Skip to main content
Download PDF

The role of Rab27 in tick extracellular vesicle biogenesis and pathogen infection

Parasites & Vectors volume 17, Article number: 57 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis, transmits most vector-borne diseases in the US. It vectors seven pathogens of public health relevance, including the emerging human pathogen Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Nevertheless, it remains critically understudied compared to other arthropod vectors. Ixodes scapularis releases a variety of molecules that assist in the modulation of host responses. Recently, it was found that extracellular vesicles (EVs) carry several of these molecules and may impact microbial transmission to the mammalian host. EV biogenesis has been studied in mammalian systems and is relatively well understood, but the molecular players important for the formation and secretion of EVs in arthropods of public health relevance remain elusive. RabGTPases are among the major molecular players in mammalian EV biogenesis. They influence membrane identity and vesicle budding, uncoating, and motility.

Methods

Using BLAST, an in silico pathway for EV biogenesis in ticks was re-constructed. We identified Rab27 for further study. EVs were collected from ISE6 tick cells after knocking down rab27 to examine its role in tick EV biogenesis. Ixodes scapularis nymphs were injected with small interfering RNAs to knock down rab27 and then fed on naïve and A. phagocytophilum-infected mice to explore the importance of rab27 in tick feeding and bacterial acquisition.

Results

Our BLAST analysis identified several of the proteins involved in EV biogenesis in ticks, including Rab27. We show that silencing rab27 in I. scapularis impacts tick fitness. Additionally, ticks acquire less A. phagocytophilum after rab27 silencing. Experiments in the tick ISE6 cell line show that silencing of rab27 causes a distinct range profile of tick EVs, indicating that Rab27 is needed to regulate EV biogenesis.

Conclusions

Rab27 is needed for successful tick feeding and may be important for acquiring A. phagocytophilum during a blood meal. Additionally, silencing rab27 in tick cells results in a shift of extracellular vesicle size. Overall, we have observed that Rab27 plays a key role in tick EV biogenesis and the tripartite interactions among the vector, the mammalian host, and a microbe it encounters.

Graphical Abstract

Background

The most medically relevant arthropod vector in the US is Ixodes scapularis, the blacklegged or deer tick [1]. Ixodes scapularis is responsible for spreading seven known human pathogens, encompassing bacteria, viruses, and parasites. In 2019, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported over 50,000 cases of tick-borne illness including 34,000 cases of Lyme disease and over 5000 cases of human granulocytic anaplasmosis [2]. Current estimates have calculated that Lyme disease alone costs the US economy around $345 to $968 million per year [3]. Furthermore, the burden of vector-borne diseases on the healthcare system is expected to increase in the coming years [4,5,6,7].

Ticks are hematophagous or blood-feeding arthropods. When a tick takes a blood meal, it introduces its saliva into the wound along with any microbes it is carrying. Tick saliva has long been studied and is known to contain a variety of anesthetics, anti-coagulants, and anti-inflammatory compounds [8,9,10,11]. However, the mechanism of delivery of these compounds was unknown until recently. It was found that tick cells secrete extracellular vesicles (EVs) in their saliva [12]. Tick EVs have been shown in microbial transmission and to enable arthropod fitness [12,13,14]. Despite their role in arthropod fitness and disease, the molecular mechanisms and proteins involved in tick extracellular vesicle biogenesis remain poorly defined.

The bulk of EV biogenesis research has been completed in mammalian systems. In mammals, a variety of proteins participate in forming EVs including endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) proteins, tetraspanins, soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment receptor (SNAREs), and Rab-GTPases [15]. These proteins aid in the transition from early to late endosome and the invagination of the endosome, which creates intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) and the multivesicular endosome (MVE) [16,17,18]. The MVE is then trafficked to and fuses with the plasma membrane, releasing EVs into the extracellular space. Once EVs are released, they are known to function in cell-to-cell communication, by transporting a variety of molecules. Additional evidence shows that components of the EV biogenesis pathway can be manipulated by intracellular bacteria and are important for transmission of arthropod-borne pathogens in other systems [12, 13, 19,20,21]. The function of EVs has not been thoroughly explored in arthropod biology. Although it is known that ticks and tick cells secrete EVs, how EV biogenesis occurs in ticks remains elusive. Here, we indicate that silencing rab27 in I. scapularis impacts arthropod fitness and microbial infection.

Methods

Mice and ticks

C57BL/6 J mice were obtained from the University of Maryland Veterinary Resources. All mice used were between 6 and 8 weeks of age. Ixodes scapularis nymphs were supplied by the Oklahoma State University and the University of Minnesota breeding colonies. Ticks were housed upon arrival at 23 °C with 85% relative humidity and a 14/10-h light/dark photoperiod cycle. All mouse experiments were performed according to the protocols approved by the Institutional Biosafety (IBC-00002247) and Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC-01121014) at the University of Maryland School of Medicine and complied with National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines (Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare [OLAW] assurance number A3200-01).

Tick cell culture

The I. scapularis ISE6 cell line was cultured in L15C300 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, 24 MilliporeSigma), 10% tryptose phosphate broth (BD), and 0.1% bovine lipoprotein concentrate (MP Biomedicals) at 34 °C [22]. Tick cells were grown to confluence and sub-cultured in capped T25 flasks (Greiner bio-one). All cell cultures were verified by PCR to be Mycoplasma-free (Southern Biotech).

Anaplasma phagocytophilum culture

Anaplasma phagocytophilum strain HZ was cultured in vented T25 flasks (CytoOne) containing HL-60 cells. HL-60 cells were cultured in 20 ml RPMI medium, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1 × Glutamax. Anaplasma phagocytophilum-infected cells (500 μl) were added to 5 ml of uninfected cells at 1 to 5 × 106 cells/ml diluted in 24.5 ml of media. Infection percentage was monitored by the Richard-Allan Scientific™ three-step staining (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Infected cells were spun onto microscope slides with a Cytospin (Thermo Scientific). Cells were visualized by light microscopy with an Axioskop microscope (Zeiss). Bacteria were either used for experiments or sub-cultured once cultures had reached > 90% infection. Bacterial numbers were estimated using the number of infected HL-60 cells × 5 morulae/cell × 19 bacteria/cell.

Bioinformatics

Tick homologs of protein sequences involved in EV biogenesis in humans, mice, and Drosophila melanogaster were identified and compared using the NIH Basic Local Alignment Search Tool for proteins (BLASTp). Proteins with Expect (E) values < 1 × 10–5 and > 80% query coverage were selected. The homologs identified were used to construct a putative EV biogenesis pathway for ticks.

RNA interference

Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and scramble RNAs (scRNAs) were designed based on the sequence of tick rab27 that was identified during the construction of the in silico EV biogenesis pathway in ticks. siRNAs were designed using BLOCK-iT RNAi designer (https://rnaidesigner.thermofisher.com/rnaiexpress/), and scRNA was designed using InvivoGen siRNA Wizard Software (https://www.invivogen.com/sirnawizard/scrambled.php). Both siRNAs and scRNAs were blasted against the I. scapularis genome to confirm specificity and avoid off target effects. All siRNA primers can be found in Additional file 1: Table S1.

For in vitro experiments, si-rab27 and sc-rab27 were synthesized by MilliporeSigma with dTdT overhangs. ISE6 cells were plated at 5 × 105 cells per well (24 well plate) or 1 × 106 cells per well (6 well plate). siRNAs (1 μg per ml) were nucleofected into ISE6 cells using the 4D-Nucleofector System (Lonza Bioscience). Tick cells were centrifuged at 100 × g for 10 min to pellet the cells. The pellet was washed with 10 ml dPBS, resuspended in SF buffer (Lonza Bioscience), and si-rab27 or sc-rab27 was added to the suspension. The nucleofection mix was added to a multiwell cuvette, inserted into the nucleofector, and pulsed using pulse condition EN150. The cells were then rested in the cuvette for 10 min post-nucleofection before being added to pre-warmed L15C300 complete media and seeded for experiments.

For in vivo experiments, si-rab27 and sc-rab27 were synthesized using the Silencer siRNA construction kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the primers in Additional file 1: Table S1. Ixodes scapularis nymphs were microinjected with 20–40 ng of si-rab27 or sc-rab27 RNA in a 50 nl volume. Nymphs were rehoused and returned to the incubator and rested for 24 h before placement on mice.

EV-depleted medium

L15C300 medium was supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (MilliporeSigma), 5% tryptose phosphate broth (BD), and 0.1% lipoprotein concentrate (MP Biomedicals). Medium was cleared from EVs by ultracentrifugation at 100,000 × g for 18 h at 4 °C in a LE-80 ultracentrifuge (Beckman Coulter) with a 60Ti rotor [ 13]. The absence of EVs was confirmed by determining the particle size distribution with a NanoSight NS300 (Malvern Panalytical) for nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). If EVs were present, the medium was subjected to a second ultracentrifugation at 100,000 ×g for 18 h at 4 °C. EV-free medium was sterilized by passing the content through a 0.22-μm Millipore Express® PLUS (MilliporeSigma).

EV collection

ISE6 cells were nucleofected with si-rab27 or sc-rab27 as described above. After 72 h, the L15C300 medium was replaced with EV-depleted L15C300 medium. EV collection was carried out as described previously [13]. Briefly, the EV-depleted medium was collected from cell cultures and cleared of any live cells by centrifugation at 300 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. Live cell pellets were resuspended in 1 ml Trizol and saved for RNA extraction and qPCR. Dead cells were removed by a second centrifugation at 2000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected, and apoptotic bodies were removed by a third centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 30 min at 10 °C. To reduce the number of EVs > 200 nm in size, the supernatant was filtered through a 0.22-μm Millipore syringe filter (Millipore-Sigma). EVs were pelleted by ultracentrifugation (100,000 × g) for 18 h at 4 °C. Supernatant was discarded, and EVs were resuspended in 1:500 in 1 × PBS for NTA analysis.

EV quantification

EV concentration and sizes were determined using a NanoSight NS300 (Malvern Panalytical) with NTA software version 3.0. The mean of the size generated in the NTA reports was used to calculate the average size of the EVs in each sample. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Version 10.0.3 from Prism.

Quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)

The PureLink RNA Mini kit (Invitrogen) was used to extract RNA from cells or ticks in Trizol. cDNA was synthesized with the Verso cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). qRT-PCR was performed with the CFX96 Touch Real Time PCR Detection System (Biorad). For bacterial acquisition experiments, A. phagocytophilum 16S rRNA gene expression was measured by absolute quantification and normalized to I. scapularis actin. Copy numbers for A. phagocytophilum and I. scapularis were calculated from a standard curve. Tick rab27 gene expression was measured by relative quantification and normalized to I. scapularis actin. The fold changes in gene expression were calculated using the 2 − ΔΔC T method. Non-template controls were included to confirm the absence of primer-dimers and contamination. Gene expression was measured using iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Amplifications were done using the following conditions: an initial denaturation cycle at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation for 15 s at 95 °C, amplification at three different annealing temperatures (rab27: 58 °C; Actin: 57 °C; A. phagocytophilum 16S: 54 °C) for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s. Primers were used at a final concentration of 400 nM each, and 2 μl of cDNA was used as template. The specificity of the products was determined by single peaks in the melting curves, and each control and sample was run in duplicate. Primers were designed using the PrimerQuest Tool (IDT). All primers used in this study can be found in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Tick fitness experiments

Ixodes scapularis nymphs were microinjected with 20–40 ng of si-rab27 or sc-rab27 in a 50 nl volume. Nymphs were rested for 24 h. After 24 h, the silenced or scrambled nymphs were placed on separate C57BL/6 J mice for 20 min and allowed to feed for 3 days. Ticks were removed from mice with forceps (partially engorged). Fully engorged ticks were not considered in these experiments. The weight of the ticks was measured using a Pioneer™ analytical balance (OHAUS), and engorgement was evaluated. Ticks labeled as having a weight of zero were below the scale’s limit of detection of 1 mg. Ticks were stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction.

Anaplasma phagocytophilum acquisition experiments

One week prior to nymph placement, 6–8-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice were intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected with HL-60 cells containing A. phagocytophilum (1 × 107 bacteria/injection) resuspended in 100 μl 1× PBS. At 6 days post infection (d.p.i.), I. scapularis nymphs were microinjected with 20–40 ng of si-rab27 or sc-rab27. Nymphs were rested for 24 h. At 7 d.p.i., the silenced or scrambled nymphs were placed on C57BL/6 J for 20 min and allowed to feed for 3 days. Ticks were removed from mice with forceps, and fallen ticks were recovered from a water trap. Tick attachment was calculated based on contingency using Fisher’s exact test. The weight of the ticks was measured using a Pioneer™ analytical balance (OHAUS), and tick engorgement was evaluated. Ticks were stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction.

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance of rab27 silencing, vesicle concentration, and weight were assessed with an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction. Tick attachment was calculated based on contingency using a Fisher’s exact test. We used GraphPad PRISM® (GraphPad Software version 10.0.3) for all statistical analyses. Outliers were detected by a Graphpad Quickcalcs program (https://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/Grubbs1.cfm).

Results

Building an in silico extracellular biogenesis pathway in I. scapularis

Using BLAST, we found several groups of proteins associated with human EV biogenesis including Rab-GTPases, SNARE, ESCRT-dependent and -independent pathway, and tetraspanin proteins (Fig. 1, Additional file 1: Table S2). Prior research in I. scapularis involved Vamp33, a SNARE protein important for exosome release [13], which is located at the terminus of EV biogenesis. Thus, we became interested in proteins upstream of Vamp33. Among the Rab-GTPases identified, we found only one sequence with identity to both mammalian rab27a and rab27b in the I. scapularis genome (Fig. 1, Additional file 1: Table S2). Given this observation, we chose to examine the tick rab27 gene.

Fig. 1
figure 1

In silico analysis of EV biogenesis in the Ixodes scapularis genome. Sequences from proteins involved in mammalian EV biogenesis were input into the NCBI Basic Local Alignment Search Tool for proteins (BLASTp) against the I. scapularis genome and arranged based on mammalian literature to construct an in silico pathway in ticks. Accession numbers are listed in parentheses. Rab27 is highlighted

Full size image

Importance of Rab27 for EV biogenesis in I. scapularis

We opted to investigate the function of Rab27 during the formation of EVs in the tick. Thus, we nucleofected tick ISE6 cells with tick Rab27 siRNA or scrambled RNA (scRNA) (Fig. 2A). We then measured their size and concentration with Nano-particle tracking analysis (NTA) and observed that the total release of vesicles in tick cells did not change between silenced and scrambled treatments (Fig. 2B). However, the size range of the rab27 silenced vesicles shifted to larger vesicles compared to the scrambled treatment (Fig. 2C). The sc-rab27-treated tick cells mostly produced vesicles between 0 and 300 nm. Conversely, si-rab27-treated tick cells produced vesicles up to ≤ 600 nm. Collectively, the shift in size indicated that Rab27 is involved in tick EV biogenesis.

Fig. 2
figure 2

rab27 silencing shifts the size of EVs being released by tick cells. A Experimental schematic for vesicle collection from tick cells. Tick ISE6 cells were nucleofected with small interfering (si-rab27) (green) or scrambled (sc-rab27) (gray) RNA for tick rab27. After 72 h, the cell culture media was replaced with vesicle free (VF) media. 24-h later, vesicles were collected through a series of tabletop and ultracentrifuge steps and measured using a nanosight machine. Graphs are representative of one two independent experiments. B Total vesicle amount released by tick cells does not change between the si-rab27 or sc-rab27 treatments. Statistical significance was evaluated by an unpaired, two-tailed t-test. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) is plotted. ns = not significant, P > 0.05. C Distribution of vesicles collected from sc-rab27 treated cells and compared to the si-rab27 treatment ranging from 0 to 600 nm

Full size image

Silencing Rab27 impacts I. scapularis feeding

Next, we wanted to determine the effect of rab27 silencing in vivo. We microinjected I. scapularis nymphs with either si-rab27 or sc-rab27 (Fig. 3A). After 24 h, ticks were placed on C57BL/6 mice for 3 days. Ticks that did not attach and fell from mice were recovered from the water trap and counted each day. On the 3rd day, we removed ticks that remained attached to the mouse, weighed them, and performed RNA extraction and then qPCR to confirm silencing. We observed significant silencing in the RNAi-treated ticks compared to the scrambled controls (Fig. 3B). Silencing rab27 did not affect tick attachment (Fig. 3C); however, ticks in both the control and treatment groups struggled to attach. The health of the ticks upon receipt or experience of the microinjector may influence attachment rate. Additionally, ticks freely roamed on the mouse. The mouse may disturb ticks during grooming or possibly eat them, leading to decreased attachment. Importantly, rab27 silenced ticks weighed less than their scrambled counterparts (Fig. 3D), indicating that Rab27 is important for I. scapularis hematophagy.

Fig. 3
figure 3

rab27 silencing affects the fitness of Ixodes scapularis nymphs during hematophagy. A Ixodes scapularis nymphs were microinjected with small interfering (si-rab27)(green) or scrambled (sc-rab27)(gray) RNA, incubated for 24 h, and then placed on uninfected mice. B rab27 expression relative to actin after silencing. The graph represents three independent experiments combined. si-rab27 (n = 16). sc-rab27 (n = 25). Mean ± standard deviation (SD) is plotted. Statistical significance was evaluated by an unpaired, two-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction. *P < 0.05. C rab27 silencing effect on tick attachment. The graph represents three independent experiments combined. A Fisher’s exact test was performed to determine statistical differences. ns = not significant, P > 0.05. D Tick weight after rab27 silencing. The graph represents three independent experiments combined. si-rab27 (n = 16). sc-rab27 (n = 25). Mean ± SD is plotted. Statistical significance was evaluated by an unpaired, two-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction. *P < 0.05. Ticks recorded as a weight of 0 mg were below the limit of detection of our scale (1 mg)

Full size image

rab27 silencing reduces acquisition of A. phagocytophilum by I. scapularis

Intracellular bacteria co-opts Rab GTPases to create a niche for their survival. Prior research has also shown that ISE6 cells infected with A. phagocytophilum produce an increased number of vesicles compared to uninfected cells [13]. Given that Rab27 is important for tick vesicle production and feeding and is involved in the life cycle of some intracellular bacteria, we explored how silencing of rab27 affected pathogen acquisition. C57BL/6 mice were intraperitoneally injected with 107 A. phagocytophilum 7 days before tick infestation (Fig. 4A). One day prior to tick placement, I. scapularis nymphs were microinjected with either si-rab27 or sc-rab27. After 24-h incubation, we placed the microinjected ticks on the infected mice and allowed them to feed for 3 days. Unattached ticks were recovered from the water trap daily. After 3 days, the attached ticks were removed, weighed, and used for RNA extraction and qPCR determination of silencing. qPCR analysis detected significant levels of silencing compared to the scrambled controls (Fig. 4B). However, unlike the ticks fed on uninfected mice, significantly fewer rab27 silenced ticks remained attached to the infected mice compared to the rab27 scrambled treatment (Fig. 4C). As in our experiments with ticks on naïve mice, tick attachment may be impacted by mouse grooming, tick health upon arrival, or the microinjector experience. Like our previous results, rab27 silencing led to decreased blood meal intake (Fig. 4D), which resulted in a significant reduction in A. phagocytophilum relative levels compared with the scrambled ticks (Fig. 4E). These results show that when I. scapularis feeds on an infected host, Rab27 is important for tick fitness, including attachment. It remains unclear whether the decrease observed in A. phagocytophilum burden was due to the diminished hematophagy in Rab27-silenced ticks or a direct effect on pathogen establishment.

Fig. 4
figure 4

rab27 silencing impacts Anaplasma phagocytophilum acquisition during blood feeding of Ixodes scapularis nymphs. A C57BL/6 mice were intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected with 107 A. phagocytophilum (Ap) 7 days prior to tick placement. Ticks were microinjected with small interfering (si-rab27) (green) or scrambled (sc-rab27)(gray) RNA, incubated for 24 h, and then placed on infected mice. Ticks were recovered daily from a water trap. Remaining ticks attached to the mouse at day 3 were removed by forceps. B rab27 silencing in I. scapularis ticks placed on Ap infected mice. The graph represents three independent experiments combined. si-rab27 (n = 9). sc-rab27 (n = 35). Mean ± standard deviation (SD) is plotted. Statistical significance was evaluated by an unpaired, two-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction. ***P < 0.0005. C Impact of rab27 silencing on tick attachment. The graph represents three independent experiments combined. Fisher’s exact test was performed to determine statistical differences. ****P < 0.0001. D Effect of rab27 silencing on tick weight. The graph represents three independent experiments combined. si-rab27 (n = 11). sc-rab27 (n = 37). Statistical significance was evaluated by an unpaired, two-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction. *P < 0.05. Ticks recorded as a weight of 0 mg were below the limit of detection of our scale (1 mg). E Impact of rab27 silencing on Ap acquisition. The graph represents three independent experiments combined. si-rab27 (n = 10). sc-rab27 (n = 32). Mean ± SD is plotted. Statistical significance was evaluated by an unpaired, two-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction. ****P < 0.0001

Full size image

Discussion

Ticks are responsible for most vector-borne diseases in the US. Due to their multiple life stages, feeding requirements, and limited genetic tools, uncovering their cellular biology has been challenging. After silencing rab27 in ISE6 cells, we observed a shift in vesicle size showing that a protein known to be involved in EV biogenesis in mammals is important for I. scapularis EV biogenesis and fitness. Mammals have two isoforms of Rab27, whereas I. scapularis ticks only have one present in their genome. In mammals, Rab27a and Rab27b have roles in separate stages of EV biogenesis [18]. Rab27a orchestrates the movement of the MVE to the plasma membrane of the cell. Rab27b is important for the docking of the MVE to the plasma membrane prior to exosome release [18]. Despite the change in vesicle size, it remains unclear whether the tick Rab27 protein functions in a similar manner to its roles identified in mammals. It is also conceivable that the tick Rab27 protein may function distinctly from what has been described in mammalian literature. Further research will need to be completed to determine tick Rab27’s specific role in EV biogenesis.

We observed that Rab27 is important for proper tick feeding and acquisition of A. phagocytophilum. Because silencing rab27 results in an alteration of vesicle size, it is plausible that the vesicles do not perform their function during tick feeding correctly, resulting in reduced fitness. This is possibly due to altered surface proteins, improper trafficking, or disrupted formation. Alternatively, the cargo in the vesicle after rab27 silencing may have changed, impacting vesicle function and tick fitness. Incorrect cargo may not influence the tick-host interface as it should or not interact at all, resulting in impaired feeding. We have not distinguished whether the reduced acquisition of A. phagocytophilum was due to the impediment of tick feeding after rab27 silencing or, alternatively, if Rab27 is needed for the life cycle of A. phagocytophilum in ticks. Previous work has shown that the tick-borne pathogens A. phagocytophilum, Anaplasma marginale, and Ehrlichia chaffeensis are associated with several Rab GTPases [23,24,25,26,27]. Additionally, E. chaffeensis utilize Rabs during infection by recruiting them to the occupied vacuole and delaying endosome maturation [27, 28]. Furthermore, recent findings show that Rab27 is important for the egress of A. phagocytophilum from mammalian cells [29]. Whether this manipulation occurs in ticks remains elusive.

We observed that tick attachment was not affected when silencing rab27 and feeding on uninfected mice. However, when rab27 silenced ticks were fed on A. phagocytophilum-infected mice, silenced ticks attached significantly less than scrambled treated ticks. Prior research from our laboratory showed that when tick cells were infected with A. phagocytophilum, they secreted increased EVs compared to uninfected or Borrelia burgdorferi-treated cells [13]. Since silencing rab27 disrupts EV biogenesis and A. phagocytophilum causes an increase of EV production, the effects of rab27 silencing may become more pronounced when feeding ticks on infected mice, thus resulting in an attachment difference. Although given that tick attachment can be influenced by multiple factors, we are reticent to draw a firm conclusion from the attachment data without further experimentation. Moreover, I. scapularis salivary vesicle content has been examined in naïve ticks but not under infection conditions [13]. Given A. phagocytophilum infection increases EV secretion in tick cells, we anticipate that infection alters vesicle number, size, cargo, and post-translation protein modifications, but further study is required [13]. The molecular interactions between Rab27 and A. phagocytophilum are not defined in the tick I. scapularis. Future research could uncover an important relationship between tick EV biogenesis proteins and tick-borne diseases.

With recent advancements in the technology available to the vector-borne disease community, such as Clustered Regularly Interspaced Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) in ticks [30], and ectopic expression in tick cells [31], future work can aim to unravel Rab27’s exact mechanism of action as well as its interaction with important tick-borne pathogens, such as A. phagocytophilum [32]. Furthermore, it is unclear whether Rab27 is important for tick fitness in other species. Research regarding vesicle formation in ticks and their importance for acquisition or transmission of tick-borne disease could reveal future targets to mitigate the spread of illnesses unraveling a previous unexplored aspect of vector biology. Overall, we have shown that Rab27 is important for tick EV biogenesis and fitness in I. scapularis. We shed light on a previously unstudied aspect of tick biology.

Conclusions

Disrupting rab27 impairs tick feeding and A. phagocytophilum acquisition during a blood meal. Additionally, silencing rab27 in tick cells results in a shift of extracellular vesicle size. Rab27 appears to play a role in tick EV biogenesis. Future research and technological advancements will allow for further study into tick biology, the specific role of Rab27, and its importance for tick-borne disease transmission.

Availability of data and materials

All datasets have been included with this article.

Abbreviations

EV:

Extracellular vesicle

ESCRT:

Endosomal sorting complex required for transport

SNARE:

Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment receptor

ILVs:

Intraluminal vesicles

MVE:

Multivesicular endosome

BLASTp:

Basic Local Alignment Search Tool for proteins

NTA:

Nanoparticle tracking analysis

siRNA:

Small interfering RNA

scRNA:

Scrambled RNA

i.p.:

Intraperitoneally

d.p.i.:

Days post infection

References

  1. Eisen RJ, Eisen L. The blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis: an increasing public health concern. Trends Parasitol. 2018;34:295–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2017.12.006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. CDC. Tickborne Disease Surveillance Data Summary. https://www.cdc.gov/ticks/data-summary/index.html. Accessed 1 July 2023.

  3. Hook SA, Jeon S, Niesobecki SA, Hansen AP, Meek JI, Bjork JKH, et al. Economic burden of reported Lyme disease in high-incidence areas, United States, 2014–2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28:1170–9. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2806.211335.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Boulanger N, Boyer P, Talagrand-Reboul E, Hansmann Y. Ticks and tick-borne diseases. Med Mal Infect. 2019;49:87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmal.2019.01.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johansson M, Mysterud A, Flykt A. Livestock owners’ worry and fear of tick-borne diseases. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:331. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04162-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson N, Migné CV, Gonzalez G. Tick-borne encephalitis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2023;36:198–202. https://doi.org/10.1097/qco.0000000000000924.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beard CB, Eisen RJ, Barker C, Garofalo J, Hahn M, Hayden M, et al. Ch. 5: vectorborne diseases. Washington, DC: US Global Change Research Program; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kotál J, Langhansová H, Lieskovská J, Andersen JF, Francischetti IM, Chavakis T, et al. Modulation of host immunity by tick saliva. J Proteomics. 2015;128:58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2015.07.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Nuttall PA. Tick saliva and its role in pathogen transmission. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift. 2023;135:165–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-019-1500-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Šimo L, Kazimirova M, Richardson J, Bonnet SI. The essential role of tick salivary glands and saliva in tick feeding and pathogen transmission. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:281. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00281.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wikel S. Ticks and tick-borne pathogens at the cutaneous interface: host defenses, tick countermeasures, and a suitable environment for pathogen establishment. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:337. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00337.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou W, Woodson M, Neupane B, Bai F, Sherman MB, Choi KH, et al. Exosomes serve as novel modes of tick-borne flavivirus transmission from arthropod to human cells and facilitates dissemination of viral RNA and proteins to the vertebrate neuronal cells. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1006764. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006764.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Oliva Chávez AS, Wang X, Marnin L, Archer NK, Hammond HL, Carroll EEM, et al. Tick extracellular vesicles enable arthropod feeding and promote distinct outcomes of bacterial infection. Nat Commun. 2021;12:3696. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23900-8.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou W, Tahir F, Wang JC, Woodson M, Sherman MB, Karim S, et al. Discovery of exosomes from tick saliva and salivary glands reveals therapeutic roles for CXCL12 and IL-8 in wound healing at the tick-human skin interface. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00554.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. van Niel G, D’Angelo G, Raposo G. Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;19:213–28. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2017.125.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hyenne V, Labouesse M, Goetz JG. The small GTPase Ral orchestrates MVB biogenesis and exosome secretion. Small GTPases. 2018;9:445–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/21541248.2016.1251378.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Colombo M, Raposo G, Théry C. Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2014;30:255–89. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101512-122326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ostrowski M, Carmo NB, Krumeich S, Fanget I, Raposo G, Savina A, et al. Rab27a and Rab27b control different steps of the exosome secretion pathway. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:19–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gold AS, Feitosa-Suntheimer F, Araujo RV, Hekman RM, Asad S, Londono-Renteria B, et al. Dengue virus infection of Aedes aegypti alters extracellular vesicle protein cargo to enhance virus transmission. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21186609.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Dikshit N, Bist P, Fenlon SN, Pulloor NK, Chua CE, Scidmore MA, et al. Intracellular uropathogenic E. coli exploits host Rab35 for iron acquisition and survival within urinary bladder cells. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1005083. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005083.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Spanò S, Galán JE. Taking control: Hijacking of Rab GTPases by intracellular bacterial pathogens. Small GTPases. 2018;9:182–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/21541248.2017.1336192.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Munderloh UG, Liu Y, Wang M, Chen C, Kurtti TJ. Establishment, maintenance and description of cell lines from the tick Ixodes scapularis. J Parasitol. 1994;80:533–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang B, Hubber A, McDonough JA, Roy CR, Scidmore MA, Carlyon JA. The Anaplasma phagocytophilum-occupied vacuole selectively recruits Rab-GTPases that are predominantly associated with recycling endosomes. Cell Microbiol. 2010;12:1292–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01468.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Truchan HK, Cockburn CL, Hebert KS, Magunda F, Noh SM, Carlyon JA. The pathogen-occupied vacuoles of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Anaplasma marginale interact with the endoplasmic reticulum. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016;6:22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2016.00022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Truchan HK, VieBrock L, Cockburn CL, Ojogun N, Griffin BP, Wijesinghe DS, et al. Anaplasma phagocytophilum Rab10-dependent parasitism of the trans-Golgi network is critical for completion of the infection cycle. Cell Microbiol. 2016;18:260–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/cmi.12500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Magunda F, Thompson CW, Schneider DA, Noh SM. Anaplasma marginale actively modulates vacuolar maturation during intracellular infection of its tick vector, Dermacentor andersoni. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:4715–31. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01030-16.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Yan Q, Lin M, Huang W, Teymournejad O, Johnson JM, Hays FA, et al. Ehrlichia type IV secretion system effector Etf-2 binds to active RAB5 and delays endosome maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:E8977–86. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806904115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Rikihisa Y. Subversion of RAB5-regulated autophagy by the intracellular pathogen Ehrlichia chaffeensis. Small GTPases. 2019;10:343–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/21541248.2017.1332506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Read CB, Lind MCH, Chiarelli TJ, Izac JR, Adcox HE, Marconi RT, et al. The obligate intracellular bacterial pathogen Anaplasma phagocytophilum exploits host cell multivesicular body biogenesis for proliferation and dissemination. mBio. 2022;13:e0296122. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02961-22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sharma A, Pham M, Reyes J, Chana R, Yim WC, Heu C, et al. Cas9-mediated gene editing in the black-legged tick, Ixodes scapularis, by embryo injection and ReMOT control. iScience. 2022;25:103781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.103781.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Singh N, Rolandelli A, O’Neal AJ, Butler LR, Samaddar S, Laukaitis-Yousey HJ, et al. Genetic manipulation of an Ixodes scapularis cell line. bioRxiv. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.08.556855.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Nuss A, Sharma A, Gulia-Nuss M. Genetic Manipulation of Ticks: a paradigm shift in tick and tick-borne diseases research. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:678037. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.678037.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Pedra laboratory for providing scientific guidance and advice. We also thank Ulrike G. Munderloh (University of Minnesota) for supplying the ISE6 cells line.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from NIH to LRB (F31AI167471), JHFP (R01AI134696, R01AI116523, R21AI165520 and P01AI138949), DKS (R01AI162819), and ASOC [United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)—National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch-MultiState Project #TEX0-1-7714]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the USDA, the NIH, the Department of Health and Human Services, or the US government.

Author information

Author notes

  1. L. Rainer Butler

    Present address: Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

  2. Anya J. O’Neal

    Present address: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA

    L. Rainer Butler, Nisha Singh, Liron Marnin, Luisa M. Valencia, Anya J. O’Neal, Francy E. Cabrera Paz & Joao H. F. Pedra

  2. Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA

    Dana K. Shaw

  3. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    Adela S. Oliva Chavez

Authors
  1. L. Rainer Butler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nisha Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liron Marnin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Luisa M. Valencia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anya J. O’Neal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Francy E. Cabrera Paz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dana K. Shaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Adela S. Oliva Chavez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Joao H. F. Pedra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

This project was developed by LRB and supervised by JHFP. LRB performed the research and wrote the paper with contributions from NS, LM, LMV, AJO, FECP, DKS, ASOC, and JHFP.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joao H. F. Pedra.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All mouse experiments were performed according to the protocols approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC no. 01121014) at the University of Maryland School of Medicine and complied with NIH guidelines (Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare [OLAW] assurance number A3200-01).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

The primers used in this study. Table S2. Alignment of protein sequences related to EV biogenesis. Table S3. Reagents used in this study.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Butler, L.R., Singh, N., Marnin, L. et al. The role of Rab27 in tick extracellular vesicle biogenesis and pathogen infection. Parasites Vectors 17, 57 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06150-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06150-7

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us