Skip to main content
Download PDF

Novel Ehrlichia canis genogroup in dogs with canine ehrlichiosis in Cuba

Parasites & Vectors volume 15, Article number: 295 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis (CME) is caused by the tick-borne pathogen Ehrlichia canis, an obligate intracellular Gram-negative bacterium of the family Anaplasmataceae with tropism for canine monocytes and macrophages. The trp36 gene, which encodes for the major immunoreactive protein TRP36 in E. canis, has been successfully used to characterize the genetic diversity of this pathogen in different regions of the world. Based on trp36 sequence analysis, four E. canis genogroups, United States (US), Taiwan (TWN), Brazil (BR) and Costa Rica (CR), have been identified. The aim of this study was to characterize the genetic diversity of E. canis in Cuba based on the trp36 gene.

Methods

Whole blood samples (n = 8) were collected from dogs found to be infested with the tick vector Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato (s.l.) and/or presenting clinical signs and symptoms of CME. Total DNA was extracted from the blood samples and trp36 fragments were amplified by PCR. Nucleotide and protein sequences were compared using alignments and phylogenetic analysis.

Results

Four of the trp36 sequences obtained (n = 8) fall within the phylogenetic cluster grouping the US genogroup E. canis strains. The other E. canis trp36 sequences formed a separate and well-supported clade (94% bootstrap value) that is phylogenetically distant from the other major groups and thus represents a new genogroup, herein designated as the ‘Cuba (CUB) genogroup’. Notably, dogs infected with the CUB genogroup presented frequent hemorrhagic lesions.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that genetic diversification of E. canis in Cuba is associated with the emergence of E. canis strains with increased virulence.

Background

Ehrlichia canis is an obligate intracellular bacterium transmitted by the brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato (s.l.). The bacterium is the primary etiologic agent of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis (CME), a serious and sometimes lethal tick-transmitted rickettsial disease affecting mainly domestic dogs [1]. The acute disease is characterized by a high fever, depression, lethargy, anorexia, lymphadenomegaly, splenomegaly and hemorrhagic tendencies (usually exhibited by dermal petechiae and ecchymoses, and epistaxis). Ophthalmological lesions are frequent and include anterior uveitis, chorioretinitis, papilledema, retinal hemorrhage, presence of retinal perivascular infiltrates and bullous retinal detachment [2].

Although E. canis is primarily associated with canine disease, human infections with this pathogen have been reported, originally in Venezuela [3] and more recently in Panama [4]. In addition, E. canis DNA was detected in samples from human blood-bank donors in Costa Rica [5]. Molecular characterization of E. canis has been accomplished using highly conserved genes such as the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and disulfide oxidoreductase (dsb), as well as other immunoreactive protein gene sequences, including those of the OMP-1 family (p28/30). Despite the wide geographic dispersion of E. canis, 16S rRNA gene sequences are 99.4–100% identical among isolates from South America, North America, Asia, Europe, Africa and the Middle East. This close similarity between E. canis 16S rRNA genes provides little information regarding the overall diversity of this organism. Similarly, the immunoreactive proteins, including those of the OMP-1 family, DSB, TRP19 and TRP140, have also been found to be conserved in geographically dispersed strains [6,7,8,9,10,11].

The trp36 gene, which encodes a major Tandem Repeat Protein (TRP), TRP36, provides more information regarding E. canis genetic diversity and can be used for genotyping E. canis strains based on amino acid tandem repeat sequences and/or on the numbers of tandem repeats [5, 12, 13]. Ehrlichia canis TRP36 contains a major antibody epitope in the tandem repeat region [14], and ehrlichial TRPs are major immunoreactive proteins that have been associated with functional host–pathogen interactions such as adhesion and internalization, actin nucleation and immune evasion [15]. Variations in the sequence and/or number of tandem repeats of TRP36 may alter the biological function of this protein, possibly resulting in different forms of disease presentation [16, 17].

Phylogenetic analysis of trp36 gene sequences has allowed the distinction of four E. canis genogroups: (i) the USA (US) genogroup, identified in North America, Brazil, Nigeria, Cameroon, Spain, Turkey and Israel [11, 13, 16]; (ii) the Taiwan (TWN) genogroup, identified in South Africa, Thailand, Turkey and Taiwan [18, 19]; (iii) the Brazil (BR) genogroup, identified in the midwest, northern and southern regions of Brazil and recently in Turkey [17, 20]; and (iv) the Costa Rica (CR) genogroup, recently detected in human blood donors from Costa Rica [5] and described in canines from four Peruvian settlements [21].

In Cuba, the first published studies on tick-borne diseases of dogs were carried out by Pérez et al. [22] who described a case of CME, based on clinical and pathological findings. León et al. [23] studied 155 dogs, of which 82.5% were seropositive for E. canis, and observed rickettsia-like structures in blood smears from 13 of them.

More recently, an epidemiological study including 378 domestic dogs from four municipalities in the western region of Cuba found high prevalence (47.4%) of E. canis infection detected by PCR in blood samples [24]. In addition, of 206 plasma samples examined by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), 78.6% were seropositive for E. canis [24]. An increased risk of E. canis infection in some localities with a history of tick infestation was also observed [24]. In another study, tick infestation on dogs was assessed in the western region of Cuba, revealing that 40% of dogs were infested by ticks morphologically characterized as R. sanguineus s.l. [25]. A subsequent epidemiological study conducted in the same municipalities detected a high prevalence of E. canis in dogs, which provided strong evidence that R. sanguineus s.l. is the vector of E. canis in Cuba [26], as in other regions of the world [27,28,29]. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA, and gltA genes suggested a low genetic diversity of E. canis in Cuba [30], but molecular markers with higher genetic resolution, such as the trp36 gene, may provide a more realistic view of the genetic diversity of this important pathogen in the country. The present study aimed to determine the genetic diversity of E. canis in Cuba using trp36 gene sequences.

Methods

Samples

A cross-sectional study was conducted between October and November 2013 to assess the prevalence of the tick-borne pathogen E. canis in dogs from four municipalities located in the western region of Cuba [24]. In total, 378 dogs were randomly selected to assess infection status and seroprevalence of E. canis in Cuba. Blood samples were collected in dogs regardless of sex, breed, age or presence of clinical symptoms related to CME. The sample size per municipality was 104 dogs in Habana del Este (Province La Habana), 102 dogs in Boyeros (Province La Habana), 82 dogs in Cotorro (Province La Habana) and 90 dogs in San José de las Lajas (Province Mayabeque). Of these 378 dogs, 179 were positive for E. canis based on a PCR assay that amplified a region of the 16S rRNA [24]. In the present study, blood samples (n = 8) collected from dogs confirmed to be positive for E. canis infection based on 16S rRNA PCR in the municipalities of Habana del Este (n = 3) and Boyeros (n = 5) [24] were selected to assess the genetic diversity of E. canis in dogs in Cuba. The presence of pathogens other than E. canis was not assessed in the samples.

Clinical diagnostics of canine ehrlichiosis

In accordance with the clinical criteria for the diagnosis of CME established by Navarrete et al. [24], we assessed the following clinical signs for each dog: elevated body temperature, depression, lethargy, anorexia, lymphadenomegaly, splenomegaly and hemorrhagic tendencies (i.e., petechiae and ecchymoses, and epistaxis). We also looked for ophthalmological lesions [2], neurological signs [31], pale mucous membranes and weakness [32].

Assessment of tick infestation in dogs

The dogs were manually inspected for tick infestation. This assessment was performed primarily to categorize dogs as infested or uninfested. Additionally, a representative sample of any ticks found on a dog, up to 10 specimens per animal, was collected to confirm the tick species on the respective animal. Ticks were deposited into labeled tubes containing 85% ethanol and transported to the laboratory for morphological identification under a dissecting stereoscopic microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany) using standard taxonomic keys [33, 34]. Although the collected specimens included immature tick stages, only adult ticks were identified to the species level and developmental stages were not quantified.

Isolation of trp36 gene

For the present study, eight E. canis 16S rRNA-positive blood samples [24] were tested for trp36 gene fragment amplification using a heminested PCR. In the first step, the primers TRP36-F2 (forward:5′-TTTAAAACAAAATTAACACACTA-3′) and TRP36-R1 (reverse: 5′-AAGATTAACTTAATACTCAATATTACT-3′) were used to obtain amplicons of 800–1000 base pairs (bp) in a total reaction volume of 25 µl containing 12.5 µl GoTaq®—Green Master Mix 2x (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 3.0 µl of each primer (10 pmol/µl), 4 µl DNA and 2.5 µl Nuclease Free Water (Promega). The amplification protocol consisted of an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles of denaturation (95 °C 30 s), annealing (52 °C 30 s) and extension (72 °C for 1 min) and a final extension of 72 °C for 5 min [17]. In the second step, primers TRP36-DF (forward: 5′-CACACTAAAATGTATAATAAAGC-3′) and TRP36-R1 were used [35] under the same conditions as in the first step, except that an annealing temperature of 57 °C applied for 30 s was used. Ehrlichia canis strain Cuiaba #1 (kindly donated by the Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases of the Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro) was used as the positive control, and ultrapure water was used as the no-template control.

Amplicon purification and sequencing

The amplicons were subjected to 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis, stained with GelRed® 10,000X, a red fluorescent DNA gel stain at a concentration of 10,000× in solution (Biotium, Fremont, CA, USA), and examined under ultraviolet (UV) light using a UV transilluminator. The amplified products were purified using the commercial ReliaPrep® DNA Clean-up and Concentration System® Kit (Promega) and sequenced in both directions using the Big Dye Kit™ (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) by Sanger`s method, according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The sequences were determined using an automated DNA sequencer ABI 3500 Series Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems), following the instructions of the user manual. The detected sequences were submitted to GenBank.

Analysis of the trp36 gene and putative amino acid sequences

The TRP36 protein sequence was evaluated for potential mucin-type O-linked glycosylation on serines and threonines with the computational algorithm NetOGlyc v3.1 [36]; for N-linked glycosylation, we used the NetNGlyc 1.0 Server (NetNGlyc 1.0 Server, http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/). The Tandem Repeats Finder (TRF) database [37] was used to predict the presence of tandem repeats in trp36. For sequence analysis and comparison, the trp36 nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequences were divided into three regions (I, II and III) as previously reported [19]. Region I was the 5′-end pre-tandem repeat region composed of 426–429 bp/142–143 amino acids at the N-terminus of the encoded protein; region II was the tandem repeat region (variable numbers of the 27 bp/9 amino acids repeat units depending on the strain); and region III was the 3′-end post-repeat region (81–93 bp/28–30 amino acids) at the C terminus of the encoded protein.

Phylogenetic analysis

To investigate the phylogenetic relationships among E. canis trp36 isolates, the representative nucleotide sequences of E. canis trp36 obtained in this study were compared to those available in GenBank. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using the ClustalW algorithm implemented in the BioEdit software v.7.2.5 [38]. The sequences were trimmed manually, and the resulting overall alignment was 579 bp in length. A neighbor-joining (NJ) tree was constructed applying the Tamura 3-parameter (T92) model [according to the Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample sizes (AICc)] using the MEGA v.7.0 bioinformatics software [39]. Reliability of internal branches was assessed using the bootstrapping method with 1000 bootstrap replicates.

Results

Clinical findings associated with canine ehrlichiosis

Five of the dogs tested displayed common clinical signs related with CME (dog5, dog17, dog23, dog78, dog172), including hemorrhagic tendencies, such as petechiae, ecchymoses and epistaxis (dog17, dog23, dog172), cough (dog5) and emaciation (dog78). The three remaining dogs (dog26, dog60, dog92) were asymptomatic. Two of the symptomatic dogs (dog5 and dog23) and two of the asymptomatic dogs (dog60 and dog92) were infested with R. sanguineus s.l. (Table 1).

Table 1 Clinical findings and tick infestation of dogs
Full size table

Amplification and phylogenetic analysis of trp36 variants

Partial trp36 gene sequences were amplified and sequenced from eight E. canis-positive blood samples. A NJ phylogenetic analysis using trp36 nucleotide sequences obtained in this study (n = 8) and additional sequences retrieved from GenBank (n = 128) showed differential clustering of the sequences into five major clades (Fig. 1). Four of these clades were previously described as the US, TWN, BR and CR genogroups. Notably, four sequences (dog5, dog23, dog60, dog172) formed a separate and well-supported clade (94% bootstrap value) that is phylogenetically distant from the other E. canis strains; this clade therefore represents a new genogroup, designated here as the ‘Cuba (CUB) genogroup’. The other four E. canis trp36 sequences (dog17, dog26, dog78, and dog92) clustered together with sequences of the US genogroup.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Neighbor-joining tree constructed with the partial trp36 nucleotide sequences of E. canis. Bootstrap values based on 1000 replicates are indicated at the nodes. Only bootstrap values > 50% are included. Sequences generated in this study are indicated in bold. The US, TWN, BR, CR and CUB genogroups are highlighted in orange, violet, blue, green and red, respectively

Full size image

trp36 sequence analysis

The PCR products derived from the amplified trp36 gene fragments in the blood samples collected from the different dogs had variable molecular sizes: 465 bp (dog5), 496 bp (dog17), 480 bp (dog23), 516 bp (dog26), 483 bp (dog60), 579 bp (dog78), 479 bp (dog92) and 473 (dog172), encoding for protein sequences of 136, 164, 138, 172, 139, 192, 159 and 149 amino acids, respectively. These predicted amino acid sequences showed variable degrees of identity between them. For example, comparison of some of the sequences showed identity values ranging from 37.41% (dog60 and dog92) to 99.39% (dog17 and dog78).

Comparison of the sequences obtained in this study with previously reported trp36 sequences showed that samples from dog17, dog26, dog78 and dog92 had an identity between 98.58% and 99.79% compared to other isolates of the US genogroup. To facilitate the molecular analysis, we divided analysis of the TRP36 protein into three regions designated I, II and III. The putative protein sequences of one trp36 amplicon (dog172) included the three regions. The trp36 fragments amplified from the other samples only included regions I and II (dog17, dog26, dog78 and dog92) and regions II and III (dog5, dog23 and dog60).

TRP36 region I

Comparison of TRP36 fragments in which region I was identified (dog17, dog26, dog78, dog92, dog172) revealed 100% identity between samples from dog17 and dog78 and 100% identity between samples from dog26, dog92 and dog172. The amino acid sequences of region I in samples dog17, dog78 shared 98.46% identity with that in samples dog26, dog92 and dog172.

TRP36 is a glycoprotein [14] containing predicted N-glycosylation (region I) and O-glycosylation (regions I and II) sites [12, 13]. The addition of N-glycosyl groups on asparagine (N) residues requires special motifs called sequons [NX serine (S)/threonine (T)], where X can be any amino acid [40]. The N 125 of the five sequences contained a potential sequon (NPS, where P is proline), but the presence of P between N and S dramatically reduces the probability of N-glycosylation [40] and thus it may prevent the addition of glycosyl groups on N 125. In addition, this region presents three S residues in the five samples (dog17, dog26, dog78, dog92 and dog172), which based on prediction are sites of O-glycosylation.

TRP36 regions II and III

Region II contains a variable number of repeated units of 27 nucleotides coding for nine amino acids depending on the isolate, as reported previously by Doyle et al. [14] and Hsieh et al. [19]. A variable number of tandem repeats (range: 5–12), with a conserved sequence (TEDSVSAPA), was identified in region II of the Cuban isolates (Table 2). Both the nucleotide and amino acid sequences in the tandem repeat region were highly conserved within the Cuban isolates as well as between genogroups (Table 2). The strains reported in this work presented a 100% of amino acid identity in this region when compared to other isolates (Table 2). The samples from dog23 and dog60 have no defined last amino acid in four and two tandem sequences, respectively, but the nine amino acid consensus sequences rarely present amino acid changes [9]. Region II is rich in S and T residues, which could be potential O-glycosylation sites. The length of region III was 30 amino acids for samples from dog5, dog23, dog60 and dog172, with 100% of identity between them and in comparison with other samples.

Table 2 Summary of trp36 sequence features from representative strains of different Ehrlichia canis genogroups
Full size table

Discussion

The intracellular bacteria Ehrlichia canis is globally distributed and is the most common tick-borne pathogen infecting dogs in South America [16, 41,42,43]. Infection with E. canis has been reported previously in Cuba [22], and phylogenetic analysis based on E. canis 16S rRNA led to the identification of 179 E. canis-positive dogs in the western region of Cuba [24]. In the present study, a fragment of trp36 was amplified from eight E. canis-positive blood samples collected from dogs and sequenced to characterize the genetic diversity of this bacterium in Cuba.

The trp36 gene has significant diversity and allows the differentiation of E. canis genotypes isolated in different geographic locations [19, 44]. Several E. canis strains of the US, CR and BR genogroups have been reported in South America. For example, strains of the US genogroup have been reported in Brazil and Venezuela; while other strains within the CR and BR genogroups were reported in Peru and Costa Rica [5, 21] and in Brazil [16], respectively. Notably, four strains identified in this study formed a clade separated from all currently known genogroups, revealing the presence of strains from two E. canis genogroups in Cuba, the US genogroup and the CUB genogroup, reported here for the first time. A more exhaustive sampling may have revealed the presence of additional genogroups in the country. For example, trp36 gene sequencing in 35 samples of E. canis-positive dogs revealed the presence of three genogroups (i.e., US, CR, and BR) in Colombia [45]. The evolutionary events associated with the emergence of the CUB genogroup are not clear and are beyond the scope of this study. However, genetic diversification of E. canis trp36 has been linked with episodic bursts of selection unequally distributed across nucleotide positions [5]. The trp36 gene was under strong selection in highly diverse E. canis strains [5] identified in South Africa [12] and Brazil [17]. We propose that episodic diversifying selection, such as that affecting highly diverse E. canis strains in South Africa and Brazil, may have contributed to the diversification of E. canis in Cuba.

The presence in Cuba of E. canis strains of the US genogroup, the most frequent among canids and tick vectors [46], suggests pathogen introduction events, probably associated with host movement (e.g., infected dogs) and/or tick vector migration (i.e., infected ticks carried by migratory birds). Dogs with chronic, subclinical E. canis infection can be transported to new locations and serve as reservoirs for pathogen acquisition by local R. sanguineus s.l. ticks. Records show that traveling dogs are not fully protected and/or free of infection since cases of vector-borne diseases, including CME caused by E. canis, occur in non-endemic regions [47]. Despite parasitism by R. sanguineus s.l. on hosts other than dogs is unusual, this tick can occasionally infest a wide range of domestic and wild hosts, including cats, rodents and birds, as well as humans [48]. Thus, R. sanguineus s.l. ticks infected with E. canis and/or E. canis-infected hosts (e.g., dogs or migratory birds) could have been associated with the presence of the US genogroup strains in the country.

In agreement with other studies [12, 17, 45, 46], our results support the use of the trp36 gene as a suitable molecular tool for genotyping E. canis, based not only on phylogenetic analysis of trp36 nucleotide sequences, but also on differences in the amino acid sequences of regions I, II and III, as well as on the number and sequence of the TRP36 tandem repeats. Analysis of TRP36 region I showed the presence of N 125 in the context of a potentially non-glycosylated sequon, NPS, previously identified in E. canis strains in the USA, Spain, Israel, Central Africa and Brazil [5]. In contrast, in strains from Taiwan and South Africa, N 125 is present in the context of a potentially glycosylated sequon, NSS [5]. The relevance of sequon sequence variability and of the eventual absence (NPS) or presence (NSS) of glycosylation for E. canis life cycle and/or pathogenicity are currently unknown. However, as N-glycosylation plays an important role in cellular biology, impacting on several properties of proteins, such as solubility, stability and turnover, secretion, protease resistance, protein–protein interaction/recognition and immunogenicity [40], differences in glycosylation patterns contribute to evasion of the host immune system [13, 49] and antigenic drift [5, 50]. Whether variations in TRP36 glycosylation overlap differences in E. canis pathogenicity warrants further investigations.

Conclusions

Taken together, the results of this study provide important information on the genetic diversity of E. canis in Cuba, reporting for the first time the characterization of trp36 gene fragments of E. canis strains identified in the country as well as the presence of a new E. canis genogroup, named the CUB genogroup. The combination of clinical findings and genetic diversity analysis revealed that animals infected with strains of the CUB genogroup presented hemorrhagic tendencies (dog23 and dog172) and cough (dog5). This suggests that E. canis strains of the CUB genogroup could be associated with increased virulence and pathogenicity in dogs with CME in Cuba, a hypothesis that warrants further research.

Availability of data and materials

The nucleotide sequences obtained in this study were submitted to GenBank and are available under the accession numbers ON231837 (dog5), ON231838 (dog17), ON231839 (dog23), ON231840 (dog26), ON231841 (dog60), ON231842 (dog78), ON231843 (dog92), and ON231844 (dog172).

References

  1. Rar V, Golovljova I. Anaplasma, Ehrlichia, and “Candidatus Neoehrlichia” bacteria: pathogenicity, biodiversity, and molecular genetic characteristics, a review. Infect Genet Evol. 2011;11:1842–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Komnenou AA, Mylonakis ME, Kouti V, Tendoma L, Leontides L, Skountzou E, et al. Ocular manifestations of natural canine monocytic ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia canis): a retrospective study of 90 cases. Vet Ophthalmol. 2007;10:137–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pérez M, Bador M, Zhang C, Xiong Q, Rikihisa Y. Human infection with Ehrlichia canis accompanied by clinical signs in Venezuela. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1078:110–7.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Daza T, Osorio J, Santamaria A, Suárez J, Hurtado A, Bermúdez S. Caracterización del primer caso de infeción humana por Ehrlichia canis en Panamá. Rev Med Panama. 2018;36:63–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bouza-Mora L, Dolz G, Solórzano-Morales A, Romero-zu JJ, Salazar-Sánchez L, Labruna MB, et al. Novel genotype of Ehrlichia canis detected in samples of human blood bank donors in Costa Rica. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2016;8:36–40.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aguirre E, Sainz A, Dunner S, Amusategui I, López L, Rodríguez-Franco F, et al. First isolation and molecular characterization of Ehrlichia canis in Spain. Vet Parasitol. 2004;125:365–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu XZ, McBride JW, Walker DH. Restriction and expansion of Ehrlichia strain diversity. Vet Microbiol. 2007;143:337–46.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aguiar DM, Hagiwara MK, Labruna MB. In vitro isolation and molecular characterization of an Ehrlichia canis strain from São Paulo, Brazil. Braz J Microbiol. 2008;39:489–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang X, Luo T, Keysary A, Baneth G, Miyashiro S, Strenger C, et al. Genetic and antigenic diversities of major immunoreactive proteins in globally distributed Ehrlichia canis strains. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008;15:1080–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang CC, Hsieh YC, Tsang CL, Chung YT. Sequence and phylogenetic analysis of the gp200 protein of Ehrlichia canis from dogs in Taiwan. J Vet Sci. 2010;11:333–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamani J, Lee CC, Haruna AM, Chung PJ, Weka PR, Chung YT. First detection and molecular characterization of Ehrlichia canis from dogs in Nigeria. Res Vet Sci. 2013;94:27–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cabezas-Cruz A, Valdes JJ, de la Fuente J. The glycoprotein TRP36 of Ehrlichia sp. UFMG-EV and related cattle pathogen Ehrlichia sp. UFMT-BV evolved from a highly variable clade of E. canis under adaptive diversifying selection. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:584.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zweygarth E, Cabezas-Cruz A, Josemans AI, Oosthuizen MC, Matjila PT, Lis K, et al. In vitro culture and structural differences in the major immunoreactive protein TRP36 of geographically distant Ehrlichia canis isolates. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2014;5:423–31.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Doyle CK, Nethery KA, Popov VL, McBride JW. Differentially expressed and secreted major immunoreactive protein orthologs of Ehrlichia canis and E. chaffeensis elicit early antibody responses to epitopes on glycosylated tandem repeats. Infect Immun. 2006;74:711–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McBride JW, Walker DH. Molecular and cellular pathobiology of Ehrlichia infection: targets for new therapeutics and immunomodulation strategies. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2011;13:e3. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1462399410001730.

  16. Ferreira RF, Cerqueira AM, Castro TX, Ferreira EO, Neves FP, Barbosa AV, et al. Genetic diversity of Ehrlichia canis strains from naturally infected dogs in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2014;23:301–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aguiar DM, Zhang X, Melo ALT, Pacheco TA, Meneses AMC, Zanutto MS, et al. Genetic diversity of Ehrlichia canis in Brazil. Vet Microbiol. 2013;164:315–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nambooppha B, Rittipornlertrak A, Tattiyapong M, Tangtrongsup S, Tiwananthagorn S, Chung YT, et al. Two different genogroups of Ehrlichia canis from dogs in Thailand using immunodominant protein genes. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;63:116–25.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsieh YC, Lee CC, Tsang CL, Chung YT. Detection and characterization of four novel genotypes of Ehrlichia canis from dogs. Vet Microbiol. 2010;146:70–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Aktas M, Özübek S. Genetic diversity of Ehrlichia canis in dogs from Turkey inferred by TRP36 sequence analysis and phylogeny. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;64:20–4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Geiger J, Morton BA, Jose E, Vasconcelos R, Tngrian M, Kachani M, et al. Molecular characterization of tandem repeat protein 36 gene of Ehrlichia canis detected in naturally infected dogs from Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;146:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pérez B, Valdés R, Vitorte S. Epidemiología de las enfermedades transmitidas por garrapatas en Cuba. Rev Cuba Cienc Vet. 2002;20:78–87.

    Google Scholar 

  23. León A, Demedio J, Márquez M, Castillo E, Perera A, Zuaznaba O, et al. Diagnóstico de ehrlichiosis en caninos en la ciudad de La Habana. Redvet. 2008;3:1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Navarrete MG, Cordeiro MD, Silva CB, Massard CL, López ER, Rodríguez JCA, et al. Serological and molecular diagnosis of Ehrlichia canis and associated risk factors in dogs domiciled in western Cuba. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Rep. 2018;14:170–5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. González-Navarrete M, Cordeiro MD, da Silva CB, Pires MS, Uzedo Ribeiro CCD, Cabezas-Cruz A, et al. Molecular detection of Ehrlichia canis and Babesia canis vogeli in Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato ticks from Cuba. Rev Bras Med Vet. 2016;38:63–7.

    Google Scholar 

  26. González-Navarrete M, da Silva CB, Cuello Portal S, Rodríguez Alonso MB, Fonseca AH. Diagnosis of Ehrlichia canis in domestic dogs of Havana, Cuba. Rev Salud Anim. 2019;41:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Aguiar DM, Cavalcante GT, Pinter A, Gennari SM, Camargo LMA, Labruna MB. Prevalence of Ehrlichia canis (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) in Dogs and Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Acari: Ixodidae) Ticks from Brazil. J Med Entomol. 2007;44:126–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cicuttin GL, Tarragona EL, De Salvo MN, Mangold AJ, Nava S. Infection with Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma platys (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) in two lineages of Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato (Acari: Ixodidae) from Argentina. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2015;6:724–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Moraes-Filho J, Krawczak FS, Costa FB, Soares JF, Labruna MB. Comparative evaluation of the vector competence of four South American populations of the Rhipicephalus sanguineus group for the bacterium Ehrlichia canis, the agent of canine monocytic Ehrlichiosis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0139386.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Díaz-Sánchez AA, Corona-González B, Meli ML, Roblejo-Arias L, Fonseca-Rodríguez O, Pérez Castillo A, et al. Molecular diagnosis, prevalence and importance of zoonotic vector-borne pathogens in Cuban shelter dogs—a preliminary study. Pathogens. 2020;9:901.

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Harrus S, Waner T. Diagnosis of canine monocytotropic ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia canis): an overview. Vet J. 2011;187:292–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Harrus S, Kass PH, Klement E, Waner T. Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis: a retrospective study of 100 cases, and an epidemiological investigation of prognostic indicators for the disease. Vet Rec. 1997;141:360–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pérez VI. Los ixódidos y culícidos de Cuba; su historia natural y médica. La Habana: Universidad de La Habana; 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Onófrio VC, Venzal JM, Pinter A, Szabó M. Família Ixodidae: características gerais, comentários e chave para gêneros. En Carrapatos de importância médico-veterinária da região neotropical: um guia ilustrado para identificacão de espécies. São Paulo: Vox/ICTTD-3/Butantan; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Aguiar DM, Ziliani TF, Zhang X, Melo ALT, Braga IA, Witter R, et al. A novel Ehrlichia genotype strain distinguished by the trp36 gene naturally infects cattle in Brazil and causes clinical manifestations associated with ehrlichiosis. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2014;5:537–44.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Julenius K, Molgaard A, Gupta R, Brunak S. Prediction, conservation analysis, and structural characterization of mammalian mucin type O-glycosylation sites. Glycobiology. 2005;15:153–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:573–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1999;41:95–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Spiro RG. Protein glycosylation: nature, distribution, enzymatic formation, and disease implications of glycopeptide bonds. Glycobiology. 2002;12:43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Montenegro VM, Bonilla MC, Kaminsky D, Romero-Zúniga JJ, Siebert S, Kramer F. Serological detection of antibodies to Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Ehrlichia canis and of Dirofilaria immitis antigen in dogs from Costa Rica. Vet Parasitol. 2017;236:97–107.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Saito TB, Cunha-Filho NA, Pacheco RC, Ferreira F, Pappen FG, Farias NA, et al. Canine infection by Rickettsiae and Ehrlichiae in southern Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79:102–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. de Paula WVF, Taques ÍIGG, Miranda VC, Barreto ALG, Paula LGF, Martins DB, et al. Seroprevalence and hematological abnormalities associated with Ehrlichia canis in dogs referred to a veterinary teaching hospital in central-western Brazil. Cienc Rural. 2021;52(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20201131.

  44. Doyle K, Labruna M, Breitschwerdt E, Yi-Wei T, Corstvet R, Hegarty B, et al. Detection of medically important Ehrlichia by quantitative multicolor TaqMan real-time polymerase chain reaction of the dsb gene. J Mol Diagn. 2005;7:504–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Arroyave E, Rodas-González JD, Zhang X, Labruna MB, González MS, Fernández-Silva JA, et al. Ehrlichia canis TRP36 diversity in naturally infected-dogs from an urban area of Colombia. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2020;11:101367.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bezerra-Santos MA, Nguyen V-L, Latta R, Manoj RRS, Latrofa MS, Hodžić A, et al. Genetic variability of Ehrlichia canis TRP36 in ticks, dogs, and red foxes from Eurasia. Vet Microbiol. 2021;255:109037.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Englund L, Pringle J. New diseases and increased risk of diseases in companion animals and horses due to transport. Acta Vet Scand Suppl. 2003;100:19–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Dantas-Torres F. Biology and ecology of the brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kobayashi Y, Suzuki Y. Evidence for N-glycan shielding of antigenic sites during evolution of human influenza A virus hemagglutinin. J Virol. 2012;86:3446–51. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.06147-11.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Das SR, Puigbò P, Hensley SE, Hurt DE, Bennink JR, Yewdell JW. Glycosylation focuses sequence variation in the influenza A virus H1 hemagglutinin globular domain. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1001211.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank members of NeuroPaTick group (www.neuropatick.com) for insightful discussions about the manuscript.

Funding

UMR BIPAR is supported by the French Government’s Investissement d’Avenir program, Laboratoire d’Excellence “Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases” (Grant No. ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID). Alejandra Wu-Chuang is supported by Programa Nacional de Becas de Postgrado en el Exterior “Don Carlos Antonio López” (Grant No. 205/2018).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Maylin González Navarrete and Adnan Hodžić contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Agrarian University of Havana, Carretera de Tapaste y Autopista Nacional, Km 23 1/2, 32700, San José de las Lajas, Mayabeque, Cuba

    Maylin González Navarrete & Eugenio Roque López

  2. Department of Pathobiology, Institute of Parasitology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria

    Adnan Hodžić

  3. Direction of Animal Health, National Center for Animal and Plant Health, Carretera de Tapaste y Autopista Nacional, Apartado Postal 10, 32700, San José de las Lajas, Mayabeque, Cuba

    Belkis Corona-González, Liani Coronado Báez & Elianne Piloto-Sardiñas

  4. Department of Animal Parasitology, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ), BR 465, Km 7, Seropedica, RJ, 23890000, Brazil

    Matheus Dias Cordeiro & Claudia Bezerra da Silva

  5. School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada

    Dasiel Obregón

  6. Virology and Rickettsioses Laboratory, Hospital Veterinário da Facultade de Medicina Veterinária, Federal University of Mato Grosso State, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil

    Daniel Moura de Aguiar, Amanda Noeli da Silva Campos & Ísis Indaiara Gonçalves Granjeiro Taques

  7. UMR BIPAR, INRAE, ANSES, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort, Université Paris-Est, 94700, Maisons-Alfort, France

    Alejandra Wu-Chuang & Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz

  8. Animal Biotechnology Department, Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Avenue 31 between 158 and 190, P.O. Box 6162, 10600, Havana, Cuba

    Lianet Abuin-Denis

  9. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ), BR 465, Km 7, Seropedica, RJ, 23890000, Brazil

    Adivaldo Henrique da Fonseca

Authors
  1. Maylin González Navarrete
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adnan Hodžić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Belkis Corona-González
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matheus Dias Cordeiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Claudia Bezerra da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Liani Coronado Báez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dasiel Obregón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Daniel Moura de Aguiar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Amanda Noeli da Silva Campos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ísis Indaiara Gonçalves Granjeiro Taques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Alejandra Wu-Chuang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Eugenio Roque López
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Elianne Piloto-Sardiñas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Lianet Abuin-Denis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Adivaldo Henrique da Fonseca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: MGN, BC-G and AC-C. Investigation: MDC, CBS, ANSC and IIGGT. Sequence analysis: AH, AW-C and BC-G. Resources: DMA and AHF. Visualization: AH. Writing—original draft preparation: MGN, AH, BC-G, LCB, LA-D and AC-C. Writing—review and editing: MGN, AH, BC-G, LCB, DO, EP-S, LA-D, DMA, AHF, MDC, CBS, ANSC, IIGGT and AC-C. Supervision: BC-G, ERL and AC-C. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Navarrete, M.G., Hodžić, A., Corona-González, B. et al. Novel Ehrlichia canis genogroup in dogs with canine ehrlichiosis in Cuba. Parasites Vectors 15, 295 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05426-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05426-0

Keywords

  • Ticks
  • Ehrlichia canis
  • Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis
  • Dogs
  • trp36
  • Rhipicephalus sanguineus

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us