Skip to main content
Download PDF

Immunomodulatory effects of Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides serpin RHS2 on host immune responses

Parasites & Vectors volume 12, Article number: 341 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides is a widespread tick species in China and other South East Asian countries, where it is the vector of many pathogens. The objective of this study was to study the role of serpin (serine protease inhibitor) during the tick-host interaction.

Methods

The differentiation of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDC) was induced in vitro, and the effect of RHS2 on the maturation of DCs was evaluated. The effects of RHS2 on T cell activation and cytotoxic T lymphocytes’ (CTLs) activity were analyzed by flow cytometry. Antibody subtypes after immunization of mice with RHS2 and OVA were determined.

Results

RHS2 can inhibit the differentiation of bone marrow-derived cells into DCs and promote their differentiation into macrophages. RHS2 can inhibit the maturation of DCs and the expression of CD80, CD86 and MHCII. The number of CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells secreting IFN-γ, IL-2 and TNF-α was decreased, and the number of CD3+CD4+ T cells secreting IL-4 was increased, indicating that RHS2 can inhibit the activation of CD4 T cells and CD8 T cells, leading to inhibition of Th1 immune response. RHS2 inhibits the elimination of target cells by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. After immunization of mice with RHS2 and OVA, serum IgG2b was significantly reduced and IgM was increased.

Conclusions

The results show that RHS2 has an inhibitory effect on the host immune response. Ticks have evolved various ways to circumvent adaptive immunity. Their serpin inhibits BMDC differentiation to reduce immune responses.

Background

Ticks are hematophagous arachnid ectoparasites characterized by a complex developmental life-cycle. Following hatching, ticks have three development stages: larva, nymph and adult (male and female) [1]. Widely distributed throughout the world, ticks are known to parasitize mammals, including humans, birds, reptiles and even amphibians [2]. Taxonomically, ticks are divided into three families: Ixodidae, Argasidae and Nuttallidae. Ticks are second only to mosquitoes in importance as vectors of pathogens causing human and animal diseases [3]. In human and veterinary medicine, ticks are direct external parasites and also vectors of important pathogens. Ticks transmit tick-borne diseases (TBD), including parasitic, viral, bacterial and spirochete diseases [2, 4]. Ticks and TBD have been significant problems plaguing animal production in many countries [3, 5, 6]. The control of ticks and TBD relies on the use of acaricides. However, because of environmental pollution [7] and acaricide resistance [8,9,10], it is important to develop new and more sustainable control strategies.

Serine protease inhibitor (serpin) plays an important role in the regulation of endogenous protease balance [11], innate immune response [12], pathogen transmission [13, 14], food digestion [15, 16], blood-sucking [17,18,19] and egg production [18, 20]. It also affects host blood coagulation [11, 21,22,23,24] and immune response modulation [14, 25,26,27]. The inflammatory response also has an important effect in the host. Iris, a protein secreted by Ixodes ricinus, suppresses proliferation of T lymphocytes, induces a Th2 immune response by increasing IL-4 secretion, and regulates the innate immune response by inhibiting the production of typical Th1 cytokines (IL-2 and IFN-γ) [28]. Ixodes ricinus salivary serpin IRS2 inhibits acute inflammatory responses, swelling and the migration of neutrophils into the inflamed tissue [14, 29]. IRS2 also inhibits Th17 cell differentiation by downregulating the IL-6/STAT-3 signaling pathway [14]. IRS2 is a serpin inhibitor that targets cathepsin G and chymotrypsin. These two proteases are secreted after the activation of neutrophils (cathepsin G) and mast cells (chymotrypsin) and they are involved in various types of physiological processes of acute inflammatory reactions [29], especially the interactions between neutrophils and platelets [30]. IRS2 also inhibits thrombin-induced platelet aggregation and it may have multiple roles in inflammation and anticoagulation, particularly by regulating the activation of protease-activated receptors (PAR) [29]. The effects of serpin from other arthropods on innate immunity cells and their function in driving adaptive immune responses have been studied [31,32,33,34].

To avoid attack by the host immune system during blood-feeding, ticks secrete protein and non-protein molecules which have anticoagulant and immunomodulatory effects [35]. The surfaces of dendritic cells (DCs) have pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that specifically recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). They also participate in the uptake of antigens, expressed via MHC class I (MHCI) and class II (MHCII) molecules. In antigen presentation they play a role in the initiation and regulation of immune responses [36]. After DCs take up antigens, they process them so that they become associated with the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules and be presented on the cell surface [37]. DCs activate T lymphocytes as a result of antigen presentation, creating a unique link between innate and acquired immune responses [37]. Antigen processing by DCs primarily occurs through two major pathways: an exogenous (endosomal) pathway and an endogenous (proteasomal) pathway, CD4 and CD8 T cells respond to peptide antigen displayed on MHC class II and MHC class I molecules [36].

During tick-feeding, ticks digest host cells. In the tick gut epithelium, nutrient endocytosis and lysosome maturation facilitate intracellular digestion [38, 39]. The luminal surface of the midgut can be accessed by the host immune effectors and the blood components ingested during blood-feeding [40]. It is unclear how the midgut cells inhibit multiple proteases and effector molecules in the host blood to maintain homeostasis and protect the midgut cells from damage. Most inhibitors have been found in the salivary glands but relatively few have been identified in the midgut [41]. Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides serpin 2 (RHS2) is only expressed in the midgut and is able to significantly inhibit chymotrypsin activity [42]. RNA interference studies have shown a significant decrease in tick attachment and engorgement rates. These results reveal that RHS2 is involved in successful tick blood-feeding [42].

It is important to determine the role of tick serpin on host immune effector molecules and its role in blood digestion. In this study, we studied the effects of RHS2 on host immune regulation.

Methods

Animals and ticks

Six-eight-week-old female C57BL/6 mice were purchased from SLAC Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). They were maintained following the approved guidelines from the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute (approval number SHVRI-MO-2018010020). Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides were maintained under standard conditions in the animal facilities of the Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Shanghai, China).

Reagents and chemicals

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (Escherichia coli, E. coli 055:B5) and PMA [phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate ≥ 99% (TLC), film or powder] were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Ionomycin (Free Base) was purchased from MKbio (Shanghai, China). Recombinant mouse GM-CSF (granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor), IL-4 (interleukin 4) and IL-2 (interleukin 2) were obtained from Peprotech (Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). Cell staining was performed by using the following mAbs from BD Biosciences (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA): anti-CD45 FITC (30-F11, #553079), anti-CD11b PerCP-Cy5.5 (M1/70, #550993), anti-CD11c APC (HL3, #550261), anti-F4/80 BV421 (T45-2342, #565411), anti-Ly-6G (Gr-1) PE (1A8, #551461), anti-CD80 PE (16-10A1, #553769), anti-MHC II BV421 (M5/114.15.2, #562564), anti-CD86 PE (GL1, #561963), anti-CD40 BV421 (3/23, #562846), anti-CD3 FITC (17A2, #561798), CD4 PerCP-Cy5.5 (RM4-5, #550954), anti-CD8a PerCP-Cy5.5 (53-6.7, #551162), anti-IL-2 PE (JES6-5H4, #554428), anti-TNFα BV421(MP6-XT22, #563387) and anti-IFNγ APC (XMG1.2, 554413). The isotype-matched mAbs for control staining were from BD Biosciences. Cytotoxicity LDH Assay Kit-WST was purchased from Dokindo (Tokyo, Japan).

Expression and purification of RHS2

The recombinant plasmid expressing RHS2 (PGEX-6P-1-RHS2) was transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3). Then, the transformants were induced with 1 M isopropyl-b-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 20 °C to express the protein for 20 h. After induction, the bacterial cells were harvested, ultrasonicated and centrifuged. The recombinant proteins were highly expressed and soluble. The supernatant was purified with a GST resin column (Novagen, Madison, WI, USA). After purification, the GST-tag recombinant proteins were PreScission Protease (Sigma, # SAE0045, USA) cleaved at 4 °C for 16 h. The cleaved proteins were examined by 12% sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The cleaved proteins were treated by Detoxi-Gel Endotoxin Removing Gel (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to remove the endotoxin. Finally, the concentration of RHS2 was determined by a BCA protein assay to remove endotoxins.

Bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDC) culture

BMDC were generated as previously described with some minor modifications [43, 44]. Briefly, BM cells were removed from the femurs and tibias of C57BL/6 mice and the marrow was flushed with RPMI-1640 (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) using a syringe with a 0.45-mm needle. Clusters within the marrow suspension were disassociated by rapid pipetting, and cells were filtered through a 70-μm cell strainer. BM cells were cultured in 6-well culture plates, at a concentration of 1.5 × 106 cells per well, in 1.5 ml of RPMI-1640 supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% fetal bovine serum (New Zealand FBS, Gibco), 100 U/ml of penicillin, 100 μg/ml of streptomycin, GM-CSF (40 ng/ml) and IL-4 (20 ng/ml). On day 3 of culturing, the same volume of the supplemented medium was added. On days 6 and 9, the supernatant was gently removed and replaced with the same volume of fresh medium. On day 9 of culturing ≈ 90% of the cells were CD11c+ DCs.

Isolation of splenocytes and splenic lymphocytes

Female C57BL/6 mice (6–8-weeks-old, SPF) were killed by CO2 asphyxiation and their spleens were removed aseptically and placed into ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Gibco). Single cell suspensions were prepared by gentle dispersion of the cells and straining through a 70-μm nylon strainer. Clustered cells were removed by filtration through a 40-μm nylon strainer, and washed twice with PBS. Lymphocytes were separated using Ficoll–Hypaque gradients and were resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco) containing 10% FBS.

CD4 and CD8 T cell activation

Dendritic cells were cultured for 10 d in culturing in 6-well culture plates at a concentration of 1.5 × 106 cells per well in 1.5 ml of RPMI-1640 supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% FBS, 100 U/ml of penicillin, 100 μg/ml of streptomycin, OVA-CD4 (KISQAVHAAHAEINEAG), or OVA-CD8 (SIINFEKL) peptide, in the presence or absence of RHS2 (20 μg/ml). BMDC were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. After 36 h of incubation, 2 × 106 of freshly isolated lymphocytes of culture medium was added to each well. The lymphocytes were incubated with DCs for 3 d before re-stimulation with PMA (20 ng/ml) and ionomycin (1 μM). After an additional 2 h, the cells were treated with the protein transport inhibitor brefeldin A (BD). The cells were then incubated for 4 h before staining was performed with anti-CD3 FITC (17A2), CD4 PerCP-Cy5.5 (RM4-5), anti-CD8a PerCP-Cy5.5 (53–6.7), anti-IL-2 PE (JES6-5H4), anti-TNF-α BV421 (MP6-XT22), anti-IL-4 PE (11B11) and anti-IFN-γ APC (XMG1.2) (BD Biosciences).

Immunoblotting

Western blot analysis was performed as described previously [45]. In the present study, BM-derived DCs were collected on the 3rd and 6th days of culture. Cells were washed twice with cold PBS. They were then lysed in a modified RIPA buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), in the presence of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), protease and phosphatase inhibitor (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). They were then placed on ice for 10 min on a swirling plate to assure uniform spreading. The samples were then centrifuged at 12,000×g for 10 min to pellet the cell debris. Cell lysates from each sample were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by the transfer of proteins to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes. Following blocking in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 5% fat-free milk, the blots were incubated overnight with the antibodies against STAT-3 (124H6, #9139), phospho-STAT-3 (Tyr705, #9145), ERK (Thr202, #9102), phospho-ERK (Thr202, #9106), p38 (Thr180, #9212), phospho-p38 (Thr180, #9211) (all from Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) and β-actin (60008-1-Ig, Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA). The signal was detected with an Enhanced Chemiluminescent Substrate Reagent Kit (NCM Biotech, Sunzhou, China) and it was visualized under a Tanon-5200 Chemiluminescent Imaging System (Tanon Science and Technology, Shanghai, China).

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) killing assay

Tumor cell line B16F10-OVA were the target cells of the assay. A subclone of cells was transfected with the cDNA of OVA. Cells were cultured in DMEM (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS, penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 µg/ml).

Mice were inoculated subcutaneously with 500 μg OVA-CD8 peptide plus incomplete Freund’s adjuvant to the flank once a week for 6 weeks. Lymphocytes (2 × 106 cells/ml) were isolated from spleens 7 d after the third immunization. Spleens were harvested and homogenized into single cell suspensions, and a 70-μm cell strainer (FALCON, Durham, NC, USA) was used to remove debris. The cells were washed and resuspended in RPMI medium for counting. Cells were resuspended at 2 × 106 cell/ml in RPMI complete medium, and they were incubated with 20 μg/ml OVA-CD8 peptide for 4 d at 37 °C.

B16F10-OVA were seeded (1 × 106/well) in triplicate (100 μl/well) in 96-well plates cells. They were cultivated at 37 °C in a humid incubator for 2 h with 5% CO2. Then, 100 μl of lymphocytes (2 × 106 cell/well) were added as effector (E) cells and cultivated with 20 µg/ml RHS2 for 2 to 4 h. Triton X-100 was added to the positive control group. The Cytotoxicity LDH Assay Kit-WST was used to measure the absorbance of all of the samples at 490–500 nm using a Spectramax microplate reader (Spectramax M5, Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA).

Mice immunization

Six-week-old female C57BL/6 mice were divided into three groups, each consisting of five mice. Animals were immunized subcutaneously with 50 μg of ovalbumin (OVA, Sigma-Aldrich) in the presence or absence of RHS2 (50 μg). PBS-treated animals were included as the controls. A boosting injection was given 14 d later. Serum was collected 10 d after the third immunization for antibody subtyping detection.

Antibody subtype detection

Anti-OVA IgG, IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, IgM and IgE antibodies in serum were detected by an indirect ELISA. Briefly, microtiter plate wells (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were coated with 100 μl OVA solution (1 μg/ml, in 50 mM carbonate-bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.6) for 14 h at 4 °C. The wells were washed three times with PBS containing 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20 (PBS/Tween, PBST), and then blocked with 5% skimmed milk powder (SMP) at 37 °C for 1 h. After three washings, 100 μl of diluted serum sample (1:100) or PBS as control was added to the triplicate wells. The plates were then incubated for 2 h at 37 °C, followed by washing 6 times. Aliquots of 100 μl of goat anti-mouse IgG horseradish peroxidase conjugate diluted 1:4000, goat anti-mouse IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, IgM and IgE peroxidase conjugate 1:4000 with 5% SMP were added to each plate. The plates were further incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. After washing, the peroxidase activity was assayed as follows. A total of 100 μl of substrate solution (10 mg of 3, 3′, 5, 5′-tetramethylbenzidine and 37.5 μl of 30% H2O2 in 25 ml of 0.1 M citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 5.0) was added to each well. The plate was incubated for 10 min at 37 °C and the enzyme reaction was terminated by adding 50 μl/well of 2M H2SO4. The optical density (OD) was measured in an ELISA reader at 490 nm with a 595 nm reference. Data were expressed as the mean OD value of the samples minus the mean OD value of the control. When sets of serum samples were subjected to within- and between-group comparisons, ELISA assays were performed on the same day for all of the samples.

Data analysis

GraphPad Prism 6 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was employed for the statistical analysis. Comparisons between two groups were performed using the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test. When more than two groups were compared, one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni’s test was used. P < 0.05 was considered to be significant and P < 0.01 was considered to be highly significant.

Results

Differentiation of BMDC

Recombinant RHS2 was obtained using a prokaryotic expression system with a molecular weight of 42.7 kDa (Fig. 1a). The effect of tick serpin RHS2 on the differentiation of DCs from BM precursors was investigated by culturing BM-derived cells in the presence of GM-CSF, IL-4 and RHS2 (20 μg/ml, 2.4 μM) for 9 days. RHS2 significantly inhibited the differentiation of BM cells into CD45+ CD11c+ DCs (Fig. 1b) and CD45+CD11b+ cells (Fig. 1c). In order to verify whether the RHS2-inhibitory effect was directed against an early or a late phase of DCs differentiation, we collected the DCs on days 3, 6 and 9, and we determined the CD45+ CD11c+ cell population by two color flow cytometry. Our data showed that RHS2 significantly reduced DC (CD45+ CD11c+) differentiation on days 3, 6 and 9 of BM cell culture (day 3, IL-4/GM-CSF+RHS2: 11.54 ± 0.85% vs IL-4/GM-CSF: 21.78 ± 0.80%; t-test: t(4) = 15.2, P = 0.00001; day 6, IL-4/GM-CSF+RHS2: 37.79 ± 0.87% vs IL-4/GM-CSF: 64.97 ± 2.22%; t(4) = 19.87, P = 0.00001; day 9, IL-4/GM-CSF+RHS2: 52.56 ± 0.11% vs IL-4/GM-CSF: 91.12 ± 0.49%; t(4) = 55.18, P = 0.00001; Fig. 1d, e). Results presented in Fig. 1 are representative of three independent experiments.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Differentiation of BMDC in the presence or absence of RHS2. a Recombinant RHS2 purified from a GST affinity column (GST-RHS2 and after cleavage of the GST tag, detected by Western blot). b, c Cultured cells were labeled with the designated monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and analyzed by two-color flow cytometry. Results are shown as the mean percentage ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of CD45+ CD11c+ cells from duplicate wells. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001 compared to cells cultured only with GM-CSF + IL-4 (control group). Data shown are representative of two experiments. d CD45+ CD11c+ and e CD45+ CD11b+ F4/80+, the results are shown as the mean percentage ± standard error of the mean (SEM)

Full size image

Promotion of p38 and STAT3 phosphorylation

The JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway plays an important role in cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis [46, 47]. The phosphorylated ERK1/2 can phosphorylate p90RSK and promote cell proliferation, survival and metastasis through targeted gene expression [48]. p38 MAPK are activated by cellular stress stimuli or cytokines, and they are associated with stress response, cytokine production, cell growth and apoptosis [49]. To further understand the mechanisms underlying the changes in DCs phenotype observed above, we investigated the involvement of ERK, STAT3 and p38 signaling effector by Western blot. We found that RHS2 induced upregulation of phosphorylated p38 (t-test: day 3, t(2) = 4.533, P = 0.0454; day 6, t(2) = 2.235, P = 0.155) and STAT3 (t-test: day 3, t(2) = 6735, P = 0.0001; day 6, t(2) = 9953, P = 0.0001; Fig. 2a–c), and downregulation of phosphorylated ERK (t-test: day 3, t(2) = 17.35, P = 0.0033; day 6, t(2) = 427.3, P = 0.0001; Fig. 2d).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The effects of RHS2 on ERK, STAT3 and p38 phosphorylation. a Western blotting was performed to analyze the phosphorylation levels of ERK, STAT3 and p38 in DC differentiation, which was significantly higher in GM-CSF/IL-4 + RHS2 compared to GM-CSF/IL-4. b–d Gel-Pro analyzer 4 was used to detect gray value and the results were defined as normalized gray value of various experiments in reference to the control group. Each experiment was performed independently three times. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

Full size image

Maturation of BMDC

Activation and maturation of DCs are crucial for the initiation of cell-mediated immunity. The maturation of DCs is evaluated by studying the increase in the expression of CD40, CD80, CD86 and MHC-II proteins on the surface. BMs were cultured in the presence of GM-CSF and IL-4 for 9 days, and the differentiated immature DCs were harvested. The harvested DCs were stimulated by LPS for 36 h with or without RHS2. Then, the DCs were stained and analyzed for the expression of CD40, CD80, CD86 and MHC-II molecules by flow cytometry. The immature DCs stimulated with LPS showed significantly increased expression of CD40 (one-way ANOVA: F(2, 6) = 502.3, P = 0.00001), CD80 (F(2, 6) = 138, P = 0.00001), CD86 (F(2, 6) = 64.99, P = 0.0001) and MHCII (F(2, 6) = 230.9, P = 0.00001) compared with that of the control group. However, following LPS induction, we observed downregulation of CD80 (one-way ANOVA: F(2, 6) = 16.08, P = 0.0028), CD86 (F(2, 6) = 18.74, P = 0.0026) and MHCII (F(2, 6) = 8.298, P = 0.0264; Fig. 3) and no change of CD40 (F(2, 6) = 0.8821, P = 0.5015; Fig. 3). These results indicated the RHS2 inhibitory effect on BMDC maturation.

Fig. 3
figure 3

RHS2 inhibited the maturation of BMDC. a Expression of co-stimulatory molecules incubated with LPS or with RHS2 after 36 hours using flow cytometry, MFI levels are shown from three independent experiments. b The percentage of co-stimulatory and MHC-II molecule expression on CD45+ CD11c+ cells. Each experiment was performed independently three times. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001; bars represent the mean of three independent experiments ± SD

Full size image

IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-α production in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells

Since T cell activation by vaccine-primed DCs is important for adaptive immunity [50], we investigated the ability of OVA-CD4 polypeptide or OVA-CD8 polypeptide with RHS2-primed BMDC to activate T cells. We stimulated BMDC with OVA-CD4 or OVA-CD8 and RHS2 for 36 h and co-cultured them with isolated spleen lymphocytes for 3 days. As shown in Fig. 4a, b, RHS2-primed BMDC remarkably inhibited the secretion of IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-α by CD4+ (t-test: t(4) = 6.204, P = 0.0034; t(4) = 7.934, P = 0.0006; t(4) = 4.446, P = 0.005) and CD8+ (t-test: t(4) = 10.45, P = 0.0005; t(4) = 5.624, P = 0.0049; t(4) = 8.425, P = 0.0005) cells. However, a significant increment was detectable following RHS2 treatment for IL-4 (t(4) = 7.213, P = 0.002) after OVA-CD4 peptide stimulation (Fig. 4a). These results suggested that RHS2 stimulated DCs to inhibit Th1 immune responses in CD4+ T cells.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Production of IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-α-from CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. a Co-cultured cells stained with anti-CD3+ and CD4+ markers were analyzed by flow cytometry to evaluate levels of IL-2, IL-4, IFN-γ and TNF-α. The percentage of IL-2-, IL-4-, IFN-γ- and TNF-α-producing cells was determined in live CD4+ cells. b Co-cultured cells stained with anti- CD3+ and CD8+ markers were analyzed by flow cytometry to evaluate levels of IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-α. The percentage of IL-2-, IFN-γ- and TNF-α-producing cells was determined in live CD8+ cells. The data are expressed as the mean percentages of production cytokines in CD4+ and CD8+ cells from triplicate wells plus SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

Full size image

Inhibition of OVA-CD8 induce cytotoxic T lymphocytes

To evaluate the specific cytotoxic activity of CD8+ T lymphocytes generated after the immunization of C57BL/6 mice with the OVA-CD8 peptide, we cultured spleen lymphocytes cells from OVA immunized mice with OVA-CD8 for 4 days. Then, we analyzed the lytic activity of preculture B16F10-OVA cells and spleen lymphocytes at ratios of 1:2 and 1:5, and in the presence or absence of 20 μg/ml RHS2 protein. The results that are shown in Fig. 5 indicate that CD8+ T lymphocytes incubated with the OVA-CD8 peptide were able to lyse the B16F10-OVA cells, while spleen lymphocytes cells incubated with RHS2 protein showed a significantly lower lytic activity (one-way ANOVA: F(2, 6) = 1206, P = 0.00001).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Cytotoxicity assay. OVA-CD8-activated CD8+ cytotoxic lymphocytes were used as effector cells, whereas the OVA-expressing B16F10 cells were used as target cells. Triton X-100 was added to the positive control group. The data are presented as the percent specific lysis of the target cells in a 2 h RHS2-stimulate assay. Each point represents the mean of triplicate cultures. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001

Full size image

Serum IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgM and IgE Level

Serum antibody levels of IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, IgM and IgE induced by OVA were determined by ELISA. As expected the total IgG, IgG1 and IgG2b levels in the serum were significantly higher in the OVA group compared with the PBS group (one-way ANOVA: F(2, 6) = 181.2, P = 0.00001; F(2, 6) = 1315, P = 0.00001; F(2, 6) = 163, P = 0.00001), whereas IgG2b from the OVA+RHS2 group was significantly lower compared with the OVA group (F(2, 6) = 163, P = 0.001; Fig. 6a). There were significant differences in IgM (F(2, 6) = 10.56, P = 0.0108) production for the OVA+RHS2 group relative to the control group (Fig. 6a), but there were no significant differences in IgG2a (F(2, 6) = 5.879, P = 0.2339), IgG3 (F(2, 6) = 5.041, P = 0.0519) and IgE (F(2, 6) = 2.562, P = 0.1569) production.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effect of RHS2 on serum anti-OVA antibody in mice immunized subcutaneously. The serum was collected 10 days after the third immunization for antibody subtype and total antibody titer evaluation. a Anti-OVA antibody IgG, IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, IgM and IgE were measured by ELISA. b IgG2b/IgG1 ratio. Each data point represents the mean antibody titer ± SEM with n = 5. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01

Full size image

Th1 cells induce the production of IgG2a and IgG2b antibodies, and Th2 cells promote IgE and IgG1 subclasses [51, 52]. IgG2b can be produced in response to either Th1 or Th2 under different conditions [53]. IgG2b and IgG1 are produced via Th1 and Th2 cells, which drive cellular and humoral immunity, respectively. The decreased ratio of IgG2b/IgG1 compared to the antigen control group is an indicator of Th1-biased immune response. As shown in Fig. 6b, antigens from the OVA+RHS2-treated mice exhibited a lower IgG2b/IgG1 ratio than the mice in the control group (t-test: t(4) = 4.278, P = 0.0064; Fig. 6b).

Discussion

Once on the host, ticks actively search for a favorable place for feeding. The first step in feeding is the secretion of a substance that solidifies the contact with the skin of the host. Adult females of the genus Ixodes imbibe blood meals exceeding about 100 times their own weight within 7–9 days. The success rate of pathogens transmitted by ticks is mainly a result of the favorable aspects of tick physiology arising from their adaptation to the relatively long-lasting blood-feeding [12]. During the progress of blood-sucking, a dramatic series of changes occurs in the tick’s salivary glands, whose cells are profoundly transformed, adapting their physiology and pharmacological secretions to the new ‘active’ status [54]. The inoculation of several dozen pharmacologically active compounds [54,55,56] contributes to the sustained flow of blood into the feeding cavity, lysis of the cells surrounding the feeding place and evasion of the host’s immune response [12]. Ticks lack extracellular digestive enzyme organs, and ticks uptake components of host blood by endocytic digestive cells that line the tick midgut epithelium [16]. This is beneficial to the long-term survival of pathogens that are ingested into the midgut. Nevertheless, ticks have a defense mechanism that enables them to maintain pathogens and commensal microbes at a certain level [57], without compromising their own health and development. The long-term co-evolution of ticks and pathogens leads to mutual tolerance and adaptation of their physiological differences. Information on tick innate immunity is rather fragmented and allows only an approximate comparison with other invertebrates [58, 59]. Humoral defenses are based on a variety of pattern-recognition proteins and effector molecules, such as lectins, complement-related molecules and a broad spectrum of common as well as specific antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) [58].

Since ticks are blood-sucking arthropods, host immune responses are evaded by various mechanisms during blood-sucking. Many molecules in the saliva secreted into the biting site act on the host immune system, including anti-inflammatory molecules, protease inhibitors and innate and acquired immunomodulatory molecules. Serpin has a variety of biological functions, and it is secreted into the host by saliva during blood-sucking, acting as an anticoagulant [11, 21,22,23,24], immunosuppressant [14, 27] and enzyme inhibitory factor [11, 23, 60], which are beneficial to blood-sucking development and pathogen transmission.

In haematophagous ectoparasites, DC modulators have presumably evolved to suppress host immunity in order to facilitate blood-feeding [61]. The present study demonstrated that RHS2 from R. haemaphysaloides ticks was able to inhibit the differentiation and terminal maturation of DCs, and subsequently affected their immunostimulatory functions. This could be the mechanism by which blood-feeding arthropods immunosuppress their host’s immune response during meal uptake [62, 63], and it could also explain how tick saliva can modulate the production of cytokines by the host. The present investigation also showed what seems to be a novel modulatory role of arthropod vectors’ saliva at an initial step of the immune response through the inhibition of differentiation and maturation of DCs into functional antigen-presenting cells, which has also been supported by a previous report [26].

We found that tick RHS2 inhibited GM-CSF/IL-4-driven differentiation of BM precursors into DCs. The culture system using GM-CSF/IL-4 to differentiate BM precursors into DCs favors the expression of genes that are related to the development of these cells to the detriment of other haemopoietic populations, such as granulocytes and macrophages. DCs develop from progressively restricted bone marrow progenitors: this progenitor cells include granulocyte, monocyte and DC progenitor [64]. The diminished percentage of DCs found when RHS2 was present in the culture was not caused by cell death and was not compensated by B cells (CD19), but it was compensated by granulocyte (Gr-1+) and macrophage (F4/80+) cell populations.

To our knowledge, this study provides the first direct evidence that the JAK/STAT pathway results in the immune suppression of BMDC induced by tick serpin RHS2. Therefore, we conducted Western blot analysis to identify the signaling molecules involved. We examined the phosphorylation of ERK, p38 and STAT3, which are essential in regulating many cellular processes including inflammation, cell differentiation and cell proliferation. We also showed that tick serpin RHS2 could lead to BMDC immunosuppression. RHS2 could induce high expressions of p-STAT3 and p-p38, consequently regulating the surface marker, which might influence BMDCs to drive T helper 1 type immune responses. Furthermore, STAT3-depleted DCs are more resistant to cancer cell-derived inhibitory factors [65]. These STAT3-deficient DCs are more potent activators of T cells and they have a high capacity to induce Th1 responses [65]. Activation of p38 kinase is related to stress response, growth arrest and apoptosis [66, 67], whereas ERK is important in cellular mitogenesis and differentiation [68]. MAPK activation regulates gene expression via the phosphorylation of downstream transcription factors.

Upon exposure to inflammatory or microbial stimuli such as LPS or TNF-α, immature DCs upregulate the surface expression of MHCII, beside adhesion and co-stimulatory molecules [36, 37]. After stimulation, these newly matured DCs reduce their antigen-uptake capacity and migrate to the regional lymph nodes, where they exert their function as potent APC [37]. The results presented herein demonstrated that RHS2 could inhibit the expression of CD80, CD86 and MHCII induced by LPS on the DCs’ surfaces. However, in this study, the expression of CD40 molecules was not altered. Fewer CD40 molecules on the DCs can result in diminished presentation of antigen, reduced production of cytokines and, as a consequence, lack of CD80 and CD86 upregulation. Our results showed that RHS2 may impair the competence of DCs for T-cell priming, owing to a lack of appropriate co-stimulation.

The flow cytometry data showed that RHS2 could result in the downregulation of CD80, CD86 and MHCII expression. The antigen-presenting function of DCs is dependent on their activation, which is characterized by the expression of MHCII molecules and co-stimulatory molecules such as CD80. It has been reported that the low level of MHCII could reduce DCs’ production of inflammatory cytokines in response to Toll-like receptor ligands. It also weakened DCs ability to interfere with antigen-specific CD4+ T cell activity in regulatory T-cell development [69]. Reduced CD80 expression correlates with reduced IFN-γ levels by increasing the Th2 cytokine levels [70] and the suppression of the Th1 response [71] in reflecting the negative influence of antigens on DCs. Here, we found that the lower level expression of CD80, CD86 and MHCII resulted in poor CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell stimulatory capacity. A decreased number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells might be implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory disorders; many chronic diseases, including cancer, are linked to inflammation disorder [72]. The balance between the different immunological cells is responsible for a normal immunological function to maintain immune homeostasis.

This study showed that RHS2 significantly influenced the equilibrium between Th1 and Th2 subpopulations and the cytokines they produce. Each subpopulation is characterized by unique transcription factors and cytokine patterns. CD4+ Th lymphocytes can be divided into Th1 (IFN-γ, IL-2 and TNF-α) and Th2 (IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10 and IL-13) subsets on the basis of their cytokine secretion profile [73,74,75]. Th1 cytokines induce the cell-mediated immune response targeted against intracellular pathogens [76]. They promote isotype class switching to produce IgG2 [73, 77] and they trigger antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Th2 cytokines induce powerful antibody-mediated responses [78]. Antibody isotypes switch to IgG1 [73] and IgE, which protects the body against extracellular pathogens, in particular parasites. Th1 and Th2 cytokines are produced by T cells and other immune system cells and changes in Th1/Th2 cell polarization of an immune response are associated with susceptibility to autoimmune and infectious diseases.

In addition, CD8+ T cells perform a cytotoxic function via the quality of antigen presentation [79]. The number of CD3+CD8+ T cells secreting IFN-γ, IL-2 and TNF-α was decreased, indicating that CD8 T cell activation was inhibited. It is well established that CD8+ T cells constitute an important branch of adaptive immunity that contributes to clearance of intracellular pathogens and provides long-term protection. These functions are mostly fulfilled by the best characterized subpopulation of CD8+ T cells, the cytotoxic T lymphocytes, owing to their ability to kill infected cells and to secrete cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF-α [80]. However, our results indicated that RHS2 inhibited the killing of target cells by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. However, it is not clear that RHS2 inhibits CD8+ T cells from killing cells bearing the target antigen by inhibiting the release of cytotoxic molecules (such as granzymes and perforin), or inhibiting the secretion of cytokines (IFN-γ and TNF-α) into the immunological synapse.

According to the secreted cytokine profile, differentiation of naïve CD4+ cells into functionally distinct effector helper T cell subsets [81,82,83], with Th1 and Th2 populations, is the most thoroughly studied in the tick-host interaction. Th1 populations are associated with host cellular and inflammatory responses and Th2 populations are linked with host humoral responses against ticks [74, 75].

Experiments with tick serpin have shown polarization of the immune response from Th1 to Th2 branches by suppression of Th1 and upregulation of Th2 cytokines in both mice and humans. This polarization leads to an attenuated inflammatory response, which is beneficial for tick survival and feeding [84]. Briefly, RHS2 inhibited secretion of IL-2, TNF and IFN-γ. One of the mechanisms described for the action of R. haemaphysaloides serpin involves a negative effect on DCs, which then prime naive CD4+ T cells to induce Th2 cell differentiation in vitro and in vivo. Ticks have evolved various methods to circumvent adaptive immunity and to actively direct the immune response toward the Th2 arm, which favors their feeding. The immunosuppressive properties of tick secretions also include the inhibition of antibody production by B cells, which could damage activation of other cells or complement.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating that RHS2 has an inhibitory effect on the initial, activation and effect phases of the host immune response. RHS2 from R. haemaphysaloides ticks was able to inhibit the differentiation and terminal maturation of DCs, subsequently affecting their immunostimulatory functions. RHS2-primed BMDC remarkably inhibited the secretion of IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-α by CD4+ and CD8+ cells, as well as Th1 immune responses. Ticks have evolved various ways to circumvent adaptive immunity, which is beneficial for their survival and feeding, and the transmission of TBDs.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Abbreviations

serpin:

serine protease inhibitor

RHS2:

R. haemaphysaloides serine protease inhibitor 2

CTLs:

cytotoxic T lymphocytes

BMDC:

bone marrow-derived dendritic cells

DCs:

dendritic cells

OVA:

ovalbumin

TBD:

tick-borne diseases

IL-2:

interleukin 2

IL-4:

interleukin 4

IFN-γ:

interferon gamma

TNF-α:

tumor necrosis factor alpha

MHCI:

major histocompatibility complex I

MHCII:

major histocompatibility complex II

LPS:

lipopolysaccharide

IPTG:

isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside

GM-CSF:

granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor

SDS-PAGE:

sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

FBS:

fetal bovine serum

PBS:

phosphate-buffered saline

PMSF:

phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride

TBS:

Tris-buffered saline

SMP:

skimmed milk powder

ELISA:

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

References

  1. Estrada-Peña A. Ticks as vectors: taxonomy, biology and ecology. Rev Sci Tech. 2015;34:53–65.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fuente JDL, Antunes S, Bonnet S, Cabezascruz A, Domingos AG, Estradapeña A, et al. Tick-pathogen interactions and vector competence: identification of molecular drivers for tick-borne diseases. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:114.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Jongejan F, Uilenberg G. The global importance of ticks. Parasitology. 2004;129:S3–14.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dantastorres F, Chomel BB, Otranto D. Ticks and tick-borne diseases: a one health perspective. Trends Parasitol. 2012;28:437–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. de Castro JJ. Sustainable tick and tick borne disease control in livestock improvement in developing countries. Vet Parasitol. 1997;71:77.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shibata S, Dunn DF, Kuchii M, Kashiwagi M, Norton TR. Reassessment of the potential economic impact of cattle parasites in Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2014;23:150–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meneghi DD, Stachurski F, Adakal H. Experiences in tick control by acaricide in the traditional cattle sector in Zambia and Burkina Faso: possible environmental and public health implications. Front Public Health. 2016;4:239.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fular A, Sharma AK, Kumar S, Nagar G, Chigure G, Ray DD, et al. Establishment of a multi-acaricide resistant reference tick strain (IVRI-V) of Rhipicephalus microplus. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2018;9:1184–91.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghosh S, Kumar R, Nagar G, Kumar S, Sharma AK, Srivastava A, et al. Survey of acaricides resistance status of Rhipiciphalus (Boophilus) microplus collected from selected places of Bihar, an eastern state of India. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2015;6:668–75.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rodríguez-Hidalgo R, Pérez-Otáñez X, Garcés-Carrera S, Vanwambeke SO, Madder M, Benítez-Ortiz W. The current status of resistance to alpha-cypermethrin, ivermectin, and amitraz of the cattle tick (Rhipicephalus microplus) in Ecuador. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0174652.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim TK, Tirloni L, Radulovic Z, Lewis L, Bakshi M, Hill C, et al. Conserved Amblyomma americanum tick Serpin19, an inhibitor of blood clotting factors Xa and XIa, trypsin and plasmin, has anti-haemostatic functions. Int J Parasitol. 2015;45:613–27.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hajdusek O, Sima R, Ayllon N, Jalovecka M, Perner J, Jose DLF, et al. Interaction of the tick immune system with transmitted pathogens. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013;3:26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Blisnick AA, Foulon T, Bonnet SI. Serine protease inhibitors in ticks: an overview of their role in tick biology and tick-borne pathogen transmission. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:199.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Páleníková J, Lieskovská J, Langhansová H, Kotsyfakis M, Chmelař J, Kopecký J. Ixodes ricinus salivary serpin IRS-2 affects Th17 differentiation via inhibition of IL-6/STAT-3 signalling pathway. Infect Immun. 2015;83:1949–56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Imamura S, Namangala B, Tajima T, Tembo ME, Yasuda J, Ohashi K, et al. Two serine protease inhibitors (serpins) that induce a bovine protective immune response against Rhipicephalus appendiculatus ticks. Vaccine. 2006;24:2230–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Perner J, Provazník J, Schrenková J, Urbanová V, Ribeiro JMC, Kopáček P. RNA-seq analyses of the midgut from blood- and serum-fed Ixodes ricinus ticks. Sci Rep. 2016;6:36695.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jittapalapong S, Kaewhom P, Pumhom P, Canales M, De FJ, Stich RW. Immunization of rabbits with recombinant serine protease inhibitor reduces the performance of adult female Rhipicephalus microplus. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2010;57:103–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim TK, Radulovic Z, Mulenga A. Target validation of highly conserved Amblyomma americanum tick saliva serine protease inhibitor 19. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016;7:405–14.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sugino M, Imamura S, Mulenga A, Nakajima M, Tsuda A, Ohashi K, et al. A serine proteinase inhibitor (serpin) from ixodid tick Haemaphysalis longicornis; cloning and preliminary assessment of its suitability as a candidate for a tick vaccine. Vaccine. 2003;21:2844–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodriguez-Valle M, Xu T, Kurscheid S, Lew-Tabor AE. Rhipicephalus microplus serine protease inhibitor family: annotation, expression and functional characterisation assessment. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ibelli AM, Kim TK, Hill CC, Lewis LA, Bakshi M, Miller S, et al. A blood meal-induced Ixodes scapularis tick saliva serpin inhibits trypsin and thrombin, and interferes with platelet aggregation and blood clotting. Int J Parasitol. 2014;44:369–79.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Radulović ŽM, Mulenga A. Heparan sulfate/heparin glycosaminoglycan binding alters inhibitory profile and enhances anticoagulant function of conserved Amblyomma americanum tick saliva serpin 19. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2017;80:1–10.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tirloni L, Kim TK, Coutinho ML, Ali A, Seixas A, Termignoni C, et al. The putative role of Rhipicephalus microplus salivary serpins in the tick-host relationship. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2016;71:12–28.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu T, Lew-Tabor A, Rodriguez-Valle M. Effective inhibition of thrombin by Rhipicephalus microplus serpin-15 (RmS-15) obtained in the yeast Pichia pastoris. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016;7:180–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brake DK, Pérez de León AA. Immunoregulation of bovine macrophages by factors in the salivary glands of Rhipicephalus microplus. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:38.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cavassani KA, Aliberti JC, Dias ARV, Silva JS, Ferreira BR. Tick saliva inhibits differentiation, maturation and function of murine bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells. Immunology. 2005;114:235–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Prevot PP, Beschin A, Lins L, Beaufays J, Grosjean A, Bruys L, et al. Exosites mediate the anti-inflammatory effects of a multifunctional serpin from the saliva of the tick Ixodes Ricinus. FEBS J. 2009;276:3235–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Leboulle G, Crippa M, Decrem Y, Mejri N, Brossard M, Bollen A, et al. Characterization of a novel salivary immunosuppressive protein from Ixodes ricinus ticks. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:10083–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chmelar J, Oliveira CJ, Rezacova P, Francischetti IM, Kovarova Z, Pejler G, et al. A tick salivary protein targets cathepsin G and chymase and inhibits host inflammation and platelet aggregation. Blood. 2011;117:736–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zarbock A, Polanowskagrabowska RK, Ley K. Platelet-neutrophil-interactions: linking hemostasis and inflammation. Blood Rev. 2007;21:99–111.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Abraham EG, Pinto SB, Ghosh A, Vanlandingham DL, Budd A, Higgs S, et al. An immune-responsive serpin, SRPN6, mediates mosquito defense against malaria parasites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:16327–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Danielli A, Kafatos FC, Loukeris TG. Cloning and characterization of four Anopheles gambiae serpin isoforms, differentially induced in the midgut by Plasmodium berghei invasion. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:4184–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ooi C-P, Haines LR, Southern DM, Lehane MJ, Acosta-Serrano A. Tsetse GmmSRPN10 has anti-complement activity and is important for successful establishment of trypanosome infections in the fly midgut. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e3448.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Pinto SB, Kafatos FC, Michel K. The parasite invasion marker SRPN6 reduces sporozoite numbers in salivary glands of Anopheles gambiae. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10:891–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Francischetti IMB, Sánunes A, Mans BJ, Santos IM, Ribeiro JMC. The role of saliva in tick feeding. Front Biosci. 2009;14:2051–88.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lipscomb MF, Masten BJ. Dendritic cells: immune regulators in health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2002;82:97–130.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Granucci F, Foti M, Ricciardicastagnoli P. Dendritic cell biology. Adv Immunol. 2005;88:193–233.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Agyei A, Runham N. Studies on the morphological changes in the midguts of two ixodid tick species Boophilus microplus and Rhipicephalus appendiculatus during digestion of the blood meal. Int J Parasitol. 1995;25:55–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Franta Z, Frantová H, Konvičková J, Horn M, Sojka D, Mareš M, Kopáček P. Dynamics of digestive proteolytic system during blood feeding of the hard tick Ixodes ricinus. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:119.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Oleaga A, Obolo-Mvoulouga P, Manzano-Román R, Pérez-Sánchez R. Midgut proteome of an argasid tick, Ornithodoros erraticus: a comparison between unfed and engorged females. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:525.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Assumpção TC, Ma D, Mizurini DM, Kini RM, Ribeiro JMC, Kotsyfakis M, et al. In vitro mode of action and anti-thrombotic activity of boophilin, a multifunctional kunitz protease inhibitor from the midgut of a tick vector of babesiosis, Rhipicephalus microplus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004298.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Yu Y, Cao J, Zhou Y, Zhang H, Zhou J. Isolation and characterization of two novel serpins from the tick Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2013;4:297–303.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Boudreau J, Koshy S, Cummings D, Wan Y. Culture of myeloid dendritic cells from bone marrow precursors. J Vis Exp. 2008;17:e769.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Son YI, Egawa S, Tatsumi T Jr, Redlinger R, Kalinski P, Kanto T. A novel bulk-culture method for generating mature dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow cells. J Immunol Methods. 2002;262:145–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Yu X, Zhou Y, Cao J, Zhang H, Gong H, Zhou J. Caspase-1 participates in apoptosis of salivary glands in Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:225.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Li WX. Canonical and non-canonical JAK-STAT signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 2008;18:545–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang X, Kan J, Han J, Zhang W, Bai L, Wu H. LncRNA SNHG16 functions as an oncogene by sponging MiR-135a and promotes JAK2/STAT3 signal pathway in gastric cancer. J Cancer. 2019;10:1013–22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Denhardt DT. Signal-transducing protein phosphorylation cascades mediated by Ras/Rho proteins in the mammalian cell: the potential for multiplex signalling. Biochem J. 1996;318(Pt 3):729–47.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tibbles LA, Woodgett JR. The stress-activated protein kinase pathways. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1999;55:1230–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Akhmatova NK, Kurbatova EA, Akhmatov EA, Egorova NB, Logunov DY, Gening ML, et al. The effect of a BSA conjugate of a synthetic hexasaccharide related to the fragment of capsular polysaccharide of streptococcus pneumoniae type 14 on the activation of innate and adaptive immune responses. Front Immunol. 2016;7:248.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Peng SL, Szabo SJ, Glimcher LH. T-bet regulates IgG class switching and pathogenic autoantibody production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:5545–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Yanase N, Toyota H, Hata K, Yagyu S, Seki T, Harada M, et al. OVA-bound nanoparticles induce OVA-specific IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG2b responses with low IgE synthesis. Vaccine. 2014;32:5918–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Dixit S, Singh SR, Yilma AN, Nd AR, Taha M, Dennis VA. Poly(lactic acid)-poly(ethylene glycol) nanoparticles provide sustained delivery of a Chlamydia trachomatis recombinant MOMP peptide and potentiate systemic adaptive immune responses in mice. Nanomedicine. 2014;10:1311–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Nuttall PA, Labuda M. Tick-host interactions: saliva-activated transmission. Parasitology. 2004;129:S177–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Chmelař J, Kotál J, Langhansová H, Kotsyfakis M. Protease inhibitors in tick saliva: the role of Serpins and Cystatins in tick-host-pathogen interaction. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:216.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Nuttall PA, Labuda M. Saliva-assisted transmission of tick-borne pathogens. In: Bowman AS, Nuttall PA, editors. Ticks biology disease and control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 205–19.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  57. Mans BJ. Evolution of vertebrate hemostatic and inflammatory control mechanisms in blood-feeding arthropods. J Innate Immun. 2011;3:41–51.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kopácek P, Hajdusek O, Buresová V, Daffre S. Tick innate immunity. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;708:137–62.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sonenshine DE, Hynes WL. Molecular characterization and related aspects of the innate immune response in ticks. Front Biosci. 2007;13:7046–63.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Mulenga A, Kim T, Ibelli AM. Amblyomma americanum tick saliva serine protease inhibitor 6 is a cross-class inhibitor of serine proteases and papain-like cysteine proteases that delays plasma clotting and inhibits platelet aggregation. Insect Mol Biol. 2013;22:306–19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Preston SG, Majtán J, Kouremenou C, Rysnik O, Burger LF, Cabezas Cruz A, et al. Novel immunomodulators from hard ticks selectively reprogramme human dendritic cell responses. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003450.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. O’Keeffe M, Mok WH, Radford KJ. Human dendritic cell subsets and function in health and disease. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72:4309–25.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Said A, Weindl G. Regulation of dendritic cell function in inflammation. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:743169.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Breton G, Lee J, Liu K, Nussenzweig MC. Defining human dendritic cell progenitors by multiparametric flow cytometry. Nat Protoc. 2015;10:1407.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Iwatakajihara T, Sumimoto H, Kawamura N, Ueda R, Takahashi T, Mizuguchi H, et al. Enhanced cancer immunotherapy using STAT3-depleted dendritic cells with high Th1-inducing ability and resistance to cancer cell-derived inhibitory factors. J Immunol. 2011;187:27–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Aggeli IK, Gaitanaki C, Beis I. Involvement of JNKs and p38-MAPK/MSK1 pathways in H2O2-induced upregulation of heme oxygenase-1 mRNA in H9c2 cells. Cell Signal. 2006;18:1801–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Tanos T, Marinissen MJ, Leskow FC, Hochbaum D, Martinetto H, Gutkind JS, et al. Phosphorylation of c-Fos by members of the p38 MAPK family. Role in the AP-1 response to UV light. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:18842–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Chen G, Gulbranson DR, Yu P, Hou Z, Thomson JA. Thermal stability of fibroblast growth factor protein is a determinant factor in regulating self-renewal, differentiation, and reprogramming in human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells. 2012;30:623–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Dáňová K, Klapetková A, Kayserová J, Šedivá A, Špíšek R, Jelínková LP. NF-kB, p38 MAPK, ERK1/2, mTOR, STAT3 and increased glycolysis regulate stability of paricalcitol/dexamethasone-generated tolerogenic dendritic cells in the inflammatory environment. Oncotarget. 2015;6:14123.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Balkhi MY, Latchumanan VK, Singh B, Sharma P, Natarajan K. Cross-regulation of CD86 by CD80 differentially regulates T helper responses from Mycobacterium tuberculosis secretory antigen-activated dendritic cell subsets. J Leukoc Biol. 2004;75:874–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Kuchroo VK, Prabhu Das M, Brown JA, Ranger AM, Zamvil SS, Sobel RA, et al. B7-1 and B7-2 costimulatory molecules activate differentially the Th1/Th2 developmental pathways: application to autoimmune disease therapy. Cell. 1995;80:707–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Janssen EM, Lemmens EE, Herrath MGV, Schoenberger SP, Wolfe T, Christen U. CD4+ T cells are required for secondary expansion and memory in CD8+ T lymphocytes. Nature. 2003;421:852–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Feng Y, Tian J, Xie HQ, She J, Xu SL, Xu T, et al. Effects of acute low-dose exposure to the chlorinated flame retardant dechlorane 602 and Th1 and Th2 immune responses in adult male mice. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124:1406.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Obremski K. Changes in Th1 and Th2 cytokine concentrations in ileal Peyer’s patches in gilts exposed to zearalenone. Pol J Vet Sci. 2014;17:53–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Talaat RM, Mohamed SF, Bassyouni IH, Raouf AA. Th1/Th2/Th17/Treg cytokine imbalance in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients: correlation with disease activity. Cytokine. 2015;72:146–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Chen J, Liu X. The role of interferon gamma in regulation of CD4+ T-cells and its clinical implications. Cell Immunol. 2009;254:85–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Crawley A, Raymond C, Wilkie BN. Control of immunoglobulin isotype production by porcine B-cells cultured with cytokines. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2003;91:141–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Agnello D, Lankford CSR, Bream J, Morinobu A, Gadina M, O’Shea JJ, et al. Cytokines and transcription factors that regulate T helper cell differentiation: new players and new Insights. J Clin Immunol. 2003;23:147–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Ghosh S, Sarkar M, Ghosh T, Guha I, Bhuniya A, Biswas J, et al. Absence of CD4(+) T cell help generates corrupt CD8(+) effector T cells in sarcoma-bearing Swiss mice treated with NLGP vaccine. Immunol Lett. 2016;175:31–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Mittrücker H-W, Visekruna A, Huber M. Heterogeneity in the differentiation and function of CD8 + T cells. Arch Immunol Ther Exp. 2014;62:449.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Auderset F, Coutaz M, Tacchini-Cottier F. The role of notch in the differentiation of CD4+ T helper cells. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2012;360:115.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Kara EE. Tailored immune responses: novel effector helper T cell subsets in protective immunity. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1003905.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. London CA, Abbas AK, Kelso A. Helper T cell subsets: heterogeneity, functions and development. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1998;63:37–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Brossard M, Wikel SK, Bowman AS, Nuttall PA. Tick immunobiology. Parasitology. 2004;129:S161–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Ibrahim A. Hassan from the Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute for kindly reading this manuscript and giving revision suggestions.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 31572512) supported this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Animal Parasitology of Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China

    Zhengmao Xu, Zhibing Lin, Nana Wei, Qing Di, Jie Cao, Yongzhi Zhou, Haiyan Gong, Houshuang Zhang & Jinlin Zhou

Authors
  1. Zhengmao Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhibing Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nana Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qing Di
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jie Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yongzhi Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Haiyan Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Houshuang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jinlin Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JZ and ZL contributed to the conception and design of the study. ZX, ZL, NW and QD performed the experiment. ZX organized the database. NW performed the statistical analysis. ZX wrote the first draft of the manuscript. HG and HZ participated in the experiments and in data interpretation. YZ and JC participated in the animal experiments. All authors contributed to manuscript revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinlin Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocols in this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute (IACUC approve number shvri-mo-2018010020) and authorized by the Animal Ethical Committee of Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Z., Lin, Z., Wei, N. et al. Immunomodulatory effects of Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides serpin RHS2 on host immune responses. Parasites Vectors 12, 341 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3607-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3607-4

Keywords

  • Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides
  • Tick
  • Serpin
  • BMDC
  • Immmunomodulatory

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us