Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Isolation and identification of Asaia sp. in Anopheles spp. mosquitoes collected from Iranian malaria settings: steps toward applying paratransgenic tools against malaria

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
Contributed equally
Parasites & Vectors201811:367

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2955-9

  • Received: 4 November 2017
  • Accepted: 15 June 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

In recent years, the genus Asaia (Rhodospirillales: Acetobacteraceae) has been isolated from different Anopheles species and presented as a promising tool to combat malaria. This bacterium has unique features such as presence in different organs of mosquitoes (midgut, salivary glands and reproductive organs) of female and male mosquitoes and vertical and horizontal transmission. These specifications lead to the possibility of introducing Asaia as a robust candidate for malaria vector control via paratransgenesis technology. Several studies have been performed on the microbiota of Anopheles mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Iran and the Middle East to find a suitable candidate for controlling the malaria based on paratransgenesis approaches. The present study is the first report of isolation, biochemical and molecular characterization of the genus Asaia within five different Anopheles species which originated from different zoogeographical zones in the south, east, and north of Iran.

Methods

Mosquitoes originated from field-collected and laboratory-reared colonies of five Anopheles spp. Adult mosquitoes were anesthetized; their midguts were isolated by dissection, followed by grinding the midgut contents which were then cultured in enrichment broth media and later in CaCO3 agar plates separately. Morphological, biochemical and physiological characterization were carried out after the appearance of colonies. For molecular confirmation, selected colonies were cultured, their DNAs were extracted and PCR was performed on the 16S ribosomal RNA gene using specific newly designed primers.

Results

Morphological, biochemical, physiological and molecular results indicated that all isolates are members of the genus Asaia.

Conclusions

Contrary to previous opinions, our findings show that Asaia bacteria are present in both insectary-reared colonies and field-collected mosquitoes and can be isolated by simple and specific methods. Furthermore, with respect to the fact that we isolated Asaia within the different Anopheles specimens from distinct climatic and zoogeographical regions, it is promising and may be concluded that species of this genus can tolerate the complicated environmental conditions of the vector-borne diseases endemic regions. Therefore, it can be considered as a promising target in paratransgenesis and vector control programs. However, we suggest that introducing the new technologies such as next generation sequencing and robust in silico approaches may pave the way to find a unique biomarker for rapid and reliable differentiation of the Asaia species.

Keywords

  • Paratransgenesis
  • Asaia
  • Bacteria
  • Malaria
  • Vector-borne diseases
  • Vector control

Background

Malaria is considered as the most deadly parasitic communicable disease worldwide and the most important vector-borne disease in Iran. Furthermore, it is a major health challenge in northern and southern parts of Iran [1, 2]. The WHO world malaria report in 2015 proclaimed 212 million cases of disease and 429,000 deaths worldwide in 2015 [3]. Widespread insecticide and drug resistance in mosquitos and parasites, respectively, and the lack of an effective malaria vaccine are the main obstacles to achieve the goals of global malaria eradication program [4, 5]. It is obvious that new solutions and management strategies are required for a successful control of malaria disease [6]. To overcome the existing barriers, the WHO invited about 2500 scientists with distinct specialties in different scientific groups from all over the world to determine the drawbacks of the first global malaria eradication program and suggest their solutions to revise the existing program and achieve global malaria eradication by 2050 [6]. One of the scientific groups was related to the vector control. They believed that to support the efforts towards global malaria elimination and eradication, development of complementary vector control strategies are mandatory. Particularly, those that are less vulnerable to the current problem in vector control and insecticide resistance are mandatory and these strategies should be considered in the frontline of malaria vector control intervention approaches. Therefore, these scientists suggested that the main attempts in vector control should be focused on transgenesis and paratransgenesis approaches, and designing new and efficient insecticides with different effect mechanisms compared to previous ones [7].

The main goal of performing the vector control approaches is intervening the transmission of parasites through the mosquitoes [8]. This aim can be achieved by killing the mosquitoes with insecticides and affecting the fitness of mosquitoes or reducing the competency of the vector by presenting new effector molecules which consequently block the sexual parasite development. In recent years, transgenesis and paratransgenesis have been introduced as promising strategies which can be used as effective tools for controlling vector-borne diseases. Genetically modified mosquitoes that express anti-plasmodium effector molecules in their midguts have been introduced in recent years [912]. Although genetic modification of insects was a challenge in previous years, new approaches such as phi C31 and CRISPR/Cas9 have been recently introduced and have improved the efficacy of the process [1316]. Nevertheless, creation of genetically modified insects needs advanced technology, special instruments and skills. In addition, this technology reduces the risks and concerns of gene flow from one mosquito population to another which can be possible in the future [8, 17]. Another interesting technique for delivering the effector molecules is the genetic engineering of symbiotic microorganisms of mosquitoes such as bacteria, fungi and viruses to present the interfering molecules which is also known as paratransgenesis [5, 1824]. Several studies have been performed on identification and using competent microorganisms to combat against vector-borne diseases, especially against malaria [1, 2, 2529].

Among the mentioned microorganisms, bacteria have specific advantages such as: simple isolation, growth in basic media, availability of genetic engineering methods and tools, rapid replication rate and relatively uncomplicated approaches compared to other candidate microorganisms. Therefore, bacteria have been on the frontline of attention for developing an effective paratransgenic tool against malaria from the creation of this concept. Engineered vector-associated bacteria could impose a pathogenic effect on their host, interfere with their reproduction and fitness or reduce their competency [8, 30]. Asaia is a genus of bacteria with unique features which has been isolated and characterized from the malaria vectors. This bacterium was isolated from An. stephensi for the first time and genetically modified and labeled by green fluorescent protein by Favia et al. [7]. Consequently, it was revealed that the bacteria are localized in many organs such as the midgut, salivary glands, and the reproductive system of female and male Anopheles and can disperse between these organs through the hemolymph [8]. Furthermore, Favia et al. [8] demonstrated that Asaia can transmit to the next generation vertically. These special features are the main advantages of this bacterium and those have led to Asaia be considered as a versatile tool in paratransgenesis. According to the performed studies, the distribution of these bacteria in mosquito populations is performed through various mechanisms, including co-feeding, sexual mating and maternal transmission [31, 32]. Asaia can be cultivated and genetically modified in the laboratory and can also be recolonized in the new host [33]. Vertical transmission capability suggests that Asaia is able to establish stable associations across multiple generations. This bacterium can be cultivated in cell-free media and can be easily transformed with exogenous DNA [8]. In a previous study, we could not isolate Asaia from field-collected samples from the north and south regions of Iran. According to the aforementioned specifications of Asaia and its importance in paratransgenesis, we modified our previous methods and tried to isolate Asaia in normal flora of different species of Anopheles in different regions of Iran, including Mazandaran, Bandar-Abbas, Chabahar and Kazerun.

Methods

Field collection of Anopheles spp.

Mosquitoes which were used in this study, originated from field- and laboratory-reared colonies of adult Anopheles spp. Coastal, semi-mountainous, or hilly rural areas (Siaho area and Eslamabad) with many permanent and seasonal rivers are the most important urban and rural regions for catching Anopheles in north, south, and southeastern part of Iran. Therefore, these regions with a wide distribution were selected for sampling and specimens were collected from Mazandaran, Chabahar, Bandar-Abbas (Siaho area) and Kazerun (Eslamabad) districts (Table 1). Larvae were collected from larval habitats using the standard dipping technique (350 ml dipper) and adults were captured from human and animal refuges and human settlements by hand catch method using an aspirator. After sampling, the larva specimens were transferred alive to the National Insectarium of Malaria and Vector Research Group (MVRG) at the Pasteur Institute of Iran (Tehran). After maturation, their adults were identified to species level using the standard morphological key of Iranian anophelines to determine the species of all Anopheles samples [34].
Table 1

Anopheles spp. studied, their collection sites, number of the mosquitoes and the prevalence of Asaia in their midguts

Species

Bandar-Abbas

Chabahar

Mazandaran

Kazerun

An. stephensi

38/50 (70%)

43/50 (86%)

0

0

An. maculipennis

0

0

7/10 (70%)

0

An. superpictus

0

0

0

9/14 (64%)

An. fluviatilis

0

0

0

7/16 (43%)

An. dthali

8/11 (73%)

0

0

0

Dissection of mosquitoes, isolation and cultivation of microorganisms

All adult mosquitoes were anesthetized by incubating them for 2 min at -20 °C. Before dissection, the surfaces of the samples were sterilized by soaking in 70% ethanol in 2 ml micro-tubes and shaking for 5 min. Dissection was accomplished in sterile conditions under a biological laminar flow hood (class-II). Each dissected midgut was transferred to a 1.5 ml micro-tube; its contents were suspended in 1 ml of sterile saline solution (0.9% NaCl) and homogenized by an electrical homogenizer. Then, a 0.5 ml aliquot of this suspension was inoculated into the handmade enrichment media [8]. A specific enrichment broth media was used for isolation of the acetic acid bacteria in this study comprising 2.2% D-sorbitol, 0.5% peptone, 0.5% yeast extract (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), 100 ppm cycloheximide and its pH was adjusted to 3.5 with hydrochloric acid [8, 33, 3537]. Next, isolated bacteria were inoculated in 10.0 ml of handmade enrichment culture medium in culture tubes. When microbial growth occurred, the extent of the growth was determined by turbidity monitoring. After that the suspension of the microorganisms was rubbed on a CaCO3 agar plate which contained 2.2% D-glucose, 1.0% ethanol, 1.0% yeast extract, 0.7% CaCO3 and 1.2% agar [36, 37]. Asaia colonies were experimentally identified by the morphological properties and formation of carbonate dissolution haloes in agar plates (Fig. 1). Colonies which were capable of clearing the CaCO3 were selected and isolated to perform more experiments and characterization. The isolates were maintained on agar slants of AG medium which contained 0.1% D-glucose, 1.5% glycerol, 0.5% peptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 0.2% malt extract, 0.7% CaCO3 and 1.5% agar [36].
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

The appearance of Asaia colonies on the glucose-yeast extract-CaCO3 medium. Asaia species produce the pink to colorless colonies on glucose-yeast extract-CaCO3 medium which is one of their unique morphological characteristics

Morphological, biochemical and physiological characterization

Gram stain was used to study the morphological characteristics of bacteria. The presence of catalase was tested by adding a few drops of 3.0% hydrogen peroxide solution on the bacterial colonies. Assimilation of ammoniacal nitrogen was examined by testing the growth of isolates at 30 °C for 5 days on a medium which contained 3.0% D-glucose, 0.1% (NH4)2SO4, 0.01% K2HPO4, 0.09% KH2PO4, 0.025% MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0005% FeCl3.6H2O and its pH was adjusted to 4.0 and 7.0 separately [36]. In addition, growth ability was tested in AG-medium without CaCO3 and agar as basal medium which contained various concentrations of acetic acid up to 0.35% at 30 °C for five days. Acid production from sugars was tested by the method of Asai et al. [37].

DNA extraction from bacterial isolates and amplification of 16S rRNA gene

The DNA of bacterial colonies was extracted with a Cinna Pure DNA kit according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Cinna Gen, Tehran, Iran). Specific forward and reverse primers were designed based on the specific 16S rRNA gene fragments of Asaia bacteria using the Gene Runner software (version 5.0.59) as follows: 16sF (5'-TGG CGG ACG GGT GAG TAT C-3'), 16sR (5'-AGT TGG TTT GAC CCG AAG CC-3') based on the LT838398.1 GenBank accession number and Asafor (5'-GCG CGT AGG CGG TTT ACA C-3') and Asarev (5'-AGC GTC AGT AAT GAG CCA GGT T-3') were used based on our previous study [2]. 16sF-16sR and Asafor-Asarev primer pairs were used to amplify the 1370 bp and 180 bp fragments, respectively. Reaction mixtures were prepared with a final volume of 25 μl using 1 unit of Dream Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas, Waltham, USA), 0.25 mM dNTPs, 1× Taq polymerase buffer, 0.4 μm of each primer, and 20 ng of the extracted DNA as template. Reactions were performed at 94 °C for 5 min and cycled 35 times through a protocol of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 60 °C, and 100 s at 72 °C. Finally, the reactions were maintained at 72 °C for 10 min. Amplicon size was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel. Staining was done with ethidium bromide and amplicons were visualized by an UV trans-illuminator.

Cloning

Amplified fragments were purified by the Accu Prep® Gel Purification Kit according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Bioneer Corporation, Seoul, Korea) and PCR products with the expected size were cloned into the pDrive TA cloning vector (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).

Sequencing

The TA-cloned inserted sequences (six samples) were sequenced by the Millegene Company (Labege, France). Sequences were further analyzed for confirmation using the nucleotide BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) and those were submitted to GenBank (Table 2).
Table 2

Information about the isolated bacteria: colony codes of the isolated Asaia bacteria, Anopheles spp. from which bacteria were isolated, their collection sites and the accession numbers of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of the isolated Asaia species

Colony code

Anopheles spp.

Collection site

GenBank ID

Colony13

An .stephensi

Bandar-Abbas

KU529464

Colony31

An .stephensi

Chabahar

KU529465

Colony33

An. maculipennis

Mazandaran

KU529466

colony41

An. superpictus

Kazerun

KU529467

colony57

An. fluviatilis

Kazerun

KU529468

colony95

An. dthali

Bandar-Abbas

KU529469

Phylogenetic analysis

In the next step, these six sequences were aligned using the MEGA6.0 software and Clustal X program with the available sequences representative of Asaia krungthepensis, Asaia bogorensis, Asaia platycodi, Asaia siamensis, Asaia lannaensis, Asaia prunellae, Asaia spathodeae and Asaia astilbes for genetic linkage analysis. Additionally, three species of the family Acetobacteraceae including Neoasaia chiangmaiensis, Gluconacetobacter takamatsuzukensis and Acetobacter aceti were selected as outgroup taxa. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the neighbour-joining (NJ) method. The NJ analysis was performed using the Tamura-Nei model with MEGA6.0 software [38]. The statistical robustness of the clusters was evaluated by bootstrap analysis after 1000 replications.

Results

As indicated in Table 1, Asaia bacterium was isolated with various prevalence from the field-collected Anopheles species from different regions of Iran. All the isolates were gram-negative, coccobacilli-shaped and strictly aerobic (require a shaking incubator) and their size ranges were 0.4–1.0 × 0.8–2.0 μm. Isolates had swarming when those were cultured and streaked on the agar medium. Colonies were pink to yellowish and white, smooth, glossy which had been marked by a full margin on glucose-yeast extract-CaCO3 agar plates (Fig. 1). Good growth occurred at pH 3.0 (titration with hydrochloric acid instead of acetic acid) and 30 °C. All new isolates grew on mannitol, dulcitol, D-sorbitol, glycerol, and maltose agar, but none of them grew in the presence of ethanol (Table 3). In addition, the isolates did not produce a water-soluble dark pigment on the glucose-yeast extract-CaCO3 medium. Acetic acid allowed a little growth at 0.3% but at 0.35%, growth was inhibited completely. Adequate growth was achieved by the use of D-glucose and ammonium sulfate as the sole sources of carbon and nitrogen on the vitamin-free medium.
Table 3

Distinctive features of the genus Asaia and other acetic acid bacteria genera [35, 42] applied for identification of Asaia within Anopheles species

Feature

Asaia

Acetobacter

Gluconobacter

Assimilation of ammonium sulfateon glucose medium

+

+w

-

Acetic acid production on ethanol-CaCO3 agar

- or +w

+

+

Acid production from

 D-mannitol

- or +

- or +w

+

 D-sorbitol

- or +

-

+

 Dulcitol

+

-

-

 Glycerol

+

-

+

 Ethanol

- or +w

+

+

 Maltose

+

-

-

Key: w, weak reaction; +, ability to use substrate; -, inability to use substrate

As mentioned above, for molecular characterization and confirmation, we designed two sets of Asaia 16S rRNA gene-specific primers. After DNA extraction of the isolated strains, PCR was performed with two sets of primers separately. Following the agarose gel electrophoresis, the 1370 bp and 180 bp specific amplicons of Asaia 16S rRNA gene were observed (Fig. 2). PCR analysis confirmed the presence of Asaia spp. in nearly 70% of the different Anopheles specimens from distinct regions of Iran (Table 3).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Agarose gel electrophoresis of the 16S rRNA gene amplicons of Asaia sp. Electrophoresis of the 1370 bp (a) and 180 bp (b) amplicons which correspond to the general and specific amplicons of 16S rRNA in the genus Asaia. Lane N: negative control; Lane L: DNA marker (100–1500 bp); Lane 1: Asaia bacterium from An .stephensi (Bandar-Abbas); Lane 2: Asaia bacterium from An .stephensi (Chabahar); Lane 3: Asaia bacterium from An. maculipennis (Mazandaran); Lane 4: Asaia bacterium from An. superpictus (Kazerun); Lane 5: Asaia bacterium from An. fluviatilis (Kazerun); Lane 6: Asaia bacterium from An. dthali (Bandar-Abbas)

These amplicons were recovered from agarose gel, TA-cloned and sequenced. Analysis of these sequences with nucleotide BLAST revealed that they were related to the 16S rRNA gene of Asaia.

Among these sequences, six were submitted to the GenBank database with the accession numbers KU529464-KU529469. The details of each sequence such as geographical sources and species of the Anopheles are presented in Table 2.

In the next step, these six sequences were aligned using the MEGA6.0 software and Clustal X program with the available sequences of different species of Asaia in the GenBank database. The resulting dataset of 1300 nucleotides was used to infer the genetic relationships of the under study samples using a phylogenetic approach based on the NJ method. The constructed phylogenetic tree showed that our isolated samples were not completely similar and located in different clusters. Among them, Asaia isolates from An. stephensi (Chabahar), An. maculipenis (Mazandaran) and An. dthali (Bandar-Abbas) clustered with known Asaia spp. and revealed a close relationship with Asaia krungthepensis. Moreover, it was interesting that Asaia isolates from An. superpictus (Kazerun), An. stephensi (Bandar-Abbas) and An. fluviatilis (Kazerun) clustered separately from all the other samples (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Evolutionary analysis of the isolated bacteria. Phylogenetic tree created with MEGA6.0 software and ClustalX program based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. The neighbor-joining method was used for evolution relationship analysis and associated taxa were clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates)

Discussion

Paratransgenesis is a novel approach which has been introduced by the scientific community as an effective and promising method for controlling the vector-borne diseases such as malaria in recent years [3941]. Among the several candidates which have been presented for combating malaria, Asaia is at the focus of considerations due to its specific features such as horizontal and vertical transmission and moving through the hemolymph inside the mosquito’s body towards different organs. In the present study, Asaia sp. was isolated from the midgut of different Anopheles mosquitoes using the selected medium to provide the basic element for developing a robust tool against malaria.

A variety of pink-colored to colorless colonies which are observed in frequent culturing are the probable marker of growth for this bacterium [36]. Asaia is the only genus of the family Acetobacteraceae that assimilates ammonium sulfate on glucose medium. Species of this genus are not fast-growing on ethanol-CaCO3 agar, and unlike species of the other genera, do not use ethanol [42]. However, acid production from dulcitol and maltose is helpful for differentiation between the Asaia and other genera (Table 1). In addition to morphological and biochemical characterization of Asaia in this study, the isolated strains were confirmed with specific primers for the 16S rRNA gene.

Sequence analysis of the 16S ribosomal gene confirmed that all of these strains belonged to the genus of Asaia, but because the 16S rRNA gene had high similarity among different species of this genus, the current molecular method could not differentiate these species. Regarding the fact that there is no record on preference of using a specific species of Asaia for paratransgenesis, it is necessary to evaluate their efficacy and compare the level of unique features of each species within this genus to select the best one for future paratransgenesis studies. Therefore, the biochemical tests carried out in the present study can be used to differentiate some species of the genus Asaia. For instance, unlike other species that do not grow on maltose, only this bacterium has the ability to grow in a maltose-containing environment [43]. Furthermore, the species Asaia bogorensis and Asaia siamensis which are not able to produce acetic acid from ethanol on the ethanol/calcium carbonate agar, instead can produce acid from dulcitol, glycerol and maltose [36, 4345].

Sequence analysis of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene of isolated strains in this study, confirmed the similarity and relationship of some of Asaia isolates which were detected in Anopheles from Mazandaran (An. maculipenis), Chabahar (An. stephensi), and Bandar-Abbas (An. dthali) with A. krungthepensis (Fig. 3). Furthermore, other Asaia samples which were isolated from Anopheles from Kazerun (An. superpictus and An. fluviatilis) and Bandar-Abbas (An .stephensi) clustered separately from the other isolated specimens in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3).

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of simultaneous isolation, identification and characterization of Asaia within a variety of Anopheles species, including An. maculipenis, An. stephensi, An. dthali, An. superpictus and An. fluviatilis from different zoogeographical and vector-borne disease-endemic areas in the world.

One of the major achievements of this study was that we could isolate Asaia from the insectary-reared colonies (An .stephensi from Chabahar and Bandar-Abbas). This achievement shows that Asaia can tolerate different situations and confirmed its vertical and horizontal transmission through several generations. With regard to the importance of Asaia in paratransgenesis, its isolation, identification, and characterization from various species of Anopheles would be beneficial and could be an applied step toward achieving the applying of paratransgenesis against malaria. Several studies have been performed for isolation of Asaia from different medically important vectors and this bacterium has been isolated from An. gambiae, An. stephensi, Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, Culex pipiens and Culex quinquefasciatus [4648]. This study is, however, the first report of isolation of Asaia from An. fluviatilis, An. maculipenis and An. dthali and the first report of its isolation from An. stephensi in Iran. However, to determine which species is dominant in each mosquito species and which of them are more efficient for using in paratransgenesis, it seems that developing new molecular or biochemical approaches are necessary.

Conclusions

In this study, samples for species of the genus Asaia were successfully isolated and identified from different Anopheles mosquito species with various vectorial capacities and from different vector-borne disease endemic regions. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the position of the isolated Asaia samples is close to other known species of this genus. However, with the present data, determining the species of Asaia is not possible and there is a necessity for developing a novel, reliable method to differentiate various species within this genus. Introducing new technologies such as next generation sequencing and robust in silico approaches, are the promising points that may make it possible to find a unique biomarker for rapid and reliable differentiation of the Asaia species.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr Hamzeh Alipour for his assistance and coordination in field sampling. We thank all Colleagues in the Malaria and Vector Research Group (MVRG), Biotechnology Research Center (BRC), Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran for their technical assistance.

Funding

This work has been supported through the internal fund of MVRG by NDD and SZ.

Availability of data and materials

The sequences obtained and/or analyzed during the current study are deposited in the GenBank database under the accession numbers KU529464-KU529469 (16S rRNA gene). All other relevant data are included in the article.

Authors’ contributions

NDD and AR conceived the study. All authors participated in the design of the study. AR performed the assays and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Malaria and Vector Research Group (MVRG), Biotechnology Research Center (BRC), Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran

References

  1. Lindh JM, Terenius O, Faye I. 16S rRNA gene-based identification of midgut bacteria from field-caught Anopheles gambiae sensu lato and A. funestus mosquitoes reveals new species related to known insect symbionts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:7217–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Djadid ND, Jazayeri H, Raz A, Favia G, Ricci I, Zakeri S. Identification of the midgut microbiota of An. stephensi and An. maculipennis for their application as a paratransgenic tool against malaria. PLoS One. 2011;6:e28484.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. World Health Organization. World malaria report 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.Google Scholar
  4. Capone A, Ricci I, Damiani C, Mosca M, Rossi P, Scuppa P, et al. Interactions between Asaia, Plasmodium and Anopheles: new insights into mosquito symbiosis and implications in Malaria Symbiotic Control. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:182.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Wang S, Ghosh AK, Bongio N, Stebbings KA, Lampe DJ, Jacobs-Lorena M. Fighting malaria with engineered symbiotic bacteria from vector mosquitoes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:12734–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Alonso PL, Chitnis CE, Hall L. The science of malaria eradication. Yucatan: Keystone Symposia; 2014.Google Scholar
  7. Control mCGV. A research agenda for malaria eradication: vector control. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1000401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Favia G, Ricci I, Damiani C, Raddadi N, Crotti E, Marzorati M, et al. Bacteria of the genus Asaia stably associate with Anopheles stephensi, an Asian malarial mosquito vector. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:9047–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Isaacs AT, Li F, Jasinskiene N, Chen X, Nirmala X, Marinotti O, Vinetz JM, James AA. Engineered resistance to Plasmodium falciparum development in transgenic Anopheles stephensi. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002017.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Dong Y, Das S, Cirimotich C, Souza-Neto JA, McLean KJ, Dimopoulos G. Engineered Anopheles immunity to Plasmodium infection. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002458.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Isaacs AT, Jasinskiene N, Tretiakov M, Thiery I, Zettor A, Bourgouin C, James AA. Transgenic Anopheles stephensi coexpressing single-chain antibodies resist Plasmodium falciparum development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:E1922–E30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim W, Koo H, Richman AM, Seeley D, Vizioli J, Klocko AD, O’brochta DA. Ectopic expression of a cecropin transgene in the human malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae): effects on susceptibility to Plasmodium. J Med Entomol. 2004;41:447–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Meredith JM, Underhill A, McArthur CC, Eggleston P. Next-generation site-directed transgenesis in the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae: self-docking strains expressing germline-specific phiC31 integrase. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59264.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Nimmo D, Alphey L, Meredith J, Eggleston P. High efficiency site-specific genetic engineering of the mosquito genome. Insect Mol Biol. 2006;15:129–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Gantz VM, Jasinskiene N, Tatarenkova O, Fazekas A, Macias VM, Bier E, James AA. Highly efficient Cas9-mediated gene drive for population modification of the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:E6736–E43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Hammond A, Galizi R, Kyrou K, Simoni A, Siniscalchi C, Katsanos D, et al. A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive system targeting female reproduction in the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34:78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Carballar-Lejarazú R, Jasinskiene N, James AA. Exogenous gypsy insulator sequences modulate transgene expression in the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles stephensi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:7176–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Ren X, Hoiczyk E, Rasgon JL. Viral paratransgenesis in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e1000135.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Suzuki Y, Niu G, Hughes GL, Rasgon JL. A viral over-expression system for the major malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Sci Rep. 2014;4:5127.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Ren X, Rasgon JL. Potential for the Anopheles gambiae densonucleosis virus to act as an “evolution-proof” biopesticide. J Virol. 2010;84:7726–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Riehle MA, Jacobs-Lorena M. Using bacteria to express and display anti-parasite molecules in mosquitoes: current and future strategies. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;35:699–707.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fang W, Vega-Rodríguez J, Ghosh AK, Jacobs-Lorena M, Kang A, Leger RJS. Development of transgenic fungi that kill human malaria parasites in mosquitoes. Science. 2011;331:1074–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Bisi DC, Lampe DJ. Secretion of anti-Plasmodium effector proteins from a natural Pantoea agglomerans isolate by using PelB and HlyA secretion signals. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:4669–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Ricci I, Damiani C, Scuppa P, Mosca M, Crotti E, Rossi P, et al. The yeast Wickerhamomyces anomalus (Pichia anomala) inhabits the midgut and reproductive system of the Asian malaria vector Anopheles stephensi. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13:911–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Manguin S, Ngo CT, Tainchum K, Juntarajumnong W, Chareonviriyaphap T, Michon A-L, Jumas-Bilak E. Bacterial biodiversity in midguts of Anopheles mosquitoes, malaria vectors in Southeast Asia. In: Manguin S, editor. Anopheles mosquitoes - new insights into malaria vectors. Rijeca: InTech; 2013. p. 549–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Chavshin AR, Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H, Pourmand MR, Raeisi A, Enayati AA, et al. Identification of bacterial microflora in the midgut of the larvae and adult of wild caught Anopheles stephensi: a step toward finding suitable paratransgenesis candidates. Acta Trop. 2012;121:129–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Chavshin AR, Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H, Pourmand MR, Raeisi A, Terenius O. Isolation and identification of culturable bacteria from wild Anopheles culicifacies, a first step in a paratransgenesis approach. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:419.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Rani A, Sharma A, Rajagopal R, Adak T, Bhatnagar RK. Bacterial diversity analysis of larvae and adult midgut microflora using culture-dependent and culture-independent methods in lab-reared and field-collected Anopheles stephensi - an Asian malarial vector. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9:96.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Terenius O, Dantas de Oliveira C, Pinheiro WD, Tadei WP, James AA, Marinotti O. 16S rRNA gene sequences from bacteria associated with adult Anopheles darlingi (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes. J Med Entomol. 2008;45:172–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Abdul-Ghani R, Al-Mekhlafi AM, Alabsi MS. Microbial control of malaria: biological warfare against the parasite and its vector. Acta Trop. 2012;121:71–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Damiani C, Ricci I, Crotti E, Rossi P, Rizzi A, Scuppa P, et al. Paternal transmission of symbiotic bacteria in malaria vectors. Curr Biol. 2008;18:R1087–R88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mamlouk D, Gullo M. Acetic acid bacteria: physiology and carbon sources oxidation. Indian J Microbiol. 2013;53:377–84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Favia G, Ricci I, Marzorati M, Negri I, Alma A, Sacchi L, et al. Bacteria of the genus Asaia: a potential paratransgenic weapon against malaria. In: Aksoy S, editor. Transgenesis and the management of vector-borne disease. New York: Springer; 2008. p. 49–59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Sofizadeh A, Edalat H, Abai MR, Hanafi-Bojd AA. Fauna and some biological characteristics of Anopheles mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Kalaleh County, Golestan Province, northeast of Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2016;6:730–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Yamada Y, Katsura K, Kawasaki H, Widyastuti Y, Saono S, Seki T, et al. Asaia bogorensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an unusual acetic acid bacterium in the alpha-Proteobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000;50:823–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Asai T, Iizuka H, Komagata K. The flagellation and taxonomy of genera Gluconobacter and Acetobacter with reference to the existence of intermediate strains. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 1964;10:95–126.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Ramalho-Ortigão M, Coutinho-Abreu IV. Transgenesis, paratransgenesis and transmission blocking vaccines to prevent insect-borne diseases. In: Larramendy ML, editor. Integrated pest management and pest control: Current and future tactics. Rijeca: InTech; 2012. p. 581–612.Google Scholar
  39. Coutinho-Abreu IV, Zhu KY, Ramalho-Ortigao M. Transgenesis and paratransgenesis to control insect-borne diseases: current status and future challenges. Parasitol Int. 2010;59:1–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hurwitz I, Fieck A, Read A, Hillesland H, Klein N, Kang A, Durvasula R. Paratransgenic control of vector-borne diseases. Int J Biol Sci. 2011;7:1334.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Sharafi S, Rasooli I, Beheshti-Maal K. Isolation, characterization and optimization of indigenous acetic acid bacteria and evaluation of their preservation methods. Iran J Microbiol. 2010;2:38.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Yukphan P, Potacharoen W, Tanasupawat S, Tanticharoen M, Yamada Y. Asaia krungthepensis sp. nov., an acetic acid bacterium in the α-Proteobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54:313–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Malimas T, Yukphan P, Takahashi M, Kaneyasu M, Potacharoen W, Tanasupawat S, et al. Asaia lannaensis sp. nov., a new acetic acid bacterium in the Alphaproteobacteria. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2008;72:666–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Katsura K, Kawasaki H, Potacharoen W, Saono S, Seki T, Yamada Y, et al. Asaia siamensis sp. nov., an acetic acid bacterium in the alpha-proteobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001;51:559–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Chouaia B, Rossi P, Montagna M, Ricci I, Crotti E, Damiani C, et al. Molecular evidence for multiple infections as revealed by typing of Asaia bacterial symbionts of four mosquito species. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:7444–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Crotti E, Damiani C, Pajoro M, Gonella E, Rizzi A, Ricci I, et al. Asaia, a versatile acetic acid bacterial symbiont, capable of cross-colonizing insects of phylogenetically distant genera and orders. Environ Microbiol. 2009;11:3252–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Damiani C, Ricci I, Crotti E, Rossi P, Rizzi A, Scuppa P, et al. Mosquito-bacteria symbiosis: the case of Anopheles gambiae and Asaia. Microb Ecol. 2010;60:644–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. De Freece C, Damiani C, Valzano M, D'amelio S, Cappelli A, Ricci I, Favia G. Detection and isolation of the α-proteobacterium Asaia in Culex mosquitoes. Med Vet Entomol. 2014;28:438–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement