Skip to main content

Transcriptome analysis of Haemaphysalis flava female using Illumina HiSeq 4000 sequencing: de novo assembly, functional annotation and discovery of SSR markers

Abstract

Background

Ticks are ectoparasites capable of directly damaging their hosts and transmitting vector-borne diseases. The ixodid tick Haemaphysalis flava has a broad distribution that extends from East to South Asia. This tick is a reservoir of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus (SFTSV) that causes severe hemorrhagic disease, with cases reported from China, Japan and South Korea. Recently, the distribution of H. flava in South Korea was found to overlap with the occurrence of SFTSV.

Methods

This study was undertaken to discover the molecular resources of H. flava female ticks using the Illumina HiSeq 4000 system, the Trinity de novo sequence assembler and annotation against public databases. The locally curated Protostome database (PANM-DB) was used to screen the putative adaptation-related transcripts classified to gene families, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme, aquaporin, adenylate cyclase, AMP-activated protein kinase, glutamate receptors, heat shock proteins, molecular chaperones, insulin receptor, mitogen-activated protein kinase and solute carrier family proteins. Also, the repeats and simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were screened from the unigenes using RepeatMasker (v4.0.6) and MISA (v1.0) software tools, followed by the designing of SSRs flanking primers using BatchPrimer 3 (v1.0) software.

Results

The transcriptome produced a total of 69,822 unigenes, of which 46,175 annotated to the homologous proteins in the PANM-DB. The unigenes were also mapped to the EuKaryotic Orthologous Groups (KOG), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) specializations. Promiscuous presence of protein kinase, zinc finger (C2H2-type), reverse transcriptase, and RNA recognition motif domains was observed in the unigenes. A total of 3480 SSRs were screened, of which 1907 and 1274 were found as tri- and dinucleotide repeats, respectively. A list of primer sequences flanking the SSR motifs was detailed for validation of polymorphism in H. flava and the related tick species.

Conclusions

The reference transcriptome information on H. flava female ticks will be useful for an enriched understanding of tick biology, its competency to act as a vector and the study of species diversity related to disease transmission.

Graphical abstract

Background

Haemaphysalis flava belongs to the family (Ixodidae) of hard ticks. The ticks of this family are considered to be a public health concern due to their essential role in transmitting tick-borne pathogens [1]. H. flava has been found to be distributed widely across the Asian continent, including China, Japan, Vietnam and South Korea, contrary to the spread of the Asian longhorned tick, H. longicornis to 96 countries, including Australia [2,3,4]. H. flava is a competent vector for bacterial pathogens such as Anaplasma spp., Ehrlichia spp., Borrelia spp., Rickettsia spp., Coxiella burnetti, Francisella tularensis, among others and for parasites such as Babesia spp. and Toxoplasma gondii [5,6,7,8]. A few studies have also reported the detection of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus (SFTSV) and tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) genome fragments from H. flava distributed in China, Japan and South Korea [9,10,11]. Similar to H. longicornis, H. flava has a wide host range that includes humans, domestic animals (for example, dogs, horses, pigs, sheep, cattle) and various wildlife, including hedgehogs, pandas, water deer, eastern roe deer, Siberian chipmunks and Raccoon dogs [12,13,14].

In South Korea, surveys for hard ticks, especially H. flava and H. longicornis, have been prioritized by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) due to the increase in the number of reported SFTS cases since 2013. This increase has also resulted in more deaths associated with SFTS infections, which in turn has significantly increased public health burdens [15, 16]. In a 4-year (2015–2018) surveillance of hard ticks on the island of Ganghwa-do (Incheon Metropolitan City), 5.71% of the identified hard ticks were H. flava, and these tested negative for SFTSV [17]. In another study, on the seasonal incidence of hard ticks in Gyeonggi-do province, H. flava was observed as one of the dominant tick species along with H. longicornis, but again with negative results for SFTSV [2]. However, contrary to the findings of earlier surveys, the different developmental stages of H. flava collected (between April 2016 and June 2018) from Deogyusan National Park, Korea, showed positive results for SFTSV [18]. Further, SFTSV-positive pools were detected in the H. flava populations collected from Gyeonggi-do province South Korea in another study [19]. Moreover, the prevalence of TBEV has also been confirmed in H. flava ticks collected from southern provinces of South Korea [20]. Hence, H. flava ticks have been confirmed as a vector and reservoir of SFTSV and TBEV in South Korea. These evidence-based investigations have promoted continuous surveillance of geological and climatic factors correlated with the prevalence of tick density. Further, the KCDC has prioritized the phylogenomic study of SFTSV strains from H. longicornis and H. flava to promulgate risk-assessment strategies for tick-borne diseases. In the context of this surveillance yardstick, a genome-level understanding of tick biology has been proposed that could be vital in exploring the molecular resources of host–pathogen interactions.

An increased understanding of zoonotic disease vectors, including ticks, at the transcriptome-wide level, has been helpful in making informed assumptions regarding the host competency for pathogens and vectorial efficiency in the spread of disease [21,22,23]. The differences in gene expression that dictate the competency of ticks to harbor disease-causing bacterial and viral pathogens and promote or affect their competence as a vector have been explored [21, 23, 24]. However, there is a lack of information on the complete genome, transcriptome and proteome of H. flava and, consequently, a poor understanding of its biology. Such information is needed given the increasing burden the tick species is placing on public health systems. The de novo transcriptome of H. flava at the larval and nymph stages has been studied, providing new targets for controlling the pathogenesis of the tick [25]. The ovary transcriptome of H. flava ticks partially or fully engorged has provided a preliminary understanding of ovary maturation and oogenesis [26]. In a previous study, the sialoprotein genes were identified from the transcriptome of H. flava and found to enrich the changes in salivary proteins during blood feeding, focusing on vector competence models [27]. In the context of tick control strategies, studies of the H. flava midgut transcriptome have provided transcripts involved in blood digestion, feeding and defense from pathogens [28]. Likewise, genetic elements, such as simple sequence repeat (SSR) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers (collectively termed ‘microsatellites’), derived from expressed sequence tag (EST) and transcriptome sequences hold promise as these can be used as functional elements for population genetic analysis and polymorphism identification [29, 30]. Transcriptome sequencing can identify thousands of SSRs and SNPs in the coding transcripts suitable for detecting and comparing polymorphism levels among ticks obtained from different sources. Genetic variability assessments using transcriptome-derived SNPs have been explored in the tick Ixodes ricinus [31]. Moreover, SSRs (tandem repeats of 1–6 nucleotides) have been exclusively studied on the coding transcripts due to their reproducibility, multi-allelic nature, codominant inheritance, abundance and genome-wide coverage [32]. While SSRs in the coding sequences have been reported from 25 insect species [33], including a few mosquito species [34], the assessment of SSRs from ticks and applications of these SSRs towards the discovery of diversity in these species is yet to be fully explored.

Here, we detail, for the first time, the whole transcriptome of H. flava female ticks collected from Korea. The sequenced strain was classified under the native ticks of Japan, Korea and the Ryukyu [35]. The transcripts obtained and the SSR markers screened from the H. flava transcriptome will be essential to understanding the molecular biology, biochemistry and biological evolution of this tick from the perspective of the tick as a vector. Additionally, this is the first large-scale screening of SSRs from the coding transcripts of H. flava ticks that includes the identified primers for genetic diversity studies.

Methods

Sample collection

Ticks were collected from Dangjin-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea (36.8936°N, 126.6283°E) in the period from September to October 2018. Specific permission for the collection of ticks was not required as the collection site was not located within national parks or protected areas. Within the collection site, we selected four locations with different environmental characteristics, namely mountains, a graveyard, grassland and paddy fields, respectively. At each of these locations we placed three traps at intervals of 10 m to collect ticks; thus, there was a total of 12 dry-ice bait-collecting traps (Shin-Young Commerce System, Gyeonggi, Korea) placed at the collection site. The tarpaulin cylindrical trap (35 × 40 cm [diameter × height]) consisted of a cylindrical dry ice container (10 × 30 cm [diameter × height]) containing approximately 2.5 kg ice for luring the ticks into the trap overnight. The ticks were found either on the surface of the trap or inside of it and collected using forceps into the tick collection tube (patent no. 10-0925882). Adult male and female ticks were separated and subsequently identified based on morphological keys using an optical microscope. Based on Yamaguti et al. [35], the H. flava ticks were classified as native ticks of Japan, Korea and the Ryukyu Islands. Three adult female H. flava were used as samples for total RNA extraction.

RNA extraction and library construction

The whole body of ticks was ground with a pestle homogenizer using TRIzol® Reagent (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in dry ice for total RNA extraction. Residual DNA (if any) was removed using RNase-free DNase I (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and incubation at 37 °C for 30 min. The quality of the extracted RNA was assessed using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). Pooled RNA samples were prepared for constructing the complementary DNA (cDNA) library using the Illumina Stranded mRNA Prep Kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Briefly, 2 µg of messenger RNA (mRNA) was fragmented randomly in fragmentation buffer using an RNA fragmentation kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) to obtain short mRNA fragments of 200 nucleotides. These short mRNA fragments were reverse-transcribed to second-strand cDNA using random primers, reverse transcriptase, RNase H and DNA polymerase I. After purification, terminal repair, A-tailing, ligation of sequencing adapters (adapter 1: AGATCGGAAGAGCACACGTCTGAACTCCAGTCAC; adapter 2: AGATCGGAAGAGCGTCGTGTAGGGAAAGAGTGTAGATCTCGGTGGTCGCCGTATCATT), size selection (200 ± 25 bp) and PCR amplification, the cDNA library was sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform to generate 125-bp paired-end (PE) reads. The sequencing was completed at GnC Bio-Company, Daejeon, Korea on 4 January 2019.

Data filtering, de novo assembly and functional annotation

Raw data from Illumina sequencing (in FASTQ format) were filtered for adapter-only sequences using the Cutadapt program v4.2 (source code downloaded at http://code.google.com/p/cutadapt/). Subsequently, the reads were filtered for low-quality sequences using the Sickle program v1.33 (available at https://github.com/najoshi/sickle) [36]. The clean reads obtained were assembled de novo using the Trinity program v2.13.2 under the default setting of the minimum allowable length of 200 bp [37, 38]. The redundancy in sequences and the only coding transcripts were retrieved using the TransDecoder suite v2.0.3 (http://transdecoder.github.io). Clustering of the transcripts to unigenes (sequences that could not be extended on either ends) was performed using the TIGR Gene Indices Clustering Tool (TGICL) package [39].

Bioinformatics analysis of the transcriptome

Functions of the assembled unigenes were annotated by performing Blastx (E-value cut-off of < 10–5) against the locally curated Protostome database (PANM-DB) v3 [40] and Swiss-Prot database. Additionally, annotations against UniGene database were performed using Blastn (E-value cut-off of < 10–5). For a comprehensive functional annotation of unigenes, we used KOG (EuKaryotic Orthologous Groups of proteins) at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/ [41], GO (Gene Ontology), KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes), and IPS (InterProScan; using OmicsBox 2.0.29) [42]. The PANM-DB was used as a priority for screening putative adaptation-related transcripts from the de novo assembled unigenes of the H. flava transcriptome.

Screening for SSRs and repeats

RepeatMasker v4.0.6 (downloaded at http://www.girinst.org) was used to screen repeat elements from all unigenes of the H. flava transcriptome and categorize them under ‘short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs),’ ‘long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs),’ long terminal repeat elements (LTRs), and other ‘DNA elements.’ The PerlScript program MISA v1.0 was used for the detection of SSRs in the unigenes. Further, we designed a set of primers flanking the target SSR regions screened from the unigenes of SSRs in the H. flava transcriptome using the BatchPrimer 3 v1.0 program [43]. Considering its utilization in polymorphism studies, the following screening criteria were used: dinucleotides with ≥ 6 iterations and tri-/tetra-/penta-nucleotide repeats with ≥ 3 iterations.

Results

Illumina sequencing and de novo transcriptome assembly

The Illumina HiSeq 4000 sequencing platform was utilized to obtain PE reads of 40,662,485 × 2 = 81,324,970 (81.3 Mb) and raw read sequences of 12,280,070,470 bases. A total of 93.45% bases with a mean length of 282.2 bp were retained after filtering the adapter-only sequences. In the next step the low-quality and ambiguous sequences were filtered, resulting in 79,329,970 sequences (10,758,688,876 bases), which were designated as clean reads. Hence, a total of 97.55% raw read sequences (87.61% bases) were pre-processed as clean reads with a mean length, N50 length (the length for which the collection of all contigs of that length or longer contains at least half of the sum of the lengths of all contigs) and percent guanine-cytosine content (GC%) of 136 bp, 126 bp and 53.65%, respectively (Additional file 1: Table S1).

The assembly of clean read sequences was accomplished using the de novo sequence assembler Trinity, harnessing its efficiency to reconstruct the transcriptome without a reference genome. All the reads with a length of < 200 bp were removed, leaving 1,083,053 contigs (478,226,128 bases) with a mean length of 442 bp and an N50 length of 470 bp. Overall 26.57% and 3.94% of the contig sequences were ≥ 500 bp and ≥ 1000 bp, respectively, with the largest contig size being 8332 bp. The contigs were screened for candidate coding regions, and such transcript sequences constituted 27.24% of the contigs. Approximately 43.10% and 9.67% of the sequences were of lengths ≥ 500 bp and ≥ 1000 bp, respectively, with the retention of the largest sequence of 8332 bp. The clustered unigenes (sequences that cannot be extended at either end) constituted approximately 6.45% of the assembled contig sequences, with a mean length, N50 length and GC% of 792 bp, 947 bp and 53.09%, respectively. The statistical summary of the processing of clean reads is shown in Table 1. We further analyzed the number of contigs, transcripts and unigenes obtained based on size (Fig. 1). Maximum contigs (approx. 34.39%) showed a size of ≤ 300 bp with only 0.22% showing sizes of ≥ 2001 bp (Fig. 1a). The transcript and unigene sizes ≥ 2001 bp were 0.85% and 3.76%, respectively (Fig. 1b, c). Further, 65.09% of unigenes were of ≥ 501 bp, suggesting a greater likelihood of discovering a homolog with putative functions.

Table 1 Statistical summary of the de novo assembled Haemaphysalis flava transcriptome
Fig. 1
figure 1

Size distribution of Haemaphysalis flava de novo assembled transcriptome. A Contigs, B transcripts, C unigenes

Sequence annotation of H. flava unigenes

All 69,822 unigenes from the H. flava female transcriptome assembly were functionally annotated by searching for homologs in the public databases, including the locally curated PANM-DB. The annotation statistics are shown in Table 2. About 70% of unigenes had homologs in at least one of the representative databases, with almost 66.13% showing hits to sequences in the PANM-DB. Of the 46,175 unigene hits to sequences in the PANM-DB, 92.71% of unigenes were >= 301 bp. Further, 42.35%, 41.54%, 32.30%, 27.32%, 24.24% and 5.15% of unigenes were annotated against the KOG, Swiss-Prot, UniGene, GO, IPS and KEGG databases, respectively. Using a four-way Venn diagram, we investigated the overlap of unigene annotation against sequences in the PANM, UniGene, Swiss-Prot and KOG databases (Fig. 2). We observed that 13,023 unigenes showed homologous matches specifically to sequences in the PANM database, which is significantly higher compared to other databases. Further, 10,200 unigenes showed homologous matches in the PANM, Swiss-Prot and KOG databases mainly represented as protein databases. About 17,799 unigenes showed homologous matches distributed in all four databases. Based on the PANM-DB annotation, most unigenes matched with the homologous proteins of Amblyomma aureolatum, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, Rhipicephalus pulchellus and I. ricinus (Fig. 3). Moreover 152 unigenes were found to perfectly match with the available protein sequences from H. flava. Further, only 299 H. longicornis homologs were identified for the assembled H. flava unigenes.

Table 2 Annotation of H. flava unigenes against public databases
Fig. 2
figure 2

Venn diagram plotting the H. flava unigene annotations against the locally curated PANM, Swiss-Prot, KOG (Blastx; E-value ≤ 1E−5) and UniGene (Blastn; E-value ≤ 1E−5) databases. KOG, EuKaryotic Orthologous Groups; PANM, Protostome

Fig. 3
figure 3

Distribution of top-hit species in the Protostome database based on homology matching of H. flava unigenes (Blastx; E-value cutoff of 1.0E-5)

Homology statistics of H. flava unigenes

The annotation of H. flava unigenes against the PANM-DB using Blastx was statistically analyzed in detail (Fig. 4). Of the 46,175 unigenes annotated against this database, 27,794 showed an E-value proportionate to 1E−50 to 1E−5, followed by 12,570 unigenes with an E-value of 1E−100 to 1E−50 (Fig. 4a). Surprisingly, 21,448 unigenes showed an identity of 80–100% with homologous sequences in the PANM-DB, followed by 13,831 unigenes showing an identity of 60–80%. About 2.35% of unigenes showed 100% identity to the database sequences (Fig. 4b). The similarity index also showed a similar trend, with 26,838 unigenes showing a similarity of 80–100% with database sequences, followed by 12,895 unigenes showing similarity of 60–80% (Fig. 4c). The similarity index includes the identical matches with the database sequences. Further, the annotation hits improved with an increase in the length of unigenes, suggesting the increased likelihood of finding conserved regions or domains in the sequences. A maximum of 2024 hits (as compared to 600 no-hits) were recorded for unigenes of lengths ≥ 2001 bp (Fig. 4d).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Homology statistics of H. flava unigenes annotated against PANM-DB (Blastx; E-value cutoff of 1.0E−5). a–d Distributions of E-value (A), identity (B), similarity (C) and Hits vs. non-hits (D). PANM-DB, Protostome database

Functional classification of H. flava unigenes

The KOG scheme characterized H. flava unigenes under 25 categories classified under: ‘Information storage and processing,’ ‘Cellular processes and signaling,’ ‘Metabolism,’ and ‘Poorly characterized’ (Fig. 5). However, 16.53% of KOG annotated unigenes were classified to multiple categories. Further, a large proportion of unigenes were distributed under ‘Cellular processes and signaling’ (9608 unigenes), followed by ‘Poorly characterized’ (5695 unigenes) and ‘Metabolism’ (5316 unigenes). Understandably, maximum unigenes were ascribed to ‘R-General function prediction only.’ Surprisingly, ‘T-Signal transduction mechanisms’ and ‘O-Post-translational modifications, protein turnover, and chaperones’ were the dominant classifiers under ‘Cellular processes and signaling.’ A more even distribution of unigenes was ascribed under the ‘Metabolism’ category, with the maximum number of transcripts under ‘I: Lipid transport and metabolism.’ The classifiers ‘J: Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis,’ ‘A: RNA processing and modification’ and ‘K’: Transcription’ accounted for 84.11% of unigenes annotated under ‘Information storage and processing.’

Fig. 5
figure 5

Classification of H. flava unigenes against 25 KOG categories excluding the multifunctional category. Poorly characterized categories were: Function unknown (S) and General function prediction only (R). Metabolism categories were: Secretory metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism (Q); Inorganic ion transport and metabolism (P); Lipid transport and metabolism (I); Coenzyme transport and metabolism (H); Nucleotide transport and metabolism (F); Amino acid transport and metabolism (E); Carbohydrate transport and metabolism (G), Energy production and conversion (C). Cellular processes and signaling categories were: Post translational modifications, protein turnover and chaperons (O); Intracellular trafficking, secretion and vascular transport (U); Extracellular structure (W); Cytoskeleton (Z); Cell motility (N); Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis (M); Signal transduction Mechanism (T); Defense mechanism (V); Nuclear structure (Y); Cell cycle control, cell division and chromosome partitioning (D). Information storage and processing categories were Chromatin structure and dynamics (B); Replication, recombination and repair (L); Transcription (K); RNA Processing and modification (A); Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis (J). KOG, EuKaryotic Orthologous Groups

Using Blast2 GO analysis, 19,074 unigenes of 47,702 annotated sequences (to all databases) were assigned to GO terms. Significantly, 7245 sequences were classified under a single GO term, whereas 4720, 3623 and 2153 sequences were categorized to two, three and four GO terms, respectively (Fig. 6a). Further, most of the unigenes were exclusively assigned to ‘Molecular function’ (6445 sequences), followed by ‘Biological process’ (1227 sequences) and ‘Cellular component’ (1013 sequences) categories (Fig. 6b). About 14.45% sequences annotated under GO were assigned to all three functional groups. Under the ‘Biological process’ category, most unigenes were directed to cellular and metabolic processes. Under the ‘Cellular component’ category, a high percentage of unigenes were classified to the cellular anatomical entities, and under the ‘Molecular function’ category, binding and catalytic activity formed the predominant GO terms (Fig. 7). GO annotations are represented in the form of GO evidence codes. As is known, most of these representations are inferred from electronic annotations and not from experimental annotations; hence the GO interpretation of unigenes, in the stricter sense, relates only to the predicted function [44]. In the present study, maximum GO annotations were also inferred from electronic annotations. The KEGG-based annotations revealed 8704 sequences ascribed to enzymes in the biochemical pathway. These sequences belonged to 629 enzymes in these pathways and, not surprisingly, the maximum number of these enzymes belonged to the carbohydrate metabolism pathway (Fig. 8). The maximum number of enzyme sequences belonged to nucleotide metabolism and metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, with 43 and 42 enzymes, respectively. Signal transduction and immune system pathways were represented by 15 (enzymes categorized under phosphatidylinositol signaling system and mTOR signaling pathway) and three enzymes (phosphatase and protein tyrosine kinase), respectively. The enriched functional domain search by annotating H. flava unigenes to the InterProScan domain database showed promiscuous presence of protein kinase, reverse transcriptase, zinc finger, immunoglobulin-type and other domains crucial for cellular regulatory mechanisms (Table 3). Of course, protein kinase, immunoglobulin, serpin and fibronectin-III type domains are conspicuously found in proteins constituting the immune signaling cascades.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Functional annotation of H. flava unigenes against GO terms. A The number of unigenes annotated against the number of GO terms. B Venn diagram showing the classification of unigenes against GO functional categories in terms of Biological process, Cellular component and Molecular function. GO, Gene Ontology

Fig. 7
figure 7

GO classification of H. flava unigenes at level 2. Unigenes were classified into GO categories of Biological process (A), Cellular component (B) and Molecular function (C). A Classification of unigenes into GO category Biological process: GO:0009987 (cellular process); GO:0008152 (metabolic process); GO:0065007 (biological regulation); GO:0050789 (regulation of biological process); GO:0051179 (localization); GO:0050896 (response to stimulus); GO:0023052 (signaling); GO:0071840 (cellular component or biogenesis); GO:0048519 (negative regulation of biological process); GO:0048518 (positive regulation of biological process); GO:0022610 (biological adhesion); GO:0032501 (multicellular organismal process); GO:0032502 (signaling); GO:0051704 (obsolete multi-organism process); GO:0002376 (immune system process); GO:0040011 (locomotion); GO:0000003 (reproduction); GO:0022414 (reproductive process); GO:0098754 (detoxification); GO:0008283 (cell population proliferation). B Classification of unigenes into GO category Cellular component: GO:0110165 (cellular anatomical entity); GO:0005622 (intracellular anatomical structure); GO:0032991 (protein-containing complex); GO:0005623 (obsolete cell).C Classification of unigenes in GO category Molecular function: GO:0005488 (binding); GO:0003824 (catalytic activity); GO:0005215 (transporter activity); GO:0098772 (molecular function regulator activity); GO:0005198 (structural molecule activity); GO:0140110 (transcription regulator activity); GO:0045182 (translation regulator activity); GO:0060089 (molecular transducer activity); GO:0016209 (antioxidant activity); GO:0038024 (cargo receptor activity). GO, Gene Ontology

Fig. 8
figure 8

KEGG distribution of H. flava unigenes. The outer pie shows the sequences of enzymes and the inner pie the enzymes in the pathway. KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

Table 3 List of InterPro domains with the most unigenes of H. flava transcriptome

Screening of adaptation-related transcripts

Many adaptation-related candidate gene families were screened from the assembled H. flava unigenes based on the Blastx-based homology matching to the PANM-DB. These included the angiotensin-converting enzyme, aquaporins, adenylate cyclases, AMP-activated protein kinase, glutamate receptors, heat shock proteins (HSPs; category includes small HSPs, 70-kDa, 90-kDa class), molecular chaperones (grp170/HSP70 superfamily), insulin receptor, mitogen-activated protein kinase, phospholipase and solute carrier family (Additional file 1: Table S2) of proteins. The putative functions of such adaptation-related transcripts in H. flava addressing tick biology are discussed further in this article.

SSRs and repeat analysis

The repeat elements screened from all unigenes of the H. flava transcriptome are presented in Table 4. The repeats were screened from a total length of 55,278,029 bp while masking 438,287 bp of the sequence. Simple repeats, small RNAs and total interspersed repeats occupied the maximum length. The number of DNA elements, hAT-Charlie elements and TcMar-Tigger elements was 311, 27 and 64, respectively. The transposable elements thus accounted for the majority of repeat elements. Retrotransposons, divided into LTR and non-LTR groups, were also conspicuously found in the assembled unigenes of H. flava. The LTRs constituted 51 elements, and the non-LTRs, such as SINEs and LINEs, constituted 51 (3006 bp) and 67 elements (3979 bp), respectively.

Table 4 Repeat elements screened from the unigenes of the H. flava transcriptome

A total of 3480 SSRs were screened from all unigenes of the H. flava transcriptome. These SSRs were found in 2166 unigenes, with 826 unigenes containing > 1 SSR. Table 5 shows that most SSRs were present as trinucleotide repeats, followed in decreasing frequency by dinucleotide and tetranucleotide repeats. Further, most di-, tri- and tetranucleotide repeats were present in six, five and four iterations, respectively (Table 5). Repeats with five, six and seven iterations were the most promiscuous, with 30.93%, 29.76% and 13.18% of all iterations, respectively. Among the repeat motif types, the trinucleotide repeat motif AGC/CTG was the most prominent, followed by dinucleotide repeat motifs AC/GT and AG/CT, respectively. Some tetranucleotide repeat motifs were also screened, such as AAAG/CTTT, ATGC/ATGC, AAAC/GTTT, ACGC/CGTG and AATC/ATTG. The repeat motif types versus the number of repeats are shown in Fig. 9. We also designed primers flanking the di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide repeats that could be used to validate the SSRs and genotyping of species. The list of primers predicted with specific features is given in Additional file 1: Table S3. Primers have been designed flanking the cDNA-SSRs on transcripts coding for putative functions, such as serine protease inhibitor, tetraspanin, STAT protein, heat shock proteins, among others.

Table 5 Screening of simple sequence repeats from the unigenes of the H. flava transcriptome
Fig. 9
figure 9

The simple sequence repeat motif types in the screened unigenes of H. flava

Discussion

Hard ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) are the most important vectors of human pathogens worldwide. They are also the focus of significant public health concern as they are competent vectors of agents causing diseases in humans, domesticated animals and wildlife. The distributional range of Ixodid hard ticks and Haemaphysalis spp., respectively, has possibly changed due to climate crisis, as suggested by empirical and theoretical studies [45]. The climate change scenario in the Korean Peninsula has been one of a steady change from temperate to subtropical conditions, significantly enhancing the prevalence of ticks and tick-borne diseases [46]. This has heightened the need for surveys of tick populations in terms of both temporal and geographical distributions and for epidemiological investigations of SFTSV and TBEV in ticks in South Korea [2, 20]. Ixodid tick species such as H. longicornis are prevalent in South Korea, and implicated as a major driver of SFTSV infection [15]. However, H. flava (the second most prevalent tick species in South Korea) has been found to be distributed in all the study sites of South Korea, increasing the risks of SFTSV and TBEV infections [47]. Moreover, H. flava species collected from South Korea have not been sequenced to explore the resources related to vector competence and its distributional shifts. In the present study, we constructed the reference transcriptome of H. flava female ticks distributed in South Korea with de novo assembly of putative transcripts.

Annotation results showed that 68.32% of the transcripts had a homologous match to available sequences in public databases. For example, 66.13% of unigenes in our study had a match to homologous proteins in the PANM-DB, a local repository of Protostomes (Arthropoda, Mollusca and Nematoda). The PANM-DB v3 was updated on 20 March 2019 with 11,612,243 protein sequences extracted from the NCBInr (protein) database and arranged in a multi-FASTA format [40]. The annotation profile of the PANM-DB was also utilized to screen the putative candidate transcripts of H. flava female ticks in relation to adaptation. The PANM-DB has been consistently used to retrieve valuable transcripts related to adaptation in protostome species, including butterflies, moths, gastropods and other molluscs [6, 48,49,50,51]. The assembled transcripts of larva and nymph stages of the H. flava transcriptome showed a match of 48.6% to the near-reported species, with Ixodes scapularis the most represented species [25]. In the ovary transcriptome of H. flava, 51.93% of unigenes were annotated to the databases, with maximum match to I. scapularis [26]. De novo assembly from the salivary gland transcriptome of H. flava retrieved 54,357 unigenes, of which 37.06% were matched to homologs in the Swiss-Prot database. The top-hit species in the annotation included R. pulchellus, I. scapularis and Amblyomma maculatum [27]. About 41.54% of the unigenes in the present study could be matched to proteins in the Swiss-Prot database, with near consistency relative to the top-hit species represented. Amblyomma spp., Rhipicephalus spp. and Ixodes spp. were largely represented in the present study’s PANM-DB database annotation. Many protein sequences are available for species under the genus name in NCBI, which relates to greater annotation hits. Further, the H. longicornis genome with 24,189 protein-coding genes have been made available [52]. This availability could improve the annotation profile significantly and enable close sequence matches to H. flava sequence queries. Moreover, the whole-genome characterization of ticks has been relatively slower due to a number of difficulties, such as the existence of abundant repeating sequences in the genome and contamination of host and pathogen transcripts [53].

The functional directions were ascribed to the de novo assembled unigenes of H. flava by annotating these against the KOG, GO and KEGG databases. KEGG analysis detected the presence of promiscuous carbohydrate, amino acid, lipid and energy metabolism pathways that represented the basic metabolic processes. The signal transduction pathway was the most prominent pathway among the non-metabolic processes. Among the KOG classifiers, the signal transduction mechanism category was promiscuous, with a high proportion of unigenes. Many signaling modules are channelized by membrane receptors, with intracellular kinases modulating the signals to activate gene transcription, thereby controlling adaptive processes. Hence, the over-representation of such an environmental information processing pathway module could be crucial to understanding the tick response to climate-sensitive variables. The differential expression of genes obtained for partially and fully engorged H. flava ovaries showed a similar representation of KEGG pathway enrichment analysis [26]. The GO analysis in the present study categorizes a large number of unigenes to ‘Molecular function’ classifiers, predominantly to binding and catalytic activity. This result is consistent with the H. flava salivary gland transcriptome data [27]. Further, the InterProScan search exaggerated the presence of domains conspicuously found in signaling proteins, such as the fibronectin-III, immunoglobulin, serine-threonine protein kinase, serine proteases and serpin domain. For example, a putative fibronectin-III domain-containing tick gut protein facilitates the congregation of spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi on the gut epithelium, which is essentially related to the transmission of the spirochete to the vertebrate host [54, 55]. Consolidated evidence for the involvement of such domains in immunity-related mechanisms has been enriched in I. scapularis genome data available through public databases [56]. For example, serpins and other proteases could manipulate host defense and increase tick’s vector competency and therefore act as a candidate for host-microbe interactions [57, 58]. Further, the proteases could be effective for the blood digestion process as blood from the host is an essential source for tick survival, growth and reproduction [59, 60]. Proteomics-based identification of such proteases from the midgut of H. flava has significantly complemented transcriptome studies [28, 61]. The salivary gland transcriptome of H. flava was sufficient to screen the genes encoding secreted proteins that mediate hematophagy and blood ingestion [27]. Included within the secretory proteins are the metalloproteases and serine protease inhibitors, which bestow a survival advantage to the ticks and ensure success in blood-feeding [62, 63]. Further, the tick signaling-related genes for the Toll, Imd and Jak/Stat pathways are associated with many kinases distributed in the cytosol, comprising the protein kinase domain [64]. Analysis of the saliva proteome from H. flava (partially and fully engorged adult females) has identified tick proteins classified to categories that include protease inhibitors, immunity-related proteins and an abundance of uncharacterized proteins predicted to regulate immune functions and anti-coagulation processes [65]. Similar categories of tick-derived candidate proteins with the abundances of vitellogenin, microplusin and α-2 macroglobulin have been screened from tick hemolymph, differentiating it from the host-derived proteins. Such proteome profiles have been successful in unraveling the physiological processes relevant to ticks as a vector of diseases [66].

The whole transcriptome assembly of the female H. flava tick also provided rich insights into the adaptation-related transcripts screened from the PANM-DB-based annotations. Notably, HSPs and molecular chaperones were enriched in the transcriptome, supporting the involvement of HSPs in the physiological activities of ticks, especially blood-feeding [27, 67]. However, using HSPs as a candidate vaccine antigen against ticks is still under scrutiny and needs extensive investigation [67, 68]. In the tick Dermacentor silvarum, HSP70—and not HSP90—was required for adaptation to cold stress, leading to an understanding of the acclimatization of overwintering ticks [69]. Further, HSP70 and HSP20 have been reported to affect the stress response, Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection and questing behavior in I. scapularis [70]. The insulin receptor has been previously characterized from I. ricinus, I. scapularis and the triatomine bug Rhodnius prolixus, as is screened from this study. This receptor could be crucial for understanding the insulin signaling pathway involved in tick feeding, development and reproduction [71]. The information reported from the present study also could shed insights on the tick nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling cascades (Toll, Imd and JAK/STAT pathways) that have been largely neglected due to the enrichment of putative immune transcripts. Future directions based on the present study would explore the NF-κB pathway components alongside the interconnections for a succinct understanding of host–pathogen interactions. Few aquaporin-specific transcripts have been screened from the H. flava transcriptome. Aquaporins in ticks (aquaporin 1 and aquaporin 2) are required during blood-feeding as they facilitate the excretion of excess water back into the host through the salivary glands, and a high-potential aquaporin 1 has been used as a candidate for anti-tick vaccine development [72, 73]. Other screened adaptation-related transcripts, such as the glutamate receptors, kinases (AMP-activated protein kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase), phospholipase and solute carrier family proteins, need further study in relation to the physiology of ticks. The present study does not include a comprehensive screening of immunity, growth and reproduction-related transcripts that could further enhance an understanding of tick biology. However, a recent study has used liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and ovary transcriptomic data to identify the candidate proteins in H. flava eggs for targeted interventions during embryogenesis. Most of these proteins are enzymes (including cathepsins and other antioxidant enzymes such as catalase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione-S-transferase, among others), proteinase inhibitors (including serpins), vitellogenins, immunity-related proteins (such as neutrophil elastase inhibitor) and HSPs (HSP70 and HSP83) [74].

The discovery of polymorphic SSRs from the coding transcripts, realized by transcriptome sequencing, has revolutionized genetic diversity studies as these SSRs are considered to be more transferable than random genomic SSRs [29, 75]. Especially in non-model species, these SSRs are included in any transcriptome pipeline to understand the species taxonomy, population diversity and marker-assisted breeding programs [48, 76, 77]. The tick genome is punctuated by a high proportion of repeating elements and SSRs. For example, the H. longicornis genome shows a high proportion of SSRs (54.72%), which support a genetic understanding of the species [52]. SSRs have been identified from the midgut transcriptome of H. flava, represented mainly by mononucleotide repeats (61.97% of all SSRs). Further, these SSRs are long, with 10–12 iterations accounting for 24.21% and 20.75% of the total SSRs, respectively [28]. Mononucleotides were also conspicuous in SSRs screened from the salivary gland transcriptome of H. flava, constituting 62.83% of SSRs [27]. In the present study, mononucleotides were not considered for analysis as these can be unstable in Illumina-based sequencing. Trinucleotides were the most numerous among the repeats, followed by dinucleotides, with a maximum of five and six iterations, respectively. Indeed, the SSRs characterized from the transcriptome can be used for polymorphism detection among tick populations and provide enriched outputs to understand the biology and ecology of H. flava. We have therefore designed PCR primers flanking the highly iterated SSRs that could be utilized for such studies. Some of the earlier studies on the H. flava transcriptome did not present the SSR primers as a means to understand the polymorphic resources [27, 28]. The detection of SNPs in expressed regions also supports polymorphism detection in ticks that prepare informed decisions for future population genetic studies. In I. ricinus, a total of 3,866 SNPs were utilized to calculate the heterozygosity of wild and laboratory tick populations [31]. We assume that such genetic resources can be accessed by national public health surveillance centers to characterize tick infestations and deploy relevant quarantine measures.

Conclusion

This is the first report on the transcriptome sequences of H. flava adult females collected in South Korea. The de novo assembled transcripts were annotated for functional directions, and many candidate transcripts associated with the adaptive physiology of the tick were scrutinized. The transcripts are mostly categorized into blood digestion, feeding and signaling cascades pertaining to host–pathogen interactions. Further, SSRs were screened on the functional transcripts, and primers were predicted in the SSR flanking regions to understand the ecology of the species. A few of the components discovered using this pipeline could be addressed as candidates for tick control.

Data availability

The raw read sequences of H. flava female transcriptome have been submitted to NCBI under submission ID- SUB12004304. The submitted reads have been processed under the accession SRR21412058 and the BioProject ID PRJNA876399.

Abbreviations

GO:

Gene Ontology

HSP:

Heat shock protein

KCDC:

Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

KOG:

EuKaryotic Orthologous Groups

LINE:

Long-interspersed nuclear elements

LTR:

Long-terminal repeats

PANM-DB:

Protostome database

PE:

Paired-end

SFTSV:

Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus

SINE:

Short-interspersed nuclear elements

SNP:

Single nucleotide polymorphism

SSR:

Simple sequence repeats

TBEV:

Tick-borne encephalitis virus

TGICL:

TIGR Gene Indices clustering tool

References

  1. Machado-Ferreira E, Vizzoni VF, Balsemao-Pires E, Moerbeck L, Gazeta GS, Piesman J, et al. Coxiella symbionts are widespread into hard ticks. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:4691–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-5230-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jung M, Kho JW, Lee WG, Roh JY, Lee DH. Seasonal occurrence of Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) and Haemaphysalis flava, vectors of Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) in South Korea. J Med Entomol. 2019;56:1139–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjz033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. US Department of Agriculture. National Haemaphysalis longicornis (Asian longhorned tick) situation report. 2020. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/animal_diseases/tick/downloads/longhorned-tick-sitrep.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2021.

  4. St. John HK, Masuoka P, Jiang J, Takhampunya R, Klein TA, Kim HC, et al. Geographic distribution and modeling of ticks in the Republic of Korea and the application of tick models towards understanding the distribution of associated pathogenic agents. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2021;12:101686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2021.101686.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Suzuki J, Hashino M, Matsumoto S, Takano A, Kawabata H, Takada N, et al. Detection of Fancisella tularensis and analysis of bacterial growth in ticks in Japan. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2016;63:240–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12616.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kang SW, Patnaik BB, Hwang HJ, Park SY, Chung JM, Song DK, et al. Transcriptome sequencing and de novo characterization of Korean endemic land snail, Koreanohadra kurodana for functional transcripts and SSR markers. Mol Genet Genomics. 2016;291:1999–2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-016-1233-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hong SH, Kim SY, Song BG, Roh JY, Cho CR, Kim CN, et al. Detection and characterization of an emerging type of Babesia sp. similar to Babesia motasi for the first case of human babesiosis and ticks in Korea. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2019;8:869–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2019.1622997.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim JY, Jung M, Kho JW, Song H, Moon KH, Kim YH, et al. Characterization of overwintering sites of Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) and tick infection rate with severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus from eight provinces in South Korea. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2020;11:101490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2020.101490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oh SS, Chae JB, Kang JG, Kim HC, Chong ST, Shin JH, et al. Detection of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus from wild animals and Ixodidae ticks in the Republic of Korea. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2016;16:408–14. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2015.1848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ejiri H, Lim CK, Isawa H, Yamaguchi Y, Fujita R, Takayama-Ito M, et al. Isolation and characterization of Kabuto Mountain virus, a new tick-borne phlebovirus from Haemaphysalis flava ticks in Japan. Virus Res. 2018;244:252–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2017.11.030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sato Y, Mekata H, Sudaryatma PE, Kirino Y, Yamamoto S, Ando S, et al. Isolation of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus from various tick species in area with human severe fever with thrombocytopenia cases. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2021;21:378–84. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2020.2720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim HC, Han SH, Chong ST, Klein TA, Choi CY, Nam HY, et al. Ticks collected from selected mammalian hosts surveyed in the Republic of Korea during 2008–2009. Korean J Parasitol. 2011;49:331–5. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2011.49.3.331.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim BJ, Kim H, Won S, Kim HC, Chong ST, Klein TA, et al. Ticks collected from wild and domestic animals and natural habitats in the Republic of Korea. Korea J Parasitol. 2014;52:281–5. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2014.52.3.281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng WY, Zhao GH, Jia YQ, Bian QQ, Du SZ, Fang YQ, et al. Characterization of Haemaphysalis flava (Acari: Ixodidae) from Qingling subspecies of Giant Panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca qinlingensis) in Qinling mountains (Central China) by morphology and molecular markers. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e69793. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069793.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Park SW, Song BG, Shin EH, Yun SM, Han MG, Park MY, et al. Prevalence of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus in Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks in South Korea. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014;5:975–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.07.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Choi SJ, Park SW, Bae IG, Kim SH, Ryu SY, Kim HA, et al. Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in South Korea, 2013–2015. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0005264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005264.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim-Jeon MD, Jegal S, Jun H, Jung H, Park SH, Ahn SK, et al. Four-year surveillance of the vector hard ticks for SFTS, Ganghwa-do, Republic of Korea Korean. J Parasitol. 2019;57:691–8. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2019.57.6.691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang JG, Cho YK, Jo YS, Han SW, Chae JB, et al. Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus in ticks in the Republic of Korea. Korean J Parasitol. 2022;60:65–71. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2022.60.1.65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim YJ, Seo JY, Kim SY, Lee HI. Molecular detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia species in ticks removed from humans in the Republic of Korea. Microorganisms. 2022;10:1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ko S, Kang JG, Kim SY, Kim HC, Klein TA, Chong ST, et al. Prevalence of tick-borne encephalitis virus in ticks from southern Korea. J Vet Sci. 2010;11:197–203. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2010.11.3.197.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. de la Fuente J, Antunes S, Bonnet S, Cabezas-Cruz A, Domingos AG, Estrada-Pena A, et al. Tick-pathogen interactions and vector competence: Identification of molecular drivers for tick-borne diseases. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Vedururu RK, Neave MJ, Sundaramoorthy V, Green D, Harper JA, Gorry PR, et al. Whole transcriptome analysis of Aedes albopictus mosquito head and thorax post-chikungunya virus infection. Pathogens. 2019;8:132. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8030132.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Yuan C, Wu J, Peng Y, Li Y, Shen S, Deng F, et al. Transcriptome analysis of the innate immune system of Hyalomma asiaticum. J Invertebr Pathol. 2020;177:107481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2020.107481.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schafer M, Pfaff F, Hoper D, Silaghi C. Early transcriptional changes in the midgut of Ornithodoros moubata after feeding and infection with Borrelia duttonii. Microorganisms. 2022;10:525. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10030525.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Guo J, Sun Y, Luo X, Li M, He P, He L, et al. De novo transcriptome sequencing and comparative analysis of Haemaphysalis flava Neumann, 1897 at larvae and nymph stages. Infect Genet Evol. 2019;75:104008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2019.104008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao Y, Qu ZH, Jiao FC. De novo transcriptome sequencing and comparative profiling of the ovary in partially engorged and fully engorged Haemaphysalis flava ticks. Parasitol Int. 2021;83:102344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2021.102344.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu XL, Cheng TY, Yang H, Yan F, Yang Y. De novo sequencing, assembly and analysis of salivary gland transcriptome of Haemaphysalis flava and identification of sialoprotein genes. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;32:135–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2015.03.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu XL, Cheng TY, Yang H, Liao ZH. De novo assembly and analysis of midgut transcriptome of Haemaphysalis flava and identification of genes involved in blood digestion, feeding and defending from pathogens. Infect Genet Evol. 2016;38:62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2015.12.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ellis JR, Burke JM. EST-SSRs as a resource for population genetic analysis. Heredity. 2007;99:125–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6801001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hamarsheh O, Amro A. Characterization of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) from Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae) expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:189. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-189.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Charrier NP, Couton M, Voordouw MJ, Rais O, Durand-Hermouet A, Hervet C, et al. Whole-body transcriptomes and new insights into the biology of the tick Ixodes ricinus. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:364. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2932-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Buschiazzo E, Gemmell NJ. The rise, fall and renaissance of microsatellites in eukaryotic genomes. BioEssays. 2006;28:1040–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.20470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Behura SK, Severson DW. Genome-wide comparative analysis of simple sequence coding repeats among 25 insect species. Gene. 2012;504:226–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2012.05.020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang XT, Zhang Y-J, Qiao L, Chen B. Comparative analyses of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in 23 mosquito species genomes: Identification, characterization and distribution (Diptera: Culicidae). Insect Sci. 2019;26:607–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12577.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yamaguti N, Tipton VJ, Keegan HL, Toshioka S. Ticks of Japan, Korea, and the Ryukyu Islands. Brigham Young Univ Sci Bull Biol Ser. 1971;15:1.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Joshi NA, Fass JN. Sickle: A sliding window, adaptive, quality-based trimming tool for FastQ files (Version 1.33) [Software]. 2011. https://github.com/najoshi/sickle. Accessed 15 Dec 2019

  37. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:644–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1883.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Haas BJ, Papanicolaou A, Yassour M, Grabherr M, Blood PD, Bowden J, et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat Protocols. 2013;8:1494–512. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.084.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pertea G, Huang X, Liang F, Antonescu V, Sultana R, Karamycheva S, et al. TIGR Gene Indices Clustering tools (TGICL): a software system for fast clustering of large EST datasets. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:651–2. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kang SW, Park SY, Hwang HJ, Chung JM, Sang MK, Min HR, et al. PANM-DB ver 3.0: an update of the bioinformatics database for annotation of large datasets from sequencing of species under Protostomia clade. Kor J Malacol. 2019;35:73–5. https://doi.org/10.9710/kjm.2019.35.1.73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV, et al. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinform. 2003;4:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-4-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. BioBam Bioinformatics Solutions. OmicsBox: Bioinformatics made easy. 2019. https://www.biobam.com/omicsbox. Accessed 22 Feb 2020.

  43. You FM, Huo N, Gu YQ, Luo MC, Ma Y, Hane D, et al. BatchPrimer3: a high throughput web application for PCR and sequencing primer design. BMC Bioinform. 2008;9:253. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Rogers MF, Ben-Hur A. The use of gene ontology evidence codes in preventing classifier assessment bias. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1173–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gilbert L. The impacts of climate change on ticks and tick-borne disease risk. Ann Rev Entomol. 2021;66:373–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-052720-094533.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Seo MG, Noh BE, Lee HS, Kim TK, Song BG, Lee HI. Nationwide temporal and geographical distribution of tick populations and phylogenetic analysis of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus in ticks in Korea, 2020. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1630. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081630.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Chung ST, Kim HC, Suh SJ, Klein TA, Robbins RG. Morphological abnormalities in ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) from the Republic of Korea. Systematic Appl Acariol. 2020;25. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.25.11.6.

  48. Patnaik BB, Hwang HJ, Kang SW, Park SY, Wang TH, Park EB, et al. Transcriptome characterization for non-model endangered Lycaenids Protantigius superans and Spindasis takanosis, using Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:29948–70. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms161226213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Patnaik BB, Wang TH, Kang SW, Hwang HJ, Park SY, Park EB, et al. Sequencing, de novo assembly, and annotation of the transcriptome of the endangered freshwater pearl bivalve, Cristaria plicata, provides novel insights into functional genes and marker discovery. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0148622. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148622.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Patnaik BB, Park SY, Kang SW, Hwang HJ, Wang TH, Park EB, et al. Transcriptome profile of the Asian giant hornet (Vespa mandarinia) using Illumina HiSeq 4000 sequencing: de novo assembly, functional annotation, and discovery of SSR markers. Int J Genomics. 2016;2016:e4169587. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4169587.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Hwang HJ, Patnaik BB, Chung JM, Sang MK, Park JE, Kang SW, et al. De novo transcriptome sequencing of Triton shell Charonia lampas sauliae: identification of genes related to neurotoxins and discovery of genetic markers. Mar Genomics. 2021;59:100862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margen.2021.100862.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Yu Z, He B, Gong Z, Liu Y, Wang Q, Yan X, et al. The new Haemaphysalis longicornis genome provides insights into its requisite biological traits. Genomics. 2022;114:110317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110317.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Vayssier-Taussat M, Moutailler S, Michelet L, Devillers E, Bonnet S, Cheval J, et al. Next generation sequencing uncovers unexpected bacterial pathogens in ticks in western Europe. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e81439. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081439.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Narasimhan S, Rajeevan N, Liu L, Zhao YO, Heisig J, Pan J, et al. Gut microbiota of the tick vector Ixodes scapularis modulate colonization of the Lyme disease spirochete. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15:58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2013.12.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Kurokawa C, Lynn GE, Pedra JHF, Pal U, Narasimhan S, Fikrig E. Interactions between Borrelia burgdorferi and ticks. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18:587–600. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-0400-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Smith AA, Pal U. Immunity-related genes in Ixodes scapularis-perspectives from genome information. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2014.00116.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Mulenga A, Khumthong R, Chalaire KC. Ixodes scapularis tick serine proteinase inhibitor (serpin) gene family; annotation and transcriptional analysis. BMC Genom. 2009;10:217. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Chmelar J, Oliveira CJ, Rezacova P, Francischetti IMB, Kovarova Z, Pejler G, et al. A tick salivary protein targets cathepsin G and chymase and inhibits host inflammation and platelet aggregation. Blood. 2011;117:736–44. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-06-293241.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Mulenga A, Erikson K. A snapshot of the Ixodes scapularis degradome. Gene. 2011;482:78–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2011.04.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Xu Z, Yan Y, Cao J, Zhou Y, Zhang H, Xu Q, et al. A family of serine protease inhibitors (serpins) and its expression profiles in the ovaries of Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides. Infect Genet Evol. 2020;84:104346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104346.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Liu L, Cheng TY, He XM. Proteomic profiling of the midgut contents of Haemaphysalis flava. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2018;9:490–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.01.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ali A, Khan S, Ali I, Karim S, da Silva Vaz I Jr, Termignoni C. Probing the functional role of tick metalloproteases. Physiol Entomol. 2015;40:177–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/phen.12104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Tirloni L, Reck J, Terra RMS, Martins JR, Mulenga A, Sherman NE, et al. Proteomic analysis of cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus saliva: a comparison between partially and fully engorged females. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e94831. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094831.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Fogaca AC, Sousa G, Pavanelo DB, Esteves E, Martins LA, Urbanova V, et al. Tick immune system: what is known, the interconnections, the gaps, and the challenges. Front Immunol. 2021;12:628054. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.628054.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Liu L, Cheng R, Mao SQ, Duan DY, Feng LL, Cheng TY. Saliva proteome of partially- and fully-engorged adult female Haemaphysalis flava ticks. Vet Parasitol. 2023;318:109933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2023.109933.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Liu L, Yan F, Zhang L, Wu ZF, Duan DY, Cheng TY. Protein profiling of hemolymph in Haemaphysalis flava ticks. Parasit Vectors. 2022;15:179. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05287-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Tian Z, Liu G, Zhang L, Yin H, Wang H, Xie J, et al. Identification of the heat shock protein 70 (HLHsp70) in Haemaphysalis longicornis. Vet Parasitol. 2011;181:282–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.04.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Hussein NA, Shahein YE, El-Hakim AE, Abouelella AM, Guneidy RA, Hamed RR. Molecular cloning of Ra-sHSP1, a novel member of the HSP20 family from Rhipicephalus annulatus salivary glands. Int J Biol Macromol. 2014;67:7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.02.057.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Agwunobi DO, Wang T, Zhang M, Wang T, Jia Q, et al. Functional implication of heat shock protein 70/90 and tubulin in cold stress of Dermacentor silvarum. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14:542. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-05056-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Busby AT, Ayllon N, Kocan KM, Blouin EF, de la Fuente G, Galindo RC, et al. Expression of heat shock proteins and subolesin affects stress responses, Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection and questing behavior in the tick, Ixodes scapularis. Med Vet Entomol. 2012;2012:92–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.2011.00973.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Kozelkova T, Dolezel D, Grunclova L, Kucera M, Perner J, Kopacek P. Functional characterization of the insulin signaling pathway in the hard tick Ixodes ricinus. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2021;12:101694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2021.101694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Contreras M, de la Fuente J. Control of infestations by Ixodes ricinus tick larvae in rabbits vaccinated with aquaporin recombinant antigens. Vaccine. 2017;35:1323–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.01.052.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Ndekezi C, Nkamwesiga J, Ochwo S, Kimuda MP, Mwiine FN, Tweyongyere R, et al. Identification of Ixodid tick-specific aquaporin-1 potential anti-tick vaccine epitope: an in-silico analysis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:236. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00236.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Cheng R, Li D, Duan DY, Parry R, Cheng TY, Liu L. Egg protein profile and dynamics during embryogenesis in Haemaphysalis flava ticks. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2023;14:102180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2023.102180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Dudaniec RY, Storfer A, Spear SF, Richardson JS. New microsatellite markers for examining genetic variation in peripheral and core populations of the coastal giant salamander (Dicamptodon tenebrosus). PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e14333. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Wu Q, Zang F, Xie X, Ma Y, Zheng Y, Zang D. Full-length transcriptome sequencing analysis and development of EST-SSR markers for the endangered Populus wulianensis. Sci Rep. 2020;10:16249. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73289-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Zhang Y, Gao J, Zhang Y, Zou Y, Cao X. Transcriptome sequencing of the endangered species Elongate Loach (Leptobotia elongata) from the Yangtze River: De novo transcriptome assembly, annotation, identification and validation of EST-SSR markers. Front Mar Sci. 2021;8:616727. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.616727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by an Agreement of Cooperation between Korea Native Animal Resources Utilization Convergence Research Institute (KNAR), South Korea and Fakir Mohan University, Balasore, Odisha, India.

Funding

This research was funded by Government-wide R&D Fund project for infectious disease research (GFID), Republic of Korea (HG18C0028020019). We acknowledge the additional support from Korea Basic Science Institute (National research Facilities and Equipment Center) grant funded by the Ministry of Education (2022R1A6C101B794), the National Research Foundation (NRF-2021R1A6A1A03039503 (KNAR) / NRF-2017R1D1A3B06034971) and Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MKS, BBP, JEP, HJH, JYJ and LZ conducted the experiments. MKS, JEP, JYJ, YTK, HJS, HCC, CEH and EHS collected specimens and conducted data management. BBP, MKS, JEP, DKS, SYP and SWK contributed to data analysis, data interpretation and manuscript preparation. YHJ, YSH, BBP, HHP, SJC and YSL contributed to scholastic intellectual content and data review. YSH, HSP, SHP, CHK and YSL contributed to sequencing studies and data management. YSH and YSL conceived the study. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Seok Lee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Summary of the pre-processing steps of H. flava transcriptome. Table S2. The adaptation-related candidate transcripts screened from H. flava unigenes based on PANM database annotations. Table S3. Primer sequences to validate polymorphic SSRs in the assembled unigenes of H. flava.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sang, M.K., Patnaik, H.H., Park, J.E. et al. Transcriptome analysis of Haemaphysalis flava female using Illumina HiSeq 4000 sequencing: de novo assembly, functional annotation and discovery of SSR markers. Parasites Vectors 16, 367 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-05923-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-05923-w

Keywords