Skip to main content

Advertisement

Isolation and characterization of a temperature-sensitive lethal strain of Anopheles arabiensis for SIT-based application

Abstract

Background

Malaria is still a global health problem and vector control is the cornerstone of disease control strategies using indoor residual insecticide spraying (IRS) and insecticide-treated nets. The situation is becoming acute with widespread resistance to the limited arsenal of available insecticide classes. Therefore, new and innovative tools to reduce Plasmodium transmission are in need and this situation raised considerable interest in using sterile insect technique (SIT) against human pest insects, particularly Anopheles malaria vectors. When considering a mosquito release programme, one of the first issues to be addressed is how to eliminate/separate the hematophagous vector females. In this paper, we report the development and evaluation of an Anopheles arabiensis temperature-sensitive lethal (tsl) strain towards its potential use for the development of a genetic sexing strain (GSS).

Anopheles arabiensis male mosquitoes originated from North Cameroon were treated with 0.05% ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS). The mutagen was added to 10% sucrose solution and mosquitoes fed ad-libitum for 24h and 48h on a cotton wool soaked with sucrose-mutagen solution placed at the top of the cup. Treated males were then allowed to mate with wild virgin females and their progenies were screened for heat sensitivity from F3 to F8, until the isolation and establishment of a tsl strain which was further characterized by assessing its productivity (fecundity and fertility), larval development, adult longevity as well as nature and inheritance pattern of the tsl.

Results

Observations showed that the number of eggs laid and their hatch rate were similar between females that mated with mutagenized males and those from the control suggesting that mutagenesis didn't affect An. arabiensis male fecundity and fertility. At F3, fourteen isofemale families out of 88 tested, which showed mortalities ranged between 50 and 80 %, were selected as lines potentially containing a tsl mutation. From F4 to F8, a tsl strain was isolated and established by screening L1 larvae at 41°C for 3 hours. This strain showed similar life history traits compared to the wild type strain in terms of fertility, larval development time and adult's emergence. Crossing experiments to further assess the nature and inheritance pattern of the tsl phenotype showed that it is due to a recessive allele located on an autosome.

Conclusion

The successful establishment of the An. arabiensis tsl strain is a valuable tool towards the development of a GSS for SIT applications against this species. This will be done by induction of a Y-autosome translocation to link the wild-type allele to the Y chromosome in such manner that males are wild-type (temperature resistant) and females are mutant (temperature sensitive).

Introduction

Malaria is caused by the Plasmodium parasites which are transmitted to humans through the bite of infected female Anopheles mosquitoes. Despite efforts made for diagnosis and treatment of the disease and for vector control, transmission still occurs in 96 countries in the tropics of the Americas, many parts of Asia and most of Africa. In 2016, an estimated 216 million cases of malaria occurred worldwide with 445000 deaths. Sub-Saharan Africa was reported to be the most affected by the disease, where an estimated 80% of malaria deaths occurred [1].

In addition to drug administration, the control of malaria mainly relies on the ability to suppress mosquito vector populations or to prevent human-vector contacts using conventional methods such as indoor residual insecticide spraying (IRS) and insecticide-treated nets, respectively [2]. However, the efficacy of these methods is seriously compromised by the emergence and spread of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes, and there are also legitimate environmental and human health concerns about many insecticides used for vector control [3,4,5]. Henceforth, it is unanimously recognized that current control methods are insufficient to achieve and maintain malaria elimination, pointing out the necessity to develop new and innovative tools to reduce Plasmodium transmission, which can integrate with and enhance current malaria control measures [6, 7].

The sterile insect technique (SIT) is among the innovative vector control methods envisaged. It consists of the production and release of large number of sterile males that mate with wild females preventing production of offspring and it is always recommended to be applied as a component of an area-wide integrated pest management strategy [8,9,10,11,12,13]. SIT has proven to be a safe, cost-effective and environmentally friendly strategy, and has been successfully used to control a number of insect pest species including populations of screwworm fly (Cochliomyia hominivorax), Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata) and tsetse fly (Glossina austeni) [10, 14]. The experience and knowledge gained from implementation of this technique in other insect species has resulted in considerable interest in using SIT to control insect vectors of human diseases, particularly for malaria vector control.

In SIT program targeting malaria vectors, only sterile males should be released since females could transmit the disease as they are blood suckers. Besides, bisexual releases could significantly reduce the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the application, because released males and females would mate with each other reducing the proportion of mating between sterile males and wild females [15]. Therefore, one of the crucial steps in the development and implementation of a mosquito SIT program is sex separation and female elimination [16]. Sex separation and female elimination must ideally take place as early as possible during the development (eg: eggs or L1) as this minimizes rearing cost and would overall facilitate the handling and processing of male only-based sterile releases. Additionally, the method developed for sex separation and female elimination should ideally be conditionally lethal for females because they are needed to maintain the colony and for male production [16, 17].

Genetic sexing strains for sex separation and female elimination have been developed for Anopheles species (Anopheles albimanus and An. arabiensis) using classical genetic approaches based on the Y-autosome translocation of an insecticide resistance mutation to link the inheritance of this mutation to sex [17]. For example, the males of the An. arabiensis ANO IPCL1 genetic sexing strain are resistant to dieldrin, while females are eliminated when exposing eggs or other stages to the insecticide. This method proved to be efficient leading to complete elimination of females, without significant decrease of male emergence, when eggs were exposed to 2, 3, and 4 ppm dieldrin solution [18, 19]. However, there have been several concerns about this strain in respect to its productivity, stability as well as the potential impact on environment [20]. In addition, it has been shown that dieldrin becomes less potent once used, probably because molecules are absorbed by eggs as well as onto the surfaces of containers in which the treatments are performed, preventing multiple uses of a dieldrin solution for consecutive treatments [21]. Consequently, treatments of large number of eggs, as it would be the case for SIT programmes, should produce enormous quantities of waste which need to be managed. Moreover, the fact that chemicals cannot penetrate the eggshell in most of the cases could also limit the efficiency of the chemical-based systems [10]. Therefore, selectable markers that respond to physical treatment (e.g. temperature) could be a better alternative.

In the present study, we report the establishment and evaluation of an An. arabiensis tsl strain towards its potential use for the development of a genetic sexing strain, similar to the Mediterranean fruit fly C. capitata tsl-based Vienna 8 GSS which is currently used for SIT applications to suppress populations of this major agricultural pest worldwide [22,23,24].

Methods

Anopheles arabiensis mosquito colony

Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes were collected in Mayo-Oulo (9°46'N; 13°44'E), a locality situated within the dry savannah area of North Cameroon. In these sites, the vegetation is constituted of an arid savannah and the climate is characterized by a short rainy season from July to September, with an average annual rainfall of 750 mm. Blood-fed resting females were collected using electric aspirators in human dwellings and external shelters. Subsequently, An. gambiae (s.l.) mosquitoes were sorted from other species using morphological criteria [25, 26]. Larvae were collected in An. gambiae (s.l.) typical aquatic habitats using dipping method and brought back to the laboratory. They were fed with TetraMin® Baby fish food until emergence of adults. Once emerged, adults were supplied with 10% sucrose solution for three days and subsequently fed with rabbit's blood meal.

Field-collected or laboratory blood-fed females were kept in cages until they were fully gravid and ready to lay eggs. Then, females were individually placed in plastic cups containing approximately 25 ml of water for oviposition. Once having laid eggs, they were killed and genomic DNA was extracted from legs using a standard protocol [27], followed by species identification by PCR carried out using GeneAmp® PCR System 2700 (Applied Biosystems, UK). Because An. gambiae M and S forms (now An. coluzzii and An. gambiae, respectively) [28] and An. arabiensis are the only members of the An. gambiae complex reported in North Cameroon, we used the PCR diagnostic method of Santolamazza et al. [29] which allows rapid discrimination between the three species. The PCR is based on the amplification of a nearly 200 bp-long Short Interpersed Nuclear Element (SINE 200) locus on chromosome X (locus S200 X 6.1.) using the primers SINE 200X6.1F (5'-TCG CCT TAG ACC TTG GGT TA-3') and SINE 200X6.1R (5'-CGC TTC AAG AAT TCG AGA TAC-3'). The reaction mixture contained 2 μl of 10x PCR buffer (Promega, Madison WI, USA), 1 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 0.3 μM of each primer (Eurogentec, Angers, France), 0.35 unit of Taq DNA Polymerase (Promega) and 2 μl of template DNA, in a total volume of 20 μL. Amplification runs were performed under the following conditions: an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 10 min followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 54°C, 60 s at 72°C, and a final elongation step of 10 min at 72°C. In 2% agarose gels, the amplified fragment length is 479 bp in An. coluzzii, in which the insertion is fixed, and 249 bp in the An. gambiae due to the absence of the insertion. Similarly, the insertion is absent in An. arabiensis but the PCR product is represented by a 223 bp band due to a 26 bp deletion in the S200 X 6.1. flanking region. Progenies of all mosquitoes identified as An. arabiensis were pooled and reared in the insectary. Larvae were reared at 29 ± 1°C and about 70±10% relative humidity and fed with TetraMin. Adults were maintained at 27 ± 1°C and 80-85% relative humidity with a continuous supply of 10% sucrose solution.

EMS mutagenesis and establishment of an An. arabiensis temperature-sensitive strain

The protocol of selection and establishment of a tsl strain is shown in Fig. 1. Male and female pupae were separated based on the morphology of the last abdominal segment, and they were placed in different cages for emergence of adults. Four-day-old virgin males were treated with 0.05% of EMS obtained from Sigma (Taufkirchen, Germany). This dose has been used to induce temperature-sensitive lethal mutations in Culex tritaeniorhynchus using the same mutagen [30]. The mutagen was added to 10% sucrose solution. Three replicates of 50 virgin males per cup were formed and mosquitoes were allowed to feed ad libitum for 24 h and 48 h on a cotton wool soaked with sucrose-mutagen solution placed at the top of the cup. After EMS-sugar feeding, EMS-treated males were introduced in cages with virgin females in a 1:1 ratio for 3 consecutive days. After that, females were blood-fed and allowed to oviposit individually. The fecundity (number of eggs laid) and fertility (percentage of eggs hatched) of each female were assessed and larvae pooled according to the treatment for rearing to F3.

Fig. 1
figure1

Experimental scheme for the isolation and establishment of an An. arabiensis tsl strain

Females were blood-fed and allowed to oviposit individually as described above. Eggs were allowed to hatch in source water containing larval diet. L1 larvae were screened for temperature sensitivity as follows. Thirty (N=30) L1 larvae (24-30 h after hatching) per isofemale family were introduced in Eppendorf tubes containing 0,5 ml pre-warmed water at 40°C. The tubes containing larvae were placed in a digital bath (Benchmark Scientific Model H2000-4-E) set at 40 °C for 30 min. The remaining larvae were maintained in cups throughout the experiments. Two controls were used: (i) a negative control constituted of larvae from EMS-treated and normal strains which have been handled similarly, but were not exposed to the elevated temperature, to verify that variations in mortality were induced by heat shock; and (ii) a positive control constituted of normal wild type L1 larvae which have been handled similarly and exposed to heat shock at 40°C for 30 min, to verify that increased mortality in EMS-treated strain after heat shock was due to an EMS-induced tsl mutation. Mortalities were recorded 24 h after exposure to the specified temperatures. As we were attempting to isolate a tsl mutation, only families which showed high and significant mortalities compared to the controls were selected as possibly containing a tsl mutation. At F4, the optimal conditions to achieve 100% and lowest mortalities in EMS-treated and control larval bathes, respectively, were identified by screening L1 larvae at various temperatures (25 to 42°C) and time periods (30 min to 120 min). These optimal conditions were used to establish the tsl strain, from F4 to F8.

The nature and inheritance pattern of the tsl was investigated using standard crossing experiments. For each crossing, virgin males and females were placed for four consecutive days in cages in ratio 1:1, and females were blood fed and allowed to oviposit individually. L1 larvae of each crossed strain, and of the tsl and the wild type strains were then screened for temperature sensitivity as described above.

Characterization of the An. arabiensis temperature-sensitive lethal strain

Assessing the productivity of the temperature-sensitive lethal strain

Twenty-four hours-old virgin males and females were placed in cages in ratio 1:1 and allowed to mate for three consecutive days. After that, females were blood-fed and gravid females were allowed to oviposit individually. The number of eggs laid by each female was counted under a stereo-microscope. Average values were calculated and compared between the temperature-sensitive and the wild type strains. Eggs were subsequently allowed to hatch in source water and larvae from each batch were counted and removed daily for two consecutive days. Female insemination rate was estimated by dividing the number of females for which eggs hatched by the number which laid eggs. Fertility of each female was calculated by dividing the number of L1 by the number of eggs initially placed in trays for hatching. Similarly, average values were calculated and compared between temperature-sensitive lethal and the wild type strains.

Larval development and adult longevity

Mosquito larvae were reared at 25°C and 70% RH. Three replicates of each strain were formed by adding 50 first instars larvae to 0.3 L of source water in 15 × 10 cm plastic pans. Each larva received daily 0.2 mg of food (TetraMine) until pupation. Larval trays were inspected once daily at 10 am, and dead larvae or pupae were removed and recorded. The pupae were transferred to individual cups, and adult emergence and survival were monitored. The following parameters were assessed: larval survival as the proportion of L1 that reached the pupal stage; larval development time as the time between L1 stage and the pupation; pupal survival as the proportion of adults emerged from pupae, and longevity as the number of days adult mosquitoes survived.

Data analysis

Data were entered in excel and all statistical analysis was performed using GraphpadPrism software V5.00. Fisher's exact and chi-square tests were used to compare proportions while Mann-Whitney test was used to compare means. The Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used to compare survival curves. All P-values were considered as significant at a cut-off of 0.05.

Results

Mosquito species identification

In Mayo-Oulo, a total of 323 Anopheles mosquitoes were collected among which 168 (52.01%) were blood-fed, semi-gravid or gravid females at the time of collection. According to morphological identification, An. gambiae (s.l.) was the most abundant (302/323) and the other species collected in the locality was An. rufipes (21/323). In the insectary, only 52 An. gambiae (s.l.) mosquitoes laid eggs and their molecular identification resulted in the following distribution: An. gambiae (43/52), An. arabiensis (6/52) and An. coluzzii (3/52). All An. arabiensis progenies from these six females were used to establish a colony.

Fecundity and fertility of mutagenized males

Feeding mosquitoes with EMS-sucrose solution for 48h resulted in high sterility. Therefore, experiments were done only with males fed for 24h. Our data showed that fecundity was similar (Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.899) between females mated with EMS-treated males (n = : 51; range 25–153; mean: 72.22 ± 30; median: 69) and females mated with non-treated males (n = 22; range: 10–162; mean: 73.23 ± 40.30; median: 58.50). The hatch rate of eggs laid by females mated with EMS-treated males (mean: 61.13 ± 32.87; median: 75) tended to be lower compared to the control (mean: 74.5 ± 18.56; median: 81), but the difference was not statistically significant (Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.282).

Isolation and establishment of temperature-sensitive lethal strain

At F3, 2640 early first instars larvae originating from 88 isofemale families were screened for their temperature sensitivity after their exposure at 40°C for 30 min. In parallel, 1800 larvae (60 isofemale families) from the control (untreated) were also screened at the same conditions. Mortality was significantly higher (Fisher's exact test, P < 0.0001) in the EMS-treated strain (range: 0–80%; mean: 32.36%) compared to the control (range: 0–10%; mean: 5.67%) suggesting that the EMS treatment induced temperature sensitivity in An. arabiensis (Fig. 2). Fourteen (15.91%) isofemale families out of 88 tested showed mortality ranging between 50 and 80 % and were selected as possibly containing a tsl mutation.

Fig. 2
figure2

Mortality at F3 in mutagenized (treated, n = 2640 larvae from 88 isofemale families) and non-mutagenized (control, n = 1800 larvae from 60 isofemale families) mosquitoes after heat shock at 40°C for 30 min. Each dot represents a single isofemale family

As we were unable to observe 100% mortality after the exposure of L1 mosquitoes at 40°C for 30 min at F3, we tested various temperatures (25 to 42°C) and time periods (30 min to 120 min) in F4 (data not shown). A total of 111 isofemale families (3330 L1 larvae) were screened and 53 of them (47.75%) showed 100% mortality after exposure at 41°C for 3 h. The mosquitoes of these 53 lines were pooled and reared to the next generation. Using the same conditions, 103 isofemale families (95.37%) out of 108 (3240 L1 larvae) screened at F5 showed complete mortality and their larvae were pooled and reared to F6. From F6 to F8, the isolation and establishment of the tsl strain was confirmed by screening 116 isofemale families (3480 L1 larvae): no larva survived after 3 h exposure at 41°C (Fig. 3). In the wild type strain, a total of 189 isofemale families (5670 L1 larvae) were tested during F4 to F8 generation under the same conditions and the mortality was significantly lower (mean: 20–27.69%, P < 0.0001) compared to the EMS-treated strain (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Mortality in mutagenized (F4-F8, n = 3480 larvae from 116 isofemale families) and non-mutagenized (control, n = 5670 larvae from 189 isofemale families) mosquitoes after heat exposure at 41°C for 3 hours. Each dot represents a single isofemale family. ***P < 0.001

Investigation of the tsl genetic behavior showed that mortality in heterozygous crossed strains had a similar trend compared to that of the wild type strain, although slightly higher, giving preliminary indication that our tsl is recessive and is located on an autosome (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure4

Mortality in temperature sensitive lethal (SS), wild type (NS) and two hybrid strains after heat exposure at 41°C for 3 hours. Each dot represents a single isofemale family. MNS × FSS: males of wild type strain crossed with females of temperature sensitive lethal strain, MSS × FNS: temperature sensitive lethal males crossed with wild type females. A total of 1560 larvae (52 isofemale families) for SS, 1560 (52 isofemale families) for NS, 840 (28 isofemale families) for MNS × FSS and 750 (25 isofemale families) for MSS × FNS were tested. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ns: not statistically different. Comparisons were done two by two

Characterization of the temperature-sensitive lethal strain

Wild type females tended to lay more eggs than tsl females with the mean number of eggs laid per female being 65.22 ± 26.80 and 49.31 ± 24.16, respectively (Mann-Whitney test, P < 0.0001,) (Fig. 5). In contrast to the fecundity, the fertility was similar between the wild type and the tsl strains with the proportion of females for which at least one eggs hatched being 86.36% and 82.41%, respectively (Fisher's exact test, P > 0.05). The proportion of eggs that hatched was 69.18% for the wild type strain and 70.54% for the tsl (Chi-square test, P = 0.107) (Fig. 6).

Fig. 5
figure5

Fecundity of temperature sensitive lethal (SS, n = 108 females) and wild type (NS, n = 110 females) strains. Each dot represents number of eggs laid by single female. ***P < 0.001

Fig. 6
figure6

Fertility of eggs laid by females of temperature sensitive lethal (SS) and wild type (NS) strains. Each dot represents hatch rate of eggs from single female. ns: not statistically different

The larval development time was similar between the wild type and the tsl strains, taking approximately 10 days from L1 to pupation (Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.081). For both strains, pupae were collected between day 7 and day 13 with the maximum collected on day 9 and 10 (Fig. 7). The proportion of adults emerged from pupae was similar between the two strains: 82.44% and 85.48% for the tsl and wild type strain, respectively (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.609).

Fig. 7
figure7

Daily pupation rates of the temperature sensitive lethal (SS) and wild type (NS) strains

Regarding the longevity, tsl mosquitoes tended to live longer than wild type ones, with a mean survival of 12 and 11 days, respectively. The Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test confirmed that there is statistically significant difference in the survival curves of the tsl and wild type strains (P < 0.001) (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure8

Longevity of adult mosquitoes of the temperature sensitive lethal (SS) and wild type (NS) strains

Discussion

In this paper, we report the isolation of a tsl mutation, for the establishment and characterization of an An. arabiensis temperature-sensitive strain towards its potential use for the development of a GSS for SIT applications against this malaria vector [16]. This species belongs to the An. gambiae complex comprising eight species among which An. arabiensis, An. coluzzii and An. gambiae are the major vectors [28]. Anopheles arabiensis is a temporary pool breeding mosquito species prevailing in arid savanna zones and for such its populations experience dramatic reduction during the dry season. This seasonality makes An. arabiensis a suitable species to be targeted by SIT since releases done during dry seasons could easily allow to achieve suppression of low-density populations. Moreover, the SIT-targeted species should be genetically uniform, panmictic (i.e. freely mating) and preferably there should be only one species present in the release area, and this appears to be the case for An. arabiensis [31].

The An. arabiensis tsl strain was isolated following treatment of wild males from North Cameroon with EMS, an alkylating agent which is known to induce mutations in various organisms including Anopheles [30, 32,33,34]. Treatment of male adult mosquitoes with 0.05% EMS during 24 h did not significantly reduce female fecundity or fertility. Similar observations were reported in Aedes mosquitoes even after five days of exposure to EMS [35]. The fact that high sterility was observed in An. arabiensis after only two days of treatment with EMS in this study indicate that this species would be more sensitive to this mutagen than Aedes mosquitoes. This high sterility could have been caused by chromosomal breakages due to prolonged effect of EMS [36]. Our study shows that the EMS induced a tsl mutation in An. arabiensis and this finding is in line with EMS mutagenic effects in other organisms. For example, it has been reported that most EMS-induced recessive lethal mutations in Drosophila appeared to be point-mutations and that few EMS lethals were associated with chromosomal rearrangements or deletions [37].

In SIT programmes, tsl-based sexing methods allow removal of females at early developmental stage, ideally during egg stage, and avoid the use of toxic chemicals. Using EMS, several tsl mutations have been induced and used as selectable markers in insects of medical or economic importance including the vector mosquito C. tritaeniorhynchus and the fruit fly C. capitata. For C. tritaeniorhynchus, the tsl isolated was recessive and located on an autosome. Females homozygous for tsl survived at 26°C but died at 32°C. This tsl locus has the particularity to be located within a chromosomal inversion that suppresses recombination allowing indefinite maintenance of the strain with no culling [38]. Similarly, the tsl isolated in C. capitata was also recessive and autosomal, and homozygous females died when the eggs were exposed to temperatures between 31°C and 35°C for 24 hours. A white pupae mutation located close to the tsl gene allowed the monitoring of the strain to ensure its stability [39].

In this study, preliminary crossing experiments indicated that our tsl is also recessive and autosomal. However, heterozygotes tended to be slightly more temperature-sensitive than the wild type, similarly to what has been observed in C. capitata [39]. The lethal conditions of homozygous females of the tsl strain were different from those of the two other studies mentioned above. For instance, homozygous females were killed when exposed as L1 to 41°C for three hours. This difference could reflect different behavior of the tsl mutations or more likely difference in temperature sensitivity between eggs and larval stages, with the eggs being the most temperature-sensitive phase of the life-cycle. Additional work will be done to characterize the sensitive period during the life-cycle by shifting mosquitoes from the permissive to the restrictive temperature and vice versa at different successive intervals after the eggs are laid. In addition, the temperature-sensitive profile of the other developmental stages (e.g. adults) will be investigated.

The established An. arabiensis tsl strain has been maintained at 25 ± 1°C and 70% relative humidity. Our data showed that this strain tends to lay less eggs than the wild type strain, but its larvae develop relatively faster and adults live longer. Before this tsl strain is used for the development of a genetic sexing strain, a thorough genetic analysis needs to be done to confirm our initial observations that the tsl phenotype is due to an autosomal recessive gene as well as to confirm the stability of the marker in different backgrounds. This is crucial because changes in the expression of temperature-sensitive lethals in outcrossing experiments with Drosophila spp. have been reported [40]. Besides, it was noted that many EMS-induced temperature-sensitive mutations in Habrobracon either disappeared or became non-temperature-sensitive when the genetic background was altered [37]. Moreover, the temperature sensitivity profile of all stages (eggs, larvae, pupae and adults) should be defined in order to determine optimal conditions for rearing and colony maintenance, particularly under mass rearing conditions and for the production of male only colonies, if a GSS is successfully developed. Finally, isolation of a traceable selectable marker linked to the tsl will allow for tracking of recombinants in mass-rearing systems.

Conclusion

The successful establishment of the An. arabiensis tsl strain is a valuable tool towards the development of a GSS for SIT applications against this species. This will be done by an irradiation-induced translocation which would link wild type tsl allele (resistant) to Y chromosome. Males carrying this translocation should then mate with females homozygous for the tsl mutation and this would result to the establishment of the GSS in which females will be homozygous for the recessive temperature-sensitive lethal and would die when they are exposed to elevated temperatures, while males will be heterozygous and would survive. Such a development would be extremely useful for the implementation of an SIT program to suppress populations of An. arabiensis, which is a major African malaria vector.

Abbreviations

EMS:

Ethyl methanesulfonate

GSS:

genetic sexing strain

IAEA:

International Atomic Energy Agency

IPCL:

Insect Pest Control Laboratory

L1:

First-instar larvae

OCEAC:

Organisation de Coordination pour la lutte contre les Endémies en Afrique Centrale

RH:

relative humidity

SIT:

sterile insect technique

tsl:

temperature-sensitive lethal

References

  1. 1.

    World Health Organization: World Malaria Report 2017. WHO Global Malaria Programme. http://www.whoint/malaria/publications/world-malaria-report-2017/en/ . Accessed 5 Jan. 2018.

  2. 2.

    Karunamoorthi K. Vector control: a cornerstone in the malaria elimination campaign. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17(11):1608–16.

  3. 3.

    Abdalla H, Wilding CS, Nardini L, Pignatelli P, Koekemoer LL, Ranson H, et al. Insecticide resistance in Anopheles arabiensis in Sudan: temporal trends and underlying mechanisms. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:213.

  4. 4.

    Mouchet J, Carnevale P, Coosemans M, Julvez J, Manguin S, Richard-Lenoble D, et al. Biodiversité du paludisme dans le monde. In: Editions John Libbey Eurotext; 2004.

  5. 5.

    Hemingway J, Ranson H. Insecticide resistance in insect vectors of human disease. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:371–91.

  6. 6.

    Caragata EP, Rances E, Hedges LM, Gofton AW, Johnson KN, O'Neill SL, et al. Dietary cholesterol modulates pathogen blocking by Wolbachia. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(6):e1003459.

  7. 7.

    MalERA CGoVC. A research agenda for malaria eradication: vector control. PLoS Med. 2011;8(1):e1000401.

  8. 8.

    Knipling EF. Possibilities of insect control or eradication through the use of sexually sterile males. J Econ Entomol. 1955;48:459–69.

  9. 9.

    Alphey L. Re-engineering the sterile insect technique. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2002;32(10):1243–7.

  10. 10.

    Dyck VA, Hendrichs J, Robinson AS. Sterile insect technique. Principles and practice in area-wide integrated pest management. Dordrecht: Springer; 2005. p. 525–45.

  11. 11.

    Bourtzis KL, Lees RS, Hendrichs J, Vreysen MJB. More than one rabbit out of the hat: radiation, transgenic and symbiont-based approaches for sustainable management of mosquito and tsetse fly populations. Acta Trop. 2016;157:115–30.

  12. 12.

    Lees SR, Gilles JRL, Hendrichs J, Vreysen MJB, Bourtzis K. Back to the future: the sterile insect technique against mosquito disease vectors. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2015;10:156–62.

  13. 13.

    Vreysen MJB, Gerardo-Abaya J, Cayol JP. Lessons from area-wide integrated pest management (AW-IPM) programmes with an SIT component: an FAO/IAEA perspective. In: Vreysen MJB, Robinson AS, Hendrichs J, editors. Area-wide Control of Insect Pests: From Research to Field Implementation: Springer; 2007. p. 723–44.

  14. 14.

    Vreysen MJ, Saleh KM, Ali MY, Abdulla AM, Zhu ZR, Juma KG, et al. Glossina austeni (Diptera: Glossinidae) eradicated on the island of Unguja, Zanzibar, using the sterile insect technique. J Econ Entomol. 2000;93(1):123–35.

  15. 15.

    Rendon P, McInnis D, Lance D, Stewart J. Medfly (Diptera: Tephritidae) genetic sexing: large-scale field comparison of males-only and bisexual sterile fly releases in Guatemala. J Econ Entomol. 2004;97(5):1547–53.

  16. 16.

    Gilles JR, Schetelig MF, Scolari F, Marec F, Capurro ML, Franz G, et al. Towards mosquito sterile insect technique programmes: exploring genetic, molecular, mechanical and behavioural methods of sex separation in mosquitoes. Acta Trop. 2014;132(Suppl):S178–87.

  17. 17.

    Papathanos PA, Bossin HC, Benedict MQ, Catteruccia F, Malcolm CA, Alphey L, et al. Sex separation strategies: past experience and new approaches. Malar J. 2009;8(Suppl 2):S5.

  18. 18.

    Davidson G, Hamon J. A case of dominant dieldrin resistance in Anopheles gambiae Giles. Nature. 1962;196:1012.

  19. 19.

    Yamada H, Benedict MQ, Malcolm CA, Oliva CF, Soliban SM, Gilles JR. Genetic sex separation of the malaria vector, Anopheles arabiensis, by exposing eggs to dieldrin. Malar J. 2012;11:208.

  20. 20.

    Yamada H, Vreysen MJ, Bourtzis K, Tschirk W, Chadee DD, Gilles JR. The Anopheles arabiensis genetic sexing strain ANO IPCL1 and its application potential for the sterile insect technique in integrated vector management programmes. Acta Trop. 2015;142:138–44.

  21. 21.

    Bowman MC, Acree F Jr, Lofgren CS, Beroza M. Chlorinated Insecticides: fate in aqueous suspensions containing mosquito larvae. Science. 1964;146(3650):1480–1.

  22. 22.

    Caceres C. Mass rearing of temperature sensitive genetic sexing strains in the Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata). Genetica. 2002;116(1):107–16.

  23. 23.

    Robinson AS. Genetic sexing strains in medfly, Ceratitis capitata, sterile insect technique programmes. Genetica. 2002;116(1):5–13.

  24. 24.

    Augustinos AA, Targovska A, Cancio-Martinez E, Schorn E, Franz G, Caceres C, et al. Ceratitis capitata genetic sexing strains: laboratory evaluation of strains from mass rearing facilities worldwide. Entomol Exp Appl. 2017;164:305–17.

  25. 25.

    Gillies MT, De Meillon B. The Anophelinae of Africa south of the Sahara. Publ Sth Afr Inst Med Res. 1968;54:1–343.

  26. 26.

    Gillies M, Coetzee M. A supplement to the Anophelinae of Africa South of the Sahara. Pub Sth Afr Inst Med Res. 1987;55:1–143.

  27. 27.

    Morlais I, Poncon N, Simard F, Cohuet A, Fontenille D. Intraspecific nucleotide variation in Anopheles gambiae: new insights into the biology of malaria vectors. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;71(6):795–802.

  28. 28.

    Coetzee M, Hunt RH, Wilkerson R, Della Torre A, Coulibaly MB, Besansky NJ. Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles amharicus, new members of the Anopheles gambiae complex. Zootaxa. 2013;3619:246–74.

  29. 29.

    Santolamazza F, Mancini E, Simard F, Qi Y, Tu Z, della Torre A. Insertion polymorphisms of SINE200 retrotransposons within speciation islands of Anopheles gambiae molecular forms. Malar J. 2008;7:163.

  30. 30.

    Sakai RK, Baker RH. Induction of heat-sensitive lethals in Culex tritaeniorhynchus by ethyl methanesulfonate. Mosq News. 1974;34:420–4.

  31. 31.

    Helinski MEH, El-Sayed B, Knols BGJ. The Sterile Insect Technique: can established technology beat malaria? Entomol Berichten. 2006;66:13–20.

  32. 32.

    Mitchell SE, Seawright JA. EMS-Induced mutations in Anopheles quadrimaculatus (Say), Species A. J Hered. 1989;80:56–61.

  33. 33.

    Sakai RK, Chaudhry M, Baker RH. An EMS-induced mutant, rose eye, in Culex quinquefasciatus. J Hered. 1980;71(2):136–9.

  34. 34.

    McDonald IC. Temperature-sensitive mutations in the house fly: the characterization of heat-sensitive recessive lethal factors on autosome III. J Econ Entomol. 1972;65(5):1361–8.

  35. 35.

    Thompson PA, Rodriguez P. Develomental effects of ethyl methanesulfonate and thiotepas in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 1979;15(2):115–21.

  36. 36.

    Cattanach BM, Pollard CE, Isaacson JH. Ethyl methanesulfonate induced-chromosome breakage in the mouse. Mutat Res. 1968;6:297–307.

  37. 37.

    Sega GA. A review of the genetic effects of ethyl methanesulfonate. Mutat Res. 1984;134(2-3):113–42.

  38. 38.

    Sakai RKB, Baker RH. Inducton of heat-sensitive lethals in Culex tritaeniorhynchus by ethyl methanesulfonate. Mosq news. 1974;34(4):420–4.

  39. 39.

    Franz G, Kerremans P, Rendon P, Hendrichs J. Development and application of genetic sexing systems for the Mediterranean fruit fly based on a temperature sensitive lethal. B A McPheron G J Steck Fruit fly pestsa world assessment of their biology and management;1996:185-191. St. Lucie Delray Beach, FL.

  40. 40.

    Suzuki DT. Temperature-sensitive mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 1970;170(3959):695–706.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Mark Benedict for his support throughout the experiments.

This study was supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency research contact no. 17939 as part of the Coordinated Research Project “Exploring genetic, molecular, mechanical and behavioural methods of sex separation in mosquitoes.

Funding

This work was supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency through the research contract 17953 to CN. Publication costs for this study was provided by the International Atomic Energy Agency as part of the Coordinated Research Project “Exploring genetic, molecular, mechanical and behavioural methods of sex separation in mosquitoes”.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during the current study are included in this published article.

About this supplement

This article has been published as part of Parasites & Vectors Volume 11 Supplement 2, 2018: Exploring genetic molecular, mechanical and behavioural methods of sex separation in mosquitoes. The full contents of the supplement are available online at https://parasitesandvectors.biomedcentral.com/articles/supplements/volume-11-supplement-2.

Author information

CN conceived the study and designed the study protocol. CN, YP, DM, PAA participated in field and laboratory analyses. CN analysed data and drafted the manuscript with contributions from YP, PAA, TT, JG and KB. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Cyrille Ndo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source is given.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • Anopheles arabiensis
  • sterile insect technique
  • genetic sexing strain
  • Plasmodium
  • malaria
  • ethyl methylsulfonate
  • temperature-sensitive lethal strain

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.