Skip to main content
Download PDF

Plasmodium berghei Brca2 is required for normal development and differentiation in mice and mosquitoes

Parasites & Vectors volume 15, Article number: 244 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Malaria is a major global parasitic disease caused by species of the genus Plasmodium. Zygotes of Plasmodium spp. undergo meiosis and develop into tetraploid ookinetes, which differentiate into oocysts that undergo sporogony. Homologous recombination (HR) occurs during meiosis and introduces genetic variation. However, the mechanisms of HR in Plasmodium are unclear. In humans, the recombinases DNA repair protein Rad51 homolog 1 (Rad51) and DNA meiotic recombinase 1 (Dmc1) are required for HR and are regulated by breast cancer susceptibility protein 2 (BRCA2). Most eukaryotes harbor BRCA2 homologs. Nevertheless, these have not been reported for Plasmodium.

Methods

A Brca2 candidate was salvaged from a database to identify Brca2 homologs in Plasmodium. To confirm that the candidate protein was Brca2, interaction activity between Plasmodium berghei (Pb) Brca2 (PbBrca2) and Rad51 (PbRad51) was investigated using a mammalian two-hybrid assay. To elucidate the functions of PbBrca2, PbBrca2 was knocked out and parasite proliferation and differentiation were assessed in mice and mosquitoes. Transmission electron microscopy was used to identify sporogony.

Results

The candidate protein was conserved among Plasmodium species, and it was indicated that it harbors critical BRCA2 domains including BRC repeats, tower, and oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding-fold domains. The P. berghei BRC repeats interacted with PbRad51. Hence, the candidate was considered a Brca2 homolog. PbBrca2 knockout parasites were associated with reduced parasitemia with increased ring stage and decreased trophozoite stage counts, gametocytemia, female gametocyte ratio, oocyst number, and ookinete development in both mice and mosquitoes. Nevertheless, the morphology of the blood stages in mice and the ookinete stage was comparable to those of the wild type parasites. Transmission electron microscopy results showed that sporogony never progressed in Brca2-knockout parasites.

Conclusions

Brca2 is implicated in nearly all Plasmodium life cycle stages, and especially in sporogony. PbBrca2 contributes to HR during meiosis.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Malaria is an infection caused by protozoan parasites of the genus Plasmodium. In 2020, there were an estimated 229 million cases of malaria and 409,000 deaths caused by the disease worldwide [World Health Organization (WHO): https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/reports/world-malaria-report-2020]. Malaria is difficult to control, and no efficacious vaccine has been developed against it. Moreover, there is continuous antigenic variation, genetic diversity, and antimalarial drug resistance in Plasmodium [1, 2]. In humans, Plasmodium is transmitted from host to host via Anopheles mosquitoes [3]. When a mosquito takes a blood meal from a host, it injects Plasmodium sporozoites into the bloodstream. The sporozoites ultimately migrate to the host’s liver where they develop into merozoites, which are then released into the circulatory system and start an asexual reproduction cycle. Only a small proportion of the parasites exist as gametocytes in the blood. When a female Anopheles mosquito takes a blood meal from a host, gametocytes are ingested, pass into the midgut and differentiate into male and female gametes. Fertilization, zygote formation, and meiosis then occur. Next, the zygotes differentiate into motile ookinetes. The latter migrate, traverse the midgut epithelium, settle under the midgut basal lamina, and differentiate into oocysts at approximately 24 h after blood ingestion. The asexual reproduction cycle then resumes once again. Several thousand sporozoites form within each oocyst and are released approximately 2 weeks after blood ingestion. The sporozoites then migrate and invade the mosquito salivary glands, which enables the insect to transmit the pathogen to another host.

Efficacious drugs targeting all Plasmodium life cycle stages are required to control malaria. The zygote to ookinete stages are feasible drug targets as the numbers at these stages are far lower than at the other stages. However, the currently available anti-Plasmodium drugs only target blood-stage parasites present in the mammalian host. Sexual reproduction and meiosis occur from the zygote to ookinete stages. Homologous recombination (HR) occurs during meiosis in Plasmodium spp., which plausibly involves the DNA recombinases DNA repair protein Rad51 homolog 1 (Rad51) and DNA meiotic recombinase 1 (Dmc1) [3,4,5,6]. It was reported that Dmc1 knockout (KO) in Plasmodium berghei resulted in a reduced number and altered development of oocysts and sporozoites [6]. Rad51 and Dmc1 also regulate HR during meiosis in mammals [7]. In mammals they interact with BRCA2 and are regulated by it. This mechanism also contributes to HR during meiosis [7, 8]. Mammalian BRCA2 harbors several functional domains. In humans, Rad51 and Dmc1 interact with BRCA2 through BRC repeats. Rad51 and Dmc1 also interact with BRCA2 through the C-terminal Rad51- and DMC1-binding domains, respectively [9,10,11]. HR also participates in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. Most living organisms repair DSBs via HR and/or non-homologous end joining. The HR-related proteins are conserved in Plasmodium whereas the non-homologous end joining proteins are not [3]. Thus, most DSBs are repaired by Plasmodium HR proteins [12].

BRCA2 orthologs have been detected in eukaryotes such as mammals, Xenopus, fish, Caenorhabditis elegans, Ustilago maydis, Trypanosoma, and Leishmania. They are absent in yeasts, archaea, and bacteria [13,14,15,16,17]. In yeasts, Rad52 is the Rad51-regulating protein. Human BRCA2 cannot interact with yeast Rad51 [18]. In lower eukaryotes such as C. elegans, U. maydis, Trypanosoma, and Leishmania, Brca2 orthologs possess only the vital BRC repeats and the tower and oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding (OB)-fold domains. In Plasmodium, HR proteins, including Rad51 and Dmc1, are conserved and their functions resemble those of human Rad51 and Dmc1 [6]. However, the Rad51 and Dmc1 regulatory protein, such as BRCA2, has not been identified. Thus, the aims of the present study were to salvage BRC repeats and DNA binding domain-containing proteins from the Plasmodium database and clarify the functions of Plasmodium Brca2 by generating KO P. berghei.

Methods

Bioinformatics

The P. berghei (Pb) Brca2 (PbBrca2) (PbANKA_1343400) genomic sequences used in the present study were retrieved from PlasmoDB (http://www.plasmodb.org). The online hidden Markov model structure prediction tool HHpred (https://toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/tools/hhpred) was used to predict the features of the PbBrca2 domain [19, 20]. The online signal peptide prediction tool PSORT II Prediction (https://psort.hgc.jp/form2.html) was used to predict the subcellular localization of PbBrca2 [21, 22].

Crystal structure modeling

The crystal structures of human Rad51 and BRC repeat 4 were retrieved from the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank (PDB) at http://www.rcsb.org/ [PDB identifier (ID) 1N0W] and analyzed with Chimera software (http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/) [8]. The OB-fold and tower domains of PbBrca2 were predicted with AlphaFold2 [23], and their structures were compared via Chimera against those of human BRCA2 helical, OB, and tower domains (PDB ID 1MIU) or that of the OB domain of human replication protein A1 (PDB ID 4O0A).

Mice, parasites, and mosquitoes

ICR and BALB/c mice aged 6–8 weeks were obtained from Charles River Laboratories Japan (Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan). The P. berghei ANKA strain constitutively expressing green fluorescent protein was obtained from Dr. M. Yuda (Mie University, Tsu, Mie Prefecture, Japan) [24]. Anopheles stephensi (STE2 strain) mosquitoes were kept in an insectary at 27 °C, 80% relative humidity, and a 14-h/10-h light/dark cycle and fed 10% (w/v) sucrose solution. All experimental procedures were executed following a protocol approved by the Kitasato University Animal Care and Use Committee (approval nos. 16-020 and 19-087).

Mammalian two-hybrid assay

The coding regions of the PbBrca2 BRC repeats domain were cloned into pM plasmids (Clontech Laboratories, Mountain View, CA). Plasmodium berghei Rad51 and Dmc1, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51, and human Rad51 were cloned into pVP16 plasmids (Clontech Laboratories). The methods used for the mammalian two-hybrid assays have been previously described [25]. FuGENE HD transfection reagent (Promega, Madison, WI) was used to co-transfect ~ 2 × 105 cells 293 T cells with pM and pVP16 vectors, the pGluc luciferase reporter, and pRL-tk normalization plasmids (Promega). The luciferase activity of the cell extracts was measured with a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega).

Generation of PbBrca2-KO parasites

PbBrca2 was knocked out by double-crossover HR technology using a pBluescript II-based plasmid containing a puromycin resistance gene inserted upstream (5′) of the PbEf1α gene and downstream (3′) of the PbDhfr-ts gene, as previously described [26, 27]. A donor plasmid with 1000-bp homology arms was cloned upstream with the primers 5′-PbBrca2 forward (F) (5′-CGGGGTACCTTTTATTGTATCCCTATAA-3′), and 5′-PbBrca2 reverse (R) (5′-GGCGGGCCCCTTTATTTAATTATTAAGATTTTTTTGTTAC-3′); and cloned downstream with the primers 3′ PbBrca2 F (5′-CCGTCTAGATATCGTTTTAAGGTTGTTTC-3′), and 3′-PbBrca2 R (5′-CCGGCGGCCGCTATGTTGTATTGTTTGTTTT-3′). To clone the homology arms, the plasmids were treated with the restriction enzymes KpnI and ApaI for upstream of the PbBrca2 gene and XbaI and NotI for downstream of the PbBrca2 gene (all restriction enzymes were purchased from New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA). Ten micrograms of donor vector was linearized using ScaI (New England Biolabs) and electroporated with a Nucleofector 2b device (Lonza Group, Basel, Switzerland) into cultured P. berghei schizonts. Transfected parasites were selected by puromycin and cloned by limiting dilution as previously described [26, 27].

PbBrca2-KO parasite genotyping and PbBrca2 amplification in complementary DNA

Blood infected with wild type (WT) or PbBrca2-KO parasites was collected and the DNA or RNA extracted with a Gentra Puregene Blood Kit (Qiagen, Düsseldorf, Germany) or a NucleoSpin RNA Blood Kit (TaKaRa Bio, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. To genotype the PbBrca2-KO, the PbBrca2 locus was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using 5′-PbBrca2 F and 3′-PbBrca2 R from genomic DNA. The extracted RNA was reverse-transcribed with SuperScript IV VILO Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PbBrca2 expression was detected by PCR using PbBrca2 exon 3 F, 5′-GGGAACCACATTTTTAAATGA-3′, and PbBrca2 exon 4 R, 5′-CCTTTGGGTATGTTCTTAGGG-3′.

Southern blot analysis

Two micrograms of the extracted DNA was digested with the restriction endonuclease EcoRV (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), separated on a 0.8% agarose gel, transferred to a Hybond N+ membrane (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK), and hybridized with probes labeled using a PCR DIG Probe Synthesis Kit (Roche Diagnostics) with the primers PbPuro SH F2 (5′-ACCTCGAGAGATCCCGTTTT-3′) and PbPuro SH R2 (5′-TTTATGAATCATTGAAGAGACAACA-3′). The signal was detected with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibody (Roche Diagnostics) and CDP-Star Detection Reagent (GE Healthcare).

Phenotypic analysis of PbBrca2-KO parasites

The development of WT and PbBrca2-KO parasites in the BALB/c mice was assessed. Five mice per group were each injected with 1 × 106 WT or PbBrca2-KO parasites. Parasitemia was monitored daily using Giemsa-stained blood smears. The morphology of blood-stage parasites was observed using a phase-contrast microscope (ECLIPSE E200; Nikon, Tokyo). A survival assay was performed using nine and 10 mice infected with WT and PbBrca2-KO1 parasites, respectively, for 11 days after infection. The humane endpoints were when mice showed rapid weight loss (> 20% of body weight) or poor physical appearance (reduced mobility, rough coat, and depression). When parasitemia reached approximately 10% in four mice per group, the gametocytes per infected red blood cell were enumerated and the gametocyte sex ratios were determined by Giemsa-stained tail blood smears. Male gametocyte exflagellation was quantified as previously described [28]. Briefly, 1 µL gametocyte-infected blood was drawn from the tail vein and immediately mixed with 1 µL heparin and 38 µL complete ookinete culture medium (OKM; RPMI 1640 medium; Gibco, Grand Island, NY) and 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). The mixture was placed under a coverslip at room temperature. After 5 min, the exflagellation centers were counted under a phase-contrast microscope (ECLIPSE E200; Nikon) for the next 10 min. Parasite differentiation into gametocytes and exflagellation were then assessed. Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes were fed on the infected mice, and the oocysts were microscopically examined between days 13–15. At least 30 mosquitoes were dissected. Enhanced green fluorescent protein-expressing oocysts were detected by fluorescence stereoscopic microscopy (Leica M205 FA; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The oocysts in each positive midgut were counted to determine infection intensity and the prevalence of infection [29]. The sporozoites in A. stephensi mosquitoes treated as described above were examined microscopically at day 28. Enhanced green fluorescent protein-expressing sporozoites in the salivary glands were detected using fluorescence microscopy (Leica M205 FA; Leica Microsystems).

Ookinete culture and purification

Blood presenting with 10 × 104 red blood cells in which gametocytes were undergoing exflagellation was obtained from mice by heart puncture. Ten volumes of OKM was added to the blood and the suspension was cultured at 19 °C for 24 h. Ookinetes were enumerated and their structure was examined using culture suspension smears. They were purified in a MidiMACS Separator System (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany) as previously described [28]. A total of 3 mL culture was passed through the system thrice before removing the column from the magnet. The ookinetes were recovered by passing 5 mL OKM through the column. The purified ookinetes were centrifuged at 1000 g and 4 °C for 10 min and washed thrice in phosphate-buffered saline. Ookinete morphology was observed by differential interference contrast microscopy (Olympus IX83; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Transmission electron microscopy

Mosquito midguts were collected at 7, 14, and 21 days post-infection to evaluate oocyst differentiation, sporozoite development, and sporozoite maturation, respectively. The midguts were fixed in 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde and 2% (v/v) paraformaldehyde in 0.03 M HEPES buffer (pH 7.4) at 4 °C for 2 h. The cells were then treated with 1% (w/v) osmium tetrachloride/1.5% (w/v) potassium ferrocyanide at 21–24 °C for 2 h to enhance cytoplasmic contrast [30]. The midguts were then dehydrated, embedded in epoxy resin, sectioned to 70-nm thickness with an Ultracut N (Reichert–Nissei, Vienna), stained with 1% (w/v) uranyl acetate for 18 min and 2% (w/v) lead citrate for 1 min, and examined under a transmission electron microscope (H-7650; Hitachi, Tokyo) at 80 kV [29].

Statistical analyses

The F-test followed by Student’s t-test with or without Holm’s correction was used to compare treatments in terms of interaction activity (mammalian two-hybrid assay), parasitemia, infection intensity (number of oocysts/midgut), gametocytemia, gametocyte and exflagellation ratios, and ookinete numbers. A log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test was used to compare the survival rate in the survival assay. The total number of each blood-stage counts and the total number of female and male gametocyte counts were analyzed by a χ2-test. The number of oocysts was assessed by a Mann–Whitney U-test.

Results

Bioinformatic analyses of Plasmodium Brca2

Analysis of the Plasmodium genome by the online hidden Markov model structure prediction tool (https://toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/tools/hhpred) suggested that the conserved gene product PBANKA_1343400 is a BRCA2 ortholog in P. berghei (Fig. 1a). According to PlasmoDB, PBANKA_1343400 is a conserved Plasmodium protein with unknown function (https://plasmodb.org/plasmo/app/search?q=PBANKA_1343400). The regions of this gene product that are conserved among Plasmodium spp. are presented in Additional file 1: Fig. S1. It was predicted that Brca2 in P. berghei has three BRC repeats and OB-fold and tower domains such as Trypanosoma brucei and Leishmania infantum Brca2 and Ustilago maydis Brh2, which are the simplest BRCA2 orthologs harboring essential BRCA2 domains, i.e. one BRC repeat, OB and tower domains, and nuclear localization signals (Fig. 1a). The three-dimensional structure of the predicted PbBrca2 OB-fold and tower domains was generated by AlphaFold2 (https://www.alphafold.ebi.ac.uk) and compared against human BRCA2 and the typical OB domain of the structure of human replication protein A1 (Additional file 2: Fig. S2). AlphaFold2 predicted one tower and two OB domains. We also estimated the subcellular localizing signal using the online subcellular localization prediction tool PSORT II Prediction (https://psort.hgc.jp/form2.html). It was predicted that PbBrca2 has three nuclear localization signals and that it is localized in the nucleus with a probability of 69.6%.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A–E Breast cancer susceptibility protein 2 (Brca2) is conserved in Plasmodium berghei (Pb). A Schematic representation of PbBrca2 protein domains relative to human, Trypanosoma brucei, and Leishmania infantum BRCA2 and Ustilago maydis Brh2. Predicted BRC repeats, tower and oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding (OB)-fold domains, and nuclear localization signals are shown. For human BRCA2, PALB2, DMC1, and DNA repair protein Rad51 homolog 1 (Rad51)-binding domains (BD) are shown. B Alignment of human BRCA2 BRC repeat 4 and three PbBrca2 BRC repeats. Magenta boxes indicate that the phenylalanine residues F1524 and F1546 are required for interaction with Rad51. C Interaction activity of PbBrca2 BRC repeats with P. berghei, human, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 and P. berghei Dmc1 was tested by mammalian two-hybrid assay; 293T cells were transfected with DNA-binding domain fused with PbBrca2 BRC repeats, transactivation domain (TAD) fused with Rad51 or Dmc1, and luciferase reporter and normalization plasmids. Relative luciferase activity normalized with Renilla luciferase activity. Comparison of mean values was performed using the F-test followed by Student’s t-test; * P < 0.05 (vs. paired TAD-fused protein-expressing samples). D Expression levels of TAD-fused proteins in mammalian two-hybrid assay were confirmed. All TAD-fused proteins are expressed. E Structural representation of the amino acid substitutions in human Rad51. The substituted amino acids are important for interaction with human BRC repeat 4 and differ from PbRad51. The three-dimensional structure based on human Rad51 and BRC repeat 4 crystal structure was predicted using Chimera software. Number of contacts between BRC repeat 4 and Rad51 decrease in the case of all four substitutions

Full size image

PbBrca2 BRC repeats interacted only with PbRad51

BRC repeats are essential for human BRCA2 to be able to interact with Rad51. Three predicted BRC repeats of PbBrca2 aligned with human BRCA2 BRC repeat 4 (Fig. 1b). All three BRC repeats of PbBrca2 were highly conserved with human BRC repeat 4. The phenylalanine residues F1524 and F1546 in human BRCA2, which were essential for the Rad51 interaction, were also conserved in PbBrca2 [31]. We used the mammalian two-hybrid assay to confirm that the predicted PbBrca2 BRC repeats interact with PbRad51. Human BRCA2 interacts with Rad51 and DMC1 via BRC repeats and the other binding domains. It does not interact with S. cerevisiae Rad51 [9,10,11, 18]. We tested the interaction activity of the PbBrca2 BRC repeats against P. berghei, human, and S. cerevisiae Rad51 and the meiosis-specific Rad51 paralog P. berghei Dmc1 (Fig. 1c, d). Relative luciferase activity increased only in the P. berghei BRC repeats and PbRad51 in the transfected samples (Fig. 1c). The other combination had the same luciferase activity as the negative control which was only transfected with Rad51- or Dmc1-expressing plasmids. We also confirmed Rad51 and Dmc1 expression in each species via the mammalian two-hybrid assay (Fig. 1d). Thus, the PbBrca2 BRC repeats interacted only with PbRad51, not with human Rad51. We aligned the amino acid sequences of P. berghei and human Rad51 to assess why interaction activity was observed only in PbBraca2 and PbRad51 (Additional file 3: Fig. S3). The Rad51 homology between P. berghei and human Rad51 was > 80%. However, the chemical properties of the amino acid residues M158, Y205, M251, and L255 in human Rad51 differed between human and P. berghei Rad51. These residues were associated with the important phenylalanines F1524 and F1546 in the BRC repeats. We predicted the structure using Chimera software, human BRC repeat 4, and the Rad51 three-dimensional structure, and estimated the interaction mechanism (PDB ID 1N0W) (Fig. 1e). We conducted an in silico analysis to estimate the effects of the P. berghei amino acid residues on the interaction between human Rad51 and BRC repeat 4. Substitution of M158L, Y205I, M251G, and L255I reduced the number of contacts between BRC repeat 4 and Rad51 (Fig. 1e).

PbBrca2-KO parasite production

Next, we attempted to elucidate the function of PbBrca2. To this end, we generated a Brca2 null P. berghei (Fig. 2). To generate the Brca2 KO parasite, we transfected a codon-optimized puromycin resistance gene with up- and downstream PbBrca2 homology arms into a P. berghei ANKA strain expressing green fluorescent protein (Fig. 2a). We then subjected the full-length genomic DNA region of the puromycin-selected PbBrca2 null clones to PCR amplification and southern blot hybridization (Fig. 2b, c). Two PbBrca2-KO parasites were generated. A PCR analysis of the genomic DNA revealed that the amplicons of the PbBrca2-KO clones (about 4 kbp) were shorter than that of the WT parasite (about 10 kbp). Both KO parasites harbored the predicted genomic DNA fragment size. To confirm the lack of mRNA-level PbBrca2 expression, we performed reverse transcription-PCR using primers amplifying between exons 3 and 4 of PbBrca2. As expected, amplification was absent in the PbBrca2-KO parasites (Fig. 2d).

Fig. 2
figure 2

A–D Generation of PbBrca2-knockout (KO) parasites. A Schematic representation of targeted PbBrca2 disruption. Targeting vector (bottom) containing puromycin resistance gene (PuromycinR) upstream (5′) of PbEf1α and downstream (3′) of PbDhfr-ts was integrated into the PbBrca2 locus (top) by double crossover. Arrows indicate genomic DNA (B) and reverse transcription (RT)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (C) primers. Black bar indicates southern blot probe. B PbBrca2 locus amplified in wild type (WT) and PbBrca2-KO1 (KO1) and PbBrca2-KO2 (KO2) clones. In the WT parasite, PCR products were longer than those detected for KO1 and KO2 parasites. C PbBrca2 KO was detected by southern blot. EcoRV-digested genomic DNA from WT and KO parasites demonstrated hybridization with upstream PbBrca2. KO1 and KO2 clones detected relatively short bands. D To analyze mRNA-level PbBrca2 expression, RT-PCR was performed using primers amplifying the region between PbBrca2 exon 3 and exon 4 in blood-stage parasites. PbBrca2 PCR products were detected for WT but not for KO1 or KO2 parasites. Amplified 18S ribosomal RNA was the positive control. M DNA size marker

Full size image

PbBrca2 is required for asexual blood-stage growth and oocyst formation

A comprehensive gene expression analysis revealed that PbBrca2 is upregulated in the schizont, female gametocyte, and ookinete. Moreover, its expression gradually increases from the ring to the schizont stage and gradually decreases from the ookinete to the sporozoite stage (https://www.sanger.ac.uk/science/tools/mca/mca/) [32]. To elucidate the function of PbBrca2, we analyzed asexual blood-stage growth (Fig. 3) and found that the PbBrca2-KO parasites caused milder parasitemia than the WT (Fig. 3a). The severity of PbBrca2-KO parasitemia increased and reached that of WT parasitemia at a later time point. Additionally, we assessed the effect of PbBrca2-KO on pathogenesis in mice (Fig. 3b). All the mice infected with WT parasites were euthanized or died within 10 days post-infection, whereas 50% of the mice infected with PbBrca2-KO1 parasites were alive at 11 days post-infection, and had a significantly higher survival rate than WT-infected mice (P = 0.006). Moreover, mice infected with PbBrca2-KO1 parasites maintained their daily level of activity despite high levels of parasitemia. The morphology of the PbBrca2-KO parasites at the ring to schizont stages was comparable to that of the WT parasites at the same stages (Fig. 3c); however, the counts at each blood stage differed between the WT and PbBrca2-KO parasites (Table 1). Specifically, counts at the ring stage were increased and those at the trophozoite and gametocyte stages were decreased for PbBrca2-KO parasites compared to WT parasites.

Fig. 3
figure 3

A–E PbBrca2 is required for asexual blood-stage growth and oocyst formation. A Parasitemia in mice intraperitoneally infected with WT (blue) or PbBrca2-KO1 (red) and PbBrca2-KO2 (orange) parasites. Each group included five mice, and the mice were infected via intraperitoneal injection with 106 blood-stage parasites. Mice infected with WT and PbBrca2-KO parasites were euthanized after days 6 and 10, respectively, in a humane manner. B Survival curves of mice infected with WT (n = 9) or PbBrca2-KO1 (n = 10) parasites. Mice demonstrating a highly pathological phenotype were euthanized in a humane manner. A log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test was used to compare survival curves. C Morphological analyses of WT and PbBrca2-KO1 parasites at the ring, trophozoite, and schizont stages. D Oocysts/midgut of mosquitoes infected with WT or PbBrca2-KO1 or PbBrca2-KO2 parasites. Mosquitoes were fed on three infected mice in each group. Horizontal bars are medians. e Proportions of mosquitoes harboring ≥ 1 oocyst. The F-test followed by Student’s t-test with Holm’s correction was used to compare the mean values of parasitemia and oocyst infection intensity. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, N.S. non-significant (vs. WT parasites). Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare the medians of oocyst numbers. For abbreviations, see Figs. 1 and 2

Full size image
Table 1 Total numbers of parasites at each blood stage
Full size table

We then analyzed oocyst formation in mosquitoes because they are susceptible to parasite infestation at that stage. Oocyst formation decreased in the PbBrca2-KO parasites (Fig. 3d). We evaluated the proportions of mosquitoes infected with more than one oocyst to determine whether the PbBrca2-KO parasites had low infectivity in the mosquitoes. There was no difference in the severity of midgut infestation caused by the WT and PbBrca2-KO parasites (Fig. 3e).

Female gametocyte and ookinete formation are inhibited in PbBrca2-KO parasites

The PbBrca2-KO1 and PbBrca2-KO2 clones were similar in terms of the severity of parasitemia and oocyst number. Hence, we analyzed the PbBrca2-KO1 clone in the subsequent experiments. We enumerated gametocytemia and the proportions of female and male gametocytes using blood smears from PbBrca2-KO or WT parasite-infected mice. There were no apparent differences between the PbBrca2-KO and WT parasites in terms of gametogony morphology (Fig. 4a). However, the PbBrca2-KO parasites induced less gametocytemia than the WT parasites (Fig. 4b). The proportions of female and male gametocytes differed between the WT and PbBrca2-KO parasites (Fig. 4c). Statistical analysis also confirmed that the total number of female gametocytes was lower and the total number of male gametocytes higher in mice infected with PbBrca2-KO parasites compared to those infected with WT parasites (Table 2). However, the exflagellation ratios for WT and PbBrca2-KO parasites were comparable. Therefore, male gametocyte maturation was considered morphologically normal in the PbBrca2-KO parasites (Fig. 4d). Ookinete formation was also reduced in the PbBrca2-KO parasites, but there were no apparent morphological differences between the PbBrca2-KO and WT ookinetes (Fig. 4a, e).

Fig. 4
figure 4

A–E PbBrca2 is vital for female gametocyte development and ookinete formation. A Morphological analyses of male and female gametocytes and ookinetes of WT and PbBrca2-KO1 parasites. B Gametocytes were enumerated in four mice infected with WT or PbBrca2-KO1 parasites at approximately 10% parasitemia. C Proportions of female and male gametocytes in mice infected with either WT or PbBrca2-KO1 parasites. Percentages of female (pink) and male (blue) gametocytes are shown. D Exflagellation ratios were measured for in vitro cultures using blood from five mice infected with WT or PbBrca2-KO1 parasites and with approximately 10% parasitemia. E Ookinete counts for in vitro cultures after 24 h of incubation at 19 °C in ookinete culture medium using blood from five mice infected with WT or PbBrca2-KO1 parasites and with approximately 10% parasitemia. Data are plotted as bar graphs. F-test followed by Student’s t-test was used to compare the mean values of gametocytemia, female and male ratio, exflagellation, ookinete number. Error bars indicate SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, N.S. non-significant (vs. WT parasites). RBC Red blood cells; for other abbreviations, see Figs. 1 and 2

Full size image
Table 2 Total numbers of female and male gametocytesa
Full size table

PbBrca2-KO parasite oocysts presented with a developmental abnormality

Mosquitoes infected with PbBrca2-KO parasites could not transmit them to their secondary hosts. Furthermore, sporozoites were absent from the salivary glands of these mosquitoes at day 28 post-infection (Fig. 5). Thus, we examined the morphology of PbBrca2-KO parasite oocysts and sporozoites in the mosquito midguts (Fig. 6). An ultrastructural analysis disclosed that PbBrca2-KO formed oocysts in the midguts on day 7 post-infection. By contrast, PbBrca2-KO revealed no sporozoite formation in the oocysts on day 14 or 21 post-infection. PbBrca2-KO parasites showed undeveloped oocysts after day 7 post-infection. On day 14 post-infection, the oocysts shrank and vacuoles appeared in them. Certain mosquitoes shed oocysts from their midgut lumens on day 14 (data not shown). At day 21 post-infection, the PbBrca2-KO oocysts were vacuolated and the oocyst capsules shrank. These results indicate that PbBrca2-KO ookinetes can differentiate into oocysts but not sporozoites in mosquito midguts. Therefore, PbBrca2-KO cannot undergo sporogony and has a defective life cycle.

Fig. 5
figure 5

PbBrca2 is essential for sporozoite development in the salivary gland. Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes were fed on infected mice, and the sporozoites were microscopically examined at day 28 post-infection. Arrowheads indicate enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-positive sporozoites, which were detected for WT parasites only. For other abbreviations, see Figs. 1 and 2

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

PbBrca2 is essential for sporogony. Ultrastructural analyses of WT and PbBrca2-KO1 oocytes at 7, 14, and 21 days post-infection. WT exhibited normal sporogony, whereas PbBrca2-KO1 oocysts were small and had indeterminate morphology (day 7). PbBrca2-KO1 parasites did not form sporozoites, and in some cases their oocysts shrank and became vacuolated (day 14). PbBrca2-KO1 oocysts showing notable shrinkage (day 21). Image parts delineated by white dotted lines (lower panels) are magnifications of image parts delineated by black dotted lines (upper panels). Arrowheads indicate abnormal parasite development. Scale bar = 1 μm. For abbreviations, see Figs. 1 and 2

Full size image

Discussion

In the present study, we identified the recombinase-regulating protein PbBrca2 and determined the phenotype of PbBrca2-KO parasites. PbBrca2 is well conserved among various Plasmodium species. BRC repeats of human BRCA2 could not interact with S. cerevisiae Rad51 [18]. In the present study, BRC repeats of PbBrca2 interacted with PbRad51 but not with human or S. cerevisiae Rad51 (as confirmed by the mammalian two-hybrid assay). We also attempted to assess the interaction between PbBrca2 BRC repeats and PbRad51 via immunoprecipitation, but could not detect the interaction, probably because of the low expression of Plasmodium proteins in the human cell line. Furthermore, using in silico analysis, we assessed the importance of the Rad51 amino acids M158, I205, M251, and L255 because they interact with the phenylalanine residues F1524 and F1546 in human BRC repeat 4. Their substitution reduced the number of contacts between BRC repeat 4 and Rad51. Plasmodium Rad51 forms homomultimers and mediates strand exchange [4, 33]. Homology between P. berghei and human Rad51 is > 80% but the chemical properties of the four amino acids near the BRC repeat binding site differ between human and P. berghei Rad51. Moreover, the amino acid sequences of the BRC repeats also differ between human and P. berghei Brca2. For these reasons, the interactions between Rad51 and Brca2 have uniquely evolved in each species and differ between humans and Plasmodium. This discrepancy might facilitate the development and application of anti-Plasmodium drugs. We also tested the interaction activity between PbBrca2 BRC repeats and PbDmc1, as it was reported that human BRCA2 interacted with Dmc1 via BRC repeats [9]. However, we detected no such interaction activity in P. berghei. Existence of the DMC1-binding domain in human BRCA2 is controversial. Another study reported a DMC1-specific binding domain and the absence of any interaction with DMC1 via BRC repeats containing peptides [10]. Thus, interaction analysis using partial PbBrca2 peptides is required to identify the Dmc1-binding domain in Plasmodium Brca2.

Here, we endeavored to establish why relatively few PbBrca2-KO oocysts were found in the mosquitoes. The PbBrca2-KO parasites also presented reduced numbers of gametocytes. The female gametocyte ratio decreased whereas the exflagellation ratio (male gametocyte number) did not. Brca2 was upregulated in female gametocytes but only weakly expressed in male gametocytes [32]. These results suggest that female gametocyte differentiation was altered or destabilized in PbBrca2-KO parasites. Knocking out PbBrca2 produced morphologically normal male gametocytes, but their function could not be well assessed. To understand the function of Brca2 in male gametocytes, cross-fertilization assays using male-specific sterile lines, such as CDPK4-KO or Map2-KO parasites, are warranted [34, 35]. Moreover, for PbBrca2-KO parasites, the number of gametocytes was reduced and there were even fewer post-meiosis ookinetes. PbBrca2 may contribute to HR during meiosis. BRCA2 mutations in mice and zebra fish led to infertility by inhibiting gamete development and inducing gamete death [36, 37]. Hence, these might induce atypical meiosis and parasite death. A few PbBrca2-KO parasites were nonetheless able to form oocysts. Transmission electron microscopy revealed no sporogony. PbBrca2-KO parasite differentiation was terminated at ~ 7 days after WT parasite infection. At day 14 post-infection, vacuoles appeared in the oocysts and the latter began to degrade. Thus, PbBrca2 is also required for sporozoite development.

Some results of the present study align with those previously reported for the PbDmc1-KO parasite [5]. Plasmodium Dmc1 is a meiosis-specific recombinase [5]. In humans, DMC1 contributes to HR and is regulated by BRCA2 during meiosis [7]. The PbDmc1-KO parasites presented with relatively reduced oocyst and sporozoite numbers. Moreover, their phenotype was less pathological than that of our PbBrca2-KO parasites. However, the PbDmc1-KO parasites could nonetheless differentiate into sporozoites. In contrast, the PbBrca2-KO parasites displayed reduced numbers of female gametocytes, ookinetes, and oocysts, and presented with no sporozoite development. They also proliferated only very slowly at the blood cell stage. It was predicted that PbDmc1 only plays a role during meiosis, and that its KO would have a limited effect. PbBrca2 might have a broader function than Dmc1. Moreover, PbBrca2 KO influenced all the Plasmodium life cycle stages. Further investigations on the function of PbBrca2 in meiosis are required to determine whether the roles of Brca2 are more important than those of Dmc1 in Plasmodium.

In humans, BRCA2 plays pivotal roles in HR repair when DNA is damaged by DSBs, and in meiotic HR via RAD51 binding [38]. We observed a slow progression of the blood stages of the PbBrca2-KO parasites, with an increased proportion of parasites at the ring stage and a decreased proportion at the trophozoite stage compared to those observed for the WT parasites. It is possible that parasitemia was lower in the case of PbBrca2-KO parasites than WT parasites due to the increased induction of life cycle arrest resulting from damage to DNA during stages of asexual reproduction. Responses to DNA damage were not examined in the present study. However, the contribution of PbBrca2 to HR after DNA DSBs could be examined in a future study by evaluating the sensitivity of PbBrca2 to agents inducing DNA damage during asexual reproduction.

Conclusions

Here, we identified Plasmodium Brca2 harboring BRC repeats and OB and tower domains, which are sequence fingerprints of BRCA2. Brca2 KO in P. berghei resulted in reduced parasitemia, with an increase in counts at the ring stage and a decrease at the trophozoite stage, a decrease in oocyst formation, a decrease in the number of oocytes and a reduction in ookinete development. Sporogony did not progress under Brca2 KO. The results of the present, and previous, studies suggest that Brca2 contributes to HR during meiosis. The absence of Brca2 had an effect on the sporogony and nearly every other developmental stage of Plasmodium. Brca2 might be a potential anti-Plasmodium drug target. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first step in elucidating the function of Brca2 in Plasmodium, and the results presented here help clarify the mechanism of meiosis in this pathogen.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BRCA2:

Breast cancer susceptibility protein 2

DMC1:

DNA meiotic recombinase 1

DSB:

Double-strand break

HR:

Homologous recombination

KO:

Knockout

OB:

Oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding

OKM:

Ookinete culture medium

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

Rad51:

DNA repair protein Rad51 homolog 1

WT:

Wild type

References

  1. Ross LS, Fidock DA. Elucidating mechanisms of drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;26:35–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Skwarczynski M, Chandrudu S, Rigau-Planella B, Islam MdT, Cheong YS, Liu G, et al. Progress in the development of subunit vaccines against malaria. Vaccines. 2020;8:373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee AH, Symington LS, Fidock DA. DNA repair mechanisms and their biological roles in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2014;78:469–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Roy N, Bhattacharyya S, Chakrabarty S, Laskar S, Babu SM, Bhattacharyya MK. Dominant negative mutant of Plasmodium Rad51 causes reduced parasite burden in host by abrogating DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Microbiol. 2014;94:353–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mlambo G, Coppens I, Kumar N. Aberrant sporogonic development of Dmc1 (a meiotic recombinase)-deficient Plasmodium berghei parasites. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e52480.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kelso AA, Waldvogel SM, Luthman AJ, Sehorn MG. Homologous recombination in protozoan parasites and recombinase inhibitors. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li Q, Engebrecht J. BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumor suppressor function in meiosis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:668309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Andreassen PR, Seo J, Wiek C, Hanenberg H. Understanding BRCA2 function as a tumor suppressor based on domain-specific activities in DNA damage responses. Genes. 2021;12:1034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Martinez JS, von Nicolai C, Kim T, Ehlén Å, Mazin AV, Kowalczykowski SC, et al. BRCA2 regulates DMC1-mediated recombination through the BRC repeats. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113:3515–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thorslund T, Esashi F, West SC. Interactions between human BRCA2 protein and the meiosis-specific recombinase DMC1. EMBO J. 2007;26:2915–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Carreira A, Kowalczykowski SC. Two classes of BRC repeats in BRCA2 promote RAD51 nucleoprotein filament function by distinct mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:10448–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirkman LA, Lawrence EA, Deitsch KW. Malaria parasites utilize both homologous recombination and alternative end joining pathways to maintain genome integrity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:370–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kroeger PT, Drummond BE, Miceli R, McKernan M, Gerlach GF, Marra AN, et al. The zebrafish kidney mutant zeppelin reveals that brca2/fancd1 is essential for pronephros development. Dev Biol. 2017;428:148–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin JS, Winkelmann N, Petalcorin MIR, McIlwraith MJ, Boulton SJ. RAD-51-dependent and -independent roles of a Caenorhabditis elegans BRCA2-related protein during DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:3127–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kojic M, Yang H, Kostrub CF, Pavletich NP, Holloman WK. The BRCA2-interacting protein DSS1 is vital for DNA repair, recombination, and genome stability in Ustilago maydis. Mol Cell. 2003;12:1043–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hartley CL, McCulloch R. Trypanosoma brucei BRCA2 acts in antigenic variation and has undergone a recent expansion in BRC repeat number that is important during homologous recombination. Mol Microbiol. 2008;68:1237–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Genois M-M, Mukherjee A, Ubeda J-M, Buisson R, Paquet E, Roy G, et al. Interactions between BRCA2 and RAD51 for promoting homologous recombination in Leishmania infantum. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:6570–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jensen RB, Carreira A, Kowalczykowski SC. Purified human BRCA2 stimulates RAD51-mediated recombination. Nature. 2010;467:678–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zimmermann L, Stephens A, Nam S-Z, Rau D, Kübler J, Lozajic M, et al. A completely reimplemented MPI bioinformatics toolkit with a new HHpred server at its core. J Mol Biol. 2018;430:2237–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gabler F, Nam S, Till S, Mirdita M, Steinegger M, Söding J, et al. Protein sequence analysis using the MPI bioinformatics toolkit. Curr Protoc Bioinform. 2020;72:e108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nakai K, Horton P, Nakai K, Horton P. PSORT: A program for detecting sorting signals in proteins and predicting their subcellular localization. Trends Biochem Sci. 1999;24:34–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakai K, Kanehisa M. A knowledge base for predicting protein localization sites in eukaryotic cells. Genomics. 1992;14:897–911.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596:583–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ishino T, Orito Y, Chinzei Y, Yuda M. A calcium-dependent protein kinase regulates Plasmodium ookinete access to the midgut epithelial cell. Mol Microbiol. 2006;59:1175–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoshikawa Y, Morimatsu M, Ochiai K, Ishiguro-Oonuma T, Morioka R, Okuda K, et al. Identification of the core motif of the BRCA2 C-terminal RAD51-binding domain by comparing canine and human BRCA2. J Vet Med Sci. 2021;83:759–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Soga A, Bando H, Ko-ketsu M, Masuda-Suganuma H, Kawazu S, Fukumoto S. High efficacy in vitro selection procedure for generating transgenic parasites of Plasmodium berghei using an antibiotic toxic to rodent hosts. Sci Rep. 2017;7:4001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Soga A, Shirozu T, Fukumoto S. Glyoxalase pathway is required for normal liver-stage proliferation of Plasmodium berghei. Biochem Bioph Res Commun. 2021;549:61–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nakayama K, Kimura Y, Kitahara Y, Soga A, Haraguchi A, Hakozaki J, et al. Role of Plasmodium berghei ookinete surface and oocyst capsule protein, a novel oocyst capsule-associated protein, in ookinete motility. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14:373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sasaki H, Sekiguchi H, Sugiyama M, Ikadai H. Plasmodium berghei Cap93, a novel oocyst capsule-associated protein, plays a role in sporozoite development. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sugiyama M, Machida N, Yasunaga A, Terai N, Fukasawa H, Ono HK, et al. Vaginal mucus in mice: developmental and gene expression features of epithelial mucous cells during pregnancy. Biol Reprod. 2021;105:1272–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rajendra E, Venkitaraman AR. Two modules in the BRC repeats of BRCA2 mediate structural and functional interactions with the RAD51 recombinase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:82–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Howick VM, Russell AJC, Andrews T, Heaton H, Reid AJ, Natarajan K, et al. The malaria cell atlas: single parasite transcriptomes across the complete Plasmodium life cycle. Science. 2019;365:eaaw2619.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bhattacharyya MK, Bhattacharyya nee Deb SB, Jayabalasingham B, Kumar N. Characterization of kinetics of DNA strand-exchange and ATP hydrolysis activities of recombinant PfRad51, a Plasmodium falciparum recombinase. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2005;139:33–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Billker O, Dechamps S, Tewari R, Wenig G, Franke-Fayard B, Brinkmann V. Calcium and a calcium-dependent protein kinase regulate gamete formation and mosquito transmission in a malaria parasite. Cell. 2004;117:503–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Tewari R, Dorin D, Moon R, Doerig C, Billker O. An atypical mitogen-activated protein kinase controls cytokinesis and flagellar motility during male gamete formation in a malaria parasite. Mol Microbiol. 2005;58:1253–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rodríguez-Marí A, Wilson C, Titus TA, Cañestro C, BreMiller RA, Yan Y-L, et al. Roles of brca2 (fancd1) in oocyte nuclear architecture, gametogenesis, gonad tumors, and genome stability in zebrafish. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1001357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sharan SK, Pyle A, Coppola V, Babus J, Swaminathan S, Benedict J, et al. BRCA2 deficiency in mice leads to meiotic impairment and infertility. Development. 2004;131:131–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sun Y, McCorvie TJ, Yates LA, Zhang X. Structural basis of homologous recombination. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77:3–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The green fluorescent protein-expressing P. berghei ANKA strain was provided by Dr. Yuda (Mie University, Tsu, Mie Prefecture, Japan). The Anopheles stephensi (strain STE2, MRA-128) was provided by the BEI Resources Repository (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). In silico analyses of the interactions between the Rad51 and BRC repeats and the tower and OB-fold domains of BRCA2 were performed with Chimera (Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics, University of California, San Francisco, CA) with the support of NIH P41-GM103311. The authors gratefully acknowledge the indispensable assistance of Mai Tanaka, who is a member of our laboratory’s support staff. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for the English language editing of the final draft of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI under grant nos. 20K06417 (to YY) and 17H04073 (to HI), and by a Cooperative Research Grant (2020-joint-15 and 2021-joint-14) from the National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases of Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine (to YY). The funding bodies played no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of the results, or manuscript writing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Veterinary Biochemistry, School of Veterinary Medicine, Kitasato University, Towada, Aomori, 034-8628, Japan

    Yasunaga Yoshikawa, Shunta Kimura, Aki Ueno, Hiroki Kondo, Zida Zhu, Taisuke Kitano & Koichi Orino

  2. National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada, Obihiro, 080-8555, Japan

    Akira Soga & Shinya Fukumoto

  3. Laboratory of Veterinary Anatomy, School of Veterinary Medicine, Kitasato University, Towada, Aomori, 034-8628, Japan

    Makoto Sugiyama

  4. Laboratory of Veterinary Hygiene, School of Veterinary Medicine, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, Musashino, Tokyo, 180-8602, Japan

    Kazuhiko Ochiai

  5. Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Kitasato University, Towada, Aomori, 034-8628, Japan

    Kazuhiko Nakayama, Jun Hakozaki, Kodai Kusakisako, Asako Haraguchi & Hiromi Ikadai

Authors
  1. Yasunaga Yoshikawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shunta Kimura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Akira Soga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Makoto Sugiyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aki Ueno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hiroki Kondo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zida Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kazuhiko Ochiai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Kazuhiko Nakayama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jun Hakozaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Kodai Kusakisako
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Asako Haraguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Taisuke Kitano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Koichi Orino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Shinya Fukumoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Hiromi Ikadai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YY, SF, KK, and HI contributed to the study conception and design. SK, AU, HK, KN, JH, KK, AH, TK, and KO prepared the material and undertook the data collection and data analysis. ZZ, YY, and K Ochiai conducted the in silico analysis. AS and SF generated the KO parasites. MS performed the electron microscopy. YY and MS wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All the authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript and read and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasunaga Yoshikawa.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The protocols of all the experiments conducted in this study were approved by the Institutional Laboratory Animal Care and Use Committee of the School of Veterinary Medicine at Kitasato University, Japan (approval nos. 16-020 and 19-087) and were performed in accordance with its guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Alignment of Brca2 amino acid sequence among Plasmodium spp. Alignment of Plasmodium berghei, Plasmodium yoelii, Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium ovale, Plasmodium malariae, and Plasmodium knowlesi Brca2. Red and blue boxes indicate BRC repeats and OB and tower domains in P. berghei Brca2, respectively.

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

Three-dimensional structure of DNA-binding domains in Plasmodium berghei Brca2. A Three-dimensional structures of OB, tower, and DNA-binding domains in P. berghei Brca2 were predicted with AlphaFold2 and compared against human BRCA2 domains (PDB ID 1MIU). B Three-dimensional structures of OB and tower domains in P. berghei Brca2 were compared against the typical OB domain of human replication protein A1 (PDB ID 4O0A).

Additional file 3: Figure S3.

A human and P. berghei Rad51 alignment. Red characters indicate amino acid residues interacting with vital phenylalanine residues F1524 and F1546 in BRC repeat 4 in human Rad51. Blue characters in P. berghei Rad51 indicate the amino acid residues that differ from the human Rad51 amino acid residues required for interaction with F1524 and F154 in BRC repeat 4.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoshikawa, Y., Kimura, S., Soga, A. et al. Plasmodium berghei Brca2 is required for normal development and differentiation in mice and mosquitoes. Parasites Vectors 15, 244 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05357-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05357-w

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us