 2, and the results are summarized in Tables 4 and 5.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Visual determination of positive and negative samples. Examples of malaria CZC-LAMP tubes after the reaction. It is not possible to determine positive or negative under natural light due to the interference by hemoglobin (lower). However, positive samples emit green fluorescence under 505 nm blue-green light (upper)

Table 4

Results of malaria CZC-LAMP for blood samples collected from Chinshimbwe, eastern Zambia

ID

ICT

Non-Pf CZC-LAMP

Non-Pf Nested PCR

Pf CZC-LAMP

Pf Nested PCR

C01

+

Pm

+

+

C04

F

+

Pm

+

+

C05

+

+

C06

F

+

+

C07

+

+

C09

+

+

C10

F, NF

+

+

C12

F

+

+

C14

+

+

C15

F

+

Poc

+

+

C16

+

+

C17

F

+

+

C19

F

+

+

C22

F

+

Pm

+

+

C23

F

+

+

C24

+

Pm

+

+

C25

+

+

C26

+

Pm

+

+

C27

F

+

+

C30

F, NF

+

Pm

+

+

C31

F

C32

F

+

+

C33

F

C35

+

Pow

+

+

Abbreviations: F P. falciparum positive in ICT, NF non-P. falciparum positive in ICT, Pow P. ovale wallikeri, Poc P. ovale curtisi, Pm P. malaria

Table 5

Results of malaria CZC-LAMP for blood samples collected from Shikabeta, eastern Zambia

ID

ICT

Non-Pf CZC-LAMP

Nested PCR non-Pf

Pf CZC-LAMP

Nested PCR Pf

S03

+

+

S06

+

+

S09

+

Poc

S10

F, NF

+

Pm

+

+

S11

F, NF

+

Pm

+

+

S12

F

+

Pm

+

+

S14

F

+

Pm

+

+

S15

F

+

Pm + Poc

+

+

S18

+

+

S19

F

+

Pm

S20

+

Pm

S22

+

Poc

+

+

S23

F, NF

+

Pm

+

+

S24

+

+

S25

F

+

Pm

+

+

S26

F

S27

+

Poc

S29

+

Pm

+

+

S31

F, NF

+

Pv

+

+

S32

F

+

Pm

+

+

S33

+

Pm

S35

F, NF

+

Pm

+

+

S36

F, NF

+

Pm

+

+

S37

F, NF

+

Pm

+

+

S38

F

+

+

S39

+

Pow

S40

+

+

S41

F

S42

F, NF

+

Pm

+

+

S43

F

+

Pow

+

+

S44

NF

+

Pm

+

S47

+

+

S48

F

+

Pm

+

+

S50

Poc

S51

F

Pm

+

+

S52

F, NF

+

Poc

+

+

S54

F, NF

+

Pm

+

+

S56

+

S57

F

S59

Pm

+

+

S61

F, NF

+

Pm

+

+

Abbreviations: F P. falciparum positive in ICT, NF non-P. falciparum positive in ICT, Pow P. ovale wallikeri, Poc P. ovale curtisi, Pm P. malariae

Of the 35 blood samples in Chinshimbwe, 8 were positive for non-Pf CZC-LAMP and 22 were positive for Pf CZC-LAMP, while ICT detected 2 non-Pf and 14 Pf. At this sampling site, nested PCR results which had been done later at the laboratory in Lusaka were exactly matched to those obtained by both non-Pf and Pf malaria CZC-LAMPs, resulting in 100% of the sensitivities and specificities. In case of ICT, we observed false positive cases in 2 Pf and 1 non-Pf samples. The sensitivities of ICT were 13% and 55%, and the specificities were 50% and 80% for non-Pf and Pf, respectively.

Of the 61 blood samples collected from Shikabeta area, nested PCR detected 30 non-Pf-positive cases (21 Pm, 5 Poc, 2 Pow, 1 P. vivax [Pv] single infections and 1 Pm/Poc mixed infection). Non-Pf CZC-LAMP detected 27 of the 30 PCR-positive cases, 3 false negatives but no false positive samples. In addition, 30 Pf-positive samples were detected by nested PCR. CZC-LAMP detected 29 nested PCR-positive samples and 1 false positive sample when the Pf nested PCR results were used as a reference. The sensitivities and specificities of non-Pf/Pf CZC-LAMP in Shikabeta were 90%/96.7% and 100%/96.7%, respectively. On the other hand, the sensitivities and specificities of non-Pf/Pf ICT were 40%/67% and 100%/87%, respectively.

Overall sensitivities and specificities of non-Pf CZC-LAMP obtained during this study were 92.1 and 100%; and Pf CZC-LAMP were 98.1 and 98.1%, respectively (Table 6). On the other hand, the sensitivities and specificities of ICT were 34.2% (95% CI: 18.6–49.8) and 92.9% (95% CI: 78.0–100) for non-Pf, 61.5% (95% CI: 47.9–75.1) and 86.5% (95% CI: 75.1–97.9) for Pf, respectively. In addition, although non-Pf CZC-LAMP reacted to four non-Pf malaria species (Pm, Poc, Pow and Pv), cross-reaction between non-Pf and Pf was not observed at all. As is the case with purified DNA samples, non-Pf and also Pf CZC-LAMPs detected all high-parasitemic samples which were both nested PCR- and ICT-positive. In the case of low density conditions, the sensitivities of non-Pf and Pf CZC-LAMP were 88.0 and 95.0%, respectively (Table 6).
Table 6

Diagnostic accuracy of malaria CZC-LAMP for blood samples collected from Chinshimbwe and Shikabeta, eastern Zambia

  

Pf CZC-LAMP

Non-Pf CZC-LAMP

% (95% CI)

% (95% CI)

Total

Sensitivity

98.1 (94.3–100)

92.1 (83.3–100)

Specificity

98.1 (94.3–100)

100

ICT positive

Sensitivity

100

100

Specificity

100

100

ICT negative

Sensitivity

95.0 (84.8–100)

88.0 (74.6–100)

Specificity

95.0 (84.8–100)

100

Discussion

In this study, we conducted field surveillance studies of malaria in the remote rural parts of the eastern Zambia using a field-applicable molecular diagnosis system, CZC-LAMP. We demonstrated that Pf and non-Pf CZC-LAMPs were substantially superior in terms of sensitivity and specificity to the conventional ICT. Not only did both Pf and non-Pf CZC-LAMP perfectly detected parasite DNA from moderate-density parasitemia samples which were both ICT- and nested PCR-positive, but non-Pf CZC-LAMP improved the sensitivity of non-Pf malaria diagnosis (34.2% by ICT to 92.1%) without sacrificing specificity. In addition, Pf CZC-LAMP exhibited better sensitivity than existing Pf LAMP and was thus almost as sensitive as nested PCR when blood samples were directly subjected to the analysis without any DNA extraction or purification steps.

Our initial aim was to develop a field-applicable simplified molecular diagnosis method, but we have also achieved increased sensitivity with both Pf and non-Pf CZC-LAMP for low-parasitemia samples when the test samples switched from purified DNA to anticoagulated otherwise unprocessed fresh blood (83.3 to 88% for non-Pf and 80 to 95% for Pf). Therefore, the LAMP method in which unprocessed blood is used exhibits a superior sensitivity to that of the existing LAMP method which employs extracted DNA from the blood. This minimization of sample preparation process has advantage for the point-of-care test under resource poor settings.

ICT is most commonly used Malaria RDTs showing high sensitivities and specificities, especially when parasite burden is high in sick patient. It has been demonstrated that Hexagon rapid diagnostic test showed 100% sensitivity both for Pf and non-Pf, if > 5,000 parasite/μl blood were used. But this sensitivity was dramatically dropped when low-density patient blood showing < 500 parasite/μl were used, showing 50 and 0% sensitivity for Pf and non-Pf [10]. As such, although ICT is useful in terms of simple operation and sensitivity for high parasitemia patient, more sensitive and specific alternative diagnostics must be developed for controlling malaria in endemic areas.

For the purpose of malaria DNA detection, commercial malaria LAMP kits to detect Pf and pan-plasmodium species (Loopamp™ MALARIA Pan/Pf Detection Kit, Eiken Chemical Company, Japan) are already available. Although these kits also demonstrated excellent performance in malaria detection, even at low-density parasitemia, comparable to nested PCR in minimally equipped laboratories [1113], our Pf/non-Pf CZC-LAMP have advantages over these kits in the following points. First, the CZC-LAMPs use a minute amount of blood from the patient which can be introduced into the reaction without any process. CZC-LAMP require neither DNA extraction by PURE method nor blood boiling and spin down steps, and are as convenient as conventional ICT using less than 5 μl of blood collected. In addition, direct blood method may contribute to sensitization of LAMP reaction as mentioned above. Secondly, CZC-LAMPs are important to determine whether non-Pf malaria species are in a mixed infection with Pf or not. This suggests that rapid and accurate point-of-care diagnoses of monolithic Pf or non-Pf as well as Pf/non-Pf mixed infection, are possible, facilitating for the immediate and effective medication of the affected patients. The other advantages of CZC-LAMP over existing LAMP were already described in our previous report [5].

Recent molecular epidemiological studies of malaria detection and species discrimination by nested PCR in sub-Saharan Africa have shown that there exist mixed infections of low-density non-Pf species other than Pv with Pf much more than previously considered [1416]. In Zambia, the situation of mixed infections with low-density Pf and non-Pf had largely remained unexplored until the recent study using stored samples from the children under 6 years old and nested PCR was published [17]. In the present study, we report the detection of many cases of mixed infections of low-density Pf and non-Pf (mainly Pf + Pm and to a lesser extent Pf + Po), and also a few non-Pf monolithic infections at sampling points in the eastern Zambia (Additional file 2: Table S1). Artemisinin used as first-line medicine in several sub-Saharan African counties fails to eliminate Pm, Po and also low-density Pf [18]. These findings suggest that there is a need for continuous monitoring of non-Pf infections and low-density Pf prevalence for effective treatment to malaria species. Our Pf and non-Pf CZC-LAMPs are expected to be extremely useful in the diagnosis or surveillance studies of malaria in sub-Saharan African countries. CZC-LAMPs are also useful means to monitor and confirm the negative transmission in the area where malaria elimination is almost achieved. Because malaria CZC-LAMP is relatively cost-effective and easy for operation, this can be applied for active and massive vector surveillance. Therefore, application of our malaria CZC-LAMP to mosquito lysate or extracted DNA is required in future work.

In conclusion, these Pf and non-Pf CZC-LAMPs showed higher sensitivity/specificity compared to conventional ICT. As for the new RDT, CZC-LAMP will provide new paradigm of malaria infection, low-density chronic infection and transmission. Therefore, these diagnosis tools will not only elucidate the full picture of epidemiology of malaria but are also expected to contribute to reduction or elimination of malaria infections from endemic areas in sub-Saharan Africa.

Conclusions

Recent studies have indicated that low-density chronic infection of malaria in asymptomatic patient, undetectable by conventional RDTs, is the next problem for malaria infection control. Using human blood DNA samples collected in malaria endemic area in Zambia, we have developed malaria CZC-LAMP kits, new simple and sensitive RDT, for falciparum malaria and non-falciparum (four species) malaria, respectively. These kits detected low-density, even falciparum/non-falciparum mixed, infection with a high degree of accuracy in blood samples collected in malaria endemic areas. This system will elucidate the ecological geography of chronic malaria infection especially for P. falciparum and P. malariae, both of them do not have dormant liver stage, and may contribute to complete elimination effort of malaria.

Abbreviations

HAT: 

Human African trypanosomiasis.

ICT: 

Immunochromatographic test

LAMP: 

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification

Non-Pf: 

Non-Plasmodium falciparum (P. vivax P. ovale, P. malariae)

Pf: 

Plasmodium falciparum

Pm: 

P. malariae

Poc: 

P. ovale curtisi

Pow: 

P. ovale wallikeri

Pv: 

P. vivax

RDTs: 

Rapid diagnostic tests

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. Masaru Iizuka for coordination of field surveillance.

Funding

This research was financially supported by JST/JICA, SATREPS (Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development) program, Japan, and also supported by AMED (Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development) program, Japan and Global Institution for Collaborative Rese arch and Education (GI-CoRE) program. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Availability of data and material

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Authors’ contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: KH, KK. Performed the experiments: KH, KK, BN, HC, MS, JN, AC, CS. Analyzed the data: KH, KK. Wrote the paper: KH, KK, BN, CS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing of interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study has been approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee, University of Zambia, and received ethical clearance for the testing human blood samples from the Ministry of Health, Zambia. The samples were collected after a written informed consent was obtained from each participant in the presence of independent witnesses. The parents/guardians provided consents on behalf of all child participants.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Collaboration and Education, Hokkaido University Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan
(2)
Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia
(3)
Department of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia
(4)
Department of Paraclinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia
(5)
Global Station for Zoonosis Control, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan

References

  1. Gething PW, Elyazar IRF, Moyes CL, Smith DL, Battle KE, Guerra C, et al. A long neglected world malaria map: Plasmodium vivax endemicity in 2010. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6, e1814.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Mueller I, Zimmerman PA, Reeder JC. Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale - the “bashful” malaria parasites. Trends Parasitol. 2007;23:278–83.Google Scholar
  3. Ashley E, White NJ. The duration of Plasmodium falciparum infections. Malar J. 2014;13:1–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N, et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28, E63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Hayashida K, Kajino K, Hachaambwa L, Namangala B, Sugimoto C. Direct blood dry LAMP: A rapid, stable, and easy diagnostic tool for human African trypanosomiasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9, e0003578.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Koressaar T, Remm M. Enhancements and modifications of primer design program Primer3. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:1289–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, et al. Primer3-new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Polley SD, Mori Y, Watson J, Perkins MD, González IJ, Notomi T, et al. Mitochondrial DNA targets increase sensitivity of malaria detection using loop-mediated isothermal amplification. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:2866–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Snounou G, Viriyakosol S, Jarra W, Thaithong S, Brown KN. Identification of the four human malaria parasite species in field samples by the polymerase chain reaction and detection of a high prevalence of mixed infections. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993;58:283–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Wanji S, Kimbi HK, Eyong JE, Tendongfor N, Ndamukong JL. Performance and usefulness of the Hexagon rapid diagnostic test in children with asymptomatic malaria living in the Mount Cameroon region. Malar J. 2008;7:89.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Polley SD, González IJ, Mohamed D, Daly R, Bowers K, Watson J, et al. Clinical evaluation of a loop-mediated amplification kit for diagnosis of imported malaria. J Infect Dis. 2013;208:637–44.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Hopkins H, González IJ, Polley SD, Angutoko P, Ategeka J, Asiimwe C, et al. Highly sensitive detection of malaria parasitemia in a malaria-endemic setting: Performance of a new loop-mediated isothermal amplification kit in a remote clinic in Uganda. J Infect Dis. 2013;208:645–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Cook J, Aydin-Schmidt B, González IJ, Bell D, Edlund E, Nassor MH, et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for point-of-care detection of asymptomatic low-density malaria parasite carriers in Zanzibar. Malar J. 2015;14:43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Bruce MC, Macheso A, Kelly-Hope LA, Nkhoma S, McConnachie A, Molyneux ME. Effect of transmission setting and mixed species infections on clinical measures of malaria in Malawi. PLoS One. 2008;3, e2775.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Oguike MC, Betson M, Burke M, Nolder D, Stothard JR, Kleinschmidt I, et al. Plasmodium ovale curtisi and Plasmodium ovale wallikeri circulate simultaneously in African communities. Int J Parasitol. 2011;41:677–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Fançony C, Gamboa D, Sebastião Y, Hallett R, Sutherland C, Sousa-Figueiredo JC, et al. Various pfcrt and pfmdr1 genotypes of Plasmodium falciparum cocirculate with P. malariae, P. ovale spp., and P. vivax in Northern Angola. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012;56:5271–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Sitali L, Chipeta J, Miller JM, Moonga HB, Kumar N, Moss WJ, et al. Patterns of mixed Plasmodium species infections among children 6 years and under in selected malaria hyper-endemic communities of Zambia: population-based survey observations. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:1–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Dinko B, Oguike MC, Larbi JA, Bousema T, Sutherland CJ. Persistent detection of Plasmodium falciparum, P. malariae, P. ovale curtisi and P. ovale wallikeri after ACT treatment of asymptomatic Ghanaian school-children. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2013;3:45–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement