Skip to main content
Download PDF

Strigea robusta causes polydactyly and severe forms of Rostand’s anomaly P in water frogs

Parasites & Vectors volume 13, Article number: 381 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cases of polydactyly in natural populations of amphibians have attracted great interest from biologists. At the end of the 1940s, the French biologist Jean Rostand discovered a polymorphic syndrome in some water frog (Anura: Pelophylax) populations that included polydactyly and some severe morphological anomalies (he called it ‘anomaly P’). The cause of this anomaly remains unknown for 70 years. In a previous study, we obtained anomaly P in the laboratory in tadpoles of water frogs that developed together with molluscs Planorbarius corneus (Mollusca: Gastropoda) collected in the field. We thus proposed the ‘trematode hypothesis’, according to which the infectious agent responsible for anomaly P is a trematode species.

Methods

Metacercariae from tadpoles with anomaly P were identified using ITS2 gene sequencing as Strigea robusta (Trematoda: Strigeidae). To verify teratogenic features of the species, cercariae of S. robusta were tested for the possibility to cause anomalies. Identification of cercariae species was made using morphological and molecular methods (sequencing of ITS2 and 28S rRNA). The tadpoles were exposed to parasites at four doses of cercariae (control, low, medium and high) and divided into two groups: “early” (at 25–27 Gosner stages) and “late” (at 29–34 Gosner stages) exposure.

Results

A total of 58 (72.5%) tadpoles survived until metamorphosis under the dose-dependent experiment with the trematode S. robusta. Differences in the survival rates were observed between the exposed and unexposed tadpoles both in the group of “early” tadpoles and “late” tadpoles. The exposure of tadpoles to the cercariae of S. robusta induced anomaly P in 82% of surviving tadpoles. The severe forms developed only in “early” stages under all doses of cercariae exposure. Polydactyly predominantly developed in the “late” stages; under a light exposure dose, polydactyly also developed in “early” tadpoles. Laboratory-hatched tadpoles reared together with infected snails had different rates of survival and complexity of deformations associated with the period of coexistence.

Conclusions

The experiments with direct cercariae exposure provide compelling evidence that S. robusta leads to anomaly P in tadpoles of water frogs. The manifestation of anomaly P turned out to be dependent on the stage of development, cercariae dose, and the location of the cysts.

Background

In amphibians, polydactyly (together with ectromely, ectrodactyly and polymely) is one of the most frequent skeletal anomalies (figure 36b in [1]). It consists of various numbers of extra digits or parts thereof, and can occur in hindlimbs, forelimbs, or both, and be symmetrical or asymmetrical [2]. Polydactyly can manifest itself in different types of morphological anomalies: schizodactyly (duplication of a digit’s part); synpolydactyly (fusion of proximal parts of a duplicated digit); hyperdactyly (duplication of a full digit); and polyphalangy (additional phalanges) [1, 2]. About 40 records of polydactyly are known in water frogs of the genus Pelophylax across Europe [3, 4]. However, the etiology of this anomaly remains unknown in many cases [1].

In 1947, the famous French writer and biologist Jean Rostand started to study polydactyly in anurans. From 1947 to 1951, he demonstrated the existence of several types of polydactyly resulting from recessive and dominant mutations in common toad (Bufo bufo) populations of the Paris region [5]. In 1949, he found mass symmetrical polydactyly in hind limbs (14.5% of adults) in a water frog population (then known as “Rana esculenta”) in Trévignon, western France [6]. In 1952, while studying tadpoles from the same locality, he found new morphological anomalies, including some very severe cases: strongly modified hind limbs with symmetrical flexions (taumely); polydactyly; edemas; brachymely; outgrowths; small additional limbs and spikes; and polydactyly in forelimbs [7, 8]. He noted a gradient in these abnormal structures and anomalies, starting with polydactyly as its mildest expression, and proposed that they clearly belonged to the same syndrome, which was termed ‘anomaly P’ [9]. Unlike in Bufo, this anomaly was demonstrated to not be inheritable and was then supposed to be determined by an environmental agent acting on the very early stages of tadpole development (after hatching). For 20 years, Rostand tried in vain to find the cause of the anomaly. He successfully obtained anomaly P in experiments involving fishes (tadpoles reared with fish and content of fish intestine) and thus supposed that this syndrome was caused by a teratogenic virus transmitted by fish or any components of fish diet [8,9,10]; however, the evidence in favor of this hypothesis was scant. In 1976, Dubois did not succeed to repeat these last results of Rostand [10].

In 2016 and 2017, mass polydactyly and severe cases of anomaly P (17.6%) were found in populations of the marsh frog (Pelophylax ridibundus) in the European part of Russia [11]. Severe cases of anomaly P were revealed again for the first time in 40 years and were registered in 6.2% of individuals [4, 11]. Despite chemical pollution of water (above-threshold concentrations of heavy metals and biogenic elements), authors suggested a biological nature of the infectious agent [11] of the anomaly following Rostand [9]. Additionally, three new populations of P. lessonae and P. ridibundus with individuals showing anomaly P, were found in Russia [4]. In one of these populations, discovered in 1998, anomaly P has disappeared, as has happened with all “ponds with monsters” studied in France in 1952–1971 [9]. Finally, anomaly P was obtained in laboratory experiments [12] where water frog tadpoles were raised in tanks with the mollusc Planorbarius corneus (Mollusca: Gastropoda) collected in the field. In tadpoles with the anomaly, cysts with metacercariae of trematodes were detected. Based on this, the ‘trematode hypothesis’ was proposed according to which an infectious agent responsible for anomaly P is a trematode species [11].

Recent studies have shown that, in several amphibian species, the anomalies can be caused by some species of trematodes [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. The most investigated cases concerned the trematode Ribeiroia ondatrae in many amphibian populations across the USA and Canada [13,14,15]. This species induces the development of additional complete or partial limbs, as well as other anomalies, reducing mobility of amphibians and making them easier prey for birds or mammals as definitive hosts [26]. Large-scale research showed a strong association of these deformities with Ribeiroia infection over a wide area across the USA [27, 28]. The effect of cercariae exposure on different stages of larval development leads to different manifestations of anomalies [29]. The sensitivity to Ribeiroia infection can be different among various amphibians. Species with more rapid larval development, which are smaller at metamorphosis (‘fast-species’), are more susceptible to the infection [30].

Although there are many records of abnormal amphibians in Eurasia [1], only some cases of trematode-dependent anomalies were strongly supported by laboratory experiments [20,21,22,23,24,25]. Here, we describe new variants of morphological anomalies caused by the trematode Strigea robusta in Eurasian amphibians. This discovery might explain the high number of polydactyly records in western Palaearctic water frogs observed in different localities in Europe.

Methods

Field sites and samples

We collected individuals of the marsh frog (P. ridibundus) in 2016–2019 in Ostrovtsovskaya Lesosteppe (52.815426°N, 44.458827°E, part of the Privolzhskaya Lesosteppe Nature Reserve, Penza Province, Russia). In total, 432 individuals of different age groups were collected: 320 tadpoles, metamorphs, and juveniles; 60 subadults; and 52 adults. Among them, in 2019, we collected 11 tadpoles and 37 juveniles. Ten studied water bodies were described previously [11]. Species identification of water frogs was achieved by multiplex PCR analysis described previously by Ermakov et al. [31].

A helminthological study was performed on four ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) from adjacent territories with Ostrovtsovskaya Lesosteppe in August, 2019; one was infected with 40 adult worms of S. robusta.

Experimental tadpoles

Experimental tadpoles were obtained by a laboratory crossing of species of the genus Pelophylax. In May and June 2019, the water frogs were collected from three localities in Mari El Republic, Russia: Krasnooktyabrskiy settlement (56.681188°N, 47.679397°E), Ilynka settlement (56.801795°N, 47.908759°E), and Kuguvan settlement (56.788572°N, 47.783403°E). Anomaly P had never been observed in these localities. We performed 3 crosses of 6 individuals: 2 crosses among pairs of P. lessonae and 1 cross of a male P. esculentus and female P. lessonae. Species identification was carried out using the multiplex PCR method [31].

Experimental cercariae

Metacercariae from tadpoles with anomaly P, which were reared in the laboratory with the mollusc P. corneus [12], were identified by molecular analysis as S. robusta (see Results). Dose-dependent experiments with cercariae of this trematode species were carried out.

Freshwater snails were collected from ponds with a high frequency of anomaly P in water frogs (Ostrovtsovskaya Lesosteppe) during 2018–2019. Our previous laboratory experiments [12] showed that anomaly P can be obtained in tadpoles reared together with the mollusc P. corneus. Another mollusc, Planorbis planorbis, was used for cercariae screening because it was registered as main first intermediate host for S. robusta [32]. A total of 1316 P. corneus and 851 P. planorbis were used for cercariae screening. The molluscs were placed individually in small containers (50 ml) with aged tap water. The emergence of cercariae was stimulated by heating the containers with a lamp for 1‒2 h; the distance between the lamp and container was approximately 15–20 cm. The cercariae were studied using light microscopy. For their vital staining, neutral red and Nile blue stains were used. The cercariae from each shedding snail were examined using a light microscope (400×). The primary morphological identification of S. robusta cercariae was based on Faltýnková et al. [33].

Molecular analysis of trematodes

We carried out molecular analyses for identification of different life-cycle stages of S. robusta. We used two metacercariae (E3A and E6A) from tadpoles with anomaly P [12], cercariae from P. corneus used in the dose-dependent experiments, and one adult worm from the intestine of a field-collected mallard. Molecular analysis was performed for cercariae from a snail (P. corneus) used in the dose-dependent (see ‘Experimental design’), 3-day and 20-day experiments (for the 30-day experiment we used cercariae identified based on morphological traits from another snail).

DNA was extracted from trematodes using the standard salt-extraction method [34]. The 28S rRNA and ITS2 (internal transcribed spacer 2) markers were used in the identification of trematode species [35, 36]. The following primers were used for PCR amplification: 3S (5’-GGT ACC GGT GGA TCA CGT GGC TAG TG-3’) and ITS 2.2 (5’-CCT GGT TAG TTT CTT TTC CTC CGC-3’) for ITS2, and dig12 (5’-AAG CAT ATC ACT AAG CGG-3’) and 1500R (5’-GCT ATC CTG AGG GAA ACT TCG-3’) for 28S rDNA [35, 36]. The PCR reaction mixture (25 μl) contained 50–100 ng of DNA, 0.5 μM of each primer, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 2.5 μl 10× PCR buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl), and two units of Taq polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Oyster Point, CA, USA). The thermocycling profile for 28S rRNA was: 30 s denaturation at 94 °C; 40 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 53 °C, 2 min at 72 °C; and a 5 min extension at 72 °C. The initial cycle for ITS2 was: 32 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 53 °C, and 45 s at 72 °C. The PCR fragments were prepared for sequencing by elution with a high-salt solution from a 6% polyacrylamide gel. Sequencing was performed on an ABI 3500 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using the BigDye®Terminator 3.1 kit (Applied Biosystems) and the same primers used for amplification. The obtained sequences were aligned and edited manually in Chromas v. 2.5.1 (Technelysium, Tewantin, Australia).

The sequences obtained have been deposited in GenBank (ITS2: MT075803, MT075804, MK295777, MK295776; 28S rRNA: MT075841, MT075842, MK585230, MK585229). Screening of the primary sequences was performed using the BLAST algorithm available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information [37].

Experimental design

Cercariae of the trematode S. robusta were tested for a possibility to cause anomalies. For this, each tadpole was placed in a separate specimen cup containing 50 ml of aged tap water. The tadpoles were then exposed to parasites at 4 doses of cercariae over a 10-day period, following Johnson et al. [13]: 0 (control), 16 (low), 32 (medium) and 48 (high). For the experiment we used ‘fresh’ cercariae after 1–2 h of emergence. We used cercariae from one snail infected with one species of trematode identified by molecular analysis. The number of cercariae was counted using a dissecting microscope, and the predetermined numbers of cercariae were released in each cup. The tadpoles were then kept in the cups for a minimum of 6 h.

The developmental stages of tadpoles were determined according to Gosner’s [38] table of normal anuran development. The tadpoles were divided into two groups: “early” (at 25–27 Gosner stages) and “late” (at 29–34 Gosner stages) exposure according to Holland et al. [16] and Johnson et al. [29] with modifications. After exposure, the tadpoles were transferred into 60 l aquariums. Ten tadpoles of each group (i.e. 0-early, 0-late, 16-early, 16-late, 32-early, 32-late, 48-early and 48-late) were tested. Thus, a total of 60 tadpoles received doses of S. robusta cercariae. The water in the aquariums was changed twice a week. Tadpoles were fed fish food (TetraMin Inc., Melle, Germany) ad libitum.

In an additional experiment, tadpoles were kept together with P. corneus snails infected with S. robusta in 60 l aquariums for three different time periods: 3 days, 20 days, and 32 days. The initial sample sizes in each aquarium were 10 tadpoles and one snail. The water in these aquariums was not changed during the period of coexistence.

We described anomalies in tadpoles using a dissecting microscope following the terminology of Henle et al. [2] and specific terminology for anomaly P [8, 10]. We counted metacercariae in tadpoles after the experiment under a dissecting microscope.

Statistical analysis

Rates of survival and anomalies were analyzed using logistic regression with Firth’s correction [29]: normal or abnormal tadpoles (alternatively, alive or dead) were the response variables; cercariae dose and developmental stage of the tadpole were predictors. The significance of difference between frequency of parasite occurrence in snails was tested by Yates corrected χ2 test [39]. Because tadpoles from the same treatment were grouped together in aquaria after infection, our samples were not strongly independent. This problem was partly solved by statistical analysis: we used a generalized linear mixed model with a random intercept term for the container (individual tadpoles were used as nested observations). All calculations were performed using the R software and RStudio (v. 1.2.5042).

Results

Molecular identification of trematode species

The morphological study of trematode cysts in tadpoles with anomaly P revealed the presence of only one trematode species. Molecular analysis of these cysts allowed us to identify the specific status of this trematode. The sequence of the ITS2 gene of S. robusta (GenBank: MF537205 [40]) was identical to our sequences (Table 1). Sequences of the 28S rRNA gene of S. robusta were not represented on GenBank. Our sequences of the 28S rRNA were 98% similar to Apharyngostrigea cornu (GenBank: MF398344). In addition, we sequenced an adult worm of S. robusta, determined by morphological traits, and the sequence was identical with metacercariae sequences (Table 1). Thus, according to molecular data, cysts of S. robusta were found in tadpoles with anomaly P, and, therefore, this trematode species is the first possible candidate for the role of “infectious agent” of anomaly P. Additionally, cercariae from P. corneus collected in ponds with anomaly P were sequenced (28S rRNA and ITS2). According to these data, they were identical to the adult worm and metacercariae and also belong to S. robusta.

Table 1 Sequences deposited in GenBank and similarities of sequences according to BLAST analysis
Full size table

Survival of tadpoles

For strong evidence of a teratogenic effect of the trematode S. robusta, it was necessary to conduct direct cercariae dose-dependent experiments. A total of 58 (72.5%) tadpoles survived until metamorphosis under the dose-dependent experiment with S. robusta. The exposure of tadpoles to cercariae induced anomaly P in 82% of tadpoles that survived until metamorphosis (n = 38; see Table 2, Fig. 1). In control groups, all tadpoles (n = 20) survived and had no anomalies.

Table 2 Composition of anomalies from the laboratory experiment and field collection
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Survivorship, frequency and complexity of the anomaly P in Pelophylax lessonae tadpoles infected with Strigea robusta. a Frequency of mild and severe forms of anomaly P in tadpoles under a given treatment (infection with 0, 16, 32 and 48 cercariae). Initial sample sizes in each treatment were 20 tadpoles. b, c Complexity of anomalies in tadpoles on “late” (b) and “early” (c) stages of limb development. Initial sample sizes in each group were 10 tadpoles. d Correlation between survivorship and frequency of anomalies in tadpoles

Full size image

When tadpoles were exposed to a dose of 16 cercariae, almost all individuals survived (19 individuals), but the survival reduced in experiments with larger exposures (32 and 48) and amounted to about 50% (Fig. 1). Statistically significant differences in the survival rates were observed both in the group of “early” tadpoles (logistic regression with Firth’s correction: χ2 = 18.14, df = 1, Wald = 10.3, P = 0.001) and the “late” tadpoles (χ2 = 9.06, df = 1, Wald = 5.12, P = 0.024).

Tadpoles reared together with infected snails had different rates of survival associated with the period of coexistence. A 3-day period led to 100% survival. Sixty percent of the tadpoles underwent metamorphosis after 20 days of coexistence. Hyperinvasion of S. robusta, observed during 20–30 days of coexistence, led to almost total mortality: only one tadpole (10%) survived.

Manifestation of anomaly P

The tadpoles from the laboratory experiments showed both the severe and mild forms of anomaly P (Fig. 2): 23 (61%) tadpoles had the mild form (polydactyly) of the syndrome, whereas 8 tadpoles (21%) had severe forms of anomaly P. Seven tadpoles (18%) were normal. We registered statistically significant differences in manifestation of anomaly P between groups of treatment for both early (logistic regression with Firth’s correction: χ2 = 25.08, df = 1, Wald = 6.43, P = 0.011) and late (χ2 = 19.11, df = 1, Wald = 8.67, P = 0.003) groups of tadpoles.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Severe cases of anomaly P in Pelophylax lessonae tadpoles under exposure to different doses of Strigea robusta cercariae and localization of cysts in tadpoles (arrows)

Full size image

Because we grouped tadpoles of the same treatment together in aquaria after infection, we should check our results in the following way. If stage is ignored for a moment, then there are two replicate aquaria for each exposure dosage, and tadpoles can be statistically nested within aquaria using a random intercept term for the container. We tested the effects of S. robusta on survival and anomaly manifestation in a mixed model, where individual tadpoles are used as nested observations. We found a significant negative effect of dose (estimate coefficient = -0.09, P < 0.001), and a positive effect of time of exposure (estimate coefficient = 1.43, P = 0.027) for survival, while effect of dose was positive (estimate coefficient = 0.15, P < 0.001) and insignificant in the case of time of exposure (estimate coefficient = -0.68; P = 0.383) for abnormality rates.

The mild form included symmetrical cases of polydactyly with 1 (57%) and 2 (39%) additional digits on the hind limbs. One individual (4%) had asymmetrical polydactyly (7 digits on the right side and 6 on the left side). All tadpoles with 6 digits on the hind limbs (except one) had 4 digits on the forelimbs. Seven tadpoles, which had 7 digits on the hind limbs, also had 5 digits on the forelimbs; one individual with 7 toes had asymmetry on the forelimbs (5 digits on the right side and 4 on the left side) and three 7-digit individuals had 4 digits on the forelimbs. Despite exceptions, we found a strong correlation between the number of digits on the hind- and forelimbs in the mild form of anomaly P (r = 0.65, P = 0.001).

The severe form included brachymely (shortened femur and tibia), polydactyly, flexions (taumely or bony triangles), and spurs. Two individuals had 6 digits on the hind limbs and 4 digits on the forelimbs, 3 tadpoles had 7 digits on the hind limbs and 4 digits on the forelimbs (but one had an asymmetrical case with five on the right side), and one for each variant with 5 digits on the forelimbs and 8, 9 and 10 (10 on the right side and 9 on the left) digits on the hind limbs. We also found a correlation between the numbers of digits on the fore- and hindlimbs for severe anomalies (r = 0.79, P = 0.020).

The percentage of individuals with 5 fingers on the forelimbs increased as the dose of cercariae increased: with 16 cercariae there were 16% of such individuals, with 32 cercariae 20% and with 48 cercariae 78%.

It is important to note that 4 cases of asymmetrical polydactyly (2 on the hindlimbs and 2 on the forelimbs; 2 for severe cases and 2 for the mild form) had supernumerary digits always on the right side.

The severe forms of anomaly P developed only in the “early” stages under all doses of cercariae exposure. Polydactyly predominantly developed in the “late” stages; however, under the light dose of exposure, polydactyly also developed in “early” tadpoles. Normal tadpoles were found in the “late” stages under the “light” and “intermediate” doses of exposure only.

Strigea robusta cysts were observed under the skin in the tails and limbs of abnormal tadpoles, indicating their successful infection and development into metacercariae. We found 41 cysts in tadpoles before metamorphosis: 14 in tadpoles with severe cases of anomaly P; 26 in the mild form and one cyst in normal individuals (which had received a dose of 16 cercariae); 20–30% of cysts were localized under the skin in the tail, dorsal part of body and head. Some cysts were found on the ventral side in the pectoral and pelvic girdles (Fig. 2). Some polydactyly individuals had a higher number of cysts than some individuals with severe cases of anomaly P, which indicates that the complexity of deformities depends more on localization of cysts than on their number.

Tadpoles reared together with infected snails had different levels of anomaly complexity connected with the period of coexistence. A 3-day period led to polydactyly in 90% of cases. After 20 days of coexistence 5 tadpoles had severe cases of anomaly P and 1 tadpole had polydactyly on the hindlimbs. After 20–30 days of coexistence with infected snails one surviving tadpole had a severe case of anomaly P.

Field observations

In 2019, we found anomaly P in natural populations (4 cases out of 48 metamorphs and tadpoles, i.e. 8.3%), which indicated that the “infectious agent” was present in natural populations during our laboratory experiments (Rostand noted the disappearance of the anomaly in natural populations [9]). In a total four-year period of research, the anomaly P observed in 22.9% of water frogs (n = 432) from field sites (Ostrovtsovskaya Lesosteppe): 18.3% had polydactyly and 4.6% had severe forms of the anomaly. Adult and subadult frogs had 9.8% of the mild form of anomaly P, juveniles and tadpoles had 21.2% of polydactyly and 6.3% of severe forms. We found differences between frequency of anomalies in tadpoles/juveniles and adult/subadult frogs (χ2 = 4.6, P = 0.032); the rate of the anomaly in adult/subadult frogs was lower than in earlier age groups.

The frequency of P. corneus infected with S. robusta from the same ponds with high a frequency of anomalies was 0.38% (n = 1316). Planorbis planorbis was infected with S. robusta (prevalence of 0.24%; n = 851). The differences between the prevalence of S. robusta in these two snail species was not significant (χ2 = 0.04, df = 1, P = 0.848).

Discussion

Anomaly P has interested scientists for over 70 years. Since its discovery by Jean Rostand in 1949‒1952, it is known as a syndrome of rare but very peculiar morphological anomalies with unknown etiology occurring in water frogs of the genus Pelophylax. Undoubtedly, during this time, “light” forms of anomaly P were observed by biologists, who regarded them as cases of symmetrical polydactyly [10]. However, 50 years after Jean Rostand’s works, this anomaly has never been studied in detail in any laboratory in Europe.

Mass polydactyly in marsh frogs was discovered in Ostrovtsovskaya Lesosteppe water bodies in June 2016 [11]. In August 2016, we found severe forms of anomaly P. The discovery of a high frequency of the anomaly in ponds without fish, which were considered by Rostand as the teratogenic vector of the syndrome, prompted us to study molluscs and test a possible trematode infection hypothesis. During winter 2017‒2018, we obtained anomaly P in the laboratory from tadpoles raised together with the mollusc P. corneus [12]. The obtained results encouraged us to consider a species of trematode as a possible infectious agent of anomaly P. Thus, we designed a study on how trematodes from planorbid snails can affect tadpoles in experimental conditions.

The positive results of experiments with direct cercariae exposure provide compelling evidence that S. robusta led to anomaly P in tadpoles of water frogs. The life-cycle of S. robusta was investigated in detail by Odening [32] and completed by Vojtek [41]. It has a three-host life-cycle, which includes planorbid snails as first intermediate hosts, larvae of frogs, toads, and newts as second intermediate hosts, and birds of the family Anatidae as definitive hosts (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Life-cycle of Strigea robusta. a First intermediate hosts are planorbid snails (Planorbarius corneus and Planorbis planorbis). b Second intermediate hosts are amphibian larvae and adult amphibians; anomaly P is developed in water frog tadpoles at early stages of development (pre-limb and limb bud stages). c Definitive hosts are anatid birds (Anas platyrhynchos)

Full size image

As a rule, the first intermediate hosts are freshwater snails of the genera Planorbis and Anisus. It was experimentally shown that Bathyomphalus contortus, Anisus leucostomus, Gyraulus albus, Segmentina nitida and P. corneus could also play the role of first intermediate hosts [32, 41]. A total of 1989 P. corneus investigated in the Czech Republic [33] as well as 1999 in Belarus [42] did not contain larval stages of S. robusta, whereas this species occurred in Planorbis and Segmentina nitida. Thus, a unique situation was discovered here, in which S. robusta was parasitizing P. corneus in natural populations.

The second intermediate hosts are larvae of Lissotriton vulgaris and Triturus cristatus according to Vojtek [41] and Sinsch et al. [40, 43]. Odening [32] reported brown frogs infected with Strigea robusta near Berlin, with a prevalence of 60–100%. He conducted experiments with the anurans Rana arvalis, Rana temporaria and Bufo bufo, and obtained metacercariae from these species [32]. No information was provided by this author regarding anomalies in tadpoles of brown frogs or common toads from these experiments. Similarly, there is no information from Vojtek’s [41] experiments about any anomalies in the development of green frog tadpoles. According to our data, the anomaly P developed in four species of water frog; it was found in nature in the marsh frog P. ridibundus [11], the Sahara frog, P. saharicus [9], and obtained in laboratory hybridogenous P. esculentus [12], and in the pool frog P. lessonae [4].

In Europe, ducks are the definitive hosts of S. robusta. This species was reported to occur in 3% of Anas platyrhynchos and 0.9% of Aythya fuligula [44]. According to Sudarikov [45], a wider spectrum of birds can be infected with S. robusta.

Rostand reported the existence of a sensitive period for the action of the infectious agent during the early stages of tadpole development [9]. We found that anomalies developed in tadpoles up to Gosner stage 36; after that, anomalies did not develop in tadpoles. The complexity of the anomalies (light or severe forms) depended on the stage of the tadpole: tadpoles at “late” 29‒34 Gosner stages, developed polydactyly only, whereas tadpoles at “early” 25‒27 Gosner stages, developed severe forms of anomaly P. According to our data, the complexity and severity of the anomalies may also depend on the number of metacercariae, their localization, and individual immunological sensitivity. Because we detected cysts after preservation of tadpoles in 70% of ethanol, data about the number of metacercariae that survived is incomplete and further investigation of this question is required.

The limbs of other amphibians that live syntopically and are infected with S. robusta show no anomalies. In Russia, these are Lissotriton vulgaris, Triturus cristatus, Pelobates vespertinus, Bombina bombina and Rana arvalis [11]. Possibly, it can be explained by differences in terms of reproduction and development of tadpoles (especially, development of their limb buds) from one side, and the time of sporocysts development and cercariae emergence, from another. However, B. bombina has a period of reproduction and duration of larval development similar to P. ridibundus. It is very interesting to note that in introduced populations of P. ridibundus in the Ural Region polydactyly has also been detected [46] and can be caused by S. robusta. Probably, S. robusta may have been introduced together with P. ridibundus, but more likely it has switched to a new host, because this species was registered east of the Ural Mountains. For example, S. robusta was found in Siberia [45, 47], and in a Siberian population of the moor frog, R. arvalis, cysts of S. robusta were found in 2.5% of studied frogs [47]. Obviously, S. robusta can live outside of water frog ranges and have a life-cycle not involving Pelophylax spp. Literature data indicate that the main second intermediate hosts for this species are brown frogs of the genus Rana [32, 45]. Possibly, S. robusta can switch between amphibian hosts, but its teratogenic effects for other species of amphibians remain unknown, and such long-term co-evolutionary relationships of S. robusta with different amphibian hosts are of great interest. Also, we were not aware of any records of anomalies similar to severe cases of anomaly P in other amphibian species.

Therefore, the teratogenic effects appear to be taxon specific. The teratogenic factor was supposed to be retinoic acid in the trematode Ribeiroia ondatrae [48]. In the case of anomaly P, the teratogenic factor can influence the expression levels of HoxD genes [49, 50] and lead to a peculiar morphology with the reduction of the hind limb’s proximal parts (brachymely) and multiplication of the distal parts (polydactyly). Some similar anomalies in vertebrates caused by deletions in PITX1 and represented by a spectrum of lower-limb malformations including mirror-image polydactyly [51].

What effect can this trematode have on amphibian populations? The invasion of S. robusta led to the decline of a large smooth newt population (Lissotriton vulgaris) inhabiting a pond at Schmidtenhöhe near Koblenz [43]. It is important to note, that none of the crested newt (Triturus cristatus) populations, was infected with S. robusta, whereas 73% of the smooth newts were infected [40, 43]. Differences in infections with metacercariae in adult Lissotriton newts and larvae (that had no cysts), in various species of newts (T. cristatus and L. vulgaris), as well as infection rates between populations of brown frogs, are still unknown and intriguing [43]. Finally, it has been proven that S. robusta reduced the survival of newts and led to an exceptional case of population decline in amphibians under trematode infection [40, 43].

Our data confirm this information, showing that under the influence of S. robusta the survival rates of water frog tadpoles decrease, and that infection with metacercariae leads to the manifestation of a polymorphic syndrome, the extreme manifestation of which is grotesque deformations incompatible with life. The rate of anomaly P in water frog populations can reach 80% (severe cases can reach 40–50% in abnormal cases) according to Rostand’s data [8,9,10,11], 23% according to our field data and 82% according to data obtained in the laboratory infection of tadpoles. From an ecological point of view, it may be interesting to understand whether a decrease in locomotor activity and survival of a large number of tadpoles may lead to the decline and extinction of water frog local populations. Probably, the balance between normal forms and abnormal specimens in water frog populations may result from the limited time span in the early stages of tadpole development and from the rather rare occurrence of S. robusta in planorbid molluscs.

Thus, many questions remain unanswered. The possibility of species of the genus Strigea to cause anomalies in amphibians is of great interest. Currently, more than 50 species of Strigea are known in Africa, Australia, Europe, Asia, and North and South America [52, 53], and the phylogenetic relationships within this group remain unknown. Strigea robusta may prove of considerable interest for the study of molecular and physiological mechanisms of trematode action on their intermediate hosts.

Conclusions

Cercariae dose-dependent experiment clearly indicates that Rostand’s mysterious anomaly P syndrome in water frogs is caused by the trematode S. robusta. The complexity of anomalies depends on stages of limb development in tadpoles. At the early stages, severe or mild forms of anomaly P developed, while at the late stages we observed polydactyly only. We also confirmed the rare occurrence of S. robusta in planorbid snails in wildlife and found a unique situation, in which S. robusta was parasitizing P. corneus. Anomaly P syndrome is a new variant of morphological anomalies in amphibians caused by a trematode species. Nowadays, mass polydactyly cases in western Palaearctic water frogs observed over Europe can be partially explained by the action of this species.

Availability of data and materials

Our sequences were deposited in the GenBank database under the accession numbers MT075803, MT075804, MK295776, MK295777 (ITS2) and MT075841, MT075842, MK585229, MK585230 (28S rRNA).

Abbreviations

PCR:

polymerase chain reaction

dNTP:

deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate

ITS2:

internal transcribed spacer 2

PITX1:

pituitary homeobox 1

HoxD :

homeobox D cluster

References

  1. Henle K, Dubois A, Vershinin V. A review of anomalies in natural populations of amphibians and their potential causes. Studies on anomalies in natural populations of amphibians. Mertensiella. 2017;25:57–164.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Henle K, Dubois A, Vershinin V. Commented glossary, terminology and synonymies of anomalies in natural populations of amphibians. Studies on anomalies in natural populations of amphibians. Mertensiella. 2017;25:9–48.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rothschild BM, Schultze HP, Pellegrini R. Herpetological osteopathology: annotated bibliography of amphibians and reptiles. New York: Springer; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Svinin AO, Bashinskiy IV, Osipov VV, Neymark LA, Ivanov A, Ermakov OA, et al. New records of the anomaly P syndrome in two water frog species (Pelophylax ridibundus and P. lessonae) in Russia. Herpetozoa. 2019;32:277–81.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rostand J. Sur la polydactylie des batraciens anoures. Bull Biol France Belgique. 1951;85:113–36.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rostand J. Polydactylie naturelle chez la grenouille verte (Rana esculenta L.). Compt Rend Acad Sci. 1949;228:1666–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rostand J. Sur la variété d’expression d’une certain anomalie (P) chez la grenouille verte (Rana esculenta L.). Compt Rend Acad Sci. 1952;235:583–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dubois A. Rostand’s anomaly P in Palaearctic green frogs (Pelophylax) and similar anomalies in amphibians. Studies on anomalies in natural populations of amphibians. Mertensiella. 2017;25:49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rostand J. Les étangs à monstres. Histoire d’une recherché (1947–1970). Paris: Stock; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dubois A. Anomalies and mutations in natural populations of the Rana esculenta complex (Amphibia, Anura). Mit Zool Mus Berl. 1979;55:59–87.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Svinin AO, Bashinskiy IV, Litvinchuk SN, Neymark LA, Osipov VV, Katsman EA, et al. First record of the Jean Rostand’s “anomaly P” in the marsh frog, Pelophylax ridibundus, in central Russia. Alytes. 2019;37:31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Svinin AO, Bashinskiy IV, Litvinchuk SN, Neymark LA, Ivanov AY, Ermakov OA, et al. Planorbarius corneus is an intermediate host of the infectious agent of Rostand’s “anomaly P” in green frogs. Rus J Herp. 2019;26:349–53.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson PT, Lunde KB, Ritchie EG, Launer AE. The effect of trematode infection on amphibian limb development and survivorship. Science. 1999;284:802–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson PTJ, Lunde KB, Haight RW, Bowerman J, Blaustein AR. Ribeiroia ondatrae (Trematoda: Digenea) infection induces severe limb malformations in western toads (Bufo boreas). Can J Zool. 2001;79:370–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson PTJ, Sutherland DR. Amphibian deformities and Ribeiroia infection: an emerging helminthiasis. Trends Parasitol. 2003;19:332–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Holland MP, Skelly DK, Kashgarian M, Bolden SR, Harrison LM, Cappello M. Echinostome infection in green frogs (Rana clamitans) is stage and age dependent. J Zool. 2006;271:455–62.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rajakaruna RS, Samarawickrama VAMPK, Ranawana KB. Amphibian declines and possible etiologies: the case for Sri Lanka. J Natl Sci Found Sri. 2007;35:3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rajakaruna RS, Piyatissa PMJR, Jayawardena UA, Navaratne AN, Amerasinghe PH. Trematode infection induced malformations in the common hourglass treefrogs. J Zool. 2008;275:89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vershinin VL, Neustroeva NS. The role of trematode infestation in the specifics of skeleton morphogenesis of Rana arvalis Nilsson, 1842. Dokl Biol Sci. 2011;440:290–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jayawardena UA, Rajakaruna RS, Navaratne AN, Amerasinghe PH. Monostome cercariae induced malformations in amphibians: effect of infection at the pre-limb-bud stage tadpoles of Polypedates cruciger Blyth. J Natl Sci Found Sri. 2010;38:241–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jayawardena UA, Tkach VV, Navaratne AN, Amerasinghe PH, Rajakaruna RS. Malformations and mortality in the Asian common toad induced by exposure to pleurolophocercous cercariae (Trematoda: Cryptogonimidae). Parasitol Int. 2013;62:246–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jayawardena UA, Rohr JR, Navaratne AN, Amerasinghe PH, Rajakaruna RS. Combined effects of pesticides and trematode infections on hourglass tree frog Polypedates cruciger. EcoHealth. 2016;13:111–22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jayawardena UA, Rohr JR, Amerasinghe PH, Navaratne AN, Rajakaruna RS. Effects of agrochemicals on disease severity of Acanthostomum burminis infections (Digenea: Trematoda) in the Asian common toad, Duttaphrynus melanostictus. BMC Zool. 2017;2:13.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pathirana NUK, Meegaskumbura M, Rajakaruna RS. Infection sequence alters disease severity—effects of the sequential exposure of two larval trematodes to Polypedates cruciger tadpoles. Ecol Evol. 2019;9:6220–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Pathirana NUK, Meegaskumbura M, Rajakaruna RS. Host resistance and tolerance to parasitism: development-dependent fitness consequences in common hourglass tree frog (Polypedates cruciger) tadpoles exposed to two larval trematodes. Can J Zool. 2019;97:1021–9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson PTJ, Reeves MK, Krest SK, Pinkney AE. A decade of deformities: advances in our understanding of amphibian malformations and their implications. In: Sparling DW, Linder G, Bishop C, Krest S, editors. Ecotoxicology of amphibians and reptiles. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2010. p. 515–40.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Johnson PTJ, Preston DL, Hoverman JT, Richgels KLD. Biodiversity reduces disease through predictable changes in host community competence. Nature. 2013;494:230–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Haas SE, Reeves MK, Pinkney AE, Johnson PTJ. Continental-extent patterns in amphibian malformations linked to parasites, chemical contaminants, and their interactions. Glob Change Biol. 2018;24:e275–88.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson PTJ, Kellermanns E, Bowerman J. Critical windows of disease risk: amphibian pathology driven by developmental changes in host resistance and tolerance. Funct Ecol. 2011;25:726–34.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson PTJ, Rohr JR, Hoverman JT, Kellermanns E, Bowerman J, Lunde KB. Living fast and dying of infection: host life history drives interspecific variation in infection and disease risk. Ecol Lett. 2012;15:235–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ermakov O, Ivanov A, Titov S, Svinin A, Litvinchuk S. New multiplex PCR method for identification of east European green frog species and their hybrids. Rus J Herpetol. 2019;26:367–70.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Odening K. Der Entwicklungszyklus von Parastrigea robusta Szidat, 1928 (Trematoda, Strigeida) im Raum Berlin. Z Parasitenkd. 1965;26:185–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Faltýnková A, Našincová V, Kablásková L. Larval trematodes (Digenea) of planorbid snails (Gastropoda: Pulmonata) in central Europe: a survey of species and key to their identification. Syst Parasitol. 2008;69:155–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Aljanabi SM, Martinez I. Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4692–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wilson WD, Johnson PTJ, Sutherland DR, Moné H, Loker ES. A molecular phylogenetic study of the genus Ribeiroia (Digenea): trematodes known to cause limb malformations in amphibians. J Parasitol. 2005;91:1040–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tkach V, Pawlowski J, Mariaux J. Phylogenetic analysis of the suborder Plagiorchiata (Platyhelminthes, Digenea) based on partial lsrDNA sequences. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:83–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Altschul S, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E, Lipman D. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gosner KL. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica. 1960;16:183–90.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sokal RR, Rohlf JF. Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 2nd ed. New York: Freeman WH; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sinsch U, Heneberg P, Těšínský M, Balczun C, Scheid P. Helminth endoparasites of the smooth newt Lissotriton vulgaris: linking morphological identification and molecular data. J Helminthol. 2018;93:332–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Vojtek J. Observations on the life cycle of Parastrigea robusta Szidat, 1928 (Trematoda: Strigeidae) in Czechoslovakia. Folia Parasitol. 1972;19:210.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Akimova LN, Shimalov VV, Bychkova EI. Diversity of trematode larvae in gastropod mollusks in water bodies of Belarus. Parazitologiya. 2011;45:287–305.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Sinsch U, Kaschek J, Wiebe J. Heavy metacercariae infestation (Parastrigea robusta) promotes the decline of a smooth newt population (Lissotriton vulgaris). Salamandra. 2018;54:210–21.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Heneberg P, Sitko J, Těšínský M, Rząd I, Bizos J. Central European Strigeidae Railliet, 1919 (Trematoda: Strigeidida): molecular and comparative morphological analysis suggests the reclassification of Parastrigea robusta Szidat, 1928 into Strigea Abildgaard, 1790. Parasitol Int. 2018;67:688–701.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sudarikov VE. Trematodes of the fauna of the USSR. Strigeidae. Moscow: Nauka; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Vershinin VL, Vershinina SD, Neustroeva NS. Amphibian anomalies as a source of information on the adaptive and evolutionary potential. Biol Bull. 2018;45:192–200.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhigileva ON, Kirina IY. Helminth infestation of the moor frog (Rana arvalis Nilsson, 1842) and the Siberian tree frog (Rana amurensis Boulenger, 1886) in western Siberia. Contemp Probl Ecol. 2015;8:232–6.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Szuroczki D, Vesprini ND, Jones TR, Spencer GE, Carlone RL. Presence of Ribeiroia ondatrae in the developing anuran limb disrupts retinoic acid levels. Parasitol Res. 2012;110:49–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Fromental-Ramain C, Warot X, Messadecq N, LeMeur M, Dollé P, Chambon P. Hoxa-13 and Hoxd-13 play a crucial role in the patterning of the limb autopod. Development. 1996;122:2997–3011.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Muragaki Y, Mundlos S, Upton J, Olsen BR. Altered growth and branching patterns in synpolydactyly caused by mutations in HOXD13. Science. 1996;272:548–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Klopocki E, Kähler C, Foulds N, Shah H, Joseph B, Vogel H, et al. Deletions in PITX1 cause a spectrum of lower-limb malformations including mirror-image polydactyly. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20:705–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Dubois G. Synopsis des Strigeidae et des Diplostomatidae (Trematoda). Mem Soc Sci Nat Neuchatel. 1968;10:1–258.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yamaguti S. Synopsis of digenetic trematodes of vertebrates. Vols. 1 and 2. Tokyo: Keigaku; 1971.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr P. T. J. Johnson (University of Colorado Boulder, USA) for his valuable review, comments and help in statistical analysis in R. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewer for valuable comments. We would like to thank Drs V. L. Vershinin and S. D. Vershinina (Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia) for support and discussions. We sincerely thank Dr A. Ohler (National Museum of Natural History, Paris, France) for valuable literature sources.

Funding

This study was supported by the Russian Foundation of Basic Research No. 18-34-00059.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mari State University, 424000, Yoshkar-Ola, Russia

    Anton O. Svinin, Aleksander A. Vedernikov & Galina P. Drobot

  2. A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071, Moscow, Russia

    Ivan V. Bashinskiy & Leonid A. Neymark

  3. Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 194064, St. Petersburg, Russia

    Spartak N. Litvinchuk

  4. Dagestan State University, 3367000, Makhachkala, Russia

    Spartak N. Litvinchuk

  5. Penza State University, 440026, Penza, Russia

    Oleg A. Ermakov & Alexander Yu. Ivanov

  6. Privolzhskaya Lesosteppe State Nature Reserve, 440031, Penza, Russia

    Vitalij V. Osipov

  7. Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography, 410002, Saratov, Russia

    Vitalij V. Osipov

  8. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Institut Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité, 75005, Paris, France

    Alain Dubois

Authors
  1. Anton O. Svinin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ivan V. Bashinskiy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Spartak N. Litvinchuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Oleg A. Ermakov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alexander Yu. Ivanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Leonid A. Neymark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Aleksander A. Vedernikov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Vitalij V. Osipov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Galina P. Drobot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Alain Dubois
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AOS performed experiments, analyzed results and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. OAE and AYI carried out the molecular analysis. AD, IVB, SNL, GPD and OAE conceived the conceptualization, participated in the design of the experiment, analyzed results and edited of the manuscript. LAN, VVO and AAV collected samples of molluscs and frogs in the field and were also contributors in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton O. Svinin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent participate

Manipulations with animals were carried out in accordance with national and international guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Svinin, A.O., Bashinskiy, I.V., Litvinchuk, S.N. et al. Strigea robusta causes polydactyly and severe forms of Rostand’s anomaly P in water frogs. Parasites Vectors 13, 381 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04256-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04256-2

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us