Skip to main content

Quantitative proteomic analysis and functional characterization of Acanthamoeba castellanii exosome-like vesicles



Pathogenic protozoans use extracellular vesicles (EVs) for intercellular communication and host manipulation. Acanthamoeba castellanii is a free-living protozoan that may cause severe keratitis and fatal granulomatous encephalitis. Although several secreted molecules have been shown to play crucial roles in the pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba, the functions and components of parasite-derived EVs are far from understood.


Purified EVs from A. castellanii were confirmed by electron microscopy and nanoparticle tracking analysis. The functional roles of parasite-derived EVs in the cytotoxicity to and immune response of host cells were examined. The protein composition in EVs from A. castellanii was identified and quantified by LC-MS/MS analysis.


EVs from A. castellanii fused with rat glioma C6 cells. The parasite-derived EVs induced an immune response from human THP-1 cells and a cytotoxic effect in C6 cells. Quantitative proteomic analysis identified a total of 130 proteins in EVs. Among the identified proteins, hydrolases (50.2%) and oxidoreductases (31.7%) were the largest protein families in EVs. Furthermore, aminopeptidase activities were confirmed in EVs from A. castellanii.


The proteomic profiling and functional characterization of EVs from A. castellanii provide an in-depth understanding of the molecules packaged into EVs and their potential mechanisms mediating the pathogenesis of this parasite.


Acanthamoeba spp. are free-living amoeba and distributed in diverse natural environments, including water and soil. Acanthamoeba is capable of causing a rare but fatal encephalitis known as granulomatous amoebic meningoencephalitis (GAE) [1] or a painful and sight-threatening corneal infection termed Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) [2]. GAE is associated with immunocompromised individuals [3], whereas the patients affected by AK are generally immunocompetent [4]. AK is also a rare disease, with less than 150 reported cases each year in the USA [5], and this may be due to the significant role of the mucosal immune system [6]. GAE has led to a mortality rate of more than 90% due to the lack of specific anti-acanthamoebic drugs and the selectivity of the blood-brain barrier [7]. Additionally, Acanthamoeba has been considered a Trojan horse for other microbial pathogens, including a variety of viruses, bacteria, and fungi [8]. Hence, it is essential to further elucidate the mechanism of Acanthamoeba spp. pathogenesis and develop chemotherapeutic agents to combat Acanthamoeba infections.

The host is probably affected by the release of soluble mediators by parasites that degrade or interact with their target cells. Acanthamoeba spp. possess hydrolytic enzymes, including elastases [9], phospholipases [10], glycosidases and a variety of serine, cysteine and metalloproteases [11, 12], and some of these extracellular protease activities are increased in pathogenic Acanthamoeba strains [13, 14]. For example, mannose-induced 133 kDa protease (MIP133) and aminopeptidase M20/M25/M40 family protein have been identified as the principal virulence factors of pathogenic A. castellanii [15, 16]. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) that are secreted into the extracellular milieu have emerged as key players in intercellular communication without direct cellular contact. EVs can be mainly classified into exosomes and ectosomes [17]. Exosomes are 30–100 nm membrane-bounded vesicles generated within multivesicular bodies (MVBs) that are specialized late endosomes and can traffic to the plasma membrane, with which they fuse to release exosomes. Ectosomes range from 100 to 500 nm in diameter and are produced via budding of the plasma membrane. Exosomes contain various molecular constituents of the original cell, including proteins, mRNAs, and microRNAs [18].

The production of exosomes has been described in parasites, and the importance of these EVs during host-parasite interactions has been highlighted [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. In a previous study, the pro-inflammatory (interleukin-6 [IL-6], IL-12) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokines in monocytes/macrophages were shown to be elevated by stimulation with Acanthamoeba-derived cell-free conditioned medium [34]. In addition to the secreted proteins mentioned above, the EVs of A. castellanii have been reported to be cytotoxic to epithelial and glioblastoma cells [33, 35]. Hence, it is likely that the EVs of Acanthamoeba spp. not only play a crucial role in the progression of infection but also elicit the host immune response.

In the present study, we demonstrate that A. castellanii secretes EVs with physical characteristics similar to mammalian and other protozoan exosomes. The roles of EVs from A. castellanii in the host cell immune response and pathogenicity are validated. The protein composition of EVs from A. castellanii is quantified by a LTQ-orbitrap-based proteomic approach, which sheds light on the potential contact-independent mechanism mediating the pathogenesis of this parasite.


Cell culture

Acanthamoeba castellanii (ATCC 30010) was axenically cultured in a proteose peptone yeast extract glucose (PYG) medium, pH 6.5, at 28 °C in cell culture flasks. Trophozoites were harvested at the logarithmic growth phase after cultivation for 3–5 days. Rat glial C6 cells (ATCC CCL-107) were cultured in 10 ml Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum at 37 °C and 5% CO2. THP-1 cells (ATCC TIB-202) were maintained in continuous culture in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat inactivated fetal calf serum, 100× l-glutamine (Caisson Labs, Utah, USA), 100× antibiotic-antimycotic (Caisson Labs, Utah, USA) at 37 °C and 5% CO2.

Isolation of EVs from Acanthamoeba castellanii

Acanthamoeba castellanii was cultured in PYG medium in T-75 flasks until they reached 80% confluency, followed by removal of the culture medium. The cells were washed three times and resuspended in Pageʼs modified Neffʼs amoeba saline (PAS) (120 mg NaCl, 4 mg MgSO4 × 7H2O, 3 mg CaCl2, 142 mg Na2HPO4, 136 mg KH2PO4 in 1 l distilled water) for 48 h. The cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 2000×g for 30 min and further centrifuged at 10,000×g for 30 min. The cell-free medium was ultra-filtered through Amicon ultracentrifugation filters (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), then filtered through a 0.22 μm filter. Next, 0.5 volumes of the total exosome isolation reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were added to the supernatants and incubated at 4 °C overnight. After incubation, the supernatants were centrifuged at 10,000×g for 1 h. Pellets were resuspended in 50 μl PBS and stored at − 80 °C. The concentration of exosome protein was determined by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., USA). The protein samples were separated with 10% SDS-PAGE (T-Pro, Taipei, Taiwan) followed by silver staining using standard procedures.

Internalization of EVs from A. castellanii with rat glial C6 cells

Purified EVs were labeled with PKH67 Green Fluorescent Cell Linker kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with modification. Briefly, EVs were mixed in 150 μl of PBS with an equal volume of diluent C and PKH67 dye at room temperature for 3 min in the dark. The reaction was terminated by adding 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). The PKH67-labeled EVs were then centrifuged at 14,000× rpm for 1 h at 4 °C. Pellets were collected and washed with PBS at 14,000× rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. The PKH67-labeled vesicles were obtained and resuspended in PBS. For fluorescence microscopy analysis, 1 × 105 C6 cells/ml were seeded on an 18 × 18 mm coverslip at 37 °C for 24 h in a 5% CO2 incubator. After incubation, cells were washed with PBS and co-incubated with PKH67-labeled EVs at different time points to observe the internalization event after short and prolonged incubation (15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h and 8 h). The cells were washed three times with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and then stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) as a counterstain before being mounted with Fluoromount™ Aqueous Mounting Medium (Sigma-Aldrich). The internalization of EVs by cells was visualized with fluorescence microscopy (Olympus CellR, Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan).

Assay of cytopathic effects (CPE)

The rat glial C6 cells (1 × 105 C6 cells/ml) were cultured in a 6-well plate for 24 h. After removing the culture medium, the cells were washed with PBS. C6 cells were cultured in DMEM without FBS (500 μl) and incubated with Acanthamoeba EVs (100 μg) in PBS. The total volume of culture medium was adjusted to 1 ml. DMEM without FBS (500 μl) combined with PBS (500 μl) served as a negative control. After 24 h of co-incubation, the cells were washed, paraformaldehyde-fixed, and then stained with Giemsa stain (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) [36].

Live-cell imaging of C6 cells coincubation with EVs from A. castellanii

The live-cell image analysis was conducted by microscopy (Olympus CellR) as previously described [15]. The morphology of rat glial C6 cells was observed after coincubation with EVs for 24 h.

Total RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis

RNA was isolated using the Total RNA Extraction Miniprep System (Viogene, CA, USA). RNA was stored at − 70 °C. The concentration and A260/A280 ratio of RNA were measured with the ND-1000 (NanoDrop, Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA).

cDNA synthesis was performed using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The kit components were allowed to thaw on ice and 20 µl reaction volumes were prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription conditions were set as follows: 25 °C for 10 min, 37 °C for 120 min, 85 °C for 5 min, and a hold at 4 °C.

Reverse transcription-PCR

One-step reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) was performed with SuperScript™ One-Step RT-PCR with the Platinum Taq kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, CA, USA) to investigate gene expression. All of the cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA from THP-1 cells. RT-PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose ethidium bromide (EtBr) stained gel The primers used in this study are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.

In-sol digestion of EV proteins

A total of 10 μg exosome protein was reconstituted with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, reduced with 5 mM dithiothreitol (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at 56 °C for 45 min, and blocked cysteine with 10 mM iodoacetamide (Sigma-Aldrich) at 25 °C for 30 min. All samples were digested with trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) at a 1:25 enzyme:substrate ratio at 37 °C for 16 h. Then, the digested peptides were desalted and dried for storage at − 80 °C until use.

LC-MS/MS analysis for EV protein identification

The dried peptide mixtures were reconstituted with 0.1% formic acid for analysis using a nanoLC-LTQ-Orbitrap hybrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) as described previously [37]. The MS raw data files were analyzed by Proteome Discoverer Software (version 1.4, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and searched against the UniProt database (downloaded on 15 Nov 2017, extracted for A. castellanii; 17,223 sequences) using the Mascot search engine (Matrix Science, London, UK; version 2.5). One missed cleavage was allowed for trypsin digestion, 10 ppm mass tolerance was permitted for peptide masses, and 0.5 Da was chosen for CID fragment ions for peptide identification. The settings of fixed and variable modifications were carbamidomethyl and oxidized methionine/acetyl, respectively. Peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs) were then filtered based on high confidence and rank 1 of peptide identification in the Mascot search to ensure an overall false discovery rate below 0.01. Proteins with a single peptide hit were removed.

Aminopeptidase activity assay

The aminopeptidase activity in EVs was measured by the hydrolysis of l-leucine-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin hydrochloride (Leu-AMC) and l-arginine-AMC (Arg-AMC) (Sigma-Aldrich) as previously described [15]. Briefly, the EV solution was added to assay buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) containing 10 μM Leu-AMC or Arg-AMC, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 30 min. The PBS buffer served as the control for this assay. The release of fluorescence was detected at an excitation wavelength of 370 nm and an emission wavelength of 440 nm using a FlexStation 3 Multi-Mode microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) [38].

Transmission electron microscopy

Isolated EVs were added to charged carbon-coated grids after being stained with 1% uranyl acetate. EVs treated with uranyl acetate were examined using a transmission electron microscope (JEM-1400, Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical analysis

Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± SD. of three independent experiments. Studentʼs t-test (two-tailed) was used to evaluate the significant differences between groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Physical characterization of EVs produced by A. castellanii

To test whether A. castellanii produces EVs, we isolated the fraction from cell-free medium that contained secreted proteins, followed by a series of centrifugation and concentration steps. The commercial exosome isolation reagent was used to extract the less soluble components, such as vesicles (Fig. 1a). The purified fraction of EVs was confirmed by electron microscopy (EM) (Fig. 1b) and nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) (Fig. 1c). EM analysis revealed round or cup-shaped vesicles with double membranes, similar to mammalian and other protozoan exosomes. NTA identified a major population of vesicles, with a concentration of 2.83 × 1010 (particles/ml) and a mean diameter of 166.7 nm. Among them, a large number of vesicles were ~ 118 nm in size. This solubility-based approach yielded purified EVs from A. castellanii with characteristics similar to previously identified exosomes [39].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Isolation and physical characterization of EVs from Acanthamoeba castellanii. a The flow chart of EV isolation from the excretory-secretory products of A. castellanii. b Morphological characterization of EVs by TEM. Arrows indicate isolated EVs stained with uranyl acetate. The enlarged region shows the EVs with a double membrane structure. c Representative nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) plot showing the distribution of size and concentration of EVs

EVs from A. castellanii are internalized into rat glial C6 cells

Increasing evidence suggests that protozoan exosomes are able to mediate cell-cell communication and host cell response by delivering their contents into host cells [17]. We thus examined whether EVs from A. castellanii can fuse with their target cells by labeling the membrane of EVs with PKH67 fluorescent dye, followed by incubation with rat glial C6 cells for different time intervals (15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h and 8 h). The punctate signals of PKH67-labeled EVs were strongly observed in C6 cells after short coincubation (15 min) and increased in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 2). After prolonged incubation (4 h or 8 h) with EVs, the dispersed fluorescence in the cytoplasm of C6 cells suggested that EVs had delivered their contents into their target cells. This result clearly indicates that EVs of A. castellanii are internalized into rat glial C6 cells.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Uptake of PKH67-labeled EVs by C6 cells. Rat glial C6 cells were cocultured with PKH67-stained EVs (green) from Acanthamoeba castellanii and fixed for fluorescence microscopy. C6 cells were incubated with PKH67-labeled EVs for 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h or 8 h. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Arrows indicate EVs that were taken up by C6 cells

EVs from A. castellanii lead to cytotoxic effects on rat glial C6 cells

The cytopathic effect (CPE) assay was done to evaluate the effect of C6 cell coincubation with different Acanthamoeba strains [36]. We previously demonstrated that the pathogenic strain NCKH_D causes C6 cell damage, which is mediated by both contact-dependent and contact-independent destruction [15]. Acanthamoeba secreted proteins (Asp) play an important role in the contact-independent cytolysis of C6 cells. To examine whether EVs of A. castellanii also lead to cytotoxic effects on C6 cells, the CPE of C6 cells was evaluated after co-culture with EVs from A. castellanii for 24 h. The data showed that C6 cells markedly detached from the culture plates after coincubation with EVs from A. castellanii compared with the PBS-treated control, suggesting that parasite-derived EVs destroyed the adhesive ability of target cells and caused cell death (Fig. 3a). Time-lapse microscopy analysis also revealed that the C6 cells were more spherical and cytolytic following exposure to EVs from A. castellanii (Fig. 3b). These results provide in vitro evidence that EVs from A. castellanii disrupt mammalian host cells during the establishment of an infection.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Cytopathogenicity of EVs from Acanthamoeba castellanii on C6 cells. a Rat glial C6 cells were cocultured with EVs from A. castellanii, and the CPE was evaluated by Giemsa staining after cocultivation for 24 h. The data are representative of three independent experiments. b Light micrographs show the CPE of C6 cells produced by EVs from A. castellanii after cocultivation for 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 16 h and 20 h

EVs from A. castellanii induce the immune response of human THP-1 cells

In addition to Acanthamoeba trophozoites, amoeba-derived cell-free conditioned medium has been found to stimulate the production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), IL-6, and IL-12 [34]. To clarify the effect of EVs from A. castellanii on the host immune response, we detected the mRNA expression levels of cytokines IL-6, IL-12, and CXCL10 secreted by human monocytic THP-1 cells in response to EVs. The data showed that EVs from A. castellanii triggered an immune response in THP-1 cells, resulting in increased transcription of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-12 (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4). There was no significant change in CXCL10 transcription after exposure to EVs from A. castellanii. Similar to the observations reported in other pathogenic protozoans [24, 40], we demonstrate for the first time that EVs from A. castellanii send a message to immune cells and elicit an immune response.

Fig. 4
figure 4

EVs from Acanthamoeba castellanii trigger the expression of IL-6 and IL-12 by THP-1 cells. THP-1 human monocytic cells were stimulated with EVs from A. castellanii, lipopolysaccharides (LPS) or PBS for 24 h. LPS and PBS served as positive and negative controls for cytokine stimulation, respectively. The mRNA expression levels of IL-6, IL12, CXCL10 were examined by RT-PCR. The results were obtained from three independent experiments and are represented as the mean ± SD. β-Actin was used as an internal control for RT-PCR. *P < 0.05; ns, not significant

Quantitative proteomic analysis of EVs from A. castellanii

To better understand the components of EVs in Acanthamoeba, proteins collected from the fraction of EVs from A. castellanii were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by silver staining. The pattern of protein bands separated from the EV fraction was not similar to that of the fraction of secreted proteins (Fig. 5a), suggesting that the distinct proteins were packaged into EVs from A. castellanii. To determine the protein composition in EVs, the proteins were analyzed by 1D-LC-MS/MS using an LTQ-Orbitrap mass analyzer (Fig. 5b). A total of 130 proteins were identified from EVs of A. castellanii (Additional file 2: Table S2). The identified proteins were classified into several functional groups based on KEGG annotations (Fig. 5c). Approximately 65% of the proteins in EVs were previously uncharacterized. Among the identified proteins with functional annotations, the largest protein families in EVs were categorized into hydrolases (50.2%) and oxidoreductases (31.7%). In the hydrolase group, 13 proteasome subunits were identified, accounting for 6.24% of EV proteins. Specifically, the most abundant proteins in EVs from A. castellanii were inosine-uridine-preferring nucleoside hydrolase family protein (IUNH) (13.92%), carboxylic ester hydrolase (4.76%), and peroxidase (4.25%). We found that EVs from A. castellanii contained approximately 5.5% proteins analogous to previously known exosomal proteins in other organisms, such as talin (0.23%), GM2 activator protein (0.23%), and filamin repeat domain-containing protein (0.16%). Together, these results suggest that numerous A. castellanii-specific proteins with enzymatic activity were packaged in EVs.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Proteomic analyses of EVs from Acanthamoeba castellanii. a The secreted proteins and the EV fraction harvested from A. castellanii culture medium were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and silver staining. Lane M: Protein marker. b The workflow for proteomic profiling of EVs. c Identification and functional classification of proteins in EVs from A. castellanii

Detection of the peptidase activities in EVs from A. castellanii

We previously reported that Asp can hydrolyze leucine and arginine, suggesting that aminopeptidases are included in the secreted fraction and that this may be important for disruption of host cells [15]. Based on the proteomic analysis of EVs from A. castellanii, there are several proteins with aminopeptidase activities (Additional file 2: Table S2), which may also contribute to the pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba. To validate the peptidase activities in EVs, we detected the levels of AMC-labeled arginine and leucine by a spectrophotometer (Fig. 6), which could reflect the activities of corresponding aminopeptidases. Compared with the PBS-treated control, the levels of AMC-labeled arginine and leucine were significantly increased following treatment with EVs from A. castellanii, confirming that the aminopeptidases were enriched in the proteome.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Detection of aminopeptidase activity in EVs from Acanthamoeba castellanii. The aminopeptidase activity of EVs was detected by the hydrolysis of Leu-AMC and Arg-AMC compared with that of the PBS-treated control. The released fluorescence with an emission wavelength of 440 nm represents the corresponding aminopeptidase activity


We successfully purified EVs from A. castellanii and demonstrated their potential roles in the pathogenesis of this parasite, highlighting the significance of EVs in destroying and delivering messages to the mammalian cells via contact-independent mechanisms in addition to secreted proteins [15]. Additionally, EVs from A. castellanii induced the immune response of THP-1 cells. The first quantitative proteomic analysis of EVs from A. castellanii was also conducted, providing an in-depth understanding of the abundance of molecules inside the EVs and their possible functions in mediating pathogenesis.

In a recent report, the EVs secreted by A. castellanii were isolated using a differential centrifugation approach [33]. These EVs grown in two nutritional conditions were characterized, including nutrient-rich PYG medium (PYG-EVs) and nutrient-deficient glucose medium (glucose-EVs). Although a different approach for EV isolation was used in the present study, we showed that the size of EVs (mean diameter = 166.7 nm) is similar to that in the previous study (117.1 ± 73.3 and 117.7 ± 55.8 nm for PYG-EVs and glucose-EVs, respectively). Specifically, we clearly identified the morphology of EVs with their double-layered membrane.

Monocytes/macrophages are considered to be important effectors in response to Acanthamoeba infections [41]; however, the biochemical mechanisms that occur in human monocytes upon exposure to Acanthamoeba-secreted products are far from understood. EVs often elicit a pro-inflammatory response, which enhances the parasite burden in the host [17]. To our knowledge, we showed for the first time that EVs from A. castellanii induce the host immune response, stimulating the expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-12 by human THP-1 cells. IL-6 is a chief stimulator of acute inflammation, and its production by the host appears to be a common immune response to EVs of various protozoans, such as Trichomonas vaginalis, Plasmodium spp. (infecting erythrocytes) and Trypanosoma brucei [17]. IL-12 induces the cytotoxic activity of phagocytes, the production of INF-γ by natural killer cells, and the development of cytotoxic lymphocytes [42]. A previous study demonstrated that the production of the cytokines IL-6 and IL-12 by THP-1 cells was significantly increased after coincubation with the soluble products contained in amoebic conditioned cell-free medium (aCM), whereas no marked elevation of these cytokines was observed after coincubation with Acanthamoeba trophozoites [34]. This in vitro observation leads us to hypothesize that the stimulation of such pro-inflammatory cytokine release by aCM is mediated, at least partially, through EVs. Future in vivo models developed to study the effects of Acanthamoeba EVs on various host effector cells recruited during infection will be necessary to understand the complicated immune response and its impact on disease progression.

It has been demonstrated that A. castellanii EVs display cytotoxicity to Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) and T98G mammalian cells via necrosis and apoptosis, respectively, suggesting that different cell death mechanisms are induced by EVs in various host cells [33, 35]. We also showed that EVs cause cell disruption and reduce cell adhesion ability, resulting in CPE on rat glial C6 cells, which is similar to the outcome exerted by the secreted proteins [15]. These in vitro findings suggest that EVs mediate the pathogenesis of A. castellanii. The secreted proteases have been shown to play a key role in the pathogenesis of several protozoans, such as T. vaginalis [43], Giardia lamblia [44], Leishmania spp. [45] and Entamoeba histolytica [46]; however, the proteases are mainly identified in the EV-free supernatant of A. castellanii [33]. Hence, other previously uncharacterized proteins with potential impact on virulence and biological functions in EVs from A. castellanii deserve further investigation. For example, several proteasome subunits have been identified in EVs of this species. It has been demonstrated that the proteasome is involved in the regulation of encystation and extracellular proteolytic activities of Acanthamoeba [47]. It is worthwhile to study whether the proteasome subunits in EVs are involved in Acanthamoeba differentiation or in cytotoxicity to host cells.

A previous study has identified 110 and 148 proteins in EVs from A. castellanii grown in PYG and glucose medium, respectively [33]. The majority of proteins in PYG-EVs and glucose-EVs belonged to the ribosomal and miscellaneous protein categories, respectively. Different protein compositions in PYG-EVs and glucose-EVs suggest that the proteins packaged in EVs were affected by different environmental cues. However, that report was a qualitative analysis of the protein composition in EVs of A. castellanii, which could not reflect the abundance of proteins. Herein, we conducted quantitative proteomic analysis of EVs and found that the largest protein families in EVs were categorized into the classes of hydrolases and oxidoreductases. In comparison with the previously identified proteins in PYG-EVs [33], 13 of the same proteins were identified in our study. The differences in EV proteome profiles identified from independent studies may be due to the use of different strains, isolation methods, and culture conditions. It is feasible to define a common set of Acanthamoeba exosome proteins derived from more studies and produce the specific antibodies as biomarkers to recognize the isolated exosomes. We note that only a small portion of proteins in EVs were analogous to previously identified EV proteins, suggesting that many distinct proteins are packed into the EVs of A. castellanii. For example, we showed that the most abundant protein in the EVs was the IUNH family protein, which catalyzes the hydrolysis of the N-glycosidic bond of all of the commonly occurring purine and pyrimidine nucleosides into ribose and the associated base [48]. IUNH is important for protozoan parasites incapable of de novo biosynthesis of purines, such as Leishmania major [49], exerting the function of purine salvage from the host. However, it has been shown that A. polyphaga is able to utilize radiolabeled formate and glycine as precursors for purine biosynthesis [50]. Hence, the biological significance of IUNH in free-living protozoans remains to be determined. Comparative proteomic analysis of proteins secreted into the extracellular space of pathogenic and non-pathogenic A. castellanii also revealed that IUNH is upregulated more than 5-fold in the pathogenic strain [51]. It is worth investigating whether IUNH in EVs plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of A. castellanii.


Collectively, our findings provide in vitro experimental evidence that EVs form A. castellanii are internalized into rat glial C6 cells, induce the immune response of the human monocyte/macrophage lineage, and cause the disruption of their target cells. Our quantitative proteomic analysis of EVs revealed several previously uncharacterized proteins, such as the proteasome subunits and IUNH, shedding new light on their potential roles during the establishment of Acanthamoeba infections.

Availability of data and materials

Data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study will be made available by the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD014735.



extracellular vesicles


granulomatous amoebic meningoencephalitis


Acanthamoeba keratitis


mannose-induced 133 kDa protease


multivesicular bodies




cytopathic effect


tumor necrosis factor alpha


Acanthamoeba secreted proteins


inosine-uridine-preferring nucleoside hydrolase family protein


l-leucine-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin hydrochloride




peptone yeast extract glucose


extracellular matrix


amoebic conditioned cell-free medium


  1. Martinez AJ, Visvesvara GS. Free-living, amphizoic and opportunistic amebas. Brain Pathol. 1997;7:583–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Illingworth CD, Cook SD. Acanthamoeba keratitis. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42:493–508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Walochnik J, Aichelburg A, Assadian O, Steuer A, Visvesvara G, Vetter N, et al. Granulomatous amoebic encephalitis caused by Acanthamoeba amoebae of genotype T2 in a human immunodeficiency virus-negative patient. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:338–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lorenzo-Morales J, Khan NA, Walochnik J. An update on Acanthamoeba keratitis: diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment. Parasite. 2015;22:10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Panjwani N. Pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Ocul Surf. 2010;8:70–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Niederkorn JY. The role of the innate and adaptive immune responses in Acanthamoeba keratitis. Arch Immunol Ther Exp. 2002;50:53–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schuster FL, Visvesvara GS. Free-living amoebae as opportunistic and non-opportunistic pathogens of humans and animals. Int J Parasitol. 2004;34:1001–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Siddiqui R, Khan NA. Biology and pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferrante A, Bates EJ. Elastase in the pathogenic free-living amoebae Naegleria and Acanthamoeba spp. Infect Immun. 1988;56:3320–1.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mortazavi PN, Keisary E, Loh LN, Jung SY, Khan NA. Possible roles of phospholipase A(2) in the biological activities of Acanthamoeba castellanii (T4 Genotype). Protist. 2011;162:168–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Khan NA. Acanthamoeba: biology and increasing importance in human health. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2006;30:564–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alsam S, Sissons J, Jayasekera S, Khan NA. Extracellular proteases of Acanthamoeba castellanii (encephalitis isolate belonging to T1 genotype) contribute to increased permeability in an in vitro model of the human blood-brain barrier. J Infect. 2005;51:150–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lorenzo-Morales J, Ortega-Rivas A, Foronda P, Abreu-Acosta N, Ballart D, Martinez E, et al. RNA interference (RNAi) for the silencing of extracellular serine proteases genes in Acanthamoeba: molecular analysis and effect on pathogenecity. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2005;144:10–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mattana A, Cappai V, Alberti L, Serra C, Fiori PL, Cappuccinelli P. ADP and other metabolites released from Acanthamoeba castellanii lead to human monocytic cell death through apoptosis and stimulate the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. Infect Immun. 2002;70:4424–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang JM, Liao CC, Kuo CC, Chen LR, Huang LLH, Shin JW, et al. Pathogenic Acanthamoeba castellanii secretes the extracellular aminopeptidase M20/M25/M40 family protein to target cells for phagocytosis by disruption. Molecules. 2017;22:2263.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Tripathi T, Smith AD, Abdi M, Alizadeh H. Acanthamoeba-cytopathic protein induces apoptosis and proinflammatory cytokines in human corneal epithelial cells by cPLA2alpha activation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:7973–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Szempruch AJ, Dennison L, Kieft R, Harrington JM, Hajduk SL. Sending a message: extracellular vesicles of pathogenic protozoan parasites. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14:669–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Simons M, Raposo G. Exosomes–vesicular carriers for intercellular communication. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009;21:575–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Estevez AM, Kempf T, Clayton C. The exosome of Trypanosoma brucei. EMBO J. 2001;20:3831–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Atyame Nten CM, Sommerer N, Rofidal V, Hirtz C, Rossignol M, Cuny G, et al. Excreted/secreted proteins from trypanosome procyclic strains. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:212817.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Silverman JM, Clos J, Horakova E, Wang AY, Wiesgigl M, Kelly I, et al. Leishmania exosomes modulate innate and adaptive immune responses through effects on monocytes and dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2010;185:5011–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Silverman JM, Reiner NE. Leishmania exosomes deliver preemptive strikes to create an environment permissive for early infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2011;1:26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marcilla A, Trelis M, Cortes A, Sotillo J, Cantalapiedra F, Minguez MT, et al. Extracellular vesicles from parasitic helminths contain specific excretory/secretory proteins and are internalized in intestinal host cells. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e45974.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Twu O, de Miguel N, Lustig G, Stevens GC, Vashisht AA, Wohlschlegel JA, et al. Trichomonas vaginalis exosomes deliver cargo to host cells and mediate hostratioparasite interactions. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003482.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lopez-Rosas I, Marchat LA, Olvera BG, Guillen N, Weber C, Hernandez de la Cruz O, et al. Proteomic analysis identifies endoribouclease EhL-PSP and EhRRP41 exosome protein as novel interactors of EhCAF1 deadenylase. J Proteom. 2014;111:59–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Neves RF, Fernandes AC, Meyer-Fernandes JR, Souto-Padron T. Trypanosoma cruzi-secreted vesicles have acid and alkaline phosphatase activities capable of increasing parasite adhesion and infection. Parasitol Res. 2014;113:2961–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hansen EP, Kringel H, Williams AR, Nejsum P. Secretion of RNA-containing extracellular vesicles by the porcine whipworm, Trichuris suis. J Parasitol. 2015;101:336–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dlugonska H, Gatkowska J. Exosomes in the context of Toxoplasma gondii—host communication. Ann Parasitol. 2016;62:169–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim MJ, Jung BK, Cho J, Song H, Pyo KH, Lee JM, et al. Exosomes secreted by Toxoplasma gondii-infected L6 cells: their effects on host cell proliferation and cell cycle changes. Korean J Parasitol. 2016;54:147–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Santos GB, Monteiro KM, da Silva ED, Battistella ME, Ferreira HB, Zaha A. Excretory/secretory products in the Echinococcus granulosus metacestode: is the intermediate host complacent with infection caused by the larval form of the parasite? Int J Parasitol. 2016;46:843–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhu L, Liu J, Dao J, Lu K, Li H, Gu H, et al. Molecular characterization of S. japonicum exosome-like vesicles reveals their regulatory roles in parasite–host interactions. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25885.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Olmos-Ortiz LM, Barajas-Mendiola MA, Barrios-Rodiles M, Castellano LE, Arias-Negrete S, Avila EE, et al. Trichomonas vaginalis exosome-like vesicles modify the cytokine profile and reduce inflammation in parasite-infected mice. Parasite Immunol. 2017;39:e12426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Goncalves DS, Ferreira MDS, Liedke SC, Gomes KX, de Oliveira GA, Leao PEL, et al. Extracellular vesicles and vesicle-free secretome of the protozoa Acanthamoeba castellanii under homeostasis and nutritional stress and their damaging potential to host cells. Virulence. 2018;9:818–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Mattana A, Sanna M, Cano A, Delogu G, Erre G, Roberts CW, et al. Acanthamoeba castellanii genotype T4 stimulates the production of interleukin-10 as well as proinflammatory cytokines in THP-1 cells, human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and human monocyte-derived macrophages. Infect Immun. 2016;84:2953–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Goncalves DS, Ferreira MDS, Guimaraes AJ. Extracellular vesicles from the protozoa Acanthamoeba castellanii: their role in pathogenesis, environmental adaptation and potential applications. Bioengineering. 2019;6:13.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Lagmay JP, Matias RR, Natividad FF, Enriquez GL. Cytopathogenicity of Acanthamoeba isolates on rat glial C6 cell line. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1999;30:670–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu CC, Lin CC, Hsiao YC, Wang PJ, Yu JS. Proteomic characterization of six Taiwanese snake venoms: identification of species-specific proteins and development of a SISCAPA-MRM assay for cobra venom factors. J Proteom. 2018;187:59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee YR, Na BK, Moon EK, Song SM, Joo SY, Kong HH, et al. Essential role for an M17 leucine aminopeptidase in encystation of Acanthamoeba castellanii. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0129884.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Colombo M, Raposo G, Thery C. Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2014;30:255–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Li Y, Liu Y, Xiu F, Wang J, Cong H, He S, et al. Characterization of exosomes derived from Toxoplasma gondii and their functions in modulating immune responses. Int J Nanomed. 2018;13:467–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hurt M, Apte S, Leher H, Howard K, Niederkorn J, Alizadeh H. Exacerbation of Acanthamoeba keratitis in animals treated with anti-macrophage inflammatory protein 2 or antineutrophil antibodies. Infect Immun. 2001;69:2988–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Biron CA, Gazzinelli RT. Effects of IL-12 on immune responses to microbial infections: a key mediator in regulating disease outcome. Curr Opin Immunol. 1995;7:485–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hernandez HM, Marcet R, Sarracent J. Biological roles of cysteine proteinases in the pathogenesis of Trichomonas vaginalis. Parasite. 2014;21:54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu J, Ma’ayeh S, Peirasmaki D, Lundstrom-Stadelmann B, Hellman L, Svard SG. Secreted Giardia intestinalis cysteine proteases disrupt intestinal epithelial cell junctional complexes and degrade chemokines. Virulence. 2018;9:879–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Silverman JM, Chan SK, Robinson DP, Dwyer DM, Nandan D, Foster LJ, et al. Proteomic analysis of the secretome of Leishmania donovani. Genome Biol. 2008;9:R35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Lidell ME, Moncada DM, Chadee K, Hansson GC. Entamoeba histolytica cysteine proteases cleave the MUC2 mucin in its C-terminal domain and dissolve the protective colonic mucus gel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:9298–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Siddiqui R, Saleem S, Khan NA. The effect of peptidic and non-peptidic proteasome inhibitors on the biological properties of Acanthamoeba castellanii belonging to the T4 genotype. Exp Parasitol. 2016;168:16–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Parkin DW, Horenstein BA, Abdulah DR, Estupinan B, Schramm VL. Nucleoside hydrolase from Crithidia fasciculata. Metabolic role, purification, specificity, and kinetic mechanism. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:20658–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Shi W, Schramm VL, Almo SC. Nucleoside hydrolase from Leishmania major. Cloning, expression, catalytic properties, transition state inhibitors, and the 2.5-a crystal structure. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:21114–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ogbunude PO, Baer HP. De novo purine biosynthesis in a free living protozoan parasite, Acanthamoeba polyphaga [correction of polypha]. Trop Med Parasitol. 1993;44:19–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Moon EK, Choi HS, Park SM, Kong HH, Quan FS. Comparison of proteins secreted into extracellular space of pathogenic and non-pathogenic Acanthamoeba castellanii. Korean J Parasitol. 2018;56:553–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to the Biotools Co., Ltd, Taiwan for their help in the LC-MS/MS analysis and protein identification.


This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 106-2320-B-006-070-MY3) to WCL and (MOST 107-2320-B-016-008-MY3) to KYH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



WCL, LJC and KYH conceived the idea and wrote the manuscript. CYT, JMH and SRW performed the experiments, CYT and JMH contributed to statistical analyses. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuo-Yang Huang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Primers used in this study.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

Identification of proteins in EVs from A. castellanii by quantitative proteomic analysis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, WC., Tsai, CY., Huang, JM. et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis and functional characterization of Acanthamoeba castellanii exosome-like vesicles. Parasites Vectors 12, 467 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: