Skip to main content
Download PDF

Molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in caracals (Caracal caracal) living in human-modified landscapes of South Africa

Parasites & Vectors volume 13, Article number: 220 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Wild carnivores living alongside humans and domestic animals are vulnerable to changes in the infectious disease dynamics in their populations. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence and diversity of selected tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) of veterinary and/or zoonotic concern in wild populations of caracals (Caracal caracal) occurring in human-modified landscapes in South Africa. Using molecular techniques, we screened 57 caracal blood samples for infection by rickettsial bacteria and piroplasms in three regions of South Africa: rangeland in the Central Karoo (n = 27) and Namaqualand (n = 14) as well as the urban edge of the Cape Peninsula (n = 16) of South Africa. To characterise pathogen identity, we sequenced the 18S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes from positive samples and analysed sequences within a phylogenetic framework. We also examine the diversity of potential tick vectors.

Results

All individuals tested were infected with at least one tick-borne pathogen. Pathogens included Hepatozoon felis, Babesia felis, Babesia leo and a potentially novel Babesia species. An Anaplasma species previously described in South African domestic dogs was also found in 88% of urban edge caracals. Higher rates of co-infection characterised urban edge caracals (81% vs 15% and 0% in the two rangeland populations), as well as a greater incidence of mixed infections. Host attached tick species include Haemaphysalis elliptica, an important pathogen vector among carnivore hosts.

Conclusions

This study confirms the occurrence of previously undocumented tick-borne pathogens infecting free-ranging caracals in human-modified landscapes. We identify clear differences in the pathogen profiles among our study populations and discuss the likely health costs to caracals living adjacent to urban areas.

Background

Landscape modification, and urbanisation specifically, is considered a key driver of emerging infectious diseases in wildlife [1]. Evidence for the negative impacts of urbanisation on wildlife health is emerging [1,2,3,4,5] and across a range of human-modified landscapes, a growing body of literature suggests that disease prevalence can vary substantially in response to environmental change [6]. Detailed investigation into how landscape modification influences both pathogen prevalence and wildlife health is clearly necessary for understanding the complex disease ecologies associated with human-wildlife interfaces.

Much of what is currently understood about the dynamic between landscape modification and wildlife ecology comes from the study of wild carnivores [7,8,9,10]. For small to medium-sized carnivores, this is likely due to their ability to persist in landscapes that have undergone varying degrees of anthropogenic change [11, 12]. The caracal (Caracal caracal) is an adaptive generalist that is prevalent in both rural [13] and urban [4] environments although its abundance across most of its range is thought to be low [14]. To date there have been no extensive studies on the health of caracals in human-modified landscapes but opportunistic sampling of individuals in disease studies of other felid species have yielded novel findings, specifically for tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) [15, 16].

Despite studies indicating that TBP infections may be common in wildlife species [17, 18], the literature tends to focus on domestic animals and ranched wildlife as TBPs are among the most important disease-causing agents in humans and domestic animals [19, 20]. TBPs vary in their presentation from sub-clinical to acute infection with the vertebrate host presenting fever, lethargy, malaise, jaundice and anorexia [21,22,23,24,25]. Severe infection is also associated with stress factors such as age, immunological status and concomitant infections [24, 26]. In rare instances, infection can be fatal, e.g. hepatozoonosis reported in spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) in the Serengeti region of Tanzania [27]. However, very few studies on TBP prevalence in wildlife species have noted clinical manifestations of disease (with the exception of significant wildlife population declines through interactions with other pathogens, e.g. [21, 22, 28]) and are instead concerned about the potential for wildlife to act as reservoir hosts to sympatric domestic animals [29, 30].

Commonly considered in studies of TBP infection in mammalian hosts are pathogens in the orders Rickettsiales (e.g. Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species), Eucoccidia (e.g. Hepatozoon species) and Piroplasmida (e.g. Babesia, Theileria and Cytauxzoon species). Pathogens in the family Anaplasmataceae, which include Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species, are globally recognised as causative agents of numerous emerging infectious diseases [31,32,33] and have been reported in wild carnivores, including Leopardus tigrinus and Speothus venaticus [18]. However, few studies have been carried out specifically to survey these species by molecular means, e.g. [10, 32,33,34,35,36]. In sub-Saharan Africa, wildlife infections by rickettsial bacteria are gaining attention as wildlife managers focus on disease dynamics in reservoir or spill-over populations, e.g. African buffaloes (Syncerus caffer [37] and lions (Panthera leo [38]).

Infection by the protozoan pathogens, Hepatozoon, Babesia, Theileria and Cytauxzoon is relatively well-researched in wildlife [22, 24, 39,40,41]. In South Africa, Babesia infections in wildlife populations have been confirmed in numerous carnivore species, e.g. African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus [42]); meerkats (Suricata suricatta [43]), and particularly in wild felids including cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus), lions [16], leopards (Panthera pardus), black-footed cats (Felis nigripes) and caracals [15, 16, 44, 45]. Hepatozoon spp. appear to have a worldwide distribution in carnivores, and are reported in numerous species of wild canids and felids in the areas that have been surveyed [25, 34, 46,47,48,49]. Less common are reports of Cytauxzoon species in African felids [38], although this is a regionally dominant TBP in North America [50] and parts of Europe [41].

Here, we explore how TBP profiles vary with landscape modification by humans in a free-ranging mesocarnivore, the caracal. Using a molecular diagnostic approach, we characterise TBP prevalence and diversity in three caracal populations with the goal of assessing whether pathogen prevalence and co-infection differ between host populations inhabiting two land-use types. We also present our findings of tick species presence found on sampled caracals. To our knowledge, this study represents the first detailed examination of tick-borne pathogens in caracals, a little-studied predator of economic and ecological significance in the southern African region.

Methods

Study sites and sample collection

Whole blood samples were collected from caracals in three regions of South Africa: the Central Karoo (−32.66, 22.25), Namaqualand (−30.12, 17.84) and the Cape Peninsula (−34.08, 18.40). The first two sites (“rangeland”) are semi-arid and rural with low human densities and the dominant land-use being free-range small-stock farming. The Namaqualand site includes a section of Namaqua National Park. The Cape Peninsula (“urban edge”) is characterised by a national park (Table Mountain National Park) surrounded by the large metropole of the City of Cape Town and has much higher mean annual precipitation (MAP) than the rangeland sites. The climate on the Cape Peninsula is classified as Mediterranean with hot, dry summers and cold, wet winters. Rainfall in this region is moderate, with a MAP of 480–540 mm. Average minimum and maximum temperatures are 7–18 °C in winter and 16–26 °C in the summer months. The Central Karoo falls within the Nama Karoo biome and is characterised by a continental climate, with highly variable annual rainfall patterns [51]. Most of the rain falls in the late summer, and MAP ranges from 50–240 mm with a maximum of 750 mm on the top of mountain ranges [51, 52]. Average temperatures range between −5–17 °C in winter and 15–43 °C in summer. Drought in this region is common and may persist for prolonged periods [53]. Namaqualand falls within the Succulent Karoo Biome, which has a Mediterranean climate, characterised by winter rainfall [54]. Most rainfall occurs between May and September, with the peak in June [55]. MAP is approximately 160 mm, although some years receive less than 100 mm. Temperatures range between 7–17 °C in winter and 15–30 °C in summer.

Blood sampling in the Central Karoo region took place in April 2015, while sampling in Namaqualand and the Cape Peninsula took place during 2014/2015, spanning 12–16 months across all seasons. Samples from the Central Karoo (n = 27) were obtained from individuals culled during permitted annual predator control operations on privately owned farms. Necropsies were performed within 24 h of death. Blood samples were taken from the right ventricle of the heart and stored in EDTA at −20 °C. Samples from Namaqualand (n = 14) and the Cape Peninsula (n = 16) were collected from live animals under anaesthetic with veterinary assistance in addition to three blood samples collected from vehicle mortalities on the Cape Peninsula (see [4] for details of blood collection for the Cape Peninsula caracals).

Where evident, approximately two to five ticks were removed from each caracal and stored in 70–96% ethanol. Identification to species level was done using a Leica EZ4D stereo-microscope (Leica Microsystems). Species identification was based on field guides [56, 57] and confirmed by Professor Ivan Horak, a recognised expert in African tick identification.

Pathogen screening by reverse line blot (RLB) hybridisation

All blood samples were first screened for infection by a range of tick-borne pathogens using reverse line blot (RLB) hybridisation. All samples that were positive for species-specific pathogens were then screened using pathogen-specific PCR primers and direct sequencing. Total DNA was extracted from whole blood using the QIAamp® DNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Multiplex PCR-based RLB hybridisation [58] was used to diagnose infection with a range of tick-borne pathogen species (Table 1). To avoid cross-reaction of primers during PCR, initial amplification was performed separately for Babesia/Theileria species and Ehrlichia/Anaplasma species. Although Babesia/Theileria probes were designed for these genera, they are also able to detect Cytauxzoon and Hepatozoon species [38, 59]. The Babesia/Theileria PCR was carried out using primers RLB-F2 (5ʹ-GAC ACA GGG AGG TAG TGA CAA G-3ʹ) and RLB-R2 (biotin-5ʹ-CTA AGA ATT TCA CCT CTG ACA GT-3ʹ) which amplify the V4 region in the 18S rRNA gene [60, 61]. For the Ehrlichia/Anaplasma PCR, primers Ehr-F (5ʹ-GGA ATT CAG AGT TGG ATC MTG GYT CAG-3ʹ) and Ehr-R (5ʹ-Biotin-CGG GAT CCC GAG TTT GCC GGGACT TYT TCT-3ʹ) were used to amplify the V1 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene [62, 63]. Babesia bovis and Anaplasma centrale from commercial vaccines (Onderstepoort Biological Products, Pretoria, South Africa) were used as positive controls. PCRs were performed in a final reaction mixture of 25 μl, with 12.5 μl of Quantitative PCR Supermix-UDG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Johannesburg, South Africa); 1 μM stock of each forward and reverse primer; nuclease-free water and up to 5 μl of DNA template. PCR conditions followed a touchdown protocol consisting of an initial step of 3 min at 37 °C, followed by a 10-min step at 94 °C, two cycles at 94 °C (20 s), 67 °C (30 s) and 72 °C (30 s), which were repeated with the annealing temperature decreased by 2 °C until this reached 59 °C. Thereafter, 40 cycles of 94 °C (20 s), 57 °C (30 s) and 72 °C (30 s) were carried out before a final extension step at 72 °C for 7 min.

Table 1 Oligonucleotide probes used to detect tick-borne pathogen species in caracals (Caracal caracal)
Full size table

RLB hybridisation was then performed on PCR product diluted in 2× SSPE/0.1% SDS buffer, following the protocol described by [60], with modifications from [61]. In place of ECL hyperfilm, X-ray film was used and exposed to the chemi-luminescent membrane for 1–3 s. The list of oligonucleotide probes used is detailed in Table 1.

Diagnostic PCR and cloning for direct sequencing of isolates

A subset of positive samples (minimum 25% per group based on RLB results, e.g. Anaplasma isolates) was then selected for PCR and direct sequencing. Where there were fewer than ten positive samples in a species category, all samples were processed. Samples were selected according to the quantity of pathogen DNA that could be obtained. Samples reacting to the generic Babesia/Theileria catch-all probes in the RLB assay were amplified using primers Nbab 1F and TB Rev [63, 64] targeting a 1600 bp region of the 18S rRNA gene. Reactions were performed in a final volume of 25 μl, consisting of using DreamTaq Green PCR Master Mix (2×) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Johannesburg, South Africa) and 0.5 μM of each primer. Cycling conditions were as follows: 2 min at 95 °C, 30 s each at 95 °C, 31 °C, 72 °C (35 cycles), and a final extension step of 10 min at 72 °C. An additional set of Babesia/Theileria/Hepatozoon primers (BTF1 and BTR2) was used as a diagnostic tool for comparison with the RLB results on all samples. The BTF1 and BTR2 primers target a ~ 848 bp fragment of the 18S rRNA gene [38, 65, 66] and are able to detect Babesia, Theileria, Cytauxzoon and Hepatozoon species [38]. Reactions were carried out in a final volume of 25 μl using DreamTaq Green PCR Master Mix (2×) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 2.5 μM each of each primer [67].

Samples positive for Ehrlichia and Anaplasma species were amplified for sequencing using the primers fD1 and rP2 that target a ~ 1600-bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene [68]. Reactions were performed in a final volume of 25 μl using DreamTaq Green PCR Master Mix (2×) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1 μM of each primer. All PCR reactions were carried out on an ABI2720 Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Johannesburg, South Africa) and amplified products were visualised by ethidium bromide staining on 1% agarose gel by electrophoresis. After separation, bands were excised and cleaned using the Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-up System (Promega, Madison, USA).

Where direct sequencing suggested infection with multiple pathogen species, samples were cloned using the pGEM-T Easy Vector System I (Promega) and JM109 competent cells (Promega). Blue-white screening was used to detect positive clones and each reaction was plated in duplicate. A minimum of five positive colonies, along with a negative colony, were selected for colony PCR amplification using commercially available plasmid-specific primers, M13-F (5ʹ-GTA AAA CGA CGG CCA GT-3ʹ) and M13-R (5ʹ-CAG GAA ACA GCT ATG AC-3ʹ) (Thermo Fisher Scientific). PCR was performed in a final volume of 20 μl using DreamTaq Green PCR Master Mix (2×) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1 μM each of primers M13-F and M13-R. PCR was performed with the following conditions: 2 min at 95 °C, 35 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 20 s at 50 °C, 40 s at 72 °C and a final step for 10 min at 72 °C. Amplified PCR products were gel purified, using a Wizard SV gel and PCR clean-up system (Promega) and sequenced using the M13-F primer.

All DNA sequencing was performed using the Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit version 3.1 on an ABI3730xl Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems). Sequencing was performed at the Central Analytical Facility, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa. Sequence chromatograms were visualised and manually edited in BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor v. 7.2.5 [69].

Phylogenetic analysis to determine pathogen identity

DNA sequences were analysed using both the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLASTn) function in GenBank and phylogenetic methods to determine their identity in relation to known species. Sequence identity was first assessed using BLASTn, with sequence identity verified at a threshold of 97% [70]. Reference sequences of known identity were selected from GenBank and analysed in conjunction with sequences from this study using a phylogenetic framework. Sequences were first aligned using ClustalW [71] implemented within BioEdit v.7.2.5. Final alignments were trimmed to the length of the shortest sequence and analysed in MEGA v.6.0. I [72]. Phylogenetic trees were generated using both the neighbour-joining and maximum likelihood methods of tree construction. Model selection was performed in MEGA v.6.0.1 and the model with the lowest AICc value was selected [73]. Node support was evaluated with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Outgroups were selected following existing literature [24, 74, 75].

Pathogen prevalence was calculated as the proportion of the total population sample with a positive result for a pathogen. Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals (CI) for binomial response data were calculated using the ‘exactci’ function in the PropCIs package in R [76]. Chi-square tests of homogeneity were used to test for differences in prevalence among groups. For multiple comparisons, P-values were subjected to Benjamini-Hochberg correction using the fifer package in R [77]. All statistical analyses were carried out in R for Windows v 3.2.2 [78].

Results

A total of 57 caracals from three sites were surveyed for tick-borne pathogens (16 in Cape Peninsula; 27 in Central Karoo and 14 in Namaqualand). Based on the RLB hybridisation all individuals, from all three sites, showed evidence of infection with at least one TBP (see Table 2 for list of pathogens examined).

Table 2 Reverse line blot hybridisation detection of tick-borne pathogens in South African caracals (Caracal caracal)
Full size table

Phylogenetic identity of tick-borne pathogens in South African caracals

Rickettsial infections

Results from both BLASTn analysis and phylogenetic reconstruction of directly sequenced PCR products (Figs. 1, 2, 3) indicate that Ehrlichia spp. were not present in our study populations while Anaplasma spp. were only confirmed in the Cape Peninsula. According to BLASTn analysis, our isolated sequences had 99% identity to an Anaplasma phagocytophilum-like species isolated from domestic dogs in South Africa (GenBank: AY570538, AY570539 [79]), and from a Mongolian gazelle (Procapra gutturosa) in China (GenBank: KM186950). Despite a positive RLB result for the presence of Ehrlichia/Anaplasma in samples from the Central Karoo population, direct sequencing of samples did not support this result.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Maximum likelihood phylogeny (K2 + G substitution model) of partial Ehrlichia and Anaplasma sp. 16S rRNA gene sequences (849 bp)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Maximum likelihood phylogeny (T92 + G + I) of partial Babesia spp. 18S rRNA gene sequences (489 bp)

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Maximum likelihood phylogeny (T92 + G substitution model) of partial Hepatozoon spp. 18S rRNA gene sequences (531 bp)

Full size image

The BLASTn identification of a domestic dog Anaplasma sp. in Peninsula caracals is further supported by the phylogenetic placement of sequences within a well-supported clade comprising Anaplasma spp. sequences isolated in South African domestic dogs (Fig. 1). Results from both neighbour-joining and maximum likelihood tree construction methods recovered the same topologies for all analyses reported in this study, thus only maximum likelihood trees are presented here. Within the Anaplasma clade, the erythrocytic Anaplasma species (A. marginale, A. centrale and A. ovis) are distinct from the leucocytic Anaplasma species (A. phagocytophilum, A. platys and A. bovis), which is in agreement with the accepted 16S rRNA phylogeny of the Anaplasmataceae [49, 74, 80].

Piroplasmid infections

All caracals showed hybridisation to the Babesia 1 genus-specific probe, while 96% (n = 55) also tested positive for the Babesia 2 probe. Both the Babesia 1 and Babesia 2 probes are specific to genus level, but differ in the regions they target. Fourteen caracals (25%) had Babesia species-specific binding, all of which were from the Cape Peninsula. Two of the sixteen (12.5%) Cape Peninsula caracals indicated no Babesia species-specific binding. According to the RLB, hybridization to multiple species-specific probes, including B. felis, B. microti and B. leo, occurred among Cape Peninsula caracals, with samples from 9/16 individuals (56%) hybridising to all three, 3/16 (19%) hybridising to B. felis and B. microti and one sample (6%) hybridising to B. microti and B. leo. One caracal showed hybridization only to B. microti, but not to either B. felis or B. leo.

Phylogenetic analysis of Babesia sequences isolated from our study populations supported the RLB results, placing Babesia isolates from caracals into two main clades: “Babesia (sensu lato)” contains isolates in the Babesia felis, B. leo and B. microti/vulpes/rodhaini groups, while “Babesia (sensu stricto)” contains isolates comprising B. ovis, B. canis, B. gibsoni, B. odocoilei, B. “venatorum” (following [81]). Sequences from the Cape Peninsula and the Central Karoo were placed in “Babesia (sensu lato)”, while sequences from Namaqualand and the Central Karoo were placed in “Babesia (sensu stricto)” (Fig. 2).

Infections with piroplasmid species were also confirmed by phylogenetic analysis. Sequence data from direct sequencing of PCR products confirmed infection by species of Babesia in all three study populations. Cape Peninsula caracals are infected with numerous Babesia species. Babesia felis was identified in two peninsula caracals, with sequence similarity of 98–99% with Babesia sp. identified in caracals from Kruger National Park, South Africa (GenBank: AF244914, AF244913) and from a domestic cat (Felis catus) in Port Elizabeth, South Africa (GenBank: AY452699). Babesia leo was identified in three of the peninsula caracal individuals, with 97–100% sequence similarity to B. leo isolated from a lion in Kruger National Park (GenBank: AF244911) and a domestic cat in Port Elizabeth, South Africa (GenBank: AY452708).

Direct sequencing of PCR products that targeted the genus Babesia also identified caracals infected with the closely-related pathogen, Hepatozoon felis. BLASTn analysis indicated 99–100% sequence similarity with Hepatozoon isolates from a range of felids including the domestic cat, African lion, Asian lion (P. leo persica) and Asian leopard (P. pardus fusca). A further H. felis sequence obtained from a Namaqualand caracal showed 99–100% sequence similarity to H. felis isolated directly from several tick species found on leopard cats (Prionailurus bengalensis euptilura) from Japan. Phylogenetic analysis of Hepatozoon isolates from caracals confirmed these results (Fig. 3); sequences from caracals were distributed across two different clades comprising both domestic cat isolates as well as those reported from a Bengal tiger (P. tigris tigris), Asian lion and Indian leopard. Piroplasms of Cytauxzoon species were included in “Babesia (sensu stricto)” [59] and would also be detected by the generic RLB piroplasm probes. None of the isolates selected for species identification were found to be Cytauxzoon species.

Tick-borne pathogen prevalence in South African caracal populations

In the Central Karoo, three TBPs were confirmed in the caracal population (Table 2). Hepatozoon felis was observed at a prevalence of 92.6% (95% CI: 75.7–99.1%), Babesia felis at 7.4% (95% CI: 0.9–24.3%) and an unknown Babesia sp. was observed in a single caracal (3.7%; 95% CI: 0–19.0%). Mixed infections were identified in four individuals (14.8%; 95% CI: 4.2–33.7%). Namaqualand caracals showed similar prevalence patterns, with H. felis observed in 85.7% (95% CI: 57.2–98.2%) of individuals. However, the only Babesia species identified in individuals from this region appears to be a novel species, closely related to B. “venatorum”, and occurring at a prevalence rate of 14.3% (95% CI: 1.8–42.8%). No mixed infections occurred in Namaqualand caracals.

Pathogen prevalence in caracals from the Cape Peninsula contrasted with both the Central Karoo and Namaqualand (Fig. 4). Cape Peninsula caracals showed evidence of infection with H. felis, B. felis, B. leo and an Anaplasma phagocytophilum-like species. Rangeland caracal populations (Central Karoo and Namaqualand), supported similar prevalence of H. felis and B. felis, while the prevalence of Hepatozoon felis (6.3%; 95% CI: 0.2–30.2%) was lower for the Cape Peninsula caracals (χ2 = 74.864, df = 2, P < 0.001). Prevalence of B. felis (75%; 95% CI: 47.6–92.7%) was higher in the Cape Peninsula versus both the Central Karoo and Namaqualand (χ2 = 124.39, df = 2, P < 0.001). Babesia leo was only observed in the Cape Peninsula, where 68% (95% CI: 41.3–89%) of the sampled population was infected. The Cape Peninsula population is the only one in which an Ehrlichia or Anaplasma species was observed, with A. phagocytophilum-like species, most similar to Anaplasma isolates from South African dogs, occurring in 14 caracals (87.5%; 95% CI: 61.6–98.4%). The rate of mixed infections was also highest in the Cape Peninsula (χ2 = 116.98, df = 2, P < 0.001), occurring in 81.3% (95% CI: 54.4–96%) of the sampled population.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Tick-borne pathogen prevalence (%) in South African caracals based on PCR and direct sequencing

Full size image

Host-attached tick presence in South African caracal populations

Ticks were collected from seven caracals in the Central Karoo, 11 in Namaqualand and 13 caracals in the Cape Peninsula, yielding a total of 63 ticks across all sites. Exhaustive tick surveys were not executed. All sampled ticks were from the family Ixodidae, and included representatives from four genera (Amblyomma, Haemaphysalis, Ixodes, Rhipicephalus) and at least six species (A. marmoreum, H. elliptica, H. zumpti, I. rubicundus, I. pilosus, R. gertrudae and R. capensis). In most instances, differentiation among H. elliptica and H. zumpti could not be established due to morphological similarity, and hence both species are classified under the H. elliptica/H. zumpti group.

The larvae of A. marmoreum were the most prevalent ticks on Central Karoo caracals (57% of caracals with attached ticks), with I. rubicundus and H. elliptica/H. zumpti also recorded. Namaqualand caracals also carried I. rubicundus and H. elliptica/H. zumpti, as well as R. gertrudae. Cape Peninsula caracals appeared to host the greater abundance (S. Viljoen, personal observation) and diversity of ticks, with recorded species being H. elliptica/H. zumpti, R. gertrudae and two species only observed in the Cape Peninsula, namely, R. capensis and I. pilosus.

Discussion

Molecular analysis of tick-borne pathogens in caracals from South Africa suggests an important role for land-use in determining the diversity and prevalence of tick-borne pathogens. Clear differences in the patterns of prevalence and diversity of TBPs characterised caracals from different land-use areas of South Africa, with the greatest overall prevalence and diversity of pathogen occurring in caracals on the Cape Peninsula. While climate, vegetation characteristics and vertebrate host density are all important for tick vectors [82, 83], this study draws attention to how TBPs in free-ranging caracals varies across human-modified land-use types. All individuals analysed in the study were infected with at least one TBP, with caracals occurring in the urban/agricultural/natural matrix of the Cape Peninsula having a greater prevalence of multiple TBP co-infections.

High prevalence and diversity of tick-borne pathogen infections in peri-urban caracals

While rangeland caracals were not infected with either Ehrlichia or Anaplasma species, caracals living at the urban edge on the Cape Peninsula showed high rates of infection with an Anaplasma species most similar to that previously reported in South African (SA) domestic dogs [74]. This species, ‘Anaplasma sp. SA dog’, is similar to A. phagocytophilum, and has only since been reported once in black-backed jackals (Canis mesomelas) in the Gauteng Province of South Africa [79]. The latter finding suggests that there may be unexplored diversity of TBPs in the Cape Peninsula region, but also more broadly in South Africa.

Anaplasma phagocytophilum is a generalist pathogen known to occur in domestic animals and wildlife, including carnivores, wild ruminants, reptiles, rodents and birds (see [84] for an extensive list of hosts). Our observation of ‘Anaplasma sp. SA dog’ in peri-urban caracals indicates a possible epidemiological link where caracals and domestic dogs co-occur. Epidemiological relationships based on common vector-borne pathogens between sympatric domestic and wild carnivore species have previously been proposed in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and domestic dogs in Portugal [30], and between mountain lions (Puma concolor) and domestic cats in California, USA [29].

The prevalence of Anaplasma sp. in the Peninsula caracals is substantially higher than levels previously reported in studies of wild felids, including lions, South African wildcats (Felis silvestris cafra), cheetahs and servals (Leptailurus serval) [38]. Our results revealed 88% prevalence in Peninsula caracals while a range of wild felid species from Zimbabwe showed an average prevalence rate of only 8% [38]. Felids outside of the African continent (Puma concolor and captive Panthera leo) have been reported with up to 10% infection rates of A. phagocytophilum [29, 85]. The small pool of survey data to which our data can be compared limits our ability to infer whether the high prevalence in the Peninsula caracals is unusual, and thereby of concern to wildlife managers. Our findings do, however, provide the first record of Anaplasma infection in caracals, making it one of very few records from wild felids in Africa (see [38]).

Ehrlichia sp. could not be confirmed in any of the samples that were positive for Ehrlichia/Anaplasma based on the RLB. This finding was not unexpected, as a number of studies that use molecular techniques to detect blood parasites in carnivores report similar findings [86, 87]. It is possible that the low prevalence of Ehrlichia parasites and/or the small sample size of most studies limit the detection of Ehrlichia presence in the host population.

Protozoon diversity across caracal populations

Babesia infections have been noted in both domestic and wild animals in many parts of the world [22, 87,88,89]. A number of these Babesia species have demonstrated zoonotic potential [90,91,92], while others are important disease-causing agents in domestic dogs, e.g. B. canis in Europe and B. gibsoni worldwide [93].

Our study identified a number of Babesia species known to infect both wild and domestic cats. In addition to ‘Anaplasma sp. SA dog’, Cape Peninsula caracals were also host to B. felis and B. leo, which have both previously been reported occurring in caracal from rural areas in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa [15]. Phylogenetic analysis of the Babesia species circulating in Peninsula caracals suggests there is a large degree of B. felis diversity represented in the Cape Peninsula’s caracal population, possibly indicating multiple infections.

Caracals from the Central Karoo were also infected with B. felis together with an unknown Babesia, most similar to isolates of B. “venatorum”, which has yet to be comprehensively described. Babesia “venatorum” is considered an emerging zoonosis in Europe and Asia [40, 94], but has yet to be reported in Africa.

Direct sequencing of Babesia-positive individuals from all three populations revealed infection of individuals with the apicomplexan blood parasite Hepatozoon felis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of H. felis in caracals. Hepatozoon felis was detected in all three caracal populations, and at least two strains of H. felis were identified in the individuals analysed in this study. Unlike their semi-arid rangeland counterparts, Peninsula caracals have a low prevalence of H. felis.

Central Karoo caracals do not support a wide diversity of TBPs, and the vast majority of the high overall prevalence of TBPs in this population is attributed to widespread infection with H. felis. The caracal population in Namaqualand revealed a similar TBP profile to the Central Karoo population. In these semi-arid landscapes, strains of Hepatozoon felis were the dominant TBP circulating in caracals. Based on phylogenetic analysis, one of these strains is very similar to H. felis isolated from domestic and wild felids across the globe, e.g. lions in Zambia, tigers (Panthera tigris) in India and domestic cats from Spain and Israel. This common strain was only identified in individuals from the Central Karoo. The second Hepatozoon clade is sister to the ‘canis-felis’ clade, and occurred in both the Central Karoo and Namaqualand caracals. Isolates in this second clade appear to be distinctive from those previously reported for H. felis.

Samples from two caracals hybridised to the Theileria genus-probe, with only one indicating species-specific binding to the T. annulata probe. Evidence for Theileria infection could not be confirmed by sequencing. The known distribution of T. annulata does not extend into the southern Africa [95], and thus this finding is most likely a cross-reaction. The detection of Hepatozoon species when using PCR primers that are designed for Babesia species is not uncommon, and has previously been noted by other authors (e.g. [96] in bank voles (Myodes glareolus) in Germany).

There was not enough variation in pathogen prevalence to examine drivers of infection using a Generalized Linear Model (GLM) framework (e.g. [97]). The use of logistic regression modelling would be useful in attempting to answer questions relating to drivers of pathogen prevalence, which could greatly improve our understanding of epidemiology and tick-borne disease dynamics. However, large sample sizes and a variety of predictor variables measured across sites are required.

Tick diversity on caracals in human-modified landscapes

In sub-Saharan Africa, where tick-borne diseases are among the most important threats to livestock and domestic animals, very few tick species have been established as disease vectors [98]. Other than causing blood loss and/or biting stress associated with high tick burdens, Ixodes pilosus, Amblyomma marmoreum and Rhipicephalus capensis are not known to transmit any notable pathogens or be responsible for any severe toxicosis. However, I. pilosus is thought to be common on both domestic cats and caracals [99,100,101]. Rhipicephalus gertrudae has been reported to harbour the rickettsial pathogens, Anaplasma centrale and A. marginale [102], both of which are economically important for the livestock industry.

The only tick species observed in all three sites, and also which we observed as the most common (data not shown), are those in the H. elliptica/H. zumpti group. Haemaphysalis elliptica is considered the only tick of veterinary importance which infects both domestic and wild felids [101] and is also suspected of being the vector for B. felis and B. leo, although this has yet to be demonstrated conclusively. The high prevalence of B. felis and B. leo in Cape Peninsula caracals provides some support for this hypothesis, but should not be interpreted as evidence of a vector role. Haemaphysalis elliptica is one of the most common ticks on South African domestic dogs [101, 103], as well as being abundant in domestic and wild felids in South Africa [100, 104]. Both H. elliptica and the morphologically similar H. zumpti have previously been recorded in caracals [101]. Interestingly, H. elliptica is also considered the vector of Babesia rossi, the causative agent of canine babesiosis [105]. Given that domestic dogs are present in all study sites, particularly in the urban matrix of the Cape Peninsula, the ubiquity of this tick species likely has important consequences for the spread of TBPs in the sites examined.

The similarity in tick presence between the Central Karoo and Namaqualand tick is likely as a result of the similar climate, vegetation structure and host communities that exist in both sites [83]. Caracals from the Cape Peninsula differ from the rangeland caracals in that they appear to host a greater diversity of ticks. However, given that tick sampling was not exhaustive this finding is anecdotal.

Conclusions

This study represents the first molecular survey of TBPs in free-ranging caracals in South Africa. The findings presented here contribute to the growing body of work on tick-borne pathogens infecting wild carnivores, and specifically to our knowledge of carnivores living in human-modified landscapes. These data represent an exploratory investigation into the pathogen diversity present in South African caracals. Baseline data on pathogen diversity and prevalence in wildlife is generally lacking worldwide, even in systems such as the human-wildlife-livestock interface, where this knowledge is of economic value. Our results demonstrate potential epidemiological links that wild carnivores persisting in human-modified landscapes may have with sympatric domestic species. The extent of the influence that land transformation has on the health of wild carnivores in sub-Saharan Africa remains largely unknown, but extensive screening of important pathogens is the first step in improving regional understanding of wildlife disease ecology within the One Health framework.

Availability of data and materials

Data analysed for this publication are available from the corresponding author on request. All original sequences have been accessioned in the GenBank database: MK271634-MK271635 (Anaplasma spp.); MK616186-MK616205 (Babesia spp.) and MK621302-MK621310 and MK621316-MK621319 (Hepatozoon spp.).

Abbreviations

TBP:

tick-borne pathogen(s)

rRNA:

ribosomal ribonucleic acid

MAP:

mean annual precipitation

EDTA:

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

RLB:

reverse line blot

PCR:

polymerase chain reaction

DNA:

deoxyribonucleic acid

SSPE:

saline sodium phosphate EDTA

SDS:

sodium dodecyl sulfate

BLASTn:

Basic Local Alignment Search Tool for nucleotides

AICc:

Akaike’s information criterion with small sample correction

CI:

confidence interval

K2:

Kimura 2-parameter model

G:

Gamma distribution

T92:

Tamura 1992 model

I:

invariable sites

df:

degrees of freedom

SA:

South African

GLM:

Generalised linear model

References

  1. Bradley CA, Altizer S. Urbanization and the ecology of wildlife diseases. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007;22:95–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hollings T, Jones M, Mooney N, McCallum H. Wildlife disease ecology in changing landscapes: mesopredator release and toxoplasmosis. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2013;2:110–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Murray M, Edwards MA, Abercrombie B, Cassady C, Clair S. Poor health is associated with use of anthropogenic resources in an urban carnivore. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2015;282:20150009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Serieys LEK, Bishop J, Okes N, Broadfield J, Winterton DJ, Poppenga RH, et al. Widespread anticoagulant poison exposure in predators in a rapidly growing South African city. Sci Total Environ. 2019;666:581–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Drewe JA, O’Riain MJ, Beamish E, Currie H, Parsons S. Survey of infections transmissible between baboons and humans, Cape Town, South Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:298–301.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Brearley G, Rhodes J, Bradley A, Baxter G, Seabrook L, Lunney D, et al. Wildlife disease prevalence in human-modified landscapes. Biol Rev. 2013;88:427–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alvarado-Rybak M, Solano-Gallego L, Millán J. A review of piroplasmid infections in wild carnivores worldwide: importance for domestic animal health and wildlife conservation. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:538.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bevins SN, Carver S, Boydston EE, Lyren LM, Alldredge M, Logan KA, et al. Three pathogens in sympatric populations of pumas, bobcats, and domestic cats: Implications for infectious disease transmission. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e31403.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mackenstedt U, Jenkins D, Romig T. The role of wildlife in the transmission of parasitic zoonoses in peri-urban and urban areas. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2014;4:71–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Millán J, Proboste T, Fernández de Mera IG, Chirife AD, de la Fuente J, Altet L. Molecular detection of vector-borne pathogens in wild and domestic carnivores and their ticks at the human-wildlife interface. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016;7:284–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bateman PW, Fleming PA. Big city life: carnivores in urban environments. J Zool. 2012;287:1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Šálek M, Drahníková L, Tkadlec E. Changes in home range sizes and population densities of carnivore species along the natural to urban habitat gradient. Mamm Rev. 2014;45:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Avenant NL, Nel JAJ. Among habitat variation in prey availability and use by caracal Felis caracal. Mamm Biol - Zeitschrift für Säugetierkd. 2002;67:18–33.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Avgan B, Henschel P, Ghoddousi A. Caracal caracal. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2016. http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/3847/0. Accessed 11 Mar 2017.

  15. Penzhorn BL, Kjemtrup AM, López-Rebollar LM, Conrad PA. Babesia leo n. sp. from lions in the Kruger National Park, South Africa, and its relation to other small piroplasms. J Parasitol. 2001;87:681–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bosman AM, Venter EH, Penzhorn BL. Occurrence of Babesia felis and Babesia leo in various wild felid species and domestic cats in southern Africa, based on reverse line blot analysis. Vet Parasitol. 2007;144:33–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. André MR, Adania CH, Teixeira RHF, Vargas GH, Falcade M, Sousa L, et al. Molecular detection of Hepatozoon spp. in Brazilian and exotic wild carnivores. Vet Parasitol. 2010;173:134–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. André MR, Dumler JS, Scorpio DG, Teixeira RHF, Allegretti SM, Machado RZ. Molecular detection of tick-borne bacterial agents in Brazilian and exotic captive carnivores. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2012;3:247–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. de la Fuente J, Estrada-Pena A, Venzal JM, Kocan KM, Sonenshine DE. Overview: ticks as vectors of pathogens that cause disease in humans and animals. Front Biosci. 2008;13:6938–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Baneth G. Tick-borne infections of animals and humans: A common ground. Int J Parasitol. 2014;44:591–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kocan A, Levesque GC, Whitworth LC, Murphy GL, Ewing SA, Barker RW. Naturally occurring Ehrlichia chaffeensis infection in coyotes from Oklahoma. Emerg Infect Dis. 2000;6:477–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Penzhorn BL. Babesiosis of wild carnivores and ungulates. Vet Parasitol. 2006;138:11–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Metzger B, Paduan KDS, Rubini AS, de Oliveira TG, Pereira C, O’Dwyer LH. The first report of Hepatozoon sp. (Apicomplexa: Hepatozoidae) in neotropical felids from Brazil. Vet Parasitol. 2008;152:28–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schnittger L, Rodriguez AE, Florin-Christensen M, Morrison DA. Babesia: a world emerging. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12(8):1788–809.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maia JP, Álvares F, Boratyński Z, Brito JC, Leite JV, Harris DJ. Molecular assessment of Hepatozoon (Apicomplexa: Adeleorina) infections in wild canids and rodemts from north Africa, with implications for transmission dynamics across taxonomic groups. J Wildl Dis. 2014;50:837–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Skotarczak B, Adamska M, Sawczuk M, Maciejewska A, Wodecka B, Rymaszewska A. Coexistence of tick-borne pathogens in game animals and ticks in western Poland. Vet Med. 2008;53:668–75.

    Google Scholar 

  27. East ML, Wibbelt G, Lieckfeldt D, Ludwig A, Goller K, Wilhelm K, et al. A Hepatozoon species genetically distinct from H. canis infecting spotted hyenas in the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania. J Wildl Dis. 2008;44:45–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Munson L, Terio KA, Kock R, Mlengeya T, Roelke ME, Dubovi E, et al. Climate extremes promote fatal co-infections during canine distemper epidemics in African lions. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2545.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Girard YA, Swift P, Chomel BB, Kasten RW, Fleer K, Foley JE, et al. Zoonotic vector-borne bacterial pathogens in California. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012;12:913–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cardoso L, Cortes HCE, Reis A, Rodrigues P, Simões M, Lopes AP, et al. Prevalence of Babesia microti-like infection in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) from Portugal. Vet Parasitol. 2013;196:90–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dumler JS. Anaplasma and Ehrlichia infection. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1063:361–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dumler JS, Walker DH. Tick-borne ehrlichioses. Lancet Infect Dis. 2001;1:21–8.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tate CM, Mead DG, Luttrell MP, Howerth EW, Dugan VG, Munderloh UG, et al. Experimental infection of white-tailed deer with Anaplasma phagocytophilum, etiologic agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:3595–601.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Almeida AP, Souza TD, Marcili A, Labruna MB. Novel Ehrlichia and Hepatozoon agents infecting the crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous) in southeastern Brazil. J Med Entomol. 2013;50:640–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cardoso L, Gilad M, Cortes HCE, Nachum-Biala Y, Lopes AP, Vila-Viçosa MJ, et al. First report of Anaplasma platys infection in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and molecular detection of Ehrlichia canis and Leishmania infantum in foxes from Portugal. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:144.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sashika M, Abe G, Matsumoto K, Inokuma H. Molecular survey of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia infections of feral raccoons (Procyon lotor) in Hokkaido, Japan. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11:349–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Eygelaar D, Jori F, Mokopasetso M, Sibeko KP, Collins NE, Vorster I, et al. Tick-borne haemoparasites in African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) from two wildlife areas in Northern Botswana. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kelly P, Marabini L, Dutlow K, Zhang J, Loftis A, Wang C. Molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in captive wild felids, Zimbabwe. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:514.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Yabsley MJ, Murphy SM, Cunningham MW. Molecular detection and characterization of Cytauxzoon felis and a Babesia species in cougars from Florida. J Wildl Dis. 2006;42:366–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yabsley MJ, Shock BC. Natural history of Zoonotic Babesia: role of wildlife reservoirs. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2013;2:18–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Meli ML, Cattori V, Martínez F, López G, Vargas A, Simón MA, et al. Feline leukemia virus and other pathogens as important threats to the survival of the critically endangered Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e4744.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Matjila PT, Leisewitz AL, Jongejan F, Bertschinger HJ, Penzhorn BL. Molecular detection of Babesia rossi and Hepatozoon sp. in African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) in South Africa. Vet Parasitol. 2008;157:123–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. LeClaire S, Menard S, Berry A. Molecular characterization of Babesia and Cytauxzoon species in wild South African meerkats. Parasitology. 2014;142:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Penzhorn BL, Schoeman T, Jacobson LS. Feline babesiosis in South Africa: a review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1026:183–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bosman AM, Oosthuizen MC, Peirce MA, Venter EH, Penzhorn BL. Babesia lengau sp. nov., a novel Babesia species in Cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus Schreber, 1775) populations in South Africa. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:2703–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Giannitti F, Diab SS, Uzal FA, Fresneda K, Rossi D, Talmi-Frank D, et al. Infection with a Hepatozoon sp. closely related to Hepatozoon felis in a wild Pampas gray fox (Lycalopex pseudalopex gymnocercus) co-infected with canine distemper virus. Vet Parasitol. 2012;186:497–502.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Starkey LA, Panciera RJ, Paras K, Allen KE, Reiskind MH, Reichard MV, et al. Genetic diversity of Hepatozoon spp. in coyotes from the south-central United States. J Parasitol. 2013;99:375–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Farkas R, Solymosi N, Takács N, Hornyák Á, Hornok S, Nachum-Biala Y, et al. First molecular evidence of Hepatozoon canis infection in red foxes and golden jackals from Hungary. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:303.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Garcia-Perez AL, Oporto B, Espi A, del Cerro A, Barral M, Povedano I, et al. Anaplasmataceae in wild ungulates and carnivores in northern Spain. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016;7:264–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Shock BC, Moncayo A, Cohen S, Mitchell EA, Williamson PC, Lopez G, et al. Diversity of piroplasms detected in blood-fed and questing ticks from several states in the United States. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014;5:373–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mucina L, Rutherford M, Palmer AR, Milton SJ, Scott L, Lloyd JW, et al. Nama-Karoo Biome. In: Mucina L, Rutherford M, editors. The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute; 2006. p. 326–45.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Potgeiter DJ, Du Plessis JJ. Standard encyclopaedia of Southern Africa, vol. 6. Cape Town: Nasou; 1972. p. 306–7.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Booysen J, Rowswell DI. Die droogteprobleem in die Karoogebiede. Proc Grassl Soc S Afr. 1983;18:40–5.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Cowling RM, Esler KJ, Rundel PW. Namaqualand, South Africa—an overview of a unique winter-rainfall desert ecosystem. Plant Ecol. 1999;142:3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Desmet PG. Namaqualand—a brief overview of the physical and floristic environment. J Arid Environ. 2007;70:570–87.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Latif AA, Walker AR. An introduction to the biology and control of ticks in Africa. ICTTD-2 project; 2004. p. 1–29. http://www.alanrwalker.com/assets/PDF/tick-biology-africa.pdf. Accessed 17 Sept 2016.

  57. Walker AR, Bouattour A, Camicas J-L, Estrada-Pena A, Horak IG, Latif AA, et al. Ticks of domestic animals in Africa: a guide to identification of species. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Bioscience Reports; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kong F, Gilbert GL. Multiplex PCR-based reverse line blot hybridization assay (mPCR/RLB)-a practical epidemiological and diagnostic tool. Nat Protoc. 2007;1:2668–80.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bosman A-M, Oosthuizen MC, Venter EH, Steyl JC, Gous TA, Penzhorn BL. Babesia lengau associated with cerebral and haemolytic babesiosis in two domestic cats. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:128.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Gubbels JM, De Vos AP, Van Der Weide M, Viseras J, Schouls LM, De Vries E, et al. Simultaneous detection of bovine Theileria and Babesia species by reverse line blot hybridization. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:1782–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Matjila PT, Penzhorn BL, Bekker CPJ, Nijhof AM, Jongejan F. Confirmation of occurrence of Babesia canis vogeli in domestic dogs in South Africa. Vet Parasitol. 2004;122:119–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Bekker CPJ, de Vos S, Taoufik A, Sparagano O, Jongejan F. Simultaneous detection of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species in ruminants and detection of Ehrlichia ruminatum in Amblyomma variegatum ticks by reverse line blot hybridization. Vet Microbiol. 2002;89:223–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Matjila PT, Leisewitz AL, Jongejan F, Penzhorn BL. Molecular detection of tick-borne protozoal and ehrlichial infections in domestic dogs in South Africa. Vet Parasitol. 2008;155:152–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Oosthuizen MC, Zweygarth E, Collins NE, Troskie M, Penzhorn BL. Identification of a novel Babesia sp. from a sable antelope (Hippotragus niger Harris, 1838). J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:2247–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Kubelová M, Tkadlec E, Bednář M, Roubalová E, Široký P. West-to-east differences of Babesia canis canis prevalence in Dermacentor reticulatus ticks in Slovakia. Vet Parasitol. 2011;180:191–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Terao M, Akter S, Yasin MG, Nakao R, Kato H, Alam MZ, et al. Molecular detection and genetic diversity of Babesia gibsoni in dogs in Bangladesh. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;31:53–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Jefferies R, Ryan UM, Irwin PJ. PCR-RFLP for the detection and differentiation of the canine piroplasm species and its use with filter paper-based technologies. Vet Parasitol. 2007;144:20–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Kubo S, Tateno M, Ichikawa Y, Endo Y. A molecular epidemiological survey of Babesia, Hepatozoon, Ehrlichia and Anaplasma infections of dogs in Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 2015;77:1275–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser.; 1999.

  70. Petti CA. Detection and identification of microorganisms by gene amplification and sequencing. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:1108–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. ClustalW—improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Posada D, Buckley TR. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike information criterion and bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst Biol. 2004;53:793–808.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Inokuma H, Oyamada M, Kelly PJ, Jacobson LA, Fournier P, Okuda M, et al. Molecular detection of a new Anaplasma species closely related to Anaplasma phagocytophilum in canine blood from South Africa. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:2934–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Baneth G, Florin-Christensen M, Cardoso L, Schnittger L. Reclassification of Theileria annae as Babesia vulpes sp. nov. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:207.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Scherer R. PropCIs: various confidence interval methods for proportions. 2014. http://cran.r-project.org/package=PropCIs. Accessed 10 Dec 2016.

  77. Fife D. ‘fifer’: a biostatisticians toolbox for various activities, including plotting, data cleanup, and data analysis. 2017. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/fifer/fifer.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2016.

  78. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 10 Dec 2016.

  79. Penzhorn BL, Netherlands EC, Cook CA, Smit NJ, Vorster I, Harrison-White RF, Oosthuizen MC. Occurrence of Hepatozoon canis (Adeleorina: Hepatozoidae) and Anaplasma spp. (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) in black-backed jackals (Canis mesomelas) in South Africa. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:158.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Tateno M, Nishio T, Sakuma M, Nakanishi N, Izawa M, Asari Y, et al. Molecular epidemiologic survey of Bartonella, Ehrlichia, and Anaplasma infections in Japanese Iriomote and Tsushima leopard cats. J Wildl Dis. 2013;49:646–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Schreeg ME, Marr HS, Tarigo JL, Cohn LA, Bird DM, Scholl EH, et al. Mitochondrial genome sequences and structures aid in the resolution of Piroplasmida phylogeny. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0165702.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Estrada-Peña A. Forecasting habitat suitability for ticks and prevention of tick-borne diseases. Vet Parasitol. 2001;98:111–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Estrada-Peña A. Effects of habitat suitability and landscape patterns on tick (Acarina) metapopulation processes. Landsc Ecol. 2005;20:529–41.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Stuen S, Granquist EG, Silaghi C. Anaplasma phagocytophilum—a widespread multi-host pathogen with highly adaptive strategies. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013;3:31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Torina A, Naranjo V, Pennisi MG, Patania T, Vitale F, Laricchiuta P, et al. Serologic and molecular characterization of tick-borne pathogens in lions (Panthera leo) from the Fasano Safari Park, Italy. J Zoo Wildl Med. 2007;38:591–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Filoni C, Catão-Dias JL, Bay G, Durigon EL, Jorge RSP, Lutz H, et al. First evidence of feline herpesvirus, calicivirus, parvovirus, and Ehrlichia exposure in Brazilian free-ranging felids. J Wildl Dis. 2006;42:470–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Williams BM, Berentsen A, Shock BC, Teixiera M, Dunbar MR, Becker MS, et al. Prevalence and diversity of Babesia, Hepatozoon, Ehrlichia, and Bartonella in wild and domestic carnivores from Zambia, Africa. Parasitol Res. 2014;113:911–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Criado-Fornelio A, Buling A, Casado N, Gimenez C, Ruas J, Wendt L, et al. Molecular characterization of arthropod-borne hematozoans in wild mammals from Brazil, Venezuela and Spain. Acta Parasitol. 2009;54:187–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Zanet S, Trisciuoglio A, Bottero E, de Mera IGF, Gortazar C, Carpignano MG, et al. Piroplasmosis in wildlife: Babesia and Theileria affecting free-ranging ungulates and carnivores in the Italian Alps. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Malandrin L, Jouglin M, Sun Y, Brisseau N, Chauvin A. Redescription of Babesia capreoli (Enigk and Friedhoff, 1962) from roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): isolation, cultivation, host specificity, molecular characterisation and differentiation from Babesia divergens. Int J Parasitol. 2010;40:277–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Anderson JF, Mintz ED, Gadbaw JJ, Magnarelli LA. Babesia microti, Human babesiosis, and Borrelia burgdorferi in Connecticut. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:2779–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Herwaldt BL, Cacciò S, Gherlinzoni F, Aspöck H, Slemenda SB, Piccaluga PP, et al. Molecular characterization of a non-Babesia divergens organism causing zoonotic babesiosis in Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:942–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Kledmanee K, Suwanpakdee S, Krajangwong S, Chatsiriwech J, Suksai P, Suwannachat P, et al. Research note development of multiplex polymerase chain reaction for detection of Ehrlichia canis. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Heal. 2009;40:35–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Jiang JF, Zheng YC, Jiang RR, Li H, Huo QB, Jiang BG, et al. Epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of 48 cases of “Babesia venatorum” infection in China: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:196–203.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Jongejan F, Uilenberg G. The global importance of ticks. Parasitology. 2004;129(Suppl.):3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Silaghi C, Woll D, Hamel D, Pfister K, Mahling M, Pfeffer M. Babesia spp. and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in questing ticks, ticks parasitizing rodents and the parasitized rodents-analyzing the host–pathogen–vector interface in a metropolitan area. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:191.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Duarte MD, Henriques AM, Barros SC, Fagulha T, Mendonça P, Carvalho P, et al. Snapshot of viral infections in wild carnivores reveals ubiquity of parvovirus and susceptibility of Egyptian mongoose to feline panleukopenia virus. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e59399.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Madder M, Horak IG, Stoltsz H. Ticks: tick importance and disease transmission. Afrivip. 2013. http://www.afrivip.org/sites/default/files/importancecomplete.pdf. Accessed 17 Sept 2016.

  99. Horak IG, Guillarmod AJ, Moolman LC, De Vos V. Parasites of domestic and wild animals in South Africa. XXII. Ixodid ticks on domestic dogs and on wild carnivores. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1987;54:573–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Horak IG, Matthee S. Parasites of domestic and wild animals in South Africa. XLIII. Ixodid ticks of domestic dogs and cats in the Western Cape Province. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2003;70:187–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Horak IG, Heyne H, Donkin EF. Parasites of domestic and wild animals in South Africa. XLVIII. Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) infesting domestic cats and wild felids in southern Africa. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2010;77:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Berggoetz M, Schmid M, Ston D, Wyss V, Chevillon C, Pretorius AM, et al. Protozoan and bacterial pathogens in tick salivary glands in wild and domestic animal environments in South Africa. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014;5:176–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Matthee S, Lovely C, Gaugler A, Beeker R, Venter HR, Horak IG. Ixodid ticks on domestic dogs in the Northern Cape Province of South Africa and in Namibia. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2010;81:126–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Horak IG, Braack LE, Fourie LJ, Walker JB. Parasites of domestic and wild animals in South Africa. XXXVIII. Ixodid ticks collected from 23 wild carnivore species. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2000;67:239–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Lewis BD, Penzhorn BL, Lopez-Rebollar LM, De Waal DT. Isolation of a South African vector-specific strain of Babesia canis. Vet Parasitol. 1996;63:9–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Schouls LM, van der Pol I, Rijpkema SGT, Schot CS. Detection and identification of Ehrlichia, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, and Bartonella species in Dutch Ixodes ricinus ticks. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:2215–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Matjila PT, Leisewitz AL, Oosthuizen MC, Jongejan F, Penzhorn BL. Detection of a Theileria species in dogs in South Africa. Vet Parasitol. 2008;157:34–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Yisaschar-Mekuzas Y, Jaffe CL, Pastor J, Cardoso L, Baneth G. Identification of Babesia species infecting dogs using reverse line blot hybridization for six canine piroplasms, and evaluation of co-infection by other vector-borne pathogens. Vet Parasitol. 2013;191:367–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Nijhof AM, Penzhorn BL, Lynen G, Mollel JO, Morkel P, Bekker CPJ, et al. Babesia bicornis sp. nov. and Theileria bicornis sp. nov.: tick-borne parasites associated with mortality in the black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis). J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:2249–54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Gubbels MJ, Hong Y, Van Der Weide M, Qi B, Nijman IJ, Guangyuan L, et al. Molecular characterisation of the Theileria buffeli/orientalis group. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:943–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Butler CM, Nijhof AM, Jongejan F, van der Kolk JH. Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in horses in the Netherlands. Vet Rec. 2008;162:216–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Schnittger L, Yin H, Qi B, Gubbels MJ, Beyer D, Niemann S, et al. Simultaneous detection and differentiation of Theileria and Babesia parasites infecting small ruminants by reverse line blotting. Parasitol Res. 2004;92:189–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Oura CAL, Bishop RP, Wampande EM, Lubega GW, Tait A. Application of a reverse line blot assay to the study of haemoparasites in cattle in Uganda. Int J Parasitol. 2004;34:603–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Nijhof AM, Pillay V, Steyl J, Prozesky L, Stoltsz WH, Lawrence A, et al. Molecular characterization of Theileria species associated with mortality in four species of African antelopes. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:5907–11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Govender D, Oosthuizen MC, Oosthuisen MC, Penzhorn BL. Piroplasm parasites of white rhinoceroses (Ceratotherium simum) in the Kruger National Park, and their relation to anaemia. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2011;82:36–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. He L, Feng HH, Zhang WJ, Zhang QL, Fang R, Wang LX, et al. Occurrence of Theileria and Babesia species in water buffalo (Bubalus babalis Linnaeus, 1758) in the Hubei Province, South China. Vet Parasitol. 2012;186:490–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Western Cape Nature Conservation Board for the donation of tissue samples, the Central Karoo Farmers Union for hosting SV and MD during sample collection and processing, and farmers in Namaqualand for allowing access to their private land. Dr Eleonore Hellard and Mr H. L. de Wet assisted SV during sample collection. We also gratefully acknowledge the numerous field assistants of the Urban Caracal Project (UCP) and Namaqualand PEACE Project, as well as Drs Aimee Knight and Bruce Stevens for UCP sample collection. Professor Marinda Oosthuizen provided logistical support for SV performing genetic analysis at the University of Pretoria. We also wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the initial manuscript.

Funding

The following funding sources are gratefully acknowledged: Institute for Communities and Wildlife in Africa, University of Cape Town (project funding for SV and MD), Foundational Biodiversity Information Programme, National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grant 98110) to BLP, University of Cape Town Science Faculty Grant and National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grant 99062) to JMB for laboratory work, National Research Foundation Freestanding Masters bursary to SV, Claude Leon Foundation postdoctoral fellowship at the University of Cape Town to BC, Wilderness Wildlife Trust bursary to SV, The Cape Leopard Trust (project funding for LEKS, BC and KJT), Conservation South Africa (project funding for BC and KJT), South African National Parks (in kind).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Communities and Wildlife in Africa, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

    Storme Viljoen, M. Justin O’Riain, Marine Drouilly, Laurel E. K. Serieys, Bogdan Cristescu & Jacqueline M. Bishop

  2. Vectors & Vector-borne Diseases Research Programme, Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

    Barend L. Penzhorn

  3. National Zoological Garden, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, South Africa

    Barend L. Penzhorn

  4. The Cape Leopard Trust, Cape Town, South Africa

    Laurel E. K. Serieys, Bogdan Cristescu & Kristine J. Teichman

  5. Department of Biology, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada

    Kristine J. Teichman

Authors
  1. Storme Viljoen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Justin O’Riain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Barend L. Penzhorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marine Drouilly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Laurel E. K. Serieys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bogdan Cristescu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kristine J. Teichman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jacqueline M. Bishop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The research was conceived by SV, BLP, MJO and JMB. SV and MD collected Central Karoo blood samples. KJT and BC collected Namaqualand samples. LEKS collected Cape Peninsula samples. SV conducted RLB and sequencing. SV performed all data analysis. SV wrote the manuscript with input from MJO, JMB, BLP and MD. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Storme Viljoen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animals used in the study originating in the Central Karoo region of South Africa were culled by professional hunters as part of a predator-control program in accordance with regulations of the provincial conservation authority (CapeNature permit number AAA007-00161-0056). On application to CapeNature, carcasses were made available to the project for sample collection (permit no. 0056-AAA007-00161). Ethical clearance was not required by the University of Cape Town Science Faculty Animal Ethics Committee as no animals were killed specifically for the research purposes of this project. Ethical clearance for the capture and sample collection from caracals in Namaqualand was obtained through the University of Cape Town Science Faculty Animal Ethics Committee (2013/V30/BC). Permits for the collection and use of blood samples were issued by the appropriate national (South African National Parks: CRC-2013/029-2014) and provincial authorities (Northern Cape Department of Environment and Nature Conservation: FAUNA 1157/2013; FAUNA 1158/2013). Ethical clearance for capture and sample collection from caracals on the Cape Peninsula was obtained through the University of Cape Town Science Faculty Animal Ethics Committee (2014/V20/LS). Permits for the collection and use of blood samples were issued by South African National Parks (2014/CRC/2014-017, 2015/CRC/2014-017) and CapeNature (AAA007-00147-0056).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Viljoen, S., O’Riain, M.J., Penzhorn, B.L. et al. Molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in caracals (Caracal caracal) living in human-modified landscapes of South Africa. Parasites Vectors 13, 220 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04075-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04075-5

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us