Skip to main content
Download PDF

Cryptosporidium parvum regulates HCT-8 cell autophagy to facilitate survival via inhibiting miR-26a and promoting miR-30a expression

Parasites & Vectors volume 15, Article number: 470 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cryptosporidium parvum is an important zoonotic parasite, which not only causes economic losses in animal husbandry but also harms human health. Due to the lack of effective measures for prevention and treatment, it is important to understand the pathogenesis and survival mechanism of C. parvum. Autophagy is an important mechanism of host cells against parasite infection through key regulatory factors such as microRNAs and MAPK pathways. However, the regulatory effect of C. parvum on autophagy has not been reported. Here, we demonstrated that C. parvum manipulated autophagy through host cellular miR-26a, miR-30a, ERK signaling and P38 signaling for parasite survival.

Methods

The expression of Beclin1, p62, LC3, ERK and P38 was detected using western blotting in HCT-8 cells infected with C. parvum as well as treated with miR-26a-mimic, miR-30a-mimic, miR-26a-mimic or miR-30a-inhibitor post C. parvum infection. The qPCR was used to detect the expression of miR-26a and miR-30a and the number of C. parvum in HCT-8 cells. Besides, the accumulation of autophagosomes was examined using immunofluorescence.

Results

The expression of Beclin1 and p62 was increased, whereas LC3 expression was increased initially at 0–8 h but decreased at 12 h and then increased again in C. parvum-infected cells. C. parvum inhibited miR-26a-mimic-induced miR-26a but promoted miR-30a-mimic-induced miR-30a expression. Suppressing miR-30a resulted in increased expression of LC3 and Beclin1. However, upregulation of miR-26a reduced ERK/P38 phosphorylation, and inhibiting ERK/P38 signaling promoted Beclin1 and LC3 while reducing p62 expression. Treatment with miR-26a-mimic, autophagy inducer or ERK/P38 signaling inhibitors reduced but treatment with autophagy inhibitor or miR-30a-mimic increased parasite number.

Conclusions

The study found that C. parvum could regulate autophagy by inhibiting miR-26a and promoting miR-30a expression to facilitate the proliferation of parasites. These results revealed a new mechanism for the interaction of C. parvum with host cells.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Cryptosporidium is considered to be the second major cause of diarrhea and death in children [1, 2]. Cryptosporidium has thus far 44 recognized species and more than 120 genotypes, of which 17 species and 4 genotypes are zoonotic [3, 4]. Cryptosporidium parvum infects the gastrointestinal tract of animals and humans [6]. The main clinical manifestation of C. parvum infection is watery diarrhea, which usually occurs 3–4 days after infection of oocysts, lasting for about 1–2 weeks [5]. In addition, loss of appetite, drowsiness, dehydration and even death can also be observed. At present, there are no vaccines for Cryptosporidium; the drug commonly used for cryptosporidiosis is nitazoxanide, with little therapeutic effect for cryptosporidiosis patients with immune deficiency [7]. Mutant kinase inhibitors of calcium-dependent protein kinase 1 (CDPK1) and phosphatidylinositol-4-OH kinase inhibitors are potential new drugs to treat cryptosporidiosis [8,9,10]. An in-depth understanding of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of Cryptosporidium will be helpful to discover new potential therapeutic targets.

Autophagy is an important cellular recycling process in eukaryotes for cell survival and maintenance. In normal physiological processes, autophagy can remove aged, aggregated and misfolded proteins, as well as damaged organelles, to regulate cell growth. Autophagy also plays an important role in the process of pathogen invasion. It was reported that Helicobacter pylori outer membrane vesicle induced host cell autophagy to limit the growth and survival of bacteria, which is an important antibacterial mechanism in gastric epithelial cells [11]. Certain pathogens can inhibit, block or even destroy the mechanism of autophagy to provide a stable environment for pathogen survival [12]. Mycobacterium tuberculosis can inhibit the process of autophagy to evade the clearance of host macrophages [13]. However, it is still unclear whether C. parvum can regulate the autophagy of host cells.

MicroRNAs, a group of non-coding RNAs that play a key role in host cellular response to various pathogens, including viruses, parasites and bacteria, are key factors in regulating autophagy [14]. MiR-30a, miR-376b, and miR-519a are involved in regulating autophagy via Beclin1 signaling, and miR-375 regulates autophagy via ATG protein [15]. It has been shown that miR-30a-5p could regulate autophagy by targeting Beclin1 during porcine circovirus type 2 and duck enteritis virus infection [16, 17]. MiR-30a-3p enhanced the megaautophagy and autophagy of host cells to reduce the intracellular proliferation of Leishmania donovani [18]. Autophagy is also known to be regulated by complex signaling pathways [19]. MAPK signaling pathways could regulate autophagy in the process of various diseases. P38 MAPK could inhibit autophagy by phosphorylating ULK1 or activate chaperone-mediated autophagy by phosphorylating LAMP2A [20, 21]. Ganoderma applanatum polysaccharide could induce autophagy in MCF-7 cells by downregulating p-ERK or upregulating p-P38 and p-JNK [22]. In hepatocellular carcinoma cells, novel 2-phenyloxypyrimidine derivative enhanced autophagy by activating ERK signaling [23]. A previous study suggested that DUSP5, a negative regulator of MAPK, was the potential target of miR-26a, which is involved in autophagy regulation [24]. MiR-139-5p promoted autophagy through MAPK/NF-κB signaling pathway [25]. However, it is not clear whether miRNA and MAPK signaling pathways are involved in regulating autophagy in HCT-8 cells infected with C. parvum.

MiRNA and MAPK signaling pathways are important in the process of parasite infection. During Leishmania infection, miR-7, miR-223, miR-133a and miR-146b showed high expression [26]. Toxoplasma gondii infection upregulated miR-155-5p and miR-29c-3p, but downregulated miR-21-5p and miR-125b-5p [27]. The downregulation of miR-322 in response to Trypanosoma cruzi infection plays an important role in the invasion process [28]. Therefore, the abnormal expression of miRNA in parasite infection could be considered a disease diagnostic indicator. Leishmania and T. cruzi targeted MAPK pathways to regulate the host immune system and promoted its replication and survival in macrophages [29]. In biliary epithelial cells, the expression of the let-7 family miRNAs was decreased by C. parvum [30]. After C. parvum infection, 20 miRNAs of HCT-8 cells exhibited significant differential expression [31]. Muñoz et al. reported that C. parvum could activate ERK and P38 MAPK pathways [32]. However, the roles of miRNAs and MAPK signaling pathways have not been investigated in intestinal epithelial cells infected with C. parvum.

The present study was designed to elucidate the role of host cell autophagy in C. parvum infection and the regulatory mechanism of C. parvum on autophagy. The study might provide new intervention targets for the prevention and treatment of C. parvum.

Methods

Cells and parasites

HCT-8 cells were preserved and propagated in our laboratory. HCT-8 cells were cultured with RPMI 1640 medium (Biological Industries, Israel) containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin streptomycin (Biological Industries, Israel) at 37 °C in 5% CO2. When grown to 70–80% confluence, the cells were subjected to passaging or plating.

Cryptosporidium parvum (gene subtype: IIa A15G2R1) was preserved and propagated in our laboratory. Cryptosporidium oocysts, originally obtained from our laboratory, were used to infect 5-day-old Holstein calves (1×108/animal). Following the onset of oocyst shedding, feces were collected daily, mixed with an equal volume of 5% potassium dichromate and stored at 4 °C. Oocyst isolation was through discontinuous sucrose gradients according to previous methods [33]. For purification of sporozoites, oocysts were resuspended in 0.8% sodium taurocholate (Sigma, MO, USA) with 2.5% trypsin (BOSTER, Wuhan, China), then incubated at 37 °C for 30 min, washed three times in PBS and resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium with 2% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. The excystation rate of sporozoites is about 70% using a cell counting plate, and the number of oocysts required is calculated as a ratio of 1:2 of sporozoites to HCT-8 cells.

MiRNA detection

HCT-8 cells (2.5 × 106 cells/well) were stimulated with sporozoite at a ratio of 1:2 (sporozoite:cell). After stimulation with sporozoites for 2 h, HCT-8 cells were thoroughly rinsed with fresh medium and cultured at 37 °C. Then, the cells were collected at 12 h, 18 h and 24 h post-sporozoite stimulation. Total RNAs were extracted from HCT-8 cells using TRIZOL reagent (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China) including chloroform extraction and isopropanol precipitation. The cDNA was constituted from total RNA using specific miRNA reverse transcription primers (miR-23a, miR-375, miR-30a and miR-26a, Ruibobio, Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix, TaKaRa, China).

MiR-26a-mimic, miR-30a-mimic or ssRNA (negative control) was transfected into HCT-8 cells for 24 h; then, the cells were stimulated with sporozoite (sporozoite:cell = 1:2) for 12 h. Total RNAs were extracted from HCT-8 cells, and cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using specific miRNA reverse transcription primers according to the manufacturer’s protocols.

The qPCR reaction components are as follows: FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master 10 μl, specific quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) primers (miR-23a, miR-375, miR-30a and miR-26a) 0.8 μl, cDNA 5 μl and ddH2O 4.2 μl. The qPCR was performed using the FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (ROX) (Roche, Swiss) with the following conditions: an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 20 s and 60 °C for 1 min using qTOWER2.0 (Analytik Jena AG, Germany).

Transfection

HCT-8 cells were seeded in a 24-well plate at 5×105 cells per well or 2×106 cells per well in a 6-well plate with RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS (BI, Israel). The cells were transfected with miR-26a-mimic/inhibitor and miR-30a-mimic/inhibitor (Ruibobio, Guangzhou, China) (10 μl each well in 6-well plates and 2 μl each well in 24-well plates) or EGFP-LC3 (8 μg each well in 24-well plates) using Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen, USA). Then, the cells were stimulated with sporozoites (sporozoite:cell = 1:2) in RPMI 1640 medium containing 2% FBS.

Fluorescent microscopy detection

HCT-8 cells transfected with EGFP-LC3 were cultured in 24-well plates containing glass slides (2 × 105 cells/well). At 24 h post-transfection, the miR-26a-mimic or miR-30a-inhibitor was transfected into the cells; cells were cultured with ERK inhibitor (LY3214996, 1 μM; Selleckchem, USA), P38 inhibitor (SB203580, 5 μM; Selleckchem, USA) or Rapamycin (1 μM, Selleckchem, USA) for 1 h. The cells were incubated with sporozoites (sporozoite:cell = 1:2) for 12 h before harvesting. Cells on glass slides were washed with PBS three times (5 min for each time), fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature (RT) and treated with 0.25% TritonX-100 (Life Technologies Corporation, USA) for 20 min at RT. Then, the cells were blocked with 3% Bovine Serum Albumin (Boster Biological Technology, USA) in PBS for 30 min at RT and incubated with a 1:100 dilution of the C. parvum virus capsid antibody (prepared in our laboratory) overnight at 4 °C. The cells were washed and incubated with CoraLite594 secondary antibody (Proteintech, Wuhan, China) for 1 h at RT. At last, the cells were sealed by Antifade Mounting Medium (BOSTER Biological Technology, USA) with 0.1% DAPI (Thermo Science, Waltham, MA) and observed under a laser scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM710, Germany).

Western blotting

HCT-8 cells were stimulated with sporozoite at a ratio of 1:2 (sporozoite:cell). After stimulation with sporozoite for 2 h, HCT-8 cells were thoroughly rinsed with fresh medium, cultured and collected at 0 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 18 h, and 24 h. Cells were pretreated with ERK inhibitor and P38 inhibitor for 1 h and stimulated with sporozoite (sporozoite:cell = 1:2) for 12 h; miR-26a-mimic, miR-26a-inhibitor, miR-30a-mimic, miR-30a-inhibitor and ssRNA (negative control) (Ribobio, Guangzhou, China) were transfected into HCT-8 cells for 24 h, and the cells were stimulated with sporozoite (sporozoite:cell = 1:2) for 12 h.

All the samples were lysed by the Whole Cell Lysis Assay (KeyGENBioTECH, Jiangsu, China) to extract proteins, and the concentration was determined by the Pierce BCA Assay (Thermo Science, Waltham, MA). Equal amounts of protein were resolved to either 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked in 5% skimmed milk (solution TBST) for 2 h and then incubated overnight with primary rabbit antibodies anti-phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204), p44/42 MAPK (ERK1/2), anti-phospho-P38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182), anti-P38 MAPK, anti-phospho-SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185), anti-SAPK/JNK, anti-p62, anti-GAPDH, anti-Beclin1 and anti-LC3 (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA). After washing, membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000; Proteintech, Wuhan, China) for 1 h at RT. Protein bands were visualized by chemiluminescent detection (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, USA). Quantification of western blotting bands was performed using Image J software (NIH, USA) analysis.

Cells and parasite growth detection

HCT-8 cells were seeded in six-well plates (2 × 106 cells/well). The cells were divided into two groups. For one group, miR-26a-mimic, miR-26a-inhibitor, miR-30a-mimic, miR-30a-inhibitor and ssRNA (negative control) were transfected into the cells for 24 h and stimulated with sporozoites (sporozoite:cell = 1:2) for 24 h. For the other group, cells were treated with rapamycin (1 μM), 3-MA (1 mM, Selleckchem, USA), LY3214996 or SB203580 for 1 h before being challenged with sporozoites (sporozoite:cell = 1:2) for 24 h.

The cells were collected, and the total RNA was extracted using TRIZOL reagent (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China) including chloroform extraction and isopropanol precipitation. Total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, Beijing, China). The proliferation of C. parvum was examined by qPCR. The qPCR reaction was as follows: SYBR Green Master Mix 12.5 μl, primers 1 μl, cDNA 2 μl and ddH2O 8.5 μl. The primers for qPCR were as follows: Cp18S-1604F (5’-CCT ACG GAA ACC TTG TTA CGA-3’) and Cp18S-1943R (5′-AGT TTT AGG CAA TAA CAG GTC-3′) (GenBank accession number: NC_006986.1) (C. parvum 18S rRNA) and Hs18S-1246F (5′-ACT CAA CAC GGG AAA CCT CAC-3′) and Hs18S-1645R (5′-AGC TTA TGA CCC GCA CTT ACT GG-3′) (GenBank accession number: NR_003286) (human 18S rRNA). PCR was performed on a qTOWER 2.0 (Analytik Jena, Germany) with the following program: 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s and 60 °C for 30 s, with a final step at 70 °C to 95 °C for melting curves.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as mean ± SD. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test or two-way ANOVA assay with the Bonferroni test. All graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, CA, USA). P < 0.05 was considered significant (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). P ≥ 0.05 was considered not significant.

Results

Autophagy occurred in HCT-8 cells infected with C. parvum

To confirm whether autophagy occurred in HCT-8 cells infected with C. parvum, the expression levels of Beclin1, LC3 and p62 were detected using western blotting. The results showed that the expression levels of Beclin1 gradually increased from 0 to 24 h post-C. parvum infection. The expression levels of LC3 increased gradually from 0 to 8 h, downregulated at 12 h and increased again from 18 to 24 h post-C. parvum infection. The expression levels of p62 showed no change from 0 to 8 h but increased after 12 h post-C. parvum infection. The results indicated that C. parvum induced autophagy in HCT-8 cells within 8 h, but inhibited autophagy from 12 to 24 h (Fig. 1A–D). To further detect cellular autophagy in C. parvum-stimulated HCT-8 cells, the accumulation of autophagosomes was examined. The results showed that C. parvum caused the accumulation of LC3 in HCT-8 cells (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). To investigate the roles of autophagy in C. parvum proliferation, the inhibitor (3-MA) and inducer (Rapamycin) of autophagy were used in HCT-8 cells infected with C. parvum (Fig. 1E, F). Treatment with rapamycin or 3-MA did not influence the number of HCT-8 cells. The numbers of C. parvum were decreased in HCT-8 cells treated with rapamycin (0.68-fold) while increased in the cells treated with 3-MA (2.02-fold). The data suggested that host cell autophagy could initially inhibit C. parvum proliferation, while C. parvum inhibited autophagy from 12 to 24 h post-infection to promote parasite survival.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Autophagy occurred in HCT-8 cells infected with C. parvum HCT-8 cells, which were infected with C. parvum sporozoites for 0–24 h. The cellular samples were then analyzed by western blotting with rabbit anti-LC3, anti-Beclin1, anti-p62 and anti-GAPDH antibodies (A). The results were further analyzed by grayscale analysis from four independent experiments (B–D). HCT-8 cells were pretreated with rapamycin (1 μM) and 3-MA (1 mM). Parasite numbers (E) and cell numbers (F) were quantified by using qPCR assays at 24 h post-transfection infected with C. parvum sporozoites. A one-way ANOVA assay with the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test was used for analyzing data. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ns = no significant differences)

Full size image

Cryptosporidium parvum inhibited autophagy of HCT-8 cell by regulating miR-26a and miR-30a expression

To clarify the mechanism by which C. parvum inhibited autophagy in HCT-8 cells, four miRNAs related to autophagy (miR-23a, miR-375, miR-26a and miR-30a) were examined at 12 h-24 h post-C. parvum infection using qPCR. The results revealed that C. parvum was involved in regulating the expression of the four miRNAs (Fig. 2A–D). However, only miR-26a and miR-30a expression was increased from 12 to 24 h post-C. parvum infection (Fig. 2C, D), which was consistent with the expression trend of autophagy proteins. These results suggested that C. parvum-regulated miR-26a and miR-30a might be involved in controlling autophagy in HCT-8 cells. To further confirm the roles of C. parvum-regulated miR-26a and miR-30a in autophagy, the expression levels of Beclin1, LC3 and p62 were detected in HCT-8 cells treated with the mimics or inhibitors of miR-26a and miR-30a. Although the miR-26a inhibitor resulted in a decrease in LC3 and Beclin1 expression while an increase in p62 expression, the difference was not significant. After the cells were transfected with miR-26a-mimic, no differential expression was observed for Beclin1. The expression of p62 was inhibited while LC3 was increased (Fig. 3A–D), which indicated that miR-26a could induce autophagy in HCT-8 cells infected with C. parvum. Moreover, the miR-30a inhibitor increased LC3 and Beclin1 expression (Fig. 3E–H), suggesting that miR-30a prevented autophagy in HCT-8 cells infected with C. parvum. In addition, treatment with miR-26a-mimic or miR-30a inhibitor promoted the accumulation of LC3 in HCT-8 cells (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). To further study the effect of C. parvum on miR-26a and miR-30a expression, miR-26a or miR-30a mimics were transfected into HCT-8 cells. Cryptosporidium parvum reduced the expression of miR-26a-mimic-induced miR-26a (0.47-fold) but increased the expression of miR-30a-mimic-promoted miR-30a (1.51-fold). These results suggested that C. parvum suppressed miR-26a expression and promoted miR-30a expression to downregulate autophagy levels.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The expression of miR-23a, miR-375, miR-26a and miR-30a was detected in HCT-8 cells during C. parvum infection. HCT-8 cells were infected by C. parvum sporozoites. MiRNAs (miR-23a, miR-375, miR-26a and miR-30a) were examined at 12 h, 18 h and 24 h after C. parvum infection by qPCR. No infection group was the blank control. All these miRNAs were differentially expressed at different time points (A–D). Two-way ANOVA assay with Bonferroni test was used for analyzing data. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ns = no significant differences)

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Cryptosporidium parvum inhibited autophagy of HCT-8 cell by regulating miR-26a and miR-30a expression. MiR-26a-mimic, miR-26a-inhibitor, miR-30a-mimic, miR-30a-inhibitor or ssRNA (negative control) was transfected into HCT-8 cells, and the cells were infected with C. parvum sporozoites at 24 h post-transfection. The protein samples were collected after 12 h infection and analyzed by western blotting with rabbit anti-LC3, anti-Beclin1, anti-p62 and anti-GAPDH antibodies (A, E). The results were further analyzed by grayscale analysis from three independent experiments (B–D, F–H). miR-26a-mimic, miR-30a-mimic or ssRNA (negative control) was transfected into HCT-8 cells, and the cells were infected with C. parvum sporozoites at 24 h post-transfection. The expression of miR-26a and miR-30a was detected using qPCR. A one-way ANOVA assay with Tukey-Kramer post hoc test was used for analyzing data. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ns = no significant differences)

Full size image

MiR-26a induced autophagy in HCT-8 cells by inhibiting ERK and P38 signaling

Previous studies suggest that miR-30a can directly target autophagy proteins [34]. To further explore the specific mechanism of miR-26a-regulated autophagy, the phosphorylation of MAPK signaling in HCT-8 cells infected by C. parvum was detected using western blotting. The results showed that C. parvum activated ERK and P38 MAPK signaling pathways. The phosphorylation levels of ERK gradually increased from 0 to 8 h but were not increased so high at 12 h. The phosphorylation levels of P38 MAPK were elevated from 2 to 24 h post-C. parvum infection. However, no phosphorylated JNK was detectable in HCT-8 cells (Fig. 4A–C). Next, the roles of miR-26a in the phosphorylation of ERK and P38 MAPK were analyzed. Cryptosporidium parvum-induced phosphorylation of ERK and P38 MAPK was significantly inhibited in HCT-8 cells by miR-26a-mimic (Fig. 5A–C). However, the phosphorylation of P38 and ERK was not significantly changed in HCT-8 cells treated with the miR-26a inhibitor. Subsequently, the relationship between ERK/P38 pathways and autophagy was examined. The results revealed that treatment with ERK inhibitor LY3214996 or P38 inhibitor SB203580 promoted the production of Beclin1 or LC3 and the accumulation of LC3 in HCT-8 cells (Fig. 5D–F, Additional file 1: Fig. S1). However, the production of p62 was not significantly changed (Fig. 5G). These data indicated that miR-26a could induce autophagy by inhibiting ERK and P38 signaling in HCT-8 cells infected with C. parvum.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Cryptosporidium parvum activated MAPK signaling pathway in HCT-8 cells. HCT-8 cells were stimulated with C. parvum sporozoites from 0 to 24 h, cell lysates were used for western blotting using the rabbit anti-p-ERK, anti-ERK, anti-p-P38 MAPK, anti-P38 MAPK, anti-p-JNK and anti-JNK (A). The results were further analyzed by grayscale analysis from three independent experiments (B, C). A one-way ANOVA assay with Tukey-Kramer post hoc test was used for analyzing data. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001)

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

MiR-26a-induced autophagy in HCT-8 cells infected with C. parvum via p38 and ERK signaling. HCT-8 cells were transfected with miR-26a-mimic, miR-26a-inhibitor or ssRNA (negative control) and were infected with C. parvum sporozoites at 24 h post-transfection. Protein samples were collected at 12 h post infection and were analyzed by western blotting (A). The results were further analyzed by grayscale analysis from three independent experiments (B, C). HCT-8 cells were treated with ERK inhibitor LY3214996 (1 μM) and P38 inhibitor SB203580 (5 μM) for 1 h and then were infected with C. parvum sporozoites. The protein samples were collected at 12 h post infection and were detected by western blotting (D). The results were further analyzed by grayscale analysis from three independent experiments (E–G). A one-way ANOVA assay with Tukey-Kramer post hoc test was used for analyzing data. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments (*P < 0.05, ns = no significant differences)

Full size image

MiR-26a, miR-30a and ERK/P38 signaling regulated the proliferation of C. parvum in HCT-8 cells

To investigate the roles of miR-26a, miR-30a and ERK/P38 signaling in C. parvum proliferation, miR-26a-mimic or miR-26a-inhibitor, miR-30a-mimic or miR-30a-inhibitor, ERK inhibitor LY3214996 and P38 inhibitor SB203580 were used. Treatment with these inducers or inhibitors did not influence the number of HCT-8 cells (Fig. 6B, D, F). Transfection with miR-30a-mimic increased the number of C. parvum (4.02-fold) and transfection with miR-26a-mimic decreased the number of C. parvum (0.32-fold), whereas treatment with miR-26a-inhibitor and miR-30a inhibitor did not influence the number of C. parvum (Fig. 6A, C). Treatments with LY3214996 or SB203580 reduced the number of C. parvum to 0.25 times and 0.45 times compared with the control group (Fig. 6E). These results suggested that miR-26a inhibited while miR-30a or ERK/P38 signaling promoted C. parvum proliferation in HCT-8 cells.

Fig. 6
figure 6

MiR-26a, miR-30a, ERK signaling and P38 signaling regulated C. parvum proliferation in HCT-8 cells. HCT-8 cells were transfected with miR-30a-mimic, miR-30a-inhibitor, miR-26a-mimic or miR-26a-inhibitor and were infected with C. parvum sporozoites for 24 h. Parasite numbers (A, C) and cell numbers (B, D) were quantified by using qPCR assays. HCT-8 cells were incubated with ERK inhibitor LY3214996 (1 μM) or P38 inhibitor SB203580 (5 μM) for 1 h before being challenged with C. parvum sporozoites for 24 h. Parasite numbers (E) and cell numbers (F) were quantified by using qPCR assays. A one-way ANOVA assay with the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test was used for analyzing data. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001)

Full size image

Discussion

Autophagy degrades lysosomes and recycles cytosolic components to keep cells homeostatic and is also involved in the capture and elimination of parasites. Treatment with DHA (an autophagy inducer) reduced the number of T. gondii in macrophages [35]. Rapamycin reduced the heart damage induced by T. cruzi by promoting cell autophagy [36]. Similarly, the present study revealed that promoting HCT-8 cell autophagy inhibited the proliferation of C. parvum. However, parasites are also able to inhibit autophagy or induce incomplete autophagy, which provides favorable conditions for parasite growth. Trypanosoma cruzi induced incomplete autophagy of cells, which was manifested in increased accumulation of LC3 and p62 [37]. Toxoplasma gondii prevented autophagy-mediated clearance by activating host EGFR signaling [38]. Our study showed that autophagy occurred initially in HCT-8 cells, which was inhibited from 12 to 24 h post-C. parvum infection to benefit parasite survival.

Several microRNAs were involved in response to C. parvum infection. Cryptosporidium parvum upregulated miR-942-5p expression and downregulated miR-181d expression in HCT-8 cells through TLR2/TLR4-NF-κB signaling [39, 40]. Twenty miRNAs, which are involved in cell apoptosis and immune responses, were differentially expressed in human intestinal epithelial cells after C. parvum infection [31]. We speculated that C. parvum regulated autophagy in HCT-8 cells via inducing miRNA expression. Thus, miR-26a, miR-30a, miR-23a and miR-375, which were related to the regulation of autophagy, were measured in HCT-8 cells stimulated with C. parvum. The present data showed that the expression of the four miRNAs was altered by C. parvum infection in HCT-8 cells. Only miR-26a and miR-30a expressions were consistent with the expression trend of autophagy proteins, suggesting that the two miRNAs might play major roles in regulating host cell autophagy.

A previous study revealed that lncRNA OTUD6B-AS1 promoted autophagy in triple-negative breast cancer cells by regulation of the miR-26a/MTDH pathway [41]. Rapamycin promoted autophagy dependent on the miR-26a-5p/DAPK1 pathway in glioma cells [42]. MiR-26a enhanced autophagy to protect against ethanol-induced acute liver injury [24]. Similarly, our study revealed that miR-26a promoted HCT-8 cell autophagy during C. parvum infection. However, MiR‑30a mitigated autophagy in renal ischemia/reperfusion injury [43]. C‑Myc promoted miR‑30a‑5p transcription to inhibit senescent cardiomyocyte autophagy [44]. In the present study, C. parvum-induced miR‑30a also inhibited HCT-8 cell autophagy. We found that C. parvum inhibited miR-26a-mimic-induced miR-26a expression and promoted miR-30a-mimic-induced miR-26a. HCT-8 cell autophagy was inhibited from 12 to 24 h post-C. parvum infection. Thus, these findings revealed that C. parvum inhibited miR-26a expression and promoted miR-30a expression to inhibit autophagy.

What could the mechanism of regulation autophagy by miR-26a and miR-30a be in HCT-8 cells infected with C. parvum? It is noted that miR-30a targeted Beclin-1 to inactivate autophagy in gastrointestinal stromal tumor cells [45]. miR-30a targeted ATG5 and attenuated autophagy in lung epithelial cells [34]. These results indicated that miR-30a could inhibit autophagy by targeting autophagy proteins, suggesting that C. parvum-induced miR-30a directly prevented autophagy in HCT-8 cells.

However, miR-26a induced autophagy in triple-negative breast cancer cells via the MTDH pathway and miR-26a induced autophagy in glioma cells via the DAPK1 pathway [41, 42], suggesting that miR-26a might indirectly inhibit autophagy. Meanwhile, a previous study showed that miR-26a might upregulate the expression of HIF-1a by activating the ERK pathway in BMECs [46]. MiR-26a overexpression or knockdown modulated the activity of P38 MAPK in EPCs. Interestingly, we also found that C. parvum infection induced the phosphorylation of ERK and P38 in HCT-8 cells, and the phosphorylation levels of ERK and P38 were reduced in miR-26a-mimic-treated cells infected with C. parvum. The combined treatment of BCL2L1 inhibitor and BCL2 inhibitor induced autophagy via NOX4/ROS/P38 MAPK axis [47]. However, P38 signaling may inhibit hunger-induced autophagy through the Atg5 protein [48]. Mouse embryonic palatal cells triggered autophagy through the ROS/ERK signaling pathway to avoid cell damage caused by nicotine [49]. Sulfated alginate oligosaccharide exerted autophagy induction by inactivating MEK1/ERK/mTOR signaling in osteosarcoma [50]. Ganoderma applanatum polysaccharide could promote the autophagy of MCF-7 cells by upregulating ERK phosphorylation or downregulating P38 MAPK and JNK phosphorylation [22]. These data revealed the roles of P38 or ERK signaling in autophagy were different in different cells. In this study, C. parvum-caused autophagy levels were increased in HCT-8 cells after treatment with P38 or ERK inhibitor, and miR-26a induced autophagy by inhibiting P38 and ERK signaling.

MiR-26a targeted EphA2 to resist intracellular Listeria monocytogenes in macrophages [51]. MiR-26a inhibited feline herpesvirus 1 replication by targeting SOCS5 and promoting type I interferon signaling [52]. Similarly, promoting miR-26a expression inhibited C. parvum proliferation. MiR-30a modulates type I interferon responses to facilitate coxsackievirus b3 replication by targeting tripartite motif protein 25, whereas miR-30a-5p can inhibit duck enteritis virus replication by reducing autophagy by targeting Beclin-1 [17]. In this study, promoting miR-30a expression increased C. parvum proliferation by inhibiting autophagy. Besides, ERK and P38 MAPK were involved in mediating NET formation during C. parvum invasion [32]. P38 signaling promoted N. caninum proliferation, but ERK signaling inhibited N. caninum infection in macrophages [53, 54]. However, the roles of the MAPK signaling pathway in host defense against C. parvum in intestinal epithelial cells have not been investigated. Our research further complemented the functional role of ERK and P38 in promoting C. parvum proliferation via suppressing autophagy.

Conclusions

Taken together, the present study indicated that autophagy occurred and inhibited C. parvum proliferation in HCT-8 cells, whereas C. parvum inhibited miR-26a expression and promoted miR-30a expression to inhibit autophagy for parasite survival. Besides, miR-26a could induce autophagy by inhibiting ERK and P38 signaling in HCT-8 cells. These findings indicated that the downregulation of miR-26a, upregulation of miR-30a, and ERK and P38 MAPK activation in host cells induced by C. parvum-inhibited autophagy, which was required for parasite survival. This provides novel therapeutic targets for C. parvum infection.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

HCT-8:

Human colon adenocarcinoma HCT-8 cell line

miRNA:

MicroRNA

MAPK:

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

PBS:

Phosphate balanced solution

qPCR:

Quantitative real-time PCR

mRNA:

Messenger ribonucleic acid

PVDF:

Polyvinylidene fluoride

BSA:

Albumin from bovine serum

DAPI:

4’,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole

cDNA:

Complementary deoxyribonucleic acid

SDS-PAGE:

Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

TBST:

Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20

References

  1. Khan A, Shaik JS, Grigg ME. Genomics and molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium species. Acta Trop. 2018;184:1–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Laurent F, Lacroix-Lamandé S. Innate immune responses play a key role in controlling infection of the intestinal epithelium by Cryptosporidium. Int J Parasitol. 2017;47:711–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Feng Y, Ryan UM, Xiao L. Genetic diversity and population structure of Cryptosporidium. Trends Parasitol. 2018;34:997–1011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryan U, Zahedi A, Feng Y, Xiao L. An update on zoonotic Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in humans. Animals. 2021;11:3307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ryan U, Fayer R, Xiao L. Cryptosporidium species in humans and animals: current understanding and research needs. Parasitology. 2014;141:1667–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boulter-Bitzer JI, Lee H, Trevors JT. Molecular targets for detection and immunotherapy in Cryptosporidium parvum. Biotechnol Adv. 2007;25:13–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Thomson S, Hamilton CA, Hope JC, Katzer F, Mabbott NA, Morrison LJ, et al. Bovine cryptosporidiosis: impact, host-parasite interaction and control strategies. Vet Res. 2017;48:42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arnold SLM, Choi R, Hulverson MA, Schaefer DA, Vinayak S, Vidadala RSR, et al. Necessity of bumped kinase inhibitor gastrointestinal exposure in treating Cryptosporidium infection. J Infect Dis. 2017;216:55–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hulverson MA, Choi R, Vidadala RSR, Whitman GR, Vidadala VN, Ojo KK, et al. Pyrrolopyrimidine bumped kinase inhibitors for the treatment of cryptosporidiosis. ACS Infect Dis. 2021;7:1200–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Manjunatha UH, Vinayak S, Zambriski JA, Chao AT, Sy T, Noble CG, et al. A Cryptosporidium PI(4)K inhibitor is a drug candidate for cryptosporidiosis. Nat. 2017;546:376–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang F, Chen C, Hu J, Su R, Zhang J, Han Z, et al. Molecular mechanism of helicobacter pylori-induced autophagy in gastric cancer. Oncol Lett. 2019;18:6221–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McEwan DG. Host-pathogen interactions and subversion of autophagy. Essays Biochem. 2017;61:687–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dong W, Wang G, Feng J, Li P, Wang R, Lu H, et al. MiR-25 blunts autophagy and promotes the survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by regulating NPC1. iScience. 2022;25:104279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu JZ, Wang YF, Tan XR, Jing HJ. MicroRNAs in autophagy and their emerging roles in crosstalk with apoptosis. Autophagy. 2012;8:873–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Frankel LB, Lund AH. MicroRNA regulation of autophagy. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:2018–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang X, Xu X, Wang W, Yu Z, Wen L, He K, et al. MicroRNA-30a-5p promotes replication of porcine circovirus type 2 through enhancing autophagy by targeting 14-3-3. Arch Virol. 2017;162:2643–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu X, Jia R, Wang M, Chen S, Liu M, Zhu D, et al. Downregulation of microRNA-30a-5p contributes to the replication of Duck enteritis virus by regulating Beclin-1-mediated autophagy. Virol J. 2019;16:144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh AK, Pandey RK, Shaha C, Madhubala R. MicroRNA expression profiling of leishmania donovani-infected host cells uncovers the regulatory role of miR30a-3p in host autophagy. Autophagy. 2016;12:1817–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang YP, Liang ZQ, Gu ZL, Qin ZH. Molecular mechanism and regulation of autophagy. Acta Pharmacol Sin B. 2005;26:1421–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Li W, Zhu J, Dou J, She H, Tao K, Xu H, et al. Phosphorylation of Lamp2a by p38 MAPK couples er stress to chaperone-mediated autophagy. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. He Y, She H, Zhang T, Xu H, Cheng L, Yepes M, et al. P38 MAPK inhibits autophagy and promotes microglial inflammatory responses by phosphorylating ULK1. J Cell Biol. 2018;217:315–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hanyu X, Lanyue L, Miao D, Wentao F, Cangran C, Hui S. Effect of ganoderma applanatum polysaccharides on MAPK/ERK pathway affecting autophagy in breast cancer MCF-7 cells. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;146:353–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang J, Sun P, Chen Y, Yao H, Wang S. Novel 2-phenyloxypyrimidine derivative induces apoptosis and autophagy via inhibiting pi3k pathway and activating MAPK/ERK signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Sci Rep. 2018;8:10923.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Han W, Fu X, Xie J, Meng Z, Gu Y, Wang X, et al. MiR-26a enhances autophagy to protect against ethanol-induced acute liver injury. J Mol Med (Berl). 2015;93:1045–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yao L, Xu B, Li X. Neisseria gonorrhoeae-induced salpingitis is targeted by circular RNA eif3k via miR-139-5p and regulating MAPK/NF-κB signaling pathway to promote apoptosis and autophagy bacterial cells. Microb pathogenesis. 2020;142:104051.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mendonça LSO, Santos JM, Kaneto CM, de Carvalho LD, Lima-Santos J, Augusto DG, et al. Characterization of serum cytokines and circulating microRNAs that are predicted to regulate inflammasome genes in cutaneous leishmaniasis patients. Exp Parasitol. 2020;210:107846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Meira-Strejevitch CS, Pereira IS, Hippólito DDC, Maia MM, Cruz AB, Gava R, et al. Ocular toxoplasmosis associated with up-regulation of miR-155-5p/miR-29c-3p and down-regulation of miR-21-5p/miR-125b-5p. Cytokine. 2020;127:154990.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rojas-Pirela M, Andrade-Alviárez D, Medina L, Castillo C, Liempi A, Guerrero-Muñoz J, et al. MicroRNAs: master regulators in host-parasitic protist interactions. Open Biol. 2022;12:210395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pellegrini E, Palencia A, Braun L, Kapp U, Bougdour A, Belrhali H, et al. Structural basis for the subversion of map kinase signaling by an intrinsically disordered parasite secreted agonist. Structure. 2017;25:16–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hu G, Gong AY, Roth AL, Huang BQ, Ward HD, Zhu G, et al. Release of luminal exosomes contributes to TLR4-mediated epithelial antimicrobial defense. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang C, Liu L, Zhu H, Zhang L, Wang R, Zhang Z, et al. MicroRNA expression profile of HCT-8 cells in the early phase of Cryptosporidium parvum infection. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Muñoz-Caro T, Lendner M, Daugschies A, Hermosilla C, Taubert A. Nadph oxidase, MPO, NE, ERK1/2, p38 MAPK and Ca2+ influx are essential for Cryptosporidium parvum-induced NET formation. Dev Comp Immunol. 2015;52:245–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Arrowood MJ, Sterling CR. Isolation of Cryptosporidium oocysts and sporozoites using discontinuous sucrose and isopycnic percoll gradients. J parasitol. 1987;73:314–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Li BB, Chen YL, Pang F. MicroRNA-30a targets ATG5 and attenuates airway fibrosis in asthma by suppressing autophagy. Inflammation. 2020;43:44–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Choi JW, Lee J, Lee JH, Park BJ, Lee EJ, Shin S, et al. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids prevent Toxoplasma gondii infection by inducing autophagy via AMPK activation. Nutrients. 2019;11:2137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Duque TLA, Cascabulho CM, Oliveira GM, Henriques-Pons A, Menna-Barreto RFS. Rapamycin treatment reduces acute myocarditis induced by Trypanosoma cruzi infection. J Innate Immun. 2019;12:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Onizuka Y, Takahashi C, Uematsu A, Shinjo S, Seto E, Nakajima-Shimada J. Inhibition of autolysosome formation in host autophagy by Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Acta Trop. 2017;170:57–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lopez Corcino Y, Gonzalez Ferrer S, Mantilla LE, Trikeriotis S, Yu JS, Kim S, et al. Toxoplasma gondii induces prolonged host epidermal growth factor receptor signaling to prevent parasite elimination by autophagy: Perspectives for in vivo control of the parasite. Cell Microbiol. 2019;21:e13084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang G, Zhang Y, Niu Z, Wang C, Xie F, Li J, et al. Cryptosporidium parvum upregulates miR-942-5p expression in HCT-8 cells via TLR2/TLR4-NF-κB signaling. Parasite Vector. 2020;13:435.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Feng R, Niu Z, Zhang X, Hou W, Zhang Y, Jian F, et al. Cryptosporidium parvum downregulates miR-181d in HCT-8 cells via the p50-dependent TLRs/NF-κB pathway. Vet Parasitol. 2022;305:109710.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Li PP, Li RG, Huang YQ, Lu JP, Zhang WJ, Wang ZY. LncRNA OTUD6B-AS1 promotes paclitaxel resistance in triple negative breast cancer by regulation of miR-26a-5p/MTDH pathway-mediated autophagy and genomic instability. Aging. 2021;13:24171–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang Z, Wang X, Cheng F, Wen X, Feng S, Yu F, et al. Rapamycin inhibits glioma cells growth and promotes autophagy by miR-26a-5p/DAPK1 axis. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;13:2691–700.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Fang Y, Zou L, He W. MiR-30a-5p mitigates autophagy by regulating the Beclin-1/ATG16 pathway in renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Int J Mol Med. 2021;48:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Xu L, Zhang H, Wang Y, Guo W, Gu L, Yang A, et al. H3k14 hyperacetylation-mediated c-MYC binding to the miR-30a-5p gene promoter under hypoxia postconditioning protects senescent cardiomyocytes from hypoxia/reoxygenation injury. Mol Med Rep. 2021;23:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chen W, Li Z, Liu H, Jiang S, Wang G, Sun L, et al. MicroRNA-30a targets Beclin-1 to inactivate autophagy and sensitizes gastrointestinal stromal tumor cells to imatinib. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:198.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Liang Z, Chi YJ, Lin GQ, Luo SH, Jiang QY, Chen YK. MiRNA-26a promotes angiogenesis in a rat model of cerebral infarction via PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK pathway. Eur Rev Med Pharmaco. 2018;22:3485–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Chiou JT, Lee YC, Wang LJ, Chang LS. Bcl2 inhibitor ABT-199 and BCL2l1 inhibitor WEHI-539 coordinately promote noxa-mediated degradation of MCL1 in human leukemia cells. Chem-Biol Interact. 2022;361:109978.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Keil E, Hocker R, Schuster M, Essmann F, Ueffing N, Hoffman B, et al. Phosphorylation of ATG5 by the GADD45beta-MEKK4-p38 pathway inhibits autophagy. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20:321–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Chen J, Yao Y, Wang Y, Wang X, Peng X, Li T, et al. Autophagy triggered by the ROS/ERK signaling pathway protects mouse embryonic palatal cells from apoptosis induced by nicotine. Environ Sci Pollut R. 2022;29:81909–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Pan Z, Wei XJ, Li SJ, Guo H, Li ZH, Zhang KK, et al. Sulfated alginate oligosaccharide exerts antitumor activity and autophagy induction by inactivating MEK1/ERK/mTOR signaling in a KSR1-dependent manner in osteosarcoma. Oncogenesis. 2022;11:16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang J, Yuan J, Wang L, Zheng Z, Ran H, Liu F, et al. MiR-26a targets epha2 to resist intracellular listeria monocytogenes in macrophages. Mol Immunol. 2020;128:69–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang J, Li Z, Huang J, Yin H, Tian J, Qu L. MiR-26a inhibits feline herpesvirus 1 replication by targeting SOCS5 and promoting type I interferon signaling. Viruses. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12010002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Jin X, Gong P, Zhang X, Li G, Zhu T, Zhang M, et al. Activation of ERK signaling via TLR11 induces IL-12p40 production in peritoneal macrophages challenged by Neospora caninum. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Jin X, Gong P, Li G, Zhang X, Li J. The p38 MAPK inhibitor, SB203580, inhibits cell invasion by Neospora caninum. Parasitol Res. 2017;116:813–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 31872465, 31972704) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (no. 2017YFD0501305). The experiments conducted in this study comply with the current laws of China.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Heng Jiang and Xu Zhang contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases, Key Laboratory for Zoonosis Research of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Zoonosis and College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, 130062, China

    Heng Jiang, Xu Zhang, Xin Li, Xiaocen Wang, Nan Zhang, Pengtao Gong, Xichen Zhang & Jianhua Li

  2. The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, Jilin, China

    Yanhui Yu

Authors
  1. Heng Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaocen Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Pengtao Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xichen Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yanhui Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jianhua Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HJ, JL and XZ drafted the main manuscript and performed the data analysis; HJ, NZ and PG planned and performed experiments; JL, XCW and XL were responsible for experimental design; JL, XCZ and YHY responsible for guiding and supporting the experiments and manuscript revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yanhui Yu or Jianhua Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

MiR-26a, miR-30a, ERK and P38 regulated the accumulation of the EGFP-LC3 in HCT8 cells. EGFP-LC3 and miR-26a-mimic or miR-30a-inhibitor were transfected into HCT-8 cells for 24 h, and then the cells were challenged with C. parvum sporozoites for 12 h. Besides, after being transfected with EGFP-LC3 for 24 h, HCT-8 cells were incubated with ERK inhibitor LY3214996 (1 μM) or P38 inhibitor SB203580 (5 μM) for 1 h and were challenged with C. parvum sporozoites for 12 h. The accumulation of the EGFP-LC3 was observed by immunofluorescence. Red fluorescence = C. parvum (594), green fluorescence = LC3, and DAPI (blue) was used to stain nuclear DNA (Scale bar=5 µm).

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

Cryptosporidium parvum and HCT-8 cells. A Purified oocysts. B Sporozoites. C HCT-8 cells. D HCT-8 cells were stimulated with sporozoite at a ratio of 1:2, and the cells were observed by immunofluorescence. The sporozoites were green (green arrow, C. parvum virus capsid antibody), and the nucleus was blue (blue arrow).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, H., Zhang, X., Li, X. et al. Cryptosporidium parvum regulates HCT-8 cell autophagy to facilitate survival via inhibiting miR-26a and promoting miR-30a expression. Parasites Vectors 15, 470 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05606-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05606-y

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us