Skip to main content
Download PDF

Canine microfilaraemia in some regions of Iran

Parasites & Vectors volume 15, Article number: 90 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens are vector-borne zoonotic parasites which affect mainly dogs and humans worldwide. In Iran, information about the distribution of those nematodes is scant in several regions. Therefore, we investigated the prevalence of these filarial parasites in stray dogs from five Iranian provinces where no information about these parasites is available.

Methods

Blood samples were collected from 344 stray dogs in five provinces of Iran (i.e. Mazandaran, Gilan, Esfahan, Qazvin and Loresan). The presence of microfilariae was assessed using direct smear, modified Knott’s test, molecular detection of filarial DNA (cox1 gene) and Wolbachia endosymbiont of parasitic nematodes (ftsZ gene) by conventional PCR (cPCR). All of the PCR products were sequenced and phylogenetic analysis was performed.

Results

In total, 75 dogs (21.8%) were found to be positive for D. immitis by cPCR. Infection was detected in all provinces, with the highest prevalence in Gilan province (22/28; 78.6%). Acanthocheilonema reconditum was diagnosed in five dogs (1.4%) from three provinces (i.e. Esfahan, Mazandaran, Gilan). Two dogs were infected with both parasites and three were only infected with A. reconditum. Dirofilaria repens infection was not found in the examined population. Representative sequences of the D. immitis cox1 gene from dogs from the northern provinces (Mazandaran, Gilan, Qazvin) were grouped together and distinctly separate from the ones from western and central provinces (Lorestan and Esfahan), suggesting that different nematode populations are present in the country.

Conclusion

The data reported herein fill existing gaps in knowledge about canine filarial infection in two Iranian provinces and record the highest prevalence of D. immitis ever reported in the country (i.e. 78.6%). A geographical review of the literature about Dirofilaria spp. and A. reconditum infections in dogs and humans has also been summarized, indicating that D. immitis and D. repens are distributed in 22 of 31 provinces in Iran, whereas A. reconditum is present in fewer regions. Effective control strategies are advocated for owned dogs, and a national program for the management of stray dogs is needed to minimize the risk of infection in animals and humans.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Canine dirofilariosis infections caused by Dirofilaria spp. (Spirurida, Onchocercidae) are a group of worldwide-distributed vector-borne diseases (VBDs) transmitted by over 70 species of mosquitoes of the genera Aedes, Ochlerotatus, Anopheles and Culex [1]. Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens are the best known agents of canine dirofilariosis and may also occasionally infect other animal species, including cats and humans [2]. While D. immitis infection, also known as heartworm disease (HWD), may cause severe conditions (e.g. respiratory distress, epistaxis, haemoptysis, ascites and exercise intolerance), D. repens is less pathogenic, being localized under the skin of the infested animals [3]. Analogously, Acanthocheilonema reconditum, which is transmitted by fleas (e.g. Ctenocephalides canis, Ctenocephalides felis) and lice (e.g. Heterodoxus spiniger, Linognathus setosus), is a less pathogenic filarial species [4], with adult worms residing in the peritoneal cavity [5]. Although A. reconditum is not considered a major zoonotic risk, in a single case report, it was removed from the subconjunctival space in a patient from Australia [6].

Since the first report of canine dirofilariosis in Iran [7], D. immitis and D. repens have been recorded in dogs, wolves, jackals, foxes and cats in 18 of the 31 provinces [8,9,10], along with at least 22 human cases including subcutaneous, ocular and pulmonary presentations, and a rare case of testicular hydrocele [9, 11]. In Iran, Culex theileri has been identified as a vector of D. immitis by dissection of mosquitoes collected in Meshkinshahr county in the northwest [12]. In addition, DNA of D. immitis has been identified in Simulium turgaicum sensu lato [13]. It has been estimated that 11.5% of dogs in Iran are infected by D. immitis, which is slightly higher than the estimated global prevalence of 10.9% [14]. However, an infection rate of 62.8% was reported from dogs of Meshkinshahr [15]. Several human cases of D. repens infection have been reported in Iran; however, data for dogs are scant [7], and few instances of circulating microfilariae have been documented [16, 17].

Since its first record in six dogs [18], A. reconditum microfilariae have been reported from dogs in many regions in Iran [19,20,21]. However, due to its morphological similarity to D. immitis, it could be misidentified, leading to a lack of information about the real picture of the distribution and prevalence of this nematode in the country. Overall, despite some reports on the prevalence of canine Dirofilaria spp. and A. reconditum in Iran [9, 21], comprehensive epidemiological data would help in implementing control measures and reducing zoonotic risk. In this study we investigated the prevalence of this filarial species in stray dogs from five Iranian provinces where no information about these parasites is available.

Methods

Study area, sampling and laboratory procedures

From December 2016 to December 2018, blood samples (2 ml) were collected from the cephalic or saphenous veins of stray dogs (n = 344; non-probabilistically sampled by convenience [22]) from five provinces of Iran including Mazandaran, Gilan and Qazvin in the north, Esfahan in the centre and Lorestan in the west, which are areas with different climatic characteristics (Fig. 1). Animal data (i.e. age, sex and province) were also recorded and were grouped according to age as ≤ 1 year (G1), > 1 to < 5 years (G2), and ≥ 5 years (G3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Samples were collected from five provinces in Iran with different climates

Full size image

Urban dogs were captured and transferred to the shelters of either the Diseases Control Office affiliated to the Provincial Veterinary Organization or the Provincial Department of Environment, where the data for animals were recorded. Based on the microfilaraemia periodicity for D. immitis and D. repens [23, 24], blood collections were performed from 11 p.m. to 1 a.m. On the following day, dogs were moved to the registered shelters in each province.

Blood samples were tested for circulating microfilariae using light microscopy observation of Giemsa-stained thin blood smears and the concentration method by modified Knott’s test. Microscopic examinations were performed under a BA410 Elite Trinocular light microscope (Motic Ltd., Xiamen, China) equipped with a digital camera (IDS uEye UI-2250SE USB 2.0 camera, Obersulm, Germany). The number of microfilariae per microlitre was calculated as described in a previous study [25]. Measurements of microfilariae were performed for up to 10 microfilariae of each nematode species per infected dog using AxioVision® software version 4.1 (Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany).

Molecular procedures

Genomic DNA was extracted from aliquots of 500 μl ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-treated blood samples using a commercial kit (MBST, Tehran, Iran) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA yield was assessed using a Thermo Scientific™ NanoDrop™ spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). All samples were tested for the presence of Dirofilaria spp. and A. reconditum cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) using conventional polymerase chain reaction (cPCR) [25, 26]. Furthermore, Wolbachia DNA was detected by cPCR using primers targeting genes encoding filamenting temperature-sensitive mutant Z (ftsZ) [27] (Table 1). For all reactions, DNA of pathogen-positive blood samples served as a positive control and samples with no template DNA as a negative control. Amplified PCR products were visualized in 2% agarose gel stained with RedSafe™ (iNtRON Biotechnology, Gyeonggi, South Korea) using the microDOC Compact Gel Documentation System with UV Transilluminator (UVT312, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The PCR products were purified using CinnaPure DNA (CinnaGen, Tehran, Iran) and submitted for sequencing in both directions using an ABI 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at the Bioneer company (Daejeon, Republic of Korea). Nucleotide sequences were edited, aligned and analysed using the Chromas platform version 3.1 (Technelysium PTY Ltd., Queensland, Australia) and compared with those available in the GenBank® database using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) and ClustalW (http://www.clustalw.genome.jp).

Table 1 Primers, target genes and PCR conditions used in this study
Full size table

Phylogenetic analysis

The cox1 and ftsZ representative sequences obtained in this study and the corresponding sequences available from the GenBank database were imported into MEGA X [28], and phylogenetic relationships were inferred using the maximum likelihood (ML) method and Tamura–Nei model [29]. Initial trees for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying neighbour-joining and BIONJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the maximum composite likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with the superior log-likelihood value. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. Codon positions included were 1st + 2nd + 3rd + Non-coding. Homologous sequences from Wolbachia endosymbiont of D. immitis (accession no. FJ390296) were used as outgroups.

Statistical analyses

Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were established for proportions. Cohen’s kappa (κ) was calculated to compare the agreement between Knott’s modified test and PCR results. The Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were used to compare proportions, with a probability P-value < 0.05 regarded as statistically significant. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 18 software for Windows 10 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Of the 78 dogs with a positive cPCR result for D. immitis (n = 75; 21.8%, 95% CI: 17.5–26.5) and for A. reconditum (n = 5; 1.45%, 95% CI: 0.47–3.36), two dogs were co-infected with both parasites and three were only infected with A. reconditum. Twenty-one dogs (6.1%; 95% CI: 1.88–1.95) were positive according to the modified Knott’s method and none based on Giemsa-stained blood smears. Based on the length and morphology of the microfilariae, infection with D. immitis or A. reconditum or co-infection with both species was diagnosed in 19, one and two dogs, respectively (Table 2). The number of microfilariae ranged from 0.05 to 1.85 mf/μl (SD ± 0.55). The length of microfilariae of D. immitis was 311.8 ± 9.8 μm (280–328) and for A. reconditum was 228.2 ± 12.1 μm (212–252) (Table 2). The level of agreement between the modified Knott’s test and cPCR was low for both D. immitis (κ = 0.35) and A. reconditum (κ = 0.57).

Table 2 Comparison of results from different diagnostic tools employed for the detection of blood microfilariae in 344 dogs in Iran
Full size table

The infection with D. immitis was present in all five regions, but A. reconditum-infected dogs were from three provinces, i.e. Mazandaran, Gilan and Esfahan. The risk of infection by D. immitis was significantly associated with the locality (Chi-square test, χ2 = 77.7, df = 4, P = 0.0001); that is, dogs in northern provinces (Gilan, Mazandaran and Qazvin) with temperate and Mediterranean climate had a higher chance of the presence of microfilaraemiae than those from the warm and dry provinces of Esfahan and Lorestan. Furthermore, age was statistically significant for D. immitis (Chi-square test, χ2 = 14.6, df = 2, P = 0.001) and A. reconditum (Chi-square test, χ2 = 7.05, df = 2, P = 0.03) infection. Sex was not a risk factor (Table 3).

Table 3 Number and percentage of dogs in Iran positive for Dirofilaria immitis and Acanthocheilonema reconditum DNA (n = 344) according to their sex, age and sampling area
Full size table

Consensus sequences for D. immitis and A. reconditum displayed 100% nucleotide identity with those available in the GenBank® database. In particular, D. immitis nucleotides were identical to AJ537512 (dog from Australia), MK250758 (dog from Thailand) and MH920260 (human from Iran). In addition, A. reconditum nucleotides showed 100% similarity with isolates from dogs in Moldova (MW656249), Portugal (MW246127), Algeria (MW138007) and Italy (JF461456).

In the ML tree based on the partial cox1 gene sequences of D. immitis, all representative sequences of northern provinces (Mazandaran, Gilan, Qazvin) were grouped together and distinctly separate from western and central provinces (Lorestan and Esfahan) (Fig. 2a). The ML tree based on the partial cox1 gene sequences of A. reconditum was supported by the distinct separation from other filarial nematodes inferred from the phylogenetic analyses (Fig. 2b). The ML tree based on the partial ftsZ gene sequences of Wolbachia endosymbiont of D. immitis showed that all sequences detected herein clustered in one clade (supergroup C) and distinct from Wolbachia from Brugia spp. (supergroup D).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Phylogenetic relationship of D. immitis (a) and A. reconditum (b) sequences isolated in this study to other filarial helminths based on a partial sequence of the cox1 gene. Homologous sequences from Wolbachia endosymbiont of D. immitis and Ascaris lumbricoides (GenBank: FJ390296, AB591801) were used as outgroups

Full size image

Discussion

The detection of filarial parasites in the blood of dogs in different regions of Iran, including D. immitis with zoonotic importance, indicates that all dog populations in the country are exposed to these VBDs, thus posing a risk not only to them but also to public health. Since the distribution pattern and positivity of dogs for VBDs differ in different areas [30, 31], updated epidemiological data are necessary for the design and implementation of operational control strategies. This study fills the gap regarding microfilaraemia in dogs of two Iranian provinces, and records the highest prevalence of dirofilariosis ever reported from Iran (i.e. 22/28 dogs in Gilan province in the north). Dogs of four other provinces were also infected, albeit at a lower prevalence.

The trend of positivity for D. immitis in different provinces of Iran paralleled that of the climatic and ecological features, with the highest prevalence recorded in Gilan (78.6%) and Mazandaran (50%) in the Caspian region, which could be due to the typical Mediterranean climate all year-round [32]. The low prevalence observed in Esfahan (0.9%), Lorestan (6.9%) and Qazvin (27.3%) could be due to the increase in temperature and decrease in yearly rainfall.

This study provides new information about the microfilaraemia in dogs from three Iranian provinces (i.e. Esfahan, Lorestan and Qazvin) and updates the epidemiology of the infections in two provinces (i.e. Mazandaran and Gilan). In Mazandaran, we found infection with D. immitis in 22% and with A. reconditum in 4.5% of dogs by PCR. Previous studies in this province demonstrated infection with D. immitis in up to 15.2% of dogs based on microscopic examination of blood, and 60.9% based on necropsy [7, 33]. However, in a later study performed in 75 dogs (2018–2019) in the same province, no infected animals were diagnosed by PCR [34]. Differences in reported infection rates in different years could be due to changes in the environment, bioclimatic factors such as rainfall which affect the propagation of intermediate arthropod hosts, and differences in the population structure (e.g. age) of the examined animals [35]. On the other hand, in Gilan province we detected D. immitis in 78.6% and A. reconditum in 3.6% of the examined dogs, which is close to those previously reported (i.e. 51.5% for D. immitis and 4.5% for A. reconditum) [19].

Since the first record of D. immitis infection in dogs of northern Iran [7], several studies have reported prevalence up to 62.8% for dirofilariosis (Table 4). Though there is no information about probable infection of dogs in nine out of 31 Iranian provinces with Dirofilaria species, reports of human cases of infection with D. immitis and D. repens in Alborz and Hormozgan indicate the occurrence of infection in the canine population as well (Fig. 3). In addition, since wild carnivores such as wolves, jackals and foxes play significant roles in the epidemiology of dirofilariosis [36, 37], more epidemiological surveillance studies are necessary for filling the gaps in knowledge about wild reservoir hosts.

Table 4 Prevalence of haematic microfilariae in dogs of Iran (n = 6520) until September 2021. Highest records are marked in bold
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Distribution of D. immitis, D. repens and A. reconditum in dogs and humans of Iran. See Table 3 for data about dogs and references [8, 9, 70] for data about human cases

Full size image

In this study, A. reconditum was detected in three out of five studied provinces, with only 1–3 infected dogs in each province. Microfilariae of A. reconditum were identified for the first time in the blood of 6/139 tested dogs in Tehran [18]. Since then, different studies have reported infection with A. reconditum in up to 19.5% of dogs [46] (Table 4; Fig. 3). Since wild canine species, such as jackals, may contribute to the epidemiology of A. reconditum [71], it is suggested that this less pathogenic nematode should be screened in wildlife parasitological studies.

PCR was found to detect more infected dogs in comparison with modified Knott’s test (i.e. 75 vs 21 for D. immitis and 5 vs 3 for A. reconditum), which could be due to low parasitaemia [72, 73]. The sensitivity of the two PCR methods for the detection of D. immitis by the cox1 gene and Wolbachia endosymbionts ftsZ was identical. Although the modified Knott’s test which is based on the detection and identification of microfilariae is the most popular parasitological method among concentration tests, serological assays for the detection of antibodies against D. immitis (e.g. enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] and immunochromatographic tests) are also common [72, 74]. Antigen tests may detect occult infections such as amicrofilaraemic cases [72], but positive dogs could have overcome the infection or were only exposed to D. immitis in the past without the development of actual infection [75].

Phylogenetic analysis of D. immitis nucleotide sequences in this study showed that Iranian isolates from dogs living in northern provinces (i.e. Mazandaran, Gilan and Qazvin) clustered together, and isolates from dogs of Lorestan and Esfahan clustered separately. This could be due to differences in the population of the parasites, segregated in specific geographical areas or in dog populations. However, due to the relatively low number of animals, any hypothesis would need confirmatory evidence. It has been suggested that relocation of domestic dogs within and between countries is associated with the risk of dissemination of parasites and vectors, and hence continuous relocation represents a global veterinary and public health concern [76], mainly in low- or middle-income countries where the public health politics are disregarded [77, 78]. In this context, and considering that canine dirofilariosis is significantly more prevalent in the Caspian region, veterinary examination of dogs prior to movement to other regions of the country is advocated.

Conclusions

The present study confirmed HWD in three more Iranian provinces (i.e. Lorestan, Qazvin and Esfahan). A review of the previous reports shows that dogs in all areas of Iran are at risk of dirofilariosis. Considering that D. immitis is a zoonotic parasite, the application of ectoparasiticides and repellents is highly recommended for dogs in Iran. Furthermore, a national program for the control of VBDs in stray dogs in Iran is necessary.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. Representative sequences of pathogens detected in this study were deposited in the GenBank® database under the accession numbers MZ541842–MZ541846, MZ540218–MZ540220, MZ506839–MZ506844, MH048644, MZ509546 for D. immitis, MZ540221–MZ540225 for A. reconditum, and MZ566793–MZ566801 for Wolbachia endosymbiont of D. immitis.

Abbreviations

cox1:

Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1

ftsZ :

Filamenting temperature-sensitive mutant Z

HWD:

Heartworm disease

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

OR:

Odds ratio

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

CI:

Confidence interval

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

df :

Degrees of freedom

References

  1. Dantas-Torres F, Otranto D. Overview on Dirofilaria immitis in the Americas, with notes on other filarial worms infecting dogs. Vet Parasitol. 2020;282:109113.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dantas-Torres F, Otranto D. Dirofilariosis in the Americas: a more virulent Dirofilaria immitis? Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:288.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Baneth G, Thamsborg S, Otranto D, Guillot J, Blaga R, Deplazes P, et al. Major parasitic zoonoses associated with dogs and cats in Europe. J Comp Pathol. 2016;155:S54–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brianti E, Gaglio G, Napoli E, Giannetto S, Dantas-Torres F, Bain O, et al. New insights into the ecology and biology of Acanthocheilonema reconditum (Grassi, 1889) causing canine subcutaneous filariosis. Parasitol. 2012;139:530–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Napoli E, Brianti E, Falsone L, Gaglio G, Foit S, Abramo F, et al. Development of Acanthocheilonema reconditum (Spirurida, Onchocercidae) in the cat flea Ctenocephalides felis (Siphonaptera, Pulicidae). Parasitol. 2014;141:1718–25.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huynh T, Thean J, Maini R. Dipetalonema reconditum in the human eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:1391–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sadighian A. Helminth parasites of stray dogs and jackals in Shahsavar area, Caspian region. Iran J Parasitol. 1969;55:372–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Azari-Hamidian S, Yaghoobi-Ershadi M, Javadian E, Moubedi I, Abai M. Review of dirofilariasis in Iran. J Guilan Univ Med Sci. 2007;15:102–13 (Article in Persian with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Azari-Hamidian S, Norouzi B, Harbach RE. A detailed review of the mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) of Iran and their medical and veterinary importance. Acta Trop. 2019;194:106–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bohloli Oskoii S, Sadeghi E, Hashemian AH, Ghaffari KS. Study on shepherd dog dirofilariosis in Kermanshah province in 2011–2012. J Vet Lab Res. 2013;5:47–54 (Article in Persian with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parsa R, Sedighi A, Sharifi I, Bamorovat M, Nasibi S. Molecular characterization of ocular dirofilariasis: a case report of Dirofilaria immitis in south-eastern Iran. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20:520.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Azari-Hamidian S, Yaghoobi-Ershadi M, Javadian E, Abai M, Mobedi I, Linton YM, et al. Distribution and ecology of mosquitoes in a focus of dirofilariasis in northwestern Iran, with the first finding of filarial larvae in naturally infected local mosquitoes. Med Vet Entomol. 2009;23:111–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Khanzadeh F, Khaghaninia S, Maleki-Ravasan N, Koosha M, Oshaghi MA. Molecular detection of Dirofilaria spp. and host blood-meal identification in the Simulium turgaicum complex (Diptera: Simuliidae) in the Aras River Basin, northwestern Iran. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:548.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Anvari D, Narouei E, Daryani A, Sarvi S, Moosazadeh M, Hezarjaribi HZ, et al. The global status of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on published articles. Res Vet Sci. 2020;131:104–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Khanmohammadi M, Falak R, Meamar AR, Arshadi M, Akhlaghi L, Razmjou E. Molecular detection and phylogenetic analysis of endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) isolated from Dirofilaria immitis in northwest of Iran. J Arthropod Borne Dis. 2019;13:83–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Pedram N, Shojaee Tabrizi A, Hosseinzadeh S, Pourmontaseri M, Rakhshandehroo E. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in outdoor dogs in Tehran Province, Iran. Comp Clin Path. 2019;28:1165–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Razmi G. A study of the situation of different filarial infection in dogs of Mashhad. J Fac Vet Med Univ Tehran. 1999;54:5–7 (Article in Persian with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Niak A, Khatibi S. A record of Dipetalonema (Acanthocheilonema) (Filariata: Setariidae) in dogs in Iran. Vet Rec. 1971;89:449–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ranjbar-Bahadori S, Veshgini A, Shirani D, Eslami A, Mohieddin H, Shemshadi B, et al. Epidemiological aspects of canine dirofilariasis in the north of Iran. Iran J Parasitol. 2011;6:73–80.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ranjbar-Bahadori S, Eslami A, Bokaic S. Evaluation of different methods for diagnosis of Dirofilaria immitis. Pak J Biol Sci. 2007;10:1938–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoseini M, Jalousian F, Hoseini SH, Sadeghian AG. A cross sectional study on Dirofilaria immitis and Acanthocheilonema reconditum in sheepdogs in a western region in Iran. Vet Res Forum. 2020;11:185–90.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Stratton SJ. Population research: convenience sampling strategies. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021;36:373–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Eslami A, Meshgi B. Periodicity of Dirofilaria immitis in a dog from Tehran. J Fac Vet Med Univ Tehran. 2000;55:15–8 (Article in Persian with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ionică AM, Matei IA, D’Amico G, Bel LV, Dumitrache MO, Modrý D, et al. Dirofilaria immitis and D. repens show circadian co-periodicity in naturally co-infected dogs. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:116.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Rojas A, Rojas D, Montenegro VM, Baneth G. Detection of Dirofilaria immitis and other arthropod-borne filarioids by an HRM real-time qPCR, blood-concentrating techniques and a serological assay in dogs from Costa Rica. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:170.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Albonico F, Loiacono M, Gioia G, Genchi C, Genchi M, Mortarino M. Rapid differentiation of Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in canine peripheral blood by real-time PCR coupled to high resolution melting analysis. Vet Parasitol. 2014;200:128–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Turba ME, Zambon E, Zannoni A, Russo S, Gentilini F. Detection of Wolbachia DNA in blood for diagnosing filaria-associated syndromes in cats. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:2624–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1547–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol. 1993;10:512–26.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mendoza-Roldan J, Benelli G, Panarese R, Iatta R, Furlanello T, Beugnet F, et al. Leishmania infantum and Dirofilaria immitis infections in Italy, 2009–2019: changing distribution patterns. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:193.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Brianti E, Panarese R, Napoli E, De Benedetto G, Gaglio G, Bezerra-Santos MA, et al. Dirofilaria immitis infection in the Pelagie archipelago: the southernmost hyperendemic focus in Europe. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14089.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Malmasi A, Hosseini S, Aramoon M, Bahonar A, Seifi HA. Survey of canine Dirofilaria immitis infection in Caspian provinces of Iran. Iran J Vet Res. 2011;12:340–4.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bahadori SR, Mohtasham RM, Eslami A, Meshgi B. Study on blood filariosis of dog in Tonekabon. J Fac Vet Med Univ Tehran. 2005;60:353–6.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Iatta R, Sazmand A, Nguyen V-L, Nemati F, Bahiraei Z, Mazhar Ayaz M, et al. Vector-borne pathogens in dogs of different regions of Iran and Pakistan. Parasitol Res. 2021;120:4219–28.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Alho AM, Landum M, Ferreira C, Meireles J, Goncalves L, de Carvalho LM, et al. Prevalence and seasonal variations of canine dirofilariosis in Portugal. Vet Parasitol. 2014;206:99–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Otranto D, Deplazes P. Zoonotic nematodes of wild carnivores. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2019;9:370–83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Meshgi B, Eslami A, Bahonar A, Kharrazian-Moghadam M, Gerami-Sadeghian A. Prevalence of parasitic infections in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and golden jackal (Canis aureus) in Iran. Iran J Vet Res. 2009;10:387–91.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vafae Eslahi A, Kia EB, Mobedi I, Sharifdini M, Badri M, Mowlavi G. Road killed carnivores illustrate the status of zoonotic helminthes in Caspian Sea littoral of Iran. Iran J Parasitol. 2017;12:230–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Meshgi B, Eslami A, Ashrafi HJ. Epidemiological survey of blood filariae in rural and urban dogs of Tabriz. J Fac Vet Med Univ Tehran. 2002;57:59–63 (Article in Persian with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Khezri A, Tavasoli M, Javadi S, Bartafteh E. Prevalence of parasites of the cardiovascular system and genitourinary system in stray dogs in Urmia. In: 16th Iranian Veterinary Congress. Tehran, Iran. 2010: THVC16_0802.

  41. Javadi S, Hanifeh M, Tavassoli M, Dalir Naghadeh B, Khezri A, Hadian M. Dirrofilariasis in shepherd dogs of high altitudes areas in West Azerbaijan-Iran. Vet Res Forum. 2011;2:53–7.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Naghipour M, Javadi S, Tavassoli M, Shamsi S. Serological study of Dirofilaria immitis in urban dogs of Urmia using modified Knott and rapid antigen tests. J Zoon Dis. 2018;3:42–7.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Amouoghli Tabrizi B, Dastmalchi F, Gharadagy Y, Khakpour M. Evaluation of some hematological changes in canine heartworm infection (Dirofilaria immitis). J Vet Clin Pathol. 2007;1:195–201 (Article in Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nematollahi A, Javidi Barazandeh MA. A survey on Dirofilaria immitis occurence in stray dogs of Tabriz (Iran). Acta Vet Brno. 2010;79:449–51.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Khanmohammadi M. Dirofilaria immitis occult infection and seropervalence in sheepdogs in Sarab (East Azerbaijan Province). J Comp Pathol. 2012;8:657–64.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Razmaraii N, Sadegh-Eteghad S, Babaei H, Paykari H, Esmaeilnia K, Froghy L. Molecular survey of canine microfilariae species in East-Azerbaijan province of Iran. Arch Razi Inst. 2013;68:125–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Hosseinzadeh Varjoy M, Ashrafi Helan J, Salehi N, Bazmani A, Nematollahi A, Imani BA. Molecular detection and epidemiological aspects of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs in Tabriz and suburbs. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2016;26:20–31 (Article in Persian with English abstract). 

    Google Scholar 

  48. Raoof P, Garedaghi Y. Investigation of infection with Dirofilaria immitis parasite in stray dogs in Tabriz city of Iran. Livest Sci. 2017;8:38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hashemzadeh Farhang H, Bahavarnia SR, Esmailzadeh MJ, Mahmoudi KN. Survey on zoonotic importance and prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis Infection in dogs of Tabriz. Iran Int J Med Parasitol Epidemiol. 2020;1:11–3.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mobedi I, Javadian E, Abaei M. Introducing the foci of zoonotic dog heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) (Nematoda, Filaioidea) in Meshginshahr region (East Azerbaijan Province) and its importance in Iran. In: First National Iranian Congress of Parasitology. Rasht, Iran. 1990:78.

  51. Bokaei S, Mobedi I, Mohebali M, Hosseini SH, Nadim A. A study of dirofilarisis prevalence in dogs in Meshkinshahr area, Northwest Iran. J Fac Vet Med Univ Tehran. 1998;53:23–6 (Article in Persian with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zarei Z, Kia EB, Heidari Z, Mikaeili F, Mohebali M, Sharifdini M. Age and sex distribution of Dirofilaria immitis among dogs in Meshkin-Shahr, northwest Iran and molecular analysis of the isolates based on COX1 gene. Vet Res Forum. 2016;7:329–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Yakhchali M, Sadi F. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis infections in dogs in Saghez city, Kurdistan province, Iran. Vet Res Biol Prod. 2008;21:149–53 (Article in Persian with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Namjoo A, Vahed-Dehkordi E, Jafarian-Dehkorid M. Prevalence of dirofilaria infection in necropsied dogs in Shahrekord. In: First National Congress of Veterinary Laboratory Sciences. Tehran, Iran 2009: VETLAB01_455.

  55. Farahnak A, Mobedi I, Mohamadi F. Study of zoonotic helminths of carnivores in Khuzestan, Iran. Iran J Public Health. 1998;27:15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ranjbar-Bahadori S, Delvarzadeh E, Shemshadi B. Dirofilaria immitis infection in stray dogs of Khuzestan, a province in South-Western Iran. Iran J Vet Med. 2009;3:133–6.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Razi Jalali M, Alborzi A, Avizeh R, Mosallanejad B. A study on Dirofilaria immitis in healthy urban dogs from Ahvaz, Iran. Iran J Vet Res. 2010;11:357–62.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Razi Jalali M, Ghorbanpoor M, Mosallanejad B, Avizeh R, Alborzi A, Rahrowani M. Diagnosis of Dirofilaria immitis infection in urban and rural dogs in Ahvaz city by counterimmunoelectrophoresis. J Fac Vet Med Univ Tehran. 2013;68:319–26 (Article in Persian with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Akhtardanesh B, Radfar MH, Voosough D, Darijani N. Seroprevalence of canine heartworm disease in Kerman, southeastern Iran. Comp Clin Path. 2011;20:573–7.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Khedri J, Radfar MH, Borji H, Azizzadeh M, Akhtardanesh B. Canine heartworm in southeastern of Iran with review of disease distribution. Iran J Parasitol. 2014;9:560–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Bamorovat M, Sharifi I, Fasihi-Harandi M, Nasibi S, Sadeghi B, Khedri J, et al. Parasitological, serological and molecular study of Dirofilaria immitis in domestic dogs, Southeastern Iran. Iran J Parasitol. 2017;12:260–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Naderi A, Sharifi I, Aflatoonian MR, Mostafavi M, Parizi MH, Mashayekhi J, et al. Dirofilariosis caused by Dirofilaria immitis in the south of Kerman province, Iran. Microb Pathog. 2021;154:104863.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Mohebby M. Investigate the prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs in the city of Zabol. Zabol, Iran: University of Zabol; 2016 (Thesis in Persian with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Anvari D, Saadati D, Siyadatpanah A, Gholami S. Prevalence of dirofilariasis in shepherd and stray dogs in Iranshahr, southeast of Iran. J Parasit Dis. 2019;43:319–23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Meshgi B, Eslami A. Investigation on the filariosis of dog in Tehran area. J Fac Vet Med Univ Tehran. 2001;55:53–6 (Article in Persian with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ranjbar-Bahadori S, Hekmatkhah A. A study on filariosis of stray dogs in Garmsar. J Fac Vet Med Univ Tehran. 2007;62:73–6 (Article in Persian with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Salimi Bejestani M, Darabizade Z. Determining the prevalence of blood’s microfilaria in dogs of Semnan city by modified Knott test. J Vet Lab Res. 2019;11:27–32 (Article in Persian with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Jafari S, Gaur S, Khaksar Z. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs of Fars province of Iran. J Appl Anim Res. 1996;9:27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Sadjjadi S, Mehrabani D, Oryan A. Dirofilariosis of stray dogs in Shiraz, Iran. J Vet Parasitol. 2004;18:181–2.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ghasemi E, Shamsinia S, Taghipour A, Anvari D, Bahadory S, Shariatzadeh SA, et al. Filarial worms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diversity in animals from Iran with emphasis on human cases. Parasitology. 2020;147:909–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Gherman CM, Mihalca AD. A synoptic overview of golden jackal parasites reveals high diversity of species. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:419.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Panarese R, Iatta R, Mendoza-Roldan JA, Szlosek D, Braff J, Liu J, et al. Comparison of diagnostic tools for the detection of Dirofilaria immitis infection in dogs. Pathogens. 2020;9:499.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Mendoza-Roldan JA, Gabrielli S, Cascio A, Manoj RR, Bezerra-Santos MA, Benelli G, et al. Zoonotic Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens infection in humans and an integrative approach to the diagnosis. Acta Trop. 2021;223:106083.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Solgi R, Sadjjadi SM, Mohebali M, Zarei Z, Golkar M, Raz A. Development of new recombinant DgK antigen for diagnosis of Dirofilaria immitis infections in dogs using ELISA technique and its comparison to molecular methods. Iran Biomed J. 2018;22:283–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Selim A, Alanazi AD, Sazmand A, Otranto D. Seroprevalence and associated risk factors for vector-borne pathogens in dogs from Egypt. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14:175.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Wright I, Jongejan F, Marcondes M, Peregrine A, Baneth G, Bourdeau P, et al. Parasites and vector-borne diseases disseminated by rehomed dogs. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:546.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F, Mihalca AD, Traub RJ, Lappin M, Baneth G. Zoonotic parasites of sheltered and stray dogs in the era of the global economic and political crisis. Trends Parasitol. 2017;33:813–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Dantas-Torres F, Otranto D. Best practices for preventing vector-borne diseases in dogs and humans. Trends Parasitol. 2016;32:43–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Amin Bakhshani for assistance in sampling and Mr. Abbas Gerami-Sadeghian for his help in the lab.

Funding

This study was supported by the University of Tehran and Lorestan University under the framework of the theses of Fateme Manshori-Ghaishghorshagh, Ahdieh Eslamian and Mohammad Ramezani.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Fateme Manshori-Ghaishghorshagh and Mohammad Ramezani contributed equally to this work

Affiliations

  1. Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Seyed Hossein Hosseini, Fateme Manshori-Ghaishghorshagh, Mohammad Bagher Ahoo, Ahdieh Eslamian & Fatemeh Jalousian

  2. The Iranian Museum of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Seyed Hossein Hosseini & Mohammad Bagher Ahoo

  3. Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran

    Mohammad Ramezani & Hassan Nayebzadeh

  4. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Rastegar Reference Laboratory, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Minoo Soltani

  5. Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Shahram Jamshidi

  6. Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy

    Marcos Antonio Bezerra-Santos & Domenico Otranto

  7. Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

    Alireza Sazmand & Domenico Otranto

  8. Zoonotic Diseases Research Center, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

    Alireza Sazmand

Authors
  1. Seyed Hossein Hosseini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fateme Manshori-Ghaishghorshagh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Ramezani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hassan Nayebzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mohammad Bagher Ahoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ahdieh Eslamian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Minoo Soltani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Shahram Jamshidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Marcos Antonio Bezerra-Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Fatemeh Jalousian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Alireza Sazmand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Domenico Otranto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FJ, SHH, HN, ShJ conceived the study. HN, AE, ShJ, MS, MBA, MR performed field work. FM-G, MR, AE, AS, MABS performed laboratory work and analysed the data. AS and FJ wrote the first draft of the manuscript. MABS, DO reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatemeh Jalousian.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All the procedures on animals were approved by the Ethical Research Committee of the University of Tehran (code: 21/6/7502001 VETMEDUT).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hosseini, S.H., Manshori-Ghaishghorshagh, F., Ramezani, M. et al. Canine microfilaraemia in some regions of Iran. Parasites Vectors 15, 90 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05209-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05209-7

Keywords

  • Acanthocheilonema reconditum
  • Dirofilaria immitis
  • Haemoparasites
  • Iran
  • PCR
  • Zoonosis

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us