Open Access

Detection of Babesia annae DNA in lung exudate samples from Red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Great Britain

  • Paul M. Bartley1Email author,
  • Clare Hamilton1,
  • Cari Wilson1,
  • Elisabeth A. Innes1 and
  • Frank Katzer1
Parasites & Vectors20169:84

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1364-1

Received: 23 November 2015

Accepted: 6 February 2016

Published: 12 February 2016

The Erratum to this article has been published in Parasites & Vectors 2016 9:275

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of Babesia species DNA in lung exudate samples collected from red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) from across Great Britain. Babesia are small piroplasmid parasites which are mainly transmitted through the bite of infected ticks of the family Ixodidae. Babesia can cause potentially fatal disease in a wide-range of mammalian species including humans, dogs and cattle, making them of significant economic importance to both the medical and veterinary fields.

Methods

DNA was extracted from lung exudate samples of 316 foxes. A semi-nested PCR was used to initially screen samples, using universal Babesia-Theileria primers which target the 18S rRNA gene. A selection of positive PCR amplicons were purified and sequenced. Subsequently specific primers were designed to detect Babesia annae and used to screen all 316 DNA samples. Randomly selected positive samples were purified and sequenced (GenBank accession KT580786). Clones spanning a 1717 bp region of the 18S rRNA gene were generated from 2 positive samples, the resultant consensus sequence was submitted to GenBank (KT580785). Sequence KT580785 was used in the phylogenetic analysis

Results

Babesia annae DNA was detected in the fox samples, in total 46/316 (14.6 %) of samples tested positive for the presence of Babesia annae DNA. The central region of England had the highest prevalence at 36.7 %, while no positive samples were found from Wales, though only 12 samples were tested from this region. Male foxes were found to have a higher prevalence of Babesia annae DNA than females in all regions of Britain. Phylogenetic and sequence analysis of the GenBank submissions (Accession numbers KT580785 and KT580786) showed 100 % identity to Babesia sp.-‘Spanish Dog’ (AY534602, EU583387 and AF188001).

Conclusions

This is the first time that Babesia annae DNA has been reported in red foxes in Great Britain with positive samples being found across England and Scotland indicating that this parasite is well established within the red fox population of Britain. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that though B. annae is closely related to B. microti it is a distinct species.

Keywords

Babesia annae DNA Red foxes Vulpes vulpes Babesiosis Great Britain Phylogeny

Background

Babesia are small piroplasmid parasites which are widely distributed throughout the world and are transmitted to hosts through the bite of infected ticks, transplacentally [1] and mechanically through the exchange of blood i.e., in dog fights [2] as well as transovarially and transstadially in ticks . More than 100 species of Babesia have been documented [3], Babesia parasites are capable of infecting a wide range of wild and domestic host species, including humans, cattle and dogs. This ability to infect and cause disease in many mammalian species make Babesia of great economic importance in both the medical and veterinary fields. Bovine babesiosis (Red water fever) for example is considered the most important arthropod transmitted disease in cattle [4]. In Europe the main cause of human babesiosis is considered to be B. divergens [4], though over recent years other Babesia species including B. microti [5] have also been found to be responsible for human babesiosis. Babesia annae is among these economically important species having been shown to cause severe (even fatal) disease in dogs [1, 2].

Little is known about the prevalence of piroplasm infections in dogs in Great Britain. A recent study by Crawford and colleagues [6] examining 262 canine blood donors found none were positive for Babesia DNA, while a study by Smith and colleagues [7] found only 2.4 % 16/742 ticks collected from dogs from across Great Britain tested PCR positive for Babesia DNA, 11 of which showed 97–100 % identity to B. gibsoni. There are no records of Babesia annae having been previously detected in Britain.

Babesia annae was identified previously under numerous synonyms including Theileria annae, Babesia sp. ‘Spanish dog’ and Babesia-microti-like [8]. This species has been found in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), and dogs (Canis familiaris) in North America and Canada [9, 10] and throughout Europe [1, 1115] and is considered by some authors to be “hyperendemic” in northwest Spain [16].

Red foxes are common throughout Great Britain, being highly adaptive and opportunistic predators and scavengers [17]. The most recent surveys suggested that there are between 240,000 and 258,000 red foxes in Britain, of which approximately 87 % (225,000) live in rural areas, compared to 13 % (33,000) of urban foxes (Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust (2013) and DEFRA FOI release (2013). The foxes are most likely to encounter questing adult ticks, nymphs and larvae whilst hunting and scavenging. Anthropogenic changes, such as wildlife and forest management strategies and changes in land use have also created more suitable habitats for foxes, their prey and the Ixodid ticks that feed on both. These changes have lead not only to increases in tick numbers, but have also enabled ticks to increase their distribution across Europe, with Ixodes ticks now being found in areas previously considered tick free i.e., northern Sweden [18].

The main tick species found in Britain are Ixodes ricinus (sheep tick, which is also known in some countries as the deer tick) and Ixodes hexagonus (hedgehog tick). Both tick species can be found on a wide range of domestic and wild animal species and have been shown in previous studies in Spain and Germany to be positive for B. annae (synonym T. annae) DNA [15, 19]. This is however not conclusive proof that these species are vectors for the transmission of B. annae.

This study aimed at determining the prevalence of piroplasm infection in red foxes and the species of piroplasm circulating in the red fox population in Great Britain, through the analysis of lung exudate samples.

Methods

Sample collection and preparation

The three hundred and sixteen foxes were originally collected by the University of Edinburgh as part of a study looking at the prevalence of Echinococcus multilocularis, Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii [20, 21]. Lung samples were collected at post mortem examination and frozen at −20 °C prior to processing. Lung fluids were prepared as previously described [20]. Briefly, lungs were defrosted and bloody exudate was collected into a 1.5 ml microfuge tube, where no exudate was visible, lung samples were placed in a stomacher bag with approximately 5 ml of phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and processed in a stomacher for 15 s. All exudates / PBS samples were stored at −20 °C prior to DNA extraction.

The foxes sampled were collected over a wide range of locations in each of the study regions. A majority of the foxes were shot by game keepers and land owners as part of routine pest control procedures, so the location data from where the foxes were originally collected and the gender of the animals were often available. However some of the foxes were obtained from direct culls, for these animals the location and gender of the animal was not always available [21].

DNA extraction

Three hundred and sixteen lung exudate samples were defrosted and mixed by vortexing, 400 μl of each sample was added to 900 μl Nuclei Lysis Solution (Promega, Madison WI, USA) and incubated at 55 °C overnight. The samples were then processed to DNA using the Wizard® genomic DNA (Promega, Madison WI, USA) purification protocol, which was adapted by Bartley and colleagues [22] to be scaled up to allow the use of 400 μl of starting material. The DNA was resuspended in 300 μl of DNase and RNase free water and stored at +4 °C for immediate use or at −20 °C for longer term storage. Extraction controls (water) were also prepared with each batch of exudate samples, these were used as indicators of contamination and acted as additional negative controls.

PCR for detection of Babesia DNA in blood samples

A semi-nested PCR was used to screen for the presence of Babesia DNA in 120 lung exudate samples using universal Babesia-Theileria primers BT1-F and BTH-1R for the primary amplification and BT1-F and BT1-R for the second round amplification (previously described [23]). Following this initial screening the B. annae specific primers BTFox1F and BTFox1R were designed (Primer3web v4.0.0) for use in the second round amplifications (Table 1). All 316 lung exudate samples were tested using the B. annae specific primers BTFox1F and BTFox1R.
Table 1

Primer names, specificity and sequences used for the detection of Babesia DNA in fox lung exudate samples

Primer Name

Specificitya

Sequence (5’ – 3’)

Reference

BT1-F

Universal BabesiaTheileria

GGTTGATCCTGCCAGTAGT

[23]

BTH-1R

Universal BabesiaTheileria

TTGCGACCATACTCCCCCCA

BTH-1 F

Universal BabesiaTheileria

CCTGMGARACGGCTACCACATCT

BT1-R

Universal BabesiaTheileria

GCCTGCTGCCTTCCTTA

BTFox1F

Babesia annae

AGTTATAAGCTTTTATACAGC

Developed in the study

BTFox1R

Babesia annae

CACTCTAGTTTTCTCAAAGTAAAATA

BT-Outer-R

Babesia annae

GGAAACCTTGTTACGACTTCTC

BT-Inner-R

Babesia annae

TTCTCCTTCCTTTAAGTGATAAG

600-F

Babesia annae

AGTTAAGAAGCTCGTAGTTG

1200-F

Babesia annae

AGGATTGACAGATTGATAGC

aAll primers were designed against the 18S rRNA gene

The reaction mixture was adapted from that previously described by Burrells and colleagues [24] and amplification conditions were as follows; each reaction (20 μl) consisted of custom PCR master mix (containing final concentrations of 45 mM Tris–HCl, 11 mM (NH4)2SO4, 4.5 mM MgCl2, 0.113 mg/ml BSA, 4.4 μM EDTA and 1.0 mM each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP and dTTP) (ABgene, Surrey, UK), 0.25pM of each forward and reverse primer (Eurofins MWG Operon), 0.75U Taq polymerase (Bioline Ltd. London, UK) and 2 μl sample template DNA, to increase sensitivity each sample was analysed in duplicate. The basic reaction conditions for all the PCR amplifications were as follows; 94 °C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing (see Table 2) for 1 min and 72 °C for 1 min with a final extension period at 72 °C for 5 min.
Table 2

Annealing temperatures and amplicon sizes of nested PCR reactions used for the detection of Babesia annae DNA in fox lung exudate samples

Primers

Amplicon size (bp)

Annealing Temp (°C)

BT1-F and BTH-1R

1073

55

BT1-F and BT1-R

408

60

BTFox1F and BTFox1R

655

52

BT1-F and BT-Outer-R

1737

55

BT1-F and BT-Inner-R

1717

49

A selection of positive samples that gave positive results for both duplicates using the B. annae specific BTFox1F and BTFox1R primers were tested in a semi-nested PCR using the primers BT1-F and BT-Outer-R (Table 1) in the primary reaction and BT1-F and BT-Inner-R (Table 1) in the second round reaction. These primers were designed to produce a longer 18S rRNA gene fragment (approx 1.7Kb). Following the second round amplification, 10 μl of each PCR product was analysed by agarose gel electrophoresis (2 % agarose in 1x TAE buffer), stained with gel red (1:10,000) (Biotonium, Hayward, CA, USA) and visualised using UV light.

PCR clean up and DNA sequencing

PCR products from samples that gave positive results for both duplicates using the BT1-F and BT-Outer-R (Table 1) in the primary reaction and BT1-F and BT-Inner-R primers in the second round reaction were selected for sequencing. These amplicons were cleaned using the commercially available Wizard® SV Gel and PCR Clean-up System (Promega, Madison WI, USA), as per manufacturers’ instructions. The PCR product was eluted in 30 μl of DNase / RNase free water and the nucleic acid concentration was determined by spectralphotometry (Nanodrop ND1000), 100 ng of each sample was sent for sequencing with each primer (MWG Operon) BT1-F, BTH-1 F, BTFox1F and BTFox1R (Table 1) to create a forward and reverse consensus sequence.

Cloning of the 18 s rRNA gene of Babesia annae

Seven samples which gave positive results for both duplicates from the semi nested PCR (B. annae specific BT1-F and BT-Outer-R followed by BT1-F-BT-Inner-R), were selected for cloning and PCR products were purified as above, 7 μl of purified product was ligated into the pGEM®-T Easy Vector (Promega, Madison WI, USA) using 1 μl of T4 DNA ligase (3 Weiss units/μl), 1 μl of 10X Rapid Ligation Buffer and 1 μl of pGEM®-T Easy vector (50 ng/μl) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Following ligation, 2 μl of ligated vector/insert was used to transform 50 μl of high-efficiency competent JM109 cells (≥1 × 108 cfu/μg DNA) (Promega, Madison WI, USA) using manufacturers’ instructions, with the following exception that LB broth was used instead of SOC medium to culture the cells. Successful transformation was confirmed using LB agar plates containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin and spread with 100 μl of IPTG (100 mM) and 20 μl of X-Gal (50 mg/ml). White colonies were screened by PCR using the BTFox1F and BTFox1R primers (Table 1) to determine the presence of the B. annae 18S rRNA gene insert. Positive colonies were cultured overnight (approx 18 h) in 10 ml LB broth containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin. Following this incubation plasmid DNA was then purified from 5 ml of each culture using the QIAprep® Miniprep kit (Qiagen), according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Purified plasmid DNA (100 ng per primer) was sent to be sequenced (MWG Operon) using T7 and SP6 primers along with BTH-1 F, 600-F, 1200-F, BT1-R, and BTH-1R (Table 1), this created an overlapping forward and reverse consensus sequence for each clone.

Sequence / phylogenetic analysis

Following sequencing, results were compared using NCBI Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) to determine percentage identity of the generated sequences against published sequences. Multiple sequence alignments were created to compare these sequences to previously published data (EMBL-EBI Multiple Sequence Comparison by Log- Expectation (MUSCLE)), while phylogenetic analysis was performed on the long (1717 bp) consensus sequence using PhyML 3.0 (ATCG, Phylogeny.fr). The Gblocks programme was used for automatic alignment curation, while PhyML was used for tree building and TreeDyn programme was used to draw the phylogenetic tree [2527]. All analyses are based on the maximum likelihood principal using an approximation of the standard Likelihood Ratio Test.

Statistical analysis

Calculations regarding the prevalence of Babesia in red foxes from separate regions of Britain were performed only using data from animals where a location was known (253 / 316 samples). Comparisons of infection rates in relation to gender were made where data was available. All 316 samples were used when calculating the overall prevalence of Babesia DNA in red foxes in Britain.

Proportion positive (prevalence), with confidence intervals (95 % CI), was calculated for the overall study set as well as at regional level. Prevalence at the regional level was compared with the overall UK prevalence to determine if there was a significant difference (Minitab 15 (v15.1.0.0)). In addition the overall prevalence in male animals was compared with that in females (Minitab 15 (v15.1.0.0)). In these analyses, Fisher’s Exact Test was used where the number of events was less than 5; in all other cases the hypothesis test was based on the normal approximation.

Results

Screening of fox lung exudate samples for the presence of Babesia spp. DNA

Of the 120 samples initially screened, 29 samples gave positive results. From these nine samples that gave positive results for both duplicates from the semi-nested PCR (universal Babesia-Theileria primers BT1-F-BTH-1R and BT1-F-BT1-R) were cleaned as described above and sent for sequencing in one direction, using either the BT1-F or BTH-1 F primers. Following this initial screening all sequences returned with 99–100 % identity to several isolates of Babesia annae (previously referred to as: Babesia sp. ‘Spanish dog’ accession numbers EU583387, AY534602 and AF188001) [28]. No other Babesia species were identified in the fox lung exudate samples.

Verification of PCR specificity

A random selection of nine positive samples from across Britain that gave positive results for both duplicates, were sent for sequencing using the Babesia annae specific BTFox1F and BTFox1R primers, this created a 597 bp consensus sequence (submitted to GenBank accession number KT580786). When this resultant sequence was compared using NCBI BLAST to the published sequences, it was found to have 100 % identity to several isolates of Babesia annae (previously referred to as: Babesia sp. ‘Spanish dog’ (accession numbers EU583387, AY534602 and AF188001) [28]. A further 13 positive samples were sequenced only using the BTFox1F primer; all of these sequences were 100 % identical to Babesia annae (previously referred to as: Babesia sp. ‘Spanish Dog’-AY534602, EU583387 and AF188001).

Seven clones were created from two of the positive samples (F501 (4 clones) and F340 (3 clones)) using the primers BT1-F & BT-Outer-R and BT1-F & BT-Inner-R. These clones were used to create two consensus sequences, which were identical to each other. One of the 1717 bp consensus sequences was submitted to GenBank (accession number KT580785). When this consensus sequence was compared using BLAST it demonstrated a 100 % identity to the published sequences of Babesia annae (previously referred to as: Babesia sp. ‘Spanish dog’ (accession numbers AY534602, EU583387 and AF188001).

Distribution of Babesia annae in red foxes in Great Britain

Of the 316 lung exudate samples tested by nested PCR (using the BTFox1F and BTFox1R primers), 46 (14.55 % with a 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) of 10.66–18.44 %) returned positive results for the presence of Babesia annae (previously referred to as: Babesia sp. ‘Spanish dog’) DNA. Positive samples were found in foxes widely distributed across Great Britain (see Table 3), with B. annae DNA being found in Scotland as well as across the whole of England. The central region of England had the highest prevalence with 18 / 49 positive samples (36.7 % prevalence - 95 % CI 23.23 %–50.23 %), which was significantly (p = 0.007) higher than the British average. Of the regions of Britain where positive samples were found, Scotland had the lowest prevalence with only 6 / 80 positive samples (7.5 % prevalence - 95 % CI 1.72 %–13.27 %). Scotland had a significantly lower (p = 0.012) prevalence than the British average. No positive samples were found in Wales, though only 12 samples were available for analysis for this region.
Table 3

Prevalence of Babesia annae DNA in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) from across Great Britain

Region

No tested

No Positive

Prevalence (%)

95 % CI

Gender

No / No Positive

% Prevalence

95 % CI

Scotland

80

6

7.5*

1.7–13.3 %

Male

48 / 5

10.4

1.8–19.0 %

Female

32 / 1

3.1

0.00–9.2 %

Wales

12

0

0

-

Male

5 / 0

0

-

Female

7 / 0

0

-

Northern (England)

34

8

23.5

9.3–37.8 %

Male

20 / 6

30

9.9–50.1 %

Female

14 / 2

14.2

0.0–32.6 %

Central (England)

49

18

36.7**

23.2–50.2 %

Male

22 / 10

45

24.6–66.3 %

Female

27 / 8

29.6

12.4–46.9 %

Southern (England)

78

11

14.1

6.4–21.8 %

Male

45 / 8

17.8

6.6–28.9 %

Female

9 / 3

9.1

0.0–18.9 %

    

Total

Male

140 / 29

20.7

14.0–27.4 %

Female

113 / 14

12.4

6.3–18.5 %

N Number, CI Confidence interval

* Significantly lower prevalence than nation average (p = 0.045)

** Significantly higher prevalence than national average (p = 0.003)

The data shows that a higher number male foxes tested positive for parasite DNA than females in all the regions where positive samples were found (Table 3), although no statistically significant differences (p = 0.093) were observed between numbers of positive males and females when comparing genders across Britain.

Phylogenetic relationship of Babesia annae and related species

Following maximum likelihood analysis it can be seen that Babesia parasites appear to be in three separate clades (Fig. 1) using the nomenclature suggested by Lack and colleagues [29], with KT580785 (B. annae) situated in clade VIII (microti group) with AY534602, EU583387 and AF188001, which are other published sequences of Babesia annae (previously referred to as: Babesia sp. ‘Spanish dog’) (see Fig. 1) found in Spain and the USA. The next most closely associated group of sequences have all been classified as B. microti (AB032434, AB085191 and AB190459); these were isolated from a human, bank vole and forest mouse respectively. Two Piroplasmida species found in Eurasian badges (Meles meles) (EF057099) and Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) (FJ225390) were also closely related to B. annae. The remaining Babesia species are further separated into 2 clades: The classical Babesia group (clade I) and the duncani group (clade IV). The Theileria species, with the exception of T. equi are situated in clade III, while the Hepatozoon parasites are situated in a separate clade.
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic analysis on 18S rRNA gene. Phylogenetic tree showing maximum likelihood approximation of the standard likelihood ratio test scores. A maximum likelihood approximation of the standard likelihood ratio test score of 0 indicating that no base pair substitutions were observed between AY534602, EU583387, AF188001 and KT580785. The phylogenetic analysis places KT580785 in clade VIII (microti group according to the nomenclature suggested by Lack and colleagues [26]).

Discussion

The results described in the current study clearly demonstrate that B. annae DNA is present widely in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) population in Great Britain, with positive samples being found across all regions of England and throughout Scotland. Though we did not find any positives in the samples collected from Wales, the sample size for this region was small, with only 12 samples available for examination.

The overall prevalence of B. annae DNA from foxes in Britain was 14.6 % (see Table 1), the highest prevalence of B. annae was found in the central region of England where an overall prevalence of 36.7 % was observed, which was significantly (p = 0.007) higher than the national average. These figures are higher than the levels seen in foxes in numerous other European countries. In Croatia, 5.2 % (10 / 191) of foxes studied were PCR positive for Babesia annae (Synonym Theileria annae) DNA [13], while in Poland only 1 /123 (0.7 %) of fox spleens tested were PCR positive for Babesia annae (Synonym Babesia microti-like) DNA [14]. In two separate studies in Spain, 20 % (1 / 5) of foxes tested in the Burgos Region were positive for Babesia annae (Synonym Theileria annae) DNA [30], while in another study 50 % (5 / 10) of foxes from central Spain (Guadalajara) were positive for Babesia annae (Synonym T. annae, which had a 100 % identity to AF188001-Babesia sp. ‘Spanish Dog’) [23]. However these results may not reflect the actual prevalence across Spain, as sample numbers for both of these studies were very small with only 5 and 10 animals being tested, respectively. While a higher prevalence of Babesia annae (Synonym Babesia microti-like) has been found in Portugal where 63 / 91 (69.2 %) red foxes were PCR positive for the parasite [12].

An interesting observation from our study was that male foxes had a higher prevalence of B. annae DNA than females in all regions where positive samples were found (Table 3), though these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.093). This may be a consequence that male foxes leave or are driven out of their home range territories in search of new territories, food and potential mates [31], increasing the chance of male foxes being exposed to infected ticks. Over recent years Ixodes tick numbers and their distribution appear to have been steadily increasing in Britain [32]. Exposure of foxes to Babesia parasites is likely to be through contact with infected ticks that occurs whilst scavenging and from small prey animals such as rodents and other small mammals, which are known to be reservoirs for Babesia parasites and also hosts to both common types of Ixodid ticks found in Britain (in particular I. ricinus). In a recent study in Britain, Brown and colleagues [33], demonstrated B. microti infections in 30.3 % of common shrews (Sorex araneus) and 30.4 % of field voles (Microtus agrestis) tested. Both shrews and voles were also found to be infested with I. ricinus ticks, strongly suggesting a role for these small mammals in the epidemiology of tick borne infections. We are unsure whether rodents can be infected with B. annae, as the parasite has never been described in any species other than canids. The primers used by Brown and colleagues [33] were B. microti specific and would not have detected B. annae even if it had been present. However Babesia annae (synonym Theileria annae) DNA has been demonstrated in both I. ricinus and I. hexagonus ticks in Spain [11, 19] with one tick being removed from a wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus). Alhough the tick tested positive for Babesia annae (synonym Theileria annae) DNA there is no evidence that the parasite was transmitted from the host mouse, or whether the tick was already infected prior to it attaching to the mouse [19]. There is also currently no evidence to prove if either of these species of ticks are competent vectors for the transmission of B. annae [34].

During this study we only detected parasite DNA from frozen exudates, we did not detect viable parasites or manage to examine blood smears for the presence of intra-erythrocytic life cycle stages. Nor was any clinical data available for the animals involved in this study, so we are unsure whether B. annae caused clinical symptoms in infected foxes or if it caused an asymptomatic infection. However, recent studies in Spain, Sweden and USA have demonstrated that B. annae is the causative agent of severe clinical disease and pathological abnormalities in dogs [1, 9, 34]. Clinical Babesia infections in dogs are often attributed to B. canis as there are few diagnostic tools for veterinarians to distinguish between the blood-borne piroplasms in routine veterinary practices [34], other than the direct examination of red blood cells under light microscopy. In laboratories the immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT) is used for serological diagnosis, while PCR generally corresponds to a more sensitive and specific diagnostic tool.

Our phylogenetic analysis shows that the 18S rRNA gene of B. annae described in this study is identical to that described in Europe with a maximum likelihood approximation of the standard likelihood ratio test score of 0 indicating that no base pair substitutions were observed between AY534602, EU583387, AF188001 and KT580785. The sequences generated also showed a closer parsimony to B. rodhaini, B. felis and B. leo than B. divergens, B. gibsoni and B. duncani. The sequence analysis carried out in this study agrees with that carried out by Lack and colleagues [29], who placed B. microti and the microti-like parasites in a distinct phylogenetic clade (referred to as the microti Group) which included Babesia ‘Spanish dog’ and B. microti found in mice (AB190459) and bank voles (AB085191) amongst others [29]. The phylogenetic data presented in this study shows that the Babesia are separated into three distinct clades, while the Theileria and Hepatozoon species are also all situated in separate clades. However the piroplasmida parasites found in otters and badgers (EF057099 and FJ225390) are positioned in between the Babesia clades, suggesting these members of the phylum require further reclassification.

More work needs to be carried out to help determine the dynamics of transmission of B. annae to foxes; an examination of small prey animals (rodents etc.) and the ticks that infest them may help demonstrate their role in maintaining B. annae infections in the environment. Further studies are also required to examine cases of canine babesiosis in Britain to speciate the causative agent and determine if B. annae is present within the British dog population and if it is causing clinical disease in canids.

Conclusions

This is the first study to demonstrate the presence of B. annae DNA in Britain. Sequence analysis has shown the B. annae 18S rRNA gene sequence detected in foxes in Britain to be identical to that detected in foxes in Europe and North America. Phylogenetic analysis shows that B. annae is closely related to Babesia microti, but clearly is a distinct species.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Sarah Middleton for her contribution to this project, Emily Hotchkiss for her help with the statistical analysis and the Scottish Government’s Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division (RESAS) for supporting this work

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Moredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park

References

  1. Falkeno U, Tasker S, Osterman-Lind E, Tvedten HW. Theileria annae in a young Swedish dog. Acta Vet Scand. 2013;55:50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Yeagley TJ, Reichard MV, Hempstead JE, Allen KE, Parsons LM, White MA, et al. Detection of Babesia gibsoni and the canine small Babesia ‘Spanish isolate’ in blood samples obtained from dogs confiscated from dogfighting operations. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009;235:535–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Homer MJ, Aguilar-Delfin I, Telford 3rd SR, Krause PJ, Persing DH. Babesiosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13:451–69.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Schnittger L, Rodriguez AE, Florin-Christensen M, Morrison DA. Babesia: a world emerging. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12:1788–809.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hildebrandt A, Hunfeld KP, Baier M, Krumbholz A, Sachse S, Lorenzen T, et al. First confirmed autochthonous case of human Babesia microti infection in Europe. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;26:595–601.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawford K, Walton J, Lewis D, Tasker S, Warman SM. Infectious agent screening in canine blood donors in the United Kingdom. J Small Anim Pract. 2013;54:414–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Smith FD, Wall LE. Prevalence of Babesia and Anaplasma in ticks infesting dogs in Great Britain. Vet Parasitol. 2013;198:18–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Baneth G, Florin-Christensen M, Cardoso L, Schnittger L. Reclassification of Theileria annae as Babesia annae sp. nov. Parasites Vectors. 2015;8:207.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Birkenheuer AJ, Horney B, Bailey M, Scott M, Sherbert B, Catto V, et al. Babesia microti-like infections are prevalent in North American foxes. Vet Parasitol. 2010;172:179–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Clancey N, Horney B, Burton S, Birkenheuer A, McBurney S, Tent K. Babesia (Theileria) annae in a Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) from Prince Edward Island, Canada. J Wildl Dis. 2010;46:615–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Camacho AT, Pallas E, Gestal JJ, Guitian FJ, Olmeda AS, Telford SR, et al. Ixodes hexagonus is the main candidate as vector of Theileria annae in northwest Spain. Vet Parasitol. 2003;112:157–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cardoso L, Cortes HC, Reis A, Rodrigues P, Simoes M, Lopes AP, et al. Prevalence of Babesia microti-like infection in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) from Portugal. Vet Parasitol. 2013;196:90–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dezdek D, Vojta L, Curkovic S, Lipej Z, Mihaljevic Z, Cvetnic Z, et al. Molecular detection of Theileria annae and Hepatozoon canis in foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Croatia. Vet Parasitol. 2010;172:333–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Karbowiak G, Majlathova V, Hapunik J, Pet’ko B, Wita I. Apicomplexan parasites of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in northeastern Poland. Acta Parasitologica. 2010;55:210–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Najm NA, Meyer-Kayser E, Hoffmann L, Herb I, Fensterer V, Pfister K, et al. A molecular survey of Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and their ticks from Thuringia, Germany. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014;5:386–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dixit P, Dixit AK, Varshney JP. Evidence of new pathogenic Theileria species in dogs. J Parasit Dis. 2010;34:29–32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Young A, Marquez-Grant N, Stillman R, Smith MJ, Korstjens AH. An investigation of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and Eurasian badger (Meles meles) scavenging, scattering, and removal of deer remains: forensic implications and applications. J Forensic Sci. 2015;60 Suppl 1:S39–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Medlock JM, Hansford KM, Bormane A, Derdakova M, Estrada-Pena A, George JC, et al. Driving forces for changes in geographical distribution of Ixodes ricinus ticks in Europe. Parasites Vectors. 2013;6:1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Lledo L, Gimenez-Pardo C, Dominguez-Penafiel G, Sousa R, Gegundez MI, Casado N, et al. Molecular detection of hemoprotozoa and Rickettsia species in arthropods collected from wild animals in the Burgos Province, Spain. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010;10:735–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamilton CM, Gray R, Wright SE, Gangadharan B, Laurenson K, Innes EA. Prevalence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) from around the UK. Vet Parasitol. 2005;130:169–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Learmount J, Zimmer IA, Conyers C, Boughtflower VD, Morgan CP, Smith GC. A diagnostic study of Echinococcus multilocularis in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) from Great Britain. Vet Parasitol. 2012;190:447–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bartley PM, Wright SE, Zimmer IA, Roy S, Kitchener AC, Meredith A, et al. Detection of Neospora caninum in wild carnivorans in Great Britain. Vet Parasitol. 2013;192:279–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Criado-Fornelio A, Martinez-Marcos A, Buling-Sarana A, Barba-Carretero JC. Molecular studies on Babesia, Theileria and Hepatozoon in southern Europe - Part Epizootiological aspectsI. Vet Parasitol. 2003;113:189–201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Burrells A, Bartley PM, Zimmer IA, Roy S, Kitchener AC, Meredith A, et al. Evidence of the three main clonal Toxoplasma gondii lineages from wild mammalian carnivores in the UK. Parasitology. 2013;140:1768–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Anisimova M, Gascuel O. Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: A fast, accurate, and powerful alternative. Syst Biol. 2006;55:539–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Dereeper A, Guignon V, Blanc G, Audic S, Buffet S, Chevenet F, et al. Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:W465–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 2010;59:307–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Zahler M, Rinder H, Schein E, Gothe R. Detection of a new pathogenic Babesia microti-like species in dogs. Vet Parasitol. 2000;89:241–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lack JB, Reichard MV, Van Den Bussche RA. Phylogeny and evolution of the Piroplasmida as inferred from 18S rRNA sequences. Int J Parasitol. 2012;42:353–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gimenez C, Casado N, Criado-Fornelio A, Alvarez de Miguel F, Dominguez-Penafiel G. A molecular survey of Piroplasmida and Hepatozoon isolated from domestic and wild animals in Burgos. Vet Parasitol. 2009;162:147–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Cavallini P. Variation in the social system of the red fox. Ethol Ecol Evol. 1996;8:323–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Jameson LJ, Medlock JM. Tick surveillance in Great Britain. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11:403–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Bown KJ, Lambin X, Telford G, Heyder-Bruckner D, Ogden NH, Birtles RJ. Vector borne and zoonotic diseases. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11:947–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Miro G, Checa R, Paparini A, Ortega N, Gonzalez-Fraga JL, Gofton A, et al. Theileria annae (syn. Babesia microti-like) infection in dogs in NW Spain detected using direct and indirect diagnostic techniques: clinical report of 75 cases. Parasites Vectors. 2015;8:217.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bartley et al. 2016

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement