Skip to main content
Download PDF

Immature instars of three species of Rhodnius Stål, 1859 (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae): morphology, morphometry, and taxonomic implications

Parasites & Vectors volume 15, Article number: 91 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Among the 18 genera of the Triatominae subfamily, three stand out for their diversity and epidemiological importance: Triatoma, Panstrongylus, and Rhodnius. Rhodnius includes 21 species that can transmit Trypanosoma cruzi (the etiological agent of Chagas disease, also known as American trypanosomiasis) and Trypanosoma rangeli. The Rhodnius prolixus complex comprises seven species, including Rhodnius marabaensis, Rhodnius prolixus, and Rhodnius robustus, which occur in the northern region of Brazil. Since both adults and immatures can carry T. cruzi, in this study the five nymphal instars of the three species mentioned were dorsally characterized.

Methods

Using microscopy, morphometrics, and geometric morphometrics, the present work measures and describes the morphological characters of the five nymphal instars of R. marabaensis, R. prolixus, and R. robustus.

Results

The study enabled the characterization of all five nymphal instars, as well as the distinction between the three species in each of their instars.

Conclusions

The morphological, morphometrics of the head, thorax, and abdomen and geometric morphometrics studies of the head enabled the specific distinction of these three species in all five instars.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Chagas disease is an endemic infection in the Americas caused by the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas, 1909) (Kinetoplastida, Trypanosomatidae) [1] and transmitted mainly by triatomines [2]. In South America, the Amazon region has a large potential to disseminate the disease, both for the relevant number of triatomine species living there and the difficulties related to vector surveillance and control [3]. In addition to the transmission by feces/urine infected with the protozoan, cases by oral transmission occurred due to the ingestion of food contaminated with T. cruzi, such as the juices of açaí (Euterpe oleracea), bacaba (Oenocarpus bacaba), jaci (Attalea butyracea), orange (Citrus sinensis), guava (Psidium guajava), sugarcane, and palm wine [3,4,5].

All species of Triatominae are potential or proven vectors of T. cruzi [6,7,8]. These species are placed into 18 genera, including Rhodnius Stål, 1859, which in addition to T. cruzi can transmit Trypanosoma rangeli Tejera, 1920 [9]. Although there is no evidence that T. rangeli is pathogenic to vertebrates, when examining or isolating Trypanosomatidae strains from triatomines, it is necessary to identify whether it is T. cruzi or T. rangeli [10]. Rhodnius has 21 species [11], of which 10 are found in northern Brazil: Rhodnius amazonicus Almeida, Santos & Sposina, 1973; Rhodnius barretti Abad-Franch et al., 2013; Rhodnius brethesi Matta, 1919; Rhodnius milesi Carcavallo et al., 2001; Rhodnius montenegrensis Rosa et al., 2012; Rhodnius paraensis Sherlock et al., 1977; Rhodnius pictipes Stål, 1872; Rhodnius prolixus Stål, 1859; Rhodnius robustus Larrousse, 1927, and Rhodnius marabaensis Souza et al., 2016 [12, 13].

Species belonging to Rhodnius present well-defined morphological characters that facilitate their identification in the Triatominae subfamily, but distinguishing them from one another is a complex task [2, 14]. The typical morphology of Rhodnius is characterized by the position of the antennal tubercle on the apex of the head and the absence of phallosome support in the genitalia of some species [2, 12, 14]. Their color tends towards dark/light brown, with spots that can be sharp [2]. Nymphs are characterized by an elongated head, antennal tubercles located in the distal one-third or one-fourth of the anteocular area, absence of ocelli, and spotted abdomen on the back. Median tubercles are located dorsally on the central longitudinal line from segment I–X [2, 9, 14,15,16]. Because of the related taxonomic difficulties and its epidemiological importance, Rhodnius is widely studied, yet its phylogeny has not been clarified and requires new studies [11, 17].

The tribe Rhodniini (Rhodnius + Psammolestes Bergroth, 1911) consists of a monophyletic group of two genera naturally occurring in the Neotropical region [18]. Arboreal habits are common in the genus, and most are associated with one or more palm species. Among the species studied in this work, R. robustus is found in Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Venezuela, as well as northern Brazil [2, 19]. In wild environments it is generally found in a variety of palm species, its presence having also been reported in domiciles and peridomiciles [20, 21]. This species is also related to food contamination and infection of forestry workers [22, 23]. Rhodnius robustus is very close to R. montenegrensis, but molecular studies have confirmed the specific status of each species [24, 25].

Rhodnius marabaensis, described in 2016 from the state of Pará, has a straw color, and its dorsal thorax has a trapezoidal shape limited by a straw carina. Its lobes usually show a black-spot pattern. The larger length of the second antennal segment and the keel-shaped head apex are two of the main morphological features of adults [12]. Recently, R. marabaensis had its specific status validated by transposable element analysis [25], as well as its biological cycle [26]. It is a species found in the wild with moderate epidemiological importance [12].

Rhodnius prolixus is considered the most important species in the transmission of Chagas disease in Venezuela, Colombia, and Central America [2, 19]. One of the factors that contribute to this is its optimal adaptation to human dwellings. It is similar to R. robustus, which makes the separation between them more difficult [27].

Taking all these considerations into account, this study aims to characterize R. marabaensis, R. prolixus, and R. robustus both morphologically and morphometrically, making it easier to distinguish the five nymphal instars of these three species. In addition to the epidemiological importance of the five nymphal instars, as they can carry T. cruzi and T. rangeli [9], the taxonomic validity of the study of their morphological characters must also be considered. Although the epidemiological importance of R. marabaensis is still unknown on account of its recent description, R. prolixus and R. robustus are important vectors of Chagas disease in the areas where they occur.

Methods

Specimens

Specimens maintained in the Triatominae Insectarium (temperature 24 °C and 63% humidity) at the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences of the São Paulo State University (Unesp-Araraquara) (https://www2.fcfar.unesp.br/#!/triatominae/) were used. Rhodnius marabaensis specimens (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5a, b) that originated the colony were collected in the county of Marabá, state of Pará, Brazil on May 12, 2014. The founders of the R. prolixus colony (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5c, d) were collected in Venezuela on May 23, 1983. The colony of R. robustus (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5e–f) originated from specimens collected on January 13, 2016, in the county of Ouro Preto do Oeste, state of Rondônia, Brazil. Nymphs of first, second, third, fourth, and fifth instars were taken from the respective colonies on the same day they were utilized. First-instar nymphs were selected right after egg hatching. Nymphs of second, third, fourth, and fifth instars were selected immediately after ecdysis (no abdominal distension from feeding). The nymphs were only fed (on ducks), every 7 days, to pass through the instars. The morphological and morphometric studies were conducted without verifying the gender distinction of the five nymphal instars.

Fig. 1
figure 1

First-instar nymphs. Rhodnius marabaensis: a dorsal view, b ventral view; R. prolixus: c dorsal view, d ventral view; R. robustus: e dorsal view, f ventral view

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Second-instar nymphs. R. marabaensis: a dorsal view, b ventral view; R. prolixus: c dorsal view, d ventral view; R. robustus: e dorsal view, f ventral view

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Third-instar nymphs. R. marabaensis: a dorsal view, b ventral view; R. prolixus: c dorsal view, d ventral view; R. robustus: e dorsal view, f ventral view

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Fourth-instar nymphs. R. marabaensis: a dorsal view, b ventral view; R. prolixus: c dorsal view, d ventral view; R. robustus: e dorsal view, f ventral view

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Fifth-instar nymphs. R. marabaensis: a dorsal view, b ventral view; R. prolixus: c dorsal view, d ventral view; R. robustus: e dorsal view, f ventral view

Full size image

Morphological study

To generate images, five specimens of each of the five instars of R. marabaensis, R. prolixus, and R. robustus were used. Images of the dorsal sides of the head, thorax, and abdomen as well as the complete images of each of the five instars from dorsal view were obtained using a Leica M205 stereoscopic microscope and Leica Application Suite X software.

Morphometric study

Fifteen specimens of first-, second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-instar nymphs of R. marabaensis, R. prolixus, and R. robustus were measured using a Leica MZ APO stereoscopic microscope and the Motic Advanced 3.2 plus image analysis system.

The total length (TL), head length (HL), thorax length (XL), and abdomen length (AL) were measured for nymphs of all instars. Following Dujardin et al. [28], interocular (IO), anteocular (AO), and postocular (PO) distances were measured, as well as the three visible segments of the labium. The four antennal segments were also measured, according to Rosa et al. [29]. All measurements are expressed in millimeters.

The obtained data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, using t-tests for mean and standard deviation. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s pairwise comparison were performed to evaluate the degree of differentiation of the three species using PAST software (Additional file 1).

Geometric morphometrics of heads

Geometric morphometrics was used to evaluate variations in head shape and size using Cartesian reference coordinates. Variations among the heads of all nymphal instars of the studied species were evaluated. Fifteen heads of each instar were selected, and the images were obtained using a stereoscopic magnifying glass coupled to the Motic Advanced 3.2 plus scanning system. The coordinates of the reference points were selected according to Bookstein [30]. Four landmarks were adopted for the first and second instars and five landmarks for the other instars (Additional file 2). All of the landmarks are type 1 and were collected and processed using the modules available in the tpsDig v.1.18 software [31] and digitized using the CLIC package (https://xyom-clic.eu/the-clic-package/). Then the file with the raw coordinates was used for a generalized Procrustes analysis (GPA). GPA is a method that allows all the information related to size, position, and orientation of previously digitized anatomical frames to be eliminated [31]. The matrix of form was held in Euclidean space to generate a set of marks known as partial warps [30]. All the additional statistical forms were performed using Procrustes residues to analyze differences in the size and shape of the heads of each nymphal instar (Additional file 3). Procrustes ANOVA (p < 0.0001) [32] is used to infer differences between species. Procrustes ANOVA is a method for quantifying relative amounts of variation at different levels. These differences in size were assessed using an isometric estimator defined as centroid size (CS) [33]. Mahalanobis distances between pairs of species were calculated for measurements of shape and significance was assessed using a non-parametric test based on permutations (bootstrap, 10,000 replications) using MorphoJ [34]. In addition to that, using distance dice from Mahalanobis, neighbor-joining trees (NJ) were recovered using PAST v.3.25 [35]. To determine the relationships between species, canonical variable analysis (CVA) was performed using MorphoJ [34]. The CVA was performed associated with a resampling method (bootstrap, 10,000 replications) to build regions of trust in relation to the median size of the species center. A factorial map of the first two canonical fathers was created using MorphoJ, version 1.0.7a [34] (Additional file 3).

Results

Morphological description of the five nymphal instars of R. marabaensis, R. prolixus, and R. robustus by optical microscopy

First instar: the head of the nymphs has a dark-brown cuticle covering all its granular extension due to the presence of tubercles with small setae, whose color is darker than that of the cuticle. The maxillary plate and mandibular plate showed no significant differences among the species. Regarding the postocular area, the species shows Y-shaped cephalic sutures (Fig. 6a–c). On the thorax, there are tubercles with setae in the three segments, located mainly in the center. The pronotum has a trapezoidal shape and is the segment with larger external borders, followed by the metanotum and the mesonotum. The three segments are well delimited by the dividing lines, but the line separating the mesonotum from the metanotum shows a sinuous protuberance that overlaps the metanotum in about one-third of its size (Fig. 6d–f). The abdomen of first-instar nymphs has a lighter color in comparison with the thorax and the head. There are many tubercles with setae lighter colored than the cuticle. Connexivum with darker spots along the margin surrounding the abdomen. A lighter median longitudinal stripe is evident all over the abdomen (Fig. 6g–i).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Dorsal view of first-instar nymphs. Head, thorax, and abdomen. a, d, g: R. marabaensis; b, e, h: R. prolixus; c, f, i: R. robustus; cs cephalic suture, tu tubercle, ao anteocular distance, po postocular distance, mt metanotum, ms mesonotum, pr pronotum, I–X abdominal segments

Full size image

Second instar: the general aspects of the head of second-instar nymphs are similar to those described for first-instar nymphs. However, some differences are noticeable, such as the increase in the granulation grade and the number of setae in the three species, as well as the lighter color of the cuticle (Fig. 7a–c). Tubercles with setae are present in the three segments of the thorax, located mainly in the central portion. It is not possible to quantify the difference in size between the mesonotum and the metanotum, but, as in the first instar, the metanotum is broad on the sides and narrow in the central portion. The three segments are well delimited by the dividing lines, but the line separating the mesonotum from the metanotum has a sinuous protuberance that overlaps the metanotum in about one-third of its size (Fig. 7d–f). The abdomen has a median spot lighter than the cuticle in the dividing line of each of the urotergites, resembling a stripe. The connexival spots are more evident in this instar (Fig. 7g–i).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Dorsal view of second-instar nymphs. Head, thorax, and abdomen. a, d, g: R. marabaensis; b, e, h: R. prolixus; c, f, i: R. robustus; cs cephalic suture, tu tubercle, ao anteocular distance, po postocular distance, mt metanotum, ms mesonotum, pr pronotum, I–X abdominal segments

Full size image

Third instar: for the three species, the maxillary plates are more rounded and extend until the end of the clypeus. Postocular cephalic sutures are also more rounded and roughly have a U-shape (Fig. 8a–c). Tubercles with setae are present in the three segments of the thorax, distributed across them. The pronotum has the shape of a trapezium and is the segment with the largest external borders, followed by the mesonotum and the metanotum. The three segments are well delimited by the dividing lines, but the line separating the mesonotum from the metanotum has a sinuous protuberance that overlaps the metanotum in about one-third of its size (Fig. 8d–f). The three species possess 2 + 2 dark stripes across the abdomen. An increase of spots in the connexivum can also be observed. In R. marabaensis abdominal segments III and IV are the broadest. The segments widen from segment I to III and gradually narrow from segment VI onwards. A central stripe of straw color is also easily visible on the abdomen of this species, and from the sides there is another straw-colored stripe, located between two black stripes. These three stripes are arched and have the same shape as the abdomen, but they are not continuous, as they are interrupted in the intersegmental sutures. In R. prolixus and R. robustus the largest abdominal segment is the IV (Fig. 8g–i).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Dorsal view of third-instar nymphs. Head, thorax, and abdomen. a, d, g: R. marabaensis; b, e, h: R. prolixus; c, f, i: R. robustus; ne neck, cs cephalic suture, tu tubercle, at anteniferous tubercle, ge maxillary plate, cl clypeus, ao anteocular distance, po postocular distance, mt metanotum, ms mesonotum, pr pronotum, I–X abdominal segments

Full size image

Fourth instar: fourth-instar nymphs present some peculiar characteristics, such as triangular mandibular plate, rounded maxillary plate surpassing the clypeus, and a higher granulation grade near the eyes (Fig. 9a–c). The three segments of the thorax have tubercles with setae. The mesonotum is the largest segment in this instar due to the presence of the first pair of wing pads. The second pair of wing pads originates from the metanotum. The three segments are well delimited by the dividing lines (Fig. 9d–f). In all three species the dark stripes on the abdomen are more evident, which gives the area a striped aspect. In this instar, the connexivum spots become more rounded. The central stripe on the abdomen has the same aspect as in the third instar and differentiates the three species: in R. marabaensis the three side stripes on the abdomen, a straw-colored stripe between two black ones to the right and left, are similar to what is observed in the third instar (Fig. 9g–i).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Dorsal view of fourth-instar nymphs. Head, thorax, and abdomen. a, d, g: R. marabaensis; b, e, h: R. prolixus; c, f, i: R. robustus; ne neck, ju mandibular plate, ge maxillary plate, cl clypeus, ao anteocular distance, po postocular distance, mt metanotum, ms mesonotum, pr pronotum, I–X abdominal segments

Full size image

Fifth instar: in this instar, all three species also have a quite visible white stripe on the head (Fig. 10a–c). There are tubercles with setae in the three segments of the thorax. The posterior pair of wing pads can be seen overlapping, projecting from the mesonotum through the anterior pair, which in turn projects from the mesonotum (Fig. 10d–f). It is possible to see only the central area of the metanotum as a result of this large overlapping. The anterior pair of wing pads reach the beginning of the third urotergite. In this instar, the central line of the abdomen retains the characteristics observed in the third and fourth instars. In R. marabaensis the three side stripes on the right and left (one straw and two black) observed in the third and fourth instars are still present. There is also an increase in the number of tubercles with setae (Fig. 10g–i).

Fig. 10
figure 10

Dorsal view of fifth-instar nymphs. Head, thorax, and abdomen. a, d, g: R. marabaensis; b, e, h: R. prolixus; c, f, i: R. robustus; ne neck, ju mandibular plate, ge maxillary plate, cl clypeus, ac anteclypeus, ao anteocular distance, po postocular distance, mt metanotum, ms mesonotum, pr pronotum, I–X abdominal segments

Full size image

In this study, morphological differences were also observed between the three species in their five nymphal instars (Table 1).

Table 1 Differences observed by optical microscopy between three species of Rhodnius in the five nymphal instars
Full size table

Morphometric study of the five nymphal instars of R. marabaensis, R. prolixus, and R. robustus

With the acquired data it was possible to calculate the mean for each parameter and species, and then compare them to evaluate the degree to which the three Rhodnius species differ.

In the first and second instars, none of the parameters were statistically significant to evaluate the degree of the differences among the three Rhodnius species. As for the third instar, the parameter of the third segment of the antenna (F(2,42) 23.12, P = 1.693) was significant (Table 2). In the fourth instar, only the postocular distance stands out (F(2,42) 13.64, P = 2.718) (Table 3). Lastly, on the fifth instar, just the second segment of the antenna (F(2,42) 36.32, P = 6.965) (Table 2) made it possible to evaluate the degree of the difference between R. marabaensis, R. prolixus, and R. robustus.

Table 2 Mean and standard deviation of the antennal and labium segments of three species of Rhodnius
Full size table
Table 3 Mean and standard deviation of the parameters of the three species of Rhodnius
Full size table

Geometric morphometrics of the five nymphal instars of R. marabaensis, R. prolixus, and R. robustus

By ontogenetic geometric morphometry of the heads of nymphs, it was possible to describe the differences in shape and size of the five instars of R. robustus, R. prolixus, and R. marabaensis. CS measures show variability in the head size of the species. Furthermore, by the isometric measurement of the CS, the size gain among immature shapes can be clearly seen (Fig. 11). Analysis of the CS shows that differences among the size means are significant (p < 0.0001, supplementary material). Rhodnius robustus and R. prolixus have larger means than R. marabaensis (Fig. 11). Differences can also be explained as a percentage of the total variance among groups in the eigenvalues (auto values), the percentages being 89% for the first instar, 83% for the second, 98% for the third, 93% for the fourth, and 90% for the fifth. Mahalanobis distance was used as a metric estimator. The estimator considers the variations and correlations among groups defined a priori and enables pairwise comparison. Mahalanobis distances were significant among the pairs of the assessed species (p < 0.001, supplementary material). Dendrograms were built based on the values recovered for Mahalanobis distances and neighbor joining (NJ). The topology is identical for all instars (Fig. 12). It was possible to delimit the proximity between R. prolixus and R. marabaensis (Fig. 12). Procrustes ANOVA test also recovered significant values, showing shape differences among the species (p < 0.0001, supplementary material).

Fig. 11
figure 11

Geometric morphometry-based boxplot of centroid sizes (in pixels) among R. marabaensis, R. prolixus, and R. robustus. The thick black bar shows the standard error. a first instar; b second instar; c third instar; d fourth instar; e fifth instar

Full size image
Fig. 12
figure 12

Neighbor-joining (NJ) tree generated from the measurements of Mahalanobis for the five nymphal instars of R. marabaensis, R. prolixus, and R. robustus (boot number = 100). a first instar; b second instar; c third instar; d fourth instar; e fifth instar

Full size image

The projection of the three species in the space defined by canonical axes 1 (CVA1) and 2 (CVA2) provides a description of the specified groups in the set of multivariate data. The analyses of the canonical variables resulted in 10 variables and explain 100% of the discrimination among the species (Fig. 13). The first two variables (CVA1 and CVA2) generated the following percentages: 85.2% and 22.49% for the first instar; 47.76% and 21.48% for the second; 97.1% and 3% for the third; 92.8% and 3% for the fourth; and 85.2% and 22.49% for the fifth (Fig. 13). The grouping in the space of the canonical axis shows an overlapping relationship between R. prolixus, R. robustus, and R. marabaensis in the first and fourth instar; however, the separation of populations in the second, third, and fifth instars is clear. R. marabaensis is the species that was best separated in the CVA analysis.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Scatter plots of the canonical variate analysis (CVA) of the grouped matrices for geometric morphometric of heads. The scores of the first canonical variable (CVA1) are on the x-axis and the scores for the second canonical variable (CVA2) are on the y-axis. The ellipses represent the confidence for means limits of each population (probability 0.5). (R. marabaensis—black ellipses; R. prolixus—red ellipses; R. robustus—blue ellipses). a first instar; b second instar; c third instar; d fourth instar; e fifth instar

Full size image

Discussion

A striking feature of Triatominae is that males, females, and nymphs of all instars can transmit T. cruzi if infected [36, 37]. In several field collections carried out between 1989 and 2021 by Rosa et al. [unpublished data], a higher prevalence of nymphs than adults was observed. Thus, studies regarding the specific identification of nymphal instars become necessary, which is the objective of this study. Therefore, studies about nymphal instars not only have taxonomic and phylogenetic interest, but also have epidemiological importance. Specifically, about the genus Rhodnius, the following works can be mentioned: Mascarenhas [38], which studied the five instars of R. brethesi; Ponsoni et al. [39] and Marconato et al. [40], which carried out a biometric study of nymphs of R. neglectus Lent, 1954 and R. prolixus; and Santos [41], which described nymphs of the five instars of Rhodnius colombiensis Meija, Galvão & Jurberg, 1999, Rhodnius ecuadoriensis Lent & León, 1958, R. milesi, and Rhodnius stali Lent, Jurberg & Galvão, 1993.

Morphological characters are useful tools for taxonomic and systematic studies in Triatominae, in addition to being useful for epidemiological surveillance. The morphological analyses showed the separation of the three species by characters observed on the head, thorax, and abdomen shape. This made it possible to separate them in all five nymphal instars and to characterize for the first time the development instars of R. marabaensis. In their chapter about nymphal instars, Lent and Wygodzinsky [2] mentioned that R. prolixus and R. robustus do not have sub median tubercles or aggregations of granules along the midline, but such characters were observed in all five nymphal instars of those species, as well as in R. marabaensis. Rosa et al. [37], studying first- and second-instar nymphs of Triatoma wygodzinskyi Lent, 1951, distinguished the two instars by morphological characters of the thorax. Thus, by scanning electronic microscopy, they observed the absence of collar, glabrous areas, and tubercles in the first instar of T. wygodzinskyi, which were present in the second instar. Nevertheless, the differentiation among third, fourth, and fifth instars of R. marabaensis, R. prolixus, and R. robustus was made using the same characters observed by Rosa et al. [37] in nymphs of the previously mentioned instars of T. wygodzinskyi, i.e., the formation and conformation of the two pairs of wing pads located on the thorax. Although the ventral surface was not described, it is very likely that in future studies, new differential characters between the three species will be added to those already described in this work.

In this study, the results of the morphometry of characters from the abdomen, antenna, head, labium, and thorax showed little discrimination between the three species. In general, the compared averages are small or not significant, and the morphometric study is not suitable for identification. However, R. marabaensis had its nymphs characterized morphometrically and morphologically for the first time.

The relative length of the four antennal segments in R. marabaensis showed the same pattern for the first three instars, another for the fourth instar, and a third pattern for the fifth instar, whereas R. prolixus and R. robustus showed the same pattern for the first and second instars, another for the third and fourth instars, and a third one for the fifth instar. Santos [41], measuring R. colombiensis, R. ecuadoriensis, and R. stali, found two patterns of relative length for antennal segments of the five nymphal instars. For R. milesi, the author found three patterns, one for the first and second instars, another for the fourth and fifth instars, and a third one for the third instar, hence different patterns from the ones observed in R. marabaensis, R. prolixus, and R. robustus.

Rosa et al. [42] carried out a morphometric study of the four antennal segments of nymphs of the five instars and adults of Panstrongylus megistus (Burmeister, 1835), R. neglectus, R. prolixus, and Triatoma vitticeps (Stål, 1859). The patterns identified in R. neglectus and R. prolixus were the same as those found for R. prolixus and R. robustus in this work. Rosa et al. [29] measured the antennal segments of Triatoma rubrovaria (Blanchard, 1843) and found patterns different from R. marabaensis, R. prolixus, and R. robustus, but similar to those observed in P. megistus by Rosa et al. [42]. However, in relation to the relative length of the four antennal segments, it is not possible to differentiate the studied species. The different results were described for R. colombiensis, R. ecuadoriensis, R. milesi, R. stali [41], and R. neglectus [42], T. rubrovaria [29], P. megistus, and T. vitticeps [42]. Furthermore, our data show that R. prolixus and R. robustus are like R. neglectus [42] and can be distinguished from R. colombiensis, R. ecuadoriensis, R. milesi, and R. stali [41] as well as T. rubrovaria [29], P. megistus, and T. vitticeps [42] for this characteristic.

Geometric morphometry enables the evaluation of the variation in shape in relation to causal effects [43]. The technique allows us to quantify biological forms and discuss the evolution of phenetic patterns [34]. The technique is used in paleontological, anthropological, ecological, zoological, and botanical studies [30, 34]. In triatomines, geometric morphometry is used to assess the shape and size variables of hemelytra [44, 45], heads [13, 46], and eggs [47]. It is also used for ontogenetic studies [48,49,50].

Recently two subcomplexes of the genus Triatoma Laporte, 1832 were studied using geometric morphometrics, which indicated the potential of the technique to study specimens that are phylogenetically close [44, 46]. Geometric morphometrics allowed the differences in head shape and size of the five nymphal instars to be described. In relation to the CS, all values obtained were significant and enabled the differentiation of the three species in the five nymphal instars. Variation was observed among the instars, but considering the general aspect, R. robustus was easily characterized by the geometric profile of the heads of nymphs. The second and fourth instar showed less discrimination potential, i.e., only approximated size means were recovered.

The metric estimator of Mahalanobis distance was used to recover NJ dendrograms, where it is possible to visualize that in all evaluated instars R. robustus is distant, whilst R. prolixus and R. marabaensis form a single clade. However, CVA ellipses showed that in the first and second instars, R. marabaensis and R. robustus remain close, while groups are clearly separated in the third, fourth, and fifth instars. Regarding the shape, the values of the Procrustes ANOVA test revealed differences among the cephalic capsules, enabling discrimination. It was shown that the multivariate morphometric technique is more efficient for discriminating against the studied species when confronted with linear morphometric data.

Conclusion

In this study, the morphological and morphometric differences in three Rhodnius species were evaluated. New data were also provided for R. marabaensis. Furthermore, it was shown that the morphology of the head (third, fourth, and fifth), thorax (second and fifth instar), and abdomen (first, second, third, and fifth instar) are useful in discriminating the studied species. Through morphometric analysis of the head, it was verified that the postocular distance of the fourth instar and the lengths of the antennal segments of the third and fifth instars distinguish the three species. Lastly, geometric morphometry proved to be useful for these species. The size and shape variables clearly show the differences between R. marabaensis, R. prolixus, and R. robustus.

Availability of data and materials

“Belintani, Tiago (2021), “Immature instars of three species of Rhodnius (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae): morphological and morphometric studies”, Mendeley Data, V5, https://doi.org/10.17632/tjgj87yw78.5.

References

  1. Chagas C. Nova tripanozomiaze humana: estudos sobre a morfolojia e o ciclo evolutivo do Schizotrypanum cruzi n. gen, n. sp., ajente etiolojico de nova entidade morbida do homem. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1909;1:159–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lent H, Wygodzinsky PW. Revision of the Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae), and their significance as vectors of Chagas’ disease. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 1979;163:123–520.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Santos VRCd, Pará SdEdSd, Meis Jd, Cruz-Fiocruz FO, Savino W, Cruz-Fiocruz FO, et al. Acute Chagas disease in the state of Pará, Amazon region: is it increasing? Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2018;113.

  4. Ferreira RTB, Branquinho MR, Cardarelli-Leite P. Transmissão oral da doença de Chagas pelo consumo de açaí: um desafio para a Vigilância Sanitária. Vig Sanit Debate. 2014:4–11.

  5. Mattos CdM, Marciano MAM, Ferreira ARdS, Pereira-Chioccola VL. Determination of the viability of Trypanosoma cruzi in the experimentally contaminated açaí pulp and sugar cane juice. BEPA. 2019;16:15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alevi KCC, Oliveira JD, Garcia ACC, Cristal DC, Delgado LMG, Bittinelli IdF, et al. Triatoma rosai sp. nov. (Hemiptera, Triatominae): a new species of Argentinian Chagas disease vector described based on integrative taxonomy. Insects. 2020;11:830.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dale C, Justi SA, Galvão C. Belminus santosmalletae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae): new species from Panama, with an updated key for Belminus Stål, 1859 species. Insects. 2021;12:686.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Poinar G. A primitive triatomine bug, Paleotriatoma metaxytaxa gen. et sp. nov. (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae), in mid-Cretaceous amber from northern Myanmar. Cretac Res. 2019;93:90–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosa JA, Mendonça VJ, Gardim S, de Carvalho DB, de Oliveira J, Nascimento JD, et al. Study of the external female genitalia of 14 Rhodnius species (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae) using scanning electron microscopy. Parasites Vectors. 2014;7:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ramírez LE, Machado MIR, Maywald PG, Matos A, Chiari E, Silva EL. Primeira evidência de Trypanosoma rangeli no sudeste do Brasil, região endêmica para doença de Chagas. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1998;31:99–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Paula AS, Barreto C, Telmo MCM, Diotaiuti L, Galvão C. Historical biogeography and the evolution of hematophagy in Rhodniini (Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). Front Ecol Evol. 2021;9:261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Souza ES, Von Atzingen NCB, Furtado MB, de Oliveira J, Nascimento JD, Vendrami DP, et al. Description of Rhodnius marabaensis sp. n. (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae) from Pará State. Brazil ZooKeys. 2016;621:45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao Y, Galvão C, Cai W. Rhodnius micki, a new species of Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) from Bolivia. ZooKeys. 2021;1012:71–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lent H, Jurberg J. O gênero Rhodnius Stal,. com um estudo sobre a genitália das espécies. Rev Brasil Biol. 1859;1969:487–560.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barata JMS. Macroscopic and exochorial structures of Triatominae eggs. In: Carcavallo RU, Girón IG, Jurberg J, Lent H, editors. Atlas of Chagas disease vectors in the Americas. 2: Fiocruz; 1998. p. 409–80.

  16. Abad-Franch F, Monteiro FA. Molecular research and the control of Chagas disease vectors. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2005;77:437–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Monteiro FA, Weirauch C, Felix M, Lazoski C, Abad-Franch F. Evolution, systematics, and biogeography of the Triatominae, vectors of Chagas disease. Adv Parasitol. 2018;99:265–344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Abad-Franch F, Monteiro FA, Jaramillo ON, Gurgel-Gonçalves R, Dias FBS, Diotaiuti L. Ecology, evolution, and the long-term surveillance of vector-borne Chagas disease: a multi-scale appraisal of the tribe Rhodniini (Triatominae). Acta Tropic. 2009;110:159–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bender A, Python A, Lindsay SW, Golding N, Moyes CL. Modelling geospatial distributions of the triatomine vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi in Latin America. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:e0008411.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Galíndez Girón I, Rocha DdS, Lent H, Carcavallo RU, Jurberg J, Galväo C, et al. Nymphal stages. In: Carcavallo RU, Galíndez Girón I, Jurberg J, Lent H, editors., et al., Atlas dos vetores da doença de Chagas nas Américas. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz; 1998. p. 449–513.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rocha DdS, Jurberg J, Carcavallo RU, Presgrave OAF, Cunha V, Galvão C. Influência da temperatura e umidade no desenvolvimento ninfal de Rhodnius robustus. Rev Saúde Públ. 2001;35:400–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Miles MA, de Souza AA, Póvoa M. Chagas’ disease in the Amazon basin III. Ecotopes of ten triatomine bug species (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) from the vicinity of Belém, Pará State. Brazil J Med Entomol. 1981;18:266–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Coura JR, Junqueira AC, Fernandes O, Valente SA, Miles MA. Emerging Chagas disease in Amazonian Brazil. Trends Parasitol. 2002;18:171–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Carvalho DB, Congrains C, Chahad-Ehlers S, Pinotti H, Brito RAd, da Rosa JA. Differential transcriptome analysis supports Rhodnius montenegrensis and Rhodnius robustus (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae) as distinct species. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0174997.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Castro MRJ, Goubert C, Monteiro FA, Vieira C, Carareto CMA. Homology-free detection of transposable elements unveils their dynamics in three ecologically distinct Rhodnius species. Genes. 2020;11:70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Olaia N, Alevi KCC, de Oliveira J, Cacini GL, Souza EDS, Pinotti H, et al. Biology of Chagas disease vectors: biological cycle and emergence rates of Rhodnius marabaensis Souza et al., 2016 (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae) under laboratory conditions. Parasitol Res. 2021;120:2939–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Monteiro FA, Barrett TV, Fitzpatrick S, Cordon-Rosales C, Feliciangeli D, Beard CB. Molecular phylogeography of the Amazonian Chagas disease vectors Rhodnius prolixus and R. robustus. Mol Ecol. 2003;12:997–1006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dujardin JP, Steindel M, Chavez T, Machane M, Schofield CJ. Changes in the sexual dimorphism of Triatominae in the transition from natural to artificial habitats. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1999;94:565–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rosa JA, Tres DFA, Santos JLF, Barata JMS. Estudos morfométricos dos segmentos antenais de ninfas e adultos de duas colônias de Triatoma rubrovaria (Blanchard, 1843) (Hemiptera, Reduviidae). Entomol Vect. 2000;7:255–64.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bookstein FL. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Rohlf FJ. TpsDig v1.18. Available in: http://www.life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/ (Accessed 10 May 2020) edn1999.

  32. Klingenberg CP, Leamy LJ. Quantitative genetics of geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Evolution. 2001;55:2342–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Monteiro LR, dos Reis SF. Princípios de morfometria geométrica. 1st ed. Ribeirão Preto: Holos; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Klingenberg CP. MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011;11:353–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Elect Paleo. 2001:9.

  36. Lima C. Insetos do Brasil: Escola Nacional de Agronomia; 1940. p 352.

  37. Rosa JA, Medeiros MP, Cilense M, Barata JMS. Morphological study of the thorax of the five nymphal instars of Triatoma arthurneivai Lent & Martins (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae). Rev Bras Entomol. 2005;49:289–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mascarenhas BM. Descrição dos estádios imaturos de Rhodnius brethesi Mata, 1919 (Hemiptera, Reduviidae). Bol Mus Para Emilio Goeldi. 1987;3:183–94.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ponsoni EJ, Marconato E, da Rosa JA. Estudo biológico e morfométrico dos estádios ninfais de Rhodnius neglectus Lent, 1954 (Hemiptera, Reduviidae). Rev Ciênc Farmac. 2004;25:125–8.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Marconato E, Ponsoni EJ, Barata JMS, da Rosa JA. Estudo biológico e biométrico dos estádios ninfais de Rhodnius prolixus Stäl, 1859 (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) sob condições laboratoriais. Rev Ciênc Farmac Bas Aplic. 2006;27:157–61.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Santos CM. Caracterização morfológica, ultra-estrutural e morfométrica das formas imaturas de espécies do gênero Rhodnius Stal, 1859 (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae) encontradas na região amazônica. Tese doutorado. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Oswaldo Cruz; 2009.

  42. Rosa JA, Freitas SC, Malara FF, Rocha CS. Morphometry and morphology of the antennae of Panstrongylus megistus Burmeister, Rhodnius neglectus Lent, Rhodnius prolixus Stal and Triatoma vitticeps Stal (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Neotrop Entomol. 2010;39:214–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bookstein FL. A statistical method for biological shape comparisons. J Theor Biol. 1984;107:475–520.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Belintani T, Oliveira J, Pinotti H, Silva LA, Alevi KCC, Galvão C, et al. Phylogenetic and phenotypic relationships of the Triatoma sordida subcomplex (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). Acta Trop. 2020;212:105679.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gurgel-Gonçalves R, Ferreira JBC, Rosa AF, Bar ME, Galvão C. Geometric morphometrics and ecological niche modelling for delimitation of near-sibling triatomine species. Med Vet Entomol. 2011;25:84–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Oliveira J, Marcet PL, Takiya DM, Mendonça VJ, Belintani T, Bargues MD, et al. Combined phylogenetic and morphometric information to delimit and unify the Triatoma brasiliensis species complex and the Brasiliensis subcomplex. Acta Trop. 2017;170:140–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Santillán-Guayasamín S, Villacís AG, Grijalva MJ, Dujardin J-P. The modern morphometric approach to identify eggs of Triatominae. Parasites Vectors. 2017;10:55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Rocha DdS, Dale C, da Rosa JA, Galvão C. Description of nymphs and ontogenetic morphometry of Triatoma ryckmani Zeledón & Ponce, 1972 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). EntomoBrasilis. 2020;13:e899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Raigorodschi RS, Rocha DS, Jurberg J, Galvão C. Description and ontogenetic morphometrics of eggs and instars of Triatoma costalimai Verano & Galvão, 1959 (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). Zootaxa. 2011;2011:3062.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Goncalves L, Liria J, Soto-Vivas A. Ontogenetic morphometrics in Psammolestes arthuri (Pinto 1926) (Reduviidae, Triatominae) from Venezuela. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2016;4:369–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the collaborators of the Parasitology Laboratory of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences of the São Paulo State University (Unesp), especially Vinicius Fernandes de Paiva and Lucas Abrantes da Silva, for the work developed in feeding the triatomine colonies maintained at the Triatominae Insectarium of the School of Pharmaceutical Sciences /Unesp/Araraquara. The first author, GLC, would like to thank Cláudio Alexandre Lázari Cacini.

Funding

This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo—FAPESP process 2017/13674-0 and 2017/06460-4. Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001, CAPES Organization (Ministry of Education, Brazilian Government, Brazil), process number 23038.005285/2011-12. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico CNPq, PQ-2, process 307 398/2018-8.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Rodovia Araraquara-Jaú km 1, Araraquara, SP, 14801-902, Brazil

    Gustavo Lázari Cacini, Nicoly Olaia, Mara Cristina Pinto & João Aristeu da Rosa

  2. Departamento de Epidemiologia, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Laboratório de Entomologia em Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo 715, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

    Jader de Oliveira

  3. Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP, Brazil

    Tiago Belintani

  4. Departamento de Entomologia, Fundação de Medicina Tropical Heitor Vieira Dourado (FMT-HVD), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil

    Éder dos Santos Souza

Authors
  1. Gustavo Lázari Cacini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jader de Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tiago Belintani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Éder dos Santos Souza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nicoly Olaia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mara Cristina Pinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. João Aristeu da Rosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

GLC, JAR, and JO were responsible for conceptualizing. GLC, NO, ESS, and TB were responsible for the acquisition and interpretation of results. GLC was responsible for the investigation, data curation, and writing of the original draft. GLC, TB, and MCP were responsible for the formal analysis and statistical analysis. GLC and JAR were responsible for the morphological descriptions and the writing of the text. GLC, NO, and JO were responsible for the morphometric study and writing. TB was responsible for the geometric morphometrics and writing. ESS was responsible for the acquisition and description of the new species Rhodnius marabaensis. JAR was responsible for the acquisition of funds and text review. All authors contributed to the discussion and interpretation of data, revised the manuscript, and approved the submitted version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gustavo Lázari Cacini.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Morphometry tests.

Additional file 2.

Landmarks of heads.

Additional file 3.

Geometric morphometrics.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lázari Cacini, G., de Oliveira, J., Belintani, T. et al. Immature instars of three species of Rhodnius Stål, 1859 (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae): morphology, morphometry, and taxonomic implications. Parasites Vectors 15, 91 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05200-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05200-2

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us