Skip to main content
Download PDF

Fluralaner (Bravecto®) induces long-term mortality of Lutzomyia longipalpis after a blood meal in treated dogs

Parasites & Vectors volume 13, Article number: 609 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Leishmania infantum is the etiological agent of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in the New World, where the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis and domestic dogs are considered the main vector and host reservoirs, respectively. Systemic insecticides have been studied as an alternative to control vector-borne diseases, including VL. Fluralaner, an isoxazoline class compound, is a systemic insecticide used in dogs, with proven efficiency against different species of phlebotomine sand flies. However, to date no studies have demonstrated the efficacy of fluralaner on Lu. longipalpis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the insecticidal effect of fluralaner (Bravecto®) on the sand fly Lu. longipalpis after blood meal in treated dogs.

Methods

Healthy mongrel dogs (n = 8) were recruited from the Zoonoses Control Center in the city of Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil, and randomized into two groups: fluralaner treated (n = 4) and non-treated control (n = 4). Colony-reared female specimens of Lu. longipalpis (n = 20) were allowed to feed on all dogs for 40 min before treatment (for fluralaner-treated dogs), at day 1 after treatment and then monthly until 1 year post-treatment.

Results

In the treatment group, there was 100% mortality of Lu. longipalpis for up to 5 months after treatment initiation, decreasing to 72.5% at 6 months post-treatment initiation. The efficacy of fluralaner ranged from 100% at day 1 (P = 0.0002) to 68% ( P = 0.0015) at 6 months, decreasing to 1.4% at 1 year post-treatment. Sand fly mortality carried out blood meal in non-treated control dogs remained constant at ≤ 15%.

Conclusions

Taken together, our results suggest that fluralaner may be used as a control strategy for VL in dogs in VL endemic areas.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is caused by the protozoan parasite Leishmania infantum and is considered to be a public health concern due to its wide geographic distribution, high number of estimated cases annually (50,000–90,000) and high mortality rate, mainly in malnourished children, old-aged individuals and patients with Leishmania–human immunodeficiency virus coinfection. In the Americas, VL is endemic in 12 countries, with approximately 96% of new cases reported in Brazil [1,2,3]. Dogs are the main domestic reservoir and play an important role in maintaining the disease cycle due to the high prevalence of L. infantum infection in dogs, the presence of amastigote forms in their skin and their proximity to humans [4,5,6,7]. For this reason, dogs are considered to be strategic targets for disease control.

The main L. infantum transmission route is through the bite of the blood-feeding female phlebotomine sand fly (Diptera, Psychodidae, Phlebotominae) belonging to the genus Phlebotomus in the Old World and Lutzomyia in the New World [8]. Lutzomyia longipalpis is the main vector of L. infantum in the Americas [7]. This sand fly species is widely distributed throughout most Brazilian states, and has shown to be highly adaptable to the urban environment [9,10,11,12]. The control actions currently used to target the vector and its main reservoir are controversial and appear to have a limited impact on the incidence of human and canine VL cases due to several limitations, including inefficiency of diagnostic methods, absence of a treatment that eliminates the parasite and/or lack of an effective vaccine to prevent infection in humans and dogs [13, 14].

Previous studies have explored the use of systemic insecticides as a control measure. Recently, some studies have focused on a new class of drugs, isoxazolines (fluralaner, afoxolaner, saxolaner), which are licensed for veterinary use to protect against fleas, ticks and mites through its inhibition of the arthropod nervous system [15,16,17]. Among this class of drugs, the fluralaner compound provides the most prolonged protection, approximately 12 weeks [18,19,20]. Fluralaner acts as an antagonist of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-gated chloride ion (Cl−) channels, preventing the entry of Cl− into the postsynaptic neuron, which in turn leads to hyperexcitability of the insect central nervous system [15]; it has a very long half-life in vivo [21]. Fluralaner has been shown to be safe in dogs [22] and has a significant selectivity for insects over mammalian receptors [23]. Experimental studies with fluralaner have shown insecticide activity within short periods of time against Triatoma infestans, the vector of Trypanosoma cruzi (the etiologic agent of Chagas disease [24]) and against some species of phlebotome sand flies, such as Phlebotomus papatasi [25, 26] and P. perniciosus [27]. However, to date, there has been no study demonstrating fluralaner action on Lu. longipalpis, the main vector of VL in the New World. In this study, we evaluated the systemic insecticidal activity of a single oral dose of fluralaner against Lu. longipalpis after blood feeding on dogs, based on monthly assays of Lu. longipalpis activity during 1 year.

Methods

Dog recruitment and maintenance

Dogs were obtained from the Zoonoses Control Center (ZCC) in the city of Natal, Rio Grande do Norte (Brazil). With permission of the ZCC, eight healthy mongrel dogs (n = 8; 1:1 ratio of male and female), weighing ≥ 20 kg were recruited and maintained in individual kennels. They were provided with water ad libitum and food corresponding to 5% of their body weight and routinely observed. No insecticide treatment was used in the kennels or on the dogs during the assays, and the animals were bathed with neutral shampoo 2 weeks before each assay.

Sand fly colony maintenance

A sand fly colony was established in the Laboratory of Insects and Vectors of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (Brazil), starting with eggs of Lu. longipalpis (donated by the Laboratory of Physiology of Hematophagous Insects of the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil). The colony was maintained under standard conditions (75–80% relative humidity, 26–27 ℃, 12:12 light:dark cycle). A homogeneous fermented mixture consisting of crushed mouse food, dried rabbit feces and soil was used for larval feeding [28].

Study design

The dogs were randomized into two groups: a fluralaner-treated (n = 4) group and an untreated control group (n = 4), with each group comprising two male and two female dogs. Randomization was by tossing a coin in the presence of an observer. The fluralaner-treated group received a single oral dose of fluralaner (Bravecto®; Merck Animal Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Kenilworth, NY, USA) on the same day as randomization, following the manufacturers’ recommendations. The sand fly feeding assays were performed on both groups 1 h prior to fluralaner treatment and on days 1, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300, 330 and 360 (i.e. monthy assessments) to evaluate mortality.

Female sand flies (5–6 days old) of Lu. longipalpis, without blood- or sugar-feeding (12 h before the experiment), were used. The dogs were gently restrained by trained veterinarians and positioned upright or lying down for more comfortable position. This was followed by the placement of a cylindrical plastic pot fitted with a tight lid that was perforated and covered with a net onto the ventral region of each dog, with each pot containing 20 female/5–10 male specimens of Lu. longipalpis, which were allowed to feed for 40 min (Fig. 1a). After the assays, sand flies were maintained in an insectary under standard conditions (relative humidity 75–80 %, 26–27 °C and 12:12 light:dark cycle), and the insects were fed with cotton soaked in a glucose-saturated solution (Fig. 1b). All female specimens were monitored at 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 h post-blood meal to record the number of dead females, determined by the lack of movement (Fig. 1c).

Figure 1
figure 1

Entomological bioassay. Lutzomyia longipalpis specimens blood-fed directly on dogs treated with fluralaner. a A cylindrical plastic pot covered with a net, containing 20 female/5–10 male specimens of Lu. longipalpis, was positioned onto the ventral region of each dog for 40 min. b Insects were fed with cotton soaked with a glucose-saturated solution, maintained and monitored in an insectary under standard conditions and assays at 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 h post-exposure to determine mortality rate. c Dead specimens of Lu. longipalpis after the observational period.

Full size image

Statistical analysis

The efficacy of fluralaner for killing sand flies was assessed using Abbott’s formula [29]. Efficacy was measured by comparing the number of dead female insects after a blood meal from the treated and untreated group using the following formula:

$${\text{Efficacy }}\left( \% \right) \, = \, \left( {1 - \frac{{n{\text{ in T after treatment}}}}{{n{\text{ in Co after treatment}}}}} \right) \, \times { 1}00$$

where n is the sand fly population, T is treated (dogs) and Co is the control (dogs). Differences between the groups were determined using Fisher’s exact test on each experimental test day [25]. Sand fly mortality tests were two-tailed and differences between groups were considered to be significant when P ≤ 0.05. Survival analyses were conducted using the Kaplan Meier method on each assay day until 120 h post-feeding. The analyses were performed using BioEstat 5.0 software (Brazil).

Results

No side effects were observed in dogs treated with fluralaner

The assays were conducted between November 2018 and November 2019. Recruited dogs weighed between 20 and 40 kg and aged between 4 and 10 years. There were no significant differences in the weight or ages of dogs between the untreated control and fluralaner-treated dogs. No side effects among fluralaner-treated dogs were observed during the study.

Fluralaner (Bravecto®) induces 100% mortality of Lu. longipalpis up to 5 months after treatment in dogs

All female Lu. longipalpis specimens used in the assays were engorged, with 100% feeding success. Following the administration of a single oral dose of fluralaner to dogs, during the 1-year follow-up study we recorded 100% mortality of female Lu. longipalpis specimens up to 150 days after treatment (Fig. 2). After the fifth month, mortality levels started to decline with increasing time from treatment, to 72.5% on post-treatment day 180, 62.5% on post-treatment day 210, 61.2% on post-treatment day 240, 50% on post-treatment day 270, 42.5% on post-treatment day 300, 23.7% on post-treatment day 330 and 15% on post-treatment day 360. The mortality of the sand flies after the blood meal in treated dogs was higher than that in the control dogs until post-treatment day 300 (Fig. 2). However, mortality was similar between groups at post-treatment days 330 and 360 (Fig. 2). The mortality of sand flies blood-fed on control dogs was always ≤ 15% (range 12.5–15%) up to 120 h after the feeding (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Lutzomyia longipalpis mortality (%) after blood meal on fluralaner-treated dogs and untreated control dogs. After fluralaner-treated dogs had received a single oral dose of fluralaner (Bravecto®), Lu. longipalpis mortality (n = 20) was assessed on days 1, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300, 330 and 360 post-treatment. The data are representative of two-tailed tests and Fisher’s exact test was used. Asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference between groups at P < 0.05

Full size image

Analyses of Lu. longipalpis mortality was performed in each experiment until 120 h after blood-feeding on dogs. On the first day post-treatment, 100% of the sand flies had died by 24 h after the blood meal on the treated dogs (Fig. 3). After post-treatment day 1, the time to reach 100% mortality gradually increased, to 48 h on post-treatment day 30, 72 h on post-treatment day 60, 96 h on post-treatment day 90, 120 h on post-treatment day 120 and 120 h on post-treatment day 150. Fluralaner provided sustained mortality (100%) for up to 5 months according to the 120 h post-test (Fig. 3). Mortality results observed after 120 h were 72.5% on post-treatment day 180, 62.5% on post-treatment day 210, 61.2% on post-treatment day 240, 50% on post-treatment day 270, 42.5% on post-treatment day 300, 23.7% on post-treatment day 330, and 15% on post-treatment day 360 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Lutzomyia longipalpis mortality up to 120 h after blood meal in dogs treated with fluralaner (Bravecto®). Proportion (%) of Lu. longipalpis (n = 20) specimens that died within 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 h after blood meal on mongrel dogs treated (n = 4) and not treated (n 4/control) with fluralaner at post-treatment days 1, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300, 330 and 360

Full size image

Fluralaner (Bravecto®) has insecticidal efficacy against Lu. longipalpis for up to 9 months after treatment in dogs

The fluraner-treated dogs had a significantly higher insecticidal efficacy between post-treatment day 1 (P = 0.0002) and day 150 (P < 0.0001), with insecticidal efficacy maintained at 100%, than during the subsequent follow-up, with efficacy decreasing to 68.1% on post-treatment day 180 (P = 0.0015), 56.5% on post-treatment day 210 (P = 0.0049), 55.7% on post-treatment day 240 (P = 0.0022) and 41.2% on post-treatment day 270 (P = 0.0171) (Table 1). No significant differences in insecticidal efficacy were observed in the fluralaner-treated group on post-treatment days 300, 330 and 360 compared to the control group (Table 1). Kaplan–Meier analyses at 120 h post-feeding (95% confidence interval) per group and sampling day are reported in Table 1; the complete post-feeding data set (24, 48, 72, 96, 120 h) is provided in Additional file 1: Table S1. Taken together, these results show that the treatment of dogs with fluralaner is effective against Lu. longipalpis up to 270 days after treatment.

Table 1 Follow-up of Lutzomyia longipalpis mortality and insecticidal efficacy after blood meal on dogs for up to 12 months (360 days) after treatment with a single oral dose of fluralaner (Bravecto®)
Full size table

Discussion

In this study, we observed that a single oral dose of fluralaner induces Lu. longipalpis mortality, with insecticidal efficacy maintained up to 270 days after treatment in dogs. In the treated dogs, fluralaner treatment had an efficacy of 100% on female phlebotomine sand flies for the first 5 months post treatment, decreasing to 68.1% at 6 months. These results suggest that fluralaner may be a promising tool for VL control in dogs in endemic areas, possibly by administering the agent every 5 months.

There was a 100% mortality rate in Lu. longipalpis within 120 h post-blood meal on fluralaner-treated dogs for up to 150 days post-treatment. Susceptibility to fluralaner has been determined in other sand fly species, such as Phlebotomus papatasi and P. perniciosus [25, 27]. A survey by Gomez and co-workers noted mortality of 100, 96, 89 and 42% in P. papatasi (24 h post-blood meal directly on dogs) on post-treatment days 3, 31, 45 and 73, respectively [25]. We observed similar results in our study during the same period of time (24 h after blood meal) for Lu. longipalpis, with observed mortality of 100, 91.2, 48.7 and 37.5 on post-treatment days 1, 30, 60 and 90, respectively. Furthermore, a study with P. perniciosus showed that 96 h after blood meal, there was 100, 100 and 68.6% mortality on days 1, 28 and 84 post-fluralaner treatment, respectively [27]. In our study, 96 h after a blood meal, 100% mortality was recorded in Lu. longipalpis on days 1, 30 and 90 after fluralaner treatment, indicating that Lu. longipalpis is more susceptible to the insecticide effect of fluralaner than P. perniciosus. The insecticidal efficacy of fluralaner against P. papatasi was determined in a membrane-feeding study. Sand fly mortality 24 h post-feeding was higher in the group fed blood samples from fluralaner-treated dogs up to 30 days (60% mortality) post-treatment compared to the control [26].

In the present study, fluralaner was able to kill the female specimens of sand flies within 5 days after blood-feeding. Female sand flies take approximately 7 days to become infected after ingesting a blood meal, with development of the infective form in the foregut and possibly transmitting L. infantum to other hosts [30]. The use of fluralaner will not prevent an infected sand fly from transmitting the parasite during blood-feeding, but when used on a large scale it can become an alternative strategy to control Lu. longipalpis populations in risk areas in the long term because sand flies blood-feeding on fluralaner-treated dogs will die before becoming infectious, thereby preventing the transmission. In addition to furalaner’s action in adult sand flies, engorged sand fly females which did not die within the 120-h post-blood feeding period on treated dogs (> day 150 post-treatment) were able to lay eggs, although fewer eggs and larvae were observed. These observations suggest that fluralaner could act in preventing egg development and maturation (data not shown). However, further studies should be performed to elucidate this possible action.

We recorded the efficacy of fluralaner efficacy to kill Lu. longipalpis after blood-feeding on treated dogs for up to 270 days and observed 100% fluralaner efficacy against Lu. longipalpis 96 h after a blood meal. On the other hand, fluralaner efficacy against sand fly P. perniciosus was 100, 100 and 52.7 on days 1, 28 and 84 post-treatment, respectively [27]. The prolonged efficacy of fluralaner against Lu. longipalpis, when compared to other species of sand flies, may be associated with intra- and inter-specific variations in size or ingestion of the blood meal and the attractiveness of the animal under study [31, 32]. A study developed by William and co-workers showed that ticks collected from fluralaner-treated dogs weighed significantly less than ticks collected from the control dogs, leading to minimal blood absorption, which results in a sufficient exposure of ticks to the fluralaner and consequently high levels of mortality [33]. In the present study, we observed that all specimens showed high levels of mortality after feeding on fluralaner-treated dogs, regardless of the quantity of blood ingested by the Lu. longipalpis females. In addition, we performed a sand fly feeding assay, with 100% of feeding success, directly on the ventral region of dogs, where there is a greater concentration of fat and consequently a higher drug concentration than in other tissues [34]. In future studies, we intend to perform the feeding assays directly on the ear of the dogs and compare the results to assays on other body regions.

When evaluating systemic insecticides to be applied to dogs as a control measure for vector-borne diseases, some points should be considered. To achieve greater coverage in risk areas, insecticides should be easy to apply, present immediate and prolonged efficacy and require a low number of reapplications. When there is a good safety profile, side effects to the dog are avoided, increasing owner’s adherence [35]. In this context, fluralaner appears to be a promising compound for sand fly control, especially Lu. longipalpis populations. The results of our study show high levels of mortality, the longest reported residual activity against sand flies and high efficacy levels for up to 9 months. Another point to be mentioned is that only mongrel dogs were used in the study, presenting variable ages and weights, so the results may closely resemble the real-life situation.

Conclusions

Taken together, our results show that fluralaner treatment in dogs has an insecticide efficacy against Lu. longipalpis and represents a possible public health intervention strategy for combating and reducing infected vectors in endemic areas of VL, thereby reducing canine and human cases of this disease.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

NA:

Not applicable

VL:

Visceral leishmaniasis

ZCC:

Zoonoses Control Center

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global leishmaniasis update, 2006–2015: a turning point in leishmaniasis surveillance. WER 2017;38:557–72.

  2. Erza N, Ochoa MT, Craft N. Human immunodeficiency virus and leishmaniasis. J Glob Infect Dis. 2010;2:248–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Panamerican Health Organization. Epidemiological report of the Americas. Rep leishmaniases. 2019;7:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alvar J, Cañavete C, Molina R, Moreno J, Nieto J. Canine leishmaniasis. Adv Parasitol. 2004;57:1–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baneth G, Shaw SE. Chemotherapy of canine leishmaniosis. Vet Parasitol. 2002;106:315–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Braga RR, Lainson R, Shaw JJ, Ryan L, Silveira FT. Leishmaniasis in brazil. XXII: characterization of Leishmania from man, dogs and the sandfly Lutzomyia longipalpis (Lutz & Neiva, 1912 isolated during an outbreak of visceral leishmaniasis in Santarém, Pará state. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1986;80:143–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Quinnell RJ, Courtenay O. Transmission, reservoir hosts and control of zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis. Parasitology. 2009;136:1915–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Killick-Kendrick R. The biology and control of phlebotomine sand flies. Clin Dermatol. 1999;17:279–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. França-Silva JC, Barata RA, Da Costa RT, Monteiro ÉM, Machado-Coelho GLL, Vieira EP, et al. Importance of Lutzomyia longipalpis in the dynamics of transmission of canine visceral leishmaniasis in the endemic area of Porteirinha municipality, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Vet Parasitol. 2005;131:213–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Michalsky ÉM, França-Silva JC, Barata RA, Silva FOL, Loureiro AMF, Fortes-Dias CL, et al. Phlebotominae distribution in Janaúba, an area of transmission for visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104:56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dias ES, Regina-Silva S, França-Silva JC, Paz GF, Michalsky ÉM, Araújo SC, et al. Eco-epidemiology of visceral leishmaniasis in the urban area of Paracatu, state of Minas Gerais. Brazil Vet Parasitol. 2011;176:101–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brazil RP. The dispersion of Lutzomyia longipalpis in urban areas. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2013;46:263–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Courtenay O, Quinnell RJ, Garcez LM, Shaw JJ, Dye C. Infectiousness in a cohort of Brazilian dogs: why culling fails to control visceral leishmaniasis in areas of high transmission. J Infect Dis. 2002;186:1314–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Romero GAS, Boelaert M. Control of visceral leishmaniasis in latin America—a systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e584.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gassel M, Wolf C, Noack S, Williams H, Ilg T. The novel isoxazoline ectoparasiticide fluralaner: selective inhibition of arthropod γ-aminobutyric acid- and l-glutamate-gated chloride channels and insecticidal/acaricidal activity. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;45:111–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Letendre L, Huang R, Kvaternick V, Harriman J, Drag M, Soll M. The intravenous and oral pharmacokinetics of afoxolaner used as a monthly chewable antiparasitic for dogs. Vet Parasitol. 2014;201:190–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shoop WL, Hartline EJ, Gould BR, Waddell ME, McDowell RG, Kinney JB, et al. Discovery and mode of action of afoxolaner, a new isoxazoline parasiticide for dogs. Vet Parasitol. 2014;201:179–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rohdich N, Roepke RK, Zschiesche E. A randomized, blinded, controlled and multi-centered field study comparing the efficacy and safety of Bravecto™ (fluralaner) against Frontline (fipronil) in flea- and tick-infested dogs. Parasites Vectors. 2014;7:83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Taenzler J, Wengenmayer C, Williams H, Fourie J, Zschiesche E, Roepke RK, et al. Onset of activity of fluralaner (BravectoTM) against Ctenocephalides felis on dogs. Parasites Vectors. 2014;7:1–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fourie JJ, Liebenberg JE, Horak IG, Taenzler J, Heckeroth AR, Frénais R. Efficacy of orally administered fluralaner (Bravecto™) or topically applied imidacloprid/moxidectin (Advocate®) against generalized demodicosis in dogs. Parasites Vectors. 2015;8:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kilp S, Ramirez D, Allan MJ, Roepke RK, Nuernberger MC. Pharmacokinetics of fluralaner in dogs following a single oral or intravenous administration. Parasites Vectors. 2014;7:85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Walther FM, Allan MJ, Roepke RK, Nuernberger MC. Safety of fluralaner chewable tablets (BravectoTM), a novel systemic antiparasitic drug, in dogs after oral administration. Parasites Vectors. 2014;7:87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ozoe Y, Asahi M, Ozoe F, Nakahira K, Mita T. The antiparasitic isoxazoline A1443 is a potent blocker of insect ligand-gated chloride channels. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;391:744–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Loza A, Talaga A, Herbas G, Canaviri RJ, Cahuasiri T, Luck L, et al. Systemic insecticide treatment of the canine reservoir of Trypanosoma cruzi induces high levels of lethality in Triatoma infestans, a principal vector of Chagas disease. Parasites Vectors. 2017;10:344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gomez SA, Lucientes J, Castillo JA, Peris MP, Delacour S, Ortega P, et al. A randomized, blinded, controlled trial to assess sand fly mortality of fluralaner administered orally in dogs. Parasites Vectors. 2018;11:627.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gomez SA, Curdi JL, Hernandez JAC, Peris PP, Gil AE, Velasquez RVO, et al. Phlebotomine mortality effect of systemic insecticides administered to dogs. Parasites Vectors. 2018;11:230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bongiorno G, Meyer L, Evans A, Lekouch N, Bianchi R, Khoury C, et al. A single oral dose of fluralaner (Bravecto®) in dogs rapidly kills 100% of blood-fed Phlebotomus perniciosus, a main visceral leishmaniasis vector, for at least 1 month after treatment. Med Vet Entomol. 2019;34:240–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Volf P, Volfova V. Establishment and maintenance of sand fly colonies. J Vector Ecol. 2011;36:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Abbott WS. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol. 1925;18:265–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sacks DL, Perkins PV. Identification of an infective stage of Leishmania promastigotes. Science. 1984;223:1417–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Abbasi I, Cunio R, Warburg A. Identification of blood meals imbibed by phlebotomine sand flies using cytochrome b PCR and reverse line blotting. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2009;9:79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Daba S, Daba A, Shehata MG, El Sawaf BM. A simple micro-assay method for estimating blood meal size of the sand fly, Phlebotomus langeroni (Diptera: Psychodidae). J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2004;34:173–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Williams H, Demeler J, Taenzler J, Roepke RKA, Zschiesche E, Heckeroth AR. A quantitative evaluation of the extent of fluralaner uptake by ticks (Ixodes ricinus, Ixodes scapularis) in fluralaner (BravectoTM) treated vs untreated dogs using the parameters tick weight and coxal index. Parasites Vectors. 2015;8:352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP). CVMP assessment report for Bravecto (EMEA/V/C/002526/0000). London: European Medicine Agency. 2014.

  35. Pfister K, Armstrong R. Systemically and cutaneously distributed ectoparasiticides: a review of the efficacy against ticks and fleas on dogs. Parasites Vectors. 2016;9:436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Marcos Horacio, Nelder Gontijo and César Nonato from the Laboratory of Physiology of Hematophagous Insects of the Federal University of Minas Gerais, who kindly provided the eggs to start our own sand fly colony and the experiments.

Funding

This work was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (Edital Universal—Grant No. 409271/2018-7) and financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior–Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001. The authors (PMMG and MSLN) receive a scientific productivity scholarship from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). The author TBDQ received a doctoral scholarship from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior–Brasil (CAPES).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

    Tamyres Bernadete Dantas Queiroga & Vicente Toscano de Araújo Neto

  2. Graduate Program in Parasitary Biology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

    Henrique Rafael Pontes Ferreira, Wilo Victor dos Santos & Ana Beatriz Lourenço de Assis

  3. Department of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

    Antônia Cláudia Jácome da Câmara

  4. Zoonoses Control Center, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

    João Ciro Fagundes Neto

  5. Canis and Catus Veterinary Clinic, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

    Romeika Karla dos Reis

  6. Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

    Manuela Sales Lima Nascimento, Renata Antonaci Gama & Paulo Marcos Matta Guedes

Authors
  1. Tamyres Bernadete Dantas Queiroga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Henrique Rafael Pontes Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wilo Victor dos Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ana Beatriz Lourenço de Assis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vicente Toscano de Araújo Neto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Antônia Cláudia Jácome da Câmara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. João Ciro Fagundes Neto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Romeika Karla dos Reis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Manuela Sales Lima Nascimento
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Renata Antonaci Gama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Paulo Marcos Matta Guedes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TBDQ, RAG, ACJM and PMMG designed the study protocol. HRPF and ABLA cared for the sand fly colony. TBDQ, WVS, JCFN, VTAN and RKRL performed the sand fly feeding assays. TBDQ and HRPF observed sand fly mortality. TBDQ and RAG performed the statistical analysis. TBDQ, MSLN and PMMG were the main contributors to the writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Marcos Matta Guedes.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte and Zoonoses Control Center, Natal, Brazil. All experimental protocols were performed according to the Brazilian National Animal Care Ethical Council and the Ethics Committee on Animal Use of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte under protocol number 136.061/2018.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Lutzomyia longipalpis mortality (%) after blood meal (determined up to 120 h after blood meal) on fluralaner (Bravecto®)-treated dogs for up to 12 months post-treatment.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Queiroga, T.B.D., Ferreira, H.R.P., dos Santos, W.V. et al. Fluralaner (Bravecto®) induces long-term mortality of Lutzomyia longipalpis after a blood meal in treated dogs. Parasites Vectors 13, 609 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04489-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04489-1

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us