Open Access

Species composition of phlebotomine sand flies and bionomics of Phlebotomus orientalis (Diptera: Psychodidae) in an endemic focus of visceral leishmaniasis in Tahtay Adiyabo district, Northern Ethiopia

  • Araya Gebresilassie1, 2Email author,
  • Oscar David Kirstein3,
  • Solomon Yared2, 4,
  • Essayas Aklilu1,
  • Aviad Moncaz3,
  • Habte Tekie1,
  • Meshesha Balkew4,
  • Alon Warburg3,
  • Asrat Hailu5 and
  • Teshome Gebre-Michael4
Parasites & Vectors20158:248

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0849-7

Received: 10 February 2015

Accepted: 9 April 2015

Published: 25 April 2015

Abstract

Background

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a neglected tropical disease, which is strongly associated with poverty. VL caused by Leishmania donovani and transmitted by Phlebotomus orientalis is endemic in various remote areas of north and north-west Ethiopia. The present study was designed to determine the sand fly fauna and bionomics of P. orientalis in the VL endemic focus of Tahtay Adiyabo district.

Methods

Sand flies were collected using CDC light traps (n = 602), sticky traps (n = 9,350) and indoor pyrethrum spray catches (n = 578 house visits) from indoor, peri-domestic and agricultural field habitats between May 2011 to April 2012. All sand fly specimens collected were identified to species level and counted.

Results

In total, 100,772 sand fly specimens, belonging to 25 sand fly species (nine Phlebotomus and sixteen Sergentomyia) were collected and identified. S. africana and P. orientalis made up 59.1% and 23.5% of the collected sand flies, respectively. As it could be determined from the proportion of collections from outdoor (peri-domestic and agricultural fields) and indoor locations, P. orientalis appears to exhibit increased exophilic behavior. The outdoor to indoor index was 79:1 on m2 of sticky traps. Mean density of P. orientalis caught was significantly higher on horizontally placed sticky traps (mean = 60 ± 14.56/m2/night) than vertically deployed sticky traps (12 ± 3.57/m2/night). The highest abundance of P. orientalis occurred between March and April. Through July to September, there was a sharp decline in abundance of P. orientalis population. Regarding climatic variables, P. orientalis density in light traps and on sticky traps showed a significant positive and negative association with temperature and relative humidity, respectively. However, non-significant negative correlation was observed with rainfall pattern.

Conclusions

Overall, P. orientalis was found to be the most abundant Phlebotomus species, showing marked seasonal abundance that mainly peaks during the dry season (March to April). Likewise, the people in the area usually sleep in compounds during these months that potentially expose them to a high risk of peri-domestic VL transmission.

Keywords

Bionomics Population dynamics Phlebotomus orientalis Sand fly fauna Tahtay Adiyabo Visceral leishmaniasis

Background

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL), caused by Leishmania donovani, is an important public health problem in several regions of Ethiopia, with an estimated annual incidence of 3,700 to 7,400 cases per year [1]. This systemic disease has been reported from at least 40 areas, with the most important endemic foci being the arid south‐west and the north‐west lowlands of the country bordering Kenya and Sudan, respectively [2,3]. In recent years, reports have described increasing numbers of VL cases as well as new foci of disease in the semi-arid lowlands of Tigray Regional State, northern Ethiopia [4,5]. For instance, between 2006 and 2011, 209 VL cases were treated in Tahtay Adiyabo district [5].

So far, 22 species of Phlebotomus have been reported in Ethiopia. Of these, the incriminated vectors of VL, from which parasites have been detected and/or isolated and identified, include P. martini, P. celiae and P. orientalis for L. donovani from the south, south-west and northern foci ([6,7]; Gebresilassie et al., unpublished data). In our study area, natural infection rates of P. orientalis with L. donovani are found to be 0.51% (Gebresilassie et al., unpublished data). However, detailed studies on the bionomics of sand flies in north and north-west Ethiopia in general and Tahtay Adiyabo district in particular, are very limited since the occurrence of the disease was recently recognized [4]. Knowledge on the distribution, population dynamics, and behavior of sand fly vectors contributes to understanding of where, when, and how humans become infected with L. donovani. Moreover, determining the abundance and seasonal dynamics of vector species are crucial for recommending sound vector management methods towards the control of VL transmission in the area. Because of the limited information available about the sand fly vector(s) involved, an extensive entomological study aimed at identifying the sand fly fauna and bionomics of P. orientalis, the vector of the disease, was initiated in the rural community of Tahtay Adiyabo district.

Methods

Study area

Longitudinal entomological investigations were undertaken in three different villages (Ademeyti, Lemlem and Mentebteb) of Tahtay Adiyabo district (14°23’41”N/37°46’15”E) in the Tigray Regional State, northern Ethiopia between May 2011 and April 2012 (Figure 1). The topography of the study area is predominantly lowland plain except in the southwest, where it is mountainous. Sheraro, the administrative center of the district, lies 1,028 meters above sea level and has a latitude and longitude of 14°23’41” N /37°46’15” E, respectively. The town is also located about 1,117 km north of Addis Ababa and 402 km north-west of Mekelle, the capital of the Regional State. The three villages were Ademeyti (14°21’31.53” N; 37°41’37.89” E; 1,060 m above sea level), Lemlem (14°22’15.27” N; 37°44’35.96” E; 1,068 m above sea level), and Mentebteb (14°19’37.78” N; 37°44’15.56” E; 1,079 m above sea level). The villages of Ademeyti and Lemlem are approximately 17 and 6 kms northwest and west of Sheraro town, respectively. The third village, Mentebteb is located about 13 km southwest of Sheraro town. The distance between the three villages is about 8–12 km.
Figure 1

Map of Tahtay Adiyabo District (modified based on GIS of Ethiopia); red, green, and yellow colors showing selected study villages.

The villages are located on hilly outcrops (peri-domestic) of sandy clay loam soil, which does not form cracks. The villages are surrounded by large fields many of which are vertisols and red clay soil. The dominant soil in the study villages is chromic vertisols [8], characterized by high contents of smectitic clay minerals. This soil type is also main agricultural field in the study area. The climate is generally characterized as tropical semi-arid area with an extended dry period of nine to ten months. The area has uni-modal rainfall pattern (July-late-September) with a mean annual precipitation of about 600 mm (Ethiopian National Meteorological Agency). During the rainy season, there is frequent cloud cover and thunder. Vertisols also become excessively muddy and even flooded during the rainy seasons. Around the last week of September the rain ceases and there begins a period marked by clear skies and cool winds which continue with gradual warming to February. March to May is the hottest part of the year with an average temperature of 39°C at noon and January is the coldest one with an average temperature of 14.2°C at night. Under the relentless sun, the vertisols dry, forming large cracks as deep as 1 m and with finer fissures below [8]. The visible moisture line recedes to the bottom of the cracks.

Three sand fly sampling habitats were considered: indoor (inside tukuls), peri-domestic habitats (homesteads shared with animal shelters), and agricultural fields on the periphery of human residence with scattered and mixed trees mainly Acacia-Balanites-Zyzpus-Combretum trees and some scrub vegetation. The study area was once covered with natural forest, but because of various human activities like cultivation, grazing, and wood cutting the natural vegetation have been reduced to a few scattered clumps of Acacia-Balanites-Zyzpus-Combretum trees/bushes. The human dwellings comprise stonewalls and wooden roofs covered with flat stones, sandy soil while few houses are made of stone wall and thatched roofs or corrugated iron roofs. The inside walls and floor of these houses are leveled with alluvial soil and plastered with mud frequently. Houses are built close to animal enclosures and are situated approximately 50–200 meters from farm fields many of which are in vertisols. The inhabitants are mainly engaged in the production of cereals and oilseeds and raising different domestic animals, cattle, sheep, and goats being predominant.

Sand fly collection and processing

CDC light traps

Sand flies were collected in CDC miniature light traps (John W. Hock, Gainesville, FL) (n = 602/137 nights). Traps were set-up for three consecutive nights twice a month. These traps were used to sample sand fly species from peri-domestic and agricultural fields. No light traps were used indoors as light traps may have a tendency to attract flies from outside, and may not represent the true endophagic/endophilic species. Five CDC light traps were deployed in representative sites (i.e., on cracked walls, a stone pile produced by a collapsing hut, compound of human dwellings, and animal enclosures) of peri-domestic habitats. Likewise, another five light traps in each village were used to sample sand flies in agricultural fields, where they were suspended under trees/ bushes, in open fields, dry riverbeds, and the edge of farmlands with different bushes. CDC traps were suspended with the fan 40–50 cm above the ground level. The traps were set 1 h before sunset and collected at sunset the next morning. Then, traps containing sand flies were transported to the field laboratory, where sand flies were sorted by sex and genus and were preserved in 70% ethanol for later identification to species level.

Sticky trap (ST) collection

A4-sized (21 × 29 cm) white sticky traps (n = 9350/187 nights) of polypropylene sheets coated with sesame oil were used for capturing sand flies from all sampling habitats. Fifty sticky traps were divided into 10 sets each having five sheets tied together on nylon string about 50 cm apart and these were placed vertically 1 m high inside ten different houses in each village to intercept and capture any endophilic sand flies. Another 10 sets of sticky traps were randomly installed horizontally 1 m high on cracked walls (2 sets), stone piles (2 sets), and animal enclosures (6 sets) in the peri-domestic ecotopes. Another 50 STs were also deployed in agricultural fields. In this habitat, five sets of STs (5 A4 sized sheets/set) were hung vertically in a row 30 cm above the ground supported by metal pegs. Simultaneously, another five sets of STs were placed horizontally on the cracks of agriculture fields. Each morning, sand flies from STs were removed using forceps and stored in 96% ethyl alcohol in labeled vials for identification. Sticky traps were deployed for three consecutive nights twice a month.

Pyrethrum spray catches (PSC)

Indoor resting sand flies were sampled in the morning (6:00 to 8:00) from ten randomly selected houses by the application of pyrethrum spray catches [9] between May 2011 and April 2012 twice a month. Prior to spraying in each house, all food items and small animals were removed; the openings and eaves of windows and doors were filled with pieces of cloth, and the floor was entirely covered with white plastic sheets. After the door was closed, the pyrethrum aerosol (Roach killer, M/S Kafr EI Zayat, Egypt) was sprayed for about three to five minutes. After ten minutes of spraying, the knocked down sand flies were then collected from the white sheets using fine forceps or fine camel hair brushes and placed in tubes containing 70% ethanol for latter processing and identification.

Mounting and identification of sand flies

Collected sand flies were mounted on microscope slides in Hoyer’s medium with their heads separate from thoraces and abdomens. Species were identified based on the morphology of the external genitalia of males and the pharynx, antennal features and spermathecae of females, using different keys, [10,11] and other publications [12].

Age grading of wild-caught male sand flies

Age grading of wild-caught males of P. orientalis was conducted based on the orientation of their genitalia. The external genitalia of male sand flies undergo dextral rotation on the longitudinal body axis through 180° during the initial 24 hours of adult life to assume their mature (= rotated) position [8,13,14]. In order to make use of this easily discernable physical characteristic to identify young males, P. orientalis males were mounted on slides. Males with un-rotated or partially rotated external genitalia were considered active for the first night of their adult life.

Meteorological data

Meteorological data on maximum and minimum temperatures, average relative humidity, and rainfall of Tahtay Adiyabo district during May 2011 to April 2012 were obtained from the National Meteorology Agency of Ethiopia to assess the effect of local weather elements on the seasonal dynamics of P. orientalis.

Ethical considerations

Verbal informed consent was obtained from heads of households selected for sampling sand flies from inside houses.

Data analysis

Prior to data analysis, sand fly numbers were log-transformed [log (n + 1)] to fit normal distribution and checked for normality by Shapiro-Wilk test. When trapping data did not conform to the normal distribution, the non-parametric equivalent tests of Kruskal-Wallis and Mann–Whitney-U were applied. Kruskal-Wallis test was followed to compare the mean numbers of P. orientalis collected in the three sampling villages using CDC-LTs and STs. For non-parametric comparisons, multiple-Mann–Whitney U-test was used and, P-values were adjusted with the Bonferroni correction to adjust for the inflation of type I errors when several Mann–Whitney tests are performed [15]. For habitat preference comparisons, the equivalent non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-test were used. Seasonal abundance of P. orientalis was compared using Kruskal-Wallis-test. Pearson correlation analysis was also applied to compare the effects of mean monthly temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall on the mean number of P. orientalis caught per trap-night. Further, Mann–Whitney U-test was used for comparing the number and proportions of P. orientalis indoor and outdoor abundance, age-grading, sex ratio in trapping methods and comparative efficacy of different arrangements of sticky traps. Statistical analysis were considered significant when P < 0.05 unless stated. Statistical analyses were carried out using IBM SPSS statistics, version 20 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and Microsoft® Office Excel 2007.

Results

Species composition and relative abundance of sand flies

In total, 100,772 sand fly specimens, belonging to twenty-five species (nine Phlebotomus and sixteen Sergentomyia) were collected and identified (Table 1). The genus Phlebotomus represented six subgenera while four subgenera were identified in Sergentomyia. Different sand fly species identified in the present study consist of Phlebotomus (Larroussius) orientalis, P. (Anaphlebotomus) rodhaini, P. (Synphlebotomus) martini, P. (Phlebotomus) bergeroti, P. (P.) papatasi, P. (P.) duboscqi, P. (Paraphlebotomus) alexandri, P. (Parvidens) lesleyae, P. (Parv.) heischi, Sergentomyia (Parrotomyia) africana, S. (Sergentomyia) schwetzi, S. (S.) antennata, S. (S.) bedfordi group, S. (S.) dubia, S. (Sintonius) clydei, S. (Sin.) adleri, S. (Sin.) calcarata, S. (Sin.) subtilis, S. (Sin.) adami, S. (Sin.) satti, S. (Sin.) christophersi, S. (Sin.) capensis, S. (Sin.) thomsoni, S. (Sin.) affinis, and S. (Grassomyia) squamipleuris.
Table 1

Relative abundance and fauna of sand flies collected from three villages of Tahtay Adiyabo district, May 2011 to April 2012

Sand fly species

CDC light traps

Sticky traps

Indoor space sprays

Total

Relative frequency (%)

M/F

M/F

M/F

 

Phlebotomus orientalis

5,360/2,606

14,547/1,150

26/22

23,711

23.53

P. rodhaini

17/13

29/33

0/0

92

0.09

P. bergeroti

26/20

15/13

2/3

79

0.08

P. martini

19/11

11/10

3/3

56

0.06

P. papatasi

14/16

6/4

0/3

43

0.04

P. duboscqi

5/9

1/6

1/5

27

0.03

P. alexandri

0/2

0/0

0/0

2

0.002

P. lesleyae

8/85

21/33

0/0

147

0.14

P. heischi

2/2

0/2

0/0

6

0.006

Sergentomyia africana

19,373/1,7812

10,301/10,423

406/1204

59,519

59.06

S. schwetzi

774/1,255

1,191/1,358

97/365

5,040

5.00

S. clydei

1,059/1,631

446/721

60/111

4,028

3.99

S. antennata

*346/276

*1398/1097

*74/344

3,535

3.51

S. bedfordi

270/388

421/402

13/32

1,526

1.51

S. dubia

*-/198

*-/894

*-/75

1,167

1.16

S. squamiplueris

146/278

129/64

6/6

629

0.62

S. adleri

132/168

105/122

36/48

611

0.61

S. calcarata

27/102

38/211

6/91

475

0.47

S. subtilis

4/11

11/18

0/0

44

0.04

S. adami

4/5

3/2

6/7

27

0.03

S. satti

2/0

0/0

0/0

2

0.002

S. christophersi

0/0

1/1

0/0

2

0.002

S. capensis

0/0

1/1

0/0

2

0.002

S. thomsoni

1/0

0/0

0/0

1

0.001

S. affinis

1/0

0/0

0/0

1

0.001

Total

27,590/24,888

28,675/16,565

736/2,318

100,772

100

*Males of S. antennata and S. dubia are morphologically difficult to distinguish with certainty (Abonnenc and Minter [11]).

The relative abundance of these species is indicated in Table 1. The most abundant species of Phlebotomus was P. orientalis (23.5%) followed by P. lesleyae (0.14%). While the other Phlebotomus species constituted only 0.31% of the entire sand fly collection. Among the genus Sergentomyia, S. africana (59.1%) was the most prevalent species followed by S. schwetzi (5%).

Comparison of the three villages for P. orientalis productivity

Mean numbers of P. orientalis collected from the three sampling villages (Ademeyti, Lemlem, and Mentebteb) using CDC light traps and sticky traps during the entire collection period are illustrated in Table 2. Significant differences were recorded in the mean numbers of P. orientalis captured per CDC trap/night in the three sampling villages (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.05). Likewise, the sampling villages significantly differed in their sand fly productivity on sticky trap collections (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.05). In both trapping methods, Ademeyti and Lemlem were the most productive sampling villages for P. orientalis population compared to Mentebteb (Table 2).
Table 2

Mean numbers of P. orientalis collected by CDC light traps and sticky traps from three different sampling villages, May 2011 to April 2012

 

Mean number ± SE of P. orientalis

Sampling villages

CDC light traps (trap/night)

Sticky traps (m 2 /night)

Ademeyti

6.57 ± 1.57a

9.84 ± 2.49a

Lemlem

4.53 ± 1.02a

8.58 ± 2.69a

Mentebteb

2.85 ± 0.58b

3.75 ± 1.43b

Mean values followed by different letters in the same column are statistically significant (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.05).

Habitat preference of P. orientalis

More mean number of male and female P. orientalis was caught in agricultural fields than in peri-domestic habitats in CDC light traps, although this number in both sexes in the two habitats was not significantly different (Mann Whitney U-test, P > 0.05; Table 3). Mean density of P. orientalis males and females captured in light traps in agricultural fields was 5.19 ± 1.86 and 1.47 ± 0.33 per trap/night (Table 3), respectively. While the mean density in peri-domestic ecotopes for P. orientalis male was 1.47 ± 0.33 per trap/night and 1.83 ± 0.41 per trap/night for females.
Table 3

Mean numbers (± SE) of P. orientalis collected in CDC light traps/night from different sampling habitats, May 2011 to April 2012

Habitat types

Total number of males (mean/trap/night ± SE)

Total number of females (mean/trap/night ± SE)

Total number of (mean/trap/night ± SE)

Peri-domestic

2.69 ± 0.81a

1.47 ± 0.33a

4.16 ± 1.08a

Agricultural fields

5.19 ± 1.86a

1.83 ± 0.41a

7.02 ± 2.14a

Mean values followed by the same letters in the same column are statistically not significant (Kruskal-Wallis test, P > 0.05).

Unlike light trap collections, habitat types had significant effects on the abundance of P. orientalis male and female populations on sticky trap captures (Kruskal-Wallis-test, P < 0.05; Table 4). A significantly higher mean density of P. orientalis males was recorded in agricultural fields (mean = 16.92 ± 3.55/m2 trap/night) followed by peri-domestic (mean = 3.66 ± 1.48/m2 trap/night) and indoors (mean = 0.05 ± 0.02/trap/night) (Table 4). Likewise, more mean number of P. orientalis females were collected in agricultural fields and peri-domestic habitats (Table 4). However, fewer mean numbers of females were found indoor (mean = 0.04 ± 0.01/ m2 trap/night).
Table 4

Mean density (±SE) of P. orientalis collected per m 2 sticky trap/night from different sampling habitats over one, May 2011 to April 2012

Habitat types

Total no. males (mean/m 2 /night ± SE)

Total no. females (mean/ m 2 /night ± SE)

Total no. (mean/ m 2 /night ± SE)

Indoor

0.05 ± 0.02a

0.04 ± 0.01a

0.08 ± 0.03a

Peri-domestic

3.66 ± 1.48b

0.7628 ± 0.20b

4.43 ± 1.60b

Agricultural fields

16.92 ± 3.55c

1.2972 ± 0.23c

18.22 ± 3.70c

Mean values followed by different letters in the same column are statistically significant (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.05)

Indoor resting behavior of P. orientalis

Table 5 shows the numbers of P. orientalis and other sand flies found resting at 6:00 to 8:00 hours in rooms. Of 3,054 indoor resting sand flies captured in the pyrethrum spray collections during 578 house visits, 48 (1.57%) P. orientalis were found resting inside houses. In particular, female populations of P. orientalis had low endophilic behavior, constituting only 0.95% of the entire indoor resting specimens collected. Among Sergentomyia spp. S. africana had a greater proportion (52.72%) followed by S. schwetzi (Table 5).
Table 5

Indoor resting sand fly species captured inside human dwellings using pyrethrum spray collections, May 2011 to April 2012

 

Sand fly specimens collected per 578 house visits

Sand fly species

Male (%)

Female (%)

Total (%)

P. orientalis

26 (3.53)

22 (0.95)

48 (1.57)

P. duboscqi

1 (0.13)

5 (0.22)

6 (0.20)

P. bergeroti

2 (0.27)

3 (0.13)

5(0.16)

P. martini

3 (0.40)

2 (0.09)

5(0.16)

P. papatasi

0 (0)

3 (0.13)

3 (0.09)

S. africana

406 (55.16)

1,204 (51.94)

1,610 (52.72)

S. schwetzi

97 (13.18)

365 (15.75)

462 (15.13)

S. antennata

74 (10.05)

344 (14.84)

418 (13.69)

S. clydei

60 (8.15)

111 (4.79)

171 (5.60)

S. calcarata

6 (0.82)

91 (3.92)

97 (3.18)

S. adleri

36 (4.89)

48 (2.07)

84 (2.75)

S. dubia

0 (0)

75 (3.24)

75 (2.46)

S. bedfordi

13 (1.77)

32 (1.38)

45 (1.47)

S. adami

6 (0.82)

7 (0.30)

13 (0.43)

S. squamiplueris

6 (0.82)

6 (0.26)

12 (0.39)

Total

736

2,318

3,054

Indoor and outdoor abundance of P. orientalis

In total, 52 (29 males and 23 females) from indoors and 15,901 (14,519 male; 1382 female) from outdoors were captured on sticky traps. The result of the outdoor (peri-domestic and agricultural fields combined) P. orientalis captures was much greater than, the indoor (Mann Whitney U-test, P < 0.05). P. orientalis was abundant outdoors and had low abundance indoors with a ratio of 79:1 on m2 of sticky traps (Table 6).
Table 6

Indoor and outdoor abundance of P. orientalis determined by sticky traps in Tahtay Adiyabo district, May 2011 to April 2012

Habitat type

Total no. males (mean/m 2 trap/night ± SE)

Total no. females (mean/m 2 trap/night ± SE)

Total no. (mean/m 2 trap/night ± SE)

Indoor

29 (0.05 ± 0.02)a

23 (0.04 ± 0.01)a

52 (0.08 ± 0.03)a

Outdoor*

14,519 (5.72 ± 1.31)b

1,382 (0.58 ± 0.10)b

15,901 (6.30 ± 1.39)b

Mean values followed by different letters in the same column are significantly different (Mann Whitney U-test, P < 0.05).

*Outdoor (combined collections of peri-domestic and agricultural field).

Population dynamics of P. orientalis

The annual mean maximum and minimum temperatures were 38.4°C in March and 15.8°C in January, while relative humidity was 63.5% in August and between 38-39% during the months of January to April 2012, respectively (Figure 2). The main rainy period was between June and September. The maximum precipitation recorded in the area during sand fly sampling was 287.5 mm in August 2011 (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Seasonal fluctuations in the mean monthly maximum and minimum temperatures, relative humidity, and rainfall in the study area, May 2011 to April 2012.

To assess the overall seasonal changes in abundance of the P. orientalis in the district collected by means of CDC-light traps and sticky traps, data from each village were pooled. There were significant mean monthly fluctuations in the numbers of P. orientalis caught using light traps and sticky traps from different biotopes over the twelve months of trapping period (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.05). P. orientalis showed distinct seasonality, with the greatest overall abundance between January and June, reaching its peak density (6.18 ± 2.43/trap-night) in March when the average temperature was also high (30.4°C). From July to December, including the rainy season (July-September) and shortly after that (October-December), there was a sharp decrease in abundance of P. orientalis (Figure 3A) with an increase in relative humidity and decrease in average temperature (Figure 2). The lowest mean density of P. orientalis/trap/night was found to be in the period from August to October in the range of 0.07 ± 0.04 to 0.09 ± 0.03.
Figure 3

Seasonal density of P. orientalis collected from three villages of Tahtay Adiyabo district, May 2011 to April 2012. A: collected by CDC light traps (specimen/trap/night). B: collected by sticky traps (specimens/m2 trap/night).

The highest mean monthly density of P. orientalis recorded on sticky traps was in April (9.65 ± 4.37/m2 trap/night) while the lowest was during August to October, which ranged from 0.07 to 0.27/m2 trap/night (Figure 3B).

In light trap catches, monthly abundance of P. orientalis had a significant positive correlation with temperature (r = 0.762; P = 0.004). In contrast, the mean monthly abundance of P. orientalis was correlated negatively with relative humidity (r = −0.803; P = 0.037) and rainfall (r = −0.467), respectively though the relationship with the later was not significantly different (P = 0.126). Mean monthly density of P. orientalis on sticky traps had a positive correlation with temperature (r = 0.867; P = 0.000), and was associated negatively with relative humidity (r = −0.780; P = 0.003) and rainfall (r = −0.467; P = 0.163).

Sex ratios

Sex ratios (males: females) for different sand fly species demonstrated that males caught by all methods was higher than that of females (57,001 male: 43,771 female), with an overall sex ratio of 1.3:1. For P. orientalis, the sex ratio in light traps was 2.1:1, which did not show any significant difference between sexes (Mann Whitney U-test, P > 0.05) as opposed to a very high ratio of male to female (12.7:1) on the sticky traps that was clearly significant (P = 0.000).

Age grading of wild-caught male sand flies

Sticky traps intercepted 655 P. orientalis males with un-rotated or partially rotated genitalia during the study period (Table 7). Of these, 187 and 468 were captured in peri-domestic and agricultural field habitats, respectively. The difference in the proportion of P. orientalis immature males with un-rotated or partially rotated genitalia captured in agricultural field versus peri-domestic habitat was significant (Mann Whitney U-test, P = 0.015). However, no freshly emerged P. orientalis males were recorded with other collection methods used.
Table 7

Phlebotomus orientalis young males (=un-rotated genitalia) caught over 12 months on sticky traps that were placed in peri-domestic and agricultural field

Habitat type

No. collected (%)

Mean no. ± SE/sticky trap/month

Peri-domestic

187 (28.55)

15.58 ± 6.75a

Agricultural field

468 (71.45)

39.00 ± 4.98b

Total

655

 

Mean values followed by different letters in the same column are significantly different (Mann Whitney U-test, P < 0.05).

Comparative efficacy of sticky traps deployed horizontally versus vertically

Significant difference was observed in the mean density of P. orientalis captured between horizontally (HSTs) and vertically (VSTs) placed sticky traps (Mann Whitney U-test, P < 0.05). A relatively higher mean density of P. orientalis was found on horizontally placed sticky traps (mean = 60 ± 14.56/m2/night) than vertically deployed (mean = 12 ± 3.57/m2/night, Figure 4).
Figure 4

Comparison of efficacy of sticky traps deployed in different positions for trapping P. orientalis in agriculture field, May 2011 to April 2012.

Discussion

In the remote rural villages of Tahtay Adiyabo district, entomological studies revealed the presence of twenty five species of phlebotomine sand flies, including nine species of Phlebotomus (six subgenera) and sixteen species of Sergentomyia (four subgenera). The sand fly fauna in the area is composed of the Afrotropical elements [10,16,17].

Out of the nine species of Phlebotomus caught, P. orientalis was the most prevalent, accounting for more than 98%. This species is the proven vector of L. donovani, the causative parasite of VL, in Sudan, South Sudan, south western Ethiopia [6,18] and a vector in northern Ethiopia ([19]; Gebresilassie et al., unpublished data). The preponderance of this species in sand fly catches was also noted in previous studies in north-west Ethiopia [19,20] as well as in the same district [21-23]. P. martini and P. rodhaini were also recorded in the present study: the former being the major vector of VL in southern Ethiopia [7] and the later was implied as possible vector of L. donovani between animal reservoir hosts in Sudan [24]. The three sympatric species (P. papatasi, P. bergeroti and P. duboscqi) [19] were also found, where their epidemiological role as possible vectors of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis would be minor despite L. major from blood samples was reported in this area [4]. Among the Sergentomyia spp., S. africana was found to be the predominant species (77.5%) followed by S. schwetzi (6.6%). In general, the species composition of phlebotomine sand flies encountered in the present study concord with previous reports in other parts of Ethiopia [22,23,25,26].

Habitat preferences of most sand fly species is associated with biotopes, harboring high levels of stable mild temperatures and high humidity, and that contain decaying organic matter allowing better breeding sites and more suitable diurnal resting shelters [27,28]. In this study, more number of P. orientalis was collected in agricultural fields than other habitats. Agricultural fields are mostly vertisols, which are characterized by high contents of clay minerals that enhance swelling when hydrated and shrinkage upon desiccation, thereby, causing extensive cracking during the dry season [8]. The combination of high humidity and stable temperatures maintained throughout the dry season, and the availability of organic matter that provide food for larval development in the deeper layers of cracked vertisols [8,27], possibly explains the relatively large populations of P. orientalis in cultivated fields than other habitats observed. Secondly, the presence of trees and scrub vegetations provide shade and source of sugar for adult populations [29]. Earlier studies in various parts of Sudan also stressed that P. orientalis is mainly associated to forest area with large expanses of vertisols [10,30,31] and rarely associated with human dwellings.

Exophilic and endophilic behaviors of sand flies are important from the control point of view and determining where transmission takes place. It is evident from the study that P. orientalis exhibited strong exophilic behavior expressed in outdoor/indoor index of 79:1 on m2 of sticky traps. Supportive of the sticky trap indoor collections, less proportion of P. orientalis females were found resting indoors in 578 house visits, indicating lower rates of endophily. Elnaiem et al. [31] reported the same behavior in Umsalala village in eastern Sudan. Indoor collections of P. orientalis in some villages of north-west Ethiopia also yielded less capture (Aklilu, unpublished data). As the weather, in Tahtay Adiyabo is typically warm from January through May, the people usually sleep outdoors in their compounds during these months. Farmers also usually keep domestic animals in the yard overnight often within a few meters of the sleeping area, a practice that contributes to an increased abundance of P. orientalis females. Therefore, these activities expose people to the bite of P. orientalis leading to an outdoor transmission of L. donovani.

Our data demonstrated that P. orientalis in Tahtay Adiyabo appear to increase in density during the hot-dry period of March to April. A similar trend was also reported in Sudan, where the numbers of P. orientalis captured using sticky traps and CDC light traps remained low in the early dry season (January and February) and increased highly between March and May, after the hot, dry weather has begun [10,20,32,33]. Likewise, it was found that P. orientalis appeared to reach its peak during the driest months of March and April in Kafta-Humera, north-west Ethiopia [20,34]. Importantly, this sand fly period also tends to be the most likely period of VL transmission in humans as females was found with 0.51% rate of natural infection with L. donovani in the area (Gebresilassie et al., unpublished data). The current study also demonstrated that the adult populations of P. orientalis diminish and disappear as the rain commences. This population disappearance was also observed in preceding studies in southern Sudan [10]. However, our findings did not concur with the previous studies in north-west Ethiopia [34] and in eastern Sudan [31].

Sand fly population dynamics is largely regulated by a complex interplay between the biotic potential of the vector species and meteorological-environmental conditions [35-37]. In the current study, temperature and relative humidity showed significant correlations with P. orientalis abundance. Sharp increases in population density of P. orientalis from March to April coincide with an increase in temperature and a reduction in relative humidity in the area. Presumably, the rapid decrease in abundance of P. orientalis through July to October largely attributed to an increased amount of rainfall that completely floods the surface and seals the deep cracks of vertisols, leading to a micro-climate change in the breeding/resting sites of the fly population. Moreover, changes in the monthly temperature and relative humidity during those periods might have resulted in a decrease in population abundance. During the rainy season, P. orientalis seems to undergo diapauses as larvae, which were observed in the fourth larval stage of laboratory colony [38]. The diapause is possibly broken by the end of rainy season as temperature increases re-opening of soil cracks.

As for the sex ratio of sand flies throughout the collections, P. orientalis had higher proportion of male to female both in CDC light traps and sticky traps, though the mean number ratio of male to female for the former was not significant. This male biased sex ratio was also observed for other sand fly species [36,39,40]. For instance, Kasap et al. [40] reported that male sand flies composed of 80% of their collections conducted in an endemic CL. Given a normal sex ratio of 1, then skewed ratios in favour of males might be related to the fact that the traps were placed near emergence sites, where males are generally abundant.

The natural breeding habitats of sand flies could be determined from sticky trap catches as these traps usually capture sand flies by passive interception rather than attraction in their diurnal/breeding habitats [41]. In the present study, sticky traps deployed in vertisols captured higher percentages of freshly emerged males of P. orientalis. This habitat constituted more than 70% of P. orientalis immature males caught with either un-rotated or partially rotated genitalia. More accurate recording of the condition of males with un-rotated external genitalia can indicate the proximity of immature sites [42]. Moreover, males apparently are more sedentary than females [43,44]. Deeply cracked vertisols in open cultivated fields and tree-related habitats were also identified as breeding sites for P. orientalis in our study area [8]. Accordingly, it can be conceived that a relatively high catch with large proportion of males with un-rotated or partially rotated genitalia in our study indicates a proximity to breeding sites.

Significantly, higher mean density of P. orientalis was recorded on horizontally placed (HSTs) STs than vertically (VSTs) deployed. Both sexes of P. orientalis were attracted to HSTs, albeit twenty two times as many males as females were trapped. Interestingly, deploying STs horizontally can be a practical solution for monitoring sand fly populations, particularly in flat plains with crevice although it remains to be determined in other sand fly habitats. The higher proportion of male P. orientalis on HSTs in the present study could be due to the attraction behavior of this vector species to the horizontal surface, establishing mating swarms [21,45]. Alternative reason could be the difference in the flight angle of the species.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our study demonstrated that P. orientalis was found to be the most abundant Phlebotomus species, showing distinct seasonality that mainly peaks during the dry season (March to April) within the entire study area. Furthermore, this study depicts the exophilic behavior of P. orientalis. This behavior is of practical importance because it apparently makes the species less vulnerable to insecticide residual spraying (IRS) or long lasting insecticidal nets in indoor conditions. However, the small number of P. orientalis collected in sticky traps and pyrethrum spray catch indoors may still be of epidemiological significance. Therefore, control programs designed to contain VL transmission in different villages of Tahtay Adiyabo should focus mainly on targeting P. orientalis in outdoors without ignoring its minor endophilic behavior.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Global Health Program (grant number OPPGH5336) provided financial support. We gratefully thank our field assistants Haile Gebremariam and Mehari Naizgi and our driver Kibrom Tafere for their help with collection and processing of sand fly specimens. We are also indebted to the people of Tahtay Adiyabo villagers for their kind co-operation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Zoological Sciences, Addis Ababa University
(2)
Department of Biology, College of Natural Science, Jigjiga University
(3)
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, The Institute of Medical Research Israel-Canada The Kuvin Center for the Study of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical School
(4)
Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University
(5)
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University

References

  1. Alvar J, Vélez ID, Bern C, Herrero M, Desjeux P, Cano J, et al. Leishmaniasis worldwide and global estimates of its incidence. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35671.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lyons S, Veeken H, Long J. Visceral leishmaniasis and HIV in Tigray, Ethiopia. Trop Med Int Health. 2003;8:733–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hailu A, Gebre-Michael T, Berhe N, Balkew M. Leishmaniasis in Ethiopia. In: Berhane Y, Haile-Mariam D, Kloos H, editors. The Ecology and Epidemiology of Health and Disease in Ethiopia. 1st ed. Addis Ababa: Shama Books; 2006. p. 615–34.Google Scholar
  4. Abbasi I, Aramin S, Hailu A, Shiferaw W, Kassahun A, Belay S, et al. Evaluation of PCR procedures for detecting and quantifying Leishmania donovani DNA in large numbers of dried human blood samples from a visceral leishmaniasis focus in Northern Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:153.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Desjeux P, Ghosh RS, Dhalaria P, Strub-Wourgaft N, Zijlstra Ed E. Meeting report of the Post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) consortium meeting, New Delhi, India, 27–29 June 2012. Parasit Vect. 2013;6:196.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Hailu A, Balkew M, Berhe N, Meredith S, Gemetchu T. Is Phelotomus (Larroussius) orientalis a vector of visceral leishmaniasis in south–west Ethiopia? Acta Trop. 1995;60:15–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gebre-Michael T, Lane R. The roles of Phlebotomus martini and P. celiae (Diptera: Phiebotominae) as vectors of visceral leishmaniasis in the Aba Roba focus, southern Ethiopia. Med Vet Entomol. 1996;10:53–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Moncaz A, Kirstein O, Gebresilassie A, Lemma W, Yared S, Gebre-Michael T, et al. Characterization of breeding sites of Phlebotomus orientalis-The vector of visceral leishmaniasis in northwestern Ethiopia. Acta Trop. 2014;139:5–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kent RJ, Thuma PE, Mharakurwa S, Norris DE. Seasonality, blood feeding behavior, and transmission of Plasmodium falciparum by Anopheles arabiensis after an extended drought in southern Zambia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76:267–74.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Quate LW. Leishmaniasis in Sudan Republic. 19. Phlebotomus sand flies of the Paloich area in the Sudan (Diptera, Psychodidae). J Med Entomol. 1964;1:19–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Abonnenc E, Minter DM. Bilingual keys for the identification of the sand flies of the Ethiopian Region (in Fr. and Eng.). Mém Off Rech Sci Tech Outre-Mer Entomol Med. 1965;5:1–63.Google Scholar
  12. Lane RP, Fritz GN. The differentiation of the leishmaniasis vector Phlebotomus papatasi from the suspected vector P. bergeroti (Diptera: Phlebotominae). Syst Entomol. 1986;11:439–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis NT. Leishmaniasis in the Sudan republic. 28. Anatomical studies on Phlebotomus orientalis Parrot and P. papatasi Scopoli (Diptera: Psychodidae). J Med Entomol. 1967;4:50–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Moncaz A, Kirstein O, Gebresilassie A, Lemma W, Yared S, Gebre-Michael T, et al. Sergentomyia spp.: Breeding sites in vertisols and peri-domestic habitats in North West Ethiopia. Acta Trop. 2014;137:88–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dytham C. Choosing and using Statistics. A biologist’s guide. 3rd ed. UK: Wiley-Blackwell. A John Wiley and Sons, Ltd; 2011.Google Scholar
  16. Buttiker W, Lewis DJ. Some ecological aspects of Saudi Arabian phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Pychodidae). Fauna of Saudi Arabia. 1983;4:509–19.Google Scholar
  17. Lane RP. The sand flies of Egypt (Diptera: Phlebotominae). Bull Br Mus (Nat Hist) Entomol. 1986;52:1–35.Google Scholar
  18. Elnaiem DA, Ward RD, Hassan HK, Miles MA, Frame LA. Infection rates of Leishmania donovani in Phlebotomus orientalis from a focus of visceral leishmaniasis in eastern Sudan. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1998;92:229–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gebre-Michael T, Balkew M, Berhe N, Hailu A, Mekonnen Y. Further studies on the phlebotomine sand flies of the kala-azar endemic lowlands of Humera-Metema (north-west Ethiopia) with observations on their natural bloodmeal sources. Parasit Vect. 2010;3:6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lemma W, Tekie H, Balkew M, Gebre-Michael T, Warburg A, Hailu A. Population dynamics and habitat preferences of Phlebotomus orientalis in extra-domestic habitats of Kafta-Humera lowlands–kala-azar endemic areas in Northwest Ethiopia. Parasit Vect. 2014;7:359.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Moncaz A, Gebresilassie A, Kirstein O, Faiman R, Gebre-Michael T, Hailu A, et al. Attraction of phlebotomine sand flies to baited and non-baited horizontal surfaces. Acta Trop. 2013;126:205–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kirstein OD, Faiman R, Gebresilassie A, Hailu A, Gebre-Michael T, Warburg A. Attraction of Ethiopian phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) to light and sugar-yeast mixtures (CO2). Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:341.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gebresilassie A, Yared S, Aklilu E, Kirstein OD, Moncaz A, Tekie H, et al. The influence of moonlight and lunar periodicity on the efficacy of CDC light trap in sampling Phlebotomus (Larroussius) orientalis (Parrot, 1936) and other Phlebotomus sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Ethiopia. Parasit Vect. 2015;8:106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Elnaiem DEA, Hassan HK, Osman OF, Maingon RDC, Killick-Kendrick R, Ward RD. A possible role for Phlebotomus (Anaphlebotomus) rodhaini (Parrot, 1930) in transmission of Leishmania donovani. Parasit Vect. 2011;4:238.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Gemetchu T. The distribution of sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae, Phlebotominae) in northwest Ethiopia. Sinet Ethiop J Sci. 1983;6:65–73.Google Scholar
  26. Balkew M, Gebre-Michael T, Berhe N, Ali A, Hailu A. Leishmaniasis in the middle course of the Ethiopian Rift Valley II. Entomological observations. Ethiop Med J. 2002;40:271–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Elnaiem DA, Conners S, Thmoson M, Hassan MM, Hassan KH, Aboud MA, et al. Environmental determinants of the distribution of Phlebotomus orientalis in Sudan. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1998;92:877–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Feliciangeli DM. Natural breeding places of phlebotomine sand flies. Med Vet Entomol. 2004;18:71–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Elnaiem D, Hassan H, Ward R. Associations of Phlebotomus orientalis and other sand flies with vegetation types in the eastern Sudan focus of kala‐azar. Med Vet Entomol. 1999;13:198–203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoogstraal H, Heyneman D. Leishmaniasis in the Sudan Republic: 30. Final Epidemiologic Report. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1969;18:1091–210.Google Scholar
  31. Elnaiem DA, Hassan HK, Ward RD. Phlebotomine sand flies in a focus of visceral leishmaniasis in a border area of eastern Sudan. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1997;91:307–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lambert M, Dereure J, El-Safi SH, Bucheton B, Dessein A, Boni M, et al. The sand fly fauna in the visceral-leishmaniasis focus of Gedaref in the Atbara-River area of eastern Sudan. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002;96:631–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gemechu T, Zerihune A, Assefa G, Lemma A. Observations of the sand fly (Phlebotominae) fauna of Setit Humera (North-Westem Ethiopia). Ethiop Med J. 1975;13:41–51.Google Scholar
  34. Ashford RW, Hutchinson MP, Bray RS. Kala-azar in Ethiopia: epidemiological studies in a highland valley. Ethiop Med J. 1973;11:259–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ibrahim AA, Abdoon MA. Distribution and population dynamics of sand flies (Diptera: Pychodidae) in an endemic area of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Asir Region, Southwestern Saudi Arabia. J Entomol. 2005;2:102–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Belen A, Alten B. Seasonal dynamics and altitudinal distributions of sand fly (Diptera: Psychodidae) populations in a cutaneous leishmaniasis endemic area of the Cukurova region of Turkey. J Vec Ecol. 2009;36:87–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Elnaiem DE. Ecology and control of the sand fly vectors of Leishmania donovani in East Africa, with special emphasis on Phlebotomus orientalis. J Vec Ecol. 2011;36:23–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Seblova V, Volfova V, Dvorak V, Pruzinova K, Votypka J, Kassahun A, et al. Phlebotomus orientalis sand flies from two geographically distant Ethiopian localities: Biology, genetic analyses and susceptibility to Leishmania donovani. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2187.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kamhawi S, Abdel-Hafe SK, Molyneux DH. A comprehensive account of species composition, distribution and ecology of phlebotomine sand flies in Jordan. Parasite. 1995;2:163–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Kasap OE, Belen A, Kaynas S, Simsek FM, Biler L, Ata N, et al. Activity patterns of sand fly (Diptera: Psychodidae) species and comparative performance of different traps in an endemic cutaneous leishmaniasis focus in Cukurova Plain, Southern Anatolia, Turkey. Acta Vet Brno. 2009;78:327–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Alexander B. Sampling methods for phlebotomine sand flies. Med Vet Entomol. 2000;14:109–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Ready PD. Biology of phlebotomine sand flies as vectors of disease agents. Annu Rev Entomol. 2013;58:227–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Yuval B, Warburg A, Schlein Y. Leishmaniasis the Jordan Valley. V. Dispersal characteristics of the sand fly Phlebotomus papatasi. Med Vet Entomol. 1988;2:391–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Orshan L, Szekely D, Khalfa Z, Bitton S. Distribution and seasonality of Phlebotomus sand flies in cutaneous leishmaniasis foci, Judean Desert, Israel. J Med Entomol. 2010;47:319–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Ashford RW. Sand flies (Diptera: Phlebotomidae) from Ethiopia: taxonomic and biological notes. J Med Entomol. 1974;11:605–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Gebresilassie et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement