Skip to main content

Prohemocytes are the main cells infected by dengue virus in Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus

Abstract

Background

The primary disease vectors for dengue virus (DENV) transmission between humans are the mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus, with Ae. aegypti population size strongly correlated with DENV outbreaks. When a mosquito is infected with DENV, the virus migrates from the midgut to the salivary glands to complete the transmission cycle. How the virus crosses the hemocoel, resulting in systemic infection, is still unclear however. During viral infection and migration, the innate immune system is activated in defense. As part of cellular-mediated immunity, hemocytes are known to defend against bacteria and Plasmodium infection and may also participate in defending against DENV infection. Hemocytes are categorized into three cell types: prohemocytes, granulocytes, and oenocytoids. Here, we investigated which hemocytes can be infected by DENV and compare hemocyte infection between Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus.

Methods

Hemocytes were collected from Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus mosquitoes that were intrathoracically infected with DENV2-GFP. The collected hemocytes were then identified via Giemsa staining and examined microscopically for morphological differences and viral infection.

Results

All three types of hemocytes were infected by DENV, though the predominantly infected cell type was prohemocytes. In Ae. aegypti, the highest and lowest infection rates at 7 days post infection occurred in prohemocytes and granulocytes, respectively. Prohemocytes were also the primary infection target of DENV in Ae. albopictus, with similar infection rates across the other two hemocyte groups. The ratios of hemocyte composition did not differ significantly between non-infected and infected mosquitoes for either species.

Conclusions

In this study, we showed that prohemocytes were the major type of hemocyte infected by DENV in both Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus. The infection rate of prohemocytes in Ae. albopictus was lower than that in Ae. aegypti, which may explain why systemic DENV infection in Ae. albopictus is less efficient than in Ae. aegypti and why Ae. albopictus is less correlated to dengue fever outbreaks. Future work in understanding the mechanisms behind these phenomena may help reduce arbovirus infection prevalence.

Graphical Abstract

Background

The main vectors for dengue virus (DENV) transmission between humans are the mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. In mosquitoes, infection with DENV starts in the midgut. After a blood meal from a host infected with DENV, the virus replicates in midgut cells and disseminates into the mosquito’s hemocoel. After circulation in the hemolymph, DENV infects other tissues in the mosquito, including the salivary glands. Once the salivary glands are infected with DENV, the infected mosquito host can spread the infection to another human with its next blood meal bite. However, how the virus travels in the hemocoel to infect other mosquito tissues remains unclear.

Historically, Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus have coexisted in the same geographical areas. Although Ae. albopictus has been responsible for dengue epidemics in Japan, Malaysia, China, and Hawaii, its vectorial capacity for DENV is lower than that of Ae. aegypti [1, 2]. Studies have shown that Ae. aegypti can be more efficiently infected with multiple DENV serotypes than Ae. albopictus [3], suggesting that Ae. albopictus are less capable of viral dissemination [3,4,5]. However, there is little detailed information about fundamental differences in DENV infection mechanisms between these two species.

The mosquito anti-viral defense mechanism is dependent on its activated innate immunity, which includes the Toll, IMD, JAK/STAT, and RNA interference (RNAi) pathways [6, 7]. Viruses are recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), which trigger the activation of immune pathway cascades that induce the expression of anti-microbial peptides (AMPs) or RNAi responses [8]. In addition to these well-known innate immune pathways, insects also have cellular-mediated immunity that is affected by a group of circulating macrophage-like cells referred to as hemocytes [9, 10]. Hemocytes participate in many activities in the host body, such as the promotion of tissue repair, removal of dead cells, and elimination of ingested microbes by phagocytosis, lysis, and melanization. They are also involved in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), reactive nitrogen species (RNS) [11], prophenoloxidase (PPO) [12], and AMPs with fat bodies, the latter of which are well-known immune cells in insects. The importance of hemocytes for bacteria and Plasmodium clearance is well established [13], but their role in arbovirus infection, such as DENV, is not clearly understood.

Although the mosquito host initiates immune responses to defend against DENV, the virus cannot be eliminated. Some viruses, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV-1), will infect immune cells (e.g. macrophages) to escape elimination by the immune system [14]. For example, white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) proliferates in the hemocytes of a shrimp (Fenneropenaeus chinensis) [15] and Sindbis virus (SINV) can infect hemocytes of Ae. aegypti [16]. We hypothesized that it is possible that DENV uses a similar strategy to infect the hemocytes of mosquitoes for proliferation.

There are three known types of hemocytes in mosquitoes: prohemocytes, granulocytes, and oenocytoids. Prohemocytes are round, have a high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio, and are thought to be a precursor cell to granulocytes and oenocytoids [17]. They may also play a role in the infection cycle, as previous work has shown that prohemocytes are also involved in phagocytosis [18, 19]. Granulocytes are polymorphic and highly phagocytic cells. They typically have various particles or vesicles in the cytoplasm. Oenocytoids are round cells with eccentric nuclei and a homogeneous cytoplasm. They mostly produce melanin, an insoluble pigment involved in the melanization immune process [20, 21]. However, the involvement of hemocytes in arbovirus infection, including differences between types of hemocyte, still needs to be investigated.

Here, we studied the role played by hemocytes during DENV infection in both Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus mosquitoes. We identified differences in DENV infection in the hemocytes of these two species, which may be an important factor for the systemic infection. Further studies of this infection mechanism could provide insights into new ways to inhibit DENV spread.

Methods

Mosquito rearing

Aedes aegypti (Higgs) and Ae. albopictus (lab-adapted) mosquito eggs were hatched in reverse osmosis (RO) water. Larvae were transferred to larger containers and fed a mixture of yeast powder (Taiwan Sugar Corporation, Taiwan) and lyophilized powder of goose liver (#7573, NTN fishing bait LTD, Taiwan). Pupae were collected and then transferred to cages for adult emergence. Adult mosquitoes were given a constant supply of 10% sucrose water. The environment was maintained at 28 °C and 75% relative humidity under a 12-h light: 12-h dark cycle.

DENV maintenance

DENV2-EGFP (New Guinea C strain, NGC) (Additional file 1: Fig. S1) [22] was passaged using the Vero cell line and stored in a − 80 °C freezer. Viral titers were determined via plaque assay.

Infection of mosquitoes with DENV2

Mosquitoes were infected with DENV intrathoracically by injection of 400 PFU of DENV2 using a micro-injector (Nanoject II, Drummond Scientific Company). Injected mosquitoes were maintained in regular conditions and incubated for 7 days.

Hemocyte collection and characterization

Hemocyte collection and characterization were performed in accordance with protocols from previous studies [23]. Each uninfected or infected mosquito was anesthetized on ice and placed on a glass slide. A pulled glass needle was filled with hemolymph diluent solution (60% Schneider’s medium, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), and 30% citrate buffer) and injected into the hemocoel of the mosquito in the last two abdominal segments. Injection was continued until the abdomen became filled or bloated. Injected mosquitoes were placed back on ice for 5 min. After incubation, the legs, wings, and tip of abdomen were removed from each mosquito and placed on a glass slide that was treated with 70% ethanol. Hemolymph diluent solution was injected into the thorax of the incubated mosquito using a glass needle. Hemolymph was collected by opening the abdomen. Hemolymph from 20 uninfected or infected mosquitoes was collected individually. The collected hemolymph were allowed to air-dry on the slide. The slide was fixed by treatment with methanol for 5 min and then stained with Giemsa (10 times diluted in phosphate buffer pH 7.2) for 5 min, followed by a wash with distilled water.

Results

Dengue virus is able to infect all three hemocyte groups in mosquitoes

To investigate whether mosquito hemocytes are infected by DENV, we first infected Ae. aegypti intrathoracically with DENV2–EGFP and then incubated for 7 days. Hemocytes were collected and immediately stained with Giemsa dye for visual examination. We were able to identify all three groups (prohemocytes, granulocytes, or oenocytoids) of hemocyte (Additional file 2: Fig. S2, BF). In addition, we also confirmed members of each group which were GFP positive (EGFP+) and thus presented DENV infection (Additional file 2: Fig. S2, GFP).

We found GFP-positive cells in each of the three hemocyte groups, implying that not only can DENV infect hemocytes but that it can infect all three hemocyte types. We wondered whether DENV infection differed in these distinct types and therefore analyzed the ratio of GFP positive to negative cells in each hemocyte group.

Prohemocytes are the major hemocyte group infected with dengue virus in Ae. aegypti

To investigate which type of hemocyte was the major target of DENV, we infected large amounts of Ae. aegypti intrathoracically with DENV2–EGFP. We collected more than 4000 hemocytes from at least 20 uninfected and infected mosquitoes and stained them after 7 days of incubation. We observed the cells using microscopy and determined that the ratio of hemocyte groups did not obviously change after DENV infection (Fig. 1a). We found that the prohemocytes and granulocytes represented the largest and smallest groups, respectively; prohemocytes represented above 50% of the total number of hemocytes in both infected and uninfected mosquitoes, while < 5% were granulocytes.

Fig. 1
figure 1

DENV infection in the hemocytes of Ae. aegypti adult females. Female mosquitoes were injected with DENV2-EGFP. After incubation for 7 days, hemocytes were collected, stained, and categorized by morphology into types. a Percentage of total collected hemocytes identified as prohemocytes, oenocytoids, or granulocytes. b Percentage of DENV-infected (EGFP expressing) cells in each hemocyte group

Next, we investigated the infection rate of DENV within each type of hemocyte. We employed the EGFP marker as a readout for DENV infection and observed that 30.1% of the prohemocytes collected from the infected mosquitoes exhibited green fluorescence (i.e. EGFP+ cell) (Fig. 1b). We also observed that 8.6% and 12.1% of granulocytes and oenocytoids, respectively, were EGFP positive (EGFP+) (Fig. 1b). From this, we concluded that prohemocytes are the major target of DENV infection in mosquito hemocytes.

Dengue virus preferentially infects Ae. albopictus prohemocytes

Infection of DENV in the secondary tissue of Ae. albopictus is less efficient than for Ae. aegypti [3]. To study the infection status of Ae. albopictus hemocytes, we infected Ae. albopictus and collected and stained > 4000 hemocytes from at least 20 infected or uninfected mosquitoes. As for Ae. aegypti, we found that the largest group of hemocytes in Ae. albopictus was prohemocytes, at > 70% of the total hemocyte population in infected and uninfected mosquitoes (Fig. 2a). Granulocytes were the smallest group, at < 12% of the total population.

Fig. 2
figure 2

DENV infection in the hemocytes of Ae. albopictus adult females. Female mosquitoes were injected with DENV2-EGFP. After incubation for 7 days, hemocytes were collected, stained, and categorized by morphology into types. Infected hemocytes were confirmed with EGFP expression. a Percentage of total collected hemocytes identified as prohemocytes, oenocytoids, or granulocytes. b Percentage of DENV-infected (EGFP expressing) cells in each hemocyte group

We also analyzed the DENV infection rate in individual hemocyte groups. In prohemocytes of infected Ae. albopictus, we found that 20.7% of cells were infected with DENV (Fig. 2b). In granulocytes and oenocytoids, 13.0% and 13.3% of cells, respectively, were infected with DENV (Fig. 2b). Taken together, these results suggest that DENV does infect hemocytes in Aedes mosquitoes and predominantly targets prohemocytes. In addition, DENV infection rates of hemocytes are lower in Ae. albopictus than in Ae. aegypti.

Discussion

Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti are both major vectors of DENV, though their relative vector competences are drastically different. Though the two species share similar physiologies, small differences may be sufficient to explain these distinct vector competences, potentially via differential infection of hemocytes. In this study, we address the question of how DENV travels in mosquito bodies to infect other tissues by demonstrating that DENV infected and replicated in the hemocytes of both intrathoracically infected mosquito vectors. Our results also showed a stronger infection presence in Ae. aegypti, which may indicate it is the more potent vector.

Our work here demonstrated that hemocytes are indeed infected by DENV in mosquitoes, though not equally across all cell types. Among the three types of hemocytes, prohemocytes had the highest infection rate, suggesting that a different function of prohemocytes makes them more likely to encounter the virus or become infected. The other types of hemocytes, granulocytes and oenocytoids, were infected by DENV as well. A recent study using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) suggested these two hemocyte types may be divided into different sub-groups with distinct functions [24]. The reasons for the preferential infection of prohemocytes, and whether sub-groups of the other hemocytes are differentially targeted by DENV, require further investigation.

We also identified DENV replication in cells other than prohemocytes with DENV2–EGFP, which might indicate that those other cells also supported DENV replication but at lower levels. Alternatively, since prohemocytes are thought to be the precursor cells of granulocytes and oenocytoids [17], we hypothesize that the infection of these cells may come before their differentiation. For instance, when infected prohemocytes differentiate into granulocytes or oenocytoids, the differentiated daughter cells may still be infected with DENV. This hypothesis would also benefit from a deeper investigation into the mechanism of infection of prohemocytes versus other cell types.

To further probe the reasons for prohemocytes having the highest ratio of infection with DENV, we speculated on possible mechanisms of infection that could be investigated in future studies. Prohemocytes, as well as granulocytes, are highly phagocytic cells, and phagocytosis can be rapidly initiated when the cells are exposed to pathogens. Previous studies in mammalian cells showed that cell surface phagocytosis receptors, such as dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN) and mannose receptor (MR) [25,26,27], are involved in DENV entry. We suspect DENV could infect mosquito prohemocytes through a similar mechanism because of the role of prohemocytes in phagocytosis. The possible role of phagocytosis in DENV infection is also strengthened by considering the overall function of phagocytosis as well as differences in this function between midgut and systemic infections [28]. For instance, orally infected mosquitoes have an increased number of hemocytes recruited to the midgut. When phagocytosis is blocked in hemocytes, the midgut infection is less severe, but the systemic infection is intensified. The type of hemocyte involved in these two kinds of infections has not yet been specified, so we cannot be sure which type of hemocyte was involved in these differences. We speculate that prohemocytes are the major hemocyte type involved in defending the midgut tissue against DENV infection and granulocytes are the major type involved in systemic infection, as granulocytes are considered to be a typical phagocytic hemocyte for bacterial infection. If prohemocytes localized to the midgut to combat DENV infection via phagocytosis and were then infected, the prolonged localization of prohemocytes in the midgut tissue would aggravate midgut infection.

Our study did contain an anomaly compared to previous studies—we obtained 150–250 hemocytes per adult female mosquito, which was lower than that of previous studies (around 500–4000 hemocytes per adult mosquito [17]). One possible reason is the natural decrease in hemocytes with adult age in mosquitoes (days). We allowed 4–5 days for the mosquitoes to achieve maturation and mating before intrathoracically infecting them with DENV. After we infected the mosquitoes intrathoracically, we incubated them for an additional 7 days to achieve systemic infection. Adult mosquitoes that are 11–12 days old were shown to have about half the number of hemocytes than 1–3 days old adult mosquitoes [17]. Therefore, we assume that the number of granulocytes, oenocytoids, and prohemocytes will differ between mosquitoes that are 1 and 12 days old.

Finally, our study showed that the ratio of infected prohemocytes in Ae. albopictus was lower than that in Ae. aegypti, whereas the infection rates for granulocytes and oenocytoids were similar. Therefore, Ae. aegypti could have greater infection rates in secondary tissues across the hemocoel and midgut than Ae. albopictus. The mechanisms behind the lower virulence of DENV and lack of correlation to outbreaks in Ae. albopictus are unclear and can be contradictory between studies. Our work here matches previous work showing that infection by multiple serotypes of DENV in Ae. albopictus is less efficient than in Ae. aegypti [3]. Furthermore, studies have reported lower dissemination of DENV-2 to the secondary tissues (e.g. Malpighian tubules, ovaries, and salivary glands) of Ae. albopictus than Ae. aegypti [3, 5]. Consequently, this may decrease the risk of DENV transmission via Ae. albopictus to other human hosts. However, other studies indicate that this may not be affected by the activation of immune pathways. Toll and JAK/STAT immune pathways, important pathways in defending against virus infection, were equally activated in response to DENV infection in both species [29]. Another possible reason for lower DENV virulence in Ae. albopictus may be its role as a natural host of Wolbachia, a bacteria that naturally occurs in some insects. Wolbachia has artificially been introduced to Ae. aegypti to combat DENV transmission for several years, with this having been shown to reduce infection and dissemination in Aedes species [30].

Conclusions

In this study, we collected and examined the hemocytes of Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus intrathoracically infected with DENV. Our finding that prohemocytes were the primary targets of DENV infection, with over 20% infected, sheds new light on the mosquito infection process, which is key for discovering ways to reduce later transmission to humans. The greater proportion of prohemocytes infected in Ae. aegypti over Ae. albopictus may be a factor for lower DENV transmission between human hosts that are bitten by Ae. albopictus. These data may explain the lower correlation between Ae. albopictus and dengue fever outbreaks in endemic areas. As the major component of cellular-mediated immunity, hemocytes may play a crucial role in systemic DENV infection. Further understanding of the detailed mechanisms of viral infection in hemocytes may be helpful in generating novel methods of reducing DENV transmission.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the findings of this article are included within the article and its Additional files.

Abbreviations

DENV:

Dengue virus

Ae. aegypti :

Aedes aegypti

Ae. albopictus :

Aedes albopictus

IMD:

Immune deficiency

JAK/STAT:

Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription

RNAi:

RNA interference

PRRs:

Pattern recognition receptors

AMPs:

Anti-microbial peptides

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

RNS:

reactive nitrogen species

PPO:

Prophenoloxidase

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

HTLV-1:

Human T-lymphotropic virus

WSSV:

White spot syndrome virus

SINV:

Sindbis virus

RO:

Reverse osmosis

NGC:

New Guinea C strain

PFU:

Plaque-forming unit

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

EGFP:

Enhanced green fluorescent protein

scRNA-seq:

Single-cell RNA sequencing

DC-SIGN:

Dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing non-integrin

MR:

Mannose receptor

References

  1. Mubbashir H, Munir S, Kashif R, Nawaz HB, Abdul B, Baharullah K. Characterization of dengue virus in Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus spp. of mosquitoes: a study in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Mol Biol Res Commun. 2018;7:77–82.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Tsujimoto H, Hanley KA, Sundararajan A, Devitt NP, Schilkey FD, Hansen IA. Correction: dengue virus serotype 2 infection alters midgut and carcass gene expression in the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0192128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Soni M, Khan SA, Bhattacharjee CK, Dutta P. Experimental study of dengue virus infection in Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus: a comparative analysis on susceptibility, virus transmission and reproductive success. J Invertebr Pathol. 2020;175: 107445.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guo XX, Zhu XJ, Li CX, Dong YD, Zhang YM, Xing D, et al. Vector competence of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) for DEN2-43 and New Guinea C virus strains of dengue 2 virus. Acta Trop. 2013;128:566–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Whitehorn J, Kien DT, Nguyen NM, Nguyen HL, Kyrylos PP, Carrington LB, et al. Comparative susceptibility of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti to dengue virus infection after feeding on blood of viremic humans: implications for public health. J Infect Dis. 2015;212:1182–90.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar A, Srivastava P, Sirisena P, Dubey SK, Kumar R, Shrinet J, et al. Mosquito innate immunity. Insects. 2018;9:95.

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang YH, Chang MM, Wang XL, Zheng AH, Zou Z. The immune strategies of mosquito Aedes aegypti against microbial infection. Dev Comp Immunol. 2018;83:12–21.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bahar AA, Ren D. Antimicrobial peptides. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2013;6:1543–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lamiable O, Arnold J, de Faria I, Olmo RP, Bergami F, Meignin C, et al. Analysis of the contribution of hemocytes and autophagy to Drosophila antiviral immunity. J Virol. 2016;90:5415–26.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Tassetto M, Kunitomi M, Andino R. Circulating immune cells mediate a systemic RNAi-based adaptive antiviral response in Drosophila. Cell. 2017;169:314-325.e13.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Marmaras VJ, Lampropoulou M. Regulators and signalling in insect haemocyte immunity. Cell Signal. 2009;21:186–95.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shiao SH, Higgs S, Adelman Z, Christensen BM, Liu SH, Chen CC. Effect of prophenoloxidase expression knockout on the melanization of microfilariae in the mosquito Armigeres subalbatus. Insect Mol Biol. 2001;10:315–21.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hillyer JF, Schmidt SL, Christensen BM. Hemocyte-mediated phagocytosis and melanization in the mosquito Armigeres subalbatus following immune challenge by bacteria. Cell Tissue Res. 2003;313:117–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barton K, Winckelmann A, Palmer S. HIV-1 reservoirs during suppressive therapy. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24:345–55.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Cui C, Liang Q, Tang X, Xing J, Sheng X, Zhan W. Differential apoptotic responses of hemocyte subpopulations to white spot syndrome virus infection in Fenneropenaeus chinensis. Front Immunol. 2020;11: 594390.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Parikh GR, Oliver JD, Bartholomay LC. A haemocyte tropism for an arbovirus. J Gen Virol. 2009;90:292–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Castillo JC, Robertson AE, Strand MR. Characterization of hemocytes from the mosquitoes Anopheles gambiae and Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2006;36:891–903.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hillyer JF, Strand MR. Mosquito hemocyte-mediated immune responses. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2014;3:14–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. King JG, Hillyer JF. Spatial and temporal in vivo analysis of circulating and sessile immune cells in mosquitoes: hemocyte mitosis following infection. BMC Biol. 2013;11:55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang H, Wang Y, Ma C, Kanost MR. Subunit composition of pro-phenol oxidase from Manduca sexta: molecular cloning of subunit ProPO-P1. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1997;27:835–50.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Drif L, Brehélin M. The circulating hemocytes of Culexpipiens and Aedesaegypii: cytology histochemistry, hemograms and functions. Dev Comp Immunol. 1983;7:687–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee JK, Chui JLM, Lee RCH, Kong HY, Chin WX, Chu JJH. Antiviral activity of ST081006 against the dengue virus. Antivir Res. 2019;171: 104589.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dedkhad W, Bartholomay LC, Christensen BM, Hempolchom C, Chaithong U, Saeung A. Hemocyte classification of three mosquito vectors: Aedes togoi, Anopheles lesteri and Culex quinquefasciatus. Trop Biomed. 2019;36:505–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Raddi G, Barletta ABF, Efremova M, Ramirez JL, Cantera R, Teichmann SA, et al. Mosquito cellular immunity at single-cell resolution. Science. 2020;369:1128–32.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Alen MM, Kaptein SJ, De Burghgraeve T, Balzarini J, Neyts J, Schols D. Antiviral activity of carbohydrate-binding agents and the role of DC-SIGN in dengue virus infection. Virology. 2009;387:67–75.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu P, Ridilla M, Patel P, Betts L, Gallichotte E, Shahidi L, et al. Beyond attachment: roles of DC-SIGN in dengue virus infection. Traffic. 2017;18:218–31.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang YL, Pai FS, Tsou YT, Mon HC, Hsu TL, Wu CY, et al. Human CLEC18 gene cluster contains C-type lectins with differential glycan-binding specificity. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:21252–63.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Leite T, Ferreira AGA, Imler JL, Marques JT. Distinct roles of hemocytes at different stages of infection by dengue and zika viruses in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Front Immunol. 2021;12: 660873.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Smartt CT, Shin D, Alto BW. Dengue serotype-specific immune response in Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2017;112:829–37.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsai CH, Chen TH, Lin C, Shu PY, Su CL, Teng HJ. The impact of temperature and Wolbachia infection on vector competence of potential dengue vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in the transmission of dengue virus serotype 1 in southern Taiwan. Parasites Vectors. 2017;10:551.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Justin Jang Hann Chu at National University of Singapore for kindly providing DENV2–EGFP infectious clone for this study.

Funding

This study also was supported by the National Health Research Institutes (NHRI), Taiwan (Grant No. NHRI-MR-110-GP-12) awarded to Chun-Hong Chen.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LC, WLL, and CHC: conception and design. LC: formal analysis. LC, WLL, SCH: investigation and data collection. LC, WLL, MPS and JRW: methodology. CHC: funding. LC, CHC: writing—original draft. All authors contributed to the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun-Hong Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Schematic representation of DENV2-EGFP. The EGFP gene was inserted into the DENV capsid (C) for production during viral replication.

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

Hemocytes of Ae. aegypti can be infected with DENV. Adult female mosquitoes were injected with DENV2-EGFP, which is used as a fluorescent indicator for DENV infection. Hemocytes were collected from uninfected (left panel) and infected (right panel) mosquitoes, and their morphologies observed with 100× phase contrast (BF) and green channel (GFP) fluorescence microscopy, shown on the left and right of each pair of images, respectively. Hemocytes can be divided into three groups based on their observed morphology under fluorescent microscopy and Giemsa staining: prohemocytes, oenocytoids, and granulocytes.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, L., Liu, WL., Su, M.P. et al. Prohemocytes are the main cells infected by dengue virus in Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Parasites Vectors 15, 137 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05276-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05276-w

Keywords

  • Mosquito
  • Hemocyte
  • Dengue virus
  • Aedes aegypti
  • Aedes albopictus