Skip to main content
Download PDF

The microsporidian polar tube: origin, structure, composition, function, and application

Parasites & Vectors volume 16, Article number: 305 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Microsporidia are a class of obligate intracellular parasitic unicellular eukaryotes that infect a variety of hosts, even including humans. Although different species of microsporidia differ in host range and specificity, they all share a similar infection organelle, the polar tube, which is also defined as the polar filament in mature spores. In response to the appropriate environmental stimulation, the spore germinates with the polar filament everted, forming a hollow polar tube, and then the infectious cargo is transported into host cells via the polar tube. Hence, the polar tube plays a key role in microsporidian infection. Here, we review the origin, structure, composition, function, and application of the microsporidian polar tube, focusing on the origin of the polar filament, the structural differences between the polar filament and polar tube, and the characteristics of polar tube proteins. Comparing the three-dimensional structure of PTP6 homologous proteins provides new insight for the screening of additional novel polar tube proteins with low sequence similarity in microsporidia. In addition, the interaction of the polar tube with the spore wall and the host are summarized to better understand the infection mechanism of microsporidia. Due to the specificity of polar tube proteins, they are also used as the target in the diagnosis and prevention of microsporidiosis. With the present findings, we propose a future study on the polar tube of microsporidia.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Microsporidia are a class of obligate intracellular parasitic unicellular eukaryotes. In the mid-nineteenth century, Nosema bombycis was first identified as the pathogen causing severe Pébrine disease in silkworms [1]. Initially, microsporidia were classified as protists [2]. With the phylogenetic analysis of the conserved gene (α-tubulin, β-tubulin, RNA polymerase II, heat shock protein 70), data have confirmed that microsporidia are a clade or sister group to fungi [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].

Microsporidia have a wide range of hosts, including invertebrates, vertebrates, and even humans [14]. Approximately half of all animal phyla have been reported to be infected with microsporidia [15]. The wide host range enables microsporidia to obtain more survival resources and opportunities [16,17,18]. More than 200 genera and 1700 species of microsporidia have been identified, 17 of which are known to infect humans, including Anncaliia connori, Anncaliia algerae, Anncaliia vesicularum, Enterocytozoon bieneusi, Encephalitozoon cuniculi, Encephalitozoon hellem, Encephalitozoon intestinalis, Pleistophora sp., Pleistophora ronneafiei, Trachipleistophora anthropophthera, Trachipleistophora hominis, Tubulinosema acridophagus, Vittaforma corneae, Nosema ocularum, Endoreticulatus sp., Microsporidium africanum, and Microsporidium ceylonensis [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Although human-infecting microsporidia were generally thought to infect immunocompromised patients, they have now been reported in immunocompetent individuals as well [23, 26,27,28].

Microsporidia differ in host range and host specificity; however, they all have a unique infection organelle, the polar tube, which is also defined as the polar filament in mature spores. In response to the appropriate environmental stimulation, the spore germinates with the polar filament everted, like a reversed finger of a glove, forming a hollow polar tube [29, 30]. The ejection process of the polar filament is so rapid that Encephalitozoon species take less than 500 ms for polar filament firing and passing of the infectious cargo through the polar tube, while the velocity of A. algerae emerging in the polar tube is up to 300 µm/s, with only 1.6 s required for the entire process [31]. Finally, the infectious sporoplasm is transported into the host cell to complete the microsporidian invasion [32]. However, the process by which the polar tube mediates the sporoplasm entry into host cells is still unclear. Currently, two phenomena have been observed: one in which the polar tube penetrates the host cell membrane to directly deliver the infectious sporoplasm into the host [33, 34], and the other wherein the polar tube attaches to the host cell membrane, forming invasive synapses to create a protected microenvironment for the sporoplasm, after which the sporoplasm is transported into the host cells by endocytosis [35]. Therefore, the polar tube plays an important role in microsporidian infection.

The polar tube is mainly composed of polar tube proteins (PTPs). With the development of proteomics technology, an increasing number of potential PTPs have been successfully identified [36], which lays a foundation for further research on the infection mechanism of microsporidia. In this paper, we review the origin, structure, composition, function, and application of the microsporidian polar tube in recent years, and provide new insights into the study of this unique infection organelle.

Origin

In general, the life cycle of microsporidia is divided into three stages: infective phase, proliferative phase, and sporogonic phase [37,38,39]. Microsporidian development starts with mature spores and ends with mature spores. Mature spore germination initiates the infective phase. One of the most widely accepted hypotheses regarding microsporidian germination is that under a series of stimuli, the water from the environment flows into mature spores to increase the intracellular osmotic pressure, which results in the disordering of the polaroplasts and swelling of the posterior vacuole, pushing the discharged polar filament. There are many factors (such as temperature, ultraviolet radiation, pH, metal ions, digestive enzymes, and so on) that trigger this germination process [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. Next, the infectious sporoplasm transported into host cells begins the proliferative phase, which is the first stage of microsporidian intracellular parasitic life. The initial merogony division produces multiple merozoites, which transform into the sporont by binary fission or multiple fission. Then the spore wall begins to gradually thicken outside the plasma membrane, indicating the entry of the sporogonic stage. In this phase, the sporont undergoes binary fission to form a sporoblast, which finally develops as mature spores. The formation of the extrusion apparatus, involving the polar filament, polaroplast, and posterior vacuole, usually begins during this period. Finally, mature spores are released from the infected host to begin the next new life cycle [37].

Microsporidia do not have the typical Golgi complex (GC), but rather a GC-like structure, which is considered as clusters of vesicles derived from a nuclear envelope and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in the early proliferate stage [50, 51]. And it was thought to be 300-nm networks of thin branching or varicose tubules in the late sporoblasts and young mature spores of Paranosema grylli and Paranosema locustae [51, 52]. The polar filament considered to originate from the GC-like structure was first observed in the early sporoblast [30, 52, 53]. Thiamine pyrophosphatase (TPPase), a histochemical marker of the GC, was found on the membranes and the high-electron-dense region of the polar filament in the fish microsporidium Glugea stephani, suggesting that the GC-like structure was indeed associated with the polar filament formation [53]. In addition, the ER is thought to participate in polar filament formation. It was found the signal of nucleoside diphosphatase (NDPase), a histochemical marker of ER, was in the core and outer sheath of the polar filament in G. stephani [54]. Weidner [55] suggested that the central core of the polar filament was from the GC-like structure vesicles, whereas the outer envelope was derived from the ER. Hence, the end of the tubular vesicle of the ER containing high-electron-dense material may be transported to the GC-like structure to gradually develop the extrusion apparatus [37].

The formation of the polar filament is a relatively complex process, and a hypothesis has been proposed for microsporidian polar filament formation (Fig. 1A–F). Firstly, electron-dense vesicles appear close to the nucleus (Fig. 1A), like the matrix-arranged clusters of small vesicles (CsVm) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as the “ER-to-Golgi intermediates” [51, 56, 57]. Then additional vesicles transform into tightly packed short tubules performing as cis-GC in sporonts (Fig. 1B), similar to tubular clusters of small vesicles (CsVt) in S. cerevisiae and vesicular tubular clusters (VTCs) in mammalian cells [51, 56, 57]. With the development of microsporidia, the tubular network (TN) becomes more prominent (Fig. 1C). In addition, the PTPs are synthesized and then are concentrated and modified in the TN [52, 58]. The PTPs gradually accumulate at the edge of the TN to connect with it, forming the core and envelope of the polar filament (Fig. 1D) [52]. Finally, the polar filament is gradually assembled into layers (Fig. 1E, F) [37], depending on its maturity [30, 59].

Fig. 1
figure 1

The hypothesis of the formation process of the microsporidian polar filament. A In the early proliferate stages, the GC-like structure (G) is considered as clusters of vesicles derived from the nucleus (N) and endoplasmic reticulum (ER). B The GC-like structure gradually appears as tubules. C With the tubular network (TN) formed, the PTPs are concentrated and modified in the TN and gradually accumulate at its edge. D With the assembly of PTPs, the core and envelope of the polar filaments are first formed. E, F They further develop into layers to develop mature polar filaments

Full size image

Structure

The study of the polar filament structure began in 1960 [49]. The polar filament is composed of two parts: the anterior end is a vertical linear region (the manubrium portion), attached through an anchoring disc and surrounded by the polaroplast, and the other part is the helical region to protect the nucleus at the mid-posterior part of the mature spore [50]. The spiral number of polar filaments usually varies from four to 30 coils, depending on the microsporidian species [30, 31, 50, 60]. The polar filament is a right-handed helix packed at a special angle relative to the anterior–posterior (A–P) axis of the spore, which is 45° ± 10° in A. algerae and 37° ± 12° in Enc. hellem. This handedness may arise from the composition of polar filaments (such as PTPs) or the mechanical asymmetry involved in polar tube assembly [31]. The polar filament is composed of multiple concentric layers of different electron densities and thicknesses, mainly including the outer dense area, middle electron–lucent area, and inner dense area [29, 30, 49, 61]. Chioralia et al. [62] observed up to six concentric layers in the coiled region and three layers in the manubrium of the A. algerae polar filament. Kelley et al. [63] applied the waffle method to reveal the macrostructure of the polar filament in Enc. hellem: concentric circles were observed in axial view and cylinders in side view, and 2.5-nm-diameter bumps on the second cylindrical layer of the polar filament. It is widely accepted that the polar filament is located inside the plasma membrane; however, Cali et al. [64] observed the existence of a continuous network of membranes between the polar filament and spore cytoplasm of A. algerae, suggesting that the polar tube might be located outside the plasma membrane.

Under suitable stimulation, the polar filament instantly everts from the thinnest end of the spore wall, forming a hollow polar tube. The length of the extruded polar tube is generally 50–500 µm, which is more than twice the length of the polar filament [33, 47]. The diameter of the polar tube is about 0.1–0.2 µm [47, 65,66,67], and is so elastic that it can be enlarged up to 600 nm to facilitate the traversal of various intracellular cargo [33, 48, 67,68,69]. The polar tube has the following morphological features: tube-within-tube, cylinder, cylinder-within-cylinder, and unassembled PTPs [33, 46, 64]. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo–EM) was first used to observe the polar tube of A. algerae, demonstrating that the PTPs were regularly arranged to form overlapping sheets, and a multilayer concentric ring structure composed of electron-dense membrane-like materials was found in the polar tube [68]. The surface of the polar tube had a row of ridges at intervals of 5–6 nm, rapidly increasing the diameter of the polar tube to transport the cargo. Some fine fibers were observed on the outermost layer of the polar tubes, which might be the glycosylated PTPs. At the tip of the extruded polar tube of A. algerae, a “J”-shaped hook existed [31, 68], which was also found in the extruded polar tube of N. bombycis [70]. During the process of germination, the polar tube first elongated to its maximum length , and then rapidly shortened once the sporoplasm was released [31].

Composition

The key role of the polar tube in microsporidian infection has led to increasing research interest in its composition. A polar tube is composed of proteins, and many polar tube proteins (PTPs) have been reported from microsporidia to date [35, 37, 71,72,73,74]. Taking advantage of the special solubility of the polar tube, Keohane et al. [75] treated the microsporidium Glugea americanus with 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 9 mol/L urea, and 2% dithiothreitol (DTT), and successively isolated four major proteins with molecular weight of 23, 27, 34, and 43 kDa. The monoclonal antibody specifically recognized the 43-kDa protein localized on the microsporidian polar tube [76,77,78,79]. Moreover, this protein contained several cysteine residues at the N-terminal and C-terminal, suggesting that the disulfide bond was important for PTP1 function [72, 75, 80]. Homologous proteins with similar solubility and molecular weight as other microsporidia were also identified and designated as polar tube protein 1 (PTP1) [75, 81, 82]. Moreover, PTP1 is an O-mannosylated glycoprotein. Pretreatment of RK13 cells with mannose was found to reduce the infectivity of the microsporidium Enc. hellem, implying that O-mannosylated PTP1 plays an important role in microsporidian infection [83]. The 35-kDa PTP2 protein was identified by a similar method [82]. PTP2 is more conserved than PTP1 among different microsporidian species, which all have the basic isoelectric point, high lysine content, and conserved cysteine residue sites [82, 84]. Interestingly, the ptp1 and ptp2 gene loci of different microsporidia are adjacent, and their neighbor genes are also relatively conserved in N. bombycis, N. ceranae, Enc. hellem, Enc. intestinalis, and so on [82, 84, 85]. PTP3 was screened from a complementary DNA (cDNA) library of Enc. cuniculi. The molecular weight of PTP3 is approximately 150 kDa. Unlike PTP1 and PTP2, PTP3 only dissolves in the presence of SDS [73]. Moreover, EcPTP1, EcPTP2, and EcPTP3 formed a large protein complex by cross-linkers, and EcPTP3 could interact not only with itself but also with EcPTP1 and EcPTP2 [86]. Hence, PTP3 has been hypothesized to act as a scaffolding protein for polar tube formation [73, 86].

With the development of proteomics technology, novel PTPs have increasingly been screened and identified. In 2017, EhPTP4 was identified from Enc. hellem [35]. Unlike the previous three PTPs, EhPTP4 was specifically localized at the tip of the extruded polar tube and interacted with the special transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) on the host cell membrane [35]. By comparing the sequence characteristics of PTP1–PTP4 from the genus Encephalitozoon, we found that the homologous PTPs have many common features (Table 1). Lv et al. first identified NbPTP6 from N. bombycis, which was rich in histidine and serine. Similar to EhPTP4, NbPTP6 could bind with the host cell surface, suggesting that the potential interaction receptor of NbPTP6 is present on the host cell membrane to promote microsporidian infection [74]. Recently, the polar filament and polar tube were isolated and purified from N. bombycis. For the analysis of the proteomic composition of these two structures, the candidate PTPs were screened to provide a reference for the identification of novel PTPs [36]. Although the more novel PTPs are screened, the sequence identity of PTPs from different microsporidia is so low that it hinders the finding of homologous proteins by blastp (protein–protein BLAST [Basic Local Alignment Search Tool]) analysis. The development of AlphaFold provides more possibilities for predicting the three-dimensional structure of proteins. Although amino acid sequence identity among the PTP6 homologous proteins from five different microsporidian species is not high (Fig. 2A), they show a highly conservative spatial structure by AlphaFold2 [87, 88]. The overlap region is concentrated at the 10th to 185th amino acid region of PTP6, whose secondary structure is mainly beta-strand and a small amount of random coil (Fig. 2B). In the future, combining the multiple sequence alignment with the protein structural alignment is a recommended method of exploring more novel homologous PTPs with low sequence similarity among different microsporidian species. However, no PTP structure has been resolved until now. Obtaining more information on the structural characteristics of PTPs provides insights into the evolution and function of these proteins, and also for revealing the PTP assembly on the microsporidian polar tube.

Table 1 Comparison of the sequence characteristics of PTP1–PTP4 from the genus Encephalitozoon
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparison of the predicted PTP6 protein structure among different species of microsporidia by AlphaFold2. A Amino acid sequence alignment was generated with ClustalW (https://www.genome.jp/tools-bin/clustalw) and colored by ESPript 3.0 (https://espript.ibcp.fr/ESPript/cgi-bin/ESPript.cgi). B The PTP6 protein structure model of Enc. cuniculi (GenBank No. AGE95102.1), Enc. hellem (GenBank no. AFM98867.1), Enc. intestinalis (GenBank no. ADM12100.1), N. bombycis (GenBank no. EOB11485.1), and N. ceranae (GenBank no. EEQ82670.1) were predicted by AlphaFold2. The highlighted fluorescent green is the overlap region of PTP6 in different species of microsporidia produced by Chimera 1.16

Full size image

Function

The polar tube acts as a bridge for transporting the infectious cargo into host cells, which is the key function of the polar tube [30, 33, 36, 37, 58, 89, 90]. Live-cell imaging of nuclei transport through the A. algerae polar tube showed that the nuclei were elongated, then recovered a globular shape after exiting the polar tube [31]. Lv et al. labeled the diplokaryons of N. bombycis and also found that they were elongated for transport in the polar tube [70]. However, Takvorian et al. [68] observed some circular diplokaryons surrounded by a membrane forming the oval or sperm-head-shaped structures in the A. algerae polar tube. Therefore, understanding how the nuclei are transported through the polar tube still requires further evidence. The anterior end of the extruded polar tube would form a “J”-shaped hook [68], where the droplet sporoplasm attached to the polar tube for several minutes [33]. In 2019, the interaction between sporoplasm surface protein 1 (EhSSP1) and EhPTP4 was found, contributing to sporoplasm adhesion at the tip of the polar tube [91].

Polar tubes may also interact with host surface proteins. Han et al. [35] analyzed the interaction between EhPTP4 and the host TfR1, which was the first identified host receptor for PTPs. TfR1 recombinant protein and anti-TfR1 antibody had an obvious inhibitory effect on the microsporidian infection rate in TfR1 knockout cells [35]. Moreover, it was also found that mannose-pretreated RK13 cells reduced Enc. hellem infection, implying that O-mannosylated PTP1 might play an important role in interacting with mannose receptors on host cells to promote microsporidian infection [83].

As the outermost structure of mature spores, the spore wall plays an important role in maintaining homeostasis and fixing the polar filament in mature spores. At present, studies on the interaction between the spore wall and polar tube are mainly in the microsporidium N. bombycis. As spore wall proteins, NbSWP5 and NbSWP9 were also reported to be localized on the extruded polar tube [92, 93], and NbSWP5 was found to interact with NbPTP2 and NbPTP3 [93]. Meanwhile, NbSWP9 interacted with NbPTP1, NbPTP2, and NbPTP3, which was considered to be a scaffolding protein to anchor the polar tube fixed to the spore wall for protection of the nucleus in mature spores [92].

Application

As a pathogen with such a broad infection range, microsporidia not only threaten human health, but also cause serious economic losses for the aquaculture industry [94]. Therefore, the diagnosis and control of microsporidia have become an important research target in recent years (Table 2).

Table 2 PTPs as the target application in the diagnosis and control of microsporidia
Full size table

The microscopic examination method for N. bombycis invented by Pasteur is still used in China today, and is a low-cost and simple operation; however, it has great limitations in sensitivity and specificity [95,96,97]. Therefore, PTPs are unique and conserved to utilize as the microsporidian diagnostic target in modern molecular detection methods. With ptp2 as the detection target, Kanitchinda et al. (2020) used recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)–Cas12a fluorescence methods to detect Ent. hepatopenaei in the hepatopancreas tissue of shrimp [98]. Similarly, a SYBR Green I fluorescence quantitative PCR method targeting the ptp2 gene was established which, combined with Fluorescent Brightener 28 staining, could be applied to detect and analyze the quantity of Ent. hepatopenaei in the field shrimp [99]. Lannutti et al. [100] developed a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay targeting the ptp3 gene for rapid detection and monitoring of N. ceranae in honey bees. Due to the length polymorphism and sequence diversity, ptp1 genes have gradually become a good candidate target for analysis of the species type of human-infecting microsporidia (such as Ent. bieneusi and Enc. cuniculi), providing a supplementary method for genotyping [77, 78]. According to a large-scale serosurvey reported, an immune response to the polar tube of Enc. intestinalis appeared in 8% of Dutch blood donors and 5% of pregnant women in France [101]. In this case, the serological diagnostic method of targeting PTPs (based on immunofluorescence antibody staining, enzyme-linked immunoassay [ELISA], and western blotting) is an important tool for studying the pathogenicity and epidemiology of human-infecting microsporidia.

In light of the limited drugs available for treatment (only albendazole and fumagillin are currently approved for microsporidiosis) [102], PTPs have potential importance in the control of microsporidia. Rodriguez Garcia et al. [103] silenced the ptp3 gene expression of N. ceranae in bees by oral administration of ptp3 double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) to achieve microsporidian load reduction, which provided a novel idea for the prevention and control of microsporidia in RNA interference (RNAi) therapy. In addition, human anti-polar tube sera could partially reduce the microsporidium Enc. intestinalis infection in vitro, which was also thought to be a potential microsporidiosis treatment [104].

Conclusion

For one and a half centuries, as the special and unique infection organelle, the polar tube has been the research focus of microsporidia. With the continuous development of proteomics and bioinformatics technology, an increasing number of potential PTPs will be screened, laying the foundation for analyzing the composition of the polar tube. In addition, with the help of cryo-EM technology, the structural characteristics of the polar tube and polar filament are gradually becoming clear. However, many aspects of the microsporidian polar tube are not yet understood. In the future, the study and application of the polar tube can be carried out from the following perspectives (Fig. 3): (1) The polar filament is considered to form in the early sporoblast, but the key factor for activation of the polar filament formation is unclear. (2) To clarify the process of the polar filament transformation into the polar tube, the characteristics of PTP assembly on the polar filament need to be demonstrated. (3) The study of the interaction between the polar tube and host is needed in order to reveal the infection mechanism of microsporidia. (4) Finally, additional novel PTPs can be applied for the diagnosis and control of microsporidia.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Summary. In response to external environmental stimulation, the spore germinates with the polar filament everted, forming a hollow polar tube, and then the infectious cargo is transported to inject into host cells through the polar tube. During this process, the polar tube interacts with both the microsporidian spore wall proteins and host receptors, and there are still many unknown aspects that need to be solved. PT polar tube, PF polar filament, PP polaroplast, PV posterior vacuole, Sp sporoplasm, TfR1 transferrin receptor 1

Full size image

Availability of data and materials

No data were collected for this review. All data and information synthesized in the review are already published and publicly available, and those publications are properly cited in the submission.

Abbreviations

PTPs:

Polar tube proteins

GC:

Golgi complex

Cryo-EM:

Cryo-electron microscopy

TfR1:

Transferrin receptor 1

References

  1. Sazmand A, Bahari A, Papi S, Otranto D. Parasitic diseases of equids in Iran (1931–2020): a literature review. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:586.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Vossbrinck CR, Maddox JV, Friedman S, Debrunner-Vossbrinck BA, Woese CR. Ribosomal RNA sequence suggests microsporidia are extremely ancient eukaryotes. Nature. 1987;326:411–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee SC, Corradi N, Byrnes EJ 3rd, Torres-Martinez S, Dietrich FS, Keeling PJ, et al. Microsporidia evolved from ancestral sexual fungi. Curr Biol. 2008;18:1675–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Keeling PJ, Doolittle WF. Alpha-tubulin from early-diverging eukaryotic lineages and the evolution of the tubulin family. Mol Biol Evol. 1996;13:1297–305.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Keeling PJ, Luker MA, Palmer JD. Evidence from beta-tubulin phylogeny that microsporidia evolved from within the fungi. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;17:23–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirt RP, Logsdon JM, Healy B, Dorey MW, Doolittle WF, Embley TM. Microsporidia are related to fungi: evidence from the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II and other proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:580–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirt RP, Healy B, Vossbrinck CR, Canning EU, Embley TM. A mitochondrial Hsp70 orthologue in Vairimorpha necatrix: molecular evidence that microsporidia once contained mitochondria. Curr Biol. 1997;7:995–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arisue N, Sachez LB, Weiss LM, Muller M, Hashimoto T. Mitochondrial-type hsp70 genes of the amitochondriate protists, Giardia intestinalis, Entamoeba histolytica and two microsporidians. Parasitol Int. 2002;51:9–16.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Germot A, Philippe H, LeGuyader H. Evidence for loss of mitochondria in microsporidia from a mitochondrial-type hsp70 in Nosema locustae. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1997;87:159–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Germot A, Philippe H. Critical analysis of eukaryotic phylogeny: a case study based on the hsp70 family. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1999;46:116–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peyretaillade E, Broussolle V, Peyret P, Metenier G, Gouy M, Vivares CP. Microsporidia, amitochondrial protists, possess a 70-kDa heat shock protein gene of mitochondrial evolutionary origin. Mol Biol Evol. 1998;15:683–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. James TY, Kauff F, Schoch CL, Matheny PB, Hofstetter V, Cox CJ, et al. Reconstructing the early evolution of fungi using a six-gene phylogeny. Nature. 2006;443:818–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Keeling PJ. Congruent evidence from alpha-tubulin and beta-tubulin gene phylogenies for a zygomycete origin of microsporidia. Fungal Genet Biol. 2003;38:298–309.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weiss LM. Clinical syndromes associated with microsporidiosis. In: Weiss LM, Becnell JJ, editors. Microsporidia: pathogens of opportunity, vol. 3. Wiley Blackwell; 2014. p. 371–401.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Murareanu BM, Sukhdeo R, Qu R, Jiang J, Reinke AW. Generation of a microsporidia species attribute database and analysis of the extensive ecological and phenotypic diversity of microsporidia. MBio. 2021;12:e0149021-e.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koehler AV, Springer YP, Randhawa HS, Leung TLF, Keeney DB, Poulin R. Genetic and phenotypic influences on clone-level success and host specialization in a generalist parasite. J Evol Biol. 2012;25:66–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Clavel J, Julliard R, Devictor V. Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization? Front Ecol Environ. 2011;9:222–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lange B, Kaufmann AP, Ebert D. Genetic, ecological and geographic covariables explaining host range and specificity of a microsporidian parasite. J Anim Ecol. 2015;84:1711–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Desportes I, Lecharpentier Y, Galian A, Bernard F, Cochandpriollet B, Lavergne A, et al. Occurrence of a new microsporidan Enterocytozoon bieneusi n. g., n. sp., in the Enterocytes of a human patient with AIDS. J Protozool. 1985;32:250–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Visvesvara GS. In vitro cultivation of microsporidia of clinical importance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:401–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Juarez SI, Putaporntip C, Jongwutiwes S, Ichinose A, Yanagi T, Kanbara H. In vitro cultivation and electron microscopy characterization of Trachipleistophora anthropophthera isolated from the cornea of an AIDS patient. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2005;52:179–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Franzen C, Nassonova FS, Scholmerich J, Issi IV. Transfer of the members of the genus Brachiola (microsporidia) to the genus Anncaliia based on ultrastructural and molecular data. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2006;53:26–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weber R, Bryan RT. Microsporidial infections in immunodeficient and immunocompetent patients. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;19:517–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Didier ES, Didier PJ, Friedberg DN, Stenson SM, Orenstein JM, Yee RW, et al. Isolation and characterization of a new human microsporidian, Encephalitozoon hellem (n. sp.), from 3 AIDS patients with keratoconjunctivitis. J Infect Dis. 1991;163:617–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Han B, Pan GQ, Weiss LM. Microsporidiosis in humans. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2021;34:e0001020.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Didier ES, Weiss LM. Microsporidiosis: Not just in aids patients. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011;24:490–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lewis NL, Francis IC, Hawkins GS, Coroneo MT. Bilateral microsporidial keratoconjunctivitis in an immunocompetent non-contact lens wearer. Cornea. 2003;22:374–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Metge S, Van Nhieu JT, Dahmane D, Grimbert P, Foulet F, Sarfati C, et al. A case of Enterocytozoon bieneusi infection in an HIV-negative renal transplant recipient. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;19:221–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lom J. On the structure of extruded microsporidian polar filament. Z Parasitenk. 1972;38:200–13.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Xu Y, Weiss LM. The microsporidian polar tube: a highly specialised invasion organelle. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35:941–53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Jaroenlak P, Cammer M, Davydov A, Sall J, Usmani M, Liang FX, et al. 3-dimensional organization and dynamics of the microsporidian polar tube invasion machinery. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16:e1008738.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Franzen C. How do microsporidia invade cells? Folia Parasitol (Praha). 2005;52:36–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Weidner E. Ultrastructural study of microsporidian invasion into cells. Z Parasitenk. 1972;40:227–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Takvorian PM, Weiss LM, Cali A. The early events of Brachiola algerae (microsporidia) infection: Spore germination, sporoplasm structure, and development within host cells. Folia Parasitol (Praha). 2005;52:118–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Han B, Polonais V, Sugi T, Yakubu R, Takvorian PM, Cali A, et al. The role of microsporidian polar tube protein 4 (PTP4) in host cell infection. Plos Pathog. 2017;13:e1006341.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Lv Q, Zhou B, Liao H, He X, Chen Y, Pan G, et al. Proteomic profile of polar filament and polar tube from fungal pathogen microsporidium Nosema bombycis provides new insights into its unique invasion organelle. J Proteomics. 2022;263:104617.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Weiss LM, Delbac F, Russell Hayman J, Pan G, Dang X. The microsporidian polar tube and spore wall. In: Weiss LM, Becnell JJ, editors. Microsporidia: pathogens of opportunity, vol. 3. Wiley Blackwell; 2014. p. 261–306.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Canning EU, Hulls RH. A microsporidan infection of Anopheles gambiae Giles, from Tanzania, interpretation of its mode of transmission and notes on Nosema infections in mosquitoes. J Protozool. 1970;17:531–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Canning EU, Hollister W. In vitro and in vivo investigations of human microsporidia. J protozool. 1991;38:631–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Han B, Takvorian PM, Weiss LM. Invasion of host cells by microsporidia. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:172.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Undeen A, Avery S. Effect of anions on the germination of Nosema algerae (Microspora: Nosematidae) spores. J Insect Pathol. 1988;52:84–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Frixione E, Ruiz L, Cerbon J, Undeen AH. Germination of Nosema algerae (Microspora) spores: Conditional inhibition by D2O, ethanol and Hg2+ suggests dependence of water influx upon membrane hydration and specific transmembrane pathways. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1997;44:109–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Frixione E, Ruiz L, Undeen AH. Monovalent cations induce microsporidian spore germination in vitro. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1994;41:464–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Troemel ER, Becnel JJ. Genome analysis and polar tube firing dynamics of mosquito-infecting microsporidia. Fungal Genet Biol. 2015;83:41–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Undeen AH, Frixione E. The role of osmotic pressure in the germination of Nosema algerae spores. J Protozool. 1990;37:561–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Weidner E. The microsporidian spore invasion tube. III. Tube extrusion and assembly. J Cell Biol. 1982;93:976–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Frixione E, Ruiz L, Santillan M, Devargas LV, Tejero JM, Undeen AH. Dynamics of polar filament discharge and sporoplasm expulsion by microsporidian spores. Cell Motil Cytoskel. 1992;22:38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lom J, Vavra J. The mode of sporoplasm extrusion in microsporidian spores. Acta Protozool. 1963;1:81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Huger A. Electron microscope study on the cytology of a microsporidian spore by means of ultrathin sectioning. J Insect Pathol. 1960;2:81–105.

  50. Wittner M. Structure of the Microsporidia. In: Wittner M, Weiss LM, editors. The microsporidia and microsporidiosis. ASM press; 1999. p. 7–84.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Sokolova Y, Snigirevskaya E, Morzhina E, Skarlato S, Mironov A, Komissarchik Y. Visualization of early Golgi compartments at proliferate and sporogenic stages of a microsporidian Nosema grylli. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2001;48:86S-S87.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Beznoussenko GV, Dolgikh VV, Seliverstova EV, Semenov PB, Tokarev YS, Trucco A, et al. Analogs of the Golgi complex in microsporidia: structure and avesicular mechanisms of function. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:1288–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Takvorian PM, Cali A. Enzyme histochemical identification of the Golgi apparatus in the microsporidian Glugea stephani. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1994;41:63S-S64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Takvorian PM, Cali A. Polar tube formation and nucleoside diphosphatase activity in the microsporidian Glugea stephani. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1996;43:102S-S103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Weidner E. Ultrastructural study of microsporidian development. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1970;105:33–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Morin-Ganet MN, Rambourg A, Deitz SB, Franzusoff A, Kepes F. Morphogenesis and dynamics of the yeast Golgi apparatus. Traffic. 2000;1:56–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Sokolova YY, Mironov AA. Structure and function of the Golgi organelle in parasitic protists. In: Mironov AA, Pavelka M, editors. The Golgi apparatus. Springer; 2008. p. 647–74.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Keohane EM, Weiss LM. The structure, function, and composition of the microsporidian polar tube. In: Wittner M, Weiss LM, editors. The microsporidia and microsporidiosis. ASM press; 1999. p. 196–224.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Chioralia G, Trammer T, Kampen H, Seitz HM. Relevant criteria for detecting microsporidia in stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:2279–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Cali A, Takvorian PM. The microsporidia: Pathology in man and occurrence in nature. SE Asian J Trop Med. 2004;35:58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Vinckier D, Porchet E, Vivier E, Vávra J, Torpier G. A freeze-fracture study of microsporidia (Protozoa: Microspora): II. The extrusion apparatus: polar filament, polaroplast, posterior vacuole. Eur J Protistol. 1993;29:370–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Chioralia G, Trammer T, Maier WA, Seitz HM. Morphologic changes in Nosema algerae (Microspora) during extrusion. Parasitol Res. 1998;84:123–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kelley K, Raczkowski AM, Klykov O, Jaroenlak P, Bobe D, Kopylov M, et al. Waffle method: a general and flexible approach for improving throughput in FIB-milling. Nat Commu. 2022;13:1857.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Cali A, Weiss LM, Takvorian PM. Brachiola algerae spore membrane systems, their activity during extrusion, and a new structural entity, the multilayered interlaced network, associated with the polar tube and the sporoplasm. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2002;49:164–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Kudo R, Daniels E. An electron microscope study of the spore of a microsporidian Thelohania californica. J Protozool. 1963;10:112–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Lom J, Corliss JO. Ultrastructural observations on the development of the microsporidian protozoon Plistophora hyphessobryconis schaperclaus. J Protozool. 1967;14:141–52.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Weidner E. Microsporidian spore invasion tube ultrastructure, isolation, and characterization of protein comprising tube. J Cell Biol. 1976;71:23–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Takvorian PM, Han B, Cali A, Rice WJ, Gunther L, Macaluso F, et al. An ultrastructural study of the extruded polar tube of Anncaliia algerae (microsporidia). J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2020;67:28–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Olsen P, Rice W, Liu T. In vitro germination of Nosema apis spores under conditions favorable for the generation and maintenance of sporoplasms. J Invertebr Pathol. 1986;47:65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Lv Q, Chen Y, Qi L, Hong L, Xie Z, Liao H, et al. Microsporidia dressing up: the spore polaroplast transport through the polar tube and transformation into the sporoplasm membrane. bioRxiv. 2023;538940.

  71. Delbac F, Peyret P, Méténier G, David D, Danchin A, Vivarès CP. On proteins of the microsporidian invasive apparatus: complete sequence of a polar tube protein of Encephalitozoon cuniculi. Mol Microbiol. 1998;29:825–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Delbac F, David D, Metenier G, Vivares C. First complete amino acid sequence of a polar tube protein in a microsporidian species Encephalitozoon cuniculi. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1997;44:77S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Peuvel I, Peyret P, Metenier G, Vivares CP, Delbac F. The microsporidian polar tube: Evidence for a third polar tube protein (PTP3) in Encephalitozoon cuniculi. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2002;122:69–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Lv Q, Wang LJ, Fan YP, Meng XZ, Liu KK, Zhou BQ, et al. Identification and characterization a novel polar tube protein (NbPTP6) from the microsporidian Nosema bombycis. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:475.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Keohane EM, Takvorian PM, Cali A, Tanowitz HB, Wittner M, Weiss LM. Identification of a microsporidian polar tube protein reactive monoclonal antibody. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1996;43:26–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Peuvel I, Delbac F, Metenier G, Peyret P, Vivares CP. Polymorphism of the gene encoding a major polar tube protein PTP1 in two microsporidia of the genus Encephalitozoon. Parasitology. 2000;121:581–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Haro M, del Aguila C, Fenoy S, Henriques-Gil N. Intraspecies genotype variability of the microsporidian parasite Encephalitozoon hellem. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:4166–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Xiao L, Li L, Visvesvara GS, Moura H, Didier ES, Lal AA. Genotyping Encephalitozoon cuniculi by multilocus analyses of genes with repetitive sequences. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:2248–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Weiss LM. Microsporidia: emerging pathogenic protists. Acta Trop. 2001;78:89–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Keohane EM, Orr GA, Zhang HS, Takvorian PM, Cali A, Tanowitz HB, et al. The molecular characterization of the major polar tube protein gene from Encephalitozoon hellem, a microsporidian parasite of humans. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1998;94:227–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Delbac F, Duffieux F, David D, Metenier G, Vivares CP. Immunocytochemical identification of spore proteins in two microsporidia, with emphasis on extrusion apparatus. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1998;45:224–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Delbac F, Peuvel I, Metenier G, Peyretaillade E, Vivares CP. Microsporidian invasion apparatus: identification of a novel polar tube protein and evidence for clustering of ptp1 and ptp2 genes in three Encephalitozoon species. Infect Immun. 2001;69:1016–24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Xu Y, Takvorian PM, Cali A, Orr G, Weiss LM. Glycosylation of the major polar tube protein of Encephalitozoon hellem, a microsporidian parasite that infects humans. Infect Immun. 2004;72:6341–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Polonais V, Prensier G, Metenier G, Vivares CP, Delbac F. Microsporidian polar tube proteins: highly divergent but closely linked genes encode PTP1 and PTP2 in members of the evolutionarily distant Antonospora and Encephalitozoon groups. Fungal Genet Biol. 2005;42:791–803.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Slamovits CH, Fast NM, Law JS, Keeling PJ. Genome compaction and stability in microsporidian intracellular parasites. Curr Biol. 2004;14:891–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Bouzahzah B, Nagajyothi F, Ghosh K, Takvorian PM, Cali A, Tanowitz HB, et al. Interactions of Encephalitozoon cuniculi polar tube proteins. Infect Immun. 2010;78:2745–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Varadi M, Anyango S, Deshpande M, Nair S, Natassia C, Yordanova G, et al. AlphaFold protein structure database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;50:D439–44.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596:583–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Keohane EM, Weiss LM. Characterization and function of the microsporidian polar tube: a review. Folia Parasitol (Praha). 1998;45:117–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Kramer JP. Variations among the spores of the microsporidian Perezia pyraustae Palliot. Am Mid Nat. 1960;64:485–7.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Han B, Ma YF, Tu V, Tomita T, Mayoral J, Williams T, et al. Microsporidia interact with host cell mitochondria via voltage-dependent anion channels using sporoplasm surface protein 1. MBio. 2019;10:e01944-e2019.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Yang D, Pan L, Peng P, Dang X, Li C, Li T, et al. Interaction between SWP9 and polar tube proteins of the microsporidian Nosema bombycis and function of SWP9 as a scaffolding protein contribute to polar tube tethering to the spore wall. Infect Immun. 2017;85:e00872-e916.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Li Z, Pan G, Li T, Huang W, Chen J, Geng L, et al. SWP5, a spore wall protein, interacts with polar tube proteins in the parasitic microsporidian Nosema bombycis. Eukaryot Cell. 2012;11:229–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Stentiford GD, Becnel JJ, Weiss LM, Keeling PJ, Didier ES, Williams BAP, et al. Microsporidia emergent pathogens in the global food chain. Trends Parasitol. 2016;32:336–48.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Franzen C, Muller A. Molecular techniques for detection, species differentiation, and phylogenetic analysis of microsporidia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12:243–85.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Procop GW. Molecular diagnostics for the detection and characterization of microbial pathogens. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:S99–111.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Field AS. Light microscopic and electron microscopic diagnosis of gastrointestinal opportunistic infections in HIV-positive patients. Pathology. 2002;34:21–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Kanitchinda S, Srisala J, Suebsing R, Prachumwat A, Chaijarasphong T. CRISPR–Cas fluorescent cleavage assay coupled with recombinase polymerase amplification for sensitive and specific detection of Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei. Biotechnol Rep (Amst). 2020;27:e00485.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Wang L, Lv Q, He Y, Gu R, Zhou B, Chen J, et al. Integrated qPCR and staining methods for detection and quantification of Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei in shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Microorganisms. 2020;8:1366.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Lannutti L, Mira A, Basualdo M, Rodriguez G, Erler S, Silva V, et al. Development of a Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and a direct lamp for the specific detection of Nosema ceranae, a parasite of honey bees. Parasitol Res. 2020;119:3947–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. vanGool T, Vetter JCM, Weinmayr B, VanDam A, Derouin F, Dankert J. High seroprevalence of Encephalitozoon species in immunocompetent subjects. J Infect Dis. 1997;175:1020–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Wei J, Fei Z, Pan G, Weiss LM, Zhou Z. Current therapy and therapeutic targets for microsporidiosis. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:835390.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Rodríguez-García C, Evans JD, Li W, Branchiccela B, Li JH, Heerman MC, et al. Nosemosis control in European honey bees, Apis mellifera, by silencing the gene encoding Nosema ceranae polar tube protein 3. J Exp Biol. 2018;221:jeb184606.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Peek R, Delbac F, Speijer D, Polonais V, Greve S, Wentink-Bonnema E, et al. Carbohydrate moieties of microsporidian polar tube proteins are targeted by immunoglobulin G in immunocompetent individuals. Infect Immuni. 2005;73:7906–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Youpeng Fan and Mr. Yunlin Tang for their comments on the use of AlphaFold2.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31402138), the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China (cstc2021jcyj-cxttX0005), and the Opening fund of State Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genome Biology (SKLSGB-ORP202105).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Resource Insects, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China

    Yuqing Chen, Qing Lv, Hongjie Liao, Zhengkai Xie, Liuyi Hong, Guoqing Pan, Mengxian Long & Zeyang Zhou

  2. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Microsporidia Infection and Control, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China

    Yuqing Chen, Qing Lv, Hongjie Liao, Zhengkai Xie, Liuyi Hong, Guoqing Pan, Mengxian Long & Zeyang Zhou

  3. College of Life Sciences, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, 400047, China

    Zeyang Zhou

  4. Biomedical Research Center for Structural Analysis, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China

    Lei Qi

Authors
  1. Yuqing Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qing Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hongjie Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhengkai Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Liuyi Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lei Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Guoqing Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mengxian Long
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Zeyang Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YQC designed the project, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. QL and HJL provided help with the figure processing. ZKX and LYH collected the material and information. LQ gave advice on the manuscript. GQP and ZYZ revised the manuscript. MXL designed the project and provided overall study supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mengxian Long.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Lv, Q., Liao, H. et al. The microsporidian polar tube: origin, structure, composition, function, and application. Parasites Vectors 16, 305 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-05908-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-05908-9

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us