Skip to main content
Download PDF

Rapid evolution of insecticide resistance and patterns of pesticides usage in agriculture in the city of Yaoundé, Cameroon

Parasites & Vectors volume 15, Article number: 186 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The practice of agriculture in urban settings contributes to the rapid expansion of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors. However, there is still not enough information on pesticide usage in most urban settings. The present study aims to assess the evolution of Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) population susceptibility to insecticides and patterns of pesticide usage in agriculture in the city of Yaoundé, Cameroon.

Methods

WHO susceptibility tests and synergist PBO bioassays were conducted on adult An. gambiae (s.l.) mosquitoes aged 3 to 5 days emerging from larvae collected from the field. Seven insecticides (deltamethrin, permethrin, DDT, bendiocarb, propoxur, fenitrothion and malathion) were evaluated. The presence of target site mutation conferring knockdown (kdr) resistance was investigated using TaqMan assay, and mosquito species were identified using SINE-PCR. Surveys on 81 retailers and 232 farmers were conducted to assess general knowledge and practices regarding agricultural pesticide usage.

Results

High resistance intensity to pyrethroids was observed with a high frequency of the kdr allele 1014F and low frequency of the kdr 1014S allele. The level of susceptibility of An. gambiae (s.l.) to pyrethroids and carbamates was found to decrease with time (from > 34% in 2017 to < 23% in 2019 for deltamethrin and permethrin and from 97% in 2017 to < 86% in 2019 for bendiocarb). Both An. gambiae (s.s.) and An. coluzzii were recorded. Over 150 pesticides and fertilizers were sold by retailers for agricultural purposes in the city of Yaoundé. Most farmers do not respect safety practices. Poor practices including extensive and inappropriate application of pesticides as well as poor management of perished pesticides and empty pesticide containers were also documented.

Conclusions

The study indicated rapid evolution of insecticide resistance and uncontrolled usage of pesticides by farmers in agriculture. There is an urgent need to address these gaps to improve the management of insecticide resistance.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Despite progress in malaria control registered during the last decade, following the large-scale deployment of insecticide-based interventions such as long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) [1, 2], malaria remains an important public health problem in Africa [3, 4]. In Cameroon, malaria is still a major threat. Prevention strategies rely mainly on the use of LLINs. Over 35 million LLINs have been distributed across the country so far. It is estimated that over 70% of households own at least a net and that 58% of the population uses nets regularly [5, 6]. However, the sustainability of these insecticide-based control interventions is challenged by the spread of insecticide resistance in main malaria vectors [7,8,9]. Studies conducted across the country reported increased expansion of insecticide resistance in the major malaria vectors An. gambiae (s.l.) and An. funestus [7, 10,11,12,13].

Pesticides used in agriculture are considered to largely contribute to the selection and spread of insecticide resistance in An. gambiae (s.l.) [10, 14,15,16,17,18]. Mosquitoes are now becoming increasingly tolerant to several compounds including pyrethroids, organochlorines, carbamates and organophosphates.

Pyrethroids are the only insecticides approved by WHO for impregnating mosquito nets [19] because of their low toxicity to humans and other mammals, quick knockdown effect and cost-effectiveness [20, 21]. The other insecticides (organophosphates, carbamates and organochlorines) are mainly used for indoor residual spraying [19]. One of the mechanisms involved in pyrethroid resistance in An. gambiae (s.l.) is target-site insensitivity, also known as knockdown resistance (kdr), induced by two different mutations occurring at position 1014 on the voltage-gated sodium channel gene (VGSC). The first mutation leads to a leucine-to-phenylalanine substitution and is widely distributed in West Africa [22], whereas the second leads to a leucine-to-serine substitution and is largely expanded in East Africa [23]. In addition to target site mechanisms, resistance could also occur through overexpression of detoxification enzymes. The overexpression of P450 genes has been found associated with resistance to organochlorines, pyrethroids and carbamates [11, 24,25,26]. Overexpression of glutathione-S transferase genes, notably the GSTe2 gene, is associated with DDT resistance [27]. GSTs are more active in An. funestus and have been associated to many cases of resistance to both pyrethroids and carbamates [12, 28]. The current evolution of insecticide resistance in vector population calls for urgent actions to improve control.

Selections by insecticide use in public health and agriculture are all considered to drive the rapid expansion of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors [29]. However, so far there have been few investigations on pesticide usage in relation with insecticide resistance expansion [30]. The last decade has shown increasing demand for pesticides with countries such as China, the USA and Argentina accounting for 70% of global pesticides used in agriculture (2.44 billion kg of active ingredient annually) [31]. Cameroon is one of the 13 countries which consume between 10 to 50 million kg of pesticides in agriculture. The utilization of pesticides in Cameroon has increased eightfold during the last decade, and the current increase is in line with the extension of agricultural land surfaces [31]. It is possible that the quantity of pesticides used could be underestimated since many pesticides and fertilizers used in the country elude controls at the borders [32,33,34]. Although there are effective laws guiding pesticide and fertilizer supply, selling and utilization, this regulation is not always applied [35, 36]. A large variety of pesticides are sold in local markets or on the street. These pesticides of unknown quality could expose the population to hazards and affect pest and vector-borne disease control [37,38,39,40]. In the present study, an assessment of the evolution of insecticide resistance in vector populations was conducted alongside a survey on pesticides sold and used by farmers in the city of Yaoundé.

Methods

Sampling site and mosquito collection

Mosquito larval collections were conducted in 32 districts of Yaoundé (Fig. 1), the capital city of Cameroon (3˚52′N; 11˚31′E). Yaoundé is situated within the Congo-Guinean phytogeographic domain and has an equatorial climate consisting of four seasons: two rainy seasons (March–June and September–November; annual rainfall 1700 mm) and two dry seasons (December–February and July–August). Yaoundé's landscape comprises high and low land areas. Low land areas include large swamps, lakes and rivers and are frequently exploited for market gardening. The practice of market gardening has now largely expanded in the city centre particularly along the edges of rivers. More than ten rivers cross the city, the most important being Mfoundi, Mefou and Biyeme Rivers. The periphery of vast Yaoundé zones has been deforested, and these areas are exploited for agriculture. Crops cultivated by inhabitants include maize, vegetables, groundnuts and beans. About 10% of the city population practices agriculture on different scales.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A map of the city of Yaoundé showing the distribution of larval collection sites [the map of Yaoundé is available in open access on the OpenStreetMap platform (https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=cameroon#map=6/7.406/12.283)]

Full size image

Larval collections and mosquito rearing

The immature stages of An. gambiae (s.l.) were collected using the standard dipping technique [41]. The latter consists of collecting mosquito larvae from the surface of the breeding sites using a ladle. Larval collections were conducted in standing water collections present in cultivated agricultural areas and different places across the city. Water collections were sometimes clean or full of organic matter. These water collections were mainly found in lowland areas or close to swamps. After collection, larvae were kept in labelled jars according to surveyed sites and then transported to the insectary at OCEAC (Organization of Coordination of the Fight against Endemic Diseases in Central Africa) for rearing. Larvae were raised under standard temperature (27 °C ± 2) and humidity (65% ± 10) conditions until the adult stage. Adult anophelines were identified to the species level using morphological identification keys [42, 43].

Insecticide susceptibility bioassays

Bioassays were carried out using the standard WHO protocol [44]. Tests were performed with WHO-supplied insecticide-impregnated papers. Insecticides tested included two pyrethroids at different doses (0.05% deltamethrin, 0.25% deltamethrin, 0.5% deltamethrin; 0.75% permethrin, 3.75% permethrin and 7.5% permethrin), one organochlorine (4% DDT), two carbamates (0.1% bendiocarb and 0.1% propoxur) and two organophosphates (1% fenitrothion and 5% malathion). Three- to 5-day-old unfed female An. gambiae (s.l.) collected at the larval stage and reared until adult stage were exposed for 1 h to these insecticides. Mosquitoes were divided into batches of 25 individuals before being exposed to insecticide-treated papers for 1 h. Experiments were conducted at a temperature of 22 to 26 °C with a minimum of four replicates per bioassay, and the mortality rates were recorded after 24 h. The insecticide-susceptible strains of An. gambiae (s.l.) (Kisumu and Ngousso strains) were used as control to assess the quality of the impregnated papers. For control tests, silicone-treated papers were used. The result of the insecticide susceptibility test was valid if mortality in the control group was < 5% and discarded if the mortality in the control was > 20%. When the mortality rate was between 5 and 20%, the mortality rate was corrected using Abbott’s formula [45]. For each insecticide, dead mosquitoes were kept separately in 1.5-ml microtubes containing silica gel, whereas mosquitoes still alive after the tests and control samples were kept separately in RNAlater tubes for molecular analysis.

Synergist bioassay with piperonyl butoxide (PBO)

Following the high level of resistance recorded against 0.75% permethrin and 0.05% deltamethrin, the effect of the synergist PBO in combination with these insecticides was tested to assess the potential contribution of P450 monooxygenase enzymes. Subsamples of 20 to 25 unfed, 3–5-day-old adult females of An. gambiae (s.l.) randomly collected from a cage were pre-exposed to 4% PBO paper for 1 h before being immediately exposed to 0.75% permethrin or 0.05% deltamethrin for an additional 1 h. Mortality following exposure to both PBO and permethrin or deltamethrin was recorded after 24 h. Susceptibility tests were conducted alongside controls.

DNA extraction, species identification and detection of kdr mutations

Sub-samples of surviving female mosquitoes (alive after 24 h exposure), dead and control mosquitoes were randomly selected for molecular analysis. The Livak method [46] was used to extract genomic DNA from single mosquitoes. Mosquito identification to the species level was carried out using SINE200 PCR for An. gambiae (s.l.) [47]. Target site mutations (L1014F and L1014S) in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of An. gambiae (s.l.) mosquitoes were genotyped using TaqMan assay protocol, previously described by Bass et al. [48].

Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) surveys of agrochemical vendors and farmers

KAP surveys of agrochemical vendors and farmers in the city of Yaoundé were conducted using a semi-structured questionnaire (Additional file 1: Table S1). The questionnaire was divided into three sections. The first section collected socio-demographic information on vendors and farmers (age, sex, education level). The second section, designed for the vendors, collected information on pesticides sold, origin of pesticides and interaction between vendors and the end-users. The third part, designed for the farmers, explored the usage of pesticides by farmers, type of pesticide used, frequency of pesticide usage, type of crops cultivated, size of the land cultivated, knowledge of pesticide used, respect of standard dosage, frequency of application and respect of safety measures (protection measures, manipulation of pesticides, management of empty containers, expired pesticides).

Statistical analysis

Results of WHO susceptibility bioassays and synergist were recorded in Microsoft Excel files and analysed according to WHO criteria [44]. A mosquito population was considered susceptible if the mortality rate was ≥ 98%; when the mortality rate was between 90 and 97% the population was considered possibly resistant but this needed to be checked; when the mortality rate was < 90% the population was considered fully resistant. A test was deemed valid if mortality in the control group was < 5% and discarded if the mortality in the control was > 20% [44]. When the mortality rate of control was between 5 and 20%, the mortality rate of mosquitoes exposed was corrected using Abbott’s formula [45]. The presence of kdr alleles was detected using TaqMan qPCR according to Bass et al. [48]. The kdr allele frequency was calculated as follows: f(R) = (2 × RR + RS)/2 N and f(S) = 1−f(R), with RR = total number of homozygote resistant, RS = total number of heterozygote resistant and N = total number of mosquitoes successfully screened for the kdr mutation. Mosquito populations were checked to determine whether they were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Data generated through the KAP surveys were analysed in Microsoft Excel. Data cleaning was performed to check for inconsistencies in data entry and responses. Data were analysed using SPSS version 20 statistical software package. Means, frequencies and proportions were used for descriptive analysis of the data. Percentages were compared using chi-squared test. Comparison between means was assessed using ANOVA. The 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was computed using MedCalc v14.8.1 software. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Species identification

Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) samples were composed of two species: An. coluzzii and An. gambiae (s.s.). Anopheles coluzzii was the most abundant species (Table 1). No major changes in the composition of the anopheline fauna was observed during the 3 years of monitoring (P ˃ 0.2).

Table 1 Distribution of species of An. gambiae (s.l.) complex during surveys in the city of Yaoundé
Full size table

Insecticide resistance profile

A total of 11,894 female An. gambiae (s.l.) mosquitoes obtained from larvae and pupae collected in 34 districts in the city of Yaoundé were tested to assess their susceptibility profile to seven insecticides (Fig. 2). Females were chosen because they are the ones transmitting malaria and coming into contact with humans. Mortality rates to deltamethrin varied from 35.2 ± 2.7%, 12.3 ± 1.6% and 22.4 ± 3.9%, respectively, for 2017, 2018 and 2019 (Fig. 2a). Mortality to permethrin, significantly decreased with time from 34.2 ± 4.2% in 2017, 7.7 ± 2.5% in 2018 to 2.1 ± 1.3% in 2019. For the organochlorine DDT, mortality rates were 1.3 ± 1.8%, 3.1 ± 1% and 1.5 ± 1.3% in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively (Fig. 2d).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Evolution of Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) resistance to pyrethroids (a 0.75% permethrin and 0.05% deltamethrin); organophosphates (b 1% fenitrothion and 5% malathion); carbamates (c 0.1% bendiocarb and 0.1% propoxur); organochlorine (d 4% DDT) insecticides in the city of Yaoundé. The error bars represent 95% confidence interval (CI)

Full size image

The average mortality rates to bendiocarb varied from 96.4 ± 1.4% in 2017, 90.1 ± 1.7% in 2018 and 85.7 ± 4.1% in 2019 (c). Mortality rate to propoxur was 52.3 ± 7.9% in 2018 and 3.3 ± 3.2% in 2019.

Mortality rates to the organophosphates fenitrothion and malathion were always > 98% in both 2018 and 2019 (b).

Insecticide resistance intensity to permethrin and deltamethrin

The mortality rate of An. gambiae (s.l.) was found to increase with the concentration of deltamethrin and permethrin (Fig. 3). For deltamethrin and permethrin 5×, the mortality rate varied respectively from 71.7 ± 2.9% and 59.9 ± 6.1% in 2018 to 80 ± 8.8% in 2019. In the case of deltamethrin 10×, the mortality rate varied from 84.6 ± 5.2% in 2018 to 95 ± 4.3% in 2019. For permethrin 10×, the mortality rate varied from 82.8 ± 4.7% in 2018 to 88.8 ± 6.9% in 2019.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Resistance intensity to permethrin and deltamethrin of An. gambiae (s.l.) from the city of Yaoundé. (1× deltamethrin = 0.05% deltamethrin; 1× permethrin = 0.75% permethrin; 5× deltamethrin = 0.25% deltamethrin; 5× permethrin = 3.75% permethrin; 10× deltamethrin = 0.5% deltamethrin; 10× permethrin = 7.5% permethrin). The error bars represent 95% confidence interval (CI)

Full size image

Tests with PBO as synergist

Pre-exposure of An. gambiae (s.l.) populations to 4% PBO synergist significantly increased the insecticidal activity of both deltamethrin and permethrin. Mortality shifted from 12.3 ± 1.6% for deltamethrin alone to 67.6 ± 5.8% for deltamethrin + PBO in 2018 and from 22.4 ± 3.9% for deltamethrin alone to 71.3 ± 9.9% mortality after pre-exposure to PBO in 2019 (Fig. 4). Similarly, mortality shifted from 7.7 ± 2.5% for permethrin alone to 27.8 ± 5.7% for permethrin + PBO in 2018 and from 2.1 ± 1.3% for permethrin alone to 33 ± 9.7% mortality after pre-exposure to PBO in 2019 (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Evolution of pyrethroid resistance in An. gambiae (s.l.) when pre-exposed to PBO in 2018 and 2019. (Delta, deltamethrin; PBO, piperonyl butoxide; Perm, permethrin). The error bars represent 95% confidence interval (CI)

Full size image

L1014F kdr detection in An. gambiae (s.s.) and An. coluzzii

A total of 801 samples were genotyped between 2017 and 2019 to assess the presence of L1014F kdr allele. Of these samples, 43.8% (351/801) were homozygote resistant RR, 53.3% (n = 427/801) were heterozygote RS, and only 2.9% (n = 23/801) were homozygote susceptible SS. The frequency of the resistant allele 1014F was high and varied from 0.6 to 0.8 (Table 2). None of the samples collected in 2017, 2018 and 2019 appeared to be in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.001).

Table 2 Evolution of kdr allele L1014F genotypes and allele frequencies in An. gambiae (s.l.) populations from the city of Yaoundé
Full size table

L1014S kdr detection in An. gambiae (s.s.) and An. coluzzii

Out of 525 samples genotyped, 2.3% (n = 12/525) were heterozygote RS; no homozygote resistant RR was found. The frequency of the resistant allele 1014S was 0.01 in 2017 and 2018. The allele was not present in 2019 samples (Table 3).

Table 3 Evolution of kdr allele L1014S genotypes and frequencies in An. gambiae (s.l.) populations in the city of Yaoundé
Full size table

Socio-demographic characteristics of pesticide vendors

A total of 81 agrochemical shops were visited in 10 different markets of the city of Yaoundé Nfoundi (n = 26), Mokolo (n = 12), Vogt Mbi (n = 8), Kouabang (n = 7), Ekounou (n = 6), Mendong (n = 5), Vogt Ada (n = 5), Etoudi (n = 5), Essos (n = 4) and Acacias (n = 3). General information on the respondents is outlined in Table 4. Most of the sellers [39.5% (n = 32/81)] were between 31 and 40 years old. The majority of pesticide vendors had the secondary education level [42% (n = 34/81)]. Some had attended the university [39.5% (n = 32/81)]; some had never attended school [16.1% (n = 13/81)].

Table 4 Socio-demographic characteristics of pesticides sellers
Full size table

Pesticides sold on the market

The agricultural pesticides found on the market in Yaoundé included: insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, nematicides and acaricides (Additional file 2: Table S2). These compounds were used for different purposes: plant protection against pests, home weeding and indoor spraying. Pesticides were sold alongside fertilizers.

Active ingredients, chemical classes and application doses

Different classes of compounds including pyrethroids, organophosphates, organochlorines, carbamates, nicotinoids and neonicotinoids were commonly found in pesticides sold on the market (Additional file 2: Table S2). Details on the composition, active ingredient, dilution and application dose were always provided. Almost all pesticides had broad-spectrum activity and acted by killing pests either after ingestion or through direct contact or inhalation. Most pesticides were multi-site inhibitors affecting various enzymes and metabolic processes in pests. Many pesticides contained a mixture of two active ingredients at different doses. Active ingredients commonly found in each insecticide family were: pyrethroids (e.g. deltamethrin, cypermethrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, bifenthrin) or organophosphates (e.g. chlorpyrifos, chlorpyrifos-thyl, pirimiphos methyl), carbamates (e.g. mancozeb, oxamyl, maneb), organochlorines (e.g. chlorothalonil), neonicotinoids (e.g. imidacloprid) and nicotinoids (e.g. acetamiprid). Other active ingredients included fungicides (e.g. mancozeb, metalaxyl-M, dimethomorph, chlorothalonil, mefenoxam, cuprous oxide, carbendazim, cymoxanil). Glyphosate, paraquat, nicosulfuron, 2,4-D amine salt, fluroxypy, triclopyr butoxyethyl ester and triclopyr acid equivalent were the main herbicides recorded and oxamyl and abamectin the main nematicide. Insecticide formulations commonly found on the market were emulsifiable concentrate (EC) and suspension concentrate (SC). Most herbicides and fungicides were formulated as soluble concentrate (SL) and wettable powders (WP), respectively.

WHO toxicity classification

Most of the insecticides found during the study (Additional file 2: Table S2) belonged to WHO Class II (moderately toxic or hazardous or dangerous); others were slightly hazardous insecticides (WHO Class III) and nocif or harmful (Class Xn). Most fungicides were classified as slightly hazardous (WHO Class III). Most herbicides were slightly hazardous insecticides (WHO Class III) and unlikely dangerous in normal use (WHO Class U). Highly hazardous pesticides (WHO Class Ib) were found in herbicides (Additional file 2: Table S2).

Pesticides sold and sources

Insecticides were the most common pesticide (48%, n = 72/150), followed by fungicides (26%, n = 39/150) and herbicides (23.3%, n = 35/150) (Additional file 2: Table S2 and Table 5). Nematicides and acaricides accounted for 2.7% (n = 4/150). Most products originated from Asia (86.7%, n = 130/150). The remaining products (13.3%, n = 20/150) originated from Europe, America and Africa. Pesticides sold were mainly used in agriculture (96.7%, n = 145/150) while just a few (3.3%, n = 5/150) were used for indoor spraying. The demand for pesticides was high (93.8%, n = 76/81) between March and June during the short rainy season at the beginning of agricultural activities.

Table 5 Different selling practices reported by pesticide vendors during the survey
Full size table

Pesticide usage and safe practices

All pesticide retailers (100%, n = 81/81) reported regularly advising their customers on the safe usage of pesticides (Table 5). Advice provided concerned the choice of the product (70.4%, n = 57/81) (based on the type of crops which could be sprayed and pest or crop diseases targeted by the compound), how to prepare the doses for field application (28.4%, n = 23/81) and personal protection measures (1.2%, n = 1/81). Most retailers (80.3%, n = 65/81) reported that pesticides and fertilizers often perished in their shops. Many reported not selling those stocks but returning them to their suppliers (60%, n = 39/65). Some admitted selling them (6.2%, n = 4/65), using them in the field (26.2%, n = 17/65) or throwing them in the trash (7.7%, n = 5/65)].

Socio-demographic characteristics and socio-economic status of farmers interviewed during the survey

The socio-economic and demographic profile of the 232 farmers who participated in the survey is summarized in Table 6. Most of the farmers were male [58.6% (n = 136)]. The age range of farmers varied from 20 to > 50 years. Concerning their level of education, 22% (n = 51/232) had primary school level, 39.2% (n = 91/232) secondary, 34.9% (n = 81/232) university level and 3.9% (9/232) no formal education. Most farmers interviewed practiced farming as a part-time activity (79.3%, n = 184/232), whereas for 20.7% (n = 48/232) of the respondents it was their main activity.

Table 6 Socio-demographic characteristics of farmers involved in the survey
Full size table

Sites surveyed

Farmers working in different neighbourhoods of the city of Yaoundé were visited; the areas included: Ekounou ekie, Ahala, Mendong, Nsimeyon, Etoug-ebe, Mokolo, Nkolondom, Ekounou palais, Efoulan, Nsimbock and Nkolbisson. Crops cultivated in the different areas included vegetables, tomatoes, fruit trees, celery, parsley, basil, lettuce, eggplant, leek, chili, cabbage, okra, maize, mint, melon, water melon, cucumber, marzipan, banana, plantain, groundnut, pepper, peanuts, cereals, potatoes, sugar cane, beans, citrus, avocado, cassava and papaya. Pests reported to affect production included a wide range insects (beetles, grasshoppers, flies, ants, bugs, crickets, locusts), scales, worms, biters, suckers, crushers, fungal infections, black pod disease, thrips, caterpillars and aphids.

Knowledge on pesticide use

Of the 232 farmers interviewed, 87.5% (n = 203/232) were small-scale farmers with < 2000 m2 land exploited (Table 7). Farmers exploiting land size of 2000 m2 to 1 ha represented 11.2% (n = 26/232) and farmers exploiting land surface > 1 ha were only 1.3% (n = 3/232). Almost all farmers [91% (n = 211/232)] reported using both pesticides and fertilizers. Only 9.1% (n = 21/232) of the farmers reported not using pesticides simply because of lack of financial means. Among pesticides, those most commonly applied on crops were insecticides. Insecticides were mostly used in combination with other compounds such as fungicides, nematicides, acaricides and herbicides. The proportion of farmers using mixtures of insecticides + fungicides represented 49.8% (n = 105/211). The proportion mixing insecticides + fungicides + nematicides + acaricides was 33.65% (n = 71/211); those mixing insecticides + fungicides + herbicides was 2.4% (n = 5/211). Those using insecticides alone represented 14.2% (n = 30/211).

Table 7 Different usage practices of pesticides by farmers in Yaoundé
Full size table

Knowledge on pesticide usage and safety practices

From the study, it appeared that farmers normally use far more than the recommended dosage of various pesticides and fertilizers (Table 7). Almost all farmers (95.8%, n = 202/211) admitted not respecting the recommended dosages. Most farmers (80.1%, n = 169/211) said they took advice from retailers before using pesticides and fertilizers. Some farmers (15.2%, n = 32/211) reported to have been trained in how to grow crops and use pesticides while 4.7% (n = 10/211) farmers reported using instructions on labels. Concerning pesticide dilution and the indicated rate of application, most farmers (51.2%, n = 108/211) said they took advice from pesticide vendors or family members, friends, neighbours or other farmers. Some (31.8%, n = 67/211) reported reading the instructions on labels, 10% (n = 21/211) stated that they determined the dosage by themselves and 7.1% (n = 15/211) stated that they attended training workshops.

Frequency of pesticide usage and handling

Pesticides, fertilizers and treatments are applied at different times during crop growing (Table 7). Most farmers reported using pesticides in all seasons (76.8%, n = 162/211). Some indicated applying pesticides only during the dry season (23.2%, n = 49/211). The spraying device used by farmers was a sprayer. Pesticides were always sprayed in combination with fertilizers. The dose of pesticides sprayed depended on the frequencies of spraying, type of crop cultivated, land size, severity of infection and income status. Usually, pesticides were applied several times, up to six times (82.5%, n = 174/211), during plant growth. Most farmers (93.4%, n = 197/211) reported high efficacy of pesticides when applied several times.

Management of empty pesticide containers and expired pesticides

Empty pesticide containers and sachets were discarded indiscriminately after pesticide application (36%, n = 76/211). Some farmers discarded the empty containers in the trash (31.3%, n = 66/211), some burnt the containers (14.2%, n = 30/211), some buried them (7.6%, n = 16/211), and some recycled them for other purposes (10.9%, n = 23/211). A total of 27% (n = 57/211) of farmers reported that pesticides and fertilizers used often perished. Among those having expired pesticides and fertilizers, 70.1% (n = 148/211) indicated throwing them away, 15.2% (n = 32/211) buried them, 3.3% (n = 7/211) burned them when possible, and 2.4% (n = 5/211) said they returned the pesticide to the vendor or used them (3.8%, n = 8/211).

Discussion

Regular surveillance of vector susceptibility to insecticides is crucial for the management of insecticide resistance, which greatly affects the control and elimination of malaria [29]. Two species, namely An. gambiae (s.s.) and An. coluzzii, are present in Yaoundé. These species play major roles in malaria transmission in Cameroon [8, 49,50,51,52,53]. Unplanned urbanisation and the practice of urban agriculture provide suitable breeding habitats for these species in Yaoundé [54,55,56,57]. A high insecticide resistance profile to different insecticide classes was detected, in conformity with previous studies [10, 11, 13, 50]. The evolution of insecticide resistance in the present study was consistent with studies conducted across Africa supporting the rapid expansion of insecticide resistance to various compounds [58,59,60,61,62,63]. Anopheline from Yaoundé also displayed resistance to high concentrations of permethrin and deltamethrin. Pyrethroids are the main compounds recommended for bednet impregnation [44]. The increasing tolerance of mosquitoes to high permethrin and deltamethrin doses is concerning and could jeopardize control efforts if nothing is done, so further attention is required. Several studies also suggested rapid expansion of pyrethroid resistance affecting all anopheline species including An. gambiae (s.s.), An. coluzzii, An. arabiensis, An. funestus and Culex species in the country [7, 50, 64,65,66,67,68,69,70].

High frequency of kdr allele 1014F was recorded. This allele had been reportedly involved in most cases of resistance to both pyrethroids and DDT [7, 10]. A low frequency of the kdr 1014S allele was recorded, supporting no major role for this allele. It is likely that metabolic base mechanisms are involved in mosquito resistance. The overexpression of several P450 detoxification genes such as Cyp6M2, Cyp6P3 and Cyp9K1 has been reported in mosquitoes from the city of Yaoundé [55, 64]. Concerning resistance to the carbamate bendiocarb, it could be induced by the presence of the mutation ACE-1 and the overexpression of different detoxification genes [11, 64, 71]. Resistance to both carbamates and organophosphates is now expanding in malaria vectors across Africa [60, 62, 72,73,74].

Monitoring mosquito population susceptibility and resistance genes between 2017 and 2019 suggested high variability from one year to another. The evolution of insecticide resistance could be closely linked to the evolution of selective pressure induced by pesticide use in agriculture. From the survey conducted on pesticide usage, knowledge and management practices among vendors and farmers in the city of Yaoundé, it appeared that an increasing number of compounds are now used for controlling pests in agriculture. This same trend was recorded in other parts of the country [37, 75,76,77]. This study shows that more than 150 agricultural pesticides are sold on the market. The frequent usage of these compounds and their presence in breeding habitats might also contribute to the selection, development and spread of resistance in mosquitoes [78,79,80,81].

Many active ingredients were recorded in pesticides sold on the market by retailers. Studies conducted in Tanzania similarly identify a high number of formulations sold by retailers [82]. Different classes of insecticides including organophosphates, organochlorines, carbamates, pyrethroids and neonicotinoid acid were recorded in pesticides sold on the market. Some of the compounds such as neonicotinoids (imidacloprid, acetamiprid, thiamethoxam, thiacloprid and clothianidin) are new classes of insecticides that recently received approval for use in public health [83, 84]. The use of these compounds in agriculture could rapidly lead to insecticide resistance and affect the sustainability of new neonicotinoid base control tools. Neonicotinoids act by exerting neurotoxic effects via irreversible binding to insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptors [85]. Other insecticide classes are also used in both public health and agriculture and could select for insecticide resistance in mosquitoes. Several studies have emphasized the potential role of pesticides in the selection of insecticide resistance [15, 82, 86,87,88,89]. Glyphosate, atrazine, paraquat and dichloro-phenoxy acetic acid were common active ingredients in herbicides. These compound are considered to cause metabolic stress and can induce overexpression of genes involved in insecticide resistance [90,91,92,93,94]. Mixture of insecticides and fungicides was largely practiced by farmers. Other mixtures included insecticides + fungicides + nematicides + acaricides and insecticides + fungicides + herbicides. These mixtures could lead to the production of compounds highly toxic to plants and non-target organisms, harmful to the ecosystem, environment and farm operators [95,96,97,98,99,100,101]. Although most pesticides sold were on the list of pesticides approved for use in Cameroon [102], several formulations or versions of poor quality with the same brand were found in the market. The number of counterfeit agricultural products in Cameroon may be high because of poor check points along the boundaries with neighbouring countries [34, 37, 103, 104]. Some farmers admitted to applying up to six rounds of pesticides during the crop-growing stages. This extensive use as well as ineffective application of pesticides was also observed by many authors [37, 105,106,107,108] and is in accordance with the poor quality of pesticides sold on the market. Although all the retailers admitted to regularly providing advice to end-users, most of them had never received training on the use of these compounds. Retailers advise farmers on the choice of pesticides and the dosage based on their experience. Farmers on the other end did not have knowledge about crop pests, diseases, pesticide usage and management of pesticides. They mainly relied on information provided by pesticide retailers, other farmers and friends and sometimes from their personal work experience. Most of the farmers admitted never following the recommended dose; these findings are similar to those of studies conducted in other places [14, 17, 82, 100]. Pesticide application in farms varied according to season. There was a high usage of pesticides during the rainy season. Similar observations were made in the southern part of Ivory Coast, where a high utilization of insecticides and herbicides was noted during the rainy season [17]. In Tanzania, high utilization of pesticides and fungicides was recorded instead in the dry season by farmers cultivating rice and vegetables [82]. Studies conducted so far in the city of Yaoundé indicated moderate variability of susceptibility of An. gambiae (s.l.) to insecticides according to seasonal or temporal variations or type of breeding habitats [10, 50]. Unsafe storage and disposal of expired pesticides and empty pesticide containers were recorded, showing the need for more awareness among farmers and the community to promote best practices [105, 109,110,111,112].

In the light of the present study, it will be important for future studies to look for an association between exposure to agricultural pesticides and resistance selection in malaria vectors. Concerning usage practices, it is important to also interview key managers from relevant ministries to identify regulatory processes in place for the control, supply and selling of pesticides in the country. The study also sheds light on the evolution of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors and on putative factors which could exacerbate the spread of insecticide resistance, highlighting the need for increased collaboration between the agricultural and public health sectors for better management of insecticide resistance.

Conclusions

The study confirmed the rapid evolution of insecticide resistance in An. gambiae (s.l.) populations in Yaoundé and the possible influence of pesticide use by farmers on the development of insecticide resistance. The study calls for increased action towards the population through education and sensitization campaigns to improve the use and management of pesticides and the environment. The study also stresses the need for concerted actions between actors from public health and agricultural sectors for the control and elimination of malaria.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the findings of this article are included within the published article and its additional files.

Abbreviations

ACE-1 :

Acetylcholinesterase-1

CI:

Confidence interval

CS:

Capsule suspension

DDT:

Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane

Delta:

Deltamethrin

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

EC:

Emulsifiable concentrate

GSTe2 :

Glutathione S-transferase epsilon 2

IRS:

Indoor residual spraying

KAP:

Knowledge, attitudes and practices

Kdr :

Knockdown resistance

LLINs:

Long-lasting insecticidal nets

OCEAC:

Organization for the Coordination of the fight against Endemic diseases in Central Africa

PBO:

Piperonyl butoxide

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

Perm:

Permethrin

RR:

Resistant homozygote

RS:

Resistant heterozygotes

SC:

Suspension concentrate

s.l.:

Sensu lato

SL:

Soluble concentrate

s.s.:

Sensu stricto

SS:

Susceptible homozygote

VGSC :

Voltage-gated sodium channel

WHO:

World Health Organization

WP:

Wettable powders

References

  1. Bhatt S, Weiss DJ, Cameron E, Bisanzio D, Mappin B, Dalrymple U, et al. The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature. 2015;526:207–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization. Global report on insecticide resistance in malaria vectors: 2010–2016. Geneva: WHO; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2020: 20 years of global progress and challenges. Geneva: WHO; 2020.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2021. Geneva: WHO; 2021.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Institut national de statistique. Enquête Démographique et de Santé 2018. Yaoundé, Cameroun: INS; 2020.

  6. Ministère de la santé publique. Rapport d’activités 2019 du programme national de lutte contre le paludisme. Yaoundé, Cameroun: MINSANTE; 2020.

  7. Antonio-Nkondjio C, Sonhafouo-Chiana N, Ngadjeu CS, Doumbe-Belisse P, Talipouo A, Djamouko-Djonkam L, et al. Review of the evolution of insecticide resistance in main malaria vectors in Cameroon from 1990 to 2017. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:472.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Antonio-Nkondjio C, Ndo C, Njiokou F, Bigoga JD, Awono-Ambene P, Etang J, et al. Review of malaria situation in Cameroon: technical viewpoint on challenges and prospects for disease elimination. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:501.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization. WHO Global Malaria Programme: Global plan for insecticide resistance management in malaria vectors. Geneva: WHO; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Antonio-Nkondjio C, Fossog BT, Ndo C, Djantio BM, Togouet SZ, Awono-Ambene P, et al. Anopheles gambiae distribution and insecticide resistance in the cities of Douala and Yaoundé (Cameroon): influence of urban agriculture and pollution. Malar J. 2011;10:154.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Antonio-Nkondjio C, Poupardin R, Tene BF, Kopya E, Costantini C, Awono-Ambene P, et al. Investigation of mechanisms of bendiocarb resistance in Anopheles gambiae populations from the city of Yaoundé, Cameroon. Malar J. 2016;15:424.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Menze BD, Riveron JM, Ibrahim SS, Irving H, Antonio-Nkondjio C, Awono-Ambene PH, et al. Multiple insecticide resistance in the malaria vector Anopheles funestus from Northern Cameroon is mediated by metabolic resistance alongside potential target site insensitivity mutations. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0163261.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nwane P, Etang J, Chouaїbou M, Toto JC, Koffi A, Mimpfoundi R, et al. Multiple insecticide resistance mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae s.l. populations from Cameroon Central Africa. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Chouaïbou MS, Fodjo BK, Fokou G, Allassane OF, Koudou BG, David J-P, et al. Influence of the agrochemicals used for rice and vegetable cultivation on insecticide resistance in malaria vectors in southern Côte d’Ivoire. Malar J. 2016;15:426.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Edi AVC, N’Dri BP, Chouaibou M, Kouadio FB, Pignatelli P, Raso G, et al. First detection of N1575Y mutation in pyrethroid resistant Anopheles gambiae in Southern Côte d’Ivoire. Wellcome Open Res. 2017;2:71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hien AS, Soma DD, Hema O, Bayili B, Namountougou M, Gnankiné O, et al. Evidence that agricultural use of pesticides selects pyrethroid resistance within Anopheles gambiae s.l. populations from cotton growing areas in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Plos ONE. 2017;12:e0173098.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. N’Dri BP, Heitz-Tokpa K, Chouaïbou M, Raso G, Koffi AJ, Coulibaly JT, et al. Use of insecticides in agriculture and the prevention of vector-borne diseases: population knowledge, attitudes, practices and beliefs in Elibou, South Côte d’Ivoire. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020;5:36.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Nkya TE, Akhouayri I, Poupardin R, Batengana B, Mosha F, Magesa S, et al. Insecticide resistance mechanisms associated with different environments in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae: a case study in Tanzania. Malar J. 2014;13:28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. World Health Organization. Indoor residual spraying. An operational manual for indoor residual spraying (IRS) for malaria transmission control and elimination. Geneva: WHO; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ngufor C, Tungu P, Malima R, Kirby M, Kisinza W, Rowland M. Insecticide-treated net wall hangings for malaria vector control: an experimental hut study in north-eastern Tanzania. Malar J. 2014;13:366.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. World Health Organization. World malaria report 2017. Geneva: WHO; 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Martinez-Torres D, Chandre F, Williamson MS, Darriet F, Bergé JB, Devonshire AL, et al. Molecular characterization of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol. 1998;7:179–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ranson H, Jensen B, Vulule JM, Wang X, Hemingway J, Collins FH. Identification of a point mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Kenyan Anopheles gambiae associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroids. Insect Mol Biol. 2000;9:491–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Edi CV, Djogbénou L, Jenkins AM, Regna K, Muskavitch MAT, Poupardin R, et al. CYP6 P450 enzymes and ACE-1 duplication produce extreme and multiple insecticide resistance in the malaria Mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Plos Genet. 2014;10:e1004236.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ibrahim SS, Ndula M, Riveron JM, Irving H, Wondji CS. The P450 CYP6Z1 confers carbamate/pyrethroid cross-resistance in a major African malaria vector beside a novel carbamate-insensitive N485I acetylcholinesterase-1 mutation. Mol Ecol. 2016;25:3436–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Riveron JM, Ibrahim SS, Chanda E, Mzilahowa T, Cuamba N, Irving H, et al. The highly polymorphic CYP6M7 cytochrome P450 gene partners with the directionally selected CYP6P9a and CYP6P9b genes to expand the pyrethroid resistance front in the malaria vector Anopheles funestus in Africa. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:817.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Riveron JM, Yunta C, Ibrahim SS, Djouaka R, Irving H, Menze BD, et al. A single mutation in the GSTe2 gene allows tracking of metabolically based insecticide resistance in a major malaria vector. Genome Biol. 2014;15:R27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tchouakui M, Chiang M-C, Ndo C, Kuicheu CK, Amvongo-Adjia N, Wondji MJ, et al. A marker of glutathione S-transferase-mediated resistance to insecticides is associated with higher Plasmodium infection in the African malaria vector Anopheles funestus. Sci Rep. 2019;9:5772.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2019. Geneva: WHO; 2019.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Nkya TE, Poupardin R, Laporte F, Akhouayri I, Mosha F, Magesa S, et al. Impact of agriculture on the selection of insecticide resistance in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae: a multigenerational study in controlled conditions. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:480.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Pretty J, Bharucha ZP. Integrated pest management for sustainable intensification of agriculture in Asia and Africa. Insects. 2015;6:152–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Mbiapo F, Youovop G. Regulation of pesticides in Cameroon. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1993;39:1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sonchieu J, Ngassoum MB. Pesticides poisoning cases recorded in Ngaoundere, Cameroon over a 27-month period. Toxicol Environ Chem. 2007;89:295–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mahob RJ, Ndoumbe-Nkeng M, Hoopen GT, Dibog L, Nyasse S, Rutherford M, et al. Pesticides use in cocoa sector in Cameroon: characterization of supply source, nature of actives ingredients, fashion and reasons for their utilization. Int J Biol Chem Sci. 2014;8:1976–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nambangia Okolle J, Precilia Tata Ijiang, Ajebesone Ngome F. Evaluation of farmer’s knowledge on pests and diseases of vegetables and their management practices in three different agroecological zones in Cameroon. Yaoundé, Cameroon: AVRDC – The World Vegetable Center; 2014.

  36. Tchekote H, Tajouo ELN, Melachio MN, Siyapdje EC, Mbeng E. Farmers’ accessibility to pesticides and generalization of farming practices besides the legal framework in Northern Bafou, in the Bamboutos mountains (West Cameroon). Sustain Environ. 2019;4:41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kenko DB, Fai P, Tchamadeu N, Mbida M. Environmental and human health assessment in relation to pesticide use by local farmers and the Cameroon development corporation (CDC), fako division. South-West Cameroon Eur Sci J. 2017;13:454.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Coats JR. Risks From natural versus synthetic insecticides. Annu Rev Entomol. 1994;39:489–515.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Matthews G. Integrated vector management: controlling vectors of malaria and other insect vector borne diseases. 1st ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mahmood I, Imadi SR, Shazadi K, Gul A, Hakeem KR. Effects of pesticides on environment. In: Rehman Hakeem K, Sayeed Akhtar M, Nor Akmar Abdullah S, editors. Plant, soil and microbes. 1st ed. Cham: Springer; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Service MW. Sampling the adult resting population. In: Service MW, editor. Mosquito ecology: field sampling methods. 2nd ed. Geneva: Springer; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gillies MT, Coetzee M. A supplement to the Anophelinae of Africa south of the Sahara (Afrotropical Region). Johanesburg: South African Inst Med Res. 1987.

  43. Gillies MT, De Meillon B. The Anophelinae of Africa south of the Sahara (Ethiopian Zoogeographical Region). Johanesburg: South Afric Inst Med Res. 1968.

  44. World Health Organization. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vector mosquitoes. Geneva: WHO; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Abbott WS. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol. 1925;18:265–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Livak KJ. Organization and mapping of a sequence on the Drosophila Melanogaster X and Y chromosomes that is transcribed during spermatogenesis. Genetics Genetics. 1984;107:611–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Santolamazza F, Mancini E, Simard F, Qi Y, Tu Z, della Torre A. Insertion polymorphisms of SINE200 retrotransposons within speciation islands of Anopheles gambiae molecular forms. Malar J. 2008;7:163.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Bass C, Nikou D, Vontas J, Williamson MS, Field LM. Development of high-throughput real-time PCR assays for the identification of insensitive acetylcholinesterase (ace-1R) in Anopheles gambiae. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2010;96:80–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Antonio-Nkondjio C, Defo-Talom B, Tagne-Fotso R, Tene-Fossog B, Ndo C, Lehman LG, et al. High mosquito burden and malaria transmission in a district of the city of Douala. Cameroon BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Antonio-Nkondjio C, Tene Fossog B, Kopya E, Poumachu Y, Menze Djantio B, Ndo C, et al. Rapid evolution of pyrethroid resistance prevalence in Anopheles gambiae populations from the cities of Douala and Yaoundé (Cameroon). Malar J. 2015;14:155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Boussougou-Sambe ST, Eyisap WE, Tasse GCT, Mandeng SE, Mbakop LR, Enyong P, et al. Insecticide susceptibility status of Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) in South-West Cameroon four years after long-lasting insecticidal net mass distribution. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:391.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Djamouko-Djonkam L, Mounchili-Ndam S, Kala-Chouakeu N, Nana-Ndjangwo SM, Kopya E, Sonhafouo-Chiana N, et al. Spatial distribution of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato larvae in the urban environment of Yaoundé, Cameroon. Infect Dis Poverty. 2019;8:84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Doumbe-Belisse P, Ngadjeu CS, Sonhafouo-Chiana N, Talipouo A, Djamouko-Djonkam L, Kopya E, et al. High malaria transmission sustained by Anopheles gambiae s.l. occurring both indoors and outdoors in the city of Yaoundé, Cameroon. Wellcome Open Res. 2018;3:164.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Kamdem C, Fossog BT, Simard F, Etouna J, Ndo C, Kengne P, et al. Anthropogenic habitat disturbance and ecological divergence between incipient species of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e39453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Tene BF, Poupardin R, Costantini C, Awono-Ambene P, Wondji CS, Ranson H, et al. Resistance to DDT in an urban setting: common mechanisms implicated in both M and S forms of Anopheles gambiae in the city of Yaoundé Cameroon. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61408.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Tene Fossog B, Kopya E, Ndo C, Menze-Djantio B, Costantini C, Njiokou F, et al. Water quality and Anopheles gambiae Larval tolerance to pyrethroids in the cities of Douala and Yaoundé (Cameroon). J Trop Med. 2012;2012:429817.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Tene Fossog B, Ayala D, Acevedo P, Kengne P, Ngomo Abeso Mebuy I, Makanga B, et al. Habitat segregation and ecological character displacement in cryptic African malaria mosquitoes. Evol Appl. 2015;8:326–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Camara S, Koffi AA, Ahoua Alou LP, Koffi K, Kabran J-PK, Koné A, et al. Mapping insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) from Côte d’Ivoire. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Chabi J, Baidoo PK, Datsomor AK, Okyere D, Ablorde A, Iddrisu A, et al. Insecticide susceptibility of natural populations of Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles gambiae (sensu stricto) from Okyereko irrigation site, Ghana, West Africa. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:182.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Fodjo BK, Koudou BG, Tia E, Saric J, N’dri PB, Zoh MG, et al. Insecticides resistance status of An. gambiae in areas of varying agrochemical use in Côte D’Ivoire. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:2874160.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Koffi AA, Alou LPA, Kabran J-PK, N’Guessan R, Pennetier C. Re-visiting insecticide resistance status in Anopheles gambiae from Côte d’Ivoire: a nation-wide informative survey. Plos ONE. 2013;8:e82387.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Pwalia R, Joannides J, Iddrisu A, Addae C, Acquah-Baidoo D, Obuobi D, et al. High insecticide resistance intensity of Anopheles gambiae (sl) and low efficacy of pyrethroid LLINs in Accra, Ghana. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:299.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Zoh DD, Ahoua Alou LP, Toure M, Pennetier C, Camara S, Traore DF, et al. The current insecticide resistance status of Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) (Culicidae) in rural and urban areas of Bouaké, Côte d’Ivoire. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Bamou R, Sonhafouo-Chiana N, Mavridis K, Tchuinkam T, Wondji CS, Vontas J, et al. Status of insecticide resistance and its mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles coluzzii populations from forest settings in South Cameroon. Genes. 2019;10:741.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Etang J, Fondjo E, Chandre F, Morlais I, Brengues C, Nwane P, et al. Short report : first report of knockdown mutations in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae from Cameroon. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74:795–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Etang J, Mbida Mbida A, Ntonga Akono P, Binyang J, Eboumbou Moukoko CE, Lehman LG, et al. Anopheles coluzzii larval habitat and insecticide resistance in the island area of Manoka. Cameroon BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:217.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Etang J, Pennetier C, Piameu M, Bouraima A, Chandre F, Awono-Ambene P, et al. When intensity of deltamethrin resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. leads to loss of Long Lasting Insecticidal Nets bio-efficacy: a case study in north Cameroon. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Mbida A, Etang J, Ntonga P, Abdou T, Oké-Agbo F, Eboumbou C, et al. Preliminary investigation on aggressive culicidae fauna and malaria transmission in two wetlands of the Wouri river estuary, Littoral-Cameroon. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2016;4:105–10.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Nchoutpouen E, Talipouo A, Djiappi-Tchamen B, Djamouko-Djonkam L, Kopya E, Ngadjeu CS, et al. Culex species diversity, susceptibility to insecticides and role as potential vector of Lymphatic filariasis in the city of Yaoundé, Cameroon. Plos Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007229.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Talipouo A, Mavridis K, Nchoutpouen E, Djiappi-Tchamen B, Fotakis EA, Kopya E, et al. High insecticide resistance mediated by different mechanisms in Culex quinquefasciatus populations from the city of Yaoundé, Cameroon. Sci Rep. 2021;11:7322.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Elanga-Ndille E, Nouage L, Ndo C, Binyang A, Assatse T, Nguiffo-Nguete D, et al. The G119S acetylcholinesterase (Ace-1) target site mutation confers carbamate resistance in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae from Cameroon: a challenge for the coming IRS implementation. Genes. 2019;10:790.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Aïkpon R, Agossa F, Ossè R, Oussou O, Aïzoun N, Oké-Agbo F, et al. Bendiocarb resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. populations from Atacora department in Benin, West Africa: a threat for malaria vector control. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:192.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Corbel V, N’Guessan R, Brengues C, Chandre F, Djogbenou L, Martin T, et al. Multiple insecticide resistance mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus from Benin, West Africa. Acta Trop. 2007;101:207–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Gnanguenon V, Agossa FR, Badirou K, Govoetchan R, Anagonou R, Oke-Agbo F, et al. Malaria vectors resistance to insecticides in Benin: current trends and mechanisms involved. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:223.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Abang AF, Kouame CM, Abang M, Hannah R, Fotso AK. Vegetable growers perception of pesticide use practices, cost, and health effects in the tropical region of Cameroon. Intl J Agron Plant Prod. 2013;4:873–83.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Pouokam GB, Lemnyuy Album W, Ndikontar AS, Sidatt MEH. A pilot study in Cameroon to understand safe uses of pesticides in agriculture, risk factors for farmers’ exposure and management of accidental cases. Toxics. 2017;5:30.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Talom AD, Tchuinkam T, Zeukeng F, Demano L, Kuate AF, Lehman GL, et al. Susceptibility of Anopheles gambiae s.l. to pyrethroid insecticides in vegetable farms in the city of Yaoundé, Cameroon. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2020;8:1851–8.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Abdullahi AI, Yusuf YD. Response of Anopheles gambiae detoxification enzymes to levels of physico-chemical environmental factors from northwest Nigeria, Bayero. J Pure Appl Sci. 2014;7:93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Akogbéto MC, Djouaka RF, Kindé-Gazard DA. Screening of pesticide residues in soil and water samples from agricultural settings. Malar J. 2006;5:22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Yadouleton A, Martin T, Padonou G, Chandre F, Asidi A, Djogbenou L, et al. Cotton pest management practices and the selection of pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles gambiae population in Northern Benin. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Yadouleton AWM, Asidi A, Djouaka RF, Braïma J, Agossou CD, Akogbeto MC. Development of vegetable farming: a cause of the emergence of insecticide resistance in populations of Anopheles gambiae in urban areas of Benin. Malar J. 2009;8:103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Matowo NS, Tanner M, Munhenga G, Mapua SA, Finda M, Utzinger J, et al. Patterns of pesticide usage in agriculture in rural Tanzania call for integrating agricultural and public health practices in managing insecticide-resistance in malaria vectors. Malar J. 2020;19:257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Dagg K, Irish S, Wiegand RE, Shililu J, Yewhalaw D, Messenger LA. Evaluation of toxicity of clothianidin (neonicotinoid) and chlorfenapyr (pyrrole) insecticides and cross-resistance to other public health insecticides in Anopheles arabiensis from Ethiopia. Malar J. 2019;18:49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Jeschke P, Nauen R, Schindler M, Elbert A. Overview of the status and global strategy for neonicotinoids. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:2897–908.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Jeschke P, Nauen R, Beck ME. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists: a milestone for modern crop protection. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52:9464–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Baleta A. Insecticide resistance threatens malaria control in Africa. Lancet. 2009;374:1581–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Chouaïbou M, Etang J, Brévault T, Nwane P, Hinzoumbé CK, Mimpfoundi R, et al. Dynamics of insecticide resistance in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.l. from an area of extensive cotton cultivation in Northern Cameroon. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:476–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Diabate A, Baldet T, Chandre F, Akoobeto M, Guiguemde TR, Darriet F, et al. The role of agricultural use of insecticides in resistance to pyrethroids in Anopheles gambiae s.l. in Burkina Faso. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;67:617–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Nkya TE, Mosha FW, Magesa SM, Kisinza WN. Increased tolerance of Anopheles gambiae s.s. to chemical insecticides after exposure to agrochemical mixture. Tanzan J Health Res. 2014. https://doi.org/10.4314/thrb.v16i4.10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. David J-P, Coissac E, Melodelima C, Poupardin R, Riaz MA, Chandor-Proust A, et al. Transcriptome response to pollutants and insecticides in the dengue vector Aedes aegypti using next-generation sequencing technology. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:216.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Nkya TE, Akhouayri I, Kisinza W, David J-P. Impact of environment on mosquito response to pyrethroid insecticides: facts, evidences and prospects. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2013;43:407–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Poupardin R, Reynaud S, Strode C, Ranson H, Vontas J, David J-P. Cross-induction of detoxification genes by environmental xenobiotics and insecticides in the mosquito Aedes aegypti: Impact on larval tolerance to chemical insecticides. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2008;38:540–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Poupardin R, Riaz MA, Vontas J, David JP, Reynaud S. Transcription profiling of eleven cytochrome P450s potentially involved in xenobiotic metabolism in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Insect Mol Biol. 2010;19:185–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Riaz MA, Poupardin R, Reynaud S, Strode C, Ranson H, David J-P. Impact of glyphosate and benzo[a]pyrene on the tolerance of mosquito larvae to chemical insecticides. Role of detoxification genes in response to xenobiotics. Aquat Toxicol. 2009;93:61–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Cloyd RA. Pesticides, formulations, effects, fate. 1st ed. London: IntechOpen; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Forrester NW. Designing, implementing and servicing an insecticide resistance management strategy. Pestic Sci. 1990;28:167–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Imoro ZA, Larbi J, Duwiejuah AB. Pesticide availability and usage by farmers in the northern region of Ghana. J Health Pollut. 2019;9:190906.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Phillips JR, Graves JB, Luttrell RG. Insecticide resistance management: relationship to integrated pest management. Pestic Sci. 1989;27:459–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Pingali PL. Environmental consequences of agricultural commercialization in Asia. Environ Dev Econ. 2001;6:483–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Rahaman MM, Islam KS, Jahan M. Rice farmers’ knowledge of the risks of pesticide use in Bangladesh. J Health Pollut. 2018;8:181203.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Sherwood SG, Coleman DC, Crissman C, Chauca MCP. The pesticide detox: towards a more sustainable agriculture. 1st ed. London: Earthscan; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. Liste des pesticides homologues au cameroun au 18 Avril 2019. Yaoundé, Cameroun: MINADER; 2019.

  103. Kenko DBN, Kamta PN. Human and environmental health implications of pesticide utilization by market gardeners in the Western Highlands of Cameroon. AJEE. 2021;14:44–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Sonchieu J, Akono EN, Ngwamitang CT, Ngassoum BM. Heath risk among pesticide sellers in Bamenda (Cameroon) and peripheral areas. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25:9454–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Aniah P, Kaunza-Nu-Dem MK, Dong-Uuro PP, Ayembilla JA, Osumanu IK. Vegetable farmers’ knowledge on pesticides use in Northwest Ghana. Environ Dev Sustain. 2021;23:7273–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Huang Y, Luo X, Tang L, Yu W. The power of habit: does production experience lead to pesticide overuse? Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27:25287–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Okonya JS, Kroschel J. A cross-sectional study of pesticide use and knowledge of smallholder potato farmers in Uganda. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:759049.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Zeng Y, Zhang J, He K, Cheng L. Who cares what parents think or do? Observational learning and experience-based learning through communication in rice farmers’ willingness to adopt sustainable agricultural technologies in Hubei Province, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019;26:12522–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Assokeng T, Siéliéchi JM, Noumi GB. Evaluation of health and environmental risks of pesticide products used in market-gardening in the city of Ngaoundere (Cameroon). JACEN. 2017;6:186–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Tandi TE, Wook CJ, Shendeh TT, Eko EA, Afoh CO. Small-scale tomato cultivators’ perception on pesticides usage and practices in Buea Cameroon. Health. 2014;06:2945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Tarla D, Meutchieye F, Assako V, Fontem D, Kome J. Exposure of market gardeners during pesticide application in the western highlands of Cameroon. Scholarly J Agric Sci. 2013;3:172–7.

    Google Scholar 

  112. van den Berg H, da Silva Bezerra HS, Chanda E, Al-Eryani S, Nagpal BN, Gasimov E, et al. Management of insecticides for use in disease vector control: a global survey. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21:468.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the authorities and the communities of the selected study sites in Yaoundé.

Funding

This work received financial support from Wellcome Trust Senior Fellowship in Public Health and Tropical Medicine (202687/Z/16/Z) to CAN. The funding body did not have any role in the design, collection of data, analysis and interpretation of data and in writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Organisation de Coordination pour la lutte Contre les Endémies en Afrique Centrale (OCEAC), Institut de Recherche de Yaoundé (IRY), P.O. Box 288, Yaoundé, Cameroon

    Nadège Sonhafouo-Chiana, Leslie Diane Nkahe, Edmond Kopya, Parfait Herman Awono-Ambene & Christophe Antonio-Nkondjio

  2. Parasites and Vector Research Unit (PAVRU), Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Buea, P.O. Box 63, Buea, Cameroon

    Nadège Sonhafouo-Chiana & Samuel Wanji

  3. Faculty of Science, University of Yaoundé I, P.O. Box 337, Yaoundé, Cameroon

    Leslie Diane Nkahe & Edmond Kopya

  4. Centre for Research in Infectious Diseases (CRID), P.O. BOX 13591, Yaoundé, Cameroon

    Charles Sinclair Wondji

  5. Research Foundation in Tropical Diseases and Environment (REFOTDE), P.O. Box 474, Buea, Cameroon

    Samuel Wanji

  6. Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK

    Charles Sinclair Wondji & Christophe Antonio-Nkondjio

Authors
  1. Nadège Sonhafouo-Chiana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leslie Diane Nkahe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Edmond Kopya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Parfait Herman Awono-Ambene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Samuel Wanji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Charles Sinclair Wondji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Christophe Antonio-Nkondjio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NSC and CAN conceived and designed the study. NSC conducted field and laboratory analysis. CSW, SW, PHAA and EK critically revised the manuscript. NSC, CAN and LDN analysed data. SCN and CAN interpreted data and drafted the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nadège Sonhafouo-Chiana or Christophe Antonio-Nkondjio.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted under ethical clearance no. 2016/11/832/CE/CNERSH/SP delivered by the Cameroon National Ethics Committee for Research on Human Health (CNERSH) Ref. no. D30-172/L/MINSANTE/SG/DROS/TMC on 4 April 2017.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Survey sheet on pesticide vendors and farmers in the city of Yaoundé, Cameroon.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

Trade names, types, active ingredients, WHO toxicity and chemical classes, and dose of pesticides used by farmers in Yaoundé, Cameroon.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sonhafouo-Chiana, N., Nkahe, L.D., Kopya, E. et al. Rapid evolution of insecticide resistance and patterns of pesticides usage in agriculture in the city of Yaoundé, Cameroon. Parasites Vectors 15, 186 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05321-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05321-8

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us