Skip to main content
Download PDF

Assessing antibody decline after chemotherapy of early chronic Chagas disease patients

Parasites & Vectors volume 14, Article number: 543 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Chagas disease remains a significant public health problem in Latin America. There are only two chemotherapy drugs, nifurtimox and benznidazole, and both may have severe side effects. After complete chemotherapy of acute cases, seropositive diagnosis may revert to negative. However, there are no definitive parasitological or serological biomarkers of cure.

Methods

Following a pilot study with seven Bolivian migrants to Spain, we tested 71 serum samples from chronic patients (mean age 12.6 years) inhabiting the Argentine Chaco region. Benznidazole chemotherapy (5–8 mg/kg day, twice daily for 60 days) was administered during 2011–2016. Subsequently, pre-and post-chemotherapy serum samples were analysed in pairs by IgG1 and IgG ELISA using two different antigens and Chagas Sero K-SeT rapid diagnostic tests (RDT). Molecular diagnosis by kDNA-PCR was applied to post-treatment samples.

Results

Pilot data demonstrated IgG1 antibody decline in three of seven patients from Bolivia 1 year post-treatment. All Argentine patients in 2017 (averaging 5 years post-treatment), except one, were positive by conventional serology. All were kDNA-PCR-negative. Most (91.5%) pre-treatment samples were positive by the Chagas Sero K-SeT RDT, confirming the predominance of TcII/V/VI. IgG1 and IgG of Argentine patients showed significant decline in antibody titres post-chemotherapy, with either lysate (IgG, P = 0.0001, IgG1, P = 0.0001) or TcII/V/VI peptide antigen (IgG, P = 0.0001, IgG1, P = 0.0001). IgG1 decline was more discriminative than IgG. Antibody decline after treatment was also detected by the RDT. Incomplete treatment was associated with high IgG1 post-treatment titres against lysate (P = 0.013), as were IgG post-treatment titres to TcII/V/VI peptide (P = 0.0001). High pre-treatment IgG1 with lysate was associated with Qom ethnicity (P = 0.045). No associations were found between gender, age, body mass index and pre- or post-treatment antibody titres.

Conclusions

We show that following chemotherapy of early chronic Chagas disease, significant decline in IgG1 antibody suggests cure, whereas sustained or increased IgG1 is a potential indicator of treatment failure. Due to restricted sensitivity, IgG1 should not be used as a diagnostic marker but has promise, with further development, as a biomarker of cure.

Graphical abstract

We show that following chemotherapy of early chronic Chagas disease, a significant decline in IgG1 antibody suggests cure, whereas sustained or increased IgG1 is a potential indicator of treatment failure. Due to restricted sensitivity, IgG1 should not be used as a diagnostic marker but has promise, with further development, as a biomarker of cure.

Background

Chagas disease, caused by the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi, remains a major cause of disability in the Americas, particularly in the Gran Chaco region of Argentina, Bolivia and Paraguay. Trypanosoma cruzi is primarily transmitted via infected faeces of the triatomine bug vector, during a blood meal, when the parasite can enter the host through mucosal membranes and abraded skin. Transmission may also be congenital, by blood or organ donation, and orally via triatomine contamination of food or drink [1]. The initial acute phase of Chagas disease is often asymptomatic or without specific symptoms, although fatalities may occur [2]. The subsequent chronic phase may develop years later, in about 30% of individuals, principally with cardiomyopathy, and/or megasyndromes of the oesophagus and colon [3]. Infection can be cleared by a full course of chemotherapy with benznidazole (or nifurtimox). However, both drugs require prolonged treatment (30–60 days), and can be interrupted by severe adverse effects, particularly in adults. Delivery of chemotherapy has gained renewed impetus in the last 10 years, and treatment is now more accessible to rural communities [4,5,6,7] and urban centres [8]. However, the potential for improving long-term prognosis and for controlling transmission is usually lost due to the lack of early diagnosis and treatment, and delay in delivering insecticide control of infested dwellings, respectively [9].

Serological techniques to identify anti-T. cruzi immunoglobulin G (IgG), which are used principally in the chronic phase when parasites are sequestered in the tissues and rare in the circulating blood [10], include the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), indirect haemagglutination (IHA), indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and several commercial rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), among the most commonly employed [10,11,12]. However, tests vary in practicality, sensitivity and specificity, and can be discordant between patients from different geographical locations [13]. During the chronic phase, other diagnostic techniques can be used, including molecular methods, for example kDNA-PCR, which amplifies sequences in the T. cruzi kinetoplast, a dense network structure of repetitive mitochondrial DNA, but these methods may lack sensitivity due to the paucity of circulating parasites. Therefore, serological identification of T. cruzi-specific IgG antibodies is considered the standard. However, the World Health Organization recommends at least two tests using different methods and/or detecting antibodies to different antigens and potentially a third test if the results are conflicting, in order to make a definitive diagnosis [14, 15]. Many biomarkers have been assayed as criteria of cure; however, reversion of conventional serology from positive to negative is considered the best and most reliable indicator of successful parasitological cure [14]. Nevertheless, except in treatment of initial acute cases or in the chronic phase during early childhood, the decline of conventional antibody (IgG) titres may take many years [16, 17], and patients therefore remain without confirmation of treatment outcome. Not having a definitive answer soon after chemotherapy is a fundamental impediment that can complicate patient management, and patients may be unwilling to start prolonged drug treatment if there is a risk of adverse side effects, with uncertain improvement of clinical prognosis, such as prevention of cardiomyopathy [18, 19]. Furthermore, with increased national and international migration, long-term patient follow-up is proving difficult and impractical. Thus, an early biomarker of cure is urgently needed [20].

Trypanosoma cruzi is composed of six genetic lineages or discrete typing units (DTUs), TcI–VI [21], with a possible seventh, TcBat [22]. TcI, TcII, TcV and TcVI are the most common in human infections, whilst TcIII and TcIV are principally associated with sylvatic cycles. It has long been proposed that the differing lineages may contribute to the varying clinical forms of Chagas disease throughout South America [23].

Various T. cruzi antigens or antigenic fractions that elicit a serological response have been evaluated for post-treatment biomarkers [24,25,26], with relative success [24]. The MultiCruzi assay, a serological assay incorporating 15 T. cruzi-specific antigens, when used with an interpretation formula, has been proposed for use as a predictive tool to assess parasitological cure in infants and children [27]. In paediatric cases post-chemotherapy, antibody titres to the trypomastigote small surface antigen (TSSA) shared by TcII, TcV and TcVI (TSSA-II/V/VI) decreased significantly faster than those against crude parasite homogenates [28]. Serology with a synthetic peptide TSSApep-II/V/VI epitope also revealed an association between seropositivity and severity of chagasic cardiomyopathy [29], and ELISAs and RDTs with protein G detection had the capacity to resolve host, ecological and epidemiological associations in the Argentine Chaco [30].

IgG is the most common class of immunoglobulin in human serum, the major antibody of the secondary immune response and is split into four subclasses, IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4. IgG1 is at the highest levels in adult sera, with a relative abundance of 60% [31]. In comparison, although children are born with a relatively high level of IgG1 from the mother, this quickly drops to low levels due to non-sustained antigenic stimulation. From 6 months of age, the level of IgG1 increases, and by 5 years of age the level of IgG1 is 75% of that found in adult sera [32].

During the acute stage of infection, IgG is found at relatively low levels, and IgM is the most abundant antibody; however, as the infection changes from acute to chronic, there is a switch to IgG [33]. Of the four subclasses of IgG, IgG1, IgG2 and IgG3 are found at high titres during T. cruzi infection, with IgG1 being the most abundant, whereas IgG4 is at relatively low levels [34, 35]. Increased anti-T. cruzi IgG1 titres have also been associated with increased severity of Chagas disease cardiomyopathy [33]. Here we address whether IgG1 may be an early biomarker of cure after treatment of chronic Chagas disease. Following a pilot study, we assess IgG and IgG1 antibody decline in treated early chronic Chagas disease patients living in the Argentine Chaco where domestic transmission was interrupted, using separately whole cell lysate and TSSApep-II/V/VI antigens, and we show that IgG1 is more discriminative as a biomarker for assessing cure than IgG, irrespective of antigen.

Methods

Pilot serological study

For a pilot cohort of chronic patients (n = 7, all of Bolivian origin) presenting in Barcelona, Spain, serum samples at 0, 60 and 365 days (post-treatment) were assayed for anti-T. cruzi IgG and IgG1 levels by ELISA against T. cruzi lysate (described below). The data from these preliminary assays informed and encouraged the wider investigation in the main study.

Main study

Sample collection, serological surveillance and treatment in Argentina

Field work took place in the rural area of Pampa del Indio, Chaco Province, in northern Argentina [36]. In this municipality, intense domestic transmission of T. cruzi occurred and was suppressed by sustained actions against Triatoma infestans, the main vector, as part of an ongoing intervention programme launched in 2007, which virtually eliminated domestic infestation by the second year post-interventions [37,38,39,40]. During 2010–2016, we scaled up delivery of serodiagnosis and chemotherapy of seropositive people in the rural area, divided for operational reasons (areas I–IV) and achieved approximately 50% of serodiagnosis coverage of nearly 9000 inhabitants (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Patients included members of the Qom and Creole ethnic groups. The seroepidemiology and long-term impact of sustained vector control on domestic transmission are described elsewhere [40,41,42,43].

All serum samples were preserved at −20 °C until assayed for T. cruzi infection by conventional serology. In Argentina, the WHO guidelines for conventional serology are followed: the use of two serological tests, either ELISA, or IHA of IIF, detecting different parasite antigens or whole parasites [14, 15]. Here, duplicate ELISAs with non-recombinant (Chagastest, Wiener) and recombinant antigens (ELISA Rec v3.0, Wiener) were used, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A serum sample was considered seropositive if reactive in two different assays [36]. Two serologically discordant human samples were sent to the National Institute of Parasitology “Dr. Mario Fatala Chabén” (ANLIS-Malbrán, Buenos Aires, Argentina) for final serodiagnosis, where they were tested by IHA, ELISA and IIF.

Benznidazole (5–8 mg/kg day) was administered twice daily for 60 days to all seropositive individuals, except in 2012 when nifurtimox was used (8–10 mg/kg day) (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Chemotherapy rounds were launched between 2011 and 2016. For the cohort treated in 2011, blood samples by venipuncture were taken by local physicians at day 0, 20–30, 60 and 180 post-treatment. Conventional serological tests were performed, and molecular diagnosis was applied by qPCR and kDNA-PCR to determine the infection status of the patients in the cohort treated in 2011 [36]. For this cohort, pre-treatment samples were collected between November 2010 and January 2011. The subsequent post-treatment samples were collected, as described above, when patients were resampled in 2017 in house-to-house visits.

Molecular assays

For DNA extraction, samples were mixed immediately after collection with an equal volume of 6 M guanidine hydrochloride and 0.2 M EDTA in pH 8.0 buffer. Guanidine/EDTA blood samples were heated in a boiling water bath for 15 min. Total DNA was purified using a DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions, slightly modified to exclude proteinase K and buffer AL [44] and eluted in 200 µl of distilled water. A total of 24 out of 34 pre-treatment Argentinean samples were positive by kDNA-PCR [36].

Chagas Sero K-SeT RDT

As previously described [29, 30], the Chagas Sero K-Set is a novel RDT manufactured by Coris BioConcept using TSSApep-II/V/VI (GTENKPATGEAPSQPG) as the antigen and colloidal gold-conjugated protein G detection of bound IgG. Each test was assessed visually and independently by two individuals after 15 min of incubation. A test was considered valid if the control line was present, determined as positive if there was a signal of any intensity at the test (antigen) line, and negative if there was no signal at the test line. The intensity of signal at the test band was assessed visually as strong, weak or absent.

ELISA

Immulon 4HBX 96-well flat-bottom ELISA plates (735–0465, VWR, UK) were divided into 16 sections of 3 columns × 2 rows of wells, to allow simultaneous assay of IgG1 and IgG paired pre- and post-treatment samples, as further described below. Wells were coated either with 100 μl/well of 1 × coating buffer (15 mM Na2CO3, 34 mM NaHCO3, pH 9.6) as a no-antigen control or with TSSApep-II/V/VI synthetic peptide (5 μg/ml) or lysate of T. cruzi TcI strain ISAN/US/00/Florida (2 μg/ml, prepared as described in [45]) diluted in 1× coating buffer. Following overnight incubation at 4 °C, plates were washed three times with PBS/0.05% Tween (PBST), then blocked with 200 µl/well of PBS/2% skimmed milk powder at 37 °C for 2 h. After three washes, 100 µl/well of serum at 1:200 dilution in PBST/2% milk was applied, such that for each paired sample per plate section, the upper row contained pre-treatment serum, and the lower row post-treatment serum. Following incubation at 37 °C for 1 h and six washes in PBST, 100 μl/well of horseradish peroxidase-labelled anti-human IgG (709–035-149, Jackson ImmunoResearch, USA) or anti-human IgG1 (ab99774, Abcam, UK), diluted 1:5000 in PBST/2% milk, were added to the second and third columns of each section, respectively. The first column of each section received PBST/2% milk only. After 1 h of incubation and six PBST washes, 100 μl/well of substrate solution (50 mM phosphate/citrate buffer, pH 5.0) containing 2 mM o-phenylenediamine HCl (P1526, Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.009% H2O2 (216,763, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the entire plate, which was then incubated in the dark. Reactions were stopped with 50 μl/well of 2 M H2SO4, and absorbance values were measured at 490 nm. Duplicate (replica) plates were performed simultaneously, and mean results obtained. Cut-off values were calculated by subtracting the plate background absorbance values from each of the samples, including the negative controls; samples that were higher than the mean of the negative controls plus three standard deviations were considered positive. Only Chagas Sero K-Set RDT-reactive samples were assayed with TSSApep-II/V/VI ELISA; other lineage-specific RDTs are not yet available [30, 46].

Data analysis

Two-tailed paired t-tests (pre- and post-treatment samples), unpaired two-sample t-tests or one-way ANOVA were used to determine statistical significance (GraphPad Prism, 8.4.3, San Diego, CA, USA). Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

A serum sample was considered to decline significantly (herein called “clear decline”) if absorbance dropped by 50% (ELISAs) or exhibited a prominent decrease in RDT test line intensity (Additional file 2: Figure S2). For a given assay, a reactive serum pre-treatment and non-reactive post-treatment was considered seronegativisation. Re-examined patients (n = 71) were grouped according to whether they completed the 60 days of chemotherapy. Thirteen of the 71 patients reporting interruption of therapy [36] were designated as group B (age range, 2–20 years), and those with completed treatment [36] or self-reporting completion as group A (age range, 6–19 years), including the patient with therapeutic failure [36]. We compared the percentage of patients showing clear decline of antibodies or seronegativisation between groups by means of Fisher’s exact tests. Group B patients were excluded from IgG and IgG1 response pre-/post-treatment, but group A and group B were compared in the univariate analysis. We merged our database with that previously published [36], updating the data for corresponding patients, to investigate the association of antibody titres with individual patient data (i.e., age, body mass index [BMI], ethnic group). The relationship between antibody decline (for each serological test) and age at treatment, treatment groups and time elapsed since treatment (in years) was tested by multiple logistic regressions implemented in R using “lme4” and “sjPlot” packages [47,48,49]. Continuous variables were standardised.

Results

Pilot study shows trend of IgG1 decline in paired pre- and post-treatment sera

To assess the trend of IgG subclass titres post-chemotherapy, sequential serum samples from seven adult Bolivian patients living in Barcelona were assayed by ELISA against T. cruzi lysate at 0, 60 and 365 days post-treatment. IgG1 antibody titre declined in three (42.3%) participants 365 days post-treatment (Fig. 1), whilst there was no antibody decline for IgG2 or IgG4; one participant showed IgG3 antibody decline 365 days post-treatment (data not shown).

Fig. 1
figure1

Pilot study supports IgG1 decline post-treatment: ELISA absorbance values are shown for individual participants at 0, 60 and 365 days post-treatment. Each line represents an individual patient. Three of seven show a decline in IgG1

Full size image

Main study

Conventional serology remains positive after chemotherapy

Conventional serological assays were used with all 71 samples collected in 2017; all except one remained consistently positive. People re-examined were on average 12.6 years of age when treated; 47.9% were female, 52.1% were Qom descendants, and on average 5.0 years had elapsed since treatment. Around a third (34%) of the study people had moved from their original household to a new residence within the municipality when revisited in 2017.

Molecular assays

kDNA-PCR was carried out with post-treatment samples collected in 2017 to indicate presence of parasitaemia. The predicted 330-bp amplicons were produced with pre-treatment samples but not produced with post-treatment samples (data not shown). All of the 71 post-treatment samples were negative.

TSSApep-II/V/VI seropositivity by Chagas Sero K-SeT RDT

All 71 pre-treatment samples were initially screened with this RDT to detect recognition of TSSApep-II/V/VI. Fifty-four of the 58 pre-treatment samples from group A and 11 of the 13 pre-treatment samples from group B were positive by this RDT (Table 1) giving an overall seropositivity of 91.5%.

Table 1 Changes in anti-T. cruzi seroreactivity according to assay and treatment group
Full size table

Comparison between treatment groups

We found a significantly higher percentage of patients showing a clear decline of antibody titres after treatment in group A than in group B when assayed against TSSApep-II/V/VI ELISA with IgG (Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.04; OR = 0.04; 95% CI = 1.07–23.33). We found no significant between-group differences in the percentage of positive patients before treatment and in those who became seronegative after treatment (Fisher’s exact test, P ≥ 0.1 in all cases) (Table 1).

Chagas Sero K-SeT RDT is the least discriminative of the TSSApep-II/V/VI assays

Using the Chagas Sero K-SeT RDT in patients from group A, 25/54 (46.3%) of samples showed a clear decrease of band intensity post-treatment, in comparison to 22/22 (100%) or 34/41 (82.9%) by TSSApep-II/V/VI ELISA with IgG1 or IgG, respectively (Table 1). A similar trend was observed in patients from group B.

ELISA with IgG1 is more discriminative than IgG in assessing seronegativisation and decline in antibody levels

The sensitivities with pre-treatment samples were significantly greater against lysate than TSSApep-II/V/VI with both IgG1 and IgG (Fisher’s exact test, P < 0.0001; OR = 5.40; 95% CI = 2.31–11.91 for IgG1 and P = 0.001; OR = 16.68; 95% CI = 2.76–181.6 for IgG) (Table 1). However, the post-treatment decline in IgG1 was more discriminative than for IgG, regardless of antigen (Fig. 2). In group A patients, a clear decline in IgG1 was observed in 35/46 (76.1%) and 22/22 (100%) samples against lysate and TSSApep-II/V/VI, respectively, compared to 21/57 (36.8%) and 34/41 (82.9%) for IgG (Table 1). Overall, antibody titres also showed a greater decline with TSSApep-II/V/VI compared to lysate for IgG1 (paired t-test, P < 0.0001, t(62) = 4.18 and P < 0.0001, t(70) = 7.35, respectively; Fig. 2). Similarly, in group B patients, ELISA with IgG1 was more discriminative than with IgG (Table 1). The seronegativisation percentage was significantly higher with IgG1 regardless of the antigen employed (Fisher’s exact test, P < 0.0001; OR = 5.98; 95% CI = 2.26–17.70 for lysate and P = 0.057; OR = 2.74; 95% CI = 0.92–7.64 for TSSApep-II/V/VI) in Group A patients and for the TSSApep-II/V/VI in Group B patients (Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.052; OR = 10.00; 95% CI = 1.12–69.44) (Table 1).

Fig. 2
figure2

IgG1 decline is more discriminative than IgG in paired pre- and post-treatment sera for patients that completed treatment (group A). In each panel (a–d), ELISA absorbance values are shown connected for individual sample pairs, and in the insets as composite box and whisker plots, blue (pre-treatment) and red (post-treatment). a IgG1 with lysate (P < 0.0001 for pre- versus post-treatment); b IgG with lysate (P < 0.0001); c IgG1 with TSSApep-II/V/VI (P < 0.0001); d IgG with TSSApep-II/V/V (P < 0.0001). The dashed line represents each assay cut-off value

Full size image

In multiple logistic regression analysis, the occurrence of antibody decline (both IgG and IgG1) in ELISAs with lysate antigen decreased significantly with increasing age at treatment, but not with treatment group or time elapsed since treatment (Additional file 3: Table S1). Using TSSApep-II/V/VI as antigen, the occurrence of IgG antibody decline was significantly associated negatively with age at treatment and positively with treatment group. Seronegativisation was significantly negatively associated with both age at treatment and time elapsed since treatment (Additional file 4: Table S2). IgG1 antibodies assayed with TSSApep-II/V/VI were not included in this analysis, because virtually all samples declined.

Univariate associations with serology

Univariate associations between IgG and IgG1 levels and lysate or TSSApep-II/V/VI ELISA are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Univariate associations with IgG1 and IgG serology
Full size table

The Qom population had a significantly higher pre-treatment IgG1 titre against lysate. In contrast, the Creole population had a significantly higher pre-treatment IgG antibody titre against TSSApep-II/V/VI. In addition, there was a statistically significant association between patients not completing treatment and higher pre-treatment IgG titre against TSSApep-II/V/VI (P = 0.049, t(61) = 2.01), higher post-treatment IgG titre against TSSApep-II/V/VI (P = 0.0001, t(61) = 4.32) or higher 5-year post-treatment IgG1 titre against lysate (P = 0.013, t(69) = 2.56), although titres were not significantly higher against TSSApep-II/V/VI. Furthermore, there was a significant association between a positive pre-treatment kDNA-PCR and higher post-treatment IgG antibodies against lysate (Table 2, P(32) = 0.019, t = 2.46). No associations were found for the Chagas Sero K-Set RDT results pre- and post-treatment.

Discussion

In Chagas disease, current methods to establish chemotherapeutic parasite clearance are technically demanding and inconclusive. Post-chemotherapy reversion of conventional serology from positive to negative may take decades to confirm parasitological cure. Failure to determine cure complicates patient follow-up, because physicians are unable to inform patients on their long-term prognosis and risk of developing chagasic cardiomyopathy or intestinal pathology. Furthermore, follow-up of patients may be difficult if they migrate to other regions or move to new households, and they may be unwilling to accept prolonged chemotherapy with potential adverse effects and no definitive outcome. Thus, there is a great need for identifying a biomarker for a rapid point-of-care test of cure. Molecular assays may be considered the most useful for assessing treatment response in the short term. However, there are no commercial molecular assay kits available, and typically only a fraction of seropositive chronic individuals are PCR-positive before treatment; moreover, a negative PCR cannot establish absence of infection, although a positive PCR proves treatment failure [50].

The role of the IgG subclasses as an early diagnostic tool, indicator of parasite clearance or predictor of disease prognosis has been assessed in other protozoan infections including malaria [51,52,53,54] and toxoplasmosis [55, 56]. In visceral leishmaniasis, the level of IgG1 response has been shown to be a potential therapeutic marker, principally in India; patients considered to be cured had significantly lower levels of anti-Leishmania IgG1 compared to those with treatment failure or relapse [57, 58], possibly due the lack of sustained antigenic stimulus associated with successful chemotherapy.

In a previous report of anti-T. cruzi IgG1 levels following accidental infection with T. cruzi, the anti-T. cruzi IgG1, IgG3 and IgG4 returned to pre-infection levels 55 days post-chemotherapy and 80 days after infection, whereas the IgG2 titres remained high at 300 days after infection [59]. Anti-T. cruzi IgG1 serology has been shown to be highly sensitive and specific for screening blood donors when conventional serological methods (ELISA and IIF) previously gave inconclusive results [60]. Similarly, anti-epimastigote IgG1 has been able to distinguish between T. cruzi-infected and non-infected individuals [61]. Most recently, the Human Chagas-Flow ATE-IgG1 has been able to differentiate between TcI, TcVI and TcII lineages with high accuracy [62].

Our pilot study of treated Bolivian patients residing in Barcelona initially detected a possible trend for a decrease in IgG1 titre compared to IgG and the other IgG subclasses. In the Argentine cohort of the main study, almost all patients remained seropositive post-treatment as determined by conventional serology, namely two commercial ELISAs that detect IgG with non-recombinant and recombinant antigens, showing that this could not determine whether treatment was successful. We assessed IgG and IgG1 antibody decline with ELISA against lysate and TSSApep-II/V/VI antigens pre- and post-treatment of early chronic Chagas disease patients. To our knowledge, there are few reports of TSSApep-II/V/VI as an antigen for assay with paired samples from chronic patients. Of pre-treatment samples screened by Chagas Sero K-SeT RDT for TSSApep-V/V/VI infection, 91.5% were positive, confirming that these are the predominant infecting lineages in the region, as previously reported [30, 63]. Among the patients who completed chemotherapy, a proportion of Chagas Sero K-SeT RDT positives (43.6%) showed IgG decline post-treatment, by visual assessment of band intensity. In contrast, IgG (82.9%) and IgG1 (100%) showed substantial decline by TSSApep-II/V/VI ELISA and even seronegativisation (Fig. 2). We propose an algorithm for incorporating IgG1 and IgG serological assays to infer the treatment outcome after chemotherapy when 5 years have elapsed (Fig. 3). In the ELISAs, IgG/IgG1 are detected with specific conjugates, whereas in the RDTs, antibodies are detected with protein G. Developing IgG1 RDTs could provide a useful tool for monitoring chemotherapy. Moreover, whereas the ELISA uses serum samples at a dilution of 1:200, RDTs use undiluted samples at the point of application, which may also explain the high RDT sensitivity with pre-treatment samples and the lower capacity to detect decline in antibody response. Modification of sample volume, together with specific IgG1 detection, could allow RDT assessment of antibody decline following chemotherapy (Fig. 3). Both antibody decline and seronegativisation were also observed in patients reporting an incomplete course of chemotherapy. Although the number of days of pill intake was missing for six out of 13 patients (group B), the remaining seven received an average of 20 days of treatment (range = 6–31) of the 60 days prescribed, thus on average less than half the treatment course. Shorter chemotherapy courses are now being trialed to avoid adverse reactions while sustaining parasiticidal effects [64, 65]. Similarly, all patients, including the 13 with incomplete treatment, had a negative kDNA-PCR post-treatment, suggesting that treatment may be effective with reduced length of chemotherapy. However, kDNA-PCR may have low sensitivity, and may not yield the correct diagnosis if there is a low number of circulating parasites.

Fig. 3
figure3

Suggested algorithm for chemotherapy follow-up after an average of 5 years post-treatment. Proposed pathway for incorporating IgG and IgG1 serology to infer chemotherapy outcome

Full size image

We considered whether treatment completion, ethnic group, pre-treatment kDNA-PCR result, gender, age and BMI were univariate factors associated with IgG1 or IgG levels. Significant associations were found between post-treatment high IgG1 and failure to complete treatment. High IgG1 has been associated with greater deterioration of cardiac function in Chagas disease patients [35]. Interestingly, a significant association was found between lower levels of IgG post-treatment and a negative pre-treatment kDNA-PCR. We speculate that there may be higher parasitaemia in patients with a positive pre-treatment kDNA-PCR, resulting in slower antibody decline. No associations were found between pre- or post-treatment antibody titres and gender, age or BMI.

The Qom ethnic group had significantly higher IgG1 titre pre-treatment against lysate. Qom households receive a lower level of formal education compared to Creoles [66]. Furthermore, the Qom do not use screens or apply insecticides as regularly, and their households had a higher prevalence of domestic infestation with T. infestans [67] and of T. cruzi-infected dogs and cats [66, 68], increasing the likelihood of repeat infection by T. cruzi and therefore increased production of antibodies [69]. However, we do not have an explanation for the higher pre-treatment titres among the Creole community with the less discriminative IgG assay.

Limitations to this study could be addressed with a larger study cohort, more representative (broader) age distribution and additional intervening time points. Employment of qPCR may have revealed a few cases with very low parasitemia, not detected by kDNA-PCR [36]. We had insufficient pre-treatment ECG data to use in our analysis of IgG1 levels, although this would be an interesting aspect of future research. Including a cardiological and clinical evaluation may shed light on the current status of the study patients.

Conclusion

Here, we show that IgG1 decline is more discriminative than IgG. A larger proportion of post-treatment samples showed anti-T. cruzi IgG1 decline in comparison to IgG, regardless of the antigen employed. Overall, post-treatment samples had significantly lower IgG1. Although IgG1 has restricted sensitivity and should not be used as a diagnostic assay, with further development it clearly has potential as a biomarker of cure. Our results emphasise the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of affected populations in endemic areas.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available as an additional file. (Additional file 5: Table S3).

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

Bz:

Benznidazole

Nf:

Nifurtimox

TSSA:

Trypomastigote small surface antigen

TSSApep:

Lineage-specific TSSA peptide

RDT:

Rapid diagnostic test

References

  1. 1.

    Nunes MCP, Beaton A, Acquatella H, Bern C, Bolger AF, Echeverria LE, et al. Chagas cardiomyopathy: an update of current clinical knowledge and management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;138:e169–209.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rassi A Jr, Rassi A, Marin-Neto JA. Chagas disease. Lancet. 2010;375:1388–402.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Perez-Molina JA, Molina I. Chagas disease. Lancet. 2018;391:82–94.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Alonso-Vega C, Billot C, Torrico F. Achievements and challenges upon the implementation of a program for national control of congenital Chagas in Bolivia: results 2004–2009. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7: e2304.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    M B: Bolivia: nuestra experiencia sobre el Chagas y cómo luchar contra su silencio. 2017. https://www.msf.es/actualidad/bolivia/bolivia-nuestra-experiencia-chagas-y-luchar-su-silencio. Accessed 05 Jan 2021.

  6. 6.

    Yun O, Lima MA, Ellman T, Chambi W, Castillo S, Flevaud L, et al. Feasibility, drug safety, and effectiveness of etiological treatment programs for Chagas disease in Honduras, Guatemala, and Bolivia: 10-year experience of Medecins Sans Frontieres. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3: e488.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bianchi F, Cucunuba Z, Guhl F, Gonzalez NL, Freilij H, Nicholls RS, et al. Follow-up of an asymptomatic Chagas disease population of children after treatment with nifurtimox (Lampit) in a sylvatic endemic transmission area of Colombia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9: e0003465.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Pereiro AC, Gold S. Building an innovative Chagas disease program for primary care units, in an urban non-endemic city. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:904.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hopkins T, Goncalves R, Mamani J, Courtenay O, Bern C. Chagas disease in the Bolivian Chaco: Persistent transmission indicated by childhood seroscreening study. Int J Infect Dis. 2019;86:175–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Vago AR. Genetic characterization of Trypanosoma cruzi directly from tissues of patients with chronic Chagas disease: differential distribution of genetic types into diverse organs. Am J Pathol. 2000;156:1805–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Verani JR, Seitz A, Gilman RH, LaFuente C, Galdos-Cardenas G, Kawai V, et al. Geographic variation in the sensitivity of recombinant antigen-based rapid tests for chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80:410–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sanchez-Camargo CL, Albajar-Vinas P, Wilkins PP, Nieto J, Leiby DA, Paris L, et al. Comparative evaluation of 11 commercialized rapid diagnostic tests for detecting Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies in serum banks in areas of endemicity and nonendemicity. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:2506–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Martin DL, Marks M, Galdos-Cardenas G, Gilman RH, Goodhew B, Ferrufino L, et al. Regional variation in the correlation of antibody and T-cell responses to Trypanosoma cruzi. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;90:1074–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    World Health Organisation. Control of Chagas disease. World Health Org Tech Rep Ser. 2002;905:1–109.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Organisation PAH. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Chagas disease. Washington: DC. PAHO; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sosa Estani S, Segura EL, Ruiz AM, Velazquez E, Porcel BM, Yampotis C. Efficacy of chemotherapy with benznidazole in children in the indeterminate phase of Chagas’ disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;59:526–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Andrade AL, Martelli CM, Oliveira RM, Silva SA, Aires AI, Soussumi LM, et al. Short report: benznidazole efficacy among Trypanosoma cruzi-infected adolescents after a six-year follow-up. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;71:594–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Morillo CA, Waskin H, Sosa-Estani S, Del Carmen Bangher M, Cuneo C, Milesi R, et al. Benznidazole and Posaconazole in eliminating parasites in asymptomatic T. Cruzi carriers: the STOP-CHAGAS Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:939–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Parisi S, Navarro M, Du Plessis JD, Shock JP, Apodaca Michel B, Lucuy Espinoza M, et al. “We have already heard that the treatment doesn’t do anything, so why should we take it?”: A mixed method perspective on Chagas disease knowledge, attitudes, prevention, and treatment behaviour in the Bolivian Chaco. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14: e0008752.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jackson Y, Chatelain E, Mauris A, Holst M, Miao Q, Chappuis F, et al. Serological and parasitological response in chronic Chagas patients 3 years after nifurtimox treatment. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:85.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zingales B. Trypanosoma cruzi genetic diversity: Something new for something known about Chagas disease manifestations, serodiagnosis and drug sensitivity. Acta Trop. 2018;184:38–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lima L, Espinosa-Alvarez O, Ortiz PA, Trejo-Varon JA, Carranza JC, Pinto CM, et al. Genetic diversity of Trypanosoma cruzi in bats, and multilocus phylogenetic and phylogeographical analyses supporting Tcbat as an independent DTU (discrete typing unit). Acta Trop. 2015;151:166–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Miles MA, Cedillos RA, Povoa MM, de Souza AA, Prata A, Macedo V. Do radically dissimilar Trypanosoma cruzi strains (zymodemes) cause Venezuelan and Brazilian forms of Chagas’ disease? Lancet. 1981;1:1338–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Pinazo MJ, Thomas MC, Bustamante J, Almeida IC, Lopez MC, Gascon J. Biomarkers of therapeutic responses in chronic Chagas disease: state of the art and future perspectives. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2015;110:422–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Moscatelli G, Moroni S, Garcia Bournissen F, Gonzalez N, Ballering G, Schijman A, et al. Longitudinal follow up of serological response in children treated for Chagas disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13: e0007668.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zrein M, Granjon E, Gueyffier L, Caillaudeau J, Liehl P, Pottel H, et al. A novel antibody surrogate biomarker to monitor parasite persistence in Trypanosoma cruzi-infected patients. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12: e0006226.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Jurado Medina L, Chassaing E, Ballering G, Gonzalez N, Marque L, Liehl P, et al. Prediction of parasitological cure in children infected with Trypanosoma cruzi using a novel multiplex serological approach: an observational, retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:1141–50.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Balouz V, Melli LJ, Volcovich R, Moscatelli G, Moroni S, Gonzalez N, et al. The Trypomastigote small surface antigen from Trypanosoma cruzi improves treatment evaluation and diagnosis in pediatric Chagas disease. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:3444–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bhattacharyya T, Messenger LA, Bern C, Mertens P, Gilleman Q, Zeippen N, et al. Severity of Chagasic cardiomyopathy is associated with response to a novel rapid diagnostic test for Trypanosoma cruzi TcII/V/VI. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67:519–24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Murphy N, Macchiaverna NP, Cardinal MV, Bhattacharyya T, Mertens P, Zeippen N, et al. Lineage-specific rapid diagnostic tests can resolve Trypanosoma cruzi TcII/V/VI ecological and epidemiological associations in the Argentine Chaco. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:424.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Vidarsson G, Dekkers G, Rispens T. IgG subclasses and allotypes: from structure to effector functions. Front Immunol. 2014;5:520.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bayram RO, Ozdemir H, Emsen A, Turk Dagi H, Artac H. Reference ranges for serum immunoglobulin (IgG, IgA, and IgM) and IgG subclass levels in healthy children. Turk J Med Sci. 2019;49:497–505.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Georg I, Hasslocher-Moreno AM, Xavier SS, Holanda MT, Roma EH, Bonecini-Almeida MDG. Evolution of anti-Trypanosoma cruzi antibody production in patients with chronic Chagas disease: Correlation between antibody titers and development of cardiac disease severity. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11: e0005796.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Morgan J, Dias JC, Gontijo ED, Bahia-Oliveira L, Correa-Oliveira R, Colley DG, et al. Anti-Trypanosoma cruzi antibody isotype profiles in patients with different clinical manifestations of Chagas’ disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1996;55:355–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Hernandez-Becerril N, Nava A, Reyes PA, Monteon VM. IgG subclass reactivity to Trypanosoma cruzi in chronic chagasic patients. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2001;71:199–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Sartor P, Colaianni I, Cardinal MV, Bua J, Freilij H, Gurtler RE. Improving access to Chagas disease diagnosis and etiologic treatment in remote rural communities of the Argentine Chaco through strengthened primary health care and broad social participation. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11: e0005336.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Gurevitz JM, Gaspe MS, Enriquez GF, Provecho YM, Kitron U, Gurtler RE. Intensified surveillance and insecticide-based control of the Chagas disease vector Triatoma infestans in the Argentinean Chaco. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7: e2158.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Gaspe MS, Provecho YM, Fernandez MP, Vassena CV, Santo Orihuela PL, Gurtler RE. Beating the odds: sustained Chagas disease vector control in remote indigenous communities of the Argentine Chaco over a seven-year period. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12: e0006804.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Provecho YM, Gaspe MS, Fernandez MDP, Gurtler RE. House reinfestation with Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) after community-wide spraying with insecticides in the Argentine Chaco: a multifactorial process. J Med Entomol. 2017;54:646–57.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Cardinal MV, Enriquez GF, Macchiaverna NP, Argibay HD, Fernandez MDP, Alvedro A, et al. Long-term impact of a ten-year intervention program on human and canine Trypanosoma cruzi infection in the Argentine Chaco. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15: e0009389.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Cardinal MV, Sartor PA, Gaspe MS, Enriquez GF, Colaianni I, Gurtler RE. High levels of human infection with Trypanosoma cruzi associated with the domestic density of infected vectors and hosts in a rural area of northeastern Argentina. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:492.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Fernandez MDP, Gaspe MS, Sartor P, Gurtler RE. Human Trypanosoma cruzi infection is driven by eco-social interactions in rural communities of the Argentine Chaco. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13: e0007430.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Fernandez MDP, Gaspe MS, Gurtler RE. Inequalities in the social determinants of health and Chagas disease transmission risk in indigenous and creole households in the Argentine Chaco. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:184.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Duffy T, Bisio M, Altcheh J, Burgos JM, Diez M, Levin MJ, et al. Accurate real-time PCR strategy for monitoring bloodstream parasitic loads in Chagas disease patients. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3: e419.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Bhattacharyya T, Falconar AK, Luquetti AO, Costales JA, Grijalva MJ, Lewis MD, et al. Development of peptide-based lineage-specific serology for chronic Chagas disease: geographical and clinical distribution of epitope recognition. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8: e2892.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Murphy N, Rooney B, Bhattacharyya T, Triana-Chavez O, Krueger A, Haslam SM, et al. Glycosylation of Trypanosoma cruzi TcI antigen reveals recognition by chagasic sera. Sci Rep. 2020;10:16395.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R foundation for Statistical Computing 2012: http://www.R-project.org/.

  48. 48.

    Lüdecke D. sjPlot: Data visualization for statistics in social science. R package version 287 2020: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjPlot.

  49. 49.

    Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67:1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Sulleiro E, Munoz-Calderon A, Schijman AG. Role of nucleic acid amplification assays in monitoring treatment response in Chagas disease: usefulness in clinical trials. Acta Trop. 2019;199: 105120.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    O’Flaherty K, Maguire J, Simpson JA, Fowkes FJI. Immunity as a predictor of anti-malarial treatment failure: a systematic review. Malar J. 2017;16:158.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Partey FD, Castberg FC, Sarbah EW, Silk SE, Awandare GA, Draper SJ, et al. Kinetics of antibody responses to PfRH5-complex antigens in Ghanaian children with Plasmodium falciparum malaria. PLoS ONE. 2018;13: e0198371.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Saavedra-Langer R, Marapara J, Valle-Campos A, Durand S, Vasquez-Chasnamote ME, Silva H, et al. IgG subclass responses to excreted-secreted antigens of Plasmodium falciparum in a low-transmission malaria area of the Peruvian Amazon. Malar J. 2018;17:328.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    O’Flaherty K, Ataide R, Zaloumis SG, Ashley EA, Powell R, Feng G, et al. Contribution of functional antimalarial immunity to measures of parasite clearance in therapeutic efficacy studies of artemisinin derivatives. J Infect Dis. 2019;220:1178–87.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Nascimento FS, Suzuki LA, Branco N, Franco RM, Andrade PD, Costa SC, et al. Toxoplasma-specific IgG subclass antibody response in cerebrospinal fluid samples from patients with cerebral toxoplasmosis. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2015;57:439–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    de Castro Z-T, Fonseca GSF, de Jesus L, Barros GB, Coelho-Dos-Reis JGA, Bela SR, et al. Establishing tools for early diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis: flow cytometric IgG avidity assay as a confirmatory test for neonatal screening. J Immunol Methods. 2017;451:37–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Marlais T, Bhattacharyya T, Singh OP, Mertens P, Gilleman Q, Thunissen C, et al. Visceral Leishmaniasis IgG1 rapid monitoring of cure vs relapse, and potential for diagnosis of post Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:427.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Mollett G, Bremer Hinckel BC, Bhattacharyya T, Marlais T, Singh OP, Mertens P, et al. Detection of immunoglobulin G1 against rK39 improves monitoring of treatment outcomes in visceral Leishmaniasis. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69:1130–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Israelski DM, Sadler R, Araujo FG. Antibody response and antigen recognition in human infection with Trypanosoma cruzi. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1988;39:445–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Campos FMF, Repoles LC, de Araujo FF, Peruhype-Magalhaes V, Xavier MAP, Sabino EC, et al. Usefulness of FC-TRIPLEX Chagas/Leish IgG1 as confirmatory assay for non-negative results in blood bank screening of Chagas disease. J Immunol Methods. 2018;455:34–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Cordeiro FD, Martins-Filho OA, Da Costa Rocha MO, Adad SJ, Correa-Oliveira R, Romanha AJ. Anti-Trypanosoma cruzi immunoglobulin G1 can be a useful tool for diagnosis and prognosis of human Chagas’ disease. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2001;8(1):112–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Alessio GD, de Araujo FF, Silva JS, Junior PAS, de Souza Gomes M, do Amaral LR, et al. Human Chagas-flow ATE-IgG1 for advanced universal and Trypanosoma cruzi discrete typing units-specific serodiagnosis of Chagas disease. Sci Rep. 2020;10:13296.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Macchiaverna NP, Enriquez GF, Buscaglia CA, Balouz V, Gurtler RE, Cardinal MV. New human isolates of Trypanosoma cruzi confirm the predominance of hybrid lineages in domestic transmission cycle of the Argentinean Chaco. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;66:229–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64

    Bustamante JM, Sanchez-Valdez F, Padilla AM, White B, Wang W, Tarleton RL. A modified drug regimen clears active and dormant trypanosomes in mouse models of Chagas disease. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12: eabb7656.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Torrico F, Gascon J, Barreira F, Blum B, Almeida IC, Alonso-Vega C, et al. New regimens of benznidazole monotherapy and in combination with fosravuconazole for treatment of Chagas disease (BENDITA): a phase 2, double-blind, randomised trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:1129–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Gaspe MS, Provecho YM, Cardinal MV, del Pilar Fernandez M, Gurtler RE. Ecological and sociodemographic determinants of house infestation by Triatoma infestans in indigenous communities of the Argentine Chaco. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9: e0003614.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Gurevitz JM, Ceballos LA, Gaspe MS, Alvarado-Otegui JA, Enriquez GF, Kitron U, et al. Factors affecting infestation by Triatoma infestans in a rural area of the humid Chaco in Argentina: a multi-model inference approach. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5: e1349.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Cardinal MV, Orozco MM, Enriquez GF, Ceballos LA, Gaspe MS, Alvarado-Otegui JA, et al. Heterogeneities in the ecoepidemiology of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in rural communities of the Argentinean Chaco. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;90:1063–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Marin-Neto JA, Cunha-Neto E, Maciel BC, Simoes MV. Pathogenesis of chronic Chagas heart disease. Circulation. 2007;115:1109–23.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Nilda Blanco, Marcelo Wirth, Omar Lana and Paula Sartor for their work and commitment with this study, the National Institute of Parasitology “Dr Mario Fatala Chaben” (ANLIS, Malbrán; Argentina) especially Constanza Lopez Albizu for conducting confirmatory serology. The Argentine National Chagas Program provided Bz and Nf. MVC, GFE and REG are members of CONICET Researcher’s Career. We are grateful for discussion on diagnostics with participants in the AfriKADIA programme of EDCTP and DNDi.

Funding

This study received major financial support from Fundación Bunge y Born (2015–2018) and additional support from Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2015–2921) and Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBACYT 20020130100843BA and 20020170100779BA). The work undertaken by NM was funded by the Sir Halley Stewart Trust. The views expressed within this article are those of the author and not necessary those of the Trust.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Niamh Murphy and M. Victoria Cardinal contributed equally to this work

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

    Niamh Murphy, Tapan Bhattacharyya & Michael A. Miles

  2. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Laboratorio de Eco-Epidemiología, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, Av. Int. Güiraldes 2180, C1428EHA, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    M. Victoria Cardinal, Gustavo F. Enriquez, Natalia P. Macchiaverna, Alejandra Alvedro & Ricardo E. Gürtler

  3. CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires (IEGEBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina

    M. Victoria Cardinal, Gustavo F. Enriquez, Natalia P. Macchiaverna, Alejandra Alvedro & Ricardo E. Gürtler

  4. Hopital de Niños “Dr. Ricardo Gutiérrez”, CABA, Argentina

    Héctor Freilij

  5. Barcelona Institute for Global Health (IS Global), Barcelona, Spain

    Pablo Martinez de Salazar & Israel Molina

  6. Coris BioConcept, Gembloux, Belgium

    Pascal Mertens & Quentin Gilleman

Authors
  1. Niamh Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Victoria Cardinal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tapan Bhattacharyya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gustavo F. Enriquez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Natalia P. Macchiaverna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alejandra Alvedro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Héctor Freilij
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Pablo Martinez de Salazar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Israel Molina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Pascal Mertens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Quentin Gilleman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ricardo E. Gürtler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Michael A. Miles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MVC, HF, MAM and REG conceived the study and the analysis. MVC, GFE, NPM and AA conducted field work. PMS, IM, REG and MVC provided sera. NM, MVC, PMS and TB generated the data. NM, MVC, PMS, TB and MAM analysed the data. PM and QG developed and produced reagents. NM, MVC, TB and MAM wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niamh Murphy.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Bolivian samples: the study protocol for collection of samples was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Vall d’Hebron Hospital (Barcelona, Spain), and all procedures were carried out in accordance with ethical standards laid out in the Helsinki Declaration as revised in 2000. All patients provided written informed consent, and samples were anonymised. Argentine samples: the collection, serological surveillance and treatment protocol were approved and supervised by the Dr. Carlos Barclay “Comité de Ética en Investigación Clínica” (Ethics Committee in Clinical Research), Buenos Aires, Argentina (IRB No. 00001678; Protocol No. TW-01-004), and all clinical investigations were carried out in accordance with principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All individuals (or parents/guardians) provided written informed consent to participate in the serological surveillance and treatment. When information on the study was given to indigenous populations, an indigenous healthcare worker or community member was provided as translator [36]. The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (UK) Ethics Committee approved further work and secondary analysis of these samples.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

P.M. and Q.G. are employees of Coris BioConcept with no shares in the company.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Timeline of field work and main activities undertaken in Pampa del Indio, Chaco, Argentina.

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

Decline in RDT test line intensity. Examples of notable decline in Chagas Sero K-SeT test line intensity observed between pre- and post-treatment samples. a. From strong to moderate, b. From moderate to weak and c. From weak to negative. C: Control line T: Test line.

Additional file 3: Table S1.

Multiple logistic regression analysis of antibody decline as a function of selected predictors.

Additional file 4: Table S2.

Multiple logistic regression analysis of seronegativisation as a function of selected predictors.

Additional file 5: Table S3.

Database.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murphy, N., Cardinal, M.V., Bhattacharyya, T. et al. Assessing antibody decline after chemotherapy of early chronic Chagas disease patients. Parasites Vectors 14, 543 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-05040-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Trypanosoma cruzi
  • Chagas disease
  • Serology
  • ELISA
  • Rapid diagnostic test
  • IgG
  • IgG1
  • Pre-treatment
  • Post-treatment

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us