Skip to main content

Evaluation of antibody responses to the early transcribed membrane protein family in Plasmodium vivax



Malaria parasites form intracellular membranes that separate the parasite from the internal space of erythrocytes, and membrane proteins from the parasites are exported to the host via the membrane. In our previous study, Plasmodium vivax early transcribed membrane protein (PvETRAMP) 11.2, an intracellular membrane protein that is highly expressed in blood-stage parasites, was characterized as a highly immunogenic protein in P. vivax malaria patients. However, the other PvETRAMP family proteins have not yet been investigated. In this study, PvETRAMPs were expressed and evaluated to determine their immunological profiles.


The protein structure and amino acid alignment were carried out using bioinformatics analysis software. A total of six PvETRAMP family proteins were successfully expressed and purified using a wheat germ cell free protein expression system and the purified proteins were used for protein microarray and immunization of mice. The localization of the protein was determined with serum against PvETRAMP4. IgG subclasses were assessed from the immunized mice.


In silico analysis showed that P. vivax exhibits nine genes encoding the ETRAMP family. The ETRAMP family proteins are relatively small molecules with conserved structural features. A total of 6 recombinant ETRAMP proteins were successfully expressed and purified. The serum positivity of P. vivax malaria patients and healthy individuals was evaluated using a protein microarray method. Among the PvETRAMPs, ETRAMP4 showed the highest positivity rate of 62%, comparable to that of PvETRAMP11.2, which served as the positive control, and a typical export pattern of PvETRAMP4 was observed in the P. vivax parasite. The assessment of IgG subclasses in mice immunized with PvETRAMP4 showed high levels of IgG1 and IgG2b. PvETRAMP family proteins were identified and characterized as serological markers.


The relatively high antibody responses to PvETRAMP4 as well as the specific IgG subclasses observed in immunized mice suggest that the ETRAMP family is immunogenic in pathogens and can be used as a protein marker and for vaccine development.


Malaria is a major global public health problem and causes pathogen-specific mortality. Approximately three billion people from approximately 100 countries are exposed to the five human-infectious malaria parasites, resulting in 219 million malaria infections in 2017 [1, 2]. In order to eliminate the parasite from the host, malaria-specific antibodies play essential roles in acquired immunity via the phagocytosis and opsonization of parasites [3], and the importance of immunity is evident in experimental animal models as well as passive transfer studies in which antibodies from a parasite-infected donor patient have been used to effectively treat patients with severe malaria [4, 5]. Moreover, the identification and the evaluation of antibodies raised against unknown merozoite antigens involved in parasite survival is also necessary for the development of serological markers as well as a vaccine [6,7,8]. For this reason, the development of omics techniques and high-throughput screening systems involving cell-free protein synthesis technology has led to the identification of numerous vaccine candidates and has extended the possibilities for investigating serological markers that induce an immune response in endemic areas of Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax [9,10,11,12].

The early transcribed membrane protein (ETRAMP) family was identified first in human-infectious malaria parasites, followed by rodent malaria parasites, and shows conserved structural features such as the presence of a signal peptide at the N terminus and a charged domain in the C-terminal region [13,14,15,16,17]. Interestingly, most ETRAMPs are expressed in stage-specific expression patterns during the parasite life cycle, and they mostly localize to the parasitophorous vacuole membrane (PVM), which spatially separates the parasite from the cytosol of erythrocytes in infected RBCs and mediates the free passage of molecules, probably through membranous pores such as the Plasmodium translocon for exported proteins (PTEX) and exported protein 1 (EXP1) [18,19,20,21,22]. On the other hand, the P. berghei ETRAMP family member small exported protein 2 (SEP2), localizes to membranous compartments of the ookinete and is released during gliding motility in the sporozoite, indicating that the protein family is involved in not only blood stage but also sexual stage [23].

In our previous studies, 232 blood stage-specific proteins of P. vivax were screened using P. vivax patient serum samples to evaluate the immune response and explore vaccine candidates using a protein array method, and PvETRAMP11.2 showed a relatively high antibody responses under relapse and reinfection of P. vivax according to serological analysis, indicating that the PvETRAMP family is likely to be immunogenic in P. vivax patients [24,25,26]. Therefore, in the present study, the other ETRAMPs of P. vivax were expressed for evaluation of serum reactivity to P. vivax-infected patient sera and profiling of the IgG subclass phenotype.


Bioinformatics analysis

The genes encoding pvetramps were retrieved from PlasmoDB (, along with their predicted transcriptional expression levels in blood-stage parasites. Alignments of the corresponding amino acid sequences were carried out with Clustal W2 [27]. The Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool (SMART) ( and the TMHMM Server v. 2.0 ( were used for the prediction of signal peptides and transmembrane domains [28,29,30,31].

Sample and serum preparation

Blood samples that were confirmed to be either P. vivax positive or negative via testing with a rapid diagnosis test kit and microscopy were collected in the Republic of Korea with approval from the Institutional Review Board at Kangwon National University (IRB No. 2017–05–009–001). The collected whole blood samples were centrifuged to separate the serum and packed cells.

Cloning and protein expression of PvETRAMPs

The six pvetramps were amplified by PCR from genomic DNA isolated from Korean P. vivax malaria patients. The primers used for PCR are described in Table 1. The six amplified genes were cloned into the XhoI and BamHI sites of the pEU-E01-His-Tev-N2 plasmid vector (CellFree Sciences, Matsuyama, Japan) for protein expression using in-fusion cloning (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The nucleotide sequence of pvetramps in the pEU plasmid DNA vector was confirmed by sequence analysis (Genothech, Daejeon, Korea). The pEU plasmid DNAs were purified with a Midiplus ultrapure plasmid extraction system (Viogene, Taipei, Taiwan) and were used for protein expression as described in a previous report [32]. The recombinant proteins were purified using a Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) affinity chromatography column (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) [33]. The purified proteins were confirmed by 12% SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis under reducing conditions.

Table 1 Primer sequence information for pvetramps for cloning into the pEU expression vector

Evaluation of antibody responses against six recombinant PvETRAMPs in P. vivax malaria patients or healthy individuals using a protein microarray

The preparation of amine-coated slides was described in a previous report [25]. Serum samples from P. vivax malaria patients or healthy individuals were used to evaluate the antibody reactivity of PvETRAMPs. A recombinant protein (100 ng in each protein) was spotted in each well of a slide, followed by incubation for 2 h at 37 °C. After washing the slide with phosphate-buffered saline-Tween (PBST, 0.1%), the slide was blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 1 h at 37 °C. The slide was probed with serum (1:10 dilution) and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Alexa Fluor 546-conjugated goat anti-human IgG (10 ng/μl; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was spotted on the slide, followed by incubation for 1 h at 37 °C for visualization. The slide was scanned in a fluorescence scanner (Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA, USA) [34]. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of each spot was quantified using ScanArray Express software version 4.0 (Perkin Elmer). The cut-off MFI value was determined as the MFI of serum from a healthy individual plus two standard deviations [33].

Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA)

Slides smeared with an enriched schizont-stage of P. vivax from patient blood samples were fixed with ice-cold acetone for 3 min, dried, and stored at − 80 °C until use. The slides were blocked with 5% BSA in PBS at 37 °C for 30 min and washed with PBS. The slides were incubated with a 1:50 diluted primary antibody (mouse anti-PvETRAMP4 and rabbit anti-PvETRAMP11.2) at 37 °C for 1 h. The slides were stained with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG, Alexa Fluor 568-conjugated anti-mouse IgG and Alexa Fluor 568-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies (Invitrogen) and 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Invitrogen) at 37 °C for 30 min. The stained slides were mounted in ProLong Gold antifade reagent (Invitrogen) and visualized under a confocal laser scanning FV200 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The captured images were analyzed using FV10-ASW 3.0 viewer software.

Immunization and IgG subclass profiling

To induce IgGs against PvETRAMP4, 20 μg of recombinant protein was injected into 5-week-old female BALB/c mice (Daehan Biolink Co., Eumsung, Korea) with Freund’s complete adjuvant, followed by an incomplete adjuvant. The injections were performed a total of three times at 2-week intervals. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were used for the profiling of IgG subclasses produced against PvETRAMP4 in mice [35]. Ninety-six-well ELISA plates (Costar, Corning, NY) were coated with purified mouse IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG3 (Invitrogen) and incubated with immunized mouse sera diluted 1:1000 in PBST. Horse-radish peroxide-conjugated anti-mouse IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG3 antibodies (Invitrogen) at 1:1000, 1:1000, 1:2000, and 1:1000 dilutions, respectively, were used to detect each isotype antibody. The reaction was developed by adding 100 μl of diluted 3, 3′, 5, 5′-tetramethylbenzidine single solution (Invitrogen, Rockford, IL) for 15 min at 37 °C, then stopped with 100 μl of 1N HCl solution. The intensity was measured and calculated from the log–log curve fit.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) and Microsoft Excel 2016 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA). Unpaired t-tests were used to compare the differences between the means of each group. Values of P <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Sensitivity was calculated based on the percentage of patients exhibiting values above the cut-off MFI, and specificity was calculated based on the percentage of healthy patients presenting values below the cut-off MFI.


Identification of PvETRAMP proteins

Nine proteins in the ETRAMP family were found in P. vivax, and the proteins were named according to their orthologues in P. falciparum. The PvETRAMPs were relatively small molecules except for PvETRAMP10.2, showing sizes of 11.9–25.0 kDa and 110–212 amino acids (Table 2, Fig. 1a). However, all PvETRAMPs presented high conservation of a signal peptide at the N terminus and one or two transmembrane domain(s) flanked by highly charged domain(s) containing amino acids such as lysine (K) and aspartic acid (D), leading most PvETRMPs to exhibit high pI values (Fig. 1a, b). In the transcriptome analysis, PvETRAMP4, 9, and 10.2 were predicted to be highly transcribed at the late trophozoite and early schizont stages, and PvETRAMP13 and 14.2 showed high transcription levels at the late schizont stage, indicating that expression of PvETRAMPs is mostly stage specific during intraerythrocytic development (Fig. 1c).

Table 2 The genetic information for the etramp family in Plasmodium vivax
Fig. 1

Schematic structures and amino acid alignments of the PvETRAMP family. a Schematic structure of the PvETRAMP family. A total of nine PvETRAMPs were identified. The signal peptide and transmembrane domain are indicated by a black box and a gray box, respectively. b Analysis of conserved sequence regions in PvETRAMPs. Eight PvETRAMP proteins showed the conserved domains, including the signal peptide (red box) and transmembrane domain (yellow box). c Predicted transcription levels of PvETRAMPs

Expression and purification of recombinant PvETRAMP proteins from a wheat germ cell-free system

A total of six PvETRAMP proteins were successfully expressed and purified using a wheat germ cell-free system, and their purity was confirmed by SDS-PAGE and western blot analyses (Fig. 2). The specific bands observed in the elution fraction indicated that the recombinant proteins were purified in a soluble form. However, the expression or solubility rate of PvETRAMP9 and 11.2 was considerably lower than those of the others. Two proteins, PvETRAMP5 and PvETRAMP10.3, had different banding patterns in the SDS-PAGE and immunoblot results, which was thought to be non-specific proteins co-expressed with target proteins. Most of the recombinant proteins were observed at slightly greater or lower sizes than their expected molecular weights, which might be due to the pI values of proteins, and these results were consistent with PfETRAMPs (Table 2) [13].

Fig. 2

Recombinant protein expression and purification of PvETRAMPs in a wheat germ cell-free expression system. a SDS-PAGE of purified PvETRAMPs. Arrows indicate purified PvETRAMP proteins. b Western blot of PvETRAMPs with an anti-penta-His antibody. Abbreviations: M, protein marker; T, total fraction; S, soluble fraction; P, pellet fraction; Ft, flow-through; E, elution fraction

Humoral immune response evaluation of PvETRAMPs

A protein array method was exploited to evaluate the humoral immune responses against PvETRAMPs (Fig. 3). All PvETRAMPs showed high specificity (> 95%), indicating that they can be used for differentiating infected and non-infected humans. There were significant antibody reactivity differences between patients and healthy individuals (P < 0.05) for most PvETRAMPs, except for PvETRAMP9 (P = 0.05) (Table 3). The sera from P. vivax-infected individuals to PvETRAMPs showed significantly higher mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values than those from malaria-naïve individuals. The highest seropositivity was found for PvETRAMP11.2 (76.8%), followed by PvETRAMP4 (62%), which was used for further study.

Fig. 3

IgG antibody responses to PvETRAMPs in the sera of Plasmodium vivax patients and malaria-naïve individuals. PvETRAMPs were reacted with the sera of P. vivax malaria patients or healthy individuals from the ROK. P-values were calculated with unpaired t-tests. The bar indicates the mean plus SD

Table 3 Prevalence, 95% confidence intervals, and mean fluorescence intensities of IgG responses to PvETRAMPs in P. vivax malaria patients and healthy individuals

Subcellular localization of PvETRAMP4 in blood-stage parasites

Mice were immunized with a recombinant PvETRAMP4 protein for further analysis, and the specific serum reacted with the P. vivax isolate (Fig. 4). Interestingly, PvETRAMP4 showed signal associated membrane and organelle in different stages, and PvETRAMP11.2 partially colocalized with PvETRAMP4.

Fig. 4

Localization and expression levels of PvETRAMP4 in Plasmodium vivax isolates. Parasites were stained with antisera against PvETRAMP4 (green color) PvETRAMP11.2 (red color) and DAPI (blue color). a Immature schizont stage. b Fully mature schizont stage. Scale-bars: 5 µm

Isotype prevalence of the antibody response in immunized mice

To evaluate isotype prevalence, an anti-PvETRAMP4 antibody from immunized mice was analyzed by ELISA. As shown in Fig. 5, the major components of the antibody response against PvETRAMP4 were IgG1 and IgG2b. There was no significant difference between the levels of IgG2a and IgG3.

Fig. 5

IgG subclass levels in response to PvETRAMP4 in immunized mice. The mice immunized with PvETRAMP4 were examined for the characterization of IgG subclasses. Error bars indicate the mean ± SD


The ETRAMP family is distributed in all human-infectious malaria species as well as other mammalian malaria parasites, such as rodent and primate parasites. In addition, several ETRAMP family proteins are abundantly transcribed in the erythrocytic stages of P. falciparum and P. vivax [36, 37]; therefore, characterization and identification of the ETRAMP family are carried out for the development of serological markers and novel vaccine candidate discovery.

Plasmodium vivax has nine identifiable etramps genes, as shown in Table 2, and thus fewer than in P. falciparum, in which 13 ETRAMPs have been identified and found to be expressed at a specific stage [13]. Similar to P. falciparum, PvETRAMPs were predicted to be expressed specifically at the schizont and early ring stages. It is useful to identify the stage-specific proteins in the parasite life-cycle because they may play important and specific roles in parasite development. For example, the transcription levels of invasive proteins such as merozoite surface proteins were found to be sharply increased in the late schizont stage, indicating that the merozoites interact with erythrocytes through these proteins. In a previous report, PvETRAMP11.2 was considered to be an interaction partner of PvTRAg36.6, which is exported to the RBC membrane in transgenic P. falciparum and localizes to the apical ends of the free merozoites in P. vivax; additionally, the interaction between PvETRAMP11.2 and PvEXP1, which is considered to be essential for parasite growth, was confirmed [38, 39]. Moreover, the lower expression levels of four ETRAMPs found in Saimiri monkeys, to which the P. vivax parasite can infect, but without PvDBP-II binding, suggest that ETRAMPs expressed at a specific stage either directly or indirectly affect the regulation of functional protein(s) necessary for parasite growth [40].

One of the critical factors for the discovery and evaluation of potential targets that induce a strong humoral immune response in parasite-infected patients is the use of appropriate screening methods. In our previous study, a large number of P. vivax antigens were screened using a wheat germ cell free-expression system and protein array with P. vivax patient sera and healthy sera. A high correlation between the protein array and ELISA for the screening of serum reactivity was validated; therefore, we used the protein array method to analyze the humoral immune response against the ETRAMP family in P. vivax [41, 42]. Interestingly, PvETRAMP4 showed higher serum positivity than the other PvETRAMPs tested, although it does not seem to be directly exposed to the human immune system (Fig. 3, Table 3). Generally, the antigen that induces a humoral immune response in the host, such as EMP-1 or MSP-1, is a result of exposure to the immune system and is usually located on the erythrocyte or merozoite surface, which is continuously exposed to the human immune system. However, there is a possibility that some proteins within infected erythrocytes can also be exposed to the immune system upon lysis of the parasite after egress [43]. For a deeper understanding of the immune system response to PvETRAMP4, the IgG subclasses generated in immunized mice were evaluated. The IgG subclasses produced against PvETRAMP4 showed that IgG1 and IgG2b were predominantly produced. In a previous study, cytophilic isotypes (IgG1 and mainly IgG3) were found to be predominantly produced by P. vivax infection; IgG2b in mice plays a similar role to IgG3 in humans [44, 45], suggesting that PvETRAMP4 probably induces IgG3 in the human immune system. However, the immune response to other PvETRAMPs could not be evaluated due to a limited amount of protein. Therefore, there is a need to further study other ETRAMP members of P. vivax.


For the immunological profiling of the P. vivax ETRAMP protein family, six proteins from the nine ETRAMP family proteins of P. vivax were expressed and purified, after which they were used for evaluation of the humoral immune response in P. vivax patients and immunization in mice. Interestingly, PvETRAMP4 and 11.2 showed relatively high antibody responses in P. vivax patients, and IgG isotype profiling showed that IgG1 and IgG2b were predominant in mice immunized with PvETRAMP4, suggesting that the PvETRAMPs might be candidates for vaccine and serological markers.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.



early transcribed membrane protein


small exported proteins


polymerase chain reaction


immunoglobulin G


parasitophorous vacuole membrane


red blood cell


Plasmodium translocon for exported proteins (PTEX)


exported protein-1


merozoite surface protein 1


erythrocyte membrane protein-1


  1. 1.

    Reyes-Sandoval A, Bachmann MF. Plasmodium vivax malaria vaccines: why are we where we are? Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013;9:2558–65.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    WHO. World Malaria Report (2008–2018). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Accessed 19 Nov 2018.

  3. 3.

    Kumaratilake LM, Ferrante A. Opsonization and phagocytosis of Plasmodium falciparum merozoites measured by flow cytometry. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000;7:9–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cohen S, Mc GI, Carrington S. Gamma-globulin and acquired immunity to human malaria. Nature. 1961;192:733–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sabchareon A, Burnouf T, Ouattara D, Attanath P, Bouharoun-Tayoun H, Chantavanich P, et al. Parasitologic and clinical human response to immunoglobulin administration in falciparum malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1991;45:297–308.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cohen S, Butcher GA, Crandall RB. Action of malarial antibody in vitro. Nature. 1969;223:368–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    McCallum FJ, Persson KE, Mugyenyi CK, Fowkes FJ, Simpson JA, Richards JS, et al. Acquisition of growth-inhibitory antibodies against blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3571.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Brown GV, Anders RF, Mitchell GF, Heywood PF. Target antigens of purified human immunoglobulins which inhibit growth of Plasmodium falciparum in vitro. Nature. 1982;297:591–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Miura K. Progress and prospects for blood-stage malaria vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2016;15:765–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Shen HM, Chen SB, Cui YB, Xu B, Kassegne K, Abe EM, et al. Whole-genome sequencing and analysis of Plasmodium falciparum isolates from China-Myanmar border area. Infect Dis Poverty. 2018;7:118.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bourgard C, Albrecht L, Kayano A, Sunnerhagen P, Costa FTM. Plasmodium vivax biology: insights provided by genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ntege EH, Takashima E, Morita M, Nagaoka H, Ishino T, Tsuboi T. Blood-stage malaria vaccines: post-genome strategies for the identification of novel vaccine candidates. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017;16:769–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Spielmann T, Fergusen DJ, Beck HP. etramps, a new Plasmodium falciparum gene family coding for developmentally regulated and highly charged membrane proteins located at the parasite-host cell interface. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14:1529–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Vaughan AM, Aly AS, Kappe SH. Malaria parasite pre-erythrocytic stage infection: gliding and hiding. Cell Host Microbe. 2008;4:209–18.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sharma A, Yogavel M, Akhouri RR, Gill J. Crystal structure of soluble domain of malaria sporozoite protein UIS3 in complex with lipid. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:24077–88.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kaiser K, Matuschewski K, Camargo N, Ross J, Kappe SH. Differential transcriptome profiling identifies Plasmodium genes encoding pre-erythrocytic stage-specific proteins. Mol Microbiol. 2004;51:1221–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mueller AK, Camargo N, Kaiser K, Andorfer C, Frevert U, Matuschewski K, et al. Plasmodium liver stage developmental arrest by depletion of a protein at the parasite-host interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:3022–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bano N, Romano JD, Jayabalasingham B, Coppens I. Cellular interactions of Plasmodium liver stage with its host mammalian cell. Int J Parasitol. 2007;37:1329–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    MacKellar DC, Vaughan AM, Aly AS, DeLeon S, Kappe SH. A systematic analysis of the early transcribed membrane protein family throughout the life cycle of Plasmodium yoelii. Cell Microbiol. 2011;13:1755–67.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    de Koning-Ward TF, Gilson PR, Boddey JA, Rug M, Smith BJ, Papenfuss AT, et al. A newly discovered protein export machine in malaria parasites. Nature. 2009;459:945–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Johnson D, Gunther K, Ansorge I, Benting J, Kent A, Bannister L, et al. Characterization of membrane proteins exported from Plasmodium falciparum into the host erythrocyte. Parasitology. 1994;109:1–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Simmons D, Woollett G, Bergin-Cartwright M, Kay D, Scaife J. A malaria protein exported into a new compartment within the host erythrocyte. Embo J. 1987;6:485–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Curra C, Di Luca M, Picci L, de Sousa Silva Gomes dos Santos C, Siden-Kiamos I, Pace T, et al. The ETRAMP family member SEP2 is expressed throughout Plasmodium berghei life cycle and is released during sporozoite gliding motility. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67238.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lu F, Li J, Wang B, Cheng Y, Kong DH, Cui L, et al. Profiling the humoral immune responses to Plasmodium vivax infection and identification of candidate immunogenic rhoptry-associated membrane antigen (RAMA). J Proteomics. 2014;102:66–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Chen JH, Jung JW, Wang Y, Ha KS, Lu F, Lim CS, et al. Immunoproteomics profiling of blood stage Plasmodium vivax infection by high-throughput screening assays. J Proteome Res. 2010;9:6479–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chuquiyauri R, Molina DM, Moss EL, Wang R, Gardner MJ, Brouwer KC, et al. Genome-scale protein microarray comparison of human antibody responses in Plasmodium vivax relapse and reinfection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93:801–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Jagannadham MV, Abou-Eladab EF, Kulkarni HM. Identification of outer membrane proteins from an Antarctic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae Lz4W. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;10(M110):004549.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001;305:567–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sonnhammer EL, von Heijne G, Krogh A. A hidden Markov model for predicting transmembrane helices in protein sequences. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol. 1998;6:175–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Schultz J, Milpetz F, Bork P, Ponting CP. SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: identification of signaling domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:5857–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P. SMART 6: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D229–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Tsuboi T, Takeo S, Iriko H, Jin L, Tsuchimochi M, Matsuda S, et al. Wheat germ cell-free system-based production of malaria proteins for discovery of novel vaccine candidates. Infect Immunol. 2008;76:1702–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Chen JH, Wang Y, Ha KS, Lu F, Suh IB, Lim CS, et al. Measurement of naturally acquired humoral immune responses against the C-terminal region of the Plasmodium vivax MSP1 protein using protein arrays. Parasitol Res. 2011;109:1259–66.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Neeley ES, Kornblau SM, Coombes KR, Baggerly KA. Variable slope normalization of reverse phase protein arrays. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1384–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cheng Y, Wang B, Sattabongkot J, Lim CS, Tsuboi T, Han ET. Immunogenicity and antigenicity of Plasmodium vivax merozoite surface protein 10. Parasitol Res. 2014;113:2559–68.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Rutledge GG, Bohme U, Sanders M, Reid AJ, Cotton JA, Maiga-Ascofare O, et al. Plasmodium malariae and P. ovale genomes provide insights into malaria parasite evolution. Nature. 2017;542:101–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Cui L, Fan Q, Hu Y, Karamycheva SA, Quackenbush J, Khuntirat B, et al. Gene discovery in Plasmodium vivax through sequencing of ESTs from mixed blood stages. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2005;144:1–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Tyagi K, Hossain ME, Thakur V, Aggarwal P, Malhotra P, Mohmmed A, et al. Plasmodium vivax tryptophan rich antigen PvTRAg36.6 interacts with PvETRAMP and PvTRAg56.6 interacts with PvMSP7 during erythrocytic stages of the parasite. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0151065.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Cheng Y, Lu F, Lee SK, Kong DH, Ha KS, Wang B, et al. Characterization of Plasmodium vivax early transcribed membrane protein 11.2 and exported protein 1. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0127500.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Gunalan K, Sa JM, Moraes Barros RR, Anzick SL, Caleon RL, Mershon JP, et al. Transcriptome profiling of Plasmodium vivax in Saimiri monkeys identifies potential ligands for invasion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:7053–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Chen JH, Chen SB, Wang Y, Ju C, Zhang T, Xu B, et al. An immunomics approach for the analysis of natural antibody responses to Plasmodium vivax infection. Mol Biosyst. 2015;11:2354–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Fan YT, Wang Y, Ju C, Zhang T, Xu B, Hu W, et al. Systematic analysis of natural antibody responses to P. falciparum merozoite antigens by protein arrays. J Proteomics. 2013;78:148–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Horii T, Bzik DJ, Inselburg J. Characterization of antigen-expressing Plasmodium falciparum cDNA clones that are reactive with parasite inhibitory antibodies. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1988;30:9–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hussain R, Dawood G, Abrar N, Toossi Z, Minai A, Dojki M, et al. Selective increases in antibody isotypes and immunoglobulin G subclass responses to secreted antigens in tuberculosis patients and healthy household contacts of the patients. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1995;2:726–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Cheng Y, Shin EH, Lu F, Wang B, Choe J, Tsuboi T, et al. Antigenicity studies in humans and immunogenicity studies in mice: an MSP1P subdomain as a candidate for malaria vaccine development. Microbes Infect. 2014;16:419–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (NRF-2017R1A2A2A05069562) (ETH), by the Basic Science Research Programme through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2015R1A4A1038666) (ETH) and by the 2018 Research Grant (PoINT) from Kangwon National University (ETH). This study was also funded by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (81601787, 81871681), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20160192), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities funded by the Ministry of Education of China (JUSRP51710A), and the national first-class discipline program of Food Science and Technology (JUFSTR20180101). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information




SKL and YC equally contributed to the design, analysis, completion, interpretation, and reporting of the study. JHP and JHH participated in one or more of the experiments. KSH, WSP, SHH, SHN, and ETH analyzed the data and interpreted the results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yang Cheng or Eun-Taek Han.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The animal experiment was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee and followed the Ethical Guidelines for Animal Experiments of Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea (KIACUC-16-0158).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, S., Han, J., Park, J. et al. Evaluation of antibody responses to the early transcribed membrane protein family in Plasmodium vivax. Parasites Vectors 12, 594 (2019).

Download citation


  • Malaria
  • Plasmodium vivax
  • IgG antibody response
  • P. vivax patients