Open Access

Development of a LAMP assay for detection of Leishmania infantum infection in dogs using conjunctival swab samples

Contributed equally
Parasites & Vectors20158:370

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0991-2

Received: 21 May 2015

Accepted: 7 July 2015

Published: 15 July 2015

Abstract

Background

Leishmania infantum infections in dogs play a crucial role in the transmission of pathogens causing visceral leishmaniasis to humans in the Gansu province, northwest China. To be able to control zoonotic transmission of the parasite to humans, a non-invasive loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay to specifically detect L. infantum infections in dogs was developed.

Methods

The primers used in the LAMP assay were designed to target kinetoplast DNA minicircle sequences of the L. infantum isolate MCAN/CN/90/SC and tested using DNA isolated from promastigotes of different Leishmania species. The LAMP assay was evaluated with conjunctional swab samples obtained from 111 and 33 dogs living in an endemic and a non-endemic region of zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis in the Gansu province, respectively. The LAMP assay was also compared with conventional PCR, ELISA and microscopy using conjunctional swab, serum and bone marrow samples from the dogs, respectively.

Results

The LAMP assay detected 1 fg of L. infantum DNA purified from cultured promastigotes which was 10-fold more sensitive than a conventional PCR test using Leishmania genus-specific primers. No cross reaction was observed with DNA isolated from promastigotes of L. donovani, L. major, L. tropica, and L. braziliensis, and the L. infantum reference strain MHOM/TN/80/IPT1. The L. infantum-positive rates obtained for field-collected samples were 61.3 %, 58.6 %, 40.5 % and 10.8 % by LAMP, PCR, ELISA and microscopy, respectively. As only one out of the 33 samples from control dogs from the non-endemic region of zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis was positive by the LAMP assay and the PCR test, the observed true negative rate (specificity) was 97 % for both methods.

Conclusion

This study has shown that the non-invasive, conjunctional swab-based LAMP assay developed was more sensitive in the detection of leishmaniasis in dogs than PCR, ELISA and microscopy. The findings indicate that the LAMP assay is a sensitive and specific method for the field surveillance of domestic dogs, particularly of asymptomatic canines, in ZVL-endemic areas in western China.

Keywords

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification Conjunctional swabs Zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis Asymptomatic canine reservoir host Leishmania infantum

Background

Leishmaniasis is a vector-borne parasitic disease of humans and other mammals caused by flagellates of the genus Leishmania. The protozoan parasites are transmitted by the bite of infected sandflies and live and multiply intracellularly in macrophages of their mammalian host. Leishmania parasites cause three different clinical forms of the disease in humans, classified as visceral leishmaniasis (VL), cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL). VL is considered to be the most lethal form of the disease causing, annually, an estimated 59,000 deaths and 2.4 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) [1]. The disease can be divided into two forms, namely zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis (ZVL) and anthroponotic visceral leishmaniasis (AVL). ZVL is widely distributed in the Mediterranean basin, Africa, Asia and Latin America and is caused by L. infantum [25].

VL is an important public health problem in China and is currently endemic in 61 counties in six provinces or autonomous regions in western China, including Xinjiang, Gansu, Sichuan, Shaanxi, Shanxi and Inner Mongolia [6]. Among them, Gansu, Sichuan, Shaanxi and Shanxi are ZVL endemic areas, with Phlebotomus chinensis as the vector for transmission of L. infantum between humans and dogs. Recent epidemiological studies have shown that the prevalence of canine leishmaniasis in western China is generally very high with over 50 % of dogs infected with L. infantum [7]. Elimination of domestic dogs in endemic areas has resulted in a dramatic reduction of human VL cases indicating that infected dogs play a crucial role as reservoir host [7, 8]. Diagnosis of canine leishmaniasis is difficult due to the wide spectrum of clinical manifestations and the lack of symptoms during the early stage of the infection [911]. Identification of infected dogs in endemic areas, in particular asymptomatic dogs, which constitute an important reservoir for the transmission of L. infantum to humans [12], is critical for the control of human VL. Thus, a reliable, accurate and rapid diagnostic test for the detection of canine leishmaniasis is needed in order to manage infected dogs and to avoid zoonotic transmission of the parasite to humans.

Serological and parasitological tests have limitations in the diagnosis of canine leishmaniasis, especially in early infected and asymptomatic dogs [13, 14]. On the other hand, molecular techniques have been shown to be very specific and sensitive in detection of L. infantum infections in dogs [7, 1418]. However, as classical molecular methods like conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) require technically skilled staff and delicate equipment, they are not suitable for field studies in endemic regions. More recently, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) was developed using DNA polymerase with strand-displacement activity along with two inner and two outer primers recognizing six separate target regions to rapidly amplify DNA with high specificity under isothermal condition [19]. This method combines the high sensitivity of a molecular diagnostic test with the possibility of carrying out the assay under field conditions with limited technical requirements.

Most molecular tests for diagnosis of leishmaniasis use blood, bone marrow, lymph node or skin samples [20]. However, these samples are obtained by invasive procedures. A non-invasive alternative is the collecting of conjunctival swab samples as a source of DNA [21]. In this study, a non-invasive, conjunctival swab LAMP assay for diagnosing L. infantum infection in dogs was developed and compared with a conventional PCR test using the same samples.

Methods

Ethics, consent and permissions

This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Shanghai. Oral informed consent was obtained from dog owners.

Culturing of parasites

Five Leishmania species were used in this study (Table 1). Promastigotes of each species were grown in Novy-MacNeal-Nicolle medium (NNN medium) at 22-24 °C. After about 7 days of culture, promastigotes were harvested in stationary growth phase for DNA extraction.
Table 1

Leishmania species used in this study

Species

WHO code

Origin

Host

Form

L. infantum

MCAN/CN/90/SC

China (Sichuan)

dog

VL

L. donovani

MHOM/IN/80/DD8

India (Bihar)

human

VL

L. infantum

MHOM/TN/80/IPT1

Tunisia

human

CL

L. major

MHOM/SU/75/5ASKH

Turkmenistan

human

CL

L. tropica

MHOM/SU/73/K27

Azerbaijan

human

CL

L. braziliensis

MHOM/BR/75/M2903

Brazil (State of Pará)

human

CL

Clinical samples

Sampling was carried out in November 2012 in Longnan city, Wudu district, Gansu province; an endemic area for ZVL. One-hundred-and-eleven dogs older than six months were included in this study. Before sampling, animals were subjected to clinical examination. Exfoliated epithelial cells were collected from the conjunctiva of the right and left eye of each dog using sterile cotton swabs manufactured for bacteriological isolation. The cotton tips were cut off and only the cotton parts were transferred to sterile tubes containing 200 μl of sterile saline, kept on ice and then stored at −20 °C until analyzed. Blood samples were collected from dogs in tubes without anticoagulant to obtain serum (1 ml). Serum samples were stored at −20 °C until analyzed. Bone marrow aspirates of each dog were obtained using a sterile biopsy needle and smeared on three slides. After drying, the smears were fixed with methanol and later stained with Giemsa for microscopic examination.

For negative controls, conjunctival swabs and serum samples were collected from 33 dogs living in the Zhang Xian County of Gansu province, a non-endemic area of ZVL. As this county is a high altitude area (>2500 m above sea level) with a yearly average temperature below 10 °C, sandflies do not normally occur and, therefore, dogs are usually not infected with L. infantum, For this reason, no bone marrow samples were taken from these dogs in order to avoid unnecessary distress and pain for the animals.

DNA extraction

DNA of cultured promastigotes was isolated using phenol/chloroform extraction method as described in Schönian et al. [22]. DNA from conjunctival swabs was extracted by boiling the cotton parts in 200 μl of 0.9 % NaCl for 15 min followed by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C.

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification

LAMP primers were designed using PrimerExplorer software (http://primerexplorer.jp/e/) based on kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) minicircle sequence of the L. infantum isolate MCAN/CN/90/SC (Genbank, accession no. KC492147) (Table 2). The locations of the targeted sequences are shown in Fig. 1. The L. infantum specific LAMP assay was optimized for temperature and time using the strain MCAN/CN/90/SC. Different Leishmania species and strains (listed in Table 1) were used to determine the specificity of the LAMP assay.
Table 2

Nucleotide sequences of LAMP primers designed for detection of L. infantum MCAN/CN/90/SC kinetoplast minicircle DNA

Name

Length (bp)

Sequence

FIP (F1c-F2)

46

5’-CACGAAATCTCACACAATTAACACA-

TTTATGTCTCGTAAGATCCCT-3’

BIP (B1-B2c)

38

5’-TGTGCAAGTTTTGCCTTGGT-

TACCCCCATTTTCGGCTA-3’

F3

18

5’-ATGTCTGTTGGCTGTTGT-3’

B3c

18

5’-GGACCAGAAAAGTTTGGC-3’

Fig. 1

LAMP primer targeting L. infantum kinetoplast minicircle DNA. The partial sequence of L. infantum MCAN/CN/90/SC kinetoplast minicircle DNA and the location of the four primer, FIP (F1c-F2), BIP (B1-B2c), F3 and B3c are shown. Primer FIP consists of F1 complementary sequence and F2 direct sequence. Primer BIP consists of B1 direct sequence and B2 complementary sequence. The arrows indicate the direction of extension

The LAMP assay was carried out in 25 μl of reaction mixture containing 40 pmol of each FIP and BIP primers, 5 pmol of each F3 and B3 primers, 1.4 mM of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 0.8 M betaine, 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.8), 10 mM KCl, 10 mM (NH4)2SO4, 8 mM MgSO4, 0.1 % Triton X-100, 8 units of Bst DNA polymerase large fragment (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), 1 μl calcein, and 1 μl DNA sample. The reaction mixture was placed in a Loopamp Real-time Turbidimeter LA-320C (Eiken Chemical Co, Ltd., Shanghai, China) and incubated at 64 °C for 60 min. The reaction was terminated by increasing the temperature to 80 °C. For confirmation, 3 μl of LAMP product was separated by electrophoresis on a 2 % agarose gel and visualized under UV light after staining with ethidium bromide (5 μg/ml).

The sensitivity of the LAMP assay was determined with 10-fold serially diluted DNA (10 pg to 0.1 fg) isolated from promastigotes of L. infantum MCAN/CN/90/SC. To compare the sensitivity of the LAMP assay with that of conventional PCR, the same dilutions were also tested by PCR.

When analyzing field samples, DNA extracted from conjunctival swabs from six dogs with symptomatic VL and confirmed L. infantum infection from Sichuan province served as positive controls. DNA samples extracted from conjunctival swabs from non-infected dogs were used as negative controls.

Conventional polymerase chain reaction

For PCR, Leishmania genus-specific primers (RV1 (sense): 5’-CTTTTCTGGTCCCGCGGGTAGG-3’; RV2 (antisense): 5’-CCACCTGGCCTATTTTACACCA-3’ [23]) were used to amplify a 145-bp fragment of kDNA minicircle. The primers were synthesized by Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology & Service Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). PCR amplification was carried out as described previously [24]. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 2 % agarose gels.

Microscopy

Methanol-fixed bone marrow smears were stained with Giemsa and examined under 100× oil-immersion lens for presence of Leishmania amastigotes. Two investigators examined independently at least 2000 microscopic fields of each smear.

ELISA

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was carried out as previously described using promastigote antigen isolated from cultured L. infantum MCAN/CN/90/SC [7].

Statistical analysis

The χ 2-test (http://www.quantpsy.org/chisq/chisq.htm) was used for comparing LAMP, PCR, ELISA and microscopy results. A p value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Sensitivity of L. infantum LAMP assay

A set of oligonucleotide primers designed for LAMP reaction of L. infantum MCAN/CN/90/SC kDNA minicircle amplified the targeted sequences (Fig. 2). All serial dilutions of the DNA with the exception of that containing 0.1 fg DNA or just water, turned green under the UV light indicating that the detection limit of the assay was 1 fg DNA (Fig. 2a). The presence of LAMP products in the reaction mixture was confirmed by analyzing the reaction products by agarose gel electrophoresis revealing a characteristic pattern of a ladder of multiple bands (Fig. 2b). In contrast, the detection limit of a conventional PCR test using Leishmania genus-specific primers was 10 fg DNA, ten times higher than that of the LAMP assay (Fig. 2c).
Fig. 2

Comparison of detection sensitivity of L. infantum LAMP and PCR. Total DNA from L. infantum MCAN/CN/90/SC was serially diluted from 10 pg to 0.1 fg and amplified by LAMP and conventional PCR. a Visual appearance of LAMP products. b Agarose gel electrophoresis of LAMP products. c Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products. Lane M, 100-bp ladder; lanes 1–6, 10 pg, 1 pg, 100 fg, 10 fg, 1 fg and 0.1 fg DNA, respectively; lane 7, water (negative control)

Specificity of L. infantum LAMP assay

When 100 ng DNA isolated from cultured promastigotes of different Leishmania species was used, all reactions remained colorless and no amplification product was detected by agarose gel electrophoresis (Fig. 3a and b). Even a DNA sample from a different L. infantum strains (MHOM/TN/80/IPT1) included in the study to determine whether the primers were highly specific for the L. infantum isolate of Chinese origin gave a negative result (Fig. 3a and b). However, all samples gave positive results when subjected to conventional PCR using Leishmania genus-specific primers confirming that DNA was present in the samples (Fig. 3c).
Fig. 3

Specificity of L. infantum LAMP. Total DNA (100 ng) from different Leishmania species and strains were amplified by LAMP using primers targeting L. infantum MCAN/CN/90/SC kinetoplast minicircle DNA and by conventional PCR using Leishmania genus-specific primers. a Visual appearance of LAMP products. b Agarose gel electrophoresis of LAMP products. c Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products. Lane M, 100 bp ladder; lane 1, L. infantum MCAN/CN/90/SC; lane 2, L. donovani MHOM/IN/80/DD8; lane 3, L. major MHOM/SU/75/5ASKH; lane 4, L. tropica MHOM/SU/73/K27; lane 5, L. braziliensis MHOM/BR/75/M2903; lane 6, L. infantum MHOM/TN/80/IPT1; lane 7, water (negative control)

Performance of L. infantum LAMP assay

Different tissue samples from 111 dogs from the Wudu district (endemic for ZVL) were analyzed by LAMP and PCR (conjunctional swab samples), ELISA (serum samples) and microscopy (bone marrow samples). Only 12 dogs were demonstrated to be positive by all four methods (Table 3). These included 10 samples from dogs with clinical symptoms of VL. Additionally, 31 samples were positive by LAMP, PCR and ELISA, 22 samples by LAMP and PCR, and 3 samples only by LAMP, respectively (Table 3). No samples were positive only by the PCR test or by microscopy. Two samples from asymptomatic dogs were positive by ELISA but not by any other method (Table 3). Forty-one samples were negative by all four methods (Table 3).
Table 3

Number of field collected samples from dogs living in the Wudu and Zhang Xian district shown to be positive (+) or negative (−) by LAMP, PCR, ELISA and microscopy (LM)

Region

Number of samples

Assay outcomes

  

LAMP

PCR

ELISA

LM

Wudu

12a

+

+

+

+

 

31

+

+

+

 

22

+

+

 

3

+

 

2

+

 

41

 

Total 111 (+/−)

68/43

65/46

45/66

12/99

Zhang Xian

1

+

+

n.d.b

 

32

n.d.

 

Total 33 (+/−)

1/32

1/32

0/33

n.d.

a10 out of the 12 samples were from symptomatic dogs

bnot determined

Of the 111 dogs examined, 61.3 % (68 dogs (66 in left eye and 65 in right eye)) tested positive for the presence of L. infantum using the LAMP assay, 58.6 % (65 dogs (63 in left eye and 61 in right eye)) using the PCR test, 40.5 % (45 dogs) using ELISA and 10.8 % (12 dogs) using microscopy (Table 3). The difference in sensitivity between the LAMP assay and the PCR test was, however, not statistically significant (χ 2 = 0.169, p = 0.6810). On the other hand, the sensitivity of the LAMP assay, the PCR test and the ELISA were all extremely significantly different from that of the microscopic examination (χ 2 = 61.285, p < 0.0001, χ 2 = 55.853, p < 0.0001 and χ 2 = 25.705, p < 0.0001, respectively). Both LAMP assay and PCR test were statistically significantly different from the ELISA (χ 2 = 9.535, p = 0.0020 and χ 2 = 7.208, p = 0.0073).

All of the 33 dogs from the Zhang Xian County tested negative in the ELISA (Table 3). However, one of these dogs tested positive for the presence of leishmanial DNA by both the LAMP assay and the PCR test (Table 3). Based on this, the observed true negative rate (specificity) of both the LAMP assay and the PCR test was 97.0 %.

Discussion

LAMP is a relatively new nucleic acid amplification method [25], which has been successfully applied as a useful tool in the diagnosis of parasitic infections including human African sleeping sickness and malaria [26, 27]. As the LAMP reaction is a simple and rapid DNA copying procedure that does not require a denaturation step during amplification, the test is particularly useful for diagnosis of infections in the field.

The LAMP primers used in this study amplified a specific target sequence from kDNA minicircles of the L. infantum strain MCAN/CN/90/SC but not from kDNA minicircles of other Leishmania species. Even with a different L. infantum strain (MHOM/TN/80/IPT1) a negative result was obtained. This finding indicates that the LAMP primers were only useful for the detection of Chinese L. infantum strains. Similar geographic restrictions have also been reported for PCR primers. For example, PCR primers amplifying a 204 bp fragment from L. donovani kDNA minicircles have been shown to be highly specific for L. donovani isolates of Indian origin but not for L. donovani strains from other parts of the world [28]. However, as the LAMP primers used in this study only identified one strain of L. infantum and not many is not a disadvantage per se, as MCAN/CN/90/SC is the only strain in China to infect dogs to cause canine VL. In addition it is very difficult to design universal LAMP primers that can amplify kDNA minicircles from different strains of L. infantum because there are only a few short sequence stretches of kDNA minicircles that are common between different Leishmania strains [2931].

Accurate and rapid diagnosis of canine leishmaniasis is essential to reduce the number of infected dogs in endemic areas in order to prevent the transmission of the disease from the animal reservoir to humans. Although various methods are available for detection of Leishmania spp. in dogs, molecular techniques have typically much greater sensitivity than parasitological or serological tests. The LAMP assay developed in this study had a detection limit of 1 fg of L. infantum DNA purified from cultured promastigotes; an amount that represents an equivalent of about 0.1 parasites. This high sensitivity was achieved by targeting kDNA minicircles, of which, thousands of copies are present in a trypanosomatid cell [32]. This detection limit is 50 times lower than that of a recently developed L. infantum LAMP assay targeting the cysteine protease B multi copy gene [33].

LAMP assays have been previously shown to detect Leishmania infections with high sensitivity and specificity when using blood samples [3336]. However, like conventional PCR, LAMP is also sensitive to various substances present in biological fluids, although LAMP is less affected by these components than the PCR [37]. In addition, to make the LAMP technique feasible for field use, the sampling method needs to be easy, non-invasive and painless; conjunctival swabs as a sampling method fulfills all of these requirements. While DNA extraction and purification from blood samples is usually required for nucleic acid amplification methods, conjunctival swabs can just be boiled and centrifuged in order to extract the DNA. Moreover, conjunctival swab sampling in connection with conventional PCR has been shown to be highly sensitive in the detection of Leishmania infections in sick or subclinically infected dogs [21, 3840]. Equally important is the fact that non-invasive sample collection is also more acceptable to dog owners.

In the absence of a gold standard (note that serological and parasitological methods are not very sensitive in the diagnosis of subclinical leishmaniasis in dogs [13, 20]), the true positive rate (sensitivity) of the LAMP assay could not be determined. However, the newly developed LAMP assay appeared to be more sensitive than conventional PCR, ELISA and microscopy, as more dogs were diagnosed positive for infection with L. infantum. That the LAMP method achieves higher positive detection rates than PCR tests is not uncommon and has been reported for other parasitic diseases [41, 42].

The observed true negative rate (specificity) of the newly developed LAMP assay (97 %) is comparable with the specificities of other LAMP assays designed for the detection of VL in blood samples (80-98 % [33, 35]). Only one out of 33 dogs from a non-endemic area of ZVL gave a false positive result. The reason for this is unclear. It could be due to contamination of the DNA sample extracted from the conjunctival swab, as the PCR test was also positive with this sample.

Conclusion

In summary, a simple and rapid non-invasive conjunctival swab LAMP assay for the sensitive and specific detection of L. infantum in dogs was developed. As this test is an affordable and easily applied method, it is useful for epidemiological surveillance of L. infantum infections in dogs in order to control ZVL in endemic areas in western China.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Dr Darren Sexton (Liverpool John Moores University) for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the National S & T Major Program (Grant No. 2012-ZX10004-201 and 2012-ZX10004-220).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, Ministry of Public Health, National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, WHO Collaborating Centre for Malaria, Schistosomiasis and Filariasis
(2)
BioMedical Research Centre, Norwich Medical School, Norwich Research Park, University of East Anglia

References

  1. Alvar J, Yactayo S, Bern C. Leishmaniasis and poverty. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22:552–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Gramiccia M, Gradoni L. The current status of zoonotic leishmaniases and approaches to disease control. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35:1169–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Dantas-Torres F. Canine leishmaniosis in South America. Parasit Vectors. 2009;2 Suppl 1:S1.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F. Canine and feline vector-borne diseases in Italy: current situation and perspectives. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:2.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Chamaillé L, Tran A, Meunier A, Bourdoiseau G, Ready P, Dedet JP. Environmental risk mapping of canine leishmaniasis in France. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:31.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang JY, Cui G, Chen HT, Zhou XN, Gao CH, Yang YT. Current epidemiological profile and features of visceral leishmaniasis in People’s Republic of China. Parasit Vectors. 2010;5:31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Wang JY, Ha Y, Gao CH, Wang Y, Yang YT, Chen HT. The prevalence of canine Leishmania infantum infection in western China detected by PCR and serological tests. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:69.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang JY, Chen SB, Gao CH, Jin CF, Feng Y, Zhang CJ, et al. Survey on the Leishmania infantum asymptomatic infection in dogs in Wenxian county of Gansu Province. Chin J Zoonoses. 2006;22:734–7.Google Scholar
  9. Ciaramella P, Oliva G, Luna RD, Gradoni L, Ambrosio R, Cortese L, et al. A retrospective clinical study of canine leishmaniasis in 150 dogs naturally infected by Leishmania infantum. Vet Rec. 1997;141:539–43.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Koutinas AF, Polizopoulou ZS, Saridomichelakis MN, Argyriadis D, Fytianou A, Plevraki KG. Clinical considerations on canine visceral leishmaniasis in Greece: a retrospective study of 158 cases (1989–1996). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1999;35:376–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Dereure J, Pratlong F, Dedet JP. Geographical distribution and the identification of parasites causing canine leishmaniasis in the Mediterranean Basin. In: Killick-Kendrick R, editor. Canine Leishmaniasis: an update. Barcelona: Proceedings of the International Canine Leishmaniasis Forum; 1999. p. 18–25.Google Scholar
  12. Moshfe A, Mohebali M, Edrissian G, Zarei Z, Akhoundi B, Kazemi B, et al. Canine visceral leishmaniasis: asymptomatic infected dogs as a source of L. infantum infection. Acta Trop. 2009;112:101–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Gomes YM, Paiva Cavalcanti M, Lira RA, Abath FG, Alves LC. Diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis: biotechnological advances. Vet J. 2008;175:45–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Leontides LS, Saridomichelakis MN, Billinis C, Kontos V, Koutinas AF, Galatos AD, et al. A cross-sectional study of Leishmania spp. infection in clinically healthy dogs with polymerase chain reaction and serology in Greece. Vet Parasitol. 2002;109:19–27.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Reale S, Maxia L, Vitale F, Glorioso NS, Caracappa S, Vesco G. Detection of Leishmania infantum in dogs by PCR with lymph node aspirates and blood. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:2931–5.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Nasereddin A, Eregat S, Azmi K, Baneth G, Jaffe CL, Abdeen Z. Serological survey with PCR validation for canine visceral leishmaniasis in northern Palestine. J Parasitol. 2006;92:178–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Chargui N, Haouas N, Gorcii M, Lahmar S, Guesmi M, Ben Abdelhafidh A, et al. Use of PCR, IFAT and in vitro culture in the detection of Leishmania infantum infection in dogs and evaluation of the prevalence of canine leishmaniasis in a low endemic area in Tunisia. Parasite. 2009;16:65–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. de Paiva Cavalcanti M, de Felinto Brito ME, de Souza WV, de Miranda Gomes Y, Abath FG. The development of a real-time PCR assay for the quantification of Leishmania infantum DNA in canine blood. Vet J. 2009;182:356–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Mori Y, Notomi T. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): a rapid, accurate, and cost-effective diagnostic method for infectious diseases. J Infect Chemother. 2009;15:62–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Solano-Gallego L, Miró G, Koutinas A, Cardoso L, Pennisi MG, Ferrer L, et al. LeishVet guidelines for the practical management of canine leishmaniosis. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:86.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Strauss-Ayali D, Jaffe CL, Burshtain O, Gonen L, Baneth G. Polymerase chain reaction using noninvasively obtained samples, for the detection of Leishmania infantum DNA in dogs. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:1729–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Schönian G, Schweynoch C, Zlateva K, Oskam L, Kroon N, Gräser Y, et al. Identification and determination of the relationships of species and strains within the genus Leishmania using single primers in the polymerase chain reaction. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1996;77:19–29.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. le Fichoux Y, Quaranta JF, Aufeuvre JP, Lelievre A, Marty P, Suffia I, et al. Occurrence of Leishmania infantum parasitemia in asymptomatic blood donors living in an area of endemicity in Southern France. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:1953–7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gao CH, Wang JY, Yang YT, Bao YF. Study on PCR method for detecting the asymptomatic infection of Leishmania infantum. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis. 2006;24:92–6.Google Scholar
  25. Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N, et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28, E63.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuboki N, Inoue N, Sakurai T, Di Cello F, Grab DJ, Suzuki H, et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for detection of African trypanosomes. J Clin Micorbiol. 2003;41:5517–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Poon LL, Wong BW, Ma EH, Chan KH, Chow LM, Abeyewickreme W, et al. Sensitive and inexpensive molecular test for falciparum malaria: detecting Plasmodium falciparum DNA directly from heat-treated blood by loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Clin Chem. 2006;52:303–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Singh N, Curran MD, Rastogil AK, Middleton D, Sundar H. Diagnostic PCR with Leishmania donovani specificity using sequences from the variable region of kinetoplastid minicircle DNA. Trop Med Int Health. 1999;4:448–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kennedy WP. Novel identification of differences in the kinetoplast DNA of Leishmania isolates by recombinant DNA technique and in situ hybridisation. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1984;12:313–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Lawrie JM, Jackson PR, Stiteler JM, Hockmeyer WT. Identification of pathogenic Leishmania promastigotes by DNA: DNA hybridization with kinetoplast DNA cloned into E. coli plasmids. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1985;34:257–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lopes UG, Wirth DF. Identification of visceral Leishmania species with cloned sequences of kinetoplast DNA. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1986;20:77–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Stuart K. Kinetoplast DNA, mitochondrial DNA with a difference. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1983;9:93–104.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Chaouch M, Mhadhbi M, Adams ER, Schoone GJ, Limam S, Gharbi Z, et al. Development and evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for rapid detection of Leishmania infantum in canine leishmaniasis based on cysteine protease B genes. Vet Parasitol. 2013;198:78–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Takagi H, Itoh M, Islam MZ, Razzaque A, Ekram AR, Hashighuchi Y, et al. Sensitive, specific, and rapid detection of Leishmania donovani DNA by loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;81:578–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Adams ER, Schoone GJ, Ageed AF, Safi SE, Schallig HD. Development of a reverse transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the sensitive detection of Leishmania parasites in clinical samples. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;82:591–6.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Khan MG, Bhaskar KR, Salam MA, Akther T, Pluschke G, Mondal D. Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for detection of Leishmania DNA in buffy coat from visceral leishmaniasis patients. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:280.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaneko H, Kawana T, Fukushima E, Suzutani T. Tolerance of loop-mediated isothermal amplification to a culture medium and biological substances. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2007;70:499–501.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Ferreira SA, Ituassu LT, de Melo MN, de Andrade AS. Evaluation of the conjunctival swab for canine visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis by PCR-hybridization in Minas Gerais State. Brazil Vet Parasitol. 2008;152:257–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Leite RS, Ferreira SA, Ituassu LT, de Melo MN, de Andrade AS. PCR diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in asymptomatic dogs using conjunctival swab samples. Vet Parasitol. 2010;24:201–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Di Muccio T, Veronesi F, Antognoni MT, Onofri A, Piergili Fioretti D, Gramiccia M. Diagnostic value of conjunctival swab sampling associated with nested PCR for different categories of dogs naturally exposed to Leishmania infantum infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:2651–9.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. He L, Zhou YQ, Oosthuizen MC, Zhao JL. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) detection of Babesia orientalis in water buffalo (Bubalus babalis, Linnaeus, 1758) in China. Vet Parasitol. 2009;165:36–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Ni X, McManus DP, Yan H, Yang J, Lou Z, Li H, et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the identification of Echinococcus multilocularis infections in canine definitive hosts. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:254.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Gao et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement