Skip to main content

Phylogenetic relationship between the endosymbiont “Candidatus Riesia pediculicola” and its human louse host

Abstract

Background

The human louse (Pediculus humanus) is a haematophagous ectoparasite that is intimately related to its host. It has been of great public health concern throughout human history. This louse has been classified into six divergent mitochondrial clades (A, D, B, F, C and E). As with all haematophagous lice, P. humanus directly depends on the presence of a bacterial symbiont, known as “Candidatus Riesia pediculicola”, to complement their unbalanced diet. In this study, we evaluated the codivergence of human lice around the world and their endosymbiotic bacteria. Using molecular approaches, we targeted lice mitochondrial genes from the six diverged clades and Candidatus Riesia pediculicola housekeeping genes.

Methods

The mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cytb) of lice was selected for molecular analysis, with the aim to identify louse clade. In parallel, we developed four PCR primer pairs targeting three housekeeping genes of Candidatus Riesia pediculicola: ftsZ, groEL and two regions of the rpoB gene (rpoB-1 and rpoB-2).

Results

The endosymbiont phylogeny perfectly mirrored the host insect phylogeny using the ftsZ and rpoB-2 genes, in addition to showing a significant co-phylogenetic congruence, suggesting a strict vertical transmission and a host–symbiont co-speciation following the evolutionary course of the human louse.

Conclusion

Our results unequivocally indicate that louse endosymbionts have experienced a similar co-evolutionary history and that the human louse clade can be determined by their endosymbiotic bacteria.

Graphical Abstract

Background

The human louse, Pediculus humanus (Phthiraptera: Anoplura), has been a great public health concern throughout human history. It is one of the most ancient haematophagous ectoparasites and intimately related to its host [1]. Two ecotypes can infest Homo sapiens: Pediculus humanus corporis and Pediculus humanus capitis. Pediculus h. corporis, known as the body louse, infests people living in poor hygienic conditions and is the principal vector of Rickettsia prowazekii (epidemic typhus agent), Borrelia recurrentis (relapsing fever agent), Bartonella quintana (trench fever agent) [2, 3] and probably Yersinia pestis (pandemic plague agent) [4]. Pediculus h. capitis, known as the head louse, has a widespread infestation rate regardless of the hygiene conditions [5, 6]. However, its capacity to be a potential vector of disease remains poorly understood [7]. The genetic diversity of human lice has been extensively investigated using mitochondrial (mt) genes [cytochrome b (cytb), cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) and 12S ribosomal RNA (12S)], allowing their classification into six divergent clades that may be grouped in three sister groups (A–D, B–F and C–E), each exhibiting a specific geographical distribution [8]. Clade A is the most prevalent, with a worldwide distribution, while clade D is only found in central Africa. Clade B is reported on all continents, while the genetically close clade F has a geographically restricted distribution and has been recently reported in South America. In addition, clade C has been identified in lice from central Africa and Asia, whereas clade E is reported in central and west Africa [6,7,8,9].

Like all haematophagous lice, P. humanus directly depends on the presence of endosymbiotic bacteria to supplement its unbalanced diet and metabolic integration [9]. Symbiosis is a common and widespread phenomenon that has a major effect on the biology of haematophagous arthropods. This interaction encompasses a whole range of possible symbiotic associations, ranging from strict parasitism to obligate mutualism [10]. Body and head lice host the same primary endosymbiotic bacterium, Candidatus Riesia pediculicola [9], which is classified in the genus Candidatus Riesia (class Gamma-Proteobacteria, family Enterobacteriaceae) [11, 12]. The symbionts are transovarialy transmitted to progeny and are housed in the mycetome, which is localized on the ventral side of the louse midgut. Migration is initiated by a stimulating factor associated with the adult moult. In females, the symbionts migrate to the lateral oviducts at the beginning of oogenesis, and in male adults, the stomach disc will degenerate over time [13,14,15]. A genomic study of the human body louse and its primary endosymbiont has provided new insights into Candidatus Riesia pediculicola [11]. This bacterium has a small genome (< 600 genes) containing a panel of genes encoding for the synthesis of essential B-group vitamins that are crucial to the host’s diet [16, 17]. Indeed, the symbiont supplements the host’s diet with thiamine, riboflavin, niacin, pantothenic acid, pyridoxine, biotin and folate (B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B7 and B9 vitamins, respectively) [16,17,18]. Removal of the mycetome from Pediculus females leads to their death a few days later, as well as to the production of deformed eggs [10, 16]. It is a distinct possibility that the development of transgenic lineages of host and symbiont genes will facilitate our understanding of host–symbiont function and integration [19].

Human and chimpanzee lice (Pediculus schaeffi) diverged from a common ancestor, as did their human and chimpanzee hosts (Pan troglodytes), respectively, sometime between approximately five and seven million years ago. Interestingly, Candidatus Riesia pediculicola shared a common ancestor with the P. schaeffi endosymbiont (Candidatus Riesia pediculischaeffi) roughly 5.4 million years ago [17, 18]. The evaluation of this co-evolutionary association between lice and their endosymbionts might provide new insights into human evolution [17]. Also, phylogenetic studies have shown a higher sequence similarity between clade A head and body lice endosymbionts than between clade A and clade B head lice endosymbionts. These results suggest that the endosymbionts co-evolved with their hosts’ clades [17].

The aim of the present study was to establish a co-evolutionary relationship between the endosymbiotic bacteria and their human lice hosts from different clades using molecular approaches. We investigated mt genes from the six divergent clades of human lice and the housekeeping genes of Candidatus Riesia pediculicola in order to determine the louse clade using its endosymbiont bacteria population.

Methods

Lice selection and DNA extraction

From among the human lice collection of the IHU Mediterannée Infection laboratory, we selected 126 head and body lice that had been collected from around the world to perform the molecular study (Additional file 1: Table S1). These specimens had been collected in dry tubes, transported to our laboratory and frozen at − 20 °C for subsequent analysis. Prior to DNA extraction, each louse was externally decontaminated as previously reported [20]. Each specimen was cut longitudinally, and one half was frozen for subsequent analysis. DNA was extracted using a DNA extraction kit (QIAamp Tissue Kit; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), using the EZ1 instrument in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol.

Lice genotypic status

Haplogroup identification using qPCR assays

To identify the lice mt clades, DNA samples were subjected to clade-specific quantitative duplex real-time PCR (qPCR) targeting a portion of the cytb gene [21]. Each duplex is specific to clades A–D and B–C, noting that the B–C duplex also amplifies clade E lice, classified as a sub-sister clade within clade C lice. DNA amplification was performed as described previously [22]. Lice with a known clade were used as a positive control, while the master mixtures served as negative controls.

Haplotype identification using standard PCR and sequencing

Based on the qPCR results, we randomly selected 46 lice specimens encompassing the full range of clade diversity for phylogenetic analysis. DNA samples were subjected to standard PCR, targeting a 347-bp fragment of the cytb gene [23]. The final reaction volume (25 μl) consisted of 12.5 μl Amplitaq gold master mixes, 0.5 μM of each primer, 5 μl DNA template and water. cytb amplification was performed in the Applied Biosystems 2720 Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with the following thermal cycling profile: 1 cycle at 95 °C for 15 min; then 40 cycles of 1 min at 95 °C, 30 s at 56 °C and 1 min at 72 °C; followed by a final extension step for 5 min at 72 °C. Successful amplification was validated by electrophoresis in an 1.5% agarose gel. Amplicons were then purified on NucleoFast 96 PCR plates (Macherey–Nagel EURL, Hoerdt, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and sequenced using the Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with an Applied Biosystems automated sequencer.

Candidatus Riesia pediculicola housekeeping gene analysis

Primer design

In order to investigate the genotypic profile of the endosymbiotic bacteria, four standard PCR systems were designed targeting three Candidatus Riesia pediculicola housekeeping genes: ftsZ, groEL and two regions of rpoB. Four genomes of Candidatus Riesia pediculicola belonging to clade A and B lice deposited in the GenBank database (accession numbers CP012841, CP012843, CP012845, CP001085) [17, 18] were aligned using Muscle in MEGA7 software [24] and screened for conserved and discriminative genes.

Based on the variability in the available Riesia genomes, three housekeeping genes were selected as candidates for primer design. In order to find a suitable and conserved region for primers, two sequence fragments (approx. 100 bp) separated by a minimum of 500 bp for each gene were submitted to Primer3 software v. 0.4.0 (http://primer3.ut.ee/). The melting temperature of each primer was tested using the free online software programme Oligo Analyser 3.1 (https://eu.idtdna.com/calc/analyzer) [25]. Designed primers (Table 1) were then tested in silico, using the NCBI BLAST nucleotide sequence similarity tool (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).

Table 1 Details of designed primers for Candidatus Riesia pediculicola gene amplification

Housekeeping gene amplification

Prior to endosymbiotic DNA amplification, the designed primers were tested against a panel of negative controls consisting of the DNA of various bacterial species and arthropods (Additional file 2: Table S2). Once validated, 73 samples were randomly selected from the 126 lice to amplify ftsZ, groEL and the two rpoB regions of the endosymbiont (Table 1). Standard PCRs were performed as described for cytb, and amplicons were visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel.

Data analysis

Phylogenetic analysis

In total, 28 lice specimens harbored common sequences for the cytb and the endosymbionte genes, but only 21 specimens had good quality sequences and were chosen for the phylogenetic analysis. The obtained cytb sequences were combined and compared with the worldwide cytb data previously reported and deposited in the GenBank database [8, 26]. Alignments were performed using MEGA7.0.26 software, and a maximum-likelihood (ML) tree was constructed using the Kimura2-parameter model under 1000 bootstrap replicates [27]. Candidatus Riesia pediculicola sequences were combined with data reported previously by Boyd et al. [16, 17] and were analysed as described for the cytb gene. Specifically, we used an Orthologous Average Nucleotide Identity Tool (OAT) [28] to define the overall similarities between the published Candidatus Riesia pediculicola genomes reported previously by Boyd et al. [17]. We also performed a Procrustes Approach to Cophylogenetic (PACo) analysis [29] using R [30] with 10,000 permutations, to test the dependence of the endosymbionte phylogeny on that of the louse clades by superimposing principal coordinates generated from the phylogenetic distance matrixes of Candidatus Riesia pediculicola and P. humanus.

Results

Lice clade identification

In this study, we collected 126 head lice and body lice worldwide (Additional file 1: Table S1) and selected 110 (87%) and 16 (13%), respectively, from these two populations for clade determination. qPCR assay of 125 of the 126 specimens showed that 76 (61%) of the lice belonged to the most prevalent clade, clade A, with various origins, including West Africa (17/76, 22.4%), Central Africa (10/76, 13.2%), North Africa (15/76, (9.7%), South Asia (24/76, 31.6%) and Europe (2/76, 2.6%), as well as reared lice used in the study as reference (8/76, 10.5%). Of the remaining lice specimens tested, 8/125 (6.3%) were genotyped as clade D; all these specimens were collected in the African continent, with six (75%) and two (25%) collected from Central and West Africa, respectively. Further, 39/125 (31.2%) of the analysed specimens belonged to clades C/E, with worldwide distribution: 21/39 (53.8%) and 11/39 (28.2%) specimens with Clades C/E were collected from West and Central Africa, respectively, and 7/39 (18%) were collected from Europe. Finally, only 2/125 (1.5%) samples belonged to clade B; these were collected in South Asia (Pakistan).

Standard PCR and sequencing of the cytb gene of 46/126 (36.5%) samples revealed that 12/46 (26.1%) belonged to clade A, 6/46 (13%) belonged to clade D, 2/46 (4.3%) belonged to clade B and only 1/46 (2.2%) belonged to the novel clade, clade F. In addition, 4/46 (8.7%) specimens belonged to clade C, while 21/46 (45.7%) of lice belonged to clade E (Table 2). Phylogenetical analysis was performed on 21 representative samples of all lice clades and origins.

Table 2 Results of mitochondrial analysis and Candidatus Riesia pediculicola housekeeping genes of human lice samples

Phylogenetic relationship between the endosymbiont and their lice host

To determine the phylogenetic profile of Candidatus Riesia pediculicola, we selected 73/126 (57.9%) lice specimens for DNA amplification and sequencing of three housekeeping genes (ftsZ, groEL and rpoB). For ftsZ, groEL and the first and second regions of the rpoB, we were able to generate all four fragments in 46/73 (63%) selected louse sequences: 65/73 (89%), 62/73 (84.9%), 60/73 (82.2%) and 57/73 (78.1%) sequences, respectively (Table 1). However, 27/46 (58.7%) of the endosymbionts were in clade A lice collected worldwide [7/27 (26%) North Africa; 16/27 (59.3%) South Asia; 4/27 (14.7%) Orlando strain]. Of these 46 sequences, four (8.6%) belonged to clade D lice and originated from West and Central Africa; two (4.4%) specimens were clade B endosymbionts collected in South Asia (Pakistan); one (2.2%) belonged to the novel clade F collected in Europe (France); and four (8.7%) were clade C endosymbionts collected in East Africa. Finally, for its sister clade E, 8/46 (17.4%) specimens were collected from West and Central Africa (Table 2).

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees were constructed for the housekeeping genes, including 21 samples already analysed for the cytb gene. Interestingly, louse endosymbionts from each mt host clade clustered in a separate group (Fig. 1a, d), while the phylogeny based on the endosymbiotic ftsZ and the second region of rpoB (rpoB-2) genes followed that of cytb, which is not the case for the groEL and first region of rpoB (rpoB-1) genes (Fig. 1b, c). To further investigate the present congruent phylogenies, we proceeded to concatenate ftsZ and rpoB-2 sequences (848 bp of the final fragment), and a phylogenetic tree was generated and compared to that of cytb. We noted that the concatenated 848-bp fragment of different Candidatus Riesia pediculicola harboured a higher bootstrap value and grouped in clades which were almost perfect when compared to the one gene-based tree. In addition, the clustering of sister clades was also visible for the B–F and C–E clades, mimicking the mt phylogeny of P. humanus (Fig. 2). Furthermore, PACo analysis showed a significant co-phylogenetic congruence between Candidatus Riesia pediculicola and P. humanus phylogenies across all clades. These results indicated a sum of squared residuals (m2) of 0.38 (P < 0.001) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

ML phylogenetic trees of the Pediculus humanus endosymbiont housekeeping genes, distributed in six divergent clades. a ML tree of a 454-bp fragment of the ftsZ gene, b ML tree of a 631-bp fragment of the groEL gene, c, d ML tree of the 677- and 466-bp fragments of the rpoB gene (rpoB-1 and rpoB-2, respectively). Phylogenetic inference was conducted in MEGA 7 using the ML method under the Kimura 2-parameter with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Abbreviations: ML, Maximum likelihood

Fig. 2
figure 2

Phylogenetic tree of the cytb mitochondrial gene of P. humanus (a) projected with the concatenated ftsZ and rpoB (rpoB-2) genes (848 bp) of Candidatus Riesia pediculicola (b), showing the relationship and co-evolution of the endosymbiont dependently on the mitochondrial clades of their host. Phylogenetic inference was conducted in MEGA 7 using the ML method under the Kimura 2-parameter with 1000 bootstrap replicates

Fig. 3
figure 3

Procrustean superimposition plot of Candidatus Riesia pediculicola and P. humanus. The extended principal coordinate matrices (X and Y) are centred by mean column vectors and subjected to Procrustes analysis. The configuration of the endosymbiont (dots) has been rotated and scaled to fit the lice configuration (arrowheads). Asterisk indicates lice samples, underlining indicates body lice. Abbreviations: r, Reference sequences from GenBank; see phylogenetic trees in Figs. 1 and 2 for sample abbreviations

The degree of genomic similarity of the deposited endosymbiont genomes of clade A and B lice [17] strongly support our results. A higher similarity (99.97%) was observed between Candidatus Riesia pediculicola of clade A head and body lice, with a lower similarity (97.85%) observed between clade A and B P. h. capitis specimens (Additional file 3: Figure S1).

Discussion

In this study, we highlighted the codivergence of the endosymbiont Candidatus Riesia pediculicola and the mt clades of their P. humanus host. Louse endosymbionts were first reported in the 1920s, and they were subsequently successfully characterized in various histological, embryonic, experimental and nutritional studies [10]. This obligate intracellular primary endosymbiont is fully and uniquely attached to its host [16]. Its major role resides in providing essential B vitamins that are crucial for the survival of the louse and is lacking in the delivered blood meals [12, 31]. This bacterium has never been isolated in pure axenic culture, but studies employing molecular techniques suggest a polyphyletic origin [32]. Endosymbiotic microorganisms are generally associated with diverse arthropods, such as Buchnera of aphids, Carsonella of psyllids, Portiera of whiteflies, Sulcia of many homopterans, Baumannia of sharpshooters, Blochmannia of carpenter ants and Nardonella of weevils, as well as with bloodsucking insects, such as Wigglesworthia of tsetse flies [33, 34]. Their endosymbiont phylogeny generally mirrors the host phylogeny, indicating a stable and intimate host–symbiont association over time. This is also the case of the Nycteribiidae family of bat flies, which is involved in ectoparasitic blood-feeding on bats: phylogeny of the endosymbiont Candidatus Aschnera chinzeii clades shows co-speciation over the evolutionary course of the Nycteribiidae family [35]. Allen et al. dated the divergence between the Riesia and Arsenophonus (endosymbiont of Lipoptena cervi) clades at 13–25 million years ago [36]. Furthermore, 16S rDNA sequences confirmed a strict coevolution between the endosymbionts of Anoplura (i.e. Haematopinus sp. of ungulates, Solenoptes sp. of cattle, Pediculus sp. of hominids and Polyplax sp. of rodents) and Rhyncophthirinan (Haematomyzus sp. of Asian elephants) genera, with the endosymbiont sequences forming five separate monophyletic branches, each composed from only on louse genus [37]. Finally, the gene content of the Columbicola wolffhuegeli (endosymbiont of Pied Imperial Pigeon louse) was so similar to the gene content of the Candidatus Riesia pediculicola, based on the phylogenetic tree, that the human head louse and C. wolffhuegeli acquired their endosymbionts independently [38]. These findings suggest that every louse group has its own endosymbiont.

We demonstrated the evolutionary phylogenetic relationship that links Candidatus Riesia pediculicola to their host mt clades. Individual phylogenetic trees based on ftsZ, rpoB-2 and their concatenated genes enabled an identical endosymbiotic clusterization depending on human lice clades. The endosymbiont phylogeny perfectly mirrored the host insect phylogeny, suggesting strict vertical transmission and host–symbiont co-speciation during the evolutionary course of the human louse. These data will allow the classification of human louse clades through their endosymbiotic bacteria based on the ftsZ and rpoB-2 genes. The slight discordance of rpoB-1- and, in particular, groEL-based trees (Fig. 1b, c) with host cytB-based topologies may be due to the lack of sufficient informative characters. The concatenated tree of the four gene fragment analysed, however, is in perfect agreement with thehost tree (Fig. 2). We further investigated this phenomenon by constructing a ML phylogenetic tree of human, gorilla and chimpanzee lice and their endosymbionts; however, the paucity of available sequences did not allow us to conclude if there is a probable gene tree conflict (Additional file 4: Figure S2). While we observed a clear characterization of the lice clades for the first region of the rpoB-1 gene, differences regarding clades E and C were observed. The slightly incongruent trees obtained within the same gene can be explained by a difference in the mutation level between these two regions. Our findings need further investigation by sequencing and analysing the endosymbionts’ whole genomes within all human lice clades to better establish the evolutionary time courses within their hosts.

Conclusion

Based on phylogenetic and genomic analyses, we have highlighted the co-evolutionary relationship between Candidatus Riesia pediculicola and their host mt clades. Our results unequivocally indicate that louse endosymbionts have experienced a similar co-evolutionary history and that human lice clades can be determined by their endosymbiotic bacteria based on their ftsZ and rpoB housekeeping genes. In future studies, further robust phylogenetic examination of all endosymbiont genome clades will be fundamental to a better understanding of the evolution of Candidatus Riesia pediculicola depending on the mt divergence of their hosts. However, it is crucial to isolate and identify this bacterium in order to evaluate the effectiveness of a drug treatment targeting the louse endosymbiont.

Availability of data and materials

The sequences of the Candidatus Riesia pediculicola housekeeping genes referred to in this article and the attributed GenBank accession numbers are as follows. ftsZ gene: clade A (Orlando-MW588459, Senegal-MW588463), clade D (Congo-MW588466, Senegal-MW588464), clade B (Pakistan-MW588462), clade F (France-MW588460), clade C (France-MW58846) and clade E (Congo-MW588465, Guinea-MW588458). The second region of the endosymbiont rpoB gene: clade A (Orlando-MW588485, India-MW588486, Algeria-MW588487), clade D (Senegal-MW588488, Congo-MW588489); clade B (Pakistan-MW588491), clade F (France-MW588490), clade C (Ethiopia-MW588492) and clade E (Congo-MW588494, Guinea-MW588493).

References

  1. Reed DL, Clayton DH. Genetic analysis of lice supports direct contact between modern and archaic humans. PLoS Biol. 2004;2:e340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Raoult D, Roux V. The body louse as a vector of reemerging human diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29:888–911.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Light JE, Toups MA, Reed DL. What’s in a name: the taxonomic status of human head and body lice. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008;47:1203–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barbieri R, Drancourt M, Raoult D. The role of louse-transmitted diseases in historical plague pandemics. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:e17-25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Amanzougaghene N, Fenollar F, Raoult D, Mediannikov O. Where are we with human lice? A review of the current state of knowledge. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;9:474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Light JE, Allen JM, Long LM, Carter TE, Barrow L, Suren G, et al. Geographic distributions and origins of human head lice (Pediculus humanus capitis) based on mitochondrial data. J Parasitol. 2008;94:1275–81.

  7. Ashfaq M, Prosser S, Nasir S, Masood M, Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. High diversity and rapid diversification in the head louse, Pediculus humanus (Pediculidae: Phthiraptera). Sci Rep. 2015;5:14188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Amanzougaghene N, Fenollar F, Davoust B, Djossou F, Ashfaq M, Bitam I, et al. Mitochondrial diversity and phylogeographic analysis of Pediculus humanus reveals a new Amazonian clade “F.” Infect Genet Evol. 2019;2019:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boyd BM, Reed DL. Taxonomy of lice and their endosymbiotic bacteria in the post-genomic era. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:324–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sassera D, Epis S, Pajoro M, Bandi C. Microbial symbiosis and the control of vector-borne pathogens in tsetse flies, human lice, and triatomine bugs. Pathog Glob Health. 2013;107:285–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Perotti MA, Allen JM, Reed DL, Braig HR, Perotti MA, Allen JM, et al. Host-symbiont interactions of the primary endosymbiont of human head and body lice. FASEB J. 2007;21:1058–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sasaki-Fukatsu K, Koga R, Nikoh N, Yoshizawa K, Kasai S, Mihara M, et al. Symbiotic bacteria associated with stomach discs of human lice. AEM. 2006;72:7349–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Eberle MW, McLean DL. Initiation and orientation of the symbiote migration in the human body louse Pediculus humanus L. J Insect Physiol. 1982;28:417–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eberle MW, McLean DL. Observation of symbiote migration in human body lice with scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Can J Microbiol. 1983;29:755–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Buchner P. Endosymbiosis of animals with plant microorganisms. Interscience publishers. 1965; 909

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kirkness EF, Haas BJ, Sun W, Braig HR, Perotti MA, Clark JM, et al. Genome sequences of the human body louse and its primary endosymbiont provide insights into the permanent parasitic lifestyle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:12168–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Boyd BM, Allen JM, Nguyen N-P, Vachaspati P, Quicksall ZS, Warnow T, et al. Primates, lice and bacteria: speciation and genome evolution in the symbionts of hominid lice. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34:1743–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Boyd BM, Allen JM, de Crécy-Lagard V, Reed DL. Genome sequence of Candidatus Riesia pediculischaeffi, endosymbiont of chimpanzee lice, and genomic comparison of recently acquired endosymbionts from human and chimpanzee lice. G3 (Bethesda). 2014;4:2189–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gerardo NM, Wilson ACC. The power of paired genomes. Mol Ecol. 2011;20:2038–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. La Scola B, Raoult D. Acinetobacter baumannii in human body louse. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:1671–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Amanzougaghene N, Akiana J, Ndombe GM, Davoust B, Nsana NS, Parra H-J, et al. Head lice of Pygmies reveal the presence of relapsing fever Borreliae in the Republic of Congo. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0005142

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Amanzougaghene N, Fenollar F, Sangaré AK, Sissoko MS, Doumbo OK, Raoult D, et al. Detection of bacterial pathogens including potential new species in human head lice from Mali. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0184621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li W, Ortiz G, Fournier P-E, Gimenez G, Reed DL, Pittendrigh B, et al. Genotyping of human lice suggests multiple emergences of body lice from local head louse populations. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Owczarzy R, Tataurov AV, Wu Y, Manthey JA, McQuisten KA, Almabrazi HG, et al. IDT SciTools: a suite for analysis and design of nucleic acid oligomers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:W163–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hammoud A, Louni M, Baldé MC, Beavogui AH, Gautret P, Raoult D, et al. Molecular characterization and genetic diversity of haplogroup E human lice in Guinea, West Africa. Microorganisms. 2021;9:257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Efron B, Tibshirani R. Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Statist Sci. 1986;55:54–75.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lee I, Kim YO, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:1100–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Balbuena JA, Míguez-Lozano R, Blasco-Costa I, Moreau CS. PACo: a novel procrustes application to cophylogenetic analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61048.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hutchinson MC, Cagua EF, Balbuena JA, Stouffer DB, Poisot T, Fitzjohn R. PACo: implementing Procrustean approach to cophylogeny in R. Methods Ecol Evol. 2017;8:932–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Douglas AE. The B vitamin nutrition of insects: the contributions of diet, microbiome and horizontally acquired genes. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2017;23:65–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kikuchi Y. Endosymbiotic bacteria in insects: their diversity and culturability. Microb Environ. 2009;24:195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Manzano-Marín A, Oceguera-Figueroa A, Latorre A, Jiménez-García LF, Moya A. Solving a bloody mess: B-vitamin independent metabolic convergence among gammaproteobacterial obligate endosymbionts from blood-feeding arthropods and the leech Haementeria officinalis. Genome Biol Evol. 2015;7:2871–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xiong H, Campelo D, Pollack RJ, Raoult D, Shao R, Alem M, et al. Second-generation sequencing of entire mitochondrial coding-regions (approx. 15.4 kb) holds promise for study of the phylogeny and taxonomy of human body lice and head lice. Med Vet Entomol. 2014;28:40–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hosokawa T, Nikoh N, Koga R, Satô M, Tanahashi M, Meng X-Y, et al. Reductive genome evolution, host–symbiont co-speciation and uterine transmission of endosymbiotic bacteria in bat flies. ISME J. 2012;6:577–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Allen JM, Light JE, Perotti MA, Braig HR, Reed DL, Tregenza T. Mutational meltdown in primary endosymbionts: selection limits Muller’s Ratchet. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e4969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hypša V, Křížek J. Molecular evidence for polyphyletic origin of the primary symbionts of sucking lice (Phthiraptera, Anoplura). Microb Ecol. 2007;54:242–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Alickovic L, Johnson KP, Boyd BM. The reduced genome of a heritable symbiont from an ectoparasitic feather feeding louse. BMC Ecol Evo. 2021;21:108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the IHU Méditerranée-Infection for its support.

Funding

This study was supported by the Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Méditerranée Infection, the National Research Agency under the “Investissements d’avenir” programme, reference ANR-10-IAHU-03, the Région Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur and European ERDF PRIMI funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AH, ML and OM designed the study. AH performed the experiments. AH, ML, SC and OM analysed the data. AH and ML wrote the manuscript. AH, ML, DM, FF and OM edited and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Meriem Louni or Oleg Mediannikov.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Results of mitochondrial analysis of human lice samples and Candidatus Riesia pediculicola housekeeping gene analysis.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

Negative control DNA used for sensitivity and specificity determination of designed oligonucleotides.

Additional file 3: Figure S1.

Heatmap generated according to OrthoANI values calculated using Orthologous Average Nucleotide Identity Tool (OAT) software (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/orthoani) to measure the overall similarity between the genomes of Candidatus Riesia sp. strains and other related members of the Riesia genus. Abbreviations: BL, body lice; HapA, Candidatus Riesia pediculicola from P. humanus clade A; HapB, Candidatus Riesia pediculicola from P. humanus clade B; HL, head lice

Additional file 4: Figure S2.

ML phylogenetic tree of primates lice (left) and their endosymbions “Ca. Riesia sp.” (right). Phylogenetic inference was conducted in MEGA 7 using the maximum likelihood method under the Kimura 2-parameter with 1000 bootstrap replicates.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hammoud, A., Louni, M., Missé, D. et al. Phylogenetic relationship between the endosymbiont “Candidatus Riesia pediculicola” and its human louse host. Parasites Vectors 15, 73 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05203-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05203-z

Keywords

  • Human lice
  • Candidatus Riesia pediculicola
  • Co-evolution
  • Mitochondrial genes
  • Housekeeping genes
  • Phylogenetic analysis