Skip to main content

Dermal microfilariae of dogs, jackals and cats in different regions of Iran



Due to the complexity of retrieving skin-dwelling microfilariae, filarioids of dogs presenting dermal microfilariae (e.g. Cercopithifilaria spp., Onchocerca lupi) are relatively unknown compared to Dirofilaria spp. and Acanthocheilonema spp. whose microfilariae circulate in the blood. Although Cercopithifilaria spp. and O. lupi filarioids are distributed worldwide, there is a paucity of information on their occurrence in Iran. The aim of this study was to investigate these filarioids in a large population of dogs from different regions of Iran.


From October 2018 to September 2020, skin biopsies were obtained from dogs housed in shelters (n = 557) and privately owned dogs (n = 26) in seven provinces of Iran (Hamedan, Kermanshah, Yazd, Mazandaran, Khuzestan, Lorestan, Esfahan), as well as from three road-killed jackals (Canis aureus) and three cats (Felis catus) in Hamedan province. The skin biopsies were first soaked in saline solution at room temperature overnight, and examined for dermal microfilariae under the microscope. Positive skin specimens and sediments were tested by PCR for a 304-bp region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) gene and amplicons were sequenced.


Microfilariae of Cercopithifilaria spp. were found in skin biopsies of 32 of the 583 (5.5%) dogs tested, with infection rates of up to 25% in Kermanshah. No microfilariae were recovered from skin biopsy samples collected from dogs in Khorramabad and Ahvaz, nor from the examined jackals and cats. None of the privately owned dogs were found to be infected. Morphologic and morphometric characteristics of the microfilariae were consistent with C. bainae. Eighteen skin samples were positive for the cox1 gene, of which 15 sequences showed a nucleotide identity of 100% and three of 93.4% with the reference sequence of C. bainae available in GenBank (haplotype I; GenBank accession number: JF461457).


The data from this study broadens current knowledge on the geographical distribution of C. bainae in dogs in Middle Eastern countries. Further studies on different wild canine species in the country (e.g. jackal, fox, wolf) could provide further information on the epidemiology of these filarioids. A particular focus should be put on zoonotic O. lupi given the reports of its presence in human patients from this country.

Graphical Abstract


Until 15 years ago, filarial nematodes releasing microfilariae into the haematic circulation, such as Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilaria repens, Acanthocheilonema reconditum, Acanthocheilonema dracunculoides and Brugia malayi, were considered to be the most prevalent filarioids affecting dogs [1]. Conversely, those which present dermal microfilariae, such as Cercopithifilaria spp. and Onchocerca lupi, have been largely neglected by parasitologists and veterinary practitioners mainly due to the difficulties in retrieving microfilariae in the skin and to the limited number of clinical conditions they cause [2, 3]. Members of the genus Cercopithifilaria are parasites of cercopithecus monkeys, ruminants, rodents, lagomorphs, marsupials, monotremes and carnivores [4, 5]. In the past decade, three of the 29 species of Cercopithifilaria (i.e. Cercopithifilaria bainae, Cercopithifilaria grassii and Cercopithifilaria sp. II sensu Otranto et al. 2013) have been reported in domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) and red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) of Europe and the Americas [6, 7]. Infections with Cercopithifilaria spp. are generally considered to be minimally pathogenic as most of the infected dogs do not present physical abnormalities that could be associated to the presence of microfilariae in the skin. However, dermatitis [7, 8], diffused chronic polyarthritis without any other apparent cause [9] and gross skin lesions [10] have been reported in infected dogs. Recently, an infected dog with a giant cutaneous cyst in the lumbosacral region with numerous microfilariae of C. bainae was also reported [11], suggesting a further pathogenic role of this species in infected dogs. Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato (s.l.) is considered to be the competent biological vector of these nematodes [12, 13] although DNA of Cercopithifilaria spp. has been also detected in Rhipicephalus turanicus and different genogroups within R. sanguineus s.l. from different countries in Europe, Africa, Asia and Australia [14].

Microfilariae of the zoonotic nematode Onchocerca lupi, which infects dogs, wolves, cats, coyotes and humans, can also be detected in skin biopsies of the infected carnivores [15]. Infected dogs may display acute or chronic ocular diseases [16] or be completely asymptomatic due to the localisation of adult nematodes in the retrobulbar space of the eye [17]. The parasite’s life-cycle, the incubation time and the prepatent period are not fully understood, but black flies of the genus Simulium are suspected to be involved as intermediate hosts [15]. Since the first report of zoonotic infection by O. lupi in humans [18], infection has been diagnosed in more than 20 patients in Iran, Turkey, Tunisia, Greece, Hungary, Germany and the USA [19]. Human patients manifest an invasive disease featured by spinal, orbital, ocular and subdermal nodules [20,21,22].

Canine and feline infection with dermal microfilariae has been reported from different European and American countries [23]. However, although human infection with O. lupi has been confirmed in Iran and neighbouring Turkey [18, 22, 24] no information is available on O. lupi infection in dogs.

Dogs affected by Cercopithifilaria spp. and O. lupi sometimes do not display any clinical signs [25, 26]. In the context of this background, together with the presence of R. sanguineus s.l. (i.e. vectors of Cercopithifilaria spp.) in Iran [27,28,29,30,31], we decided to investigate dermal microfilariosis in dogs from different regions of the country, aiming to improve scientific knowledge on the distribution of these little known filarioids.


Study area

The study was carried out in seven provinces in Iran (i.e. Hamedan, Kermanshah, Yazd, Mazandaran, Khuzestan, Lorestan and Esfahan (Fig. 1). Most of the samples (537/538; 92.1%) were taken from animal shelters that had been built by non-governmental organisation (NGOs) to feed stray dogs. Dogs in these shelters had been rescued from all of the seven provinces (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of Iran showing the sampling localities and the number of dogs examined in each site

Fig. 2
figure 2

Shelters in Kermanshah (a), Yazd (b) and Lorestan (c) provinces where dogs were sampled

Collection of specimens and microscopic examination

From October 2018 to September 2020, 583 dogs aged > 6 months (537 dogs from the chosen shelters and 46 privately owned dogs) were sampled at seven sampling sites (Fig. 1). Clinical examination was performed, and anamnestic data were recorded for each dog sampled; the dogs sampled had not been treated with endoparasiticides for at least 1 month prior to the sampling. During the study period, three road-killed jackals (Canis aureus) and three cats (Felis catus) in Hamedan were also biopsied.

Skin biopsies (about 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 cm) were taken using disposable scalpels from the inter-scapular region and soaked in 1 ml saline solution (NaCl 0.9%) at room temperature for 10 h or overnight. A drop of sediment from the soaked skin sample was then placed on a glass slide and observed under the light microscope (2 fields of 18 × 18-mm coverslip each) at a magnification of ×100. Dermal microfilariae were counted and identified based on morphological features described previously [10, 25]. Photomicrographs were taken of microfilariae using an Olympus CX41 microscope (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a DP25 camera, and the microfilariae measured. For permanent mounting of microfilariae, the coverslips of positive slides were removed, and then both slides and coverslips were fixed with methanol, then air-dried and stained with Giemsa stain as described previously [32]. Upon diagnosis of microfilariae by microscopy, the skin tissue was transferred into clean microtubes and stored at − 20 °C for molecular analysis.

Molecular procedures

Genomic DNA was extracted from all skin samples and sediments using a commercial kit (DNeasy® Blood & Tissue kit; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A 304-bp region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) gene was amplified using the CbCox1F/NTR primer pair [33]. Amplicons were visualised by electrophoresis in a 2% agarose gel stained with GelRed (VWR International PBI, Milan, Italy) on a GelLogic 100 gel documentation system (Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA). Amplicons were then purified and sequenced in both directions using the same primers as those for the PCRs, by the Big Dye Terminator v.3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit in a 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Foster City, CA, USA). Sequences were edited and compared to those available in the GenBank™ dataset by Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) analysis ( Phylogenetic relationships were inferred using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method based on the Tamura–Nei model [34], with the Gamma distribution (+G) used to model evolutionary rate differences among sites selected by the best-fit model [35]. Evolutionary analysis was conducted on 1000 bootstrap replications using MEGA5 software [36]. A homologous sequence from Litosomoides yutajensis (GenBank accession number: AJ544869) was used as the outgroup.

Statistical analysis

Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were established for proportions. The chi-square (χ2 ) test was used to compare proportions, with a probability value < 0.05 regarded as statistically significant. Analyses were performed using Microsoft Office Excel ver. 16.37 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA).


Of the 583 dogs from whom skin biopies were taken and examined, 32 (5.5%; 95% CI 5.47–5.51) from five regions (n = 12 Kermanshah; n = 7 from Hamedan; n = 7 from Yazd; n = 3 from Amol; n = 3 from Esfahan) were positive for microfilariae. Biopsies taken from dogs sampled in Ahvaz and Khorramabad (n = 170) all tested negative for microfilariae based on microscopic examination. None of the privately owned dogs nor the jackals and cats were found to be infected. No statistical association was found between Cercopithifilaria spp. infection in dogs and sex (χ2 = 1.43, df = 1, P = 0.23) or age (χ2 = 0.49, df = 3, P = 0.92) (Table 1). At clinical examination, 69 dogs (11.8%) showed ocular clinical signs, such as mucosal discharges, conjunctivitis and keratitis or ulcers.

Table 1 Number and percentage of dogs positive for Cercopithifilaria spp. (n = 583) according to sex, age and sampling area

All of the microfilariae were identified as C. bainae, with mean length and width of 172.32 and 6.77 µm, respectively, a rounded head and a short dorsoventrally flattened body (Fig. 3, Additional file 1: Video S1). A maximum number of five microfilariae were counted in one sediment. Molecular testing showed that 18 skin samples (56.2%) were positive for the cox1 gene. Of these positive samples, 15 sequences showed a nucleotide identity of 100% with the reference sequence of C. bainae haplotype I (GenBank accession number: JF461457) and the remaining three showed 93.4% similarity (Fig. 4). The nucleotide sequences of Cercopithifilaria sp. identified in this study were deposited in GenBank (accession number: OL873253).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Microfilaria of Cercopithifilaria bainae stained with Giemsa. Note the rounded head, short body and tip-pointed tail of the microfilaria (scale bar: 20 μm)

Fig. 4
figure 4

Phylogenetic relationship of Cercopithifilaria spp. sequences detected in this study (in bold) and other filarioid nematodes available from GenBank based on a partial sequence of the cox1 gene. Evolutionary analysis was conducted on 1000 bootstrap replications using a maximum likelihood method and Tamura–Nei model to model evolutionary rate differences among sites selected by best-fit model. A homologous sequence from Litosomoides yutajensis (GenBank accession number: AJ544869) was used as the outgroup


Our survey of C. bainae infection in dogs from different regions of Iran indicates that this filarioid is more widespread than previously thought. However, the presence of Cercopithifilaria spp. in dogs from Iran could be also inferred by the fact that R. sanguineus s.l. is distributed in that region [27]. More specifically, up to 5.5% of the dogs tested were infected with C. bainae. In previous studies, infection rates of 9.4% and 13.9% were reported in Italy [1, 37], 21.6% in Spain [1], 4.3% and 13.6% in Greece [1, 26], 9.8% in Portugal [38], 2.6% in Romania [39], 1% in Brazil [40] and 2.6% in USA [41]. A similar variation was found in our survey, with the infection rates in dogs varying according to the study regions, with the highest prevalence of infection (25%) in Kermanshah and no cases in Ahvaz and Khorramabad. This pattern is similar to that observed in dogs from Italy, where the prevalence of C. bainae ranged from 7.7% in Sardinia to 13.3% in Sicily [1, 37]. The prevalence of this filarioid has also been reported to vary in Greece, between 2% and 30.8% depending on the sampling location [26]. Of note, infection in the sampled dogs in the different regions could not be associated with climate, elevation above sea level or average annual precipitation (Table 2). It has been hypothesised that Cercopithifilaria spp. might be more common in warmer areas [39].

Table 2 Cercopithifilaria infection rate in dogs included in the study according to geographical location and climatic parameters

In this study, C. bainae was the only filarioid species detected. To date, co-infection of C. bainae with other Cercopithifilaria spp. has been reported in animal populations of Italy with Cercopithifilaria sp. II and C. grassi [10, 37], in Greece with C. grassii [10, 26] and in Spain and Portugal with C. grassii and Cercopithifilaria sp. II [38]. Despite other Cercopithifilaria spp. not being detected in our study, they could be present in domestic dogs and/or wild canids of Iran. For example, DNA of C. grassi has been identified in one Rhipicephalus sp. III tick in the neighbouring country of Pakistan [14].

There was co-infection with other tick-borne pathogens in 17 of 32 dogs infected with C. bainae, based on PCR analyses of the blood of the infected dogs [42]. Specifically, 15 dogs were co-infected with C. bainae and Hepatozoon canis, and two dogs were infected with C. bainae, H. canis and Anaplasma platys [42]. Similar results have also been reported in southern Italy, where 58 C. bainae-infected dogs were simultaneously infected with at least one other tick-borne pathogen, such as H. canis, A. platys and Babesia vogeli [43]. The detection of C. bainae microfilariae indicates a prior tick exposure and should stimulate testing for other tick-borne pathogens. However, it has not yet been demonstrated whether C. bainae infection adversely affects the dog’s immune response to other pathogens [43].

Microfilariae of O. lupi were not detected in the examined samples, although 11.8% of the evaluated dogs showed mucosal discharges, conjunctivitis, keratitis or ulcers. Common ocular alterations of O. lupi in dogs are granulomatous mass on the scleral tissue, conjunctival swelling, keratitis, uveitis and mucopurulent discharge, as well as blindness [25]. Atypical migration of O. lupi in the larynx lumen of a dog has also been documented [44]. Cutaneous microfilariae of O. lupi have been reported in dogs and cats in Europe (e.g. Italy, Greece, Romania, Germany, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland), USA and Canada [45]. However, in areas outside of Europe and North America, such as Iran [24], Turkey [18, 22] and Tunisia [46], human cases of O. lupi are possibly associated with wild carnivores, which could play a role in the epidemiology of the infection [23].

In our study, the skin sediments of the examined cats and golden jackals tested negative for filarioids, probably due to the small sample size analysed. However, O. lupi has been previously reported in cats from Portugal and USA [47, 48]. On the other hand, the role of C. aureus in the epidemiology of Cercopithifilaria spp. and Onchocerca spp. is not known [49], advocating further research to elucidate the role of these animals as sylvatic carriers or reservoir hosts of these parasites.

All of the C. bainae isolated in the present study belonged to haplotype I. In contrast, a high genetic variability for C. bainae has been reported in previous studies conducted in Italy, Spain and Greece [10, 26, 50], suggesting a late introduction of the parasite from Europe. To date, 21 cox1 haplotypes of C. bainae have been identified [14, 26, 50], with haplotype I being the most commonly detected in dogs in the Mediterranean basin [50], as well as in R. sanguineus s.l. ticks from Italy, Greece, Malaysia, South Africa and USA, R. turanicus from Italy and Rhipicephalus sp. I from Greece and Italy [14, 26, 41]. The finding of three sequences displaying a relatively low nucleotide similarity (93.4%) with that of haplotype I (GenBank accession number: JF461457) is difficult to interpret, suggesting the existence of a different, as yet molecularly not characterised, species of Cercopithifilaria.

No information on the tick species circulating the microfilariae of Cercopithifilaria spp. in Iran is currently available. However, studies performed in Italy, Brazil, Spain, Portugal, Australia, Malaysia, Pakistan and South Africa reported C. bainae in different Rhipicephalus spp., indicating low specificity of these filarioids for ticks of this genus [14, 51, 52]. Therefore, further studies on dogs and tick vectors are needed to obtain a clearer picture of the geographical distribution of all three known Cercopithifilaria species infecting dogs in western Asia.


This study reports for the first time C. bainae infection in dogs from Iran, expanding current knowledge on the geographical distribution of this parasite. Further studies on the different wild canine species (e.g., jackal, fox, wolf) and Rhipicephalus spp. ticks present in the country are needed to better understand the epidemiology of Cercopithifilaria spp. in the study area. Additionally, considering the previous human reports of O. lupi in Iran, more investigations on dogs as hosts should be performed with a focus on this zoonotic nematode.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its additional files.



Basic Local Alignment Search Tool


Confidence interval


Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1


Maximum Likelihood


Sodium chloride


Non-governmental organisation


Sensu lato


  1. Otranto D, Brianti E, Latrofa MS, Annoscia G, Weigl S, Lia RP, et al. On a Cercopithifilaria sp. transmitted by Rhipicephalus sanguineus: a neglected, but widespread filarioid of dogs. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Mutafchiev Y, Dantas-Torres F, Giannelli A, Abramo F, Papadopoulos E, Cardoso L, et al. Redescription of Onchocerca lupi (Spirurida: Onchocercidae) with histopathological observations. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:309.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Otranto D, Varcasia A, Solinas C, Scala A, Brianti E, Dantas-Torres F, et al. Redescription of Cercopithifilaria bainae Almeida & Vicente, 1984 (Spirurida, Onchocercidae) from a dog in Sardinia, Italy. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bain O, Uni S, Takaoka H. A synthetic look at a twenty year old taxon, Cercopithifilaria; its probable evolution. In: 10th International Congress of Parasitology (ICOPA X), 4–9 August, 2002; Vancouver. p. 365–8.

  5. Lefoulon E, Kuzmin Y, Plantard O, Mutafchiev Y, Otranto D, Martin C, et al. Redescription of Cercopithifilaria rugosicauda (Böhm & Supperer, 1953)(Spirurida: Onchocercidae) of roe deer, with an emended diagnosis of the genus Cercopithifilaria and a genetic characterisation. Parasitol Int. 2014;63:808–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maia C, Casero M, Annoscia G, Latrofa MS, Colella V, Pereira A, et al. Cercopithifilaria sp. II in Vulpes vulpes: new host affiliation for an enigmatic canine filarioid. Parasitol Res. 2017;116:441–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boyd M, Santoro D, Craft WF, Ginn PE, Childress AL, Wellehan JF, et al. Dermatitis caused by autochthonous Cercopithifilaria bainae from a dog in Florida, USA: clinical, histological and parasitological diagnosis and treatment. Vet Dermatol. 2019;30:68-e20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Otranto D, Brianti E, Abramo F, Gaglio G, Napoli E, Latrofa MS, et al. Cutaneous distribution and localization of Cercopithifilaria sp. microfilariae in dogs. Vet Parasitol. 2012;190:143–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gabrielli S, Giannelli A, Brianti E, Dantas-Torres F, Bufalini M, Fraulo M, et al. Chronic polyarthritis associated to Cercopithifilaria bainae infection in a dog. Vet Parasitol. 2014;205:401–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Otranto D, Brianti E, Dantas-Torres F, Miro G, Latrofa MS, Mutafchiev Y, et al. Species diversity of dermal microfilariae of the genus Cercopithifilaria infesting dogs in the Mediterranean region. Parasitology. 2013;140:99–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Soares RL, Parolin LB, Mateus NLF, de Figueiredo GRD, Rodrigues VR, de Oliveira GG, et al. Giant cutaneous cyst in a dog infected by Cercopithifilaria bainae. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Rep. 2020;20:100401.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brianti E, Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F, Weigl S, Latrofa M, Gaglio G, et al. Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Ixodida, Ixodidae) as intermediate host of a canine neglected filarial species with dermal microfilariae. Vet Parasitol. 2012;183:330–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramos RAN, Giannelli A, Brianti E, Annoscia G, Cantacessi C, Dantas-Torres F, et al. Tick vectors of Cercopithifilaria bainae in dogs: Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato versus Ixodes ricinus. Parasitol Res. 2013;112:3013–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Latrofa MS, Dantas-Torres F, Giannelli A, Otranto D. Molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in Rhipicephalus sanguineus group ticks. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014;5:943–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rojas A, Morales-Calvo F, Salant H, Otranto D, Baneth G. Zoonotic ocular onchocercosis by Onchocerca lupi. Yale J Biol Med. 2021;94:331–41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Otranto D, Giannelli A, Scotty Trumble N, Chavkin M, Kennard G, Latrofa MS, et al. Clinical case presentation and a review of the literature of canine onchocercosis by Onchocerca lupi in the United States. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Franchini D, Giannelli A, Di Paola G, Cortes H, Cardoso L, Lia RP, et al. Image diagnosis of zoonotic onchocercosis by Onchocerca lupi. Vet Parasitol. 2014;203:91–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Otranto D, Sakru N, Testini G, Gürlü VP, Yakar K, Lia RP, et al. First evidence of human zoonotic infection by Onchocerca lupi (Spirurida, Onchocercidae). Am J Trop Med. 2011;84:55–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Otranto D, Colella V, Bezerra-Santos MA, Mendoza-Roldan JA, Cavalera MA, Pereira A, et al. Efficacy of a spot-on formulation containing moxidectin 2.5%/imidacloprid 10% for the treatment of Cercopithifilaria spp. and Onchocerca lupi microfilariae in naturally infected dogs from Portugal. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14:199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cantey PT, Weeks J, Edwards M, Rao S, Ostovar GA, Dehority W, et al. The emergence of zoonotic Onchocerca lupi infection in the United States—a case-series. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;62:778–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Dudley RW, Smith C, Dishop M, Mirsky D, Handler MH, Rao S. A cervical spine mass caused by Onchocerca lupi. Lancet. 2015;386:1372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hasanreisoglu M, Halim MS, Latrofa MS, Mendoza-Roldan JA, Öğüt B, Yilmaz M, et al. A human case of Onchocerca lupi mimicking nodular scleritis. Am J Trop Med. 2021;105(6):1782–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Otranto D, Deplazes P. Zoonotic nematodes of wild carnivores. Int J Parasitol Parasit Wildl. 2019;9:370–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mowlavi G, Farzbod F, Kheirkhah A, Mobedi I, Bowman DD, Naddaf SR. Human ocular onchocerciasis caused by Onchocerca lupi (Spirurida, Onchocercidae) in Iran. J Helminthol. 2014;88:250–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F, Giannelli A, Latrofa MS, Papadopoulos E, Cardoso L, et al. Zoonotic Onchocerca lupi infection in dogs, Greece and Portugal, 2011–2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:2000–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Angelou A, Latrofa MS, Annoscia G, Symeonidou I, Theodoridis A, Polizopoulou ZS, et al. Cercopithifilaria species in dogs and ticks from Greece. Parasitol Res. 2020;119:3391–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mosallanejad B, Alborzi A, Katvandi N. A survey on ectoparasite infestations in companion dogs of Ahvaz district, south-west of Iran. J Arthropod Borne Dis. 2012;6:70–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ebrahimzade E, Fattahi R, Ahoo MB. Ectoparasites of stray dogs in Mazandaran, Gilan and Qazvin Provinces, north and center of Iran. J Arthropod Borne Dis. 2016;10:366–71.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ranjbar Bahadori S. Study of species diversity of animal ticks in Garmsar [in Persian with English abstract]. J Fac Vet Med University Tehran. 2003;58:11–4.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mirani F, Yakhchali M, Naem S. A study on ectoparasites fauna of dogs in suburbs of Ghilanegharb, Kermanshah province, Iran [in Persian with English abstract]. J Fac Vet Med Univ Tehran. 2017;72:7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Khazeni A, Telmadarraiy Z, Oshaghi MA, Mohebali M, Zarei Z, Abtahi SM. Molecular detection of Ehrlichia canis in ticks population collected on dogs in Meshkin-Shahr, Ardebil Province, Iran. J Biomed Eng. 2013;6:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ghahvei Y, Mirzaei M, Hashemnia S, Golchin M, Kheirandish R, Uni S, et al. Scanning electron microscopy of Onchocerca fasciata (Filarioidea: Onchocercidae) adults, microfilariae and eggs with notes on histopathological findings in camels. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:249.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Latrofa MS, Weigl S, Dantas-Torres F, Annoscia G, Traversa D, Brianti E, et al. A multiplex PCR for the simultaneous detection of species of filarioids infesting dogs. Acta Trop. 2012;122:150–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol. 1993;10:512–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2731–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Solinas C, Varcasia A, Brianti E, Giannetto S, Pipia AP, Columbano N, et al. Cercopithifilaria spp. in dogs in Sardinia Island (Italy). Parasitol Res. 2014;113:675–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cortes HC, Cardoso L, Giannelli A, Latrofa MS, Dantas-Torres F, Otranto D. Diversity of Cercopithifilaria species in dogs from Portugal. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:261.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ionică AM, D’Amico G, Mitková B, Kalmár Z, Annoscia G, Otranto D, et al. First report of Cercopithifilaria spp. in dogs from Eastern Europe with an overview of their geographic distribution in Europe. Parasitol Res. 2014;113:2761–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ramos RAN, do Rêgo AGDO, de FariasFirmino ED, Ramos CADN, de Carvalho GA, Dantas-Torres F, et al. Filarioids infecting dogs in northeastern Brazil. Vet Parasitol. 2016;226:26–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lineberry MW, Sundstrom KD, Little SE, Stayton EM, Allen KE. Detection of Cercopithifilaria bainae infection in shelter dogs and ticks in Oklahoma, USA. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:216.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Iatta R, Sazmand A, Nguyen V-L, Nemati F, Bahiraei Z, Mazhar Ayaz M, et al. Vector-borne pathogens in dogs of different regions of Iran and Pakistan. Parasitol Res. 2021;120:4219–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Ramos RAN, Giannelli A, Lia RP, Brianti E, Tarallo VD, Breitshwerdt EB, et al. Incidence of Cercopithifilaria bainae in dogs and probability of co-infection with other tick-borne pathogens. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e88198.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Alho AM, Cruz L, Coelho A, Martinho F, Mansinho M, Annoscia G, et al. Aberrant laryngeal location of Onchocerca lupi in a dog. Parasitol Int. 2016;65:218–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Verocai GG, Conboy G, Lejeune M, Marron F, Hanna P, MacDonald E, et al. Onchocerca lupi nematodes in dogs exported from the United States into Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:1477.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F, Cebeci Z, Yeniad B, Buyukbabani N, Boral OB, et al. Human ocular filariasis: further evidence on the zoonotic role of Onchocerca lupi. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Maia C, Annoscia G, Latrofa MS, Pereira A, Giannelli A, Pedroso L, et al. Onchocerca lupi nematode in cat, Portugal. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:2252.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Labelle AL, Daniels JB, Dix M, Labelle P. Onchocerca lupi causing ocular disease in two cats. Vet Ophthalmol. 2011;14:105–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Gherman CM, Mihalca AD. A synoptic overview of golden jackal parasites reveals high diversity of species. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:419.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Otranto D, Latrofa MS, Brianti E, Annoscia G, Parisi A, Dantas-Torres F, et al. An assessment of genetic variability in the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene of Cercopithifilaria sp. (Spirurida, Onchocercidae) from dog and Rhipicephalus sanguineus populations. Mol Cell Probes. 2012;26:81–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Santos MAB, de Macedo LO, Otranto D, Ramos CAN, Rêgo AGO, Giannelli A, et al. Screening of Cercopithifilaria bainae and Hepatozoon canis in ticks collected from dogs of Northeastern Brazil. Acta Parasitol. 2018;63:605–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Santos MAB, de Souza IB, de Macedo LO, Ramos CAN, Rego AGO, Alves LC, et al. Cercopithifilaria bainae in Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato ticks from dogs in Brazil. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2017;8:623–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank all who assisted us in sampling, with specials thanks to Aliasghar Bahari, Seyedmasoud Zolhavarieh and Alireza Nourian (Bu-Ali Sina University); Gholamreza Mowlavi, Omid Hosseininejad, Fatemeh Arabifar and Mahmood Khannejad (in Ahvaz); Shilan Lorestani (in Kermanshah); Faranak Rahmanpour (in Amol); and Seyed Ali Vaziri (in Yazd). This study was performed under the academic agreement between Bu-Ali Sina University (Iran) with University of Bari (Italy).


This study was supported financially by Bu-Ali Sina University (Grant number 1/1/28864 to AS) and Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Grant number 17351 to SMS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Conceptualisation: AS, DO. Methodology: AS, ZB, FN, GA, HN, AMS, SMM, SMS. Writing/preparation of original draft: AS, GA, ZB. Writing, review and editing: AS, MABS, DO. Supervision, project administration and funding acquisition: AS, DO. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Sazmand.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Sampling in Hamedan, Kermanshah, Amol, Yazd and Ahvaz was approved by the Ethical Research Committee of Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bu-Ali Sina University. Sampling in Esfahan was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Approval ID: IR.SUMS.REC.1398.1112).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Video S1. Cercopithifilaria bainae microfilaria during the microscopic examination of a skin sediment (×400 magnification).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sazmand, A., Bahiraei, Z., Nemati, F. et al. Dermal microfilariae of dogs, jackals and cats in different regions of Iran. Parasites Vectors 15, 28 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: