Skip to main content
Download PDF

High levels of pyrethroid resistance and super-kdr mutations in the populations of tropical bed bug, Cimex hemipterus, in Iran

Parasites & Vectors volume 14, Article number: 470 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The tropical bed bug, Cimex hemipterus, is an important ectoparasite causing various health problems. This species is mainly confined to tropical regions; however, insecticide resistance, global warming, and globalization have changed its distribution map. Molecular information on pyrethroid resistance, which is essential for the development of control programs, is unknown for C. hemipterus in expanded areas. The present study was designed to determine the permethrin resistance status, characterize the pyrethroid receptor sites in voltage-gated sodium channel (vgsc) gene, and identify the resistance-related mutations in the populations of tropical bed bug in Iran.

Methods

Live bed bugs were collected, and adults of C. hemipterus were selected for bioassay and molecular surveys. Bioassay was performed by tarsal contact with permethrin 0.75% in mixed-sex of samples. Conventional and quantitative TaqMan and SYBR Green real-time PCR assays were conducted to characterize the vgsc gene and genotypes of studied populations.

Results

In the bioassay tests, the mortality rates were in the range of 30.7–38.7% and 56.2–77.4% in 24 and 48 h, respectively. The knockdown rates of studied populations were in the range of 32.2–46.6% and 61.5–83.8% in the first and second days, respectively. The KT50 and KT90 values in the Cimex lectularius Kh1 strain were presented as 5.39 and 15.55 h, respectively. These values in the selected populations of C. hemipterus varied from 27.9 to 29.5 and from 82.8 to 104.4 h, respectively. Knockdown time ratios (KR50 and KR90) in these populations varied from 5.17 to 6.17-fold compared with those of the C. lectularius Kh1 strain. Fragments of vgsc gene with 355 bp and 812 bp were amplified. Analysis of sequences revealed the A468T substitution, kdr-associated D953G, and super-kdr M918I and L1014F mutations in all populations.

Conclusions

The specific/sensitive, safe, and rapid diagnostic assays developed in this study are recommended for detection of kdr/super-kdr mutations and frequency of mutant alleles. The presence of super-kdr mutations and high resistance to permethrin in all the populations necessitate the reconsideration of control approaches against C. hemipterus.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Bed bugs are important ectoparasites that commonly affect humans and are poised to become a major household pest throughout the world. Repeated bites by these hematophagous insects cause allergic reactions, including itching and erythematous or popular urticaria-like dermatitis, which favors secondary bacterial infections, cellulitis, impetigo, ecthyma, and lymphangitis. Infestation of these pests also gives rise to anxiety, insomnia, and worsening of an existing mental health condition. Bed bugs have been found to be naturally infected with more than 28 human pathogens; however, there is no substantial evidence of their pathogen transmission to humans through bites [1, 2]. Although hepatitis C virus (HCV) was recently identified in the common bed bug, the role of this bug as a potential vector for the transmission of HCV remains unclear [3].

Bed bugs have a long association with humans, and their infestation has dramatically been increased, especially during the past decades. Two cryptic species of bed bugs, the common bed bug, Cimex lectularius, and the tropical bed bug, Cimex hemipterus, are adapted to feed on humans, attack nocturnally, and affect all socioeconomic classes. The common bed bug is found in temperate climates, whereas the tropical bed bug is mainly confined to tropical regions. Nonetheless, global warming, globalization, international trade, and insecticide resistance are several factors that have changed the tropical bed bug distribution and triggered its emergence in subtropical and even temperate regions [4, 5]. Therefore, the Middle East and north of Africa are at high risk for infestation by this species. The tropical bed bug infestation has recently been reported from Israel and Kuwait [6, 7]. Spread of the tropical bed bug in these areas raises health issues, and besides, new species may be generated by the hybridization of its strains with the populations of the common bed bug.

Although non-chemical measures, such as environmental manipulation (cleaning and organizing the living areas, furniture, and house belongings and elimination of the bed bug hiding spots and clutter) and physical control (vacuuming, using barriers, such as mattresses, and applying thermal heat or cold treatments), could be helpful in reducing the number of bed bugs, their control has mainly relied on the application of insecticides [1,2,3]. In this context, pyrethroids have extensively been used for the control of bed bugs owing to their low mammalian toxicity, fast knockdown activity, and relatively low cost. However, the intensive and continuous application of these pesticides leads to resistance in bed bugs, posing a serious obstacle to their sustained effective control [8].

Earlier studies have shown that some insecticide-resistant bed bugs have multiple resistance mechanisms, including insensitivity of target sites, enhancement of metabolic detoxification enzymes, and reduction in the cuticular penetration [9]. An important resistance mechanism against pyrethroids and DDT is known as knockdown resistance (kdr). It has been evidenced that various mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel (vgsc) gene are responsible for the increased resistance in many insect pests. These mutations change the amino acid sequences of the VGSC protein and decrease the insecticide effect on the nervous system [10,11,12,13,14,15].

Molecular analyses of susceptible and resistant strains of bed bugs have revealed that there are some point mutations in the vgsc gene and suggested that the substitution of the amino acids is the main reason for enhancing resistance to pyrethroids [12, 16,17,18,19,20]. Such alterations in the nervous cell membrane mitigate the effect of insecticide on the nervous system and cause resistance to paralysis. This intrinsic trait of kdr, which is associated with DDT and pyrethroids, was first identified in the housefly Musca domestica [21] and has been documented in different species of agricultural and public health pests [9,10,11,12, 20].

In bed bugs, kdr-type resistance to pyrethroids is associated with mutations in two VGSC regions (dual pyrethroid-receptor sites). The first region includes four putative kdr mutation sites, namely V410, V419, V421, and E435, encoding the domain IS6 and a part of the domain I–II linker [9, 19, 22,23,24]. The second region contains six putative kdr mutation sites, especially M918, L925, T929, L932, L936, and L1014 residues, encoding the domain IIS4-S6 region [9, 25,26,27], of which two M918I and L1014F mutations cause high resistance to pyrethroids in tropical bed bug. In this species, the M918I mutation is always found together with the L1014F mutation and probably plays a synergistic role in enhancing pyrethroid resistance [10, 13, 19]. Previous investigations have identified some novel mutations, such as L899V and D953G, in the vgsc gene of C. hemipterus [25] and six sequential (Y/L995H, A1007S, V1010L, I1011F, V1016E, and L1017F/S) mutations around the L1014F mutation [26]. However, the function of these mutations in pyrethroid resistance is unclear.

To date, numerous techniques have been reported for detecting kdr resistance in bed bug populations, but toxicity bioassay and molecular methods are conventional approaches in monitoring and expressing this resistance [9]. Bioassay methods are often unfeasible in routine monitoring of bed bugs as they need a sufficient number of live specimens, and obtaining a large number is difficult. Moreover, monitoring by these methods can be compromised, while the resistance alleles are recessive. Molecular techniques could provide an early warning of the development of insecticide resistance and could determine the specific resistance mechanism. Even though molecular assays such as PCR and direct DNA sequencing have been employed to detect kdr mutations in bed bug samples [23,24,25, 28], these methods are impracticable for studying large-scale populations. Accordingly, the development of conventional and sensitive quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) assays is necessary for detecting kdr mutations in field-collected strains.

In different areas of the Middle East, especially in Iran, along with other parts of the world, DDT and other organochlorine compounds (OCs; e.g. gamma HCH, dieldrin) have been exploited to control bed bugs since the 1950s. Following the OCs application, resistance to DDT has been reported from Iran, Israel, and Turkey in common bed bug [29,30,31]. Due to resistance development and environmental concern, the use of OCs was restricted in 1960s, and the progressive restriction and prohibition of such insecticides led to an increase in the use of organophosphates (OPs; e.g. malathion, diazinon, pirimiphos-methyl) and carbamates (Cs; e.g. carbaryl, propoxur, and bendiocarb) in the control plan for three decades. In Iran, pyrethroid insecticides (PYs; e.g. permethrin, cypermethrin, cyfluthrin, and lambda-cyhalothrin) have been introduced to control programs of bed bugs since 2000 and in the past decade of new millennium. In virtue of the enhanced contamination and resurgence of bed bugs, the application of these insecticides, along with OPs, Cs, phenylpyrazoles (e.g. fipronil), and neonicotinoids (imidacloprid), was escalated.

Studies on the Middle East are scarce and limited to a few reports of the common bed bug from Iran [32,33,34], Israel [24, 35], and Kuwait [36], and of the tropical bed bug from Israel [6] and Iraq [7]. Aside from these reports, there is documentation of the insensitivity of C. lectularius to malathion, diazinon, and lambda-cyhalothrin in the northeast of Iran [37] and also V419L, L925I, and I936F kdr-type mutations in different populations of the common bed bug from Israel [24]. Despite numerous reports of C. lectularius resistance to pyrethroids, there is scant information on the resistance status of the tropical bed bug in the Middle East. Owing to recently witnessed emerging character, socioeconomic impact, and potential health hazards of this pest, understanding the role of insecticide resistance in the occurrence of this species is necessary for its monitoring and management. Moreover, this information is essential to diminish and eliminate the re-infestation of this pest that accompanies its presence. Therefore, the aims of the present study were to determine the permethrin resistance status and to elucidate the role of target site insensitivity in pyrethroid resistance in various populations of the tropical bed bug. To achieve this goal, the bioassay tests and molecular surveys were conducted to assess the pyrethroid resistance, characterize the pyrethroid receptor sites in vgsc gene, and detect the kdr-associated mutations and their distribution in the populations of the tropical bed bug in Iran.

Methods

Bed bug sampling

Live bed bugs were collected from residential areas, including villas, complexes, apartments, hotels, motels, inns, and dormitories, in various parts of Iran (Fig. 1), from 2015 to 2020. In this decade, different insecticides, pirimiphos-methyl, fenitrothion, propoxur, bendiocarb, permethrin, deltamethrin and lambda-cyhalothrin, have been used to control bed bugs in study areas. Morphological identification of the adult tropical bed bug was carried out under microscopic observations, focusing on the pronotum, paragenital sinus, hind tibial pad, and parameter characters [38, 39].

Fig. 1
figure1

Collection sites of tropical bed bug specimens in Iran

Full size image

Bioassay test

Adult bed bugs from the selected sites were subjected to insecticide bioassay adapted to previously applied methods [19, 22, 23, 25, 28, 31, 36, 40,41,42,43,44,45]. The permethrin 0.75%, dosage used in previous study [42], was considered suitable for resistant-population discrimination, due to the lack of diagnostic dose for tropical bed bug and insufficiency of the permethrin 0.25% (C. lectularius recommended diagnostic dose) in detection of the mortality and knockdown values [26]. Bed bug samples were exposed to permethrin (0.75%)-impregnated filter papers, supplied by USM/01 (www.inreskit.usm.my). At least three groups of 10–15 mixed-sex bed bugs from each selected site were put in contact with impregnated filter papers disks (8-cm diameter), tightly fitted in sterile 8-cm Petri dishes, and kept in dark conditions in 40% relative humidity at 24 ± 2 °C for 48 h. Three groups of 10 bugs were also exposed to silicone oil-impregnated papers and were used as negative controls. In the studied groups, the knockdown and mortality data were recorded at 24 and 48 h, and in the selected populations, the knockdown samples were scored 2–4-hourly for 24 and 48 h. At the end of tests, the dead, knockdown, and alive samples were stored at −20 °C for further investigation. The death of bed bugs was determined by the absence of leg and antennae movements when the specimen was gently inspected with forceps. Abbott’s formula was applied if the negative control mortalities were between 5 and 20%. Permethrin resistance status was evaluated by using the classification determined by the WHO, in which > 98% mortality indicated susceptible, and less than 98% suggested the presence of resistance [46]. The knockdown time 50 (KT50, the time by which 50% of bed bugs were paralyzed) and KT90 (the time by which 90% of bed bugs were paralyzed) values were estimated from knockdown data by probit analysis using PriProbit version 1.63 software [47]. Knockdown time ratios (KR50 and KR90) were calculated by comparing the rates of KT50 and KT90 in the studied populations of tropical bed bugs with those of the C. lectularius Kh1 strain.

Genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction

The gDNA of the samples was extracted as described before [48, 49]. In brief, the samples were stored at −70 °C for 1 h. The frozen bed bugs were then placed individually in 1.5-ml tubes and homogenized in 400 µl of a lysing buffer (100 mM of Tris HCl [pH 8.0], 0.5 mM of NaCl, 10 mM of EDTA, and 1% W/V SDS) with glass beads by the aid of an electric homogenizer. Subsequently, 20 µg of proteinase K was added to the homogenates before incubation at 55 °C for 3 h. Next, 100 µl of 8 M potassium acetate was added to each tube, mixed gently, and kept on ice bath for 10 min. The samples were spun at 4000×g for 10 min, and the supernatants were transferred to fresh tubes. One milliliter of ice-cold absolute ethanol was added to each tube, followed by spinning at 8000×g for 10 min. Pellets were washed in 0.5 ml of 70% ethanol, before an eventual spinning at 8000×g for 10 min. The final pellet was dried at room temperature and re-suspended in 50 µl of TE buffer.

PCR assay

Fragment amplification was carried out using the primers FKDR1 (GTCCGTGGCACATGTTGTTCTTCA) and RKDR1 (CTGATGGAGATTTTGCCACTGATGC) for the first region (the domain IS6 and the partial domain I–II linker) and FKDR2 (GGAATTGAA GCTGCCATGAAGTTG) and RKDR2 (TGCCTATTCTGTTCGAAAGCCTCAG) for the second region (the domain II and the partial domain II–III linker). These primers were designed from the nucleotide sequences of PCR products that their primers have been proposed in previous studies [14, 23, 25, 44]. The PCR reaction contained 12.5 μl of Taq DNA Polymerase 2X Master Mix RED (Ampliqon, Denmark), 1 μl of both forward and reverse primers (10 pM), and 2 μl of DNA template in a total volume of 25 μl. PCR for both reactions were performed under the following conditions: 95 °C for 2 min, following by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 20 s, 58 °C for 3 s, and 72 °C for 2 min, and the final extension of 70 °C for 10 min.

DNA sequencing and analysis of PCR products

To monitor the putative kdr mutations in the vgsc gene, some of the amplified products were randomly selected. The products were purified by PCR Clean-Up Kit (SinaClon, Iran) and sequenced bi-directionally by Macrogen (Seoul, Korea) using the forward and reverse specific primers. The nucleotide sequences of samples were aligned by Clustal Omega (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/) and analyzed using BioEdit [50] and MEGA X [51] software. The kdr mutations were confirmed by comparing the amino acid sequences of samples with reference C. lectularius alignments (GenBank Accession Nos. FJ1997, GU123927, and GU123928). The nucleotide sequences in some of the samples were submitted to the NCBI GenBank.

SYBR Green qRT-PCR assay

Two singleplex real-time PCR assays were developed to genotype the pyrethroid resistance in the second region of the vgsc gene. The first assay targeted the mutation in the domain IIS4-5, and the primers were designed to flank the following nucleotide substitution in 918 locus. Reaction with the forward (FKDR2) and reverse (KDR; 5’CTCCATCAGGGAATCTATCCATGCT) primers yielded a 467-bp amplicon. The second assay targeted the domain IIS6 mutation, L1014F, and primers used in the reaction were KDF (AGCATGGATAGATTCCCTGATGGAG) and RKDR2, which produced a 370-bp amplicon. Each reaction (20 μl) contained 4 μl of sample gDNA, 900 nM of each primer, and 10 μl of Ampliqon SYBR Green Master mix High Rox (Ampliqon, Denmark). The sequenced amplicons of vgsc gene of the mutant tropical bed bug (with M918I and L1014F mutations), Kh1 strain of the common bed bug (without deduced double mutations), and ddH20 were used as positive control of the resistant alleles, positive control of the susceptible alleles, and negative control, respectively. The reaction was started with 95 °C hold for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 25 s and last hold step for 30 s at 90 °C. Melt curve analysis initiated from 60 to 90 °C at a rate of 0.1 °C /S, and the change in fluorescence of SYBR Green was measured continuously on the green channel of the ABI StepOnePlus RT-PCR system (Applied Biosystems, USA). Melt curves were generated in the StepOne 2.3 software (www.lifetechnologies.com). Gain optimization of all tubes was carried out before the melt analysis to obtain high-quality melting peaks. Each specimen was named as resistant (RR), susceptible (SS), and heterozygous (RS) according to the melt curves.

TaqMan qRT-PCR assay

The TaqMan PCR assays were conducted to detect the M918I mutation in bed bug samples. For these assays, the forward (CHPF; GCTCAGGGTGTTTAAGCTGG) and reverse (CHPR; CTGCATTCCCATCACAGCGA) primers, together with the wild-type CHSP (HEX-labeled probe; CCACTGTTCTGCCCATAATG) and the mutant-type CHRP (FAM-labeled probe; CCACTGTTCTGCCTATAATG), were designed from the sequences of specific PCR products of the second region using Primer Express version 2.0 software (Life Technologies, USA). The 5ʹ HEX- and FAM-labeled probes were also comprised of a non-fluorescent black hole quencher (BHQ) binder at their 3ʹ ends. PCR assay reactions (25 μl) contained 3 μl of gDNA, 12.5 μl of Probe-High Rox qPCR Master Mix (SinaClon, Iran), 700 nM of each primer, and 250 nM of each probe. Reactions were run on an ABI StepOnePlus RT-PCR system using temperature cycling conditions of 10 min at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 45 s. Increase in FAM and HEX fluorescence was monitored in real-time by acquiring each cycle on the blue (494 nm excitation and 518 nm emission) and green (535 nm excitation and 556 nm emission) channels, respectively, to aid in assigning genotypes.

Results

A total of 1377 adult bed bugs were collected from the study districts (Fig. 1), and all were identified as C. hemipterus. From the collected samples, 437 individuals were selected randomly and subjected to bioassay survey. Study populations were found to be resistant to permethrin when tested in contact bioassay within the 48-h exposure to the mentioned insecticide. The cumulative mortality rates in these populations were in the range of 30.7–38.7% and 58.4–77.4% in 24 and 48 h, respectively (Table 1). Among C. lectularius Kh1 strain, the corrected mortality rate within 24 h was obtained at > 99.0%. Results suggested that all the populations of C. hemipterus were fully resistant to permethrin. The knockdown rates of the tropical bed bug populations ranged from 32.2 to 46.6% and from 61 to 83.8% in the first and second days, respectively. There was no significant difference in the knockdown and mortality rates between studied populations (χ2 < 0.41, df = 6, p = 0.99). The low response to permethrin also occurred in minimum knockdown times. The KT50 and KT90 values in Zanjan and Rasht populations of the tropical bed bug varied in the range of 27.9–29.0 and 82.8–104.42 h, respectively, while these values were detected as 5.39 and 135.55 h in the common bed bug strain. The KT values obtained for C. lectularius population did not follow normal distribution for knockdown to log time (χ2 > 24.40, df = 8, p < 0.001). The KR50 and KR90 values among the studied populations ranged from 5.17 to 6.17 and from 5.35 to 7.58, respectively (Table 2). The results indicated kdr development among the studied populations.

Table 1 The percentage of knockdown and mortality in populations of the tropical bed bug exposing to permethrin 0.75% in 24 and 48 h
Full size table
Table 2 Regression parameters and expected minimum knockdown time (hours) in selected strains of tropical bed bug (C. h) and common bed bug (C. l) exposing to permethrin 0.75%
Full size table

Two regions of vgsc gene, containing key mutations of kdr-type resistance to PYs, were investigated in 313 samples of bed bugs. Fragments of the domain IS6 and the partial domain I–II linker of vgsc gene were amplified in 78 samples. A total of 14 amplicons (two samples from each population) were randomly selected for sequencing. The amplified fragment was 355 bp in size and contained an intron (64 bp) and two 3ʹ (147 bp) and 5ʹ (144 bp) exons encoding 97 amino acids (Fig. 2). The second region of the vgsc gene, the domain II and the partial domain II–III linker, was also amplified in 225 individuals, and 88 samples (11 amplicons from each population) were selected randomly and subjected to sequencing. Analysis of the sequences showed an 812-bp fragment containing three introns, I (73 bp), II (65 bp), and III (83 bp), and four exons, 3ʹ (144 bp), internal I (163 bp), internal II (183 bp), and 5ʹ (101 bp), and encoded 198 amino acids (Fig. 3). In samples subjected to DNA sequencing, no polymorphic site was found in the nucleotides alignment of the PCR products in both pyrethroid receptor sites. The consensus sequences were blasted in the NCBI and compared with the GenBank database. Analysis of these sequences against the reference strain of common bed bug, showed 98% identity in exon section, differing in three nucleotides within the first region (Fig. 2). Similarly, the exon nucleotide sequences of the second region of C. hemipterus reflected 95% identity with C. lectularius, with eight-nucleotide difference (Fig. 3). This analysis also showed that the fragments of the second region in C. lectularius Kh1 strain were complete similar with domain IIS1–S6 of reference common bed bug (Accession Number FJ031996). Nucleotide sequences of the studied fragments were submitted and are accessible in the NCBI GenBank with the Accession Numbers MK567761–MK567778, MK908866, MK908869–MK908921, and MK908967–MK908976.

Fig. 2
figure2

Alignment of the domain IS6 and partial domain I–II linker fragment of the vgsc gene of C. hemipterus with Accession No. MK908976 against the reference vgsc gene of C. lectularius wild type with Accession No. FJ031996. The mutation sites are indicated in vertical boxes; orange, no point mutation at V419 site, green, silent mutation with transition at A454 and K458 sites, and red, missense mutation with transition at A468T site. Nucleotides 1–147 include exon I, 148–211 intron I, and 212–355 exon II. NS and AS represent nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid sequences, respectively. The location of primers are indicated with red arrows

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure3

Alignment of the domains IIS1–S6 and partial domain II–III linker fragment of the vgsc gene of C. hemipterus with Accession No. MK567761 against the reference vgsc gene of C. lectularius wild type with Accession No. FJ031996. The mutation sites are indicated in vertical boxes; red, nonsense mutation at M918 and L1014 sites, green, silent mutations with transition (at L925, K949, N950, and H995 sites), and transversion (at L936 site), and blue, novel non-synonymous mutation with transition at D953 site. Nucleotides 1–144 include exon I, 145–217 intron I, 218–380 exon II, 381–445 intron II, 446–628 exon III, 629–711 intron II, and 712–812 exon IV. NS and AS represent nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid sequences, respectively. The location of primers are indicated with red (conventional PCR), blue (SYBR Green real-time PCR), and green (TaqMan real-time PCR) arrows

Full size image

To identify mutation within the studied populations, the nucleotide sequences of the exon at the first region were translated into protein and compared with reference sequence. No amino acid change was evident at V419 site in C. hemipterus, but A468T substitution was found in this region (Fig. 2). This replacement (A↔G transition) exhibited on ACT to GCT substitution at the first base of the A468 allele was located in the internal linker of the domain I–II, which caused amino acid change from alanine to threonine (Ala to Thr). Before the A468T substitution, two silent mutations with a transition at A454 and K458 sites occurred in the first region. Despite little kdr mutation evidence in the first region of the deduced gene, several mutations were identified in the second region. In this region, three transitions with change in amino acid at sites I918 (isoleucine/I: ATA), G953 (glycine/G: GGT), and F1014 (phenylalanine/F: TTC) were presented in C. hemipterus, compared to sites M918 (methionine/M: ATG), D953 (aspartic acid/D: GAT), and L1014 (leucine/L: CTG) in C. lectularius reference gene. The remaining mutations in the second region of C. hemipterus were silent. These mutations included transition at L925, K949, N950, and H995 sites and transversion at L854 and I936 sites (Fig. 3).

Melting peaks obtained from SYBR Green qRT-PCR assay were analyzed in 70 and 25 specimens of C. hemipterus and C. lectularius, respectively. All the tropical bed bugs showed a single peak at 76.5 °C and 76 °C in the domain IIS4–5 and IIS6 fragments, respectively. Although a single peak was also presented in all of the common bed bug samples for these fragments, the melting temperature in this bed bug was more than C. hemipterus and reached 81.5 and 81.0 in the deduced fragments, respectively. The I918/I918 and F1014/F1014 resistant homozygous alleles were visible in all the C. hemipterus samples. However, the M918/M918 and L1014/L1014 susceptible homozygous alleles were presented in all the common bed bug individuals (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure4

Melting curve of the vgsc gene fragments obtained with SYBR Green real-time PCR assay in studied samples of bed bugs. a Fragments with position 918, b Fragments with position 1014, (RR) mutant type of C. hemipterus, (SS) C. lectularius Kh1 strain without mutation in 918 and 1014 loci and similar with the domain IIS1–S6 of common bed bug (Accession No FJ031996). The violet curves and baselines represent the positive control (reference sequences of C. hemipterus and C. lectularius) and negative control, respectively. The curves on the right side of the plots, marked with SS, are common bed bug specimens and the curves on the left side of the plots, marked with RR, are samples of tropical bed bugs

Full size image

TaqMan real-time PCR assay was performed for 840 samples of the studied populations of the tropical bed bug. The M918I mutation was presented in all the samples, and all of the studied populations carried resistant kdr alleles (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure5

Amplification plots of the vgsc gene fragment of studied tropical bed bugs using TaqMan real-time PCR. a Amplification of the mutant (with M918I mutation) and wild-type DNA fragments in both samples. b Amplification of mutant and wild-type fragments in all samples. The solid blue and green lines marked with 0.074577 and 0.2 represent the threshold cycle (Ct) in the mutant and wild groups, respectively. The ΔRn in the Y axis is the difference of fluorescence between the sample and baseline. The baseline of mutant and wild groups (represented as blue and green lines, respectively) is the line at which there are no background fluorescence peaks crossing over it

Full size image

Discussion

This is the first study that widely surveyed the field strains of tropical bed bug in Iran via bioassay and molecular analysis. There has previously been no available information regarding in kdr and sequence data of vgsc gene of this species in studied areas. Therefore, generating relevant bioassay and genetic data was of high priority for investigations focusing on bed bug control in this country.

Because we did not have a standard susceptible strain, as a limitation of this study, comparison of the bioassay data between studied populations revealed low levels of knockdown and mortality rates to permethrin in all of the field strains of tropical bed bug. Even though the knockdown and the mortality rates are not indicators of the same mechanisms of resistance and evolutionary selection, the correlation between these indexes is strong enough to identify permethrin resistance in the field populations. These values cannot be confidently related to the permethrin resistance phenotype and to identify the actual values further research is suggested with the provision of sensitive strain.

Similar phenomenon in this study, i.e. resistance to insecticides, was found in the field strains of C. hemipterus to different pyrethroids (bifenthrin, cypermethrin, esfenvalerate, and etofenprox) from Thailand [42], DDT and deltamethrin residues from Malaysia [45], a mixture of deltamethrin and imidacloprid from Australia [52], and permethrin and deltamethrin from Sri Lanka [26]. These conditions were also represented in different populations of the common bed bug for pyrethroids from USA [23], permethrin and deltamethrin from Australia [53], allethrin from Sydney [44], imidacloprid and β-cyfluthrin from Malaysia [54, 55], several neonicotinoids (imidacloprid, acetamiprid, thiamethoxam, and dinotefuran) from USA [56], bifenthrin from Germany [57], a mixture of deltamethrin and imidacloprid from Australia [53], and bendiocarb from Paris [58]. Based on the bioassay results and the findings of previous studies [26, 42, 45, 52], all the bed bug populations in the present study manifested resistance to permethrin. Thus, the reconsideration of control methodologies is of paramount importance in the studied areas.

From the bioassay data, it was determined that C. hemipterus had higher resistance to permethrin compared to the common bed bug, and KR values were found to be 5–7 in this bed bug. Due to the lack of a susceptible strain, the main limitation of this study, the estimated values of KR using C. lectularius Kh1 field samples, cannot be a real value of resistance factor, as they are overestimated. Despite the absence of M918I and L1014F mutations in common bed bug samples, the possibility of V419L mutation [9, 19, 22,23,24], detoxification of enzymes [9], and heterogeneity of field samples could enhance the baseline susceptible data in this bed bug. Nevertheless, the higher value of KR, explaining the high frequency of kdr alleles, is strong evidence for the development of pyrethroid resistance. Therefore, the inclusion of resistance management in modified control programs is an important issue that needs to be taken into account.

In the present study, quantitative real-time TaqMan and SYBR Green PCR assays confirmed kdr-related mutations in the populations of tropical bed bug. There are numerous applications of these techniques in gene expression, DNA quantification, and genotyping, as well as in detecting and monitoring insecticide resistance in vector populations. Simultaneous application and visualization of newly formed DNA amplicon by these methods facilitate fast, high-throughput detection and quantification of target DNA sequences in different matrices. In addition, there is no need for further manipulations, such as electrophoresis and densitometry, which render these methods be safe in terms of avoiding contaminations. Other advantages of qRT-PCR methods include a wide dynamic range for quantification and multiplexing of amplifications of several targets into a single reaction. Despite the lack of susceptible strain of tropical bed bug, the similarity of nucleotide sequence of common bed bug Kh1 strain at 918 and 1014 loci with the sensitive samples of tropical bed bug, SYBR Green assay is suggested to identify the frequency of mutant type at 918 locus, and both of wild and mutant genotypes at 1014 site in future studies. However, the presence of nucleotide polymorphisms in the downstream of the 918 locus may cause challenges in the analysis of the wild genotype.

With the help of the SYBR Green and TaqMan real-time PCR assays, the major kdr/super-kdr mutations were identified in all of the tropical bed bug samples. The role of L1014F mutation in kdr-type resistance, reduction of target site sensitivity to pyrethroids, and M918I mutation with super-kdr resistance in C. hemipterus and several other insects have been affirmed in numerous earlier studies [9,10,11,12,13, 15, 16, 21, 25, 59,60,61,62]. From the result of this study and those of previous investigations, it can be concluded that the populations of tropical bed bug in the studied areas could have a high level of resistance to pyrethroids. This situation calls for a decrease in reliance on pyrethroids and highlights the need for alternative insecticides with different modes of action or alternative approaches to make bed bug control more effective.

DNA sequencing identified the double mutation, M918I, and L1014F, in all of studied populations. Because kdr and super-kdr genotypes are presented together, a very high resistance is expected in the studied areas. Although the traditional bioassay in the present study showed resistance to permethrin, in order to identify the actual level of resistance, it is necessary to conduct further studies using a standard bioassay test. The occurrence of M918I and L1014F mutations signifies the emergence and expansion of strong pyrethroid resistance of tropical bed bug in different areas of Iran. Two hypotheses could explain the emergence and expansion of this pest. In the first hypothesis, the homogenous strains with super-kdr alleles, historically undergo strong PYs selection pressure, might have been introduced to Iran in the early third millennium and subsequently expanded rapidly throughout the country due to human-mediated movement. The second hypothesis for the expansion of strongly resistant strains includes the adaptive response to the selective pressure of applied PYs and their inability to control this emergent pest. Previously, various parts of the study areas were covered by OCs in the 1960s, with the implementation of the malaria control program. After controlling malaria in the northern half of Iran, the southern parts were sprayed with OPs and Cs pesticides until the 1990s. A number of villages in the northern parts of the country were subjected to PYs, Cs, and OPs insecticide pressure in the 2010s, due to the implementation of parasite control plan by the Iranian Veterinary Organization, Ministry of Agriculture Jihad. Moreover, contaminated rooms were sprayed with Cs, OPs, and PYs insecticides by private pest control agents over the past three decades. In the studied populations, target site insensitivity and kdr-mediated resistance mechanism may be subjected to selection, as DDT was introduced for the first time. Since DDT and PYs have a similar mode of action, cross-resistance between them, the selection pressure has continued with the application of pyrethroids for controlling public health pests and pyrethroid-treated bed nets. However, after the control of malaria and the cessation of vector control programs, the selective pressure decreased during the last three decades. For the reason that there is not a huge selection pressure to justify the emergence of such homogeneity in the kdr and super-kdr allele, the probability of implying the adaptive response to selective pressure hypothesis is lower, and it is more likely that the homogenous strains with super-kdr allele were introduced to Iran. Although the double mutation (M918I and L1014F) kdr allele was found in populations from Australia, India, Thailand, and China [19, 25, 59], the origin of this invasive pest in Iran is under question because the corresponding gDNA sequences of the target gene are not publicly available. Additional complimentary studies with microsatellite or mitochondrial markers, such as the study of Zhao et al. [59], are suggested to clarify this hypothesis via investigating more samples from different populations. Our study was not designed to seek the point of the origin or introduction of pyrethroid resistance into bed bug populations. Nevertheless, this resistance may have a multifunctional origin, and mechanisms such as metabolic breakdown and efflux may implicate this issue [9]. Further epigenetic studies with more population and additional molecular markers are needed to come to a final conclusion on the origin of bed bug resistance in the study areas. Moreover, the presence of kdr resistance and the inability of PYs to control this emergent pest necessitate reconsidering control methodologies and applying products against this pest. Indeed, the application of the integrated pest management measures and determination of the ecological, social and biological risk factors, which play a key role in bed bug infestation, are important issues that need to be considered in developing control programs against this invasive pest.

Multiple alignment of DNA sequence from C. hemipterus with that of C. lectularius presented the A468T and D953G mutations, in addition to the M918I and L1014F mutations, in studied populations. The 468 locus in the intracellular linker of the domain IS6–IIS1 is the hypervariable site in different species of insect. Therefore, the nucleotide variation in this locus may reflect the difference between two bed bug species. On the other hand, known kdr mutations in this region are rare, and only E435K at the beginning and C785R mutations at the end of the I–II linker were identified in pyrethroid-resistant strains of the German cockroach, Blattella germanica [18]. Accordingly, the A468T substitution might be related to insecticide resistance in the tropical bed bug. The D953G mutation, located in the linker of the domain IIS5–S6, has been reported from pyrethroid-resistant strains of C. hemipterus in Thailand [25]. This mutation, which is equivalent to L936F mutation in corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea, has been verified to reduce the sensitivity to pyrethroids [18, 63]. The vgsc gene regions, where A468 and D953 are located, are major sites for the influence of PYs, and several point mutations clustering in these regions affect resistance to pyrethroids [9,10,11, 13, 15, 20, 21]. Therefore, this study highlights that the D953G and A468T substitutions could have additive effects on main kdr mutations in pyrethroid resistance, though other forms of resistance (cuticular and detoxification) cannot be excluded. Ultimately, the function of the A468T and D953G variations needs to be tested by the construction of mutant transcript in further studies, to confirm that this construction is actually a kdr mutation against the pyrethroid resistance.

Unlike the pyrethroid-resistant strains of C. lectularius in the present study, the L925I, I936F, V419L, and other putative kdr mutations in the IS6 and the partial domain I–II linker were not found in C. hemipterus. The existence of M918I and L1014F mutations in the tropical bed bug expresses the specific responses of this species to the selective pressure of PYs. These adaptive responses may be related to the innate immune system and DNA damage repair pathways in C. hemipterus [64, 65].

The aim of this investigation was to determine the kdr mutation in different populations of tropical bed bug, and, therefore, several point mutations, including A468T, D953G, M918I, and L1014F, were identified. Similar to the finding of our study, previous investigations have documented the D953G, M918I, and L1014F mutations in other populations of bed bugs and other insects [9, 13, 15, 25, 61, 62]. However, owing to the mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulatory variation in organisms, mRNA editing is possible [66]. Perhaps, the RNA sequence can be altered from the encoding DNA template, which can potentially lead to a change in the actual DNA expression of the kdr mutation. There are known surveys showing that insects use RNA editing to create variations in the vgsc gene [67, 68]. Consequently, future studies based on both DNA and cDNA sequencing would strengthen the findings of this study.

The results of the current study showed the high frequency of kdr mutations and pyrethroid resistance in different populations of tropical bed bug in the studied areas. Developing resistance management plans and applying effective tactics [2, 69] are essential to lessen the bed bug infestation and frequency of mutant alleles. Accordingly, the use of insecticides with different modes of action and intensive application of pyrethroids with insect growth regulators (IGRs) are recommended to control the tropical bed bug. Moreover, integration of non-chemical methods [70], i.e. applying multidisciplinary control methods to prevent pest entry, limiting access to feed on hosts and shelters, vacuuming, using impregnated covers and mattresses, and employing heat in form of dry steam and cold, are suggested for the management of this invasive pest.

Given that the passive host/furniture-mediated dispersal is the common modus operandi, and the active dispersal is restricted to within buildings, in addition to the mentioned control tactics, other strategies should also be considered in developing control plans, such as educating travelers to recognize bed bugs and avoid carrying them from place to place in infested luggage, training residents to identify pest and take necessary actions when infestation is suspended, providing guidelines for accommodation suppliers in how to make rooms less bed bug friendly, and establishing instructions and rules for importing and trading of second-hand goods, furniture, and clothing [2, 63, 71]. Altogether, in setting up management plans for bed bugs, the biological and socioeconomic risk factors, as well as the side effects of current control measures against public health pests, should be taken into account.

Conclusions

The distribution map of tropical bed bug has been expanded in subtropical and temperate areas. The high sensitive/specific, rapid, and cost-effective qRT-PCR assays developed in the present study are suggested for detecting the allele frequencies of kdr-type mutations in different populations of tropical bed bug. The lack of mortality and knockdown effects in exposure to permethrin, together with the presence of kdr-type mutations in vgsc gene, indicates the expansion of super-kdr-resistant populations of tropical bed bug in various areas of Iran. Further complimentary studies with microsatellite or mitochondrial markers are proposed to explain the evolutionary origin of this resistance. In addition, reconsideration of control strategies and product registration against this resurgent pest is advised for managing resistance and decrease of resistant alleles. Obviously, application of effective insecticides, as well as the consideration of biological and socioeconomic risk factors and the side effects of current public pest control measures, need to be taken into account in the establishment of revised control strategies.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. The newly generated sequences were submitted to the GenBank database under the Accession Numbers MK567761–MK567778, MK908866, MK908869–MK908921, and MK908967–MK908976.

Abbreviations

Cs:

Carbamates

gDNA:

Genomic DNA

kdr :

Knockdown resistance

KR:

Knockdown resistance ratio

KT:

Knockdown time

OCs:

Organochlorine compounds

Ops:

Organophosphates

NCBI:

National Center for Biotechnology Information

PYs:

Pyrethroids

qRT-PCR:

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

vgsc :

Voltage-gated sodium channel gene

VGSC:

Voltage-gated sodium channel protein

References

  1. 1.

    Doggett SL, Dwyer DE, Penas PF, Russell RC. Bed bugs: clinical relevance and control options. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25:164–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Doggett SL, Miller DM, Lee CY. Advances in the biology and management of modern bed bugs. Hoboken: Wiley; 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ling J, Persson Vinnersten T, Hesson JC, Bohlin J, Roligheten E, et al. Identification of hepatitis C virus in the common bed bug—a potential, but uncommon route for HCV infection? Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9:1429–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Romero A. Moving from the old to the new insecticide research on bed bugs since the resurgence. Insects. 2011;2:210–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Davies TGE, Field LM, Williamson MS. The reemergence of the bed bug as a nuisance pest: implications of resistance to the pyrethroid insecticides. Med Vet Entomol. 2012;26:241–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rosen S, Hadani A, Lavi AG, Berman E, Bendheim U, Hisham AY. The occurrence of the tropical bed bug (Cimex hemipterus, Fabricius) in poultry barns in Israel. Avian Pathol. 1987;16:339–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Al-Saffar HH, Augul RS. Survey with checklist of the invasive insects to Iraq. Bull Iraq Nat Hist Mus. 2019;15:343–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Potter MF. The history of bed bug management-with lessons from the past. Am Entomol. 2011;57:14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dang K, Doggett SL, Singham GV, Lee CY. Insecticide resistance and resistance mechanisms in bed bugs, Cimex spp. (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). Parasites Vectors. 2017;10:318.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Davies TGE, Field LM, Usherwood PNR, Williamson MS. DDT, pyrethrins, pyrethroids and insect sodium channels. IUBMB Life. 2007;59:151–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Soderlund DM. Pyrethroids, knockdown resistance and sodium channels. Pest Manag Sci. 2008;64:610–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dong K. Insect sodium channels and insecticide resistance. Invert Neurosci. 2007;7:17–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Davies TGE, Williamson MS. Interactions of pyrethroids with the voltage-gated sodium channel. Bayer Cropsci J. 2009;62:159–78.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Burton MJ, Mellor IR, Duce IR, Davies TE, Field LM, Williamson MS. Differential resistance of insect sodium channels with kdr mutations to deltamethrin, permethrin and DDT. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2011;41:723–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Dong K, Du Y, Rinkevich F, Nomura Y, Xu P, Wang L, et al. Molecular biology of insect sodium channels and pyrethroid resistance. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;50:1–17.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Soderlund DM, Knipple DC. The molecular biology of knockdown resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;33:563–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Reinhardt K, Siva-Jothy MT. Biology of the bed bugs (Cimicidae). Annu Rev Entomol. 2007;52:351–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rinkevich FD, Du Y, Dong K. Diversity and convergence of sodium channel mutations involved in resistance to pyrethroids. Pest Biochem Physiol. 2013;106:93–100.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Dang K, Toi CS, Lilly DG, Bu W, Doggett SL. Detection of knockdown resistance mutations in the common bed bug, Cimex lectularius (Hemiptera: Cimicidae), in Australia. Pest Manag Sci. 2015;71:914–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Field LM, Davies TE, O’Reilly AO, Williamson MS, Wallace BA. Voltage-gated sodium channels as targets for pyrethroid insecticides. Eur Biophys J. 2017;46:675–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Williamson MS, Martinez-Torres D, Hick CA, Devonshire AL. Identification of mutations in the house fly para-type sodium channel gene associated with knockdown resistance (kdr) to pyrethroid insecticides. Mol Gen Genet. 1996;252:51–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Yoon KS, Kwon DH, Strycharz JP, Hollingsworth CS, Lee SH, Clark JM. Biochemical and molecular analysis of deltamethrin resistance in the common bed bug (Hemiptera:Cimicidae). J Med Entomol. 2008;45:1092–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zhu F, Wigginton J, Romero A, Moore A, Ferguson K, Palli R, et al. Widespread distribution of knockdown resistance mutations in the bed bug, Cimex lectularius (Hemiptera:Cimicidae), populations in the United States. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2010;73:245–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Palenchar DJ, Gellatly KJ, Yoon KS, Mumcuoglu KY, Shalom U, Clark JM. Quantitative sequencing for the determination of kdr-type resistance allele (V419L, L925I, I936F) frequencies in common bed bug (Hemiptera:Cimicidae) populations collected from Israel. J Med Entomol. 2015;52:1018–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Dang K, Toi CS, Lilly DG, Lee CY, Naylor R, Tawatsin A, et al. Identification of putative kdr mutations in the tropical bed bug, Cimex hemipterus (Hemiptera:Cimicidae). Pest Manag Sci. 2015;71:1015–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Punchihewa R, de Silva WP, Weeraratne TC, Karunaratne SP. Insecticide resistance mechanisms with novel ‘kdr’ type gene mutations in the tropical bed bug Cimex hemipterus. Parasites Vectors. 2019;12:310.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Durand R, Cannet A, Berdjane Z, Bruel C, Haouchine D, Delaunay P, et al. Infestation by pyrethroids resistant bed bugs in the suburb of Paris, France. Parasite. 2012;19:381–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zhu F, Gujar H, Gordon JR, Haynes KF, Potter MF, Palli SR. Bed bugs evolved unique adaptive strategy to resist pyrethroid insecticides. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1456.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Mofidi C, Samimi B. Preliminary experiments on the susceptibility of Cimex lectularius to insecticides in Tehran. Institute of Parasitology and Malariology, Tehran. Mimeograph document. 1956. 5 pp.

  30. 30.

    Gefter I. Insecticide resistance and vector control. Thirteenth report of the WHO expert committee on insecticides. Geneva: WHO. Tech Rep Ser. 1963;265.

  31. 31.

    World Health Organization. Insecticide resistance and vector control. Seventeenth report of the WHO Expert Committee on Insecticides. Geneva: WHO. Tech Rep Ser. 1970;443.

  32. 32.

    Haghi SFM, Behbodi M, Hajati H, Shafaroudi MM. Prevalence of bed bug (Cimex lectularius) in human settlement area of Bahnamir, Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2014;4:S786–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Dehghani R, Hashemi A, Takhtfiroozeh S, Chimehi E. Bed bug (Cimex lectularius) outbreak: a cross-sectional study in Polour, Iran. Iran J Dermatol. 2016;19:16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ghahari H, Moulet P, Ostovan H. An annotated catalog of the Iranian Cimicidae and Largidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) and in memoriam Carl Walter Schaefer (1934–2015). Zootaxa. 2016;4111:194–200.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Mumcuoglu KY, Shalom U. Questionnaire survey of common bed bug (Cimex lectularius) infestations in Israel. Isr J Entomol. 2010;40:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    El-Azazy OME, Al-Behbehani B, Abdou NMI. Increasing bed bug, Cimex lectularius, infestations in Kuwait. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2013;43:415–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Berenji F, Moshaverinia A, Jadidoleslami A, Shamsian A, Doggett SL, Moghaddas E. Evaluation of the common bed bug, Cimex lectularius (Insecta:Hemiptera:Cimicidae) susceptibility to λ-cyhalothrin, malathion, and diazinon in northeastern Iran. J Med Entomol. 2019;56:903–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Usinger RL. Monograph of Cimicidae, The Thomas Say Foundation. Maryland: Entomological Society of America; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kim DY, Billen J, Doggett SL, Lee CY. Differences in climbing ability of Cimex lectularius and Cimex hemipterus (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). J Econ Entomol. 2017;110:1179–86.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Karunaratne SH, Damayanthi BT, Fareena MH, Imbuldeniya V, Hemingway J. Insecticide resistance in the tropical bed bug Cimex hemipterus. Pest Biochem Physiol. 2007;88:102–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Romero A, Potter MF, Potter DA, Haynes KF. Insecticide resistance in the bed bug: a factor in the pest’s sudden resurgence? J Med Entomol. 2007;44:175–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Tawatsin A, Thavara U, Chompoosri J, Phusup Y, Jonjang N, Khumsawads C, et al. Insecticide resistance in bed bugs in Thailand and laboratory evaluation of insecticides for the control of Cimex hemipterus and Cimex lectularius (Hemiptera:Cimicidae). J Med Entomol. 2011;48:1023–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Seong KM, Lee DY, Yoon KS, Kwon DH, Kim HC, Klein TA, et al. Establishment of quantitative sequencing and filter contact vial bioassay for monitoring pyrethroid resistance in the common bed bug Cimex lectularius. J Med Entomol. 2014;47:592–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Dang K, Lilly DG, Bu W, Doggett SL. Simple, rapid and cost effective technique for the detection of pyrethroid resistance in bed bugs, Cimex spp. (Hemiptera:Cimicidae). Aust J Entomol. 2014;54:191–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Dang K, Singham GV, Doggett SL, Lilly DG, Lee CY. Effects of different surfaces and insecticide carriers on residual insecticide bioassays against bed bugs, Cimex spp. (Hemiptera:Cimicidae). J Econ Entomol. 2017;110:558–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    World Health Organization. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vector mosquitoes. 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Sakuma M. Probit analysis of preference data. Appl Entomol. 1998;33:339–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ghavami MB, Haghi FP, Alibabaei Z, Enayati AA, Vatandoost H. First report of target site insensitivity to pyrethroids in human flea, Pulex irritans (Siphonaptera:Pulicidae). Pest Biochem Physiol. 2018;146:97–105.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Ghavami MB, Ghanbari M, Panahi S, Taghiloo B. Diversity of mitochondrial genes and predominance of Clade B in different head lice populations in the northwest of Iran. Parasites Vectors. 2020;13:485.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1999;41:95–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;2018(35):1547–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Lilly DG, Dang K, Webb CE, Doggett SL. Are Australian field-collected strains of Cimex lectularius and Cimex hemipterus (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) resistant to deltamethrin and imidacloprid as revealed by topical assay? Austral Entomol. 2018;57:77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Lilly DG, Russell RC, Webb CE, Doggett SL, Zalucki MP, Orton CJ. Confirmation of insecticide resistance in Cimex lectularius Linnaeus (Hemiptera:Cimicidae) in Australia. Austral Entomol. 2015;54:96–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Ab Majid AH, Zahran Z. Laboratory bioassay on efficacy of dual mode of action insecticides (beta-cyfluthrin and imidacloprid) towards tropical bed bugs, Cimex hemipterus (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). J Entomol Zool Stud. 2015;3:217–20.

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Campbell BE, Miller DM. A Method for evaluating insecticide efficacy against bed bug, Cimex lectularius, eggs and first instars. J Vis Exp. 2017;121:e55092. https://doi.org/10.3791/55092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Romero A, Anderson TD. High levels of resistance in the common bed bug, Cimex lectularius (Hemiptera: Cimicidae), to neonicotinoid insecticides. J Med Entomol. 2016;53:727–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Ashbrook AR, Scharf ME, Bennett GW, Gondhalekar AD. Detection of reduced susceptibility to chlorfenapyr and bifenthrin containing products in field populations of the bed bug (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). J Econ Entomol. 2017;110:1195–202.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Candy K, Mohammad A, Bruel C, Izri A. Ineffectiveness of insecticide bendiocarb against a Cimex lectularius (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) population in Paris, France. J Med Entomol. 2018;55:1648–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Zhao Y, Feng X, Li M, Qiu X. The double-mutation (M918I+ L1014F) kdr allele is fixed in Cimex hemipterus populations in Guangxi, China. Bull Entomol Res. 2020;110:506–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Lewis CD, Levine BA, Vargo EL, Schal C, Booth W. Recent detection of multiple populations of the tropical bed bug (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) exhibiting kdr-associated mutations in Hawaii. J Med Entomol. 2020;57:1077–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Soderlund DM. Molecular mechanisms of pyrethroid insecticide neurotoxicity: recent advances. Arch Toxicol. 2012;86:165–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Naqqash MN, Gökçe A, Bakhsh A, Salim M. Insecticide resistance and its molecular basis in urban insect pests. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:1363–73.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Hopkins BW, Pietrantonio PV. The Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) voltage-gated sodium channel and mutations associated with pyrethroid resistance in field-collected adult males. Insect Biochem Mol. 2010;40:385–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Charlesworth D, Barton NH, Charlesworth B. The sources of adaptive variation. Proc R Soc Lond Biol. 2017;284(1855):20162864.

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Hawkins NJ, Bass C, Dixon A, Neve P. The evolutionary origins of pesticide resistance. Biol Rev. 2019;94:135–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Gott JM, Emeson RB. Functions and mechanisms of RNA editing. Annu Rev Genet. 2000;34:499–531.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Song W, Liu Z, Tan J, Nomura Y, Dong K. RNA editing generates tissue-specific sodium channels with distinct gating properties. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:32554–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Xu Q, Wang H, Zhang L, Liu N. Sodium channel gene expression associated with pyrethroid resistant houseflies and German cockroaches. Gene. 2006;379:62–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Fong D, Bos C, Stuart T, Perron S, Kosatsky T, Shum M. Prevention, identification, and treatment options for the management of bed bug infestations. Environ Health Rev. 2013;55:89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Benoit J. Stress tolerance of bed bugs: a review of factors that cause trauma to Cimex lectularius and C. hemipterus. Insects. 2011;2:151–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Bennett GW, Gondhalekar AD, Wang C, Buczkowski G, Gibb TJ. Using research and education to implement practical bed bug control programs in multifamily housing. Pest Manag Sci. 2016;72:8–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grant nos. A-12-84-7 and A-12-84-12 from Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran. Our deepest thanks go to specialists and colleagues who have taken part in the collection of bed bug material for the study; regrettably, we cannot name them all here. We are thankful to Miss Babaei who helped to obtain materials and perform the laboratory work. We would like to express our gratitude to Mrs. Saffari for the English editing of the manuscript and to Mr. Mohammadi for his valuable comments. We thank Prof. Fazaeli, Prof. Enayati, and the three anonymous reviewers of the present study for their constructive comments that improved the quality of this manuscript. The authors are grateful to Deputy of Health of the studied provinces for providing bed bug sampling and technical assistance.

Funding

This study was funded by Zanjan University of Medical Sciences A-12-84-7 and A-12-84-12.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran

    Mohammad Bagher Ghavami, Zarafat Ghahremani, Narges Raeisi & Behrooz Taghiloo

Authors
  1. Mohammad Bagher Ghavami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zarafat Ghahremani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Narges Raeisi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Behrooz Taghiloo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MBG designed and performed the study. ZG and NR conceived the experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. BT helped in collection of samples and implementation of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Bagher Ghavami.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee in Biomedical Research (ZUMS.REC.1395.217) of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghavami, M.B., Ghahremani, Z., Raeisi, N. et al. High levels of pyrethroid resistance and super-kdr mutations in the populations of tropical bed bug, Cimex hemipterus, in Iran. Parasites Vectors 14, 470 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04962-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cimex hemipterus
  • Tropical bed bug
  • Kdr/super-kdr-type mutations
  • Resistant to pyrethroids
  • Bioassay test

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us