Skip to main content

Phlebotomine sand fly survey in the Republic of Moldova: species composition, distribution and host preferences

Abstract

Background

Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodiae) in the Republic of Moldova have been understudied for decades. Our study provides a first update on their occurrence, species composition and bloodmeal sources after 50 years.

Methods

During 5 seasons (2013–2017), 58 localities from 20 regions were surveyed for presence of sand flies using CDC light traps and manual aspirators. Species identification was done by a combination of morphological and molecular approaches (DNA barcoding, MALDI-TOF MS protein profiling). In engorged females, host blood was identified by three molecular techniques (RFLP, cytb sequencing and MALDI-TOF peptide mass mapping). Population structure of most abundant species was studied by cox1 haplotyping; phylogenetic analyses of ITS2 and cox1 genetic markers were used to resolve relationships of other detected species.

Results

In total, 793 sand flies were collected at 30 (51.7%) localities from 12 regions of Moldova. Three species were identified by an integrative morphological and molecular approach: Phlebotomus papatasi, P. perfiliewi and Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius), the first being the most abundant and widespread, markedly anthropophilic based on bloodmeal analyses, occurring also indoors and showing low population structure with only five haplotypes of cox1 detected. Distinct morphological and molecular characters of Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) specimens suggest the presence of a yet undescribed species.

Conclusions

Our study revealed the presence of stable sand fly populations of three species in Moldova that represent a biting nuisance as well as a potential threat of pathogen transmission and shall be further studied.

Graphical abstract

Background

Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) are vectors of several pathogens including parasitic protozoans of the genus Leishmania and phleboviruses and thus of great importance in human and veterinary medicine [35]. In Europe, they are incriminated in Leishmania transmission, which occurs mostly in the Mediterranean countries where L. infantum, transmitted by several species of the subgenus Larroussius, is well established and where two other Leishmania species, L. donovani and L. tropica, have recently re-emerged [2]. However, potential expansion of sand flies due to climatic and environmental changes into regions where they were not previously established is expected in the near future [36], posing a risk of Leishmania introduction into non-endemic areas [47]. Recently, permanent sand fly populations were recorded in several countries north of their traditional distribution [38, 43], and the knowledge of sand fly fauna in long-time understudied regions like ex-Yugoslavia countries [14] and Romania [5] was significantly updated, further demonstrating the importance of entomological field research at the edge of their occurrence.

Moldova is considered a country non-endemic for leishmaniasis; there are no records of autochthonous human or canine cases [37]. In the past, presence of three Phlebotomus species was reported: P. papatasi (Scopoli), P. perfiliewi Parrot and P. chinensis Newstead [41, 42, 45]. However, the historical studies provided scarce information about their abundance and geographical distribution within the country, and there has been no update regarding species composition, spatial distribution and bloodmeal preferences of sand flies in Moldova since then. After several decades, increasing biting nuisance reported by residents from southern Moldova since 2011 initiated this study, which presents first data to our knowledge on sand flies in Moldova after 50 years.

Methods

Sand fly sampling

A countrywide field survey was conducted to assess the presence of sand flies at 58 localities from 20 regions between 2013 and 2017. Initially, field surveys were conducted at a rural locality in southern Moldova (July 2013, August 2014 and June–September 2015) and an urban area in central Moldova (July–September 2013) using miniature Centre for Disease Control (CDC) light traps (John W. Hock Company, model 512, Gainesville, Florida, USA) and manual aspirators (Additional file 1: Table S1). In 2015, two CDC light traps were operated on the same sites close to an animal shelter between June 22 and September 26, 2015. Cross-sectional entomological surveys were then conducted between 2016 and 2017. A total of 55 localities from 16 regions were surveyed in 2016 and 10 localities from 9 regions in 2017 (Fig. 1a). Sampling was performed using CDC light traps (Trappola per Monitoraggio Zanzare, IMT Original 2002, Italy) baited with CO2 (dry ice) and placed inside or outside of the animal shelters (livestock sheds, hen houses, dog kennels) (Fig. 1b). They were used overnight in the places protected from wind exposure. Entomological collections were complemented by mouth aspirators inside the houses and animal shelters. Mouth aspirators were also used within human dwellings and animal shelters. Each collecting site was numbered and mapped using a global positioning system (GPS). Ceadir-Lunga, a rural locality in southern Moldova, was selected for seasonal sand fly collections in 2015 and 2017 using CDC traps and manual aspirators (WGS84 coordinates: 46.06549 N, 28.84219 E). Two CDC light traps operated on two permanent sites in Ceadir-Lunga close to two poultry houses between June 22 and September 26, 2015. Each site was sampled 2–3 times per week; number of performed samplings was reduced to once per week in case of rain. Collection by manual aspirators inside houses (n = 13) and animal shelters (n = 14) was conducted several times per week between June 26 and September 14, 2015. Every time one house and/or one animal shelter was visited. In 2017, two CDC light traps operated every week on the permanent sites between July 6 and September 25. Additionally, sand flies were collected manually inside a chicken coop and a house (July 30–31, 2017).

Fig. 1
figure1

Sand fly collection localities and sites in the Republic of Moldova. a Map showing the sand fly collection locations. Settlements located close to each other marked under a same number (dots 5, 9, 14, 19, 25, 31, 44, 46 represent two localities). Black dots: positive sampling localities; white dots: negative sampling localities. b Sampling sites in rural localities of the study area

Morphological identification of sand flies

The collected insects were killed by freezing in dry ice and preserved in 70 or 96% molecular grade ethanol. For morphological identification, head and genitalia of each specimen were dissected and mounted on slides using CMCP-10 high viscosity mounting medium (Polysciences, Hirschberg, Germany) or Berlese mounting medium, and the rest of the body was stored in ethanol for molecular analyses. Species identification was based on decisive morphological characters using published keys and descriptions [32, 40]. For specimens belonging to the subgenus Adlerius, morphometric measurements of decisive characters on head and genitalia were done using a light microscope Olympus BX51 (Olympus Life Science, Waltham, USA) with a camera system Olympus D70. Morphological characters were measured using the QuickPHOTO MICRO 3.0 software (Promicra, Prague, Czech Republic) and compared with previously published values [3, 13].

Molecular taxonomy of sand flies

The remaining body parts of sand flies were stored in 96% ethanol for DNA extraction that was done using High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche Life Science, Penzberg, Germany). Species identity of selected sand fly specimens was further assessed by amplification of cytochrome oxidase I (cox1) of mtDNA region using LCO/HCO primer pair or amplification of the second internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) using the primer pair JTS3/C1a following the protocols published by Folmer et al. [17] and Depaquit et al. [7], respectively. Relevant molecular markers were chosen for analyzed species depending on the availability of reference sequences, beside cox1, which is widely used as a universal DNA barcoding primer for sand flies [6]. ITS2 was used for P. perfiliewi as it was deployed in the previous study of P. perfiliewi complex [9]. PCR products were purified using a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and directly sequenced in both directions using the same primers used for DNA amplification. Sequences were edited and aligned using the BioEdit (v.7.0.9) [22] alignment editor.

Statistical parsimony network analysis implemented in TCS method has been frequently used for revealing the genetic divergence at the intraspecific level. This method has also been proven as a robust and practical way for species delimitation in several taxa [23]. Using a nucleotide data set, this method calculates the maximum number of mutational steps to link the haplotypes in a parsimonious way with 95% probability. Thus, the DNA sequences of haplotypes belonging to the same species are grouped in a single network, while the DNA sequences of haplotypes representing different species are grouped in separate networks. Cox1 sequences obtained for P. papatasi were compared with those available in GenBank using BLAST algorithm to confirm species identification. Haplotype network for 36 P. papatasi specimens collected at 20 different localities (Additional file 2: Table S2) was constructed by PopArt [31, 30] using TCS method. The position of collected P. perfiliewi specimens within the species complex Phlebotomus perfiliewi (s.l.) was assessed by sequencing analysis of ITS2 for six specimens and comparison with sequences available in GenBank. Cox1 sequences obtained for Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) from Moldova and the sequences available for the other members of the subgenus in GenBank were analyzed together to construct a neighbor joining tree based on the Kimura's two parameter (K2P) substitution model in MEGA v.6.0 [46]. Relationship between the members of Adlerius subgenus was further evaluated by constructing parsimony networks using TCS method in PopArt.

Identification of sand flies using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry

Sample preparation and analysis by MALDI-TOF MS protein profiling followed a protocol optimized for sand flies [12]. In total, 20 specimens (10 collected in 2016, 10 collected in 2017) were analyzed. Thoraxes of dissected specimens were homogenized by a manual BioVortexer homogenizer (BioSpec, Bartlesville, USA) with sterile disposable pestles in 10 μl of 25% formic acid and briefly centrifuged at 10,000g for 15 s. Two microliters of the homogenate was mixed with 2 µl of freshly prepared MALDI matrix, which was an aqueous 60% acetonitrile/0.3% TFA solution of sinapinic acid (30 mg/ml, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). One microliter of the mixture was then spotted on a steel MALDI plate in duplicate. Protein mass spectra were measured in a mass range of 4–25 kDa on an Ultraflex III MALDI-TOF spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) as a sum of 2000 laser shots (20 × 100 shots from different positions of the sample spot) and analyzed by FlexAnalysis 3.4 software. For species identification and cluster analysis, the protein profiles were processed using MALDI Biotyper 3.1 and compared with reference spectra of an in-house database constructed using protein spectra of 25 different sand fly species. For MSP dendrogram creation, an individual main spectrum (MSP) was generated from each analyzed spectrum.

Bloodmeal analysis

Bloodmeals of engorged females, all identified as P. papatasi and captured in 11 different villages mainly by manual aspirators, were analyzed by three molecular approaches, using two DNA-based techniques and a mass spectrometry approach. For morphological species identification, specimens were dissected and mounted on slides, and for molecular techniques, abdomens containing host blood were used. When morphological identification was not conclusive, species identification was further confirmed by MALDI-TOF MS protein profiling using remaining thoraxes of analyzed specimens. Additional file 3: Table S3 summarizes details about all engorged females analyzed for identification of blood origin, providing information about trapping methods, localization of the traps, potential hosts available at the trapping sites and methods applied to identify the bloodmeals.

Bloodmeals of engorged females collected in 2016, all identified as P. papatasi, were analyzed by combination of RFLP assay by HaeIII and HinfI restriction enzymes and sequencing of cytochrome B (cyt b). In total, 100 bloodfed females were analyzed, originating from 10 of the surveyed localities. These females were collected mostly indoors, inside either human dwellings (91 specimens) or hen houses (5 specimens); four specimens were collected by a trap placed outside an animal shelter. A 359-bp fragment of vertebrate cyt b gene was amplified using the modified vertebrate-universal specific primers cyt bb1/cyt bb2 [29, 34]. PCR amplification was performed as described by González et al. [19], using water instead of DNA template as a negative control to exclude contamination by the reagents. The PCR product was purified by QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN), and 15 µl was digested by 1 µl of the enzyme HaeIII or HinfI (New England Biolabs) at 37 °C for 20 min in 50 µl of total solution according to a protocol of the producer. Digested product was separated on 2% agarose gel and observed under UV light. For a proportion of randomly chosen specimens, the purified amplicons were sequenced in both directions using the same primers, cyt bb1/cyt bb2, to confirm the bloodmeal identification by RFLP.

Bloodmeals of 25 chosen engorged females collected in 2016 (8 specimens) and 2017 (17 specimens) at 4 localities (Ceadir Lunga, Corjova, Malaesti Noi and Slobozia Mare), all identified by morphology as P. papatasi, were analyzed by peptide mass mapping of host-specific hemoglobin peptides using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry as described by Hlavackova et al. [24]. From dissected specimens, thoraxes were stored for confirmation of species identification by MALDI-TOF MS protein profiling, and abdomens were homogenized in 50 μl of distilled water (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) by BioVortexer homogenizer (BioSpec); 10 μl of the homogenate was then incubated with 10 μl of 50 mM N-ethylmorpholine acetate buffer (pH 8.1; Sigma-Aldrich) and 100 ng of trypsin (Promega) at 37˚C for 30 min. After the digestion, 0.5 μl of the mixture was deposited on a MALDI plate in duplicate, air-dried and overlaid with 0.5 μl of MALDI matrix (aqueous 50% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA solution of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid; 5 mg/ml; Bruker Daltonics). Peptide mass mapping spectra were acquired on an Ultraflex III MALDI-TOF instrument in the mass range of 700–4000 Da and calibrated externally using a peptide standard PepMix II (Bruker Daltonics). At least two peptides per sample were selected for MS/MS sequencing using LIFT technology. MS/MS data were searched against the SwissProt database subset of vertebrate proteins using in-house MASCOT 2.1 search engine (Matrix Science).

Results

Entomological survey

In total, 151 sites from 58 localities were sampled using CDC traps and manual aspirators, of which 65 (43.0%) sites were positive for sand flies (Additional file 1: Table S1). A total of 793 sand flies (34.2% males) were collected and identified between 2013 and 2017 from 30 (51.7%) localities belonged to 12 regions of Moldova (Fig. 1a).

Overall, 66.9% (534/793) of specimens were collected by manual aspirators from 31 sites belonging to 21 villages, inside the houses (381 specimens, 26 sites) and animal shelters (153 specimens, 5 sites) (Fig. 1b). Three sand fly species of the genus Phlebotomus were identified based on their morphological characters as described later: P. papatasi, P. perfiliewi and Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius). The most abundant species was P. papatasi (n = 754/793; 265 males, 489 females), followed by Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) (n = 20; 3 males, 17 females) and P. perfiliewi (n = 19; 4 males, 15 females). P. papatasi was the most widely distributed species, present in 48.3% (n = 28) of all sampled localities and 41.7% (n = 65) of all collected sites from ten regions in Moldova. During the entomological surveys, the species was present in high numbers inside the hen houses and human dwellings located in central and southern Moldova. Overall, 71.9% (n = 542) of P. papatasi specimens were collected by manual aspirators inside the buildings. Phlebotomus perfiliewi was present in 13.8% (n = 8) of all sampled localities and 6.6% (n = 10) of all sites, located in six regions of the country. This species was sampled only by CDC light traps with or without dry ice, placed inside or outside the animal shelters with the potential animal hosts represented mainly by goats, poultry and dogs. Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) specimens were collected from 10.3% (n = 6) of all inspected localities belonged to four regions. This taxon was sampled mainly by CDC light traps; only two females were captured by manual aspirator inside a hen house and one male was collected inside the house.

A total of 225 and 47 sand flies were sampled in 2015 and 2017, respectively, in the locality Ceadir-Lunga. In total, 18 specimens of all three species were trapped using CDC traps between June 22 and September 26, 2015: P. papatasi (4 males, 5 females), P. perfiliewi (4 females) and Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) (5 females). First specimens were trapped in mid-July and last in mid-August. Collection by manual aspirators inside houses and animal shelters between June 26 and September 14, 2015, yielded 207 sand flies (140 specimens in the houses and 67 specimens in animal shelters). The highest number of sand flies (n = 160) of two species was collected in July in hen houses: P. papatasi (49 males, 108 females) and Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) (1 male, 2 females). Indoor sand fly activity was markedly longer, first specimens being collected at first aspiration in June 24 and last in September 14 which was the last day of collections by aspirators.

In 2017, a total of 18 sand flies were collected by two CDC traps, operated on the permanent sites between July 6 and September 25. The majority of specimens (n = 10) belonged to P. papatasi (3 males, 3 females), Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) (3 females) and P. perfiliewi (1 female) was collected in July. Seven sand fly specimens of two species [4 males of P. papatasi and 3 females of Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius)] were sampled in August and one specimen (P. papatasi male) in September 2017. Manual collection of sand flies inside a chicken coop and a house (July 30–31, 2017) provided additional 29 P. papatasi specimens (12 males, 17 females). Numbers of specimens trapped by the CDC traps during the course of active sand fly season in 2015 and 2017, respectively, are shown on graphs in Additional file 6: Figure S2.

Morphological species identification

Specimens of the subgenera Phlebotomus and Larroussius were all identified based on morphological characters on their head (pharyngeal armature) and genitalia (spermathecas of females, morphology of external terminalia of males) as Phlebotomus papatasi and P. perfiliewi, respectively. For Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) specimens, decisive morphological characters were compared with previously published values of described species within the subgenus, especially four species previously reported from Europe: Phlebotomus balcanicus, P. creticus, P. longiductus and P. simici (Table 1). Three analyzed males had markedly longer flagellomere 3 (A3) and labrum than the European species with P. chinensis and P. longiductus having the closest values of the remaining Adlerius species. Length of appendices on the external genitalia (coxite, style, parameral sheath) varied but did not match any of the Adlerius species completely; the number of coxite hairs was lower than for P. balcanicus and higher than for P. simici and P. chinensis. In 15 analyzed females, the length of A3 exceeded all that of Adlerius species except for P. longiductus, which also has a similar morphology of the pharyngeal armature (Fig. 2).

Table 1 Mean values obtained for the descriptive morphological characters for 3 males (A) and 15 females (B) of Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) in Moldova compared with other Adlerius species reviewed in Artemiev [3] and newly described P. creticus [13]
Fig. 2
figure2

Morphology of Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) specimens from Moldova: a pharyngeal armature of a female (LCE6), b parameral sheaths of a male (LMG2), c male coxite with a field of hairs (LMG2)

Species identification by molecular techniques

DNA barcoding by cox1 of 36 randomly selected P. papatasi specimens provided an alignment 602 bp long, showing presence of five unique haplotypes at the sampling localities. Obtained sequences of all specimens morphologically identified as P. papatasi confirmed the species identification when compared with sequences from GenBank using BLAST algorithm (99.46%–100% identity). Statistical parsimony analysis placed five haplotypes into a single network. Two haplotypes (hap1 and hap2) are dominant and present at most of surveyed localities, while the other three (hap3, hap4 and hap5) have a restricted occurrence, two of them unique at a single locality, Malaesti and Crihana Veche, respectively. Among these five haplotypes, only five polymorphic positions were found (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Haplotype network constructed for 36 P. papatasi specimens collected from different regions of Moldova. The relative frequency of haplotypes was reflected by the size of the circle, and dashes represent the mutational steps

All six analyzed P. perfiliewi specimens provided identical sequences of ITS2, and a neighbor joining analysis with sequences of P. perfiliewi species complex available from GenBank placed them in a lineage of P. perfiliewi (s.s.) with populations from Greece and Ukraine.

The final alignment of the 12 cox1 sequences obtained for the Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) specimens collected from Moldova was 547 bp long. All the Moldovan Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) specimens were revealed to belong to the same species as they clustered together in the NJ tree and to have diverged from the rest of the Adlerius species included in the analysis (mean K2P distance: 6.5%–16.7%). The clade comprised P. longiductus from China, Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) from Moldova and P. chinensis from China, which was divided into three well-supported (100% bootstrap values) lineages (Fig. 4). Concordantly, the mean K2P distances between Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) from Moldova and P. chinensis and P. longiductus from China were higher (13.4% and 6.5%, respectively) than those yielded between some species pairs within the subgenus Adlerius (Additional file 4: Table S4). Supporting these results, TCS identified three independent networks for these three taxa. The first network included only the five Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) haplotypes from Moldova, while the second and third networks comprised P. longiductus (n = 2) and P. chinensis (n = 5) haplotypes from China, respectively. With a 95% connection limit, 32 mutational steps were required to connect Moldovan Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) to P. longiductus and 64 mutational steps to connect Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) from Moldova to P. chinensis (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure4

Neighbor joining dendrogram based on cox1 sequences showing relations among Adlerius species

Fig. 5
figure5

Haplotype networks constructed for 12 Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) specimens from Moldova, six P. chinensis specimens from China (GenBank Accession numbers: KF137543, KF137546–KF137550) and three P. longiductus specimens from China (GenBank Accession numbers: KF137551–KF137553). The relative frequency of haplotypes is reflected by the size of the circle; missing haplotypes are illustrated by the small circles, and dashes represent the mutational steps

The NJ tree clearly showed that the recently identified P. creticus [13] is highly diverged from Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) from Moldova (mean K2P distance = 12.3%), clustering together with P. balcanicus sequences from Romania and Serbia. This group was placed as a sister taxon to P. balcanicus from Turkey (Fig. 4). The mean K2P distance between P. creticus and P. balcanicus from Romania and Serbia was lower (1.8%) than the one yielded between P. creticus and P. balcanicus from Turkey (4.5%) (Additional file 4: Table S4). These results were in concordance with the TCS results, which grouped P. creticus and P. balcanicus from Romania and Serbia in one network and constructed an independent network for P. balcanicus from Turkey (Additional file 5: Figure S1). P. simici specimens originated from Austria and Greece were clustered together, while Turkish and Israeli P. simici sequences were placed in a distinct lineage in the NJ tree, with high bootstrap support (> 95.0%). Rest of the taxa classified in the subgenus Adlerius were each represented by a single lineage (Fig. 4).

MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric protein profiling

Species identification of chosen specimens from collections performed in 2016 and 2017 was confirmed by MALDI-TOF MS protein profiling. Of 20 analyzed, all except two produced intense, species-specific protein profiles of high quality.

Of material collected in 2016, protein profiles of four specimens originating from two localities (Balabanesti and Ciopleni) identified by morphology as Phlebotomus papatasi indeed matched with protein profiles of this species in the reference database with a log score value (LSV) > 2.0, which is accepted as the unambiguous assignment. Similarly, four specimens identified by morphology as P. perfiliewi (1 male and 1 female from Braniste, 2 females from Balabanesti) produced spectra similar to P. perfiliewi in the reference database with LSV > 2.0 and thus were conclusively identified as this species. Protein spectra of one male and one female of Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) originating from Magdacesti and Balabanesti, respectively, showed differences from spectra of all Adlerius species represented in the reference database (P. arabicus, P. balcanicus, P. creticus, P. halepensis, P. simici), indicating that Moldovan specimens represent another species within the subgenus Adlerius.

Of material collected in 2017, most effort was therefore focused on the further analysis of Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius). Seven of ten analyzed specimens (1 male from Corten, 6 females from Ceadir-Lunga) produced identical protein profiles similar to those collected in 2016. In addition, protein profiles of one male of P. papatasi (locality Ceadir-Lunga) and two females of P. perfiliewi (locality Ceadir-Lunga and Slobozia Mare) were obtained, all similar with protein spectra of respective species obtained in the previous season.

Specimens of three recorded species that belong to different subgenera of the genus Phlebotomus produced reproducible, distinctive and substantially different protein spectra (Fig. 6a), enabling rapid and conclusive species identification. No differences in the protein spectra of specimens from different localities were observed. The dendrogram constructed based on protein spectra of all 20 analyzed specimens shows clear clustering corresponding to these three species (Fig. 6b). It also demonstrates that two specimens with spectra of compromised quality [LCE01, a P. perfiliewi female from Ceadir-Lunga, and LCU01, a Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) male from Corten, both collected in 2017] were successfully and correctly identified, albeit positioned on long branches that reflect the lower quality of their spectra. Protein spectra of collected Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) specimens were compared with protein profiles of three species of the subgenus Adlerius recently known to occur in Europe: Phlebotomus balcanicus and P. simici from an entomological survey in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Northern Macedonia [14] and newly described P. creticus from Crete [13]. Figure 7 shows that specimens of all four species grouped in their own distinct clades, Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) forming a sister cluster with P. simici from Northern Macedonia.

Fig. 6
figure6

MALDI-TOF MS protein profiling of sand fly species in Moldova. a MALDI-TOF mass spectra of three typical Moldovan sand fly species. Zoomed mass range of 4–14 kDa is shown. b Cluster analysis of MALDI-TOF MS protein profiles of 20 sand fly specimens collected in Moldova. Distances in the dendrogram are displayed in relative units

Fig. 7
figure7

Dendrogram comparing MALDI-TOF mass spectra of Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) from Moldova and three other European members of the subgenus Adlerius (Bosnia and Herzegovina: specimen codes BC, Montenegro: specimen codes MO, Northern Macedonia: specimen codes FVA and FSE, Greece: specimen codes CrX). Distances are displayed in relative units

Bloodmeal analysis of engorged females

A total of 100 engorged P. papatasi females were captured in 10 villages in 2016. Analysis of bloodmeal sources by RFLP assay on a part of vertebrate cyt b gene provided human restriction patterns in 98 specimens: 91 females collected inside human dwellings by aspirators, 4 females trapped by a CO2-baited CDC trap outside an animal shelter with rabbits and poultry and 3 engorged females trapped inside hen houses with poultry. Two specimens collected inside a hen house provided a restriction pattern of chickens (Gallus gallus). Sequencing analysis of cyt b amplicons from 2 specimens tested as feeding on chickens and from 20 randomly chosen specimens originating from different localities confirmed all host identifications revealed by RFLP.

MALDI-TOF peptide mass mapping analysis of bloodfed females included specimens collected in 2016 (8 specimens previously analyzed by RFLP and cyt b gene sequencing as described above) and 2017 (17 specimens), providing distinct host peptide maps for 22 of 25 analyzed females. All successfully analyzed specimens displayed 8–16 signals of host-specific alpha- and beta-hemoglobin peptides, except one female with fewer host peptides, which nevertheless still enabled a conclusive identification of the blood source (Additional file 3: Table S3). The sequencing of the peptide fragments by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) and subsequent database searching provided amino acid sequences of these host peptides and assigned the following blood origin: 6 chickens (Gallus gallus) in samples from Slobozia Mare, 2 humans from Corjova, 3 humans from Malaesti Noi, 3 humans and 8 chickens from Ceadir-Lunga. In samples collected in 2016, 7 of 8 analyzed specimens successfully provided host peptide maps, confirming all identifications of 5 human bloodmeals (2 from human dwellings and 3 from animal shelters) and 2 chicken bloodmeals (both from a hen house) as previously revealed by RFLP and cyt b gene sequencing. In samples collected in 2017, identifications were obtained for 15 of 17 analyzed specimens, showing 12 chicken bloodmeals (all from hen houses) and 3 human bloodmeals (1 from human dwelling, 2 from a hen house).

Discussion

This study provides first data on sand fly species composition, spatial distribution and host preferences in Moldova after > 50 years, substantially updating reports that indicated the presence of three species (P. papatasi, P. perfiliewi and P. chinensis) without providing sufficient information about their geographical distribution [41, 42, 45]. Our study confirmed low sand fly species diversity reported in Moldova in the past, reporting presence of three species. For their species identification, an integrative approach was deployed that enables morphological and molecular identification in parallel, utilizing both DNA barcoding as a standard method of molecular typing and MALDI-TOF MS protein profiling, a rapid and cost-effective tool recently emerging as an alternative method for species identification of various organisms including medically important arthropods. It provided 100% correct species determination with most protein profiles of a high quality and stable for specimens collected at different localities and during two consecutive seasons, thus representing a sufficiently robust identification tool. Moreover, correct species determination of few specimens, which provided protein spectra of lower quality, was nevertheless also achieved. These results support the use of this combined taxonomical approach as suitable for processing sand flies collected through field entomological surveys.

Presence of two of three previously detected species in Moldova was confirmed by our sampling, P. papatasi being the most abundant and most widely distributed species. Scarce historical data mentioned low numbers of P. papatasi (5 females and 2 males) in Giurgiulesti village, Cahul region, southern Moldova, in 1946. In 1947, during the papataci fever outbreak in southern Ukraine (Reni region) and southern Moldova (Giurgiulesti), sand fly surveillance revealed the presence of low numbers of P. papatasi in other villages located in Cahul region (Chislita, Colibasi, Vadul lui Isac, Manta, Crihana Veche villages and Cahul town), but no exact numbers were given. Only one P. papatasi male was caught in Chisinau city in 1947 [45]. The Ukrainian sand fly control efforts between 1951 and 1954 focused on treatment of buildings in the villages affected by dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and hexachlorocyclohexane, providing a rapid reduction of sand fly fever morbidity and significant decrease of sand fly densities [20]. Moreover, between 1948–1956, the national malaria eradication programs successfully used the same insecticides to combat the malaria vector Anopheles maculipennis (s.l.) in Moldova. It can be assumed that such widespread use of insecticides led to a decrease of the sand fly densities in Moldovan villages as well. Sand fly surveillance after the antimalaric campaign showed the presence of three sand fly species in four regions (Vulcanesti, Taraclia, Cahul and Ceadir-Lunga) in southern Moldova between 1957 and 1967. In total, 453 sand fly specimens were collected manually inside the buildings at 8 localities during that decade with average number of specimens per building between 0.7 and 5.7 [45]. Our manual collections inside the buildings in the same villages (Giurgiulesti, Slobozia Mare, Colibasi) or villages located close to the historical sampling sites show a higher average number of sand flies inside the buildings (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of historical sand fly collections in the Republic of Moldova (1957–1967) and recent collections (2015–2017)

The presence of sand flies inside the human dwellings and animal shelters was first reported by residents from southern Moldova in 2011 when the local population started suffering from sand fly bites during the summer season. Our entomological surveys revealed the presence of P. papatasi in high numbers inside the human dwellings and hen houses in southern and central Moldova. Between 2013 and 2017, a total of 793 sand flies (34.2% males) were collected and identified from 30 (51.7%) out of 58 localities belonging to 12 regions of Moldova (Fig. 1a) by CDC traps and manual aspirators (Additional file 1: Table S1). The northernmost sites of P. papatasi collections were recorded at latitudes 47° 35ʹ–47° 47ʹ where the species was present in low numbers only in CDC trap collections; the northernmost record of P. papatasi sampling in the 1950s was in the Chisinau city at latitude 47°02' [45].

Comparison of historical records and our recent data shows a higher average number of sand flies inside the buildings, and the biting burden reported by the residents living at sand fly-infested sites indicates an increase of sand fly population in Moldova that probably successfully recovered after ceasing wide-scale applications of insecticides. Moreover, while breeding of livestock in the households was common in the countryside before the 1990s, deterioration of the economic situation led to a reduction of livestock, which was replaced by a large number of backyard poultry in the villages. Perhaps both socioeconomic and environmental changes promoted the increase of P. papatasi densities in the villages.

Continuous trapping in Ceadir-Lunga during the active sand fly season in years 2015 and 2017 showed markedly longer activity of P. papatasi indoors; specimens were collected from first aspirations in the second half of June until last collections in mid-September, suggesting that the actual indoor activity of P. papatasi may have been even longer. On the contrary, first specimens from outdoor trapping were collected in early July, despite earlier trapping efforts. In 2015, no specimens were trapped outdoors after mid-August, and in 2017, outdoor activity ceased by mid-September, despite later trapping efforts (Additional file 6: Figure S2). Low numbers of trapped specimens do not allow drawing robust conclusions regarding the seasonal dynamics, and few data for the species recorded in Moldova are available from other countries of a similar latitude; no information on seasonality was provided by a recent study in Romania [5], and only scant remarks on trapping dates were given by a sand fly survey in Hungary [16]. Recent study of seasonal dynamics of P. mascittii, a species so far not recorded in Moldova, at localities in Styria and Lower Austria of similar or higher latitude showed sand fly activity from early June until end of August, depending on the year and trapping locality [27]. Further effort that will include more localities is needed to better understand the seasonal dynamics of sand fly populations in Moldova.

We applied several methods to determine blood sources of collected bloodfed females of P. papatasi. Bloodmeal analysis of engorged P. papatasi females collected in a 2016 survey by RFLP assay demonstrated their strong anthropophily; 98% of successfully analyzed females were feeding on humans. This finding is not surprising as 91 of 98 females determined to feed on humans were collected by manual aspirators inside the houses. Interestingly, the remaining 7 females with detected human blood were sampled outside an animal shelter with rabbits and poultry (4 specimens) or even inside hen houses with poultry (3 specimens), suggesting that P. papatasi females preferred to feed on humans even when other hosts were available. Moreover, while domestic cats were present at two indoor sampling sites, they were not determined to be a source of blood. Domestic chickens were detected as a second and less frequently utilized host, chicken blood being identified in two females collected inside a hen house. These findings were confirmed by a sequencing analysis of chosen engorged specimens that included also females with alternative blood sources to humans available. Peptide mass mapping using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry was recently introduced as a new and effective tool for bloodmeal identification of hematophagous arthropods [24]. Beside other advantages, this method in general provides very specific identifications in case of human bloodmeals within this study based on MS/MS sequencing of 3–4 unique peptides of human hemoglobins, thus excluding a misidentification induced by human skin debris contamination during the sample preparation, which may blur the results provided by DNA-based methods. With a vast majority of analyzed bloodmeals identified as of human origin, we decided to apply this MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry approach to re-analyze some samples collected in 2016 to exclude a possibility of contamination and analyze all engorged females collected in the following season. It proved to be well applicable, providing 22 identifications of 25 analyzed specimens, confirmed all identifications of human and chicken blood previously revealed by RFLP and cyt b gene sequencing among samples from 2016 and identified 12 chicken bloodmeals and 3 human bloodmeals among samples from 2017. In conclusion, bloodmeal analyses of engorged females confirmed both humans and chickens as hosts of bloodfeeding sand fly females, emphasizing the apparent tight trophic connection of P. papatasi with human dwellings. Our observations support the notion that this species is an opportunistic feeder with host preferences varying according to the availability and abundance of the blood sources but strongly anthropophilic when feeding close to or even inside human dwellings. A vast majority of females feeding on humans may be also partially explained by the absence of other domestic animals (sheep, goats, cattle) at catching sites in Moldova while these hosts were reported as additional blood sources to humans in previously studied foci of P. papatasi in other regions [25, 48]. P. papatasi is a species with markedly wide geographical distribution; however, studies based on several genetic markers showed that various geographical populations are relatively homogeneous and of limited genetic differentiation [8, 15]. More genetic variation was observed mainly among populations geographically separated by prominent natural barriers such as the High Atlas Mountains in Morocco [21]. In our study, P. papatasi collected at various sites in Moldova showed a limited genetic variability in cytochrome oxidase I gene, providing five haplotypes with only five polymorphic sites, suggesting a genetically homogeneous population. With respect to the geography of Moldova and adjacent regions that lack natural barriers of dispersal, we may expect a rather unrestricted gene flow with populations from neighboring countries. The very low mean intraspecific K2P distance (0.02%) obtained for P. papatasi specimens collected from Moldova was comparable with those previously reported from Greece, Cyprus [10] and Turkey (Erisoz Kasap et al. [26]) and further supports the conclusion that Moldovan P. papatasi comprise genetically close populations.

Two other recorded species, P. perfiliewi and Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius), were present sporadically in CDC trap collections inside or outside the animal shelters. Phlebotomus perfiliewi is one of the main vectors of Leishmania infantum in the Mediterranean basin and in Central Asia [35]. It is regarded as a species complex of at least three species; however, recent taxonomic study failed to align their morphological and genetic characters, and sequencing analyses of two chosen markers (ITS2 and cyt B) provided incongruent phylogenies [9]. Unfortunately, cox1 was not used in that study; we therefore decided to deploy ITS2. Sequences obtained from specimens collected in Moldova suggest that they belong to P. perfiliewi (s.s.) and are closely related to populations from Greece and Crimea.

The subgenus Adlerius harbors over 20 described and formally undescribed species, females of which are usually considered indistinguishable morphologically, and their identification is often based on the identification of associated males [1, 3]. Previous historical record of P. chinensis in Moldova is questionable and shall be considered with respect to later evolvement of taxonomy within the subgenus. Phlebotomus chinensis is a species currently understood to occur only in China. In the past, however, this taxonomic designation was applied to sand fly populations from much broader geographical areas, which were later described as new Adlerius species [3]. Morphological analysis of males from Moldova, albeit limited to only three trapped specimens, suggests that they differ from P. chinensis as well as two of three European Adlerius species, P. balcanicus and P. simici, in several characters including number of coxite hairs. This was further confirmed by MALDI-TOF MS protein profiling, which added evidence that also a third European Adlerius species, only recently described P. creticus, provides species-specific protein profiles distinctively different from specimens from Moldova. In a dendrogram derived from their protein spectra (Fig. 7), Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) from Moldova clustered with P. simici while P. creticus formed a sister clade with P. balcanicus. For the cox1 sequences obtained for the Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) (both male and female specimens) from Moldova, the BLAST search revealed these sequences to be 93.78–94.15% identical to P. longiductus from China (GenBank accession numbers: KF137551–KF137553). The NJ analysis placed the Moldovan Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) and P. longiductus in highly diverged lineages (Fig. 4), and the mean K2P distance between these two lineages (6.5%) was comparable to those previously reported for different sand fly species classified in the subgenus Adlerius (Erisoz Kasap et al. [26]). These results are further corroborated by parsimony network analysis which identified two independent networks for these two lineages, suggesting they may represent two different species.

Supporting the sequencing data, both female and male Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) specimens were found to be different from P. longiductus morphologically as described above, although the statistical significance of this difference was not assessed. P. longiductus is widely distributed in China, Central and South Asia, and in the Middle East and has been previously reported from Eastern Europe (reviewed in [35]). Therefore, examination of representative specimens across its range is needed to reveal if these morphological and molecular differences reflect intraspecific geographical variation of local populations or the cryptic speciation within this taxon. The close relationship between P. balcanicus sequences from Eastern Europe (Romania and Serbia) and recently identified P. creticus needs further evaluation as well as the divergence of two lineages within the widely distributed P. simici, which has been recently recorded in Austria, suggesting possible northward spread in Europe [28]. An integrative approach deploying several molecular methods that study both DNA and proteins to complement the traditional morphological “golden standard” was recently successfully applied when describing Phlebotomus creticus, a novel species from the eastern Mediterranean [13], as well as studying sand fly fauna in East Africa [39]. Our findings further advocate its use as a valuable tool that provides better understanding of the taxonomy and biogeography of this morphologically challenging yet medically important sand fly subgenus.

Notably, five species of sand flies were recently reported from Romania [5] and six species are known from Ukraine (except Crimea) [3, 4, 42]. We may speculate that some of the species occurring in these countries may be detected by further entomological surveys also in Moldova, especially when wider surveillance is possible. While this study cannot provide robust data on the seasonality of three detected species, the results obtained in Ceadir-Lunga, a most comprehensively surveyed site located in the south of the country, suggest that sand fly activity indoors may start earlier than outdoors and last until mid-September. Following studies at different localities with sand fly presence will provide full understanding of seasonal sand fly dynamics in Moldova.

Moldova is so far regarded as a non-endemic country for leishmaniasis [37]. In the past, a single officially published imported human case was reported in a 1-year-old child who traveled with his parents from Rustavi, Georgia, to Straseni Region, Moldova, in the spring of 2013 [33]. In the 1980s, a total of 6000 samples of human serum from 28 regions in Moldova were tested for the presence of antibodies to sand fly fever viruses. In the Vulcanesti region (southern Moldova), 7.0% and 10.5% of humans tested were positive for antibodies to sandfly fever Sicilian virus (SFSV) and Neapolitan sandfly fever viruses, respectively [44]. Precise information on the imported/autochthonous human and canine cases of leishmaniasis in Moldova is not available. However, autochthonous cases of canine leishmaniasis have been recently reported in several countries in proximity to Moldova, which are also considered as non-endemic for leishmaniasis, namely Romania [11], Ukraine [18] and Hungary [47]. The Republic of Moldova continues to preserve the traditional rural lifestyle with domestic pets, poultry and cattle in backyard animal shelters, but with limited veterinary care. The presence of two proven vectors of leishmaniasis in the country and favorable environmental conditions may have an impact on the emergence and local transmission of leishmaniasis in Moldova. Intensive and continuous surveillance should be carried out to regularly update the information on sand fly vectors and the presence of Leishmania parasites in potential domestic and wild reservoirs and sand flies.

Conclusions

Three sand fly species of the genus Phlebotomus were identified in the Republic of Moldova based on integrated morphological and molecular approaches. Phlebotomus papatasi was the most widely distributed and abundant species, feeding indoors and strongly anthropophilic as suggested on bloodmeal analyses. Haplotype network analysis showed low structuring of the P. papatasi population with only 5 haplotypes of cox1 with minor differences detected. Two other recorded species, P. perfiliewi and Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius), were present sporadically in CDC trap collections. ITS2 sequences of collected P. perfiliewi specimens identified then as P. perfiliewi (s.s.). Distinct morphological and molecular characters of Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) specimens suggest the presence of yet undescribed species that will be further studied to reveal their relationships with other species within the subgenus and their potential role in pathogen transmission. The presence of two proven vectors of leishmaniasis in the country emphasizes a need for intensive and continuous surveillance to update the information on sand fly populations.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and its additional files, available as Additional file 1: Table S1, Additional file 2: Table S2, Additional file 3: Table S3, Additional file 4: Table S4, Additional file 5: Figure S1. Cox1 sequences obtained during this study were deposited in GenBank database under the accession numbers MZ519855-MZ519866.

References

  1. 1.

    Akhoundi M, Parvizi P, Baghaei A, Depaquit J. The subgenus Adlerius Nitzulescu (Diptera, Psychodidae, Phlebotomus) in Iran. Acta Trop. 2012;122(1):7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.10.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Antoniou M, Gramiccia M, Molina R, Dvorak V, Volf P. The role of indigenous phlebotomine sand flies and mammals in the spreading of leishmaniasis agents in the Mediterranean region. Euro Surveill. 2013;18:54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Artemiev MM. A revision of the sandflies of the subgenus Adlerius (Diptera, Psychodidae, Phlebotomus). Zool Zh. 1980;59:1177–93.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Artemiev MM, Neronov VM. Distribution and ecology of sand flies of the Old World (genus Phlebotomus). Moscow: Institute of Evolution, Morphology and Ecology of Animals; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cazan C, Păstrav IR, Ionică AM, Oguz G, Erisoz Kasap O, Dvorak V, Halada P, Dumitrache MO, Volf P, Alten B, Mihalca AD. Updates on the distribution and diversity of sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Romania. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12(1):247.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Depaquit J. Molecular systematics applied to phlebotomine sandflies: review and perspectives. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;28:744–56.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Depaquit J, Ferté H, Léger N, Lefranc F, Alves-Pires C, Hanafi H, Maroli M, Morillas-Marques F, Rioux JA, Svobodova M, Volf P. ITS2 sequences heterogeneity in Phlebotomus sergenti and Phlebotomus similis (Diptera, Psychodidae): Possible consequences in their ability to transmit Leishmania tropica. Int J Parasitol. 2002;32:1123–1131.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Depaquit J, Lienard E, Verzeaux-Grion A, Ferte H, Bounamous A, Gantier JC, Hanafi HA, Jacobson RL, Maroli M, Moin-Vaziri V, et al. Molecular homogeneity in diverse geographical populations of Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera, Psychodidae) inferred from ND4 mtDNA and ITS2 rDNA Epidemiological consequences. Infect Genet Evol. 2008;8:159–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Depaquit J, Bounamous A, Akhoundi M, Augot D, Sauvage F, Dvorak V, Chaibullinova A, Pesson B, Volf P, Léger N. A taxonomic study of Phlebotomus (Larroussius) perfiliewi s. l. Infect Genet Evol. 2013;20:500–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dokianakis E, Tsirigotakis N, Christodoulou V, Poulakakis N, Antoniou M. Identification of wild-caught phlebotomine sand flies from Crete and Cyprus using DNA barcoding. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Dumitrache MO, Nachum-Biala Y, Gilad M, Mircean V, Cazan CD, Mihalca AD, Baneth G. The quest for canine leishmaniasis in Romania: the presence of an autochthonous focus with subclinical infections in an area where disease occurred. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:297.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dvorak V, Halada P, Hlavackova K, Dokianakis E, Antoniou M, Volf P. Identification of phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Dvorak V, Tsirigotakis N, Pavlou C, Dokianakis E, Akhoundi M, Halada P, Volf P, Depaquit J, Antoniou M. Sand fly fauna of Crete and the description of Phlebotomus (Adlerius) creticus n. sp. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13(1):547.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Dvorak V, Erisoz Kasap O, Ivovic V, Mikov O, Stefanovska J, Martinkovic F, Omeragic J, Pajovic I, Baymak D, Oguz G, Hlavackova K, Gresova M, Gunay F, Vaselek S, Ayhan N, Lestinova T, Cvetkovikj A, Klaric Soldo D, Katerinova I, Tchakarova S, Yılmaz A, Karaoglu B, Risueno Iranzo J, Kadriaj P, Velo E, Ozbel Y, Petric D, Volf P, Alten B. Sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in eight Balkan countries: historical review and region-wide entomological survey. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13(1):573.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Esseghir S, Ready PD, Killick-Kendrick R, Ben-Ismail R. Mitochondrial haplotypes and phylogeography of Phlebotomus vectors of Leishmania major. Insect Mol Biol. 1997;6:211–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Farkas R, Tanczos B, Bongiorno G, Maroli M, Dereure J, Ready P. First surveys to investigate the presence of canine leishmaniasis and its phlebotomine vectors in Hungary. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11(7):823–34.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994;3(5):294–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gavrilova IP, Dragushchenko EO. Lyme borreliosis, ehrlichiosis and leishmaniasis on the territory of Ukraine—danger for human and dog. VetZoo Profy. 2012;6(62):30–4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    González E, Gállego M, Molina R, Abras A, Alcover MM, Ballart C, Fernández A, Jiménez M. Identification of blood meals in field captured sand flies by a PCR-RFLP approach based on cytochrome b gene. Acta Trop. 2015;152:96–102.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gritsai MK, Lavrenko EM, Kolmogorova VV, Yezhkov MA, Berkovich BI, Lekova TH. Sand fly fever and the fight against it in the areas of the former Izmailovo and now the Odessa region. Med Parazit Parazit Bol. 1957;1:71–3.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Guernaoui S, Hamarsheh O, Garcia D, Fontenille D, Sereno D. Population genetics of Phlebotomus papatasi from endemic and nonendemic areas for zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Morocco, as revealed by cytochrome oxidase gene subunit I sequencing. Microorganisms. 2020;8:1010.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hall T. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser. 1999;41:95-8.14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hart MW, Sunday J. Things fall apart: biological species form unconnected parsimony networks. Biol Lett. 2007;3:509–12.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hlavackova K, Dvorak V, Chaskopoulou A, Volf P, Halada P. A novel MALDI-TOF MS-based method for blood meal identification in insect vectors: A proof of concept study on phlebotomine sand flies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(9):e0007669.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Jaouadi K, Bettaieb J, Bennour A, Salem S, Ghawar W, Rjeibi MR, Khabouchi N, Gonzalez JP, Diouani MF, Ben SA. Blood meal analysis of phlebotomine sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) for Leishmania spp. identification and vertebrate blood origin, central Tunisia, 2015–2016. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98:146–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kasap OE, Linton YM, Karakus M, Ozbel Y, Alten B. Revision of the species composition and distribution of Turkish sand flies using DNA barcodes. Parasites Vectors. 2019;12:410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kniha E, Milchram M, Dvorak V, Halada P, Obwaller A, Pöppl W, Mooseder G, Volf P, Walochnik J. Ecology, seasonality and host preferences of Austrian Phlebotomus (Transphlebotomus) Mascittii Grassi, 1908 Populations. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14:291.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kniha E, Dvorak V, Milchram M, Obwaller A, Köhlsler M, Pöppl W, Antoniou M, Chaskopoulou A, Paronyan L, Stefanovski J, Mooseder G, Volf P, Walochnik J. Phlebotomus (Adlerius) simici Nitzulescu, 1931: first record in Austria and phylogenetic relationship with other Adlerius species. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14(1):20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kocher TD, Thomas WK, Meyer A, Edwards SV, Paabo S, Villablanca FX, Wilson AC. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1983;86:6196–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Leigh JW. PopART (Population Analysis with Reticulate Trees); 2015. http://popart.otago.ac.nz/. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.

  31. 31.

    Leigh JW, Bryant D. PopART: full feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol Evol. 2015;6:1110–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lewis DJ. A taxonomic review of the genus Phlebotomus (Diptera: Psychodidae). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Entomol. 1982;45:121–209.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lungu V. Visceral leishmaniasis in the Republic of Moldova. Curierul medical. 2014;57(2):105–8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Malmqvist B, Strasevicius D, Hellgren O, Adler PH, Bensch S. Vertebrate host specificity of wild-caught blackflies revealed by mitochondrial DNA in blood. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2004;271:S152–5.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Maroli M, Feliciangeli MD, Bichaud L, Charrel R, Gradoni L. Phlebotomine sandflies and the spreading of leishmaniases and other diseases of public health concern. Med Vet Entomol. 2013;27(2):123–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Medlock J, Hnasford K, Van Bortel W, Zeller H, Alten B. A summary of the evidence for the change in European distribution of phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) of public health importance. J Vector Ecol. 2014;39(1):72–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Mihalca AD, Cazan CD, Sulesco T, Dumitrache OM. A historical review on vector distribution and epidemiology of human and animal leishmanioses in Eastern Europe. Res Vet Sci. 2019;123:185–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Oerther S, Jöst H, Heitmann A, Lühken R, Krüger A, Steinhausen I, Brinker C, Lorentz S, Marx M, Schmidt-Chanasit J, Naucke T, Becker N. Phlebotomine sand flies in southwest Germany: an update with records in new locations. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13(1):173.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Pareyn M, Dvorak V, Halada P, Van Houtte N, Girma N, de Kesel W, Merdekios B, Massebo F, Leirs H, Volf P. An integrative approach to identify sand fly vectors of leishmaniases in Ethiopia by morphological and molecular techniques. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13(1):580.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Perfiliev PP. Phlebotominae. Jerusalem: Israel Program of Scientific Translations; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Petrishcheva PA. Carriers of pathogens of natural focal diseases. Moscow: MEDGIZ; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Petrishcheva PA. A study of sand flies (fam. Phlebotomidae) in the USSR. Parazitologiya. 1967;1(6):455–64.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Poeppl W, Obwaller A, Weiler M, Burgmann H, Mooseder G, Lorentz S, Rauchenwald F, Aspöck H, Walochnik J, Naucke T. Emergence of sand flies (Phlebotominae) in Austria, a Central European Country. Parasitol Res. 2013;112(12):4231–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Scoferta PG, Yarovoi PI, Proka LI, Stepanova OA. Some results of the study on arboviruses in Moldova. In: Arboviruses, a collection of abstracts of the plenum reports to the All-Union Problem Commission. Tallinn. 11–12 April; 1984. p. 24–5.

  45. 45.

    Sinelschikov VA. Sand flies of southern Moldavia. Paraziti zivotnih i rastenii. 1973;9:226–9.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Tánczos B, Balogh N, Király L, Biksi I, Szeredi L, Gyurkovsky M, et al. First record of autochthonous canine leishmaniasis in Hungary. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012;12:588–94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Yaghoobi-Ershadi M, Javadian E, Kannani A. Host preference pattern of phlebotomine sandflies of Borkhar rural district, Isfahan province. Iran Acta Trop. 1995;60:155–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the owners of the properties where trappings were performed.

Funding

This study was supported by VectorNet, a European network for sharing data on the geographic distribution of arthropod vectors, transmitting human and animal disease agents (contract OC/EFSA/AHAW/2013/02-FWC1) funded by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), the Czech Science Foundation (15-04329S), the European Regional Development Fund (projects BIOCEV CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0109 and CePaViP CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/ 16_019/0000759) and the Institute of Zoology, Republic of Moldova (15.817.02.12F; 20.80009.7007.02).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BA, PV, VD, TȘ: designed the study. TȘ, BA,GO: conducted the field sampling and field data processing. OEK, VD: analyzed DNA sequences. PH, VD, MG: performed MALDI-TOF assays and data analysis. RD: contributed to field data collection and processing. TȘ, VD, OEK: wrote the manuscript. PV, PH, BA: revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatiana Șuleșco.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All individual authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Positive sand fly localities in the Republic of Moldova.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

Information on Phlebotomus papatasi specimens used for haplotype network constructed by PopArt using TCS method.

Additional file 3: Table S3.

Engorged P. papatasi females analyzed for identification of blood origin and indicates which methods were applied.

Additional file 4: Table S4.

cox1 sequence divergence between Phlebotomus sp. (Adlerius) from Moldova and some members of the subgenus Adlerius based on K2P nucleotide substitution model. Intraspecific distances were indicated on the diagonal line.

Additional file 5: Figure S1.

Haplotype networks constructed for P. balcanicus from Romania (GenBank Accession Number: MK425636), Serbia (GenBank Accession Number: MN003380), Turkey (GenBank Accession Numbers: MN086653- MN086654) and P. creticus from Crete (GenBank Accession Numbers: MT501623-MT501638). The relative frequency of haplotypes was reflected by the size of the circle; missing haplotypes were illustrated by the small circles, and dashes represent the mutational steps.

Additional file 6: Figure S2.

Numbers of specimens trapped by the CDC traps during the course of active sand fly season in 2015 and 2017 in Ceadir-Lunga.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Șuleșco, T., Erisoz Kasap, O., Halada, P. et al. Phlebotomine sand fly survey in the Republic of Moldova: species composition, distribution and host preferences. Parasites Vectors 14, 371 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04858-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Phlebotomus
  • Bloodmeal analysis
  • Haplotype network
  • MALDI-TOF MS protein profiling