- Open Access
Fitness cost in field and laboratory Aedes aegypti populations associated with resistance to the insecticide temephos
© Diniz et al. 2015
- Received: 18 March 2015
- Accepted: 20 December 2015
- Published: 30 December 2015
The continued use of chemical insecticides in the context of the National Program of Dengue Control in Brazil has generated a high selective pressure on the natural populations of Aedes aegypti, leading to their resistance to these compounds in the field. Fitness costs have been described as adaptive consequences of resistance. This study evaluated the biological and reproductive performance of A. aegypti strains and a field population resistant to temephos, the main larvicide used for controlling mosquitoes.
Comparative tests were performed with a resistant field population from the municipality of Arcoverde, Pernambuco State, Brazil, with a high rate of temephos resistance (RR = 226.6) and three isogenetic laboratory strains from the same origin (Araripina municipality, Pernambuco): RecR (RR = 283.6); RecRNEx (RR = 250.5), a strain under a process of resistance reversion; and RecRev (RR = 2.32), a reversed susceptible strain used as an experimental control.
Our study revealed that the absence of selective pressure imposed by exposure to temephos, for five consecutive generations, led to a discrete reduction of the resistance ratio and the response of the detoxifying enzymes. Most of the 19 biological parameters were impaired in the resistant strains and field population. The analysis of the fertility life table confirmed the presence of reproductive disadvantages for the resistant individuals. Similarly, the longevity, body size, and total energetic resources were also lower for the resistant females, except for the last two parameters in the field females (Arcoverde). In contrast, the sex ratio and embryonic viability suffered no interference in all strains or population evaluated, regardless of their status of resistance to temephos.
The reproductive potential and survival of the resistant individuals were compromised. The parameters most affected were the larval development time, fecundity, net reproduction rate, and the generational doubling time. These fitness costs in the natural population and laboratory strains investigated are likely associated with maintaining the metabolic mechanism of resistance to temephos. Our results show that despite these costs, the highly temephos resistant populations can compensate for these losses and successfully overcome the control actions that are based on the use of chemical insecticides.
- insecticide resistance
Aedes aegypti is a species of wide geographic distribution that has great epidemiological importance because females of this species can carry several arbovirus, such as Dengue, Yellow Fever and Chikungunya [1, 2]. Due to the absence of a polyvalent vaccine for human immunization against different serotypes of Dengue virus (DENV), vector control through the use of chemical insecticides remains the primary strategy to contain outbreaks of the disease . The intensive and extensive use of the organophosphate temephos for controlling A. aegypti worldwide has generated a high selective pressure on mosquito populations, causing changes in the susceptibility of natural populations of this species [4–12], including in Africa .
Resistance is a pre-adaptive process resulting from random genetic mutations . Resistance to organophosphates such as temephos may occur due to changes in the target site of the insecticide, which, in this case, is the enzyme acetylcholinesterase, a neurotransmitter present in nerve synapses, or due to accelerated metabolism of the insecticide, which prevents the insecticide from reaching its target . Accelerated insecticide metabolism is caused by the over expression of detoxifying enzymes or enzyme structural changes that increase their metabolic capacity . Until now, no case of natural A. aegypti populations with mutations in the enzyme acetylcholinesterase, leading to resistance, has ever been recorded, although it has been described in other diptera [15–17]. Thus, it is believed that metabolic resistance is the process most likely involved in the resistance to temephos in this species [8, 18].
One of the most discussed issues in biological studies involving resistance is the nature of the adaptive process, which, despite often being associated with a fitness cost, leads to the survival and reproductive success of individuals exposed to a natural or induced adverse condition [19–21]. Fitness cost is an energetic investment that leads to incremental losses of biotic potential. Previous work on this subject was performed on Culex pipiens (a model organism for fitness cost studies), and the fitness costs have been described as a consequence of the vector/parasite interaction or of the resistance to chemical insecticides . Moreover, with respect to this species, it has been found that genes that confer resistance to chemical insecticides typically carry a number of associated biological costs, such as vulnerability to predation, reduced competitive potential among males, increased development time, decreased size of individuals, and reduced survival rates [23–26].
The amount of some energetic reserves in C. pipiens mosquitoes resistant to organophosphates can be reduced due to an over expression of enzymes (esterases) involved in the metabolic process of insecticide detoxification . According to Rivero et al., this reduction is a consequence of metabolic exchange, which is defined by the expression “trade-off”, which means compensation, representing a reallocation of energetic resources from a primary function (such as egg production) to maintain a secondary function (for example, overproduction of detoxifying enzymes) . Thus, resistant insects may have a large adaptive advantage in an environment where there is continuous pressure due to insecticide use . However, their survival in these conditions may represent the reduced performance of certain physiological processes, such as fecundity and longevity of individuals in the field .
Thereby, genotypes that confer resistance to xenobiotics may have some adaptive disadvantages compared with the genotypes of susceptible individuals in the absence of the selective pressure exerted by these compounds . Resistance, in most cases, is not stable and tends to decrease significantly over time in the field when the contact with the insecticide ceases. This suggests the existence of a fitness cost related to maintaining the biological mechanisms that provide resistance to insecticides .
In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that biological parameters are impaired due to high levels of resistance to temephos (RR > 200) in the A. aegypti field population and laboratory strains that are harboring the metabolic resistance mechanism.
Establishment and maintenance of Aedes aegypti strains and field population
To perform the experiments in this work we first established the laboratory strains and the field population under controlled conditions in the insectary of Aggeu Magalhães Research Center (Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães - CPqAM), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz - Fiocruz). In order to standardize the conditions for rearing larvae, 200 first instar larvae were placed in plastic containers containing 2 L of water and 1 mg of cat food (Friskies®)/per larva for rearing and nine containers for each laboratory strain or population were used, totaling 1800 larvae per group. In the pupal stage, individuals were transferred to containment cages for the emergence of mosquitoes. Males and females were fed a 10 % sugar solution ad libitum, and additionally, females were offered four blood meals from Swiss mice (Mus musculus) once a week to obtain progenies. Ethical approval: the use of these mice was authorized by the Animal Ethics Committee of the CPqAM, approval no. 27/2011. The female mosquitoes laid their eggs on substrates (filter paper) moistened with water. The moist eggs were partially dried after embryogenesis at room temperature and then stored until use. All the insects were kept in climatized rooms at 26 °C ± 1 °C with a relative humidity of 50 % to 60 % and a 12 h photophase.
Aedes aegypti laboratory strains and field population
Recife-Resistant (RecR): The strain, which originated from a field population collected in the municipality of Araripina (7°34′34″ S and 40°29′54″ W), 690 km from Recife, capital of Pernambuco State, has been subjected to high selective pressure with the organophosphate temephos. The RecR strain has been maintained in the Insectary of Department of Entomology of the CPqAM/FIOCRUZ-Pernambuco since 2004 . All the tests in this study were performed with the 26th generation of this strain, with a resistance ratio to temephos higher than >200 fold.
Sub-strains Rec-Reverse (RecRev) and RecR Non-Exposed (RecRNEx): the first sub-strain subjected to the process of reversion of resistance to temephos, RecRev, was established from the 14th generation of RecR, when it presented a resistance ratio of 125-fold . The 21stgeneration of RecRev used in this study was considered susceptible to temephos because it presents a resistance ratio <3 fold and exhibits patterns of detoxification enzyme activity similar to the Rockefeller strain (standard susceptible strain). RecRev has been kept without exposure to temephos, and it was used as a control for biological performance of the resistant individuals. The second sub-strain, RecRNEx, was established from the 26th generation of RecR. Selective pressure with temephos was suspended for five consecutive generations to evaluate the biological parameters.
Rockefeller strain: This standard susceptibility strain to chemical insecticides, was used exclusively as a control to estimate the resistance ratio and detoxification enzyme activity. This strain has been maintained in the CPqAM insectary since 2007 .
Resistant field population: Samples of a natural A. aegypti population from the municipality of Arcoverde (08°25′08″ S; 37°03′14″ W), 389.7 km from Araripina and 252 km from Recife were previously obtained by collecting eggs using traps (ovitraps), following the procedure of the MoReNAa Network, between July and August 2011 . A sample of this population was kindly provided for this study by the Reference Service for the Control of Culicid Vectors (Serviço de Referência de Controle de Culicídeos Vetores - SRCCV) of the CPqAM- Department of Entomology in 2011. Comparative tests with this population were conducted using the second filial generation (F2) to avoid potential influence of maternal and grand-maternal influence.
It is important to highlight that in all the experiments regarding fitness cost described below, RecR, RecRev, RecRNEx and the field population from Arcoverde were all used simultaneously.
Quantification of the resistance to temephos
In vivo assays were performed to measure the resistance of the larvae of the populations analyzed in this study. In the bioassays, various concentrations of technical grade temephos were used [0.30 to 3.50 mg/mL] (Sigma/97.5 % - batch no. 0535/2011). Tests were performed according to the methodology adapted from the protocol of the World Health Organization . For each concentration of temephos and control, three replicates were used, and at least three independent experiments were performed with each strain to estimate the lethal concentrations (LC) of the insecticide. The resistance ratio was estimated by taking the LC95 value of the test strain divided by the observed value for the Rockefeller strain (LC95 = 0.011 mg/mL). The resistance degree of the populations were classified according to the criteria established by Mazzarri and Georghiou and were adjusted by the MoReNAa Network into low (3 ≤ RR ≤ 5), medium (5 < RR ≤ 10) or high (RR > 10) resistance . Therefore, samples with a resistance ratio <3 were considered susceptible.
Quantification of the detoxification enzymes activity
These tests measured the activity of enzymes involved in the detoxification of xenobiotics in A. aegypti strains and the field population, previously characterized in relation to their profile of susceptibility to temephos by Araujo et al.  and in the present work. The enzymes assessed were mixed-function oxidases (MFOs), glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), and esterases (alpha, beta, and PNPA). Biochemical tests were performed according to the protocol described by the Brazilian Ministry of Health . Approximately 120 unfed females one day post-emergence were analyzed in each group (field population or laboratory strains). At least three independent experiments were performed. The individuals were separately macerated with Milli-Q water (deionized) and homogenized in 1.5 mL microtubes. The homogenates were distributed into 96-well microplates (Nunc®) in duplicate and incubated with their specific substrates. Absorbance readings were performed with a spectrophotometer (Biosystem® Elx808) at the proper wavelength for each enzyme. The absorbance results were analyzed using the software GEN 5, which transformed the original data (obtained in absorbance values) into enzymatic activity, by calculating the standard deviation of the replicates. The values obtained for each individual were corrected according to the total protein concentration. The enzymatic profiles of the tested groups were classified by comparison with the 99th percentile of the Rockefeller strain. Analyses of the biochemical data classifies populations as unaltered (≤15 %), altered (>15 % and <50 %) and highly altered (>50 %) based on the percentage of individuals from each laboratory strain or field population with enzymatic activity above the Rockefeller 99th percentile .
Biological parameters related to resistance to temephos
Investigation of the dynamics of development of the different groups of Aedes aegypti
This experiment was performed to assess how long most individuals, with distinct profiles of susceptibility to temephos and raised under the same abiotic conditions (density, pH, light, amount of food and relative humidity), took to reach adulthood. In this test, three replicates (200 L1/plastic containers/group) were used in each experiment and three independent experiments were performed, totalizing 1800 L1 per group. Larvae were reared according to the conditions described above and the percentage of surviving individuals (larvae, pupae and adults) and the number of males and females (sex ratio) were recorded every three days until the end of the cycle. However, the first record was performed at the 5th day of development.
Reproductive parameters and longevity of the Aedes aegypti females
With the purpose of studying the fecundity, fertility and longevity, groups of 15–20 females were randomly picked from the experiments described above. Newly emerged females from each group of three independent experiments were initially transferred to a containment cage, where they were kept in contact with males for five days before receiving the first blood meal from female Swiss mice (Mus musculus) 45 days old. One mouse per group was used. On the day following this procedure, engorged females were carefully placed individually into smaller cages with a cup of water containing filter paper for depositing their eggs. To enhance the mating opportunity, it was also added to each individual cage a male, which remained in contact with the female until his death. Additionally, blood meals were offered to individual female once a week for three consecutive weeks, using different mice. Females that were not fed over the four successive blood meals, as well as those who fed at least once but died during the experiment were excluded from the analyzes. Subsequently, the fecundity (number of eggs per female), fertility (number of L1 per number of eggs per female) and longevity (in survival days) were recorded. Likewise, females that did not lay eggs or laid unfertilized eggs were excluded from the analysis of reproductive performance.
Embryonic viability of eggs with different quiescence times
A set of approximately 200 females, resultant from the experiments of dynamics of population development, were transferred to containment cages and fed weekly with blood to obtain the eggs. Approximately five dried filter papers containing eggs from each group (laboratory strains or field population) were divided into seven parts (with similar quantities of eggs). These papers with eggs were stored in Petri dishes and maintained under controlled conditions (at 26 °C on a 12 h:12 h light:dark cycle at 50–60 % humidity) to evaluate the following quiescence times (Δt): 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 days, with three replicates for each time point.
Fertility life table
A fertility life table was constructed based on the methodology described by Silvera Neto and more recently by Diniz et al. to determine the reproductive potential through various variables [32, 33]. The primary variables were: age interval (x), specific fertility (mx) and survival probability (lx). From these variables, the population parameters related to the net reproduction rate (RO), generation time (T), intrinsic rate of natural increase (rm), finite rate of increase (λ), and time required for the population to double in number of individuals (DT) were calculated, where Ro = Σ (lx.mx), T = Σ (lx.mx.x)/Σ (lx.mx), rm = n (R0)/T, λ = erm and DT = n (2)/rm .
To estimate the morphometric parameters we used mosquitoes randomly selected from the experiments of dynamics of population development. The wet body weight was estimated from weighing 10 groups of 25 individuals, pupae and unfed adults (males and females), from each strain or population, on an analytical digital high precision scale (BA-002, BEL - Engineering). The size of the females was also estimated by the geometric morphometrics of the wing (right and left) of 15 individuals from each group. The methodology followed was previously described by Monteiro and Reis . The images of the wings, which were mounted between slides and cover slips with Canada balsam, were captured through a photographic camera coupled to a stereomicroscope (Luxeo 4D - Labomed) at 40x magnification. The positional coordinates of 18 anatomical points (landmarks) on a Cartesian plane were taken over the images with the assistance of computer programs (Tpsdig, TpsUtil, and TpsRelw) [35–37]. This data set (related only to size) was used to calculate the centroid size and analyzed by ANOVA test. The data of centroid size and wing shape were associated by canonical variate analysis (CVA), which is a multivariate analysis function used to discriminate different groups .
Quantification of energetic reserves: lipids, glycogen, and other sugars
The contents of lipids, glycogen, and sugars were individually quantified in 50 newly emerged females, randomly selected from the experiment of dynamics of population development using the modified colorimetric technique of Van Handel and Day with a Bio-Rad Smartspec 3000 spectrophotometer for measuring the absorbance data, which were subsequently converted into micrograms of reserve [39, 40]. The energetic value of the sugars and glycogen per individual was calculated by assuming that 1 mg of these carbohydrates is equivalent to 16.74 J and that 1 mg of lipid is equivalent to 37.74 J .
Experimental design and statistical analysis
The experimental design of this study was completely randomized having three replicates in at least three independent experiments. The comparative analyses of the results relating to the tests of susceptibility to temephos of the studied groups (laboratory strains and field population) were calculated through Log-Probit linear regression  from the larval mortality observed in the trials after 24 h of exposure to the insecticide using the statistical package SPSS 8.0/Windows. All the tests of fitness cost and quantification of the energetic reserves, comparative analyses were conducted using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and thereafter Tukey’s tests and/or t tests. The data normality was determined using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and the homogeneity variance was tested by Levene’s test. For fecundity, fertility and hatching rate data, normality and homogeneity were achieved by using Log neperiano + mean transformation. The geometric morphometrics of the wing assay were verified by ANOVA (to evaluate the centroid size) and multivariate analysis function (to evaluate the combined shape and size variations). All the analyses were performed using the software Statistic 7.1 (significance level of 5 %). The values obtained for the enzyme activity quantification were statistically analyzed using the software GEN 5, which analyzed the absorbance data. These data were transferred to specific Excel spreadsheets standardized by the Brazilian Ministry of Health .
The results of the present study demonstrate that most biological parameters were compromised in the resistant Aedes aegypti strains and field population probably due to the metabolic resistance mechanism.
Profile of susceptibility to temephos and characterization of the resistance mechanism in the Aedes aegypti strains and the field population
Profile of susceptibility to temephos for the Aedes aegypti laboratory strains and field population
LC95 a mg/L [CI95]
0.011 [0.009 - 0.015]
0.025 [0.018 – 0.039]
2.76 [2.31 – 3.24]
3.12 [2.83 – 3.66]
The RecRNEx strain retained a high level of resistance after five consecutive generations not exposed to temephos. This finding was expected because when the frequency of resistant individuals is very high, the tendency is that the reversal occurs slowly and progressively. Saavedra-Rodriguez et al. selected A. aegypti populations from Mexico for five generations using temephos and found an increase in the resistance ratio (RR), which most likely varied according to the initial frequency of resistant individuals. Furthermore, they observed that populations with similar RR values had different levels of resistance after the selective pressure . Nonetheless, both studies show that the evolution of resistance (selection or reversal) depends on the initial frequency of resistant individuals and many other factors, for example, the environmental conditions.
Profile of enzymatic activities of Aedes aegypti groups
Aedes aegypti Strains/Field Population
% > p99 g
α-esterase (nmol/mg ptn/min)
β–esterase (nmol/mg ptn/min)
PNPA–esterase (Δabs/mg ptn/min)
MFO nmoles cit/mg ptn)
GST (mmol/mg ptn/min)
Saavedra-Rodriguez et al. evaluated the transcriptional profile of the metabolic detoxification genes from resistant Mexican A. aegypti populations by microarray (Detoxi chip) and verified that the GST Epsilon class enzymes and some esterases display an upregulation pattern compared with the susceptible population .
Dynamics of the population development in the different Aedes aegypti groups
Larvae and adult densities and cumulative mortality during 18 days of development for different Aedes aegypti groups with different patterns of susceptibility to temephos
Aedes aegypti groups
Mean L3 a ± SD Mean L4 b ± SD c
Mean number of Adults ± SD
Mean Mortality ± SD
5th to 18th day
33.7 ± 8.0
180.6 ± 15.6
167.8 ± 22.3
7.4 ± 3.4
63.2 ± 7.5
134.4 ± 6.6
120.4 ± 10.4
16.5 ± 5.1
74.3 ± 19.2
116.0 ± 15.4
92.8 ± 14.6
26.6 ± 6.3
78.5 ± 23.0
115.1 ± 34.4
53.8 ± 28.9
18.4 ± 10.0
The average number of male and female adults obtained from 200 larvae of the different Aedes aegypti groups
mean ± SD
mean ± SD
mean ± SD
95.7 ± 5.3
95.6 ± 6.1
1.06 ± 0.1
91.0 ± 7.7
92.3 ± 12.0
1.03 ± 0.2
86.2 ± 11.3
86.7 ± 10.2
1.03 ± 0.3
89.6 ± 15.1
91.2 ± 16.6
1.07 ± 0.3
In the dynamics of population development, a prolonged larval phase in the natural environment may represent an adaptive disadvantage because individuals would be more exposed to extrinsic risk factors, such as predation, temporary elimination of breeding sites and exposure to xenobiotics, which usually cause a reduced number of generations in the field, as suggested by Berticat et al. . It is important to highlight that Culex spp. colonize polluted breeding sites at ground-level in open areas, whereas, the most frequent breeding sites of A. aegypti are protected drinking water containers (plastic drum, cement tanks and barrels) [41, 49]. Thus, losses associated with predation and competition in A. aegypti are smaller than those in Culex. Therefore, in this case, we could speculate that the prolonged larval development time of resistant A. aegypti observed in our study might have contributed to individuals making better use of the nutrients available in the rearing plastic containers, partially compensating for the losses associated with maintaining the resistance mechanisms. This can be reproduced under field conditions in real breeding sites of A. aegypti, such as in large drink water containers, which are very common in urban environments, especially in areas with precarious water supply system, such as northeast Brazil .
On the other hand, another explanation could be that there is some sort of developmental threshold that triggers the beginning of the metamorphosis to the next stage (for instance, accumulation of nutrients), which takes longer for the resistant larvae to reach it, because they expend most of the assimilated resources to maintain resistance, rather than to achieve that threshold. In this case, this would be an adaptative disadvantage.
Energetic reserves determination in Aedes aegypti females
Mean amount of energy reserves for lipids and carbohydrates in microgram (μg) and total energetic levels (J), for Aedes aegypti females with different patterns of susceptibility to temephos
Population/status of temephos susceptibility
Energy reserves (μg)
Total Energetic values (J)
Lipids + sugars mean ± SD
mean ± SD
mean ± SD
mean ± SD
71.66 ± 4.94 a
29.53 ± 2.00 a
20.25 ± 1.03 c
3.54 ± 0.8 a
56.77 ± 4.28 b
24.63 ± 2.46a
16.99 ± 1.54 d
2.83 ± 0.3 b
49.05 ± 3.67b
21.88 ± 2.03 b
21.56 ± 2.42 bc
2.58 ± 0.7 b
70.27 ± 5.39 a
25.05 ± 1.88a
24.60 ± 1.45 ab
3.48 ± 0.5 a
Although the Arcoverde population did not show significant losses in the concentrations of lipid, it did not accumulate considerable gains in its biological potential in relation to other resistant groups. We believe that the reduction of reserves may be related with the production of larger quantities of detoxifying enzymes (especially to alpha-esterase and GSTs), because these enzyme activities were altered in more than 80 % of the individuals of the laboratory strains and 50 % of the field population. Rivero et al. studied organophosphate-resistant Culex pipiens strains and reported a significant reduction in the lipid and other sugar reserves when the resistance is caused by the metabolic mechanisms or by target-site alteration .
Morphometric data of Aedes aegypti
Mean weights (g) of pupae and adults in Aedes aegypti from three strains and the field population with different pattern of temephos susceptibility
Population/status for temephos susceptibility
mean ± SD
mean ± SD
mean ± SD
mean ± SD
0.057 ± 0.004 a
0.080 ± 0.020a
0.023 ± 0.001a
0.053 ± 0.004a
0.049 ± 0.002b
0.068 ± 0.006a
0.020 ± 0.004b
0.030 ± 0.005 b
0.048 ± 0.005b
0.065 ± 0.006a
0.018 ± 0.004b
0.026 ± 0.005b
0.056 ± 0.004a
0.076 ± 0.030a
0.024 ± 0.004a
0.053 ± 0.006 a
Likewise, Jaramillo-O et al. analyzing the effect of resistance to the insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin in A. aegypti samples, including a laboratory strain, found no effect on the size of the wings of mosquitoes, only on its shape .
Although Arcoverde population has similar levels of resistance of the resistant lab strains, it separated from them, probably because it is a natural field population (with a different genetic background).
Fecundity, fertility, and longevity of Aedes aegypti females
Frequency of reproductive Aedes aegypti females with different pattern of temephos susceptibility
Non reproductive females
hatching rate (%)
Mean ± SD
Mean ± SD
205.4 ± 125.5
175.5 ± ±107.5
107.3 ± 70.6
89.2 ± 66.6
93.0 ± 49.1
64.7 ± 40.8
100.6 ± ±81.5
79.0 ± 83.0
The hatching rate was approximately 85 % for RecRev, 83 % for RecRNEx, 78 % for Arcoverde, and 70 % for RecR, with significant differences (F = 21.32; df = 3.14; p = 0.005) only between the control group and RecR (p = 0.03) and between RecRNEx and RecR (p = 0.005) (Table 7). Likewise, Belinato et al. reported differences between susceptible and resistant females to temephos, which produced approximately 20 % fewer eggs (81 ± 30.0) compared with susceptible control females (Rockefeller) (103 ± 19) . Jaramillo-O et al. also observed that A. aegypti females resistant to lambda-cyhalothrin were affected in relation to fertility and lifespan .
Fertility life table of Aedes aegypti groups with different pattern of temephos susceptibility
Population/status for temephos
Parameters of population growth
RecRNEx (resistant non-exposed)
RecR (resistant exposed)
Arcoverde (resistant field)
Diniz et al. also reported losses in the net reproductive rate (Ro) and other variables of the fertility life table, such as the generation time (T), for A. aegypti populations from Campina Grande, Paraíba State, Brazil. Still, the Ro values, for example, ranged from 35.5 to 130.7 and were higher than those found in our study, suggesting that the reproductive potential of resistant females from these populations is higher than that observed for all the females of our study .
These greater losses in reproductive potential can be justified by the very high levels of resistance (RR > 200) and the presence of the metabolic mechanism mediating this process. Other studies evaluating strains of Anopheles stephensi resistant to temephos and propoxur, and A. aegypti resistant to pyrethroids, via two different resistance mechanisms, one linked to a knockdown mutation (kdr) and another to a change in the detoxification enzymes activity (α-EST, PNPA-EST, and GST) revealed impairments in the reproductive potential of these species, similar to those described in our study [54, 55].
Regarding longevity, it was observed that females from the control survived an average of 39 (±18) days, with an intragroup variation from 11 to 64 days, while the resistant females survived a significantly shorter time (F = 31.51; df = 3.196; p < 0.0005) (Fig. 3c). A reduced longevity for resistant A. aegypti was also observed by Belinato et al. who studied other Brazilian A. aegypti populations from Boa Vista/Roraima State and Aparecida de Goiâna/Goiás State .
Interestingly, the parameters such as size (wing morphology and body weight), amount of energy reserves (lipid and glycogen), and longevity were similar between the control and Arcoverde females. That profile observed for the field population with a high level of resistance to temephos could be explained if we consider that the extension of larval development time may lead to an accumulation of nutrient reserves. Despite this finding, costs were detected in several reproductive parameters for this population compared with the control strain, including a higher percentage of mating females that fed on blood but did not produce eggs or produced them in small amounts.
Assuming that all females have mated, our result suggests that the nutrients obtained during the blood meal were used for maintaining other processes linked to the survival of females instead of egg production. This impairment was confirmed when the variables of the fertility life table (Ro, rm, and λ) revealed losses in the reproductive potential in resistant females to maintain other processes linked to their survival, especially for the laboratory strains. Therefore, the negative pleiotropic effects of resistance to temephos were more evident in our study for the isogenetic strains RecR and RecRNEx than for the Arcoverde field population, although all groups have a similar level of resistance to this compound (RR > 200).
Viability of eggs with different quiescence times
Summary of fitness cost related to temephos resistance in Aedes aegypti laboratory and field populations
Mean larval development time (days)
7.5 ± 2.4
Mean egg-adult development time (days)
11.2 ± 5.2
Time (min - max) for obtaining adults (days)
11 to 18
Mortality at the juvenile stage (larvae and pupae)
Size of the females - morphometrics of the wings (pixels)
9.0 × 1016
Total energy value/female (lipids and carbohydrates) (J)
Lipid reserve (μg)
71.66 ± 4.94
205.4 ± 120
175.5 ± 120
Ro (net reproduction rate)
T (generation time)
rm (intrinsic rate of natural increase)
λ (finite rate of increase)
DT (doubling time of individuals)
Egg viability (180 days of quiescence)
Sex ratio (male/female)
Reproductive inviability (group of 50 females)
Female longevity (days)
39 ± 18.0
Activity of metabolic enzymes
Number of parameters ≠ of RecRev
Our study revealed that there are fitness costs for A. aegypti associated with its resistance to temephos. Furthermore, it was clear that the adaptive disadvantages in populations resistant to this organophosphate, which are caused by the accumulation of negative pleiotropic effects, were particularly reflected in the reproductive parameters, especially when the individuals were selected in the laboratory. Despite this finding, since there is no loss of embryonic viability in the quiescent eggs, resistant individuals would have the same survivability as the susceptible individuals in the field. This trait (prolonged viability) may be critical in promoting the maintenance of residual frequencies of resistant individuals in the field, thereby hindering the effectiveness of management actions.
The resistance to temephos may also promote losses of energetic reserves, particularly in lipids, that are important for physiological activities with a high energetic demand, such as flight, metamorphosis, and egg production. A possible compensation mechanism for these losses observed in our study was the extension of larval development in resistant individuals, a strategy that can minimize deficits related to the survival and reproduction of the females. Moreover, resistance to temephos in A. aegypti populations can be reduced or even reversed in the absence of exposure to the insecticide; furthermore, the normal pattern of activity of detoxifying enzymes can be regained. It is important to remember that temephos is still the most widely used larvicide for controlling A. aegypti larvae worldwide, although resistance to this compound has been described in various locations, including in non-target species .
The data obtained in our study can be considered in the construction of a model of A. aegypti population dynamics to estimate whether negative pleiotropic effects of temephos resistance have an impact on the establishment of these populations in the field. In addition, our data may be useful to predict mosquito population trends in areas where insecticide resistance has been detected and resistance management is required.
The authors thank the team of the insectarium and of the Animals Facilities at CPqAM-FIOCRUZ-PE for technical support, with special thanks to Elisângela Dias; the Department of Biochemistry, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), for assistance with the tests for quantifying the energetic reserve of the mosquito, especially the undergraduate students (João Ricardhis and Marilia Juliene) and the master student Thaise Gabriele; the Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE) for financial support (IBPG-0655-2.13/11); and Fundação Oswaldo Cruz/Vice-Presidência de Pesquisa e Laboratórios de Referência/Serviço de Referência para Controle de Culicídeos Vetores/Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães-PE (FIOCRUZ/VPPLR/SRCCV/CPqAM-PE). This work was funded by FIOCRUZ Papes VI/CNPq and CAPES (grants 407475/2012 and 1520/2011).
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Consoli RAGB, De Oliveira RL. Principais Mosquitos de Importância Sanitária no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz; 1994.Google Scholar
- Dupont-Rouzeyrol M, Caro V, Guillaumot L, Vazeille M, D’Ortenzio E, Thiberge JM, et al. Chikungunya virus and the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti in New Caledonia (South Pacific Region). Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012;12:1036–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Braga IA, Valle D. Aedes aegypti: Inseticidas, mecanismos de ação e resistência. Epidemiol Serv Saúde. 2007;16:279–93.Google Scholar
- Bisset LJA. Uso correcto de insecticidas: control de la resistencia. Rev Cuba Med Trop. 2002;54:202–19.Google Scholar
- Braga IA, Lima JBP, Soares SDS, Valle D. Aedes aegypti resistance to temephos during 2001 in several municipalities in the states of Rio de Janeiro, Sergipe, and Alagoas, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2004;99:199–203.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lima JBP, Da-Cunha MP, Da Silva RCJ, Galardo AKR, Soares SDS, Braga IA, et al. Resistance of Aedes aegypti to organophosphates in several municipalities in the State of Rio de Janeiro and Espírito Santo, Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;68:329–233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lima EP, Martins A, Filho DO, Wellington J, Lima DO, Novaes A, et al. Resistência do Aedes aegypti ao Temefós em Municípios do Estado do Ceará. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2006;39:259–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Melo-Santos MAV, Varjal-Melo JJM, Araújo AP, Gomes TCS, Paiva MHS, Regis LN, et al. Resistance to the organophosphate temephos: mechanisms, evolution and reversion in an Aedes aegypti laboratory strain from Brazil. Acta Trop. 2010;113:180–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Montella IR, Martins AJ, Viana-Medeiros PF, Lima JBP, Braga IA, Valle D. Insecticide resistance mechanisms of Brazilian Aedes aegypti populations from 2001 to 2004. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77:467–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marcombe S, Mathieu RB, Pocquet N, Riaz MA, Poupardin R, Sélior S, et al. Insecticide Resistance in the Dengue Vector Aedes aegypti from Martinique: Distribution, Mechanisms and Relations with Environmental Factors. PLoS One. 2012;7:1–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bisset JA, Marín R, Rodríguez MM, Severson DW, Ricardo Y, French L, et al. Insecticide Resistance in Two Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Strains from Costa Rica. J Med Entomol. 2013;50:352–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dusfour I, Thalmensy V, Gaborit P, Issaly J, Carinci R, Girod R. Multiple insecticide resistance in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) populations compromises the effectiveness of dengue vector control in French Guiana. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2011;106:346–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rocha HD, Paiva MH, Silva NM, de Araújo AP, Camacho DD, Moura AJ, et al. Susceptibility profile of Aedes aegypti from Santiago Island, Cabo Verde, to insecticides. Acta Trop. 2015;152:66–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Palchick S. Chemical Control of Vectors. In: The Biology of Disease Vectors. Colorado: University Press of Colorado; 1996.Google Scholar
- Grisales N, Poupardin R, Gomez S, Fonseca-Gonzalez I, Ranson H, Lenhart A. Temephos resistance in Aedes aegypti in Colombia compromises dengue vector control. Plos Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:1–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weill M, Fort P, Berthomieu A, Dubois MP, Pasteur N, Raymond M. A novel acetylcholinesterase gene in mosquitoes codes for the insecticide target and is non-homologous to the ace gene in Drosophila. Proc R Soc. 2002;269:2007–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weill M, Duron O, Labbé P, Berthomieu A. La résistance du moustique Culex pipiens aux insecticides. Med Sci. 2014;19:1190–2.Google Scholar
- Araújo AP, Diniz DFA, Helvecio E, Barros RA, Oliveira CMF, Ayres CFJ, et al. The susceptibility of Aedes aegypti populations displaying temephos resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis: a basis for management. Paras Vectors. 2013;6:1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Georghiou GP, Taylor CE. Genetic and biological influences in the evolution of insecticide resistance. J Econ Entomol. 1977;70:319–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oliveira EE, Guedes RNC, Corrêa AS, Damasceno BL, Santos CT. Resistência vs Susceptibilidade a Piretróides em Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera : Curculionidae). Neotrop Entomol. 2005;34:981–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kliot A, Ghanim M. Fitness costs associated with insecticide resistance. Pest Manag Sci. 2012;68:1431–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rivero A, Magaud A, Nicot A, Vézilier J. Energetic Cost of Insecticide Resistance in Culex pipiens Mosquitoes. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2011;48:694–700.Google Scholar
- Berticat C, Boquien G, Raymond M, Chevillon C. Insecticide resistance genes induce a mating competition cost in Culex pipiens mosquitoes. Genet Res. 2002;79:41–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Berticat C, Duron O, Heyse D, Raymond M. Insecticide resistance genes confer a predation cost on mosquitoes, Culex pipiens. Genet Res. 2004;83:189–96.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bourguet D, Guillemaud T, Chevillon C, Raymond M. Fitness costs of insecticide resistance in natural breeding sites of the mosquito Culex pipiens. Evol. 2004;58:128–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chevillon C, Bourguet D, Rousset F, Pasteur N, Raymond M. Pleiotropy of adaptive changes in populations: comparisons among insecticide resistance genes in Culex pipiens. Genet Res. 1997;70:195–203.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roush RT, Mckenzie JA. Ecological genetics of insecticide and acaricide. Ann Rev Entomol. 1987;32:361–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Braga IM, Vale D. Aedes aegypti: surveillance, resistance monitoring, and control alternatives in Brazil. Epidemiol Serv Saúde. 2007;16:295–302.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization. Instructions for Determining the Susceptibility or Resistance of Mosquito Larvae to Insecticides. Geneva: WHO; 1981.Google Scholar
- Mazzarri MB, Georghiou GP. Characterization of resistance to organophosphate, carbamate, and pyrethroid insecticides in field populations of Aedes aegypti from Venezuela. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1995;11:315–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brasil. Metodologia para quantificação de atividade de enzimas relacionadas com a resistência a inseticidas em Aedes aegypti. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Brasília (Brazil): Ministério da Saúde; 2006.Google Scholar
- Silveira-Neto S, Nakano O, Bardin D, Nova NAV: Manual de Ecologia dos Insetos. Agronômica Ceres1976, 419 p.Google Scholar
- Diniz MMCSL, Henriques ADS, Leandro RS, Aguiar DL, Beserra EB. Resistência de Aedes aegypti ao temefós e desvantagens adaptativas. Rev Saúde Pública. 2014;48:775–82.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Monteiro LR, Reis SF. Princípios de Morfometria Geométrica. Holos: São Paulo; 1999.Google Scholar
- Rohlf FJ: Tpsdig,digitize landmarks and outlines [software version version 2.05]. State University of New York; 2005.Google Scholar
- Rohlf FJ: TpsUtil, relative warp analysis [software version 1.26]. State University of New York; 2004.Google Scholar
- Rohlf FJ: TpsRelw file utility program [software version 1.36]. State University of New York; 2003.Google Scholar
- Krzanowski WJ. On confidence regions in canonical variate analysis. Biometrika. 1989;76:107–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van Handel E. Rapid determination of glycogen and sugars in mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1985;1:299–301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Handel E. Rapid determination of total lipids in mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1985;1:302–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clements AN. The biology of mosquitoes. Development, Nutrition and Reproduction. Volume 2. 1st ed. London: Chapman & Hall; 1992.Google Scholar
- Finney DJ: Probit analysis. London: Cambridge University Press; 1971.Google Scholar
- Lima EP, Paiva MHS, Araújo AP, Silva EVG, Silva UM, Oliveira LN, et al. Insecticide resistance in Aedes aegypti populations from Ceará, Brazil. Paras Vectors. 2011;4:1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Saavedra-Rodriguez K, Strode C, Flores AE, Garcia-Luna S, Reyes-Solis G, Ranson H, et al. Differential transcription profiles in Aedes aegypti detoxification genes after temephos selection. Insect Mol Biol. 2014;23:199–215.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Strode C, Melo-Santos MAV, Magalhaes T, Araujo AP, Ayres CFJ. Expression profile of genes during resistance reversal in a temephos selected strain of the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti. PLoS One. 2012;7:e39439.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hemingway JL, Ranson H. Insecticide resistance in insect vectors of human disease. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:371–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Perry TBP, Daborn PJ. The biology of insecticidal activity and resistance. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2011;41:411–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ortelli F, Rossiter LC, Vontas J, Ranson H, Hemingway J. Heterologous expression of four glutathione transferase genes genetically linked to a major insecticide-resistance locus from the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Biochem J. 2003;373:957–63.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brasil. Dengue Instruções para Pessoal de Combate ao Vetor - Manual de Normas Técnicas. Brasília (Brazil): Fundação Nacional de Sáude, Ministério da Saúde, Ascom; 2001.Google Scholar
- CapraraI C, Lima JWO, Marinho ACP, CalvasinaI PG, LandimI LP, Sommerfeld J. Irregular water supply, household usage and dengue: a bio-social study in the Brazilian Northeast. Cad Saúde Pública. 2009;25:125–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sharma P, Mohan L, Dua KK, Srivastava CN. Status of carbohydrate, protein and lipid profile in the mosquito larvae treated with certain phytoextracts. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2011;4:301–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jaramillo-O N, Fonseca-González I, Chaverra-Rodríguez D. Geometric morphometrics of nine field isolates of Aedes aegypti with different resistance levels to lambda-cyhalothrin and relative fitness of one artificially selected for resistance. PLoS One. 2014;9:1–15.Google Scholar
- Belinato TA, Martins AJ, Valle D. Fitness evaluation of two Brazilian Aedes aegypti field populations with distinct levels of resistance to the organophosphate temephos. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2012;107:916–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brito LP, Linss JGB, Lima-Camara TN, Belinato TA, Peixoto AA, Lima JBP, et al. Assessing the effects of Aedes aegypti kdr mutations on pyrethroid resistance and its fitness cost. PLoS One. 2013;8:1–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sanil D, Shetty NJ. The effect of sublethal exposure to temephos and propoxur on reproductive fitness and its influence on circadian rhythms of pupation and adult emergence in Anopheles stephensi Liston-a malaria vector. Parasitol Res. 2012;111:423–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Silva HHG, Silva IG. Influência do período de quiescência dos ovos sobre o ciclo de vida de Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762) (Diptera, Culicidae) em condições de laboratório. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1999;32:349–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paris M, David JP. Despres L: Fitness costs of resistance to Bti toxins in the dengue vector Aedes aegypti. Ecotoxicology. 2011;20:1184–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Amorim LB, Helvecio E, Oliveira CMF, Ayres CFJ. Susceptibility status of Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) populations to the chemical insecticide temephos in Pernambuco, Brazil. Pest Manag Sci. 2013;69:1307–1314.37.Google Scholar