Skip to main content
Download PDF

Inhibitory effect of naphthoquine phosphate on Babesia gibsoni in vitro and Babesia rodhaini in vivo

Parasites & Vectors volume 15, Article number: 10 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Drug resistance and toxic side effects are major challenges in the treatment of babesiosis. As such, new drugs are needed to combat the emergence of drug resistance in Babesia parasites and to develop alternative treatment strategies. A combination of naphthoquine (NQ) and artemisinin is an antimalarial therapy in pharmaceutical markets. The present study repurposed NQ as a drug for the treatment of babesiosis by evaluating the anti-Babesia activity of naphthoquine phosphate (NQP) alone.

Methods

An in vitro growth inhibition assay of NQP was tested on Babesia gibsoni cultures using a SYBR Green I-based fluorescence assay. In addition, the in vivo growth inhibitory effect of NQP was evaluated using BALB/c mice infected with Babesia rodhaini. The parasitemia level and hematocrit values were monitored to determine the therapeutic efficacy of NQP and the clinical improvements in NQP-treated mice.

Results

The half maximal inhibitory concentration of NQP against B. gibsoni in vitro was 3.3 ± 0.5 μM. Oral administration of NQP for 5 consecutive days at a dose of 40 mg/kg of body weight resulted in significant inhibition of B. rodhaini growth in mice as compared with that of the control group. All NQP-treated mice survived, whereas the mice in the control group died between days 6 and 9 post-infection.

Conclusion

This is the first study to evaluate the anti-Babesia activity of NQP in vitro and in vivo. Our findings suggest that NQP is a promising drug for treating Babesia infections, and drug repurposing may provide new treatment strategies for babesiosis.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Babesiosis is an infectious disease caused by intraerythrocytic parasites of the genus Babesia. More than 100 Babesia species have been identified. The most notable species include Babesia bigemina, B. divergens, and B. bovis for bovine, B. caballi for equine, B. canis and B. gibsoni for canine, and B. microti and B. rodhaini for murine hosts [1]. Moreover, several Babesia species have been reported to infect humans. Because of the wide range of hosts, babesiosis is one of the most ubiquitous infections of free-living animals and is attracting increasing interest as an emerging zoonosis in humans [1]. Parasites replicate in the mammalian host red blood cells (RBCs) and produce clinical symptoms including fever, hemolytic anemia, anorexia, hemoglobinuria, and emaciation, and the severe infection phase often results in death [2]. Current treatment strategies for babesiosis are limited. For instance, imidocarb dipropionate and diminazene aceturate are used for the treatment of animal babesiosis, and atovaquone combined with azithromycin and clindamycin combined with quinine are recommended for the treatment of human babesiosis [3]. However, adverse side effects of imidocarb dipropionate, diminazene aceturate, and quinine, low effectiveness of clindamycin or azithromycin, and the emergence of drug resistance to atovaquone are well documented [4,5,6,7,8,9].

Over the past five decades, cases of human babesiosis have increased in the United States [10]. A review study reported that during the period from 1982 to 1993, 139 hospitalizations occurred due to Babesia infection. Among the patients, 25% required intensive care stays and nine patients died [11]. Moreover, recent surveillance in the USA found that a total of 7612 cases of babesiosis were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from 2011 to 2015. Of 7612 cases, 82.5% were classified by the reporting health jurisdiction as confirmed babesiosis and 17.5% as probable. Among these patients, 7 of 46 deaths were attributed to babesiosis and 4 of 46 deaths were not babesiosis-related, whereas for 35 patients, whether the deaths were due to babesiosis was not verified [12]. Atovaquone combined with azithromycin as the standard therapy for treating human babesiosis has failed in some clinical cases, caused by a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the B. microti cytochrome b gene [5]. In addition, although the atovaquone–azithromycin drug combination is effective on B. gibsoni infections, a recent study found that 8.57% of B. gibsoni isolates obtained from Japanese dogs carry a SNP in the cytochrome b gene, which was empirically proven to be associated with resistance to atovaquone [13, 14]. Therefore, new drugs are needed to combat the emergence of drug resistance and to develop effective treatment options.

Naphthoquine (NQ) is an antimalarial drug that was first synthesized in China in 1986 and registered as naphthoquine phosphate (NQP) in 1993. Initial clinical trials showed that NQ monotherapy was highly efficacious without documented toxicity [15, 16]. Subsequently, a drug combination comprising NQ and artemisinin (ART) at a fixed ratio of 1:2.5 was developed in order to retain the strongpoint of the two drugs and for prevention of the possible emergence of drug resistance. Safety data for NQ-containing therapies involving more than 4000 patients showed no serious adverse reaction, hematology, or biochemistry changes. It has been considered as a promising antimalarial drug candidate and is marketed under the name of ARCO® in various tropical countries [15,16,17]. Because of the close relationship between Plasmodium and Babesia genera, we investigated whether NQP has effects on the in vitro growth of B. gibsoni, a causative agent of canine babesiosis, and in vivo-propagated B. rodhaini, a highly pathogenic rodent Babesia species.

Methods

Chemicals

NQP was purchased from ChemScene (NJ, USA), and was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich, Tokyo, Japan) to prepare a 40 mg/ml stock solution. In parallel, tafenoquine (TAF, Sigma-Aldrich, Tokyo, Japan) was dissolved as mentioned above, and was used as a control treatment. TAF was previously reported as a potent anti-Babesia agent for treating B. rodhaini infection [18]. SYBR Green I (SG1) nucleic acid stain was purchased from Lonza America (GA, USA).

Maintenance of the parasites in vitro and in vivo

The Babesia gibsoni Oita strain [19] was cultured and used for the in vitro growth inhibition assay. For maintenance, the B. gibsoni was cultured in canine RBCs and was suspended in a culture medium, RPMI-1640, supplemented with 20% canine serum. The culture was maintained in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 5% O2.

For the in vivo inhibition assay, the B. rodhaini Australia strain [20] was recovered from the stock in our laboratory. For the maintenance of B. rodhaini, cryopreserved parasitized RBCs were passaged by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of mice. Challenge infection was performed with i.p. inoculation of 107 fresh B. rodhaini-infected RBCs (iRBCs). A total of 20 BALB/c mice (6 weeks old) were purchased from CLEA Japan and were used to maintain B. rodhaini for the in vivo study.

In vitro growth inhibition assay

To test the growth inhibitory effect of NQP on B. gibsoni, a SG1 fluorescence-based assay was performed as reported previously [21]. Briefly, the in vitro cultures of B. gibsoni were diluted to 1% parasitemia with fresh canine RBCs. The stock solution of NQP was diluted in medium to achieve final concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, and 5.0 μM, and incubated with iRBCs in triplicate in 96-well plates with 5% hematocrit (HCT) for 96 h. After a lysis buffer containing a 2 × SG1 nucleic acid stain was added in each well, the fluorescence values were evaluated using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (485 and 518 nm, Fluoroskan Ascent, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and the inhibitory activity and half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were calculated using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software Inc., USA).

In vivo growth inhibition assay

Fifteen BALB/c mice intraperitoneally challenged with 107 B. rodhaini (iRBCs) were randomly assigned to groups (n = 5 per group). When parasitemia was about 3–5%, the drug treatment was initiated. The first group was treated orally with 40 mg/kg of NQP for 5 consecutive days as previously described [22, 23]. The second group was treated orally with 20 mg/kg TAF as single-dose therapy, according to a previously regimen [18]. The control group was treated orally with 5% DMSO in Milli-Q water. Parasitemia was calculated from Giemsa-stained blood smears by counting infected RBCs among 3000 RBCs. HCT changes were monitored for the development of an index of anemia by using a hematology analyzer (Nihon MEK-6450, Nihon Kohden Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) every 2 days until 42 days post-infection (dpi). All experiments were approved by the Animal Welfare Committee (approval no. 20-128) and were conducted in accordance with the standards for the care and management of experimental animals as stipulated by the Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism. Differences in parasitemia between the control and treated groups were determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) plus Tukey–Kramer post hoc analysis. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, with regard to the log-rank test. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Effects of NQP on B. gibsoni growth in vitro

NQP significantly inhibited B. gibsoni growth at 2.5 μM and 5 μM (Fig. 1a) (F (6,14) = 552.9, P < 0.05). The IC50 value of NQP on B. gibsoni was 3.3 ± 0.5 μM (Fig. 1b). Meanwhile, the IC50 value of TAF was 20.0 ± 2.4 μM (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The in vitro growth inhibitory effect of naphthoquine phosphate (NQP). a NQP inhibits growth of B. gibsoni in vitro. The gray column represents the DMSO-treated culture as a drug solvent control, the red columns represent the NQP-treated cultures, and the blue column represents 100 μM tafenoquine (TAF)-treated culture. b Dose-dependent inhibition curve of NQP on B. gibsoni in vitro. c Dose-dependent inhibition curve of TAF on B. gibsoni in vitro. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments carried out in a triplicate. The asterisks indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the drug-treated cultures and the DMSO-treated culture

Full size image

Effects of NQP on B. rodhaini in vivo

The highest parasitemia of B. rodhaini in DMSO-treated group was 78.2% at 8 dpi (Fig. 2a). In contrast, the parasitemia in NQP- and TAF-treated groups were decreased after treatment and showed 95.1% (3.8% peak parasitemia) and 95.8% (3.3% peak parasitemia) inhibition compared to the highest parasitemia in the DMSO-treated group, respectively. A significant difference in parasitemia levels was calculated in NQP-treated group and TAF-treated group as compared with the DMSO-treated group at 6 and 8 dpi (F (2, 44) = 15.87, P < 0.05). Parasitemia was undetectable via Giemsa-staining in mice treated with NQP and TAF at 10 dpi and 8 dpi, respectively. Afterwards, regrowth of parasites was observed in both NQP-treated (n = 2/5) and TAF-treated (n = 1/5) groups at 16 dpi and 22 dpi (Fig. 2a), respectively. Significant reductions in HCT values were observed in the DMSO-treated mice at 6 dpi and 8 dpi as compared to the values recorded from the NQP- or TAF-treated group (Fig. 2b) (F (2, 24) = 10.35, P < 0.05). All the mice in the NQP- and TAF-treated groups survived until the end of the experiment (by 40 dpi; P = 0.0002), whereas none of DMSO-treated mice survived by 10 dpi (Fig. 2c). Compared with the DMSO-treated group, the TAF-treated parasites showed abnormal morphological changes such as faint chromatin staining and degenerative forms from 5 dpi onwards, while denigrative forms of NQP-treated parasites were observed at 8 dpi (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The growth inhibitory effect of naphthoquine phosphate (NQP) on B. rodhaini in BALB/c mice. a NQP and tafenoquine (TAF) prevent the typical growth of B. rodhaini in mice as compared with that in DMSO-treated mice as a drug solvent control. b Changes of hematocrit (HCT) values in mice treated with NQP or TAF as compared with that in DMSO-treated mice. The asterisks indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the NQP- or TAF-treated group and the DMSO-treated group. c Survival rates of NQP-, TAF-, and DMSO-treated mice. The arrows indicate time of treatment. Parasitemia was calculated by counting infected RBCs among 3000 RBCs using Giemsa-stained blood smears. Dotted line indicates the reference range

Full size image

Discussion

NQ is a 4-aminoquinoline antimalarial drug with a longer half-life but slower action than ART, and is currently combined with ART to treat malaria [15]. This combination therapy is also effective on Schistosoma mansoni [24]. NQP combined with azithromycin for malaria treatment is available in the market [25]. The toxic effects of NQP on mammalian hosts have been reported. Daily treatments in dogs for 14 days at a dose of 17.5 mg/kg/day and in rats for 70 mg/kg/day were safe. The safe doses in canine and rat models are equivalent to approximately 10 mg/kg/day in humans [16, 26]. A previous study reported that the concentration of NQP reached the peak level in plasma 2 h post treatment with a dose of 10 mg/kg. The peak concentrations were 300.84 ng/ml and 273.29 ng/ml in plasma and erythrocytes, respectively, and the half-life of NQP was 198 h (~ 8 days) in normal mice [27]. Interestingly, the concentrations were far greater in Plasmodium berghei-infected mice [27]. The antiparasitic activity of NQP, as shown by the inhibition of B. gibsoni in vitro (Fig. 1) prompted us to further explore its anti-Babesia activity in vivo. We used the lethal species B. rodhaini in the mouse model for evaluating NQP as a therapeutic. In the current in vivo trial, NQP exhibited excellent inhibitory efficacy as evidenced by reduced parasite growth (Fig. 2a) and degenerative morphological changes in the parasites (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Furthermore, the first 2 days of treatment with 40 mg/kg NQP prevented the rise of B. rodhaini parasitemia starting from 6 dpi compared with the typical rise of mean parasitemia in DMSO-treated mice. In addition, the accumulation of NQP in plasma [27] by completion of the 4-day treatment resulted in morphological changes of parasites in all treated mice at 8 dpi. The TAF-treated group showed an aberrant parasite phenotype (Additional file 1: Figure S1) which has been associated with oxidative stress [18]. Babesia rodhaini-infected mice in the DMSO-treated group rapidly developed anemia, whereas NQP and TAF prevented anemia development in infected mice (Fig. 2b).

Since TAF was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a single-drug treatment for malaria, TAF studies have attracted much attention [18, 22]. The limitation of TAF is the risk of inducing severe hemolytic anemia in individuals with G6PD deficiency in humans and relapse of parasitemia, which are well documented [18, 28, 29]. A single treatment of TAF on immunocompromised hosts could not eliminate parasites [18, 28]. Recently, TAF showed strong and broad antiparasitic activity against Babesia spp., including B. microti, B. gibsoni, and B. rodhaini [18]. Hence, TAF was selected as a reference drug in this study. In the present study, the relapse of parasitemia was observed in both the NQP-treated group and TAF-treated group (Fig. 2a). Therefore, NQP may need to be accompanied by other anti-Babesia drugs to augment its effect and prevent the regrowth of parasites.

In addition, the mechanism of action of NQP has not been fully elucidated. The inhibitory activity of NQP for Plasmodium was hypothesized to be through the inhibition of hemozoin bio-crystallization in the digestive vacuole of late-stage parasites and disruption of the membrane system. Due to Babesia not producing hemozoin during parasite development, the inhibitory effect of NQP on the Babesia parasite is hypothesized to be related to targeting the parasite’s membrane system [16, 30].

It should be noted that there are some limitations to the present study. Although NQP exhibited a potential anti-Babesia effect, it has a slower onset of action and a longer half-life, which may easily lead to drug build-up with increasing the probability of developing resistance. Therefore, future studies are warranted to analyze the possible synergistic effect of NQP when administrated in combination with other drugs which have a rapid onset of babesicidal action and a short half-life. Such analysis will help to determine the most effective composition ratio for treatment of Babesia in animals in clinical applications. Furthermore, the mode of action by which NQP inhibits the in vitro and in vivo growth of Babesia is still unknown. Consequently, further studies are required to elucidate this point. Although the present study demonstrated the potential anti-Babesia efficacy of NQP in a mouse model, additional in vivo experiments are required to confirm such inhibitory effect in B. gibsoni-infected dogs.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrated the growth inhibitory effect of NQP against B. gibsoni in vitro and B. rodhaini in vivo. Our findings indicate that NQP is a potential candidate agent for the treatment of babesiosis and suggest further investigation on the possible use of this chemical for canine babesiosis and human babesiosis.

Availability of data and materials

All data sets were presented as tables, figures and text description in this article.

Abbreviations

NQ:

Naphthoquine

NQP:

Naphthoquine phosphate

ART:

Artemisinin

TAF:

Tafenoquine

SG1:

SYBR Green I

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulfoxide

RBCs:

Red blood cells

iRBCs:

Infected red blood cells

i.p.:

Intraperitoneal

IC50 :

Half maximal inhibitory concentration

SD:

Standard deviation

dpi:

Days post-infection

HCT:

Hematocrit

References

  1. Homer MJ, Aguilar-Delfin I, Telford SR, Krause PJ, Persing DH. Babesiosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13:451–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kavanaugh MJ, Decker CF. Babesiosis. Dis Mon. 2012;58:355–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vial HJ, Gorenflot A. Chemotherapy against babesiosis. Vet Parasitol. 2006;138:147–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mosqueda J, Olvera-Ramirez A, Aguilar-Tipacamu G, Canto GJ. Current advances in detection and treatment of babesiosis. Curr Med Chem. 2012;19:1504–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Simon MS, Westblade LF, Dziedziech A, Visone JE, Furman RR, Jenkins SG, et al. Clinical and molecular evidence of atovaquone and azithromycin resistance in relapsed Babesia microti infection associated with rituximab and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:1222–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamasaki M, Watanabe N, Idaka N, Yamamori T, Otsuguro K, Uchida N, et al. Intracellular diminazene aceturate content and adenosine incorporation in diminazene aceturate-resistant Babesia gibsoni isolate in vitro. Exp Parasitol. 2017;183:92–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sakuma M, Fukuda K, Takayama K, Kobayashi Y, Shimokawa Miyama T, et al. Molecular epidemiological survey of the Babesia gibsoni cytochrome b gene in western Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 2012;74:1341–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lawres LA, Garg A, Kumar V, Bruzual I, Forquer IP, Renard I, et al. Radical cure of experimental babesiosis in immunodeficient mice using a combination of an endochin-like quinolone and atovaquone. J Exp Med. 2016;213:1307–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lemieux JE, Tran AD, Freimark L, Schaffner SF, Goethert H, Andersen KG, et al. A global map of genetic diversity in Babesia microti reveals strong population structure and identifies variants associated with clinical relapse. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:16079.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Vannier EG, Diuk-Wasser MA, Ben Mamoun C, Krause PJ. Babesiosis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015;29:357–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. White DJ, Talarico J, Chang HG, Birkhead GS, Heimberger T, Morse DL. Human babesiosis in New York state: review of 139 hospitalized cases and analysis of prognostic factors. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:2149–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gray EB, Herwaldt BL. Babesiosis surveillance—United States, 2011–2015. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019;68:1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Iguchi A, Soma T, Xuan X. Further epidemiological survey for atovaquone resistant related gene of Babesia gibsoni in Japan during 2015–2018. J Vet Med Sci. 2020;82:1700–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Iguchi A, Matsuu A, Ikadai H, Talukder MH, Hikasa Y. Development of in vitro atovaquone-resistant Babesia gibsoni with a single-nucleotide polymorphism in cytb. Vet Parasitol. 2012;185:145–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang J, Cao W, Shan C, Zhang M, Li G, Ding D, et al. Naphthoquine phosphate and its combination with artemisinine. Acta Trop. 2004;89:375–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moore BR, Laman M, Salman S, Batty KT, Page-Sharp M, Hombhanje F, et al. Naphthoquine: an emerging candidate for artemisinin combination therapy. Drugs. 2016;76:789–804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hombhanje FW, Huang Q. Artemisinin-naphthoquine combination (ARCO®): an overview of the progress. Pharmaceuticals. 2010;3:3581–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu M, Ji S, Kondoh D, Galon EM, Li J, Tomihari M, et al. Tafenoquine is a promising drug candidate for the treatment of babesiosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021;65: e0020421.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sunaga F, Namikawa K, Kanno Y. Continuous in vitro culture of erythrocytic stages of Babesia gibsoni and virulence of the cultivated parasite. J Vet Med Sci. 2002;64:571–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Terkawi MA, Zhang G, Jia H, Aboge G, Goo YK, Nishikawa Y, et al. C3 contributes to the cross-protective immunity induced by Babesia gibsoni phosphoriboprotein P0 against a lethal B. rodhaini infection. Parasite Immunol. 2008;30:365–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rizk MA, Ji S, Liu M, El-Sayed SAE, Li Y, Byamukama B, et al. Closing the empty anti-Babesia gibsoni drug pipeline in vitro using fluorescence-based high throughput screening assay. Parasitol Int. 2020;75: 102054.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Carvalho L, Tuvshintulga B, Nugraha AB, Sivakumar T, Yokoyama N. Activities of artesunate-based combinations and tafenoquine against Babesia bovis in vitro and Babesia microti in vivo. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:362.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Tuvshintulga B, AbouLaila M, Davaasuren B, Ishiyama A, Sivakumar T, Yokoyama N, et al. Clofazimine inhibits the growth of Babesia and Theileria parasites in vitro and in vivo. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:2739–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. El-Beshbishi SN, Taman A, El-Malky M, Azab MS, El-Hawary AK, El-Tantawy DA. First insight into the effect of single oral dose therapy with artemisinin-naphthoquine phosphate combination in a mouse model of Schistosoma mansoni infection. Int J Parasitol. 2013;43:521–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bei Z, Li G, Zhao J, Zhang M, Ji X, Wang J. Evaluation of the combination of azithromycin and naphthoquine in animal malaria models. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64:e02307-e2319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang J, Zuo B, Xu Z, Sun G, Zhang M, Wang C, et al. Long-term toxicity of co-naphthoquine in beagle dogs. Bull Acad Mil Med Sci. 2003;27:196–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li F, Zhang Z. Chapter 8 - Artemisinin–naphthoquine phosphate combination (ARCO). In: Li G, Li Y, Li Z, Zeng M, editors. Artemisinin-based and other antimalarials. London: Academic Press; 2018. p. 483–569.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mordue DG, Wormser GP. Could the drug tafenoquine revolutionize treatment of Babesia microti infection? J Infect Dis. 2019;220:442–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Peters AL, Van Noorden CJ. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency and malaria: cytochemical detection of heterozygous G6PD deficiency in women. J Histochem Cytochem. 2009;57:1003–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Rudzinska MA, Trager W, Lewengrub SJ, Gubert E. An electron microscopic study of Babesia microti invading erythrocytes. Cell Tissue Res. 1976;169:323–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (18H02336 and 18KK0188) and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Core-to-Core Program, both from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan, and a grant from the Strategic International Collaborative Research Project (JPJ008837) promoted by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido, 080-8555, Japan

    Shengwei Ji, Mingming Liu, Eloiza May Galon, Mohamed Abdo Rizk, Bumduuren Tuvshintulga, Jixu Li, Iqra Zafar, Yae Hasegawa, Naoaki Yokoyama & Xuenan Xuan

  2. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Basic Medicine, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, 441053, China

    Mingming Liu

  3. Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt

    Mohamed Abdo Rizk

  4. College of Agriculture and Animal Science, Qinghai University, Xining, 810016, China

    Jixu Li

  5. Joint Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture, Tottori University, Tottori, 680-8550, Japan

    Aiko Iguchi

Authors
  1. Shengwei Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mingming Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eloiza May Galon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mohamed Abdo Rizk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bumduuren Tuvshintulga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jixu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Iqra Zafar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yae Hasegawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Aiko Iguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Naoaki Yokoyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Xuenan Xuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SJ and XX designed the study. SJ carried out the experiments. JL, IZ and YH contributed reagents/materials preparation. SJ, ML, MAR, BT, AI, NY and EMG wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuenan Xuan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures were carried out according to the ethical guidelines approved by the Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine (permit numbers: animal experiment, 20-128; DNA experiment, 1723-4 and 1724-4; pathogen, 201712-5).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Light micrographs of B. rodhaini-infected mice during NQP and TAF treatment (from 4 to 8 dpi) and of DMSO-treated mice (from 4 to 7 dpi). Compared with the DMSO-treated group, NQP treatment exhibits degenerated parasites at 8 dpi (red arrow), whereas parasites in the TAF-treated mice show a vacuole-like aberrant phenotype. Bars = 10 μm.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ji, S., Liu, M., Galon, E.M. et al. Inhibitory effect of naphthoquine phosphate on Babesia gibsoni in vitro and Babesia rodhaini in vivo. Parasites Vectors 15, 10 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-05127-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-05127-0

Keywords

  • Naphthoquine phosphate
  • Babesia gibsoni
  • Babesia rodhaini
  • In vitro
  • In vivo

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us