Open Access

High prevalence of Trichomonas gallinae in wild columbids across western and southern Europe

  • Melanie Marx1Email author,
  • Gerald Reiner2,
  • Hermann Willems2,
  • Gregorio Rocha3,
  • Klaus Hillerich4,
  • Juan F. Masello1,
  • Sylvia L. Mayr2,
  • Sarah Moussa1,
  • Jenny C. Dunn5,
  • Rebecca C. Thomas6,
  • Simon J. Goodman6,
  • Keith C. Hamer6,
  • Benjamin Metzger7,
  • Jacopo G. Cecere8,
  • Fernando Spina8,
  • Steffen Koschkar9,
  • Luciano Calderón1,
  • Tanja Romeike1 and
  • Petra Quillfeldt1
Parasites & Vectors201710:242

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2170-0

Received: 30 June 2016

Accepted: 3 May 2017

Published: 18 May 2017

Abstract

Background

Avian trichomonosis is known as a widespread disease in columbids and passerines, and recent findings have highlighted the pathogenic character of some lineages found in wild birds. Trichomonosis can affect wild bird populations including endangered species, as has been shown for Mauritian pink pigeons Nesoenas mayeri in Mauritius and suggested for European turtle doves Streptopelia turtur in the UK. However, the disease trichomonosis is caused only by pathogenic lineages of the parasite Trichomonas gallinae. Therefore, understanding the prevalence and distribution of both potentially pathogenic and non-pathogenic T. gallinae lineages in turtle doves and other columbids across Europe is relevant to estimate the potential impact of the disease on a continental scale.

Results

We examined 281 samples from four wild columbid species for Trichomonas infection and determined the genetic lineages. The overall prevalence was 74%. There were significant differences between the species (P = 0.007). The highest prevalence was found in stock doves Columba oenas (86%, n = 79) followed by wood pigeons Columba palumbus (70%, n = 61) and turtle doves (67%, n = 65), while three of five collared doves Streptopelia decaocto (60%) were infected. We found seven different lineages, including four lineages present in columbids in the UK, one lineage already described from Spain and three new lineages, one of those found in a single turtle dove migrating through Italy and another one found in a breeding stock dove. Stock doves from Germany and collared doves from Malta were infected with a potentially pathogenic lineage (lineage A/B), which is known to cause lesions and mortality in columbids, raptors and finches.

Conclusions

Generally, turtle doves showed high prevalence of Trichomonas infection. Furthermore, the potentially pathogenic lineage A/B (or genotype B according to previous literature) was found in a recovering stock dove population. Both findings are worrying for these columbid species due to the occasional epidemic character of trichomonosis, which can have severe negative effects on populations.

Keywords

Trichomonas gallinae Columbiformes Stock dove Phylogenetic analysis Genetic lineage Pathogen

Background

The protozoan parasite Trichomonas gallinae infects captive and wild bird species across the world and can lead to the avian disease called trichomonosis. Due to its widespread occurrence and sometimes pathogenic character, it is thought to play a role in the regulation of wild bird populations [15]. Bird migrations can contribute to the spread of Trichomonas. For instance, the drastic decline observed in greenfinch Chloris chloris and chaffinch Fringilla coelebs in the UK and Fennoscandia as well as the increased mortality of finches in Germany and Austria was linked to spread of the parasite by bird species during migration [4, 69].

Birds belonging to the Columbiformes are the main hosts of Trichomonas gallinae [1, 3] and rock pigeons Columba livia are thought to be the predominant transmitters of T. gallinae worldwide [1]. Trichomonas parasites also occur in wild columbid species around the world [1014]. In Europe, columbids from wild populations in Spain and the UK were surveyed recently. Trichomonosis has been detected in wild European columbid species including collared doves Streptopelia decaocto, stock doves Columba oenas, wood pigeons Columba palumbus and European turtle doves Streptopelia turtur (hereafter turtle doves) [3, 12, 1517].

Turtle doves, stock doves and wood pigeons are migratory birds, which can favour the spread of Trichomonas parasites. Turtle doves display three main migration flyways, a western, central and eastern route between Europe and sub-Saharan Africa [18]. Stock doves and wood pigeons from European countries mainly use the western migratory flyway to France and Iberia [19, 20]. As pathogens can be spread by migratory birds, those species might be more vulnerable to parasite exposure [6].

Within the Columbiformes, parasite transmission can occur at shared feeding and drinking sites within and among species and from adults to nestlings while crop milk feeding [1, 21]. Epidemic trichomonosis in finches showed a relatively low host specificity of the parasite [22], with parasite spill-over probably occurring at feeding and watering stations shared by different bird species [3, 23]. If birds are infected by Trichomonas, they can develop necrotic lesions in the crop and oropharynx (i.e. trichomonosis), which can lead to death by starvation and suffocation [1]. Moreover, not only the upper digestive tract can be affected, but also less commonly the liver, air sacs as well as parts of the cranium [1]. Nevertheless, there are individual differences in disease response and not all infected birds show clinical signs, because the virulence of the parasite varies among different lineages [4, 14, 24]. For instance, it might happen a bird shows clinical signs of the disease, such as caseous lesions, but recovers after some days [1, 25]. On the other hand, there are highly pathogenic lineages, which weaken birds severely, cause lesions to develop in oropharynx and liver, and lead to death in almost any case [25]. Furthermore, outbreaks can occur even when food shortage or stress is present because birds get more vulnerable to parasite exposure and infection due to limited food sources and crowding with probably infected birds [3]. However, Stabler [26] also showed the possible immunisation with less pathogenic Trichomonas lineages in birds. Nevertheless, as reported in finches, the most pathogenic lineages can heavily affect population sizes [6]. Thus, trichomonosis might represent an additional threat to endangered bird species, such as Mauritian pink pigeons Nesoenas mayeri in Mauritius [10] or turtle doves in Europe [27, 28]. Likewise, recovering stock dove populations, which showed population declines in the 20th century due to a lack of adequate breeding sites [19, 29], may be threatened again in the future by this emerging infectious disease due to their migratory character and the low host specificity of Trichomonas parasites.

Here we examined samples from four different columbid species from Germany, Spain, Italy and Malta. Spanish and UK turtle dove populations are connected through the western European flyway, and turtle doves from western Germany also migrate through Spain [18]. Furthermore, Italian and Maltese turtle doves follow a central/eastern flyway [18]. The aims of the present study were to (i) test whether turtle doves migrating through Italy and Malta, along the central/eastern flyway [18], have similar prevalence and genetic lineages of Trichomonas as birds along the western flyway; (ii) obtain baseline data on prevalence and genetic lineages of Trichomonas in a recovering population of stock doves in Germany; and (iii) provide information from a larger sample of turtle doves, collared doves (sampled in Malta), stock doves and wood pigeons migrating along the western flyway (sampled in Spain and Germany), with a focus on the potentially pathogenic lineages (in Lennon et al. [12]: lineages 3 and 4, which belong to the genotype B [14]), which are known to cause gross lesions and mortality in columbids, raptors and finches [12, 14].

Methods

Species and study sites

A total of 281 columbids from four different countries (Germany, n = 180; Spain, n = 45; Malta, n = 36; and Italy, n = 20) were sampled for Trichomonas infections, with the main focus on stock doves and wood pigeons from Germany and turtle doves on migration through Malta and Italy as well as from a breeding population in Spain. We also took samples from Spanish and Maltese collared doves. 80% of sampled birds came from Western Europe, and 20% of birds came from Central Europe. Samples from stock doves included breeding adults (n = 33), chicks (n = 58) and one first-year bird. Considering stock dove chicks, we had 47 siblings out of 23 nests. Of those nests, 22 included two siblings, and one nest had three siblings. Additionally, we sampled adult and first-year turtle doves at the end of the breeding season in Extremadura, Spain (39°51′42″N, -6°6′37″E). Other turtle doves were sampled during the non-breeding season, birds during spring migration on Comino, Malta (36°0′36″N, 14°20′8″E) and Italy (on the island of Ventotene: 40°47′54″N, 13°25′55″E) (Table 1). Unfortunately, for almost half of the turtle doves, we could not determine the age, thus they were classified as “unknown” age.
Table 1

Trichomonas spp. prevalence found in four columbid species at different European study sites with the use of PCR analysis. The prevalence was calculated according to PCR results

Species

No. of samples

Place

(n)

Status

(n)

Sample

(n)

No. positive

No. negative

Prevalence [%]

No. of sequences

Stock dove

92

Hesse, Germany (90)

Brandenburg, Germany (2)

Adult (33)

First year (1)

Chick (58)

Swab (92)

79

13

86

16

Wood pigeon

87

Bavaria, Germany (50)

North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany (24)

Lower Saxony, Germany (8)

Thuringia, Germany (3)

Hesse, Germany (1)

Unknown, Germany (1)

Adult (87)

Tissue (87)a

61

26

70

23

Collared dove

5

Monfrague, Spain (3)

Comino, Malta (2)

Adult (3)

Second year (1)

Unknown (1)

Swab (5)

3

2

60

2

Turtle dove

97

Monfrague, Spain (42)

Comino, Malta (34)

Ventotene, Italy (20)

Hesse, Germany (1)

Adult (22)

Juvenile (23)

Second year (2)

Unknown (50)

Swab (70)

Tissue (27)

All

65

0

65

5

27

32

93

0

67

43

0

43

Total

281

  

Swab (167)

Tissue (114)

All

154

61

208

13

53

73

93

54

74

61

23

84

aOne of the wood pigeons (sample WP4) had yellow plaque

Sampling and parasite culture

The Veterinary Department of the Justus-Liebig University Giessen obtained dead adult wood pigeons from hunting managers from different sites in Germany. Therefore, they constitute a random sample of the population, as they had not died from natural causes. To obtain a tissue sample, we opened the oropharynges of 87 defrosted birds from outside with a sterile scalpel and cut a small tissue sample from the oropharyngeal tract. While we extracted the tissue sample, we also checked the pigeon for lesions. Only one wood pigeon had a yellow plaque in the throat. Furthermore, we obtained 27 samples of oropharyngeal tissue from migrating turtle doves hunted in Malta. The tissue samples were kept at -18 °C until DNA extraction. Since we could not investigate the entire bird, we cannot tell, whether these Maltese birds had lesions in their oesophagus.

Oral swabs were taken from oropharynx and crop after visual inspection of 41 freshly hunted birds in Spain and 126 live birds at all other sites with a dry, sterile cotton tip. No lesions were detected, and swabs were inoculated individually in a Trichomonas selective culture medium (OXOID Deutschland GmbH, Wesel, Germany) (n = 20) or an InPouch TF culture kit (BioMed Diagnostics, Oregon, USA) (n = 147). Both media have similar detection sensitivities for Trichomonas parasites and have been used successfully in Finland [30]. The samples were incubated at 37 °C for five to seven days, giving any protozoan parasites sufficient time to multiply [31]. Samples were centrifuged for 5 min at 1,000× g, the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was re-suspended in 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The samples were centrifuged again for 5 min at 1,000× g the pellet was re-suspended in five drops of PBS (approximately 100 μl) and kept at -18 °C until DNA extraction.

DNA extraction

DNA from tissue samples was extracted using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. For final elution, we used 60 μl of ddH2O to increase DNA concentration in the eluate. T. gallinae swab samples were centrifuged for 5 min at 13,000× g. The supernatant was discarded, and DNA was extracted as described by Mégia-Palma et al. 2013 [32]. The DNA was re-suspended in 30 μl of ddH2O. The DNA concentration of all samples was measured with a ThermoScientific Nanodrop 2000 micro-volume UV-VIS spectrometer. For samples with a concentration above 70 ng/μl, the sample was diluted with ddH2O to a final concentration of at least 20 ng/μl.

ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 PCR amplification and gel electrophoresis

For infection detection, we amplified the highly conserved ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 ribosomal region of the T. gallinae genome [33] with the primers TFR1 (5′-TGC TTC AGT TCA GCG GGT CTT CC-3′) and TFR2 (5′-CGG TAG GTG AAC CTG CCG TTG G-3′) [34], which produce an expected product of 400 bp [4]. We applied two different reagents and reaction volumes for (i) the samples from Malta, and (ii) all other samples due to different laboratory environments, caused by the opportunity to use a new laboratory when Maltese samples became available. For Maltese samples, we used 20 μl reaction volume per sample, including 17.5 μl DreamTaq PCR Mastermix (2×) (Thermo Scientific, Germany). The mastermix contained DreamTaq DNA Polymerase, 2× DreamTaq buffer, 0.4 mM of each dNTP and 4 mM MgCl2, TFR1 and TFR2 (both 20 μM) and ddH2O. Furthermore, we added 2.5 μl of template DNA.

For polymerase chain reactions (PCR) of the remaining samples, we used 10 μl reaction volume per sample, including 5 μl of 2× MM Mastermix (Qiagen) (with HotStarTaq DNA Polymerase, PCR buffer containing 3 mM MgCl2, 400 μM of each dNTP), 2 μl H2O, 1 μl loading dye (containing 0.3% Orange G and 25% Saccharose) and 1 μl primer mix, containing 20 μM of both, TFR1 and TFR2 and added 1 μl of template DNA.

The reactions of the Maltese samples were conducted on a peqstar 96Q Real-Time PCR cycler (PEQLAB Biotechnologie GmbH, Erlangen, Germany). PCR reactions of all other samples were conducted on a Biometra TPersonal Thermocycler (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany). All PCR reactions were run with a negative control. We applied following cycling conditions for all PCR reactions: polymerase activation at 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 35 cycles with a denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 60 °C for 90 s and extension at 72 °C for 60 s. Final extension was set to 72 °C for 10 min.

We used gel electrophoresis to visualise PCR products, and positive samples were sequenced at either SEQLAB (Sequence Laboratories Göttingen, Germany) (Maltese samples) or the Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology (University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria) (all other samples). In total, two PCR products from Maltese collared doves, 34 PCR products from stock doves, 39 from wood pigeons and 49 from turtle doves were sent for sequencing. We assumed that most of our samples came from unrelated individuals, except for two pairs of siblings from two nests of stock doves that were included to determine whether they were infected by the same Trichomonas lineage.

Furthermore, we applied a Chi-square test using R 3.2.4 [35] to check for differences in prevalence between columbid species. Due to the small sample size of collared doves, those were excluded from statistical analyses.

Fe-hydrogenase PCR amplification and capillary electrophoresis

We performed PCR reactions for all samples that were tested positive and used in the phylogenetic analysis for ITS1/5.8S/ITS2 We used the primers TrichhydFOR (5′-GTT TGG GAT GGC CTC AGA AT-3′) and TrichhydREV (5′-AGC CGA AGA TGT TGT CGA AT-3′) [22]. For Fe-hydrogenase gene PCR amplifications the Multiplex PCR Plus Kit (Qiagen) was used. That leads to higher PCR outputs, when samples were stored in PBS because PBS inhibits PCR reactions due to high chloride concentrations [36].

For polymerase chain reactions, we used 15 μl reaction volume per sample, including 7.5 μl of 2× Qiagen Multiplex PCR Mastermix (Qiagen) (with HotStarTaq DNA Polymerase, PCR buffer containing 6 mM MgCl2, and ultrapure quality of dNTPs), 2 μl H2O, 0.75 μl of each primer (10 μM concentration) and added 4 μl of template DNA.

PCR reactions were conducted on a Biometra TONE Thermocycler (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany). All PCR reactions were run with a negative and a positive control. The positive control originated from a British greenfinch in 2007 [37]. We applied following cycling conditions for all PCR reactions: polymerase activation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles with a denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 57 °C for 90 s and extension at 72 °C for 90 s. Final extension was set to 72 °C for 5 min.

We used capillary electrophoresis (QIAxcel Advanced, Qiagen, Switzerland) to visualise PCR products and positive samples were sequenced at SEQLAB (Sequence Laboratories Göttingen, Germany). In total, six PCR products were sent for sequencing. Five came from turtle doves, and one originated from a collared dove.

Phylogenetic analysis of the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region

Forward and reverse sequences were assembled and trimmed with CLC Main Workbench 7.6.1 (CLC bio, Qiagen). With NCBI Blast [38] we checked every sequence for its closest GenBank match and downloaded these as reference sequences (see Additional file 1: Table S1 for an overview about the percentage of identity to the closest GenBank match). Additionally, we downloaded the closest GenBank matches, obtained for columbids by Lennon et al. [12]. This enables the direct comparison of Trichomonas lineages occurring in stock doves, wood pigeons and turtle doves from the UK to Germany, Italy and Spain. Tritrichomonas foetus (GenBank accession number DQ243911.1 [39]) was used as outgroup for phylogenetic analysis following previous studies [12]. We aligned all sequences using BioEdit [40]. The nucleotide substitution model that best fitted our alignment was determined with MEGA 6.0 [41] using Bayesian Information Criterion scores. The phylogenetic tree was also inferred with MEGA 6.0 [41] using the Maximum Likelihood algorithm and employing the Tamura 3 substitution model with invariant sites. Node support was assessed after 1000 bootstrap pseudo-replicates. The GenBank accession numbers of analysed sequences are given in Additional file 2: Table S3.

Phylogenetic analysis of the Fe-hydrogenase gene

Forward and reverse sequences were assembled and trimmed with CLC Main Workbench 7.6.1 (CLC bio, QIAGEN). With NCBI Blast [38] we checked every sequence for its closest GenBank match and downloaded these as reference sequences (see Additional file 3: Table S2 for an overview about the percentage of identity to the closest GenBank match). We also downloaded the reference sequences used in Chi et al. 2013 [42] to specify the sub-lineages of Trichomonas gallinae. Trichomonas vaginalis (GenBank accession number: XM_001310179.1 [43]) was used as the outgroup for phylogenetic analysis following previous studies [22]. We aligned all sequences using BioEdit [40]. The phylogenetic tree was inferred with MEGA 6.0 [41] using the Maximum Likelihood algorithm and employing the Kimura 2 substitution model with invariant sites. Node support was assessed after 1000 bootstrap pseudo-replicates. The GenBank accession numbers of analysed sequences are given in Additional file 2: Table S3.

Results

Prevalence of Trichomonas in columbids

We found an overall prevalence of 74% across all 281 columbid samples with a significant difference between species (χ 2 = 91.023, df = 3, P = 0.007). Within swab samples, there was a total prevalence of 93% (n = 154) and within tissue samples a prevalence of 54% (n = 61) (Table 1). The majority of wood pigeons (n = 61; 70%) and stock doves (n = 79; 86%) were infected. From stock doves, 28 adults showed infection (30%), and 51 chicks were infected (55%). The first-year-old bird was not infected. Also, turtle doves (n = 65; 93%) showed high prevalence (Table 1). Additionally, turtle doves from different countries displayed high prevalence for every country (Fig. 1), including the one German turtle dove tested positive for Trichomonas. Only turtle doves from Malta had > 50% samples testing negative for Trichomonas (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Map of sample sites and prevalence of Trichomonas in columbids from Germany, Italy and Spain. Next to the pie charts, the species name, the number of positive Trichomonas samples out of the sample size and percentages of positive Trichomonas samples within a species from one country are given. The results for wood pigeons arise from tissue samples. Furthermore, 27 samples of Maltese turtle doves were tissue samples. All of those were tested PCR-negative for Trichomonas

Phylogenetic analysis of Trichomonas lineages

From 124 PCR products sequenced for the ITS/5.8S/ITS2 region, 84 were successfully assembled and used for further phylogenetic analysis (Table 1). Unfortunately, not all PCR products were able to assemble, due to their insufficient quality. The same applies to the PCR products sequenced for the Fe-hydrogenase region. Only three samples were sequenced successfully.

The phylogenetic tree for the ITS1/5.8S/ITS2 region contained seven different lineages (Fig. 2, Additional file 4: Figure S1). The lineage names were given according to first discoverers and where new lineages were found, the lineage names were labelled according to the nomenclature of Gerhold et al. [44]. Most samples clustered in lineages II [12] and C/V/N [42, 44], followed by lineage P (Table 2, Additional file 1: Table S1). Wood pigeons were predominantly infected by lineages II [12] and C/V/N [42, 44]. Turtle doves showed infections mainly caused by the P and III [42] lineage. Most of the Italian turtle dove samples belonged to the P and III [42] lineage (n = 4 for each lineage). One turtle dove sample from Italy could not be linked to a previously described Trichomonas lineage, but the closest GenBank match was KF993705.1 with 92% maximum identity and 98% query coverage (Table 2, Additional file 1: Table S1). Additionally, another stock dove sample could not be linked to a described lineage. Its closest GenBank match was EU881912.1 with 97% maximum identity and 96% query coverage (Table 2, Additional file 1: Table S1). The Spanish samples mainly belonged to the P and C/V/N [42, 44], lineages (n = 9 and n = 7, respectively). The Maltese samples occurred mainly in lineage P (n = 3).
Fig. 2

Phylogenetic analysis of the ITS1/5.8S/ITS2 ribosomal region of Trichomonas sp. Lineages found within this study together with the identical reference sequences from GenBank analysed using maximum likelihood. Reference sequences are labelled by GenBank accession number and Trichomonas species. References to GenBank accession numbers are as follows: JQ030996.1, JQ755275.1 and JQ755278.1 (Peters & Raidal, unpublished; samples from Australia), U86615.1 ([32]; sample from Switzerland), HM579936.1 ([57]; sample from France), KF993705.1 and KF993679.1 (Martínez-Herrero et al. unpublished; samples from Spain), EU881911.1, EU881912.1 and EU881917.1 ([12]; samples from Spain), KC215387.1 ([14]; sample from USA), JN007005.1 ([62]; sample from Austria), KC529665.1 ([42]; sample from UK), DQ243911.1 ([34]; sample from France). Asterisk marks the two single sequences and their sample names, which could not be linked to any of the previously described lineages

Table 2

Summary of Trichomonas lineages found in this study compared to sequences described previously

Lineage

No. of infected birds

% infected birds

Species

No. of species

% species

Lineage name by

Lennon et al. [12]

Lineage name by Gerhold et al. [44]

Lineage name by Chi et al. [42]

A/BB a

6

7.1

SD

4

25.0

3 (TD, WP) and 4 (WP)

A and B

A and B

   

CD

2

100

   

C/V/NA b

23

27.4

SD

4

25.0

1 (TD, WP)

C, D and E

C and V

   

WP

10

43.5

   
   

TD

9

20.9

   

O

1

1.2

SD

1

6.3

Not found

Not found

Not found

II

22

26.2

SD

3

18.8

2 (SD, TD, WP)

Not found

II

   

WP

12

52.2

   
   

TD

7

16.3

   

P

19

22.6

SD

2

12.5

Not found

Not found

Not found

   

WP

1

4.4

   
   

TD

16

37.2

   

Q

1

1.2

TD

1

2.3

Not found

Not found

Not found

III

12

14.3

SD

2

12.5

Not found

Not found

III

   

TD

10

23.3

   

Notes: For lineages obtained in our study and for the similar study by [12] we displayed the wild columbid host species as well as numbers and percentages of infected individuals. Furthermore, we give the numbers and percentages of lineages found in a species. Note, the percentages in a species (% species) were calculated according to the number of species infected by a certain lineage and divided through the absolute number of infected individuals of a species

Abbreviations: SD stock dove, WP wood pigeon, TD turtle dove, CD collared dove

aThe lineage is synonymous with genotype B described by Sansano-Maestre et al. [14] and is therefore potentially pathogenic

bThe lineage is synonymous with genotype A described by Sansano-Maestre et al. [14] and is therefore apparently non-pathogenic and widespread

Collared doves and stock doves were the only species infected by lineage A/B [44]. Besides, six out of seven Trichomonas lineages detected in this study occurred in stock doves. The four chicks from two stock dove nests were infected by different Trichomonas lineages. The first two siblings showed Trichomonas from lineage A/B [44]. The other two were infected by two different Trichomonas lineages (P and III [42]).

The samples sequenced for the Fe-hydrogenase gene clustered in sub-lineage P1 distinct to the reference sequences and sub-lineages (Additional file 5: Figure S2).

Discussion

Prevalence of Trichomonas in columbids

Stock doves, wood pigeons, collared doves and turtle doves in our study throughout a range of European sites showed a high prevalence of infection by Trichomonas sp. These results are in agreement with previous findings in the UK [12].

Although we only had a small sample size of collared doves, the prevalence seems high (67%). Additionally, if we separate the results by countries, Spanish collared doves suggest a much lower prevalence by Trichomonas sp. (33%) than in the UK (86%, see [12]) and lie closer to the prevalence shown in Iraq (10%, see [45]), but the samples from Malta showed a prevalence closer to the results shown in the UK (Fig. 1). Both compared studies used swab samples [12, 46] as we did in our survey, thus the differences cannot be linked to the different sample material. Furthermore, Al-Bakry [45] used a larger sample size of collared doves (n = 40) compared to Lennon et al. [12], who used seven individuals. Thus, the Iraqi results might be more reliable and a low Trichomonas prevalence in collared doves, as shown in the present study, may be more realistic. However, the small sample size in our study and Lennon et al. [12] should be interpreted carefully.

In our study, stock doves had a much higher prevalence than previously suggested (22–40% [12, 45]). Furthermore, chicks had higher prevalence of Trichomonas than adults, which is in agreement with Bunbury [46], who showed the negative impact of trichomonosis in Mauritian Pink pigeon chicks until an age of three months. In the present study, stock dove chicks were between five and 22 days old and therefore, within the most common time for infection with Trichomonas parasites in pigeon chicks [46].

In turtle doves, a high infection status of 67% was detected, which is 1/3 lower than previously observed in the UK (95%) [R. C. Thomas, unpublished data]. However, if we disregard the prevalence results of defrosted tissue samples from Maltese turtle doves, we would have a prevalence of 93% in turtle doves from Europe (Table 1), thus very similar to results from the UK.

On the other hand, our results revealed much higher prevalence for wood pigeons than previously suggested (47%, see [12]). However, it needs to be taken into account that the 70% prevalence of Trichomonas infection in German wood pigeons and the very low prevalence in turtle doves from Malta likely underestimates the true prevalence, because samples were not cultured directly, but analysed from tissues after freezing and defrosting. This might cause major differences in the detection rate, because of DNA degradation due to several freezing and thawing cycles, especially for Maltese samples during transportation [4750]. Furthermore, Dunn et al. [51] showed the need to culture Trichomonas samples to reliably detect the infection. However, our results suggest high prevalence, at least for wood pigeons, but note that Maltese tissue samples were treated with a different Taq DNA Polymerase than wood pigeon samples. Thus, it might be the DreamTaq DNA Polymerase was less sensitive to DNA in thawed tissue samples.

Compared to other columbid species like mourning doves (Zenaida macroura), the overall prevalence of Trichomonas protozoan in the species studied here lies at the top of prevalence ranges. Mourning doves showed a very low prevalence of only 5.6% ranging from 4.4 to 10.6% [52]. In the endangered Mauritian pink pigeon the average prevalence of Trichomonas was 50% (ranging from 20 to 82%) [37], and therefore lower than in turtle doves, which are listed as a vulnerable species [28]. However, such prevalence has already been highlighted as a major threat to pink pigeons’ population recovery [37]. This might be caused by their small distribution range and population size, but also reveals the importance of gaining knowledge about parasite infection, particularly in recovering and declining birds. In the UK, trichomonosis has been indicated as a potential additive factor for the reported population decline of turtle doves since the 1970s [12]. Furthermore, Calderon et al. [53] already highlighted the decreasing effective population size of turtle doves, which makes them more vulnerable to threats. Thus, the present study suggests a potentially strong impact of Trichomonas on declining turtle doves across western and central Europe and likewise on recovering German stock dove populations.

Turtle doves are likely to be more dependent on anthropogenic food sources at feeding sites than in the 1960s, which was described in detail in the UK [54]. However, this circumstance might not only be limited to Great Britain, since it is linked to increased use of herbicides resulting from agricultural intensification, which has occurred throughout Europe [55, 56]. Furthermore, in the last century a change and intensification in forest management occurred as well [56], which led to a decreased number of natural breeding holes. That is why nowadays stock doves are largely dependent on artificial nest boxes in Germany [19, 56]. In Hesse, the stock dove population recovered locally, through provision of artificial nest boxes. However, besides increased food stress or insufficient natural breeding sites [29], turtle doves, stock doves, but also wood pigeons are migratory birds [19], which is why they may be more exposed to a wider range of parasites and pathogens of different bird species or populations (stop-overs at feeding and water sites) [15, 19, 21, 55]. Moreover, despite the existence of three main migratory flyways [18], European turtle doves show a lack of genetic structure [53]. That increases the probabilities for higher vulnerability and potential fast spread of infection among turtle dove populations.

Resident species, in contrast, may be less prone to infection, as shown for collared doves in Iraq [41] and Spain (this study, but see [12]). On the other hand, collared doves in Malta indicated a 100% Trichomonas prevalence.

As the disease occurs worldwide and is rapidly spreading, i.e. among wild finches [4], it seems likely that especially turtle doves and stock doves are also infected in other European countries. Regarding turtle doves, information on the disease in eastern Europe would be especially interesting, since, to our knowledge, no data on prevalence are available yet from the eastern European distribution range. Furthermore, the transmission may be reduced where no supplementary food is provided for endangered or vulnerable species and gamebirds [12].

Phylogenetic relationships among Trichomonas lineages

Several attempts have been made to classify the genetic diversity of Trichomonas parasites in birds, with ensuing different nomenclatures (Table 2). Out of a total of seven genetic lineages found in the present study, three lineages were found in all columbid species we examined: lineages II [12], P and C/V/N [42, 44] (Fig. 2, Additional file 4: Figure S1). Of those, lineages II [12] and P belong to different Trichomonas species (T. tenax and Trichomonas sp., which grouped within T. canistomae [55]). However, species identification, based on morphological methods, may need to be revised and complemented as more genetic data are available. Since several Trichomonas species have been reported in birds based solely on morphology [12, 33, 43, 51,], the nomenclature for Trichomonas might also need revision as more molecular-based phylogenetic analyses are available. However, judging by the overall occurrence of these three lineages, our findings suggest a widespread distribution of those lineages across columbids [12, 33]. For instance, lineages II [12] and C/V/N [42, 44] were also predominant in species from the UK, Austria and the USA [12, 55]. Lineage II [12] even infected the same host species as shown in the UK [19] (Table 2).

Lineage C/V/N [42, 44] has also been described as “genotype A”, an apparently non-pathogenic Trichomonas lineage [19] with a global and frequent occurrence. It was previously found in turtle doves and wood pigeons [19], and we here additionally demonstrate infection in stock doves.

Regarding existing literature and previously described lineages, lineages O, P and Q might be newly detected lineages, because they were not described in previous studies [12, 22, 33, 42, 44, 57]. The samples from lineage P sequenced for the Fe-hydrogenase gene also clustered in a distinct and apparently new group of Fe-hydrogenase sub-lineage P1 (S4). Furthermore, lineages O and Q appear distinct to lineages A/B and C/V/N [42, 44], thus they may not be as common or widespread as lineages II, P and C/V/N [12, 42, 44], because they were only found in one German stock dove sample (O) and one Italian turtle dove sample (Q). Additionally, lineage III [42], found in stock doves and turtle doves, was identical to assigned reference sequences isolated from feral pigeons and was only found in Austria and the UK [42, 58]. Thus, we confirm its presence in turtle doves from Malta, Italy and Spain and in stock doves from Germany.

Only, lineage A/B [44] grouped with a potentially fatal lineage (genotype B) [12, 16, 19, 22], which was also responsible for the finch trichomonosis epizootic in the UK [22] (Table 2). This lineage, which is often lethal, has also been detected in turtle doves, wood pigeons and other non-passerines [12, 16, 22, 27] and we here confirm its presence in stock doves from Germany and resident collared doves from Malta. A fatal case of trichomonosis in a stock dove from Germany has been described previously [16] based on necrotic lesions and Trichomonas presence in microscopic analyses [16]. The lethal course of the disease hints to an infection by lineage A/B [44], although it was not genetically confirmed.

The lethal character of trichomonosis was described also in the Mauritian pink pigeon, a resident species on Mauritius similar to the collared doves on Comino (Malta) [52]. Thus, at least on Comino, the collared dove population might decrease in the future due to this potentially pathogenic lineage. Some years ago, the collared dove population already crashed due to an outbreak of a disease, which affected the region around the beak (B. Metzger, personal communication). No further description of the illness is known, but it is possible that it was trichomonosis.

Two genotypes of T. gallinae have previously been proposed to exhibit a differential in pathogenicity. Lineage C/V/N [42, 44] is synonymous with genotype A, described by Sansano-Maestre [19] as a wide-spread Trichomonas lineage, with mild or no pathogenicity. Lineage A/B [44] is synonymous with genotype B [19] described as possessing a more severe pathogenicity. Regarding all other lineages, pathogenicity has not been assessed. For this purpose, transmission experiments would be very helpful to see, if birds show signs of active trichomonosis and if they recover from infection and acquire possible immunity [25, 26].

Phylogenetic analysis of Trichomonas lineages from stock dove siblings

To our knowledge, this is the first report of phylogenetic examination of Trichomonas from stock dove nestlings belonging to the same nest. Both findings (siblings), were infected by the same lineage as well as by different lineages; this can be explained by disease transmission via crop milk feeding, as both parents share chick feeding [19]. Thus, if both parents are infected by the same Trichomonas lineage, chicks receive the same Trichomonas pathogen. If both parents are infected by Trichomonas but carry different lineages, their chicks might be infected by different pathogens as well. Additionally, studies have shown [14, 59, 60], that individual birds may carry more than one Trichomonas lineage, so it is possible we only sequenced one strain when more than one was present. Here, we found a T. gallinae and T. canistomae-like lineage in two siblings of a stock dove nest. A coinfection of an apparently non-pathogenic T. gallinae (genotype A) [14] lineage plus a T. tenax-like strain was found previously in pigeons [60].

Conclusions

Our results are in agreement with previous findings of geographically widespread Trichomonas lineages. We provide information about diverse lineages from Germany, Spain and Italy across different columbid species. Especially, lineages 2 [12], P and C/V/N [42, 44] were identified in all species and might, therefore, represent the most common Trichomonas lineages, at least in Columbiformes. However, only stock doves and collared doves from this study showed infections by the potentially pathogenic and often lethal Trichomonas lineages. Furthermore, we detected three newly discovered lineages (O, P and Q) and one additional sub-lineage based on the Fe-hydrogenase gene P1. Additionally, only one German stock dove sample was assigned to lineage O, and one Italian turtle dove sample was assigned to lineage Q. Due to the higher dependency on anthropogenic food sources [19, 54] and artificial nesting sites [19, 29] of turtle doves and stock doves as well as the migratory character of wood pigeons, turtle doves and stock doves these three species might have a higher risk to ingest Trichomonas protozoans of different lineages from various bird species and populations at shared feeding and water sites. This might be especially dangerous for recovering stock dove populations and declining turtle dove populations when parasites spread during times of food shortage or stress. Furthermore, it may be particularly worrying when stock doves or turtle doves get infected by potentially pathogenic lineages as we have shown here for stock doves from Germany and has already been shown for turtle doves in the UK [12]. The occurrence of potentially pathogenic lineages of Trichomonas in resident collared doves on Comino (Malta) might raise the concern for turtle doves even more since they share watering and feeding sites on the island. However, to estimate an impact on the population level, it would be very important to gain further knowledge about the prevalence of Trichomonas protozoans and the occurring lineages in turtle doves from Eastern European countries and to compare these data to turtle doves from Western Europe.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to everyone, who helped in the field, especially to Victor Cilia, Michael Zerefa, Gilbert Haber, Manuel Mallia, Edward Jenkins, Juansa Santiago and Paulo Lago Barreiro. Furthermore, a special thank goes to Boglarka Balint, who helped with sequencing.

Funding

The project was funded by the German Ornithologists’ Society (DO-G).

Availability of data and material

The studied sequences were submitted to the GenBank database under accession numbers KX459439–KY675299.

Authors’ contributions

Conceived and designed the study: MM and PQ. Collected the data: MM, GrR, KH, JFM, SK, SLM, BM, JGC and FS. Analysed the data: MM, GeR, HW, SM, JCD, RCT, SJG, KCH, TR and LC. Drafted the manuscript: MM and PQ. Critically revised the manuscript: GeR, HW, GrR, JFM, SLM, JCD, RCT, SJG, KCH, BM, JGC, FS and LC. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

In this study, samples were taken from hunted and living columbids. None of the hunted birds was shot exclusively for the present study. Turtle doves in Spain were sampled during the legal annual late summer hunting weekends, at a hunting estate visited after a hunting event. Wood pigeons in Germany were part of independently approved research projects at the Department of Clinical Veterinary Sciences. Swab samples from living wild birds were taken in the field after they were caught in mistnets or whoosh nets during approved bird ringing and migration studies. For those samples, all the methods used were approved by the Animal Welfare Office Justus-Liebig-University Giessen.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Animal Ecology & Systematics, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen
(2)
Department of Clinical Veterinary Sciences, Justus-Liebig-University
(3)
Department of Agro-forestry Engineering, University of Extremadura
(4)
Röntgenstraße 7
(5)
School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Joseph Banks Laboraties
(6)
School of Biology, Irene Manton Building, University of Leeds
(7)
BirdLife Malta, Xemxija Waterfront Apartments
(8)
ISPRA, Institute for Environmental Protection and Research
(9)
Dorfstraße 11

References

  1. Stabler RM. Trichomonas gallinae. A review. Exp Parasitol. 1954;3(4):368–402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Krone O, Altenkamp R, Kenntner N. Prevalence of Trichomonas gallinae in northern goshawks from the Berlin area of northeastern Germany. J Wildl Dis. 2005;41:304–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Forrester DJ, Foster GW. Trichomonosis. In: Atkinson CT, Thompson NJ, Hunter DB, editors. Parasitic diseases of wild birds. Ames: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.Google Scholar
  4. Robinson RA, Lawson B, Toms MP, Peck KM, Kirkwood JK, Chantrey J, et al. Emerging infectious disease leads to rapid population declines of common british birds. PLoS One. 2010;5:e12215.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Amin A, Bilic I, Liebhart D, Hess M. Trichomonads in birds - a review. Parasitology. 2014;141:733–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lawson B, Robinson RA, Neimanis A, Handeland K, Isomursu M, Agren EO, et al. Evidence of spread of the emerging infectious disease, finch trichomonosis, by migrating birds. Ecohealth. 2011;8:143–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lehikoinen A, Lehikoinen E, Valkama J, Väisänen RA, Isomursu M. Impacts of trichomonosis epidemics on Greenfinch Chloris chloris and Chaffinch Fringilla coelebs populations in Finland. Ibis. 2013;155:357–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ganas P, Jaskulska B, Lawson B, Zadravec M, Hess M, Bilic I. Multi-locus sequence typing confirms the clonality of Trichomonas gallinae isolates circulating in European finches. Parasitology. 2014;141:652–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Peters M, Kilwinski J, Reckling D, Henning K. Gehäufte Todesfälle von wild lebenden Grünfinken an Futterstellen infolge Trichomonas-gallinae-Infektionen - ein aktuelles Problem in Norddeutschland. Kleintierpraxis. 2009;54:1–5.Google Scholar
  10. Bunbury N, Jones CG, Greenwood AG, Bell DJ. Trichomonas gallinae in Mauritian columbids: implications for an endangered endemic. J Wildl Dis. 2007;43:399–407.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Girard YA, Rogers KH, Woods LW, Chouicha N, Miller WA, Johnson CK. Dual-pathogen etiology of avian trichomonosis in a declining band-tailed pigeon population. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;24:146–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lennon RJ, Dunn JC, Stockdale JE, Goodman SJ, Morris AJ, Hamer KC. Trichomonad parasite infection in four species of Columbidae in the UK. Parasitology. 2013;140:1368–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Qiu SB, Yan C, Zhou DH, Hou J, Wang QQ, Lin Y, et al. High prevalence of Trichomonas gallinae in domestic pigeons (Columba livia domestica) in subtropical southern China. African J Microbiol Res. 2012;6:3261–4.Google Scholar
  14. Sansano-Maestre J, Garijo-Toledo MM, Gómez-Muñoz MT. Prevalence and genotyping of Trichomonas gallinae in pigeons and birds of prey. Avian Pathol. 2009;38:201–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Villanúa D, Höfle U, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Gortázar C. Trichomonas gallinae in wintering common wood pigeons Columba palumbus in Spain. Ibis. 2006;148:641–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Hegemann A, Hegemann ED, Krone O. Trichomonosis in a free-living stock dove (Columba oenas). Eur J Wildl Res. 2007;53:235–7.Google Scholar
  17. Höfle U, Gortazar C, Ortiz JA, Knispel B, Kaleta EF. Outbreak of trichomoniasis in a woodpigeon (Columba palumbus) wintering roost. Eur J Wildl Res. 2004;50:73–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Marx M, Korner-Nievergelt F, Quillfeldt P. Analysis of ring recoveries of European turtle doves Streptopelia turtur - flyways, timing of migration and origins of hunted birds. Acta Orn. 2016;51(1):55–70.Google Scholar
  19. von Blotzheim UG, Bauer KM. Handbuch Der Vögel Mitteleuropas, Band 9, Columbiformes-Piciformes. 1994.Google Scholar
  20. Hobson KA, Lormée H, Van Wilgenburg SL, Wassenaar LI, Boutin JM. Stable isotopes (δD) delineate the origins and migratory connectivity of harvested animals: the case of European woodpigeons. J Appl Ecol. 2009;46:572–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kocan RM. Various grains and liquid as potential vehicles of transmission for Trichomonas gallinae. Bullet Wildl Dis Assoc. 1969;5(3):148–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Lawson B, Cunningham AA, Chantrey J, Hughes LA, John SK, Bunbury N, et al. A clonal strain of Trichomonas gallinae is the aetiologic agent of an emerging avian epidemic disease. Infect Genet Evol. 2011;11:1638–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawson B, Robinson RA, Colvile KM, Peck KM, Chantrey J, Pennycott TW, et al. The emergence and spread of finch trichomonosis in the British Isles. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012;367:2852–63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Bunbury N, Stidworthy M, Greenwood A, Jones C, Sawmy S, Cole R, et al. Causes of mortality in free-living Mauritian pink pigeons Columba mayeri, 2002–2006. Endanger Species Res. 2008;9:213–220.21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Stabler RM. Variations in virulence of strains of Trichomonas gallinae in pigeons. J Parasitol. 1948;34(2):147–9.Google Scholar
  26. Stabler RM. Protection in pigeons against virulent Trichomonas gallinae acquired by infection with milder strains. J Parasitol. 1948;34(2):150–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Stockdale J, Dunn JC, Goodman SJ, Morris AJ, Sheehan DK, Grice PV, Hamer KC. The protozoan parasite Trichomonas gallinae causes adult and nestling mortality in a declining population of European Turtle Doves, Streptopelia turtur. Parasitology. 2015;142(3):490–8.Google Scholar
  28. BirdLife International. Species factsheet: Streptopelia turtur. 2016. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org. Accessed 18 Feb 2016.
  29. Hillerich K. Ergebnisse aus mehrjähriger Planberingung von Hohltauben (Columba oenas). Vogel und Umwelt. 1984;3:117–34.Google Scholar
  30. Neimanis AS, Heandeland K, Isomursu M, Ågren E, Mattson R, Hamnes IS, et al. First report of epizootic trichomoniasis in wild finches (Family Fringilidae) in southern Fennoscandia. Avian Dis. 2010;54:136–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Bunbury N, Bell D, Jones C, Greenwood A, Hunter P. Comparison of the InPouch TF culture system and wet-mount microscopy for diagnosis of Trichomonas gallinae infections in the pink pigeon Columba mayeri. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:1005–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Megía-Palma R, Martínez J, Merino S. Phylogenetic analysis based on 18S rRNA gene sequences of Schellackia parasites (Apicomplexa: Lankesterellidae) reveals their close relationship to the genus Eimeria. Parasitology. 2013;140:1149–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Grabensteiner E, Bilic I, Kolbe T, Hess M. Molecular analysis of clonal trichomonad isolates indicate the existence of heterogenic species present in different birds and within the same host. Vet Parasitol. 2010;172:53–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Felleisen RS. Comparative sequence analysis of 5.8S rRNA genes and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of trichomonadid protozoa. Parasitology. 1997;115(2):111–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2016. http://www. Rproject.org.Google Scholar
  36. Zhu Y, Zhang Y-X, Liu W-W, Ma Y, Fang Q, Yao B. Printing 2-dimentional droplet array for single-cell reverse transcription quantitative PCR assay with a microfluid robot. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9551.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Bunbury N, Jones CG, Greenwood AG, Bell DJ. Epidemiology and conservation implications of Trichomonas gallinae in the endangered Mauritian pink pigeon. Biol Cons. 2008;141:153–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–402.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Duboucher C, Caby S, Chabé M, Gantois N, Billy C, Barré E, et al. Molecular identification of Tritrichomonas foetus -like organisms as coinfecting agents of human pneumocystis pneumonia. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;3:1–5.Google Scholar
  40. Hall T. BioEdit Biological sequence alignment editor for Win95/98/NT/2K/XP/7. http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/bioedit.html
  41. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(12):2725–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Chi JF, Lawson B, Durrant C, Beckmann K, John S, Alrefaei AF, et al. The finch epidemic strain of Trichomonas gallinae is predominant in British non-passerines. Parasitology. 2013;140(10):1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Carlton JM, Hirt RP, Silva JC, Delcher AL, Schatz M, Zhao Q, et al. Draft genome sequence of the sexually transmitted pathogen Trichomonas vaginalis. Science. 2007;315(5809):207–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Gerhold RW, Yabsley MJ, Smith AJ, Ostergaard E, Mannan W, Cann JD, Fischer JR. Molecular characterization of the Trichomonas gallinae morphologic complex in the United States. J Parasitol. 2008;94(6):1335–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Al-Bakry H. Prevalence of avian trichomoniasis in different species of pigeons in Mosul. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2009;23:105–9.Google Scholar
  46. Bunbury N. Parasitic disease in the endangered Mauritian pink pigeon Columba mayeri, PhD thesis, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. 2006.Google Scholar
  47. Alur MD, Grecz N. Mechanism of Injury of Escherichia coli by Freezing and Thawing. Biochem Biophys Res Com. 1975;62(2):308–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Ross KD, Haites NE, Kelly KF. Repeated freezing and thawing of peripheral blood and DNA in suspension: effects on DNA yield and integrity. J Med Genet. 1990;27:569–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Straube D, Juen A. Storage and shipping of tissue samples for DNA analyses: A case study on earthworms. Eur J Soil Biol. 2013;57:13–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Botling J, Edlund K, Segerstern U, Tahmasebpoor S, Engström M, Sundström M, et al. Impact of thawing on RNA integrity and gene expression analysis in fresh frozen tissue. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2009;18:44–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Dunn JC, Stockdale JE, McCubbin A, Thomas RC, Goodman SJ, Grice PV, et al. Non-cultured faecal and gastrointestinal seed samples fail to detect trichomonad infection in clinically and sub-clinically infected columbid birds. Conservation Genet Resour. 2016;8(2):97–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Schulz JH, Bermudez AJ, Millspaugh JJ. Monitoring presence and annual variation of trichomoniasis in mourning doves. Avian Dis. 2005;49(3):387–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Caldéron L, Campagna L, Wilke T, Lormee H, Eraud C, Dunn JC, et al. Genomic evidence of demographic fluctuations and lack of genetic structure across flyways in a long distance migrant, the European turtle dove. BMC Evol Biol. 2016;16:237.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Browne SJ, Aebischer NJ. Habitat use, foraging ecology and diet of turtle doves Streptopelia turtur in Britain. Ibis. 2003;145:572–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Donald PF, Green RE, Heath MF. Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2001;268:25–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Europäische Umweltagentur. Der dritte Lagebericht. Zusammenfassung. Luxemburg: Amt für Veröffentlichungen der Europäischen Gemeinschaften, Die Umwelt in Europa/Europäische Umweltagentur; 2003.Google Scholar
  57. Leterrier M, Morio F, Renard B, Poirer AS, Miegeville M, Chambreuil G. Trichomonads in pleural effusion: case report, literature review and utility of PCR for species identification. New Microbiol. 2012;35:83–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Martínez-Herrero MC, Sansano-Maestre J, López Márquez I, Obón E, Ponce C, González J, et al. Genetic characterization of oropharyngeal trichomonad isolates from wild birds indicates that genotype is associated with host species, diet and presence of pathognomonic lesions. Avian Pathol. 2014;43(6):1–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Kleina P, Bettim-Bandinelli J, Bonatto SL, Benchimol M, Bogo MR. Molecular phylogeny of Trichomonadidae family inferred from ITS-1, 5.8S rRNA and ITS-2 sequences. Int J Parasitol. 2004;34:963–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Jiang X, Sun J, Wang F, Li H, Zhao X. Prevalence of Trichomonas spp. in domestic pigeons in Shandong Province, China, and genotyping by restriction fragment length polymorphism. Vet J. 2016;211:88–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Voncken FGJ, Boxma B, van Hoek AHAM, Akhmanova AS, Vogels GD, Huynen M, et al. A hydrogenosomal [Fe]-hydrogenase from the anaerobic chytrid Neocallimastix sp. L2. Gene. 2002;284:103–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Reinmann K, Müller N, Kuhnert P, Campero CM, Leitsch D, Hess M, et al. Tritrichomonas foetus isolates from cats and cattle show minor genetic differences in unrelated loci ITS-2 and EF-1α. Vet Parasitol. 2012;185:138–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement