Skip to main content

Field safety and efficacy of an orally administered combination of sarolaner, moxidectin and pyrantel (Simparica Trio®) for the prevention of angiostrongylosis in dogs presented as veterinary patients



Infection with the cardiopulmonary nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum may cause severe disease in dogs, therefore prophylactic treatments are necessary to prevent infection in dogs at risk. A clinical field study was conducted to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of an oral combination of sarolaner, moxidectin and pyrantel (Simparica Trio®) for the prevention of A. vasorum infection in dogs (prevention study). A survey study was conducted concurrently to determine the infection pressure in the same areas.


Prevention and survey studies were both conducted at the same veterinary clinics in endemic hot spots for A. vasorum in Denmark and Italy. The prevention study was a randomized, placebo controlled, double masked study where 622 client-owned dogs were treated and tested at 30 days intervals for 10 months. In the survey study 1628 dogs that were at risk of infection and/or were suspected to be infected were tested by fecal and/or serological methods, and the percent of dogs positive for A. vasorum was calculated.


In the prevention study, there were no adverse events related to treatment with Simparica Trio®. Two placebo-treated animals became infected with A. vasorum during the 10-month study period, while none of the dogs in the combination product-treated group became infected. In the survey study, 12.2% of the study dogs were found positive to A. vasorum, indicating high exposure to the parasite during the period of the prevention study.


Monthly oral treatment with the combination of sarolaner, moxidectin and pyrantel (Simparica Trio®) was 100% effective in the prevention of natural infection with A. vasorum in dogs in highly endemic areas. In endemic areas, A. vasorum occurrence in dogs at risk is considerable.


Angiostrongylus vasorum (also referred to as French heartworm) infection of dogs has been reported with increasing frequency in the past two decades, including from regions outside the previously known endemic areas [1]. The latter include several European countries (e.g. France, the UK, Denmark, Ireland and Switzerland) [2], Newfoundland in Canada [3], Brazil, Colombia [4] and Uganda [1]. In most countries the occurrence has been historically localized to hot spots, however these areas where dogs are at increased risk of infection are expanding. For example, in the UK the endemic foci used to be localized in the South East of England and in South of Wales [5, 6] but recent reports confirmed the expansion to Northern England and Scotland [7, 8]. Similarly, in Germany besides the historically endemic areas in the southwest (Baden-Wuerttemberg and Rhineland-Palatinate); recently, a relatively high number of cases were identified in the northeast (Brandenburg and Mecklenburg Western Pomerania) [9]. Within the endemic hot spots, repeated surveys showed an increasing prevalence. For example, in Newfoundland between 1997 and 1999 4% of the tested dogs with cardiopulmonary disease were infected, while in 2000–2001, using the same inclusion criteria, 24% of the tested dogs were positive for A. vasorum [10]. A similar trend has been reported in several countries in Europe [11]. In Germany, a significant increase in the prevalence of A. vasorum was reported between 2003 and 2015 [9]. Besides the historically endemic countries, autochthonous infections have also been reported in dogs from other countries including the Netherlands [12], Hungary [13], Slovakia [14] and Belgium [15].

Computer modelling suggests that there is a high probability that A. vasorum will also spread in North America to the eastern half of the continent and along the western coast [16]. Indeed, the first report of an autochthonous A. vasorum infection in the USA emerged in 2011 from a red fox in West Virginia [17]. In Canada the expansion has also been confirmed from Newfoundland and Labrador to the mainland, after the parasite has been isolated from coyotes in Nova Scotia [18]. This is not surprising given that at least five species of European slugs which are suitable intermediate hosts for A. vasorum have been introduced to North America [19], and genetic analyses also suggested that A. vasorum in Newfoundland has most likely originated from western Europe [20].

Infections with A. vasorum may cause severe disease in dogs: together with the most frequently reported respiratory signs, bleeding diathesis, neurological signs and other unspecific signs are reported [21,22,23]. Canine angiostrongylosis can be fatal if left untreated [21, 23, 24]. Dogs may be infected by ingesting the intermediate (i.e. snails and slugs) or paratenic (e.g. frogs) hosts, or by eating grass, chewing on sticks or drinking from puddles etc., that are contaminated with the third stage larvae excreted by the intermediate hosts [1]. In the final host, after visceral migration and two molts, the fifth-stage larvae reach the right ventricle and pulmonary arteries where they develop into adults [1]. After mating, the females lay eggs that hatch in the respiratory vessels and the first-stage larvae will be excreted in the feces usually within two months post-infection [1].

Given the increasing number of dogs diagnosed with angiostrongylosis, the relevant clinical picture of the disease and the geographic expansion of the parasite, effective prophylactic medications are needed in addition to the currently approved treatments for established infections. In the present study, the preventative efficacy of a novel oral combination containing moxidectin, sarolaner and pyrantel (Simparica Trio®, Zoetis) was evaluated in client-owned dogs. In parallel to this study, a prospective survey study was conducted concurrently to establish the contemporaneous infection pressure in the same geographical areas.


The prevention and survey studies were conducted at the same study sites in Denmark (16 clinics) and Italy (14 clinics) over a period of 14 months each. The survey study was conducted between March 2016 and May 2017, and the prevention study between May 2016 and July 2017. The study sites were selected based on previous frequent diagnosis of A. vasorum infections in dogs, and their locations are shown in Fig. 1. Both studies complied with Good Clinical Practices [25].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Locations of the study sites in Denmark (red markers) and Italy (blue markers)

Prevention study

The prevention study was conducted as a double-masked, placebo-controlled field trial. Dogs that were at risk of A. vasorum infection in the opinion of the veterinarians, weighing at least 1.3 kg and at least 8 weeks of age were eligible for inclusion in the study. Dogs were considered to be at risk of infection if they had a history of eating snails/frogs, were active hunting dogs, were living or were walked in areas where foxes were frequently seen or if the household had a history of previous A. vasorum infection [1]. Animals that were pregnant or lactating or intended for breeding were excluded from the study as were dogs that tested positive for A. vasorum at the enrolment visit. Up to six dogs could be enrolled from a single household. Dogs were randomly allocated 1:1 to treatment with Simparica Trio® or placebo according to a randomization plan using a randomized complete block design with one-way treatment structure (meaning that the levels of treatment consisted of one factor of interest) replicated in multiple clinics.

Enrolled animals were not allowed to receive any product with known activity for the treatment or prevention of A. vasorum infestation including fenbendazole, levamisole, ivermectin or milbemycin oxime at any dose rate and via any route. Dogs that were randomized to the combination product group were not allowed to receive any medication with efficacy against fleas/ticks and helminths including prophylactic products against Dirofilaria immitis. Dogs randomized to placebo were only allowed to receive ectoparasiticides and anthelmintics, including D. immitis preventatives (only moxidectin administered as a monthly oral treatment at the dose rate of 3 µg/kg), from the unmasked dispenser. Both groups were allowed to receive deltamethrin collars as mosquito/sand fly repellents and tapeworm treatments with praziquantel, if required.

The combination product was provided as Simparica Trio® chewable tablets in six different tablet strengths and was dosed at the dose ranges of 1.2 to 2.4 mg/kg sarolaner, 24 to 48 µg/kg moxidectin and 5 to 10 mg/kg pyrantel (as pamoate salt). The placebo tablets were provided in four different sizes. Treatments were administered at monthly intervals on ten consecutive occasions on Days 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240 and 270 (with minor deviations). The dose was determined based on the bodyweight collected just before the treatment administration. Treatments were administered orally by a dedicated and unmasked dispenser and could be administered independently of the time of the dog’s main meal. Owners and masked clinic personnel performing clinical examinations and assessments were not allowed to witness the dispensing and the administration of the study treatments.

Dogs were presented to the clinics monthly on Days 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270 and 300 (with minor deviations). At each clinic visit dogs received a physical examination by a veterinarian and blood samples were collected from each dog. Any abnormal health event observed by the examining veterinarian or reported by the dog owner was recorded, as were any concomitantly administered medications. At each visit, serum samples were tested for A. vasorum antigen by masked study personnel using the Angio Detect™ Test (IDEXX Laboratories Inc., Westbrook, Maine, USA) in the clinic according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Additional serum samples were shipped to a single Central Laboratory (University of Zurich) where these were tested for circulating antigen and antibodies against A. vasorum using ELISAs according to the laboratory’s previously published protocols [26, 27].

If an animal tested positive with any or both of the antigen detection tests (ELISA or Angio Detect™ Test) and was also positive for antibodies, then the animal was considered to be infected with A. vasorum. If only the antibody (by ELISA) or an antigen (either ELISA or Angio Detect™ Test, or both) test was positive, then three consecutive daily fecal samples, each weighing at least 10 grams, were collected from the patient. These were processed with the modified Baermann method [11] in certified Parasitology Laboratories in each country (University of Copenhagen and University of Bari) to detect A. vasorum first-stage larvae (L1). If L1 were found in the feces (independent of the antibody and antigen test results), the animal was determined to be infected with A. vasorum. Any dog that was considered to be infected with A. vasorum subsequently received antiparasitic treatment for the condition.

Dogs that tested positive by the above-mentioned procedures on or before Day 60 were considered as having been infected before the beginning of the study and were withdrawn from the study. These dogs were excluded from the data analysis for efficacy but were included in the safety evaluation. Dogs that were considered to be infected with A. vasorum after Day 60 were included in the data analysis for efficacy and safety. The number and percentage of dogs infected with A. vasorum was tabulated at each visit. Preventative efficacy was defined as the percent of animals that remained negative during the study in the Simparica Trio®-treated group. All dogs that received at least one study treatment were included in the safety evaluation.

Survey study

The study was conducted as a prospective, observational clinical field survey. It was run concurrently with the prevention study at the same study sites in Denmark and Italy. The aim was to determine the occurrence of natural A. vasorum infections in dogs in the same geographical areas as in the prevention study. The study was not intended to and thus was not designed to provide general prevalence data in the two countries, but to provide an estimation for the infection pressure that the study dogs enrolled in the prevention study were exposed to.

Dogs that needed to be tested for A. vasorum infection because the veterinarian considered them to be at risk of infection and/or were suspected to be infected were enrolled. During a single veterinary visit the demographic details of the dogs, their clinical signs and/or abnormal laboratory results and possible risk factors (e.g. dog was an active hunting dog or had history of eating snails or frogs, foxes have been seen in the area the dog is walked) were recorded. The study veterinarians were allowed to use any suitable diagnostic test to establish the diagnosis of A. vasorum infection. These methods included serological antigen detection test (Angio Detect™ Test), Baermann test using a single or three daily fecal samples, fecal smear and fecal flotation methods. The clinic staff was experienced in conducting and evaluating these tests. Once the veterinarian confirmed the diagnosis based upon the test results, the animal was considered positive for A. vasorum infection. To evaluate the infection pressure, the number and percentage of positive cases were determined for the entire study duration. To compare infected vs non-infected animals regarding the frequency distributions of the risk factors and diagnostically relevant clinical findings, Fisher’s Exact Test were conducted using the PROC FREQ procedure in SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).


Prevention study

In total, 622 dogs of various breeds and mixed breeds were enrolled in the study, with 307 dogs receiving placebo and 315 dogs receiving Simparica Trio®. Enrollment by study site is summarized in Table 1. During the study, 45 placebo- and 46 combination product-treated dogs were lost to follow up or were withdrawn. Thus, 531 dogs (262 placebo- and 269 combination product-treated dogs) completed the study on Day 300. Withdrawals included 32 dogs (20 dogs in the placebo group and 12 dogs in the combination product group) that tested positive for A. vasorum before or on Day 60 and were thus considered to have been infected before enrollment.

Table 1 Enrollment per study site in the survey and the prevention study

The demographic data of the dogs in the two study groups were similar (see Table 2). During the study 2762 doses of placebo and 2858 doses of Simparica Trio® were administered. All dogs were dosed completely. Two dogs, one in each group, vomited after a single treatment administration and were re-dosed with a full dose. Both animals completed the study without further vomiting at any other administration.

Table 2 Demographics of dogs enrolled in the survey and prevention studies

None of the dogs in Simparica Trio®-treated group tested positive during the study, while two placebo-treated animals, both in Denmark, were diagnosed with an A. vasorum infection after Day 60. None of these two positive dogs showed any clinical signs of infection. One of the placebo-treated dogs (female Hovawart, 3-months-old at enrollment and that was seen eating snails, living in an area where foxes were seen and in a household with history of A. vasorum infection) tested positive by the antibody ELISA at Days 92 and 119, and by antigen ELISA on Day 119. The Angio Detect™ Test was negative on Days 92 and 119. First-stage larvae were found in the feces collected on Days 109–111. The animal was treated with fenbendazole (25 mg/kg p.o.) for 20 days starting on Day 126, after which no L1 were found in the fecal samples collected on Days 148 to 150. The antibody ELISA was still positive on Day 150, while the antigen ELISA and Angio Detect™ Test were negative. On Day 206, the dog tested negative by both ELISAs. The second placebo-treated dog (2.5-year-old female Labrador retriever that lived in an area where foxes were seen) tested positive for antibodies by ELISA at Days 91, 120 and 154, but tested negative by the antigen ELISA and the Angio Detect™ Test on all these study days. First-stage larvae were found in the feces collected on Days 151 to 153. The animal was treated with milbemycin oxime (0.5 mg/kg p.o.) weekly for 4 weeks, starting on Day 157. There was no follow up information available from this animal after starting the treatment with milbemycin.

Of the dogs originally enrolled in the prevention study, 34 dogs tested positive for A. vasorum. This included 32 dogs that were positive before or on Day 60, and the two placebo-treated dogs that became infected during the study. Additionally, five more dogs tested positive at study screening and because they did not meet the inclusion criteria, they did not receive any study treatment and were excluded from the study. Nevertheless, these dogs delivered information on the contemporaneously investigated epidemiological situation within the study area and were thus included in the calculations of the total number of positive dogs in the prevention study. Therefore, during the entire study period, A. vasorum infection was diagnosed in 6.3% (39/622) of the dogs.

There were no adverse events related to treatment with Simparica Trio® during the study. After the first treatment administration 136 abnormal health events were reported in 74 dogs in the placebo-treated group (24.1%) and 187 events in 99 dogs in the Simparica Trio®-treated group (31.4%). The abnormal health events were typical of those expected to occur in the general dog population and occurred with similar frequency in both treatment groups. The most frequent abnormal health events included skin and appendage disorders in 18.4% and 24.1% of all events, digestive tract disorders in 21.3% and 18.2% of all events, ear and labyrinth disorders in 11.0% and 11.8% of all events, in the placebo and the Simparica Trio®-treated groups, respectively. Fourteen animals died or were euthanized during the 10-month study, seven animals in each group, none of which was related to treatment administration. In the placebo-treated group 265 dogs (86.3%) and in the Simparica Trio®-treated dogs 162 dogs (51.4%) received concomitant medications during the study. Overall, 84 and 90 unique concomitant medications were administered to the dogs in the placebo- and the Simparica Trio®-treated group, respectively. Two placebo-treated and 3 Simparica Trio®-treated dogs received anthelmintic treatments with efficacy against A. vasorum, therefore these dogs were withdrawn from the study after these treatments. In the placebo-treated group, the most commonly prescribed treatments were against flea/tick infestations in 37.3% of all concomitant medications in 224 dogs. In both groups deltamethrin collar was also frequently used in Italy for Leishmania spp. vector prevention, in 50 placebo-treated and 47 Simparica Trio®-treated dogs. Other frequently administered concomitant treatments included antibiotics, vaccines, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, cestode treatment (praziquantel), sedatives, analgesics and anesthetics in animals of both groups, and anthelmintics (pyrantel) in the placebo-treated group.

Survey study

In total, 1623 dogs of various breeds and mixed breeds were enrolled, out of which 198 dogs tested positive for A. vasorum (see Table 1). The number of dogs tested at each study site and, therefore, the number and percentage of positive dogs varied across the different sites. Overall, in the tested dog population at the same study sites as in the prevention study 12.2% of the dogs were positive for A. vasorum during a 14-months study period.

The most commonly used diagnostic method in 77.7% of the dogs was the Angio Detect™ Test (n = 1261). Of all the 198 positive dogs, 155 dogs (78.3%) were diagnosed with this test. Baermann test with three daily fecal sampling was performed in 17.0% of the cases (n = 276) and with single fecal sampling in 5.2% of the dogs (n = 84). Of all the 198 positive dogs, 29 (14.6%) and 12 (6.1%) dogs were diagnosed using Baermann test on three daily or single fecal samples, respectively. One dog each was tested and found positive with fecal flotation and fecal smear.

The most common risk factor for the enrolled dogs (88.5% of the dogs) for A. vasorum infection was the presence of foxes in the area where the dogs lived, followed by the history of eating snails/frogs in 61.7% (Table 3). Out of the 1623 study dogs, 61.6% (1000 dogs) were enrolled by the study veterinarians because they were suspected to be infected as they showed clinical signs consistent with A. vasorum infection. Among the 198 dogs that tested positive for A. vasorum infection, 86.4% (n = 171) were suspected to be infected at enrollment based on their clinical signs, while these were absent in the remaining 13.6% of the animals. The clinical signs shown by all study dogs, dogs that tested positive or negative for A. vasorum infection, are listed in Table 3. Dogs positive for A. vasorum had significantly more frequently a previous or ongoing history of an infection in the household, showed more frequently signs of respiratory disease (coughing, dyspnea, tachypnoea, increased lung sounds or crackles at auscultation, thoracic radiographic or ultrasonographic signs), bleeding disorders (including pale mucous membranes, petechiae or ecchymosis), exercise intolerance, syncope, seizure, and tremor. Furthermore, also other signs (including weight loss, inappetence, lethargy, ascites, other neurological signs not listed in the table, melena, sneezing, heart murmur) and laboratory abnormalities (anemia, leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia, eosinophilia, hyperglobulinemia) were more frequently observed in A. vasorum positive dogs (see Table 3).

Table 3 Potential risk factors and clinical signs reported in the survey study: in all enrolled dogs, and in the dogs that were positive or negative for Angiostrongylus vasorum infection


The prevention study reported here demonstrated that a novel oral chewable tablet combining moxidectin, sarolaner and pyrantel provided complete preventative efficacy for dogs against A. vasorum infection under field conditions in endemic hot spots. The repeated monthly administrations of Simparica Trio® for ten consecutive months was well tolerated by the dogs. The infection pressure was substantial, with 6.3% of the total dogs screened and enrolled in the prevention study testing positive, and 12.2% of the selected dogs in the concurrent survey also testing positive. These results showed that the prevention study was conducted in endemic hot spots of A. vasorum, thus indicating that the dogs had high parasite exposure. Nevertheless, due to the nature of the study it cannot be excluded entirely that dogs included in the prevention study did not ingest the parasite. The number of positive animals was expected to be high in the tested geographic locations: in fact, in the study areas in Denmark, a previous survey reported 14.0% prevalence in dogs with clinical signs consistent with A. vasorum infection [28]. In Italy, in a very recent survey with randomly selected dogs, 3.4% were infected with A. vasorum, with prevalence peaks of 5.8% to 19.3% in certain regions [29].

While effective treatment options are available for canine angiostrongylosis, clinical diagnosis is not always straightforward. Infected dogs may present with only vague signs affecting a variety of organ systems, including most often the respiratory, but also the nervous, the cardiovascular and the gastrointestinal system, or may show only coagulopathies [21,22,23,24]. In the current survey with selected dogs, respiratory signs were the most frequently reported abnormality in the infected animals (e.g. coughing in 58.1% of the dogs), followed by exercise intolerance in 50.5% of the dogs. Accordingly, also further signs indicative for an impairment of the respiratory system such as dyspnea (30.8%), tachypnea (24.2%) and increased lung sounds (39.9%) were significantly more frequent in infected animals and complemented by abnormalities observed through diagnostic imaging. These results are in line with previous case series from Denmark [22] and from southern England [21, 30] in which coughing was the most frequent sign (68.1%, 65% and 54%, respectively), followed by dyspnea (23.2%, 43% and 22%, respectively), exercise intolerance (15.6%, 35% and 17%, respectively) and depression (21.9%, 48% and 22%, respectively). Among further primary complaints, hemorrhagic disorders are a frequent cause of death; they may manifest with bleedings from different body localizations or as petechiae or ecchymosis [21, 24]. This was also more frequently observed in the group of infected dogs in the present study; they showed pale mucous membranes, petechiae or ecchymosis or melena, and corresponding laboratory findings such as anemia and thrombocytopenia. Hemorrhages were observed in 15.6%, 35% and 15% of the dogs in the above-mentioned studies from Denmark and England as well [21, 22, 30]. Other laboratory findings more frequently observed in infected dogs of our studies (leukocytosis, eosinophilia, hyperglobulinemia) can be explained by the substantial inflammatory reaction that occurs during A. vasorum infections [31, 32]. Other unspecific signs such as weight loss, inappetence or lethargy that were more frequently reported in infected dogs of this study have been previously reported in A. vasorum infected dogs [21, 22], evidencing the challenging clinical picture of the infection. However, infected dogs may not present with any clinical signs for a prolonged period and therefore the diagnosis may only be made at an advanced stage when severe damage is already present in the lungs. In line with this, in the survey study presented here, 13.6% of the dogs that tested positive for A. vasorum were not suspected to be infected by the veterinarian because they had no clinical signs. Previous or ongoing history of an infection in the household may alert and help to identify further positive dogs, as observed here.

In advanced cases, fatalities may occur before anthelmintic treatment can be initiated [21, 23, 33]. Regular preventative treatment is therefore the safest and most effective option for animals living in endemic areas and is recommended by the European Scientific Counsel Companion Animal Parasites [34]. Before starting the prophylactic treatment regimen, it may be recommended to test the dogs for concurrent infections.

In the prevention and survey studies different diagnostic methods were used. In the survey study the aim was to establish the level of infection by the methods that are routinely used by veterinarians. Therefore, it was at the discretion of the veterinarians to diagnose the infection in the study dogs by the test method they were utilizing in their daily practice. Because the prevention study used a negative control group that was not allowed to receive any preventative treatment against A. vasorum during the study period, it was essential for animal welfare reasons to diagnose an infection as early as possible. The ELISA methods were reported to be the most sensitive tests to diagnose an early infection, hence these were implemented in the prevention study [26, 27]. These also showed best diagnostic consistency during the course of infection, compared to the Baermann method and to PCR performed with different substrates [35]. In experimentally infected animals, antibodies can be detected by ELISA as early as 2 to 3 weeks, and at the latest between 5 and 7 weeks after inoculation, i.e. this method may already detect infection during the prepatent period [27]. With a reported sensitivity of 85.7%, the antibody ELISA appears to be the most reliable test available for identifying dogs at an early stage of infection [27]. The antigen ELISA may require a longer time after infection to yield positive results. In experimentally infected dogs, the earliest positive results in 20% of the samples were observed 5 weeks post-inoculation when the fecal tests were still negative for L1 [26]. At 8–9 weeks after inoculation, 63.3–71.0% of the samples were antigen positive by ELISA [26, 36]. In comparison, with the Angio Detect™ Test, the earliest positive results in experimentally infected dogs were observed 9 weeks after inoculation and it was only 5 weeks later when all samples were positive [35]. In that study L1 were detectable in the feces of the dogs 47–55 days after infection, indicating that positive results with the Angio Detect™ Test may only be expected in dogs with more advanced stages of infection, i.e. several weeks after a patent infection. In the survey study, the ELISA methods were not used, therefore it is possible that the study somewhat underestimated the number of positive animals, as dogs in the pre-patent period of infection could not be diagnosed.

In the prevention study, two placebo-treated dogs became infected during the study. These dogs were first positive by antibody ELISA 91 and 92 days (~13 weeks) after study start. As discussed above, the antibody ELISA is expected to become positive within 2–7 weeks after the infection took place, therefore these results indicate that these two animals became infected after study start. Because the antigen ELISA and the Angio Detect™ Test may detect infections at a later stage, it is not surprising that the antigen ELISA was only positive in one of the two dogs, and only when L1 were also detectable in the feces, while the Angio Detect™ Test was still negative in both dogs. This suggests that the two placebo dogs were indeed at an early stage of infection. The sensitivity of these tests should also be considered when interpreting the results. For the Angio Detect™ Test 84.6% (95% CI: 69.5–94.1%) sensitivity and for the antigen ELISA 94.9% (95% CI: 82.7–99.3%) sensitivity was reported [36].

The preventative efficacy of Simparica Trio® for angiostrongylosis has recently been confirmed in placebo-controlled, randomized, masked laboratory studies where dogs were experimentally infected with A. vasorum [37]. Simparica Trio®, besides preventing angiostrongylosis, also provides effective treatment of flea and/or tick infestations due to the inclusion of sarolaner [38, 39] and, due to pyrantel and moxidectin inclusion, efficacy against four gastrointestinal nematode species [40]. Additionally, the 24–48 µg/kg moxidectin dose in the combination is effective in the prevention of heartworm disease caused by Dirofilaria immitis [41]. Therefore, for dogs at risk of A. vasorum infection, Simparica Trio® will provide an effective, safe and convenient option to prevent angiostrongylosis and treat and protect against other important parasitic and potentially zoonotic infections at the same time.


Monthly oral treatment with the combination of sarolaner, moxidectin and pyrantel was safe and 100% effective in the prevention of natural infections with A. vasorum in dogs in high endemic areas with a concurrently determined infection rate of 12.2% in selected dogs.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.



per os


  1. Elsheikha HM, Holmes SA, Wright I, Morgan ER, Lacher DW. Recent advances in the epidemiology, clinical and diagnostic features, and control of canine cardio-pulmonary angiostrongylosis. Vet Res. 2014;45:92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schnyder M, Bilbrough G, Hafner C, Schaper R. Angiostrongylus vasorum, “the French heartworm”: a serological survey in dogs from France introduced by a brief historical review. Parasitol Res. 2017;116:S31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bourque A, Conboy G, Miller L, Whitney H, Ralhan S. Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in 2 dogs from Newfoundland. Can Vet J. 2002;43:876–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Penagos-Tabares F, Lange MK, Chaparro-Gutiérrez JJ, Taubert A, Hermosilla C. Angiostrongylus vasorum and Aelurostrongylus abstrusus: neglected and underestimated parasites in South America. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Martin M, Neal C. Distribution of angiostrongylosis in Cornwall. J Small Anim Pract. 1992;33:327–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Trees AJ. Angiostrongylus vasorum in dogs in Wales. Vet Rec. 1987;120:424.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kirk L, Limon G, Guitian FJ, Hermosilla C, Fox MT. Angiostrongylus vasorum in UK mainland: a nationwide postal questionnaire survey of veterinary practices. Vet Rec. 2014;175:118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Taylor CS, Gato RG, Learmount J, Aziz NA, Montgomery C, Rose H, et al. Increased prevalence and geographic spread of the cardiopulmonary nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum in fox populations in Great Britain. Parasitology. 2015;142:1190–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maksimov P, Hermosilla C, Taubert A, Staubach C, Sauter-Louis C, Conraths FJ, et al. GIS-supported epidemiological analysis on canine Angiostrongylus vasorum and Crenosoma vulpis infections in Germany. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Conboy G. Natural infections of Crenosoma vulpis and Angiostrongylus vasorum in dogs in Atlantic Canada and their treatment with milbemycin oxime. Vet Rec. 2004;155:16–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Taubert A, Pantchev N, Vrhovec MG, Bauer C, Hermosilla C. Lungworm infections (Angiostrongylus vasorum, Crenosoma vulpis, Aelurostrongylus abstrusus) in dogs and cats in Germany and Denmark in 2003–2007. Vet Parasitol. 2009;159:175–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Doorn DCK, Van de Sande AH, Nijsse ER, Eysker M, Ploeger HW. Autochthonous Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in dogs in The Netherlands. Vet Parasitol. 2009;162:163–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Majoros G, Fukar O, Farkas R. Autochtonous infection of dogs and slugs with Angiostrongylus vasorum in Hungary. Vet Parasitol. 2010;174:351–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hurníková Z, Miterpáková M, Mandelík R. First autochthonous case of canine Angiostrongylus vasorum in Slovakia. Parasitol Res. 2013;112:3505–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jolly S, Poncelet L, Lempereur L, Caron Y, Bayrou C, Cassart D, et al. First report of a fatal autochthonous canine Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in Belgium. Parasitol Int. 2015;64:97–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Morgan ER, Jefferies R, Krajewski M, Ward P, Shaw SE. Pulmonary angiostrongylosis: the influence of climate on parasite distribution. Parasitol Int. 2009;58:406–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kistler WM, Brown JD, Allison AB, Nemeth NM, Yabsley MJ. First report of Angiostrongylus vasorum and Hepatozoon from a red fox (Vulpes vulpes) from West Virginia, USA. Vet Parasitol. 2014;200:216–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Priest JM, Stewart DT, Boudreau M, Power J, Shutler D. First report of Angiostrongylus vasorum in coyotes in mainland North America. Vet Rec. 2018;183:747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Conboy GA. Canine angiostrongylosis: the French heartworm: an emerging threat in North America. Vet Parasitol. 2011;176:382–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jefferies R, Shaw SE, Willesen J, Viney ME, Morgan ER. Elucidating the spread of the emerging canid nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum between Palaearctic and Nearctic ecozones. Infect Genet Evol. 2010;10:561–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chapman PS, Boag AK, Guitian J, Boswood A. Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in 23 dogs (1999–2002). J Small Anim Pract. 2004;45:435–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Koch J, Willesen JL. Canine pulmonary angiostrongylosis: an update. Vet J. 2009;179:348–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Di Cesare A, Traversa D, Manzocchi S, Meloni S, Grillotti E, Auriemma E, et al. Elusive Angiostrongylus vasorum infections. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sigrist NE, Hofer-Inteeworn N, Jud Schefer R, Kuemmerle-Fraune C, Schnyder M, Kutter AP. Hyperfibrinolysis and hypofibrinogenemia diagnosed with rotational thromboelastometry in dogs naturally infected with Angiostrongylus vasorum. J Vet Intern Med. 2017;31:1091–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. EMEA. Guideline on good clinical practices. VICH Topic GL9. Accessed 20 Jan 2020.

  26. Schnyder M, Tanner I, Webster P, Barutzki D, Deplazes P. An ELISA for sensitive and specific detection of circulating antigen of Angiostrongylus vasorum in serum samples of naturally and experimentally infected dogs. Vet Parasitol. 2011;179:152–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schucan A, Schnyder M, Tanner I, Barutzki D, Traversa D, Deplazes P. Detection of specific antibodies in dogs infected with Angiostrongylus vasorum. Vet Parasitol. 2012;185:216–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Willesen JL, Rahbek C, Koch J. Occurrence of Angiostrongylus vasorum infections in dogs with a relevant clinical picture in Denmark. European Society of Dirofilariosis and Angiostrongylosis (ESDA). In: Fourth European Dirofilaria and Angiostrongylus days, Budapest, Hungary; 2014.

  29. Traversa D, Morelli S, Cassini R, Crisi PE, Russi I, Grillotti E, et al. Occurrence of canine and feline extra-intestinal nematodes in key endemic regions of Italy. Acta Trop. 2019;193:227–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Morgan ER, Jefferies R, van Otterdijk L, McEniry RB, Allen F, Bakewell M, et al. Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in dogs: presentation and risk factors. Vet Parasitol. 2010;173:255–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schnyder M, Fahrion A, Riond B, Ossent P, Webster P, Kranjc A, et al. Clinical, laboratory and pathological findings in dogs experimentally infected with Angiostrongylus vasorum. Parasitol Res. 2010;107:1471–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Willesen JL, Jensen AL, Kristensen AT, Koch J. Haematological and biochemical changes in dogs naturally infected with Angiostrongylus vasorum before and after treatment. Vet J. 2009;180:106–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Traversa D, Torbidone A, Malatesta D, Guglielmini C. Occurrence of fatal canine Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in Italy. Vet Parasitol. 2008;152:162–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. European Scientific Counsel Companion Animal Parasites. ESCCAP Guideline 01: Worm Control in Dogs and Cats. 2017. Accessed 20 Jan 2020.

  35. Schnyder M, Jefferies R, Schucan A, Morgan ER, Deplazes P. Comparison of coprological, immunological and molecular methods for the detection of dogs infected with Angiostrongylus vasorum before and after anthelmintic treatment. Parasitology. 2015;142:1270–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Schnyder M, Stebler K, Naucke TJ, Lorentz S, Deplazes P. Evaluation of a rapid device for serological in-clinic diagnosis of canine angiostrongylosis. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Becskei C, Thys M, Doherty P, Mahabir S. Efficacy of orally administered combination of sarolaner, moxidectin and pyrantel (Simparica Trio™) for the prevention of experimental Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in dogs. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Becskei C, Fias D, Mahabir S, Farkas R. Efficacy of a novel oral chewable tablet containing sarolaner, moxidectin, and pyrantel (Simparica Trio™) against natural flea and tick infestations on dogs presented as veterinary patients in Europe. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Becskei C, Liebenberg J, Thys M, Mahabir S. Efficacy of a novel combination tablet containing sarolaner, moxidectin, and pyrantel pamoate (Simparica Trio™) against four common tick species infesting dogs in Europe. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Becskei C, Kryda K, Fias D, Follis SL, Wozniakiewicz M, Mahabir S, et al. Field efficacy and safety of a novel oral chewable tablet containing sarolaner, moxidectin, and pyrantel pamoate (Simparica Trio™) against naturally acquired gastrointestinal nematode infections in dogs presented as veterinary patients in Europe and the United States. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kryda K, Six RH, Walsh KF, Holzmer SJ, Chapin S, Mahabir SP, et al. Laboratory and field studies to investigate the efficacy of a novel, orally administered combination product containing moxidectin, sarolaner and pyrantel for the prevention of heartworm disease (Dirofilaria immitis) in dogs. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank the extraordinary support of the veterinarians and their clinical staff for conducting the studies and the owners for their participation. The assistance of the study monitors and laboratory personnel is also deeply acknowledged.


This study was funded by Zoetis, Parsippany, NJ.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



All authors were involved in protocol development, data production and interpretation, and manuscript review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Csilla Becskei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animals were enrolled with the written informed consent of the owners in both studies. The protocols were reviewed and approved by the Zoetis Ethics Review Assessment team, the ethical committee of the University of Copenhagen and by the local regulatory authorities prior to implementation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

CB, MW and SM were employees of Zoetis. JW, MS and NM were contracted to participate in the studies.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Becskei, C., Willesen, J.L., Schnyder, M. et al. Field safety and efficacy of an orally administered combination of sarolaner, moxidectin and pyrantel (Simparica Trio®) for the prevention of angiostrongylosis in dogs presented as veterinary patients. Parasites Vectors 13, 385 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: