Open Access

Mosquito larvicidal activity of Cassia tora seed extract and its key anthraquinones aurantio-obtusin and obtusin

  • Valentine C. Mbatchou1, 2,
  • David P. Tchouassi3,
  • Rita A. Dickson2,
  • Kofi Annan2,
  • Abraham Y. Mensah2,
  • Isaac K. Amponsah2,
  • Julia W. Jacob3,
  • Xavier Cheseto3,
  • Solomon Habtemariam4 and
  • Baldwyn Torto3, 5Email author
Parasites & Vectors201710:562

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2512-y

Received: 11 August 2017

Accepted: 31 October 2017

Published: 10 November 2017

Abstract

Background

The edible and medicinal leguminous plant Cassia tora L. (Fabaceae) is known to possess insecticidal properties against a wide range of plant-feeding insects. However, the bioactivity of extracts of this plant and their constituents against vectors of medical importance has been largely unexplored. We investigated the mosquito larvicidal activity of the seed extract and its major anthraquinones against larvae of the African malaria vector Anopheles gambiae (s.s.).

Methods

Third-fourth instar larval mortality was observed after 24, 48, 72 and 96 h of exposure to varying doses of the extracts, and two anthraquinones isolates identified using liquid chromatography- quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry (LC-QtoF-MS). The mosquito larval mortality was evaluated relative to the natural insecticide azadirachtin.

Results

Fractionation of the crude extract decreased mosquito larvicidal activity, however, larvicidal activity increased with increasing dose of the treatment and exposure time. The known anthraquinones aurantio-obtusin and obtusin were identified as key larvicidal compounds. Aurantio-obtusin and obtusin, exhibited similar toxicity to larvae of A. gambiae (s.s.) with LD50 values of 10 and 10.2 ppm, respectively. However, the two anthraquinones were four- and ~ six-fold less potent than that of the crude seed extract and azadirachtin, which had comparable LD50 values of 2.5 and 1.7 ppm, respectively.

Conclusion

Both aurantio-obtusin and obtusin showed mosquito larvicidal activity which were comparable to their respective fractions although they were less potent relative to the crude extract and azadirachtin. Further studies need to be conducted on C. tora for its exploitation as a potential eco-friendly tool in mosquito larval source reduction.

Keywords

Cassia tora Aurantio-obtusinObtusinAnthraquinoneMosquito larvicidal activity Anopheles gambiae S.S

Background

Mosquito control has become a global health priority, owing to their vectoring role of pathogens of many diseases such as malaria, dengue, yellow fever, Zika, West Nile, affecting a significant proportion of the world population. These diseases contribute significantly to the estimated 17% of the global vector-borne disease burden of all infectious diseases, accounting for >1 billion new cases and >1 million deaths annually [1]. Current control strategies against these diseases mainly targeting vector populations overwhelmingly rely on the classic integrated vector management (IVM). This involves entomological surveillance, community involvement through environmental management to eliminate breeding sites, and application of pyrethroid insecticides against adults and Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis (Bti) against larvae [2]. Besides the growing concerns related to sustainability of these measures, there is the challenge of widespread evolution of resistance in mosquito populations to insecticides and even the biopesticides [35].

The need for safe and ecologically friendly tools has spurred interest in the use of botanicals in mosquito larval control commonly referred to as larval source management [6, 7]. Controlling mosquitoes as larvae seems more feasible than adults as they are relatively immobile and often readily accessible compared to adults which can disperse and change their habitat to avoid control measures [7]. The plant Azadirachta indica (Meliaceae), commonly referred to as neem, is a classic botanical whose insecticidal activity of the crude or derived products have been evaluated against many insects including vectors of medical importance [3, 6, 8]. In addition, various plant-derived compounds for controlling medically and veterinary important insect vectors have been highlighted [9, 10]. On the other hand, to date, most of the work carried out on Cassia tora L. (Fabaceae) an edible and medicinal leguminous plant, widely distributed in farmlands in Central Africa [11], has been on its antifeedant and repellent activities on a range of crop pests including Zonocerus variegatus and the cowpea weevil [11, 12]. The plant has also been found to suppress the spread of the invasive weed Centrosema pubescens [12]. However, C. tora which produces large quantities of fruits has an unexplored potential for control of insect pests such as medical disease vectors. In this study, we aimed to assess the potential of the crude extract, its solvent fractions and two major anthraquinones against larvae of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae (s.s.).

Methods

Insects

For bioassays, we used third-fourth-instar larvae of A. gambiae (Mbita strain) obtained from a colony maintained at the insectary of the Duduville Campus of the International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe) in Nairobi. The strain originally from Mbita Point, western Kenya has been maintained in colony reared under laboratory conditions for over 20 years. The mosquito larvae were fed on Tetramin fish food (Melle, Germany) and the rearing conditions were maintained at a mean temperature of 31 °C and relative humidity of 52% RH during the day while at night the mean temperature and relative humidity were 24 °C and 72% RH, respectively (12 h light and 12 h dark).

Plant material

Pods containing C. tora seeds were randomly harvested from trees near Kramah quarters, Kumba (4°38′N, 9°26.4′E), South-West Region, Cameroon in March 2013. They were identified by botanists at the Department of Applied Biology (University for Development Studies, Ghana) where a voucher specimen (AB/4/160/13) has been deposited.

Isolation of aurantio-obtusin and obtusin

Isolation of the two anthraquinones aurantio-obtusin and obtusin was carried out as previously described with minor modifications [13]. Briefly, the seed-pods of C. tora were opened by hand and the seeds air-dried at room temperature (25 °C) for 1 week, and ground into powder with the aid of mortar and pestle. The powdered seeds (5 kg) were defatted by Soxhlet extraction using petroleum ether 1 v/w (Fisher Scientific Co. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA) for 12 h and then extracted in ethyl acetate 5 v/w (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) until exhaustion (48 h) to yield 25.5 g of the crude extract. The ethyl acetate extract (25.5 g) was loaded onto a silica gel (70−150 Mesh ASTM) glass column of diameter 35 mm (400 mm long) and eluted with solvents of increasing polarity using petroleum ether and ethyl acetate (from 100% petroleum ether with increasing amounts of ethyl acetate to 100% of it to yield 125 fractions). The eluates were then concentrated under reduced pressure on a rotary evaporator (Laborata 4000; Heidolph instruments GmbH & Co. KG, Germany) at 40 °C and bulked into five fractions based on their thin layer chromatography profiles. The plates were visualized under UV-lamp at 254 and 365 nm and sprayed with ethanolic KOH. Repeated column chromatography on silica gel of fractions 3 and 4 using gradient mixtures of petroleum ether and ethyl acetate afforded aurantio-obtusin 1 (1.95 g) and obtusin 4 (0. 72 g) (Fig. 1) from a 10:90% petroleum ether and ethyl acetate fraction. The identities of aurantio-obtusin 1 and obtusin 4 were confirmed by co-injection of the isolated samples with the crude seed extract and analysed by liquid chromatography-quadrupole time of flight-mass spectrometry (LC-QtoF-MS).
Fig. 1

LC-QTOF-MS representative total ion chromatogram showing compounds identified in the seed extract of C. tora

LC-QTOF-MS analysis of C. tora seed extract

The seed extract of C. tora (10 mg), was dissolved in 1 ml [5:95:water (0.01% formic acid)], acetonitrile, LC-MS grade CHROMASOLV, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Luis, MO, USA), vortexed for 30 s, and centrifuged at 14,000× rpm for 5 min, after which 0.2 μl of the supernatant was analysed on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC I-class system (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) fitted with an ACE C18 column, 4.6 × 250 mm × 4.6 μm (Scotland, UK) with a heater turned off and an autosampler tray cooled to 5 °C. Mobile phases of water A and acetonitrile B, each with 0.01% formic acid was employed. The following gradient was used 0 min, 5% B; 0–3 min, 5–30% B; 3–6 min, 30% B; 6–7.5 min, 30–80% B; 7.5–10.5 min, 80% B; 10.5–13.0 min, 80–100% B, 13–18 min, 100% B; 18–20 min, 100–5% B; 20–22 min, 5% B, run time 25 min. The flow rate was held constant at 0.3 ml/min.

The UPLC system was interfaced by electrospray ionization to a Waters Synapt G2-Si QTOF-MS operated in full scan MSE in positive mode. Data were acquired in resolution mode over the m/z range 100–1500 with a scan time of 1 s using a capillary voltage of 0.5 kV, sampling cone voltage of 40 V, source temperature of 100 °C and desolvation temperature of 350 °C. The nitrogen desolvation flow rate was 500 l/h. For the high-energy scan function, a collision energy ramp of 25–45 eV was applied in the T-wave collision cell using ultrahigh purity argon (≥ 99.999%) as the collision gas. A continuous lock spray reference compound (leucine enkephalin; [M + H] + = 556.2766) was sampled at 10 s intervals for centroid data mass correction. The mass spectrometer was calibrated across the 50–2000 Da mass range using a 0.5 mM sodium formate solution prepared in 90:10 propan-2-ol:water. MassLynx version 4.1 SCN 712 (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) was used for data acquisition and processing. The elemental composition was generated for every analyte. Potential assignments were calculated using the monoisotopic masses with specifications of a tolerance of 10 ppm deviation and both odd- and even-electron states possible. The number and types of expected atoms were set as follows: carbons ≤ 50; hydrogens ≤ 100; oxygens ≤ 50; nitrogens ≤ 10; chlorines ≤ 10; sulfurs ≤ 10. The empirical formula generated was used to predict structures that were proposed based on the online database (METLIN, ChemSpider and ChemCalc, CSI:Fingerid), fragmentation pattern and literature [1417].

Mosquito larvicidal assay

Mosquito larvicidal assay was carried out following standard procedure described by WHO [18] and adopted by Ndung’u et al. [1921] with an exception of the solvents used, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich), instead of acetone. Briefly, 1 ml standard w/v of each test material or treatment in DMSO was made up to 20 ml with distilled water in 100 ml beakers in three replicates. Azadirachtin, a potent anti-insect naturally occurring limonoid [22], previously isolated and characterized in our laboratory from neem Azadirachta indica [20] and used as a positive control was similarly prepared in DMSO (1 ml). Twenty late third-fourthinstar larvae each were transferred into the test and control solutions, and larval mortality was monitored and recorded for up to 96 h. Dead larvae were removed from each treatment daily (after 24 h). The room temperature was maintained at 25–27 °C and larvae in each treatment were fed daily with approximately 1 mg of Tetramin fish food (Melle, Germany).

For the assays, we prepared a stock solution of 10 mg/ml by dissolving 40 mg of crude extract, fractions 3 and 4, and compound 1 in 4 ml of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and 2.5 mg of compound 4 in 0.25 ml DMSO (due to limited material available). From the stock solution, five concentrations of 0.1, 0.01, 0.005, 0.0025 and 0.001 mg/l (corresponding to 100, 10, 5, 2.5 and 1 ppm, respectively) for the crude extract, fractions 3 and 4 and compound 1, and only three concentrations of 0.01, 0.0025 and 0.001 mg/ml (corresponding to 5, 2.5 and 1 ppm, respectively) for compound 4.

Statistical analysis

The mortality data after 96 h were subjected to Probit analysis to determine the relative toxicity of each of the compounds and controls to the larvae. The dose used was log-transformed and data subjected to a generalized linear model (GLM) binomial regression model with the link probit function with the binomial response variables (no. dead/no. alive). We compared the differences in dose responses for each compound and controls by estimating LD50 and LD90, and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Also, the number of dead larvae in each replicate of a treatment were converted into proportions and analyzed by ANOVA after arcsine-transformation to normalize the distribution. Mean mortalities induced by each treatment and dose were compared by Tukey’s HSD test. All analyses were performed in R version 3.3.1 (R Development Core Team) at α = 0.05 level of significance.

Results

Chemical analysis

LC-QtoF-MS analysis revealed that anthraquinones dominated the seed extract of C. tora; four of which were identified as aurantio-obtusin, obtusiolin, chryso-obtusin and obtusin (Fig. 1, Table 1). Aurantio-obtusin and obtusin were isolated from the bioactive fractions 3 and 4, respectively, and confirmed by co-injection with the crude extract and analysed by LC-QtoF-MS.
Table 1

Retention time and major fragment ions of compounds identified in the seed extract of C. tora

Peak no.

Retention time (min)

Compound name

[M + H]+

Major fragments

Reference

1

9.72

Aurantio-obtusin

331.0824

316.0610, 298.0490, 288.0645, 270.0531, 253.0491, 242.0589

[1417]

2

10.03

Obtusiolin

285.0766

270.0522, 255.0648, 237.0510, 196.0431, 177.1118, 133.0861

[1417]

3

10.14

Chryso-obtusin

359.1142

326.0758, 270.3160, 268.0780, 211.0748, 177.1149, 133.0853

[1417]

4

10.65

Obtusin

345.0931

330.0735, 312.0622, 282.0526, 254.0513, 238.0612, 154.0484

[1417]

Mosquito larvicidal activity

Fractionation of the extract decreased mosquito larvicidal activity, although irrespective of the treatment, larvicidal activity increased with increasing dose and time of exposure of the treatment (Table 2, Fig. 2). There was a significant difference in larval mortality for the different compounds tested at different doses (F (6, 27) = 20.77, P < 0.001). Fractions 3 and 4 were ~ two- to four-fold less potent than the crude extract and the positive control azadirachtin, as indicated by their LD50 values (5 ppm, 95% CI: 0.004–0.006 for fraction 3; 7 ppm, 95% CI: 0.005–0.01 for fraction 4) and exposure time (Fig. 2). Likewise, aurantio-obtusin (1) and obtusin (4), had LD50 values of 10 ppm (95% CI: 0.02–0.05) and 10.2 ppm (95% CI: 0.02–0.12), respectively, and were four- and ~six-fold less potent than the crude seed extract and the positive control azadirachtin respectively, which had LD50 values of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.001–0.003) and 1.69 ppm (95% CI: 0.008–0.02), respectively and exposure time (Fig. 2; Table 2). Interestingly, except for fraction 4 whose LD90 value was 90 (95% CI: 0.043–0.185), the LD90 values of the other treatments were not significantly different from that of the positive control.
Table 2

Mosquito larvicidal activity (percent mortality ± SE) of the crude and active fractions of C. tora, and pure compounds against third and fourth-instars of A. gambiae

 

1 ppm

2.5 ppm

5 ppm

10 ppm

100 ppm

LD50 (95% CI)

LD90 (95% CI)

Crude extract

33.3 ± 7.3 Ac

38.3 ± 14.5 Ac

65 ± 13.2 Abc

91.7 ± 8.3Aab

100 ± 0 Aa

2.5 (0.001–0.003)A

10.36 (0.009–0.021) A

Fraction 3

11.7 ± 7.3 Bc

18.3 ± 4.4 Ac

53.3 ± 6.0 ABbc

75 ± 10 ABab

100 ± 0 Aa

5 (0.004–0.006) B

20 (0.013–0.030) A

Fraction 4

18.3 ± 6.0 Bb

20 ± 2.9 Ab

43.3 ± 8.3 ABb

66.7 ± 3.3 ABab

88.3 ± 11.6 Aa

7 (0.005–0.01) B

90 (0.043–0.185) B

Compd1

6.7 ± 4.4 Bc

6.7 ± 4.4 Bc

3.3 ± 3.3 Bc

58.3 ± 8.8 ABb

100 ± 0 Aa

10 (0.008–0.013) B

30 (0.02–0.05) A

Compd 4

1.7 ± 1.7 Bb

8.66 ± 5.0 Bb

13.2 ± 7.6 Ba

10.2 (0.008–0.017) B

50 (0.02–0.12) A

Azadirachtina

43 ± 12.0 Ab

51.7 ± 10.1 Ab

73.3 ± 14.2 Aab

90 ± 0 ABab

100 ± 0 Aa

1.69 (0.001–0.002) A

10.25 (0.008–0.020) A

Note: Means followed by the same upper-case letter within the same column (treatment doses and LSD50/90) and by the same lower-case letter within the same row (treatment doses only) are not significantly different (α = 0.05) after mean separation by Tukey’s HSD test

Abbreviation: SE standard error

a Positive control

Fig. 2

Mean percent mortalities of A. gambiae larvae induced by different doses of the treatments. a Crude C. tora extract. b Fraction 3. c Fraction 4. d Aurantio-obtusin. e Obtusin. f Azadirachtin

Larval mortality varied with both dose of treatment and exposure time. At 100 ppm, the crude seed extract, fraction 3, aurantio-obtusin (1) and azadirachtin elicited the highest larval mortaility, ~ 100% mortality after 24 h of larval exposure to the treatments (Fig. 2). While the bioactivity of the crude seed extract was retained at 10-fold dilution (10 ppm), the bioactivity of fraction 3, aurantio-obtusin and azadirachtin decreased drastically at the same dose to ~40–60% mortality, with azadirachtin eliciting the least larval mortality to ~10%. In general, except for the crude extract and azadirachtin, whereby larval mortality increased with exposure time at low doses (1 and 2.5 ppm), exposure time had minimal effect on the bioactivity of the other treatments at the same doses.

Discussion

The results of this study show that the crude ethyl acetate extract of C. tora is toxic to larvae of the malaria vector A. gambiae. Previous studies have shown that the most effective mosquito larvicidal extracts are derived from plants in the families Meliaceae, Asteraceae and Lamiaceae [23]. Bioactivity of these extracts have been attributed to specific classes of chemicals such as limonoids in the Meliaceae, sesquiterpene lactones in the Asteraceae and terpenoids in the Lamiaceae, or different classes of chemicals acting synergistically [1921, 24]. A recent study documented that the mosquito larvicidal principals in the crude seed extract of Milletia pinnata, a plant belonging to the same family Fabaceae as C. tora, were derived from various chemical classes including flavonoids, saturated and unsaturated fatty acids [25]. Mosquito larvicidal compounds may act as toxicants, insect growth regulators, anti-microbials against endosymbionts of the larvae, or serve as juvenile hormone blockers in physiological changes such as metamorphosis [26, 27]. Other researchers have shown that a mixture of the same class of compounds in an extract can equally exert the same effect elicited by a blend of compounds derived from different chemical classes. Structural modifications in the basic skeleton of the molecule, can alter bioactivity based on the types and/or positions of substituents in the molecule [19, 20, 28]. Previous researchers have also shown that a key compound in an extract can account for the full bioactivity of an extract [19, 29]. Our chemical analysis of the crude seed extract by LC-qToF-MS revealed predominantly the presence of anthraquinones. As earlier suggested, these compounds may act in combination with each other or with other unidentified classes of chemicals to account for the bioactivity of the crude seed extract. Further research is required to confirm if the different anthraquinones in the crude seed extract of C. tora combine with each other or with other classes of chemicals in the extract to explain its bioactivity.

When we fractionated the crude extract, the larvicidal activity decreased, confirming our earlier suggestion that toxicity of the extract was due to a blend of the different compounds. Purification of bioactive fractions led to the isolation of the key anthraquinones, aurantio-obtusin and obtusin. Their bioactivity was similar, with LD50 values of 10 ppm, which was four- and six-fold less potent than the crude ethyl acetate extract and the positive control azadirachtin, respectively, and with respect to larval exposure time. The similarity in their bioactivity is not surprising because of the similarity in their structures. Whereas aurantio-obtusin has a hydroxy group at the C-3 position, a methoxy group is located at the same position in obtusin. This suggests that bioactivity of the two different compounds is not dependent on the substituent located at this position, but rather bioactivity may be distributed across the entire molecule, as found for compounds in other studies [19, 22]. Mosquito larvicidal activity of the other structurally different anthraquinones in the extract would help shed light on this suggestion.

The medical importance of anthraquinones isolated from various parts of Cassia species has been reviewed recently [30]. Most of the anthraquinones identified have been reported previously to possess a wide range of biological effects, including anti-microbial, anti-viral, anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, anti-diabetic, antioxidant, and antigenotoxic effects against certain carcinogens, to name a few [13, 3134]. In the present study, we show that the two major anthraquinones aurantio-obtusin and obtusin are the key mosquito larvicidal compounds identified from fractions 3 and 4 respectively obtained from the seed extract of C. tora against larvae of the malaria vector A. gambiae. Compared to the crude seed extract and azadirachtin, both aurantio-obtusin and obtusin were moderately effective as mosquito larvicides. When we examined dead larvae exposed to the crude seed extract and azadirachtin (Fig. 3), at the highest dose of 100 ppm, it appeared that larvae were not able to metabolize these specific treatments suggesting that these two treatments might share the same mode of action. On the other hand, the mode of action of fractions 3, 4 and the two individual anthraquinones may be different and worthy of further elucidation. The fact that at 10-fold less than the highest dose (100 ppm) tested, only the crude extract was fasting acting, eliciting the highest larvicidal activity after 24 h compared to that elicited by the other treatments including the positive control azadirachtin suggests that the crude seed extract of C. tora is a more favourable option for larval source management than use of its fractions and identified individual key anthraquinones.
Fig. 3

Pictorial representation of dead A. gambiae larvae after larvicidal assays. a Negative control (DMSO). b Crude seed extract of C. tora. c Azadirachtin (positive control)

Conclusions

The present study has shown that the crude seed extract and the isolated anthraquinones of the edible leguminous plant C. tora possess larvicidal activity against the malaria vector. However, their practical application requires further evaluation in a semi-field and field setting, and on other mosquito species including effect on non-target insects. Because of the tremendous need to reduce and eliminate the burden of vector-borne diseases, the WHO [35] emphasizes a flexible vector control system that supports locally tailored approaches beyond the use of only available effective, evidence-based control interventions. This plant as it is widespread, can be useful in this scenario at a local scale for mosquito population management. This is especially required because of the development of resistance to common larvicides or biological agents including temephos and Bacillus thuringiensis impacting on their operational use [3].

Abbreviations

DMSO: 

Dimethyl sulfoxide

LC-Qtof-MS: 

Liquid chromatography–quadruple time of flight–mass spectrometry

PPM: 

Parts per million

WHO: 

World Health Organisation

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank Milcah Gitau of the icipe insectary for technical assistance in rearing the mosquitoes used for the assays.

Funding

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support for this research by the following organizations and agencies: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) for a studentship to VCM; UK’s Department for International Development (DFID); the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC); and the Kenyan Government. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the donors. The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included in this article. The raw data can be obtained from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

RAD, KA, IKA, AYM and BT conceptualized the project. VCM performed the isolation. XC and BT performed the LC-MS analysis. JWJ and DT performed the larvicidal bioassays and analyzed the data. VCM, DT, SH and BT wrote the final draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Applied Chemistry and Biochemistry, University for Development Studies
(2)
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
(3)
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology
(4)
Pharmacognosy Research Laboratories and Herbal Analysis Services UK, University of Greenwich
(5)
Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria

References

  1. World Health Organization. Fact Sheet. http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/vector_ecology/en/. Accessed 7 June 2016.
  2. Beier JC, Keating J, Githure JI, Macdonald MB, Impoinvil DE, Novak RJ. Integrated vector management for malaria control. Malar J. 2008;7:S4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Dua VK, Pandey AC, Raghavendra K, Gupta A, Sharma T, Dash AP. Larvicidal activity of neem oil (Azadirachta indica) formulation against mosquitoes. Malar J. 2009;8:124.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Paris M, Tetreau G, Laurent F, Lelu M, Despres L, David JP. Persistence of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti) in the environment induces resistance to multiple Bti toxins in mosquitoes. Pest Manag Sci. 2011;67:122–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hemingway J. The role of vector control in stopping the transmission of malaria: threats and opportunities. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2014;369:20130431.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Mulla M, Activity ST. Biological effects of neem products against arthropods of medical and veterinary importance. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1999;15:133–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fillinger U, Lindsay SW. Larval source management for malaria control in Africa: myths and reality. Malar J. 2011;10:353.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Mordue AJ, Nisbet AJ. Azadirachtin from the neem tree Azadirachta indica: its action against insects. An Soc Entomol Bras. 2000;29:615–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. George DR, Finn RD, Graham KM, Sparagano OA. Present and future potential of plant-derived products to control arthropods of veterinary and medical significance. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:28.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Muema JM, Bargul JL, Njeru SN, Onyango JO, Imbahale SS. Prospects for malaria control through manipulation of mosquito larval habitats and olfactory-mediated behavioural responses using plant-derived compounds. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:184.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Kekeunou S, Weise S, Messi J, Tamò M. Farmers' perception on the importance of variegated grasshopper (Zonocerus variegatus (L.)) in the agricultural production systems of the humid forest zone of southern Cameroon. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2006;2:17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Suka E. Using agroforestry to mitigate crop damaged by grasshoppers, invasive weeds and other pant plants. World Acad Sci Eng Technol. 2011;59:1214–20.Google Scholar
  13. Jang DS, Lee GY, Kim YS, Lee YM, Kim C-S, Yoo JL, et al. Anthraquinones from the seeds of Cassia tora with inhibitory activity on protein glycation and aldose reductase. Biol Pharm Bull. 2007;30:2207–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Zheng X, Xu L, Liang Y, Xiao W, Xie L, Zhang Y, et al. Quantitative determination and pharmacokinetic study of solamargine in rat plasma by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2011;55:1157–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim M, Lim SJ, Lee H-J, Nho CW. Cassia tora seed extract and its active compound aurantio-obtusin inhibit allergic responses in IgE-mediated mast cells and anaphylactic models. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;63:9037–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lambert M, Meudec E, Verbaere A, Mazerolles G, Wirth J, Masson G, et al. A high-throughput UHPLC-QqQ-MS method for polyphenol profiling in rosé wines. Molecules. 2015;20:7890–914.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhang J, Yan H, Qu X, Zhou W. Validated LC-MS/MS method for quantitation of demethylbellidifolin in rat plasma and its application to pharmacokinetic and bioavailability studies. Biomed Chromatogr. 2017;e4043.Google Scholar
  18. World Health Organisation. Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides. Geneva: WHO; 2005. p. 1–41.Google Scholar
  19. Ndung'u M, Hassanali A, Hooper AM, Chhabra S, Miller TA, Paul RL, et al. Ring A-seco mosquito larvicidal limonoids from Turraea wakefieldii. Phytochemistry. 2003;64:817–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ndung'u MW, Kaoneka B, Hassanali A, Lwande W, Hooper AM, Tayman F, et al. New mosquito larvicidal tetranortriterpenoids from Turraea wakefieldii and Turraea floribunda. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52:5027–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ndung'u M, Torto B, Knols BG, Hassanali A. Laboratory evaluation of some eastern African Meliaceae as sources of larvicidal botanicals for Anopheles gambiae. Int J Trop Insect Sci. 2004;24:311–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Champagne DE, Koul O, Isman MB, Scudder GG, Towers GN. Biological activity of limonoids from the Rutales. Phytochemistry. 1992;31:377–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Sukumar K, Perich MJ, Boobar L. Botanical derivatives in mosquito control: a review. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1991;7:210–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Torto B, Hassanali A. Progress in the search for anti-arthropod botanicals. Recent Res Dev Phytochemistry. 1997;1:475–88.Google Scholar
  25. Perumalsamy H, Jang MJ, Kim J-R, Kadarkarai M, Ahn Y-J. Larvicidal activity and possible mode of action of four flavonoids and two fatty acids identified in Millettia pinnata seed toward three mosquito species. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:237.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Shaalan EA-S, Canyon D, Younes MWF, Abdel-Wahab H, Mansour A-H. A review of botanical phytochemicals with mosquitocidal potential. Environ Int. 2005;31:1149–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Isman MB. Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world. Annu Rev Entomol. 2006;51:45–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pasquale G, Romanelli GP, Autino JC, García J, Ortiz EV, Duchowicz PR. Quantitative structure-activity relationships of mosquito larvicidal chalcone derivatives. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60:692–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim S-I, Ahn Y-J. Larvicidal activity of lignans and alkaloid identified in Zanthoxylum piperitum bark toward insecticide-susceptible and wild Culex pipiens pallens and Aedes aegypti. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:221.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Dave H, Ledwani LA. Review on anthraquinones isolated from Cassia species and their applications. Indian J Nat Prod Resour. 2012;3:291–319.Google Scholar
  31. Kim Y-M, Lee C-H, Kim H-G, Lee H-S. Anthraquinones isolated from Cassia tora (Leguminosae) seed show an antifungal property against phytopathogenic fungi. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52:6096–100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee GY, Jang DS, Lee YM, Kim JM, Kim JS. Naphthopyrone glucosides from the seeds of Cassia tora with inhibitory activity on advanced glycation end products (AGEs) formation. Arch Pharm Res. 2006;29:587.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Nam J, Choi H. Effect of butanol fraction from Cassia tora L. seeds on glycemic control and insulin secretion in diabetic rats. Nutr Res Pract. 2008;2:240–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Park YB, Kim SB. Isolation and identification of antitumor promoters from the seeds of Cassia tora. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;21:1043–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. World Health Organisation. Draft Global vector control response 2017–2030. Geneva: WHO; 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement