Skip to main content
Download PDF

Assessment of malaria transmission intensity and insecticide resistance mechanisms in three rural areas of the Moyen Ogooué Province of Gabon

Parasites & Vectors volume 15, Article number: 217 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Vector control is considered to be the most successful component of malaria prevention programs and a major contributor to the reduction of malaria incidence over the last two decades. However, the success of this strategy is threatened by the development of resistance to insecticides and behavioural adaptations of vectors. The aim of this study was to monitor malaria transmission and the distribution of insecticide resistance genes in Anopheles populations from three rural areas of the Moyen Ogooué Province of Gabon.

Methods

Anopheles spp. were collected using human landing catches in Bindo, Nombakélé and Zilé, three villages located in the surroundings of Lambaréné, during both the rainy and dry seasons. Mosquitoes were identified morphologically, and DNA was extracted from heads and thoraces. Members of the Anopheles gambiae complex were identified by molecular methods using the PCR SINE200 protocol and by sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer 2 region. Taqman assays were used to determine Plasmodium infection and the presence of resistance alleles.

Results

Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (97.7%), An. moucheti (1.7%) and An. coustani (0.6%) were the three groups of species collected. Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (98.5%) and An. coluzzii (1.5%) were the only species of the An. gambiae complex present in the collection. Of the 1235 Anopheles collected, 1193 were collected during the rainy season; these exhibited an exophagic behaviour, and consistently more mosquitoes were collected outdoor than indoor in the three study areas. Of the 1166 Anopheles screened, 26 (2.2%) were infected with Plasmodium species, specifically Plasmodium falciparum (66.7%), P. malariae (15.4%), P. ovale curtisi (11.5%) and P. ovale wallikeri (3.8%). Malaria transmission intensity was high in Zilé, with an average annual entomological inoculation rate (aEIR) of 243 infective bites per year, while aEIRs in Bindo and Nombakélé were 80.2 and 17 infective bites per year, respectively. Both the L1014F and L1014S mutations were present at frequencies > 95% but no Ace1G119S mutation was found.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that malaria transmission intensity is heterogeneous in these three rural areas of Moyen Ogooué Province, with areas of high transmission, such as Zilé. The exophagic behaviour of the mosquitoes as well as the high frequency of resistance mutations are serious challenges that need to be addressed by the deployment of control measures adapted to the local setting.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Malaria remains a major public health issue in many malaria-endemic countries. Despite all the efforts put in place to control malaria, the disease still took an estimated 409,000 lives in 2019, mostly children under 5 years of age in sub-Saharan Africa [1]. Between 2000 and 2015, the incidence of malaria due to Plasmodium falciparum decreased by 40%, which a significant proportion of this decrease attributable to malaria vector control interventions, such as insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) [2]. However, there is evidence that members of the Anopheles gambiae complex and the Anopheles funestus group, the main malaria vectors in Africa [3], have developed physiological resistance to the insecticides used in malaria control programmes. Pyrethroids were until recently the sole class of insecticides used to impregnate bednets, and this is now a main factor driving the emergence and spread of insecticide resistance [4]. Furthermore, while the widespread use of ITNs has had a large effect in reducing endophilic/anthropophilic vectors, some evidence indicates that it may have led to changes in vector behaviour and mosquito population composition. Consequently, some malaria vectors have changed their biting activity from indoors to outdoors as well as their biting time, which reduces the effect of the two main interventions [5].

There is a need for data on local vector species prior to or following the introduction of vector control measures. In Gabon, ITNs are the main tools used in vector control, however, net ownership in 2019 was estimated to be below 20% [1]. Moreover, data on malaria transmission are lacking as only few entomological assessments have been carried out over the years [6,7,8,9] and distribution of insecticide resistance has received little attention [8,9,10,11]. Most of the studies carried out to date focussed mainly on a few parts of the country, with members of the An. gambiae complex identified as the main malaria vectors in Lambaréné, Libreville and Port-Gentil [7,8,9], and An. funestus found to be the primary and secondary vector in Akou and Benguia, respectively [6, 12]. Other mosquito species, such as Anopheles nili, An. moucheti and An. hancocki, have been reported to be secondary vectors [6, 7, 12].

Sylla et al. [7] reported that An. gambiae and An. moucheti are the main vector species in Moyen Ogooué Province, situated in the midwestern part of Gabon. However, no data are currently available on the distribution of insecticide resistance genes in malaria vectors. The aim of the present study was to assess species composition of malaria vectors, sporozoite rate, Plasmodium species composition, entomological inoculation rate (EIR) and presence of insecticide resistance genes in localities where intense clinical malaria research activities have been carried out for > 25 years [13].

Methods

Study sites

The study was carried out from May 2017 to August 2018 in three villages of Moyen Ogooué Province: Zilé (−0.703910, 10.340140), Nombakélé (−0.847490, 10.378100) and Bindo (−0.436095, 10.387816) (Fig. 1). Zilé is an area located approximately 12 km from Lambaréné and is surrounded by forest and rubber plantations. The houses, which are the homes of the plantations’ workers and families, are constructed of concrete materials. Bindo is located approximately 61 km from Lambaréné, in an area of palm tree plantations and forest. The houses are constructed of concrete materials. Nombakélé is located along the National 1 road. The inhabitants of Nombakélé have diverse occupations, and the houses are mostly built with wooden planks.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of the study areas

Full size image

Precipitation data were obtained from the World Weather Online website [14]. During the study period, Moyen Ogooué Province was subjected to a prolonged rainy season stretching from October to May, with a small decline in precipitation from January to February, with monthly precipitation > 200 mm. The dry season extended from June to September, with monthly rainfalls of < 200 mm.

Mosquito collection and identification

Mosquitoes were collected in both the rainy and dry seasons by overnight human landing catches (HLC), indoor and outdoor. A total of four rounds of collections were performed in the three study areas, two during the rainy seasons and two during the dry seasons, with the exception of Zilé where three collections were performed in the rainy seasons and one during the dry seasons. The mosquitoes were collected during 2 nights in each month of collection. Collectors were trained and informed by the investigators of the procedure and of the associated risks. All collectors signed an informed consent form. They were instructed to contact the team in case they developed any symptoms of malaria during the 4 weeks following the HLC. The HLC method was used in this study after the results of a pilot test aimed at assessing the efficacy of CDC-light traps in catching mosquitoes were not satisfactory.

Four collectors were appointed each night at each collection point, two indoor and two outdoor at least 5 m away from the houses. Mosquito collections were performed during 2 nights in two selected houses at each of the study locations from 1800 hours to 0600 hours. Each collection period was divided into a 50-min collection time followed by a 10-min break, and this schedule was repeated for the duration of the night. Collectors switched houses and switched from indoor to outdoor every hour to minimize any bias due to the skills of the collectors or their attractiveness to mosquitoes.

Mosquitoes that landed on the exposed legs of the collectors were collected in glass tubes and pooled per collection hour.

Mosquitoes were transferred back to the Medical Entomology Laboratory of the Centre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné for morphological identification. Anopheles mosquitoes were identified using the morphological keys of Gillies and de Meillon [15] and Gillies and Coetzee [16]. Following morphological identification, the mosquitoes were preserved at − 20 °C in silica gel in Eppendorf tubes until transferred to the Institute of Tropical Medicine in Tübingen, Germany for further processing.

The mosquitoes were dissected, and the head/thorax separated from the abdomen. The head/thorax was ground in a FastPrep-24™ 5G sample disruption instrument and lysis system (MP Biomedicals LLC, Irvine, CA, USA), and DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA Mini and Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen®, Hilden, Germany) and the Quick-DNA Tissue/Insect Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research Corp., Irine, CA, USA). Mosquitoes that were morphologically identified as An. gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) were further analysed by PCR for species identification using the PCR-SINE200 protocol of Santolamazza et al. [17]. The PCR products were then electrophoresed in a 1.5% agarose gel.

Detection of Plasmodium spp. sporozoites

The extracted DNA was used to screen Anopheles mosquitoes for the presence of sporozoites using the protocol of Bass et al. [18] with slight modifications. This protocol allows for the simultaneous identification of Plasmodium spp. using one set of primers (PlasF: 5′-GCT TAG TTA CGA TTA ATA GGA GTA GCT TG-3′; PlasR: 5′-GAA AAT CTA AGA ATT TCA CCT CTG ACA-3′) and two probes, one labelled with the FAM fluorophore (Falci+; 5′-TCT GAA TAC GAA TGT C-3′) for the detection of P. falciparum and one labelled with the HEX fluorophore (OVM+; 5′-CTG AAT ACA AAT GCC-3′) for the detection of Plasmodium ovale, P. vivax and P. malariae. TaqMan assays were performed in the LightCycler 480 Instrument II system (Roche Applied Science, Penzburg, Germany). The cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min.

The samples with positive assay results according to Bass et al. [18] were further differentiated using the nested qPCR protocol from Groger et al. [19] that allows for the differential identification of Plasmodium spp. The positive samples were pre-amplified using primers from Snounou et al. [20], and the PCR products were used as templates in a single-plex qPCR assay for each of the five species of Plasmodium that can cause malaria in humans (P. falciparum, P. malariae, P. ovale curtisi, P. ovale wallikeri and P. vivax) using previously described primers and probes [19]. The cycling conditions consisted of polymerase activation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 30 s.

Identification of insecticide resistance genes

A subsample of 118 mosquitoes were selected randomly and screened for the knockdown resistance gene (Kdr) and Ace-1 genes using the protocol of Bass et al. [22] with slight modifications. This protocol enables the detection of knockdown mutations and wild-type (WT) alleles in two separates assays using one set of primers (kdr-forward: 5′-CAT TTT TCT TGG CCA CTG TAG TGA T-3′; kdr-reverse: 5′-CGA TCT TGG TCC ATG TTA ATT TGC A-3′) and three probes. One of the probes was labelled with the HEX fluorophore and was used to detect the WT allele (5′-CTTACGACTAAATTTC-3′) and the remaining two probes were labelled with the FAM fluorophore for the detection of the resistant alleles Knockdown West (KdrW; 5′-ACG ACA AAA TTT C-3′) and Knockdown East (KdrE; 5′-ACG ACT GAA TTT C-3′). The cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s and 65 °C for 45 s.

The detection of the insensitive acetylcholinesterase (iAChe) mutation was performed using an assay that enables the WT allele and the mutant allele (S119) to be distinguished. The protocol uses one set of primers (ACE1-F: 5′-GGC CGT CAT GCT GTG GAT-3′; ACE1-R: 5′ -GCG GTG CCG GAG TAG A-3′) and two probes, one labelled with the HEX fluorophore for the detection of the susceptible allele (Ace1G119; 5′-TTC GGC GGC GGCT-3′) and one labelled with the FAM fluorophore for the detection of the resistant allele (Ace1S119; 5′-TTC GGC GGC AGC T-3′). The cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 35 s.

Internal transcribed spacer 2 sequencing

Thirty-seven samples that failed to amplify using the PCR-SINE200 approach were amplified using the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) gene [22]. A subset of samples (n = 16) identified either by molecular or morphological methods were also sequenced. As primers, the 5.8S ATC ACT CGG CTC GTG GAT CG and 28S ATG CTT AAA TTT AGG GGG TAGTC were used. The cycling conditions consisted of 95 °C for 2 min, 30 cycles of 95 °C at 30 s, 50 °C at 30 s and 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension of 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed in a 1.5% agarose gel to confirm that the samples were amplified. The PCR products were cleaned using ExoSAP (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and sequenced using Sanger sequencing.

Sequence analysis for species identification

The sequences were cleaned and analysed with Bioedit v. 7.2.5. The consensus sequences generated were blasted in the NCBI Genbank. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using MUSCLE in MEGA v.10.2.6 with default parameters.

The evolutionary history was inferred by using the maximum likelihood method and Kimura 2-parameter model [23]. The bootstrap consensus tree was inferred from 1000 replicates [24] and taken to represent the evolutionary history of the taxa analysed [24]. A discrete Gamma distribution was used to model evolutionary rate differences among sites (5 categories (+G, parameter = 63919)). Codon positions included were first, second, third positions and non-coding sites. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA [25].

Statistical analysis

Human biting rate (HBR) was calculated by dividing the total number of Anopheles mosquitoes collected by the number of collectors multiplied by the number of collection nights. The EIR was calculated by multiplying the HBR by the sporozoite rate. The seasonal daily EIRs were calculated by multiplying the average HBRs and sporozoite rate of the collections carried out for each season in each study site. The seasonal monthly EIRs were determined by multiplying the seasonal daily EIRs by the number of days in each season (243 days for the rainy season [October–May] and 122 days for the dry season [June–September]). For this study, we performed two types of analysis: a descriptive analysis and a univariate explanatory analysis. The statistical analyses were carried out using R version 4.0.2 with a two-sided P < 0.05% indicating significance. Graphical presentation of data was done using GraphPad Prism Version 8.4.0 (GraphPad Software Inc.) A descriptive analysis was carried out on all the study data and the results were expressed as proportions. To achieve the objectives, logistic regression analysis was used to compare the number of mosquitoes collected per site and per season and the indoor/outdoor collections using binary data. We used the Pearson Chi-square (χ2) test to compare the HBRs between the three sites and Tukey’s method for multiple comparison.

Results

Human landing catches

A total of 1235 Anopheles spp. mosquitoes were collected in Bindo, Nombakélé and Zilé (Table 1). Overall, the highest HBR was recorded in Zilé, with 25 bites per person per night (b/p/n) (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.3–38.7), resulting in the collection of 800 mosquitoes, 64.8% of the total number of mosquitoes collected throughout the study period (χ2 = 22,558.4, df = 3, P < 0.0001). In Bindo and Nombakélé, the HBR was on average 11.25 (95% CI 3.6–18.9) and 2.34 (95% CI 0–5.5) b/p/n, respectively, yielding a total of 360 (29.1%) mosquitoes collected in Bindo and 75 (6.1%) mosquitoes in Nombakélé (Table 2). Anopheles gambiae s.l. was the most abundant species collected in the three areas, with a total of 1207 samples collected (97.7%). Other species collected were An. moucheti (n = 21, 1.7%) and An. coustani (n = 7, 0.6%).

Table 1 Anopheles species collected in Bindo, Nombakélé and Zilé
Full size table
Table 2 Summary of entomological indicators of malaria transmission in Bindo, Nombakélé and Zilé
Full size table

Molecular identification of Anopheles spp.

Of the 1003 An. gambiae s.l. identified using molecular methods, 42 samples could not be analysed molecularly. Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) was the predominant species collected, comprising up to 97.4% (189/194), 98.5% (65/66) and 98.7% (692/701) of the mosquitoes identified in Bindo, Nombakélé and Zilé, respectively. Anopheles coluzzii (n = 14) was the second most common species identified and was found in proportions of < 2% in the three areas. One sample collected in Bindo was identified as a hybrid between An. gambiae/An. coluzzii.

Species identification by sequencing

The ITS2 sequences from 36 of the 37 samples that were morphologically identified as An. gambiae s.l., but which could not be identified using the SINE200 protocol, had a 99–100% identity to An. gambiae (Additional file 1). Two samples identified as An. gambiae s.l. and An. moucheti were identified as An. moucheti and An. gambiae s.l., respectively, after ITS2 sequencing. A phylogenetic analysis was performed using the closest hits in Genbank. The sequences obtained from the samples that failed to amplify formed a clade with a high bootstrap support of 96% that included the molecularly identified samples (An. gambiae s.s. and An. coluzzii) from our collections. Two other distinct clades were formed by samples morphologically identified as An. moucheti and An. coustani (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Maximum-likelihood tree of Anopheles ITS2 sequences. Abbreviations: ITS2, Internal transcribed spacer 2

Full size image

Seasonal variations

More mosquitoes (1193/1235) were collected during the rainy seasons than during the dry seasons in all three localities (generalized linear model [GLM], P < 0.0001) (Fig. 3). The effect of season was particularly strong at Bindo where the HBR decreased from 22.13 b/p/n (95% CI 11.09–33.16) during the rainy season to 0.38 b/p/n (95% CI 0–0.81) during the dry season (Table 2). In Nombakélé, the HBR decreased from 9.25 b/p/n (95% CI 0–24.41) in the rainy season to 0.06 b/p/n (95% CI 0–0.20) in the dry season. In Zilé, the HBR during the rainy seasons was 31.88 (95% CI 15.10–48.65) b/p/n and dropped to 4.38 (95% CI 3.01; 5.73) b/p/n during the dry season (Table 2). However, in Zilé the HBR dropped in February 2018 (5.75 b/n/p) compared to the collections carried out in November 2017 (62.5 b/n/p) and May 2017 (27.38 b/n/p).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Number of Anopheles spp. collected according to seasons in Bindo, Nombakélé and Zilé. Months shown in bold represent the months of collections. Blue and yellow shading indicates the rainy seasons and the dry seasons, respectively

Full size image

Similar to the findings for An. gambiae s.l., more An. moucheti (n = 12 vs. n = 1) and An. coustani (n = 6 vs. n = 1) were collected during the rainy seasons than during the dry seasons. The dominant species during the two seasons were An. gambiae s.l.

Hourly collection and biting behaviour

In all three study areas, more mosquitoes (80.73%) were collected during the second half of the night (from midnight [00 h] to 0600 hours) than during the first half (0600 hours to midnight [00 hours]). There was a steady increase in the number of bites from An. gambiae s.l throughout the night up to early morning when the peak biting times were recorded. Specifically, the peak biting times in Nombakélé and Zilé were between 0400 hours and 0500 hours, and in Bindo, between 0500 hours and 0600 hours (Fig. 4). The number of An. moucheti and An. coustani was very small for a clear pattern to be observed, but similar to the biting pattern observed for An. gambiae s.l., most of these two species were collected during the second half of the night.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Hourly distribution of Anopheles mosquito bites in Bindo, Nombakélé and Zilé

Full size image

Anopheles spp. collected in the three study areas exhibited a highly exophagic behaviour (Fig. 5). Consistently higher proportions of mosquitoes were collected outdoor than indoor in Bindo (58.6 vs. 41.4%; GLM, P ˂ 0.05), Nombakélé (76 vs. 24%; GLM, P ˂ 0.05) and Zilé (55 vs. 45%; GLM, P ˂ 0.05).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Hourly distribution of Anopheles mosquito bites indoor and outdoor in Bindo (a), Nombakélé (b) and Zilé (c)

Full size image

Sporozoite rate and EIR

Out of the 1166 Anopheles mosquitoes screened, 26 (2.2%) were infected with Plasmodium spp. Of the 26 sporozoite-positive mosquitoes, 18 (69.2%) were infected with P. falciparum, four with P. malariae (15.4%), three (11.5%) with P. ovale curtisi and one (3.8%) with P. ovale wallikeri. Plasmodium spp. transmission was detected in three (May 2017, August 2017 and November 2017) of the four collections carried out in Zilé (Table 2). In Bindo and Nombakélé, infected mosquitoes were found only in collections performed in December 2017 and November 2017, respectively (Table 2). The highest infection rate was recorded during a collection carried out in the dry season in Zilé, with four of 29 (13.8%) Anopheles mosquitoes infected (Table 2).

In Bindo and Nombakélé, the annual average EIR was 80.2 and 17 infective bites/person/year (ib/p/y), respectively (Table 2). These EIRs were recorded exclusively in collections carried out between November and December and were similar to the average number of infective bites received by a person in Bindo (80.2 ib/p/8 months) and Nombakélé (17 ib/p/8 months) during the rainy season. The daily EIR in Bindo and Nombakélé was 0.71 and 0.15 infective bites per person per night (ib/p/n), respectively (Table 2).

In Zilé, the annual average EIR was estimated to be 243.3 ib/p/y. The EIR in Zilé was 2.3-fold greater during the rainy season (168 ib/p/8 months) than during the dry season (72 ib/p/4 months) (Table 2). The highest daily EIR (1.69 ib/p/n) was recorded in November 2017, yielding a monthly average of 50.70 ib/p/month. There was a drop in the daily EIR to 0.41 ib/p/n in May 2017 (rainy season) which was lower than the one recorded in August 2017 (0.60 ib/p/n) (Table 2).

Anopheles resistance genes

A total of 118 An. gambiae s.l. were randomly selected for screening for the presence of the Kdr and Ace-1R alleles. Of the 117 An. gambiae s.l. that were successfully amplified, 116 (99%) were either heterozygous or homozygous for the Kdr L1014F and L1014S mutations, which are associated with resistance to dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and pyrethroids. Of the 116 An. gambiae s.l. carrying resistance mutations, 67 (57.3%) and 10 (8.5%) were homozygous for the L1014F and L1014S mutation, respectively, while 39 (33.3%) were heterozygous for both mutations. One Anopheles mosquito was homozygous for the WT allele L1014L. The L1014F mutation (73.9%) was the most common mutation found in mosquitoes, followed by the L1014S (25.2%) and L1014L (0.9%) mutations. Allelic frequencies between the three villages were similar.

All of the mosquitoes were homozygous for Ace1G119, which is the WT (susceptible) allele for resistance to carbamates and organophosphates.

Discussion

Accurate and up-to-date data are key to the implementation of vector control measures that are efficient at reducing malaria transmission. To fill the gap in knowledge of malaria vectors in Gabon, we assessed the EIR as a measure of malaria transmission, as well as the distribution of insecticide resistance genes in Anopheles mosquitoes in three rural areas of Moyen Ogooué Province. Rural areas are usually hotspots of malaria transmission due to the abundance of breeding sites and the absence of adequate primary health care facilities.

ITS2 sequencing confirmed the presence of three groups of Anopheles species, namely An. gambiae s.l., An. moucheti and An. coustani, in accordance with the respective species identification based on morphological characters. Anopheles gambiae s.s. and An. coluzzii were the only species of the An. gambiae complex present, with the former being the dominant vector species, as previously reported in other areas of Gabon [8, 9, 11]. One sample was identified as a hybrid between An. gambiae s.s. and An. coluzzii. Hybrids of these two distinct species can occasionally be found, usually in frequencies of < 1% [26]. Other collected species, such as An. moucheti and An. coustani, may be acting as secondary vectors. The failure to amplify samples identified by sequencing of the ITS2 region as An. gambiae s.l. could be due to technical reasons.

Zilé had the highest HBR, followed by Bindo and Nombakélé. The high HBRs found in our study were expected based on previous collections performed in rural areas. The high HBRs is rural areas of Gabon compared to urban area are due to the availability of breeding sites for malaria vectors in the former, as reported previously [8, 9]. That Zilé was home to permanent breeding sites established through human activities could explain the high density of vectors found in this area. In addition, the lack of implementation of comprehensive vector control measures could also explain the high HBRs recorded in our study areas. Gabon has not yet implemented a mass distribution campaign of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), unlike other countries in sub-Saharan Africa [27,28,29,30,31]. The low LLIN ownership is a result of the targeted policy that has focused solely on the provision of ITNs to pregnant women and children aged < 5 years [1].

Anopheles density was significantly higher during the rainy seasons than during the dry seasons, which was expected as there is an increase in the availability of breeding sites for mosquitoes during the rainy season. This is especially true for species like An. gambiae s.s., the dominant species in our study areas, which has been shown to prefer temporally variable and rain-dependent breeding sites [32]. Although, the proportion of An. coluzzii was < 2%, the species composition of the Anopheles gambiae complex should be monitored regularly as a shift in species composition may have epidemiological consequences, such as year-round malaria transmission [33]. Anopheles coluzzii prefers long-lasting breeding sites resulting from anthropogenic activities [32]. Most Anopheles mosquitoes were collected during the second half of the night (> 80%), with peak biting times early in the morning. This period of the night corresponds to the time when people are sleeping, thereby presenting a reduced risk from host defensive behaviour. This late night/early morning biting behaviour is a trait well known for An. gambiae that may increase their ability to transmit malaria [3, 34].

Anopheles gambiae s.l. exhibited a highly exophagic behaviour, and all a higher number of all three Anopheles species was consistently collected outdoor than indoor in the three study sites, as also previously reported in Libreville [9]. This exophagic behaviour may preclude the efficacy of indoor-focused vector control interventions, such as LLINs and IRS, to significantly reduce malaria transmission [35]. The observed exophagic behaviour in the absence of large-scale vector control interventions may be due to adaptations of local Anopheles spp. to human sleeping behaviour in combination with physiological resistance to insecticides, which are potential exacerbators of outdoor biting [36]. A growing number of studies have reported the switch in mosquito feeding behaviour from indoor to outdoor biting following vector control interventions. This switch may have implications on the current way interventions are designed, targeting mosquitoes at the source or while resting and feeding upon humans or livestock outside of houses [5].

Anopheles gambiae s.s. was the sole species infected with Plasmodium spp. Infected mosquitoes were found in three of the four collections performed in Zilé, while in Bindo and Nombakélé they were found only in collections performed during the rainy season (October–May). Plasmodium falciparum was found to be the most prevalent species infecting mosquitoes although there was a substantial proportion of infections by non-falciparum species. Specifically, P. malariae was the second most common species infecting mosquitoes, followed by P. ovale curtisi and P. ovale wallikeri, respectively. This distribution of Plasmodium species is similar to that reported in humans from rural settings of Gabon [37]. In comparison, no mosquito was found to be infected with more than one species although a high prevalence of coinfections in humans has been reported from neighbouring areas [37]. This finding suggests that people living in those areas develop infections concurrently following sequential bites from mosquitoes infected with different Plasmodium spp. and that mosquitoes from this area have the tendency to be infected by only one parasite species at a time after feeding on coinfected individuals. Our results should draw attention to these non-falciparum species as this is the first study to screen for all Plasmodium species in mosquitoes in Gabon; previous studies were based on P. falciparum circumsporozoite protein determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [6,7,8,9, 12]. Overall, the sporozoite rate was 2.3%, with the highest sporozoite rate (13.8%) surprisingly recorded during a collection carried out during the dry season in Zilé. Similar results were reported in Thailand by Rosenberg et al. [38] and were attributed to higher vector survival rates of mosquitoes during the dry season.

The EIR is used to measure the intensity of transmission of Plasmodium spp. by anopheline vectors [39]. In the present study, the transmission of malaria was different across study sites, with almost a perennial transmission in Zilé and intermittent transmission in Bindo and Nombakélé. The major contribution of the period between October to December to the overall burden of malaria transmission in our study areas was exemplified by the fact that the highest EIR in Zilé as well as the sole EIRs in Bindo and Nombakélé were recorded in collections carried out during this period. The annual average EIR (243.3 ib/p/y) recorded in Zilé was one of the highest ever recorded in Gabon and should be associated to a high infection rate in populations living in this area. Indeed, Beier et al. [41] reported that annual EIRs of ≥ 200 are regularly associated with a > 80% prevalence of P. falciparum in humans. Although the average annual EIRs recorded in Bindo and Nombakélé were lower than that in Zilé, the former suggest a P. falciparum prevalence in humans of at least 50% [40]. Aside from the availability of breeding sites as mentioned above, this high transmission intensity in Zilé may be a consequence of the high prevalence of helminth infections, such as Schistosoma haematobium and Trichuris trichiura or hookworm, in populations living in these area compared to populations living in Bindo and Nombakélé [41]. These helminths, especially S. haematobium, have been shown to have an effect on P. falciparum infections in humans by increasing P. falciparum incidence, thus increasing its transmission intensity either alone [42,43,44] or in synergy with other helminths, such as Trichuris trichiura or hookworm [41].

Previous reports have shown the presence of the Kdr mutations in local vector populations [8, 9, 17, 45]. Libreville was the first coastal West African location where the presence of both L1014F (Kdr-w) and L1014S (Kdr-e) was observed [45]. These mutations were subsequently also found in mosquito populations from other areas, such as Benguia [46], Port-Gentil and Libreville [8] and Mouila [10]. The genotypic and allelic frequencies of the Kdr mutations observed in An. gambiae collected in the present study are similar to frequencies reported in previous studies in Gabon and suggest the presence of high level of resistance in these mosquito populations to pyrethroids and DDT [8, 9, 17, 45]. This potential resistance to pyrethroids, in the absence of a mass distribution of LLINs, may be driven by the use of these insecticides in agriculture, as previously described [47, 48]. However, our finding that all of the mosquitoes screened carried the susceptible allele for carbamate and organophosphate may hint to the susceptibility of mosquitoes to these classes of insecticides, suggesting that a combination strategies may be used as a tool to circumvent the effect that pyrethroid resistance may have on the efficacy of LLINs. Such studies have been conducted in Burkina-Faso [49] and Tanzania [50], with the results showing that simultaneous use of LLINs and net wall hangings treated with organophosphate improved malaria control.

Our study has a number of limitations, which mainly include the small sample size in terms of mosquitoes collected as well as the number of collections which did not allow us to fully assess the effect of seasonal variations on mosquito populations. In addition, the use of qPCR to screen for mosquito infections did not allow us to determine with confidence the infective status of mosquitoes. Although Foley et al. [51] reported that bisection of mosquitoes anterior to the junction of the thorax and abdomen eliminates the risk of false positives, it has been demonstrated that this risk is not totally eliminated, especially when using very sensitive PCR protocols [52].

Conclusion

The assessment of Plasmodium spp. distribution based on the results of the present study revealed a high prevalence of non-falciparum species in the mosquitoes collected, which should draw more attention to their contribution to the malaria burden in Gabon, particularly in Moyen Ogooué Province. From our results, it is obvious that the transmission of malaria was heterogenous in the three areas, where Zilé could be considered to be an area of high transmission. The combination of exophagic behaviour of mosquitoes and the high frequencies of Kdr mutations before the implementation of a mass distribution of LLINs may significantly impede the success of such a strategy to durably curb malaria transmission. Thus, there is a need to adopt vector control strategies that will include the use of other insecticide classes and new vector control tools.

Availability of data and materials

Raw data are archived and available on request from the corresponding author. The ITS2 sequences found in this study were deposited in the GenBank database with accession numbers OL895462–OL895515.

Abbreviations

DDT:

Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane

EIR:

Entomological inoculation rate

HBR:

Human biting rate

HLC:

Human landing catches

iAChE :

Insensitive acetylcholinesterase

IRS:

Indoor residual spraying

ITN:

Insecticide-treated net

ITS2:

Internal transcribed spacer 2

Kdr :

Knockdown resistance gene

LLIN:

Long-lasting insecticidal net

References

  1. WHO. World malaria report 2020: 20 years of global progress and challenges. 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240015791 Geneva. Accessed 23 March 2021

  2. Bhatt S, Weiss DJ, Cameron E, Bisanzio D, Mappin B, Dalrymple U, et al. The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature. 2015;526:207–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sinka ME, Bangs MJ, Manguin S, Coetzee M, Mbogo CM, Hemingway J, et al. The dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria in Africa, Europe and the Middle East: occurrence data, distribution maps and bionomic précis. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:117.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. WHO. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vectors mosquitoes. 2013. https://www.apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/80139. Accessed 01 April 2021

  5. Sougoufara S, Ottih EC, Tripet F. The need for new vector control approaches targeting outdoor biting Anopheline malaria vector communities. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:295.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Elissa N, Karch S, Bureau P, Ollomo B, Lawoko M, Yangari P, et al. Malaria transmission in a region of savanna-forest mosaic, Haut-Ogooue Gabon. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1999;15:15–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sylla EHK, Kun JFJ, Kremsner PG. Mosquito distribution and entomological endemic areas in Gabon inoculation rates in three malaria-endemic areas in Gabon. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000;94:652–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mourou J-R, Coffinet T, Jarjaval F, Pradines B, Amalvict R, Rogier C, et al. Malaria transmission and insecticide resistance of Anopheles gambiae in Libreville and Port-Gentil. Gabon Malar J. 2010;9:321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mourou J, Coffinet T, Jarjaval F, Cotteaux C, Pradines E, Godefroy L. Malaria transmission in Libreville: results of a one year survey. Malar J. 2012;11:40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Koumba AA, Sevidzem SL, Ketoh GK, Faye O, M’batchi B, Mavoungou JF, et al. Identification of the knockdown resistance (Kdr) mutations in Anopheles gambiae s.l. in the Mouila area Southwest Gabon. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2018;6:602–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Koumba AA, Zinga-koumba CR, Nguema Mintsa R, Comlan P, Asseko GN, Razack Safiou A, et al. Current sensitivity status of Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) (Culicidae) to DDT and pyrethroids in two agricultural sites of Mouila Gabon. Int J Mosq Res country. 2019;6:12–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elissa N, Luty A, Renaut A, Toure F, Vaillant M, Lawoko M, et al. Relationship between entomological inoculation rate, Plasmodium falciparum prevalence rate, and incidence of malaria attack in rural Gabon. Acta Trop. 2003;85:355–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramharter M, Agnandji ST, Adegnika AA, Lell B, Mombo-Ngoma G, Grobusch MP, et al. Development of sustainable research excellence with a global perspective on infectious diseases: Centre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné (CERMEL), Gabon. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2021;133:500-8.

  14. World Weather Online. Lambarene climate weather averages. www.worldweatheronline.com/lambarene-weather-averages/moyen-ogooue/ga.aspx. Accessed 20 Sept 2021.

  15. Gillies MT, de Meillon B. The Anophelinae of Africa south of the Sahara (Ethiopian Region). South Afr Inst Med Res. 1968;54:1–343.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gillies MT, Coetzee M. A supplement to the anophelinae of Africa south of the Sahara (Afrotropical region ). South Afr Inst Med Res. 1987;55:1–143.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Santolamazza F, Mancini E, Simard F, Qi Y, Tu Z, della Torre A. Insertion polymorphisms of SINE200 retrotransposons within speciation islands of Anopheles gambiae molecular forms. Malar J. 2008;7:163.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bass C, Nikou D, Blagborough AM, Vontas J, Sinden RE, Williamson MS, et al. PCR-based detection of Plasmodium in Anopheles mosquitoes: a comparison of a new high-throughput assay with existing methods. Malar J. 2008;7:177.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Groger M, Veletzky L, Lalremruata A, Cattaneo C, Mischlinger J, Zoleko-manego R, et al. Prospective clinical trial assessing species-specific efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium ovale, and mixed Plasmodium malaria in Gabon. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62:e01758-e1817.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Snounou G, Viriyakosol S, Zhu XP, Jarra W, Pinheiro L, Rosario VE, et al. High sensitivity of detection of human malaria parasites by the use of nested polymerase chain reaction. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993;61:315–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bass C, Nikou D, Donnelly MJ, Williamson MS, Ranson H, Ball A, et al. Detection of knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations in Anopheles gambiae: a comparison of two new high-throughput assays with existing methods. Malar J. 2007;6:111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Beebe N, Saul A. Discrimination of all members of the Anopheles punctulatus complex by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995;53:478–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980;16:111–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution (NY). 1985;39:783–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1547–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Della Torre A, Tu Z, Petrarca V. On the distribution and genetic differentiation of Anopheles gambiae s.s. molecular forms. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;35:755–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kilian A, Byamukama W, Pigeon O, Gimnig J, Atieli F, Koekemoer L, et al. Evidence for a useful life of more than three years for a polyester-based long-lasting insecticidal mosquito net in Western Uganda. Malar J. 2011;10:299.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Padonou GG, Sezonlin M, Ossé R, Aizoun N, Oké-agbo F, Oussou O, et al. Impact of three years of large scale indoor residual spraying (IRS) and insecticide treated nets (ITNs) interventions on insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. in Benin. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Badolo A, Traore A, Jones CM, Sanou A, Flood L, Guelbeogo WM, et al. Three years of insecticide resistance monitoring in Anopheles gambiae in Burkina Faso : resistance on the rise ? Malar J. 2012;11:232.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mutuku FM, Khambira M, Bisanzio D, Mungai P, Mwanzo I, Muchiri EM, et al. Physical condition and maintenance of mosquito bed nets in Kwale County, coastal Kenya. Malar J. 2013;12:46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Morgan J, Abilio AP, Pondja R, Luciano J, Fernandes G, Morgan J, et al. Physical durability of two types of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) three years after a mass LLIN distribution Campaign in Mozambique, 2008–2011. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92:286–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Coetzee M, Hunt RH, Wilkerson R, Della Torre A, Coulibaly MB, Besansky NJ. Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles amharicus, new members of the Anopheles gambiae complex. Zootaxa. 2013;3619:246–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kamdem C, Fossog BT, Simard F, Etouna J, Ndo C, Kamdem C, et al. Anthropogenic habitat disturbance and ecological divergence between incipient species of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e39453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Carnevale P, Manguin S. Review of issues on residual malaria transmission. J Infect Dis. 2021;223:S61-80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Killeen GF, Seyoum A, Sikaala C, Zomboko AS, Gimnig JE, Govella NJ, et al. Eliminating malaria vectors. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sherrard-smith E, Skarp JE, Beale AD, Fornadel C, Norris LC, Moore SJ. Mosquito feeding behavior and how it influences residual malaria transmission across Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Woldearegai G, Lalremruata A, Nguyen TT, Gmeiner M, Veletzky L, Tazemda-Kuitsouc GB, et al. Characterization of Plasmodium infections among inhabitants of rural areas in Gabon. Sci Rep. 2019;9:9784.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosenberg R, Andre RG, Somchit L. Highly efficient dry season transmission of malaria in Thailand. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1990;84:22–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shaukat AM, Breman JG, Mckenzie E. Using the entomological inoculation rate to assess the impact of vector control on malaria parasite transmission and elimination. Malar J. 2010;9:122.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Beier J, Killeen G, Githure J. Entomologic inoculation rates and Plasmodium falciparum malaria prevalence in Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;61:109–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dejon-Agobé JC, Zinsou JF, Honkpehedji YJ, Ateba-Ngoa U, Edoa J, Adegbite BR, et al. Schistosoma haematobium effects on Plasmodium falciparum infection modified by soil-transmitted helminths in school-age children living in rural areas of Gabon. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12:e000666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Akim NIJ, Drakeley C, Kingo T, Simon B, Senkoro K, Sauerwein RW. Dynamics of P. falciparum gametocytemia in symptomatic patients in an area of intense perennial transmission in Tanzania. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000;63:199–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nacher M, Singhasivanon P, Silachamroon U, Treeprasertsuk S, Krudsood S, Gay F, et al. Association of Helminth infections with increased gametocyte carriage during mild falciparum malaria in Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;65:644–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Noland GS, Graczyk TK, Fried B, Kumar N. Enhanced malaria parasite transmission from helminth co-infected mice. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76:1052–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pinto J, Lynd A, Elissa N, Donnelly MJ, Costa C, Gentile G, et al. Co-occurrence of East and West African kdr mutations suggests high levels of resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in Anopheles gambiae from Libreville. Gabon Med Vet Entomol. 2006;20:27–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Santolamazza F, Calzetta M, Etang J, Barrese E, Dia I, Caccone A, et al. Distribution of knock-down resistance mutations in Anopheles gambiae molecular forms in west and west-central Africa. Malar J. 2008;7:74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Diabate A, Baldet T, Chandre F, Akogbeto M, Guiguemde TR, Darriet F, et al. The role of agricultural use of insecticides in resistance to pyrethroids in Anopheles gambiae s.l. in Burkina Faso. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;67:617–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Chouaïbou M, Etang J, Brévault T, Nwane P, Hinzoumbé CK, Mimpfoundi R, et al. Dynamics of insecticide resistance in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.l. from an area of extensive cotton cultivation in Northern Cameroon. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:476–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ngufor C, Tchicaya E, Koudou B, N’Fale S, Dabire R, Johnson P, et al. Combining organophosphate treated wall linings and long-lasting insecticidal nets for improved control of pyrethroid resistant Anopheles gambiae. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e83897.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Ngufor C, Tungu P, Malima R, Kirby M, Kisinza W, Rowland M. Insecticide-treated net wall hangings for malaria vector control: an experimental hut study in north-eastern Tanzania. Malar J. 2014;13:366.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Foley DH, Harrison G, Murphy JR, Dowler M, Rueda LM, Wilkerson RC. Mosquito bisection as a variable in estimates of PCR-derived malaria sporozoite rates. Malar J. 2012;11:145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Hendershot AL, Esayas E, Sutcliffe AC, Irish SR, Gadisa E, Tadesse FG, et al. A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14:473.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Theo Nzoughe-Nzeng, Eddi Wilfrid Mangaboula Mangaboula and all the collectors for helping with mosquito collection. The authors thank Ynous Djida, Cédric Otchagué, Jean Claude Toto, Dr. Parfait Awono-Ambene and Prof. Charles Wondji for technical assistance and Dr. Chiara Andolina for proof-reading the manuscript.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was funded by a grant from the German Research Foundation, grant number: MO 1071/12-1. This work also received support from CANTAM (EDCTP‑CSA2020NoE‑3100). We acknowledge support by Open Access Publishing Fund of University of Tübingen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné, Lambaréné, Gabon

    Stravensky Térence Boussougou-Sambe, Tamirat Gebru Woldearegai, Ange Gatien Doumba-Ndalembouly, Barclaye Ngossanga, Romuald Beh Mba, Jean Ronald Edoa, Jeannot Fréjus Zinsou, Yabo Josiane Honkpehedji, Ulysse Ateba Ngoa, Jean Claude Dejon-Agobé, Steffen Borrmann, Peter G. Kremsner, Benjamin Mordmüller & Ayôla A. Adegnika

  2. Institut für Tropenmedizin, Eberhard Karls Universität, Tübingen, Germany

    Stravensky Térence Boussougou-Sambe, Tamirat Gebru Woldearegai, Steffen Borrmann, Peter G. Kremsner, Benjamin Mordmüller & Ayôla A. Adegnika

  3. Department of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

    Jeannot Fréjus Zinsou & Yabo Josiane Honkpehedji

  4. Center of Tropical Medicine and Travel Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, Division of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    Jean Claude Dejon-Agobé

  5. German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

    Tamirat Gebru Woldearegai, Peter G. Kremsner & Ayôla A. Adegnika

  6. Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center (UMC), 6524 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Benjamin Mordmüller

  7. Fondation pour la Recherche Scientifique (FORS), Cotonou, Benin

    Yabo Josiane Honkpehedji & Ayôla A. Adegnika

Authors
  1. Stravensky Térence Boussougou-Sambe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tamirat Gebru Woldearegai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ange Gatien Doumba-Ndalembouly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Barclaye Ngossanga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Romuald Beh Mba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jean Ronald Edoa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jeannot Fréjus Zinsou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yabo Josiane Honkpehedji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ulysse Ateba Ngoa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jean Claude Dejon-Agobé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Steffen Borrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Peter G. Kremsner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Benjamin Mordmüller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Ayôla A. Adegnika
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AAA, BM, PGK, JCDA, UAN, TGW and STBS conceived and planned the study and its design. STBS, AGDN and BN performed the field activities with support from JRE, JFZ and YJH for the follow-up of the collectors. STBS and TGW carried out the laboratory analysis of the samples. RBM and STBS analysed the data. STBS drafted the manuscript. AAA, BM, PGK, SB, JCDA and TGW critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors contributed to the intellectual input to the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stravensky Térence Boussougou-Sambe.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved from the Institutional Review Board of the Centre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné (CEI-CERMEL: 009/2014).

Consent for publication

All authors concur with the submission presented by the corresponding author.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Sequence identification of Anopheles sp. using ITS2.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boussougou-Sambe, S.T., Woldearegai, T.G., Doumba-Ndalembouly, A.G. et al. Assessment of malaria transmission intensity and insecticide resistance mechanisms in three rural areas of the Moyen Ogooué Province of Gabon. Parasites Vectors 15, 217 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05320-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05320-9

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us