Leishmania braziliensis replication protein A subunit 1: molecular modelling, protein expression and analysis of its affinity for both DNA and RNA
© Nocua et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014
Received: 17 April 2014
Accepted: 26 November 2014
Published: 12 December 2014
Replication factor A (RPA) is a single-strand DNA binding protein involved in DNA replication, recombination and repair processes. It is composed by the subunits RPA-1, RPA-2 and RPA-3; the major DNA-binding activity resides in the subunit 1 of the heterotrimeric RPA complex. In yeast and higher eukaryotes, besides the three basic structural DNA-binding domains, the RPA-1 subunit contains an N-terminal region involved in protein-protein interactions with a fourth DNA-binding domain. Remarkably, the N-terminal extension is absent in the RPA-1 of the pathogenic protozoan Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis; however, the protein maintains its ability to bind ssDNA. In a recent work, we identify Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis RPA-1 by its specific binding to the untranslated regions of the HSP70 mRNAs, suggesting that this protein might be also an RNA-binding protein.
Both rLbRPA-1 purified by His-tag affinity chromatography as well as the in vitro transcribed L. braziliensis 3′ HSP70-II UTR were used to perform pull down assays to asses nucleic acid binding properties. Also, homology modeling was carried out to construct the LbRPA-1 tridimensional structure to search relevant amino acid residues to bind nucleic acids.
In this work, after obtaining the recombinant L. braziliensis RPA-1 protein under native conditions, competitive and non-competitive pull-down assays confirmed the single-stranded DNA binding activity of this protein and demonstrated its interaction with the 3′ UTR from the HSP70-II mRNA. As expected, this protein exhibits a high affinity for ssDNA, but we have found that RPA-1 interacts also with RNA. Additionally, we carried out a structural analysis of L. braziliensis RPA-1 protein using the X-ray diffraction structure of Ustilago maydis homologous protein as a template. Our results indicate that, in spite of the evolutionary divergence between both organisms, the structure of these two RPA-1 proteins seems to be highly conserved.
The LbRPA-1 protein is a ssDNA binding protein, but also it shows affinity in vitro for the HSP70 mRNA; this finding supports a possible in vivo role in the HSP70 mRNA metabolism. On the other hand, the three dimensional model of Leishmania RPA-1 serves as a starting point for both functional analysis and its exploration as a chemotherapeutic target to combat leishmaniasis.
KeywordsReplication protein A (RPA) RPA subunit 1 Single-stranded DNA binding protein RNA binding protein Leishmania braziliensis
The leishmaniasis, caused by protozoan parasites belonging to the genus Leishmania, affects the population of 98 countries on the 5 continents, being 350 million people at risk of infection, 12 million are currently infected and each year 2 million new cases occur . In the Americas, Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis is the major agent of mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (LMC) and one of the six causative species of cutaneous leishmaniasis (LC) . As there are no vaccines against any type of leishmaniasis and the treatment options are limited, efforts for developing effective vaccines and drugs should be done urgently.
Replication protein A (RPA) is the main eukaryote single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding protein, being essential for DNA replication, recombination and repair processes . It has also been involved in cell cycle and DNA damage checkpoint activation ,. In mammals, this protein, composed by the subunits RPA-1 (70 kDa), RPA-2 (32–34 kDa) and RPA-3 (14 kDa), plays two functional roles. On the one hand, the protein maintains ssDNA in an extended structure and protects solvent-exposed DNA bases from undesired chemical modifications. On the other hand, RPA interacts with several proteins in order to orchestrate different cellular processes regarding DNA maintenance .
The RPA heterotrimer consists of six ssDNA binding domains (DBD), also known as OB (oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding) fold, each one consisting of five β-strands arranged in a β-barrel . The major DNA-binding activity is found in the subunit 1 of the RPA protein (RPA-1), which is also responsible for interaction with replication and repair proteins. It exhibits a modular structure having four out of the six RPA DBDs existing in the heterotrimeric RPA. These domains, arranged in tandem, are denoted as DBD-F, DBD-A, DBD-B, and DBD-C ,. The N-terminal region (RPA1N), besides bearing the DBD-F domain, is involved in interactions with other DNA metabolism proteins ,. Indeed, the initiation of the DNA damage response by RPA is mediated by the RPA-1 subunit through protein-protein interactions involving its N-terminal domain .
A homologue of RPA was biochemically purified from the trypanosomatid Crithidia fasciculata by Brown and co-workers . The purified complex was found to consist of three polypeptides of 51, 28, and 14 kDa that binds single-stranded DNA via the large subunit; the complex was localized within the nucleus. In a subsequent work, the genes encoding the 51-kilodalton subunit (p51) and the 28-kilodalton subunit (p28) of RPA were cloned and sequenced . The predicted p51 polypeptide has sequence similarity to the corresponding subunits from humans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but it is smaller, lacking of a segment of approximately 20 kDa in the N-terminal region. In Leishmania amazonensis, a species belonging to the subgenera Leishmania and associated with different clinical manifestations such as cutaneous (CL), mucocutaneous (MCL) and visceral (VL) leishmaniasis , the subunit 1 of replication protein A (RPA-1) was identified by its association with G-rich telomeric sequences . Of note, this protein also showed affinity for RNA oligonucleotides containing the cognate telomeric sequence . After sequencing of the gene and deducing of the encoded amino acid sequence, it was found that LaRPA-1, like the CfRPA-1 (see above), lacked the N-terminal RPA70N domain (present in human and yeast RPA-1), but shared with hRPA-1 and yRPA-1 a canonical N-terminal tRNA_anti domain, which is an OB (oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding) fold structure . More recently, these authors found evidence that the natural absence of RPA1N domain in LaRPA-1 does not impair its participation in DNA damage response and telomere protection .
In a recent work, we identified the L. braziliensis RPA-1 (LbRPA-1) protein based on its binding to the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTR) of the 70 kDa heat shock protein (HSP70) mRNAs . In order to further analyze the role played by LbRPA-1, as a first step, we conducted a structural analysis and its tertiary structure was modelled based on the X-ray diffraction structure of Ustilago maydis RPA-1 protein, which has been solved recently . In spite of the sequence divergence existing between both proteins, L. braziliensis RPA-1 protein conforms the typical DNA-binding domains of RPA proteins. Additionally, we expressed the LbRPA-1 protein in Escherichia coli and the purified recombinant protein was used to study its affinity for both DNA and RNA. As expected, the rLbRPA-1 binds ssDNA with high affinity, but remarkably it also binds RNA, suggesting a possible role for this protein in mRNA metabolism.
Parasite cultures and nucleic acid extraction
Promastigotes of L. braziliensis MHOM/BR/75/M2904 were cultured in vitro at 26°C in Schneider’s insect medium (Sigma Aldrich, Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 20% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Eurobio, Inc., Les Ulis, France), and 0.1 μg/mL of 6-biopterin (Sigma Aldrich, Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA). Total DNA from parasite cells was isolated using the phenol-chloroform-isoamilic alcohol method .
Cloning and sequence analysis of the L. braziliensis RPA-1 gene
The L. braziliensis RPA-1 (LbRPA-1) coding region was amplified from genomic DNA by PCR using the primers RPA1F (5′-GGATCC ATCGTGATGCAGCAGCCG-3′) and RPA1R (5′-CTGCAG TCACACGTACGCCTCGATGAG-3′). These primers were designed from the LbrM.28.1990 entry existing in the L. braziliensis GeneDB database (http://genedb.org). These primers amplify a fragment of 1422 bp and contain the Bam HI and Pst I restriction sites (italics letters in the sequence), respectively. The PCR mix reaction (final volume of 20 μL) included: 1× reaction buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 9.0, 50 mM KCl, 0.1% Triton X-100), 2 mM MgCl2, 0.4 mM of dNTP mix, 0.5 μM of each primer, 0.06 units per μL of expand high fidelity enzyme (Roche, Inc., Mannheim, Germany) and 3.3 ng/μL of L. braziliensis total DNA. An MJ Research PTC-100 DNA thermocycler was used for the reaction with the following amplification profile: 95°C/3 min, 3 cycles at 92°C/30 s, 56°C/30 s, 72°C/1.5 min, followed by 36 cycles at 92°C/30 s, 64°C/30 s, 72°C/1.5 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min and 12°C as PCR stop temperature. The amplified fragment was resolved in agarose gels and visualized under UV exposure after ethidium bromide staining. PCR product was excised from gel, purified using a Zymoclean™ Gel DNA Recovery Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) and cloned into the pGEM-T Easy plasmid (Promega, Inc., Fitchburg, WI, USA). The plasmid insert of two clones, named RPA-1A and RPA-1B, was sequenced using the Big Dye Terminators v3.1 kit (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA, USA) by automatic sequencing at the Servicio de Genómica (Parque Científico de Madrid, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid). The sequence of both clones was identical to the entry LbrM.28.1990.
The homology analyses of amino acids sequences of RPA-1 was carried out using the T-Coffee tool (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/tcoffee/) . The domains and potential phosphorylation sites were identified by the InterProScan tool (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/pfa/iprscan/) , and the NetPhos server (http://cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetPhos/) , respectively.
Cloning and expression of the L. braziliensis RPA-1 gene
The LbRPA1 coding region was subcloned into the pQE30 expression plasmid (QIAGEN, Inc., Hilden, Germany), and thermo competent E. coli cells (M15 strain) were transformed with the corresponding plasmid. The cells were grown in 200 mL of LB medium supplemented with 75 μg/mL of ampicillin and 25 μg/mL of kanamycin overnight at 37°C. When the culture reached an A600 of 0.6, protein expression was induced with 1 mM isopropyl thio-β-galactopyranoside (IPTG); bacteria were incubated at 37°C for an additional 4 h. The cells were harvested (15 min, 4696 g at 4°C) and the pellet was suspended in 10 mL of lysis buffer (300 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaH2PO4, 0.5 mg/mL lysozyme, 10 μg/mL DNase I, 10 μg/mL RNase A and 1% Triton X-100, pH 8.0), incubated on ice for 30 min and then 1 mM PMSF was added. This mixture was centrifuged, and the pellet was suspended in 10 mL of Urea lysis buffer A (100 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Tris–HCl and 8 M Urea, pH 8.0), and disrupted by sonication on ice followed by centrifugation. The presence of the protein in the supernatant was confirmed by SDS-PAGE.
Protein purification was carried out through affinity chromatography using a Ni2+-NTA-Agarose resin (QIAGEN, Inc., Hilden, Germany), and following the method described by Lira and co-workers , with a few modifications. In brief, after binding to the nickel-column, the protein was refolded passing a urea gradient (from 6 M to 1 M) in a solution containing 50 μg/mL heparin, 300 mM NaCl, 100 mM NaH2PO4 and 20% glycerol. Subsequently the protein was eluted in different fractions with a buffer containing 50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 400 mM imidazole, 10 mM HEPES, 50 μg/ml heparin, 5% glycerol and 50 mM glycine, pH 7.5. The concentration of refolded protein was determined using the Micro BCA™ protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Finally, the purity of the protein was checked by SDS-PAGE.
Cloning and expression of the L. braziliensis α-tubulin gene
For cloning the α-tubulin ORF of L. braziliensis, two oligonucleotides were designed from the entry LbrM13_V2.0200: Lb-Tub-F, GGATCC ATGC GTGAGGCTAT CTGC (Bam HI site in italics letters); Lb-Tub-R, CTGCAG CTAG TACTCCTCGA CGTCCT (Pst I site in italics letters). PCR reaction was carried out as indicated above, using the following amplification program: 95°C for 5 min, 30 repeated cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 30 s at 58°C, and 2 min at 72°C. A final extension of 5 min at 72°C was included. The PCR product was digested with Bam HI and Pst I and cloned into the corresponding restriction sites of plasmid pQE30 (QIAGEN, Inc., Hilden, Germany). After checking the sequence correctness, the resulting clone was used for protein expression in E. coli M15 strain. Protein expression and purification was done following identical procedures to those used for the rLbRPA-1 protein (see above).
In vitro transcription and non-radioactive labeling of the L. braziliensis 3′ HSP70-II UTR
The L. braziliensis 3′ HSP70-II UTR region was PCR amplified as described previously using pTLb3H70-11B clone as a template . The T7 promoter sequence was included in the forward oligonucleotide in order to obtain a PCR product bearing at its 5′-end the recognition site for the T7 RNA polymerase. For in vitro transcription, the MEGAscript® T7 kit was used according to manufacturer’s instructions (Ambion, Inc., Austin, TX, USA). Subsequently, the transcription products were treated with RNase free-DNase and the RNAs purified by the TRIZOL reagent method (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to Ramirez and coworkers . The non-radioactive labeling was performed using a terminal transferase (Roche, Inc., Mannheim, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Binding and competition assays of the L. braziliensis RPA-1 recombinant protein to a digoxigenin-labelled oligodeoxyribonucleotide
The rLbRPA-1 protein (40 μg) was incubated with 0.8 mg of His-tag isolation & Pull down dynabeads (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) in 1× binding buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 50 μg/ml heparin, 0.01% tween 20 and 5% glycerol) at room temperature for 10 min on continuous stirring. Unbound protein was removed through three rinses with 500 μl of 1× binding buffer. Then, the rLbRPA-1 bound to the beads was incubated with 12.5 ng of Dig-Oligodeoxyribonucleotide (Dig-O, 5′ Dig-GGCGAGCAGC GTCGGCCACG CATCTCAACG CGAGCGTGCT 3′) and either double stranded DNA (dsDNA), single stranded DNA (ssDNA), yeast tRNA (Roche, Inc., Mannheim, Germany) or none. Plasmid pQE30 DNA (QIAGEN, Inc., Hilden, Germany) was linearized with Bam HI and used as dsDNA competitor; the ssDNA competitor was obtained after incubation at 95°C for 10 min of the Bam HI-linearized pQE30. After incubation of the mixtures overnight at room temperature in 1× pull-down buffer (3.25 mM NaH2PO4 pH 7.4, 70 mM NaCl, and 0.01% tween 20); the protein-nucleic acid complexes loaded in the beads were crosslinked by adding 1% formaldehyde, and afterwards the beads were washed three times with 1× pull down buffer. Finally, the protein-nucleic acid complexes were eluted in 20 μL of pull down elution buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 400 mM Imidazole, 10 mM HEPES, 50 μg/mL heparin and 10% glycerol) at 90°C for 5 min. The rLbRPA1-nucleic acid complexes obtained were analyzed by dot immunoblotting. Immunological detection of the complexes was performed using the DIG luminescent detection kit (Roche, Inc., Mannheim, Germany). For this purpose, 2 μL of the eluted samples were placed on a nylon membrane (Roche, Inc., Mannheim, Germany), fixed with UV (1200 μJ), washed with maleic washing buffer (0.1 M maleic acid, 0.15 M NaCl pH 7.5 and 0.3% tween 20), and blocked overnight on continuous stirring. Next, the membrane was incubated with anti-DIG-AP conjugate (1:20000 in blocking solution) at 37°C during 40 min on continuous stirring. After extensive washing with the maleic washing buffer, the membrane was incubated in the detection buffer (0.1 M Tris–HCl and 0.1 M NaCl pH 9.5); afterwards, the CSPD substrate solution was spread on membrane, which was incubated for 10 min at 37°C. Finally, an x-ray film (Agfa, Inc., Mortsel, Belgium) was exposed to the membrane for 30 min and then developed.
Pull down assays of the L. braziliensis RPA-1 recombinant protein and nucleic acids
The rLbRPA-1 protein was incubated with His-tag isolation & Pull down dynabeads (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) in binding 1× buffer at room temperature for 15 min on continuous stirring. Unbound protein was removed and the protein-coupled beads were blocked by adding 5 μg of recombinant L. braziliensis α-tubulin for 20 min. Then, the beads were incubated with single strand DNA or RNA for 20 min in pull-down 1× buffer; afterwards, the beads were washed three times with pull down buffer 0.5× and once with DEPC-treated distilled water. Finally, the protein-nucleic acid complexes were eluted in 10 μL of pull down elution buffer at 90°C for 5 min. The rLbRPA1-nucleic acid complexes obtained were analyzed by dot immunoblotting and the signals were detected as mentioned above.
Molecular modeling of the Leishmania RPA-1 proteins
The primary sequences were analyzed by PSI-BLAST (Position-Specific Iterated-Basic Local Alignment Search, http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PROGRAM=blastp&PAGE_TYPE=BlastSearch&LINK_LOC=blasthome) tool  against the Protein Data Bank (PDB, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/home/home.do)  in order to identify possible homologues proteins having tertiary structure resolved by experimental methods. The protein exhibiting the best BLAST/p e-value, alignment score and sequence coverage was used as template for building the 3D homology model of the L. braziliensis protein. The protein modeling was achieved using the Phyre2 server (http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/phyre2/html/page.cgi?id=index) . The predicted tertiary structures were compared with the predictions of secondary structures, and validated according to Ramachandran plot and other stereochemical parameters analyzed by the PROCHECK tool . This program assesses the stereochemical quality of a given protein structure by analyzing the geometry of the residues in a given protein structure in comparison with stereochemical parameters derived from well-refined, high-resolution structures. The PROCHECK tool is available at the Swiss Model web-server (http://swissmodel.expasy.org/) . Additionally, molecular modelling of the L. braziliensis RPA-1 sequence was obtained using the I-TASSER server, which has been developed to generate automated full-length tridimensional protein structural predictions -. The RPA-1 protein models were visualized with the program MacPyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 220.127.116.11.
Results and discussion
Structural features of the L. braziliensis RPA-1 and determination of its tridimensional structure by molecular modeling
RPA-1 undergoes phosphorylation, which is believed to play a role in modulating its affinity for DNA. In humans, the Chk1 protein, a serine/threonine kinase, phosphorylates with high efficiency the DBD-A and DBD-B domains (171–450 amino acids) . As expected, it was noted that phosphorylation decreases the affinity of these two major DNA-binding domains . Moreover, binding of RPA-1 to ssDNA blocks Chk1 phosphorylation, suggesting that Chk1 and ssDNA compete for binding to the RPA domains . In this regard, the analysis of phosphorylation sites in L. braziliensis and L. amazonensis RPA-1 proteins showed the presence of at least 25 potential sites, sixteen of which are located on the DBD-A and DBD-B domains (Figure 1).
Expression of L. braziliensis RPA-1 as recombinant protein and analysis of its affinity to ssDNA
After purification of the rLbRPA-1, we analyzed whether the protein maintained its cognate capacity of binding to ssDNA. For this purpose, an oligodeoxyribonucleotide, containing a digoxigenin molecule at its 5′-end (DIG-O), was synthetized and used in binding assays with the recombinant protein. The ability of the rLbRPA-1 to bind this DIG-O was tested by pull-down assays based on the affinity of the His-tag to Ni2+-beads. As shown in Figure 4C, rLbRPA-1 showed a clear affinity for ssDNA, suggesting that the protein was refolded in vitro correctly. As a negative control, binding assays using recombinant L. braziliensis α-tubulin were performed in parallel.
L. braziliensis RPA-1 also binds RNA
Once the RNA binding activity of rLbRPA-1 was demonstrated, we considered of interest to further evaluate its relative affinity for DNA and RNA. For this purpose, a digoxigenin-labelled RNA oligonucleotide (derived from the 3′ HSP70-II UTR RNA sequence; 5′ 5DigN-AUGUCUUUUA UUUUUUUGUG UGUGUUUUAU AUUUUUCUCC UUUCGUACUA A 3′) was incubated with the renatured rLbRPA-1 and its binding analyze also by pull-down assays (Figure 6B). In this assay, we included an assay in which the rLbRPA-1 was maintained in a denatured conformation by adding 8 M urea to the binding buffer. This control served to exclude that the oligonucleotide binding was non-specific (Figure 6B, point D). Additionally, competition assays using either the non-labelled RNA oligonucleotide or a DNA oligonucleotide containing the equivalent sequence (5′ ATGTCTTTTA TTTTTTTGTG TGTGTTTTAT ATTTTTCTCC TTTCGTACTA A 3′) were carried out. The results showed that the competition was more effective in the presence of the DNA oligonucleotide competitor than with the RNA one. These findings confirmed the higher affinity of rLbRPA-1 for ss-DNA than for RNA, at least when this particular sequence, present in the 3′ HSP70-II mRNA molecule, is used as substrate. Nevertheless, for future works, it should be analyzed the relative affinity for DNA and/or RNA of the native LbRPA-1, considering that heterologous expression of rLbRPA-1 (as for any other protein) in E. coli could have introduced conformational alterations or modifications that may affect in some extent the affinity for its targets.
The rLbRPA-1 protein, purified in denaturing conditions and refolded in vitro, was able to bind ssDNA molecules. This result confirmed, on one hand, that the purified protein is functional and, on the other hand, allowed us to confirm that LbRPA-1 is a ssDNA binding protein as predicted. In addition, we have shown that this protein is able to interact with RNA molecules, which may be suggesting a role of this protein in the mRNA HSP70 expression, in particular, and in RNA metabolism, in general. Likewise, the detailed structural analysis and the molecular modelling carried out on the Leishmania RPA-1 protein have shown a remarkable conservation with the homologues from evolutionarily distant organisms. Nevertheless, the comparison with the human RPA-1 protein also served to locate differences, such as the absence of the N-terminal RPA70N domain and the existence of a highly divergent sequence at the C- terminal region. These differences could be exploited for developing molecules with antileishmanial properties.
This work was supported by Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (Colombia) Research Project ID PPTA 00004564 “Estudio de la interacción entre la proteína Rpa1 y la región 3 UTR-II de los genes HSP70 de Leishmania braziliensis”. PANM and CAR were supported by Colciencias, Programa Nacional de Doctorados 2012, and 2008, respectively. Work at the JMR’s lab was supported by VI PN de I + D + I 2008–2011, ISCIII -Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa (RICET- RD12-0018-0009). JMR’s ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3410-9488.
- Alvar J, Velez ID, Bern C, Herrero M, Desjeux P, Cano J, Jannin J, den Boer M: Leishmaniasis worldwide and global estimates of its incidence. PLoS ONE. 2012, 7: e35671. 10.1371/journal.pone.0035671.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Velez ID, Hendrickx E, Robledo SM, Agudelo SP: Leishmaniosis cutánea en Colombia y género. Cad Saúde Pública. 2001, 17: 171-180. 10.1590/S0102-311X2001000100018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zou Y, Liu Y, Wu X, Shell SM: Functions of human replication protein A (RPA): From DNA replication to DNA damage and stress responses. J Cell Physiol. 2006, 208: 267-273. 10.1002/jcp.20622.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lindsey-Boltz LA, Reardon JT, Wold MS, Sancar A: In vitro analysis of the role of replication protein A (RPA) and RPA phosphorylation in ATR-mediated checkpoint signaling. J Biol Chem. 2012, 287: 36123-36131. 10.1074/jbc.M112.407825.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wold MS: Replication protein A: a heterotrimeric, ssDNA-binding protein required for eukaryotic DNA metabolism. Annu Rev Biochem. 1997, 66: 61-91. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bochkarev A, Bochkareva E: From RPA to BRCA2: lessons from single-stranded DNA binding by the OB-fold. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2004, 14: 36-42. 10.1016/j.sbi.2004.01.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bochkarev A, Pfuetzner RA, Edwards AM, Frappier L: Structure of the single-stranded-DNA-binding domain of replication protein A bound to DNA. Nature. 1997, 385: 176-181. 10.1038/385176a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jacobs DM, Lipton AS, Isern NG, Daughdrill GW, Lowry DF, Gomes X, Wold MS: Human replication protein A: Global fold of the N-terminal RPA-70 domain reveals a basic cleft and flexible C-terminal linker. J Biomol NMR. 1999, 14: 321-331. 10.1023/A:1008373009786.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fanning E, Klimovich V, Nager AR: A dynamic model for replication protein A (RPA) function in DNA processing pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: 4126-4137. 10.1093/nar/gkl550.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lao Y, Gomes XV, Ren Y, Taylor JS, Wold MS: Replication protein A interactions with DNA. III Molecular basis of recognition of damaged DNA. Biochemistry. 2000, 39: 850-859. 10.1021/bi991704s.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patrone JD, Kennedy JP, Frank AO, Feldkamp MD, Vangamudi B, Pelz NF, Rossanese OW, Waterson AG, Chazin WJ, Fesik SW: Discovery of protein-protein interaction inhibitors of replication protein A. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2013, 4: 601-605. 10.1021/ml400032y.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown GW, Melendy TE, Ray DS: Conservation of structure and function of DNA replication protein A in the trypanosomatid Crithidia fasciculata. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1992, 89: 135-142.Google Scholar
- Brown GW, Hines JC, Fisher P, Ray DS: Isolation of the genes encoding the 51-kilodalton and 28-kilodalton subunits of Crithidia fasciculata replication protein A. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1994, 63: 135-142. 10.1016/0166-6851(94)90016-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barral A, Pedral-Sampai D, Grimaldi G, Momen H, McMahon-Pratt D, Ribeiro de Jesus A, Almeida R, Badaro R, Barral-Netto M, Carvalho EM, Jhonson WD: Leishmaniasis in Bahia, Brazil: evidence that Leishmania amazonensis produces a wide spectrum of clinical disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1991, 44: 536-546.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fernández MF, Castellari RR, Conte FF, Gozzo F, Sabino AA, Pinheiro H, Novello JC, Eberlin MN, Cano MI: Identification of three proteins that associate in vitro with the Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis G-rich telomeric strand. Eur J Biochem. 2004, 271: 3050-3063. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04237.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siqueira-Neto JL, Lira CBB, Giardini MA, Khater L, Perez AM, Peroni LA, dos Reis JR, Freitas-Junior LH, Ramos CH, Cano MI:Leishmania replication protein A-1 binds in vivo single-stranded telomeric DNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007, 358: 417-423. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.04.144.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Viveiros Da Silveira RC, Santos Da Silva M, Nunes VS, Perez AM, Cano MI: The natural absence of RPA1N domain did not impair Leishmania amazonensis RPA-1 participation in DNA damage response and telomere protection. Parasitology. 2013, 140: 547-559. 10.1017/S0031182012002028.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ramírez CA, Dea-Ayuela MA, Gutiérrez-Blázquez MD, Bolas-Fernández F, Requena JM, Puerta CJ: Identification of proteins interacting with HSP70 mRNAs in Leishmania braziliensis. J Proteomics. 2013, 94: 124-137. 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.09.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fan J, Pavletich NP: Structure and conformational change of a replication protein A heterotrimer bound to ssDNA. Genes Dev. 2012, 26: 2337-2347. 10.1101/gad.194787.112.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ramírez CA, Requena JM, Puerta CJ: Identification of the HSP70-II gene in Leishmania braziliensis HSP70 locus: genomic organization and UTRs characterization. Parasit Vectors. 2011, 4: 166-177. 10.1186/1756-3305-4-166.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Notredame C, Higgins DG, Heringa J: T-coffee: a novel method for fast accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol. 2000, 302 (1): 205-217. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4042.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zdobnov EM, Apweiler R: InterProScan- an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro. Bioinformatics. 2001, 17: 847-848. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.9.847.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Quevillon E, Silventoinen V, Pillai S, Harte N, Mulder N, Apweiler R, Lopez R: InterProScan: protein domains identifier. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: W116-W120. 10.1093/nar/gki442.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blom N, Gammeltoft S, Brunak S: Sequence and structure-based prediction of eukaryotic protein phosphorylation sites. J Mol Biol. 1999, 294 (5): 1351-1362. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lira CB, Gui KE, Perez AM, da Silveira RC, Gava LM, Ramos CH, Cano MI: DNA and heparin chaperone the refolding of purified recombinant replication protein A subunit 1 from Leishmania amazonensis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009, 1790 (2): 119-125. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2008.10.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 3389-3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Westbrook J, Feng Z, Chen L, Yang H, Berman HM: The Protein Data Bank and structural genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 481-491. 10.1093/nar/gkg068.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kelley LA, Sternberg MJ: Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nat Protoc. 2009, 4: 363-371. 10.1038/nprot.2009.2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM: PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr. 1993, 26: 283-291. 10.1107/S0021889892009944.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arnold K, Bordoli L, Kopp J, Schwede T: The SWISS-MODEL Workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics. 2006, 22: 195-201. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti770.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Y: I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008, 9: 40. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-40.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y: I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat Protoc. 2010, 5: 725-738. 10.1038/nprot.2010.5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roy A, Yang J, Zhang Y: COFACTOR: an accurate comparative algorithm for structure-based protein function annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40: W471-W477. 10.1093/nar/gks372.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Erdile LF, Heyer WD, Kolodner R, Kelly TJ: Characterization of a cDNA encoding the 70-kDa single-stranded DNA-binding subunit of human replication protein A and the role of the protein in DNA replication. J Biol Chem. 1991, 266: 1209-12098.Google Scholar
- Heyer WD, Rao MRS, Erdile LF, Kelly TJ, Kolodner RD: An essential Saccharomyces cerevisiae single-stranded DNA binding protein is homologous for the large subunit of human RP-A. EMBO J. 1990, 9: 2321-2329.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bochkareva E, Koroley S, Lees-Miller SP, Bochkarev A: Structure of the RPA trimerization core and its role in the multistep DNA-binding mechanism of RPA. EMBO J. 2002, 21: 1855-1863. 10.1093/emboj/21.7.1855.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olivares-Illana V, Rodríguez-Romero A, Becker I, Berzunza M, García J, Pérez-Montfort R, Cabrera N, López-Calahorra F, de Gómez-Puyou MT, Gómez-Poyou A: Perturbation of the dimer interface of triosephosphate isomerase and its effect on Trypanosoma cruzi. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2007, 1: e1. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu JS, Kuo SR, Melendy T: DNA damage-induced RPA focalization is independent of gamma-H2AX and RPA hyper-phosphorylation. J Cell Biochem. 2006, 99: 1452-1462. 10.1002/jcb.21066.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Göringer HU: ‘Gestalt’, composition and function of the Trypanosoma brucei editosome. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2012, 66: 65-82. 10.1146/annurev-micro-092611-150150.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.