Skip to main content

Identification and characterization of an R-Smad homologue (Hco-DAF-8) from Haemonchus contortus



Smad proteins are essential cellular mediators within the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily. They directly transmit incoming signals from the cell surface receptors to the nucleus. In spite of their functional importance, almost nothing is known about Smad proteins in parasitic nematodes including Haemonchus contortus, an important blood-sucking nematode of small ruminants.


Based on genomic and transcriptome data for H. contortus and using bioinformatics methods, a Smad homologue (called Hco-daf-8) was inferred from H. contortus and the structural characteristics of this gene and its encoded protein Hco-DAF-8 established. Using real-time PCR and immunofluorescence assays, temporal transcriptional and spatial expression profiles of Hco-daf-8 were studied. Gene rescue in Caenorhabditis elegans was then applied to assess the function of Hco-daf-8 and a specific inhibitor of human Smad3 (called SIS3) was employed to evaluate the roles of Hco-DAF-8 in H. contortus development.


The features of Hco-DAF-8 (502 amino acids), including conserved R-Smad domains and residues of the L3-loop that determine pathway specificity, are consistent with a TGF-β type I receptor-activated R-Smad. The Hco-daf-8 gene was transcribed in all developmental stages of H. contortus studied, with a higher level of transcription in the fourth-stage larval (L4) females and the highest level in adult males. Hco-DAF-8 was expressed in the platymyarian muscular cells, intestine and reproductive system of adult stages. Gene rescue experiments showed that Hco-daf-8 was able to partially rescue gene function in a daf-8 deficient mutant strain of C. elegans, leading to a resumption of normal development. In H. contortus, SIS3 was shown to affect H. contortus development from the exsheathed third-stage larvae (L3s) to L4s in vitro.


These findings suggest that Hco-DAF-8, encoded by the gene Hco-daf-8, is an important cellular mediator of H. contortus development via the TGF-β signalling pathway. They provide a basis for future explorations of Hco-DAF-8 and associated pathways in H. contortus and other important parasitic nematodes.


The transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signalling pathway regulates the growth, development and differentiation of cells in diverse organisms including humans, mice, flies and worms [1, 2]. In this pathway, signalling is initiated when the ligand induces the assembly of a heteromeric complex of type II and type I receptors. Upon activation of type I receptors, signalling from cell-surface receptors to the nucleus is mediated by Smad proteins.

Based on their functions, Smad proteins are classified into three subclasses, i.e. receptor-regulated Smads (R-Smads), common-partner Smads (Co-Smads) and inhibitory Smads (I-Smads) [3]. R-Smads are direct substrates of type I receptors, represented by TGF-β/Activin-activated R-Smads and BMP-activated R-Smads. The former molecules are specifically activated by activin/nodal and TGF-β type I receptors, such as Hs-Smads 2 and 3; the latter molecules are activated by BMP (bone morphogenetic protein) type I receptors, including Hs-Smads 1, 5 and 8 [4]. Following phosphorylation by a type I receptor, R-Smads interact with Co-Smads to form a complex, which is then translocated into the nucleus to regulate the transcription of target genes. In these processes, R-Smads usually play a central role in maintaining specificity in the TGF-β signalling pathway by functioning both as a substrate of the type I receptor and as an usher for Co-Smad [5]. In addition, R-Smads are regulated by inhibitory Smads, which prevent the phosphorylation and/or nuclear translocation of R-Smads [6].

In Caenorhabditis elegans, the TGF-β signalling pathway (daf-7 pathway) functions to regulate dauer formation via the R-Smads Cel-DAF-8 and Cel-DAF-14 [7]. In favourable environments, the daf-7 signal is received by a heterotetrameric receptor composed of two DAF-1 type I receptor and two DAF-4 type II receptor subunits on the cell surface. The DAF-4 type II receptor first phosphorylates the DAF-1 type I receptor, which then propagates the signal through phosphorylation of the R-Smad proteins Cel-DAF-8 and Cel-DAF-14. Activated R-Smads complexes are translocated into the nucleus and inhibit the functions of DAF-3/Co-Smad and DAF-5, regulating the transcription of genes involved in normal larval development [8]. Under harsh environmental conditions the daf-7 pathway is inactive, allowing downstream genes such as daf-3 and daf-5 to promote dauer formation [9]. Cel-DAF-3 can repress the transcription of Cel-DAF-8, which drives a negative feedback loop of this pathway [10]. In C. elegans, R-Smads Cel-DAF-8 and Cel-DAF-14 are co-expressed in a subset of neurons, the intestine and excretory cells, and, interestingly, have partial functional redundancy of one another [10, 11].

In the parasite nematode H. contortus, recent studies identified some members of the TGF-β signalling pathway including TGF-β type I receptor [12], TGF-β type II receptor [13] and Co-Smad [14] and evaluated their important roles in larval development from the exsheathed third-stage larvae (L3s) to L4s in intro. As there is no information available on these R-Smads for parasitic nematodes of clade V [15], we took the opportunity of exploring the structure and function of the homologue of Cel-DAF-8 in H. contortus (barber’s pole worm), one of the economically most important parasites of small ruminants worldwide [16].

Herein, a TGF-β-activated R-Smad gene from H. contortus, called Hco-daf-8 was isolated and characterised. The transcription profile of the Hco-daf-8 gene in distinct developmental stages of H. contortus and protein localisation in adults were investigated. Gene rescue experiment showed that Hco-daf-8 was able to partially rescue the dauer phenotype of daf-8-deficient mutant strain of C. elegans, and a Smad3-specific inhibitor SIS3 was shown to affect H. contortus development from L3s to L4s in vitro.


Caenorhabditis elegans and H. contortus strains, and their maintenance

Caenorhabditis elegans strains were purchased from the Caenorhabditis Genetic Center (CGC) (University of Minnesota, USA) and cultured with Escherichia coli OP50 as a food source on nematode growth medium (NGM) using standard procedures [17], unless otherwise stated. Worm strains used were N2 wild-type and a daf-8 mutant (CB1393), the latter of which is temperature-sensitive and has a dauer phenotype at 25 °C. Haemonchus contortus (Haecon 5 strain) employed here was maintained by serial passages in experimental goats (raised helminth-free; 14 weeks of age); kids were infected orally with 7000 third-stage (infective) larvae (iL3s). Eggs isolated from the faeces by sucrose flotation [18] were cultured in tissue culture flasks at 28 °C in a nutritive medium (0.1 ml/ml of culture of 1× Earle’s balanced salt solution (EBSS, Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.5% (w/v) of yeast extract) [19]. First-stage larvae (L1s), second-stage larvae (L2s) and iL3s were obtained from eggs cultured at 28 °C (constant) for 1, 4 and 7 days, respectively [20]. Fourth-stage larvae (L4s; both sexes) and adults (both sexes) were collected from the abomasa of infected goats, euthanased 8 and 30 days, respectively, following oral infection with iL3s [20]. Males and females of L4s and adults were separated as described previously [21].

DNA and RNA preparation

Genomic DNA was extracted from mixed developmental stages of C. elegans using an EasyPure Genomic DNA kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China). Genomic DNA was also isolated from adult H. contortus (both sexes) by mini-column (Wizard® Clean-Up; Promega, Beijing, China) purification following small-scale SDS/proteinase K digestion [22]. DNA samples were stored at − 20 °C. Total RNA was isolated using the TRIpure reagent (Aidlab, Beijing, China) as recommended by the manufacturer. RNA quality and yields were verified by electrophoretic analysis and spectrophotometry (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, USA), respectively. First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using the extracted RNA and PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit with DNA Eraser (Takara, Beijing, China). RNA and cDNA samples were stored at − 80 °C.

Identification of the C. elegans DAF-8 homologue in H. contortus

The Cel-daf-8 gene sequence was obtained from WormBase (WS271; code R05D11.1), and an homologue of this gene was identified by searching the C. elegans protein sequence against the non-redundant (nr) protein sequence database using the protein BLAST from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) ( Homologues of the Cel-DAF-8 protein were inferred from the H. contortus genomes (PRJEB506 and PRJNA205202) using BLAST/BLAT ( [23].

Isolation of Hco-daf-8 genomic sequence and coding DNA sequence (CDS)

Using genomic and transcriptomic data sets for H. contortus [16, 24], the sequences of the Hco-daf-8 coding region and full-length genomic region were retrieved (GenBank: HF958885.1). The coding region of Hco-daf-8 was PCR-amplified from cDNA with primer pair Hco-daf-8-F and Hco-daf-8-R (Additional file 1: Table S1) using the following cycling conditions: 98 °C for 5 min; then 98 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 5 s, 72 °C for 90 s for 35 cycles; and a final extension step at 72 °C for 5 min. The full-length genomic sequence of Hco-daf-8 was PCR-amplified from H. contortus genomic DNA using the same primer pair and conditions as described above, except that the extension time was 3 min, instead of 90 s. These two PCR products were individually inserted into pTOPO-Blunt vector (CV17; Aidlab) and directly sequenced in both directions (via TsingKe Biological Technology, Wuhan, China).

Bioinformatic and phylogenetic analyses

Nucleotide (nt) sequences and amino acid (aa) sequences were assembled and aligned using the programs BLASTx and Clustal W [25]. Briefly, the sequence of Hco-daf-8 was compared with sequences in non-redundant databases using the BLASTx from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) ( to confirm the identity of cloned genes. Each cDNA sequence was conceptually translated into predicted amino acid sequence using DNAstar software ( To determine the sequence characteristics of Hco-DAF-8, amino acid sequence comparison was performed. The predicted amino acid sequence of Hco-DAF-8 was aligned with two R-Smads (Cel-DAF-8 and Cel-DAF-14) involved in the DAF-7 signalling pathway in C. elegans and a panel of reference sequences: TGF-β/Activin-activated R-Smads (Hs-Smad2, Hs-Smad3 of Homo sapiens; Dm-Smox of Drosophila melanogaster; and Dar-MAD of Danio rerio) and BMP-activated R-Smads (Hs-Smad1, Hs-Smad5 of H. sapiens; Dm-MAD of D. melanogaster; and Mm-MAD1 of Mus musculus) (Additional file 1: Table S2) using the program Clustal W [25]. Graphic view was conducted using BioEdit software ( Sequence identity was assessed using Clustal Omega ( Protein motifs of Hco-DAF-8 were identified by scanning the databases Pfam ( and PROSITE ( Exon and intron boundaries in DNA sequences were inferred using the software MAFFT ( and the “GT-AG” rule [26]. Nuclear localisation signal (NLS) sequence was predicted using the program cNLS Mapper [27].

The alignment of Hco-DAF-8 with selected references including Cel-DAF-8 and its homologues (Cbn-DAF-8 and Cjp-DAF-8), Cel-DAF-14 and its homologues (Cbr-DAF-14 and Cjp-DAF-14), Cel-SMA-2 and its homologues (Cbr-SMA-2; Ovo-SMA-2; Hco-SMA-2), Cel-SMA-3 and Cbr-SMA-3, as well as four R-Smads from Homo sapiens and Smox from D. melanogaster were subjected to phylogenetic analysis. An inhibitory-Smad protein of D. melanogaster (Dm-DAD) was used as an outgroup (Additional file 1: Table S2). Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using the neighbour-joining (NJ), minimum evaluation (ME) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods employing the Jones–Taylor–Thornton (JTT) model [28]. Confidence limits were assessed using a bootstrap procedure, with 1000 bootstrap replications for NJ and default settings (in MEGA7; [28]) for the other methods. A 50% cut-off value was implemented for the consensus tree.

Assessing transcript abundance using real-time PCR

Transcription of Hco-daf-8 was examined in each of the six developmental stages (eggs, L1s, L2s, iL3s, L4s and adults) and both sexes (males and females) of H. contortus (Haecon-5 strain) by real-time PCR using the primers rtHco-daf-8-F and rtHco-daf-8-R (Additional file 1: Table S1). RNA was isolated separately from eggs, L1s, L2s and iL3s (10,000 of each stage) and female L4, male L4 (five of each), female adults or male adults (three of each) using TRIpure Trizol (Aidlab) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. An equal amount (1 μg) of RNA from each stage was used to synthesise the first-strand cDNA by random primer using PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara), respectively. The RT-PCR (10 μl) was performed using the TB Green™ Premix Ex Taq™ II (Tli RNaseH Plus) (Takara, No. RR820A) in a thermal cycler (AII A7; Bio-Rad, Berkeley, USA) under the following protocol: 50 °C for 2 min and 95 °C for 30 s for the first cycle, followed by 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 15 s and 72 °C for 20 s for 40 cycles. Each sample was tested in triplicate, employing a β-tubulin 8–9 gene (GenBank: M76493) as a reference gene (using specific primers Tubulin-F and Tubulin-R; Additional file 1: Table S1) [29]. The mean quantification cycle (Cq) values were subjected to compare the relative quantities with egg (egg = 1) using the 2−∆∆Cq method [30]. This assay was repeated three times. Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA in GraghPad Prism 6 ( P-values were calculated using the Tukey’s post-hoc test; values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Production of polyclonal antibody against recombinant Hco-DAF-8 and immunoblot analysis

The truncated cDNA fragment of Hco-DAF-8 coding for 251 aa was PCR-amplified using the primer pair rHco-DAF-8-F/R (Additional file 1: Table S1) and then cloned into the prokaryotic expression vector pGEX-4T, to construct the prokaryotic expression plasmid pGEX-4T-Hco-DAF-8. The insert was sequenced, and the recombinant plasmid was then transferred to BL21 (DE3) cells. Recombinant Hco-DAF-8 (rHco-DAF-8) expression was induced by 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 16 °C overnight. Expressed proteins were purified from culture supernatants using the glutathione sepharose™ 4B column system (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh USA) and then used to immunise rabbits to produce anti-rHco-DAF-8 polyclonal antibody. Briefly, recombinant protein rHco-DAF-8 (500 μg) was administered three times subcutaneously 14 days apart and once intravenously (100 μg) 6 days prior to euthanasia using pentobarbital. Serum was collected and affinity purified over a Protein A-sepharose column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) and quantified [31]. Pre-immune rabbit serum (negative control) was processed in the same manner. All sera were stored at − 80 °C.

Affinity-purified antibody against rHco-DAF-8 was used for immunofluorescence and immunoblot analyses. For immunoblot, proteins extracted from adult male or female H. contortus worms using a Total Protein Extraction Kit (BestBio, Shanghai, China) were electrophoresed in 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to an Immobilon®-PSQ Transfer Membrane (Merck Millipore Ltd., Darmstadt, Germany). After being blocked with 1% (w/v) BSA (BioFROXX, Guangzhou, China) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) containing 20% Tween-20 (PBST) for 6 h at 4 °C, the membranes were incubated in the primary antibody against rHco-DAF-8 (diluted 1:1000 in PBST) overnight at 4 °C, followed by 5 min × 6 washes in PBST and subsequent incubation with the goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody conjugated with horse radish peroxidase (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) diluted 1:1000 in PBST for 2 h at 37 °C. After five washes of the membranes, immunodetection was carried out by chemiluminescence (WesternBright ECL kit, cat. no. K-12045-D10; Aibio, Shanghai, China) as recommended, and imaging was conducted using the ChemiDoc XRS+ system (Bio-Rad).

Immunofluorescent assay to evaluate protein expression in H. contortus

Purified polyclonal antibody against rHco-DAF-8 was used to detect the expression of native Hco-DAF-8 in parasite sections. Briefly, freshly collected H. contortus adults were fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS at 4 °C, as described previously [32]. Subsequently, the worms were washed, dehydrated, immersed in paraffin wax and cut into 4 μm-thick sections. Sections were processed and incubated in 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min at room temperature (24 °C) to quench endogenous peroxidase activity. The sections were then pre-blocked with bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 20 min at 37 °C, before probing overnight with the anti-rHco-DAF-8 antibody (1:100 in PBST) at 4 °C. Negative control sections were probed with the pre-immune rabbit serum (1:100 dilution). Following three washes (5 min each), the sections were subjected to incubation with the Alexa Fluor® 594 goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody ReadyProbes® reagent (R37117; Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a 1:3000 dilution for 50 min at 37 °C. Unbound secondary serum was removed before an incubation with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 5 min at 24 °C. Subsequently, worm sections were washed and mounted in mounting-medium [33]. Fluorescence was detected using a fluorescence microscope (BX51; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Construction of plasmids and gene rescue in C. elegans

To conduct the gene rescue experiment in C. elegans, two plasmids including a test plasmid Cel-daf-8p::Hco-daf-8::gfp and a positive control plasmid Cel-daf-8p::Cel-daf-8::gfp were constructed (Additional file 1: Table S1, Additional file 2: Figure S1). In brief, the predicted promoter of Cel-daf-8 was PCR-amplified from the genomic DNA of C. elegans using a forward primer Cel-daf-8p-jy-F (Additional file 1: Table S1) containing a linker sequence (21 bp) identical to a partial sequence of pPV199 and a reverse primer Cel-daf-8p-jy-R (Additional file 1: Table S1) employing the following cycling conditions: 98 °C for 5 min; then 98 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 5 s, 72 °C for 3 min for 35 cycles; followed by 72 °C for 5 min. The full length coding sequence (CDS) of Hco-daf-8 was PCR-amplified using the primer pair Hco-daf-8-jy-F/Hco-daf-8-jy-R (Additional file 1: Table S1) from H. contortus cDNA under the following protocol: 98 °C for 5 min; then 95 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 5 s, 72 °C for 90 s for 35 cycles; followed by 72 °C for 5 min. The vector pPV199 was linearised by AgeI and BamHI. Then three fragments were ligated together to generate a test rescue plasmid Cel-daf-8p::Hco-daf-8::gfp using CloneExpress® Multis One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). Similarly, the CDS of Cel-daf-8 was amplified from the cDNA of C. elegans using the primer pair Cel-daf-8-jy-F/Cel-daf-8-jy-R (Additional file 1: Table S1) and then ligated with the amplified promoter sequence of Cel-daf-8 and the digested pPV199 fragment to produce the positive control plasmid Cel-daf-8p::Cel-daf-8::gfp for the rescue assay. The sequences of the inserts of the two plasmids were each verified by sequencing.

The rescue assay was conducted as described previously [20]. Rescue plasmid (50 ng/μl) was micro-injected into the adult germline of daf-8 (CB1393) mutant worms, together with the pRF-4 (50 ng/μl) as a marker for transformation. The transgenic strain, selected based on its green fluorescence/roller phenotype, was assessed for rescue. For each transgenic line, 15 green fluorescent protein (GFP)-positive, gravid hermaphrodites were transferred to an NGM plate containing OP50 and allowed to lay eggs at 16 °C for 3 h. Then, adults were removed, and eggs were kept at 25 °C for 3 days. Adult and dauer worms with green fluorescence were counted. Dauer was assessed based on the radial constriction of the body and a lack of pharyngeal pumping [7]. The percentage of worms rescued was calculated based on the number of adults with GFP divided by total number of GFP-positive worms. Each phenotypic assay was repeated at least three times per transgenic line. GFP expression of the rescued worms were examined using a compound epifluorescence microscope (BX51; Olympus) with Nomarski differential interference contrast (DIC) optics equipped with a digital camera.

Inhibitor assay

The specific inhibitor of human Smad3 (SIS3) was purchased from MedChemExpress (HY-13013; Shanghai, China). SIS3 was stored as a solution in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at a final concentration of 50 mM; this solution was used after being diluted to 0.5 mM with Luria Bertani medium containing 2.5 μg/ml amphotericin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 100 IU/ml penicillin (Gibco, New York, USA) (LB*, [34]) for each assay. Seven groups were set up, including a LB* group, negative control group (0 µM SIS3) with maximum DMSO (2.0%), and five experimental groups with different inhibitor concentrations ranging from 2 µM to 50 µM (5 steps). Infective L3s were exsheathed with 0.15% sodium hypochlorite for 30 min at 38 °C, followed by 6 washes in PBS and 3 washes in LB*. Exsheathed L3s (xL3s) were incubated in 100 µl LB* at a concentration of 500–1000 larvae/ml. Inhibitor was added to xL3s at a final concentration of 2 µM to 50 µM in five different experimental groups in triplicate, and larvae were cultured for 7 days at 37 °C under 20% (v/v) CO2. The percentages of xL3s that developed to L4s in vitro were counted using a microscope (cf. [35]). Experiments were repeated three times.


Structural features and sequence analysis of Hco-DAF-8

The full-length genomic DNA sequences of Hco-daf-8 and Cel-daf-8 were each amplified and sequenced. The sequences of Hco-daf-8 and Cel-daf-8 were identical to HF958885.1 and NC_003279.8 (GenBank databases), respectively. Although similar in gene length (~ 3000 bp long) and CDS length (~1500 bp) to Cel-daf-8, Hco-daf-8 has 12 exons (81–221 bp) and 11 introns (50–630 bp) compared with 6 exons (93–477 bp) and 5 introns (123–560 bp) in Cel-daf-8 (Additional file 3: Figure S2).

The full-length open reading frame of Hco-daf-8 was 1509 bp in length, encoding Hco-DAF-8 of 502 aa. The alignment of amino acid sequences indicated that all selected R-Smads have a Mad homology 1 (MH1) domain (pink) at the N-terminus, which binds DNA and a Mad homology 2 domain (MH2, blue) at the C-terminus, which participates in inter-molecular interactions and regulates transcription [36]. In the MH1 domain, a nuclear localisation signal (NLS) sequence LAKRLKKAKYLDE [27] was identified (Fig. 1). Between the MH1 domain and the MH2 domain is a proline-rich ligation region containing six SP motifs (Fig. 1), which function as target sites for phosphorylation by intracellular serine/threonine kinases [37]. Within the MH2 domain, three of the five subtype-specific residues (black arrowhead in Fig. 1) in the MH2 domain of Hs-Smads 2 and 3, which are important for the interaction with Smad anchoring for receptor activation (SARA) [38], were identified in Hco-DAF-8 (Fig. 1). In addition, also within the MH2 domain, two of the four conserved large, non-polar residues (open circle) in a characteristic spacing of nuclear export signal (NES) in the MH2 domain [39] were present (Fig. 1). Two residues (R and T, red arrowhead in Fig. 1) in the conserved L3 loop within the MH2 domain, which determine the specific interaction between R-Smads and TGF-β type I receptors [40, 41], were also identified (Fig. 1), whereas BMP-activated R-Smads have two different residues (H and D) (Fig. 1). At the extreme carboxyl terminus of Hco-DAF-8, there is a variant SSXT (X represents any amino acid) motif (SSFT) which is similar to that of Cel-DAF-8 (SSRT) (Fig. 1), but distinct from the typical SSXS motif of R-Smad, having been demonstrated to be required for the phosphorylation by TGF-β type I receptors [1]. The amino acid sequence comparison showed that Hco-DAF-8 has higher identities to the TGF-β/Activin-activated R-Smads including Hs-Smad3 (47.7%) and Hs-Smad2 (46.9%) than to the BMP-activated R-Smads including Hs-Smad1 (42.9%) and Hs-Smad5 (43.0%) (Fig. 1). Taken together, these findings suggest that Hco-DAF-8 is a member of R-Smads subfamily and has more sequence features in common with TGF-β/Activin-activated R-Smads [4].

Fig. 1

Amino acid sequence alignment of Haemonchus contortus Hco-DAF-8 with those of 10 R-Smads from selected species, including one nematode (Caenorhabditis elegans), one arthropod (Drosophila melanogaster) and three chordates (Danio rerio, Homo sapiens and Mus musculus). Sequence motifs, such as MH1 (pink), MH2 (blue) and the phosphorylation motif (****) are marked. Within the MH1 region, the predicted nuclear localisation signal (NLS) is underlined. Within the linker region between the MH1 and the MH2 domain of Hco-DAF-8, prolines (yellow) and SP motifs (open squares) which function as target sites for phosphorylation via intracellular serine/threonine kinases are highlighted. Within the MH2 domain, black arrow indicates the conserved residues involved in TGF-β/Activin-activated R-Smads interaction with SARA; open circle indicates conserved residues of the nuclear export signal. The L3 loop sequence (18 amino acids) is shown (wavy line below the alignment) with R-Smad subtype-specific amino acid residues highlighted with red arrows at the top. The sequence percent identities (%) of Hco-DAF-8 with the other R-Smads are listed at the end of the alignment. Information on sequences in the alignment is listed in Additional file 1: Table S2

Genetic relationships of Hco-DAF-8 with Smads from other species

There are four R-Smads in C. elegans, including Cel-DAF-8 and Cel-DAF-14 which are involved in DAF-7 signalling pathway and Cel-SMA-2 and Cel-SMA-3 which are involved in the DBL-1 (Dpp and BMP-like-1) signalling pathway. Herein, the aa sequence of Hco-DAF-8 was aligned with these four R-Smads and eight homologues of nematodes (Cjp-DAF-8, Cbn-DAF-8, Ovo-SMA-2, Hco-SMA-2, Cbr-SMA-2, Cbr-SMA-3, Cbr-DAF-14 and Cjp-DAF-14) as well as five R-Smads from H. sapiens and D. melanogaster (Hs-Smad3, Hs-smad2, Hs-Smad5, Hs-smad1 and Dm-Smox) for subsequent phylogenetic analysis. Consistent tree topologies were obtained for three analyses (NJ, MP and ML). The results revealed that Hco-DAF-8 clustered with three DAF-8s from Caenorhabditis species with a nodal support of 89%. In addition, this cluster grouped with three TGF-β/Activin-activated R-Smads of H. sapiens and D. melanogaster with a nodal support of 52%. On the other hand, four nematode SMA-2s formed a cluster with strong (100%) nodal support. Additionally, two BMP/Dpp-activated R-Smads from H. sapiens (Hs-Smad1 and Hs-Smad5) and two SMA-3s from Caenorhabditis species (Cel-SMA-3 and Cbr-SMA-3) grouped together, with absolute nodal support. The five small clusters (with bootstrap supports ranging from 89 to 100%) grouped together with 95% support to the exclusion of the cluster formed by three DAF-14 (Cbr-DAF-14, Cjp-DAF-14 and Cel-DAF-14) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic relationships of Haemonchus contortus Hco-DAF-8 with other R-Smads from selected species. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using amino acid sequences of Hco-DAF-8 and the R-Smad homologues from species, including six nematodes (Caenorhabditis brenneri, C. briggsae, C. elegans, C. japonica and Onchocerca volvulus), one arthropod (Drosophila melanogaster) and one chordate (Homo sapiens).The tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining (NJ) method, employing the Dm-DAD from D. melanogaster as an outgroup. Nodal support values are shown above or below the branches. Accession numbers are listed next to the R-Smad designation. Information on sequences used in the analysis is listed in Additional file 1: Table S2

Transcription of Hco-daf-8 in different developmental stages of H. contortus

Real-time PCR analysis revealed that Hco-daf-8 was transcribed in all eight developmental stages/sexes of H. contortus, with the lowest levels in the free-living stages and the highest level in the adult male stage, followed by the L4 female stage. The transcript abundance in adult males was markedly higher than that of any other stage (F(7, 16) = 77.48, P < 0.0001). In addition, there was a significant difference between L4 female and each egg (P = 0.03), L1 (P = 0.04) and L2 (P = 0.04) stages. No significant difference was observed between other stages (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

Transcriptional levels of Hco-daf-8 in eight developmental stages/sexes of Haemonchus contortus. The relative abundance of Hco-daf-8 was assessed in eight developmental stages of H. contortus: eggs (E); first-stage larvae (L1); second-stage larvae (L2); third-stage larvae (L3); fourth-stage females (L4f); fourth-stage males (L4m); adult females (Af); adult males (Am). The relative quantities (compared with egg, egg = 1) are shown as the mean values (± standard error of the mean, SE) derived from three replicates in repeat experiments. All gene transcription levels were normalised against that of the β-tubulin gene. Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA. P-values are calculated using Tukey’s post-hoc test. Significant differences between stages are marked *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001

Expression of Hco-DAF-8 in H. contortus by immunofluorescence

The cDNA encoding partial Hco-DAF-8 (251 aa) was expressed in E. coli with an expected size of 53 kDa (Additional file 4: Figure S3a), and the purified recombinant protein was used to immunise rabbits to produce serum antibody. The polyclonal antibody (positive-serum) from rabbits bound specifically to the native Hco-DAF-8 (~ 56.5 kDa) from both sexes of H. contortus adults, while the pre-immune serum did not recognize any proteins in H. contortus (Additional file 4: Figure S3b). Using this antibody as a probe, Hco-DAF-8 was shown to be highly expressed in the platymyrian muscle cells under the cuticle and the intestine in both female and male worms. In addition, it was also expressed in some eggs in the female as well as the seminal vesicle and cement gland in the male (Fig. 4a–c, g–i). There was no labelling in worm sections probed with pre-immune rabbit serum (Fig. 4d–f, j–l).

Fig. 4

The localization of Hco-DAF-8 in Haemonchus contortus adults by immunofluorescence. ac Localization of Hco-DAF-8 in H. contortus adult females: in the platymyrian muscle cells (msc) under cuticle, in intestine (i) and some eggs (e). gi Localization of Hco-DAF-8 in adult males: in the platymyrian muscle cells (msc) under cuticle, in intestine (i), seminal vesicle (vs) and cement gland (gc). Ovaries (ov), cuticle (cu) and uterus (ut) are also indicated. No fluorescence labelling was observed in negative controls probed with serum representing the pre-bleed prior to immunization (df, jl). DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochloride) is used to label the nucleus. Scale-bars: 100 μm

Genetic rescue of the daf-8 deficient C. elegans with Hco-daf-8

The Cel-daf-8 mutant strain (CB1393) of C. elegans is temperature-sensitive, and can normally develop to the adult stage at 16 °C but remains as a dauer stage at 25 °C. To assess whether Hco-daf-8 could rescue the daf-8 deficient C. elegans (CB1393) mutant strain, two transgenic C. elegans lines were constructed by micro-injecting plasmid Cel-daf-8p::Cel-daf-8::gfp (positive control) or Cel-daf-8p::Hco-daf-8::gfp (test plasmid) into the Cel-daf-8 mutant strain. The results showed that Cel-daf-8p::Hco-daf-8::gfp was expressed in all life stages, and GFP expression was mainly detected in the intestine and nervous system (Fig. 5g–l), consistent with the expression patterns in worms transformed with Cel-daf-8p::Cel-daf-8::gfp (Fig. 5a–f). In C. elegans control-transgenic lines transformed with Cel-daf-8p::Cel-daf-8::gfp plasmid, ~ 90% (89.5 ± 4.0%) of the offspring expressing GFP developed to adults (Fig. 5n, p). In contrast, the transgenic lines transformed with Cel-daf-8p::Hco-daf-8::gfp plasmid, partial (57 ± 6.4%) offspring developed to adults (Fig. 5o, p). The pharynx in rescued worms resumed pumping, the vulva projected and the uterus contained eggs, while ‘unrescued’ worms remained as dauer after the same period of development (Fig. 5m). There were significant differences in the percentages of developed adult worms in Ce-daf-8 transgenic line and Hc-daf-8 transgenic line compared with the untreated groups (F(2, 9) = 65.58, P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0002, respectively) (Fig. 5p).

Fig. 5

Results of gene rescue assays on mutant and transgenic Caenorhaboditis elegans strains. af The anatomical expression pattern in transgenic C. elegans strain transformed with The anatomical expression pattern in transgenic C. elegans strain transformed with, gi are the DIC images of the rescued worms. df, jl are the representative GFP expression patterns. Intense green fluorescent signals were detected in the intestine (i) head neurons (hn) nerve-ring (nr), excretory duct cells (ec) and tail neurons (tn). m Non-rescued mutant worms remain at the dauer stage at 25 °C with constrictive body and stationary pharynx. n, o Worms that developed to adult worms rescued successfully with the plasmids Cel-daf-8p::Cel-daf-8::gfp or Cel-daf-8p::Hco-daf-8::gfp at 25 °C, respectively. p Percentage of different phenotypes of worms that developed at 25 °C in the daf-8 C. elegans mutant strain (CB1393) and the C. elegans transgenic strains. ***P < 0.001. Scale-bars: 50 μm

SIS3 inhibits the development of H. contortus from xL3s to L4s

To further assess the functionality of Hco-DAF-8 as an R-Smad protein, the inhibitor assay using R-Smad inhibitor SIS3 was conducted in vitro. The xL3s of H. contortus developed to L4s in vitro under normal culture conditions. Compared with xL3s, the buccal capsule of L4s was fully developed and functional [42, 43]. Results showed that SIS3 significantly inhibited L4 development at five concentrations from as low as 2 µM to 50 µM (5 µM, 10 µM, 20 µM and 50 µM) (F(6, 21) = 60.45, P < 0.001). The inhibitory effect was dose-dependent, with an increased inhibition in the concentration range of 2 µM to 10 µM, reaching a maximum inhibitory effect at 10 µM and beyond (Fig. 6). There were no significant differences among groups 10 µM, 20 µM and 50 µM (F(2, 9) = 0.21).

Fig. 6

The effect of specific inhibitor of human Smad3 (SIS3) on the development of Haemonchus contortus. Seven groups were set up including LB* blank control group, DMSO group with maximum concentration (2%) as a negative control, and experimental groups of different inhibitor concentrations from 2 µM to 50 µM (5 steps). The percentages of L4s that developed from xL3s in vitro were counted. Experiments were repeated three times. Significant difference compared with the blank and DMSO (negative) groups are marked ***P < 0.001; ns, no significant difference


In the present study, an R-Smad protein coding gene (Hco-daf-8) and its predicted product (Hco-DAF-8) of H. contortus were identified and characterised both structurally and functionally. Hco-DAF-8 has characteristics consistent with TGF-β/Activin-activated R-Smads, especially the two distinctive amino acids (R462 and T465) in the L3 loop determining the specific interaction between R-Smads and TGF-β type I receptors [40, 41]. In addition, phylogenetic analysis showed that Hco-DAF-8 is closely related to DAF-8 homologues of Caenorhabditis species and grouped with the TGF-β/Activin-activated R-Smads. These results suggest that Hco-DAF-8 is a member of TGF-β/Activin-activated R-Smads that usually transmit the TGF-β signals.

To understand at which time points Hco-DAF-8 functions in H. contortus, the transcription of its encoding gene Hco-daf-8 in different developmental stages of H. controtus was assessed by real-time PCR. Hco-daf-8 was transcribed in all developmental stages studied, with the lowest transcription in the egg, L1 and L2 (free-living) stages, higher transcription in L4 females, and the highest level in adult males. In contrast, C. elegans daf-8 transcript level peaked in the early larval stages (egg and L1 stages), but then declined to low levels in L2 to adult stages [44]. This finding indicates that Cel-daf-8 might play a role in mediating developmental switch (entry into dauer or normal L3 stage) in C. elegans, while Hco-daf-8 may influence the continuous development of H. contortus from iL3s as larval arrest is facultative in C. elegans, but constitutive in the parasitic nematodes [45, 46]. Recent findings from RNAi-based studies also confirm functional roles for genes encoding TGF-β type I receptor (Hc-tgfbr1) [12], TGF-β type II receptor (Hc-tgfbr2) [13] and co-Smad (Hc-daf-3) [14] in the development from the free-living to the parasitic stages of H. contortus.

The high transcript level of Hco-DAF-8 and notable protein expression in the male reproductive system may indicate an important role of this molecule in male H. contortus. In C. elegans, Cel-DAF-8 was proven to negatively regulate the germline proliferative zone when it was expressed in the distal tip cell [10]. Another study [47] showed that a reduction of the TGF-β Sma/Mab signalling pathway in C. elegans extends the reproductive span by maintaining oocyte and germline quality. In addition, in the flatworm Schistosoma mansoni, it has been shown that TGF-β signalling pathway is crucial for the embryo development and egg production [48, 49]. We speculate that Hco-DAF-8 is involved in parasite growth and development as well as germline quality maintenance and reproduction. The expression of eggs in the female uterus indicates a possible effect of this molecule on the embryogenesis and development. Interestingly, the high level of transcription in adult males is also seen for Hc-tgftr2 [13]; both Hco-DAF-8 and Hc-TGFTR2 are highly expressed in the reproductive system. The similar transcriptional and expression patterns of these two molecules suggest that the Hco-DAF-8 may function together with Hc-TGFTR2 in reproductive development in H. contortus.

Besides the expression in the reproductive system, Hco-DAF-8 was also highly expressed in the intestinal cytoplasm of H. contortus adult worms, indicating that this protein might affect the digestive system and/or be immunogenic, given this worm’s gut is a source of effective vaccine molecules [50]. Its expression in the platymyrian muscle cells under cuticle suggests that Hco-DAF-8 or TGF-β signalling pathway may relate to cuticle formation, muscle movement, the transmission of external signals from host and ionic homeostasis [51]. Collectively, these findings might indicate an important role for Hco-DAF-8 in growth and development and/or as a regulator of transcription in response to developmental cues.

To verify whether the function of Hco-daf-8 is similar to that of Cel-daf-8, gene rescue was performed. Results showed that Hco-daf-8 can be expressed in the specific tissues consistent with Cel-daf-8 and can rescue the dauer phenotype of Cel-daf-8 mutant strain but with less efficiency. This is possibly due to differences in the target gene sequence and the transgene expression efficiency. Other reasons could be species-specific differences in gene expression that might have been reflected in suboptimal expression/function of H. contortus elements in C. elegans. Moreover, Cel-DAF-8 encoded by Cel-daf-8 interacts with some other endogenous proteins like Cel-DAF-14 [10], although it is possible that the binding of Hco-daf-8 to endogenous Cel-daf-14 is not as strong as to Cel-daf-8 in C. elegans. Nevertheless, the effective rescue indicated that the biochemical properties of Hco-DAF-8 are similar enough to those of Cel-DAF-8, such that it can function as Cel-DAF-8 when expressed at a corresponding location and time in C. elegans.

It is well known that Cel-daf-8 regulates dauer formation via TGF-β signalling. Mutant C. elegans rescued by Hco-DAF-8 can restore TGF-β signalling to complete normal development. To answer as to whether Hco-daf-8 participates in this signalling pathway and plays key roles in the development of H. contortus L3 (analogous to dauer in C. elegans), we used a Smad3-specific inhibitor (SIS3) to assess TGF-β signalling pathway function. SIS3 was first reported as a potent and selective inhibitor of Smad3 in this pathway of H. sapiens and affected neither the phosphorylation of Smad2 nor the phosphorylation of other signalling pathways [52]. Due to its important functions in suppressing cancer growth, invasion and metastasis, and in preventing the cancer death, SIS3 was described in a patent as a novel and effective anti-cancer drug by way of regulating cellular signal transduction mediated by TGF-β/Smad3 in the USA [53]. Moreover, recently, SIS3 was applied to the parasitic flatworm Echinococcus granulosus, resulting in a marked effect on the key components of the Smad signalling pathway, inhibiting the growth and survival of protoscoleces [54]. These published findings stimulated our interest in assessing this inhibitor on H. contortus in vitro. The results revealed that SIS3 inhibited the development of L3 larvae in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting a role for the Smad3 homologue in larval development in H. contortus, like other members of the TGF-β signalling pathway studied previously in this parasite [12,13,14]. Sequence analysis showed that Hco-DAF-8 has a higher similarity with Hs-Smad3 than the other Smads in H. sapiens at the amino acid level, suggesting that SIS3 specifically inhibits the function of Hco-DAF-8 in H. contortus. Future work might conduct structure activity relationship (SAR) studies of SIS3 analogs to establish whether they might show promise as a new nematocide for H. contortus and related worms.

In C. elegans, Cel-DAF-8 can inhibit the Co-Smad Cel-DAF-3 or vice versa. Herein, overlapping expression can be detected in the platymyrian muscle cells under the cuticle in both sexes of adult worms or in the cement gland in the adult male between Hco-DAF-3 and Hco-DAF-8[14], suggesting some common roles in these tissues. Considering that chemical inhibition resulted in the retarded larval development in vitro, we speculate that R-Smads positively regulate the downstream Co-Smads in the cuticle, which sense the host environment and promote transition from the free-living stage (L3s) to the parasitic stage (L4s) in H. contortus.


We identified a gene encoding an R-Smad protein (Hco-DAF-8) in H. contortus. Hco-DAF-8 is an R-Smad with inferred functional domains typical of the Smad protein family. This protein is widely expressed and appears to control the development of xL3s to L4s in H. contortus. The highest transcription level and high protein expression in the reproductive organs of male adults suggest that Hco-DAF-8 has a role in male reproduction. SIS3 inhibited the development from the xL3 to the L4 stage, suggesting a key role in developmental transition. Taken together, the findings of this study demonstrate that Hco-DAF-8 is a key molecule in the TGF-β signalling pathway of H. contortus and regulates development and/or reproduction in this worm.

Availability of data and materials

Data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files. The amino acid sequence of Hco-DAF-8 is available on GenBank under the accession number CDJ83310.1.



transforming growth factor-β


receptor-regulated Smad


specific inhibitor of human Smad3


common-partner Smads


inhibitory Smads


nematode growth medium


Earle’s balanced salt solution


coding DNA sequence


recombinant Hco-DAF-8


isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside


sodium dodecyl sulfate


phosphate-buffered saline




4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole


green fluorescent protein


dimethyl sulfoxide


Smad-anchoring for receptor activation


nuclear localisation signal


nuclear export signal


Dpp and BMP-like-1


structure activity relationship


  1. 1.

    Attisano L, Lee-Hoeflich ST. The Smads. Genome Biol. 2001;2(reviews3010):1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Crook M. The dauer hypothesis and the evolution of parasitism: 20 years on and still going strong. Int J Parasitol. 2014;44:1–8.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Moustakas A, Souchelnytskyi S, Heldin CH. Smad regulation in TGF-beta signal transduction. J Cell Sci. 2001;114:4359–69.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Miyazawa K, Shinozaki M, Hara T, Furuya T, Miyazono K. Two major Smad pathways in TGF-beta superfamily signalling. Genes Cells. 2002;7:1191–204.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Wrana JL. Crossing Smads. Sci STKE. 2000;2000:re1.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Itoh S, ten Dijke P. Negative regulation of TGF-beta receptor/Smad signal transduction. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2007;19:176–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Riddle DL, Albert PS. Genetic and environmental regulation of dauer larva development. In: Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ, Priess JR, editors. C. elegans II. 2nd ed. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Shi Y, Massagué J. Mechanisms of TGF-β signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell. 2003;113:685–700.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Thatcher JD, Haun C, Okkema PG. The DAF-3 Smad binds DNA and represses gene expression in the Caenorhabditis elegans pharynx. Development. 1999;126:97–107.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Park D, Estevez A, Riddle DL. Antagonistic Smad transcription factors control the dauer/non-dauer switch in C. elegans. Development. 2010;137:477–85.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Inoue T, Thomas JH. Targets of TGF-beta signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans dauer formation. Dev Biol. 2000;217:192–204.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    He L, Gasser RB, Korhonen PK, Di W, Li F, Zhang H, et al. A TGF-β type I receptor-like molecule with a key functional role in Haemonchus contortus development. Int J Parasitol. 2018;48:1023–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    He L, Gasser RB, Li T, Di W, Li F, Zhang H, et al. A TGF-β type II receptor that associates with developmental transition in Haemonchus contortus in vitro. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007913.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Di W, Liu L, Zhang T, Li F, He L, Wang C, et al. A DAF-3 co-Smad molecule functions in Haemonchus contortus development. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:609.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Blaxter ML, De Ley P, Garey JR, Liu LX, Scheldeman P, Vierstraete A, et al. A molecular evolutionary framework for the phylum Nematoda. Nature. 1998;392:71–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Schwarz EM, Korhonen PK, Campbell BE, Young ND, Jex AR, Jabbar A, et al. The genome and developmental transcriptome of the strongylid nematode Haemonchus contortus. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R89.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Stiernagle T. Maintenance of C. elegans. (February 11, 2006). In: The C. elegans Research Community, editors. WormBook.

  18. 18.

    Zawadzki JL, Kotze AC, Fritz JA, Johnson NM, Hemsworth JE, Hines BM, et al. Silencing of essential genes by RNA interference in Haemonchus contortus. Parasitology. 2012;139:613–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rossanigo CE, Gruner L. Accuracy of two methods for counting eggs of sheep nematode parasites. Int J Parasitol. 1991;39:115–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Li F, Lok JB, Gasser RB, Korhonen PK, Sandeman MR, Shi D, et al. Hc-daf-2 encodes an insulin-like receptor kinase in the barber’s pole worm, Haemonchus contortus, and restores partial dauer regulation. Int J Parasitol. 2014;44:485–96.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Veglia F. The anatomy and life-history of Haemonchus contortus. Vet Res. 1915;4:347–500.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gasser RB, Chilton NB, Hoste H, Beveridge I. Rapid sequencing of rDNA from single worms and eggs of parasitic helminths. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993;21:2525–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ma G, Wang T, Korhonen PK, Stroehlein AJ, Young ND, Gasser RB. Dauer signalling pathway model for Haemonchus contortus. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:187.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Laing R, Kikuchi T, Martinelli A, Tsai IJ, Beech RN, Redman E, et al. The genome and transcriptome of Haemonchus contortus, a key model parasite for drug and vaccine discovery. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R88.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Breathnach R, Chambon P. Organization and expression of eucaryotic split genes coding for proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 2003;50:349–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kosugi S, Hasebe M, Tomita M, Yanagawa H. Systematic identification of cell cycle-dependent yeast nucleocytoplasmic shuttling proteins by prediction of composite motifs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:10171–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Guo X, Zhang H, Zheng X, Zhou Q, Yang Y, Chen X, et al. Structural and functional characterization of a novel gene, Hc-daf-22, from the strongylid nematode Haemonchus contortus. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:422.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:e45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Cheung WC, Beausoleil SA, Zhang X, Sato S, Schieferl SM, Wieler JS, et al. A proteomics approach for the identification and cloning of monoclonal antibodies from serum. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30:447–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Skinner TM, Bascal ZA, Holden-Dye L, Lunt GG, Wolstenholme AJ. Immunocytochemical localization of a putative inhibitory amino acid receptor subunit in the parasitic nematodes Haemonchus contortus and Ascaris suum. Parasitology. 1998;117:89–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Nikolaou S, Hartman D, Nisbet AJ, Gasser RB. Haemonchus contortus: prokaryotic expression and enzyme activity of recombinant HcSTK, a serine/threonine protein kinase. Exp Parasitol. 2006;113:207–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Preston S, Jabbar A, Nowell C, Joachim A, Ruttkowski B, Baell J, et al. Low cost whole-organism screening of compounds for anthelmintic activity. Int J Parasitol. 2015;45:333–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Gutiérrez-Amézquita RA, Morales-Montor J, Muñoz-Guzmán MA, Nava-Castro KE, Ramírez-Álvarez H, Cuenca-Verde C, et al. Progesterone inhibits the in vitro L3/L4 molting process in Haemonchus contortus. Vet Parasitol. 2017;248:48–53.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wrana JL, Attisano L. MAD-related proteins in TGF-beta signalling. Trends Genet. 1996;12:493–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kretzschmar M, Doody J, Massagué J. Opposing BMP and EGF signalling pathways converge on the TGF-beta family mediator Smad1. Nature. 1997;389:618–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wu G, Chen YG, Ozdamar B, Gyuricza CA, Chong PA, Wrana JL, et al. Structural basis of Smad2 recognition by the Smad anchor for receptor activation. Science. 2000;287:92–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Xiao Z, Watson N, Rodriguez C, Lodish HF. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of Smad1 conferred by its nuclear localization and nuclear export signals. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:39404–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Chen YG, Hata A, Lo RS, Wotton D, Shi Y, Pavletich N, et al. Determinants of specificity in TGF-beta signal transduction. Genes Dev. 1998;12:2144–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lo RS, Chen YG, Shi Y, Pavletich NP, Massague J. The L3 loop: a structural motif determining specific interactions between SMAD proteins and TGF-beta receptors. Embo J. 1998;17:996–1005.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Mapes CJ. The development of Haemonchus contortus in vitro. I. The effect of pH and pCO2 on the rate of development to the fourth-stage larva. Parasitology. 1969;59:215–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Sommerville RI. The development of Haemonchus contortus to the fourth stage in vitro. J Parasitol. 1966;52:127–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bieri T, Blasiar D, Ozersky P, Antoshechkin I, Bastiani C, Canaran P, et al. WormBase: new content and better access. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:D506–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Crook M, Thompson FJ, Grant WN, Viney ME. daf-7 and the development of Strongyloides ratti and Parastrongyloides trichosuri. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2005;139:213–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    McSorley HJ, Grainger JR, Harcus Y, Murray J, Nisbet AJ, Knox DP, et al. daf-7-related TGF-beta homologues from Trichostrongyloid nematodes show contrasting life-cycle expression patterns. Parasitology. 2010;137:159–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Luo S, Kleemann GA, Ashraf JM, Shaw WM, Murphy CT. TGF-β and insulin signaling regulate reproductive aging via oocyte and germline quality maintenance. Cell. 2010;143:299–312.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Freitas TC, Jung E, Pearce EJ. TGF-beta signaling controls embryo development in the parasitic flatworm Schistosoma mansoni. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Osman A, Niles EG, Verjovski-Almeida S, LoVerde PT. Schistosoma mansoni TGF-beta receptor II: role in host ligand-induced regulation of a schistosome target gene. PLoS Pathog. 2006;2:e54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Tak IR, Dar JS, Dar SA, Ganai BA, Chishti MZ, Ahmad F. A comparative analysis of various antigenic proteins found in Haemonchus contortus—a review. Mol Biol (Mosk). 2016;49:883–90.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Chisholm AD, Xu S. The Caenorhabditis elegans epidermis as a model skin. II: differentiation and physiological roles. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2012;1:879–902.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Jinnin M, Ihn H, Tamaki K. Characterization of SIS3, a novel specific inhibitor of Smad3, and its effect on transforming growth factor-beta1-induced extracellular matrix expression. Mol Pharmacol. 2006;69:597–607.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Lan HY, Hong Kong SAR (CN). Treatment of cancer using Smad3 inhibitor. 2014. Patent No. US 20140120116A.

  54. 54.

    Zhang J, Zeng J, Li L, Qi HC, Wang C, Lin RY. The effect of smad inhibitor SIS3 on Echinococcus granulosus protoscoleces. J Pathog Biol. 2017;12:389–93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This study was supported by the National Key Basic Research Program (973 program) of China (grant no. 2015CB150300) and the National Natural Science Foundation (grant no. 31872462; MH); the Huazhong Agricultural University Scientific & Technological Self Innovation Foundation (program no. 2015RC005) and the Australian Research Council (ARC; RBG) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (grant no. 2017CFA020; MH and FR).

Author information




MH conceived and designed the project. FFL performed most experiments and prepared the first draft of the manuscript. RBG redrafted the manuscript, and RBG and MH edited and revised it. WDD, FFL and LH performed the real-time PCRs. FL, JNS, CXZ and CQW were responsible for sample collection and RNA extractions. RF commented on project design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Hu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All of the experimental animals used in this project were treated in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Regulation for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals of the People’s Republic of China. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Huazhong Agriculture University (permit HZAUGO-2016-007).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Oligonucleotide primers used in the present study. Table S2. Sequences used for phylogenetic and alignment analyses.

Additional file 2: Figure S1.

Schematic diagram explaining the process of constructing gene rescuing plasmids by homologous recombination. The C. elegans Cel-daf-8 promoter region was PCR-amplified using primers F1/R1. In addition, the coding region (CDS) of Cel-daf-8 or H. contortus Hco-daf-8 was amplified using primers F2/R2 or F3/R3, respectively. Besides, the GFP reporter vector pPV199 was digested simultaneously with the restriction enzymes BamHI and AgeI. Then, the three fragments (including Cel-daf-8 promoter, Cel-daf-8 CDS and the digested pPV199 or Cel-daf-8 promoter, Hco-daf-8 CDS and the digested pPV199) were used together for homologous recombination in vitro to produce the rescuing plasmid (Cel-daf-8p::Cel-daf-8::gfp or Cel-daf-8p::Hco-daf-8::gfp). Primer sequences used here are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Additional file 3: Figure S2.

Gene structures of R-Smad homologues from H. contortus (Hco-daf-8) and C. elegans (Cel-daf-8). Black boxes represent exons and the numbers above display the lengths of exons. Lines between the exons represent introns, and the numbers below indicate the lengths of introns.

Additional file 4: Figure S3.

Expression and purification of recombinant Hco-DAF-8 protein of H. contortus and immunoblot analysis. a Prokaryotic expression of recombinant protein Hco-DAF-8. Lane M: protein marker; Lane 1: expressed products of pGEX-4T-Hco-DAF-8 (94–344) non-induced; Lane 2: expressed products of pGEX-4T-Hco-DAF-8 (94–344) induced; Lane 3: expressed products of pGEX-4T empty vector induced; Lane 4: purified pGEX-4T-Hco-DAF-8 (94–344) protein. b Immunoblot analysis of natural Hco-DAF-8 protein. Lane M: protein marker; native Hco-DAF-8 protein was detected in adult male and female using anti-rHco-DAF-8 anti-serum (antiserum), using a pre-immune serum as a control.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, F., Gasser, R.B., Liu, F. et al. Identification and characterization of an R-Smad homologue (Hco-DAF-8) from Haemonchus contortus. Parasites Vectors 13, 164 (2020).

Download citation


  • Haemonchus contortus
  • R-Smads
  • TGF-β signalling pathway
  • Development
  • Gene rescue
  • Specific inhibitor of human Smad3 (SIS3)